RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
Cisco 2600 is a modular router like the 3600, and is capable of supporting two modules. Whether or not these slots are populated, it doesn't change the tty numbering, i.e slot 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the last tty + 1, the AUX port is 65 on a 2600. CM -Original Message- From: Sean Young To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 Subject: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] I am hoping someone on the group can explain to me the following situation: I've noticed that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port is listed on line 1 (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco 2600s platform, the AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still at line 0). On the cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, thenthe AUX port is listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot 3, then the AUX port is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the case on Cisco 2500s and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s platform is really out of wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent on all platforms? I work for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new network engineering folks about this especially when it involves async-lines, AS5300, Radius andTACACS (you get the point). I guess when Cisco controls about 90% market share of the router market, it really doesn't give a f___ about these things. No wonder why Juniper andAvici are kicking Cisco's ass in the carrier market because it makes the product moreuser-friendly (until it becomes just as big as Cisco then those guys will start acting arrogant). An explaination from anyone in this group is very appreciate. Sean Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6661&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
CM, I don't know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see in front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, all of them only have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are referring to Cisco 3620 then I might agree with you that Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give out wrong information unless you know it is accurate. Anyone else would like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this case? Regards, Sean >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router like the 3600, and is capable of supporting >two modules. Whether or not these slots are populated, it doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX port is 65 on a 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean Young >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone on the group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX port is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on Cisco 2500s and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform is really out of wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all platforms? I work for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >network engineering folks about this especially when it involves >async-lines, AS5300, Radius andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >when Cisco controls about 90% market share of the router market, it >really doesn't give a f___ about these things. No wonder why Juniper >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in the carrier market because it makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until it becomes just as big as Cisco then >those guys will start acting arrogant). An explaination from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. Sean > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6696&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
The 2600 series only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with different numbers of ports on them. -- Neil Schneider MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP ""Sean Young"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > CM, > > I don't know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > in > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, all of > them only > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are referring to Cisco 3620 then > I > > might agree with you that Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > out > > wrong information unless you know it is accurate. > > Anyone else would like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > case? > > Regards, > > Sean > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > like the 3600, and is capable of supporting >two modules. Whether or not > these slots are populated, it doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > port is 65 on a 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > Young >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > on the group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX port > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on Cisco 2500s > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform is really out of > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all platforms? I work > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >network engineering folks > about this especially when it involves >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >when Cisco controls about 90% > market share of the router market, it >really doesn't give a f___ about > these things. No wonder why Juniper >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > the carrier market because it makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > it becomes just as big as Cisco then >those guys will start acting > arrogant). An explaination from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > Sean > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6699&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
Just thought I'd point out the obvious: "Please don't give out wrong information unless you know it is accurate." Please explain this one. Tom McNamara -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean Young Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] CM, I don't know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see in front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, all of them only have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are referring to Cisco 3620 then I might agree with you that Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give out wrong information unless you know it is accurate. Anyone else would like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this case? Regards, Sean >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router like the 3600, and is capable of supporting >two modules. Whether or not these slots are populated, it doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX port is 65 on a 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean Young >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone on the group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX port is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on Cisco 2500s and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform is really out of wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all platforms? I work for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >network engineering folks about this especially when it involves >async-lines, AS5300, Radius andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >when Cisco controls about 90% market share of the router market, it >really doesn't give a f___ about these things. No wonder why Juniper >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in the carrier market because it makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until it becomes just as big as Cisco then >those guys will start acting arrogant). An explaination from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. Sean > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Tom McNamara.vcf] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6700&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or 3600s is thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for either 2600s or 3600s routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. Sean >From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >network engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, it >really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why Juniper >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market because it makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes just as big as Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > arrogant). An explaination from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > > Sean > > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6703&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
The equation to calculate the line no. is for cisco 3600 series. Interface unmuber = ( 32 x slot no.) + unit no. + 1 but for cisco 2600, the infromation that can be true is last tty + 1 rgds; Vincent ""Sean Young"" The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > 3600s is > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > either 2600s or 3600s > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. > > Sean > > >From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong > information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX > port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX > port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on > Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform > is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all > platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new > >network engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves > >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess > >when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, it > >really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why Juniper > >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market because it > makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes just as big as > Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > arrogant). An explaination > from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > > Sean > > > > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6723&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640]
I had to build an async interface on a 3620 not to long ago and the first number allowed me to use was Async65. Sorry Sean. At 10:00 PM 05/31/2001 -0400, Sean Young wrote: >The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or >3600s is > >thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for >either 2600s or 3600s > >routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. > >Sean > >>From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX >port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series >only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers >of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > >>""Sean Young"" wrote in message >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't >know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in >> > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, >all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are >referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that >Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong >information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would >like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > >Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , >"'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on >Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > >>Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of >supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it >doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 >etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a >2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed >the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the >group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that >on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine >consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX >port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > >cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is >> > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX >port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on >Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform >is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all >platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new >>network engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves >>async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess >>when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, it >>really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why Juniper >>andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market because it >makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes just as big as >Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > arrogant). An explaination >from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > > Sean > > > >> >> > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >> > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > >> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx Darren S. Crawford Network Systems Consultant Lucent Technologies - Sacramento email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] page via email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] pager: 800-467-1467 x$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$xx$:0`0:$x$:0`0:$xx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6824&t=6640 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6706]
But your missing the point... The 2600 series routers has two slots... With a max of 32 lines per slot, add one and you get 65 for the aux... Same with a 3640, 4 slots 4x32+1 =129 for aux port... Now wait a minute. I didn't say the 2600 has two NM slots. It has slot 0 which is a fixed lan interface config with two wic slots and slot 1, the NM slot. That is still two slots. from http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_m od2/conntser.htm The interface number of a port is determined using the following relation: interface-number = (32 x slot-number) + unit-number + 1 Thanks -The Nate "Sean Young" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > 3600s is > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > either 2600s or 3600s > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. > > Sean > > >From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong > information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX > port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX > port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on > Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform > is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all > platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new > >network engineering folks > > about this especially when it involves > >async-lines, AS5300, Radius > > andTACACS (you get the point). I guess > >when Cisco controls about 90% > > market share of the router market, it > >really doesn't give a f___ about > > these things. No wonder why Juniper > >andAvici >are kicking Cisco's ass in > > the carrier market because it > makes the >product moreuser-friendly (until > > it becomes just as big as > Cisco then >those guys will start acting > > arrogant). An explaination > from anyone in >this group is very appreciate. > > Sean > > > > > > > > > >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6706&t=6706 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6750]
Nate, Thank you very much for pointing that out. Now it does actually make sense that the Ethernet port is assigned E0/0 (duh!). However, I still think it is a very stupid way of Cisco for doing this. Where do you hear a fixed port that is also consider as a "module". Once again, thanks for pointing that out. Sean >From: "Nate Van Maren" >Reply-To: "Nate Van Maren" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6706] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:29:17 -0400 > >But your missing the point... The 2600 series routers has two slots... >With a max of 32 lines per slot, add one and you get 65 for the aux... Same >with a 3640, 4 slots 4x32+1 =129 for aux port... > >Now wait a minute. I didn't say the 2600 has two NM slots. It has slot 0 >which is a fixed lan interface config with two wic slots and slot 1, the NM >slot. That is still two slots. > >from >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_m >od2/conntser.htm > >The interface number of a port is determined using the following relation: > >interface-number = (32 x slot-number) + unit-number + 1 > >Thanks >-The Nate > >"Sean Young" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The max. number of Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > > 3600s is > > > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > > either 2600s or 3600s > > > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX is still a mystery to me. > > > > Sean > > > > >From: "Neil Schneider" >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > > only has one NM slot, but you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > > of ports on them. > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > I don't > > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I can see > > in > > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 and another 2621, > > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module (NM) slot. If you are > > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > might agree with you that > > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't give > > out > > > > wrong > > information unless you know it is accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > > like to comment on this one. Am I correct in this > > case? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > > Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > > >Cisco 2600 is a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > > supporting >two modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > > doesn't change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > > etc. As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > > 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on the > > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > that > > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line 1 > > (sine > > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s platform, the > > AUX > > port is listed on line 65(console port is still >at line 0). On the > > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module in slot 0, >thenthe AUX port is > > > > listed on line 129. If I put my FE module in slot >3, >then the AUX > > port > > is listed on line 97. I understand why that is the >case on > > Cisco 2500s > > and 3600s platform, but apparently, the 2600s >platform > > is really out of > > wack. Why doesn't Cisco make themconsistent >on >all > > platforms? I work > > for an ISP shop and it is hard for me to new > > >network engineering folks > > abou
Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6759]
Hi; The fixed moduele will be slot 0. The NM module will be in slot 1. >From the configuration, you can tell. But I am not sure I am right. Feel free to discuss. Best Rgds; Vincent ""Sean Young"" Nate, > > Thank you very much for pointing that out. Now it does actually make > sense that the Ethernet > > port is assigned E0/0 (duh!). However, I still think it is a very stupid > way of Cisco for doing > > this. Where do you hear a fixed port that is also consider as a > "module". > > Once again, thanks for pointing that out. > > > > Sean > > >From: "Nate Van Maren" >Reply-To: "Nate Van Maren" >To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > port? [7:6640] - Yes [7:6706] >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:29:17 -0400 > > >But your missing the point... The 2600 series routers has two slots... > >With a max of 32 lines per slot, add one and you get 65 for the aux... > Same >with a 3640, 4 slots 4x32+1 =129 for aux port... > >Now wait a > minute. I didn't say the 2600 has two NM slots. It has slot 0 >which is a > fixed lan interface config with two wic slots and slot 1, the NM >slot. > That is still two slots. > >from > >http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/net_ m > >od2/conntser.htm > >The interface number of a port is determined using > the following relation: > >interface-number = (32 x slot-number) + > unit-number + 1 > >Thanks >-The Nate > >"Sean Young" wrote in message > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > The max. number of > Async-line you can have on the NM for either 2600s or > > 3600s is > > > > > thirty-two (32). I couldn't find any NM that has 64 async-line for > > > either 2600s or 3600s > > > > routers. Therefore, the number 65 for AUX > is still a mystery to me. > > > > Sean > > > > >From: "Neil Schneider" > >Reply-To: "Neil Schneider" >To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: > Can anyone shed the light on Cisco AUX > > port? [7:6640] >Date: Thu, 31 > May 2001 21:16:49 -0400 > >The 2600 series > > only has one NM slot, but > you can buy NM modules with >different numbers > > of ports on them. > > >-- >Neil Schneider >MCT MCSE CCSI CCNP > > > > > > >""Sean Young"" wrote > in message > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > CM, > > > > > I don't > > know where you buy the Cisco 2600s router but from what I > can see > > in > > > > > > front of me, I have a Cisco 2610, Cisco 2611 > and another 2621, > > all of > > them only > > > > have 1 Network Module > (NM) slot. If you are > > referring to Cisco 3620 then > > I > > > > > might agree with you that > > Cisco 3620 has 2 NM slots. Please don't > give > > out > > > > wrong > > information unless you know it is > accurate. > > > > Anyone else would > > like to comment on this one. Am I > correct in this > > case? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sean > > > > > >From: Charles Manafa >To: 'Sean Young ' , > > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED] '" > > > >Subject: RE: Can anyone shed the light on > > Cisco AUX port? > [7:6640] > > >Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:27:29 +0100 > > > >Cisco 2600 is > a modular router > > like the 3600, and is capable of > > supporting >two > modules. Whether or not > > these slots are populated, it > > doesn't > change the >tty numbering, i.e slot > > 0: 0-31, slot 1: 32-64 > > etc. > As the AUX port is the >last tty + 1, the AUX > > port is 65 on a > > > 2600. > >CM > >-Original Message- >From: Sean > > Young >To: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 31/05/01 19:19 >Subject: Can > > anyone shed > > > the light on Cisco AUX port? [7:6640] > >I am hoping someone > > on > the > > group can explain to me the following >situation: I've noticed > > > that > > on the Cisco 2500s platform, the AUX port >is >listed on line > 1 > > (sine > > consoleport is on line 0). However, on Cisco >2600s > platform, the > > AUX > > port is listed on line 65(console port is still > >at line 0). On the > > > > cisco 3640 router, if I put my FE module
