Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
Has anyone got any information/links on how to configure a window2000 cert server to enroll a pix?? The TAC is informative enough about the pix side of things and offers a decent link to the MS site, but there is no mention that I can find of how to create a CEP compatible certificate for the pix... any help much appreciated. thanks, Ciaron - Original Message - From: Paul Jin To: Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263] > VoIP Guy wrote: > > > > If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any > > FRF.12 > > fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters > > are OK? I have > > a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. > > > > > > The TS statements both match on both ends. > > We have the same type of PVC with same CIR and other parameters > going to other sites and using the same TS configuration. > > And no frame fragmentations. > > I do have it schduled to swap this router out > within 2 weeks. I am hoping it is either the router or > the local cabling to the router. > > We could not get the regular 1720 that we wanted to deploy until Dec so we > have a temp 2501 that the local field company used and I do not know how > steady this router is. > > thanks > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26421&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
VoIP Guy wrote: > > If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any > FRF.12 > fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters > are OK? I have > a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. > > The TS statements both match on both ends. We have the same type of PVC with same CIR and other parameters going to other sites and using the same TS configuration. And no frame fragmentations. I do have it schduled to swap this router out within 2 weeks. I am hoping it is either the router or the local cabling to the router. We could not get the regular 1720 that we wanted to deploy until Dec so we have a temp 2501 that the local field company used and I do not know how steady this router is. thanks Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26413&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
If traffic shaping, do both sides match?Are you doing any FRF.12 fragmentation? Are you sure the traffic shaping paramaters are OK? I have a feeling this is it. Make sure both sides match. ""Paul Jin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Alex, > > This site has another router connection back to the hub so this PVC is not > being used at this moment except for testing. > > I have no fecn/becns. I have the CIR set at 128K on the network portion. > > No discards within the cloud. in fact, within the network, it is > around 70 ms between stratacom to stratacom. But between the router > to router ping, it is very abnormally high. > > The hub site has other PVCs exiting to other routers and they all > work ok. Just this particular one. > > It seems that something locally must be changed. Bad thing is I have to > rely on many intermediaries to get answers and get things done. > > Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26328&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
Hi Alex, This site has another router connection back to the hub so this PVC is not being used at this moment except for testing. I have no fecn/becns. I have the CIR set at 128K on the network portion. No discards within the cloud. in fact, within the network, it is around 70 ms between stratacom to stratacom. But between the router to router ping, it is very abnormally high. The hub site has other PVCs exiting to other routers and they all work ok. Just this particular one. It seems that something locally must be changed. Bad thing is I have to rely on many intermediaries to get answers and get things done. Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26316&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
Paul, I have a feeling that you might have tried the below, but just for a suggestion: Is the ping time always high, or does it vary depending on the time of the day? If it's the latter, it might be a congestion problem, and you can check for the presence of FECN's on the frame switch. This happened to me once, and it turned out to be an incorrect CIR on the PVC. Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26300&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latency on the local access circuit [7:26263]
Hi All, I am having issues with a remote router we turned up overseas.. The router is working fine and the local access circuit test from the local telco comes back clean but, I am getting ping times on a normal 100 byte packet of around 170ms - 220ms. Similar type of connections all fall within around 70ms or so on this type of pings, but on this one, it is much higher. Has anyone had any issues similar where you had 100ms + added onto a ping time by the local access circuit? This is frame relay network and the problem site is a remote site. On the hub router, 1 - all other connections are fine. 2 - I have control of the frame relay switches and RTD within the network is about 50ms, and usually in this type of scenario, I get another 20ms + or so added to the ping router to router for the local access circuits. 3 - Already checked the traffic shaping statements on the PVCs. 4 - Already checked the parameters on the frame switch for any wrong parameters on the switches. This is a complete FR PVC. 5 - I see no errors on the remote side's serial interface, or do I see any errors on the port of the switch. My next step is to put a ticket out for the local techs to swap out the CSU/DSU and the cables... And maybe they are not working 100% or they introduced cables that might not be standard. Has anyone had problems like this? thanks, Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=26263&t=26263 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
