Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment-1.7 packaging
roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Willing to volunteer to start packing this desktop into SRPM. The only problem is trying to get a cvs snapshot to build without errors. ~2 mos ago, evas was being a real pain in the arse when trying to get apps that depend on it to build properly. Traced everything back to evas from what I recall. Since then I have been monitoring the cvs commits (for the past 2 mos) and looks like patches are being applied every other day. I may start to try to build this again. The only problem is trying to aquire a *good* cvs snapshot that actually builds without problems!!! (this means, getting all the evolution-1.7 libs and extra applications to build without problems). Yea. ditto to what somebody else stated on the voting system, Evolution-1.7 *looks* really nice and impliments some really new ideas. (On a side note, the only reason i use evolution-1.6.x is because it's the only desktop that has a good mouse navigation between virtual desktops..other then this, i usually rely on console, .xsession/.xinit, and hotkeys to start apps.) What do you talk about, evolution or enlightenment?
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 11:21, Charles A Edwards wrote: Running current cooker and enlightenment when changing the theme or choosing restart enlightenment you get the spinning hand clock face as is normal but it thinks it is the 'energizer bunny' and keeps going and going and going. Alt-Ctrl-Backspace is required. On login the newly selected theme has been applied and of course enlightenment has been restarted. The problem surfaced within the past week so I assume it is an aftereffect of a recently applied cooker update. Charles I've run into the same problem. Here's what I noticed: Dropping to a console and doing a ps shows that there are two instances of enlightenment running. Killing the one that lists the old theme unfreezes E. -- /curtis def. 'Microsoft': ...The company that made email dangerous. Mandrake Linux 8.2 Kernel Version 2.4.18-6mdk Uptime 1 day 0 hours 50 minutes
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment in current cooker
On 02 Apr 2002 19:59:39 -0800 Curtis H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've run into the same problem. Here's what I noticed: Dropping to a console and doing a ps shows that there are two instances of enlightenment running. Killing the one that lists the old theme unfreezes E. Didn't even think about that. Thanks. Charles
Re: [Cooker] enlightenment-theme-error
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:37:20PM -0900, William Bouterse wrote: cooker 20011224 enlightenment-0.16.5-6mdk bluesSteel theme gives error on startup; CONFIG:missing required data in 100 PROGRESS_TEXT_NUMBER CONFIG:missing required data in 5vixar/12 CONFIG:missing required data in 204_EFFECT_NONE clicking ignore this through the three error messages WILL get you to the working themed/desktop This is a very long existing bug; you can fix it by hand. -- Und Tschüss. Stefan ### Kilroy was here ### 5030 10:20am up 149 days
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
On Wednesday 14 March 2001 1:18, Vox wrote: |On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) | | I don't think the specfile for 16 will work on 1717 is made of a | whole lot of stuff that 16 doesn't haveand also, 17 is *barely* | usable at this point (I check it from CVS once a week). You really don't | want to mess with it unless you are going to participate in | development/pre-pre-pre-alpha testing. I am not going to use it every day, I just want to take a look on it. Besides, I want to prepare some themes for KDE 2.1, so I am looking for different sources. :-) I am also thinking about some kind of minimalist Window Manager, have looked through some of them. As it looks like that many people sticked with E, I'd like to know what it is about. May be, I can reuse some parts of its code. | | BTW: Is Imlib2 also not *released*? | | Imlib2 *is* released alreadyso that would be nice...imlib2+ Eterm | 0.9.1...heck, if you do a bug report on Eterm 0.8.x mej will tell you to | go get imlib2 and Eterm 0.9.1, cause he isn't supporting 0.8.x anymore :) Thanks for info. | | Vox P.S. can you write me [probably, off list] what is essential about E, to your mind? -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html (Russian) Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it! http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) E0.17 has been announced but not released !! We wait for released version.. -- Frdric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim | | Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : |Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen |on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and |new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still |holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) | | E0.17 has been announced but not released !! | | We wait for released version.. Ok, may be I will try tar.gz from them. Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) BTW: Is Imlib2 also not *released*? -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html (Russian) Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it! http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Frederic Crozat wrote: Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) E0.17 has been announced but not released !! We wait for released version.. Could you start building the completed subsystems? Like imlib2 and edb. Would be nice to have Eterm-0.9 to. seb
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
Vadim Plessky wrote: Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) snip It also would be nice to hear from Mandrake what is Etox, on which Mandrake people working? :-) Enlightenment 0.17 is far from done yet, raster was just talking about what is to be exptected with the new version. And "Mandrake" in this case would be Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison, which is used the name mandrake long before Linux-Mandrake existed, see mandrake.net . Joakim Bodin
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:14:35PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: Would be nice to have Eterm-0.9 to. *That* would be fine ;) -- Und Tschss. Stefan ### Kilroy was here ### 6037 12:40pm up 4 days
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:17, you wrote: | It also would be nice to hear from Mandrake what is Etox, on which | Mandrake | people working? :-) | [...] | with the new version. And "Mandrake" in this case would be Geoff | "Mandrake" Harrison, | which is used the name mandrake long before Linux-Mandrake existed, see | mandrake.net . yes, thanks for the link. I didn't know about that guy. It's interesting if he is subscribed to any of Mandrake lists? :-) | | Joakim Bodin -- Vadim Plessky http://kde2.newmail.ru (English) http://kde2.newmail.ru/index_rus.html (Russian) Do you have Arial font installed? Just test it! http://kde2.newmail.ru/font_test_arial.html
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
During the bombing raid on Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:45:50 +, Vadim Plessky was heard mumbling in fear:: On Tuesday 13 March 2001 2:56, you wrote: | Dans l'article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Vadim | | Plessky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] a crit : |Enlightenment 0.17 was announced some time ago. From what I have seen |on Rasterman's site (www.rasterman.com), it has many improvements and |new features, comparing to E 0.16. I have checked Cooker - it still |holds E 0.16. Do you plan to update it? (imlib2 is also missing) | | E0.17 has been announced but not released !! | | We wait for released version.. Ok, may be I will try tar.gz from them. Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) I don't think the specfile for 16 will work on 1717 is made of a whole lot of stuff that 16 doesn't haveand also, 17 is *barely* usable at this point (I check it from CVS once a week). You really don't want to mess with it unless you are going to participate in development/pre-pre-pre-alpha testing. BTW: Is Imlib2 also not *released*? Imlib2 *is* released alreadyso that would be nice...imlib2+ Eterm 0.9.1...heck, if you do a bug report on Eterm 0.8.x mej will tell you to go get imlib2 and Eterm 0.9.1, cause he isn't supporting 0.8.x anymore :) Vox -- Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their messenger... For info on safety in the BDSM lifestyle http://www.the-vox.com Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_ technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr. Vox populi, vox deii
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.17
edb and imlib2 are both tagged as 1.0.x, you can go to rasterman.com and have a look. btw Geoffrey was to hasty to put it in contrib I've already done that, just not ready to upload it :D Abel Cheung On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Vadim Plessky wrote: Ok, may be I will try tar.gz from them. Will specfile from E 0.16 work for it? (I'd like to build Binary RPM) BTW: Is Imlib2 also not *released*?
Re: [Cooker] enlightenment
The /etc/X11/wmsession.d/04enlightenment file is wrong. -EXEC=/usr/bin/enlightenment +EXEC=/usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment seb Also enlightenment.install is broken. It produces a .xession pointing to /usr/bin/enlightenment and not /usr/X11R6/bin/enlightenment
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment
Yo,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment
#!/bin/sh
[ -f $HOME ] || {
/usr/bin/enlightenment.install
}
exec /usr/bin/enlightenment
Umm, probably should be -d $HOME ...
--
Can anyone tell me what the use of this is? [ -f $HOME ] will ALWAYS
return false.
seb
--
Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
§õªø·
~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant.
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk
ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk
I worry about the freedom of speech and the freedom of expression. I dread
the day when, 15 years later, my little daughter ask me, "Where were you
when all of this mess started ?"
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
Yo,
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 02:10:00PM +0100, Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
sebastid@s186b:~$ /usr/sbin/chksession -x=Enlightenment
#!/bin/sh
[ -f $HOME ] || {
/usr/bin/enlightenment.install
}
exec /usr/bin/enlightenment
Umm, probably should be -d $HOME ...
Which makes about no more sense, because that will always(?) return true.
Someone should do a check here, because it is annoying when the .xsession
gets deleted on each login. Does noone use Enlightenment?
The part below is the only interesting part of
/usr/bin/enlightenment.install
--
if [ -e $HOME"/.enlightenment" ]; then
if [ -e $HOME"/.enlightenment/.initialized" ]; then
echo "You have installed Enlightenment 0.16 or greater already and
have"
echo "run it before. Everything should be fine."
else
echo "You seem to have had either an Enlightenment version earlier
than"
echo "0.16.0 installed or a 0.16 development snapshot. Your
.enlightenment"
echo "directory will be renamed to .enlightenment.old just in case."
mv $HOME"/.enlightenment" $HOME"/.enlightenment.old"
fi
fi
--
seb
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment 0.16.4
"Soulier, Frederic P" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, Any plan to have v0.16.4 in Mdk 7.1? eh we're frozen for ages now!!! (I am still seing changelog for ver: 0.16.3 rel: mdk11) -- Guillaume Cottenceau
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Paul Duran wrote: I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... Maybe a little patience is in order? :) Was it that soon? I thought it was longer than that... hmmm... sorry then... just a little eager I suppose... =) Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834 http://shx.tzo.net . telnet://shx.tzo.net . http://tux.tzo.net BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta . Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS Check out the new Linux Information site at http://tux.tzo.net
Re: [Cooker] Enlightenment
I believe that 0.16.2 came out like under a day ago... Maybe a little patience is in order? :) On Sun, Nov 07, 1999 at 11:47:19PM -0700, Vincent Danen wrote: When are we going to see the new E? It's up to 0.16.2 now, but cooker just has 0.16.1. Vincent Danen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) . ICQ: 16978834 http://shx.tzo.net . telnet://shx.tzo.net . http://tux.tzo.net BBBS/LiI . Internet Rex for Linux Beta . Stronghold Enterprises/X BBS Check out the new Linux Information site at http://tux.tzo.net
