Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-08-03 Thread Nigel Horne

On 02/08/10 22:55, Slaven Rezic wrote:

Nigel Hornen...@bandsman.co.uk  writes:

   

On 30/07/10 13:45, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote:
 

Try installing warnings::compat for  5.6 perls.
   

Thanks for the suggestion, but that failed:

cpan  install warnings::compat
 

[...]
   

Warning: prerequisite Test::More 0 not found at (eval 1) line 219.
 

[...]
   

Perl 5.006 required--this is only version 5.00503, stopped at
 

Just force install the module. But then, I don't think
warnings::compat should use Test::More anymore. This is worth an RT
ticket.
   
Please clarify what you mean by the module.  Do you mean Test::More or 
warnings::compat?



Regards,
 Slaven

   


-Nigel

--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Adjudicator, Band Trainer, Composer, Tutor, Typesetter.
NJH Music, ICQ#20252325, twitter: @nigelhorne
n...@bandsman.co.uk http://www.bandsman.co.uk



Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-08-03 Thread David Cantrell
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:16:04AM -0400, David Golden wrote:

 Personally, I see no value in testing anything before 5.6.2 and only
 minimal value even testing that now that 5.12 is the current
 production release.

I was talking with someone from $networking_equipment_company last week,
and they have recently switched from 5.6 to 5.8 for some of their stuff.
And they use cpXXXan!

I ought to get round to upgrading my 5.6.2 tester to the shiny new CT2
world, I suppose, but I have to say that it's not a particularly high
priority for me.  I do find it useful though (or at least I did when it
was running - I turned it off when the NOC guys asked us to turn the
volume down on the mailing list) if only because it caught me using a
few pointless neologisms, which I find distasteful.

-- 
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information

Anyone who cannot cope with mathematics is not fully human.
At best he is a tolerable subhuman who has learned to wear
shoes, bathe and not make messes in the house.
   -- Robert A Heinlein


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-08-02 Thread Slaven Rezic
Nigel Horne n...@bandsman.co.uk writes:

 On 30/07/10 13:45, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote:
 Try installing warnings::compat for  5.6 perls.
 Thanks for the suggestion, but that failed:

 cpan install warnings::compat
[...]
 Warning: prerequisite Test::More 0 not found at (eval 1) line 219.
[...]
 Perl 5.006 required--this is only version 5.00503, stopped at

Just force install the module. But then, I don't think
warnings::compat should use Test::More anymore. This is worth an RT
ticket.

Regards,
Slaven

-- 
Slaven Rezic - slaven at rezic dot de

tktimex - time recording tool
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ptktools/


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Jeff Lavallee
Now I'm curious!  I'll know shortly if perl 5.6.2 will compile on my OpenBSD 
smoker box.

In any case, I can only say that I'm afraid to know why you're worried about 
perl-5.6.2.  Why not require a newer Perl for your modules? 


perl 5.6 is dead, long live Perl!


Jeff




On Jul 29, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:

 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:19:41 -0500, Todd Rinaldo to...@cpanel.net said:
 
 Looking at some of the test reports from some of my personal
 modules, it looks like there are currently no automated test systems
 for perl 5.6. I would like to contribute some perl 5.6 automated
 smokers to the cause, but do not know where to start. There seems to
 be alot of projects running around which are working on the problem,
 but after looking around for the last hour, I'm even more confused
 about how to go about setting one up. Can anyone point me to a howto
 on this topic?
 
 http://wiki.cpantesters.org/ good enough?
 
 Unfortunately perl 5.6.2 doesn't build OK anymore on my linux smoke box.
 It spews out warnings about signals and this is why I have no 5.6.2
 smoker. If somebody knows how to work around this, I'm willing to smoke
 5.6.2 again.
 
 
 
 -- 
 andreas



Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Nigel Horne
Getting it all working on older Perls isn't always that easy. For 
example Test::Reporter::Transport::Socket won't install on 5:005:3 
because it needs warnings, which I can't get on that machine (install 
warnings tries to install Perl 5.12):


Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/dist.ini
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/lib/Test/Reporter/Transport
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/lib/Test/Reporter/Transport/Socket.pm
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/01_args.t
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/META.yml
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/LICENSE
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/README
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/MANIFEST
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/META.json
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/release-pod-syntax.t
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/release-pod-coverage.t
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/00-compile.t
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/Changes
Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/Makefile.PL

  CPAN.pm: Going to build 
B/BI/BINGOS/Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12.tar.gz


Can't locate warnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd 
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 . /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach 
/usr/libdata/perl/5.00503) at Makefile.PL line 3.

BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 3.
make: no target to make.
  /usr/bin/make  -- NOT OK
Running make test
  Oops, make had returned bad status
Running make install
  Oops, make had returned bad status
cpan install warnings
Running make for J/JE/JESSE/perl-5.12.1.tar.gz



-Nigel


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Nigel Horne

Todd,

I can active a 5.6.1 smoker.  Would that help (I know that you asked for 
a 5.6.2)?


-Nigel


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21:26AM +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
 Getting it all working on older Perls isn't always that easy. For 
 example Test::Reporter::Transport::Socket won't install on 5:005:3 
 because it needs warnings, which I can't get on that machine (install 
 warnings tries to install Perl 5.12):
 
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/dist.ini
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/lib/Test/Reporter/Transport
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/lib/Test/Reporter/Transport/Socket.pm
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/01_args.t
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/META.yml
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/LICENSE
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/README
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/MANIFEST
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/META.json
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/release-pod-syntax.t
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/release-pod-coverage.t
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/t/00-compile.t
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/Changes
 Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12/Makefile.PL
 
   CPAN.pm: Going to build 
 B/BI/BINGOS/Test-Reporter-Transport-Socket-0.12.tar.gz
 
 Can't locate warnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains: 
 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-freebsd 
 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 . /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503/mach 
 /usr/libdata/perl/5.00503) at Makefile.PL line 3.
 BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 3.
 make: no target to make.
   /usr/bin/make  -- NOT OK
 Running make test
   Oops, make had returned bad status
 Running make install
   Oops, make had returned bad status
 cpan install warnings
 Running make for J/JE/JESSE/perl-5.12.1.tar.gz
 
 

Try installing warnings::compat for  5.6 perls.

-- 
Chris Williams
aka BinGOs
PGP ID 0x4658671F
http://www.gumbynet.org.uk
==


pgpJ5tKdmkdkL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:39, Andreas J. Koenig
andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
 Unfortunately perl 5.6.2 doesn't build OK anymore on my linux smoke box.
 It spews out warnings about signals and this is why I have no 5.6.2
 smoker. If somebody knows how to work around this, I'm willing to smoke
 5.6.2 again.

Have you tried building the maint-5.6 branch from Git instead of the
5.6.2 release?


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
ava...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:39, Andreas J. Koenig
 andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
 Unfortunately perl 5.6.2 doesn't build OK anymore on my linux smoke box.
 It spews out warnings about signals and this is why I have no 5.6.2
 smoker. If somebody knows how to work around this, I'm willing to smoke
 5.6.2 again.

 Have you tried building the maint-5.6 branch from Git instead of the
 5.6.2 release?

In my github repo (git://github.com/dagolden/perl.git) I have a
maint-5.6.2 branch as well as maint-5.x.y for everything from 5.6.1 to
5.8.8.

Personally, I see no value in testing anything before 5.6.2 and only
minimal value even testing that now that 5.12 is the current
production release.

-- David


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 13:16, David Golden xda...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
 ava...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:39, Andreas J. Koenig
 andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
 Unfortunately perl 5.6.2 doesn't build OK anymore on my linux smoke box.
 It spews out warnings about signals and this is why I have no 5.6.2
 smoker. If somebody knows how to work around this, I'm willing to smoke
 5.6.2 again.

 Have you tried building the maint-5.6 branch from Git instead of the
 5.6.2 release?

 In my github repo (git://github.com/dagolden/perl.git) I have a
 maint-5.6.2 branch as well as maint-5.x.y for everything from 5.6.1 to
 5.8.8.

 Personally, I see no value in testing anything before 5.6.2 and only
 minimal value even testing that now that 5.12 is the current
 production release.

There are still modules like YAML::Syck (that I and toddr now
maintain) which maintain 5.6 compatibility. Having smokers on 5.6 is a
valuable service for them.

Having smokers on releases that aren't the latest on their branch is
also valuable. Some people still run 5.6.*, 5.8.*, 5.10.* with * != 2,
9  1. E.g. Module::Install recently broke on =5.8.3.

A lot of modules are doing use 5.006, or 5.008, while really only
being compatible with 5.6.2 or 5.8.8. Holding them to it is a useful
service.


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Nigel Horne

On 30/07/10 13:45, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams wrote:

Try installing warnings::compat for  5.6 perls.

Thanks for the suggestion, but that failed:

cpan install warnings::compat
Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz
Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/modules/02packages.details.txt.gz
Scanning cache /root/.cpan/build for sizes

  There's a new CPAN.pm version (v1.9402) available!
  You might want to try
install Bundle::CPAN
reload cpan
  without quitting the current session. It should be a seamless upgrade
  while we are running...

Going to read /root/.cpan/sources/modules/03modlist.data.gz
Running make for S/SA/SAPER/warnings-compat-0.07.tar.gz
CPAN: Net::FTP loaded ok
Fetching with Net::FTP:
  
ftp://ftp.mirror.8086.net/sites/CPAN/authors/id/S/SA/SAPER/warnings-compat-0.07.tar.gz


  CPAN: MD5 security checks disabled because MD5 not installed.
  Please consider installing the MD5 module.

warnings-compat-0.07/
warnings-compat-0.07/Changes
warnings-compat-0.07/eg/
warnings-compat-0.07/eg/warnings-register.pl
warnings-compat-0.07/eg/warnings.pl
warnings-compat-0.07/lib/
warnings-compat-0.07/lib/warnings/
warnings-compat-0.07/lib/warnings/compat.pm
warnings-compat-0.07/lib/warnings/register.pm
warnings-compat-0.07/lib/warnings.pm
warnings-compat-0.07/Makefile.PL
warnings-compat-0.07/MANIFEST
warnings-compat-0.07/META.yml
warnings-compat-0.07/README
warnings-compat-0.07/t/
warnings-compat-0.07/t/00-load.t
warnings-compat-0.07/t/distchk.t
warnings-compat-0.07/t/pod.t
warnings-compat-0.07/t/podcover.t
warnings-compat-0.07/t/portfs.t
warnings-compat-0.07/t/warnings.t

  CPAN.pm: Going to build S/SA/SAPER/warnings-compat-0.07.tar.gz

Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Warning: prerequisite Test::More 0 not found at (eval 1) line 219.
'LICENSE' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name.
Writing Makefile for warnings
 Dependencies detected during 
[S/SA/SAPER/warnings-compat-0.07.tar.gz] -

Test::More
Running make test
  Make had some problems, maybe interrupted? Won't test
Running make install
  Make had some problems, maybe interrupted? Won't install
Running make for M/MS/MSCHWERN/Test-Simple-0.94.tar.gz

  CPAN: MD5 security checks disabled because MD5 not installed.
  Please consider installing the MD5 module.

Test-Simple-0.94/
Test-Simple-0.94/.perlcriticrc
Test-Simple-0.94/.perltidyrc
Test-Simple-0.94/Changes
Test-Simple-0.94/examples/
Test-Simple-0.94/examples/indent.pl
Test-Simple-0.94/examples/subtest.t
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/IO/
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/IO/Scalar.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/Module.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/Tester/
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/Tester/Color.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder/Tester.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Builder.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/More.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Simple.pm
Test-Simple-0.94/lib/Test/Tutorial.pod
Test-Simple-0.94/Makefile.PL
Test-Simple-0.94/MANIFEST
Test-Simple-0.94/MANIFEST.SKIP
Test-Simple-0.94/META.yml
Test-Simple-0.94/README
Test-Simple-0.94/SIGNATURE
Test-Simple-0.94/t/
Test-Simple-0.94/t/00compile.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/00test_harness_check.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/bad_plan.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/bail_out.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/BEGIN_require_ok.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/BEGIN_use_ok.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/buffer.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/Builder.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/carp.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/create.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/current_test.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/current_test_without_plan.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/details.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing_double.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing_plan_mismatch.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing_with_no_plan.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing_with_number.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/done_testing_with_plan.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/fork_with_new_stdout.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/has_plan.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/has_plan2.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/is_fh.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/is_passing.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/maybe_regex.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/no_diag.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/no_ending.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/no_header.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/no_plan_at_all.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/ok_obj.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/output.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/reset.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/reset_outputs.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/Builder/try.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/c_flag.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/circular_data.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/cmp_ok.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/dependents.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/diag.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/died.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/dont_overwrite_die_handler.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/eq_set.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/exit.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/explain.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/extra.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/extra_one.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/fail-like.t
Test-Simple-0.94/t/fail-more.t

Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Todd Rinaldo to...@cpanel.net wrote:
 Agreed. As evidenced by the page names. Which means we have no instructions 
 for non-beta reporters. I'm also unclear if my beta reports will eventually 
 propogate to the regular testers reports. Can you tell me?

It's sort of a long term beta now. All the beta reports go into
the main www.cpantesters.org database.

 They fail as root. I think it's the old OSX issue with root's home dir. I 
 created an unprivileged cpants account on my box and now it's working better.

Ok.  I'll see if there's a way to detect that and fail gracefully.
For what it's worth, you should never be smoke testing as root on any
machine you care about.
(Testing means running arbitrary code uploaded by someone you don't
know -- not a good idea to do with root privileges)

 One thing I'm unclear on at this point. Is there any reason at this point a 
 new user would use the 1.0 system directly? If so I can just phrase the 
 instructions as If you're a new user, do this...;

A new user should *NOT* use the 1.0 system as it will be retired at
the end of August.  New users should try 2.0 and report back here (as
you've done) with any issues so we can address them.

-- David


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Todd Rinaldo

On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:25 PM, David Golden wrote:

 They fail as root. I think it's the old OSX issue with root's home dir. I 
 created an unprivileged cpants account on my box and now it's working better.
 
 Ok.  I'll see if there's a way to detect that and fail gracefully.
 For what it's worth, you should never be smoke testing as root on any
 machine you care about.
 (Testing means running arbitrary code uploaded by someone you don't
 know -- not a good idea to do with root privileges)
I agree and thus the cpants account I setup. However my perl is installed as 
root and thus perl modules via cpanp have to be installed as root. I suppose I 
could use a different strategy to install perl. I definitely need more tuits.

Thanks for your help David

Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Barbie
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:56:52PM -0400, David Golden wrote:
 On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Todd Rinaldo to...@cpanel.net wrote:
  I hope that this email does not come off as insulting in any way.
 
 I didn't take it that way.  It's really helpful to have feedback from
 someone new because we don't always understand what isn't obvious.

Likewise, thanks for the feedback it is really useful. I had all the
good intentions of starting a new VM on my work box and go through all
the steps. However, the YAPC::Surveys, work and family have had to take
precedence. 

  2a. Stumbling around I found this page http://devel.cpantesters.org/#smoker.
  2b. Many links are broken there. Some declare themselves deprecated when 
  you search harder. poe-component-cpan-reporter for instance.

This is my fault. I updated the links a while ago and mistakenly typed a
global replace with '.dist' instead of '/dist'. Fixed now.

  3a. The page starts out talking about needing to choose between CPAN or 
  CPANPLUS. It offers no optinion
 
 That is a philosophical debate beyond the scope of CPAN Testers.
 Generally the answer is whichever you would normally use.

It generally comes down to, what do you use to install your module from
the command line? CPAN or CPANPLUS? It's a personal choice, but you're
right we should mention that :)

I have to prepare for YAPC::Europe next week, so I'm not sure how much
time I'm going to have to add the right things to the wiki. Likewise, I
imagine that Chris Williams (responsible for CPANPLUS-YACSmoke) is also
going to be busy next week too.

BTW, CPANTS != CPAN Testers, two very different projects :)

Thanks for all the feedback, it'll prove useful to help us embelish the
guides in the right places.

Cheers,
Barbie.
-- 
Birmingham Perl Mongers http://birmingham.pm.org
Memoirs Of A Roadie http://barbie.missbarbell.co.uk
CPAN Testers Blog http://blog.cpantesters.org
YAPC Conference Surveys http://yapc-surveys.org
Ark Appreciation Pages http://ark.eology.org




Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Barbie wrote:

 That is a philosophical debate beyond the scope of CPAN Testers.
 Generally the answer is whichever you would normally use.
 
 It generally comes down to, what do you use to install your module from
 the command line? CPAN or CPANPLUS? It's a personal choice, but you're
 right we should mention that :)

Also cpanminus. Does it submit reports?

Best,

David



Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread David Golden
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:46 PM, David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote:
 On Jul 30, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Barbie wrote:

 That is a philosophical debate beyond the scope of CPAN Testers.
 Generally the answer is whichever you would normally use.

 It generally comes down to, what do you use to install your module from
 the command line? CPAN or CPANPLUS? It's a personal choice, but you're
 right we should mention that :)

 Also cpanminus. Does it submit reports?

No.  By deliberate decision on Miyagawa's part, since it's a tiny
self-contained CPAN client.

David


Re: Automated testing how to?

2010-07-30 Thread Andreas J. Koenig
 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:59:10 +, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason 
 ava...@gmail.com said:

   On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 06:39, Andreas J. Koenig
   andreas.koenig.7os6v...@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
  Unfortunately perl 5.6.2 doesn't build OK anymore on my linux smoke box.
  It spews out warnings about signals and this is why I have no 5.6.2
  smoker. If somebody knows how to work around this, I'm willing to smoke
  5.6.2 again.

   Have you tried building the maint-5.6 branch from Git instead of the
   5.6.2 release?

I hadn't but I just tried it and it also didn't get the signals right.
But at least I could edit config.h manually to fill in the contents of
'kill -l'. That worked indeed and I now have a working 5.6.2 again.
Thanks for the suggestion!

After that I installed with force: CPAN::Reporter, HTML::Parser, URI
(all of them didn't pass wome tests).

Then Test::Reporter::Transport::Metabase and Crypt::SSLeay could be
installed without force.

But then CPAN::Reporter refused to run telling me that it was not
installed (while it was).

Key was finally to install File::HomeDir manually (with cp).

And after that I sent my first Metabase report with a perl 5.6.2:

[2010-07-31T03:38:45Z] [Andreas J. K�nig (ANDK)] [pass] 
[NWCLARK/Acme-Meta-0.02.tar.gz] [x86_64-linux] [perl-v5.6.2]

I'm starting to smoke it now.

-- 
andreas