RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris
Dennis Peterson wrote: Naturally it is going to follow NFS mount points. That is what you asked it to do so why wouldn't it? And what you are doing is a rather nutty thing to attempt, as well. This is a user problem, not a software problem. The solution is to scan selectively as in (examples only - this message requires you to think): Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead to guarantee all machines do a correct full scan without scanning files multiple times because they are NFS mounted. Selectively scanning would also allow area's on file systems to be missed if someone creates a new directory that is not included on the scan list. Having the ability to exclude directories or limit to local file systems, you could run a simple common script with clamscan -r / --exclude-dir's, that would guarantee to scan all your files across all your machines while missing out problem directories. Dean ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:17:42 -, Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead to guarantee all machines do a correct full scan without scanning files multiple times because they are NFS mounted. Selectively scanning would also allow area's on file systems to be missed if someone creates a new directory that is not included on the scan list. Having the ability to exclude directories or limit to local file systems, you could run a simple common script with clamscan -r / --exclude-dir's, that would guarantee to scan all your files across all your machines while missing out problem directories. Dean This is a user problem. Write a script that looks at the config of the server being scanned eg: df -F ufs to get a list of ufs file sytems use find on the df-list to generate an exclude list (pipes, doors, etc) execute clamscan df-list -exclude=exclude-list Alberto ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests
We are having problems with certain mailing list digests that cause clamav to recurse impressively. I see a hint about a similar problem on the developers list but haven't seen anything on this users list yet. A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! I think clamav is seeing the message digest headers as an indication of bounces andrecursing. This can be demonstrated using the --no-mail option to clamscan. HOWEVER, I am NOT able to turn the ScanMail feature off in the clamd daemon by editting the clamd.conf file - the option remains on. I have reverted to version 0.71 which saves embarrassment for our mail server! Any idea how I can turn ScanMail off in the daemon? Thanks, Steve Platt ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:30:55 + Steve Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are having problems with certain mailing list digests that cause clamav to recurse impressively. I see a hint about a similar problem on the developers list but haven't seen anything on this users list yet. A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! The problem has been already fixed in CVS. -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Mon Feb 28 12:31:56 CET 2005 pgpvNNJjhnhul.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Thanks ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris
Alberto da Silva wrote: On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:17:42 -, Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead to guarantee all machines do a correct full scan without scanning files multiple times because they are NFS mounted. Selectively scanning would also allow area's on file systems to be missed if someone creates a new directory that is not included on the scan list. Having the ability to exclude directories or limit to local file systems, you could run a simple common script with clamscan -r / --exclude-dir's, that would guarantee to scan all your files across all your machines while missing out problem directories. Dean This is a user problem. Write a script that looks at the config of the server being scanned eg: df -F ufs to get a list of ufs file sytems use find on the df-list to generate an exclude list (pipes, doors, etc) execute clamscan df-list -exclude=exclude-list Alberto Ok, fair point. I didn't think of doing it that way (simple really). Ill give that a go, taking in your and Dennis's suggestions. Thanks Dean ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 09:05 -0500, Stoffel Bester wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Sounds like you either need to install a C compiler, or find some binary RPMs of Clamav. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX Austin Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
On 28 Feb 2005 09:05:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Try: rpm -qa | grep gcc and see whether you have any gcc packages installed. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
hi I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 08:22, Brian Morrison wrote: On 28 Feb 2005 09:05:46 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Just having a issue installing clamav on my Redhat 7.3 box, getting some c compiler error configure: error: no acceptable C compiler found in $PATH. Try: rpm -qa | grep gcc and see whether you have any gcc packages installed. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against splitting: 1. Who is going to sign up for clamav-clueless-newbie? I can confirm that this has been the bane of many lug lists I have been on - you split the list normally into technical and chat sections, all the newbies sit on chat and all the knowledge sits in technical. What normally happens is 3 months down the line the technical list is fully subscribed and the chat list falls away. thanks Evan ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
On 28 Feb 2005 10:50:05 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 Then you need to install the gcc-3.2.2-5 package for RH 7.3, it will be on the CDs or you can have a look at rpmfind.net or similar sites for it. FYI, my RH 9 box gives the following list: gcc-c++-3.2.2-5 gcc-3.2.2-5 compat-gcc-c++-7.3-2.96.118 libgcc-3.2.2-5 gcc-g77-3.2.2-5 compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.118 gcc-objc-3.2.2-5 gcc-java-3.2.2-5 Most of the extras you may not need, but sometimes they're useful if building source from other places. -- Brian Morrison bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests
A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! The problem has been already fixed in CVS. Thanks Tomasz. I still have the problem that I cannot turn off ScanMail for the daemon clamd. That is, commented out or not, I still see this :- Mon Feb 28 12:42:19 2005 - Mail files support enabled. I am editing /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf ... With version 0.71 editting clamav.conf allowed me to turn ScanMail on or off. Thanks for any further help, Steve Platt ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:33:12PM +, Steve Platt said: A typical 170kB digest containing about 90 messages took 7 hours to scan and exploded to 3900MB! The problem has been already fixed in CVS. Thanks Tomasz. I still have the problem that I cannot turn off ScanMail for the daemon clamd. That is, commented out or not, I still see this :- Mon Feb 28 12:42:19 2005 - Mail files support enabled. I am editing /usr/local/etc/clamd.conf ... With version 0.71 editting clamav.conf allowed me to turn ScanMail on or off. Right now, you need to use DisableDefaultScanOPtions, and then selectively turn on defaults that you want. I believe 0.9x will have boolean options to make all of this easier. -- -- | Stephen Gran | Violence in reality is quite different | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | from theory. -- Spock, The Cloud | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | Minders, stardate 5818.4 | -- pgp61ywxdVUWI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] problems with ScanMail and digests
you need to use DisableDefaultScanOPtions ... A big Thank You Stephen! This option and its significance was hidden by reading:- # DO NOT TOUCH IT unless you know what you are doing. I suppose I should be congratulated for reading that one line, at least! Steve ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clamscan bug/feature in Solaris
Plant, Dean said: Dennis Peterson wrote: Naturally it is going to follow NFS mount points. That is what you asked it to do so why wouldn't it? And what you are doing is a rather nutty thing to attempt, as well. This is a user problem, not a software problem. The solution is to scan selectively as in (examples only - this message requires you to think): Nutty I may be :-) but scanning selectively is fine for a few machines but what if you have fifty machines with varying configurations. This approach would mean an extra administrative overhead to guarantee all machines do a correct full scan without scanning files multiple times because they are NFS mounted. Selectively scanning would also allow area's on file systems to be missed if someone creates a new directory that is not included on the scan list. Having the ability to exclude directories or limit to local file systems, you could run a simple common script with clamscan -r / --exclude-dir's, that would guarantee to scan all your files across all your machines while missing out problem directories. You are a prime candidate for Cfengine. dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]
Daniel J McDonald said: On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against splitting: 1. Who is going to sign up for clamav-clueless-newbie? 2. Part of your responsibility in using open source tools is to provide support to others. That's a key difference between an open-source model and a proprietary model: nobody pays for support, so everyone who does have a clue is responsible for providing it. That's also how we keep the developers focused on the task of keeping clamav the best virus-protection in the world - by offloading the job of educating newcomers to those of us who aren't involved in the development. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CNX Austin Energy I'm not buying it, and to infer the list for the inexperienced admin be named something offensive is absurd. I think you're pulling my chain, there, Daniel. A new list, Clamav-Advanced, on the other hand, could be self-filtering. But not likley to happen. So I'll suggest what I suggested on the old VNC list: voluntarily place [Windows] or [Linux] or [BSD], etc in the subject line so we can pre-filter what is not important to each of us. I'm certain Windows users' eyes roll back in their heads when some heavy Solaris discussions are going on, and if I never read about a stunned and helpless admin who can't find an RPM distro of the latest release of ClamAV again I'll be one happy camper. There isn't time to wade through all the jabber about OS specific topics for which I am not the solution nor an interested party. It is a simple matter of efficiency and goes to effectivity as well. dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 22:58 -0800, Dennis Peterson wrote: Is there a possibility there could be separate ClamAV mail lists for Linux and Windows newbies, and another for Email professionals? I can't be the only one who senses a need. I'd recommend against splitting: 1. Who is going to sign up for clamav-clueless-newbie? I can confirm that this has been the bane of many lug lists I have been on - you split the list normally into technical and chat sections, all the newbies sit on chat and all the knowledge sits in technical. What normally happens is 3 months down the line the technical list is fully subscribed and the chat list falls away. thanks Evan This is a list administration problem, not a user problem. That's why the clue bat was invented. dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav Install RH7.3
On 28 Feb 2005 10:50:05 -0500 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stoffel Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I get libgcc1-3.2.2-3 gcc-cpp-3.2.2-3 Then you need to install the gcc-3.2.2-5 package for RH 7.3, it will be on the CDs or you can have a look at rpmfind.net or similar sites for it. FYI, my RH 9 box gives the following list: gcc-c++-3.2.2-5 gcc-3.2.2-5 compat-gcc-c++-7.3-2.96.118 libgcc-3.2.2-5 gcc-g77-3.2.2-5 compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.118 gcc-objc-3.2.2-5 gcc-java-3.2.2-5 Most of the extras you may not need, but sometimes they're useful if building source from other places. -- Brian Morrison You may want to try the following: Install the apt application for the 7.3 distro from www.freshrpms.net. (http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/redhat/7.3/apt/apt-0.5.5cnc5-fr0.rh7 3.2.i386.rpm) Run the following: apt-get update Check to see what packages are available: apt-cache search gcc Install the packages make sure these were listed in the output above: apt-get install gcc gcc-c++ compat-gcc-c++ gcc-g77 compat-gcc gcc-objc gcc-java While your at it you may want to run the following to see what packages are out of date on your system: apt-get upgrade Last you could look on this site and see if they have what you need (http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/, http://apt.sw.be/). Edit the /etc/apt-sources.list to include the dag repository and use the apt-cache search command to search the packages (clamav, amavis-new...) John Gallagher ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Clueless Newbies [was: (no subject)]
I'd like to see one list, for similar reasons. I run Solaris but I can see that a lot of folks here run Linux, and if they were on a separate list probably all their general QA's would end up on that list, and I'd end up reading it anyway. And if most of the users migrated over there, it would be harder to ask questions on the Solaris list. It's often hard to tell whether something is an OS-specific question anyway. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] php-clamav
I'm rewriting this module based on some functionality issues with the original code. If your interested, examne: (these are built in functions including the logo) http://www.daleenterprise.com/info.php (scroll down to see it, click the logo) and http://www.daleenterprise.com/clamav_info.php (click the logo) To see it in action: http://www.daleenterprise.com/test.php It's still under development and I'm having a crash issue with a clamav function [cli_bm_addpatt + 0xbc (matcher-bm.c:62)] but I am working on it and hopefully I can get Tomasz to enable the shared libraries which have been disabled since 0.80. It can be built embedded into PHP (bundled) or as an extension (extension) as denoted in the visible version of the info. -- Dale ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!
I use Fedora Core 3. On booting up I notice an error message which suggests a problem with the way in which ClamAV is set up. The following four lines from the boot log give an indication of what I mean: Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter: socket-addr (local:/var/clamav/clmilter.socket) doesn't agree with sendmail.cf Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter startup failed Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sendmail startup succeeded Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sm-client startup succeeded Can anyone quickly tell me what this means and what I need to do to correct he problem? Thanks. Dave Dave Smith Struggle - Solidarity - Socialism E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (868) 683-5305 SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits this directory it does not check the contents of it? Yes, it's in my TODO. Done. Tue Mar 1 02:16:15 CET 2005 (tk) - * clamscan: respect --exclude/include when entering directories (requested by Dean Plant dean.plant*roke.co.uk) Thank you. You're welcome, -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Tue Mar 1 02:19:27 CET 2005 pgp4CcXNfsmx6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!
Clamav.conf has this in it: Title = Clamav LogFile = messages *OnlyService = clamd *RemoveHeaders sendmail.cf is probably too long t post here. What should I be looking for? On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 20:04 -0500, Dale Walsh wrote: On Feb 28, 2005, at 07:49, Dave Smith wrote: I use Fedora Core 3. On booting up I notice an error message which suggests a problem with the way in which ClamAV is set up. The following four lines from the boot log give an indication of what I mean: Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter: socket-addr (local:/var/clamav/clmilter.socket) doesn't agree with sendmail.cf Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter startup failed Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sendmail startup succeeded Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sm-client startup succeeded Can anyone quickly tell me what this means and what I need to do to correct he problem? Thanks. Dave It looks like you have defined 2 instances clamav-milter.sock or you defined one location and set a pointer to another. What's in your sendmail.cf file and what's in your clamav conf files? ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html Dave Smith Struggle - Solidarity - Socialism E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (868) 683-5305 SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:20:43 +0100 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits this directory it does not check the contents of it? Yes, it's in my TODO. Done. Tue Mar 1 02:16:15 CET 2005 (tk) - * clamscan: respect --exclude/include when entering directories (requested by Dean Plant dean.plant*roke.co.uk) Just a small update: Tue Mar 1 02:29:54 CET 2005 (tk) - * clamscan: use --include-dir/exclude-dir for directories instead of --include/exclude -- oo. Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Tue Mar 1 02:32:21 CET 2005 pgp7CBTw7G7tg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Exclude with clamdscan
Tomasz Kojm said: On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:20:43 +0100 Tomasz Kojm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:37:32 - Plant, Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tomasz Kojm wrote: Plant, Dean wrote: Is it possible to completely exclude the /net folder so that when clamscan hits this directory it does not check the contents of it? Yes, it's in my TODO. Done. Tue Mar 1 02:16:15 CET 2005 (tk) - * clamscan: respect --exclude/include when entering directories (requested by Dean Plant dean.plant*roke.co.uk) Just a small update: Tue Mar 1 02:29:54 CET 2005 (tk) - * clamscan: use --include-dir/exclude-dir for directories instead of --include/exclude -- While you're in there how about adding --include-dir-file=[path] so these can be listed once and distributed as external files? Same, of course, for exclude, tho a properly formated file could contain both. dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] socket-addr doesn't agree with sendmail.cf ... !!
in your sendmail, all that is important is anything related to ClamAV. Look in all your conf file and find where you specify the .sock file It's also not the only CLamAV conf file used in your install. -- Dale On Feb 28, 2005, at 08:34, Dave Smith wrote: Clamav.conf has this in it: Title = Clamav LogFile = messages *OnlyService = clamd *RemoveHeaders sendmail.cf is probably too long t post here. What should I be looking for? On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 20:04 -0500, Dale Walsh wrote: On Feb 28, 2005, at 07:49, Dave Smith wrote: I use Fedora Core 3. On booting up I notice an error message which suggests a problem with the way in which ClamAV is set up. The following four lines from the boot log give an indication of what I mean: Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter: socket-addr (local:/var/clamav/clmilter.socket) doesn't agree with sendmail.cf Feb 28 07:14:58 localhost clamav-milter: clamav-milter startup failed Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sendmail startup succeeded Feb 28 07:14:59 localhost sendmail: sm-client startup succeeded Can anyone quickly tell me what this means and what I need to do to correct he problem? Thanks. Dave It looks like you have defined 2 instances clamav-milter.sock or you defined one location and set a pointer to another. What's in your sendmail.cf file and what's in your clamav conf files? ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html Dave Smith Struggle - Solidarity - Socialism E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: (868) 683-5305 SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] php-clamav
Dale Walsh wrote: I'm rewriting this module based on some functionality issues with the original code. If your interested, examne: (these are built in functions including the logo) http://www.daleenterprise.com/info.php (scroll down to see it, click the logo) and http://www.daleenterprise.com/clamav_info.php (click the logo) To see it in action: http://www.daleenterprise.com/test.php It's still under development and I'm having a crash issue with a clamav function [cli_bm_addpatt + 0xbc (matcher-bm.c:62)] but I am working on it and hopefully I can get Tomasz to enable the shared libraries which have been disabled since 0.80. It can be built embedded into PHP (bundled) or as an extension (extension) as denoted in the visible version of the info. Thank you. I'll be back on that project later this week. Right now, I've got a firewall issue at our co-lo site that's requiring far too much time. -- Steve ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
[Clamav-users] Port for openbsd
I'm looking for a port for OpenBSD 3.6 for Clamav. ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Re: [Clamav-users] Port for openbsd
Penny Rand said: I'm looking for a port for OpenBSD 3.6 for Clamav. Did you know that with a basic Unix system that includes GCC you can build this from source in less than 10 minutes? It is really quite easy, can be scripted for repeatability, and frees you from this dependancy. dp ___ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
