Re: CID Beta
That would be my guess... I just sat the exam a couple of hours ago. An interesting exam... Patrick Murphy wrote: > It could mean that they were not taking anymore canidates after this date. > This seems to be what happened with the other betas. > > Patrick > - Original Message - > From: "Shane Stockman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 3:00 PM > Subject: CID Beta > > > I just checked the Cisco Beta Exam area and it states that the beta is > > closed as of 7 December.Does this mean the anyone who has booked for after > > that day cannot write ? > > > > > > _ > > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : > http://explorer.msn.com > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _ > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The rules have changed...
An interesting read... I'm not sure if anyone else has seen this. Tighe As Cisco's channel partner family has grown significantly in the past few years, we would like to take this opportunity to inform many of our newer partners about our policy regarding the reselling of Cisco products. In addition, we would like to inform all our partners about an exciting new program that affords the opportunity to participate in the secondary market. Like many high-tech companies that produce software, Cisco adopts a policy of nontransferability of its software to protect its intellectual property rights. Cisco product owners are only allowed to transfer, resell or re-lease used Cisco hardware and not the embedded software that runs on the hardware. This policy also applies to Cisco standalone software applications. Because Cisco's installed base of equipment has grown to such large numbers over the years, companies have become more interested in selling and leasing used Cisco equipment on the secondary market. To provide our valued customers and partners with this capability, Cisco has set up a program in which companies can do so and comply with the terms of the software license agreement that accompanies every Cisco product. Companies interested in transferring title and ownership of Cisco equipment that contains embedded software may now purchase a new software license to do so. Leasing companies that wish to re-lease a Cisco product with embedded software to another lessee may also purchase on behalf of the new lessee a software license each time before doing so. To learn more about this new opportunity, as well as how to place orders for software licenses, please visit: http://www.cisco.com/warp/partner/products/swlicense.html -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CCIE depreciation in 2 years [7:1882]
Regarding the number of Microsoft certified folks out there; If you've got the May 2001 issue of MCP Magazine, have a look at page 20. "MCP Certifications" MCP614,394 MCSE408,222 MCSD16,263 MCT23,441 MCDBA16,529 MCP+Internet262,820 MCP+Site Building1,509 MCSE+Internet14,080 No. of Certs1,357,258 "Jason J. Roysdon" wrote: > I can't see the certification being devalued. Cisco is constantly making > the test harder by adding more and more relevant items and removing those > that are not. Plus, by forcing older CCIE's to keep current with the CCIE > Written is decertifying those that don't care and keeping the numbers from > growing too fast. > > And, as you say, with the need for more and more folks at this caliber is > increasing, I don't think there will be any problem with the demand keeping > up with the increased supply. Not if the AVVID thing takes off for one (and > it is, at least for us). Our local county let their top PBX staff go and is > looking to implement VoIP (I don't know why they cut first and didn't get > the new system in place first, but government doesn't always make sense). > The question is, of course, who will win, 3Com, Nortel, or Cisco (our shop > actually does all 3, so we don't care so long as we win the bid, hehee). > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/ccie_present.html > Just checking the current numbers, they're not up that high - 5595 Active > CCIEs (4992 as of 11/01/2000, up 137 since 4855 CCIEs as of 06/01/2000, > which was up 156 since 03/31/2000 at 4699). That's only 896 new CCIEs in > year. Granted, it sounds like a lot (~75/month), but compare that to the > MCSE numbers (which I'd love to see, especially with the new Win2k stuff > out). Especially if you figure probably a third, if not more are Cisco > employees ;-p > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNP+Security/CCDP, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > > ""Tennesee Stud"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I was wondering what others thought about the CCIE. It seems to me now > that > > there are so many books and training materials geared towards the CCIE, it > > is making it easier to obtain the CCIE. With a steady diet of the right > > books ( which everyone seems to agree on) and hands on time with routers > and > > switches ( which to me is the only obstacle), it does not seem as > difficlut > > as it proclaimed (and I think most people see that).My opinion is the CCIE > > will be devalued considerably in the next few years (As far as salary is > > concerned as well as prestige) As others have pointed out, the CCIE > > population is growing at a faster rate (routing and switching), and even > > though the demand is high for the CCIE now, I think in 2 years there will > be > > a difference in the way the industry views CCIE's > > > > .02 thats all > > > > Tennesee Stud > > _ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=2139&t=1882 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IOS 12.2.1 & SSH [7:5164]
I seem to remember that SSH was only supported on certain platforms in pre-12.2 IOS. I'm doing SSH to a 2524 right now. A nice improvement! Tighe -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5164&t=5164 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CVoice Exam [7:5364]
I just checked CCO and CVOICE (640-647) is still listed as an active exam, but it's now a Partner Specialization Exam instead of a Career Certifications Exam. Have a look at the bottom of http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/exam_list.htm --Tighe Tim Medley wrote: > The CVoice exam was retired on May 15th, 2001. It may or may not > reappear in the future. > > tim > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Stewart Andrews > Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 10:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: CVoice Exam [7:5364] > > I am currently studying for the CVoice specialisation. > Has anyone taken this exam who can recommend any books or suitable study > aids??? > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=5389&t=5364 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Weird DHCP/VLAN solution suggestions wanted!! [7:6579]
elper address pointing to a real dhcp > > server located anywhere. > > Router then forwards any dhcp requests > > broadcasted by stations in vlans with > > apopriate subnet info, that dhcp server can > > use a defined scope for each vlan. > > Server than answers with lease data to the > > requestor via directed broadcast. > > (im not sure if such way) > > > > For example NT dhcp server service > > works flawlessy with such topology, > > with many different scopes. > > > > Pawel/ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6596&t=6579 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 340 AP and 350 nic [7:35562]
I'm sitting at home connected to a 340AP (unknown older firware version) with a PC350 (running the latest code) in my laptop (running Win2K Pro with the latest drivers). I use the PC350 to gain network access at several location, some with WEP and some without. No LEAP though... Tighe -- Tighe Kuykendall Sr. Systems Engineer 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, North Carolina 28801 -- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of NetEng Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 340 AP and 350 nic [7:35562] Im trying to use a 350 aironet card (on WinCE) to connect to a 340AP. In the aironet client utility I can disable leap (which I need to do) but when I try and login it states that I have to enable leap before I can login Any ideas Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35661&t=35562 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wireless LAN Specialization [7:27312]
I passed the Wireless exam for SE's a couple of weeks ago. It goes without saying, in the current exam all of the questions are centered around the 350 series of devices. There were a number of questions that asked specific details but didn't give a device model and both answers (one for the 340 series and one for the 350 series) were in the list. I guess it's also worth noting the several weeks ago certification.net stopped giving you a list of questions that you missed after your test has been graded. I'm sure it was presenting a problem with people sharing their exams but I found it very useful in learning the correct answer (or at least the Cisco answer) for the next test in the series. I hope you're listening Cisco. Tighe Matthew Crane wrote: > Some of the guys I work with used the Planet Wireless test from Boson, o0k > its not Cisco but at least it gave them some ideas on what might be tested > as regards specifications and the like. > Doug Justice wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > > If anyone of you have sample questions and practice tests > > that could help > > me thru the Wireless LAN specialization, that would be very > > helpful. > > Any suggestions about the Wireless LAN exams? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Doug. > > > > > > > > _________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27524&t=27312 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2 2501's as a frame relay switch - Once and For All
> hostname r2 > ! > ! > frame-relay switching > ! > interface Tunnel0 > no ip address > tunnel source Ethernet0 > tunnel destination 192.168.1.2 > ! > interface Ethernet0 > ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 > ! > interface Serial0 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > clockrate 100 > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > frame-relay intf-type dce > frame-relay route 311 interface Tunnel0 113 > ! > interface Serial1 > no ip address > encapsulation frame-relay > clockrate 100 > frame-relay lmi-type ansi > frame-relay intf-type dce > frame-relay route 411 interface Tunnel0 114 > ! > no ip classless > ! > ! > line con 0 > line aux 0 > line vty 0 4 > login > ! > end > > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Doc CD & Verity 4.00
I installed it on my laptop running Win98se last week. I had problems at first but it's working fine now. The URL for initially accessing the CD seems to have changed. BIKEMAN wrote: > Hi Art > > I am having the same problem with Win2k Pro even using the hack. > > Rudi > - Original Message - > From: "Art Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 3:00 PM > Subject: Problem with Doc CD & Verity 4.00 > > > I cracked open my shipment of 4500's to find the latest (well, July) Doc > CD. I > > hungrily loaded it up, hoping to find a complete 12.1 reference. "You must > > have Verity 4.0." Ok, so I loaded the new installer, then went back to the > doc > > cd only to find a blank html document! I uninstalled the whole thing, then > > tried again. Same thing. Then I went back to my trustworthy January > edition. > > "You must have Verity 3.0." Damn! I installed that ok, then went back to > using > > my old disc, which worked fine. This happened on two computers, both NT > 4.0. > > Anyone else run into this? Does this involve the Win2k hack? > > > > > > > > Arthur Davis > > Network Engineer > > Altra Energy Technologies > > > > > > > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 > > > > ___ > > To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body containing: > > unsubscribe ccielab > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FRS 2.0 Beta Feedback
I haven't seen any feedback on the FRS 2.0 Beta so... I took it Friday, June 23. The last day it was available. 232 Questions in 180 minutes! Needless to say, I was happy to be on question 232 and to have 5 minutes left on the clock. It was what might be expected after seeing the Routering 2.0 and hearing of the other 2.0 series exams. A fair amount of BGP, EIGRP, IGRP, RIP, VTP, VLAN, STP, and PPP (auth and use over demand and dedicated circuits). There were some "what product best fits" questions as well as some "dealing with the customer" questions. I don't recall any ATM/LANE, Appletalk, Token Ring, or FDDI questions. There was only one "complete the task" style question which seemed more like an experiment in following directions in the question. It was really a "fill-in the blanks on the diagram" question. Overall, a good test. I do however, have the following complaints; The 700 series router! I had at least 20 questions on this beast. Most of which were command line questions. I know there's an installed base of these things, but the test portrayed the 700 as a new product. This comes back to giving the Cisco answer. I recall one of the "what product best fits" questions involving the 700. The "choose the command from the list" where you're asked a questions and get an exhibit of possible answers. The first 30 or so were like the ones I saw on the Routing 2.0 Beta. We'll call this Style 1. You would answer the question with the line number of the answer in the exhibit. I'd say that the next 30 of this style wanted you to type-in (exactly) the command from the exhibit (the line numbers were gone). We'll call this Style 2. Then... The next 10 or so asked a Style 2 question but gave the Style 1 exhibit. And the best part is, none of the exhibit answers were appropriate!!! Hypothetically, the question might ask "what command would assign an IP address to an Ethernet interface?". The answers in the list would be a bunch of "show" and "debug" commands with some routing protocol commands mixed in. It seems that they got a little carried away and mis-matched the answers to the questions. The question/time ratio... -- Tighe Kuykendall Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 828.251.3204 Prism Technology Resources, Inc. 223 Haywood Street Asheville, NC 28801 http://www.Prism-Tech.com -- ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
