Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Kees Theunissen 
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018, Bill S wrote:

>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
>> point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over
>> distributions 
>
>I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of
>a non Slackware install.  If anyone finds such a package in their
>travels I would be very grateful for a link.

Have a look at https://slackbuilds.org/ for build scripts that produce
binary Slackware packages which integrate nicely with the Slackware
package management tools.

The build script for Clamav 0.99.3 on Slackware 14.2 doesn't require
any patches. Are you running "Slackware Current" perhaps?


Regards,

Kees Theunissen.

-- 
Kees Theunissen,  System and network manager,   Tel: +31 (0)40-3334724
Dutch Institute For Fundamental Energy Research (DIFFER)
e-mail address:   c.j.theunis...@differ.nl
postal address:   PO Box 6336, 5600 HH, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
visitors address: De Zaale 20, 5612 AJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Bill S 
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Reindl Harald  wrote:

> point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over
> distributions 

I have not had much luck finding a binary package that is not part of
a non Slackware install.  If anyone finds such a package in their
travels I would be very grateful for a link.

Thanks.
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Reindl Harald 



Am 21.02.2018 um 16:06 schrieb Bill S:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, SCOTT PACKARD
 wrote:

Bill S -
I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads 
verbiage.

I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name.
Once I found one, I saw I could go to https://rpmfind.net/ and look there for 
clamav, and its dependent packages.


Thanks for taking the time to reply.  Although Slackware has a
"rpm2targz" utility I have a feeling it would be a real bag of worms
to get it installed and working particularly since there are so  many
different .rpms for different versions of Fedora etc.


correct don't use it

next time just mention in the initial-post about what problem excatly 
you are talking and on what operating system in which version - that 
saves a lot of ping-pong and guessings

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Bill S 
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, SCOTT PACKARD
 wrote:
> Bill S -
> I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads 
> verbiage.
>
> I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name.
> Once I found one, I saw I could go to https://rpmfind.net/ and look there for 
> clamav, and its dependent packages.

Thanks for taking the time to reply.  Although Slackware has a
"rpm2targz" utility I have a feeling it would be a real bag of worms
to get it installed and working particularly since there are so  many
different .rpms for different versions of Fedora etc.
Thanks again.
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Reindl Harald 



Am 21.02.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Emanuel:

Is possible to install via yum?


surely when you are at RHEL/CentOS/Fedora

clamav for RHEL/CentOS is maintained in the EPEL repo which is also part 
of the Fedora project and you get a working 0.99.3 even for CentOS6


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1470


El 21/02/18 a las 11:35, SCOTT PACKARD escribió:

Bill S -
I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's 
downloads verbiage.


I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package 
name.
Once I found one, I saw I could go to https://rpmfind.net/ and look 
there for clamav, and its dependent packages.


Regards, Scott


clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Emanuel 

Is possible to install via yum?


El 21/02/18 a las 11:35, SCOTT PACKARD escribió:

Bill S -
I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads 
verbiage.

I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name.
Once I found one, I saw I could go to https://rpmfind.net/ and look there for 
clamav, and its dependent packages.

Regards, Scott


clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml


--
envialosimple.com   
Emanuel Gonzalez
IT / Departamento Emails
emanuel.gonza...@donweb.com 
www.envialosimple.com 
by donweb 

Nota de confidencialidad: Este mensaje y archivos adjuntos al mismo son 
confidenciales, de uso exclusivo para el destinatario del mismo. La 
divulgación y/o uso del mismo sin autorización por parte de DonWeb.com 
queda prohibida.
DonWeb.com no se hace responsable del mensaje por la falsificación y/o 
alteración del mismo.
De no ser Ud el destinatario del mismo y lo ha recibido por error, por 
favor, notifique al remitente y elimínelo de su sistema.
Confidentiality Note: This message and any attachments (the message) are 
confidential and intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised 
use or dissemination is prohibited by DonWeb.com.

DonWeb.com shall not be liable  for the message if altered or falsified.
If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please cancel it 
immediately and inform the sender
Nota de Confidencialidade: Esta mensagem e seus eventuais anexos podem 
conter dados confidenciais ou privilegiados.
Se você os recebeu por engano ou não é um dos destinatários aos quais 
ela foi endereçada, por favor destrua-a e a todos os seus eventuais 
anexos ou copias realizadas, imediatamente.
É proibida a retenção, distribuição, divulgação ou utilização de 
quaisquer informações aqui contidas.
Por favor, informenos sobre o recebimento indevido desta mensagem, 
retornando-a para o autor.


___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Reindl Harald 



Am 21.02.2018 um 15:35 schrieb SCOTT PACKARD:

I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads 
verbiage.


.fc26 clearly indicates Fedora 26
.el7 would be RHEL7

point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over 
distributions and since they simply include patches when appropriate i 
don't get the question "should i continue a known vulnerable version or 
even start with some beta"


the build-spec below even distincts if the tarball is PHP 7.1 or 7.2 to 
apply the correct patches depending on the used tarball


[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ cat php.spec | grep patch
Patch1: php-71-realpath-cache-openbasedir.patch
Patch2: php-71-systzdata.patch
Patch3: php-72-systzdata.patch
%patch1 -p1 -b .realpath-71
%patch3 -p1 -b .systzdata-72
%patch2 -p1 -b .systzdata-71


clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread SCOTT PACKARD 
Bill S -
I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads 
verbiage.

I was able to find these -4 versions by Googling on the full package name.
Once I found one, I saw I could go to https://rpmfind.net/ and look there for 
clamav, and its dependent packages.

Regards, Scott

> >>> clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> >>> clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> >>> clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> >>> clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> >>> clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> >>> clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> >>> clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> >>> clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> >>> clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> >>> clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Bill S 
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Reindl Harald  wrote:
>
>
> Am 21.02.2018 um 14:51 schrieb Bill S:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues
>>> properly:
>>
>>
>> Again my apologies.  I was not aware there were revised -4 flavors
>> available. When ever I went to https://www.clamav.net/downloads it
>> only showed 0.99.3.   I thought the latest version with any known
>> problems resolved would be shown on that page. I will look for a -4
>> version.
>
>
> this is 0.99.3 - you confuse upstream version with package release-tag
> anyways - the question why build from source remains

In a word - ignorance.  For years on my Slackware server I have always
done the install using ./configure --enable-milter.   The first time I
did it there were a few hiccups but I made some notes so I would not
have to reinvent the wheel with each upgrade and it has worked. well.
I have never had to look further until now.

I assume from your comments that the files you referenced below are
binaries.   I guess when I find them I will have some more learning to
do to get everything working again.



>
>>> clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
>>> clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>>> clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>>> clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
>>> clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
>>> clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>>> clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>>> clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>>> clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
>>> clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
>
> ___
> clamav-users mailing list
> clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
>
>
> Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
> https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
>
> http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Reindl Harald 



Am 21.02.2018 um 14:51 schrieb Bill S:

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald  wrote:

why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues
properly:


Again my apologies.  I was not aware there were revised -4 flavors
available. When ever I went to https://www.clamav.net/downloads it
only showed 0.99.3.   I thought the latest version with any known
problems resolved would be shown on that page. I will look for a -4
version.


this is 0.99.3 - you confuse upstream version with package release-tag
anyways - the question why build from source remains


clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch

___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Bill S 
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Reindl Harald  wrote:


> you post is crap because you don't point to any refereneces (url to said
> patch and son on) nor talking what is a "newer GCC" in your point of view
> and especially in the context of the problem

My apologies. I had been following posts right along on this issue and
it didn't occur to me that others were not. My mistake.  Here are the
URLs for those who may come along later.

http://lists.clamav.net/pipermail/clamav-users/2018-January/005751.html

https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12026


>
> why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues
> properly:


Again my apologies.  I was not aware there were revised -4 flavors
available. When ever I went to https://www.clamav.net/downloads it
only showed 0.99.3.   I thought the latest version with any known
problems resolved would be shown on that page. I will look for a -4
version.

Thanks.


>
> clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
> clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
> clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Reindl Harald 


Am 21.02.2018 um 14:06 schrieb Bill S:

I think there was a patch issued over a week ago for the problem
0.99.3 has with newer versions of GCC.  Based on that I have two
questions.

1. Will version 0.99.3 ever be revised so you do not have to use the patch?

2. If the answer to question 1 is “No”, what are the pros and cons of
staying with version 0.99.2 or switching to the 0.100.0 beta?  Is
there a clear cut preference? I have not installed the beta version
but I did try compiling it and did not run into any problems


staying at 0.99.2 can't be a serious option when there are attacks in 
the wild for weeks now targeting the issues adressed with 0.99.3


anyways:
you post is crap because you don't point to any refereneces (url to said 
patch and son on) nor talking what is a "newer GCC" in your point of 
view and especially in the context of the problem


why not use distribution packages whci seems to can handel the issues 
properly:


clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml

[clamav-users] ClamAV 0.99.3 and GCC Patch

2018-02-21 Thread Bill S 
I think there was a patch issued over a week ago for the problem
0.99.3 has with newer versions of GCC.  Based on that I have two
questions.

 1. Will version 0.99.3 ever be revised so you do not have to use the patch?

2. If the answer to question 1 is “No”, what are the pros and cons of
staying with version 0.99.2 or switching to the 0.100.0 beta?  Is
there a clear cut preference? I have not installed the beta version
but I did try compiling it and did not run into any problems.
___
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users


Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq

http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml