Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 What a lovely fairy tale you have concocted concerning
 slavery in the northern states!

Dem's da facts, ma'am...I suggest you get yourself a few good books on American 
History...


 Reread my sentence, too. I
 said they EITHER gave them letters of freedom OR just dumped
 them. meaning sold them in the South in an especially timely
 manner, only when it was evident they were going to be freed
 anyway.  Ditto those letters of freedom--only after it was
 imminent anyway.  Hardly the magnanimous gesture you attempt
 to fabricate.

Excuse me, but _I_ am not the one who fabricated the claim in the first place...if YOU 
reread MY sentences,
you will see that I refer to the people involved as 'imaginary'...


 If my sentence makes no sense to you, it is
 your reading deficiency as it is perfectly clear what I have
 stated.

Only in your own 'sleep depraved' [sic] mind...


 There were not that many states admitted in the Missouri
 Compromise and they were Midwestern
 with low populations at the time.

Just ONE free state admitted under the Missouri Compromise negates your claim that 
each and every state of the
union was a slave-holding state at one time...


 New England where you live is where the most slaves were.

And you can back up this claimhow?


 Talk about your revisionist
 history!  Southern slaves were often given letters of
 freedom also and many did not leave their original homes
 even after receiving their letters.

Yes, that claim DOES sound extremely revisionist...


 It had become
 economically unfeasible in the South to maintain large slave
 populations on individual farms and would have been
 eliminated anyway but Lincoln wanted the credit,

If this was true, then why were all those supposedly starving whites still holding 
onto slaves at the time of
the Emancipation Proclamation?  Seems to me that if it was 'economically unfeasible' 
to own slaves even before
the war, all those supposedly starving white slaveowners wouldn't have needed to be 
forced to free them by
Lincoln, they would have just opened the door and told their slaves to get the hell 
out of there...


 The factories of New England wanted the adult
 slaves to replace the children they were using as slaves in
 their factories without the expense of having the cradle to
 grave responsibility of slaves.

Bull.  By the time the Industrial Revolution took hold in the northeast -- and this 
was in the century BEFORE
the Civil War -- slavery was already being legislated out of existence in those states.

The industrialized north had no need of slaves, or even ex-slaves, as there were more 
than enough bodies
immigrating from overseas to work cheaply in the mills and factories...

You spend the time researching the ethnic makeup of those who worked in the northern 
mills and factories at
the time, and you will find that almost none of them employed blacks...first it was 
Irish and German, later it
was Italian, Portuguese, and Russian and eastern European...

That situation lasted until well into the 20th century...blacks didn't start getting 
employed in any numbers
in factories until the early 20th century, and then for the most part only in Detroit 
and Chicago...


 And yes, that is exactly what I am saying,
 that whites shared what food they had with blacks for whom
 they were responsible.

Gee, if big bwanna white massa was so good, it's amazing that any black slave accepted 
being freed...seems to
me those ex-slaves would have immediately voted to reinstitute slavery, since 
according to you they had it so
good...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

I had a great great etc grandfather who had 100 some slaves and in his
will he gave them their freedom but one old man was allowed to live on
the farm until he died, by name of Sam who was a personal butler type of
man.

So goodbye and good riddance..has Lincoln not been shot he was going
to return most to Africa and in fact did..

Think what America would be like today without these racial problems?
Like Joe Lieberman said, quoting Jesus Christ in the New Testament maybe
God in the old - the poor you have with you always.

So class tells - you have the race horse and you have the mule..you
have the thorough breds and you have Al Sharpton and Jesse
Jacksonyou have the Queen Bees and you have the drones.

So what the cotton gin did to free the slaves and blacks from mundane
task of picking cotton the computer will not do to those who think they
are computer genius - many who cannot even type - and when compters are
all talk operated that just leaves the brain to call the shots.

Ah but the computer does know know the difference between loose and lose
and council and counsel and read and red and bred as in well bred and
bread.

So we will still need a few honkies like June with her dictionary and
word of the day club to be sure, the computer and robot operators do not
look too stupid.

So no use for slaves anymore.not much use for a lot of
peoplegoing out of style.

Bet you wish they had lots of clones of Henry Kissinger, even though
they would eat us out of house and home?

Now then I have a pedigree cat and a pit bull who get along fine.a
junk yard dog with a black nose and a siamese with beautiful blue
eyes..and all my children have blonde hair and blue eyes and there
will always be a demand for blonde haired blue eyed kids

Not much demand for mules.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia
young and old Do ask
your Kind and good will toasist us in geting our freedom for
we have indured the galling yok of Bondige Ever Sence we
have Ben Brought from our own Country and I those of us that
Was Born in this Cuntry have Ben under Bondage our hol lives
untill now and their is a grat nomber of us which have been
Brotup By Such I men as have Not Larnt us to Read the woord
of God Neather have have They Lamt us the mening of the word
of I God But have Keept us from the Knoledge of that
Salvation which we have a Right to By Jesus Christ But we
Think that if we have our Liberty we Shall have an
opportunity to Larn the word of God and to Recive good to
our Sols as well as our Bodyes and if we Could But injoy our
Liberty we think that we Should Be in as Fare a way to make
our Calling and Electtion Suer and By Gods Goodness have our
Sols Saved from Eerlasting Damnation But we are keep from
all favers Both Bodys and Sols But we Look unto that god
which is as able to Save us as he is to Save our Marsters
But we Depend upon the Blesings of god in making the gurenel
asimbly the insterments of Seating us at Liberty from these
men that I Now hold us as Servents - But if your honners
Refuse to asist us in Releving us from our Marsters we Shall
I have Reson to say that you [.?.] Do Not your duty as the
word of God says in the Book of Isaiah at the 58 Chapter and
6 varse I To undo the hevy Burdens and to Leat the oppressed
Go free and that I ye Brak Every yoke - and this is the Duty
of all that have an oppertunity to Releve them that are in
Disstrass I and if your honners forgit your Duty all men may
say that our Roulars Bare the Sword in vain But if we Kant
have our Desier dont think hard of us if By our marsters we
say as David Did By his enemies Psalms the 109 and the 6
varce Set thou a wicked man over him and I Let Satan Stand
at his Right hand the 7 varc when he Shall Be I Judged Let
him Be Condemned and Let his Prayer Become Sin I the 8 varce
Let his Days Be few and Let another take his offsice I the 9
varce Let his Children Be fatherliss and his wife a widow
the 10 varce Let his Children Be Continually vagabonds and
Beg Let them Seek their Bread also out of their Desolate
Places the 11 varce Let the Extortioner Catch all that he
hath and Let the Stranger Spoil all his Labour the 12 varce
Let thair Be none to Extend mercy unto him Neither Let their
Be any to favour his fatherless Children I the 13 verce Let
his Posterity Be Cut off and in the generation I folowing
Let their Name Be Blotted out the 14 varce Let The iniquity
of his fathers Be Remembered with the Lord and Let Not the
Sin of his mother Be Blotted the 15 varce Let them Be Before
the Lord Continually that he may Cut off the memory of them
from the Earth the 16 varce Because that he Remembered not
to Shew marcy But Perscuted the Poor and nedy I man. And
Surr we hope that you will Remember the Poor and oppresed
negro men in the State which you are Chosen to Do Justice in
So we are abliged to Lement Our Case as in Lamentations at
the 5 chapter and 5 varce Our Necks are under Persecution we
Labour and have no Rest





This petition of 1880 is found among the Trumbull Papers
M.H.S., volume 13, part 2, document 251. It was first
published by Vincent J. Rosivach in "Three Petitions by
Connecticut Negroes for the Abolition of Slavery in
Connecticut," Connecticut Review, Volume XVII, no. 2, 79-92.

The editor points out that this petition is written in a
reasonably good hand by a slave who consulted a King James
version of the Bible, perhaps by having the quoted passages
read to him. On the petition's exterior are written the
words, "Hartford Negro Mem Oct 1780.+ While the year 1780 is
probably correct for the year of the petition, there is some
doubt its authors were actually from Hartford. and this
petition could well be another attempt by the slaves of
Fairfield county after the failure of their petition of
1779. We know neither the number or identity of the
petitioners. The fact that this petition is found among
Governor Trumbull's papers leads Rosivach to suspect that
the Governer never bothered to forward it to the Assembly.








- Original Message -
From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)


 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  What a lovely fairy tale you have concocted concerning
  slavery in the northern states!

 Dem's da facts, ma'am...I suggest you get yourself a few
good books on American History...


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—

Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 So what the cotton gin did to free the slaves and blacks from mundane
 task of picking cotton

The cotton gin did no such thing.  In fact, it led to the GROWTH of slavery in the 
south.

The cotton gin has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking cotton; and the fact that you 
display such ignorance
as to what the cotton gin actually DID, suggests that your claims of southern heritage 
leave a lot to be
doubted...


 the computer will not do to those who think they
 are computer genius - many who cannot even type - and when compters are
 all talk operated that just leaves the brain to call the shots.

 Ah but the computer does know know the difference between loose and lose
 and council and counsel and read and red and bred as in well bred and
 bread.

Don't know what any of this has to do with the topic of slavery...but DAMN, Aleisha!  
What ARE those drugs you
are on?


 So we will still need a few honkies like June

No honkie...one-quarter Hunkie, tho...   ;-)



 ...and all my children have blonde hair and blue eyes and there
 will always be a demand for blonde haired blue eyed kids

By whom, exactly?


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-05 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

June,
Well, the Southern states were not the only states where the
institution of slavery was practiced. I believe all states
had it prior to TWBTS, some a few years back from that
time/event.  They cleverly sold theirs into the South just
prior to the outbreak of the war. Some gave them letters of
freedom but many just "dumped" them right before the
outbreak of conflict.  Also, remember the Emmmancipation
Proclamation was not signed until 1864, after a state of
general starvation existed in the South.  Then the slaves
were freed with no way to feed themselves, etc. other than
trying to take from people who were already starving.  This
was careful timing to ensure  maximum harm being done to all
parties.  Slavery is certainly a crime against humanity but
all parties here were guilty of practicing it.  So have many
"civilizations" such as Egyptian, et al.

But I do not care if you and Bill burn the Stars and Bars
because if we were going to protest too much, something
should have been done to stop the KKK from using it so much.
They also use the American flag but nobody protests that
either.  I have seen other strange flags waved around by the
KKK that I do not recognize, either.  Some look rather
"original" and I suspect are of their own design or lack
thereof. It (SB) was not a design in the original state
flags, either, but incorporated around the time of
desegregation, so removing it should not create a big
problem.  In Montgomery, there is the former capitol of the
Confederacy where it flies and people often mistakenly think
it is the state capitol.  I think it should remain over the
historic capitol of the Confederacy, however.  Someone on
this list mentioned the KKK flag-wavers not being
descendents of original slave owners and that is for sure.
The KKK hates former slave-owning class and blames them for
the presence of Blacks in general  It never occurred to me
that people do not realize this.  They contend "We picked
our own cotton and they could have , too."  They are
by-and-largely two different groups entirely.  Of course
having married a Latin American and failing to keep the race
"pure" qualifies me for special hatred by this particular
group.  Guess they are not into widening of the gene pool
and all of that.  I know I live around some members of the
KKK but they have shown any sign of being concerned about my
presence in any way.  Hopefully, it is me in theory and not
personally to whom they object.  Also, the SB often appears
on beach towels and swimming trunks, etc as does the British
Union Jack.  This is not especially respectful display and
has made it into more of an icon of trivia.

Re:  WWII and civilian populations.  If it was collateral
damage originally aimed at military targets, I suppose it
could not be helped.  If, however, civilians and human
suffering of same was the object I think it was very wrong.
I can think of one incident, Dresden, where this would
apply.  I am sleep depraved today and the "detail police"
who ignore the big picture and concentrate on details may
get me on this but my memory from reading long ago only says
the civilian population of Dresden tried for three days to
surrender and Allied troops ignored this attempt and bombed
the hell out of them, retribution and rage.  I think that
was wrong, if accurate.  More recently, the Balkans come to
mind where some of our actions were highly questionable like
the "enemy tractor" and train bombings.
Amelia
- Original Message -
From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)


 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 These things are considered war crimes by civilized
people.

 Perhaps.  But what about the crimes against humanity the
Confederate States
 of America sought to perpetuate in the 'institution' of
human slavery.

 The Allies burned much of Germany in WWII,
also...including "homes, mostly,
 crops in fields, schools, churches, hospitals and every
mile of railroad
 track existing at the time as well as all civilian food
reserves"...

 Do you consider them guilty of war crimes, too?


 June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil a

Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-05 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Well, the Southern states were not the only states where the
 institution of slavery was practiced. I believe all states
 had it prior to TWBTS, some a few years back from that
 time/event.

No, that is wrong.  Free states admitted under the Missori Compromise never allowed 
slavery within their
borders...

And those northern states that had at one time had slavery had outlawed it long before 
the war.  Also, in
northern states slavery had been utilized in a much different manner than in the 
south...in the north, a slave
could redeem him or herself, either by buying their freedom (if they were lucky enough 
to be able to save
enough), or by serving as a slave for a set period of time; I believe this varied from 
state to state, but was
usually from 7 to 12 years.  At the end of their term of service, the slave was ruled 
to have redeemed his or
her worth and was then set free.

In many northern states, slave owners were also required to pay their slaves wages, 
albeit much lower wages
than required of a free man or woman...


 They cleverly sold theirs into the South just
 prior to the outbreak of the war. Some gave them letters of
 freedom but many just "dumped" them right before the
 outbreak of conflict.

This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  If these imaginary northern slaveowners 
gave their slaves letters
of freedom, that can hardly be considered 'dumping' them.  And if these imaginary 
slaves had letters of
freedom, how could they be sold into slavery in the south?


 Also, remember the Emmmancipation
 Proclamation was not signed until 1864, after a state of
 general starvation existed in the South.  Then the slaves
 were freed with no way to feed themselves, etc. other than
 trying to take from people who were already starving.

So you wish us to believe that prior to the Emancipation Proclamation, all those 
starving white massas gladly
gave up what little food they had to their black slaves?

I hardly think so!

And the freed black slaves had as much, or little, opportunity to feed themselves in 
the same manner their
ex-masters did...



 This
 was careful timing to ensure  maximum harm being done to all
 parties.  Slavery is certainly a crime against humanity but
 all parties here were guilty of practicing it.  So have many
 "civilizations" such as Egyptian, et al.

So do the Kuwaitis today...doesn't make it right...



June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-05 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

June,
What a lovely fairy tale you have concocted concerning
slavery in the northern states!  Reread my sentence, too. I
said they EITHER gave them letters of freedom OR just dumped
them. meaning sold them in the South in an especially timely
manner, only when it was evident they were going to be freed
anyway.  Ditto those letters of freedom--only after it was
imminent anyway.  Hardly the magnanimous gesture you attempt
to fabricate. If my sentence makes no sense to you, it is
your reading deficiency as it is perfectly clear what I have
stated.  You often use the "no sense" tactic when you do not
like what you are reading.  There were not that many states
admitted in the Missouri Compromise and they were Midwestern
with low populations at the time. I have personally seen a
slave auction house in Illinois. New England where you live
is where the most slaves were.  Talk about your revisionist
history!  Southern slaves were often given letters of
freedom also and many did not leave their original homes
even after receiving their letters.  It had become
economically unfeasible in the South to maintain large slave
populations on individual farms and would have been
eliminated anyway but Lincoln wanted the credit, so it
became a pretext..And "freeing" them with no means to
provide for themselves was not the best way this could have
been handled.  The factories of New England wanted the adult
slaves to replace the children they were using as slaves in
their factories without the expense of having the cradle to
grave responsibility of slaves. Here was their chance to
have former slaves without having any investment in them.
They paid them a sub-slave wage and hoped to lure them there
with false promises to work in their factories instead of
the children they employed at the time.
I always wonder why so many Blacks stay in the evil South.
One would think they would escape by any means.  The latest
census confirms that since 1970 they have been returning in
large numbers now that there are jobs in the area. Of course
NAFTA has eliminated lots of those. But I cannot help but
wonder why they stayed right after TWBTS in such large
numbers. They could have all left the region and come to
live in the Northeast but most did not and stayed.  The
treatment and conditions varied greatly from situation to
situation in the South also and there was no standard just
as there was no standard for the way people were treated
within families. And yes, that is exactly what I am saying,
that whites shared what food they had with blacks for whom
they were responsible.  That is well documented and you are
the first person I have ever heard claim otherwise. But you
fabricate a nice story. And it is a way to project the
national guilt onto one section instead of all guilty
parties facing up to their own participation in a system
that was morally wrong.  How convenient!
Amelia

- Original Message -
From: "Ynr Chyldz Wyld" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)


 -Caveat Lector-

 From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Well, the Southern states were not the only states where
the
  institution of slavery was practiced. I believe all
states
  had it prior to TWBTS, some a few years back from that
  time/event.

 No, that is wrong.  Free states admitted under the Missori
Compromise never allowed slavery within their
 borders...

 And those northern states that had at one time had slavery
had outlawed it long before the war.  Also, in
 northern states slavery had been utilized in a much
different manner than in the south...in the north, a slave
 could redeem him or herself, either by buying their
freedom (if they were lucky enough to be able to save
 enough), or by serving as a slave for a set period of
time; I believe this varied from state to state, but was
 usually from 7 to 12 years.  At the end of their term of
service, the slave was ruled to have redeemed his or
 her worth and was then set free.

 In many northern states, slave owners were also required
to pay their slaves wages, albeit much lower wages
 than required of a free man or woman...


  They cleverly sold theirs into the South just
  prior to the outbreak of the war. Some gave them letters
of
  freedom but many just "dumped" them right before the
  outbreak of conflict.

 This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.  If these
imaginary northern slaveowners gave their slaves letters
 of freedom, that can hardly be considered 'dumping' them.
And if these imaginary slaves had letters of
 freedom, how could they be sold into slavery in the south?


  Also, remember the Emmmancipation
  Proclamation was not signed until 1864, after a state of
  general starvation existed in the South.  Then the
slaves
  were freed with no way to feed themselves, etc. other
than
  trying to take from people who were alread

[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-04 Thread Amelia



We know how you folks like to burn things 
"Confederate"! Homes, mostly, crops in fields, schools, churches, 
hospitalsand every mile of railroad track existing at the time as well as 
all civilian food reserves. Yes, I believe this was the most successful 
scorched earth policy ever. These things are considered war crimes by 
civilized people.
Amelia

- Original Message - 

Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful 
Dodger)
In a message dated 2/2/01 9:26:18 PM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

Don't know about Samantha, but I know _I_ would burn the 
  Confederate flag 'and all for which it stands for', in a 
heartbeat...Me too...and have actually... 
Bill. 


Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-04 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These things are considered war crimes by civilized people.

Perhaps.  But what about the crimes against humanity the Confederate States
of America sought to perpetuate in the 'institution' of human slavery.

The Allies burned much of Germany in WWII, also...including "homes, mostly,
crops in fields, schools, churches, hospitals and every mile of railroad
track existing at the time as well as all civilian food reserves"...

Do you consider them guilty of war crimes, too?


June




_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-02 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Bet you fly the Gay Pride flag but would burn the Confederate and all
 for which it stands?

Don't know about Samantha, but I know _I_ would burn the Confederate flag 'and all for 
which it stands for',
in a heartbeat...

As for the 'Gay Pride' flag...well, that's a funny thing...

Seems that for years, the guys who fly the really huge (23 feet by 18 feet), expensive 
kites down at the beach
where I also fly, had at least one of these 'rainbow' flags to fly off the line of the 
big kites (these kites
pull 1000 to 2000 pounds)...

These guys are married and straight.  The rainbow flag had nothing to do with 'gay 
pride' to them, these flags
were marketed in almost every kite retail outlet, both physical stores and online.  If 
anything, people
equated the rainbow flag to the "Rainbow Coalition", which originally only meant civil 
rights for people of
all colors...

Then suddenly the rainbow flag got hyped as the 'symbol of gay pride'...and the kite 
fliers at the beach never
flew theirs again...  ;-)

Two years ago, 2 gay guys came along and were totally overwhelmed with the sight of 
all those really huge,
rainbow-colored kites in the sky...and one of them announced that he was going to buy 
himself one to fly the
following month at a gay pride festival being held at a park in Hartford...because he 
announced that such a
kite, in rainbow colors, certainly was an appropriate symbol of gay pride...(bet he 
was in for a bit of a
shock when, if he really did pursue buying one of these things, that the cost of the 
kite, matching 25-foot
spinsocks, 300-foot tube tail, and all the necessary rig to launch, fly, and keep it 
anchored runs $2000 to
$2500)...not to mention understanding the DANGER involved in trying to handle one of 
those things without
training)...

I have a rainbow-colored windsock in the shape of a trout.  These too have been 
marketed in kite outlets for
years (we attach various types of windsocks not only to kites, but to the flying line 
as "line candy")...

This past summer, someone started selling these windsocks on Ebay, hyping them as 
"show your gay pride, fly
one of these rainbow-colored trout windsocks"...so apparently I now have a gay fish... 
 ;-)

Next we'll be hearing that all those St. Patricks Day images of pots of gold at the 
end of rainbows shows gay
Irish pride...  ;-)

So the point I'm trying to make is, just because someone is flying a rainbow-colored 
item does NOT necessarily
mean they are making a statement regarding homosexuality...   ;-)


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-02 Thread William Shannon
In a message dated 2/2/01 9:26:18 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Don't know about Samantha, but I know _I_ would burn the Confederate flag
'and all for which it stands for',
in a heartbeat...

Me too...and have actually...

Bill.