Re: excessive collisions

2000-11-20 Thread Raul F. Fernandez


Hope this hepls,

Error Message
%DEC21140-5-COLL: [chars] excessive collisions
Explanation   A Fast Ethernet packet was dropped because too many attempts
to transmit it were stopped by collisions. This can be caused by a Fast
Ethernet segment that is full to capacity or by other equipment on the LAN
malfunctioning.

Recommended Action   No action is required.

Sincerely, Raul
-Original Message-
From: Rayappa Mayakunthala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, November 18, 2000 1:19 PM
Subject: excessive collisions


Folks

These messages appear on my router (Cisco 4700M) at a point of time
everyday. This is very strange because it happens between 2pm and 3pm
everyday. We tried replacing the patch cable, changing interface, etc.

%DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
%DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions

What does DEC21140 refer to? Also what is "Unit 0"?

Any clues?

 Rayappa.
---
-
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
materialfrom any computer.
---
-

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: excessive collisions

2000-11-20 Thread Erick B.


If this is a fast ethernet interface, what are the
speed/duplex settings on the router port and the
device its connecting to? You shouldn't see collisions
at 100full unless theres a equipment problem. If you
have mis-configured speed/duplex or auto-negoation
mismatchs then you could see collisions, late
collisions, alignment errors, etc. 

As for this happening at 2-3pm, anything happening in
your network at that time (broadcast storm, network
backup, etc)? I'd do a sniffer trace and see what that
reveals.

As for DEC21140, thats the chipset used on the
Ethernet interface. 

Erick

--- "Raul F. Fernandez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 Hope this hepls,
 
 Error Message
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: [chars] excessive collisions
 Explanation   A Fast Ethernet packet was dropped
 because too many attempts
 to transmit it were stopped by collisions. This can
 be caused by a Fast
 Ethernet segment that is full to capacity or by
 other equipment on the LAN
 malfunctioning.
 
 Recommended Action   No action is required.
 
 Sincerely, Raul
 -Original Message-
 From: Rayappa Mayakunthala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Saturday, November 18, 2000 1:19 PM
 Subject: excessive collisions
 
 
 Folks
 
 These messages appear on my router (Cisco 4700M) at
 a point of time
 everyday. This is very strange because it happens
 between 2pm and 3pm
 everyday. We tried replacing the patch cable,
 changing interface, etc.
 
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
 
 What does DEC21140 refer to? Also what is "Unit 0"?


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: excessive collisions

2000-11-20 Thread Rayappa Mayakunthala

Configuring the Fast Ethernet interface 0 to full duplex has fixed the
problem.

I will try not to take your help for granted, so thanks to all who replied
on this.

Rayappa.


-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 11:54 PM
To: Raul F. Fernandez; Rayappa Mayakunthala; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: excessive collisions



If this is a fast ethernet interface, what are the
speed/duplex settings on the router port and the
device its connecting to? You shouldn't see collisions
at 100full unless theres a equipment problem. If you
have mis-configured speed/duplex or auto-negoation
mismatchs then you could see collisions, late
collisions, alignment errors, etc. 

As for this happening at 2-3pm, anything happening in
your network at that time (broadcast storm, network
backup, etc)? I'd do a sniffer trace and see what that
reveals.

As for DEC21140, thats the chipset used on the
Ethernet interface. 

Erick

--- "Raul F. Fernandez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 
 Hope this hepls,
 
 Error Message
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: [chars] excessive collisions
 Explanation   A Fast Ethernet packet was dropped
 because too many attempts
 to transmit it were stopped by collisions. This can
 be caused by a Fast
 Ethernet segment that is full to capacity or by
 other equipment on the LAN
 malfunctioning.
 
 Recommended Action   No action is required.
 
 Sincerely, Raul
 -Original Message-
 From: Rayappa Mayakunthala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Saturday, November 18, 2000 1:19 PM
 Subject: excessive collisions
 
 
 Folks
 
 These messages appear on my router (Cisco 4700M) at
 a point of time
 everyday. This is very strange because it happens
 between 2pm and 3pm
 everyday. We tried replacing the patch cable,
 changing interface, etc.
 
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
 
 What does DEC21140 refer to? Also what is "Unit 0"?


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!
http://calendar.yahoo.com/

_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. 
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any 
action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the 
intended recipient is prohibited. 
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the materialfrom 
any computer.


_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: excessive collisions

2000-11-18 Thread Hans Damen (studygroup)

DEC21140 is a FastEthernet controller, Unit 0 means  FastEthernet0 being in
slot 0 of your 4700M, Excessive collisions mean that a packet was dropped
after trying to get on the medium for 15 times. The cause of this could be a
full segment, or a faulty device. It also is important to know whether you
use a hub or a switch. However according to your statement that it only
happens between 2 and 3 pm I assume that the cause is to be found in a
heavily loaded segment. Check your load during this time and try to decrease
it if so. It could also be worthwhile to check the status of your interface
(output errors, deferreds etc.)

Regards,

Hans

On CCO:
DEC21140 Fast Ethernet controller error messages


Error Message
%DEC21140-5-COLL: [chars] excessive collisions

Explanation   A Fast Ethernet packet was dropped because too many attempts
to transmit it were stopped by collisions. This
can be caused by a Fast Ethernet segment that is full to capacity or by
other equipment on the LAN malfunctioning.

Recommended Action   No action is required.


Rayappa Mayakunthala [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef in berichtnieuws
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Folks

 These messages appear on my router (Cisco 4700M) at a point of time
 everyday. This is very strange because it happens between 2pm and 3pm
 everyday. We tried replacing the patch cable, changing interface, etc.

 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions
 %DEC21140-5-COLL: Unit 0, excessive collisions

 What does DEC21140 refer to? Also what is "Unit 0"?

 Any clues?

 Rayappa.
 --
--
 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which
 it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
 Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any
 action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited.
 If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
materialfrom any computer.
 --
--

 _
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-12 Thread Lonnie Paschall

Thats funny, I have a spare 3640 that I could use in place of the 4500. I
would need to purchase an Ethernet module though. On paper the 3640 and the
4500 seem very similiar performance wise, both have 100MHZ Risc processors
and have the same amount of memory. The 3640 can handle up to 128MB thought
I think. What would be the advantage of replacing the 4500 with the 3640?

Lonnie

""Brad Ellis"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
8pkcmr$djc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pkcmr$djc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 sell it and buy a 3620 with a couple of FE's.

 -B
 ""Lonnie Paschall"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
 8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
  I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
  connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I keep
  getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
  giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no
command
 to
  set the duplex or speed on the module.
 
  Thanks,
 
  Lonnie
 
 
  **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
  _
  UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread John Neiberger

What are the stats?  "Excessive" is highly relative.  You may be seeing a
lot of collisions, but that would be expected if you have a lot of traffic
through that port. If there is no setting in the 4500 for speed or duplex,
then it is running 10 Mbps/half duplex.  In half duplex world, collisions
happen by design.

  I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
  connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I keep
  getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
  giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no command
to
  set the duplex or speed on the module.
  
  Thanks,
  
  Lonnie
  
  
  **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
  http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
  _
  UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
  FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
  Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





___
Say Bye to Slow Internet!
http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread Lonnie Paschall

Thank you. I verified that the module that I have is only half duplex /
10BaseT and the collisions are not as excessive as I first thought.

Lonnie
"John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
28604443.968697144957.JavaMail.imail@tiptoe">news:28604443.968697144957.JavaMail.imail@tiptoe...
 What are the stats?  "Excessive" is highly relative.  You may be seeing a
 lot of collisions, but that would be expected if you have a lot of traffic
 through that port. If there is no setting in the 4500 for speed or duplex,
 then it is running 10 Mbps/half duplex.  In half duplex world, collisions
 happen by design.

   I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
   connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I
keep
   getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
   giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no
command
 to
   set the duplex or speed on the module.
 
   Thanks,
 
   Lonnie
 
 
   **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
   _
   UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 ___
 Say Bye to Slow Internet!
 http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread Gabriel


If you have the old NP-2E, your ports are 10mbps half duplex. If you have
the newer NP-2E-FDX, you have the option to set port duplex on the RJ-45
ports (not the AUIs) with the commands HALF-DUPLEX or FULL-DUPLEX at the
config-if prompt.

You can't set speed on a 10mbps module. The NP-1FE does support the SPEED
command, but if you have a 2-port ethernet module it's definitely just
10mbps.

-Gabriel McCall, CCDP/CCNP+Sec

""Lonnie Paschall"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
 connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I keep
 getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
 giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no command
to
 set the duplex or speed on the module.

 Thanks,

 Lonnie


 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread Kevin Wigle

Older models of the two port ethernet module for the 45xx series do not do
full duplex.  Newer models (last year or so) can do full duplex. (I think)

No models do 100 meg, you need a FastEthernet module for that so you can't
config speed.

So I would wager that you have 2 ports of 10 meg half duplex.  Configure
your switches accordingly.

Kevin Wigle


- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Excessive collisions


 What are the stats?  "Excessive" is highly relative.  You may be seeing a
 lot of collisions, but that would be expected if you have a lot of traffic
 through that port. If there is no setting in the 4500 for speed or duplex,
 then it is running 10 Mbps/half duplex.  In half duplex world, collisions
 happen by design.

   I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
   connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I
keep
   getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
   giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no
command
 to
   set the duplex or speed on the module.
 
   Thanks,
 
   Lonnie
 
 
   **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
   http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
   _
   UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
   FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
   Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]





 ___
 Say Bye to Slow Internet!
 http://www.home.com/xinbox/signup.html

 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread Donald B Johnson Jr

You may want to set your switch speed to 10Mbits an match up your duplex
too.
Duck
- Original Message -
From: Lonnie Paschall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 10:45 AM
Subject: Excessive collisions


 I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
 connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I keep
 getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
 giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no command
to
 set the duplex or speed on the module.

 Thanks,

 Lonnie


 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive collisions

2000-09-11 Thread Brad Ellis

sell it and buy a 3620 with a couple of FE's.

-B
""Lonnie Paschall"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8pj5mq$fbn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
 I have a 4500 with a two port Ethernet module. Each port on the module
 connects to a different 2924 switch and is in a different subnet. I keep
 getting excessive collisions on the Ethernet interfaces, no runts, no
 giants, no CRC errors, just collisions. Any thoughts? There is no command
to
 set the duplex or speed on the module.

 Thanks,

 Lonnie


 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
 http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
 _
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html
_
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Excessive Collisions

2000-08-28 Thread Jeroen Timmer

Well a good thing to do is to segment your network. As you are working with
hubs, you'll get a big collision domain. It is more expensive but exchanging
the hubs with 3500 switches is a good idea. This way you can make seperate
VLAN's. 
With these VLAN's you'll get smaller collision domains.

Every workstation gets a connection to the switch. This way every
workstation has got an own collision domain. Wich means it isn't
interfearing with other workstations.


Maybe there are some other ways to do this, but this is my opinion on how to
solve your problems.

JT


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Excessive Collisions
Sensitivity: Personal


Hi Group,

A client's LAN was implemented with a stack of three Cabletron hubs and
the Ethernet interface of a Cisco 2522 router has three secondary 
addresses in addition to the primary. There are two Windows NT servers
and about thirty workstations.

The problem is that we've been having a lot of excessive collisions on
the Ethernet interface and therefore have decided to introduce CAT 5002
switch in to the LAN. 

How best can we modify the LAN with the hubs and the switch to reduce
the collisions? Any opinion is welcome. 

Regards,

Stanny.

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Excessive Collisions

2000-08-27 Thread IST . EPNL-CT-PPC-DAT

Three secondarys because we use VLSM in an OSPF environment of small
subnets. 

The router has only a link with the internal WAN. It is the only
interface between the LAN and the rest of the corporate network.

Thanks for your suggestion.

Stanny.  

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Excessive Collisions

2000-08-27 Thread Brian

On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Group,
 
 A client's LAN was implemented with a stack of three Cabletron hubs and
 the Ethernet interface of a Cisco 2522 router has three secondary 
 addresses in addition to the primary. There are two Windows NT servers
 and about thirty workstations.

by having three subnets, you are causing traffic between subnets to be
twice as much as if they were a single subnet.  This is because each
packet must goto the router, and then back out the interface to the
destination, which is all on the same collision domainso that can
be bad for collisions for one.  One way to solve this is to run an IGP so
that workstations can realize that the addreses are actually reachable
directly.

 
 The problem is that we've been having a lot of excessive collisions on
 the Ethernet interface and therefore have decided to introduce CAT 5002
 switch in to the LAN. 
 
 How best can we modify the LAN with the hubs and the switch to reduce
 the collisions? Any opinion is welcome. 
 

switch as much as possible, hub as less as possible :)  Seriously, you
will have to first start by examining your traffic flows.

 Regards,
 
 Stanny.
 
 ___
 UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
 FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
 Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

---
Brian Feeny, CCNA, CCDA   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   
Network Administrator 
ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881)

___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]