Re: [Cooker] Request: FTE-console

2000-05-20 Thread Vincent Danen

On Sat, 20 May 2000, cteg wrote:

 the current FTE package has only xfte included.
 fte-console would be nice, fits better with mutt for example.

Hi there.  Can you point me to fte-console and I'll include it in the
package?  I'm assuming it's an external add-on?  Or is this something that
comes with FTE by default and I just haven't included it in the
RPM?  Thanks for any light you can shed on it.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
Freezer Burn BBS:  telnet://bbs.freezer-burn.org . ICQ: 54924721
Webmaster for the Linux Portal Site Freezer Burn:  http://www.freezer-burn.org




Re: [Cooker] Request: FTE-console

2000-05-20 Thread cteg

On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 08:52:47AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
 On Sat, 20 May 2000, cteg wrote:
 
  the current FTE package has only xfte included.
  fte-console would be nice, fits better with mutt for example.
 
 Hi there.  Can you point me to fte-console and I'll include it in the
 package?  I'm assuming it's an external add-on?  Or is this something that
 comes with FTE by default and I just haven't included it in the
 RPM?  Thanks for any light you can shed on it.

Hi,

It's in the tarball.
in /src/fte-unix.mak you can specify the targets.
It won't be built without.
Don't worry, this is not documented.
Just tried target vfte (console) from latest tarball but fails 
for some reason, i hope you have better luck/skills and can get
this one compiled.
Anyway, i'll try to track that down. Have to look close.
Thanks for taking care of that.

-cteg

-- 
damn i'm looking good




Re: [Cooker] Request: FTE-console

2000-05-20 Thread Vincent Danen

On Sat, 20 May 2000, cteg wrote:

   the current FTE package has only xfte included.
   fte-console would be nice, fits better with mutt for example.
  
  Hi there.  Can you point me to fte-console and I'll include it in the
  package?  I'm assuming it's an external add-on?  Or is this something that
  comes with FTE by default and I just haven't included it in the
  RPM?  Thanks for any light you can shed on it.

 It's in the tarball.
 in /src/fte-unix.mak you can specify the targets.
 It won't be built without.
 Don't worry, this is not documented.
 Just tried target vfte (console) from latest tarball but fails 
 for some reason, i hope you have better luck/skills and can get
 this one compiled.
 Anyway, i'll try to track that down. Have to look close.
 Thanks for taking care of that.

Yeah, I see it won't compile either.  Quick question, doesn't cfte work
for you?  Isn't that the console version?  What's the difference between
cfte and vfte (I haven't got a clue)?

I'll see if there is a newer version and will try to upgrade the RPM to
see if that makes a difference.

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net
Freezer Burn BBS:  telnet://bbs.freezer-burn.org . ICQ: 54924721
Webmaster for the Linux Portal Site Freezer Burn:  http://www.freezer-burn.org




Re: [Cooker] Request: FTE-console

2000-05-20 Thread cteg

On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 10:58:48AM -0600, Vincent Danen wrote:
 
 Yeah, I see it won't compile either.  Quick question, doesn't cfte work
 for you?  Isn't that the console version?  What's the difference between
 cfte and vfte (I haven't got a clue)?
 
 I'll see if there is a newer version and will try to upgrade the RPM to
 see if that makes a difference.

cfte is to recompile your configuration.
vfte is fte-console.
i haven't used vfte in linux before (just on my nt-box at the office,
there is a win version of vfte, os/2 as well) and found it would be nice
to have just like vim/gvim.
It must exist somehow ;)
Found a rpm for "conectiva linux" (??), it has all the binaries.
Binaries don't work on my system tho.
Maybe i can catch the author in #icewm (yeah he is the icewm dude)

-cteg

-- 
damn i'm looking good