[Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Markus Braun

Hello,

I have installad ClamAV over apt.get on a debian sarge system.

I have made this:

apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam clamav-daemon

usermod -G Debian-exim clamav

/etc/init.d/clamav-daemon restart

So is that correct, how can i test it?
Or must i configure more?

How does freshclam updates the virus definitions?
Must i add a link to the virusdatabse and make a cronjob?

Thanks for the help
Marcus

_
Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit Windows-Desktopsuche. Suchen Sie gleichzeitig 
im Web, Ihren E-Mails und auf Ihrem PC! Jetzt neu! http://desktop.msn.de/ 
Jetzt gratis downloaden!


___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Grant Basson
Should you ever come back to visit this list you'll learn that everything
you need to know about this can be found in your clamd.conf file. That
leaves for you the challenge of finding that clamd.conf file.

dp

MM all. 

I feel like a twit, but here goes anyway.

 

How the heck do you run clamd?

Man pages suggest that I just type clamd, I get the following response:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamd

-bash: clamd: command not found

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

 

I honestly cant think of where else to turn, before I get asked the obvious
clam is installed, when I type clamscan I get the following:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$clamscan

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---

Known viruses: 40192

Engine version: 0.87

Scanned directories: 1

Scanned files: 13

Infected files: 0

Data scanned: 0.05 MB

Time: 1.004 sec (0 m 1 s)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

 

When I try clamdscan it does this:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamdscan

ERROR: Clamd is not configured properly.

 

--- SCAN SUMMARY ---

Infected files: 0

Time: 0.000 sec (0 m 0 s)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

 

Does this mean clamd is running?

 

I had to copy the man page for clamd, from the calmav website, but the
others, (clamscan, clamdscan, clamd.conf.) but no clamd

This is extremely confusing, any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.

By the way, I'm replying to this message, because clamd.conf man page, said
clamd.conf was in /etc in my case I had to create it
 

Many thanks in advance,

God Bless,

Grant.


___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) r uns on

2005-11-28 Thread Kenneth Byrne
 -Original Message-
 From: Grant Basson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 28 November 2005 11:08
 To: 'ClamAV users ML'
 Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that 
 clamav (clamd)
 runs on
 
 I feel like a twit, but here goes anyway.
 
 How the heck do you run clamd?
 
 Man pages suggest that I just type clamd, I get the following 
 response:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamd
 
 -bash: clamd: command not found
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
 
  
 
 I honestly cant think of where else to turn, before I get 
 asked the obvious
 clam is installed, when I type clamscan I get the following:

./configure --help

By default, `make install' will install all the files in
`/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc.  You can specify
an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',
for instance `--prefix=$HOME'.

  --bindir=DIR   user executables [EPREFIX/bin]
  --sbindir=DIR  system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin]


i.e. default installation is /usr/local  (the bin/ sbin/ lib/ etc.)
At a guess /usr/local/sbin isn't in your PATH... as thats where system
executables (like clamd) are installed.

Ken
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Grant Basson
./configure --help

By default, `make install' will install all the files in
`/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc.  You can specify
an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',
for instance `--prefix=$HOME'.

  --bindir=DIR   user executables [EPREFIX/bin]
  --sbindir=DIR  system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin]


i.e. default installation is /usr/local  (the bin/ sbin/ lib/ etc.)
At a guess /usr/local/sbin isn't in your PATH... as thats where system
executables (like clamd) are installed.

Ken

Ken, thanks a lot, but no joy... :(
I installed from an RPM, I tried the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# which clamscan
/usr/bin/clamscan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/bin/ | grep clam
clamav-config
clamdscan
clamscan
freshclam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#
Is it possible that clamd wasn't installed?
Thanks for your response... :)

Grant.

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 11:04:37AM +, Markus Braun said:
 Hello,
 
 I have installad ClamAV over apt.get on a debian sarge system.
 
 I have made this:
 
 apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam clamav-daemon
 
 usermod -G Debian-exim clamav
 
 /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon restart
 
 So is that correct, how can i test it?
 Or must i configure more?
 
 How does freshclam updates the virus definitions?
 Must i add a link to the virusdatabse and make a cronjob?

dpkg-reconfigure clamav-freshclam
dpkg-reconfigure clamav-base

Will do most of the work for you.

Take care,
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | Love America -- or give it back.|
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
 --


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:49:12PM +0200, Grant Basson said:
 ./configure --help
 
 By default, `make install' will install all the files in
 `/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc.  You can specify
 an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',
 for instance `--prefix=$HOME'.
 
   --bindir=DIR   user executables [EPREFIX/bin]
   --sbindir=DIR  system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin]
 
 
 i.e. default installation is /usr/local  (the bin/ sbin/ lib/ etc.)
 At a guess /usr/local/sbin isn't in your PATH... as thats where system
 executables (like clamd) are installed.
 
 Ken
 
 Ken, thanks a lot, but no joy... :(
 I installed from an RPM, I tried the following:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# which clamscan
 /usr/bin/clamscan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/bin/ | grep clam
 clamav-config
 clamdscan
 clamscan
 freshclam
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#
 Is it possible that clamd wasn't installed?
 Thanks for your response... :)

Look in /usr/sbin/ - it presumablyisn't on your path as a user, so it
isn;t found.  Generally speaking, clamd is run as a daemon on system
startup, and you won't need to do much manually after that.  There are
init scripts provided for RH, so I would start with seeing if they work
for, and checking your config file and so forth.

-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | Ogden's Law:  The sooner you fall   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | behind, the more time you have to catch |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | up. |
 --


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runson

2005-11-28 Thread Grant Basson


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Basson
Sent: 28 November 2005 01:49 PM
To: 'ClamAV users ML'
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd)
runson

./configure --help

By default, `make install' will install all the files in
`/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc.  You can specify
an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',
for instance `--prefix=$HOME'.

  --bindir=DIR   user executables [EPREFIX/bin]
  --sbindir=DIR  system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin]


i.e. default installation is /usr/local  (the bin/ sbin/ lib/ etc.)
At a guess /usr/local/sbin isn't in your PATH... as thats where system
executables (like clamd) are installed.

Ken

Ken, thanks a lot, but no joy... :(
I installed from an RPM, I tried the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# which clamscan
/usr/bin/clamscan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/bin/ | grep clam
clamav-config
clamdscan
clamscan
freshclam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#
Is it possible that clamd wasn't installed?
Thanks for your response... :)

Grant.

By the way:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# clamscan -V
ClamAV 0.87/1082/Wed Sep 14 17:22:17 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Markus Braun




dpkg-reconfigure clamav-freshclam
dpkg-reconfigure clamav-base


I have installed these packages:

apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam clamav-daemon

but clamav is not active.
How can i check this?

The eicar testfile comes into my mailbox. :-(

But in the exim4 reject.log, is some info that he is rejecting it.

marcus

_
Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit 
Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! 
http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden!


___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Krištof Petr

Grant Basson wrote:

[..]



I had to copy the man page for clamd, from the calmav website, but the
others, (clamscan, clamdscan, clamd.conf.) but no clamd

This is extremely confusing, any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.

By the way, I'm replying to this message, because clamd.conf man page, said
clamd.conf was in /etc in my case I had to create it

 



Look at mailing list archive for solution.

pk

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Grant Basson said:
./configure --help

By default, `make install' will install all the files in
`/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc.  You can specify
an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',
for instance `--prefix=$HOME'.

  --bindir=DIR   user executables [EPREFIX/bin]
  --sbindir=DIR  system admin executables [EPREFIX/sbin]


i.e. default installation is /usr/local  (the bin/ sbin/ lib/ etc.)
At a guess /usr/local/sbin isn't in your PATH... as thats where system
executables (like clamd) are installed.

Ken

 Ken, thanks a lot, but no joy... :(
 I installed from an RPM, I tried the following:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# which clamscan
 /usr/bin/clamscan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/bin/ | grep clam
 clamav-config
 clamdscan
 clamscan
 freshclam
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#
 Is it possible that clamd wasn't installed?
 Thanks for your response... :)

 Grant.

Try looking in /usr/local/sbin and /usr/sbin. If you install from an rpm
anything is possible. Because the rpm creator did not use the ClamAV
defaults nor update the documentation to help you find the peices, I'd
suggest removing that rpm and then build from source. I'd also suggest you
write down the locations of the various components you install so you can
find them later.

Or find an rpm that is properly built and documented.

dp
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Bob Hutchinson
On Monday 28 Nov 2005 11:08, Grant Basson wrote:
 Should you ever come back to visit this list you'll learn that everything
 you need to know about this can be found in your clamd.conf file. That
 leaves for you the challenge of finding that clamd.conf file.
 
 dp

 MM all.

 I feel like a twit, but here goes anyway.



 How the heck do you run clamd?

 Man pages suggest that I just type clamd, I get the following response:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamd

 -bash: clamd: command not found

you need the full path probably

find it with
which clamd

to see if it's running
ps ax | grep clamd
netstat -ap |  grep clamd

if you installed from the tarball, clamav will most likely be installed 
under /usr/local




 I honestly cant think of where else to turn, before I get asked the obvious
 clam is installed, when I type clamscan I get the following:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$clamscan

 --- SCAN SUMMARY ---

 Known viruses: 40192

 Engine version: 0.87

 Scanned directories: 1

 Scanned files: 13

 Infected files: 0

 Data scanned: 0.05 MB

 Time: 1.004 sec (0 m 1 s)

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



 When I try clamdscan it does this:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamdscan

 ERROR: Clamd is not configured properly.



 --- SCAN SUMMARY ---

 Infected files: 0

 Time: 0.000 sec (0 m 0 s)

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$



 Does this mean clamd is running?



 I had to copy the man page for clamd, from the calmav website, but the
 others, (clamscan, clamdscan, clamd.conf.) but no clamd

 This is extremely confusing, any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.

 By the way, I'm replying to this message, because clamd.conf man page, said
 clamd.conf was in /etc in my case I had to create it


 Many thanks in advance,

 God Bless,

 Grant.


 ___
 http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

-- 
-
Bob Hutchinson
Midwales dot com
-
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Grant Basson
Try looking in /usr/local/sbin and /usr/sbin. If you install from an rpm
anything is possible. Because the rpm creator did not use the ClamAV
defaults nor update the documentation to help you find the peices, I'd
suggest removing that rpm and then build from source. I'd also suggest you
write down the locations of the various components you install so you can
find them later.

Or find an rpm that is properly built and documented.

dp

Thanks... but no joy:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/local/sbin/ | grep clam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]# ls /usr/sbin/ | grep clam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] grant]#

But thanks... gonna get the source... know any South African mirrors?

Many thanks,
Grant

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:00:25PM +, Markus Braun said:
 I have installed these packages:
 
 apt-get install clamav clamav-freshclam clamav-daemon
 
 but clamav is not active.  How can i check this?

What does this mean?  Not running, or not magically integrated with your
MTA?   ps -u clamav will tell you what processes are running as user
clamav.  If clamd and freshclam are not listed in the output, I will be
very surprised.

On the other hand, if you mean they're not magically integrated with
your MTA, then the answer is of course they're not.  Read
/usr/share/doc/clamav-daemon/README.Debian.gz and look for instructions
on how to integrate clamav with your MTA.

 The eicar testfile comes into my mailbox. :-(
 
 But in the exim4 reject.log, is some info that he is rejecting it.

Again, not sure what you mean here - exim is rejecting a message with
eicar, and yet delivering it anyway?  That makes no sense.
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | On-line, adj.:  The idea that a human   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | being should always be accessible to a  |
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | computer.   |
 --


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Markus Braun

What does this mean?  Not running, or not magically integrated with your
MTA?   ps -u clamav will tell you what processes are running as user
clamav.  If clamd and freshclam are not listed in the output, I will be
very surprised.


sorry for my bad english. So Clamd and freshclam is runnning as user clamav.


Again, not sure what you mean here - exim is rejecting a message with
eicar, and yet delivering it anyway?  That makes no sense.


yes, he delivered it in my mailbox.
but i cant understand why?

This is in the reject.log of exim4:

2005-11-28 08:35:33 H=(XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX) [219.133.174.71] rejected EHLO or 
HELO 80.XXX.145.XXX: Dropped spammer pretending to be us
2005-11-28 12:49:57 1EghW9-0001Kd-Mb H=mail.fluns.com (www.declude.com) 
[63.246.13.85] F=[EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected after DATA: This 
message contains an unwanted file extension (com)

Envelope-from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P Received: from mail.fluns.com ([63.246.13.85] helo=www.declude.com)
by dXXX-XXX-XXX-XXX.dds.hosteurope.de with smtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EghW9-0001Kd-Mb
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:49:57 +0100
 X-Web-Originating-IP: 193.28.100.68
I Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
 Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 20:23:17 -0500
F From: WebMaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T To: User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Test eicar.com file [eicarplain]
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
BounDary==_307115168==_


But in my (/etc/exim4/vexim-acl-check-content.conf i have this part:

# Reject virus infested messages.
 warn  message = This message contains malware ($malware_name)
   malware = *
   log_message = This message contains malware ($malware_name)

So he dont warn me :-(
any idea?
marcus

_
Sie suchen E-Mails, Dokumente oder Fotos? Die neue MSN Suche Toolbar mit 
Windows-Desktopsuche liefert in sekundenschnelle Ergebnisse. Jetzt neu! 
http://desktop.msn.de/ Jetzt gratis downloaden!


___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Gran
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:26:04PM +, Markus Braun said:
 What does this mean?  Not running, or not magically integrated with your
 MTA?   ps -u clamav will tell you what processes are running as user
 clamav.  If clamd and freshclam are not listed in the output, I will be
 very surprised.
 
 sorry for my bad english. So Clamd and freshclam is runnning as user clamav.
 
 Again, not sure what you mean here - exim is rejecting a message with
 eicar, and yet delivering it anyway?  That makes no sense.
 
 yes, he delivered it in my mailbox.
 but i cant understand why?
 
 This is in the reject.log of exim4:
 
 [63.246.13.85] F=[EMAIL PROTECTED] rejected after DATA: This 
 message contains an unwanted file extension (com)

A file was rejected because it had the extension .com, not because of
viral content.

 But in my (/etc/exim4/vexim-acl-check-content.conf i have this part:
 
 # Reject virus infested messages.
  warn  message = This message contains malware ($malware_name)
malware = *
log_message = This message contains malware ($malware_name)
 
 So he dont warn me :-(

The warn directive adds a log message, or a header (if used as 
message = X-virus: yes or some such)  It does not reject mail or impede
mail flow in any way.  Look in your logs - do you see a line with the
above warning?

Take a look at /usr/share/doc/exim4-base/spec.txt.gz for details of what
the various directives mean.  It sounds at the moment like you are
hoping for a different behavior than you have configured from your MTA,
so I would start with making sure the MTA is properly configured.  If
you look through the docs in the exim4-base directory, there are several
that point to Debian-specific sources of information, such as mailing
lists and on-line documetnation.  I would start there, and return here
if clamav does not work as expected after you are sure the MTA
integration is correct.

Take care,
-- 
 --
|  Stephen Gran  | In those days he was wiser than he is   |
|  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | now -- he used to frequently take my|
|  http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | advice.   -- Winston Churchill  |
 --


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


[Clamav-users] W32.Sober.X

2005-11-28 Thread Steve Wakelin
Hello,

Some of my users have been receiving this virus.

http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/analyses/w32soberx.html

Is there an update for this?  I have checked the database and this is
not mentioned.

Unfortunately I do not have a example as it was neutralised/deleted by
other AntiVirus software.

Regards

/Steve


___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] Information about Virus Sober.Y

2005-11-28 Thread Elizabeth Schwartz
On 11/25/05, Richard Pijnenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Okay, So if i understand you correctly, Sober.Y == Sober.U ?


Viruses mutate frequently, and different vendors give different names to
viruses as they get ahold of samples. And, there's no strict line between
versions; one program might identify two samples as being two different
Sober variants; another program might call them both the same variant.
THere's *no way* to tell for sure whether your program's Sober Y is
Clamav's Sober.U without catching a live sample.

There are  a couple of folks out there trying to keep track of names between
antivirus programs (check the list archives), but it's pretty much an uphill
battle. Other than knowing that somefool == Netsky, I don't bother.

If your problem is that some live viruses are getting through, and you've
got the latest clamav and defs installed, snag a live copy and follow the
instructions for uploading it at www.clamav.net .

cheers Betsy

PS before submitting a sample, take the simple step of updating your
definitions and emailing it back to yourself. The definitions are updated so
frequently that you may find something that got through yesterday is blocked
today. It doesn't happen often but every once in a while McAffee or Symantec
beats ClamAV to the punch for a new variant by a few hours.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] Exploit IE CVE CAN-2005-1790

2005-11-28 Thread Rick Macdougall

Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:

On 11/23/05, Cedric Foll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

is it possible to have a clamav signature for the exploit ?
Proof of conecpt here:
http://www.computerterrorism.com/research/ie/poc.htm



I dunno about anyone else here , but I haven't heard of this site and I
really, REALLY don't want to click on whatever that is. Want to provide some
more detail?


Hi,

It is the Internet Explorer JavaScript Window() Remote Code Execution 
proof of concept.  I'm pretty sure you can not make a signature for that 
exploit.


The site in this case is just sees if your IE is vulnerable and if so 
launches calc.exe


lynx is your friend with suspicious URL's

Regards,

Rick

___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


RE: [Clamav-users] Exploit IE CVE CAN-2005-1790

2005-11-28 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Elizabeth Schwartz wrote:
 On 11/23/05, Cedric Foll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 is it possible to have a clamav signature for the exploit ? Proof of
 conecpt here: http://www.computerterrorism.com/research/ie/poc.htm
 
 
 I dunno about anyone else here , but I haven't heard of this site and
 I really, REALLY don't want to click on whatever that is. Want to
 provide some more detail?

It's Secunia's top-ranking vulnerability at the moment:

http://secunia.com/advisories/15546/
http://secunia.com/

-- 
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com   805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com   Software Engineer
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Todd Lyons
Grant Basson wanted us to know:

Should you ever come back to visit this list you'll learn that everything
you need to know about this can be found in your clamd.conf file. That
leaves for you the challenge of finding that clamd.conf file.
I feel like a twit, but here goes anyway.
How the heck do you run clamd?
Man pages suggest that I just type clamd, I get the following response:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamd
-bash: clamd: command not found

It's not in the path for user grant.  There should be a super user on
your system that will have that binary in the path.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamdscan
ERROR: Clamd is not configured properly.
Does this mean clamd is running?

No.  It probably also means that it is definitely not running.

This is extremely confusing, any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.
By the way, I'm replying to this message, because clamd.conf man page, said
clamd.conf was in /etc in my case I had to create it

There are some basic system administration issues that you probably will
learn over the course of getting this to work.
-- 
Regards...  Todd
we're off on the usual strange tangents.  next will be whether
it is ethical to walk in your neighbor's open house if they're
running ipv6:-).  --Randy Bush
Linux kernel 2.6.12-12mdksmp   3 users,  load average: 2.72, 2.57, 2.46
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] what is the default port that clamav (clamd) runs on

2005-11-28 Thread Jim Maul

Todd Lyons wrote:

Grant Basson wanted us to know:


Should you ever come back to visit this list you'll learn that everything
you need to know about this can be found in your clamd.conf file. That
leaves for you the challenge of finding that clamd.conf file.

I feel like a twit, but here goes anyway.
How the heck do you run clamd?
Man pages suggest that I just type clamd, I get the following response:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamd
-bash: clamd: command not found




Its also very possible that the package you installed is broken out into 
multiple rpm's and you didnt install the 'server' rpm so your clamd 
binary is missing.




It's not in the path for user grant.  There should be a super user on
your system that will have that binary in the path.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ clamdscan
ERROR: Clamd is not configured properly.
Does this mean clamd is running?


No.  It probably also means that it is definitely not running.


This is extremely confusing, any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.
By the way, I'm replying to this message, because clamd.conf man page, said
clamd.conf was in /etc in my case I had to create it




the rpm should create the clamd.conf so if you dont have one, it seems 
to verify what i said above.



Check to make sure you have a clamd binary on your system.  If its not 
there at all, check to make sure the package you installed doesnt have a 
server rpm which was missed during installation.


-Jim
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


[Clamav-users] Mytob virus detected as Broken.Executable?

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Christias
Hello,

we got reports that several emails carrying the Mytob virus
(W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] as reported by F-Prot) slipped through our ClamAV
installation (0.87.1, latest virus database 34/1197). We managed to
get a copy of an infected message and submitted it to the ClamAV Virus
Database where it was recognised as Broken.Executable.

We are using the default values, more or less, for the scanning
options in our clamav-milter/clamd installation and thus
DetectBrokenExecutables was disabled by default.

Any opinions regarding the DetectBrokenExecutables option? Could we or
should we enable it? And if so, why is it disabled by default?

The infected message can be found at: http://noc.ntua.gr/~christia/tmp/message

Regards,
Panagiotis
http://noc.ntua.gr/
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] Mytob virus detected as Broken.Executable?

2005-11-28 Thread Kevin W. Gagel
We are using the default values, more or less, for the
scanning options in our clamav-milter/clamd installation
and thus DetectBrokenExecutables was disabled by default.

Any opinions regarding the DetectBrokenExecutables option?
Could we or should we enable it? And if so, why is it
disabled by default?

Disabled by default because it is harmless and cannot infect
anything. Some AV companies like to detect them as a
virus because it ups their detection amount. I doubt that
ClamAV is concerned about it.

I have mine enabled, because my users cannot tell the
difference between a real virus and a broken one. Even when
the dialog box is telling them. I find it easier to rid the
system of them right upfront rather than put up with users
crying that their system is infected.

=
Kevin W. Gagel
Network Administrator
Information Technology Services
(250) 562-2131 local 448
My Blog:
http://mail.cnc.bc.ca/blogs/gagel

---
The College of New Caledonia, Visit us at http://www.cnc.bc.ca
Virus scanning is done on all incoming and outgoing email.
Anti-spam information for CNC can be found at http://avas.cnc.bc.ca
---
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAv

2005-11-28 Thread Dennis Peterson
Markus Braun said:

[whackage happened]


 Hi,
 i looked at the Readme.DEbian and found this here:

To enable clamav in the Debian exim4 packages, add
av_scanner = clamd:/var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl
(or if you've chosen tcp sockets)
av_scanner = clamd:127.0.0.1 3310
to the main configuration settings (a new file under
/etc/exim4/conf.d/main/ if split config is being used)

Then add the following to your data time acl:

deny  message = This message contains a virus: ($malware_name) please
 scan your system.
  demime = *
  malware = *

 I have addes this lines to my configuration, but the ZIP Eicar testfile
 comes directly in my mailbox, but i think some other virus mails are
 blocked. This is some text of the rejectlog:


 Can i test it with another virust test string?

A possible problem, I suppose, is that you're testing from a local account
and your system is not set up to scan mail from local accounts. Crazier
things have happened.

dp
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html


Re: [Clamav-users] Text of email not scanned.

2005-11-28 Thread Rob MacGregor
On 29/11/05, PBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Done all this. Clamscan reports the eicar test string if I scan the eicar
 file from the command line, finds it if the file is an attachment. But not
 inside an email meeting all the above requirements.

How are you integrating clamav with your mail server?

--
 Please keep list traffic on the list.
Rob MacGregor
  Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
doesn't become a monster.  Friedrich Nietzsche
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html