Re: [Cooker] Modutils rejecting ADSL Modem Module
Quel Qun wrote: On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 11:16, Crispin Boylan wrote: Hi I've been using Mandrake with my Conexant ADSL modem for a few monthes now with no probs, but now after upgrading to modutils-2.4.22-1mdk, the module is rejected, saying that the module is built with GCC 2 and the kernel with GCC3 and it is a bad idea to mix the two!! The problem is, I know the module is compiled by GCC 3.2, because I did it myself!?!? how can i fix this? Same problem with the aureal sound driver(s). yes, it seems that with these drivers there is already a pre-compiled object file, which has obviously been compiled with GCC2 (the drivers are from early 2001).this is annoying but understandable - even though the driver worked fine for me with that portion being compiled on GCC2 and the rest on GCC3, but I guess not all modules will work like that. oh well back to 2.4.19.lets hope 2.6 doesnt require 2.4.22 or higher, then i'm in a real jam... Cheers cris
[Cooker] mozilla, unable to open pages
Mozilla refuses to open some pages on the web, like http://infoweb.ntnu.no/ http://www.skandiabanken.no/ Any idea why? Is this because of the infamous cookie problem? -- Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] [Bug 604] [rpmdrake] New: Everything is already installed
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604 Product: rpmdrake Component: program Summary: Everything is already installed Version: 2.0-9mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I went to install Xine from rpmdrake this evening and came a across an error, everything is already installed (is this suppose to happen at all?) so i did a rpm -q on the package but it could not be found. maybe it's the source I thought, so I rebuild the source and same error. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi lists libbonobo2 which is already installed
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 22:03:08 +0100, Pierre wrote: I had it too, I did 'urpme libbonobo2 urpmi libbonobo2' to solve this. But it's not a real solution I admit... It has been fixed with latest libbonobo.. -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] Problems with fam
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:59:41 +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote: On 2002.12.02 Frederic Crozat wrote: On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:58:23 +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote: ... as root : /etc/init.d/portmap restart /etc/init.d/xinetd restart I have updated fam to latest, but behaviour is the same. One more clue: /var/log/xinetd.log: 02/12/4@23:59:18: FAIL: sgi_fam address from=no address 02/12/4@23:59:18: START: sgi_fam pid=2394 from=no address As root, are you able to start fam manually ? Try running fam -d -f and log as a normal user ? -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
[Cooker] GDB/ncurses problem
Hi, I run a cooker box, It seems I got the latest gdb available hugues@neraka ~ $ rpm -qa | grep gdb libgdbm2-1.8.0-18mdk gdb-5.2.1-2mdk and ncurses hugues@neraka ~ $ rpm -qa | grep ncurses ncurses-5.2-27mdk libncurses5-devel-5.2-27mdk libncurses5-5.2-27mdk yet, hugues@neraka ~ $ gdb gdb: error while loading shared libraries: libncurses.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory and yes libncurses.so.4 is not present. Besides, this library was included in ncurses-5.2-12.2mdk (according to a 'rpmfind.net' search) what is the best option ? - recompile gdb and linking against libncurses.so.5 ? - downgrade to an older ncurses package ? (perhaps not a good given some dependencies/bug issues) any opinion will be welcomed, thanks -- Jerome
Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vincent Danen wrote: On Wednesday, December 4, 2002, at 08:37 PM, Nelson Bartley wrote: I'm not sure if this has been brought up before but I'm going to ask. Is it absolutely necessary to have all bugzilla updates sent to the cooker list? The reason I ask is I currently keep a local copy of all messages I've received on the cooker list for at least the last year (I had almost 2 years stored until a stray delete command went ary) Yes, it is. And I'll tell you why. Once bugzilla is utilized like it should be, most posts will come from bugzilla on this list. The number of questions/comments/etc. on the list will be reduced because it is going through bugzilla. The mailing list is a means of keeping track of what is happening in bugzilla. [..] If this policy isn't about to change, please let me know so I can discontinue my subscription. At this rate I'm better off just checking bugzilla every few days to see what's going on. It will save on my bandwidth. I don't think it will change. It shouldn't change. This is a much better system. Of course, there are some things that could be done to resolve Neils issues: 1)He could filter his mail so bugzilla mail went to a seperate folder than cooker mail 2)Mandrakesoft could have a seperate ML just for bugzilla, so users can decide if they want to track only bug reports (via bugzilla) or other cooker discussion (via cooker) or both, at their discretion. Buchan - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE97yn5rJK6UGDSBKcRAoC/AJ9WLN2gg/U7pGbnazC6dyr/xQDcpwCeLNoU 81Aikc04iOEsT8+MUF7a8BI= =AL2u -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?
On Thursday 05 December 2002 10:27, Buchan Milne wrote: Of course, there are some things that could be done to resolve Neils issues: 1)He could filter his mail so bugzilla mail went to a seperate folder than cooker mail I did this, and it works just great, no need to subcribe to YAML. 2)Mandrakesoft could have a seperate ML just for bugzilla, so users can decide if they want to track only bug reports (via bugzilla) or other cooker discussion (via cooker) or both, at their discretion. Buchan -- John Allen, Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 596] [nedit] segfault when splitting windows
Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, [Bug 596] wrote: Bug is still here, confirm by pterjan on it cooker install. We have nedit-5.3-2mdk ! Yeah, procedure was not clear enough. Nedit segfaults in _XmSetEtchedSlider(). Titi's stuff probably. @bug_status=reopened I visited nedit bugs on sourceforge and it looks like they have really bad feeling about recent lesstif. Both bugs have already been reported there.
[Cooker] [Bug 596] [nedit] segfault when splitting windows
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 12:01 --- [olivier@andromede urpmi.setup]$ nedit urpmi.setup Segmentation fault Bug is still here, confirm by pterjan on it cooker install. We have nedit-5.3-2mdk ! --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 12:40 --- Our admin changes some header rewriting on the mail server, please check if that fixed or not. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 601] [libbonobo2_0] urpmi lists libbonobo2 which is already installed
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|9 |1353 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 13:00 --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [Bug 584] wrote: Still not: I setup mail.cae.co.za/mail.cae.sun.ac.za and we have no header-rewriting, and I don't think maties1.sun.ac.za did it. Must be yavin. Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: by mail.cae.co.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id D32E95C358; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:40:18 +0200 (SAST) Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E60E4CFC3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:40:17 +0200 (SAST) Received: from smtp.mandrake.com ([63.209.80.248]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18JuNe-0002fk-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 13:41:22 +0200 Received: from yavin.mandrax.org (moseisley.mandrax.org [63.209.80.226]) by smtp.mandrake.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED3883C08; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:25:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by yavin.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 0) id F146513F63A; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:25:25 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.mandrakesoft.com (smtp.mandrakesoft.com [212.43.244.20]) by yavin.mandrax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCACE13F65A for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 03:24:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from kenobi.mandrakesoft.com (office.mandrakesoft.com [195.68.114.34]) by smtp.mandrakesoft.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gB5BjaDo000482 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:45:36 +0100 Received: by kenobi.mandrakesoft.com (Postfix, from userid 629) id 64DE3AFB6; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:40:12 +0100 (CET) From: [Bug 584] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug-id: 584 X-loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:40:12 +0100 (CET) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sequence: 728 Precedence: list List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=help List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe%20cooker List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20cooker List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *18JuNe-0002fk-00*pl2/Zrag5Ws* X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses at mail.cae.co.za by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE97z4ErJK6UGDSBKcRAk9iAJ0TPiPRqkgekBb97aTm2hueKnkOuwCeKm7q CYx43zOu6uwKCreIzlyefNU= =5Ry3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 596] [nedit] segfault when splitting windows
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 13:00 --- On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, [Bug 596] wrote: Yeah, procedure was not clear enough. Nedit segfaults in _XmSetEtchedSlider(). Titi's stuff probably. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Re: [Cooker] [Bug 596] [nedit] segfault when splitting windows
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, [Bug 596] wrote: Bug is still here, confirm by pterjan on it cooker install. We have nedit-5.3-2mdk ! Yeah, procedure was not clear enough. Nedit segfaults in _XmSetEtchedSlider(). Titi's stuff probably. @bug_status=reopened
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 13:20 --- No change here... still gives a Reply-To address @linux-mandrake.com, not qa.linux-mandrake.com. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] ftp installation is not optimal (I found a mistale in logs)
Here the logs when I install mdk by ftp (ftp.lip6.fr mirror - ADSL line @ 65k/s) : ... Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only rpm transactions start getFile package_name: Installation CD ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again transactions done, now trying to close still opened fd Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only ... Is it optimal ? I think no. I thing there is a mistake due of ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again. It perhaps loose time. Thanks to take a look to it, Florent
Re: [Cooker] ftp installation is not optimal (I found a mistale in logs)
Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2002, 14:30:38 Uhr MET, schrieb Florent BERANGER: Here the logs when I install mdk by ftp (ftp.lip6.fr mirror - ADSL line @ 65k/s) : Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only rpm transactions start getFile package_name: Installation CD ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again transactions done, now trying to close still opened fd Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only Is it optimal ? I think no. I thing there is a mistake due of ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again. It perhaps loose time. I think that's OK. If the ftp server is full, the installer waits a moment before it tries again. That's what all the download managers do. This way you save load on the server. -- Götz Waschk master of computer science University of Rostock http://wwwtec.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key -- Logout Fascism! --
Re: [Cooker] ftp installation is not optimal (I found a mistale in logs)
Selon Götz Waschk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2002, 14:30:38 Uhr MET, schrieb Florent BERANGER: Here the logs when I install mdk by ftp (ftp.lip6.fr mirror - ADSL line @ 65k/s) : Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only rpm transactions start getFile package_name: Installation CD ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again transactions done, now trying to close still opened fd Get File XXX : Opened rpm database for retry transaction of 1 package only Is it optimal ? I think no. I thing there is a mistake due of ftp get failed, sleeping before trying again. It perhaps loose time. I think that's OK. If the ftp server is full, the installer waits a moment before it tries again. That's what all the download managers do. This way you save load on the server. -- But it does that at each rpm and it's at each install (I wrote ... before and after logs in original mail to say that it's for each rpm). I think it's not a server issue. Please test. Thanks, Florent
[Cooker] pam_mount
The homepage is: http://www.flyn.org/#id2759049
[Cooker] bug with mozilla
latest cooked mozilla shuting down when loading http://www.macromedia.com. Also http://go.icq.com java based icq loads but can not type into login window. Both of this work just fine when i try with mozilla release from mozilla.org i.e, mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-1.2.1-sea.tar.gz using identical plugins. Since mandrake package is using same version i suppose bug has to be somewhere in Xft support that mandrake version has and binary install from mozilla.org doesnt. Installed on latest cooker: mozilla-1.2.1-1mdk ( Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130) with sun java j2re1.4.1_01 plugin installed and also macromedia flash beta plugin version libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 6.0 r61 installed.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 16:36 --- Testin with admin --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 16:42 --- Need to test again --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 605] [urpmi] New: urpmi should not return rc=0 in case of wget error
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605 Product: urpmi Component: program Summary: urpmi should not return rc=0 in case of wget error Version: 4.1-8mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If something gets wrong during urpmi, urpmi should not : 1. return with $? = 0 2. say everything already installed exemple: # urpmi cvs --17:21:14-- ftp://sunsite.uio.no/pub/linux/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/cvs-1.11.2-3mdk.i586.rpm = `/var/cache/urpmi/rpms/cvs-1.11.2-3mdk.i586.rpm' Resolving proxy.xxx.fr... done. Connecting to proxy.xx.fr[zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz]:3128... connected. Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 17:21:14 ERROR 403: Forbidden. everything already installed # echo $? 0 I have verified that wget returns RC=1 in this case, so urpmi internal processing can catch the error. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] imlib2-1.0.6-2mdk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Guardiola wrote:
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-buildroot
-Requires:freetype
-Requires:XFree86
+Requires:freetype, XFree86
Is an explicit dependency on freetype (and, for that matter, XFree86,
surely xlibs are enough) really necessary?
License: GPL
+#Cleaning la files for bad /home
+cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/loaders/image/
+for i in $(ls *la); do
+echo Patching $i
+perl -pi -e
's|\-L\/home\/vguardiola\/rpm\/BUILD\/imlib2\-1\.0\.6\/src||g' $i
+done
What's going to happen with this script when someone else builds the
pacakge? Can you not do something with $RPM_BUILD_DIR (or whatever it is)?
Buchan
- --
|--Another happy Mandrake Club member--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE9741krJK6UGDSBKcRAvIsAKCo5E9uuVpNLex0uXu5PokcXZNCrwCfR5dE
RaXbftOZAwhZvnMEtqBRH2w=
=oJOz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Microsoft True Type Fonts for Contrib...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote on Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:05:17PM + : Well I'm using Cooker with KDE 3.1, and Anti-Aliasing enabled with the Luxi Sans [xft] font, and the desktop looks just magic. No Microsoft fonts needed whatsoever. I think the latest Qt anti-aliasing is just fantastic. That's because it's not QT anti-aliasing. =). Cooker KDE has been patched to use freetype2 through Xft2 and fontconfig, which will hopefully become the default way of doing fonts, because it works a treat. The microsoft fonts still look better, though. I'm partial to Tahoma as a desktop font... Would that explain why when checking webmail (SquirrelMail FYI), you can't tell what's new in Mozilla? In Konq, it shows the new mail in bold, in Mozilla it all looks the same. Blue skies... Todd - -- MandrakeSoft USA http://www.mandrakesoft.com cat /boot/vmlinuz /dev/dsp #for great justice Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.1-0.1mdk Kernel 2.4.20-1mdk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE975Lulp7v05cW2woRAoYyAKCyx041Dgjc+3chYZn3y7T/kkYZogCfSX6J kjaaz47SBCTlPFxdv2rH5/k= =WJqi -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Cooker] found a bug in setup rpm
[root@server1 shorewall]# rpm -qf /etc/services setup-2.2.0-33mdk [root@server1 shorewall]# diff -u /etc/services ../services~ --- /etc/services 2002-12-05 13:12:00.0 -0500 +++ ../services~2002-12-05 13:12:00.0 -0500 @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ hmmp-ind 612/tcp dqs313_intercell # HMMP Indication / DQS hmmp-ind 612/udp dqs313_intercell # HMMP Indication / DQS ipp631/tcp # Internet Printing Protocol -ipp631/udp # Internet Printing Protocol +ipp631/ucp # Internet Printing Protocol ldaps 636/tcp # LDAP over SSL ldaps 636/udp # LDAP over SSL acap 674/tcp ipp is udp NOT ucp Hope this helps, Bill Shirley
Re: [Cooker] found a bug in setup rpm
torsdagen den 5 december 2002 19.12 skrev Bill Shirley: [root@server1 shorewall]# rpm -qf /etc/services setup-2.2.0-33mdk [root@server1 shorewall]# diff -u /etc/services ../services~ --- /etc/services 2002-12-05 13:12:00.0 -0500 +++ ../services~2002-12-05 13:12:00.0 -0500 @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ hmmp-ind 612/tcp dqs313_intercell # HMMP Indication / DQS hmmp-ind 612/udp dqs313_intercell # HMMP Indication / DQS ipp631/tcp # Internet Printing Protocol -ipp631/udp # Internet Printing Protocol +ipp631/ucp # Internet Printing Protocol ldaps 636/tcp # LDAP over SSL ldaps 636/udp # LDAP over SSL acap 674/tcp ipp is udp NOT ucp Hope this helps, Huh? According to your patch, you're contridicting yourself ;) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson http://www.deserve-it.com
[Cooker] urpmi won't install mozilla
Check out this transcript: $ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi --no-verify-rpm mozilla To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (54 MB): galeon-1.3.0-2mdk.i586 libnspr4-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnspr4-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnss3-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-irc-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-mail-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 Is this OK? (Y/n) y % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. Dload Upload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 100 5341k 100 5341k0 0 90939 0 0:01:00 0:01:00 0:00:00 120k 100 1654k 100 1654k0 0 78562 0 0:00:21 0:00:21 0:00:00 75342 100 122k 100 122k0 0 31754 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 69162 100 10.1M 100 10.1M0 0 70210 0 0:02:30 0:02:30 0:00:00 69088 100 130k 100 130k0 0 33408 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 63150 100 187k 100 187k0 0 43123 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 0:00:00 75765 100 581k 100 581k0 0 64104 0 0:00:09 0:00:09 0:00:00 88226 everything already installed $ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-1.2-3mdk Huh? -- Ryan T. Sammartino http://members.shaw.ca/ryants/ There are three things I always forget. Names, faces -- the third I can't remember. -- Italo Svevo
Re: [Cooker] urpmi won't install mozilla
Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 19:46, Ryan T. Sammartino a écrit : Check out this transcript: $ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi --no-verify-rpm mozilla To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (54 MB): galeon-1.3.0-2mdk.i586 libnspr4-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnspr4-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnss3-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-irc-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-mail-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 Is this OK? (Y/n) y % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. Dload Upload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 100 5341k 100 5341k0 0 90939 0 0:01:00 0:01:00 0:00:00 120k 100 1654k 100 1654k0 0 78562 0 0:00:21 0:00:21 0:00:00 75342 100 122k 100 122k0 0 31754 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 69162 100 10.1M 100 10.1M0 0 70210 0 0:02:30 0:02:30 0:00:00 69088 100 130k 100 130k0 0 33408 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 63150 100 187k 100 187k0 0 43123 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 0:00:00 75765 100 581k 100 581k0 0 64104 0 0:00:09 0:00:09 0:00:00 88226 everything already installed $ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-1.2-3mdk and urpmi ? perl-URPM ? Did you tested with last cooker ? François.
Re: [Cooker] found a bug in setup rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oden Eriksson wrote on Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:23:24PM +0100 : -ipp631/udp # Internet Printing Protocol +ipp631/ucp # Internet Printing Protocol ipp is udp NOT ucp Huh? According to your patch, you're contridicting yourself ;) I think he's showing it the other way, Oden. Instead of showing the patch to fix it, he's showing what is wrong. A little confusing at first, but it's quite obvious where the issue is :) Blue skies... Todd - -- MandrakeSoft USA http://www.mandrakesoft.com Mandrake: An amalgam of good ideas from RedHat, Debian, and MandrakeSoft. All in all, IMHO, an unbeatable combination. --Levi Ramsey on Cooker ML Cooker Version mandrake-release-9.1-0.1mdk Kernel 2.4.20-1mdk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE976KVlp7v05cW2woRArwFAKC5sKGvLrmP8A/MIvlkDKTEI8wJSQCeJO4R RtiZuWZRH78skjiTY6pPfIU= =ABvL -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla posts absolutely nescessary?
On Thursday, December 5, 2002, at 03:27 AM, Buchan Milne wrote:
[..]
If this policy isn't about to change, please let me know so I can
discontinue my subscription. At this rate I'm better off just
checking
bugzilla every few days to see what's going on. It will save on my
bandwidth.
I don't think it will change. It shouldn't change. This is a much
better system.
Of course, there are some things that could be done to resolve Neils
issues:
1)He could filter his mail so bugzilla mail went to a seperate folder
than cooker mail
Yup... this could be done.. but his issue was bandwidth.
2)Mandrakesoft could have a seperate ML just for bugzilla, so users can
decide if they want to track only bug reports (via bugzilla) or other
cooker discussion (via cooker) or both, at their discretion.
There should then be a cooker-discuss list or something that is
strictly for cooker discussion and *no* bug reports. Keep cooker as
the place to discuss bugs and receive bug reports.
Of course, the usefulness of cooker-discuss would be greatly diminished
due to the fact it would just have all the noise from this list...
flames, politics, etc. The cooker list, by nature, should be
discussing bugs/problems to begin with, which should all be routed via
bugzilla for accounting purposes.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD: 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] New Geramik uploaded
I'm back :o) I've uploaded Geramik-0.11-1mdk.src.rpm to ftp.linux-mandrake.com/incoming Does Sylvestre want to take over doing these upgrades? That'd be fine with me, and probably a good thing since I'll be less able to do them at the end of the semester. Good work BTW Sylvestre. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: [Cooker] urpmi won't install mozilla
I had this problem. The fix was to urpmi.removemedia the source that had problems and urpmi.addmedia to get it back. Ken François Pons wrote: Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 19:46, Ryan T. Sammartino a écrit : Check out this transcript: $ sudo /usr/sbin/urpmi --no-verify-rpm mozilla To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed (54 MB): galeon-1.3.0-2mdk.i586 libnspr4-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnspr4-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 libnss3-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-devel-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-irc-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 mozilla-mail-1.2.1-1mdk.i586 Is this OK? (Y/n) y % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. Dload Upload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 100 5341k 100 5341k0 0 90939 0 0:01:00 0:01:00 0:00:00 120k 100 1654k 100 1654k0 0 78562 0 0:00:21 0:00:21 0:00:00 75342 100 122k 100 122k0 0 31754 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 69162 100 10.1M 100 10.1M0 0 70210 0 0:02:30 0:02:30 0:00:00 69088 100 130k 100 130k0 0 33408 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 63150 100 187k 100 187k0 0 43123 0 0:00:04 0:00:04 0:00:00 75765 100 581k 100 581k0 0 64104 0 0:00:09 0:00:09 0:00:00 88226 everything already installed $ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-1.2-3mdk and urpmi ? perl-URPM ? Did you tested with last cooker ? François.
[Cooker] [Bug 606] [lm_sensors] New: /etc/init.d/sensors script still has off-by-one errors
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606 Product: lm_sensors Component: program Summary: /etc/init.d/sensors script still has off-by-one errors Version: 2.6.4-5mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In lm_sensors-2.6.4-5.1mdk, /etc/rc.d/init.d/sensors still has an off-by-one error while attempting to unload sensor modules. Also, the correction made in the start) case attempts to unload MODULE_0. Changes in patch: Changed '-lt' in stop) case to '-le' to match start) case. Initialized i=1 to start with MODULE_1. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 606] [lm_sensors] /etc/init.d/sensors script still has off-by-one errors
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 20:54 --- Created an attachment (id=47) -- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=47action=view) Patch to /etc/init.d/sensors to correct off-by-one and other counting errors --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 607] [initscripts] New: rc.sysinit mistakenly loads sound modules in certain cases
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607 Product: initscripts Component: initscripts Summary: rc.sysinit mistakenly loads sound modules in certain cases Version: 6.91-16mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In initscripts-6.91-16.1mdk, /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit attempts to load sound modules if 'options sound dmabuf=1' is in /etc/modules.conf. The grep succeeds whether the line is commented or not, potentially starting sound in the wrong circumstances. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 607] [initscripts] rc.sysinit mistakenly loads sound modules in certain cases
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-05 20:59 --- Created an attachment (id=48) -- (https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/attachment.cgi?id=48action=view) Patch to /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit Added '^' to beginning of expression. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 608] [drakxtools] New: Execution of /usr/sbin/logdrake aborted due to compilation errors
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608 Product: drakxtools Component: logdrake Summary: Execution of /usr/sbin/logdrake aborted due to compilation errors Version: 9.1-0.3mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # logdrake Bareword found where operator expected at /usr/sbin/logdrake line 223, near } n (Missing operator before n?) syntax error at /usr/sbin/logdrake line 223, near } n Execution of /usr/sbin/logdrake aborted due to compilation errors. BUG in /usr/sbin/logdrake : my_gtk-exit was *NOT* called !! # Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20021205 20:21 cu...;o) --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 608] [drakxtools] Execution of /usr/sbin/logdrake aborted due to compilation errors
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 609] [openldap-servers] New: ldap autofs initscript startup order
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609 Product: openldap-servers Component: openldap-servers Summary: ldap autofs initscript startup order Version: 2.0.27-1mdk Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] When storing automount maps on an ldap server and using autofs on the same machine the order of starting services is incorrect. The ldap daemon needs to be running before autofs is started. In cooker this is not the case. /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S18autofs /etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S39ldap Proposal: move autofs behind ldap, since moving ldap forward would put it in front of setting up the network. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Re: [Cooker] Default fonts in Mozilla
Hi. On Tue 2002-12-03 at 11:25:03 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: Having just upgraded to Mozilla-1.2, I spent about 15 minutes making Mozilla pleasing to the eyes again. For some reason all default fonts were set to Andale Mono (which is weird). I noticed the same. But it is not Andale Mono, but simply the first font in the list, AFAIK, which for you seemes to be Andale Mono. And my search engine has also been resetted from Google to Netscape. Bye, Benjamin. msg83296/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] LyX or LaTeX problems
I am using a Mdk 9.0 original installation, with its LyX, LaTeX and TeX
All my figures inserted in a file are swaped its widht with height %
scale request.
i.e.:
A figure to present widht 80% of text% is presented HEIGHT 80% of
text%.
But here is the example, but after exported to LaTeX.
Please note that it seens export ok, asking for a widht rescale, but
the result was a HEIGHT of 100% of the page, see my comments below:
%% LyX 1.2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\documentclass[brazil]{book}
\usepackage{helvet}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,a4paper,tmargin=1.5cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=2.5cm,rmargin=1.5cm}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\makeatletter
%% LyX specific LaTeX commands.
\providecommand{\LyX}{L\kern-.1667em\lower.25em\hbox{Y}\kern-.125emX\@}
\AtBeginDocument{
\renewcommand{\labelitemii}{\(\circ\)}
\renewcommand{\labelitemiii}{\normalfont\bfseries{--}}
}
\usepackage{babel}
\makeatother
\begin{document}
\textsf{}%
\begin{figure}[!hbp]
**HERE, this line below
\begin{center}\textsf{\includegraphics[ width=0.80\textwidth,
keepaspectratio,
angle=270,
origin=lB]{images/cabo_firmware.ps}}\end{center}
\caption{\textsf{\label{cabo_firmware}Cabo de Gravação de Firmware}}
\end{figure}
\textsf{}
\end{document}
Best regards,
Antonio Augusto Todo Bom Neto
LAX Eletronica e Telecomunicacoes Ltda
gEDA-BR - Users Group - http://gedabr.projetos.etc.br
Chave Publica no Site
www.keyserver.net chave de Antonio Augusto Todo Bom Neto
ou tente pelo ID 5F7C385C, ou pelo link abaixo:
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x5F7C385Ctemplate=netenextract,netennomatch,netenerror
Fingerprint = 10C2 FEF8 0462 A985 E1AF F28C C58E 4BA5 5F7C 385C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] serel - parallel boot scripts
I am wondering what the Mandrake team thinks of this: http://www.fastboot.org/ Overview serel is software that helps computers boot faster. serel adds synchronisation and integrity-checking to the operating system service startup phase, allowing a computer's services to start in parallel. Without parallelism, service startup is typically the most time-consuming part of the boot process. It's getting about time that Linux booting takes this step forward. Who better than Mandrake to lead the pack? Is there any interest in adding this to Mandrake Linux? I am going to investigate it now. I could come back with my findings if Mandrake is interested in pursuing this. b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg83298/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] urpmi won't install mozilla
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:10:57PM +0100, François Pons wrote: Le jeu 05/12/2002 à 19:46, Ryan T. Sammartino a écrit : Check out this transcript: $ rpm -q mozilla mozilla-1.2-3mdk and urpmi ? perl-URPM ? Doh! SOrry $ rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM urpmi-4.1-8mdk perl-URPM-0.71-1mdk Did you tested with last cooker ? I am as up-to-date as the Czech cooker mirror is (well, very close.. except for Mozilla, as you can see) -- Ryan T. Sammartino http://members.shaw.ca/ryants/ Don't guess -- check your security regulations.
[Cooker] procps fork
I've been talking with the author of much of the procps code, and maintainer of a fork of it called procps 3.x, and I'll run by you some of our conversation so you can decide if we should switch to that procps tree. --- recent procps history - In the 3rd party to avoid confusion when people quote... First of all, let's be kind to the original maintainer from long ago. He dropped the project long ago, for a second time. (there was a gradual decline around 1998 to 2000) Albert Cahalan wrote the ps program shipped with all 2.x.x and 3.x.x releases. Work started in 1997. Albert quietly maintained procps after the original maintainer stopped work. (quietly to avoid being rude about it) Debian has been using Albert's code since that time. In 2001, Rik showed up for the first time. He had lots of grand ideas about fixing the project with ESR philosophy, but nothing much happened at first. Then in spring 2002, he starts accepting random patches to do a release based on the unmaintained tree in Red Hat's CVS. Now everything, even the PRI column, uses slow 64-bit math. (no thought about what ranges a value could take) Now the top program has two columns with the exact same content. (the CPU number last used by a process) Now there is a buggy thread collector thing. More seriously, Rik is missing most of the bug fixes done in the past 3 years. The debian-unstable users have been good about reporting problems on something like 11 archs. Albert and Craig (the Debian maintainer) then decided: a. the original maintainer wasn't coming back b. non-Debian users needed the years of bug fixes c. Jim's new top was better and would be maintained d. users would be confused by conflicting 2.x.x releases Thus the procps-3.0.0 code was placed on SourceForge and announced widely. The procps-3.1.1 code is quite good. http://procps.sf.net/ Note: bugs should be reported via [EMAIL PROTECTED] or via the Debian bug tracking system. --- end history note -- (lines with are me, rest is Albert Cahalan) Do you all keep up with the 2.5 kernel? Yes. Both versions fully run on 2.5.xx kernels. Neither version is 100% ahead of the other. Currently: My vmstat uses 2.5.xx features for speed. Rik's might have a faster WCHAN on 2.5.xx kernels. My vmstat reports new 2.5.xx stats. Rik's top has an extra header line of memory info. My library has fast reliable HZ calculation on 2.4.xx and 2.5.xx. That's pretty even. Maybe I'm ahead by a teeny bit, but that depends on what is important to you. I'm not sure it's good to give up a line of top's process info, and I'll have to benchmark the WCHAN stuff to see if it is an improvement worth the memory cost. Speaking of which, my ps is 2x faster than Rik's one. (well, they're both mine of course but Rik has old code) Most of the other tools have improved greatly as well. That's the main point to Rik's tree I think. If you do, shouldn't other Linux distributors start using your procps? I certainly think so! :-) There are a few Linux distributors already using it. Several of the source-package ones are using my procps. Slackware switches back and forth; I believe they've decided to package both. Of course there's Debian, which started using my code long before the 3.0.0 release. Debian-woody has my code. That's also known as debian-stable and debian-3.0 now, assuming I didn't get the codewords confused. I can put you on the announcement mailing list if you like. I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] and freshmeat.net for this. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-06 00:00 --- Another test from ISTEAM --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Cooker] [Bug 584] [Bugzilla] Invalid Reply-To Header Set on Bugzilla emails
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-06 00:20 --- Another test from ISTEAM. --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Re: [Cooker] procps fork
A bit more specific info. on the procps 3.x releases from the developers... --- David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been talking with the author of much of the procps code, and maintainer of a fork of it called procps 3.x, and I'll run by you some of our conversation so you can decide if we should switch to that procps tree. Jim and I have some changes coming in 3.1.2 that are likely to please the Mandrake developers. Quick note about changes and recent versions: 3.x.x in general: new ps -F set SKIP to avoid building stuff you don't want vmstat can display IO-wait time now most stuff runs way faster than in procps 2.x.xx top can sort any column 3.1.1 is currently the latest. It's really solid. 3.1.2 is coming out soon. Important changes: vmstat -s. (like most other UNIX-like systems have) top can read and write old-style config files top supports the old sort keys like 'M' with a recent gcc, takes advantage of C99 restrict much faster top and w Future: documented public library interface psmisc package merged back in See the NEWS file for more details. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: Re-installing yaboot from an existing Linux
Stew Benedict wrote: If rescue doesn't do so for you, mount your linux partition under /mnt and then chroot to it, then run ybin. Something like: mount /dev/hda11 /mnt chroot /mnt ybin -v exit umount /mnt reboot You will probably see a complaint about /proc not being mounted. If your OF settings are still intact, you can ignore this. Otherwise you need to mount /proc or manually fix boot-device in OF. If you have a seperate /usr, you'll need to mount it in the chroot. You can also mount /proc in the chroot if you want, something like: mount /proc /proc -t proc (this is from memory, may not be completely correct) Stew Benedict Hi Stew, Thanks to you and Brice Figureau I was able to revive my yaboot partition, the 'chroot' worked out just perfect. ThanX a lot By the way, I think I read in past mails that 9.0 will not be ported to PPC, is that correct? Bye -- | Patrick LADAM | | | Laboratoire CSSB| THE BIG BANG THEORY: | | UFR SMBH| | | 74 rue Marcel Cachin| In the begining there was | | 93017 Bobigny CEDEX |nothing at all.| | NEW e-mail: | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Then, it exploded... | | Tel: 01 48 38 77 26 / 76 85 | | | Fax: 01 48 38 77 77 | | --
Re: Graphical Install on 1280x854 Powerbook?
clock : 667MHz bogomips: 665.19 (That 667MHz puzzles me. This machine is supposed to run at 867MHz - is this some power saving feature that only MacOS knows how to turn off?) I wouldn't sweat the bogomips, it's not all that reliable anyway. I wasn't referring to the bogomips (I don't even know what that is). I meant the clock : 667MHz line. But I'm far away from X: It seems that the kernel doesn't even recognize the Radeon card, with both Mandrake kernels (2.4.18 from 8.2 and 2.4.19 from the cooker mirrors) and a bk 2.4.20 kernel from ppckernel.org. According to something I read on some yellowdog mailing list archive, dmesg should contain some lines starting with radeonfb, which doesn't happen for me. Hmm, cat /proc/fb should also be informative. Here: 0 OFfb /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY, I can't make much sense of this, can you? And some other things that could help: o An excerpt from dmesg: ... Using unsupported 1280x854 ATY,Xia_A at bc008000, depth=8, pitch=1280 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x53 fb0: Open Firmware frame buffer device on /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_A no framebuffer address found for /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_B ... o What happens when I do XFree86 -configure: XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 3 September 2002 If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting problems. (See http://www.XFree86.Org/) Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.19-16mdk ppc [ELF] Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Wed Dec 4 23:26:09 2002 Using vt 7 List of video drivers: atimisc r128 radeon mga glint s3virge sis savage trident chips tdfx fbdev ati vga nv v4l Fatal server error: XFree86 has found a valid card configuration. Unfortunately the appropriate data has not been added to xf86PciInfo.h. Please forward 'scanpci -v' output to XFree86 support team. When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send the full server output, not just the last messages. This can be found in the log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log. Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tell me if I can do anything else to pinpoint the problems. But don't feel pressed, Linux is not critical for me at the moment. -Christian
REJECTED: galeon-1.3.0-1mdk.ppc.rpm rejected (fwd)
Available at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/cooker-ppc/ Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3 IRC: irc.openproject.net #cooker-ppc Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2 -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 02:00:50 +0100 (CET) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: REJECTED: galeon-1.3.0-1mdk.ppc.rpm rejected These packages have older version that the ones in the repository * Fri Nov 29 2002 Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.3.0-1mdk - Release 1.3.0 - Remove patch3 (merged upstream) - Patch5 (CVS): fix mozilla 1.2 detection
Re: Graphical Install on 1280x854 Powerbook?
Hmm, cat /proc/fb should also be informative. Here: 0 OFfb /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY, I can't make much sense of this, can you? Looks like your booting with some video=ofonly arguments or something? o An excerpt from dmesg: ... Using unsupported 1280x854 ATY,Xia_A at bc008000, depth=8, pitch=1280 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x53 fb0: Open Firmware frame buffer device on /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_A no framebuffer address found for /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_B ... I have a 1280x854 config that was sent to me, which has been added to the new installer. Have you tried with no video= arguments passed to the kernel? You were right, there was indeed a video argument (leftover from my earlier trials), namely video=radeon:1280x854-8@60. I took that out (the Kernel command line line in dmesg confirms that it was really taken out) , but that didn't change anything. /proc/fb is still the same, as are the dmesg lines above. -Christian
Re: Graphical Install on 1280x854 Powerbook?
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Christian Walther wrote: Hmm, cat /proc/fb should also be informative. Here: 0 OFfb /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY, I can't make much sense of this, can you? Looks like your booting with some video=ofonly arguments or something? o An excerpt from dmesg: ... Using unsupported 1280x854 ATY,Xia_A at bc008000, depth=8, pitch=1280 Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x53 fb0: Open Firmware frame buffer device on /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_A no framebuffer address found for /pci@f000/ATY,XiaParent@10/ATY,Xia_B ... I guess that indicates the kernel doesn't know about the card, normally you would see that syntax with a ofonly or novideo boot. You can also verify your boot arguments with: cat /proc/cmdline I've got low-end stuff here, but my experience looking at /proc/fb, when the kernel driver is effective yields something more like: [stew@powerbook stew]$ cat /proc/fb 0 ATY Mach64 Newer kernels from the PPC tree might be more effective for you. I have a 1280x854 config that was sent to me, which has been added to the new installer. Have you tried with no video= arguments passed to the kernel? You were right, there was indeed a video argument (leftover from my earlier trials), namely video=radeon:1280x854-8@60. I took that out (the Kernel command line line in dmesg confirms that it was really taken out) , but that didn't change anything. /proc/fb is still the same, as are the dmesg lines above. -Christian Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3 IRC: irc.openproject.net #cooker-ppc Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2
New installer ISO
I've built up a new installer ISO, which Ben is graciosly hosting again at: http://mirror.brain.org/linux/mandrake/Mandrake-ppc/cooker-install-iso/ 354aeb31682c557510daa57be3e2ce14 /home/stew/9.x-ppc-cooker-install-2.iso There is also a 9.x-ppc-cooker-install-2.iso.sig generated from my gpg key. Same rules apply as last time. You need your own RPM source, either on a partition or on your own network. The tarball of the stage2 stuff is on the ISO, but the ISO should be able to be used as a bootable CD. Features: 9.0 installer based, a number of mods to accomodate OldWorld machines. My 7600 was freezing on a lot of the probing. XFree, running either native or framebuffer mode is the primary install gui display driver. Xpmac is still available as a fallback. Between my machines and some data the folks on IRC provided with a small test program I put together, we should have fairly good coverage for a number of machines. Your feedback can help expand that coverage. I would strongly suggest waiting until the 2.4.20-1mdk kernels show up before doing the install. I pulled SCSI back out into modules, as it's just too contrary to the installer and the rest of the system scripts having it integrated. It's worse for OldWorld and RS6000 as modules, but we can deal with that. Initrd images for ext2 and ext3 are in the BootX folder for OldWorld folks, as well as vmlinuz-2.4.20-1mdk. Next pass I think I'll make a script to generate ones for all the journalled filesystems as well as come other common scsi cards besides mesh and mac53c94. Happy Testing! Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3 IRC: irc.openproject.net #cooker-ppc Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2
Re: Interesting? FWB Ships Partition Toolkit Version 1.0 with Partition Resizing
Yep. Everyone knows that. However, the driver would be a way to sport software RAID throughout all OSes (Linux, MacOS, Mac OS X, etc.). There's also the feature to decrypt/encrypt the drive at the block storage driver level in the ROM, outside of the OS. I like that one, but this brings up a question: Can linux encrypt a partition and mount the encyrpted partition at a paticular mount point? - Joaquin --- Stew Benedict [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Generation NeXT wrote: This is the resizer tool: http://www.fwb.com/html/partition_toolkit.html This is the general formatting, software RAID support: http://www.fwb.com/html/hard_disk_toolkit.html Can LinuxPPC do RAID? The Mac drivers are wierd in Linux has done software raid for some time, even in kernel 2.2. Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/ppcFAQ.php3 IRC: irc.openproject.net #cooker-ppc Archives: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker-ppcr=1w=2 __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Re: Evolution 1.0.3 package
Ian Davidson wrote: Does anyone still have the Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 package which Stew Benedict built a while back? Is it possible to build the 1.2 package from the source? on my cooker-computer, evolution-1.2.0-3mdk is installed.
