BGP Weight
We have two connections to ISPs, but only one is running BGP at this moment (waiting for Verio to get off of their hineys.) I have "neighbor x.x.x.x weight 1000" configured for my lone peer. When I do "show ip bgp", shouldn't every single route have a weight of 1000? I have no other peers so shouldn't that weight command set all routes to 1000? In actuality, very few are set to 1000; most are set to zero. I haven't been able to figure out why this might be happening. Any ideas? Thanks, John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Weight
If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to reset the BGP connection, then any existing routes that were in the BGP table before adding the weight parameter to the neighbor command, would be left at the default of 0 for routes learned from the neighbor. Reset the BGP connection (**AFTER HOURS ON THE WEEKEND OF COURSE!**). At 02:18 PM 1/10/01 -0800, John Neiberger wrote: We have two connections to ISPs, but only one is running BGP at this moment (waiting for Verio to get off of their hineys.) I have "neighbor x.x.x.x weight 1000" configured for my lone peer. When I do "show ip bgp", shouldn't every single route have a weight of 1000? I have no other peers so shouldn't that weight command set all routes to 1000? In actuality, very few are set to 1000; most are set to zero. I haven't been able to figure out why this might be happening. Any ideas? Thanks, John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: BGP Weight
Or just the route you want to flush. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Sucevic Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:46 PM To: John Neiberger; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BGP Weight If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to reset the BGP connection, then any existing routes that were in the BGP table before adding the weight parameter to the neighbor command, would be left at the default of 0 for routes learned from the neighbor. Reset the BGP connection (**AFTER HOURS ON THE WEEKEND OF COURSE!**). At 02:18 PM 1/10/01 -0800, John Neiberger wrote: We have two connections to ISPs, but only one is running BGP at this moment (waiting for Verio to get off of their hineys.) I have "neighbor x.x.x.x weight 1000" configured for my lone peer. When I do "show ip bgp", shouldn't every single route have a weight of 1000? I have no other peers so shouldn't that weight command set all routes to 1000? In actuality, very few are set to 1000; most are set to zero. I haven't been able to figure out why this might be happening. Any ideas? Thanks, John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: BGP Weight
This is the first time BGP has ever run on this router, and I had the weight parameter configured before I allowed any routes in. After changing my route map to allow partial routes, I did a soft incoming reset. Might that have something to do with it somehow? Before the reset, there were no BGP routes on the router at all (except in the soft reconfiguration cache.) Strange, huh? If you did not use "clear ip bgp *" to reset the BGP connection, then any existing routes that were in the BGP table before adding the weight parameter to the neighbor command, would be left at the default of 0 for routes learned from the neighbor. Reset the BGP connection (**AFTER HOURS ON THE WEEKEND OF COURSE!**). At 02:18 PM 1/10/01 -0800, John Neiberger wrote: We have two connections to ISPs, but only one is running BGP at this moment (waiting for Verio to get off of their hineys.) I have "neighbor x.x.x.x weight 1000" configured for my lone peer. When I do "show ip bgp", shouldn't every single route have a weight of 1000? I have no other peers so shouldn't that weight command set all routes to 1000? In actuality, very few are set to 1000; most are set to zero. I haven't been able to figure out why this might be happening. Any ideas? Thanks, John ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
