[Coder-Com] X's unban... is that a bug?
This interested me today... Can anyone enlighten my about this? is it some kind of bug? [13:43] *** Marc_-- ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #politics [13:43] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net [13:43] *** Marc_-- was kicked by X ((sansmith) *Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of shit - Shame, Shame) [13:43] -> *x* unban #politics *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net [13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban *!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database [13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database [13:43] *** X sets mode: -b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net [13:43] -X- Removed 1 bans that matched *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net -Mike Empus@IRC
[Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?
ack, I sent this e-mail to early, thinking that it *did* remove the ban.
However, it did not, a couple of minutes later:
[13:44] *** Marc_-- ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
has joined #politics
[13:44] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
[13:44] *** Marc_-- was kicked by X ((sansmith) *Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of
shit - Shame, Shame)
[13:45] -> *x* lbanlist #politics *level3*
[13:45] -X- *** Ban List for channel #politics ***
[13:45] -X- #politics *!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
Level: 450
[13:45] -X- ADDED BY: Brytani ( jews are descendants of fruit
maggots)
[13:45] -X- SINCE: Tue Apr 2 06:43:49 2002
[13:45] -X- EXP: 6 days, 02:58:17
[13:45] -X- #politics *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net Level: 300
[13:45] -X- ADDED BY: sansmith (*Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of shit - Shame,
Shame)
[13:45] -X- SINCE: Wed Apr 3 04:22:25 2002
[13:45] -X- EXP: 7 days, 00:36:53
[13:45] -X- *** END ***
What's going on?!
-Original Message-
From: Empus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: X's unban... is that a bug?
This interested me today...
Can anyone enlighten my about this? is it some kind of bug?
[13:43] *** Marc_-- ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
has joined #politics
[13:43] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
[13:43] *** Marc_-- was kicked by X ((sansmith) *Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of
shit - Shame, Shame)
[13:43] -> *x* unban #politics *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
[13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban
*!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database
[13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban
*!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database
[13:43] *** X sets mode: -b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
[13:43] -X- Removed 1 bans that matched *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net
-Mike
Empus@IRC
FW: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?
damnit.. Clicked reply and went to Iso directly. *oops*
Sorry for getting it twice Iso. =)
-Original Message-
From: Empus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:46 PM
To: Isomer
Subject: RE: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?
Iso,
But *BOTH* bans were above my level, and X said it removed 1 ban matching
the hostmask I gave. It didn't remove either, therefore shouldnt have said
it removed one.
Catch my drift?
-Mike
Empus@IRC
-Original Message-
From: Perry Lorier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Isomer
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:01 PM
To: Empus
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?
> ack, I sent this e-mail to early, thinking that it *did* remove the ban.
> However, it did not, a couple of minutes later:
>
> What's going on?!
The bans were placed with an access higher than yours. You then tried
to remove it and couldn't, but X let you unset the ban from the channel
(since you could /mode #chan -b .), this is a "Feature", for
instance you might want to free up some banlist entries so you can set
some more bans. Then when the user rejoined it set the bans again
(since they were still in X -- you didn't have access to remove them).
Or am I missing something?
--
You will remember something that you should not have forgotten.
RE: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug?
But X did *NOT* notify me that I could not remove the ban in X. It said it removed the ban, when in actual fact, it did not. X should not notify a user that a ban is removed, unless that ban is able to be, and is, removed. And if it is removing the channel ban, rather than the one in X's db banlist, it should specify, so the user knows to differentiate between the two different types. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Smith Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:29 PM To: Undernet Coder-Com Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug? this has not changed since the old X... you have enough access to remove the ban on the channel but not enough access to remove the ban in X, result, X removes the channel, but notify's you that you cannot remove the ban in X. -- Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technician, Media Design School Ltd. CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or retain it. Please immediately notify us by return email and then delete the email. Note: Unless stated this email does not represent Media Design School Ltd. > From: "Empus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:47:49 +1200 > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Coder-Com] FW: X's unban... is that a bug? > > ack, I sent this e-mail to early, thinking that it *did* remove the ban. > However, it did not, a couple of minutes later: > > [13:44] *** Marc_-- ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > has joined #politics > [13:44] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > [13:44] *** Marc_-- was kicked by X ((sansmith) *Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of > shit - Shame, Shame) > > [13:45] -> *x* lbanlist #politics *level3* > [13:45] -X- *** Ban List for channel #politics *** > [13:45] -X- #politics *!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > Level: 450 > [13:45] -X- ADDED BY: Brytani ( jews are descendants of fruit > maggots) > [13:45] -X- SINCE: Tue Apr 2 06:43:49 2002 > [13:45] -X- EXP: 6 days, 02:58:17 > [13:45] -X- #politics *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net Level: 300 > [13:45] -X- ADDED BY: sansmith (*Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of shit - Shame, > Shame) > [13:45] -X- SINCE: Wed Apr 3 04:22:25 2002 > [13:45] -X- EXP: 7 days, 00:36:53 > [13:45] -X- *** END *** > > What's going on?! > > -Original Message- > From: Empus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: X's unban... is that a bug? > > > This interested me today... > Can anyone enlighten my about this? is it some kind of bug? > > > [13:43] *** Marc_-- ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > has joined #politics > [13:43] *** X sets mode: +b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > [13:43] *** Marc_-- was kicked by X ((sansmith) *Saddam_Jr* jewish piece of > shit - Shame, Shame) > [13:43] -> *x* unban #politics *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > [13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban > *!*@dialup-65.57.34.26.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database > [13:43] -X- You have insufficient access to remove the ban > *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net from #politics's database > [13:43] *** X sets mode: -b *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > [13:43] -X- Removed 1 bans that matched *!*@*.Dial1.Phoenix1.Level3.net > > > -Mike > Empus@IRC > >
RE: [Coder-Com] new /whois line backwards?
Kevin L. Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Until the clients incorporate support for this numeric, it'll either
> look a little funny, or you'll have to use a script to reorder the
> reply for human ordering. I'm personally against reordering the reply
> in the server code because of the benefits I've already mentioned...
--
raw 330:*: { echo $color(whois)
$iif($gettok($readini(mirc.ini,options,n2),26,44),-a,-s) $2 $4- $3 | halt }
That should fix it in mIRC I believe. LordLuke scripted that fix, and has
notified Khaled aparrantly - it will be included in the next mIRC release.
-Mike
Empus@IRC
RE: [Coder-Com] X search feature
stoney,
I'm all in favour of this idea. I think it would be very helpful. I'm not
a newbie, but I use the search command when I help someone find a channel
they're looking for, if I am unable to, or anyone else, is unable to help
them in the current channel.
-Mike
Empus@IRC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Py Fivestones
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Coder-Com] X search feature
Hi,
Is it possible to add parameters to the /msg x search feature? As it
is now, X will not output more than 10 hits. This limit makes the feature
self defeating in a way because newbies are the most likely ones to use the
channel search. I tried /msg x search help, and also search undernet, as a
newbie is likely to do, and the 10 hit limit yielded few "good" hits. Could
we add something like /msg x search blah 3 to find channels matching blah
with at least 3 users on the channels? That would be a good way to get
around the output limit. Or perhaps only return channels with more then 2
people on it (X+3 users).
stoney`
Py Fivestones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Coder-Com] X bug or feature?
Scenario:
X is parted from a channel (/msg x part )
A user joins that channel, who matches X's banlist for the channel
X rejoins the channel (/msg x join )
nothing happens. the user is still there.
Does X not ban these users when it rejoins (ie. reads the channel banlist),
on purpose? Is this a feature? If so, what is the reasoning behind it? I
would like to see X read it's banlist, and act accordingly, if there are
users in the channel when it rejoins, who match bans in the banlist.
Only just noticed it, trying to figure out, if it is a *feature* or a *bug*,
as I was aparrantly confused over this feature/bug issue the last time I
posted something to do with X here. *laugh*
Best Regards,
-Mike
Empus@IRC
[Coder-Com] weird occurance
Seriously, what are the chances in this? I'm figuring that happened, because we both joined at EXACTLY the same time, wonder why zeu got precedence over ops? heh *shrug* - It interested me. heh [23:47] *** Now talking in #123-test [23:47] *** zeu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #123-test [23:47] *** zeu sets mode: +o zeu [23:47] *** h25.eu.undernet.org sets mode: -o Empus [23:47] *** zeu sets mode: +o Empus [23:47] <@Empus> WOAH ---- Empus@IRC (Undernet)_ _ UserService Co-Ordinator & Coder o' \,=./ `o http://www.userservice.org(o o) ooO--(_)--Ooo---
[Coder-Com] weird ban
[22:36] -> *x* ban #userservice *!*test@*.test [22:36] -X- Added ban *!*test@*.test to #userservice at level 75 [22:36] *** X sets mode: +b *!*test@*.test [22:36] *** nootjopm was kicked by X ((Empus) No Reason) [22:36] -X- #userservice *!*test@*.test Level: 75 [22:36] -X- ADDED BY: Empus (No Reason) [22:36] -X- SINCE: Mon May 6 12:35:55 2002 [22:36] -X- EXP: 0 days, 02:59:46 [22:36] -X- *** END *** [22:36] [22:36] nootjopm is [EMAIL PROTECTED] [22:36] nootjopm is «etc» [22:36] nootjopm on *.undernet.org [22:36] nootjopm on #roxxxcrackers, #mangalia, #linuxzone, #unixzone [22:36] How is that one explained? Surely this is a *bug*, and not a 'feature' of X? -Mike ---- Empus@IRC (Undernet)_ _ UserService Senior Administrator & Coder o' \,=./ `o http://www.userservice.org(o o) ooO--(_)--Ooo---
Re: [Coder-com] Proxy monitoring service
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, wrote: > Just a simple proxy monitoring service liked as a server. Just needs to be > linked and he can start killing, or it can be linked to a other drone/broxy > database/module that can kill/gline what the Data service will find at > every scan > That's a pretty neat, lightweight little service. I'm going to have a play with it myself when I have some time :> - Empus ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
Re: [Coder-com] Proxy monitoring service
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Empus wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:24 PM, wrote: > >> Just a simple proxy monitoring service liked as a server. Just needs to >> be linked and he can start killing, or it can be linked to a other >> drone/broxy database/module that can kill/gline what the Data service will >> find at every scan >> > > That's a pretty neat, lightweight little service. > > Actually, something just got pointed out to me /me looks at http://brainbox.cc/repository/trunk/defender/ Is this code blatantly ripped, with missing credit or permission? > I'm going to have a play with it myself when I have some time :> > > - Empus > - Empus ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
[Coder-com] IPv6
Hi Guys, Do we have anyone out there able and interested to introduce IPv6 to gnuworld? I understand it to be a big^H^H^Hhorrible task, but it would be really good to make a start. Users ask about it quite often and we're falling behind in this area. Eventually, we'll be denying access to the people we want to serve. Any takers? :> - Empus ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
Re: [Coder-com] Greetings
I've a huge fan of all things electronic security (working in this space for a living) but personally, I see little benefit in SSL for IRC, because of the very architecture model. Unless you're speaking with another client on the same server, or all people in a channel you're on is on the same server, you'd end up with a false sense of security. Without guaranteeing that ALL client<->server connections are encrypted, and any server<->server connections in between are as well, you could never be sure that the end to end path is encrypted and thus MIM attacks are mitigated. So without that scenario, wouldn't the client be fooled into a false sense of security? /2 cents - Empus On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Panesar, Amrit wrote: > Greetings ircu developers, > > After much searching yet to no avail, I have been unable to find a > patch or even a discussion for SSL support in ircu > > What particular hurdles stand in the way? > ___ > Coder-com mailing list > Coder-com@undernet.org > http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com > ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
Re: [Coder-com] Greetings
I think you're missing my point.
Let's say you're ClientA, connected over SSL to ServerA.
I'm ClientB, connected insecurely (ie. no SSL) to ServerB.
ServerA is connected to ServerB, unencrypted.
You established a connection with your server over SSL, so you think your
session is secure, and that chat conversations will be protected from man
in the middle attacks because of encryption.
However, if you chat with me, the ServerA<->ServerB connection, and also
the ServerB<->ClientB side of the connection, is all insecure. You think
your SSL provides security on our conversation, but in reality, it
wouldn't. It only protects the ClientA<->ServerA side of things. One
could argue that some security is better than none, but I think it's a
dangerous illusion of sorts.
Again, these are just my thoughts but it's something I've considered before
and I think it's a valid reason to be wary of IRC over SSL.
- Empus
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
> **
> On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 12:36 +1000, Empus wrote:
>
> I've a huge fan of all things electronic security (working in this space
> for a living) but personally, I see little benefit in SSL for IRC,
> because of the very architecture model.
>
>
>
> Unless you're speaking with another client on the same server, or all
> people in a channel you're on is on the same server, you'd end up with a
> false sense of security.
>
>
>
> Without guaranteeing that ALL client<->server connections are encrypted,
> and any server<->server connections in between are as well, you could never
> be sure that the end to end path is encrypted and thus MIM attacks are
> mitigated.
>
>
>
> So without that scenario, wouldn't the client be fooled into a false
> sense of security?
>
>
>
> I'd say yes, to large networked servers like Undernet [image: ;)] but SSL
> would be a great advantage, in particular for stand alone's or small
> networks where agreements mandate ssl only.
>
> Think..
>
> Port { server = yes; port = 4400; };
> ...
> Port { port = 6667; };
> Port { port = ; ssl = yes; };
>
> anyone connects to 6667, only ssl are accepted on , commenting out
> the port 6667 Port entry, would mean server only accepts connections on
> port , that are SSL, plain connections on should be rejected.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> ___
> Coder-com mailing list
> Coder-com@undernet.org
> http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
>
>
___
Coder-com mailing list
Coder-com@undernet.org
http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
[Coder-com] gnuworld: gnu-v6 merged to master
Hi all, The gnu-v6 gnuworld branch has now been merged into master. This will be the primary moving forward following the significant round of enhancements in the last year. New branches may be used for other large developments, but outside of that we will use master and eventually remove gnu-v6 For those not aware, these days we're all on GitHub @ https://github.com/UndernetIRC Cheers, - Empus ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
Re: [Coder-com] New Coder-Com Website
Nice work Compy :> Cheers, - Empus On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:26 PM Jimmy Lipham wrote: > Hey everyone, > > With Undernet refreshing its branding and web presence, I felt it critical > to bring the coder-com website into the current time in terms of how > information is presented and the general aesthetics of the page. This > morning, we deployed a brand new Jekyll-based experience with mobile > responsive design and an "info first" approach. > > You can view the new site at https://coder-com.undernet.org > > Project release/commit information is updated automatically when new > commits are pushed or new releases are tagged. If you have any feedback, > please feel free to reach out here or on IRC. > > I also cannot thank Mitko enough for his design entry into the Coder-Com > website competition back in 2005. The design has served us well for the > last 15 years! > > We've got some interesting projects planned going forward, so watch this > space! > > -- Compy > > ___ > Coder-com mailing list > Coder-com@undernet.org > http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com > ___ Coder-com mailing list Coder-com@undernet.org http://undernet.sbg.org/mailman/listinfo/coder-com
[Coder-Com] initdb failed.
Upon installing and configuring PostgreSQL completely fine - no errors, I go to run initdb... and: gnuworld@userservice:/usr/local/pgsql/bin$ ./initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user "gnuworld". This user must also own the server process. Fixing permissions on existing directory /usr/local/pgsql/data... ok creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/base... ok creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/global... ok creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_xlog... ok creating directory /usr/local/pgsql/data/pg_clog... ok creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1...IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget(key=1, num=17, 03600) failed: Function not implemented initdb failed. gnuworld@userservice:/usr/local/pgsql/bin$ Does anyone know why is this occurring, how can it be fixed? tcl8.3, PostgreSQL 7.2, FreeBSD-4.5, gmake-3.79.1 I'm aware this isnt a PostgreSQL mailing list, but the postgresql.org lists are not responding, (seem quite inactive), and as this is a requirement to setup gnuworld, I figured someone here may have an idea about this. Kind Regards, - Mike Empus@IRC
RE: [Coder-Com] initdb failed.
thanks Iso, semi-annoyed that I have to recompile the kernel, but oh well.
and btw, no need to CC, I'm am subscribed to this list. =)
-Mike
Empus@IRC
-Original Message-
From: Perry Lorier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Isomer
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 12:48 AM
To: Empus (Mike)
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] initdb failed.
> /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1...IpcSemaphoreCreate: semget(key=1, num=17,
> 03600) failed: Function not implemented
>
Postgres is trying to use the "semget" syscall. This is a "System V
Shared Memory" system call from memory. This isn't compiled into your
kernel. Time for a recompile.
--
Is that really YOU that is reading this?
