Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-07 Thread Patrick Donlon

Thanks for the info everyone, I tested it last night and it worked great, we
now have
load balancing and the keepalive running. Here's the config for one of the
services

Cheers
Pat


service portal2
  ip address 172.16.10.12
  string portal2
  protocol tcp
  keepalive port 81
  keepalive type http
  keepalive uri "/index.html"
  active

sam sneed wrote:

> There are 2 methods of keepalives, get and head.
>
> get:
> CSS gets the web page, computes a hash based on the page and stores it for
> reference. The next time the CSS gets the webpage it looks for 200 OK and
> stauts and compares the new hash with the hash stored for reference. If
they
> are different the CSS marks the service as down. So you can conclude this
> method only works well for static content on pages.
>
> Head:
> CSS only issues an HTTP head on the service and looks for 200 OK status ,
if
> it gets it service is marked up other wise its down. Less overhead than get
> method and good for Dynamic content as well.
>
> hope that helped a bit.
>
> ""Patrick Donlon""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi Dave
> >
> > I've not had chance to test the keepalive yet but I see you mention using
> > head or get
> > can depend on the page type. Can you explain further or do you have any
> > links?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > David Harrison wrote:
> >
> > > This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since the CSS knows
> > > the ip address of the box it's watching it doesn't have to rely on a
> > > domain name to find the location of the server.
> > >
> > > However it is important that the css know the path to reach the
> > > reference page.
> > >
> > > I've used the following:
> > > service blah_blah
> > >   ip address 10.1.1.1
> > >   keepalive frequency 8
> > >   keepalive type http
> > >   keepalive uri "/.reference/arrowpoint-keepalive.html"
> > >   active
> > >
> > > I usually use the default "head" method vs the "get". Depends on
whether
> > > the file you are watching is static or dynamic.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:19 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]
> > >
> > > I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
> > > include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
> > > "/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it
works
> > > for you.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > >>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
> > > following
> > > on the
> > > service:
> > >
> > > keepalive port 81,
> > > keepalive method get,
> > > keepalive type http
> > > keepalive frequency 25,
> > > keepalive retry 25
> > > keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"
> > >
> > > I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
> > > case)
> > > Any thing
> > > obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Pat
> > >
> > > Patrick Donlon wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
> > > this
> > > > is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
> > > this
> > > > is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
> > > process
> > > > is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
> > > the
> > > > different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
> > > anyone
> > > > else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> > > > detecting the lost of service
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > >
> > > > Pat
> > > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43475&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-06 Thread sam sneed

There are 2 methods of keepalives, get and head.

get:
CSS gets the web page, computes a hash based on the page and stores it for
reference. The next time the CSS gets the webpage it looks for 200 OK and
stauts and compares the new hash with the hash stored for reference. If they
are different the CSS marks the service as down. So you can conclude this
method only works well for static content on pages.

Head:
CSS only issues an HTTP head on the service and looks for 200 OK status , if
it gets it service is marked up other wise its down. Less overhead than get
method and good for Dynamic content as well.


hope that helped a bit.

""Patrick Donlon""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi Dave
>
> I've not had chance to test the keepalive yet but I see you mention using
> head or get
> can depend on the page type. Can you explain further or do you have any
> links?
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
> David Harrison wrote:
>
> > This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since the CSS knows
> > the ip address of the box it's watching it doesn't have to rely on a
> > domain name to find the location of the server.
> >
> > However it is important that the css know the path to reach the
> > reference page.
> >
> > I've used the following:
> > service blah_blah
> >   ip address 10.1.1.1
> >   keepalive frequency 8
> >   keepalive type http
> >   keepalive uri "/.reference/arrowpoint-keepalive.html"
> >   active
> >
> > I usually use the default "head" method vs the "get". Depends on whether
> > the file you are watching is static or dynamic.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:19 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]
> >
> > I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
> > include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
> > "/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it works
> > for you.
> >
> > John
> >
> > >>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
> > Hi
> >
> > I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
> > following
> > on the
> > service:
> >
> > keepalive port 81,
> > keepalive method get,
> > keepalive type http
> > keepalive frequency 25,
> > keepalive retry 25
> > keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"
> >
> > I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
> > case)
> > Any thing
> > obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > Patrick Donlon wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
> > this
> > > is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
> > this
> > > is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
> > process
> > > is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
> > the
> > > different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
> > anyone
> > > else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> > > detecting the lost of service
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Pat
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43420&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-06 Thread Patrick Donlon

Hi Dave

I've not had chance to test the keepalive yet but I see you mention using
head or get
can depend on the page type. Can you explain further or do you have any
links?

Cheers

Pat

David Harrison wrote:

> This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since the CSS knows
> the ip address of the box it's watching it doesn't have to rely on a
> domain name to find the location of the server.
>
> However it is important that the css know the path to reach the
> reference page.
>
> I've used the following:
> service blah_blah
>   ip address 10.1.1.1
>   keepalive frequency 8
>   keepalive type http
>   keepalive uri "/.reference/arrowpoint-keepalive.html"
>   active
>
> I usually use the default "head" method vs the "get". Depends on whether
> the file you are watching is static or dynamic.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]
>
> I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
> include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
> "/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it works
> for you.
>
> John
>
> >>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
> Hi
>
> I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
> following
> on the
> service:
>
> keepalive port 81,
> keepalive method get,
> keepalive type http
> keepalive frequency 25,
> keepalive retry 25
> keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"
>
> I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
> case)
> Any thing
> obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log
>
> cheers
>
> Pat
>
> Patrick Donlon wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
> this
> > is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
> this
> > is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
> process
> > is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
> the
> > different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
> anyone
> > else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> > detecting the lost of service
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43380&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-03 Thread Gaz

A little off topic, but has anybody tried similar with Foundry. Got it to
work yet?
Got it to fail properly when the service is unavailable or does it pass the
ICMP health check, then fail the layer 7 check and flap forever.
Can't believe how flaky Foundry is turning out to be recently.

I've got a bee in my bonnet... Layer 3 filtering on Foundry NetIrons
contained in all the documentation. Tried to implement it, didn't work,
reported to Foundry. Informed that NetIrons do not now support it. Sure
enough, the documentation was almost immediately updated. They've just
binned it - one of many. Bit late when you've sold it.

Tried adding/removing ports from VLAN's with the web management. Doh!

We're looking at stripping out ServerIrons and putting in CSS, partly due to
the extra flexibility available with the Cisco health checking, but mainly
because the support works!
You can knock Cisco all you like, but we keep coming back to them.

Anybody got any views on this?

Gaz



""David Harrison""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since the CSS knows
> the ip address of the box it's watching it doesn't have to rely on a
> domain name to find the location of the server.
>
> However it is important that the css know the path to reach the
> reference page.
>
> I've used the following:
> service blah_blah
>   ip address 10.1.1.1
>   keepalive frequency 8
>   keepalive type http
>   keepalive uri "/.reference/arrowpoint-keepalive.html"
>   active
>
> I usually use the default "head" method vs the "get". Depends on whether
> the file you are watching is static or dynamic.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]
>
> I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
> include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
> "/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it works
> for you.
>
> John
>
> >>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
> Hi
>
> I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
> following
> on the
> service:
>
> keepalive port 81,
> keepalive method get,
> keepalive type http
> keepalive frequency 25,
> keepalive retry 25
> keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"
>
> I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
> case)
> Any thing
> obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log
>
> cheers
>
> Pat
>
>
>
>
> Patrick Donlon wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
> this
> > is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
> this
> > is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
> process
> > is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
> the
> > different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
> anyone
> > else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> > detecting the lost of service
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Pat
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43272&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-03 Thread David Harrison

This is correct. The domain name is not necessary. Since the CSS knows
the ip address of the box it's watching it doesn't have to rely on a
domain name to find the location of the server.

However it is important that the css know the path to reach the
reference page.

I've used the following:
service blah_blah 
  ip address 10.1.1.1 
  keepalive frequency 8 
  keepalive type http 
  keepalive uri "/.reference/arrowpoint-keepalive.html" 
  active

I usually use the default "head" method vs the "get". Depends on whether
the file you are watching is static or dynamic.

Dave


-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
"/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it works
for you.

John

>>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
Hi

I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
following
on the
service:

keepalive port 81,
keepalive method get,
keepalive type http
keepalive frequency 25,
keepalive retry 25
keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"

I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
case)
Any thing
obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log

cheers

Pat




Patrick Donlon wrote:

> Hi All
>
> I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
this
> is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
this
> is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
process
> is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
the
> different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
anyone
> else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> detecting the lost of service
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43240&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-03 Thread John Neiberger

I'm not positive about this but I don't believe you're supposed to
include the domain name in the URI.  We simply use 'keepalive uri
"/index.htm"' and that works well.  Give that a shot and see if it works
for you.

John

>>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/3/02 9:54:47 AM >>>
Hi

I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the
following
on the
service:

keepalive port 81,
keepalive method get,
keepalive type http
keepalive frequency 25,
keepalive retry 25
keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"

I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in
case)
Any thing
obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log

cheers

Pat




Patrick Donlon wrote:

> Hi All
>
> I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
this
> is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
this
> is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
process
> is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
the
> different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know
anyone
> else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> detecting the lost of service
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43233&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-03 Thread Patrick Donlon

Hi

I tested it and for some reason it didn't work,  I configured the following
on the
service:

keepalive port 81,
keepalive method get,
keepalive type http
keepalive frequency 25,
keepalive retry 25
keepalive uri  "www.blahblah.com/index.html"

I then activated the service (and re-activated it a few times just in case)
Any thing
obviously wrong and  what should I check in the log

cheers

Pat




Patrick Donlon wrote:

> Hi All
>
> I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS, this
> is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive, this
> is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services process
> is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen the
> different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know anyone
> else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> detecting the lost of service
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43232&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

You should change the keepalive type in the content switch to HTTP or SSL
which ever your webserver is using.For example it should be like the one
below.

For http

service webserver1
  ip address x.x.x.x
  keepalive port 80
  keepalive type http
  active

For SSL
ervice webserver1
  ip address x.x.x.x
  keepalive port 443
  keepalive type tcp
  active



Kind Regards /Thangavel

186K
Reading,Brkshire
Direct No   -0118 9064259
Mobile No  -07796292416
Post code: RG16LH
www.186k.co.uk

--
The greatest glory in living lies not in never falling,
 but in rising every time we fall ."
 -- Nelson Mandela




   
 
   
"Patrick
Donlon"   To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax
to:
Sent by:  Subject: Content Switching and
Keepalives [7:43141]
   
nobody@groupst
   
udy.com
   
 
   
 
   
02/05/2002
   
18:15
Please
respond
to
"Patrick
   
Donlon"
   
 
   
 




Hi All

I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS, this
is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive, this
is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services process
is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen the
different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know anyone
else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
detecting the lost of service

Cheers

Pat


[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
This e-mail is from 186k Ltd and is intended only for the 
addressee named above. As this e-mail may contain confidential
or priveleged information, if you are not the named addressee or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the named 
addressee, please advise the sender by return e-mail. The
contents should not be disclosed to any other person nor copies
taken.
186k Ltd is a Lattice Group company, registered in England 
& Wales No. 3751494 Registered Office 130 Jermyn Street 
London SW1Y 4UR
**




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43214&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-02 Thread sam sneed

I have a pair of CS11152 in HA mode and we use HTTP for load balancing. In
my opinion if your are using ping to load balance it is a waste. The CSS's
are very capable and load balance HTTP very well. As far as load balancing
methods the engineer at TAC said to use round robin which is the deafult
scheme. I was using ACA, but the engineer said that should be only used for
the heaviest fo traffic sites so i recommend using round robin as well,
it'lll work better.

Here is a sample config:

service svc-w1.web
  ip address 172.16.10.100
  port 80
  keepalive type http
  keepalive method get
  keepalive uri "/http-ping.html"
  active

service svc-w2.web
  ip address 172.16.10.101
  port 80
  keepalive type http
  keepalive method get
  keepalive uri "/http-ping.html"
  active

content cnt-www.cobrand
protocol tcp
port 80
balance roundrobin  ##you really don;t need this line becuase
roundrobin is defaut.
url "/*"
add service svc-w1.web
add service svc-w2.web
vip address 192.168.133.100
active

hope this helps

""Patrick Donlon""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All
>
> I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS, this
> is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive, this
> is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services process
> is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen the
> different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know anyone
> else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> detecting the lost of service
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43149&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Content Switching and Keepalives [7:43141]

2002-05-02 Thread John Neiberger

I see no reason not to use the http keepalive.  You can configure it to
grab some specific small object if you'd like to limit its impact.  We
just grab the our homepage and I haven't noticed a performance impact at
all.

HTH,
John

>>> "Patrick Donlon"  5/2/02 11:15:19 AM >>>
Hi All

I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS,
this
is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive,
this
is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services
process
is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen
the
different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know anyone
else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
detecting the lost of service

Cheers

Pat


[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43147&t=43141
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]