Re: avoid multicast storming on catalyst fe [7:71820]
Thank you at all for your support. Just few comments (sorry for delay but when you are working I'm sleeping ;)). - I can not configure the 3550 as router. I can not change IP and subnet for many reasons. - I can not configure VLAN, I've no chance to configure here inter vlan routing - I've bought 3550 because of IGMP snooping...but It seems that it does not work Maybe access-list or something based on mac control can help us to avoid that our tests based on multicast traffic floods on all the LAN. I can configure the multicast address (so I can know the multicast layer 2 mac). Wich is the configuration (if any) I've to set on fastethernet 0/1 in order to avoid that the specific multicast mac go out from this port? Anybody knows why switchport block multicast doesn't take any effect? Thank you again and have a nice week end. Teresa - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 5:35 AM Subject: RE: avoid multicast storming on catalyst fe [7:71820] Couldn't you use a VLAN? Maybe that's too much work since you're just testing though But VLANs divide broadcast/multicast domains... Priscilla TP wrote: Dear Group, I need help about multiscast. This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer devices so I must generate multicast traffic. All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl. We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in particular from/by fastethernet0/1. I must avoid that multicast traffic genereted locally floods the LAN creating excessive traffic. Can I achieve this? This is the configuration runnig...it doesn't work. I mean when I generate multicast traffic it crosses fe0/1 and reachs the rest of the LAN degrading network performance. Any help will be appreciated. Thank you. Teresa interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport protected switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control multicast level 20.00 System image file is flash:c3550-i9q3l2-mz.121-11.EA1/c3550-i9q3l2-mz.121-11.EA 1.bin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71884t=71820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
avoid multicast storming on catalyst fe [7:71820]
Dear Group, I need help about multiscast. This is a simple topology... I've to test some video streamer devices so I must generate multicast traffic. All video devices are connected to a catalyst 3550xl. We can reach the office LAN through the same catalyst, in particular from/by fastethernet0/1. I must avoid that multicast traffic genereted locally floods the LAN creating excessive traffic. Can I achieve this? This is the configuration runnig...it doesn't work. I mean when I generate multicast traffic it crosses fe0/1 and reachs the rest of the LAN degrading network performance. Any help will be appreciated. Thank you. Teresa interface FastEthernet0/1 switchport protected switchport block multicast no ip address storm-control multicast level 20.00 System image file is flash:c3550-i9q3l2-mz.121-11.EA1/c3550-i9q3l2-mz.121-11.EA 1.bin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71820t=71820 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to force a Disengage Requests [7:57098]
Is it possible to Remove an h323 terminal registration from a cisco gatekeeper before the aging time out? If yes... Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57098t=57098 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax t38 [7:55367]
Group, I've enabled T.38 on my two gateway. Haw can I verify the fax trasmission is going in T.38? I mean wich show or debug command can confirm the trasmission protocol? Thanks, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55367t=55367 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COS and not ID [7:53466]
Dear group, I've a catalyst 3550: is it possible to set cos for outgoing frame and not the VLAN ID field? I mean, I'd like to set priority and not a VLAN ID for frames coming from a specified port. Any suggestion, explanetion, will be appreciated. TP Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53466t=53466 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
endpointIdentifier in RAS msg [7:53211]
Group,
from debug h225asn1 we can see RAS messages and we can read
endpointIdentifier.
Anybody knows how is generated that string?
RasMessage ::= admissionRequest :{
requestSeqNum 5928
callType pointToPoint : NULL
callModel direct : NULL
endpointIdentifier {619629680001}
destinationInfo
Thanks in advance.
Teresa
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53211t=53211
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
switch over fax [7:52350]
Group, Does anybody know if there is a standard for switch over fax in H323enviorments when G.729 coedec is available? tks Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=52350t=52350 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ISDN to VOIP:Cause i = 0x809C - Invalid number format [7:48896]
I have a cisco 2621 gateway voip/isdn, the gateway has fastethernet interfaces to the lan/voip network and a 2vic BRI S/T TE connected to a ISDN BRI. Calls from a voip terminal to the pstn are OK. Calls from pstn to a voip terminals are KO. It seems I have no chance to digit the post-selection associated to the voip terminal (the same voip architecture with analog line and FXO works fine) I receive ISDN BRI1/0 TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0xC7 Cause i = 0x809C - Invalid number format (incomplete number) I'm sending the configuration, any suggestion will be appreciate. Teresa isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! interface BRI1/0 no ip address isdn switch-type basic-net3 isdn overlap-receiving T302 5000 isdn not-end-to-end 64 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn send-alerting isdn sending-complete isdn skipsend-idverify Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=48896t=48896 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VIC 2 BRI S/T TE: Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code [7:47947]
Steven, was a telco problem. Now I've a different problem. I'm in able to make voip call (with a bad quality) to pstn, but I'm not in able to make pstn call to voip. This is the disconnect cause: 02:26:37: ISDN BR1/0: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8C 02:26:37: Cause i = 0x809C - Invalid number format (incomplete number) do you have any suggestion? Teresa - Original Message - From: Steven A. Ridder To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:34 PM Subject: Re: VIC 2 BRI S/T TE: Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code [7:47833] Is their circuit up and active? Also, check the wiring. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. TP wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Dear group, I have a cisco 2621 configured as voip/isdn gateway. I'm not in able to configure properly vic 2BRI S/T TE interface. I've followed suggestion from this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-layer1.html#first (shut, no shut, clear interface and isdn-tei-negotiation first-call) But still remain the layer 1 deactivated. Any suggestion? Thanks a lot, Teresa From sh isdn status 0:49:13: BRI1/1 : Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code SDN BRI1/0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-net3 Layer 1 Status: DEACTIVATED Layer 2 Status: Layer 2 NOT Activated Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8003 Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47947t=47947 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VIC 2 BRI S/T TE: Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code [7:47831]
Dear group, I have a cisco 2621 configured as voip/isdn gateway. I'm not in able to configure properly vic 2BRI S/T TE interface. I've followed suggestion from this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/129/bri-layer1.html#first (shut, no shut, clear interface and isdn-tei-negotiation first-call) But still remain the layer 1 deactivated. Any suggestion? Thanks a lot, Teresa From sh isdn status 0:49:13: BRI1/1 : Unexpected indication (18) in f3 code SDN BRI1/0 interface dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = basic-net3 Layer 1 Status: DEACTIVATED Layer 2 Status: Layer 2 NOT Activated Layer 3 Status: 0 Active Layer 3 Call(s) Active dsl 0 CCBs = 0 The Free Channel Mask: 0x8003 Number of L2 Discards = 0, L2 Session ID = 0 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47831t=47831 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How many H.323 clients can 3640 as gatekeeper handle? [7:46877]
Dear group, do you have an answer for the question mentioned in obj? Thanks in advance! Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46877t=46877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help: what kind of interface? [7:45651]
Group, I have a LAN for data and voice traffic and a cisco 2621 as gateway voip/pstn with FXO interfaces. I have to realize the same configuration with the same data/voice gateway BUT with 4 BRI (Italy as NT interface) What kind of interface I need? Any suggestion will be appreciate, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45651t=45651 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
help: what kind of interface? [7:45653]
Group, I have a LAN for data and voice traffic and a cisco 2621 as gateway voip/pstn with FXO interfaces. I have to realize the same configuration with the same data/voice gateway BUT with 4 BRI (Italy as NT interface) What kind of interface I need? Any suggestion will be appreciate, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45653t=45653 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ip helper address: which is the mac address? [7:44608]
Dear group, When my CPE comes up, it makes a dhcp request. The DHCP server is located on a different subnet .Between dhcp client (CPE) and dhcp server there is a router whit ip helper-address configured. My question is the following: if the DHCP server has to assign a specific IP address to a specific MAC address (CPE's MAC address) but there is a router between them, the DCHP will read the router MAC address...how does it works? Where DHCP will read the correct mac address before giving the right IP address? Thanks in advace, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44608t=44608 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
why SFM? [7:42877]
I'm reading the 6509 product overview and I could configure it with the Switch Fabric Module (WS-C5600-SFM or WS-X6500-SFM2). Two questions: - Which is the benefit of th SFM? -Why I MUST install it in slot 5 or 6? Thanks in advance, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42877t=42877 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how much 10720? [7:42331]
Thank you, unfortunately Not everyone is authorized to view the Pricing = Tool. I'm one of them. Teresa =20 =20 - Original Message -=20 From: MADMAN=20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:28 PM Subject: Re: how much 10720? [7:42331] Go here and grab the price list for everything. The chassis is 13k which you have to fill up... = http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/pricing?Request=3DViewDownloadListPa= ge Dave TP wrote: =20 Anybody knows how much a new 10720? =20 Just a rough price =20 Thank you. Teresa --=20 David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 Emotion should reflect reason not guide it [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of spacer.gif] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42414t=42331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how much 10720? [7:42331]
Anybody knows how much a new 10720? Just a rough price Thank you. Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42331t=42331 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
standard trunk protocol [7:40809]
Dear Group, I'm confused. In a multi-vendor enviroment I've to design a VLANs scenario. So I can prefer 802.1Q tagging (standard) on the trunk link. And then? How to manage the VLAN informations? Is VTP (or DTP) a cisco protocol? Is there a standard in order to manage the vlan information dynamically? Thanks. Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40809t=40809 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: VOIP billing [7:38756]
you can see www.netcentrex.net It is a softswitch solution for billing, tracing and so on in a cisco voip enviroment. It is designed for H323 routed gatekeeper. And it works perfectly with cisco devices. Hope it helps. Teresa - Original Message - From: Kiran Kumar M To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:22 AM Subject: RE: VOIP billing [7:38756] Thanks for your reply. Any other external software that will compatible with cisco products also ?? Thanks, Kiran On Tue, 19 Mar 2002, George Siaw wrote: Check out the Avvid product line. I think Cisco Call manager has some functionality for billing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kiran Kumar M Sent: 19 March 2002 05:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VOIP billing [7:38756] Hai, Is there any billing solution available for VOIP in cisco products.?? Thanks, Kiran Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=38762t=38756 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: dialer unbindable [7:37260]
This is the runnunig configuration. Thanks in advance. Teresa password: RSIAen Password: RSIA#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 no service pad service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname RSIA ! no logging buffered enable secret enable password cisco ! username ELMEC password username RITND password username RSIA password username MASTER password ip subnet-zero ! no ip domain-lookup no ip finger isdn switch-type basic-net3 ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address 192.168.1.200 255.255.255.0 no ip directed-broadcast ip nat inside ! interface BRI0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp dialer pool-member 1 dialer pool-member 2 isdn switch-type basic-net3 ppp authentication chap ! interface Dialer1 description CONNESSIONE CON ITALNODE bandwidth 64 ip address 192.168.99.2 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation ppp no ip split-horizon dialer remote-name RITND dialer idle-timeout 180 dialer string 0315001148 dialer string 031520101 dialer string 031523508 dialer string 03152351 dialer pool 1 dialer-group 1 ppp authentication chap ! interface Dialer2 description CONNESSIONE A INTERNET ip address negotiated no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside encapsulation ppp no ip split-horizon dialer pool 2 dialer-group 2 ppp authentication chap pap callin ppp chap hostname mccfba ppp chap password ppp pap sent-username mccfba password ! ip nat inside source list 3 interface Dialer2 overload no ip http server ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer2 ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 Dialer1 ! access-list 3 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit dialer-list 2 protocol ip permit ! line con 0 transport input none stopbits 1 line vty 0 4 exec-timeout 20 0 password login ! end - Original Message - From: Tshon To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 8:54 AM Subject: Re: dialer unbindable [7:37260] We need your config. This will help us see your problem. omit ip addresses and passwords! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you using Chap anthencation? Have you checked that chap hostname/passowrd between these two router? Is dialer remote-name ... configed in the receiving end router's dialer interfaces? Tony Teresa wrote: Dear Group, two cisco routers connected via ISDN and a both connected to the Internet with the same bri. One bri configured and two dilaer interfaces. From one router I can browse the internet and I can reach the other router (64k for the internet and 64K for lan-to-lan connection), but when the dialer 1 is up (to the internet) I can not ping the remote router and I have the following reject (from debug isdnq931): dialer unbindable. Any idea? Thanks in advance, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37384t=37260 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
force a AS5300 involment in a VOIP-VOIP call [7:37385]
Dear Group, In h323 enviroment I have to bill all the calls, VOIP calls too. The billing system is synchronized with AS5300 and not with the Gatekeeper. The question is is there a way to force the intra voip calls (H323) through the AS5300? Any idea Thanks in advance, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37385t=37385 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: read and not write TOS [7:36946]
Thank you. It's clear for me now. with IP Prec or DiffServ (which one is it?) IP precedence (3 bits), for layer 3 Priority for layer 2. Teresa - Original Message - From: Steven A. Ridder To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:19 PM Subject: Re: read and not write TOS [7:36946] I'm pretty good with QOS. If you connect your special switch to a router and you mark your packets with IP Prec or DiffServ (which one is it?) your packet will remain marked until they reach the destination. The only time you would lose these markings is if a router is programmed to strip the markings and replace them with something else. As for your CoS bits, they will be fine until they hit a layer 3 device. If they remain on a large flat L2 network, then they will remain untouched. If the packets have to go through a router of some sort (because they need to be routed to a different network) the L3 device will strip the layer 2 ethernet packet, replace them with it's own l2 packet based on what type of link it's going out of (PPP, HDLC, another ethernet netowrk) and send it on it's merry way. Unfortuately, that L2 packet had your 802.1p bits in it and it was trashed. So you lost them (unless you have the router map l2 to l3). Therefore, it's better to just mark L3. Finally, just because you mark your packets, doesn't mean you'll get any special treatment unles the routers are told to do so (unless you have WFQ enabled on the router, as WFQ automatically classifies based on IP Prec or DiffServ.). Look up MQC to create policies to do things with your marked packets. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. TP wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]; I said special switch: it is a switch with ethernet ports and voice ports, with the voice processor and its stack. So, I can program the special switch in order to set the TOS (layer 3) per port basis and the COS (layer 2) per port basis. What happens to my packet (or frames) when I connect this switch to a router (827 per adsl) or to a layer 3 catalyst for different design? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: Re: read and not write TOS [7:36946] I don't think you can set the ToS bits on a switch. You can only set the CoS bit and the CoS will not be translated to a ToS on router unless you force it to in the configuration. ToS is a layer 3 function and CoS is a layer 2 function From: TP Reply-To: TP To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: read and not write TOS [7:36946] Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 06:14:30 -0500 Dear group, i have the following situation: a special switch connected to a cisco router via ethernet interface. This switch is enable to set TOS based on its ports. I'd like to configure the router in order to have different queuing based on the TOS (two or three queues). The router should read (and NOT write) the TOS and priorituze the traffic with the higher TOS: is it possible? If yes, maybe with access-list or samething different, can you provide the proper command lines? Thanks in advance Teresa _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37241t=36946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: read and not write TOS [7:36946]
I said special switch: it is a switch with ethernet ports and voice ports, with the voice processor and its stack. So, I can program the special switch in order to set the TOS (layer 3) per port basis and the COS (layer 2) per port basis. What happens to my packet (or frames) when I connect this switch to a router (827 per adsl) or to a layer 3 catalyst for different design? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 6:05 PM Subject: Re: read and not write TOS [7:36946] I don't think you can set the ToS bits on a switch. You can only set the CoS bit and the CoS will not be translated to a ToS on router unless you force it to in the configuration. ToS is a layer 3 function and CoS is a layer 2 function From: TP Reply-To: TP To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: read and not write TOS [7:36946] Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 06:14:30 -0500 Dear group, i have the following situation: a special switch connected to a cisco router via ethernet interface. This switch is enable to set TOS based on its ports. I'd like to configure the router in order to have different queuing based on the TOS (two or three queues). The router should read (and NOT write) the TOS and priorituze the traffic with the higher TOS: is it possible? If yes, maybe with access-list or samething different, can you provide the proper command lines? Thanks in advance Teresa _ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37136t=36946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
read and not write TOS [7:36946]
Dear group, i have the following situation: a special switch connected to a cisco router via ethernet interface. This switch is enable to set TOS based on its ports. I'd like to configure the router in order to have different queuing based on the TOS (two or three queues). The router should read (and NOT write) the TOS and priorituze the traffic with the higher TOS: is it possible? If yes, maybe with access-list or samething different, can you provide the proper command lines? Thanks in advance Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36946t=36946 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GroupStudy we have a problem.... [7:28901]
Count me in. I've benefitted from this list for quite some time on Paul's dime. It's long overdue that I kicked in a quarter or two! Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco Regional Networking Academy John Neiberger wrote: Paul, Is there some mechanism by which we could donate money toward the purchase of new equipment? I can see that may cause more headaches than it's worth but I thought I'd ask. I think if a lot of the people who use this *free* service would chip in a little bit we'd be able to get some pretty nice stuff. What do you think, is that even feasible? What about paid memberships to the professional and CCIE list? I *know* that would create a lot of hassles, as well, so it's probably not even worth considering. However, a few thousand people paying $2.99/month or whatever would make the required equipment upgrades quite a bit easier! Regards, John Paul Borghese 12/12/01 9:37:31 AM Hey gang, Servers database became corrupt thus preventing messages from being sent out. It has been fixed so if you do not see your posting, please resend. I have shipped more memory to InFlow. Lon has agreed to install it for us. This should help. So by the way, the server will be down for a little while tomorrow :-) The truth is we desperately need some better equipment. Currently we are using a server I built for $500 dollars two years ago. I purchased a used Dell Server but need to upgrade the RAID array and a few other things before putting it online. Take care, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=28917t=28901 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Passed switching [7:20868]
you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go for all exams! It is not correct...I was allowed to take coca-cola in the exam room :) Ciao, Teresa From: Baker, Jason To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:01 AM Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868] hmmm you are asking what you are allowed to bring in.. sounds to me you have been doing your exams at dodgy exam centre as well. you are not allowed to take anything in the exam room and this should go for all exams! Jason -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 7:43 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868] The passing score is 699 -Original Message- From: John McCartney To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/25/2001 2:57 PM Subject: RE: Passed switching [7:20868] What is the passing score for the BCMSN? I'm taking mine in about 3 weeks. Also, what did they let you bring in? Congrats on passing, keep going!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21117t=20868 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Telnet listening port [7:21138]
Fabio, If you want to telnet the router you have to know the dialer ip address (after negotiation). In the following expample you are opening a telnet session to 1660 port: ip nat inside source list # inferface dialer0 overload ip nat inside source static tcp (eth0 ip address) 23 (dialer0 ip address) 1600 extendable This is the configuration I set for Balassone, for troubleshooting purposes, maybe we are talking about the same customer: isn't it? Ciao, Teresa P.S. keep in mind: dialer interface will negotiate a different IP address to the next connection - Original Message - From: FC To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:13 PM Subject: Telnet listening port [7:21138] Sorry in advance for the monkey question...I'd like to Pat the 23 port of my Dialer interface (ip negotiated) to the inside lan. I am able to do this, but obviosly I lost the connection with the router from outside. There's a command to change the listening telnet port on the vty lines? I have a 827 with 12.0(3). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21178t=21138 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: delay and delay [7:20926]
EIGRP uses minimum bandwidth and total delay to compute metric (at lest in its default configuration). I'm a little bit confused: delay of each interface is inversely proportional to the configured interface bandwidth, so It seems that EIGRP metric is affected only by configured bandwidth (f(bandwidth)+ sum of f(1/bandwidth)): is this correct? Please give a look to the following output. I see in the first subinterface BW 3264 and in the second one BW 2544, but the same DLY value: 80. Rome-7206vxr#sh int atm2/0.1 ATM2/0.1 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is ENHANCED ATM PA Description: P-to-P PVC with Milan Internet address is 213.x.y.14/30 MTU 4470 bytes, BW 3264 Kbit, DLY 80 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 4/255 Encapsulation ATM 0 packets input, 0 bytes 0 packets output,0 bytes 99302 OAM cells input, 99302 OAM cells output Rome-7206vxr#sh int atm2/0.2 ATM2/0.2 is up, line protocol is up Hardware is ENHANCED ATM PA Description: P-to-P PVC with London Internet address is 213.x.y.74/30 MTU 4470 bytes, BW 2544 Kbit, DLY 80 usec, reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 4/255 Encapsulation ATM 0 packets input, 0 bytes 0 packets output,0 bytes 99121 OAM cells input, 99121 OAM cells output You suggest you can tweak the interface bandwidth and my english is awful: what does it mean? Thank you and have a nide day to all, Teresa Teresa Presutto Grapes Italia S.p.A. Italy Network Development Via Chiana, 1 - 00198 Rome (Italy) Tel +39 06 84550.1, fax +39 06 84550.640, mobile +39 348 4719450 - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:41 PM Subject: Re: delay and delay [7:20926] With ping, delay is actually measured. The router reports how long it takes to get replies. EIGRP delay is not dynamically measured. Delay of each interface is inversely proportional to the configured interface bandwidth. Total delay for an EIGRP route is a sum of each interface delay, as reported in EIGRP Updates. If you want EIGRP's delay to be somewhat more realistic, you can tweak the interface bandwidth. Priscilla At 02:06 PM 9/24/01, TP wrote: Group, what is the relation (if any) between the total delay I see in sh ip eigrp topology and the total delay I see in a simple ping? From show eigrp topology I see total delay associated to a point-to-point atm pvc lower than total delay showed for a E1 hdlc (between the same routers, 1 hop). If a make an extended ping I experience a lower delay with E1 than pvc atm (and, to be honest, this is what I'd like to see) Thanks in advace, Teresa Priscilla Oppenheimer http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20972t=20926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
delay and delay [7:20926]
Group, what is the relation (if any) between the total delay I see in sh ip eigrp topology and the total delay I see in a simple ping? From show eigrp topology I see total delay associated to a point-to-point atm pvc lower than total delay showed for a E1 hdlc (between the same routers, 1 hop). If a make an extended ping I experience a lower delay with E1 than pvc atm (and, to be honest, this is what I'd like to see) Thanks in advace, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20926t=20926 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fasteth relearning address [7:20515]
It seems I have problem with the STP. It is not a trunked link. I have two catalysts connected via cross calble (fastethernet 0/24) and both of them are connected to a 7206 (fastethernet 0/1) via BVI interface. If a set the fastethernet 0/24 in bloking (as per James.Kilby suggestion, thanks) I resolve the problem, but it's just a workaround and not a solution. By the way I don't understand why I have this loop: I have the same HW/SW configuration is 5 sites and only in this one I'm experiencing this problem. Have a nice day to all, Teresa - Original Message - From: Jeff Smith To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:33 PM Subject: Re: fasteth relearning address [7:20515] If this a trunked linked, make sure you manually set the parameters on each end, no auto. Also, I have seen some servers with teamed nic's try to etherchannel and it will flap like that unless the switch is also configured for it. Hope this helps. Jeff From: TP Reply-To: TP To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fasteth relearning address [7:20515] Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 05:29:33 -0400 Dear Group, I log into myCatalyst 2924XL and I found the following error message: %RTD-1-ADDR_FLAP: FastEthernet0/1 relearning 7 addrs per min How can I proceed to troubleshoot this? Thanks in advance, Teresa _ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20660t=20515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fasteth relearning address [7:20515]
Dear Group, I log into myCatalyst 2924XL and I found the following error message: %RTD-1-ADDR_FLAP: FastEthernet0/1 relearning 7 addrs per min How can I proceed to troubleshoot this? Thanks in advance, Teresa Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=20515t=20515 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
isdn call even if (apparentely) no ip request are coming to [7:19917]
Dear Group, I have a 801 ISDN router: it sends a call even if (apparentely) no ip request are coming to. I've enabled the debug ISDN q931 and debug ip packet. And I can observe the following: 00:26:27: IP: s=10.10.10.6 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.255 (Ethernet0), len 78, rcvd 3 00:26:28: IP: s=10.10.10.6 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.255 (Ethernet0), len 78, rcvd 3 00:26:29: IP: s=10.10.10.6 (Ethernet0), d=10.10.10.255 (Ethernet0), len 78, rcvd 3 00:26:29: IP: s=10.10.10.6 (Ethernet0), d=DNS IP address (BRI0), g=DNS IP address , len 62, forward 00:26:29: IP: s=10.10.10.6 (Ethernet0), d=213.183.144.20 (BRI0), len 62, encapsulation failed 00:26:124554092544: %ISDN-6-LAYER2UP: Layer 2 for Interface BR0, TEI 67 changed to up 00:26:124554092544: ISDN BR0: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x05 00:26:124560085020: Bearer Capability i = 0x8890 00:26:124554092544: Channel ID i = 0x83 00:26:124554092544: Called Party Number i = 0x80, 'xxx' 00:26:31: ISDN BR0: RX Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19917t=19917 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CONF REG AND BOOT SYSTEM [7:18397]
If I have: 1)conf register set to 0x1... (from ROM) 2) boot system falsh: image.bin to the next reload what happens? It will boot from ROM or FLASH? Who wins, config register or the first command line? Thank you Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=18397t=18397 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
