Re: [Cooker] Test - please ignore
I have just done a Reply and not a Reply All so you can see that something is getting through. -- Regards Frank Big or small, a challenge requires the same commitment to resolve. Registered Linux User # 324213 Quel Qun wrote: I got two successive delivery failure :(
[Cooker] Test - please ignore
I got two successive delivery failure :( -- Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] test kernel 2.6 - what do I need else?
what will it break? nothing broke here (both in my 9.1 and 9.2) for 9.1 get modules-init-tools. for 9.2 out of the box. if you want to upgrade packages, be my guest, but it's not needed. , 16 2003, 21:49,Svetoslav Slavtchev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I thought much about testing the 2.6 kernel on my 9.1 install... I read in this list, some weeks ago, something about changing in modutils (or similar), so my question is: When I want to play a bit with 2.6, what do I need else to get it (hopefully) working? on 9.1 it will be hard :( better get/ wait for mdk-9.2 on 9.1 you have o update pretty core stuff which might break your insallation on 9.2 might be just an updated module-init-tools (older version is included, but it's too old i think ) check here http://supermount-ng.sourceforge.net/mdk-25/ and may be, just may be my packages http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/ruby-2.6/ but this is 9.2/cooker stuff only :( svetljo -- diego, 21 Tishrey 5764 Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Re: [Cooker] test kernel 2.6 - what do I need else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 on 9.1 it will be hard :( better get/ wait for mdk-9.2 on 9.1 you have o update pretty core stuff which might break your insallation on 9.2 might be just an updated module-init-tools (older version is included, but it's too old i think ) check here http://supermount-ng.sourceforge.net/mdk-25/ and may be, just may be my packages http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/ruby-2.6/ but this is 9.2/cooker stuff only :( svetljo Hi Svetljo, thanks for your tipsi'll probably try it on weekend. bye Friedrich -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/jxXv1WA5NSHvnDARAvDGAJ9+j0adFdA1Vrh07Yie4/fUGiQYAQCgglNj Y/XHzyIZ8bPNupygoD5Erh4= =W1Lm -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Cooker] test kernel 2.6 - what do I need else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I thought much about testing the 2.6 kernel on my 9.1 install... I read in this list, some weeks ago, something about changing in modutils (or similar), so my question is: When I want to play a bit with 2.6, what do I need else to get it (hopefully) working? Thanks for your help, Friedrich Preuß -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/jwRU1WA5NSHvnDARArLaAKDQQNOTJf6LeeAJa2zwvYZ+nngRqgCdGiWC AaPo5KLOp/4/cQECosJrBIU= =dQvB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] test kernel 2.6 - what do I need else?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo, I thought much about testing the 2.6 kernel on my 9.1 install... I read in this list, some weeks ago, something about changing in modutils (or similar), so my question is: When I want to play a bit with 2.6, what do I need else to get it (hopefully) working? on 9.1 it will be hard :( better get/ wait for mdk-9.2 on 9.1 you have o update pretty core stuff which might break your insallation on 9.2 might be just an updated module-init-tools (older version is included, but it's too old i think ) check here http://supermount-ng.sourceforge.net/mdk-25/ and may be, just may be my packages http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/ruby-2.6/ but this is 9.2/cooker stuff only :( svetljo -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just built the 6Gb i686 version. Besides lilo complaining about labels that are too long it was a hitchless upgrade. Whenever I tried the 6Gb i686, rebuilt for athlon, be it either mdk or tmb after 24 hrs, almost to the min. system would lock-up. hmmm. I didn't change the .config file, just enabled to build the i686-up-4GB kernel in the .spec file. It's running stable since yesterday afternoon on my Athlon 1800XP. Although the DMA on my IBM harddisk (IC35L120AVV207-0) is still turned off after a while. Thomas is aware of this, we're still chasing the issue. regards, Stefan
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Svetoslav Slavtchev kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Lauantai 11 Lokakuu 2003 11:46): [...] 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN acpi 20031002 is in my kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk that should hit the mirrors soon... and are already at: www.iki.fi/tmb/Cooker/ along with the BadRAM fix and some other stuff... So for any of you that have a nForce2 or KT400 boards... go grab it and let me know if you are as happy as I am ;-) 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support Theese goes into my 2mdk 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? Theese goes into my 2mdk [...] it seems there is a new acpi release 20032002, but it's not fully uploaded yet ? I grabbed them directly from the acpi site... Since not everything got added to this build, I'll hope to have the next one out tomorrow -- Regards Thomas
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Svetoslav Slavtchev kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Lauantai 11 Lo kakuu 2003 11:46): [...] 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN acpi 20031002 is in my kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk that should hit the mirrors soon... and are already at: www.iki.fi/tmb/Cooker/ along with the BadRAM fix and some other stuff... So for any of you that have a nForce2 or KT400 boards... go grab it and let me know if you are as happy as I am ;-) 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support Theese goes into my 2mdk 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? Theese goes into my 2mdk [...] it seems there is a new acpi release 20032002, but it's not fully uploaded yet ? I grabbed them directly from the acpi site... Since not everything got added to this build, I'll hope to have the next one out tomorrow Awesome :-) thanks once again Thomas :-) now if you only could enable udf write support ( for a DVD+RW floppy :) ) i probably will stop building kernels, and will run yours :-) ( may be except when i play with multy-user :-) ) best, svetljo -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
I just built the 6Gb i686 version. Besides lilo complaining about labels that are too long it was a hitchless upgrade. Removed acpi=off from the append line, and everything is working! I see 3 USB busses (6 ports in total). Networking works, IDE is at UDMA133 (disk only goes to UDMA100). excellent work!! Stefan 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN acpi 20031002 is in my kernel-tmb-2.4.22.12.tmb.1mdk that should hit the mirrors soon... and are already at: www.iki.fi/tmb/Cooker/ along with the BadRAM fix and some other stuff... So for any of you that have a nForce2 or KT400 boards... go grab it and let me know if you are as happy as I am ;-) 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support Theese goes into my 2mdk 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? Theese goes into my 2mdk [...] it seems there is a new acpi release 20032002, but it's not fully uploaded yet ? I grabbed them directly from the acpi site... Since not everything got added to this build, I'll hope to have the next one out tomorrow -- Regards Thomas
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just built the 6Gb i686 version. Besides lilo complaining about labels that are too long it was a hitchless upgrade. Whenever I tried the 6Gb i686, rebuilt for athlon, be it either mdk or tmb after 24 hrs, almost to the min. system would lock-up. I have no such problem with the enterprise kernels. Let me know how yours fares. Charles -- The best things in the world are free -- and worth every penny of it -- Murphy's Love Laws n°7 - Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon Kernel-2.4.22-12.tmb.1mdkenterprise http://www.eslrahc.com - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Charles A Edwards kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Maanantai 13 Lokakuu 2003 14:43): On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:24:06 +0200 (CEST) Stefan van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just built the 6Gb i686 version. Besides lilo complaining about labels that are too long it was a hitchless upgrade. Whenever I tried the 6Gb i686, rebuilt for athlon, be it either mdk or tmb after 24 hrs, almost to the min. system would lock-up. I have no such problem with the enterprise kernels. Let me know how yours fares. So we have an athlon optimizing bug somewhere... I'll try to rebuild an athlon version to see if I can reproduce... I've been running the i686up version (std. i586') for ~30hours now, without problems... and looking on a diff between the configs, so besides the smp stuff, the only major differencies are swsusp and cpufreq that is not in the enterprise version --- up686 2003-10-12 05:41:07.0 +0300 +++ enterprise 2003-10-12 05:41:12.0 +0300 @@ -58,29 +58,9 @@ CONFIG_X86_MCE=y # # CPU Frequency scaling # -CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y -CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE=y -CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_PROC_INTF=y - -# -# CPUFreq governors -# -CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=y -CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_24_API=y - -# -# CPUFreq processor drivers -# -CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K6=m -CONFIG_X86_POWERNOW_K7=m -CONFIG_X86_LONGHAUL=m -CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_ICH=m -CONFIG_X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO=m -CONFIG_X86_P4_CLOCKMOD=m -CONFIG_X86_LONGRUN=m -CONFIG_X86_GX_SUSPMOD=m -CONFIG_TOSHIBA=m -CONFIG_I8K=m +# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ is not set +# CONFIG_TOSHIBA is not set +# CONFIG_I8K is not set CONFIG_MICROCODE=m CONFIG_X86_MSR=m CONFIG_X86_CPUID=m @@ -92,18 +72,19 @@ CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y CONFIG_HIGHIO=y # CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION is not set CONFIG_MTRR=y -# CONFIG_SMP is not set -CONFIG_X86_UP_APIC=y -CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC=y -CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y -CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y +CONFIG_SMP=y +CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32 +# CONFIG_X86_NUMA is not set # CONFIG_X86_TSC_DISABLE is not set CONFIG_X86_TSC=y +CONFIG_HAVE_DEC_LOCK=y # # General setup # CONFIG_NET=y +CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC=y +CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y CONFIG_PCI=y # CONFIG_PCI_GOBIOS is not set # CONFIG_PCI_GODIRECT is not set @@ -142,10 +123,7 @@ CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT=m CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF=y CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC=m CONFIG_PM=y -CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y -# CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND_DEBUG is not set -CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND_CHECKSUM=y -CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND_COMPRESSION=y +# CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND is not set CONFIG_APM=y # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set # CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE is not set @@ -259,7 +237,6 @@ CONFIG_MTD_BLKMTD=m # # Disk-On-Chip Device Drivers # -CONFIG_MTD_DOC1000=m CONFIG_MTD_DOC2000=m CONFIG_MTD_DOC2001=m CONFIG_MTD_DOCPROBE=m @@ -1699,7 +1676,7 @@ CONFIG_RTC=m CONFIG_DTLK=m CONFIG_R3964=m CONFIG_APPLICOM=m -CONFIG_SONYPI=m +# CONFIG_SONYPI is not set # # Ftape, the floppy tape device driver @@ -1803,7 +1780,7 @@ CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_DC10=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZORAN_LML33=m CONFIG_VIDEO_ZR36120=m CONFIG_VIDEO_TW98=m -CONFIG_VIDEO_MEYE=m +# CONFIG_VIDEO_MEYE is not set # # Radio Adapters @@ -2506,7 +2483,6 @@ CONFIG_LIRC_DEV=m CONFIG_LIRC_GPIO=m CONFIG_LIRC_I2C=m CONFIG_LIRC_IT87=m -CONFIG_LIRC_PARALLEL=m CONFIG_LIRC_SERIAL=m CONFIG_LIRC_SIRCD=m CONFIG_LIRC_BT829=m -- Regards Thomas
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Hi, I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested people may find it at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/ Non AMD64-specific changes include: * Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-12mdk - Various updates to PDC ultra driver - Various i810 audio fixes from 2.4.23pre5 - Add nForce3 IDE UDMA support - Add VM overcommit accounting + new swapless mode * Tue Oct 07 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-11mdk - av7 is good for acpi. - libata driver for ICH5 and VIA SATA. - 3ware patch to make smartmontools happy (erwan request). - low latency fixes are back. Hi, 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? i'll upload them later today to http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/cook/for_tmb/ in the mean time you can get them from my nosrc.rpm (~ 8Mb) http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/kernel-bruby-2.4.22.10br.1mdk-1-1mdk.nosrc.rpm (acpi is 2.4.22-20030916, i'll upload 2.4.22-20030918, or you can get the latest from kernel.org) best, svetljo -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Hi, I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested people may find it at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/ Non AMD64-specific changes include: * Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-12mdk - Various updates to PDC ultra driver - Various i810 audio fixes from 2.4.23pre5 - Add nForce3 IDE UDMA support - Add VM overcommit accounting + new swapless mode * Tue Oct 07 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-11mdk - av7 is good for acpi. - libata driver for ICH5 and VIA SATA. - 3ware patch to make smartmontools happy (erwan request). - low latency fixes are back. Hi, 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? i'll upload them later today to http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/cook/for_tmb/ in the mean time you can get them from my nosrc.rpm (~ 8Mb) http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/kernel-bruby-2.4.22.10br.1mdk-1-1mdk.nosrc.rpm (acpi is 2.4.22-20030916, i'll upload 2.4.22-20030918, or you can get the latest from kernel.org) the direct url: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/lenb/acpi/patches/release/2.4.22/ it seems there is a new acpi release 20032002, but it's not fully uploaded yet ? svetljo -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
Re: [Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested people may find it at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/ The SRPM is missing :-( Non AMD64-specific changes include: * Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-12mdk - Various updates to PDC ultra driver - Various i810 audio fixes from 2.4.23pre5 - Add nForce3 IDE UDMA support - Add VM overcommit accounting + new swapless mode * Tue Oct 07 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-11mdk - av7 is good for acpi. - libata driver for ICH5 and VIA SATA. - 3ware patch to make smartmontools happy (erwan request). - low latency fixes are back. Hi, 1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release. it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400 Nforce2 boards with USB or onboard LAN This would be nice for my nForce2 ;-) 2.) what about the usb updates that went in 23-pre5 - 23-pre6 - various fixes - usb gadgets support I'm looking at some pre7 stuff now... 3.) what about device-mapper (LVM2 support) ? Thomas could you also take a look ? i'll upload them later today to http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/cook/for_tmb/ in the mean time you can get them from my nosrc.rpm (~ 8Mb) http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/ruby-contrib/wip/kernel-bruby-2.4.22.10br .1mdk-1-1mdk.nosrc.rpm (acpi is 2.4.22-20030916, i'll upload 2.4.22-20030918, or you can get the latest from kernel.org) I'll try to add them to my next kernel... I'm starting to have a long todo for my next krnel, I'll try to wrap it up today... I'm just having some problems with our gcc 3.3 and the sparc/sparc64 that I'm re-adding support for... but I'm getting there... Regards Thomas
[Cooker] Test kernel 2.4.22-12mdk
Hi, I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested people may find it at: http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/ Non AMD64-specific changes include: * Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-12mdk - Various updates to PDC ultra driver - Various i810 audio fixes from 2.4.23pre5 - Add nForce3 IDE UDMA support - Add VM overcommit accounting + new swapless mode * Tue Oct 07 2003 Juan Quintela [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.4.22-11mdk - av7 is good for acpi. - libata driver for ICH5 and VIA SATA. - 3ware patch to make smartmontools happy (erwan request). - low latency fixes are back. Thanks, Gwenole.
[Cooker] test
[Cooker] [TEST] OOo 1.1rc4 -2mdk
Hi, Please test new packages (wrapper script + libvcl.so): http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/openoffice/1.1rc4/ This should fix: - Installation of pt-BR, zh-CN, zh-TW - UI font used for Arabic support - UI font used in Japanese Korean help content * Mon Sep 15 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1-0.rc4.2mdk - Really enable fixed Patch102 (bmp32) - Patch40: Make font substitution algorithm match documentation - Updates to wrapper script: - Really use localized instdb.ins files for installation - Reactivate font substitutions for now otherwise Japanese Korean help content is broken. This concerns (Andale Sans UI, Albany, Arial)
[Cooker] test, please ignore
move along, nothing to see here...
[Cooker] test, please ignore
dammit, this is getting annoying...
[Cooker] test -- please ignore
You couldn't help it could you. ;-) -- Brant Fitzsimmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Linux user #322847 | Linux machine #207465 | http://counter.li.org/ AMD Duron 1.3GHz | Mandrake 9.1 | Kernel 2.4.21-0.25mdkduron KDE 3.1.3 | Mozilla 1.4 Mail Client ___ All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident. -Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
[Cooker] test, please ignore
checking to see if I still have bounce problems... - John
[Cooker] test mail please ignore
trying to properly post to the newsgroup
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
söndag 20 juli 2003 10:26 em skrev andre: Also surprised that the mailing list wasn't down No, I had to test my spamassassin setup;) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
[Cooker] test, ignore...
-- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
[Cooker] Test
Please ignore. Stef -- Teletchéa Stéphane [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] [TEST] subscribed again ?
Ah, my isp was playing and I got banned... -- J.A. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.21-rc7-jam1 (gcc 3.3 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3-1mdk))
[Cooker] test, ignore...
-- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore...
onsdagen den 26 mars 2003 13.33 skrev Oden Eriksson: i hate not being in control of the damn fw i have to pass..., testing..., testing... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
[Cooker] test, please don't open
Test -- Francisco Alcaraz Ariza Departamento de Biología Vegetal Universidad de Murcia E-30100 Murcia España (Spain)
[Cooker] test, please don't open!
-- Francisco Alcaraz Ariza Departamento de Biología Vegetal Universidad de Murcia E-30100 Murcia España (Spain)
[Cooker] test, please don't open
Prueba con ono Francisco Alcaraz
[Cooker] test
Haven't recieved anything in 2 hours...just checking sorry.
[Cooker] test - please ignore
Trying gmane newsgroup
[Cooker] Test
Ignore it Regards.
[Cooker] TEST : Plize ignore this
Just testing cooker. -- Nicolas
[Cooker] TEST ignore this.
Just testing. -- Nicolas
[Cooker] Test patch for bug 930 and ldm_validate_partition_table - what's that?
Thierry, bug 930 is assigned you but it is pure kernel problem actually :)
Have a LS120 removable drive.
[...]
[...]
sigh wish i knew to look here earlier.
Here's a sip from the file:
scsi0 : SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices
Vendor: MITBISHI Model: LS-120 SLIM 05 Rev: 0015
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Vendor: MATSHITA Model: DVD-ROM SR-8171 Rev: 059d
Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Attached scsi removable disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
sda : READ CAPACITY failed.
sda : status = 0, message = 00, host = 0, driver = 28
Current sd00:00: sense key Not Ready
Additional sense indicates Medium not present
sda : block size assumed to be 512 bytes, disk size 1GB.
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 2097144
I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 2097144
I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
I/O error: dev 08:00, sector 0
ldm_validate_partition_table(): Disk read failed.
So it confirms my guess, the problem is caused by sd driver together with a bug in
ide-scsi in new kernel that makes ide-floppy devices appear as SCSI ...
Here is the patch to sd.c that
- sets size of media to 0 if no media is found (that stops kernel from attempting to
read media to find partition type)
- shuts up messages for this case (as it happens very often and automatically under
devfs, messages are quite annoying). I'd like to ask you opinion if it should be so or
it should still output a line about Media not present
Here is the second patch for ppa.c that shuts up this cable warning that fills up my
logs (and if you use supermount you have almost _only_ those cable warnings). It adds
modules parameter no_cable_warning to supress it. Again the question is should I
supress even more messages? I personally would like to do it as again, ppa is
attempted to be loaded on many devfs lookups which is quite annoying.
Please test them, if it OK they go to our kernel guys (not in this form).
-andrey
PS Please Cc to me on replies. I do read cooker but off the web so ...
--- /usr/src/linux-2.4.21-0.pre3.1mdk/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2003-01-16 19:18:11.0
+0300
+++ linux-2.4.21-0.pre3.1mdk/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2003-01-21 21:29:55.0 +0300
@@ -867,8 +867,9 @@
if( the_result != 0
((driver_byte(the_result) DRIVER_SENSE) != 0)
SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[2] == UNIT_ATTENTION
+SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[7] = 6
SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x3A ) {
- rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0x1f;
+ rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0;
sector_size = 512;
rscsi_disks[i].device-changed = 1;
rscsi_disks[i].ready = 0;
@@ -950,29 +951,40 @@
*/
if (the_result) {
- printk(%s : READ CAPACITY failed.\n
- %s : status = %x, message = %02x, host = %d, driver = %02x \n,
- nbuff, nbuff,
- status_byte(the_result),
- msg_byte(the_result),
- host_byte(the_result),
- driver_byte(the_result)
- );
- if (driver_byte(the_result) DRIVER_SENSE)
- print_req_sense(sd, SRpnt);
- else
- printk(%s : sense not available. \n, nbuff);
-
- printk(%s : block size assumed to be 512 bytes, disk size 1GB. \n,
- nbuff);
- rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0x1f;
- sector_size = 512;
-
- /* Set dirty bit for removable devices if not ready -
-* sometimes drives will not report this properly. */
- if (rscsi_disks[i].device-removable
- SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[2] == NOT_READY)
+ if (rscsi_disks[i].device-removable
+((driver_byte(the_result) DRIVER_SENSE) != 0)
+SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[2] == NOT_READY
+SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[7] = 6
+SRpnt-sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x3A ) {
+ rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0;
+ sector_size = 512;
rscsi_disks[i].device-changed = 1;
+ rscsi_disks[i].ready = 0;
+ } else {
+ printk(%s : READ CAPACITY failed.\n
+ %s : status = %x, message = %02x, host = %d, driver =
+%02x \n,
+ nbuff, nbuff,
+ status_byte(the_result),
+ msg_byte(the_result),
+ host_byte(the_result),
+ driver_byte(the_result)
+
[Cooker] test
test - please ignore.
[Cooker] test
Testing... please ignore. I know some of you like to respond to
messages that ask to be ignored because, for some reason, you think the
sender won't see it, but will see your i got it message.
In this case, I know I will get it and really don't want to have a
dozen replies. So while your fingers may itch and your eyes might
burn, please refrain from replying.
Thanks, have a great night, and sorry for the intrusion, although it is
necessary for reasons only I know.
(If you need to ignore this, I might as well make it as difficult as
possible to refrain from replying... let's see who fails).
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
lynx -source http://linsec.ca/vdanen.asc | gpg --import
{FE6F2AFD: 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
PGP.sig
Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] test ! ignore pls
test ! ignore pls
[Cooker] test - ignore
It's a simple test, please ignore
[Cooker] test - please ignore
test - adelphia mail server
[Cooker] test - please ignore
test - local server
[Cooker] Test Mail pl. Ignore
Testing
[Cooker] test
*grumble* my messages haven't been getting to the list for the last 2 days. Now I'm wondering why... -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org Never take no as an answer from someone who isn't authorized to say yes.
Re: [Cooker] test
I have been getting messages from you on the Cooker list during the past two days. Maybe they're just not coming back to you? --- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *grumble* my messages haven't been getting to the list for the last 2 days. Now I'm wondering why... -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org Never take no as an answer from someone who isn't authorized to say yes. __ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos More http://faith.yahoo.com
Re: [Cooker] test
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:57:12PM -0700, David Walser wrote: I have been getting messages from you on the Cooker list during the past two days. Maybe they're just not coming back to you? Who knows... I'm beginning to wonder if one of the messages isn't getting caught by Mandrake's spam filters... Oh well. -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org Never take no as an answer from someone who isn't authorized to say yes.
Re: [Cooker] test
Ben Reser wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 02:57:12PM -0700, David Walser wrote: I have been getting messages from you on the Cooker list during the past two days. Maybe they're just not coming back to you? Who knows... I'm beginning to wonder if one of the messages isn't getting caught by Mandrake's spam filters... Oh well. Not only spam, but anything with anything like the word s u b s c r i b e will get the message dropped. But David Walser has been receiving you recently. Here is my search result : dates and times are GMT + 1000): 03/10/02 16:54 04/10/02 06.12 04/10/02 06.13 05/10/02 03.27 05/10/02 06.05 05/10/02 10.48 05/10/02 10.49 05/10/02 11.53 05/10/02 11.54 no 06/10/02 - 21 hours with nothing. Is this the problem? 07/10/02 09.39 07/10/02 10.42 -- Ron. [Melbourne, Australia] IMPORTANT! troels... for ML 9.0 now available. See my web site: http://members.optusnet.com.au/ronst/
[Cooker] test
please disreguard this mail. -- Forest C. Adcock forest.jam.rr.com
[Cooker] test, ignore...
(is the list working or not?) -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks - http://d-srv.com
[Cooker] test
ignore it Regards
[Cooker] test
[Cooker] test
sorry ignore it -- .:: http://www.pschit.net ::.
RE: [Cooker] test
Idem -Mensaje original- De: Laurent Culioli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Enviado el: Martes 27 de Agosto de 2002 5:54 AM Para: Cooker Asunto: [Cooker] test sorry ignore it -- .:: http://www.pschit.net ::.
[Cooker] Test - 4h of messages gone away?
Mail server problems? =-= kk1
Re: [Cooker] Test - 4h of messages gone away?
Quel Qun wrote: Mail server problems? =-= kk1 It looks like that yeah. I also have a problem that some messages appear here a very long time after I post them or they don't even appear here. -- Live long and prosper!
[Cooker] test
sorry... just a quick test.
--
MandrakeSoft Security; http://www.mandrakesecure.net/
lynx -source http://www.freezer-burn.org/bios/vdanen.gpg | gpg --import
{GnuPG: 1024D/FE6F2AFD : 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD}
msg69325/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] test
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote on Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 12:01:21PM -0500 : Yes, I send e-mail directly from my laptop. I use this machine in a lot of locations, and since each location now only accepts outgoing e-mail from within their own system in order to prevent spam, it would mean having to re-configure my e-mail every time I move the machine. That is one of the Find one which supports smtp auth and configure your client to always use that outbound smtp server. Anywhere you connect from will work if you are using smtp auth (and smtp outbound is not blocked by your location's firewall, which it isn't blocking your smtp currently, so it probably won't block the smtp auth :) Blue skies... Todd -- Todd Lyons -- MandrakeSoft, Inc. http://www.mandrakesoft.com/ UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn Cooker Version mandrake-release-8.3-0.2mdk Kernel 2.4.18-21mdk msg67745/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] test
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:16:43PM -0700, Todd Lyons wrote: Find one which supports smtp auth and configure your client to always use that outbound smtp server. Anywhere you connect from will work if you are using smtp auth (and smtp outbound is not blocked by your location's firewall, which it isn't blocking your smtp currently, so it probably won't block the smtp auth :) No can do Earthlink, Mindspring, et al block port 25 to any other mailserver except their own. So when you're dialed up on them you have no choice but to use their mailserver. This is an antispam policy to prevent spammers from doing tresspass relaying. Plus it lets them throtle spammers and use software the automatically detects and terminates their accounts. :) -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we mine history for lessons convenient to the present purpose. - Brian Hayes
Re: [Cooker] test
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:30:59AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: Frankly I don't understand why they have their mailservers setup to require reverse DNS. It doesn't kill that many spammers We do filter mail servers that doesn't have a reverse DNS record and we have experienced that the emails which get undelivered due to this are from 99% from spammers, broken emails from broken mail servers from broken networks and only ~1% of undelivered emails are just a correct emails from networks with temporary DNS problems and from badly configured networks or from people not sending emails through their providers (but directly from their dialup) Also note that RFC 2821 (SMTP): ... 2.3.4 Host For the purposes of this specification, a host is a computer system attached to the Internet (or, in some cases, to a private TCP/IP network) and supporting the SMTP protocol. Hosts are known by names (see domain); identifying them by numerical address is discouraged ... I would imagine the filtering would do just fine getting rid of the spam without this requirement. Spamassasin? Why not... but I guess it will stress the servers load even more and could cause more delayed delivering (which is sometimes really bad now with cooker@) -- Martin Maok http://underground.cz/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://Xtrmntr.org/ORBman/
Re: [Cooker] test
On Saturday 13 July 2002 10:27 am, Martin Maok wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 08:30:59AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: Frankly I don't understand why they have their mailservers setup to require reverse DNS. It doesn't kill that many spammers We do filter mail servers that doesn't have a reverse DNS record and we have experienced that the emails which get undelivered due to this are from 99% from spammers, broken emails from broken mail servers from broken networks and only ~1% of undelivered emails are just a correct emails from networks with temporary DNS problems and from badly configured networks or from people not sending emails through their providers (but directly from their dialup) Yes, I send e-mail directly from my laptop. I use this machine in a lot of locations, and since each location now only accepts outgoing e-mail from within their own system in order to prevent spam, it would mean having to re-configure my e-mail every time I move the machine. That is one of the main reasons I run Postfix on this machine. Currently the ONLY place that I e-mail regularly (or at least used to :-( ) that has any problem with this is this mailing list. I can understand why the list wants reverse DNS to prevent spam.. if we're going to continue to do this, though, could we at least lower the delay? If the e-mail bounced in like 5-10 minutes instead of days, it might kind of jog the memory of folks like me to say Oh yeah - i have to send these out through Earthlink.. and they could be re-sent. Being on a client's site with this machine, if I'm working on their network, there is no way I can access any of the legal mail servers that I have access to, so any cooker related traffic would have to wait until I'm off their network, and near a phone line, so that I could dial into Earthlink to send it. Also note that RFC 2821 (SMTP): ... 2.3.4 Host For the purposes of this specification, a host is a computer system attached to the Internet (or, in some cases, to a private TCP/IP network) and supporting the SMTP protocol. Hosts are known by names (see domain); identifying them by numerical address is discouraged ... I would imagine the filtering would do just fine getting rid of the spam without this requirement. Spamassasin? Why not... but I guess it will stress the servers load even more and could cause more delayed delivering (which is sometimes really bad now with cooker@) Sorry, Somehow I DON'T think that adding something like Spamassasin is going to bring the cooker mailing list server to its knees - not unless Mandrake has some really poor servers. We're talking what? a few miliseconds per mail to process? (Does this mean that the server might need upgrading? Heck, I could be convinced to donate towards that - if only to get my access to this list back) Vinny
Re: [Cooker] test
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 05:27:07PM +0200, Martin Ma?ok wrote: We do filter mail servers that doesn't have a reverse DNS record and we have experienced that the emails which get undelivered due to this are from 99% from spammers, broken emails from broken mail servers from broken networks and only ~1% of undelivered emails are just a correct emails from networks with temporary DNS problems and from badly configured networks or from people not sending emails through their providers (but directly from their dialup) Or anytime you have some sort of temporary name resolution issue you start bouncing mail. That's stupid. Far too many people have had this problem on this list to be such a small problem. Face it DNS is not reliable and can't be used for authentication... which is what requiring reverse DNS is in essence doing. Also note that RFC 2821 (SMTP): ... 2.3.4 Host For the purposes of this specification, a host is a computer system attached to the Internet (or, in some cases, to a private TCP/IP network) and supporting the SMTP protocol. Hosts are known by names (see domain); identifying them by numerical address is discouraged You're taking that toally out of context. No where does it say that hosts must reverse resolve properly or that if they don't you should throw away their mail. It says for the purposes of the mail system that it's best to refer to hosts by their name. However in the context of receiving mail it doesn't really matter. That section was written to discourage people from doing things like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Spamassasin? Why not... but I guess it will stress the servers load even more and could cause more delayed delivering (which is sometimes really bad now with cooker@) Spamassassin is already run on Mandrake's incoming email. At least that's my understanding. -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we mine history for lessons convenient to the present purpose. - Brian Hayes
Re: [Cooker] test
Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: please ignore this - thanks! .. been unable to post lately, switching mail servers to see if that fixes it. I currently can't post from home. My ISP sux so I currently don't have reverse DNS. So, the Mandrake SMTP server refuses my mail...
Re: [Cooker] test
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: I currently can't post from home. My ISP sux so I currently don't have reverse DNS. So, the Mandrake SMTP server refuses my mail... Frankly I don't understand why they have their mailservers setup to require reverse DNS. It doesn't kill that many spammers and kills a lot of people who's ISPs don't bother with reverse or are just plain stupid. At least it's caught me and I *DO* have my reverse set right and we see this come up every so often. I would imagine the filtering would do just fine getting rid of the spam without this requirement. -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we mine history for lessons convenient to the present purpose. - Brian Hayes
Re: [Cooker] test
On 2002.07.12 Ben Reser wrote: On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:26:01PM +0200, Pascal Terjan wrote: I currently can't post from home. My ISP sux so I currently don't have reverse DNS. So, the Mandrake SMTP server refuses my mail... Frankly I don't understand why they have their mailservers setup to require reverse DNS. It doesn't kill that many spammers and kills a lot of people who's ISPs don't bother with reverse or are just plain stupid. At least it's caught me and I *DO* have my reverse set right and we see this come up every so often. I would imagine the filtering would do just fine getting rid of the spam without this requirement. At least, mdk does not require good handling of ECN. vger.kernel.org does, and it kills my ISP. It uses Sun boxes and soft, and they do not handle correctly ECN. Just block it. -- J.A. Magallon \ Software is like sex: It's better when it's free mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] \-- Linus Torvalds, FSF T-shirt Linux werewolf 2.4.19-rc1-jam3, Mandrake Linux 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 gcc (GCC) 3.1.1 (Mandrake Linux 8.3 3.1.1-0.7mdk)
[Cooker] test
please ignore this - thanks! .. been unable to post lately, switching mail servers to see if that fixes it.
Re: [Cooker] test
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 20:31, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: please ignore this - thanks! .. been unable to post lately, switching mail servers to see if that fixes it. sometimes the list is slow to post new posts. guess it's the filtering system used or something. other days, posts zip right thru. -- Roger - Verify my pgp/gnupg signature on my HomePage: http://www.alltel.net/~rogerx/about/index.html
Re: [Cooker] test
--- Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 20:31, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: please ignore this - thanks! .. been unable to post lately, switching mail servers to see if that fixes it. sometimes the list is slow to post new posts. guess it's the filtering system used or something. other days, posts zip right thru. And sometimes crap like this is the problem: Jul 11 21:33:06 luigiwalser postfix/smtp[7473]: 12BB3AE97: to=cooker@linux-mand rake.com, relay=smtp.mandrax.org[63.209.80.232], delay=42185, status=deferred ( host smtp.mandrax.org[63.209.80.232] said: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [131.118.59.4]) __ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
Re: [Cooker] test
On Thursday 11 July 2002 09:11 pm, David Walser wrote: --- Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 20:31, Vincent Meyer, MD wrote: please ignore this - thanks! .. been unable to post lately, switching mail servers to see if that fixes it. sometimes the list is slow to post new posts. guess it's the filtering system used or something. other days, posts zip right thru. And sometimes crap like this is the problem: Jul 11 21:33:06 luigiwalser postfix/smtp[7473]: 12BB3AE97: to=cooker@linux-mand rake.com, relay=smtp.mandrax.org[63.209.80.232], delay=42185, status=deferred ( host smtp.mandrax.org[63.209.80.232] said: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [131.118.59.4]) I have been getting this when I use Postfix for my outgoing mail. The one that got through was sent through an Earthlink dial-up account using thier mail server. The exact same postfix setup used to work just fine up until a few weeks ago. Is this fixable? V.
Re: [Cooker] test - messages are dying somewhere
Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: testing... sent several messages today, but they haven't shown up in the mailing list yet. It's been several hours, so I'm sending this test. Mine are taking 10 minutes to do the round trip and appear back here. If your messages contain the letter sequence s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e anywhere, sympa just drops the message. -- Ron. [au]
Re: [Cooker] test - messages are dying somewhere
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:28:28PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote: Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: testing... sent several messages today, but they haven't shown up in the mailing list yet. It's been several hours, so I'm sending this test. Mine are taking 10 minutes to do the round trip and appear back here. 5 hours + for me :P Sent 12:34:50, came back 17:57:34 Other mailing lists are working fine, and this list USED to work, so I'm pretty sure it isn't anything on my end. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to be more patient. If your messages contain the letter sequence s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e anywhere, sympa just drops the message. That wasn't the case. Cheers, and sorry for the distraction. -- Ryan T. Sammartino http://members.shaw.ca/ryants/ You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all alike.
Re: [Cooker] test - messages are dying somewhere
On Sunday 24 March 2002 08:58 pm, you wrote: On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 01:28:28PM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote: Ryan T. Sammartino wrote: testing... sent several messages today, but they haven't shown up in the mailing list yet. It's been several hours, so I'm sending this test. Mine are taking 10 minutes to do the round trip and appear back here. 5 hours + for me :P Sent 12:34:50, came back 17:57:34 Other mailing lists are working fine, and this list USED to work, so I'm pretty sure it isn't anything on my end. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to be more patient. If your messages contain the letter sequence s-u-b-s-c-r-i-b-e anywhere, sympa just drops the message. That wasn't the case. Cheers, and sorry for the distraction. a few minutes only! Sent at: Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 20:21:34 -0600 came back at: 20: 32 sk
[Cooker] test
test (message to the list bounced earlier... something about orbz.org)
[Cooker] test Install
Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020306 0:35 The mon service does not start properly, the file /etc/mon/user.conf is missing. Is it normal and normaly what package containt this file, mon itself? -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en véritable ordinateur. JL. / | Olivier Thauvin - CNRS Service Aeronomie | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 01 64 47 43 60 à Verrières (lundi,mercredi et vendredi) | 01 44 27 47 59 à Jussieu (Mardi et Jeudi) | Fax:33 (0)1 69 20 29 99 | Service d'Aéronomie, Réduit de Verrieres | Route des Gatines - BP 3 | 91371 Verrieres le Buisson Cedex | France \==
[Cooker] Test
Test - please ignore. -- Ron. [au]
[Cooker] test
test message 2
[Cooker] test only
test only --
[Cooker] Test email
Test email
[Cooker] test
My mail's arn't getting through. -- -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~- Brook Humphrey Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107 http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Holiness unto the Lord -~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Re: [Cooker] test
On Mon Jan 07, 2002 at 11:11:53PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: Ignore me again please. This is a test of the daily Vincent email. This has only been a test. If this were a real Vincent email you would have found real content here that would require your immediate attention. Yeah yeah yeah... =) -- MandrakeSoft Security, OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.8-34.1mdk uptime: 1 day 9 hours 30 minutes. msg50890/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] test
Testing something; please ignore. -- MandrakeSoft Security, OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.16-11mdklids uptime: 1 day 16 hours 22 minutes. msg50431/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] test
Ignore me again please. -- MandrakeSoft Security, OpenPGP key available on www.keyserver.net 1024D/FE6F2AFD 88D8 0D23 8D4B 3407 5BD7 66F9 2043 D0E5 FE6F 2AFD Current Linux kernel 2.4.16-11mdklids uptime: 2 days 0 hours 19 minutes. msg50449/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] test
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:48:36PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: Ignore me again please. This is a test of the daily Vincent email. This has only been a test. If this were a real Vincent email you would have found real content here that would require your immediate attention. -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org I wish it need not have happened in my time, said Frodo. So do I, said Gandalf, and so do all who live in such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.
Re: [Cooker] test
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it's so quiet - anyone there? this week has been too quiet..., but i guess (or hope) it's because of the xmas preparations... Actually an odd problem with the servers made that all our mails (mdk people) didn't pass through cooker ML :-). It seems fixed now. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] test
On Wednesdayen den 19 December 2001 15.57, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: it's so quiet - anyone there? this week has been too quiet..., but i guess (or hope) it's because of the xmas preparations... Actually an odd problem with the servers made that all our mails (mdk people) didn't pass through cooker ML :-). It seems fixed now. aha, ok. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.16-10mdksmp: 1 day 13 hours 12 minutes | cpu0 @ 799.53 bm, fan 4192 rpm, temp +26°C | cpu1 @ 801.17 bm, fan 4560 rpm, temp +27.5°C
[Cooker] test
it's so quiet - anyone there? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de | Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 2 days 7 hours 28 minutes
Re: [Cooker] test
On Wednesdayen den 19 December 2001 00.26, Alexander Skwar wrote: it's so quiet - anyone there? this week has been too quiet..., but i guess (or hope) it's because of the xmas preparations... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.16-10mdksmp: 19 hours 25 minutes | cpu0 @ 799.53 bm, fan 4245 rpm, temp +27°C | cpu1 @ 801.17 bm, fan 4560 rpm, temp +28.5°C
[Cooker] test
too late, don't read.
[Cooker] test
Hello cooker, test -- Best regards, Yura mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] test, ignore
Sorry, needed to test Kmail. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-8mdksmp: 1 hour 23 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4115 rpm, temp +30.0°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4141 rpm, temp +29°C
Re: [Cooker] test, ignore
good, kmail works 4 u :) :) :) (i'm booted in win rite now, bnut kmail werks for me) - Original Message - From: Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:22 AM Subject: [Cooker] test, ignore Sorry, needed to test Kmail. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden. | Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586 | Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-8mdksmp: 1 hour 23 minutes | cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan 4115 rpm, temp +30.0°C | cpu1 @ 815.92 bm, fan 4141 rpm, temp +29°C
[Cooker] Test, don't open
Prueba desde el webmin de la universidad
[Cooker] Test again, don't open
Prueba de nuevo, a ver si kmail lo agarra
Re: [Cooker] Test sound please
guran wrote: Hi VERSION (rsync ftp.sunet.se) /ChangeLog/1.568/Thu Sep 6 16:33:18 2001// Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20010906 22:17 I had some murky experiences of sound, in this install. No sound at the start of KDE, but that has come back, none still in FlightGear and none in RealPlayer. I went to Mdk Control Center, my SB AWE 64 PNP was set at 210/6 and it has always run at 220/5. I went into old sndconfig and then it came up in the old numbers and I have sound at the start of KDE and in RealPlayer. regards guran -- Mandrake Linux 8.1 beta Cooker kernel-2.4.8-19 vers:1.568 You have sound in KDE? That means that the artsd is working, which takes control of /dev/dsp. While artsd is running (It can be set to start up at login.) any program that tries to directly connect to /dev/dsp may return an error if you start it from the command-line, and definitely start (if it starts at all) without sound. If you're not starting it from the command-line, you miss any error messages and wonder what the hells going on. *speaking from experience* At command-line, try killall artsd program-name After program finishes, artsd as normal user to restore KDE sound. There is a program called artsdsp that tries to emulate the /dev/dsp file, so you may be able to get a program running with arts. However, I've tried running on LM8.0 artsd artsdsp esd (Works - gives me arts and esd services.) artsdsp festival_server (A voice synthesiser server.) and it seems that only one artsdsp connection can be made at the same time. Additionally, I tried the mirror of this esd esddsp artsd And arts will not connect to the esd emulation of /dev/dsp. *sighs* What would be nice is if esd and/or artsd could be set up like a sound-tee. Artsd/esd connect to the soundcard and serve arts/esound calls. Additionally any calls to /dev/dsp are routed automatically to a pipe in the sound server that acts like /dev/dsp. What would be REALLY nice is if they could be set up to supply lots of pipes, eg. /dev/dsp, /dev/dsp1, /dev/dsp2 and all calls are mixed by the server. Yeah. I know - lotta work, and it would probably have to partially exist in the kernel, if anywhere. -- Joal Heagney is: _ _ /\ _ __ __ _| | _ ___ | /__\|\ || ||__ |\ || |___|/_\|___] | /\ \_||__ ||___| \_|! | | \ \ !
Re: [Cooker] Test sound please
Joal Heagney wrote: What would be nice is if esd and/or artsd could be set up like a sound-tee. Artsd/esd connect to the soundcard and serve arts/esound calls. Additionally any calls to /dev/dsp are routed automatically to a pipe in the sound server that acts like /dev/dsp. What would be REALLY nice is if they could be set up to supply lots of pipes, eg. /dev/dsp, /dev/dsp1, /dev/dsp2 and all calls are mixed by the server. Yeah. I know - lotta work, and it would probably have to partially exist in the kernel, if anywhere. I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and can hear the two files together. I don't know what you want more. Grégoire PS : I'm not using KDE though.
Re: [Cooker] Test sound please
David Walluck wrote: On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and can hear the two files together. I don't know what you want more. Your driver support full duplex, lucky are you. The same for me ( SBLive ). the problem is to find a way to compensate the lack of full duplex when your drivers doen't support it. it's really a pain. Several people when they use linux first time with and old sound card without full duplex support are a little bit disappointed. Most of the time they hear mp3 with xmms and use licq, and unless they stop xmms, they can't hear licq notifications. I manage to convince one to buy a Creative SBLive, but I'm not going to do that everytime. It will be interesting if we could find a workaround. I will have a look at it. I really hope that there is a solution, or that we can have multiplex everything thanks to a soft. This has nothing at all to do with full-duplex vs. half-duplex. It used to be that only one program could access the sound device at a time, but with the advent of the sound daemons (most notably artsd), you can hear more than one program playing sound at the same time. Yes, but only if the programs that want to play sound make their call through artsd. If you've got a non-arts program that expects to drop sound onto the /dev/dsp device file directly, it chucks a hissyfit because artsd has already claimed it. (At least on my soundcard.) Occasionally you can use artsdsp to fit things in, but not always. -- Joal Heagney is: _ _ /\ _ __ __ _| | _ ___ | /__\|\ || ||__ |\ || |___|/_\|___] | /\ \_||__ ||___| \_|! | | \ \ !
Re: [Cooker] Test sound please
Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and can hear the two files together. I don't know what you want more. Your driver support full duplex, lucky are you. The same for me ( SBLive ). the problem is to find a way to compensate the lack of full duplex when your drivers doen't support it. it's really a pain. Several people when they use linux first time with and old sound card without full duplex support are a little bit disappointed. Most of the time they hear mp3 with xmms and use licq, and unless they stop xmms, they can't hear licq notifications. I manage to convince one to buy a Creative SBLive, but I'm not going to do that everytime. It will be interesting if we could find a workaround. I will have a look at it. I really hope that there is a solution, or that we can have multiplex everything thanks to a soft. -- Copyleft Faber's prod. 2001 http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
Re: [Cooker] Test sound please
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 10:51, Grégoire Colbert scribit : I can read multiple files, like several MP3s, at the same time. I'm using for example the libOSS driver in XMMS and ogg123 in a console, and can hear the two files together. I don't know what you want more. Your driver support full duplex, lucky are you. The same for me ( SBLive ). the problem is to find a way to compensate the lack of full duplex when your drivers doen't support it. it's really a pain. Several people when they use linux first time with and old sound card without full duplex support are a little bit disappointed. Most of the time they hear mp3 with xmms and use licq, and unless they stop xmms, they can't hear licq notifications. I manage to convince one to buy a Creative SBLive, but I'm not going to do that everytime. It will be interesting if we could find a workaround. I will have a look at it. I really hope that there is a solution, or that we can have multiplex everything thanks to a soft. This has nothing at all to do with full-duplex vs. half-duplex. It used to be that only one program could access the sound device at a time, but with the advent of the sound daemons (most notably artsd), you can hear more than one program playing sound at the same time. -- Sincerely, David Walluck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
