Re: ospf - rip redistribution issue, [7:63647]
I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip? What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface, although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol. R1: inter serial 0.12 point ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.0.0 R1#sh ip prot Routing Protocol is rip Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 21 seconds Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set Redistributing: rip Default version control: send version 1, receive version 1 Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain Loopback0 1 1 Automatic network summarization is not in effect Maximum path: 4 Routing for Networks: 1.0.0.0 200.201.0.0 Routing Information Sources: Gateway Distance Last Update 192.168.255.6120 00:03:52 Distance: (default is 120) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63717t=63647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf - rip redistribution issue, [7:63647]
alaerte Vidali wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip? What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface, although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol. R1: inter serial 0.12 point ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.0.0 you are correct. this won't work. a ways back I did some experimenting, and at the time I found that even if all routers are RIPv2, the process will not accept CIDR prefixes. You had to redistribute CIDR routes into RIPv2 Think another way. Particularly since PC said this was from a practice lab. You have to think crooked. R1#sh ip prot Routing Protocol is rip Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 21 seconds Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set Redistributing: rip Default version control: send version 1, receive version 1 Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain Loopback0 1 1 how exactly did this happen? this is not the Cisco RIP default setting, so something changed. Automatic network summarization is not in effect Maximum path: 4 Routing for Networks: 1.0.0.0 200.201.0.0 Routing Information Sources: Gateway Distance Last Update 192.168.255.6120 00:03:52 Distance: (default is 120) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63721t=63647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ospf - rip redistribution issue, [7:63647]
Hello, I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them to show up in rip.domain. No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16 which is not showing up in rip router. What can I do to make this /16 route cross the classfull boundary, as its prefix is shorter that the /24 network it need to cross thus cant be summarised. Or should this route be capable of traversing the /24 classful boundary, automatically,. Any help greatly appreciated. Kind regard. Paul. This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63647t=63647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf - rip redistribution issue, [7:63647]
Casey, Paul (6822) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them to show up in rip.domain. No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16 which is not showing up in rip router. What can I do to make this /16 route cross the classfull boundary, as its prefix is shorter that the /24 network it need to cross thus cant be summarised. Or should this route be capable of traversing the /24 classful boundary, automatically,. Any help greatly appreciated. depending upon your other restrictions ( is this a practice lab or a production network? ) you can make make the receiveing router a RIPv2. Then the process will accesspt the 200.200.0.0/16 CIDR prefix. In the Cisco world, the RIPv1 routers will accept this prefix, *I think* because Cisco rip1 routers can receive rip2 routes. in a mixed vendor environment, this might not work at all. Kind regard. Paul. This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63648t=63647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ospf - rip redistribution issue, [7:63647]
I spent a fun couple of hours setting something up and playing around. some comments below, without giving away answers, because once you discover this for yourself you will have learned another useful tool. Casey, Paul (6822) wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them to show up in rip.domain. No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16 which is not showing up in rip router. there is an interesting command I recently learned about. show ip rip database issue this command on the redistribution router and see what you can see What can I do to make this /16 route cross the classfull boundary, as its prefix is shorter that the /24 network it need to cross thus cant be summarised. no doubt the /16 is showing up just fine in the OSPF domain :- Or should this route be capable of traversing the /24 classful boundary, automatically,. in my tet bed: R3R4--R5--R6---200.200.0.0/16 RIP RIPRIP/OSPF OSPF there is indeed someting that has to happen before the /16 shows up in the RIP domain, but here is the proof: C 222.222.222.4 is directly connected, Loopback1001 R199.56.1.0/24 [120/5] via 192.168.1.5, 00:00:13, Serial1 C199.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, TokenRing0 R193.1.1.0/24 [120/1] via 199.1.1.3, 00:00:21, TokenRing0 C192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1 R195.1.1.0/24 [120/5] via 192.168.1.5, 00:00:13, Serial1 C194.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1 R200.200.0.0/16 [120/5] via 192.168.1.5, 00:00:13, Serial1 Router_4# all routers in question are RIPv1 - the command version 2 has not been added under any routing process. Any help greatly appreciated. Kind regard. Paul. This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. * Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63684t=63647 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
