[CTRL] Impeach Bush! Justification: Offsetting Political Expediency
http://www.etherzone.com/2003/lang071403.shtml IMPEACH BUSH! JUSTIFICATION: OFFSETTING POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY By: Ted Lang The impeachment process is an inquiry. It is the process directed at former President Clinton for lying about a matter that Democrats offered was personal, only a matter of sex, and the outcome of the politics of personal destruction. The impeachment process is initiated in the House of Representatives, which serves as an investigation of wrongdoing. The Senate must conduct a trial examining legal ramifications that can result in removal from office. Curiously, the justification for both an impeachment and its use are found in virtually the same place in the United States Constitution: Article II [powers of the President], Section 3 [State of the Union Message], and Section 4 [removal from office]. The Congress unconstitutionally conveyed to President George W. Bush, the authority of war-making powers, thereby violating Article I [powers of Congress], Section 8, paragraph 10 [the power to declare war]. Presidents in the past have maneuvered to obtain this concession from Congress, justifying it as necessary for the political expediency of a quick response to a national emergency or attack. Such political expediency is nevertheless unlawful and unconstitutional, subverting the intent of our republics spirit of a separation of powers, specifically as it relates to the control of the Nations military might. The Congress, by having abdicated its war-making powers in the absence of an attack upon our Nation, gave President Bush dictatorial powers during peacetime. Simply avoiding entangling alliances can obviate such expediency. It can be avoided to even a greater extent by deploying our military only when attacked. This eliminates the need for our maintaining standing armies in other nations and their staggering related costs, as well as the need for foreign treaties and their intrigue. But President George Bush did maneuver for such power in his State of the Union address. And part of that address alleged that Iraq was trying to obtain uranium from Niger in order to construct a nuclear weapon. How many other nations, including our own, are currently engaged in this activity? This is no justification for war. Along with an absence of weapons of mass destruction, the falsification of intent citing the need for a regime change, and now the falsification of a report on uranium procurement, President George Bush appears to have lied outright to the American people in his State of the Union speech. He falsely cited a clear and present danger to America. He implied that Iraq was involved in the 9-11 terrorist attack upon our nation, yet to date, no such evidence has been presented. In their headline article of July 12th in the New York Times entitled, C.I.A. Chief Takes Blame in Assertion on Iraqi Uranium, David E. Sanger and James Risen launch their piece stating: The director of central intelligence, George J. Tenet, accepted responsibility yesterday for letting President Bush use information that turned out to be unsubstantiated in his State of the Union address, accusing Iraq of trying to acquire uranium from Africa to make nuclear weapons. The article continues: Mr. Tenet issued a statement last night after both the president and his national security adviser placed blame on the C.I.A., which they said had reviewed the now discredited accusation and had approved its inclusion in the speech. For days, the White House has tried to quiet a political storm over the discredited intelligence, which was among many examples cited in Mr. Bush's speech to justify the need for confronting Iraq to force the dismantlement of Saddam Hussein's arms programs. It is clear, and hoped for as well, that the upcoming report from Republican Thomas Keans 9-11 investigation committee, which has been reputedly hampered by both funding as well as information delays from the White House, that the incompetence of intelligence gathering, a process that had it been handled properly could possibly have prevented much if not all of the devastation of 9-11, will point blame at both the CIA and the FBI relative to that terrorist act. Yet Mr. Bush has consistently stood by FBI directors Mueller and Freeh, and CIA director Tenet. Now Mr. Tenet is accepting responsibility. What does that mean? Is that the same responsibility former Attorney General Janet Reno accepted for the Waco massacre? What was her punishment? What will Tenets be? The article quotes Bush as saying; I gave a speech to the nation that was cleared by the intelligence services. In contract law, the question of reliability as concerns the warranty made by one party to a contract focuses both on whether the other party relied upon a statement made, and whether or not the relying party could reasonably be expected to have had a right to rely upon that representation of fact. Could Bush be reasonably expected to rely upon his own intelligence
[CTRL] Impeach Bush Now is your chance
-Caveat Lector- (Compared to Clinton, Bush should be hanged for treason, not impeached. (Note I said compared to. I am not advocating killing Bush. --SW) --- Forwarded message follows --- From: Khoji T. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[Elfradbitchlist] Fw: Impeach Bush Now is your chance Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date sent: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 23:17:47 -0800 Subject: Impeach Bush Now is your chance. Subject: Congressman John Conyers is asking you if you want Bush impeached! Spread this far and wide, House Representative Congressman John Conyers on the Judicial Committee is asking you to, through his legislative assistant Alexia, fax or email if you want Bush impeached. The phones are currently ringing off the hook, so please send a brief message stating whether you are for or against impeachment via email or fax: e mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR Fax: (313) 226-2085 -- They are NOT introducing articles of impeachment now. They are only TALLYING. e mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR Fax: (313) 226-2085 -- - Subject: Lies of this war: Congressman Waxman challenges the President A month later, in your State of the Union address, you stated: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld subsequently cited the evidence in briefing reporters. It has now been conceded that this evidence was a forgery. On March 7, the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, reported that the evidence that Iraq sought nuclear materials from Niger was not authentic. As subsequent media accounts indicated, the evidence contained crude errors, such as a childlike signature and the use of stationary from a military government in Niger that has been out of power for over a decade. Even more troubling, however, the CIA, which has been aware of this information since 2001, has never regarded the evidence as reliable. The implications of this fact are profound: it means that a key part of the case you have been building against Iraq is evidence that your own intelligence experts at the Central Intelligence Agency do not believe is credible. It is hard to imagine how this situation could have developed. The two most obvious explanations - knowing deception or unfathomable incompetence - both have immediate and serious implications. It is thus imperative that you address this matter without delay and provide an alternative explanation, if there is one. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2367.htm --- End of forwarded message --- News alternatives to US corporate propaganda outlets like CNN and FoxNews: http://www.aljazeerah.us/ http://www.aeronautics.ru/news A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Impeach Bush
-Caveat Lector- http://www.freepress.org/columns.php?strFunc=displaystrID=22strYear=2003strAuthor=3 Impeach Bush January 26, 2003 The Columbus Free Press is launching its own Office of Total Counter-Information Awareness. In the last few months, weve accumulated enough information to warrant the impeachment of President George Bush. First, lets recall Bushs strange relationship with that bizarre little company in Lansing, Michigan, known as Bioport. The company, despite failing various FDA inspections and being accused of bad record-keeping, holds the only federal contract for producing the anthrax vaccine. Bush has rewarded Bioport with favors such as ongoing military protection, and within weeks of 9/11 granted them a contract that tripled the price per vaccine. Now, add into the mix that the Strangelovian CIA-connected Battelle and Britains top secret Porten Down labs are partners with Bioport. Owners and investors in Bioport include former Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff William Crowe and Fuad El-Hibri. Public records and foreign press reports have linked El-Hibri to the selling of anthrax to Saudi Arabia after the Pentagon refused to. Hes also a business associated of the bin Laden family. A real Congressional investigation of Bushs relationships with the bin Laden family, El-Hibri and the related drug bank BCCI would easily lead to the Presidents impeachment. Second, the Presidents utter contempt for U.S. citizens was displayed in his appointments of three criminals: the pompous pipe-puffing Admiral John Poindexter, Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra infamy and wanted war criminal, Henry Kissinger. Poindexter, who now runs the Office of Total Information Awareness, is busily keeping files on every U.S. citizen. Well, put this in your file on Poindexter. He supervised the illegal arms for hostage sale to Iran that violated the Arms Export Control Act; he sanctioned the funneling of profits from that illegal sale into the Nicaraguan Contras, a group more famous for its drug-running than fighting the Sandinistas; he lied about his activities and destroyed evidence during the Congressional investigation; and a federal jury found him guilty of lying and obstructing justice, but the fix was apparently in and two conservative federal appeals judges overturned his convictions. After lying to Congress about the Iran-Contra scandal and being convicted on two counts, Abrams was pardoned by Bush, Sr. Now thanks to Bush, Jr., he is the top Middle East advisor on the National Security Council. And what can we say about Kissinger? From the secret bombings of Cambodia to the overthrow of Chiles democracy, there is perhaps no figure more hated in the world than the good doctor. This did not stop Junior from appointing him to cover up the real causes of 9/11. Fortunately, Special K was forced to resign when he refused to disclose his clients from his private consulting firm, Kissinger and Associates. We would have stood a better chance of getting to the truth of 9/11 had we dug up the bones of Earl Warren and created another bogus Warren Commission. Meanwhile, the forces of Big Oil surrounding Bush are hell-bent on stealing the Iraqi peoples petroleum and somehow they seem able to convince the U.S. people that the Baby Jesus himself put that oil in Iraq for us to pilfer in the name of God and country. Despite the Bush Jr.s administrations best efforts to hide the crucial role of Bush, Sr. in arming Iraq with biochemical weapons in the 1980s including Secretary of State Colin Powells bullying the UN into allowing him to remove 8,000 key pages of Iraqs 12,000-page dossier on weapons the story continues to break. Finally, Bushs foreign policy contains the rabid elements of inbred elitist ignorance. A week before Christmas, Human Rights Watch reported that the U.S. military violated international law in Afghanistan by indiscriminately dropping cluster bombs in civilian areas. That same week, the Bush administration announced a new strategy of covert actions and pre-emptive strikes, including nukes, against any country that dares attack U.S. troops now stationed in at least 148 nations throughout the world. The President announced his new version of Star Wars, Jr. guaranteeing huge profits for the U.S. military-industrial complex and insuring we will continue to be the nation with the greatest stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. For these and other reasons too numerous to reveal, the President must be impeached. A HREF=""www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the
[CTRL] Impeach the President
-Caveat Lector- http://freedom.orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/impeach_president.htm Impeach the President High Crimes and Misdemeanors by T. E. Ruppenthal After painful consideration, I have decided it is time to bring out my Impeach the President placard, dust it off and display it yet again. It has been an oft-used sign, first waved during the LBJ regime and utilized for every president since. Now it is time to confront this latest in our long line of executive branch losers. I do not take my impeachment stand lightly and only after I am certain that the President is guilty of treason, bribery or other high crimes or misdemeanors as mentioned in Article 2, Section IV. I wait for egregious acts that can only be seen as invidious to our Constitution, the pissing all over that which he had solemnly sworn to uphold. I attempt a two-year wait before considering the impeachment step, to give each President time to develop wisdom, to learn from mistakes and become a thoughtful leader. I am such an optimistic idealist. I try to wait, but I usually fail as each President, upon entering office, begins a headlong retreat from the Constitutionâs sagacity and probity and begins treating it as a sworn enemy. Only Carter and Reagan made the two year mark which must mean I wasnât paying attention then. Nixon was Nixon, a blot upon our history; Ford barely had two years and started by pardoning Tricky Dick; George the First crossed the line with his invasion of Panama and with Clinton, I waved my placard before his inauguration since I sensed he was a total sleazebag. There are many reasons to call for Georgeâs impeachment, but one particular stands out as so disreputable that I cannot wait for his second anniversary. When, at a gathering of Fliberals (âFrisco liberals), I announced my call for impeachment, the Flibs agreed and excitedly gathered round me as if I had finally become one of them. When I asked them what were their grounds for impeachment, they had to think (which takes time for a Fliberal, if they can do it at all) until a Flib finally said, "Dubya stole the election." A second chimed in with, "Illegal actions in foreign affairs." "Heâs stifling dissent"and "Heâs incredibly stupid" were other responses. With little examination it became clear that their charges would not measure up to those cited by the Constitution, but then again Flibs have little interest in our Constitution. How long did the Samuel J. Tilden Democrats whine about their loss after 1876? Eight years at least and many, I am convinced, never ceased complaining. If I didnât so enjoy Fliberal whining (which they do so well), it could be grim times ahead. Their nonstop whine that Bush stole the election â Gore not only won the popular vote, but would have won Florida, and the electoral vote too, if the biased and politicized Supreme Court hadnât entered the fray. I have always found it odd that Fliberals proudly claim as their own all those Floridians too stupid to punch a hole in paper. Whine, whine, whine. Yes, Gore did win more votes than Bush but since he did not gain a majority of the ballots cast, he had no clear claim to victory at all. If Fliberals ever took the time to read the Constitution of the United States (and of Florida), they would realize how a disputed or muddled Presidential election was to be settled â by vote of the lower house of the legislature, in which Republicans held a slim but clear majority. Bush would have been selected. No theft. As to overstepping Constitutional limitations abroad and at home, George 2 has, but this is now routine for our Imperial Presidents, including Bill Clinton. If Fliberals wouldnât impeach Bill on these grounds, how can they now impeach Bush? Our Emperor Presidents must be free to kill and maim, bomb and threaten, arrest and jail anyone, anywhere, at any time, and any who dare to disagree or dissent must be distrusted. Once again G-2 has launched us into undeclared and therefore unconstitutional warfare. He had the civility to ask our supine and corrupt Congress for a blank check to cover any and all future actions, ever, but this is not what the Founders envisioned. Time to bring out my Impeach Congress sign too. Our Imperial Presidency has become so accepted that raising a cry for impeachment for overstepping Constitutional limits is met with bewilderment. "Americaâs not an empire," people of all political stripes inform me. End of discussion. And with Congress in cahoots, how could such an impeachment succeed? I would not call our President stupid, as it is such a vague and pejorative word. I prefer to think of him as positively obtuse and mentally phlegmatic â nearer the mark while showing a touch of respect for the once noble office he occupies. Yet, even if all agreed as to his stupidity, could it be construed as a high crime or misdemeanor? Couldnât being dense be viewed as a necessity in a truly representative government?
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Bastards
-Caveat Lector- At 04:02 PM 6/27/01 -0400, : William Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.kgw.com/kgwnews/story.html?StoryID=22078http://www.kgw.com/kg wnews/story.html?StoryID=22078 Eugene Attorney Tries to Impeach High Court June 26, 2001, 08:30 AM By AP Staff A former member of Congress launched a campaign to impeach the five conservative Supreme Court justices who voted to stop the presidential ballot recount in Florida last year -- but admits it's a long shot. Charles Porter, an 82-year-old attorney in Eugene, said the Supreme Court ruling was so clearly influenced by politics that under the Constitution there may be grounds to impeach the justices for bias. What an idiot. Democrats are so narcissistic and blinded by their own partisanship, that that cannot admit the possibility that anyone might have a legitimate alternative view. Get over it. Bush won. And he's spending the money that the Democrats WOULD have gotten to spend if Democrat election officials had succeeded in excluding military ballots and counting dimpled chads. DBC A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Impeach The Bastards
http://www.kgw.com/kgwnews/story.html?StoryID=22078 Eugene Attorney Tries to Impeach High Court June 26, 2001, 08:30 AM By AP Staff A former member of Congress launched a campaign to impeach the five conservative Supreme Court justices who voted to stop the presidential ballot recount in Florida last year -- but admits it's a long shot. Charles Porter, an 82-year-old attorney in Eugene, said the Supreme Court ruling was so clearly influenced by politics that under the Constitution there may be grounds to impeach the justices for bias. The 5-4 decision in December resulted in George W. Bush being named president-elect and his opponent Al Gore conceding the election. "They did wrong, they voted politically to stop the election," Porter said. "A lot of people out there think this would be a terrible precedent for the United States if the court could ... vote for political reasons," he said. At issue is a clause in the Constitution calling on judges to show "good behavior," Porter said. While this is not defined in the founding document, the American Bar Association says judges should avoid bias or even the "appearance of impropriety." "We say they tarnished the integrity of the U.S. Supreme Court," Porter said. Porter wrote a resolution seeking the removal of justices William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy. "A lot of people think the Supreme Court is all powerful. Well, they are if they're handing down decisions. But not if they're violating the Constitution," he said. Porter found some support over the weekend within the state Democratic Party. The chairman of the party's Executive Committee, Jim Edmunson, agreed Saturday to sponsor the proposal for a vote at the party's central committee meeting on July 22. If it passes, the state party could recommend other states pass similar resolutions. "The idea is to draw attention to the problem," Edmunson said. "We're treating this as something with legal merit. Whether it's politically feasible is another question." Congress, which must initiate the articles of impeachment, is now controlled by a majority of Republicans. More than 600 law professors around the country have signed a petition decrying the Supreme Court decision, and some have asked the Senate to refrain from ratifying any appointments to the court while President Bush is in office. About 14 law professors in Oregon have signed on, according to Steve Bender, a law professor at University of Oregon. Porter served two terms in Congress beginning in 1957. He later used his practice in Eugene to litigate over a 30-year period for the removal of a cross from public land in the city.
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Bastards
-Caveat Lector- He's 82. He probably has Alzheimer's. Forget him. He probably does not know where he is or where he is going. On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:02:00 EDT William Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A HREF=http://www.kgw.com/kgwnews/story.html?StoryID=22078;http://www.kgw .com/kgwnews/story.html?StoryID=22078/A Eugene Attorney Tries to Impeach High Court June 26, 2001, 08:30 AM By AP Staff A former member of Congress launched a campaign to impeach the five conservative Supreme Court justices who voted to stop the presidential ballot recount in Florida last year -- but admits it's a long shot. Charles Porter, an 82-year-old attorney in Eugene, said the Supreme Court ruling was so clearly influenced by politics that under the Constitution there may be grounds to impeach the justices for bias. The 5-4 decision in December resulted in George W. Bush being named president-elect and his opponent Al Gore conceding the election. They did wrong, they voted politically to stop the election, Porter said. A lot of people out there think this would be a terrible precedent for the United States if the court could ... vote for political reasons, he said. At issue is a clause in the Constitution calling on judges to show good behavior, Porter said. While this is not defined in the founding document, the American Bar Association says judges should avoid bias or even the appearance of impropriety. We say they tarnished the integrity of the U.S. Supreme Court, Porter said. Porter wrote a resolution seeking the removal of justices William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy. A lot of people think the Supreme Court is all powerful. Well, they are if they're handing down decisions. But not if they're violating the Constitution, he said. Porter found some support over the weekend within the state Democratic Party. The chairman of the party's Executive Committee, Jim Edmunson, agreed Saturday to sponsor the proposal for a vote at the party's central committee meeting on July 22. If it passes, the state party could recommend other states pass similar resolutions. The idea is to draw attention to the problem, Edmunson said. We're treating this as something with legal merit. Whether it's politically feasible is another question. Congress, which must initiate the articles of impeachment, is now controlled by a majority of Republicans. More than 600 law professors around the country have signed a petition decrying the Supreme Court decision, and some have asked the Senate to refrain from ratifying any appointments to the court while President Bush is in office. About 14 law professors in Oregon have signed on, according to Steve Bender, a law professor at University of Oregon. Porter served two terms in Congress beginning in 1957. He later used his practice in Eugene to litigate over a 30-year period for the removal of a cross from public land in the city. A HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/;www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html A HREF=http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html;Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/;ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] IMPEACH RENO NOW! ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS
http://www.judicialwatch.org/ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 12, 2000 Contact: Richard Tomkins (202) 646-5172 IMPEACH RENO NOW! ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS Burton's Statements About Criminal Referrals Not Likely To Come to Pass Under Even a Bush Administration, Since Family Has Shown No Desire To Challenge Clintons and Others On Ethics and Legal Issues (Washington, DC) If only it were true that once this Clinton-Gore Administration is over, the Republican Congress -- assuming it wins reelection, and that is a big "if " in the House of Representatives -- would make criminal referrals in the Chinagate scandal to new leadership at the U.S. Department of Justice. Indeed, Judicial Watch, which sparked the scandal with its case against the Clinton-Gore Commerce Department and the testimony of John Huang in October, 1996, has a vested interest, on behalf of the American people, in seeing to it that justice is done. Unfortunately, the statements of Chairman Dan Burton of the House Government Reform Committee on yesterday's morning talk shows were likely just more political posturing during an election season. This is true for a number of reasons. First, assuming George W. Bush wins the Presidency, a great assumption given the toss-up nature of the race, his history, both in this race and as Governor of Texas, has been to show little to no interest in pursuing government ethics and corruption issues through legal proceedings. Indeed, his stump speech is limited in this regard to putting his hand on the Bible and only promising that he won't do what Clinton did. If Mr. Bush lives by the scripture, his promise is unnecessary. Second, the Bush family has never shown an inclination in "going for the jugular," as perhaps they view themselves as part of the Establishment. Indeed, it was George Bush, Sr. who, over the last several years, has written letters in support of President Clinton -- most recently urging that his Secret Service detail not be interrogated over the Lewinsky scandal. Jeb Bush, who is Governor of Florida, could have his Attorney General investigate the illegal Clinton-Gore Chinagate money laundering which took place among Democrat fundraisers in South Florida, but he has never, and will never, do so. Indeed, both Bush brothers have been virtually silent on the illegal raid of the Miami relatives and neighbors' quarter of Little Havana. The Bush family is trained to not create controversy, as this could rock the apple cart and cause counter- investigations of their alleged picadillos. The Republicans have the power to take action now, rather than promising false criminal referrals in the future. They compose the majority in Congress, and they have always had the power to commence impeachment proceedings against Reno and her deputies for their obvious obstruction of justice. That the Republicans choose not to do so, and would rather make empty future promises, speaks to their electioneering and pandering to conservatives, libertarians, and others who are upset by their continuing impotence. "Actions speak louder than words, particularly after four years of doing virtually nothing but holding hearings for public consumption during election periods. Until the American people see impeachment proceedings for Janet Reno and her aides, the Republicans should simply stop making false promises intended only to deceive their supporters," stated Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman. ### -- Judicial Watch, Inc. 501 School Street, S.W.; Suite 725; Washington, D.C. 20024 Tel: (888) JW-ETHIC; Fax: (202) 646-5199 http://www.JudicialWatch.org - © 2000, Judicial Watch, Inc. ® All rights reserved. = Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Mike Spitzer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day. = A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
[CTRL] Impeach Reno Website
http://www.impeachreno.org Please go to following website to impeach Reno WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a prelude to war! **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Impeach Reno Website
In a message dated 5/7/00 8:32:58 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Please go to following website to impeach Reno A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] IMPEACH CLINTON AGAIN
-Caveat Lector- WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a prelude to war! MPEACH CLINTON AGAIN "Internet" UPDATE [from http://www.impeachclintonagain.org to over 177,421 subscribers] (web site project of the Clinton Investigative Commission (CIC) Contact: Stephen Miroy 703-379-9188 Washington, DC U.S.A October 27, 1999 CLINTON CRIME WATCH *HALLOWEEN HEARINGS TAKE PLACE ON CLINTON=92S ABUSE OF POWER On Capitol Hill, steps are finally being taken to curb one of Clinton=92s major abuses of power --- namely the hundreds of illegal executive orders he=92s issued since 1993. A House Judiciary subcommittee is holding hearings on Thursday (10/28) to discuss H.R. 2655, the Separation of Powers Restoration Act, sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX). The House Rules committee already held an original jurisdiction hearing Wednesday morning discussing the impact of Clinton=92s executive orders on the legislative process (http://www.house.gov/rules/rules_hear08.htm ). CIC=92s Jack Clayton is urging all supporters to contact their congressman at http://www.impeachclinton.org/impeach/contact.html and urge him to support H.R. 2655. =93Clinton still has more than a year in office to reek untold damage on the country with his middle-of-the-night Executive Orders. The time is long-overdue for Clinton to be held accountable for these abuses, and H.R. 2655 will help do just that,=94 says Clayton. *CLINTON TIED TO ASIAN PROSTITUTION RING CRIME SYNDICATE The media and Congress are still silent over Chinagate, which is probably the most serious and ongoing scandals of the Clinton White House. Many crimes that have been uncovered are well-documented by several authors and independent investigators, but some are not well-known by the American public. For example, in 1995 and 1996 at the invitation of Bill Clinton, Ng Lapseng, an Asian gangster who runs brothels in Macau, visited the White House 12 times and dished out over $300,000 in cash to help Clinton=92s re-election. Thai mobster Ted Sioeng, who kidnaps Asian women for Mr. Lapseng=92s brothels, has also funneled illegal cash to Clinton. Arms dealers Li Ka-Shing, Henry Fok and Wang Jun (members of Asian organized crime,=93the Triad=94), and heroin dealer Robert Kwok, all have had =93busin= ess=94 ties to the White House via the late Commerce Secretary Ron Brown and by Clinton pal Ernest Green (now under investigation). =93Clinton=92s links to this sordid cast of Asian criminals runs long and deep, and they need to be fully investigated by Congress,=94 states CIC=92s Scott Lauf. =93Just because Clinton is a lame-duck President is no excuse for Congress to allow Clinton to commit treason and not be punished.=94 CIC urges supporters to contact the following committee chairmen to give them the needed encouragement for a complete investigation: Sen. Fred Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Rep. Dan Burton (202-225-2276 or http://www.house.gov/writerep/) HILLARY CAMPAIGN WATCH *NY ELITE LAVISHES HILLARY W/ MILLION $$$ BROADWAY BASH Hillary raked in over $1 million from the wealthy NY liberal elite Monday night during her 52nd birthday party on Broadway. President Clinton was in attendance to boost her ego. But rather than fly together, Clinton chose to fly to New York separately on Air Force One --- thus wasting hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars just like Hillary. *DICK MORRIS PREDICTS HILLARY WILL NOT RUN FOR SENATE Contrary to conventional wisdom, CIC=92s previous updates have predicted that Hillary Clinton will not run for Senate, and may just run for President. Now, some of the so-called =93experts=94 are echoing CIC. In a current op-ed (10/26) in the New York Post, former Clinton strategist Dick Morris writes: =93Her donors would do well to remember=85that she can keep their money and spend it on any political purposes she wishes, in any state she wants. My bet is that she will take the money and not run [for Senate].=94 Morris cites some of the same reasons that CIC has been talking about for weeks. Keep telling the truth, dear CIC friends. *HILLARY GETS NO RESPECT While some NY media outlets have stopped all coverage of Hillary=92s non-official Senate campaign, corporate advertisers are starting to crank up their own coverage. Pizza Hut began airing ads during the World Series which mock Hillary as a carpetbagger and a phony Yankees fan. The ads are part of Pizza Hut=92s famous =93Big New Yorker=94 advertising campaign. If you=92ve seen the ad and like it, Pizza Hut is welcoming citizens to e-mail your comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *HILLARY ALREADY HAS PRIMARY CHALLENGER New York City doctor Mark McMahon has registered with the FEC as the first officially declared Democratic candidate for the NY Senate. Black activist Al Sharpton is still contemplating throwing his hat in the ring. There is no word yet on other possible candidates. Many CIC=20 issues are being brought up in public forums. Keep up the good
[CTRL] Impeach Klinton Again? Yup. Addr. at end of post.
among other revelations below, "Maria Hsia - a Taiwanese American immigrant who for a decade has raised money for Democratic causes - was "doing the bidding" of Beijing as a Chinese agent, a senior official said. As Woodward noted, Hsia has connections going back to 1988 with Clinton crony James Riady. Riady's Lippo Group has become in recent years pretty much a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese government. Maria Hsia worked closely with John Huang, who's suspicious DNC fund- raising first raised eyebrows a year ago. Hsia was co-chair with Huang of the April 1996 Buddhist Temple fundraiser where $140,000 in foreign money was laundered on its way to help with Clinton's re-election." = It is not included in the information further below, but the Lippo Group (heavily emroiled in the China-gate campaign finance crimes) is also a major economic beneficiary of Clinton's Coalgate scandal. (not about toothpaste or nuclear waste fluoride). --- Rep. Gibbons-Clinton Coal-Gate in Utah Lippo Group Donations Prompted Coal Lock-up in Utah House of Representatives - November 09, 1997) Mr. GIBBONS: "Madam Speaker, today I rise to inform my Members about Coalgate; no, not the toothpaste or the university, but another campaign scandal. In the heat of the 1996 campaign, President Clinton created the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah, which consisted of more than 1.7 million acres of land, an area larger than the State of Delaware. The White House claims this monument was needed to protect one of the most pristine areas in America. However, I would contend that 62 billion tons of low-sulfur coal reserve was the real reason for this designation. The Lippo Group, very large donors of the President's campaign, had a large financial stake in this monument, because clean Utah coal would have competed with the imported coal from Indonesia. It is a sad day when the President would deny schoolchildren in Utah the tax revenues of $1.5 billion in coal or the royalties, to protect foreign interests and promote his own self-serving ambition. Madam Speaker, the definition of greed has truly been revealed to the American people. They deserve the truth." Dave's comment-in-passing... It seems that the Clinton administration's tactics of producing so MANY scandalous actions one on the tail of the other is working to temporarily overwhelm any media, congressional, or other group's efforts to bring him to justice. This is perhaps a new spin on the technique of telling the big lie, and repeating a lie until it's accepted-- a sort of "outrage their sense of decency and ethics so often that they stop noticing criminal acts..." Dave Hartley http://www.Asheville-Computer.com http://www.ioa.com/~davehart -Original Message- From: Globalist Agendas E Dancy Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 7:53 PM Subject: [Fwd: History A Historical Portrait..] (fwd) Impeach Klinton Again? Yup. Addr. at end of post. From the Washington Weekly: BILL CLINTON'S ALGER HISS PROBLEM Bombshell Report Cites Suppressed Evidence of Communist Plot By Carl Limbacher OYSTER BAY--Fifty years ago, a young California Congressman became the first to take the allegations of Whittaker Chambers seriously. Chambers had alleged that top State Department aide Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy. Hiss's ensuing trial and conviction on perjury charges laid bare one of the great American political scandals of this century: The Communists had infiltrated the highest levels of our government and were secretly working to subvert it. The revelations permanently tarnished Franklin Roosevelt's legacy. To this day, many New Dealers refuse to accept the notion that the president who had led the country through Depression and World War could have been so easily duped by the man FDR referred to as "Uncle Joe" Stalin. But the deals Roosevelt cut with Stalin were followed inevitably by the descent of an Iron Curtain across Eastern Europe. In a legendary photo of the Yalta meeting between FDR, Stalin in Churchill, Alger Hiss can be seen hovering in the background. In what may turn out to be one of the great historical ironies of all time, the young California congressman who used Whittaker Chambers to expose Hiss was Richard Nixon, the future 37th president of the United States. Ironic because fifty years later history may be repeating itself for President Clinton, who, because of his own "Alger Hiss" problem, may face the same fate Nixon ultimately did. Now it's clear that the taint of Communist infiltration haunts the Clinton administration. Yes, it has thus far weathered a year's worth of media reports on its campaign finance scandal. And four months of Sen. Fred Thompson's investigation into same had seemed to fall short of the mark. But it
[CTRL] Impeach klintoon again [include algore this time]
-Caveat Lector- http://www.impeachclinton.org/mailbag.html Impeachclinton.org: Mailbag What Americans are saying about www.impeachclinton.org and our efforts to bring about impeachment... Post-impeachment Comment It's amazing. I think it, and you guys publish it! Your latest newsletter is a breath of fresh air. I have contacted Congressman Barr, and will continue to support his efforts, and yours, to cleanse the government of the vermin called [the] Clinton [Administration]. God bless you people. I sleep a little bit easier at night knowing you are on the case. For the sake of my country, and especially my young son, please keep the announcements and info coming. I really appreciate it all, more than you can possibly know!! Your constituent always, Eric-Scott Bloom Tempe, AZ Fan Mail Congratulations on an excellent impeachment Website. .. At best we seem to have a felony perjurer in the Oval Office, at worst, a traitor. -Michael Kreca San Diego, Calif. " I am a 56 year-old grandmother who is frightened for our country if Clinton is not brought to justice. I am Democrat who did not vote for Clinton because of Jennifer Flowers and Mr. Clinton's stand on Vietnam. ." Susan Reitman I was a Democrat for forty some years and because of the corruption of this White House, namely Clinton, I changed my affixations to Republican in Clinton's first term of office. I don't know where they are getting their polls from it sure isn't from this part of New Mexico. To make a deal with Clinton is like making a deal with the any criminal such as a murder, an embezzler or any other law breaker. - I. Dictson This is the best Website I have ever come across. - Nathan Pearson I heard about this site from Tom Fintton, "Morning View", NET. This is great! I've been trying to find a "list" of all the offenses that Clinton is guilty of, and this is the place. - Nancy Spanial Your web site is fantastic. I agree with you 100% that Slick Willie should go! He is a disgrace to the country. I find it hard to believe that with his sexual problems, his lies etc. that people are still rating him high. - Theodore R. York Picked up your home page from a link on the London Telegraph. I find it interesting that sometimes that better, more balanced news of this whole sordid affair is being reported in Europe. - Jay Goode, Plano, Texas I am S very glad to find this!!! I sent it to all my friends and family! I signed the petition along with my husband. We are So Very Thankful for this movement. - Robin Kuritz I think what you are doing is right and just! As a 20 year Veteran of the US military, I think the Presidency has been compromised and the American public has been led astray into thinking the President has done nothing wrong. You can be assured that I will do my part to make your web page public to as many as possible. Thanks for a job well done!. - Mikel D. Krause, USN, Ret I am hoping the petitions and this committee is/are the silver bullets needed to dispatch the target. Please continue your efforts until the nation is rid of the scrooge now inhabiting the White House. Thank you. - Allison Buehre Thank you for your response, I visit your site frequently thank you for your work. It is obvious that the current president is a grave threat to national security. -Michael Parks Best wishes from, , Orange County (Florida). It is not just my imagination - there is a real grass roots political movement forming up. Let us know if we can help! -David G. Barron I support you guys 1000%. Clinton is a 1st class creep and a Tax Baron. He belongs in Prison not the White House. - John Evangelisti, Sacramento, CA I am a student at St. George's School in Newport, RI. My school is holding a debate on the topic of whether to or to not impeach President Clinton. I have been appointed to the side to argue that he should be immediately. I found your web page and found it very useful. - Paul Schmid, Newport, RI I was glad to find your website. Since the mainstream news-media (TV networks, newspapers, even tabloids!) is in BED with their golden boy, Clinton, it's difficult to find any news that hasn't been diluted or given a pro-Clinton slant. - Paul Mica I'm beginning to feel like the only sober person in a roomful of roaring drunks oblivious to their surroundings--how can this blatant liar garner a 79% approval rating? - John Borgman "Thank you so much for
Re: [CTRL] impeach this
-Caveat Lector- you sure got me there. who bitch-slapped you into such a sorry lather? you sound as though you are very obedient to something really weird. speaking of panty waste you should check the pound cake in your own panties before you start pointing fingers at anyone else. you and your friend stokes are a lot alike but i will only tell you how later like after. DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] impeach this
-Caveat Lector- Hi thereyou just getting in? It is 3:51 a.m., and I am just going to bed. Hope you had a nice evening, and good night. Guess you read your mail? Colleen I have been working on a story all evening, and I am ready to drop. DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] impeach this
-Caveat Lector- * It's Over The impeachment has ended. The results are now known. The will of the Congress Has clearly been shown. So let's all get together, Let the bitterness pass. I'll hug your elephant And you kiss my ass. DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] impeach this
-Caveat Lector- *It's true The impeachment has ceased but the brown-nosing has just begun for all the Democrats are on their knees ready and willing to *serve* Clinton Jamieson DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] impeach this
-Caveat Lector- Oh E-Mael, you be switty, How's this- E- Mael can't rhyme for jack\ He thinks himself a genius/ But, when mommy and daddy be's away/ (S)he acts like a penis Well, I like itthink it "exposes" you for what you are... a punk-ass kid, who's ill- formed (and spelled) opinions, expose you for what you really are... a bantamweight (115) trying to fight in the heavyweight division,...Oh putz-punk...one punch..., that's really all I need... Bill Shannon DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Impeach Clinton Again
-Caveat Lector- A HREF="http://www.impeachclinton.org/impeach/petitiono.html" Impeachclinton.org: Online Petition to Impeach William Jefferson Clinton Again /A http://www.impeachclinton.org/impeach/petitiono.html DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Rapist
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 99-02-26 20:53:41 EST, Mike moxley write: "It doesn't rise to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor," we heard repeated on every talking head show night after night, week after week. Well, how about rape? Does that rise to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor, Barney Frank? What ever will be next? A good point made on another list (name withheld): "I hear from the wingnuts all the time how the president screwed around, then lied to his spouse, then lied under oath about it, so therefore, we shouldn't believe a word he says. Here's a chick who was screwing around, lied to her husband, then lied under oath about it, but of course she's credible as hell, isn't she?" It is food for thought, isn't it? Samantha DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Rapist
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 2/27/99 4:51:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "I hear from the wingnuts all the time how the president screwed around, then lied to his spouse, then lied under oath about it, so therefore, we shouldn't believe a word he says. Here's a chick who was screwing around, lied to her husband, then lied under oath about it, but of course she's credible as hell, isn't she?" It is food for thought, isn't it? Samantha Yes, Samantha. Isn't it a hoot? And she's older than Clinton (which kind of precludes the deluded virgin theory too). Prudy DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Rapist
-Caveat Lector- What this has achieved is that it now allows all those rightwing loonies to follow Clinton around the country, screaming "Impeach the Rapist." Something a year of Monica Lewinsky failed to achieve. They can take your car if you appear to be Driving Under the Influence. You may be proven innocent--but that won't get you your car back. You can be accused of raping someone two decades ago. You may be proven innocent--but that won't get you your reputation back. That's the kind of country we've become. I'm writing for them to get Clinton for the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey. On 27 Feb 99, , Prudence wrote: -Caveat Lector- In a message dated 2/27/99 4:51:51 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "I hear from the wingnuts all the time how the president screwed around, then lied to his spouse, then lied under oath about it, so therefore, we shouldn't believe a word he says. Here's a chick who was screwing around, lied to her husband, then lied under oath about it, but of course she's credible as hell, isn't she?" It is food for thought, isn't it? Samantha Yes, Samantha. Isn't it a hoot? And she's older than Clinton (which kind of precludes the deluded virgin theory too). Prudy sno0wl DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Impeach The Rapist
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 2/27/99 1:29:14 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We are speechless. Thank God! You've repeated yourselves so many times. Prudy DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] Impeach The Rapist
-Caveat Lector- Impeach The Rapist By Joseph Farah © 1999 Western Journalism Center Interesting, isn't it, that not one member of Congress has come forward to call for the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton for moral turpitude in light of the accusations of Juanita Broaddrick? So, let the chorus begin here: It's way past time to throw this bum out of office. He's a disgrace to his office. He's a detriment to his country. And he's an embarrassment to the human race. I believe Juanita. And, I would dare say, 95 percent of Americans in their heart of hearts do as well. There's just no reason not to find her credible. In a he-said-she-said contest, Clinton's got to lose. He's played all his cards. He's denied the undeniable one-too-many times. It's time to recall the arguments against impeachment and conviction the last time around. "It's about consensual sex," we heard over and over again ad nauseum. Well, folks, this isn't. This is about force, about coercion, about violence, about rape. "It doesn't rise to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor," we heard repeated on every talking head show night after night, week after week. Well, how about rape? Does that rise to the level of a high crime or misdemeanor, Barney Frank? It's time to put on trial those clowns who stood by their man despite overwhelming evidence of perjury and obstruction of justice. What are they going to say about Juanita Broaddrick? That the statute of limitations has run out? What's a little rape between friends? I'd love to hear the rationalizations this time. But, of course, there's no sign we will ever hear any explanations from Clinton's chorus in Congress or from the commander-in-cheat himself. There's only one thing that can force them to defend the indefensible -- a spontaneous uprising by the American people. They've got to say it loud and say it clear: We've had enough. It's time for abuser-in-chief to go. I don't care about "political realities." I don't care that it may be impossible to get 67 votes in the Senate if this guy murdered a saint on live television. I don't care that another impeachment case would be a distraction. Let me tell you about realpolitick. The Congress of the United States and the court of public opinion are the only avenues left for justice -- for Juanita Broaddrick and for the rest of America. America cannot tolerate a rapist in the White House. And Bill Clinton is not denying Juanita Broaddrick's charges. He won't even acknowledge them. He sends his lawyers out to make parsed denials. He's betting that Americans have so lost their moral bearings that they won't demand accountability. If feminists and the religious right can't get together on this one, they will never agree on anything again. If this doesn't bridge the gender gap, it's unbridgeable. If Clinton gets away with this one, add another felony to the list of offenses -- perjury, abuse of power and now rape -- that have been effectively decriminalized by Clinton's blind partisan supporters. There is no middle ground on this one. If you believe Juanita Broaddrick, then you have to act to remove Clinton. Rape cannot be tolerated. We cannot be apathetic about sexual predators in high office. On the other hand, for those true believers who continue to stand by their man, why are you not demanding that Clinton explain himself, tell where he was at the time of the alleged attack, present his alibis, clear the air? When was the last time you heard of a man accused of rape issuing a "no comment"? Put yourself in that position: If you were unjustly accused of such a heinous crime, how would you react? Would you casually dismiss questions when the entire country is talking about it? Does that sound logical? Remember how Clinton reacted so angrily and publicly about the far less serious charge of adultery with Monica Lewinsky. "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky," he exhorted emphatically. Of course, it was a lie. But he behaved in a reasonable way for a man pretending to be falsely accused. Let's at least demand to see another show, another lie. We deserve that much. Or maybe we don't. Maybe America is getting just what it deserves in Bill Clinton. Maybe he's our curse, our judgment, for not being able to determine the difference between right and wrong. -- "If we and our posterity reject religious instruction and authority, violate the rules of eternal justice, trifle with the injunctions of morality, and recklessly destroy the political constitution which holds us together, no man can tell how sudden a catastrophe may overwhelm us, that shall bury all our glory in profound obscurity." -Daniel Webster ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Patriot Resource Center: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6627/ **Live Free or Die!** DECLARATION DISCLAIMER ==
