Re: [css-d] Stumped on font style

[Bill Braun]

David Laakso wrote:

Bill Braun wrote:
I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web 
site. I have just about everything except the top navigation font style.


This is the reference style:
http://basicbusinesssim.com/
This is the blog page I am trying to match:
http://www.basicbusinesssim.com/bbsimblog/
Note that the horizontal letter spacing in the top navigation in the 
reference style is narrower, and the horizontal letter spacing in the 
top navigation on the blog page is wider.


I've concluded that I am simply missing the obvious, but I cannot 
spot it.







They receive a different font-family.



I'm thoroughly embarrassed to say that I checked the font-family styles 
- but not extensively enough. Thank you, David, and to Patricia also.


Bill B

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on font style

[David Laakso]

Bill Braun wrote:
I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site. 
I have just about everything except the top navigation font style.


This is the reference style:
http://basicbusinesssim.com/
This is the blog page I am trying to match:
http://www.basicbusinesssim.com/bbsimblog/
Note that the horizontal letter spacing in the top navigation in the 
reference style is narrower, and the horizontal letter spacing in the 
top navigation on the blog page is wider.


I've concluded that I am simply missing the obvious, but I cannot spot 
it.







They receive a different font-family.







Any pointers?





1/ Set the fonts at default.
2/ Dig a very deep hole and bury Verdana in it [ forever ].
3/ Smile.





Best regards,

Bill B




Best,
~d

--
:: desktop and mobile ::
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] Stumped on font style

[Bill Braun]

I am adapting a Word Press style to integrate a blog into my web site. I 
have just about everything except the top navigation font style.


This is the reference style:

http://basicbusinesssim.com/

This is the blog page I am trying to match:

http://www.basicbusinesssim.com/bbsimblog/

Note that the horizontal letter spacing in the top navigation in the 
reference style is narrower, and the horizontal letter spacing in the 
top navigation on the blog page is wider.


I've concluded that I am simply missing the obvious, but I cannot spot it.

Any pointers?

Best regards,

Bill B


__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on Safari Float

[Philippe Wittenbergh]

On Nov 6, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Matt wrote:

> So my Safari float problem remains.  Anyone have any idea what the
> problem might be...
>
> Thanks again...
> - Matt
>
> On Nov 3, 2007 12:32 AM, David Laakso  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Matt wrote:
>>> For some reason, Safari and me don't get along... at least with this
>>> project!  Take a look at this:
>>>
>>> http://www.scienceprogress.org/
>>>
>>> Look at the items under "Science Progress Blog"
>>>
>>> Under Firefox and IE-Win, the thumbnails float to the right as  
>>> defined
>> in
>>> the CSS, but in Safari, the float doesn't seem to apply at all.

The pics float:right correctly in Safari 2.04, WebKit builds and  
Safari 3.03beta. OS X 10.4.10.
You don't say which version of Safari you are testing... Safari 2.04  
and older can be quite stubborn in caching stylesheets. Reloading a  
couple of times usually solves that.

Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh





__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on Safari Float

[Matt]

Ok, you've shamed me into doing some clean-up work today.  I've eliminated
60 of the 62 HTML validation errors (the 2 remainders are part of the
Share-This plug in... and I can't quite figure out how to crush them)... I
also cleaned up all the CSS and it now validates fully.

So my Safari float problem remains.  Anyone have any idea what the
problem might be...

Thanks again...
- Matt

On Nov 3, 2007 12:32 AM, David Laakso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Matt wrote:
> > For some reason, Safari and me don't get along... at least with this
> > project!  Take a look at this:
> >
> > http://www.scienceprogress.org/
> >
> > Look at the items under "Science Progress Blog"
> >
> > Under Firefox and IE-Win, the thumbnails float to the right as defined
> in
> > the CSS, but in Safari, the float doesn't seem to apply at all.  What am
> I
> > doing wrong?  Surely I'm missing something simple?  I've spent an hour
> > trying to rework the CSS six different ways, and no matter what I do, it
> > looks perfect... just not in Safari...
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > - Matt
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> No clue here, either. Could any, among the 62, markup validation errors
> have anything whatsoever with it?
>
> Best,
> ~dL
>
> --
> http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
>
>
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on Safari Float

[David Laakso]

Matt wrote:
> For some reason, Safari and me don't get along... at least with this
> project!  Take a look at this:
>
> http://www.scienceprogress.org/
>
> Look at the items under "Science Progress Blog"
>
> Under Firefox and IE-Win, the thumbnails float to the right as defined in
> the CSS, but in Safari, the float doesn't seem to apply at all.  What am I
> doing wrong?  Surely I'm missing something simple?  I've spent an hour
> trying to rework the CSS six different ways, and no matter what I do, it
> looks perfect... just not in Safari...
>
> Thanks in advance,
> - Matt
>
>   




No clue here, either. Could any, among the 62, markup validation errors 
have anything whatsoever with it?

Best,
~dL

-- 
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] Stumped on Safari Float

[Matt]

For some reason, Safari and me don't get along... at least with this
project!  Take a look at this:

http://www.scienceprogress.org/

Look at the items under "Science Progress Blog"

Under Firefox and IE-Win, the thumbnails float to the right as defined in
the CSS, but in Safari, the float doesn't seem to apply at all.  What am I
doing wrong?  Surely I'm missing something simple?  I've spent an hour
trying to rework the CSS six different ways, and no matter what I do, it
looks perfect... just not in Safari...

Thanks in advance,
- Matt
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] stumped

[Philippe Wittenbergh]

On Jun 11, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Stephen Karsch wrote:

> hey everyone!
> i'm trying to figure out why the following site looks fine in FF  
> and IE6
> but not safari...
>
> http://www.phillywriter.com/
>
> any help is greatly appreciated.

I'm not stumped.
And I believe Safari is not completely incorrect.
And Gecko is partly incorrect.

You div#content contains floated elements at the bottom, you'll need  
to clear those. Otherwise, the oversized negative margins+padding  
simply cut of the contents.

Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh





__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] stumped

[Stephen Karsch]

hey everyone!
i'm trying to figure out why the following site looks fine in FF and IE6 
but not safari...

http://www.phillywriter.com/

any help is greatly appreciated.
thanks!
steve

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] stumped x 3

[Dave Solko]

Thanks to those who responded.

At 7:57 AM -0400 4/18/06, Design Groups wrote:
>>>I cannot seem to get rid of the border around the 'close window' image. <<
>
>1)  img {border:none;}

Of course that worked. I thought I had tried that one without 
success. I guess that's what happens when trying to debug after all 
day and nite in front of the screen.

>
>>>How should I go about trying put a 4px shadow around the white 
>>>content area? <<
>
>I've done this before.  This is a fixed-width site, so it's quite 
>easy. Bascially, you need to create 3 images: a top, middle and 
>bottom.  The top and bottom should have a 1px strip of white (you 
>background color for the content area) that's the width of your 
>content area, and add your shadow to it at the top.  Same with the 
>bottom, only move the shadow to the bottom :) The middle should only 
>be 1 pixel wide, and again - the same width of your content + the 
>8px shadow color.  Then do somethign like the following:
>
>HTML:
>
>
>
>stuff here
>
>
>
>
>
>CSS:
>
>#container {
>background-image:url{"top_shadow");
>background-repeat:no-repeat;
>}
>#content {
>background-image:url("middle_shadow");
>margin-top:1px;
>}
>#footer {
>background-image:url("bottom_shadow");
>background-repeat:no-repeat;
>background-position:left bottom;
>}
>
>You may have to play with that a bit, but it basically sets your top 
>and bottom shadows, and the middle will expand as the content of 
>your site expands.  Works pretty well :)

I tried what you mentioned, but always wind up with a similar issue, 
gaps between the backgrounds 
http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/foo.html I've tried other 
variations (border, margin, background-position), but all either have 
the gaps, or the top and bottom disappear. Thoughts?

>>>It works/looks fine on a Mac, but horrendous on Windows. <<

As has been pointed out by several, it looks fine on firefox and 
other windows browsers. I should have said "Looks horrible in ie." 
So, any hints on how to fix that? I don't need ie5 compatibility.
Relevant links:
page in question: http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/test2.html
css: http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/css/test.css
should look like: http://pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/master.gif
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] stumped x 3

[francky]

Dave Solko wrote:

>I have a three (most likely simple) CSS issues which are stumping me, 
>and I would be grateful for some help.
>
>At http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/sample.html (css at 
>http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/css/sample.css) I cannot seem to 
>get rid of the border around the 'close window' image. Things look 
>fine in Safari, but not in Firefox.
>  
>
Hi Dave,
You can try
#close img {...} instead of
#close {...}

>How should I go about trying put a 4px shadow around the white 
>content area? As you can see, the existing shadow (a background-image 
>with repeat-y) has some banding issues. I also haven't been able to 
>get the top or bottom shadows to tuck in nicely -- there's always a 
>large, ugly gap. A mokup can be found at 
>http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/sample.jpg
>  
>
Do you have a link to a real life test page in which we can see the 
"large, ugly gap" and the code used for that?

>One last one while I'm asking. I tried modifying MaxDesign's 
>floattutorial 8 to create my navigation at 
>http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/test2.html (ignore the ugly 
>coloured borders). It works/looks fine on a Mac, but horrendous on 
>Windows. How should I go about making a vertical navigation with an 
>image to the right? I'm shooting for something which looks like 
>http://pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/master.gif
>  
>
Under Win98SE it looks fine, when browsed in a real browser: FF, Opera, 
... are alright, so it is not Windows itself.
See screenshot 
.
It is, indeed, only IE making a mess of it. - I'm sorry I don't have 
time to analyze at the moment.

Greetings,
francky
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] stumped x 3

[Dave Solko]

I have a three (most likely simple) CSS issues which are stumping me, 
and I would be grateful for some help.

At http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/sample.html (css at 
http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/css/sample.css) I cannot seem to 
get rid of the border around the 'close window' image. Things look 
fine in Safari, but not in Firefox.

How should I go about trying put a 4px shadow around the white 
content area? As you can see, the existing shadow (a background-image 
with repeat-y) has some banding issues. I also haven't been able to 
get the top or bottom shadows to tuck in nicely -- there's always a 
large, ugly gap. A mokup can be found at 
http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/sample.jpg

One last one while I'm asking. I tried modifying MaxDesign's 
floattutorial 8 to create my navigation at 
http://www.pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/test2.html (ignore the ugly 
coloured borders). It works/looks fine on a Mac, but horrendous on 
Windows. How should I go about making a vertical navigation with an 
image to the right? I'm shooting for something which looks like 
http://pixelalchemy.com/clients/vibe/master.gif

Please cc me, I'm on digest mode.
TIA for any help. I'll return to lurking.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped

[Kenny Meyers]

Site fixed: 

 

 CSS Positioning Example 
  
 

 

Masthead


Navigation item 1 | Navigation item 2 | Navigation
item 3 | Navigation item 4 | Navigation item 5 | 
 

HeadlineArticle goes here




The stylesheet was fine, although I did change the div tag to an id of
content which you'll want to reflect in your stylesheet. The issue was the
formatted tags which are special characters that browsers don't recognize,
which Dreamweaver 8 doesn't do, btw, but Word is a culprit. 

Cheers,
Kenny



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Design Groups
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 6:44 AM
To: Mark Fellowes; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Stumped

I know this seems stupid, and I'm probably going to sound like an idiot for 
saying this...but did the previous author (or whomever coded this stuff) use

soemthing like Dreamweaver (or God forbid, Microsoft Word) to code out this 
stuff?

The reason I ask is because I'm seeing some funky characters in spots they 
shouldn't be in, and I'm thinking it's possible that the browsers are 
reading those funky characters and dismissing them as invalid input - this 
rendering these weird issues.

For example:



See there?  your quotation marks are formatted - they aren't "text-only".

And in your body of the HTML, ALL of your quotation marks are formatted 
text - not text only.

I know it seems silly, but maybe that's the problem?

As for div#body - I think that's just the name he gave for the content area.

It's not because he wants to redo the body of the entire page - he just 
chose a poor name for it.  Normally, it'd be called "#content" or something 
along those lines.

HTH!

~Shelly 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped

[Design Groups]

I know this seems stupid, and I'm probably going to sound like an idiot for 
saying this...but did the previous author (or whomever coded this stuff) use 
soemthing like Dreamweaver (or God forbid, Microsoft Word) to code out this 
stuff?

The reason I ask is because I'm seeing some funky characters in spots they 
shouldn't be in, and I'm thinking it's possible that the browsers are 
reading those funky characters and dismissing them as invalid input - this 
rendering these weird issues.

For example:



See there?  your quotation marks are formatted - they aren't "text-only".

And in your body of the HTML, ALL of your quotation marks are formatted 
text - not text only.

I know it seems silly, but maybe that's the problem?

As for div#body - I think that's just the name he gave for the content area. 
It's not because he wants to redo the body of the entire page - he just 
chose a poor name for it.  Normally, it'd be called "#content" or something 
along those lines.

HTH!

~Shelly 

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped

[John Sico]

It looks like it's because the author's used a div called  
"body"...which is kinda confusing.

>> HeadlineArticle goes here

It might make more sense to use "content" instead.

>> HeadlineArticle goes here

Then

>> div#content {
>> height:100%;
>> background-color:#ff;}

for the css.

--
John


On Apr 17, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Mark Fellowes wrote:

> I'm using a simple layout tutorial to build my understanding.  I  
> might have been going backwards (tried a few more complicated  
> ones), however this is confusing me because only the body  
> background is showing, and not the ones set for the div's.
>
> HTML:
> 
> 
> 
> CSS Positioning Example
>  charset=iso-8859-1”>
>  title="stage.css" />  
> 
> Masthead
> 
> Navigation item 1 |
> Navigation item 2 |
> Navigation item 3 |
> Navigation item 4 |
> Navigation item 5 |
> 
> HeadlineArticle goes here
> 
> 
>
> CSS:
> body {
> background-color:#efefef;
> font-family:arial, verdana, sans-serif;}
>
> div {
> width:800px;
> border:1px solid #00;
> margin:1px;
> padding:5px;}
>
> div#masthead {
> height:100px;
> background-color:#d6d6d6;color: #f93315;}
>
> div#navigation {
> height:40px;
> background-color:#66;
> color:#ff;}
>
> div#body {
> height:100%;
> background-color:#ff;}
>
> I was "sort of" wondering why the author chose to add the  
> "div#body", since i'd think the body would have been enough.  This  
> maybe where the color issues are coming from , however I haven't  
> tried to drop the rules for body or drop the div#body.  I want to  
> understant what the purpose is to have both.
>
> Stuart
> __
> Organize. Communicate. Share. @ http://www.goowy.com
> __
> css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
> IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] Stumped

[Mark Fellowes]

I'm using a simple layout tutorial to build my understanding.  I might have 
been going backwards (tried a few more complicated ones), however this is 
confusing me because only the body background is showing, and not the ones set 
for the div's.

HTML:



CSS Positioning Example

  


Masthead

Navigation item 1 |
Navigation item 2 |
Navigation item 3 |
Navigation item 4 |
Navigation item 5 |

HeadlineArticle goes here



CSS:
body {
background-color:#efefef;
font-family:arial, verdana, sans-serif;}

div {
width:800px;
border:1px solid #00;
margin:1px;
padding:5px;}

div#masthead {
height:100px;
background-color:#d6d6d6;color: #f93315;}

div#navigation {
height:40px;
background-color:#66;
color:#ff;}

div#body {
height:100%;
background-color:#ff;}

I was "sort of" wondering why the author chose to add the "div#body", since i'd 
think the body would have been enough.  This maybe where the color issues are 
coming from , however I haven't tried to drop the rules for body or drop the 
div#body.  I want to understant what the purpose is to have both.  

Stuart
__
Organize. Communicate. Share. @ http://www.goowy.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on white border on tables

[Gunlaug Sørtun]

Scott Haneda wrote:

As you can see 
I am still nailed with this white border around the table, and I need to
make that go away.


Ok, you need a quick fix:
border="0" style="float: left; margin: -1px -1px 0 -1px; _margin: -1px 
-4px 0 -4px;">

...should do just fine.

regards
Georg
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on white border on tables

[Scott Haneda]

on 7/11/05 5:29 PM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> Look at the header and the footer, there is this 1px or so white line around
> everything, and I can not get it to go away.

I guess it is a mac thing:
td {
padding: 0px;
}

Fixed it.
-- 
-
Scott HanedaTel: 415.898.2602
 Novato, CA U.S.A.


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Re: [css-d] Stumped on white border on tables

[Scott Haneda]

on 7/11/05 6:41 PM, Ric & Jude Raftis at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Could I suggest that you get rid of all your tables for a start and stick
> with one table if you are going to use them.  At a cursory glance you appear
> to be using four tables some are nested and some aren't. Your page shows
> that you could achieve this design with a single column using colspan tags
> on your header and footer and then define your layouts using CSS.
> 
> Regards,

Sure, and I may do that later, this is just what I did now, to be fast, I am
not making a ton on this site, so I need to just get it done, even if I do
as you suggest...

As you can see 
I am still nailed with this white border around the table, and I need to
make that go away.
-- 
-
Scott HanedaTel: 415.898.2602
 Novato, CA U.S.A.


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

RE: [css-d] Stumped on white border on tables

[Ric & Jude Raftis]

Could I suggest that you get rid of all your tables for a start and stick
with one table if you are going to use them.  At a cursory glance you appear
to be using four tables some are nested and some aren't. Your page shows
that you could achieve this design with a single column using colspan tags
on your header and footer and then define your layouts using CSS.

Regards,

Ric

> Subject: [css-d] Stumped on white border on tables
> 
> <http://www.click-brand.com/se_marketing/index.ws>
> Look at the header and the footer, there is this 1px or so white line
> around
> everything, and I can not get it to go away.

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] Stumped on white border on tables

[Scott Haneda]

Look at the header and the footer, there is this 1px or so white line around
everything, and I can not get it to go away.
-- 
-
Scott HanedaTel: 415.898.2602
 Novato, CA U.S.A.


__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

[css-d] Stumped: Mac IE image over menu issue

[Frank McClung]

I've been scratching my head as to why the "Instant Quote" image is covering
up my navigation on Mac IE 5.2? Could someone point me to the correct hack?

 

http://www.computerrecycling.us/

 

Thanks,

 

Frank

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/