Re: Which is better?... [7:28532]
/ Hey Frank... It wasen't a nasty later. I think you were easy on the . He's the kind of person that when/if it comes time for him to get married, he'll ask everyone he meets if he should marry this woman (Priscilla notice I didn't say girl). We had and Egyptian in a group I was in and he kept asking everyone if he was being paid enough. If you said you didn't think he was being paid enough, he'd ask you if you thought he should ask for a raise. If you told him you thought he was being paid enough, he'd ask if you thought he should look for a higher paying job. I wonder how he ever got through an exam when he couldn't ask anyone if he should answer A, B, C, or D. \ Original message >Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 16:27:32 -0500 >From: "Frank Kim" >Subject: Re: Which is better?... [7:28532] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >This is just as easy as if you need to decide to run BGP or static route. > >1) Is money important to you? if so, take the job that offers you higher >salary. >2) Is learning/experience more is more fun for you? if so, take the job >that you will think will allow you to play with more gears. >3) Is sex more important to you? take the job that you think will allow >you to meet pretty lady customers all the time which may allow you to >'score' >4) Finally, I think you don't know what is important to you that's why >you're posting the below question. You need to know what's important to >you. This is a crucial key in life and in everything! Your below >question can tell all of us that in the future, you may be posting another >question asking: hey guys, I understand rip and ospf really well but i'm >stuck, should i run rip on this large enterprise network with 200 remote >offices or should I run ospf... > > >Sorry for this nasty email but I hate to see techies folks like us in the >industry asking this sort of question. It makes others think as if we >only know our technical stuff and are so clueless in life. > > >-Frank > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, >eFamily wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need your help. I've got two job offers, one from an oil company, and >> another from a large solution integrator. >> >> Please help me to choose between them. My mind is stuck. I'm not able to >> think about it again. Please help me. >> >> Ehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28609&t=28532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT RE: Which is better?... [7:28534]
How about the one with free food and the better severance package? Lol hehe -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:00 PM To: Frank Kim; eFamily Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Which is better?... I second your opinions. BRAVO!! - Original Message - From: "Frank Kim" To: "eFamily" Cc: ; Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Re: Which is better?... > This is just as easy as if you need to decide to run BGP or static route. > > 1) Is money important to you? if so, take the job that offers you higher > salary. > 2) Is learning/experience more is more fun for you? if so, take the job > that you will think will allow you to play with more gears. > 3) Is sex more important to you? take the job that you think will allow > you to meet pretty lady customers all the time which may allow you to > 'score' > 4) Finally, I think you don't know what is important to you that's why > you're posting the below question. You need to know what's important to > you. This is a crucial key in life and in everything! Your below > question can tell all of us that in the future, you may be posting another > question asking: hey guys, I understand rip and ospf really well but i'm > stuck, should i run rip on this large enterprise network with 200 remote > offices or should I run ospf... > > > Sorry for this nasty email but I hate to see techies folks like us in the > industry asking this sort of question. It makes others think as if we > only know our technical stuff and are so clueless in life. > > > -Frank > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, > eFamily wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need your help. I've got two job offers, one from an oil company, and > > another from a large solution integrator. > > > > Please help me to choose between them. My mind is stuck. I'm not able to > > think about it again. Please help me. > > > > Ehab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28534&t=28534 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which is better?... [7:28533]
I second your opinions. BRAVO!! - Original Message - From: "Frank Kim" To: "eFamily" Cc: ; Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 4:29 PM Subject: Re: Which is better?... > This is just as easy as if you need to decide to run BGP or static route. > > 1) Is money important to you? if so, take the job that offers you higher > salary. > 2) Is learning/experience more is more fun for you? if so, take the job > that you will think will allow you to play with more gears. > 3) Is sex more important to you? take the job that you think will allow > you to meet pretty lady customers all the time which may allow you to > 'score' > 4) Finally, I think you don't know what is important to you that's why > you're posting the below question. You need to know what's important to > you. This is a crucial key in life and in everything! Your below > question can tell all of us that in the future, you may be posting another > question asking: hey guys, I understand rip and ospf really well but i'm > stuck, should i run rip on this large enterprise network with 200 remote > offices or should I run ospf... > > > Sorry for this nasty email but I hate to see techies folks like us in the > industry asking this sort of question. It makes others think as if we > only know our technical stuff and are so clueless in life. > > > -Frank > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, > eFamily wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I need your help. I've got two job offers, one from an oil company, and > > another from a large solution integrator. > > > > Please help me to choose between them. My mind is stuck. I'm not able to > > think about it again. Please help me. > > > > Ehab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28533&t=28533 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Which is better?... [7:28532]
This is just as easy as if you need to decide to run BGP or static route. 1) Is money important to you? if so, take the job that offers you higher salary. 2) Is learning/experience more is more fun for you? if so, take the job that you will think will allow you to play with more gears. 3) Is sex more important to you? take the job that you think will allow you to meet pretty lady customers all the time which may allow you to 'score' 4) Finally, I think you don't know what is important to you that's why you're posting the below question. You need to know what's important to you. This is a crucial key in life and in everything! Your below question can tell all of us that in the future, you may be posting another question asking: hey guys, I understand rip and ospf really well but i'm stuck, should i run rip on this large enterprise network with 200 remote offices or should I run ospf... Sorry for this nasty email but I hate to see techies folks like us in the industry asking this sort of question. It makes others think as if we only know our technical stuff and are so clueless in life. -Frank On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, eFamily wrote: > Hi, > > I need your help. I've got two job offers, one from an oil company, and > another from a large solution integrator. > > Please help me to choose between them. My mind is stuck. I'm not able to > think about it again. Please help me. > > Ehab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28532&t=28532 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which is better?... [7:28531]
Hi, I need your help. I've got two job offers, one from an oil company, and another from a large solution integrator. Please help me to choose between them. My mind is stuck. I'm not able to think about it again. Please help me. Ehab Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28531&t=28531 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: certificate server, which is better? [7:6315]
Hello, Netscape and Microsoft certificate server, which one is easier to use, maintain and troubleshoot? Thanks in advance. Jim __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=6315&t=6315 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
The biggest caution I'd give about Cisco's IOS support for DHCP is that if you bounce the router, it forgets all the dynamic leases. It does have the ability to log leases to an ftp server, but if you're going to have to set up an ftp server, might as well have that box do DHCP as well. However, I've used it for SOHO that had dialup internet access (ISDN, PPPoE DSL, etc.), but not the need for a server on site. In that case, DHCP from the Cisco box was a fast solution as I already knew it from configuring it for my home 1605R. Now, again, if you've got a real server around that you can hand out DHCP from, do that, but if not, it's not a bad route to go (so long as you put the PING configured, which is defaulted to 2 conflict attempts before handing out an address, and use short lease times, the default of which is 24 hours). For home, I've got statics for my stuff, and a pool for folks when we do LAN parties (we've got drops wired all over the house): service dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.45.254 ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.45.1 192.168.45.20 ! Anything you don't exclude when you define a network is assumed available to be given out ip dhcp ping 2 ! ip dhcp pool default lease 1 network 192.168.45.0 /24 default-router 192.168.45.254 dns-server 192.168.45.14 206.13.28.12 206.13.31.12 207.92.43.4 206.13.30.12 206.13.29.12 domain-name internal.artoo.net netbios-node-type h-node netbios-name-server 207.92.43.4 207.92.43.4 ! Note that everything set in the non-specific pool for a network gets passed on to each static lease below ! or sub-pools that may fall within this range unless you specify something different ! ip dhcp pool han-kingston host 192.168.45.10 /24 client-identifier 0100.c0f0.3e23.91 client-name han ! ip dhcp pool han-cisco-pcm340 host 192.168.45.11 /24 client-identifier 0100.4096.324a.ac client-name han ! ip dhcp pool leia host 192.168.45.12 /24 client-identifier 0100.c0f0.3d0d.0a client-name leia ! ip dhcp pool c3p0-linux host 192.168.45.14 /24 client-identifier 00c0.f059.7c77 client-name c3p0 ! ip dhcp pool cisco-ap340 host 192.168.45.17 /24 client-identifier 0100.4096.3508.f0 client-name slave1 You can also configure any DHCP variable you like with the "Raw DHCP Option" command 'option #' Yeah, it's all a bit anal, but it was quick and easy and at the time I set it up as originally I didn't have a linux box at home to handle dhcp. I believe it is included in 12.1.0 and beyond (just see if 'service dhcp' works). Oh, and as a side note for smaller routers with little config space: 'service compress-config', which allows my little 1605R with 7k nv config memory to save my 12k config: falcon#wr m Building configuration... Compressed configuration from 12364 bytes to 5083 bytes[OK] -- Jason Roysdon, CCNA, MCSE, CNA, Network+, A+ List email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://jason.artoo.net/ Cisco resources: http://r2cisco.artoo.net/ "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Cisco IOS supports DHCP server as well.. > > Brian > > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Chris Boyd wrote: > > > There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs > > on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and > > has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft > > or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability > > for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version.... > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM > > Subject: Re: which is better ? > > > > > > > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > > > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > > > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > > > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > > > serial interface. > > > > > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > > > > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL P
Re: which is better ?
The subject of the discussion is whether or not to use Router based DHCP, or to install an new NT server in the client environment (Search: "ip dhcp pool"). You are talking about the Network registrar software that Cisco sells. It's handy, and I wish it were more widely deployed, but not what we're talking about. Original Message Follows From: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: which is better ? Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 18:18:10 -0400 There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version - Original Message - From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM Subject: Re: which is better ? > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > serial interface. > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
Yes Runs on Win2k and you can download a free eval copy at http://www.cisco.com Can't remember what we paid for it.just download it and check it out...it has been a life saver for us...we had one server go down (bad power supply). The failover feature saved our butss...so check it out! - Original Message - From: "Ryan Finnesey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Chris Boyd'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:55 PM Subject: RE: which is better ? > What is the cost of this Software? Are you running this in a Win2k > endearments ? > > Ryan V. Finnesey > Network Administrator > @tmosphere Interactive > 1375 Broadway, 11th floor > New York, NY 10018 > 212 827 2507 phone > 212 827 2525 fax > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -Original Message- > From: Chris Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 6:18 PM > To: Jeff Kell > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: which is better ? > > > There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs > on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and > has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft > or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability > for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM > Subject: Re: which is better ? > > > > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > > serial interface. > > > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
Cisco IOS supports DHCP server as well.. Brian On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Chris Boyd wrote: > There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs > on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and > has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft > or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability > for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version > - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM > Subject: Re: which is better ? > > > > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > > serial interface. > > > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --- Brian Feeny, CCNP, CCDP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: which is better ?
Sounds almost like Checkpoint's MetaIP? Do you know how it compares? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Boyd Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 5:18 PM To: Jeff Kell Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: which is better ? There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version - Original Message - From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM Subject: Re: which is better ? > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > serial interface. > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
There must be some misunderstanding hereCisco's DNS/DHCP software runs on an NT server and is not router based! The software is very robust and has an easy understandable UI...The question was which was better Microsoft or Cisco...for us Cisco's was b/c it gives us DDNS and "failover" capability for our DNS/DHCP servers which is not built into the Microsoft version - Original Message - From: "Jeff Kell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chris Boyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2000 7:25 AM Subject: Re: which is better ? > Router-based DHCP is often used for home/SOHO environments with NAT > overload to get many machines over a single serial line, especially in > conjunction with, for instance, 'ip address negotiated' on a Dialer > interface. The Inside interfaces generate DHCP using the negotiated > serial interface. > > On a larger scale, other options are much better. > > Jeff Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
Hey guys, We have the Cisco Network Registrar in place ad for us it works greatwe have much more control than we had with Microsoft'sCisco's version has DDNS capability and unless your talking about moving to Win2k Server and running DHCP off of that I recommend Cisco's Network Registrar Thanks, Chris Boyd Network Support Alex Lee, Inc. 120 4th Street SW Hickory, NC 28601 (828) 323-4103 http://www.alexlee.com - Original Message - From: "David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 8:13 AM Subject: Re: which is better ? > NT > > > Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Dear groups, > > > > I want to implement DHCP to our networks (20 sites). Which is better > > DHCP from Cisco Router or DHCP from Windows NT ? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Anton > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > > _ > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is better
Couple of yers ago we implemented Cisco's DHCP in our network. (10 VLAN, 800 nodes). Unfortunately, it did not work out and we had constant problems. We switched to Windows DHCP and we are happy. Whether Cisco has improved its implementation of DHCP during the last couple of years, I can't tell. A. STrobel Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear groups, > > I want to implement DHCP to our networks (20 sites). Which is better > DHCP from Cisco Router or DHCP from Windows NT ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Anton > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1 **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: which is better ?
I use the NT. Works well. What is the reason you would want it on the routers? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ariel Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 9:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: which is better ? I don't know about Cisco yet, but with Windows NT, you have lots of control of the DHCP server. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
keep your router for routing "Antonius Kurniadi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear groups, > > I want to implement DHCP to our networks (20 sites). Which is better > DHCP from Cisco Router or DHCP from Windows NT ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Anton > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
I don't know about Cisco yet, but with Windows NT, you have lots of control of the DHCP server. **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: which is better ?
NT Antonius Kurniadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Dear groups, > > I want to implement DHCP to our networks (20 sites). Which is better > DHCP from Cisco Router or DHCP from Windows NT ? > > Thanks in advance. > > Anton > > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html > _ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is better ?
Dear groups, I want to implement DHCP to our networks (20 sites). Which is better DHCP from Cisco Router or DHCP from Windows NT ? Thanks in advance. Anton **NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates.html _ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
