RE: PRI vs T1

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Actually they are both one and the same. The coding in the way the T1 is
setup at the CO makes it viable to be used as a T1. Both provides 1.544mbs
bandwidth. The test is wrong unless it gears towards voice technology.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PRI vs T1


Is there a difference between a PRI and a T-1? What has 23B + 1D? What one
has 24B? The reason I ask is I have a practice question that asks, "what
provides 1.544Mbs bandwidth."  PRI and T-1 are answers, but only PRI is the
correct answer (according to the test). What's the final answer


**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PRI vs T1

[Winchester, Derek S.]

John: A T1 is rated at 1.554mbs. A PRI is physically a T1 different
configuration makes it a PRI. Let me have your source that tells you
otherwise and I will say you are misrepresenting the information.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: John Robinett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:21 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: FW: PRI vs T1


T1 provides 1.536 MBs bandwidth so that's why PRI is the correct answer.

-Original Message-
From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PRI vs T1


Is there a difference between a PRI and a T-1? What has 23B + 1D? What one
has 24B? The reason I ask is I have a practice question that asks, "what
provides 1.544Mbs bandwidth."  PRI and T-1 are answers, but only PRI is the
correct answer (according to the test). What's the final answer


**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PRI vs T1

[Winchester, Derek S.]

And that is correct. T1 is basically a physical standard for a Pipe. PRI is
basically a logical standard for a pipe. The framing and line coding are the
same.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Clay Stuckey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:57 AM
To: Winchester, Derek S.
Subject: Re: PRI vs T1


with my experience, a pri denotes primare rate interface referring to frame
relay and is not specific to a particular pipe size. A T1 is a 1.5 Mb PRI.
You can have a 64k PRI


- Original Message -
From: "Winchester, Derek S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'NetEng'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 11:19 AM
Subject: RE: PRI vs T1


> Actually they are both one and the same. The coding in the way the T1 is
> setup at the CO makes it viable to be used as a T1. Both provides 1.544mbs
> bandwidth. The test is wrong unless it gears towards voice technology.
>
> Derek S. Winchester
> Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
> Data Communications
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phone: 410-953-4887
> Cell: 443-562-3456
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PRI vs T1
>
>
> Is there a difference between a PRI and a T-1? What has 23B + 1D? What one
> has 24B? The reason I ask is I have a practice question that asks, "what
> provides 1.544Mbs bandwidth."  PRI and T-1 are answers, but only PRI is
the
> correct answer (according to the test). What's the final answer
>
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: PRI vs T1

[Winchester, Derek S.]

If you read what I wrote previously, you would not have jumped on what I
said. Pri is logical T1 is physical. This is not that big of a topic.
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:47 PM
To: Winchester, Derek S.
Cc: 'NetEng'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PRI vs T1


On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Winchester, Derek S. wrote:

> Actually they are both one and the same. The coding in the way the T1 is
> setup at the CO makes it viable to be used as a T1. Both provides 1.544mbs
> bandwidth. The test is wrong unless it gears towards voice technology.

They are not really one and the same.  That is to say, if you have a T1 do
you have a PRI?  Maybe, but not necessarily.  If you have a PRI do you
have a T1?  Yes (imho) because you have a DS1 data rate riding over
copper.

> 
> Derek S. Winchester
> Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
> Data Communications
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Phone: 410-953-4887
> Cell: 443-562-3456
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: NetEng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 10:44 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PRI vs T1
> 
> 
> Is there a difference between a PRI and a T-1? What has 23B + 1D? What one
> has 24B? The reason I ask is I have a practice question that asks, "what
> provides 1.544Mbs bandwidth."  PRI and T-1 are answers, but only PRI is
the
> correct answer (according to the test). What's the final answer
> 
> 
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
> _
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---
Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDA   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
Network Administrator 
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Frame Relay problem

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Looks like you are not receiving any LMI. The problem is either with your CO
or your CSU. Check you physical connections and then call the CO to see if
they can tell you if they are having any problems

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Hans Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay problem


Hi colleagues,

I have a problem with my frame relay connection; the serial interface is 
up/down, and when I debug the serial interface, I can see that the interface

is constantly trying to restart:23w5d:

Serial5/0: attempting to restart:
--More--
23w5d: Serial5/0(out): StEnq, myseq 4, yourseen 0, DTE down
--More--
23w5d: Serial5/0(out): StEnq, myseq 5, yourseen 0, DTE down

What could be the reason for this ? I'll add the output for the sh int:


Serial5/0 is up, line protocol is down
  Hardware is M4T
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2048 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, crc 16, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  LMI enq sent  240, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI down
  LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent  0, LMI upd sent  0
  LMI DLCI 1023  LMI type is CISCO  frame relay DTE
  FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
  Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface broadcasts 0
  Last input 05:47:09, output 00:00:02, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:39:54
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
 354 packets output, 4649 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 80 interface resets
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
 80 carrier transitions DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=u

Thanks for your help in advance.

Georg

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CCIE written

[Winchester, Derek S.]

After a brief layoff I am going to attempt to make a jump to the main Goal
of CCIE. Could someone who has taken the written provide me with a checklist
of sorts to ease my study. Most of my studying will be from the white
papers, but I am open to book suggestions. I am in the mist of preparing for
the exam by starting with SNA options (dlsw, TN3270, and TN5250. Thanks for
Advance for your advice.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Frame Relay problem

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Well it's not mentioned if this is a current connection or a new install. If
this is a current connections and looking at the counters it looks like you
cleared it you might not want to change the lmi type. If this is a new
connection then I would try the auto detect feature or find out the correct
lmi

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Chris Lemagie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:06 PM
To: Stull, Cory; 'Hans Stout'
Cc: 'ciscostudygroup'
Subject: RE: Frame Relay problem


I'm not seeing any LMI responses from the frame-relay switch in the
interface statistics.

You will most likely have to change your LMI type from CISCO (default) to
ANSI.

Chris Lemagie
Systems Engineer
Cisco Systems
Seattle Commercial Region
(425) 468-0959
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cisco.com/

 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  On Behalf Of
Stull, Cory
Sent:   Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:13 AM
To: 'Hans Stout'
Cc: 'ciscostudygroup'
Subject:RE: Frame Relay problem

timing or incorrect lmi type..  If its a newer ios with autosensing lmi then
it is probably a timing or circuit issue...  Is it a T1 and did you set your
timeslots?

-Original Message-
From: Hans Stout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Frame Relay problem


Hi colleagues,

I have a problem with my frame relay connection; the serial interface is
up/down, and when I debug the serial interface, I can see that the interface

is constantly trying to restart:23w5d:

Serial5/0: attempting to restart:
--More--
23w5d: Serial5/0(out): StEnq, myseq 4, yourseen 0, DTE down
--More--
23w5d: Serial5/0(out): StEnq, myseq 5, yourseen 0, DTE down

What could be the reason for this ? I'll add the output for the sh int:


Serial5/0 is up, line protocol is down
  Hardware is M4T
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 2048 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation FRAME-RELAY, crc 16, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  LMI enq sent  240, LMI stat recvd 0, LMI upd recvd 0, DTE LMI down
  LMI enq recvd 0, LMI stat sent  0, LMI upd sent  0
  LMI DLCI 1023  LMI type is CISCO  frame relay DTE
  FR SVC disabled, LAPF state down
  Broadcast queue 0/64, broadcasts sent/dropped 0/0, interface broadcasts 0
  Last input 05:47:09, output 00:00:02, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters 00:39:54
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue 0/40, 0 drops; input queue 0/75, 0 drops
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
 354 packets output, 4649 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 80 interface resets
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
 80 carrier transitions DCD=up  DSR=up  DTR=up  RTS=up  CTS=u

Thanks for your help in advance.

Georg

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Sniffer Pro 3.5

[Winchester, Derek S.]

This kind of comment should be kept to one's self. Charles I hope the
previous replies helped you out in your quest to knowing how to use Sniffer
Pro. 

William: I purchase tools all the time that I do not know how to use because
:

A. Might make my job a little easier
B. 80% of job consists of exploring new
options
C. If its in the budget(department) why not
expand your resources


Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: William E Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 1:37 PM
To: Charles Nunie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Sniffer Pro 3.5


I don't mean to be rude man, but why on God's green earth would you buy a
product like Sniffer Pro without the slightest friggin inclination as to
what it does?

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Charles Nunie
> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 7:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sniffer Pro 3.5
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I bought this Sniffer Pro 3.5 which looks great.  Can I have a
> URL where I can
> info on the best way to understand and use it?
>
> Regards,
> Dzilo
>
> 
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
> _
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Possible phony CCIE

[Winchester, Derek S.]

You actually never know what a Guy knows. I have an ex-coworker that is a
CCIE. He got recruited by Xedia Corp 3 years ago.He had to learn there
routers and technology. And also he works mostly with ISP's now. His Cisco
knowledge has slipped and the first to go is basic concepts. He still knows
Cisco, but to someone who works with it everyday he might seem like a dumb
CCIE. Now if he comes back to the Cisco side of the track, yeah he will get
job offers and a good position. But to the common Engineer ready to critique
him, he will seem quite a bit of a Cisco poser.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. WAN Engineer(CCNP)
Data Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Raul F. Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 9:57 AM
To: Tim O'Brien; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Cisco
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE


Dear folks,

I have to agree with Tim on this one. It may have been possible that the
person at this site just did not pay enough attention to the question posed
or that he may not known the answer. I do not know thew nature of the
question. Perhaps Mark could be kind  enough to let us know what the
question was or were. Now depending on the nature and difficulty of the
question it may justify his not being able to answer it. If he is lying he
should be disciplined because he lied and because he has taken for granted
all the blood sweat and tears that goes into getting a CCIE. I think too
many folks get caught up in the CCIE and forget all the real hard work that
goes into it. Basically, if he does not know the answer to a perplexing
question he should at least be able to outline a troubleshooting plan to
find it.

Raul
-Original Message-
From: Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Cisco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2000 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE


>Just because a guy can config a router it does not make him a god. Lets
face
>it guys, there is nobody out there that knows everything about everything,
>and if there is someone that thinks they do, I guarantee there is someone
>else out there that knows more than they do. Obviously if this guy is lying
>about his CCIE he should be exposed, and after reported it is up to Cisco
to
>deal with as they see fit.
>
>.02
>
>Tim
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Sam LI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Mark Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 6:41 AM
>Subject: Re: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
>Well, even some real one behave like this, i come across a few in the the
>past
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Mark Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, October 23, 2000 3:55 PM
>Subject: Possible phony CCIE
>
>
>> Greetings-
>>
>>
>> I recently worked on a project with a fellow who claimed to be a CCIE. He
>> even gave me his card with the CCIE logo on it. At least I think it is
the
>> CCIE logo. It is a router symbol surrounded with laurels and has the
words
>> Cisco Certified Internetwork Engineer circling it as well. After asking
>this
>> person a few questions, I became suspicious of his credentials due to his
>> apparent lack of knowledge of the fundamentals. (I never asked for his
>CCIE
>> number because I attempted verification only after I left the account). I
>> faxed a copy of the business card he gave me (homemade BTW) to someone in
>> the CCIE program at Cisco.  She told me the card is bogus and that she
>would
>> send the card to the Cisco lawyers. That was three months ago and this
>> person is STILL working on site there. What do you people think I should
>do
>> now? Send e-mail to the persons that are contracting him there? He is
>> charging a very high bill rate. The people he is working don't have
enough
>> knowledge to confirm his credentials. Should I let this go? Isn't part of
>my
>> cert agreement with Cisco to protect the logo? I feel that Cisco isn't
>doing
>> anything to protect us here.
>>
>> Mark Cohen
>> CCNA, MCSE, MCP+I
>>
>> _
>> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>_
>FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
>Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondi

RE: Yahoo Messanger--Forming a troubleshooting network...???

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Derekwtp
 

Derek S. Winchester 
Sr. Wan Engineer (CCNP) 
Data Communications Department 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Phone: 410-953-4887 
Cell: 443-562-3456 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brandon Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:31 PM
To: Marc Giroux (EMC); '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Yahoo Messanger--Forming a troubleshooting network...???



I just set mine up.  I hope it's okay to join the network.  My Id is CCNP2BE

Brandon Carroll

CCNA, Specialist-ADSL

Verison Communications, formerly GTE


 

  "Marc Giroux (EMC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 



Up to know I am only aware of 3
jimk_ccnp
cisco_buster
Marc_giroux

Marc Giroux
Product Manager DWDM & Cable Solutions
Ericsson Canada
905-206-7441
416-817-0268 cell



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 9:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Yahoo Messanger--Forming a troubleshooting network...???
> 
> Hey group,
> I have messenger and my ID is CiscoEssentials. I've tried to add you
> all 
> in but I haven't seen your ID's in your posts. Maybe I'm just blind. 8)
> Could 
> someone send me a list of the others that got in on this. It would be 
> appreciated,
> 
> Mark Zabludovsky ~ CCNA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
> 
> If ! the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a
> 
> Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and 
> explode once a year killing everyone inside.
> ~Robert Cringely, InfoWorld~ 
> 
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




  _  

Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail   - Free email you can access from
anywhere!

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Ethernet Frame Errors

[Winchester, Derek S.]

John,
Do you have a sniffer? It might be alot easier to troubleshoot the problem
if you capture what exactly is transporting over your network. 

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer (CCNP)
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet Frame Errors


We have a Compaq file server connected at 100Mb full duplex to a switch. 
They are directly connected by a single cable (7 ft.), and we are seeing
align errors and crc errors coming from the server.  We've replaced the
cable and still see the errors.  

What might be some other causes of these errors?  This LAN is experiencing
other odd intermittent communications problems and I think these two
symptoms may be related, even though the error rate is less than 1%. 
However, it should be 0%!

Thanks for any tips, this one has me stumped.

John





___
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Connecting Switches, hubs..

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Traffic would overflow into both vlans. You would have traffic from VLan 100
flowing in 200 and vice versa. Only if you uses somekind of trunking will
the packets get tagged with somekind of header so something like this would
be disallowed. But to answer the question, that packets will get dropped
after it reaches the vlan and find out it cannot be routed to any port.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer (CCNP)
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: J K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 4:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Connecting Switches, hubs..



Color Blocking Logic - Wonderful isnt it

>From: Chris Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Chris Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: Connecting Switches, hubs..
>Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:05:21 -0400
>
>What does happen? I would think that nothing happens because traffic with
>the wrong color coming into the switch port would be dropped. Is this what
>happens?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:51 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Connecting Switches, hubs..
>
>
>
>Since we seen to be doing the Spanning Tree simulations today... Imagine
>what happens when you have two instances of STP running, one per VLAN on
>VLAN 100 and VLAN 200, and then hook both VLAN 100 and VLAN 200 to the same
>hub. :-)
>
>Have fun!  
>
>Karen E Young
>Network Engineer
>ELF Technologies, Inc
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> e.net>   cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by: Subject: Re: Connecting
>Switches, hubs..
> nobody@groups
>
> tudy.com
>
>
>
>
>
> 07/27/00
>
> 07:40 AM
>
> Please
>
> respond to
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Thu, 27 Jul 2000, Marc Quibell wrote:
>
> > STP does not work with hubs. It only works in a completly switched
>network.
> > Hubs do not run STP, hence the switch does not get BDPU's from the hub
>and
> > does not recognize the non-STP connected ports in order to put the port
>into
> > to a mode such as blocking mode.
>
>correct.
>
> >
> > That said, let's say you do have 2 switch ports (1&2) connected to a 
>same
>
> > hub. A broadcast occurs, which comes in on ports 1&2, but since a
>switched
> > port does not return traffic to the source port, the broadcasts coming 
>in
>on
> > ports 1&2 will not get re-broadcasted back onto themselves...
> >
>
>but broadcasts going out port 1 will still goto port 2 (which isn't
>itself), and vice versa.  With no STP, this would create looping.
>
>Brian
>
>
> >
> > >From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: Marc Quibell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: Connecting Switches, hubs..
> > >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:16:32 -0500 (CDT)
> > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > >Received: from [208.206.76.23] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> > >MHotMailBB48D86F008DD820F3DAD0CE4C17101E0; Wed Jul 26 18:16:32 2000
> > >Received: from mercury.shreve.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >[208.206.76.23])by mercury.shreve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
> > >UAA13766;Wed, 26 Jul 2000 20:16:32 -0500
> > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 26 18:21:17 2000
> > >In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Message-ID:
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Marc Quibell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Actaully, I did another test in the lab and the STP has nothing to 
>do
>
> > >with
> > > > hubs, so BOTH switch ports were able to plug into both hub ports, no
> > > > problem. Now my next question is: Do I now have an aggregate
>bandwidth
> > >of
> > > > 20mbs?
> > >
> > >Actually STP is important in your example.
> > >
> > >if you have a switch with two ports connected to a hub, say ports 1 and
> > >5.  A broadcast sent to port 5, will come back into the switch on port
> > >1.  Since switches forward broadcasts, it will go back out port 5, and
> > >back in port 1, and this will continue infinitly if STP is not enabled.
> > >
> > >In multilayer switching networks, you can actually have your broadcasts
> > >magnified, and things can get REAL ugly.
> > >
> > >Brian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > TIA!
> > > >
> > > > Marc
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >To: Marc Quibell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >Subject: Re: Connecting Switches, hubs..
> > > > >Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 12:11:21 -0500 (CDT)
> > > > >MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > > >Received: from [208.206.76.23] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
> > > > >MHotMailBB4866B7003DD82197E9D0CE4C1712E90; Wed Jul 26 10:11:20 2000
> > > > >Rece

RE: Nobody

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Yes I am receiving them

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer (CCNP)
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Taylor, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 12:42 PM
To: 'Nobody'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: 


Is anybody else getting loads of empty e-mails from Nobody?

-Original Message-
From: Nobody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 8:47 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: 



*
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
is unauthorized. 

If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
the governing KPMG client engagement letter. 

*

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Static route /default route

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Command for a Static route is: ip route 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0, and for a
Default route is: ip default-network 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Jacques Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Static route /default route


Sorry but can anyone pls tell me the command config a static route and
default route?
I'm drilling the OSPF and EIGRP and suddenly forgot it, having no idea where
to find
it out from my stacks of books.

I'm sorry for this

Thx

Jacques Lee
CCNA

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: 2611 Hardware issue

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Is this an active router or is it cold? Your Ios image might be bad.  Are
you sure about the IP address of the eo? With what is specified its hard to
narrow the problem

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Kent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:39 AM
To: Todd Plambeck; Brandon Peyton; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2611 Hardware issue


maybe I am asking the silly questions, did you try the
AUX?

Kent 
--- Todd Plambeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> 
> You can try to ARP an address to one of the ethernet
> ports ( if you know
> the MAC address of the ethernet port ). This will
> obviously only work if
> the ethernet port is up ( link light will tell you
> ).
> 
> Good Luck
> 
> Todd
> 
> CCNP,CCDP
> 
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what i can do with this router?
> >
> > I've got a 2611 who's console port seems to have
> died.
> > When i console into it i get strange ascii symbols
> > and then hangs.  I cant telnet from ethernet nor
> can
> > i ping its ethernet.
> >
> > The console port itself is clean and the console
> cable
> > is working fine ( works with other routers )
> >
> > Any ideas as to what i can do with this ?
> >
> > Is it fixable?  or trash now?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Brandon
> >
> >
>
---
> >   Brandon Peyton   UUNET
> MCIWorldcom
> >   Corporate Network Support3069
> Williams Dr.
> >   Senior Network Engineer  Fairfax, VA
> 22031-4648
> >   Voice:  703-744-2669 Email: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
---
> >
> > ___
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cisco Certified Salaries

[Winchester, Derek S.]

I agree anyone making less than 60k in this field is underpaid no matter
where you live. Starting salary is 60k even with a CCNA. At least it was 3
years ago when I left System Admin and went to Wan development.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: John Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 4:36 PM
To: Chad A. Simmons, MCSE; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco Certified Salaries


$29k is very low in the IT industry.

Give yourself 2 more yrs of experience and you should be making 40-50k

It is redundant to put MCP and MCSE next to each other.

- Original Message -
From: "Chad A. Simmons, MCSE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 2:00 PM
Subject: Cisco Certified Salaries


> I am a consultant for a small consulting firm. I have about 3 months of
> (real experience. I used to do small consulting jobs on the side)
> experience. I have earned my MCP, MCSE, CCNA, and CCDA. I am currently
> persuing my CCNP. I make only 29,000 a year plus overtime. This seems low
to
> me. I was wondering what anyone in a similar situation is making.
>
> Best Regards,
> Chad,  MCP, MCSE, CCNA, CCDA
>
> ___
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Now CCNP

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Passed Bcran and now I'm officially CCNP. My plans next are kind of fuzzy.
But I'm thinking of studying for the written. Thanks group for your support.
For those that will ask my order of tests were ACRC, CLSC, CIT, Bcran




Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: BCRAN/CMTD book question

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Just passed the test yesterday. And that was my only resource, besides
Boson. It is all you will need.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: Scott Merritt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BCRAN/CMTD book question


Hi group,

In an effort to continue my CCNP track, I am looking for a good BCRAN book.

The only one I can seem to find is the Cisco Press book entitled: Building 
CISCO Remote Access Networks by Catherine Paquet.

Has anyone read this book?  Would it be adequate study material?  Would it 
be as good a reference as, say, the Cisco Press ACRC book by Laura Chappel 
for the real world?

Thank you in advance to all who take the time to answer my email.

Oh, if there is a better book out there for this test I would like to hear 
about it too.

Thanks!

Scott

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Eigrp convergence

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Looking for an educated answer other than the book definitions that explain
Convergence in Eigrp: What feature or why is Convergence in Eigrp faster
than other Link-state and distance vector protocols. I would like it in the
words that actually makes sense. I know that it is faster, and I know that
Dual makes convergence simpler and fast, but in words of the common man,
WHY?


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IPSEC/ VPN query

[Winchester, Derek S.]

Hey Guys,

I have a site that needs to connect to another site over the Internet. The
other site is using VPN/IPSEC. I have no experience with VPN/IPSEC, but I
have to clear a path so that my firewall(PIX) will not continue to block the
connection. Any insight to this issue will be greatly appreciated.

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer 
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Cisco certificates

[Winchester, Derek S.]

You get a receipt that's about it. No you don't get anything until you pass
the last exam

Derek S. Winchester
Sr. Wan Engineer (CCNP)
Data Communications Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 410-953-4887
Cell: 443-562-3456


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 8:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco certificates


One question that I could not find the answer for in the archives. Do you
get any certification kit after taking each individual test in the CCNP
track for example for BSCN?
Regards
Jon MCSE, CCNA,CCDA


___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]