Re: [CTRL] Conservative Idiots

2002-09-18 Thread iNFoWaRZ

-Caveat Lector-

An American who stands up for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, our Republic, and 
our American heritage.  That is a true Conservative.
The Neo-Conservatives today, are only interested in Conserving the status quo, which 
is socialism, globalism, and big government.
Democrats and Republicans, different sides of the SAME coin.


At 04:13 AM 9/17/02 , you wrote:
-Caveat Lector-

So who would you call a True Conservative?

Steve

On 17 Sep 2002 at 0:11, iNFoWaRZ wrote:

  The problem with this article is that none of the listed are Conservatives,
  they a globalists and socialists.  Bush and Co. are pushing through the
  Clinton Agenda at lighting speed.  And the agenda is global government.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Amnesty International: New International Criminal Court Under Attack!

2002-09-18 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

http://web.amnesty.org/web/icc_petition.nsf

English - International justice system under attack

The new system of international justice, which came about with the
creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), is under attack. The
USA is trying to ensure that US nationals are exempt from ICC jurisdiction
over genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

Act now to protect the international justice system.

The ICC will investigate and prosecute people accused of genocide, crimes
against humanity and war crimes. The USA is attacking this new system of
international justice by pressing states around the world to enter into
impunity agreements not to surrender US nationals to the ICC. In many
cases the US government is threatening to withdraw military assistance
from countries that will not agree.

Such agreements are unlawful under international law. They threaten to
undermine international efforts to stop criminals ever again planning and
committing the worst crimes known to humanity.

Join Amnesty International members and sign the petition below, urging all
governments not to enter into these impunity agreements.

http://web.amnesty.org/web/icc_petition.nsf [
http://web.amnesty.org/web/icc_petition.nsf/action_English?OpenForm ]


Français - La justice internationale est en péril

Des menaces pèsent sur le nouveau système judiciaire international qui a
vu le jour avec la création de la Cour pénale internationale (CPI). Les
États-Unis essaient d'exempter leurs ressortissants de la compétence de la
CPI pour les actes de génocide, les crimes contre l'humanité et les crimes
de guerre.

Agissez maintenant pour protéger la justice internationale

La CPI a pour mandat d'enquêter sur les personnes soupçonnées de génocide,
de crimes contre l'humanité et de crimes de guerre et d'engager des
poursuites à leur encontre. Les États-Unis sont en train de mettre à mal
ce nouveau dispositif judiciaire international en exerçant des pressions
sur les autres pays pour les convaincre de passer des ententes de
non-extradition des citoyens américains vers la CPI. Dans de nombreux cas,
le gouvernement américain menace de retirer son aide militaire au pays
refusant d'accéder à ses demandes.

De tels accords sont illégaux aux termes du droit international. Ils
risquent de réduire à néant les efforts déployés à l'échelle
internationale pour arrêter les criminels qui planifient et commettent les
pires crimes contre l'humanité.

Signez l'appel d'Amnesty International ci-dessous, qui demande aux
gouvernements de ne pas conclure d'accord d'immunité de juridiction avec
les États-Unis.

http://web.amnesty.org/web/icc_petition.nsf/act_fra

Española - El sistema de justicia internacional, en peligro

El nuevo sistema de justicia internacional, surgido a raíz de la creación
de la Corte Penal Internacional (CPI), se encuentra en grave peligro.
Estados Unidos está tratando de asegurarse de que sus ciudadanos quedan
exentos de la jurisdicción de la CPI en relación con el genocidio, los
crímenes contra la humanidad y los crímenes de guerra.

No espere, actúe ya para proteger el sistema de justicia internacional

La Corte Penal Internacional investigará y procesará a personas a las que
se acuse de haber cometido genocidio, crímenes contra la humanidad y
crímenes de guerra. Estados Unidos está atacando y poniendo en grave
peligro a este nuevo sistema de justicia internacional ejerciendo intensas
presiones sobre todos los Estados del mundo para que firmen acuerdos de
impunidad en virtud de los cuales los países que lo hagan se comprometen a
no entregar a ciudadanos estadounidenses a la CPI. En muchos casos, el
gobierno de Estados Unidos está amenazando con retirar la ayuda militar a
los países que se nieguen a firmar esos acuerdos.

Los acuerdos que Estados Unidos quiere que se firmen son ilegales según el
derecho internacional y, sobre todo, amenazan gravemente con socavar los
esfuerzos internacionales para conseguir de una vez por todas acabar con
la posibilidad de que los criminales planifiquen o cometan los peores
crímenes que ha conocido la humanidad.

Únase a los miembros de Amnistía Internacional de todo el mundo y firme la
petición que se incluye seguidamente, en la que se insta a todos los
gobiernos a que NO firmen los acuerdos de impunidad para Estados Unidos.

http://web.amnesty.org/web/icc_petition.nsf/act_esl


Italiano - Un attacco alla giustizia internazionale

Il nuovo sistema di giustizia internazionale, venutosi a creare con la
nascita della Corte penale internazionale, è sotto attacco. Gli Stati
Uniti stanno cercando di garantire che i propri cittadini non siano
sottoposti alla giurisdizione della Corte per genocidio, crimini contro
l'umanità e crimini di guerra.

Agisci adesso per proteggere la giustizia internazionale

La Corte penale internazionale indagherà e promuoverà azioni giudiziarie
su persone accusate di genocidio, crimini contro l'umanità e crimini di
guerra. Gli Stati Uniti stanno 

[CTRL] Black-Out in US Press about Bush Plans

2002-09-18 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

-Original Message-
From: State and Local Freedom of Information Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Warren
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: has US press blacked-out Sunday Herald's
alleged Bush-Cheney plan?

I thought the Bush-Scowcroft reasons against invading Iraq and/or
deposing Hussein, that I circulated earlier, were interesting and
enlightening.

However, the following article in England's Sunday Herald, is
appalling -- and frightening in the degree to which it dovetails
*perfectly* with the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld efforts and proposals, so
far.

Why aren't these things being WIDELY covered in the US press?!

--jim

Jim Warren; [EMAIL PROTECTED], technology-related public-policy advocate
345 Swett, Woodside CA 94062 U.S.A.; 650-851-7075; fax/off due to spam-glut

[self-inflating puffery: InfoWorld founder; Dr.Dobb's Journal first editor;
Soc.of Prof.Journalists-Nor.Cal.James Madison Freedom-of-Information Award;
Electronic Frontier Foundation Pioneer Award (1992, its first year);
Playboy Foundation Hugh Hefner First-Amendment Award (1994);
founded the Computers, Freedom  Privacy Conferences; blah blah blah]


http://www.sundayherald.com/27735

Bush planned Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President

By Neil Mackay

A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President
Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to
secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.

The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a
'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-
president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz
(Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis
Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding
America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New
Century, was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative
think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of
the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says:
'The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent
role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with
Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial
American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the
regime of Saddam Hussein.'

The PNAC document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US
pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping
the international security order in line with American principles and
interests'.

This 'American grand strategy' must be advanced for 'as far into the
future as possible', the report says. It also calls for the US to
'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars'
as a 'core mission'.

The report describes American armed forces abroad as 'the cavalry on
the new American frontier'. The PNAC blueprint supports an earlier
document written by Wolfowitz and Libby that said the US must
'discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our
leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role'.

The PNAC report also:  SNIP

[]

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fisk on the Iraq escapade

2002-09-18 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

By Robert Fisk

[The Independent - 15 September 2002]:Years ago, in a snug
underground restaurant in downtown Tehran, drinking duq - an Iranian
beverage of mint and yoghurt - Saddam Hussein's former head of
nuclear research told me what happened when he made a personal appeal
for the release of a friend from prison. I was taken directly from
my Baghdad office to the director of state security, he said. I was
thrown down the stairs to an underground cell and then stripped and
trussed up on a wheel attached to the ceiling. Then the director came
to see me.

 'You will tell us all about your friends - everything,' he said.
'In your field of research, you are an expert, the best. In my field
of research, I am the best man.' That's when the whipping and the
electrodes began.

All this happened, of course, when Saddam Hussein was still our
friend, when we were encouraging him to go on killing Iranians in his
1980-88 war against Tehran, when the US government - under President
Bush Snr - was giving Iraq preferential agricultural assistance
funding. Not long before, Saddam's pilots had fired a missile into an
American warship called the Stark and almost sunk it. Pilot error,
claimed Saddam - the American vessel had been mistaken for an Iranian
oil tanker - and the US government cheerfully forgave the Iraqi
dictator.

Those were the days. But sitting in the United Nations General
Assembly last week, watching President Bush Jr tell us with all his
Texan passion about the beatings and the whippings and the rapes in
Iraq, you would have thought they'd just been discovered. For sheer
brazen historical hypocrisy, it would have been difficult to beat
that part of the President's speech. Saddam, it appears, turned into
a bad guy when he invaded Kuwait in 1990. Before that, he was just a
loyal ally of the United States, a strong man - as the news agency
boys like to call our dictators - rather than a tyrant.

But the real lie in the President's speech - that which has dominated
American political discourse since the crimes against humanity on 11
September last year - was the virtual absence of any attempt to
explain the real reasons why the United States has found itself under
attack.

In his mendacious article in this newspaper last week, President
Bush's Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, also attempted to mask
this reality. The 11 September assault, he announced, was an attack
on people who believe in freedom, who practise tolerance and who
defend the inalienable rights of man. He made, as usual, absolutely
no reference to the Middle East, to America's woeful, biased policies
in that region, to its ruthless support for Arab dictators who do its
bidding - for Saddam Hussein, for example, at a time when the head of
Iraqi nuclear research was undergoing his Calvary - nor to America's
military presence in the holiest of Muslim lands, nor to its
unconditional support for Israel's occupation of Palestinian land in
the West Bank and Gaza.

Oddly, a very faint ghost of this reality did creep into the start of
the President's UN address last week. It was contained in two
sentences whose importance was totally ignored by the American press
- and whose true meaning might have been lost on Mr Bush himself,
given that he did not write his speech - but it was revealing
nonetheless. Our common security, he said, is challenged by
regional conflicts - ethnic and religious strife that is ancient but
not inevitable. In the Middle East, there can be no peace for either
side without freedom for both sides. Then he repeated his old line
about the need for an independent and democratic Palestine.

This was perhaps as close as we've got, so far, to an official
admission that this whole terrible crisis is about the Middle East.
If this is a simple war for civilisation against evil - the line
that Mr Bush was so cruelly peddling again to the survivors of 11
September and the victims' relatives last week - then what are these
regional challenges? Why did Palestine insinuate its way into the
text of President Bush's UN speech? Needless to say, this strange,
uncomfortable little truth was of no interest to the New York and
Washington media, whose wilful refusal to investigate the real
political causes of this whole catastrophe has led to a news coverage
that is as bizarre as it is schizophrenic.

Before dawn on 11 September last week, I watched six American
television channels and saw the twin towers fall to the ground 18
times. The few references to the suicide killers who committed the
crime made not a single mention of the fact that they were Arabs.
Last week, The Washington Post and The New York Times went to
agonising lengths to separate their Middle East coverage from the 11
September commemorations, as if they might be committing some form of
sacrilege or be acting in bad taste if they did not. The challenge
for the administration is to offer a coherent and persuasive
explanation of how the Iraq danger is connected to 

[CTRL] Get Emails About Yourself at Federal Agencies

2002-09-18 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

-Original Message-
From: State and Local Freedom of Information Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Michael Ravnitzky
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Get Emails About Yourself at Federal Agencies


GET EMAILS ABOUT YOURSELF AT FEDERAL AGENCIES
by Michael Ravnitzky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Under the E-FOIA Amendments, you can ask for and get email that mentions
your name at federal government agencies.

If you've had issues with a FOIA request at a particular agency in the past,
or if you just wish to know how your work is being perceived in the agency,
simply send in a request that asks for all email with your name in the FOIA
Office, in the Office of General Counsel, and perhaps in the Office of
Public Affairs or in the Office of the
Administrator/Director/Commissioner/Secretary.

Or if you've worked with one particular department or component that has
become balky of late, you can ask for the email from them.

There is some surprising and illuminating email out there with your name on
it - literally.

Don't ask for all email in the entire agency; such a request would be too
broad and quite unnecessary.

If you have any problem locating a mailing address or fax number, feel free
to send me a note at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

But the best place to get the mailing address or fax for an agency FOIA
Office is:

http://www.usdoj.gov/04foia/foiacontacts.htm

and for Justice Dept agencies, go to:

http://www.usdoj.gov/04foia/04_4.html

Mike

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Pax Americana Document

2002-09-18 Thread Jei

-Caveat Lector-

-Original Message-
Subject: Pax Americana document


The Pax Americana report is actually titled, Rebuilding America's Defenses
and subtitled, Strataegy, Forces and Resources for a New Century.

It was produced by PNAC (Project for the New American Century).

The report was completed in September, 2000, and advocates many of the
actions that Bush has already put in motion.

Among the report's advised courses of action are:

- Use of the conflict over Saddam in Iraq to gain permanent placement of US
troops in the Gulf region

- Increased deployment of US troops in Europe and weakening of the nascent
moves toward the political and defense identity of the European Union

- Development of permanent military bases in Southeast Asia

- Development of strategically placed military bases, with mobile forces to
control US interests anywhere in the world

- Multiple theaters of war to maintain US military dominance in the world
and prevent any other nation from developing a force equal to the US

- Use of US military troops to police the world in a constabulary role

- Development of US missile defense program capable of destroying missiles
in any region of the world

- Development of new military technology, including the US use of biological
weapons, and the creation of space forces to include cyberspace as well as
air space.

Link to this report:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] FW: For all you Saba fans

2002-09-18 Thread Dale Stonehouse

-Caveat Lector-


 Dale, if you talk to Saba again, tell her I said You first.

 Tenorlove

 --- Dale Stonehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I don't plan on it, and was quite surprised anything was passed along to
her. She's civil with me and I don't know or care why.

The human need for enemies exists in all of us; seems it's necessary to help
us find out who or what we are. But the extreme degree of that need in some
individuals/groups continues to amaze me.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] FW: For all you Saba fans

2002-09-18 Thread Tenorlove

-Caveat Lector-

--- Dale Stonehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't plan on it, and was quite surprised anything was passed along
 to
 her. She's civil with me and I don't know or care why.

She had been with me, too, up until yesterday.

 The human need for enemies exists in all of us; seems it's necessary
 to help
 us find out who or what we are. But the extreme degree of that need
 in some
 individuals/groups continues to amaze me.

It doesn't amaze me anymore. I moderate a list where there's about 6
people, who have been banned for everything from plagiarism to
stalking, and who keep trying to come back under different aliases.
They must have 300 or more aliases. I'm now at the point where, for ALL
of the lists I moderate, I require emails from potential members so I
can run header checks. I'm thinking about no longer accepting freemail
accounts. One list I'm on required me to use my ISP email, and then let
me switch to my Yahoo email after I had established myself.

Tenorlove

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] FW: For all you Saba fans

2002-09-18 Thread thew

-Caveat Lector-

She was civil with everyone. Everyone who wasn't Jewish, gay, or skeptical
of her relationship with the Irish nobility, the queen of England, and
admirals and generals across the globe.


on 9/18/02 10:01 AM, Tenorlove at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I don't plan on it, and was quite surprised anything was passed along
 to
 her. She's civil with me and I don't know or care why.

 She had been with me, too, up until yesterday.

-- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -  - - -- --- -- - - -  - -- - - - --
 -- - -- -

Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when
the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally
alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest
dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal,
well-meaning but without understanding.
Justice Louis D. Brandeis





NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Conservative Idiots

2002-09-18 Thread thew

-Caveat Lector-

I stand up for all those things. I'm a pinko liberal newyork jewboy.


Can you name some prominent people that you consider conservative.



on 9/18/02 2:57 AM, iNFoWaRZ at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 An American who stands up for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, our
 Republic, and our American heritage.  That is a true Conservative.
 The Neo-Conservatives today, are only interested in Conserving the status quo,
 which is socialism, globalism, and big government.
 Democrats and Republicans, different sides of the SAME coin.

-- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -  - - -- --- -- - - -  - -- - - - --
 -- - -- -
Truth is more of a stranger than fiction. -- Mark Twain







NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Headline - Cloned products may be in supermarkets soon

2002-09-18 Thread thew

-Caveat Lector-

This is good news


on 9/18/02 1:45 AM, Euphorian at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Greetings,

 Euphorian wants you to know about a story on www.smh.com.au


 Personal Message:


 Cloned products may be in supermarkets soon
 By Justin Gillis in Washington
 September 18 2002

 URL: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/18/1032054822257.html

 A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
William of Occam


NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] paedophiles

2002-09-18 Thread Mermaid
-Caveat Lector-



Instead of micro chipping our children 
why not microchip every sex offender instead?
The Human rights people cannot argue with 
this because every parent with a murdered or raped child can say where were my 
kids rights?
Prisons in england are holiday camps they 
play pool they can go wherever they like and they can even have sex with their 
wives..education is free and libraries are well stocked better than in a childs 
school.
WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN HERE. 
READ TE GUNDRSONS REPORT AND THEN YOU MIGHT CHANGE YOUR MIND.
The Mermaid xxx

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Conservative Idiots

2002-09-18 Thread Zuukie

-Caveat Lector-

The word conservative is  thrown around much too loosely.  There
are supposedly neo-conservatives, fiscal conservatives, social
conservatives, media idenfied conservatives, those who call
themselves conservative before elections only, conservatives as
defined by liberals, conservatives as defined by the far right,
conservatives as defined by the far left,  members of cultural
change organizations who call themselves conservative who really
are provisions made for dissidents, etc.

Most newbie conservatives let conservative leadership be defined
for them by others.  Disillusion sets in after a few years.

 -Caveat Lector-

 I stand up for all those things. I'm a pinko liberal newyork jewboy.
 Can you name some prominent people that you consider conservative.

 on 9/18/02 2:57 AM, iNFoWaRZ at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  An American who stands up for the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
  our Republic, and our American heritage.  That is a true
  Conservative. The Neo-Conservatives today, are only interested in
  Conserving the status quo, which is socialism, globalism, and big
  government. Democrats and Republicans, different sides of the SAME
  coin.


A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Just Call it the Noelle Bush Special Treatment Division

2002-09-18 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

Transcript of call to an Orlando police dispatcher
Posted September 14, 2002 
   
The Monday night taped conversation from a client at the Center for
Drug-Free Living.
OPD Operator: You're being recorded.
Caller: Yes, I'd like to make a report please.
OPD Operator: OK, what happened.
Caller: I am located at the Center for Drug-Free Living, and I would
like a police officer to come out, please.
OPD Operator: What address are you at, ma'am?
Caller: (gives address)
OPD Operator: OK, can you tell me what happened?
Caller: This is basically a treatment center for women with children.
OPD Operator: Yeah.
Caller: And one of the women here was caught buying crack cocaine
tonight. And a lot of the women are upset because she's been caught
about five times. And we want something done because our children are
here, and they just keep letting it slip under the counter and carpet.
OPD Operator: Your name?
Caller: I'm anonymous.
OPD Operator: Well, we're going to have to meet with someone.
Caller: OK. Can I put all the girls? Because we're all here; we're all
here wanting to talk to someone.
OPD Operator: Who was she caught buying the drugs by? Who caught her
buying the drugs?
Caller: The staff.
OPD Operator: Pardon me?
Caller: Staff. They said, you know, because it's basically Noelle Bush.
And she keeps getting out of it. Because every . . . she does this all
the time and she gets out of it because she's the governor's daughter.
But we're sick of it here 'cause we have to do what's right, but she
gets treated like some kind of princess. And everybody's tired of it,
you know. We're just trying to get our lives together, and this girl's
bringing drugs on property.
OPD Operator: OK. And the staff caught her?
Caller: Yes.
OPD Operator: They caught her today?
Caller: Yes. This is just about 30 minutes ago.
OPD Operator: And she's still there though.
Caller: Yes. And she is on probation, I guess. And all kinds of stuff. I
don't know what all that is. But . . . And procedure is that they would
call the police, but they're not doing it here because of who she is.
OPD Operator: OK. So the staff is refusing to do anything about it.
Caller: Because of who she is.
OPD Operator: OK. OK. OK, if you don't want to leave me your name that's
fine. But somebody needs to meet with the officers when they get there.
Caller: OK, we'll be out front. Do you know how long . . .
OPD Operator: OK. All of you will be out front?
Caller: Yeah. There's 24 of us.
OPD Operator: OK. Hopefully, it will be within the next maybe 15 or 20
minutes. It may be longer depending on how many officers are available
now.
Caller: OK.
OPD Operator: All right.

Copyright © 2002, Orlando Sentinel

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that
matter. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FONT COLOR=#99Sell a Home with Ease!
/FONTA HREF=http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/MVfIAA/xYTolB/TM;BClick 
Here!/B/A
-~-

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major 

[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Brought to You by the Office of Disinformation-Your Taxes Hard at Work

2002-09-18 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

America plans PR blitz on Saddam
From Tim Reid in Washington

THE Bush Administration is to launch a multimillion-dollar PR blitz
against Saddam Hussein, using advertising techniques to persuade crucial
target groups that the Iraqi leader must be ousted. 
The campaign will consist of dossiers of evidence detailing Saddam's
breaches of UN resolutions, and will be launched this week at American
and foreign audiences, particularly in Arab nations sceptical of US
policy in the region. 
The White House is aware that it lacks substantial new intelligence on
Saddam's nuclear programme or evidence directly linking Baghdad to the
September 11 attacks. But it will build on the contents of President's
Bush's speech made to the UN General Assembly last week, in which he
listed Saddam's violations of UN resolutions. 
The campaign, which will initially receive over $200 million (£130
million), will be overseen by the Office of Global Communications, whose
existence will not be formally announced until next month.

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that
matter. - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.


 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
FONT COLOR=#994 DVDs Free +sp Join Now
/FONTA HREF=http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/xYTolB/TM;BClick 
Here!/B/A
-~-

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org 
OM 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 


A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


-Caveat Lector-

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-418110,00.html

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, 

[CTRL] Fwd: [CIA-DRUGS] Office of Disinformation-Your Taxes Hard at Work

2002-09-18 Thread RoadsEnd

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---
-Caveat Lector-



To be quite honest I expect
Ramzi Bin al Shibh (Binalshibh) to provide
the U.S. with the final *evidence concerning Iraq*. The odd little birdie
that sung his outstanding tunes to perplexed German investigators, told
that he turned into a body guard of Osama with the help of Bin al
Shibh. Bin al Shibh he claimed belonged to Osama's inner circle. He
met him in Pakistan, and Bin al Shibh introduced him to Osama.


3. WHY AREN'T US JOURNALISTS
REPORTING FROM IRAQ?
http://www.tompaine.com/feature.cfm/ID/6363
American journalists have totally
fallen down on the job when it
comes to reporting from Baghdad,
writes Nina Burleigh, who was one
of the first American journalists
to enter Iraq after the Gulf War. That
allows the White House to make
increasingly hyperbolic -- and false --
claims about the Iraqi threat
to America. This notion that the Iraqi
leader is in cahoots with Osama
will be easy to feed the American
people. To the American people,
one bad Arab is the same as the next,
and Osama equals Saddam,
Burleigh writes. In reality, though,
Anyone who spends a little
time in Baghdad knows there is one
thing the dwindling, beaten-down middle class of that country fears
more than the hideous regime of Saddam Hussein: an Islamic
uprising. ... As much as they hate their dictator, Iraqis hate the
Islamists even more. As a Sunni
Muslim, so does Saddam. As in the
1980s, this creepy strongman is standing between Iraqis and the jihad.
The Bush administration is so determined to prevent facts like this from
getting in its way that its plan to use military force in Iraq was set last fall
without a formal decision-making meeting or the intelligence assessment
that customarily precedes such a momentous decision, reports the
Washington Post. An intelligence official says that's because the White
House doesn't want to detail the uncertainties that persist about Iraq's
arsenal and Saddam's intentions. And with journalists asleep at the
switch, no one else will detail those uncertainties either. More web links
related to this story are available at:
 http://www.prwatch.org/spin/September_2002.html#1031940345
To discuss this story in the
PR Watch Forum, visit:
 http://www.prwatch.org/forum/discuss.php?id=1031940345




On 17 Sep 2002 at 22:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 America plans
PR blitz on Saddam
 From Tim Reid
in Washington
 
 THE Bush Administration
is to launch a multimillion-dollar PR blitz
 against Saddam
Hussein, using advertising techniques to persuade crucial
 target groups
that the Iraqi leader must be ousted. 
 The campaign
will consist of dossiers of evidence detailing Saddam's
 breaches of UN
resolutions, and will be launched this week at American
 and foreign audiences,
particularly in Arab nations sceptical of US
 policy in the
region. 
 The White House
is aware that it lacks substantial new intelligence on
 Saddam's nuclear
programme or evidence directly linking Baghdad to the
 September 11
attacks. But it will build on the contents of President's
 Bush's speech
made to the UN General Assembly last week, in which he
 listed Saddam's
violations of UN resolutions. 
 The campaign,
which will initially receive over $200 million (130
 million), will
be overseen by the Office of Global Communications, whose
 existence will
not be formally announced until next month.
 
 Our lives
begin to end the day we become silent about things that
 matter.
- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
 
 
 
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~--
 4 DVDs Free +sp
Join Now
 http://us.click.yahoo.com/pt6YBB/NXiEAA/MVfIAA/xYTolB/TM
 

[CTRL] Fw: Assassination Bid On Macedonia Minister

2002-09-18 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic

-Caveat Lector-

- Original Message -
From: Rick Rozoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:26 AM
Subject: Assassination Bid On Macedonia Minister


 http://www.ptd.net/webnews/wed/di/Qmacedonia-vote-minister.ResK_CSH.html

 Assassination bid on Macedonia minister


 SKOPJE, Sept 17 (AFP) - The interior minister in the
 outgoing Macedonian government escaped an
 assassination attempt by a paramilitary ethnic
 Albanian group, a police spokesman said Tuesday.

 Ljube Boskoski was the target when militants from the
 ethnic Albanian National Army (AKSH) opened fire on a
 vehicle on Saturday, said the spokesman, Voislav
 Zafirovski.

 The car was in the line of vehicles accompanying the
 minister back to Skopje after his father's funeral in
 the western Tetovo region's village of Celopek.

 Fortunately, the minister was not in the car and
 nobody was hurt in the incident, Zafirovski told
 reporters here.

 The AKSH had previously planned to carry out the
 attack on the minister during the funeral but some of
 attackers clashed with a police patrol in the village
 itself earlier, Zafirovski said, adding that police
 killed one attacker, wounded two and arrested another
 two.

 He said word of the attempted hit had been kept quiet
 in order not to complicate elections which were held
 on Sunday.

 A top ethnic Albanian rebel leader, Ali Ahmeti, has
 asked for a cabinet role after preliminary results
 showed his fledgling party had scored well in the
 polls.

 It was the country's first election since a bloody
 uprising by ethnic Albanians last year.




 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
 http://finance.yahoo.com


A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Harris Interactive | The Harris Poll - Special 9/11 Poll (Part 4 of 4) - Britain, Canada, Australia and Israel Now Top List (of 25 Countries) Most Widely Seen as Close Allies

2002-09-18 Thread Euphorian

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=326

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Now They Check the Books You Read

2002-09-18 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

-Caveat Lector-

From: Euphorian




Now They Check the Books You Read


By Joan E. Bertin
Joan E. Bertin is executive director of the National Coalition Against Censorship.

September 16, 2002

In the post 9/11 world, there is undoubtedly a government official whose job is to 
invent innocuous-sounding, if not reassuring, acronyms for government initiatives 
against terrorism.

Operation TIPS is a case in point. The Terrorism Information and Prevention System 
will recruit millions of utility, transportation and other workers to report on 
potentially unusual or suspicious activity in public places. In other words, 
Operations TIPS is using private citizens to spy on each other.

The Bush administration's reliance on acronyms with public-relations punch was 
apparent as early as last October when, still reeling from the events of Sept. 11, it 
proposed and Congress swiftly passed the USA Patriot Act (The Uniting and 
Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and 
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001). Like Operation TIPS, the label doesn't tell the 
whole story.

Among the less well-known aspects of the Patriot Act are provisions permitting the 
Justice Department to obtain information secretly from booksellers and librarians 
about customers' and patrons' reading, Internet and book-buying habits, merely by 
alleging that the records are relevant to an anti-terrorism investigation. The act 
prohibits librarians and booksellers from disclosing these subpoenas, so the objects 
of investigation don't know and therefore cannot defend themselves and their privacy, 
or contest the government's actions in court.

In a sample of 1,000 libraries responding to a survey last February, 85 reported 
receiving requests to turn over information about patrons to police or FBI agents. We 
have no way to know how many other libraries, and how many booksellers, received 
similar requests. We don't know how many requests were made under the Patriot Act, 
because of its secrecy provisions. What we do know is that the Patriot Act authorizes 
the government to obtain information secretly from librarians and booksellers about 
customers' and patrons' interests and activities, and that law enforcement officials 
are seeking such information. The Justice Department has refused to provide any data 
about these investigations, even to Congress.

Librarians and booksellers have voiced their dismay at being conscripted, under court 
order and threat of prosecution, to report covertly on their patrons and customers. 
Secretly obtaining information about what people read, to try to figure out what they 
think, undermines more than privacy; it threatens core First Amendment principles, as 
many librarians and booksellers understand.

The Constitution clearly protects the right to read a book, embrace an idea or express 
a thought - even an unpopular or unpatriotic book, idea or thought. The freedom of 
thought and expression is so fundamental to our democracy that, as the Supreme Court 
recently noted, the government may not prohibit speech because it increases the 
chance an unlawful act will be committed 'at some indefinite future time.' In so 
holding, the court relied on the vital distinction between words and deed, between 
ideas and conduct. In other words, the government is free to prohibit and punish 
illegal conduct, but may not criminalize ideas or punish people for their thoughts. 
Perversely, under the Patriot Act, reading certain books or researching certain topics 
- both constitutionally protected activities - now apparently provide grounds for 
criminal investigation.

The Justice Department's recent decision to repeal the domestic terrorism surveillance 
guidelines unmistakably sends this signal. The guidelines were adopted in 1976 in 
response to revelations that, under the infamous COINTELPRO (counterintelligence) 
program, civil rights and anti-war activists who were neither accused nor suspected of 
crimes became targets of government investigation because of their outspoken criticism 
of government policies. To prevent such abuses, the 1976 guidelines authorized 
surveillance of political, religious and other groups only if there was actual 
evidence of criminal activity. Without this restriction, covert surveillance of 
political dissidents with no known connection to criminal activity is bound to resume.

According to a brief recently filed by the Justice Department in defense of secret 
immigration hearings, the First Amendment creates no general right of access to 
government information or operations. The gag order imposed on librarians and 
booksellers goes even further in withholding information from the object of an 
investigation. As a result, proceedings under the act will be shrouded in secrecy, not 
only making it impossible for targeted individuals to counter the government's 
allegations, but also preventing the public at large from 

[CTRL] Read This WHITEHOUSE.ORG Article IMMEDIATELY!

2002-09-18 Thread Euphorian

-Caveat Lector-

Dear Friend - It is *imperative* that you read the following article from the
WHITEHOUSE.ORG web site: http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2002/091402.asp.  Don't
delay.  Your patriotism is at stake!

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Read This WHITEHOUSE.ORG Article IMMEDIATELY!

2002-09-18 Thread Euphorian

-Caveat Lector-

Dear Friend - It is *imperative* that you read the following article from the
WHITEHOUSE.ORG web site: http://www.whitehouse.org/iraq/facts.asp.  Don't delay.  Your
patriotism is at stake!

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] http://www.buzzflash.com/contributors/2002/09/16_Survey.html

2002-09-18 Thread Euphorian

-Caveat Lector-

September 16, 2002

Protecting Your Mental Health

by Dr. J. D. Stewart, Ed.D.

According to Mr. G.W. Bush, In these perilous times we can't be too careful. Based 
on that
assumption, it is obvious that we all must take the best possible care of our 
Bush-induced
fragile mental health. Following is a brief 10-item Mental Health Survey that will 
help give
you a better perspective on the current status of your mental health.

[CAUTION: Be aware that the results of this survey, while not (yet) medically 
substantiated,
may indicate the need for prescriptive medication or even institutional care. If so, 
see your
nearest mental health care professional IMMEDIATELY!]

MENTAL HEALTH SURVEY

QUESTION: Which of the following causes you the most stress, anxiety, nervousness,
weight loss, sleepless nights, pet-kicking, red-light-running, and /or Outright 
Clinical
Depression ?

___ 1. G.W. Bush telling the rest of us to do as he says but not as he did.

___ 2. Despite court injunctions, D. Cheney not telling anybody anything about 
anything.
(Unless they want to hear a reprise of Attack Iraq.)

___ 3. a. D. Rumsfeld telling us that our attacking Iraq is inevitable.
___ b. The rest of the civilized world - except Tony Echo Blair - telling us our 
attacking
Iraq would be one of the stupidest things they ever heard of.

___ 4. a. G.W. Bush telling us that Jose Padilla is an enemy combatant and therefore 
not
entitled to legal representation.
___ b. Police reports telling us that Mr. Padilla is an American citizen, arrested on 
the
streets of Chicago.

___ 5. a. C. Powell confirming that official (Bush) American foreign policy is now to 
reserve
the unilateral right to launch pre-emptive strikes against any nation, any time, 
anywhere
that is perceived to be a threat to the United States.
___ b. That such a foreign policy gives any nation /group the moral cover to launch a
preemptive strike against the U.S. - any time, anywhere.

___ 6. G.W. Bush telling the United Nations they must quickly act collectively against 
Iraq or,
being out of patience, he will act unilaterally

___ 7. a. J. Ashcroft telling us his Department of Justice has detained 1500 people 
without
benefit of legal representation or even public release of their names, despite a 
Federal
judge's order.
___ b. Being historically aware of the civil liberties situation in Germany in the 
late 1930s.

___ 8. a. G.W. Bush telling us that the EPA report on global warming sent to the United
Nations was merely written by the bureaucrats.
___ b. Almost every reputable, non-oil industry scientist on earth telling us that 
global
warming is writing its own report, verified by Mother Nature.

___ 9. a. The noise of the Republicans
___ b. The silence of the Democrats

___ 10. ALL OF THE ABOVE

* * *

Design: Dr. J. D. Stewart, Ed.D., VWL (Very Worried Liberal)

[NOTE: This survey is intentionally not copywritten and can therefore be shared freely 
for
non- commercial use via any appropriate /available medium. Dr. J.D.S., Ed.D.]

v. 1.1 9.11.02

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] http://www.thedailyenron.com/documents/20020918055228-85594.asp

2002-09-18 Thread Euphorian

-Caveat Lector-

War and Politics Do Mix, Apparently
Calif. Says Here's the Proof, Now Do Something



This is the week the gloves came off, and with them any remaining pretense that GOP
candidates are not politicizing the war on terrorism.

”Across the country, GOP House and Senate candidates are emphasizing the possibility of
war in Iraq, either touting their support for Bush or highlighting their opponents'
reservations -- past or present -- about military strikes against the Baghdad regime,
according to several candidates and party strategists. “ - Washington Post

With control of the House up for grabs in next month’s mid-term elections, GOP 
candidates
in tightly contested races have now openly hitched their hopes to the Bush 
administration’s
war wagon.

The change in tactics was most notable in states where the stakes were highest,
particularly in Senate races in South Dakota, Minnesota and Georgia.

These events mark a shift in the midterm elections toward a topic that Republicans
generally favor -- the Bush administration's tough stand against Hussein -- at the 
expense
of subjects that Democrats prefer -- domestic matters such as health care benefits and 
the
fiscal health of the Social Security system.” - Washington Post

Democrats worried in recent weeks that if they openly questioned the administration’s
policy on Iraq their queries would be later used against them in future campaigns. 
Those
fears were reinforced this week by a series of GOP ads in key districts. The ads used
comments and questions made in 1991 during the debate on the Gulf War to paint
Democratic opponents as soft on Saddam.

Targets of such ads included incumbent Paul Wellstone (D-MN), and South Dakota Senator
Tim Johnson. Both men were in the forefront of demanding open debate and congressional
approval for the Gulf War.

By dredging up those earlier remarks and using them in the context of current tensions,
GOP strategists hope to accomplish two goals. First, to do whatever it takes to 
maintain
control of the House and, if possible, regain control of the Senate this November.

Second, to effectively muzzle congressional criticism of the administration’s policies
regarding Iraq, terrorism and homeland security. Clearly Republicans have weighed the
cost/benefit ratio and decided they have more to gain than they risk losing by 
politicizing the
war against terrorism and possible war against Iraq.

The issue matrix is changing, admitted South Dakota GOP challenger John Thune.
Whether Tim Johnson likes it or not, this is on the mind of voters.

Which of course is the whole point. When it comes to issues, war and talk of war always
trump domestic concerns. GOP candidates suffer whenever the issues on the public’s mind
include domestic problems such as the soaring federal deficit, Social Security and 
Medicare.

Democrats and Republicans alike recognize the very real threat posed by terrorists and
Saddam Hussein. The only question is how much damage is the administration willing to
inflict on our democracy in its haste to call for war?

California: “We Told You So”

Californians have long suspected that Texas energy producers and wholesalers like Enron
and Dynegy, mugged them back in 2000-2001. Yesterday they presented the proof.

“The report by the California Public Utilities Commission blamed Houston- based power
generators Dynegy and Reliant as well as Duke Energy, Mirant and AES/Williams for
keeping significant portions of their capacity idle or off the market on key days from
November 2000 through May 2001, the height of California's energy crisis. - Houston
Chronicle

Had the generators produced the power they had available, most of the statewide
blackouts and service interruptions could have been avoided without overloading the
transmission lines linking Northern and Southern California, the report concluded.

Democratic California Gov. Gray Davis has long been critical of both the Bush
administration’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Justice Department for
failing to take action against rogue energy companies. Yesterday he said the state’s 
own
investigation challenges the DOJ to finally take action.

This report confirms that energy generators manipulated California's energy market and
stopped at nothing -- including putting the health and safety of Californians at risk 
-- in the
name of ripping off California ratepayers, said Davis in a statement.

Outrage of The Day

More evidence emerged this week on the spending habits of former Tyco Chairman Dennis
Kozlowski. This guy had a serious shopping disorder:

According to a new report, Kozlowski had the company secretly pay for personal items 
like
an $80,000 American Express bill; a $72,000 fee to a German yacht maker; a $17,100
traveling toilet box; a $15,000 dog umbrella stand; a $6,300 sewing basket; a $6,000
shower curtain; $5,960 for two sets of sheets; a $2,900 set of coat hangers; a $2,200 
gilt
metal wastebasket; a $1,650 notebook; and a $445 

[CTRL] Freedom of speech

2002-09-18 Thread Zuukie
-Caveat Lector-

This story has received considerable
attention in the Chronicle
of Higher Education (but very little
in other media). If you are an
on-line subscriber, you can access
several stories at:
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i24/24a03501.htm
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i29/29b01701.htm
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i07/07a05202.htm


A news story and a student's report
from Concordia University.




Montreal protesters force cancellation
of Netanyahu campus speech


MONTREAL (CBC News) -- Former Israeli
prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu
cancelled a speech at Concordia University
in Montreal on Monday, Sept.
9, after several hundred demonstrators
managed to get into a university
building.


The demonstrators, who called Netanyahu
anti-Palestinian and a
terrorist, threw chairs and newspaper
boxes at police, who were trying
to evacuate the building where Netanyahu
was supposed to speak.
Netanyahu was not present.


There was a long standoff between
the pro-Palestinian demonstrators and
the students who had come to hear
Netanyahu speak.


The demonstrators were pleased they
had stopped him talking. There's no
free speech for hate speech,
said Palestinian activist David
Battistuzzi.


Netanyahu was Israel's prime minister
from 1996 to 1999 as leader of the
Likud Party. Earlier this year, Likud
members voted against the
establishment of a Palestinian state.
Netanyahu was the driving force
behind the motion.


The following is from a student
at the university. The student's name is not
given here but the following was used elsewhere with permission


This morning my friends and I set
out to Concordia University, in the
heart of downtown Montreal, to hear
Benjamin Netanyahu speak. Many
articles were featured in the Montreal
papers leading up to today's
speech, warning of protest action. I had a good idea of what we would
face as we approached Concordia, but
I could never have predicted what
actually happened once we were there.


To enter the building we had to make
a giant circle around it, to get
to the supposedly safe
entrance. We had to walk right through a
volatile protest of hundreds of Palestinians
and their supporters in
keffiyehs, with flags, screaming vitriolic
hate. Once having run this
gauntlet, we waited patiently outside
the Bishop street entrance, held
back at the gate by security and police.


After about an hour they started admitting
us inside, but it was too
late because a huge group of Palestinian
'demonstrators' had appeared in
our midst. I was fortunately
right at the entrance, and as dozens of
violent protesters pushed their way
to the front, I tried to get
through. Right next to me appeared
the ringleader, who tried to push
his way in. The cop in front
of me . while
pulling me through the gate at the
same time.


I rested against the wall and watched
as at least a hundred (I think)
red-and-green coloured protesters
attacked the barriers and tried to get
in. Riot cops appeared, dozens
of them, and went to the gate as I and a
few others were herded into the building. There was yelling and
chanting, drumming and fighting going
on outside the doors, with
hundreds of our people stuck behind
the gate being abused by hundreds of
violent demonstrators.


A few of us were waiting after the
metal detectors for our friends to
come through, when all of a sudden
we heard loud chanting and yelling
INSIDE the building. The riot
cops came storming in and up the stairs
beside us, and we began hearing fighting,
crashing, yelling, punching.


Chaos broke out and riot cops made
us run for the door to the
auditorium. I thought we were going
to get killed, I swear. It was the
scariest feeling, because I knew that
these people wanted to hurt me and
anyone who supports Israel or is Jewish.


Once inside the auditorium, we were
told to be patient as more people
would drift in from the insanity outside. We waited inside for three
hours, as the commotion outside grew
increasingly loud. We could hear
chanting and yelling, and the protesters
began trashing the university
building. The police tear gassed
and pepper sprayed the entire building
and outside, and we began to feel
the effects if we stood too near the
doors.


After hoursof waiting, and bomb searches
by RCMP sniffer dogs, we were
informed that Bibi Netanyahu could
not speak after all - too much danger
to him and to us.


 This was an incredible disappointment
and we were naturally upset. We,
however, managed to maintain a kind
of composure and instead of
fighting, the 650 of us inside began
to sing Hatikvah, the national
anthem of the State of Israel. We
sang peace chants and then just
waited to be let out, in groups of
10, escorted by police.


The scene as we exited was disgusting. Benches were overturned, papers
and garbage streaked across the hallways,
and broken windows. We were
shoved outside directly into a HUGE
Palestinian riot, where some of our
people were apparently attacked. The
cops did nothing. We stood on one
side of the 

[CTRL] Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots

2002-09-18 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

Probe: U.S. Knew of Jet Terror Plots

Wed Sep 18,12:59 PM ET

By KEN GUGGENHEIM, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - American intelligence agencies received far more reports of
terrorist plotting to use planes as weapons before Sept. 11 than the U.S.
government has previously acknowledged, congressional investigators said
Wednesday.

While it was unclear whether any of the reports were in fact signs of the
impending attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon ( news - web sites),
investigators said the agencies never looked closely at the potential threat
of hijacked airliners flying into buildings. Those assertions came in a 30-
page statement by Eleanor Hill, staff director for the House and Senate
intelligence inquiry into the Sept. 11 attacks.

Hill's statement was being presented to committee members Wednesday at the
inquiry's first public hearings. Lawmakers have been meeting behind closed
doors since June, looking into intelligence failures leading up to the
attacks and how they can be corrected.

These public hearings are part of our search for the truth — not to point
fingers or pin blame, but with the goal of identifying and correcting
whatever systemic problems might have prevented our government from detecting
and disrupting al Qaida's plot, said Sen. Bob Graham ( news, bio, voting
record), chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Hill outlined 12 examples of intelligence information on the possible
terrorist use of airplanes as weapons, dating back to 1994. The last example
occurred a month before the attacks, when intelligence agencies were told of
a possible bin Laden plot to bomb the U.S. embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, or
crash a plane into it. But it contained no specifics pointing to the
impending Sept. 11 attacks.

In August 1998, U.S. intelligence learned that a group of unidentified Arabs
planned to fly an explosive-laden plane from a foreign country into the World
Trade Center, says the report. The report was given to the Federal Aviation
Administration ( news - web sites) and FBI ( news - web sites), which took
little action on it. The group may now be linked to bin Laden, the report
says.

Other intelligence suggested that bin Laden supporters might crash a plane
into a U.S. airport, or conduct a plot involving aircraft at New York and
Washington, the report said.

While generally aware of the possibility of this method of attack, the
Intelligence Community did not produce any specific assessments of the
likelihood that terrorists would use airplanes as weapons, the report said.


With revelations in the spring that President Bush ( news - web sites) had
learned a month before the attacks that that bin Laden wanted to hijack
airplanes, the White House defended the lack of disclosure of the information
by saying the president's briefing detailed plans for traditional hijackings,
not the use of airplanes as weapons.

National security adviser Condoleezza Rice ( news - web sites) said at the
time that the threat was vague and uncorroborated.

I don't think anybody could have predicted ... that they would try to use an
airplane as missile, Rice said. Had this president known of something more
specific or known that a plane was going to be used as a missile, he would
have acted on it.

Congressional investigators also said that an intelligence briefing two
months before the Sept. 11 attack warned that Osama bin Laden ( news - web
sites) would launch a spectacular terrorist attack against U.S. or Israeli
interests.

Between May and July 2001, the National Security Agency reported at least 33
communications indicating a possible, imminent terrorist attack.

The July 2001 briefing for senior government officials said that based on a
review of intelligence information over five months we believe that (bin
Laden) will launch a significant terrorist attack against U.S. and/or Israeli
interests in the coming weeks.

But Hill said the credibility of the sources was sometimes questionable and
no specific details about the attacks were available.

They generally did not contain specific information as to where, when and
how a terrorist attack might occur and generally are not corroborated by
further information, her statement said.

At Wednesday's hearing, leaders of two groups of victims' relatives, Stephen
Push and Kristin Breitweiser, were the first witnesses. Both lost spouses in
the attacks.

Breitweiser, whose husband Ron died at the World Trade Center, told lawmakers
that if the public had been aware of possible terrorist attacks, airport
security could have been bolstered and passengers may have thought twice
before boarding airplanes.

How many victims may have taken notice of these Middle Eastern men that were
boarding their plane? said Breitweiser, of Middletown, N.J. She is co-
founder of September 11th Advocates.

As Breitweiser spoke, a group of family members and advocates sitting behind
her began to weep. Mary Fetchet, of Voices of September 11, 

Re: [CTRL] The UN if filled with Jerks? (fwd)

2002-09-18 Thread William Bacon

-Caveat Lector-

I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all.

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 16:19:58 -0500
From: Rich Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The UN if filled with Jerks?


Good point, but our only recourse is to vote against every politician
who votes to pour more of our tax dollars on this international
embarrassment.
DOWN WITH THE UNITED NATIONS.

Rich Martin
Editor, Slick eZine


On Sun, 15 Sep 2002 10:24:16 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I agree the UN in filled with Jerks of the highest degree and the US
 should bow out immediately.
   Will the UN allow the US to take over Iraq all by its self?  No
 way!
   Will the UN allow the US to pull its troops out of  Europe and

 place them in Iraq - I don't think so -
 Do we care if Iraq rides camels instead of driving
 auto's?
  No as long as we get the oil ...

 Jim

 September 13, 2002
 Who is the Madman Here?
 Bush's UN Non-Sequiturs
 by Tom Gorman
 
 President Bush spoke to the UN General Assembly on Thursday,
 September 12
 about the supposedly urgent need to attack Iraq. The following is a
 list of
 statements made by him that are either illogical, half-truths, or
 outright
 falsehoods, with responses to each.
 
 1. Twelve years ago, Iraq invaded Kuwait without provocation.
 
 Kuwait had been slant-drilling the Iraqi oil field of Rumallah as
 well as
 driving down the price of oil at a time when Iraq was in desperate
 need of
 funds to rebuild its infrastructure after the Iran-Iraq War (in
 which Iraq
 was the favored state of the US). While it is arguable whether this
 was
 justification for an invasion, this provocation is significantly
 less
 specious than that cited for, say, the American invasion of Panama
 seven
 months earlier.
 
 2. And the regime's forces were poised to continue their march to
 seize
 other countries and their resources.
 
 Satellite imagery showed no Iraqi military buildup in the border
 regions with
 Saudi Arabia in either Iraq or occupied Kuwait in September 1990,
 as revealed
 in a series of articles in the St.Petersburg (FL) Times in
 January 1991.
 Yet the elder President Bush fabricated this aggression to
 justify
 Operation Desert Shield.
 
 3. Had Saddam Hussein been appeased instead of stopped, he would
 have
 endangered the peace and stability of the world. Yet this
 aggression was
 stopped by the might of coalition forces and the will of the United
 Nations.
 
 Hussein was appeased by coalition forces. After the cease-fire of
 March 1991,
 Hussein asked for permission to fly air strikes against rebels in
 both the
 northern and southern no-fly zones of Iraq. The elder Bush granted
 Hussein's
 wish, even though the American President had publicly encouraged
 the Kurdish
 population of Iraq to rise up. Hussein brutally suppressed the
 rebellion.
 
 4. In 1991, Security Council Resolution 688 demanded that the
 Iraqi regime
 cease at once the repression of its own people, including the
 systematic
 repression of minorities, which the council said threatened
 international
 peace and security in the region. This demand goes ignored.
 
 Of course it goes ignored, considering Bush's father gave Hussein
 the green
 light to continue his brutal suppression of Iraq's minorities.
 
 5. Last year, the UN Commission on Human Rights found that Iraq
 continues to
 commit extremely grave violations of human rights and that the
 regime's
 repression is all-pervasive.
 
 Yes, and UN organizations have also repeatedly stated the
 devastating effects
 of US-led sanctions on the people of Iraq. Should Iraq then call on
 the
 international community to attack the US?
 
 6. Tens of thousands of political opponents and ordinary citizens
 have been
 subjected to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, summary execution
 and torture
 by beating and burning, electric shock, starvation, mutilation and
 rape.
 
 Unfortunately, this is quite the norm in many places in the Middle
 East,
 including close American allies Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Pakistan.
 
 7. In 1993, Iraq attempted to assassinate the Emir of Kuwait and a
 former
 American president.
 
 In retaliation for this attempted assassination, evidence of which
 was
 dubious at best, the Clinton Administration launched 24 cruise
 missiles
 against Baghdad, killing six civilians, including artist Laila
 al-Attar. By
 this standard, Iraq could launch cruise missiles at Washington, as
 their
 leader has been the object of several assassination attempts by the
 US. (They
 would, of course, have to get in line behind Cuba, whose leader has
 been 

[CTRL] Back to Basics???

2002-09-18 Thread Mermaid
-Caveat Lector-



"Back to basics" campaign?? where have we heard this 
before um Oh yes Mr Blah in Jolly old england.It seems the Israelis like 
pinching the odd phrase from the UK and USA.
The difference is that although all politicians lie 
through their teeth and try to cover it up.The Israelis dont 
bother!
They think we are selectively deaf dumb and 
blind..Like the politicians who they bribe and blackmail.
If the israelis want to Get back to basics then perhaps 
they should start by returning the land they stole from the 
Palestinians!!!
Shall we look up the AJC and see who is funding them? 
Ill bet we dont get much of a surprise!!!
The Mermaid 

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/18/1032054865394.html
Jews use TV ads to spread the 
word
September 19 2002

Jewish groups in the United States are starting a television advertising 
campaign and will spend more than $A1.83 million ($3.36 billion) to promote 
Israel's side in its conflict with the Palestinians. 
The ads will run on cable news stations in 100 cities, with the message that 
Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, where Arabs, Jews and 
Christians enjoy freedom of religion and speech and the right to vote.
"This is really a back to basics campaign," said David Harris, executive 
director of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), which is helping to fund the 
ads. "The essential element is that Israel is ... a kindred spirit of the United 
States." 
While the ads do not mention the violence in the Middle East, supporters say 
the goal of the campaign is to build political support for Israel.
However, the New York Post reports CNN is refusing to run ads 
promoting Israel as the Middle East's only democracy, saying 
");document.write("advertisement"); 
 } 
 }  
 // --> 

it does not run "advocacy advertising regarding international issues from 
regions in conflict".
James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, a pro-Arab advocacy 
group, criticised the campaign. 
"Of course I find it troubling. What they're trying to do is sell an image 
that will cover up the real problems that exist." 
Associated Press

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Conservative Idiots

2002-09-18 Thread iNFoWaRZ

-Caveat Lector-

At 10:17 AM 9/18/02 , Thew wrote:

I stand up for all those things. I'm a pinko liberal newyork jewboy.

Well, that's pretty obvious, Yankee.  But it's good to know that you perceive yourself 
as others do.


Can you name some prominent people that you consider conservative.


Yes, I can.
Me, Myself, and I.
Also Ron Paul, James Lloyd, Derry Brownfield, John Stadtmiller, Alex Jones, Larry 
Pratt, etc., there are some Conservatives in Washington, DC, but you can count them on 
one hand.
I'd also like to note that I consider so-called Conservative like(NAFTA, Kill the 
Fourth Amendment)Rush Limbaugh as a globalist(read one-world government socialist) as 
is (take the microchip!, give your kids the chip!)Sean Hannity.
And Boortz?  Man, that guy is a mess.  He changes philosophy like most folks change 
underwear.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Conservative Idiots

2002-09-18 Thread thew

-Caveat Lector-

The point is that the things you said define a conservative I hold true and
dear. And we both agree I ain't one, so it must be your definition that's
off, no?


on 9/18/02 6:10 PM, iNFoWaRZ at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I stand up for all those things. I'm a pinko liberal newyork jewboy.

 Well, that's pretty obvious, Yankee.  But it's good to know that you perceive
 yourself as others do.

-- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - -  - - -- --- -- - - -  - -- - - - --
 -- - -- -


Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original
dimensions.


Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.






NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Back to Basics???

2002-09-18 Thread thew
Title: Re: [CTRL] Back to Basics???
-Caveat Lector-





Stole?

It wasnt stolen
It was given to them by you British.

If you had the right to own the land, why dont they?



on 9/18/02 6:20 PM, Mermaid at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Back to basics campaign?? where have we heard this before um Oh yes Mr Blah in Jolly old england.It seems the Israelis like pinching the odd phrase from the UK and USA.
The difference is that although all politicians lie through their teeth and try to cover it up.The Israelis dont bother!
They think we are selectively deaf dumb and blind..Like the politicians who they bribe and blackmail.
If the israelis want to Get back to basics then perhaps they should start by returning the land they stole from the Palestinians!!!
Shall we look up the AJC and see who is funding them? Ill bet we dont get much of a surprise!!!
The Mermaid 


-- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - -  - -- - - - --  -- - -- -


Never wear your best trousers when you go out to fight for freedom and truth.
Henrik Ibsen





NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew 




A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Back to Basics???

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/18/02 5:40:12 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Stole?

It wasn’t stolen
It was given to them by you British.

Some land was improperly given to them but they STOLE much more.

Bill.
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Fwd: HoffmanWire: Israel and UN Resolutions

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

PRETHE HOFFMAN WIRE
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor
A HREF= http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html 
http://www.hoffman-info.com/news.html/A
***/PRE

Contents for Sept. 18, 2002

1. Israel and those U.N. Resolutions

2. Revisionist website ruled illegal in Australia

--

Israel and those U.N. Resolutions

by Michael A. Hoffman II

George W. Bush is claiming, with chutzpah gleaned from his masters, that
the credibility of the United Nations is at stake in the confrontation
with Iraq over enforcement of U.N. resolutions. Not a peep from the
pious poodle in the White House about the sixty-eight UN Resolutions
violated by the Israelis for decades, including as recently as last
spring when the Zionists refused to allow a U.N. commission into Jenin
to investigate the possibility of war crimes having occurred there in
April.

The fiercely independent MSNBC cable news channel and the you make
the decision Fox cable news channel, have not made Israeli violations
of 68 UN resolutions -- in some cases for 20 or more years -- a rallying
cry of any kind.

The issue is not the credibility of the U.N., it is the prosecution of
a war with Iraq on behalf of Israeli security. The Sept. 17 issue of the
Wall Street Journal conservatively estimates that the Iraqi war will
cost US taxpayers between $200 and $300 billion dollars; even as elderly
Americans on fixed incomes live in poverty, unable to afford proper
medications and care; even as our environment, our schools, highways,
mass transit, and railroads deteriorate from lack of funds; even as the
quality of American life sinks so that the quality of Israeli life,
based on illegal occupation of Palestinian land (condemned by U.N.
resolutions), may improve.



Australian Jews win landmark race case
Toronto Globe and Mail, September 17, 2002

Australia's Jewish community won a landmark court case on Sept. 17
when a judge ruled a Web site that denied the Holocaust happened and
vilified Jewish people was illegal under racial discrimination laws.
Justice Catherine Branson ordered Frederick Toben to remove offensive
material from his Adelaide Institute Web site within the next seven days
and issue a written
apology to the president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry,
Jeremy Jones, who brought the legal action, and to pay the court's
costs.

Mr. Toben, said on his Web site he would appeal the ruling. Toben was
jailed in Germany in 1999 for seven months on charges of inciting hatred
through pamphlets. The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission,
which first ordered Mr. Toben to remove the material from his site two
years ago, said, This case confirms that, at least for Australian
sites, the Internet is subject to the same legal standards as other
forms of communications such as print, TV and radio. (End quote)

HOFFMAN'S COMMENT: To paint Frederick Toben's campaign against WWII
atrocity propaganda, as a race case, scrapes the bottom of the barrel
of nasty lies. A scholar with a doctorate in philosophy, Toben is
concerned with defending the German people from racial vilification
disguised as Holocaust education. He served several months in jail in
Germany due to the circulation of his revisionist publications in that
nation. Hate and race are false descriptions of Dr. Toben's
dissident activism. These buzz words are purveyed in order to smear
Toben and disguise the true nature of the disgraceful, worldwide
Inquisition against revisionists, a form of repression 

[CTRL] Paranoia in the New World Nightmare

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.bankindex.com/read.asp?ID=1223



Paranoia in the New World Nightmare 
by Lisa Guliani 

“Paranoia is just knowing all the facts.” - William S. Burroughs, Jr. 

West Nile Virus - Anthrax. Small Pox – Terrorism – War - Government satellite surveillance - Microchip Implantations - Citizen spies - Social Engineering - Psychic Warriors - Satanic ritual - Kidnapped children - Shadow government - Bohemian Grove - Alien abductions – Assassinations - Microwave radiation attacks - ELF waves - Mind control - Artificial Intelligence - Lunar Hoaxes - IRS Extortion – 9/11 Government cover-ups - Secret underground bases - UFO deceptions - ET sightings - Fluoride toxicity –Vaccine veggies - Chemtrail poisoning – HAARP - “weapons of planetary destruction” - Planet “X” - Toxic French fries - Milk that kills - Mad Cow disease - Man-made AIDS - Missing and Dead Microbiologists and Scientists - Cloning – Microchips - Nuclear threat - Military movement - FEMA… 

What do all of these things have in common? Answer: They’re all part of the New World Nightmare and they all feed the flames of paranoia. 

I am inundated every single day with more e-mail than I can count, mostly articles that drip of conspiracy theory and speculation. The topics above are a mere drop in the bucket of what I’m apt to see on a daily basis as I scroll through the inbox. The subjects listed above were just the ones I came up with off the top of my head. There are perhaps a zillion more I could add to that list if I wanted to be here all day. By tomorrow, that list would be even longer. 

The Internet is a fascinating, absorbing place to wander. It is also one of the scariest places to roam, especially if you plan on venturing into the land of secrets, the fascinating world of those who question, challenge, investigate, explore and peer into the darkness. Conspiracists challenge the “official line” presented to the public. They feed on exposing secrets. They thrive on turning every rock to see what lies beneath in the dirt. It is a realm where nothing is taken at face value, a murky place shrouded in paranoia, fear, suspicion, hidden agendas and mistrust. 

If the mainstream media whores haven’t turned you into a quivering, submissive mass of flesh by now when you tune in to the “6 o’clock Daily Lies,” then the wonderful world of cyberspace is ready to take you and your mental stability right on. Once you’ve sifted through all the information your brain cells can handle, you’re left to assimilate all this data and decide what is real and what is not. What is truth and what is a lie. It’s not so easy, is it? Kinda like what you have to do when you watch Dan Rather – figure out if he’s blowing smoke up your butt again or if he actually believes what he's saying. 

When you’ve got the perfectly-hair-sprayed-talking-heads on the idiot box telling you one thing, and then you’ve got some faceless stranger on the internet named “Cretin1002” (a fictitious example) informing you of exactly the opposite – whom do you believe? More and more, I’m finding that there IS more than dirt under those overturned rocks. Scratching even deeper beneath the surface information increasingly reveals more than just earthworms. We have all been sleeping in a bed of lies. And, as we’re all discovering, the sheets in that bed are real, real dirty, too. 

Verbal Diarrhea 

While the media whores regurgitate endless fabrications and outright distortions about September 11, and our gung-ho President Pretzel-Face continues his bang-up job of helping the Controllers destroy America, we are now warned by Pretzel-Face that we must disregard the word of conspiracy theorists. We are told to ignore them. Then, we are fed the same old song and dance. The “Pretzel” wants to keep this perpetual drumming of the war machine beating on and on. Forget the conspiracy theories. Listen to the “Pretzel”. That right there is a face you can trust, isn’t it? I’ll give the benefit of the doubt to the conspiracists any day. 

Moreover, as you listen to the verbal diarrhea being squirted by the media whores and the “White House Circus Sideshow Freaks,” can you see that all they are doing is reinforcing into your brain a notion of perpetual fear? They want the people to be afraid from day to day. They want you to deteriorate into a mental meltdown. President Pretzel is the pot calling the kettle black when he advises you to turn away from conspiracists. President Pretzel IS a conspiracist. So, take his advice and ignore him. He is lying to you while stoking the coals of a growing public paranoia. We don’t need Internet conspiracy theories to make us have a meltdown. We have George Bush and John Ashcroft. 

What President Pretzel-Face and his gang don’t want you to consider is that a lot of what you’ll find in the way of online news is NOT fiction. The Pretzel doesn’t want you to contemplate 

[CTRL] DR. STEPHEN PELLETIERE, V.I.P.

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://polyconomics.com/showarticle.asp?heading=Memo+on+the+Margin



DR. STEPHEN PELLETIERE, V.I.P.
Memo To: Vice President Dick Cheney
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: A Very Important Fellow You Should Meet

You have known me long enough, Mr. Vice President, to know that I collect interesting people who are generally unknowns, but who deserve to be known. Remember Art Laffer and Bob Mundell? Anyway, I have discovered a very interesting man, Steve Pelletiere, who happens to be retired after a long and rich career with the CIA and then the Army War College in Carlisle, Pa. He's 70 years old and as I discovered when he came to visit me last month, a tall stringbean of a fellow, who knows more about oil than I will ever know, but who wanted me to teach him about the gold/oil nexus. Imagine that, 70 and still eager to learn. His Ph.D. is in Political Science and after a stint in journalism, covering the Middle East, he became the CIA's senior analyst at Langley during the Iran/Iraq war. At the Army War College, he and others studied Iraq's victory over Iran in minute detail, and he has written a number of books on how that feat was managed, with Iraq outnumbered 3-to-1 by the Iranians. If I were you, Mr. VP, I would invite him to kick things around with your staff, to give you the kind of overview you could never get by reaching out randomly to folks at the Pentagon or State.

To whet your appetite, here is a report of a talk he gave to the Center for Policy Analysis on Palestine CPAP), September 13, 2001. That is, two days after 9-11. He is a pretty good predictor, you will see, which is why I think you should ask him to bring in his crystal ball and tell you what will happen if we bring down Saddam by force, without the UN behind us. There are few people in the world with your experience, Mr. VP, but I think you know there are still a few things you do not know. 

* * * * *

“The Role of the Media in Shaping Public Perception.”
Report from a CPAP briefing by Stephen Pelletiere 

With a PhD in Political Science, a background in journalism, and a current position as professor of National Security Affairs at the U.S. Army War College, Stephen Pelletiere brought his expertise to a discussion of the media at a 13 September 2001 Center lecture. He focused on press coverage of Iraq, Palestine, and the current situation following the 11 September plane hijackings and attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon in the U.S. 

Pelletiere began by addressing the media campaign against Iraq following the Iran-Iraq war. The U.S. did not expect Iraq to win, and when it did, U.S. leaders were “dumbfounded.” As Iraq sought to “rebuild itself” after the war, the U.S. attempted to prevent this restructuring through a number of avenues, focusing on damaging Iraq’s “credit worthiness.” Despite the accumulation of a large debt, Iraq “was good for the money” considering its oil resources. Still, in the spring of 1988, Iraq did not have the cash reserves necessary and wished to reschedule its debt payments. The media in the U.S. began running stories on Iraq, “the tone of which was extremely hostile.”

“All of the stories were slanted against Iraq,” which by itself is suspicious. In addition, some of the stories were simply “phony,” such as the report that 80,000 to 100,000 Kurds were gassed to death by Iraq. “You can’t kill that many people using gas, in a concentrated period, in terrain such as exists in northern Iraq.” Irrational stories do appear in the media on occasion, but not usually so extensively in the established press. It seemed to Pelletiere that “this was a campaign.” At the time, Congress was debating sanctions on Iraq and may have been trying to prepare the public. When sanctions were eventually declared, Iraq could no longer reschedule its debts.

Moving to the issue of how the media has covered Israel and Palestine, Pelletiere explained that Israel’s current military activity in the Occupied Territories is “coming dangerously close to ethnic cleansing.” Nonetheless, the press presents the conflict as relatively balanced and argues that both sides are equally responsible for the violence. Pelletiere takes a different approach. He explained that at the Camp David negotiations, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered a deal “that was no deal at all.” Barak hoped the Palestinians would accept it and be “saddled with an entity that was not viable,” a so-called state that would fall apart. Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat refused. “The pro-Israeli forces … had to find a way of retreating from the exposed position they found themselves in, because in the process of setting Arafat up, … they had dignified both him and his movement by appearing to take the idea of Palestinian statehood seriously.” They choose to “criminalize” the Palestinians. Israeli leader Ariel Sharon’s provocative visit to the Haram al-Sharif, which Barak 

[CTRL] Henry Makow

2002-09-18 Thread Mermaid
-Caveat Lector-



Blimey! I didnt know Old Henry Makow had 
such strong views on Womanhood..What a surprise this is certainly different to 
his normal stuff on Banking Index lol 
He does have a very good point 
though.
The Mermaid 

Burka Vs Bikini -
The DebaucheryOf American 
WomanhoodBy Henry Makow, 
Ph.D.9-18-2

  
  

  
On my wall, 
I have a picture of a Muslim woman shrouded in a burka. 
 
Beside it is a picture of an American beauty 
contestant, wearing nothing but a bikini. 
 
One woman is totally hidden from the public; the other 
is totally exposed. These two extremes say a great deal about the clash 
of so-called "civilizations." 
 
The role of woman is at the heart of any culture. 
Apart from stealing Arab oil, the impending war in the Middle East is 
about stripping Arabs of their religion and culture, exchanging the 
burka for a bikini. 
 
I am not an expert on the condition of Muslim women 
and I love feminine beauty too much to advocate the burka here. But I am 
defending some of the values that the burka represents for me. 
 
For me, the burka represents a woman's consecration to 
her husband and family. Only they see her. 
 
It affirms the privacy, exclusivity and importance of 
the domestic sphere. 
 
The Muslim woman's focus is her home, the "nest" where 
her children are born and reared. She is the "home" maker, the taproot 
that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training 
her children, providing refuge and support to her husband. 
 
In contrast, the bikinied American beauty queen struts 
practically naked in front of millions on TV. A feminist, she belongs to 
herself. In practice, paradoxically, she is public property. She belongs 
to no one and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is 
auctioning herself all of the time. 
 
In America, the cultural measure of a woman's value is 
her sex appeal. (As this asset depreciates quickly, she is neurotically 
obsessed with appearance and plagued by weight problems.) 
 
As an adolescent, her role model is Britney Spears, a 
singer whose act approximates a strip tease. From Britney, she learns 
that she will be loved only if she gives sex. Thus, she learns to "hook 
up" rather than to demand patient courtship and true love. As a result, 
dozens of males know her before her husband does. She loses her 
innocence, which is a part of her charm. She becomes hardened and 
calculating. Unable to love, she is unfit to receive her husband's 
seed. 
 
The feminine personality is founded on the emotional 
relationship between mother and baby. It is based on nurturing and 
self-sacrifice. Masculine nature is founded on the relationship between 
hunter and prey. It is based on aggression and reason. 
 
Feminism teaches woman that feminine nature has 
resulted in "oppression" and that she should convert to male behavior 
instead. The result: a confused and aggressive woman with a large chip 
on her shoulder, unfit to become a wife or mother. 
 
This, of course, is the goal of the social engineers 
at the NWO: undermine sexual identity and destroy the family, create 
social and personal dysfunction, and reduce population. (See 
http://www.inoohr.org/worldpopulationcontrolpromote.htm) In the "brave 
new world," women are not supposed to be nest makers, or progenitors of 
the race. They are meant to be neutered autonomous creatures that 
indulge in sex for physical pleasure, not for love or 
procreation. 
 
At his press conference on Sunday, Donald Rumsfeld 
said that Iranian women and youth were restive under the rule of the 
Mullahs. He implied that the US would soon liberate them. To Britney 
Spears? To low-rise "see-my-thong" pants? To the mutual masturbation 
that passes for sexuality in America? 
 
Parenthood is the pinnacle of human development. It is 
the stage when we finally graduate from self-indulgence and become God's 
surrogates: creating and nurturing new life. The New World Order does 
not want us to reach this level of maturity. Pornography is the 
replacement for marriage. We are to remain stunted: single, sex-starved 
and self-obsessed. 
 
We are not meant to have a permanent "private" life. 
We are to remain lonely and isolated, dependent on consumer products for 
our identity, in a state of perpetual courtship. 
 

[CTRL] Interesting?

2002-09-18 Thread Mermaid
-Caveat Lector-



Secret Government technology maybe? Or 
are is somebody watching the Bush/Blair roadshow with amusement?
I wonder.
The Mermaid x
http://www.rense.com/general29/astn.htm



A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Back to Basics???

2002-09-18 Thread thew
Title: Re: [CTRL] Back to Basics???
-Caveat Lector-




Not exactly accurate  some was given them, and the rest they won in wars they did not start. And some of that they gave back, for peace - 


Improperly? The British didnt own the land?


on 9/18/02 6:45 PM, William Shannon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 9/18/02 5:40:12 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Stole?

It wasnt stolen
It was given to them by you British.


Some land was improperly given to them but they STOLE much more.

Bill. A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/www.ctrl.org/A" DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance


-- --- - 
Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it


Elwood P Dowd 



NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew 




A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Henry Makow

2002-09-18 Thread thew
Title: Re: [CTRL] Henry Makow
-Caveat Lector-





His good point is skewed by the ignored fact that the American woman could wear a burka if she wanted to, but in many societies where covering a woman is the norm, it is also the law.

on 9/18/02 7:15 PM, Mermaid at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

-Caveat Lector- 
Blimey! I didnt know Old Henry Makow had such strong views on Womanhood..What a surprise this is certainly different to his normal stuff on Banking Index lol 
He does have a very good point though.
The Mermaid 
 
Burka Vs Bikini -
The Debauchery
Of American Womanhood
By Henry Makow, Ph.D.
9-18-2

On my wall, I have a picture of a Muslim woman shrouded in a burka. Beside it is a picture of an American beauty contestant, wearing nothing but a bikini. One woman is totally hidden from the public; the other is totally exposed. These two extremes say a great deal about the clash of so-called civilizations. The role of woman is at the heart of any culture. Apart from stealing Arab oil, the impending war in the Middle East is about stripping Arabs of their religion and culture, exchanging the burka for a bikini. I am not an expert on the condition of Muslim women and I love feminine beauty too much to advocate the burka here. But I am defending some of the values that the burka represents for me. For me, the burka represents a woman's consecration to her husband and family. Only they see her. It affirms the privacy, exclusivity and importance of the domestic sphere. The Muslim woman's focus is her home, the nest where her children are born and reared. She is the home maker, the taproot that sustains the spiritual life of the family, nurturing and training her children, providing refuge and support to her husband. In contrast, the bikinied American beauty queen struts practically naked in front of millions on TV. A feminist, she belongs to herself. In practice, paradoxically, she is public property. She belongs to no one and everyone. She shops her body to the highest bidder. She is auctioning herself all of the time. In America, the cultural measure of a woman's value is her sex appeal. (As this asset depreciates quickly, she is neurotically obsessed with appearance and plagued by weight problems.) As an adolescent, her role model is Britney Spears, a singer whose act approximates a strip tease. From Britney, she learns that she will be loved only if she gives sex. Thus, she learns to hook up rather than to demand patient courtship and true love. As a result, dozens of males know her before her husband does. She loses her innocence, which is a part of her charm. She becomes hardened and calculating. Unable to love, she is unfit to receive her husband's seed. The feminine personality is founded on the emotional relationship between mother and baby. It is based on nurturing and self-sacrifice. Masculine nature is founded on the relationship between hunter and prey. It is based on aggression and reason. Feminism teaches woman that feminine nature has resulted in oppression and that she should convert to male behavior instead. The result: a confused and aggressive woman with a large chip on her shoulder, unfit to become a wife or mother. This, of course, is the goal of the social engineers at the NWO: undermine sexual identity and destroy the family, create social and personal dysfunction, and reduce population. (See http://www.inoohr.org/worldpopulationcontrolpromote.htm) In the brave new world, women are not supposed to be nest makers, or progenitors of the race. They are meant to be neutered autonomous creatures that indulge in sex for physical pleasure, not for love or procreation. At his press conference on Sunday, Donald Rumsfeld said that Iranian women and youth were restive under the rule of the Mullahs. He implied that the US would soon liberate them. To Britney Spears? To low-rise see-my-thong pants? To the mutual masturbation that passes for sexuality in America? Parenthood is the pinnacle of human development. It is the stage when we finally graduate from self-indulgence and become God's surrogates: creating and nurturing new life. The New World Order does not want us to reach this level of maturity. Pornography is the replacement for marriage. We are to remain stunted: single, sex-starved and self-obsessed. We are not meant to have a permanent private life. We are to remain lonely and isolated, dependent on consumer products for our identity, in a state of perpetual courtship. This is especially destructive for woman. Her sexual attraction is a function of her fertility. As fertility declines, so does her sex appeal. If a woman devotes her prime years to becoming independent, she is not likely to find a permanent mate. Her long-term personal fulfillment and happiness lies in making marriage and family her first priority. Feminism is another cruel New World Order hoax that has debauched American women and despoiled Western civilization. It has ruined millions of lives and represents a lethal threat to 

Re: [CTRL] Interesting?

2002-09-18 Thread thew
Title: Re: [CTRL] Interesting?
-Caveat Lector-



Fun with mylar?



on 9/18/02 7:26 PM, Mermaid at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

http://www.rense.com/general29/astn.htm


-- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- --- -- - - -  - -- - - - --  -- - -- -

Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.
  Justice Louis D. Brandeis





NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew 




A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Israel the robbers!!

2002-09-18 Thread Mermaid
-Caveat Lector-



http://www.poica.org/casestudies/intifada-first-year/


http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,715564,00.html
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] 20 Years After Sabra and Shatila: the Forgotten Massacres

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.counterpunch.org/



September 18, 2002

20 Years After
Sabra and Shatila: 
the Forgotten Massacres

by Peggy Thomson

Every time I open my closet door I see them. The black Talbots sandals I wore when I revisited the wretched Palestinian refugee camps known as Sabra and Shatila. Although I've cleaned them, for some reason the sandals seem to be coated with a film of dust and dirt which simply will not go away.

Over the years dirt from Sabra and Shatila has clung just as tenaciously to Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon. As some -- but probably not many -- Americans may remember, twenty years ago this month the twin camps in southern Beirut were the scene of an infamous massacre carried out by Lebanese militiamen operating under Israel's direct control. The massacre was an exceptionally tragic denouement to Israel's 1982 invasion of its neighbor to the north, which Israel carried out with American approval partly in the hope of establishing a Lebanese government friendly to its interests.

During Lebanon's earlier civil war, Israel had begun viewing the right-wing Christian Phalange militia as a natural ally. (In a strange way the relationship reminds me of Israel's present relationship with the Christian right in this country in that both parties are trying to use the other for their own ends in an alliance which may in fact be extremely short-lived.) In the late 1970s, both Israel and the Phalangists saw the Palestinians as an enemy -- Israel because of the obvious PLO threat and the Christians because the Palestinian refugees had the potential for upsetting the country's delicate Christian-Muslim communal balance. At the end of Israel's Lebanon campaign it looked for a very short while like the Phalangist leader Bashir Gemeyal, Israel's hand-picked candidate, would indeed become the new Lebanese president. This plan was thwarted, however, after Gemeyal was assassinated in a powerful bomb blast shortly before assuming office.

Israel immediately reinvaded West Beirut and secretly began making preparations to allow Lebanese militiamen to enter the refugee camps in search of "terrorists." In a two-day orgy of bloodshed which subsequently shocked and sickened the world, Israel's allies murdered between 1,000 and ",000 unarmed Palestinian refugees and impoverished Lebanese while torturing, raping and terrorizing countless others. The death toll may in fact be as high or higher than that of the September 11 attacks on America. No one will ever be able to say for sure because figures for the number killed in the massacre vary wildly.

An Israeli investigative commission eventually found Sharon, who was Israel's defense minister at the time, "personally responsible" for the slaughter. As a result, many people, including many Israelis, predicted that Sharon would never become Israel's prime minister. Today, however, the phrase that comes to mind is "never say never."

Although Sharon has been officially rehabilitated, like every politician he must of necessity be concerned to some degree about his image. In light of the ironfisted tactics he has been using in the occupied territories since assuming the Israeli premiership, the last thing the always controversial Sharon has needed of late was a new wave of publicity relating to his involvement in the massacre.

Interest in the twenty-year-old atrocities was rekindled nonetheless, at least in Europe, after a court case was brought last year against Sharon in Belgium charging him with war crimes. The case received additional attention in January after Elie Hobeika, a Lebanese warlord involved in the massacre, was assassinated in Beirut. Shortly before his death Hobeika had announced that he would go to Belgium to testify against Sharon. Speculation is that Hobeika may have wanted to clear his name by trying to pin a large portion of blame on another Israeli proxy force long implicated in the massacre -- the South Lebanon Army of Major Saad Haddad.

Also, it is worth nothing that Hobeika isn't the only Lebanese Forces militia leader to have recently met with an untimely end: Since the first of the year two of Hobeika's comrades, who may have had connections to the case, were assassinated or died under mysterious circumstances.

In a surprise move a Belgian appeals court dismissed the case in June on grounds that Sharon could not be prosecuted because he was not residing in Belgium. Lawyers for the Palestinian survivors and relatives say they are appealing the case to the Belgian Supreme Court while Belgian legislators have been busily redrafting the existing law to specify, among other things, that the accused, including sitting heads of government, does not have to be in the country to be prosecuted.

When it comes to the massacres and to Israel's 1982 Lebanon invasion, people in this country sometimes say, "Oh yeah, I remember hearing something about that. I just can't remember what." But you can't blame the average American for not 

[CTRL] Yet Another Bush Doctrine

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.counterpunch.org/cook0918.html



September 18, 2002

Yet Another Bush Doctrine
by William A. Cook 

He said it and we must obey! "We (America) want the United Nations to be effective and respected and successful. We want (the) its resolutions to be enforced." This is the third of Dubya's new foreign policy doctrines, each a furtherance of his unilateral approach to world domination. 

Following September 11, the fledging President, whose foreign policy initiatives up to that date had been marked by retreat from international and global agreements in favor of isolationism, announced a declaration of war against the forces of evil that reside in the world. This Manichean perception of the world fit logically into his Puritan fundamentalist view that America represents the forces of good fighting against the forces of evil, the same America that had been directed to this new land by the Almighty and blessed with truth and righteousness. "You are with us or against us," he declared on September 20th. The authorities in power in 1636, the Puritan Divines, determined who was good and who was evil because they believed they were God's anointed. They determined that the Natives were "salvages" working for Satan and that gave them the right to exterminate the Pequot tribe in 1637, and they praised God for permitting it and for making the slaughter so thorough! So today we have a President who believes that he is born-again in Christ and can interpret His word as to who is good and who is evil. 

Unfortunately, since terrorists cannot be defined as rulers of nation states as defined by the United States, he provided to the world's leaders an avenue of justification for their acts of occupation and slaughter of those opposed to their regimes or their desires. We have witnessed this in Russia's justification of the slaughter of the Chechnyans, Melosovic's defense that he was only subduing "terrorists" in his ethnic cleansing of the Muslims in Bosnia, Pakistan's and India's justification of their respective attacks against each other in Kashmir, and in Israel's defense of its occupation of Arab territory. The first Bush doctrine has opened the door for anarchy throughout the world as leader after leader justifies his actions against his enemies as a "war against terrorists." 

But our President didn't stop there. He annunciated his second doctrine at the West Point military academy: the right of America to determine and execute "pre-emptive attacks" against perceived enemies. This doctrine effectively undermines international law and makes "irrelevant," to use a Sharon operative word, the United Nations. But it is worse than that. It also undermines the basic premises that have determined how the United States declares war: a determination that the United States has been attacked before it attacks. It also shifts responsibility for determination of such action from the Congress to the Executive branch if the reality of "pre-emptive" strike is to be effective. The second Bush doctrine augments the first by giving those in power another "right" to act without evidence of perceived intention or determination of "evil" by presentation of evidence before a court or a congressional or representational body.

Now we have Dubya's third doctrine: resolutions of the United Nations must be enforced; at least that is how Dubya defended his desire to bring about "regime change" in Iraq when he addressed the UN on the 12th. On the surface this would seem to be a desirable goal for international order. Unfortunately, neither Bush nor his administration mean what they say. If they did, they would apply the same doctrine to Israel. Consider the discrepancies: Iraq has broken UN resolutions since 1991 according to the President; Israel has broken UN resolutions since 1948. Bush claims that Saddam has defied the UN and thus " is a threat to UN authority and to peace." He asks this question as he presents his arguments before the UN delegates: "Are UN resolutions to be honored and enforced or cast aside without consequence?" Will the UN become irrelevant if its resolutions are not obeyed? The answer applies, of course, only to Iraq. It is the only argument he could make at the UN. 

He could not claim that the United States has authority to "go it
alone" against his perceived "evildoer." He could not use the fabrication that Iraq, with only a third of its military in tact following the other Iraqi war and hobbled with a population that has suffered ten years of deprivation caused by the US imposed sanctions, could pose a threat to the US unless they were to hand-deliver a weapon across 7,000 miles. So he resorts to this doctrine trusting, I suspect, that no one would notice that Israel has defied over 55 UN resolutions since 1967 and others prior to that reaching back to 1948. These resolutions condemn Israeli intransigence against implementation of fundamental human rights and illegal occupation of Arab 

[CTRL] Fwd: ZGram - 9/18/2002 - Ethnic Cleansing by Starvation

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon

-Caveat Lector-



A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

---BeginMessage---

-Caveat Lector-

ZGram - Where Truth is Destiny

September 18, 2002

Good Morning from the Zundelsite:

[START]

Ethnic Cleansing by Starvation

by Rania Awwad

A US-financed assessment of the overall malnutrition level among
Palestinian children, released this month by the US Agency for
International Development (USAID), found that one in five Palestinian
children under the age of five now suffers from chronic or acute
malnutrition. This astonishing statistic is on par with impoverished
nations such as Chad and Nigeria, and actually surpasses rates of
child malnutrition in Somalia and Bangladesh. Such figures, the
report noted, are considered an emergency by most humanitarians and
public health officials. The report points to Israeli-imposed
closures and sieges of major civilian centers as the direct and
primary cause.

We typically think of famines as being caused by natural disasters
(droughts, overgrazing) or by crises that result in the displacement
of large populations from their lands (wars, ethnic strife). The
situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, however, is a
startling aberration since it is clearly a man-made disaster intended
to specifically target whole civilian populations. Most importantly,
it can easily and immediately be reversed.

Today, Israeli military sieges are literally imprisoning families
within their homes for days at a time. People cannot leave their
homes to work, buy food, go to the doctor, or send their children to
school. Military checkpoints and roadblocks are restricting commerce
and the transport of food supplies. Workers cannot travel between
Palestinian towns, and farmers and manufacturers are unable to
deliver their goods to shops and markets. People have exhausted the
money they can draw on from relatives and connections on the outside.

The USAID report also revealed that about one quarter of West Bank
Palestinians have had to sell personal possessions to put food on the
table. The World Bank recently determined that as many as 62 percent
of Palestinian families are now living on less than two dollars a
day. As a result of these obstacles, increasing numbers of families
are skipping meals or reducing their food intake because eventually
they run out of money and assets to sell.

Even before the current Israeli re-occupation which began on June 20,
many Palestinians relied on aid from the Palestinian Authority and
the UN World Food Program (UNWFP). With its ministries and
institutions flattened, the PA can no longer serve in this role, and
the UNWFP has recently announced an emergency operation to cope with
what they call dramatically deteriorating living conditions in the
Palestinian Territories.

But how can the slow starvation of a whole population be stopped when
that very starvation is being altogether denied by the Israeli
government and ignored by the US Administration? Major General Amos
Gilad, Israel's coordinator of government affairs in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip, was hardly ruffled by the USAID findings. In fact, he
asserted that hunger is when people have swollen bellies and fall
over dead. There is no hunger yet.

Discovering that dismissive denial of facts is not working, the
Israeli authorities are now moving to soften criticism with
much-hyped symbolic gestures. Israel recently announced its intention
to release about seven percent of the 600 million dollars in
Palestinian tax revenue it has seized since the start of the
Intifada, as well as its intention to reissue work permits for
Palestinians to cross from the West Bank and Gaza to their jobs
inside Israel.

These measures, however, are hardly sufficient. Much more needs to be
done. It is 

[CTRL] 'Disastrous' GM crops have cost US economy £8bn, study claims

2002-09-18 Thread klewis

-Caveat Lector-

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/environment/story.jsp?story=33
4379

'Disastrous' GM crops have cost US economy £8bn, study claims
By Charles Arthur, Technology Editor

18 September 2002
The introduction of genetically modified crops in North America has
been an economic disaster, the Soil Association claimed
yesterday.

A report on the North American market drawn up by the association,
which supports organic farming, said the new crops had cost the
United States economy £8bn since 1999. The costs were said to
have been caused by contamination of crops, subsidies paid to
compensate for low prices and lost trade from manufacturers in
Europe that refused GM products – and the complete recall of one
product.

Three quarters of the world's GM food is grown in the US and
Canada, principally soya and corn. The report's findings were based
on interviews with academics, advisers and analysts in North
America as well as organic and conventional farmers in the US.
The British Government was accused, meanwhile, of failing
sufficently to monitor trials of GM crops in Britain, after it accepted a
report comprising just two sentences for year-long trials at 28 sites.

Friends of the Earth said it had written to Margaret Beckett, the
Secretary of State for the Department of Environment, Food and
Rural Affairs, about the biotech industry monitoring reports that have
been accepted by her department. The pressure group said it had
been advised that the reports did not meet legal requirements. It
consulted lawyers after seeing a copy of the monitoring report
submitted by Aventis CropScience Ltd (now Bayer CropScience)
about the winter oilseed rape farm scale trials in 2000-01.

The two-sentence report was meant to cover developments at 28
different farm sites over an entire season. The group said that
information on the performance of GM crops might be being
overlooked.


--

Outgoing mail is certified virus free
Scanned by Norton AntiVirus

In case you didn't know, ethanol is made by mixing corn with your
tax dollars. ~~Paul A. Gigot

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Rappoport On Jack Welch and Pepper Spray On MNF

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.stratiawire.com/



WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2002

CRAZY MONEY?

SEPTEMBER 18. Neutron Jack Welch is now renouncing his retirement perks, the ones contained in his golden parachute. His former company, GE, is moving along without him, and hopes to avoid any spillover from Jack’s ongoing messy divorce. 

Makes me wonder whether Jack’s renunciation of millions from GE is somehow tied in with his desire to pay out much less to his wife. But that’s another story… 

Checking up a little on GE, I discovered, much to my amazement, that this mega-corp makes 40 PERCENT of its total earnings from one subsidiary, called GE Capital Corp. A financial services company. It buys up mortgages, among other activities. 

It produces no refrigerators or toasters or tanks. GE Capital has just been split into four pieces, supposedly for the purpose of making its earnings statements more transparent to the Wall Street pros, who are edgy about corporations’ financial reporting in the current Enron-WorldCom-Global Crossing situation. 

This is just a tip at the moment, but I smell something fishy here. Where exactly does GE Capital get its money from, the money it uses to buy up mortgages? And why has it been so successful versus other companies in the same line of work? I’ve been told that GE Capital is a veritable tiger on the mortgage-buying front. It just keeps on winning. 

Remember, Enron was really making a huge chunk of its earnings NOT from the sale of energy or energy infrastructure, but from the sale of energy futures. It was phasing over to the financial services and brokering areas. Ditto for GE. 

Whenever a huge corporation eases way off on actually producing THINGS and goes toward selling and buying commercial paper (e.g., mortgages) and futures and the like, it’s a signal to investigate. 

Let me put it this way: Suppose a huge international car builder told you it was no longer selling automobiles, it was now selling the RIGHT to buy, at some future time, these vehicles. And before that future date arrived, you could turn around and sell your purchased right to the car to someone else. Wouldn’t that make you a little edgy? You don’t buy a car or even a stake in the company, you SPECULATE by buying the right to buy. 

“We’re not really a builder anymore, we’re a bank—well, not a bank exactly—more like a commodity broker. We’ve found we make more money if we sell the right to buy something rather than the something itself.” 

Speaking of banks, here is a clue to another very crazy money game. 

For years, people have accepted reports that banks often make extremely stupid loans. For example, they lend billions to corporations that are already foundering and desperately need back-up cash. 

“Oh those banks. They never really investigate their borrowers’ financial statements. What morons.” 

I think not. This is sometimes an insiders’ insidious tactic. The bank expects and wants the corporate borrower to go further into red ink. The bank wants the company to fail, to head into bankruptcy. Why? Because the bank is really a front for much quieter and more powerful interests behind the scenes—and those interests want to buy up the failing corporation and take it over. That’s right. 

Consider this as an aspect in what has been happening to Enron, Global Crossing, WorldCom, Qwest, and others. 

Here is a nearly perfect analogy. IMF, a mega-bank, lends a country billions to pay off its prior debts to IMF. IMF KNOWS that country (e.g., Argentina) is going to go much further into the red. That’s the whole idea. Because, vultures are waiting in the wings, waiting to take over all the really important industries in that desperately wobbling nation. And when the nation is in a completely untenable situation, vis-à-vis its national debt, it will accede to any imposed IMF orders. Orders, for example, to sell off its prime utilities and industries to foreign investors. 

In the coming months and years, will we be able to see who is really re-structuring and taking over the Enrons? Don’t count on it. Several levels of fronts and cutouts can hide the real new owners. But, for example, keep your eye on a multi-billion-dollar outfit called the Carlyle Group. 

Bush the Elder is a shill, in Asia, for Carlyle, and a whole host of former US government biggies is on board. 
 
PEPPER ON MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL

SEPTEMBER 18. Monday Night Football was suddenly interrupted when the whole Philadelphia Eagles team was led out on to the field by coach Andy Reid. Players were pawing at their eyes and covering their faces. The game stopped. 

The TV announcers were at a loss to explain what happened. They didn’t want to say the T word, but they finally did. Terrorism. They were careful to indicate that this wasn’t even a speculation on their part, but that, these days, the thought would occur to people. 

Today we are told it was just pepper spray. In the stands, 

[CTRL] PROMIS MOSSAD

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.rumormillnews.net/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=23185



Rumor Mill News Reading Room Forum 
WHY A FEDERAL JUDGE TRAMPLED LAW - PROMIS  MOSSAD 
Posted By: CarolAdler
Date: Wednesday, 18 September 2002, 12:51 p.m. 

WHY A FEDERAL JUDGE TRAMPLED LAW 
The fine hand of corruption and greed at the highest levels in the Justice Department is the common thread running through the web of conspiracy in the INSLAW affair. (This article was first posted in the American Free Press, www.americanfreepress.net http://www.americanfreepress.net March 3, 2002.) 
by Michael Collins Piper 
American Free Press 
September 18, 2002 

Editor’s Note: Michael Piper’s research on the Inslaw affair is impressive, and accurate. We urge you to read this article carefully and to connect the dots between China’s use of the Promis software to obtain U.S. defense secrets, after obtaining Promis from British media magnate, Robert Maxwell and the Mossad, and the current global chess game. Corruption, like carriers of the West Nile Virus, has no conscience. It is ruthless and greedy. The Inslaw affair is also well documented in Seeds of Fire: China and the Story Behind the Attack on America, by Gordon Thomas. It reveals some of the nature of our current government and its intentions. 

BULLETIN: For those of you who wish to check out the American Free Press website today, it is unavailable. It has been removed from the website. In its place is the notice: “Forbidden: You don’t have permission to access on this server.” On the Google search-engine, reference to American Free Press and Michael Piper also appears to have been removed. 

In March 1982 the Washington, D.C.-based INSLAW company, owned by Bill and Nancy Hamilton, won a $10-million, three-year contract with the Justice Department, which planned to install the PROMIS software, developed by Bill Hamilton, in the 22 largest U.S. attorneys’ offices and a word-processor version in 72 others. 

In the meantime, however, Dr. Earl Brian, a longtime crony of then-Attorney General Edwin Meese, began using his clout to interfere with the Hamilton’s contract in order to win the contract for a company that he owned after the Hamiltons refused Brian’s offer to purchase INSLAW. Brian, who had wide-ranging international contacts, was widely believed to be a longtime asset of the CIA. 

In early 1983 the Justice Department arranged with the Hamiltons to demonstrate PROMIS to an Israeli who called himself “Dr. Ben Orr” who said he represented the Israeli Ministry of Justice. “Ben Orr” said he was most impressed with PROMIS, but, to the Hamiltons’ surprise, he never bought the product. 

It was only later the Hamiltons learned why: Brian had already illicitly provided the software to LEKEM, an Israeli Defense Force intelligence unit headed by Mossad operative Rafael Eitan. 

Eitan, it turns out, was not only the “Dr. Ben Orr” who had visited the Hamiltons, but he was also the Mossad official directing the U.S.-based Jonathan Pollard spy ring, and a top ally of Ariel Sharon. 

Eitan’s LEKEM operations had been funded by a series of off-shore corporations in the Bahamas set in place by Burns and Summit, the law firm of Deputy Attorney General Arnold Burns, a key player in the Justice Department’s campaign to liquidate INSLAW and a prime mover behind the ouster of federal Judge George Bason (see accompanying story) and the appointment of S. Martin Teel to succeed him. 

Former Israeli intelligence operative Ari Ben-Menashe has said that PROMIS was perfect software for use by Israeli intelligence in tracking the Palestinian and political dissidents critical of Israel. 

“PROMIS was a very big thing for us guys, a very, very big thing,” Ben-Menashe said. “It was probably the most important issue of the 1980s because it just changed the whole intelligence outlook. The whole form of intelligence collection changed.” 

All of this was happening behind the scenes and unbeknownst, at that time, to the Hamiltons. How ever, with their software totally looted and distributed internationally—the Hamiltons found that the Justice Department was withholding more than $7 million in payments due on the contract, forcing INSLAW into insolvency. Then, in 1984, Justice abruptly canceled the contract. 

In 1985, facing bankruptcy and fighting off hostile takeover attempts by allies of Earl Brian, the Hamiltons sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in federal court in Washington and also sued the Justice Department for the losses they had suffered. 

The Justice Department’s conspiracy against INSLAW was so patently outrageous that in 1988 federal bankruptcy court Judge George Bason Jr. ruled for the Hamiltons and against Justice. Bason concluded the Justice Department had deliberately tried to bankrupt INSLAW so that they would be able to grab control of the software and not pay the Hamiltons. 

Bason’s decision was subsequently upheld, but by this 

[CTRL] Michael Medved: Berkeley Councilwoman Dona Spring on banning space-based weapons

2002-09-18 Thread Ecotoday

-Caveat Lector-

Date: Thursday September 19, 2002
Time: 1:00-2:00 PM PT
The Michael Medved Show.

AUDIO: http://www.michaelmedved.com

Berkeley Councilwoman Dona Spring will appear on the nationally syndicated
Michael Medved Show, heard in more than 130 cities such as LA, DC, Detroit,
Denver, Sacramento, San Diego and Cleveland.

On September 10, 2002, the Berkeley City Council passed Resolution 61744,
making Berkeley, California the first city in the world to pass a Resolution
calling for a  ban on all space-based weapons in support of the Space
Preservation Act, introduced by the Honorable Congressman Dennis Kucinich
(D-OH), and soon to be re-introduced in 2003, and the companion Space
Preservation Treaty.  Berkeley is the first city in the world to declare the
outer space above their city to be a space-based weapons-free zone.

For a copy of Berkeley Resolution 61744, visit:

http://www.peaceinspace.com/61744.html

If you would like to introduce this Resolution in your city, as the intention
is for every city across the country and the world to pass this Resolution,
find a councilmember in your City Council, and ask him/her to introduce it.
Contact Leuren Moret (510-845-3139) in Berkeley, California to find out how
she made it happen in Berkeley.

 CONTACT:  Environmental Commissioner Leuren Moret (510) 845-3139 or
 City Councilmember Dona Spring (510) 649-0330
 President Institute for Cooperation in Space, Dr. Carol Rosin 805-641-1999
 ICIS International Director, Alfred Webre, JD MEd, 604-733-8134

 ICIS: http://www.peaceinspace.cominfo@peaceinspace,.com

 Thank you.

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] The Ford Foundation And The CIA

2002-09-18 Thread William Shannon
-Caveat Lector-
http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?fileName=lsn20020918094139.html



The Ford Foundation And The CIA
A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the Secret Police 9/18/02 9:41:39 AM

rebelion.org

Commentary -- http://www.rebelion.org/petras/english/ford010102.htm 

The Ford Foundation and the CIA: 

A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the Secret Police 

by James Petras

15 December 2001 

Rebelión 

Introduction 

The CIA uses philanthropic foundations as the most effective conduit to channel 
large sums of money to Agency projects without alerting the recipients to their 
source. From the early 1950s to the present the CIA's intrusion into the 
foundation field was and is huge. A U.S. Congressional investigation in 1976 
revealed that nearly 50% of the 700 grants in the field of international 
activities by the principal foundations were funded by the CIA (Who Paid the 
Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, Frances Stonor Saunders, Granta 
Books, 1999, pp. 134-135). The CIA considers foundations such as Ford "The best 
and most plausible kind of funding cover" (Ibid, p. 135). The collaboration of 
respectable and prestigious foundations, according to one former CIA operative, 
allowed the Agency to fund "a seemingly limitless range of covert action 
programs affecting youth groups, labor unions, universities, publishing houses 
and other private institutions" (p. 135). The latter included "human rights" 
groups beginning in the 1950s to the present. One of the most 
important "private foundations" collaborating with the CIA over a significant 
span of time in major projects in the cultural Cold War is the Ford Foundation. 

This essay will demonstrate that the Ford Foundation-CIA connection was a 
deliberate, conscious joint effort to strengthen U.S. imperial cultural 
hegemony and to undermine left-wing political and cultural influence. We will 
proceed by examining the historical links between the Ford Foundation and the 
CIA during the Cold War, by examining the Presidents of the Foundation, their 
joint projects and goals as well as their common efforts in various cultural 
areas. 

Background: Ford Foundation and the CIA 

By the late 1950s the Ford Foundation possessed over $3 billion in assets. The 
leaders of the Foundation were in total agreement with Washington's post-WWII 
projection of world power. A noted scholar of the period writes: "At times it 
seemed as if the Ford Foundation was simply an extension of government in the 
area of international cultural propaganda. The foundation had a record of close 
involvement in covert actions in Europe, working closely with Marshall Plan and 
CIA officials on specific projects" (Ibid, p.139). This is graphically 
illustrated by the naming of Richard Bissell as President of the Foundation in 
1952. In his two years in office Bissell met often with the head of the CIA, 
Allen Dulles, and other CIA officials in a "mutual search" for new ideas. In 
1954 Bissell left Ford to become a special assistant to Allen Dulles in January 
1954 (Ibid, p. 139). Under Bissell, the Ford Foundation (FF) was the "vanguard 
of Cold War thinking". 

One of the FF first Cold War projects was the establishment of a publishing 
house, Inter-cultural Publications, and the publication of a magazine 
Perspectives in Europe in four languages. The FF purpose according to Bissell 
was not "so much to defeat the leftist intellectuals in dialectical combat 
(sic) as to lure them away from their positions" (Ibid, p. 140). The board of 
directors of the publishing house was completely dominated by cultural Cold 
Warriors. Given the strong leftist culture in Europe in the post-war period, 
Perspectives failed to attract readers and went bankrupt. 

Another journal Der Monat funded by the Confidential Fund of the U.S. military 
and run by Melvin Lasky was taken over by the FF, to provide it with the 
appearance of independence (Ibid, p. 140). 

In 1954 the new president of the FF was John McCloy. He epitomized imperial 
power. Prior to becoming president of the FF he had been Assistant Secretary of 
War, president of the World Bank, High Commissioner of occupied Germany, 
chairman of Rockefeller's Chase Manhattan Bank, Wall Street attorney for the 
big seven oil companies and director of numerous corporations. As High 
Commissioner in Germany, McCloy had provided cover for scores of CIA agents 
(Ibid, p. 141). 

McCloy integrated the FF with CIA operations. He created an administrative unit 
within the FF specifically to deal with the CIA. McCloy headed a three person 
consultation committee with the CIA to facilitate the use of the FF for a cover 
and conduit of funds. With these structural linkages the FF was one of those 
organizations the CIA was able to mobilize for political warfare against the 
anti-imperialist and pro-communist left. Numerous CIA "fronts" received major 
FF grants. Numerous supposedly "independent" CIA 

[CTRL] Priest Pleads Guilty to Stealing, Bush's Nuclear Madness

2002-09-18 Thread Smart News
-Caveat Lector-
Please note : If you receive a file from my address with an attachment, please delete it or at least check with me first before opening it. Virus programs can change "from" addresses. 




this may be heavy for survivors

from L Moss Sharman Priest Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $100,000 From Queens Parish By ANTHONY DePALMA Roman Catholic priest from Queens who was accused of serious misdeeds by a parochial school principal pleaded guilty yesterday to stealing nearly $100,000 from his former parish to pay for a time share in Mexico, a luxury car and trips to a gay resort in Florida, among other personal expenses...Mr. Riopelle said Father Thompson also denied charges that he paid extortion to a gay lover whom he allowed to live in the church's rectory, as the school principal, Barbara Samide, contended. Mrs. Samide, 39, had estimated that as much as $300,000 in funds belonging to the church and school could be missing, based on what accountants had told her. Mr. Riopelle acknowledged that Father Thompson had used money from the collection plate to pay for trips to the Blue Dolphin, a gay resort in Fort Lauderdale where clothing is optional.Mrs. Samide told investigators that Father Thompson threatened to fire her if she tried to stand in his way. She filed a sexual harassment suit against him in June and recently amended the complaint to include allegations of physical abuse and sexual assault. After amending the charges, Mrs. Samide was put on unpaid leave from her position as principal of St. Elizabeth's." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/nyregion/18PRIE.html

http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/cra0225.htm
Bush's Nuclear Madness: Horror at Dubya's Secret Attack Plan on 7 Countries
11 March 2002 President Bush faced world anger last night over America's seven-nation nuclear hit list. British MPs joined the outcry after a leaked Pentagon report revealed contingency plans to use nuclear weapons against China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Syria and Libya. The secret policy was denounced as warmongering "lunacy". Alarmed officials from Moscow to Tehran warned that the "power crazy" President, buoyed up by the successful campaign in Afghanistan, could plunge the world into chaos. British politicians said the strategy threatened the stability of the NATO alliance. International tension mounted as Washington pressed Britain to back an attack
A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] NYTimes.com Article: Revamped Proposal Suggests Strategies to Tighten Online Security

2002-09-18 Thread Tenor Love

-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Revamped Proposal Suggests Strategies to Tighten Online Security

September 18, 2002
By JOHN SCHWARTZ






A long-awaited report from the Bush administration intended
to help citizens, businesses and government shore up the
nation's cyberdefenses will be revealed today.

Sort of.

The report, The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace,
was scheduled to be released today with great fanfare at
Stanford University. But officials have decided not to
release the report in final form today in hopes of building
support among high-tech companies that worked to weaken
previous drafts.

Instead, the current document is being referred to as a
draft. It will be subject to a 60-day comment period, after
which it will be revised and submitted to the president for
final approval.

Like many other reports on cybersecurity before it, the new
document describes a society that has grown increasingly
dependent on networked computer systems, and thus
increasingly vulnerable to cyberterrorists, hackers and
destructive computer programs like viruses and worms. Like
those previous reports, it also emphasizes the importance
of education for business, government and consumers. The
report breaks down the cyberspace security challenges faced
by various online populations, including home users and
small businesses as well as industry sectors and nations.

Some of the tougher measures proposed in earlier drafts of
the document included recommendations that Internet service
providers give high-speed customers firewalls and other
tools to defeat hacking and bans on many uses of wireless
networks until the technology is made more secure. The
draft being released today calls for more general proposals
that one security expert dismissed as pretty-please
recommendations to improve security awareness.

Richard A. Clarke, the chairman of the president's critical
infrastructure protection board, dismissed assertions that
the report had been softened. That is a vast
exaggeration, Mr. Clarke said yesterday in a conference
call with reporters.

The point is not what was in Draft 4 or Draft 8 or Draft
12, Mr. Clarke said. The report, he said, is an effort to
offer guidance without resorting to a greater regulatory
structure, or what he called a government heavy hand
approach.

Everybody has to do his own thing to protect cyberspace,
he said.

The report has raised fears among civil liberties advocates
that the proposals, in trying to answer many issues, rely
heavily on more surveillance of computer networks - and, by
extension, of those who use them.

It's hard to find a security approach that will
simultaneously solve the problems of ice storms, software
glitches, Al Qaeda, faulty operating systems and spam,
said Marc Rotenberg, director of the Electronic Privacy
Information Center in Washington. But in almost any
scenario, less emphasis should be placed on monitoring and
more on reliability.

Those speaking in favor of the new report said that the
industry welcomed the opportunity to comment on the report,
and that the essence of it is unchanged.

The basic thrust of the recommendations is still there,
said Mario Correa, director of Internet and network
security policy for the Business Software Alliance, a
lobbying and policy group in Washington.

A security expert said he was disappointed that the
government was not getting tougher on cyberissues. The
expert, Russ Cooper, whose official title of surgeon
general describes his role in advocating good computer
health and hygiene at the Trusecure Corporation, said the
information he had received about the report was a lot of
rhetoric, a lot of discussion, a lot of what we've been
doing along - but nothing mandatory about what we needed to
do.

Mr. Clarke said that those expecting a detailed set of
requirements were missing the point. He declined to
estimate the ultimate costs of implementing the proposals,
saying they should not be taken as a set of low-level,
specific requirements.

It's not a plan, he said, it's a
strategy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/18/politics/18CYBE.html?ex=1033398425ei=1en=f7c7894474e98621



HOW TO ADVERTISE
-
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread 

Re: [CTRL] Rappoport On Jack Welch and Pepper Spray On MNF

2002-09-18 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



We have seen the IMF/World Bank debt scam work 
in country after country. Now we are seeing the investment bankers using the 
same M.O. on companies in the U.S. But it's really no different because the same 
people are behind both.

JR



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  William Shannon 
  
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:30 
  PM
  Subject: [CTRL] Rappoport On Jack Welch 
  and Pepper Spray On MNF
  -Caveat Lector- http://www.stratiawire.com/WEDNESDAY, 
  SEPTEMBER 18, 2002CRAZY MONEY?SEPTEMBER 18. Neutron 
  Jack Welch is now renouncing his retirement perks, the ones contained in his 
  golden parachute. His former company, GE, is moving along without him, and 
  hopes to avoid any spillover from Jack’s ongoing messy divorce. Makes 
  me wonder whether Jack’s renunciation of millions from GE is somehow tied in 
  with his desire to pay out much less to his wife. But that’s another story… 
  Checking up a little on GE, I discovered, much to my amazement, that 
  this mega-corp makes 40 PERCENT of its total earnings from one subsidiary, 
  called GE Capital Corp. A financial services company. It buys up mortgages, 
  among other activities. It produces no refrigerators or toasters or 
  tanks. GE Capital has just been split into four pieces, supposedly for the 
  purpose of making its earnings statements more transparent to the Wall Street 
  pros, who are edgy about corporations’ financial reporting in the current 
  Enron-WorldCom-Global Crossing situation. This is just a tip at the 
  moment, but I smell something fishy here. Where exactly does GE Capital get 
  its money from, the money it uses to buy up mortgages? And why has it been so 
  successful versus other companies in the same line of work? I’ve been told 
  that GE Capital is a veritable tiger on the mortgage-buying front. It just 
  keeps on winning. Remember, Enron was really making a huge chunk of 
  its earnings NOT from the sale of energy or energy infrastructure, but from 
  the sale of energy futures. It was phasing over to the financial services and 
  brokering areas. Ditto for GE. Whenever a huge corporation eases way 
  off on actually producing THINGS and goes toward selling and buying commercial 
  paper (e.g., mortgages) and futures and the like, it’s a signal to 
  investigate. Let me put it this way: Suppose a huge international car 
  builder told you it was no longer selling automobiles, it was now selling the 
  RIGHT to buy, at some future time, these vehicles. And before that future date 
  arrived, you could turn around and sell your purchased right to the car to 
  someone else. Wouldn’t that make you a little edgy? You don’t buy a car or 
  even a stake in the company, you SPECULATE by buying the right to buy. 
  “We’re not really a builder anymore, we’re a bank—well, not a bank 
  exactly—more like a commodity broker. We’ve found we make more money if we 
  sell the right to buy something rather than the something itself.” 
  Speaking of banks, here is a clue to another very crazy money game. 
  For years, people have accepted reports that banks often make 
  extremely stupid loans. For example, they lend billions to corporations that 
  are already foundering and desperately need back-up cash. “Oh those 
  banks. They never really investigate their borrowers’ financial statements. 
  What morons.” I think not. This is sometimes an insiders’ insidious 
  tactic. The bank expects and wants the corporate borrower to go further into 
  red ink. The bank wants the company to fail, to head into bankruptcy. Why? 
  Because the bank is really a front for much quieter and more powerful 
  interests behind the scenes—and those interests want to buy up the failing 
  corporation and take it over. That’s right. Consider this as an aspect 
  in what has been happening to Enron, Global Crossing, WorldCom, Qwest, and 
  others. Here is a nearly perfect analogy. IMF, a mega-bank, lends a 
  country billions to pay off its prior debts to IMF. IMF KNOWS that country 
  (e.g., Argentina) is going to go much further into the red. That’s the whole 
  idea. Because, vultures are waiting in the wings, waiting to take over all the 
  really important industries in that desperately wobbling nation. And when the 
  nation is in a completely untenable situation, vis-à-vis its national debt, it 
  will accede to any imposed IMF orders. Orders, for example, to sell off its 
  prime utilities and industries to foreign investors. In the coming 
  months and years, will we be able to see who is really re-structuring and 
  taking over the Enrons? Don’t count on it. Several levels of fronts and 
  cutouts can hide the real new owners. But, for example, keep your eye on a 
  multi-billion-dollar outfit called the Carlyle Group. Bush the Elder 
  is a shill, in Asia, for Carlyle, and a whole host of former US government 
  biggies is on