Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-17 Thread tjpa
Despite the gripes, many people are wiseing up to realize that the  
don't need to pay $1000+ per year to watch TV.


Nearly 800,000 U.S. TV households cut the cord
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ytech_gadg/20100413/tc_ytech_gadg/ytech_gadg_tc1598



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-15 Thread t.piwowar

On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:52 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:

Useless!


My thoughts exactly. Only the object of our frustration differs.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-15 Thread b_s-wilk

t.piwowar escribió:




On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:52 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:

Useless!

My thoughts exactly. Only the object of our frustration differs.



Do you have a source for data comparison of device tuners for current 
TVs, converters, DVD recorders, comparing them for consumers to decide 
which one to purchase? The report doesn't direct us to that kind of 
information.


We need to have good data on the boxes. I can compare headphones--all 
that information is in the specs. I can compare cars, radios/receivers, 
linens, but not TV tuners. Specs for tuners tell us about product 
dimensions, channel range and which cables can be connected, but nothing 
about how well the tuner picks up local and distant stations.


The report tells us in 200 pages how last year's converter boxes fared. 
We're still waiting for comparison data in plain English to help us 
choose the device with the best range, reception, reliability, etc., on 
a few easy to read pages.


And you're frustrated about...


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-15 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:41 AM, b_s-wilk b1sun...@yahoo.es wrote:

 Do you have a source for data comparison of device tuners for current TVs,
 converters, DVD recorders, comparing them for consumers to decide which one
 to purchase? The report doesn't direct us to that kind of information.

 We need to have good data on the boxes. I can compare headphones--all that
 information is in the specs. I can compare cars, radios/receivers, linens,
 but not TV tuners. Specs for tuners tell us about product dimensions,
 channel range and which cables can be connected, but nothing about how well
 the tuner picks up local and distant stations.

 The report tells us in 200 pages how last year's converter boxes fared.
 We're still waiting for comparison data in plain English to help us choose
 the device with the best range, reception, reliability, etc., on a few easy
 to read pages.

 And you're frustrated about...

  Ditto.  This is how it has always been in the TV world.  Dunno why.
No such specification information exists that allows for consumers to
make comparisons.  User or user-oriented test reviews are all that is
available, and even most such reviews never concern themselves with
the tuner component.  I can find more really useful information on the
box that a $50 push lawnmower comes in than I can on a $1,600 TV.  Go
figure.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-15 Thread mike
Is it because this information is simply moot when it comes to actual use to
the consumer because of all the variables?  So many things can affect
reception that are out of control of the tuner, perhaps it's pointless.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:09 AM, phartz...@gmail.com phartz...@gmail.comwrote:

   I can find more really useful information on the
 box that a $50 push lawnmower comes in than I can on a $1,600 TV.  Go
 figure.

  Steve


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-15 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:16 PM, mike xha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is it because this information is simply moot when it comes to actual use to
 the consumer because of all the variables?  So many things can affect
 reception that are out of control of the tuner, perhaps it's pointless.

  Not at all.  I have more than two digital television receivers, all
on the same antenna, and the difference between them in ability to
obtain a readable signal is very obvious.  One could make the same
case you have made in about FM receivers, virtually all of which
readily provide buyers with tuner specifications.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-14 Thread b_s-wilk
Perhaps Mr. Parish is going to bop you in the nose for such a response. 

The report is rich with useful information, but you have to read it. What a hardship! 




Useless!

I looked through the report, DTV Converter Box Test Program--Results and 
Lessons Learned. Aside from bad puctuation, yes, the report is rich with 
information. After you read it your brain will be filled with lots of 
information, but useful? Maybe for the researchers, but not to consumers.


Does it really matter how well any of the converter boxes performed in 
the Threshold of Visibility (TOV) and Reacquisition, single-static-echo, 
RF emissions tests or any other test? No, it doesn't. Why? None of the 
converter boxes I've seen, nor new digital TVs, nor DVD recorders have 
any of this information on the box or in the description. Few have any 
technical info on their web sites. Disclaimer: I haven't looked at specs 
for ALL devices, only ones we considered buying.


Specs for my converter, from the manual [less info on the box]:

- Product Name - Digital TV converter

- Power Supply
Input Voltage 100-240  50/60 Hz
Power consumption : Maximum 8W, standby 1W

- Decoder
Video Format: Standard definition VCBS
Audio Format: Dolby Digital audio

- Signal Input/Output
ATSC Antenna/Cable RF IN: F-Connector
RF Loop through or NTSC Ch 3/4 out: F-Connector
Antenna Impedance: 75 Ohms
Channels: VHF 2-13, UHF 14-69
SmartAntenna interface

- Video Outputs
Composite Video Output for standard analog sets: RCA Connector

- Audio Outputs
Analog Audio Outputs (L/R): RCA Connectors

- Service
Software upgrade through RS-232 port: 9 pin D-Sub type

- [box also lists dimensions, remote that includes batteries, cables]


Is there any useful data from the report to tell me how well this 
converter box will perform? No. Is there any data from the report to 
guide consumers to the better devices based on test results?


No.

Lots of geeky data that Tom or Steve or Roger or I may understand is no 
help when the manufacturers don't provide any of it in the device specs. 
How many people/consumers checked with these sites while searching for 
the right converter or TV:


https://www.ntiadtv.gov/cecb_list.cfm - maybe [when it was available]
http://datasheets.maxim-ic.com
http://www.haluyatech.com
http://www.compendiumarcana.com/
http://mail.ing-steen.se
[full links and additional links are in report]


Betty


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-13 Thread tjpa

On Apr 13, 2010, at 12:24 AM, phartz...@gmail.com wrote:
 Perhaps Mr. Parish is going to bop you in the nose for such a  
response.


The report is rich with useful information, but you have to read it.  
What a hardship!



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-12 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 4:29 AM -0400 4/12/10, t.piwowar wrote:


[snip]
DTV Converter Box Test Program -- Results and Lessons Learned 
http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/9TR1003-ConverterBoxTestReport.pdf


From the above report:
The results are presented statistically, without identifying brands 
or models of converter boxes. Consequently, the report does not 
provide information that would be useful to consumers for selecting 
a converter box.


--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-12 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Roger D. Parish
rogerd.par...@gmail.com wrote:

 At 4:29 AM -0400 4/12/10, t.piwowar wrote:

 [snip]
 DTV Converter Box Test Program -- Results and Lessons Learned 

 http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/reports/9TR1003-ConverterBoxTestReport.pdf

 From the above report:

 The results are presented statistically, without identifying brands or
 models of converter boxes. Consequently, the report does not provide
 information that would be useful to consumers for selecting a converter box.

  So, still nothing from manufacturers or the government that would
help consumers.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-12 Thread t.piwowar

On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Roger D. Parish wrote:

From the above report:
The results are presented statistically, without identifying brands  
or models of converter boxes. Consequently, the report does not  
provide information that would be useful to consumers for selecting  
a converter box.


It would not be useful to an idiot who expects answers to be presented  
on a silver platter. I expect more from our list members (or at least  
some of them).



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV [Was: Broadband Speeds Map]

2010-04-12 Thread phartz...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:07 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Roger D. Parish wrote:

 From the above report:

 The results are presented statistically, without identifying brands or
 models of converter boxes. Consequently, the report does not provide
 information that would be useful to consumers for selecting a converter box.

 It would not be useful to an idiot who expects answers to be presented on a
 silver platter. I expect more from our list members (or at least some of
 them).

  Perhaps Mr. Parish is going to bop you in the nose for such a response.

  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV for PC 2

2009-08-27 Thread Tony B
I've tried international TV. Yes, there are probably that many
channels out there. Tuning them in when you want to watch them is
problematical. I believe there is freeware software available to
assist in this.

Sporadic claims of being able to watch a distant football game
occasionally. But for entertainment value the internet still pales
compared to commercial TV.


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Tom Chamberstom.chamb...@wdn.com wrote:
 List members :
              Does anyone have experience and an opinion about software
 called Digital TV for PC2 , which is supposed to turn almost any
 PC into a TV with thousands of channels ?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-15 Thread Constance Warner
Our VCR with digital tuner is a Panasonic DMR-EZ48V.

I think it has both analog and digital outputs. (I didn't install it, so
I can't tell you for sure.)

As I said, it lets us get digital signals on an old analog TV, by
routing everything through the VCR. We could probably get a better
picture with a converter box, but the TV isn't that great anyway, so the
improvement would be marginal.  The point, for us, is that we can
actually GET some of the digital signals.  We don't have cable or
satellite, so we thought that after the conversion we would be
converting our analog set into a planter for ferns and other delicate
houseplants.

I can't report on any DRM issues associated with this VCR, because I
haven't yet tried to record anything on the digital side of the machine.
The analog side will record any analog broadcast.

--Constance Warner

-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard P.
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:34 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

Which model? Does your VCR have both analog and digital outputs?

Richard P.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Constance Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a
digital
 tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as
soon
 as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
 Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
 after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
 signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
 anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
 off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
 good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
**
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/
**

*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-15 Thread Richard P.
FYI, if anyone needs a free HDTV in the DC area, here's one on Craigslist:
http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/nva/zip/877956943.html

The Sony XBR is a great TUBE set and will produce a fantastic picture.
The downside is that it's heavy (250 lbs). I'd get this myself but I
already have one.

Richard P.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Constance Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Our VCR with digital tuner is a Panasonic DMR-EZ48V.

 I think it has both analog and digital outputs. (I didn't install it, so
 I can't tell you for sure.)

 As I said, it lets us get digital signals on an old analog TV, by
 routing everything through the VCR. We could probably get a better
 picture with a converter box, but the TV isn't that great anyway, so the
 improvement would be marginal.  The point, for us, is that we can
 actually GET some of the digital signals.  We don't have cable or
 satellite, so we thought that after the conversion we would be
 converting our analog set into a planter for ferns and other delicate
 houseplants.

 I can't report on any DRM issues associated with this VCR, because I
 haven't yet tried to record anything on the digital side of the machine.
 The analog side will record any analog broadcast.

 --Constance Warner

 -Original Message-
 From: Computer Guys Discussion List
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard P.
 Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:34 PM
 To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
 Subject: Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

 Which model? Does your VCR have both analog and digital outputs?

 Richard P.

 On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Constance Warner
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a
 digital
 tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as
 soon
 as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
 Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
 after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
 signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
 anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
 off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
 good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.


 
 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
 **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/
 **
 
 *


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-15 Thread Richard P.
According to the Specs on your deck, it looks like the tuner is all
analog and not digital:

TV System
* Tuner Qty 2
* Analog Channel Presets 181

Richard P.


On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:56 PM, rlsimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have a JVC DR-MV1S which has a dolby digital VCR and a DVD recorder with 2
 tuners which are described as Tuning System = Frequency synthesized tuner
 w/channel coverage vhf2-13,uhf14-69,catv113channels ...what is this and is
 it analog? Digital? ...huh?


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-15 Thread Richard P.
FYI, this appears to be a scam. Do not attempt to contact this person.
Sorry for having posted this.

With deepest apologies,

Richard P.

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Richard P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 FYI, if anyone needs a free HDTV in the DC area, here's one on Craigslist:
DELETED

 The Sony XBR is a great TUBE set and will produce a fantastic picture.
 The downside is that it's heavy (250 lbs). I'd get this myself but I
 already have one.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Constance Warner
Couldn't tell you right now, because I'm not home--I can look it up for
you when I do get home.

We prowled around the Big Box stores, reading boxes and asking
questions, until we got a VCR that worked with an analog TV and that had
a digital tuner in it.

--Constance

-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard P.
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:34 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

Which model? Does your VCR have both analog and digital outputs?

Richard P.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Constance Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a
digital
 tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as
soon
 as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
 Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
 after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
 signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
 anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
 off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
 good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy
**
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/
**

*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread rlsimon
Got a walmart special and hooked it up to analog tv (sony kv25xbr) and to
amplified uhf+vhf antenna on 40' tower pointed toward philly 1h away by car.
Get lots of nice analog stuff for years incl.
cbs,abc,nbc,whyy,njn,wybe,wb,fox,cw but don't get much on the digital
...initially got 3.x and no longer do.  Get 48.x and 61.x ...that's all.
What do I need2do to figure out what's wrong.  Antenna points correctly as
an antennaguy installed it and tested signal strength.  There's an amplifier
at the bottom of the tower (just inside the wall) and another near the tv...


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Richard P.
Have you run and compared your antenna system on www.antennaweb.org?
You can always call the station's engineering department for help.
They'll know if things will get better or if it's going to stay the
same after Feb. I think that your antenna amplifier transmitter is
supposed to be as close to the antenna as possible, which means at the
top of the 40' tower.

Richard P.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM, rlsimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Got a walmart special and hooked it up to analog tv (sony kv25xbr) and to
 amplified uhf+vhf antenna on 40' tower pointed toward philly 1h away by car.
 Get lots of nice analog stuff for years incl.
 cbs,abc,nbc,whyy,njn,wybe,wb,fox,cw but don't get much on the digital
 ...initially got 3.x and no longer do.  Get 48.x and 61.x ...that's all.
 What do I need2do to figure out what's wrong.  Antenna points correctly as
 an antennaguy installed it and tested signal strength.  There's an amplifier
 at the bottom of the tower (just inside the wall) and another near the tv...


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Tom Piwowar
Anyone buy one yet? Do they get decent signals? Am looking at a list of 
converters, but don't know which to choose. We live 25-50 miles from 
broadcast towers and have 2 analog TVs.

Wikipedia has a great chart of CECB units with details about their 
innards.

I have an RCA DTA800B1 because my wife wanted big buttons!. It is a 
basic unit that works well enough. The remote has a universal feature 
so it could be set to control the TV's on/off, volume, and mute, which is 
handy. It picks up most of the stations I get with my HDTV set. Both run 
off the same rooftop antenna which is about 5 miles and line of sight 
from my local stations. Neither will pick up the more distant (30 miles) 
analog station that came in fine as analog using just rabbit ears. Cost 
was $60 ($40 coupon + $20).

I also have a TIVAX STB-T9 but have not hooked it up yet.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Richard P.
Which model? Does your VCR have both analog and digital outputs?

Richard P.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Constance Warner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a digital
 tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as soon
 as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
 Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
 after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
 signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
 anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
 off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
 good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Tom Piwowar
Keep in mind that the frequency the the stations are currently
transmitting their digital signal on may change in Feb, 2009.

There is now talk of a 30-day delay.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Constance Warner
This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a digital
tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as soon
as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.

BTW, we're in the Rockville end of Silver Spring, at an area where
analog reception is fairly good but not outstanding.

One pleasant surprise: WJLA TV (Channel 7), in Washington, has several
auxiliary digital channels.  One of them, Channel 7-3, has reruns of
Magnum PI and Rockford Files on weekday evenings (9-11 p.m.).  The
comparison with the production values and, especially, the writing on
today's network shows is striking.  There's just so much more going on
in the older shows (in characterization, dialogue, plot, etc.) that you
don't see in something like the CSI shows, where the action periodically
grinds to a screeching halt while a beautiful but expressionless actor
does something incomprehensible to some nasty substance in a test tube,
while a popular song plays in the background and the editors go wild
with tricky camera shots.

On the other hand, MPT (Maryland Public Television) doesn't come in at
all where we live, but since it never did have a good signal in
Montgomery County, and it apparently doesn't have Dr. Who any more, who
cares?

--Constance Warner


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Tom Piwowar
First thing to check is signal strength. Most of these tuner boxes have a 
signal strength meter function. The meter should give you a reading even 
for stations that are too weak to lock in their digital signal.

Some stations have relocated their antennas as part of their digital TV 
buildout. How recently has your antenna guy set your antenna orientation?

What does AntennaWeb tell you about your location?

You may do better with a better box than the ones sold by WallMart. From 
my reading the ones sold by WallMart have been very basic. You probably 
need one with above average sensitivity.

Some boxes come with Smartenna connections. This is a new kind of antenna 
that can be electrically skewed to work sort of like an antenna rotor. 
This will tune the antenna for the best signal for each specific station 
you are receiving. 

Got a walmart special and hooked it up to analog tv (sony kv25xbr) and to
amplified uhf+vhf antenna on 40' tower pointed toward philly 1h away by car.
Get lots of nice analog stuff for years incl.
cbs,abc,nbc,whyy,njn,wybe,wb,fox,cw but don't get much on the digital
...initially got 3.x and no longer do.  Get 48.x and 61.x ...that's all.
What do I need2do to figure out what's wrong.  Antenna points correctly as
an antennaguy installed it and tested signal strength.  There's an amplifier
at the bottom of the tower (just inside the wall) and another near the tv...


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-14 Thread Robert

Where did you get it?


Constance Warner wrote:

This may not be exactly a propos, but we bought a new VCR with a digital
tuner in it.  Much to our surprise, we picked up digital signals as soon
as we installed it, using an old window-mounted analog antenna.
Unfortunately, we can't tell whether all of the stations will come in
after the full conversion to digital, as we're still picking up analog
signals from the major commercial channels.  If you need a new VCR
anyway--and you might, because if you want to record digital programs
off the airwaves, you need to do it on digital media--this might be a
good and easy-to-install alternative to a converter box.

BTW, we're in the Rockville end of Silver Spring, at an area where
analog reception is fairly good but not outstanding.

One pleasant surprise: WJLA TV (Channel 7), in Washington, has several
auxiliary digital channels.  One of them, Channel 7-3, has reruns of
Magnum PI and Rockford Files on weekday evenings (9-11 p.m.).  The
comparison with the production values and, especially, the writing on
today's network shows is striking.  There's just so much more going on
in the older shows (in characterization, dialogue, plot, etc.) that you
don't see in something like the CSI shows, where the action periodically
grinds to a screeching halt while a beautiful but expressionless actor
does something incomprehensible to some nasty substance in a test tube,
while a popular song plays in the background and the editors go wild
with tricky camera shots.

On the other hand, MPT (Maryland Public Television) doesn't come in at
all where we live, but since it never did have a good signal in
Montgomery County, and it apparently doesn't have Dr. Who any more, who
cares?

--Constance Warner


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

  



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-13 Thread Tony B
Actually, digital signals are both, and actually a lot _more_
reliable. To those that can receive them, anyway. What worries me much
more is that the format offers no compatible way to encode to newer
formats. i.e., it's stuck with mpeg2 compression, with no way to use
the superior mpeg4 (currently).


On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:06 PM, b_s-wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The conversion to digital should be delayed until digital signals are as
 powerful and reliable as analog signals.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-13 Thread Steve Rigby

On Oct 13, 2008, at 12:06 PM, b_s-wilk wrote:

Anyone buy one yet? Do they get decent signals? Am looking at a list  
of converters, but don't know which to choose. We live 25-50 miles  
from broadcast towers and have 2 analog TVs.


  I have had two of the Zenith DTT900 units for some time now, and  
they work quite well and are highly regarded in various ratings of  
converter boxes.  I get all signals better in digital than I got them  
in analog, including those from over thirty miles away. My units do  
not have analog pass-through, and I probably would not use it anyway  
since the digital signals for whatever reason are better than analog  
at my location.  I do have a very good external antenna, but even with  
a set-top antenna my digital reception beats analog.


  There are reception issues that will probably not go away, such as  
momentary interruptions to the picture display primarily caused by out- 
of-phase signal reflections created by passing aircraft and trucks and  
cars, but those were present in analog as well along with snow.   
Overall, the digital experience has suited me better than the analog I  
had gotten used to over many years, even with the occasional signal  
glitches previously mentioned.


  Digital reception does have a lot to do with the quality and  
sensitivity of the receiver itself, and the DTT-900, using LG  
components, rates very highly in sensitivity as well as image  
quality.  The Zenith units do not display as complete a programming  
schedule as some others do, but I would not trade away quality of  
reception for a more extensive program guide.


  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-13 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
I bought a Zenith from Circuit City and a Magnavox from WalMart.  I like the
Zenith better.  I don't use it all that much but I mostly got them to play
with and I got the $40 coupons from the feds at https://www.dtv2009.gov/
paid about $10 on top of that.  I can't get Baltimore with rabbit ears any
more from where I live in Fairfax County with the digital signal.

Check out Antennaweb.org to see what they expect that you should be able


-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-13 Thread Richard P.
Keep in mind that the frequency the the stations are currently
transmitting their digital signal on may change in Feb, 2009. Locally,
our stations are currently broadcasting digital on UHF channels, but
some will transfer the digital transmissions back to the VHF frequency
in Feb. All this to say that when you get your converter, your
reception issues may change in Feb. depending upon what your stations
has planned. See DTV.org for more info, or call your station and ask
the engineering department.

Richard P.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:06 PM, b_s-wilk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anyone buy one yet? Do they get decent signals? Am looking at a list of
 converters, but don't know which to choose. We live 25-50 miles from
 broadcast towers and have 2 analog TVs.

 Artec Digital-to-Analog Converter Box, Model T3AP, Analog RF Signal
 Pass-Through
 Sunkey SK-801 ATSC Digital TV Converter box, Analog Signal Pass-Through
 TIVAX STB-T9 Digital TV Converter Box with Remote
 TIVAX STB-T8 Digital TV Converter Box with Remote, Analog Signal
 Pass-Through
 Zenith (LG) DTT901 Digital TV Tuner Converter Box with Analog Pass-Through
 COSHIP N9901T DTV Converter Box with Analog Pass-Through
 KINGBOX K8V1 ATSC Tuner Digital Converter Box, Digital-to-Analog Converter
 Box,
 Zentech DF2000 DTV Converter Box with Remote, Tower Shape
 Artec ATSC Full Digital Conventer Box, Digital-to-Analog Converter Box,
 Analog Signal Pass-Through, Model T3AP Pro,
 Artec ATSC Full Digital Conventer Box, Digital-to-Analog Converter Box,
 Model T3A Pro,
 TIVAX DT-01 Amplified Indoor Digital TV Antenna, Perfect for Digital
 Converter Box and HDTV to Receive Free HD channels

 More?

 The conversion to digital should be delayed until digital signals are as
 powerful and reliable as analog signals. This is the worst time to expect
 millions of people to put out money for new TVs or converters. It's another
 gift to manufacturers, and a loss for consumers. How about offering discount
 cable, FIOS, satellite for those people who live within analog viewing range
 but outside digital?

 Betty


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] digital TV converter box

2008-10-13 Thread Steve Rigby

On Oct 13, 2008, at 6:00 PM, Richard P. wrote:


Keep in mind that the frequency the the stations are currently
transmitting their digital signal on may change in Feb, 2009. Locally,
our stations are currently broadcasting digital on UHF channels, but
some will transfer the digital transmissions back to the VHF frequency
in Feb. All this to say that when you get your converter, your
reception issues may change in Feb. depending upon what your stations
has planned. See DTV.org for more info, or call your station and ask
the engineering department.


  This is good information.  Another good source for info:  
http://antennaweb.org/aw/welcome.aspx

  A reversion from their current UHF signals back to VHF in February  
2009 will mean that a VHF antenna may be needed to get a good signal.   
Actually, any old TV antenna used for analog will work as long as it  
covers UHF as well as VHF into one output.  Some set-top antennas,  
such as the venerable rabbit ear have a separate output for VHF and  
UHF.  That will not work well with your converter box.  You'll need  
both UHF and VHF being fed by a single 75 ohm cable.


  Steve


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-11 Thread rlsimon
Watza deal with plasma/lcd at present ...I see Laser TVs are in the
pipeline ...was I right to wait ...I use a 1984 Sony kv25xbr which is a 25
tube set which still gets rave comments ...it also has lotsa inputs/outputs,
etc.  I can live with it longer if the Laser will be superior, and/or if the
emergence of Laser TVs drives down the prices of the predecessors ...wadda
y'all think?



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

True but most public TV stations are low powered stations.

I can get only a couple of stations via antenna where I live.  One of 
those is APT (Alabama Public Television)  The other is a local Fox 
affiliate but both of these have low powered antennas.


You might be surprised who is low powered versus who is not.

Even in the big city there are many low powered TV stations that tend 
to be ethnic, cultural or similar type of stations.


Stewart


At 05:57 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:

On Jan 10, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

I just read an article in the local paper that noted not all TV 
stations will be converting to digital.


There are only 1760 full power stations that will have to 
change.  But there are over 2900 low power and 4400 translators 
stations that will not have to convert.


Apparently if you get the wrong box and receive one of these low 
power or translator stations you might not get the stations  with the box.


  All of the above is true.  The converter boxes will generally end 
up blocking access to the transmitters that are not required to 
convert to digital.  Most large metro areas are only served by the 
full power transmitters, with low power and translator facilities 
serving outer, rural and mountainous areas.


  Steve


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-10 Thread Tony B
I'm not sure I believe this story. Do they cite references? We didn't
even get a link to the newspaper story.

It just seems to me once the new owners of the old frequencies start
using them, they're going to be awfully upset if some TV station, low
power or not, is stepping on their signals. Possibly the author (or
reader) is confusing broadcast TV with things like TV over Amateur
radio.


 I just read an article in the local paper that noted not all TV
 stations will be converting to digital.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-10 Thread Steve Rigby

On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:20 PM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

Even in the big city there are many low powered TV stations that tend 
to be ethnic, cultural or similar type of stations.


  True enough.  I was speaking of the major carriers, the primary 
network affiliates, the ones that the ninety percent of viewers are 
watching.  It is the 700 megahertz channels, the VHF band that is 
coveted by, and will be auctioned off to the corporate interests that I 
was referring to, but failed to clarify.  The UHF band will pretty much 
be left alone to the best of my knowledge.


  Steve



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Local paper, but an AP article written by John Dunbar.

The low power ones cannot step up their signal they are limited in wattage.

Stewart



At 07:42 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:

I'm not sure I believe this story. Do they cite references? We didn't
even get a link to the newspaper story.

It just seems to me once the new owners of the old frequencies start
using them, they're going to be awfully upset if some TV station, low
power or not, is stepping on their signals. Possibly the author (or
reader) is confusing broadcast TV with things like TV over Amateur
radio.


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2008-01-10 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

The VHF range is huge in the way of bandwidth.

Many people forget that part of the FM band is contained in this 
spectrum.  If you have a local channel 6, tune to FM 87.9 or so and 
you will get that station on air.


One of the ways that they have allowed multiple FM stations on the 
air is by limiting their power (or output wattage) and by tuning antennas.


The local FM station has a very wide east west pattern with their 
antenna.  If it were aimed north it would walk all over Montgomery AL 
stations, however it does not reach much farther north than 50 
miles.  However it reaches over 100 miles west.


These same restriction can be used to make sure that adjacent VHF TV 
stations that still exist will not step on or get stepped on whoever 
gets the empty frequencies.


I do not think any one entity will be able to get a VHF frequency and 
push their signal across the US, the wave length makes that 
impossible.  So the new users of the Empty VHF frequencies will be 
much like TV stations I think.  Licensed for an area.


Stewart


At 08:39 PM 1/10/2008, you wrote:
This author did not distinguish and it is possible that part of his 
story was cut out by the local paper.  But our Alabama Public TV 
stations are all VHF not UHF around here.


Stewart


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prince of Peace
Ozark, AL  SL 82



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive from 1/1/2000 is on the MARC http://marc.info/?l=computerguys-l
* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived



Re: [CGUYS] Digital TV

2007-08-30 Thread Tony B
There have been rumblings like that for years, but I'd be surprised if
anyone really does it. I mean, as people buy HD TV's, they're going to
expect HD pictures.

I don't get WMPT here, so I'll have to take your word for it that
they've made this decision. I'm mostly curious to know *what* they're
planning to put on these other channels and how exactly does an ATSC
tuner tune them in (I've never used ATSC)?

On 8/30/07, MrMike6by9 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Not the whole story. Over at AVSForum.com, there has been much
 discussion of this issue. The temptation is that the same bandwidth
 required for one HD channel can host several SD digital channels. On
 some systems, users are complaining that the HD channels are
 bit-starved because the broadcasters want the extra revenue that might
 come from multiple channels. Locally, we have an example of how bad it
 can get. WMPT has all but eliminated their HD broadcasts and even
 removed HD from the channel name (although the broadcaster is a
 non-profit).  They claim to want to able to add more SD channels.



* == QUICK LIST-COMMAND REFERENCE - Put the following commands in  ==
* == the body of an email  send 'em to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==
* Join the list: SUBSCRIBE COMPUTERGUYS-L Your Name
* Too much mail? Try Daily Digests command: SET COMPUTERGUYS-L DIGEST
* Tired of the List? Unsubscribe command: SIGNOFF COMPUTERGUYS-L
* New address? From OLD address send: CHANGE COMPUTERGUYS-L YourNewAddress
* Need more help? Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* List archive at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/
* RSS at www.mail-archive.com/computerguys-l@listserv.aol.com/maillist.xml
* Messages bearing the header X-No-Archive: yes will not be archived