Making a router load a different config
Hi, We are physically moving a router from one location to another, I will be connecting remotely to this router, is it possible to set a router to load the new config (saved in the flash) at next power up. Thanks Shawn _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Making a router load a different config
Jason, Thanks for your help, I have the text file (original config) that I am going to modify and copy to the startup-config, do I need to do anything else to this file. The reason why I asked this is because when I copy the router configs to my workstation they don't have an extension. Thanks --- Jason Roysdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, copy tftp startup-config (which doesn't affect > your running conifg). > Then next time it comes up, it uses the new startup > config. > > -- > Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ > List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ > Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ > > > ""John Zaggat"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message > 901nr6$73i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:901nr6$73i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Hi, > > We are physically moving a router from one > location to another, I will be > > connecting remotely to this router, is it possible > to set a router to load > > the new config (saved in the flash) at next power > up. > > Thanks > > Shawn > > > > > > _ > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VPN, BGP & Redundant Network
Hi all, We are trying to add redundancy to our network. There are all sorts of ideas on the table. One of the ideas is to have each of the remote sites (all 7 sites within US) connect to a local ISP and use VPN when needed to backup the frame-relay links that are inplace now. We use VPN extensively for our clients to connect to us now. I am new to BGP, and hence the question: does BGP play a role in this scenario and more importantly is this solution possible in your opinion. Thanks in advance for your help in advance JZ **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with BGP ge and le options
Could someone clearly explain what these options do and an example of how are they used. Thanks = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Customize tacacs logon prompt ?
Hi, We are using PIX with Cisci secure for NT4, is it possible to customize the logon prompt. Anyhelp will be greatly appreciated. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX & TACAS issue
Hi all, We are using a PIX 520 ver 5.1(2) with tacacs+ to authenticate all users outbound with NT database. Several of the users are experiencing repeated logon prompts when they try to go to links within a website. Has any one else seen this problem and know a solution. I have already searched the CCO website and not found much on it. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you, _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Calling Tacacs+ experts: How to Customize Logon Prompt
Hi, We are using PIX with Cisco secure for NT4. Does anyone know how to customize Logon prompt that users get when they access Internet. I posted this last week but did not get any response. Is it possible or not. Can someone atleast confirm that. Thanks _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarification:Local Serial interface on a router doesnot reply to ping
Hi, I was going through the groupstudy archives the other day and I found an interesting string on why the local interfaces on a router cannot be pinged in a frame-relay environment. The argument was that since there is no mapping between the ip address and DLCI on the directly attached serial interface of the router you won't get a reply if you ping it. I found out that I could ping the local interfaces of routers on our frame-relay network. Am I missing something here. Can some clear this up for me. Thanks JZ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to select a diff Flash img to load from ?
I have 2 different flash images (11.3 and a 12.01)on a 2610 router, what command can I use to change the IOS image the router uses at next reload. Thanks a lot. = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Get Yahoo! Mail Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help with Debug ip packet
Hello group, Can some kind soul help with the following output I got for "IP debug packet" IP: s=172.16.5.59 (Serial0), d=172.17.5.100 (Ethernet0), g=172.17.5.100, len 40, forward Does "g" stand for gateway, and if so then why is that the same as destination and not the actual gateway/router which in this case is 172.17.5.10 What does "len 40" mean ? Thanks for your help :-) = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Difference Between T1 & Frame relay
Can some one clearly explain the difference between T1 and Frame relay, Does T1 run over Frame relay circuits ? Aren't they both Layer 1 in the OSI model. I have searched the archives and found some good info but I am still a little fuzzy about the concepts. Thanks Guys. = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diff between point to point T1 and T1 with framerelay
Can some clearly explain the difference, I have checked the Archives and not found a good explanation. Also if you have some sample configs, that would be a great help to me. Thank you. = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diff between point to point T1 & T1 with frame relay
Guys, I am confused on this, couldn't find a satisfactory answer in the archives. Can some clearly explain the diff between, p-to-p T1 and T1 with frame-relay. Can some post sample configs for both. Sorry about the newbie question. Thank you = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PPP or HDLC pros and cons
Hi guys, In a point to point T1 link what would be advantages or disadvantages of using HDLC vs PPP. Thank you = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Diff between point to point T1 and T1 with framerelay
Thank you for your help, I have one more question : The bandwidth for a p-to-p connnection, should that be 1544 Mbs as compared to 1536 Mbs since there is no frame-relay overhead ? --- "Feliz, Edgar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John, > > If you order a T1 from A provider that is 1536 Mbs > you get that bandwidth > all to yourself you DO NOT have to SHARE it with > anyone. It is as if you, > and the other side of the connection had a long > cable between the two sites, > and only those two site could used that cable. All > of the data you transmit > under normal circumstance (no errors) will get > through. This comes at a > price. > > Frame-Relay on the other hand is shared bandwidth. > Yes! the provider will > under normal conditions guarantee the bandwidth that > you request (CIR = > Committed Information Rate), say 256k, 512k etc. You > will even be able to > burst for a certain period of time if there is > bandwidth available to your > port speed. But if the network becomes congested > some of your packets will > not get to their destination because they could have > met a condition (DE + > Discard eligible) set in the core network, or by the > subscriber, that > required them to be dropped under certain > circumstances, like high network > congestion,(This varies as some carriers will not > drop packets, but there > may be longer delays). When I say that it is shared > bandwidth I say this > because in fact you are sharing the bandwidth in the > Core Network of your > provider with hundreds of other subscribers to the > service. > > Hope this helps, > > EF > > -Original Message- > From: John Zaggat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:15 PM > To: CiscoGroupstudy > Subject: Diff between point to point T1 and T1 with > framerelay > > > Can some clearly explain the difference, I have > checked the Archives and not found a good > explanation. > Also if you have some sample configs, that would be > a > great help to me. > Thank you. > > = > JZ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! > http://photos.yahoo.com > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! http://photos.yahoo.com ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Diff between point to point T1 and T1 with framerelay
John, Thanks a lot for your help, I am setting up a point to point T1 link, most of the traffic will be file and email access. With so many options available for encapsulation how do you choose what's the best. I have a cisco 7206 on one side and 1604 on the other. Do you have any suggestions for me --- John Neiberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The discrepancy you're seeing has nothing to do with > frame relay overhead, > but more with the number of signalling bits present > in the T1. To provide > clocking, a T1 circuit using ESF (extended super > frames) and B8ZS (binary > eight-zero substitution) coding will insert bits > into the stream, I believe > one on every frame, as a timing reference. Because > that one bit per frame > is used for clocking and not data, it reduces your > actual throughput to 1536 > Mbps. > > I don't believe that frame relay has any more > overhead than a point to point > circuit running HDLC, for instance. Both circuits > encapsulate your data > into another type of datalink format before sending > it over the wire. Point > to point HDLC, however, doesn't have FECN, BECN, > LMI, etc., so I guess in a > way it's true that there is more protocol-specific > traffic on a frame relay > circuit than there would be on a ptp. > > I hope that helps! Feel free to ask me any more > questions. It helps me to > remember this stuff if I have to explain it to > someone else. > > Later, > John Neiberger, CCNA/CCDA > > > Thank you for your help, I have one more question > : > > The bandwidth for a p-to-p connnection, should > that be > > 1544 Mbs as compared to 1536 Mbs since there is > no > > frame-relay overhead ? > > --- "Feliz, Edgar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > John, > > > > > > If you order a T1 from A provider that is 1536 > Mbs > > > you get that bandwidth > > > all to yourself you DO NOT have to SHARE it > with > > > anyone. It is as if you, > > > and the other side of the connection had a long > > > cable between the two sites, > > > and only those two site could used that cable. > All > > > of the data you transmit > > > under normal circumstance (no errors) will get > > > through. This comes at a > > > price. > > > > > > Frame-Relay on the other hand is shared > bandwidth. > > > Yes! the provider will > > > under normal conditions guarantee the bandwidth > that > > > you request (CIR = > > > Committed Information Rate), say 256k, 512k > etc. You > > > will even be able to > > > burst for a certain period of time if there is > > > bandwidth available to your > > > port speed. But if the network becomes > congested > > > some of your packets will > > > not get to their destination because they could > have > > > met a condition (DE + > > > Discard eligible) set in the core network, or > by the > > > subscriber, that > > > required them to be dropped under certain > > > circumstances, like high network > > > congestion,(This varies as some carriers will > not > > > drop packets, but there > > > may be longer delays). When I say that it is > shared > > > bandwidth I say this > > > because in fact you are sharing the bandwidth > in the > > > Core Network of your > > > provider with hundreds of other subscribers to > the > > > service. > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > EF > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: John Zaggat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 1:15 PM > > > To: CiscoGroupstudy > > > Subject: Diff between point to point T1 and T1 > with > > > framerelay > > > > > > > > > Can some clearly explain the difference, I have > > > checked the Archives and not found a good > > > explanation. > > > Also if you have some sample configs, that > would be > > > a > > > great help to me. > > > Thank you. > > > > > > = > > > JZ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints! > > > http://photos.yahoo.com > > > > > > ___ > &g
NAT dilemma [7:42762]
Hi guys/gals, I am using a 1605R with 2 ethernet interfaces as gateway to my cable service provider. My dilemma is that when I put a default route to outside NAT stops working. I verified this by using a sniffer. Without default route everything seems to work fine but it's just bugging the hell out of me that why is it so. Can some one enlighten me ? Here is my config: Router#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 939 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption service udp-small-servers service tcp-small-servers ! hostname Router ! ! ip subnet-zero ip name-server 66.75.160.42 ip name-server 66.75.160.41 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.10 ! ip dhcp pool INSIDE network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 default-router 192.168.1.1 dns-server 66.75.160.42 ! ip ssh time-out 120 ip ssh authentication-retries 3 ! ! ! ! interface Ethernet0 ip address dhcp ip nat outside no cdp enable ! interface Ethernet1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside no cdp enable ! ip nat inside source list 1 interface Ethernet0 overload ip classless ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet0 < no ip http server no ip pim bidir-enable ! access-list 1 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 no cdp advertise-v2 no cdp run ! line con 0 line vty 0 3 login line vty 4 password cisco login ! end = JZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42762&t=42762 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is IBM 3272 and CAT 3920 same switch ? [7:24362]
Hi, can some one tell me if IBM 3272-216 and Cisco Cat 3920 the same token ring switch. Both have very similar menus, just wondering if I can upload cisco OS on to the IBM switch. Thanks for your help Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=24362&t=24362 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic - empty CCIE Lab seats! [7:55878]
I think people are afraid to be the first guinea pigs in this new experiment. ""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in message news:200210181454.OAA26971@;groupstudy.com... > this is the second consecutive morning where I have seen the entire week of > November 11 with lots of empty Lab seats. > > Plus a few on Nov 19th. > > The next open dates after that are in May 2003 > > Interesting. > > Get 'em while they're hot! > > -- Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55946&t=55878 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CCIE LAN Switching K.Clark update ? [7:55467]
Does any one here know if there will be an update to this excellent book, hopefully more in depth coverage of CAT IOS and 3550s. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55467&t=55467 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debug for mtu size [7:57338]
Can any one show me how can I debug mtu size issues. Is there debug command I can use to monitor mtu mismatches. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57338&t=57338 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
I am just trying to think of how to restrict Hubs from being used in the LAN. Politically it's a mess and despite a lot of discussions certain people are able to add hubs at will where ever they want. So I was trying to think of a way to stop that within the switch. Now normally these ports that the hubs are connected to show several mac addresses when I do "show cam" which gives me an idea is there any way to restrict host ports to only accept one mac-address. I don't want to hardcode the mac-address because that would be too much a administrative burden. But if I could restrict the port to accept just one mac-address then that will make these hubs useless. Well anyways let me know if I am way off here but are there any other tricks in use by any of you guys. I'll appreciate any pointers. JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54937&t=54937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
Thanks guys that's pretty good information, but do you think in your opinion is that good approach to deal with this problem. Do you see any caveats and are there any other ways this can be dealt with. ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > take a look into Port Security. > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration > _guide_chapter09186a008007f2dd.html > > In the event of a security violation, you can configure the port to go into > shutdown mode or restrictive mode. The shutdown mode option allows you to > specify whether the port is permanently disabled or disabled for only a > specified time. The default is for the port to shut down permanently. The > restrictive mode allows you to configure the port to remain enabled during a > security violation and drop only packets that are coming in from insecure > hosts. > > Kevin Wigle > > > - Original Message - > From: "John Zaggat" > To: > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 5:01 PM > Subject: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937] > > > > I am just trying to think of how to restrict Hubs from being used in the > > LAN. Politically it's a mess and despite a lot of discussions certain > people > > are able to add hubs at will where ever they want. So I was trying to > think > > of a way to stop that within the switch. Now normally these ports that the > > hubs are connected to show several mac addresses when I do "show cam" > which > > gives me an idea is there any way to restrict host ports to only accept > one > > mac-address. I don't want to hardcode the mac-address because that would > be > > too much a administrative burden. But if I could restrict the port to > accept > > just one mac-address then that will make these hubs useless. Well anyways > > let me know if I am way off here but are there any other tricks in use by > > any of you guys. I'll appreciate any pointers. > > JZ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54949&t=54937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to restrict hubs in a LAN [7:54937]
idging within pcs. I > > hope that answers most of > > the questions here. > > ""David j"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > See inline.. > > > Chuck's Long Road wrote: > > > > > > > > as much of a rulemeister as I am, I still have > > to look at this > > > > from the user > > > > standpoint. Why are users throwing their own > > hubs onto the > > > > network? Is there > > > > a business case to be made? Is facilities too > > slow getting > > > > requested cable > > > > pulls done? > > > > > > > > what is the concern with a user plugging a hub > > in at the desk > > > > and then > > > > connected a couple of extra PC's? if the problem > > is one of dual > > > > homing by > > > > accident or otherwise, I can see the issue with > > spanning tree > > > > recalculations. But in a single home situation, > > what do you > > > > see as the > > > > issues? > > > > > > > > > > I see one issue: collisions, if you have a > > switched network you don't want > > > to deal with collisions that hubs normally > > produce. I have to recognize, > > > though, that hubs sometimes are very convenient > > and I'm the first on using > > > them. > > > > > > > when you say that "politically, it's a mess" > > what does that > > > > mean? high > > > > powered sales people throwing their weight > > around? management > > > > does not > > > > respect your input or concerns? something bad is > > happening, and > > > > it's rolling > > > > downhill? > > > > > > > In some environments it's politically > > unacceptable, I know some hospitals > > in > > > which you have to fill in a lot papers before > > being allowed to use a PC, > > so > > > in that environments this could perfectly be part > > of the policy. > > > > > > > I'm not questioning the wisdom or the necessity > > for doing what > > > > others have > > > > suggested. I'm just wondering why it is > > necessary for the > > > > network manager / > > > > network staff to unilaterally cut off user > > access. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ""John Zaggat"" wrote in message > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Thanks guys that's pretty good information, > > but do you think > > > > in your > > > > opinion > > > > > is that good approach to deal with this > > problem. Do you see > > > > any caveats > > > > and > > > > > are there any other ways this can be dealt > > with. > > > > > ""Kevin Wigle"" wrote in message > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > > take a look into Port Security. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration > > > > > > _guide_chapter09186a008007f2dd.html > > > > > > > > > > > > In the event of a security violation, you > > can configure the > > > > port to go > > > > > into > > > > > > shutdown mode or restrictive mode. The > > shutdown mode option > > > > allows you > > > > to > > > > > > specify whether the port is permanently > > disabled or > > > > disabled for only a > > > > > > specified time. The default is for the port > > to shut down > > > > permanently. > > > > The > > > > > > restrictive mode allows you to configure the > > port to remain > > > > enabled > > > > during > > > > > a > > > > > > security violation and drop only packets > > that are coming in > > > > from > > > > insecure > > > > > > hosts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin Wigle > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > > From: "John Zaggat" > > > > > > To: > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 5:01 PM > > > > > > Subject: How to restrict hubs in a LAN > > [7:54937] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am just trying to think of how to > > restrict Hubs from > > > > being used in > > > > the > > > > > > > LAN. Politically it's a mess and despite a > > lot of > > > > discussions certain > > > > > > people > > > > > > > are able to add hubs at will where ever > > they want. So I > > > > was trying to > > > > > > think > > > > > > > of a way to stop that within the switch. > > Now normally > > > > these ports that > > > > > the > > > > > > > hubs are connected to show several mac > > addresses when I > > > > do "show cam" > > > > > > which > > > > > > > gives me an idea is there any way to > > restrict host ports > > > > to only > > > > accept > > > > > > one > > > > > > > mac-address. I don't want to hardcode the > > mac-address > > > > because that > > > > would > > > > > > be > > > > > > > too much a administrative burden. But if I > > could restrict > > > > the port to > > > > > > accept > > > > > > > just one mac-address then that will make > > these hubs > > > > useless. Well > > > > > anyways > > > > > > > let me know if I am way off here but are > > there any other > > > > tricks in > > > > use > > > > > by > > > > > > > any of you guys. I'll appreciate any > > pointers. > > > > > > > JZ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > http://faith.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=54983&t=54937 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
