Re: GTK 2.8

2006-06-07 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Philippe" == Philippe Laporte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Philippe> I'm wondering if there is any interest in making the
Philippe> Classpath build configurable and the code correspondingly
Philippe> modular enough that dependencies such as GTK can be matched
Philippe> with older versions of GTK, at the expense of degraded
Philippe> functionality of course, so that one can benefit from
Philippe> improvements in other sections of the code base while not
Philippe> upgrading specific other dependencies.

My opinion is that I would approve a clean patch to do
this...  barring objections from other developers, of course.

However, I think it would have to be maintained by the folks using it
-- i.e., I would expect that folks doing regular development against
gtk 2.8 would not be responsible for breakage.

Tom



Re: GTK 2.8

2006-06-07 Thread Yvan Norsa

Hi,


dependencies such as GTK can be matched with older versions of GTK


It sure would be useful, as GTK 2.8 doesn't seem to be in debian stable
(current is 2.6.4).

Yvan



Re: GTK 2.8

2006-06-06 Thread Philippe Laporte
Hi,
   I'm finally properly ramping up into Classpath :-)

I'm wondering if there is any interest in making the Classpath build
configurable and the code correspondingly modular enough that
dependencies such as GTK can be matched with older versions of GTK, at
the expense of degraded functionality of course, so that one can benefit
from improvements in other sections of the code base while not upgrading
specific other dependencies.

I realize this may entail a configuration mess, but I'd like to explore
the topic a bit.

Thanks,
   
-- 
Philippe Laporte 



On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:36 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just committed my patch to make GdkGraphics2D the default Java2D backend.  
> Now 
> GTK-2.8 or higher is required to build the GNU Classpath GTK peers.
> 
> Tom






Re: GTK 2.8

2006-05-26 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons

Hi,

Mark Wielaard wrote:


If someone could do some make distchecks and see if everything can be
made to build out of the box again that would be appreciated.


I fixed one problem with make distcheck but now the tools are failing to run 
because they can't find a VM.  I'm not sure how to locate a suitable VM binary. 
 A guess-and-check approach seems hacky since "make distcheck" should be 
totally self-contained and reproducible.  Perhaps we should disable these tests 
until GNU Classpath has a proper bootstrap VM?


Tom




Re: GTK 2.8

2006-05-26 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi,

On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 11:36 -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> I just committed my patch to make GdkGraphics2D the default Java2D backend.  
> Now 
> GTK-2.8 or higher is required to build the GNU Classpath GTK peers.

Cool. But note that there are still some issues with make distcheck.
unfortunately I killed our autobuilder (builder.classpath.org) trying to
upgrade to the new dependencies (don't ask) so there will not be new
test results for a couple of days. I will be travalling for 2 days and
we need Jim for restoring the image on builder before we can resurrect
the machine. My apologies.

If someone could do some make distchecks and see if everything can be
made to build out of the box again that would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Mark