RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread Jon Krabbenschmidt

I agree. It is not the responsibility of the Canadians to monitor people who
enter the US. That is the sole responsibility of the US immigrations and
customs agents. The last time I traveled back into the US from Canada I was
stopped and questioned by US officials.

Jon

-Original Message-
From: Torren Craigie-Manson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 7:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


  --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
{snip}
   I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this, if
it's
   found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US whacks Canadian
   politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
   incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).  They
should
   have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered Canada.
  
   **I** am not impressed...
  

Leigh Anne,

Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian authorities should
have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the failure of US
authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to the
integrity of Canada.

This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the world. Please
take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge and jury,
and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.

Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19732t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread Stephen Mole

Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't have found another way in?

- Original Message -
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
 murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are here, we can't deport
them
 because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these people come into Canada,
 Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have undesirable
 backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
 documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens.  That makes the US
 immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
 policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
 background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US
that's
 at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things
up.
 How often have you heard after the fact that Canada Immigration didn't
 investigate into people's backgrounds properly?  Far too often I'm afraid.

 It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that stopped the guy heading
 into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it was the US immigration
 department.

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Torren Craigie-Manson
  Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
--- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
  {snip}
 I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this,
if
  it's
 found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US
  whacks Canadian
 politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
 incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).
They
  should
 have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered
Canada.

 **I** am not impressed...

 
  Leigh Anne,
 
  Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian
  authorities should
  have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the
  failure of US
  authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to
the
  integrity of Canada.
 
  This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the
  world. Please
  take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge
  and jury,
  and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
 
  Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19745t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread J. Walker

I received this from my sister and I thought it was worth sharing...

JW


This, from a Canadian newspaper, is worth sharing. America: The Good
Neighbor. Widespread, but only partial news coverage,  was
given recently to a remarkable editorial broadcast from Toronto by
Gordon
Sinclair, a Canadian television commentator.


What follows is the full text of his trenchant remarks as printed in the
Congressional Record: This Canadian thinks it is time to speak up for
the Americans as the most generous and possibly the least appreciated
people
on all the earth.

Germany, Japan and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Italy were lifted out
of the debris of war by the Americans who poured in billions of dollars and
forgave other billions in debts.

None of these countries is today paying even the interest on its remaining
debts to the United States.

When France was in danger of collapsing in 1956, it was the Americans who
propped it up,
and their reward was to be insulted and swindled on the streets of Paris.

I was there.

I saw it.

When earthquakes hit distant cities, it is the United
States that hurries in to help.

This spring, 59 American communities were flattened by tornadoes.
Nobody helped.

The Marshall Plan and the Truman Policy pumped billions of dollars into
discouraged countries.

Now newspapers in those countries are writing about the decadent,
warmongering Americans.

I'd like to see just one of those countries that is gloating over the
erosion of
the United States dollar build its own airplane.

Does any other country in the world have a plane to equal the Boeing Jumbo
Jet, the Lockheed Tri-Star, or the Douglas DC10?

If so, why don't they fly them?

Why do all the International lines except Russia fly American Planes? Why
does no other land on earth even consider putting a man or woman on the
moon?

You talk about Japanese technocracy, and you get radios.

You talk about German technocracy, and you get automobiles.

You talk about American technocracy, and you find men on the moon - not
once, but
several times - and safely home again.

You talk about scandals, and the Americans put theirs right in the store
window for everybody to look at.

Even their draft-dodgers are not pursued and hounded.

They are here on our streets, and most of them, unless they are breaking
Canadian laws, are getting American dollars from ma and pa at home to spend
here.

When the railways of France, Germany and India were breaking down through
age, it was the Americans who rebuilt them.

When the Pennsylvania Railroad and the New York Central went broke, nobody
loaned
them an old caboose.

Both are still broke.

I can name you 5000 times when the Americans raced to the help of other
people in trouble.

Can you name me even one time when someone else raced to the Americans in
trouble?

I don't think there was outside help even during the San Francisco
earthquake.

Our neighbors have faced it alone, and I'm one Canadian who is damned tired
of hearing them get kicked around.

They will come out of this thing with their flag high. And when they do,
they
are entitled to thumb their nose at the lands that are gloating over their
present troubles.

I hope Canada is not one of those.

Stand proud, America! This is one of the best editorials that I have
ever read regarding the United States. It is nice that one man realizes it.

I only wish that the rest of the world would realize it.

We are always blamed for everything, and never even get a thank you for the
things we do.

I would hope that each of you would send this to as many people as you can
and
emphasize that they should send it to as many of their friends until this
letter
is sent to every person on the web. I SURE HOPE THAT A LOT MORE READ IT, SO
SEND
IT ON

Lora Arndt
236-1B-10
EHSR - Specialty Material Markets Group
Tel:  3-1976
Fax:  3-1958

- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mole 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't have found another way
in?

 - Original Message -
 From: Leigh Anne Chisholm
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
 Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


  I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
  murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are here, we can't deport
 them
  because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these people come into Canada,
  Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have
undesirable
  backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
  documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens.  That makes the US
  immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
  policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
  background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US
 that's
  at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things
 up.
  How often

RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm

Perhaps you haven't noticed, but Canada pretty much has an open door policy
letting in anyone who wants to come here.  You claim refugee status and then
you're permitted to leave your entry point unescorted, unmonitored.  The
substantial number of those people never come back to finish being
processed.  It's during that processing period many known terrorists are
identitfied and by then it's too late.  They've disappeared into the fabric
of our country.  Canada is home to a substantial number of terrorist groups
and I hope knowing that makes you feel comfortable.

Where there is a will there is a way, and yes they would have found another
way into the US - but Canada makes it far too easy for that sort of thing to
happen.  That's why the US needs to slap Canada's parliment upside the head
for its immigration policies.

Simply put, this is my last public post on this topic.  I won't discuss it
again.  Groupstudy isn't meant for this type of discussion, but I think it's
important that people in the US know about what goes on in the country that
borders them to the north.  The Canadian public has tried for years to get
immigration policies tightened, unsuccessfully.  Perhaps the Americans can
help.

And finally, your comments weren't very appropriate for this type of list.
Such behavior doesn't really reflect well on Canadians, now does it.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Stephen Mole
 Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:04 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't have found
 another way in?

 - Original Message -
 From: Leigh Anne Chisholm
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
 Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


  I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
  murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are here, we can't deport
 them
  because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these people come into Canada,
  Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have
 undesirable
  backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
  documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens.  That makes the US
  immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
  policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
  background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US
 that's
  at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things
 up.
  How often have you heard after the fact that Canada Immigration didn't
  investigate into people's backgrounds properly?  Far too often
 I'm afraid.
 
  It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that stopped the
 guy heading
  into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it was the US immigration
  department.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Torren Craigie-Manson
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
 --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
   {snip}
  I would really hope that of all the things that come
 out of this,
 if
   it's
  found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US
   whacks Canadian
  politicians upside the head for their lax immigration
 policies and
  incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).
 They
   should
  have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered
 Canada.
 
  **I** am not impressed...
 
  
   Leigh Anne,
  
   Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian
   authorities should
   have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the
   failure of US
   authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to
 the
   integrity of Canada.
  
   This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the
   world. Please
   take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge
   and jury,
   and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
  
   Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19792t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread John Mairs

Maybe I am an Idiot (well, there is no doubt that I am
but still...)
If I remember right, when I was in Canada and driving
back into the United States it was the responsibility
of the Customs officers of the United States that were
responible for checking my apples and bananas (and
cemtex and bullets), I don't remember seeing even
ONE Canadian officer there, ehh?

granted I was twelve at the time (two years ago...
well, in terms of maturity)...

is border protection responsibility like the polarity
of the North and South poles? If so, shouldn't it
still be 20,000 more years before we have the
Canadians and the US officers changing booths.


--- Stephen Mole  wrote:
 Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't
 have found another way in?
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Leigh Anne Chisholm 
 To: 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
 Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
  I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as
 being a haven for
  murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are
 here, we can't deport
 them
  because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these
 people come into Canada,
  Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people
 don't have undesirable
  backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy
 for them to get forged
  documents indicating that they are Canadian
 citizens.  That makes the US
  immigration department's job more difficult
 because of the free flowing
  policy of letting Canadians pass through the US
 border with a minimum of
  background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada
 enjoys with the US
 that's
  at risk unless our Government steps up to the
 plate and tightens things
 up.
  How often have you heard after the fact that
 Canada Immigration didn't
  investigate into people's backgrounds properly? 
 Far too often I'm afraid.
 
  It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that
 stopped the guy heading
  into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it
 was the US immigration
  department.
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   Torren Craigie-Manson
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
 --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
   {snip}
  I would really hope that of all the things
 that come out of this,
 if
   it's
  found that the terrorists came through
 Canada, the US
   whacks Canadian
  politicians upside the head for their lax
 immigration policies and
  incompetent information service (Canada's
 version of the FBI).
 They
   should
  have been tracking those terrorists the
 second they entered
 Canada.
 
  **I** am not impressed...
 
  
   Leigh Anne,
  
   Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that
 Canadian
   authorities should
   have spotted these terrorists, but you make no
 mention of the
   failure of US
   authorities to spot them. Your statement is
 illogical and insulting to
 the
   integrity of Canada.
  
   This is an emotionally charged situation for
 people around the
   world. Please
   take a minute to stop and think before you
 appoint yourself judge
   and jury,
   and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
  
   Torren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
John L. Mairs

__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19827t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread John Mairs
.
 
 If he was rejected for refugee status and he wasn't
 a Canadian citizen, why
 was he permitted to be in Canada for three years? 
 He bided his time hoping
 he could get Canadian citizenship so that he could
 easily pass into the US
 and blow up LAX.
 
 Canadian officials last night searched Ressams
 apartment in Montreal. They
 discovered he had simply walked away from it,
 leaving clothes in the closet
 and rotting food in the refrigerator. He then went
 to a motel in Vancouver,
 where a maid said he spent hours locked in a back
 room with a second person,
 whom authorities are seeking. The maid told ABCNEWS
 that Ressam rarely
 allowed his room to be cleaned, but that it smelled
 like eggs  an odor
 similar to that emitted by sulfur, a common
 bomb-making component. She also
 said she had seen many empty plastic containers in
 the room.
 
 The alternative to Canada cleaning up its
 immigration policies is for the US
 to deny Canadians easy access into the US--and I
 don't think any Canadian
 wants that.
 
 
   -- Leigh Anne
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  John Mairs
  Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:14 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
  Maybe I am an Idiot (well, there is no doubt that
 I am
  but still...)
  If I remember right, when I was in Canada and
 driving
  back into the United States it was the
 responsibility
  of the Customs officers of the United States that
 were
  responible for checking my apples and bananas (and
  cemtex and bullets), I don't remember seeing
 even
  ONE Canadian officer there, ehh?
 
  granted I was twelve at the time (two years ago...
  well, in terms of maturity)...
 
  is border protection responsibility like the
 polarity
  of the North and South poles? If so, shouldn't it
  still be 20,000 more years before we have the
  Canadians and the US officers changing booths.
 
 
  --- Stephen Mole  wrote:
   Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't
   have found another way in?
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Leigh Anne Chisholm
   To:
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
   Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
I guess you're not aware of Canada's
 reputation as
   being a haven for
murderers and terrorists.  Once these people
 are
   here, we can't deport
   them
because of goofy Canadian politics.  When
 these
   people come into Canada,
Canada has a responsibility to ensure these
 people
   don't have undesirable
backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's
 easy
   for them to get forged
documents indicating that they are Canadian
   citizens.  That makes the US
immigration department's job more difficult
   because of the free flowing
policy of letting Canadians pass through the
 US
   border with a minimum of
background checking.  It's the freedom that
 Canada
   enjoys with the US
   that's
at risk unless our Government steps up to the
   plate and tightens things
   up.
How often have you heard after the fact that
   Canada Immigration didn't
investigate into people's backgrounds
 properly?
   Far too often I'm afraid.
   
It wasn't the Canadian immigration department
 that
   stopped the guy heading
 
=== message truncated ===


=
John L. Mairs

__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19840t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-13 Thread Bolton, Travis

Hey Team lets take it easy.  Canada has it's problems just like we do.
We're only human.  I'm just happy that we have neighbors like them on our
side.  I personally consider them a BIG Suburb of the USA.  

-Original Message-
From: Stephen Mole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


Take a freakin hike Dipshit. What? they wouldn't have found another way in?

- Original Message -
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
 murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are here, we can't deport
them
 because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these people come into Canada,
 Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have undesirable
 backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
 documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens.  That makes the US
 immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
 policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
 background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US
that's
 at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things
up.
 How often have you heard after the fact that Canada Immigration didn't
 investigate into people's backgrounds properly?  Far too often I'm afraid.

 It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that stopped the guy heading
 into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it was the US immigration
 department.

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  Torren Craigie-Manson
  Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
--- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
  {snip}
 I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this,
if
  it's
 found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US
  whacks Canadian
 politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
 incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).
They
  should
 have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered
Canada.

 **I** am not impressed...

 
  Leigh Anne,
 
  Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian
  authorities should
  have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the
  failure of US
  authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to
the
  integrity of Canada.
 
  This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the
  world. Please
  take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge
  and jury,
  and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
 
  Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19854t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread John Mairs

--- Jim Dixon  wrote:
 and John  LET US BUILD ALLL our new
 buildings on the East COAST
 using that NEW Architecture.
 
 New East Coast will look like
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
 I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
 think
 they have succeeded in destroying a monument that
 represents the econonmic success of the United
 States.
 
 I think it is imperative that we not only rebuild
 the
 two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
 blueprints. I think a grassroots effort to encourage
 that the two towers be built at a distance one and a
 half times the original spacing and a THIRD tower a
 150 stories high right in the middle.
 
 I think that by doing this we heal the wounds of the
 original towers missing from the Manhattan skyline
 but
 also show the uniquely American gesture of the
 middle
 finger faced eastward defying terrorism in a subtle
 but unmistakable fashion.
 
 My 2 cents
 
 =
 John L. Mairs
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
 messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
 http://im.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
John L. Mairs

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19650t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread John Mairs

I think we are getting at humor and defiance. 

I would be proud to work in those buildings the MINUTE
they opened with a feeling of...

go ahead loser, you think you can knock our sh*t down
and that we will just say ooo golly, those bad people
knocked down our building I guess we better not
rebuild them anyway similarnot bloody likely, you
knock our stuff down we will rebuild it in a minute
and three times the size as the last, and beware,
because when we come a knockin' it will be 1000 fold
the damage you caused and if you try it again we will
build it bigger once more and visit you 1,000,000
times over.

I hope that provides a satisfactory clue of sorts


--- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
 Personally, I haven't a clue what Jim is getting at.
 
 Do you really think that people would want to work
 in towers that are
 identical to the ones in which so many people died? 
 In a type of attack
 that could easily happen again?  Many of those
 people have been involved in
 two terrorist attacks... I doubt they'd be keen to
 see if there would be a
 third.
 
 I would really hope that of all the things that come
 out of this, if it's
 found that the terrorists came through Canada, the
 US whacks Canadian
 politicians upside the head for their lax
 immigration policies and
 incompetent information service (Canada's version of
 the FBI).  They should
 have been tracking those terrorists the second they
 entered Canada.
 
 **I** am not impressed...
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
  John Mairs
  Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:05 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
  --- Jim Dixon  wrote:
   and John  LET US BUILD ALLL our new
   buildings on the East COAST
   using that NEW Architecture.
  
   New East Coast will look like
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
  
   -Original Message-
   From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
   I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
   think
   they have succeeded in destroying a monument
 that
   represents the econonmic success of the United
   States.
  
   I think it is imperative that we not only
 rebuild
   the
   two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
   blueprints. I think a grassroots effort to
 encourage
   that the two towers be built at a distance one
 and a
   half times the original spacing and a THIRD
 tower a
   150 stories high right in the middle.
  
   I think that by doing this we heal the wounds of
 the
   original towers missing from the Manhattan
 skyline
   but
   also show the uniquely American gesture of the
   middle
   finger faced eastward defying terrorism in a
 subtle
   but unmistakable fashion.
  
   My 2 cents
  
   =
   John L. Mairs
  
  
 __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
   messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
   http://im.yahoo.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  =
  John L. Mairs
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
 messaging with Yahoo!
  Messenger
  http://im.yahoo.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


=
John L. Mairs

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19660t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread John Mairs

I like the first part of your idea but we should get
the access-lists from somewhere other than Hell.

Most of the people we are alluding to come from, or
are going, there and you know how they like to share
information... ;-)


--- Allen May  wrote:
 Don't forget 1024bit IPSec security and access-lists
 from hell ;)
 
 - Original Message -
 From: John Mairs 
 To: 
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:05 PM
 Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
  --- Jim Dixon  wrote:
   and John  LET US BUILD ALLL our new
   buildings on the East COAST
   using that NEW Architecture.
  
   New East Coast will look like
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
   .!..
  
   -Original Message-
   From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
   I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
   think
   they have succeeded in destroying a monument
 that
   represents the econonmic success of the United
   States.
  
   I think it is imperative that we not only
 rebuild
   the
   two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
   blueprints. I think a grassroots effort to
 encourage
   that the two towers be built at a distance one
 and a
   half times the original spacing and a THIRD
 tower a
   150 stories high right in the middle.
  
   I think that by doing this we heal the wounds of
 the
   original towers missing from the Manhattan
 skyline
   but
   also show the uniquely American gesture of the
   middle
   finger faced eastward defying terrorism in a
 subtle
   but unmistakable fashion.
  
   My 2 cents
  
   =
   John L. Mairs
  
  
 __
   Do You Yahoo!?
   Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
   messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
   http://im.yahoo.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  =
  John L. Mairs
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
 messaging with Yahoo!
 Messenger
  http://im.yahoo.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


=
John L. Mairs

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19661t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread John Mairs

Another hearty example proving that every idea can be
improved upon. 
I like that... (E|) ...that was my sorry attempt at,
using the right hand, E (three bent horizontal
fingers{ala simpsons}) and | ( a very rigid thumb
up)...
That was pretty dumb huh?...maybe one set of buildings
should be built with the 150 story section on
ballbearings on a pivot with a magnet on one side and
me wearing an anvil around my neck so that, no matter
where I am, that set of buildings would be... 
facing me..;-)

And to all those that don't know, it is important that
we remember

Humor is, and has always been, an American trademark
tool, that is a powerful healing agent in difficult
times. I grieve as much as anyone else for this
tragedy and have a cousin that had an 8:00am dental
appointment on the 80th floor of building 1 that is
still unaccounted foreveryone has there own way of
dealing with tragedy and flaming those who happen to
use humor as the agent of choice in their healing
process does not serve anyone...lets not forget
THAT...




--- Jim Dixon  wrote:
 and John  LET US BUILD ALLL our new
 buildings on the East COAST
 using that NEW Architecture.
 
 New East Coast will look like
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 .!..
 
 -Original Message-
 From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
 
 
 I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
 think
 they have succeeded in destroying a monument that
 represents the econonmic success of the United
 States.
 
 I think it is imperative that we not only rebuild
 the
 two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
 blueprints. I think a grassroots effort to encourage
 that the two towers be built at a distance one and a
 half times the original spacing and a THIRD tower a
 150 stories high right in the middle.
 
 I think that by doing this we heal the wounds of the
 original towers missing from the Manhattan skyline
 but
 also show the uniquely American gesture of the
 middle
 finger faced eastward defying terrorism in a subtle
 but unmistakable fashion.
 
 My 2 cents
 
 =
 John L. Mairs
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
 messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
 http://im.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


=
John L. Mairs

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19663t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm

Several years ago I lived through a massive tornado that went through our
city.  Although neither my home nor my parents were damaged, there's
something traumatic you go through when you've lived through something as
violent as that.  What I and the rest of the people in the City I live in go
through is exactly what the people that lived through the tragedy in New
York will go through.  It's something you can't describe to someone else...
but those people (on the street and in the office towers) will never be the
same again.  I can't fathom those towers being rebuilt having those people
going back to work in buildings that have twice been the target of
terrorists.

So I guess no, I don't have the testosterone needed to jump at the chance of
acting as a terrorist magnet.  Neither do most of the people that live in my
city...  There's a website with several pictures of the twister that can be
found at http://datalib.library.ualberta.ca/tornado/new1a.JPG.  Note the
tiny oil refinery tanks in the background...


  -- Leigh Anne

 -Original Message-
 From: Debbie Becker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:46 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Fw: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 Oh, Leigh Ann -- you obviously lack the testosterone needed to jump at the
 chance to act as a terrorist magnet . . .

 I swear, with the amount of time men sometimes spend flexing their muscles
 and looking for danger, it's a wonder that the human race hasn't
 died off .
 . . 

 Deb

 - Original Message -
 From: John Mairs 
 Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 3:56 PM
 Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 I think we are getting at humor and defiance.

 I would be proud to work in those buildings the MINUTE
 they opened with a feeling of...

 go ahead loser, you think you can knock our sh*t down
 and that we will just say ooo golly, those bad people
 knocked down our building I guess we better not
 rebuild them anyway similarnot bloody likely, you
 knock our stuff down we will rebuild it in a minute
 and three times the size as the last, and beware,
 because when we come a knockin' it will be 1000 fold
 the damage you caused and if you try it again we will
 build it bigger once more and visit you 1,000,000
 times over.

 I hope that provides a satisfactory clue of sorts


 --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
  Personally, I haven't a clue what Jim is getting at.
 
  Do you really think that people would want to work
  in towers that are
  identical to the ones in which so many people died?
  In a type of attack
  that could easily happen again?  Many of those
  people have been involved in
  two terrorist attacks... I doubt they'd be keen to
  see if there would be a
  third.
 
  I would really hope that of all the things that come
  out of this, if it's
  found that the terrorists came through Canada, the
  US whacks Canadian
  politicians upside the head for their lax
  immigration policies and
  incompetent information service (Canada's version of
  the FBI).  They should
  have been tracking those terrorists the second they
  entered Canada.
 
  **I** am not impressed...
 
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
   John Mairs
   Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 1:05 PM
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: RE: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
  
  
   --- Jim Dixon  wrote:
and John  LET US BUILD ALLL our new
buildings on the East COAST
using that NEW Architecture.
   
New East Coast will look like
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
.!..
   
-Original Message-
From: John Mairs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]
   
   
I think that we cannot afford to let terrorists
think
they have succeeded in destroying a monument
  that
represents the econonmic success of the United
States.
   
I think it is imperative that we not only
  rebuild
the
two 110 story towers using the exact same set of
blueprints. I think a grassroots effort to
  encourage
that the two towers be built at a distance one
  and a
half times the original spacing and a THIRD
  tower a
150 stories high right in the middle.
   
I think that by doing this we heal the wounds of
  the
original towers missing from the Manhattan
  skyline
but
also show the uniquely American gesture of the
middle
finger faced eastward defying terrorism in a
  subtle
but unmistakable fashion.
   
My 2 cents
   
=
John L. Mairs
   
   
  __
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts  NEW webcam video instant
messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
   =
   John L. Mairs

Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Torren Craigie-Manson

  --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
{snip}
   I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this, if
it's
   found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US whacks Canadian
   politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
   incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).  They
should
   have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered Canada.
  
   **I** am not impressed...
  

Leigh Anne,

Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian authorities should
have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the failure of US
authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to the
integrity of Canada.

This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the world. Please
take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge and jury,
and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.

Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19710t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Leigh Anne Chisholm

I guess you're not aware of Canada's reputation as being a haven for
murderers and terrorists.  Once these people are here, we can't deport them
because of goofy Canadian politics.  When these people come into Canada,
Canada has a responsibility to ensure these people don't have undesirable
backgrounds.  Then when they're here, it's easy for them to get forged
documents indicating that they are Canadian citizens.  That makes the US
immigration department's job more difficult because of the free flowing
policy of letting Canadians pass through the US border with a minimum of
background checking.  It's the freedom that Canada enjoys with the US that's
at risk unless our Government steps up to the plate and tightens things up.
How often have you heard after the fact that Canada Immigration didn't
investigate into people's backgrounds properly?  Far too often I'm afraid.

It wasn't the Canadian immigration department that stopped the guy heading
into the US to blow up LAX on the millenium... it was the US immigration
department.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
 Torren Craigie-Manson
 Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 8:22 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


   --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
 {snip}
I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this, if
 it's
found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US
 whacks Canadian
politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).  They
 should
have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered Canada.
   
**I** am not impressed...
   

 Leigh Anne,

 Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian
 authorities should
 have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the
 failure of US
 authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to the
 integrity of Canada.

 This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the
 world. Please
 take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge
 and jury,
 and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.

 Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19717t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Wigle

I tried to keep this off the list but you sir are so ignorant.

Just when did it become Canada's job to prevent people entering the U.S.?

The last time I went through the border it was American guards that asked me
where I was from, where I was going and looked at my identification.

And just when did it become the U.S.'s business who gets into Canada?

It's a two way street.  We get a lot of undesirables from down south too.

And while you're at it, explain to me how these terrorists took flight
training in the U.S. to learn to fly the planes they hi-jacked.  How is it
that a Flight Training company employee actually put 2 of these student
pilots up in his house for a few days for the sake of the flight school.

All of this coming off of CNN.

All Canadians grieve at the terrible loss of life as does most of the free
world.

With the inflammatory type of statements you make against your best
neighbour I can see that most people probably don't care what impresses you.

It would be best if you used your brain first before putting mouth or
keyboard in gear.

Kevin Wigle

- Original Message -
From: Torren Craigie-Manson 
To: 
Sent: Wednesday, 12 September, 2001 22:22
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


   --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
 {snip}
I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this, if
 it's
found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US whacks
Canadian
politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).  They
 should
have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered Canada.
   
**I** am not impressed...
   

 Leigh Anne,

 Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian authorities
should
 have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the failure of
US
 authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to the
 integrity of Canada.

 This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the world.
Please
 take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge and
jury,
 and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.

 Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19722t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Kevin Wigle

Responding to my own post as I seem to have directed my own tirade to the
wrong poster.

Emotions run high and I fell trap to my own accusations.  I have apologized
to Torren off-line and I wish to apologize to the list.

Kevin Wigle

- Original Message -
From: Kevin Wigle 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, 13 September, 2001 00:26
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


 I tried to keep this off the list but you sir are so ignorant.

 Just when did it become Canada's job to prevent people entering the U.S.?

 The last time I went through the border it was American guards that asked
me
 where I was from, where I was going and looked at my identification.

 And just when did it become the U.S.'s business who gets into Canada?

 It's a two way street.  We get a lot of undesirables from down south too.

 And while you're at it, explain to me how these terrorists took flight
 training in the U.S. to learn to fly the planes they hi-jacked.  How is it
 that a Flight Training company employee actually put 2 of these student
 pilots up in his house for a few days for the sake of the flight school.

 All of this coming off of CNN.

 All Canadians grieve at the terrible loss of life as does most of the free
 world.

 With the inflammatory type of statements you make against your best
 neighbour I can see that most people probably don't care what impresses
you.

 It would be best if you used your brain first before putting mouth or
 keyboard in gear.

 Kevin Wigle

 - Original Message -
 From: Torren Craigie-Manson
 To:
 Sent: Wednesday, 12 September, 2001 22:22
 Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


--- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
  {snip}
 I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this,
if
  it's
 found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US whacks
 Canadian
 politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
 incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).
They
  should
 have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered
Canada.

 **I** am not impressed...

 
  Leigh Anne,
 
  Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian authorities
 should
  have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the failure of
 US
  authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to
the
  integrity of Canada.
 
  This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the world.
 Please
  take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge and
 jury,
  and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.
 
  Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19724t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: A plan to rebuild.... [7:19611]

2001-09-12 Thread Vilas Nafde

If you point one finger at someone else THREE fingers are pointed towards U
and one upwards. The one upwards U can call GOD, Destiny or anything.


- Original Message -
From: Torren Craigie-Manson 
To: 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 7:52 AM
Subject: Re: A plan to rebuild [7:19611]


   --- Leigh Anne Chisholm  wrote:
 {snip}
I would really hope that of all the things that come out of this, if
 it's
found that the terrorists came through Canada, the US whacks
Canadian
politicians upside the head for their lax immigration policies and
incompetent information service (Canada's version of the FBI).  They
 should
have been tracking those terrorists the second they entered Canada.
   
**I** am not impressed...
   

 Leigh Anne,

 Perhaps you can explain to me why you feel that Canadian authorities
should
 have spotted these terrorists, but you make no mention of the failure of
US
 authorities to spot them. Your statement is illogical and insulting to the
 integrity of Canada.

 This is an emotionally charged situation for people around the world.
Please
 take a minute to stop and think before you appoint yourself judge and
jury,
 and begin pointing fingers at _anyone_.

 Torren




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=19728t=19611
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]