Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-26 Thread Bill Howard
How is the corporation tied to the VP? His assets are in a blind trust.
On Mar 25, 2004, at 8:48 PM, Joshua Tinnin wrote:

-Caveat Lector-


What if the corporation in question is tied to the vice president,.



Published on Monday, March 22, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Company With Ties To VP Cheney's Energy Task Force Faces Criminal Indictment
For Gaming California Electricity Market
by Jason Leopold

Three years ago, while California's energy crisis was spiraling out of
control, Vice President Dick Cheney secretly met with half-dozen corporate
executives of the country's largest energy companies to hammer out a
national energy policy for President George W. Bush.

Cheney appeared on a number of news programs in May 2001 to promote his new
energy policy, which turned out to be a boon for the energy industries, but
abandoned consumers and environmental groups. Naturally, during some of
those interviews, Cheney was asked whether a handful of the energy companies
that sold electricity in California and stood to benefit financially from
the new policy were behaving like a cartel and manipulating prices in the
state's deregulated electricity market.

No, Cheney said in a May 17, 2001 interview with PBS' Frontline; a day
after the final energy policy report was released. The problem you had in
California was caused by a combination of things--an unwise regulatory
scheme, because they didn't really deregulate. Now they're trapped from
unwise regulatory schemes, plus not having addressed the supply side of the
issue. They've obviously created major problems for themselves...
This is quite true. The California government did a very bad job of deregulating the electricity industry and it came back to bite them. This is one of the many stated reasons Gray Davis was turned out of office.

California is not a child who must be bailed out of bad situations everytime they get into a mess. California is a sovereign state which should be able to handle it's own affairs. In this case it didn't and it paid a very high price for doing shoddy work.

It is true that FERC has not been much help to California in this crisis. I'm sure that if we dig deep into the pile we will find that Haliburton is behind the mess.

Bill H
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/>ctrl/A>

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om




[CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Prudy L
-Caveat Lector-

You've read about all theseterrorists --- most of them came here legally, but they hung around onexpired visas, some for as long as 10 - 15 years. Now, compare that toBlockbuster: you are two days late with a video and those people are allover you. Let's put Blockbuster in charge of immigration!
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Bill Howard
Great idea! The private sector is always superior to a government run agency.
Bill  H.
On Mar 25, 2004, at 4:59 AM, Prudy L wrote:

x-tad-bigger Now, compare that to/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerBlockbuster: you are two days late with a video and those people are all/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger /x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerover you/x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger./x-tad-bigger

Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Eric Hoffsten

Great idea! The private sector is always superior to a government run agency.
Bill  H.
On Mar 25, 2004, at 4:59 AM, Prudy L wrote:

 Now, compare that to Blockbuster: you are two days late with a video and those people are all over you.




Hmmm... Except when it comes to utilities like water and electricity, right?  And health care.  And airport security.

Oh, and pretty much anyplace else where citizens aren't going to benefit by having those supposedly acting in their best interest instead serving shareholders and fattening the corporation's bottom line.  Sheesh.

There IS a place for government, y'know.  That place is just not in my bedroom, on my television, listening to my telephone calls, etc...

--eh 

Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Bill Howard
-Caveat Lector-

Ask the farmers in southern Oregon about the federal government
controlling water. The farmers were almost put out of business by the
government refusing to give them water for their crops. The government
said it needed the water to save an endangered species of salmon. It
turns out that someone had given the salmon in that river a new name
and then declared them to be endangered. Thats our tax dollars at work.
Electricity. Both the feds and state do a wonderful job or regulating
that. Just look at how the California State Government let its citizens
get ripped off a couple of years ago.
And health care. Just look at how the governments of the UK and Canada
have handled that! People from these countries go abroad to receive
medical care. If they waited for their names to come up on the lists,
there is a good chance they would be dead by then. Doctors in Canada
tell their seriously ill patients that if you have the money go to the
states and get yourself taken care of.
How many sky-jackings did airport security stop before 9-11. None that
I know of.
How many sky-jackings has airport security stopped since 9-11. None
that I know of.
A very intelligent woman once said that the business of the government
was to protect the borders and deliver the mail. She was correct. We
need to get back to a part time government.
Bill H
On Mar 25, 2004, at 11:04 AM, Eric Hoffsten wrote:
Hmmm... Except when it comes to utilities like water and electricity,
right?  And health care.  And airport security.
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om


Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Eric Hoffsten
-Caveat Lector-

Electricity. Both the feds and state do a wonderful job or regulating
that. Just look at how the California State Government let its citizens
get ripped off a couple of years ago.

Wait...  So you're saying it's not Enron's fault for being greedy
criminals, but the *government's* fault for *letting* them?

I think you'd be hard-pressed to find ANY instance of the private sector
delivering better electrical service at a better price than ANY
municipally-held utility.  Across the board.

Sorry, but corporate control = crappy service  higher prices.  It's about
money, m'friend, not delivering what's needed.

--eh

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Bill Howard
-Caveat Lector-

On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:53 PM, Eric Hoffsten wrote:

-Caveat Lector-

I won't say that Enron was greedy, Enron was just flat out criminal.
In the Los Angeles area of California the DWP which is municipally-
held utility is being investigated for over charging their customers
during the California electricity problem.
A corporation that provides crappy service usually does not stay in
business. The customer may get burned by them once, but they learn and
take their business elsewhere.
Money in our society is a necessity. It can buy just about everything
with the exception of poverty.
Bill H
Wait...  So you're saying it's not Enron's fault for being greedy
criminals, but the *government's* fault for *letting* them?
I think you'd be hard-pressed to find ANY instance of the private
sector
delivering better electrical service at a better price than ANY
municipally-held utility.  Across the board.
Sorry, but corporate control = crappy service  higher prices.  It's
about
money, m'friend, not delivering what's needed.
--eh

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These
are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different
groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
===
=
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A
===
=
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om


Re: [CTRL] Great Idea

2004-03-25 Thread Joshua Tinnin
-Caveat Lector-

On Thursday, 25 March 2004 4:05 PM -0800,
Bill Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 On Mar 25, 2004, at 1:53 PM, Eric Hoffsten wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-
 
   I won't say that Enron was greedy, Enron was just flat out criminal.

 In the Los Angeles area of California the DWP which is municipally-
 held utility is being investigated for over charging their customers
 during the California electricity problem.

 A corporation that provides crappy service usually does not stay in
 business. The customer may get burned by them once, but they learn and
 take their business elsewhere.

What if the corporation in question is tied to the vice president, and what
if the regulatory agency in the government (FERC) refuses to take action?
Yes, Bush said the free market would take care of the problem. It didn't,
and it forced PGE into bankruptcy and the state into being a credit risk
and insolvency. Now there are indictments (see below). It will be
interesting to see if Cheney is called to the stand, but somehow I doubt
that will happen.

- jt

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0322-11.htm

Published on Monday, March 22, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Company With Ties To VP Cheney's Energy Task Force Faces Criminal Indictment
For Gaming California Electricity Market
by Jason Leopold

Three years ago, while California's energy crisis was spiraling out of
control, Vice President Dick Cheney secretly met with half-dozen corporate
executives of the country's largest energy companies to hammer out a
national energy policy for President George W. Bush.

Cheney appeared on a number of news programs in May 2001 to promote his new
energy policy, which turned out to be a boon for the energy industries, but
abandoned consumers and environmental groups. Naturally, during some of
those interviews, Cheney was asked whether a handful of the energy companies
that sold electricity in California and stood to benefit financially from
the new policy were behaving like a cartel and manipulating prices in the
state's deregulated electricity market.

No, Cheney said in a May 17, 2001 interview with PBS' Frontline; a day
after the final energy policy report was released. The problem you had in
California was caused by a combination of things--an unwise regulatory
scheme, because they didn't really deregulate. Now they're trapped from
unwise regulatory schemes, plus not having addressed the supply side of the
issue. They've obviously created major problems for themselves...

California's electricity crisis wreaked havoc on millions of people in the
state between 2000 and 2001, resulted in four days of rolling blackouts and
forced the state's largest utility, Pacific Gas  Electric, into bankruptcy.
California was the first state in the nation to deregulate its power market
in an effort to provide consumers with cheaper electricity and the
opportunity to choose their own power company. The results have since proved
disastrous. The experiment has cost the state more than $30 billion.

For three years, California officials pleaded with federal energy
regulators, President Bush and Vice President Cheney, to provide the state
with some relief from soaring wholesale electricity prices and to
investigate many of the energy companies that sold power to California for
allegedly manipulating the market.

Former Governor Gray Davis met with Bush a couple of weeks before Cheney's
Frontline interview and asked for federal assistance, such as price caps,
but Bush refused saying the free-market would sort out the mess.

But Cheney's denials that his friends in the energy sector weren't to blame
for the power crisis are sure to come back and haunt him and could hamper
President Bush's reelection campaign. Later this month, the United States
Attorney's office in the Northern District of California is expected to
issue its first criminal indictment against an energy company for
manipulating wholesale energy prices in California that could boost the
state's claims that it's owed billions in refunds for overcharges. The
company at the center of the probe is Houston-based Reliant Resources, Inc.

Reliant said in a news release March 8 that it was notified by the US
Attorney's office about the pending indictment, which stems from allegations
that the company deliberately shut down its power plants in California for a
few days in June 2000, creating an artificial shortage and causing wholesale
prices to skyrocket.

A spokesman for the US Attorney's office said he could not comment on
pending cases, but he confirmed that his office is also seeking criminal
indictments against several current and former Reliant employees whom he
would not name. A Reliant spokesman said the actions that are the subject
of the United States Attorney's investigation were not in violation of laws,
tariffs or regulations in effect at the time and intends vigorously to
contest any charges.

The evidence the US Attorney's office will use against Reliant is a 

[CTRL] Interesting idea to take political power away from big money

2002-11-03 Thread thew
Title: Interesting idea to take political power away from big money
-Caveat Lector-





Definitely debatable idea. Fascinating to see if it works.


http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/cleanelections.html



-- 
He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my

contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the

spinal cord would fully suffice. This disgrace to civilization should be

done away with at once. Heroism at command, senseless brutality, deplorable

love-of-country stance, how violently I hate all this, how despicable and

ignoble war is; I would rather be torn to shreds than be a part of so base

an action! It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is

nothing but an act of murder.

-- Albert Einstein




A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Xmas Idea For Religious Zealots, Fanatics

2000-11-20 Thread William Shannon
Order West Nile Virus Online!
by Robert Lederman© 2000

[visit  http://Baltech.org/lederman/spray/ for the real West Nile Virus story]

Below is the website address ( http://www.atcc.org/ ) and two pages from the ATTC (American Type Culture Collection) homepage. The second page of info [it starts about halfway through this email] is for ordering West Nile Virus (WNV).

ATTC sold Sadamm Hussein West Nile Virus and 70 other bio-warfare applicable chemicals, bacteria and viruses before the Gulf War started and its director was the former head of Rockefeller University-which may be implicated in the original
WNV epidemic in Uganda in 1937 [See Newsday excerpt and Rockefeller University article excerpt below]. Note: I am not suggesting (as a planted CIA disinformation piece in the media last year attempted to do) that Iraq was responsible for the
NYC West Nile "epidemic" nor am I suggesting that ATTC or any of its employees were responsible. I am suggesting that WNV could have been accidentally or deliberately released into the NYC environment by any of the individuals, government agencies or bio-medical institutions that have ordered it from ATTC over the past decades. The mechanism could have been as "innocent" as experimental waste materials from a NYC research facility being carelessly disposed of.

The ease of ordering this and related materials (you can order just about any toxic virus or bacteria you've ever read about from this website) makes it clear that the CDC's stated theories that WNV came into this country "in a used tire from Asia" or via "a mosquito that might have been inside an airborne Israeli tourist's clothing" or by "mosquitoes carried here in a transatlantic storm" is about as believable as the idea that we've just had an honest election. ANYONE with a couple of hundred bucks can start their own "West Nile Virus epidemic" on their kitchen table. The only screening process is to sign a form accepting responsibility. This site is worth exploring in
depth. It has references to mycoplasmas and numerous other dangerous living substances used in biowarfare that can be ordered by anyone with a credit card.



[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: Self-Service Job Placement

1999-11-09 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
Date sent:  Tue, 9 Nov 1999 11:18:10 -0500
Send reply to:  LIST RESPECT
From:   DLC News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Idea of the Week: Self-Service Job Placement
To: Multiple recipients of list NEWDEMNEWS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The DLC Update Monday, November 8, 1999
*
Discuss the Idea of the Week at the DLC Idea Exchange at
http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm
*
***Idea of the Week: Self-Service Job Placement***

You're out of a job, or you want a new job. The usual process
is to buy enough newspapers to stock the local recycling
center; pursue informal contacts; kill a few trees by mailing
out resumes; maybe even consult your local Labor
Department office, if only to make sure you can collect
unemployment or access other public services.
 But in Indiana, it all comes together in one place.  The
state's Department of Workforce Development, led by
Commissioner Craig Hartzer, has 31 full-time centers where
you can log onto a computer (with help if you need it), list
your personal characteristics, needs and skills, and
immediately find out (1) which employers in your area might
need your services; (2) what public benefits you might qualify
for, from unemployment insurance to skills training; and (3)
where you can get more help. They call it CS3--the Customer
Self-Service System.
 This is a classic "one-stop job center," a long-time
goal of New Democrats, and one that Congress and the
Administration have heartily endorsed.  But Indiana has taken
one-stops to a new level by making its services and
information available electronically in a "self-service"
environment linked to genuinely fresh job leads, and enabling
the citizen to identify his or her needs by skill-set, not by job-
title.  CS3 recently received an "Innovation in State
Government" award from the National Association of
Counties.
 To keep the job leads fresh, Indiana already makes it
possible for employers to submit information via its web
page.  By the end of the year, any citizen will be able to
access the whole system--the job-matching service, the
information on state services, the capability to file
applications for assistance--from any computer with Internet
access, for free.  That means Hoosiers can, if they wish, log
onto a home or work computer and enter into an interactive
dialogue with potential employers, state or private job
placement service providers, and their state government,
about their employment futures.
 This initiative reflects a whole host of New Democrat
policy objectives: empowering citizens with information;
using technology to bring public services close to the
"customer;" creating public-private partnerships for the public
benefit; promoting life-long skills learning; matching skills
with opportunities on an ongoing basis; and crafting a
seamless "employment system" for everyone, whether they
are a former welfare recipient, a displaced worker, or simply
someone wanting more opportunity.
 CS3 is one of Gov. Frank O'Bannon's top priorities,
and will well equip Indiana to succeed in implementing the
federal Workforce Investment Act, which gives states the
power to design not only one-stop employment centers, but a
system to empower workers with full array of public and
private job services.
 Any state can do this, and every state should.  It
extends to all citizens the sort of user-friendly, skills-specific,
cutting-edge job matching technology that several private-
sector companies already offer to a more limited audience.
Anything less is second-class service.

***A Good Day for New Democrats***

Thanks to proximity, the Washington punditry's interpretation
of last week's off-year state elections was heavily over-
influenced by the hype surrounding the GOP's lavishly
financed pickup of three seats and a narrow majority in the
Virginia House of Delegates.  But looking around the country,
Election Day '99 was a good day for New Democrats.
 New Democrat Martin O'Malley consolidated his
upset primary victory by winning 90 percent of the vote to
become Baltimore's new mayor.
 Two New Democrats won mayor's races in cities
where Democrats almost never, ever win.  In Columbus,
Ohio, longtime DLCer Michael Coleman became the first
African-American mayor, and the first Democratic mayor in
nearly three decades.  In Indianapolis, Bart Peterson, a former
chief-of-staff to then-Governor Evan Bayh, became the first
Democratic mayor in 32 years, after a textbook New
Democrat campaign stressing community policing and fiscal
discipline.  Both won by double-digit margins.
 One of the more intriguing municipal elections
occurred in New York City, where New Democrat Eva
Moskowitz, a career educator with a 

[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: Canning Spam

1999-11-01 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---

The DLC Update Monday, November 1, 1999
*
Discuss the Idea of the Week at the DLC Idea Exchange at
http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm
*

***Idea of the Week: Canning "Spam"***

No, we are not talking about the tasty luncheon meat called
Spam, but rather the annoying unsolicited commercial e-
mail called "spam" that is popping up more and more
frequently on millions of home computers.  It's time to put
it back in the can.
 Spam needs to be controlled because its
proliferation is a major threat to wider use of the Internet.
The intrusive nature of unsolicited commercial e-mail feeds
recipients' worst fears about electronic threats to their
personal privacy and security online.  Because "spammers"
typically get e-mail addresses by buying them or otherwise
leeching them from voluntary online transactions, spam
undermines consumer confidence in the medium and
inhibits the growth of legitimate e-commerce.  And since
participants in newsgroups, online forums, and other
interactive uses are most vulnerable to becoming targets for
spam, it's beginning to have a chilling effect on the Internet
as an important civic space.
 Defenders of spam often suggest it's no different
than the unsolicited commercial "junk mail" that clogs the
postal system: annoying no doubt, but easy to dispose of
and essentially harmless.  But spam really is different
because recipients and Internet service providers (ISPs) pay
the freight in transaction, communications and storage
costs.  Estimates vary on the total price tag for that cost
shifting, but it has been pegged as high as 10 percent of
Internet service provider's overhead costs--and that gets
passed on in consumers' monthly bills.  Without question,
spam is getting bigger and badder.  America Online, the
largest online service provider, estimates that fully one-
third of the e-mail messages coming into its networks from
the Internet are spam.  That's between 10 million and 24
million chunks of spam per day, just on AOL.
 Spam is a menace to the digital economy.  It clearly
warrants federal legislation (several states have enacted
anti-spam laws, but limits on state jurisdiction over out-of-
state spammers make that a clumsy and potentially
confusing and burdensome approach).  The legislation,
however, must be carefully crafted in order to be hard on
spam--that is, unsolicited commercial email--ithout
interfering in the legitimate practices of businesses using
email to build stronger relationships with existing
customers.  For example, when someone visits a Web site
and indicates interest in receiving further information or
updates, any email that business then sends to that
individual is not spam, because it is not unsolicited.
Legislation should also rely heavily on consumer
empowerment with information rather than bureaucratic
oversight and provide simple remedies for fraud and abuse.
Congress can and should set a national standard, but most
of the many pending bills tend to over- or under-shoot the
mark.  In a new Progressive Policy Institute report, How to
Can Spam: Legislative Solutions to the Problem of
Unsolicited Commercial Email, Randolph Court and
Robert Atkinson lay out a reasonable solution:
 Require all commercial email to include an "opt-
out" mechanism allowing recipients to easily remove
themselves from senders' email address lists and avoid
unwanted future mailings.

1.  Require unsolicited commercial email to include
standard identifying labels in the subject line (such as
"ADV," indicating the message is an advertisement), so
recipients can use filtering software to sort it efficiently.

2.  Enumerate rights of action for ISPs to sue those who
violate their posted policies against unsolicited commercial
email (UCE), and rights of action for states to sue on behalf
of citizens harmed by UCE.
3.  Require commercial email to contain accurate technical
information (such as the controlling data that indicates its
point of origin and routing information) in the message
"header."

 Concurrently, the Administration should work with
other countries and appropriate international bodies to craft
consistent standards addressing the problem of spam.
 The Internet can remain a free and vibrant medium
of communications--personal, political, or commercial--
without resembling a Wild West community where the bad
guys discourage the good guys from ever coming to town.
Canning spam is an important place to start.

***Over the Top Over the WTO***

We've already taken notice of some of the zanier groups
planning protests (see "Bad Company in Seattle," in the
September 27, 1999, DLC Update) for Seattle during the
World Trade Organization's ministerial summit next
month.  But a review of some of the literature being
circulated to advertise 

Re: [CTRL] no idea

1999-10-14 Thread Dave

 -Caveat Lector-

Condolences

Unless family requested immediate cremation, I'd say that this is evidence
of cover-up.  Who gave them PERMISSION? "Too much damage to repair" sounds
like pretty much a crock, also. Before surgery, they're SUPPOSED to have
done various tests, and have a pretty good indication of success.
Sounds like your friend traded in a few years (or more) of life in favor of
trusting the medical industry, while they all made bucks off the
insurance...  who'll no doubt be paying the doctor who finally killed her...
ghouls...

A very sorry business


Dave Hartley
http://www.Asheville-Computer.com
http://www.ioa.com/~davehart


-Original Message-
From: Trudy  Paul Schuett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 3:47 AM
To: NCF list
Subject: no idea


Guess I won't be going to PHX after all...My buddy Doris, who was
scheduled for triple bypass and cartoid artery surgery this AM,croaked
on the table. The word I'm getting from her neighbor and purveyor of all
news from PHX is: 'there was too much damage to repair; she wouldn't
have lived more than six months anyway.'

Her body was cremated within hours of death; I thought this was odd, but
considering the distance from home(150 miles) maybe OK. Our mutual
friend Sandy, the cardiac nurse says this is at the very least pretty
damn screwy.

Doris was fine, if not quite comfortable until her 65th b-day, when she
saw an osteopath who sent her on a merry-go-round of tests. She had a
hip problem; she coudln't walk well or long. In addition to prescribing
arch supports,this guy discovered a blocked cartoid artery, and then it
was on to the myriad of other dudes, each with their own speciality who
discovered yet another thing wrong. (As a retired federal employee 10yrs
ago, she already had good insurance long before Medicare) she had no
apparent symptoms of heart dysfunction.

The really weird thing is that she started out with no faith in
allopathic medicine. She'd become a level 1 Reiki practitioner, and had
actually cured some people. She was much better than I am. IMHO  She was
looking into herbs and other therapies for her own condition, as
diagnosed by the MDs. Sandy had urged her to get other opinons when
surgery started to be discussed. Doris never did it, for reasons we
can't yet determine. The only thing we (Sandy and I) can determine is
maybe MDs are such good salesmen you can't tell them no. We'll probably
never know.

All we know for certain at this moment is that our buddy walked into a
doc's office on 8/15, and now she's dead. There's no way of discovering
the cause.

I started an e-mail to Tangerine on this one--maybe in the morning I'll
finish it.



T

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: Third Way CAFE

1999-10-04 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
Date sent:  Mon, 4 Oct 1999 10:36:18 -0400

The DLC Update Monday, October 4, 1999
*
Discuss the Idea of the Week at the DLC Idea Exchange at
http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm
*
***Idea of the Week: Third Way CAFE***

Back during the energy crisis of the 1970s, Congress directed the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to tell Detroit and foreign
automakers doing business in the United States to make their cars more
fuel efficient. The idea was to get gas guzzlers off the road and cut U.S.
demand for foreign oil. Neither objective has been met.

The EPA developed the standards of 27.5 miles per gallon (mpg) for cars
and 20.6 mpg for light trucks. They called them "corporate average fuel
economy standards" or CAFE, because the standards were averaged over an
automaker's entire fleet.

Unfortunately, the CAFE standards are not working as they were intended,
in part because of the recent American craze for Sports Utility Vehicles
(SUVs) and pick-up trucks, both subject to the lower 20.6 mpg standard,
and both producing more pollution than regular cars.

Another flaw with CAFE is that standards are averaged over too many types
and models of cars with very different costs of increasing fuel
efficiency. A manufacturer of many big and some small cars could have a
hard time achieving the standard, but a maker of only small cars wouldn't
have any problem at all, even if the former produced a more fuel efficient
small car than the latter. The standard wouldn't necessarily encourage
either manufacturer to build a more fuel-efficient small car.

There are two simple ways to fix CAFE.  The first is to abandon the "A" in
CAFE, throwing out fleet averages and setting standards by specific
classes of vehicles.  But an even more important reform would be to
institute tradable "credits" for fuel efficiency, similar to the tradable
emissions allowances that helped reduce acid rain. Makers of more fuel
efficient vehicles could sell credits to competitors who couldn't make the
grade.  All manufacturers would have a continuous economic incentive to
innovate and improve fuel efficiency.

Taking the "A" for average out of CAFE, and instituting tradable fuel
efficiency credits, represent a Third Way on CAFE that could help get
Congress out of a current gridlock on this subject, as reflected in last
week's close Senate vote against lifting a congressional ban on tougher
standards.   With OPEC back in the price-fixing business for oil and with
the roads clogged with SUVs and light trucks, it's time to act, but in a
way that gives carmakers credit for their willingness to make a better
buggy.

***A Third Way Toward Universal Health Coverage***

Three weeks ago, Vice President Al Gore announced a plan to regain the
lost momentum toward universal access to health insurance, based on a dual
strategy of rewarding states for implementation of the Child Health
Insurance Program (CHIP), and a refundable tax credit to help adults buy
health insurance in private markets.

This week, Gore's challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination,
former Senator Bill Bradley, announced his long-awaited plan for universal
health coverage, which actually replaces both Medicaid and CHIP with a
system of premium subsidies and tax credits for the purchase of private
health insurance by the poor and the uninsured.

It's striking that both candidates have embraced the central element of
health care reform that the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI) has
promoted for years: universal private health insurance bought through
purchasing alliances with government subsidizing premiums through the tax
system for those in need. Both candidates have also decisively broken with
the old liberal alternatives of expanding government-provided or
-controlled health coverage, or creating a Canadian-style nationalized
insurance system.

Gore deserves extra credit for proposing an incremental plan that could
actually be adopted in the near future without endangering fiscal
discipline.  Bradley deserves extra credit for embracing PPI's
longstanding proposal to let uninsured individuals buy into the Federal
Employee Health Benefit Plan (FEHBP) the best current model for a health
system in which insurers compete for business on the basis of both cost
and quality--and for his willingness to get rid of the bureaucratic
structure of programs like Medicaid and CHIP.

Both candidates have essentially adopted a New Democrat approach to
universal health coverage. And both offer an implicit challenge to
Republican front-runner George W. Bush, who has said nothing on the
subject, and whose own state of Texas has been slow to take advantage of
existing federal incentives to cover uninsured children.

If this is an example of the policy debate that 

[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: A New Bargain for Public Schools

1999-09-29 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
Date sent:  Mon, 27 Sep 1999 16:48:52 -0400
Send reply to:  LIST RESPECT
From:   Web Master [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Idea of the Week: A New Bargain for Public Schools
To: Multiple recipients of list NEWDEMNEWS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The DLC Update Monday, September 27, 1999
*
Discuss the Idea of the Week at the DLC Idea Exchange at
http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm
*
***Idea of the Week: A New Bargain for Public Schools***

Most federal aid to education has been traditionally based
on an old bargain that no longer works: Washington offers
money to states and school districts based on need, and then
micro-manage how it is used, with little or no attention to
what it produces in the way of educational results.  While it
has done much good to offset the financial inequities
inherent in schools due to widely varying local revenue
bases, it has also rewarded failure as often as success.  That
is why the disparities in education levels between poor and
middle- or upper-class Americans--that justified federal aid
to education to begin with--are getting worse, not better, at
precisely the time when education and skills loom larger
than ever as a factor determining individual opportunity.

This year's reauthorization of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act (ESEA)--the primary vehicle for
federal aid--offers Congress the chance to reinvent federal
education policy for the Information Age.  In addition, there
is finally a legislative package on the horizon that would
accomplish the kind of dramatic shift in strategies the
country needs: DLC Chairman Sen. Joe Lieberman's (D-
CT) Public Education, Reinvestment, Reinvention, and
Reinvigoration Act

Lieberman's "Three R's" bill (along with a House
counterpart that Rep. Harold Ford (D-TN) intends to offer)
is based in large part on the Progressive Policy Institute's
report, Toward Performance-Based Federal Education
Funding, by Andrew Rotherham, President Clinton's
Special Assistant for Education Policy.  In some respects, it
is a more sweeping variation on the Clinton
Administration's proposal to link federal education aid to
accountability for educational results.  It also draws on
bipartisan proposals from the Governors to provide greater
flexibility in administering federal education funds by
consolidating a variety of programs.  More fundamentally,
it redefines the federal role in education and offers states
and poor school districts a new bargain: strong federal
support and broad administrative flexibility in exchange for
a commitment to reform, innovation, and the achievement
of measurable results in closing the gap between good and
bad public schools.
Lieberman's "Three R's" plan would:

--Reconfigure the Title I compensatory education program
for disadvantaged students by increasing the targeting of
funds to the poorest schools, requiring steady progress
toward the goal of ensuring math and reading proficiency
for all children, demanding radical action to improve or
close poor-performing schools, and raising overall funding
by more than 50 percent.

--Consolidate teacher training programs into one grant
focused on raising the quality of teaching as well as the
quantity of qualified teachers, with strict performance
standards.

--Streamline bilingual education programs while making it
clear the goal of bilingual instruction is to achieve student
proficiency in reading, writing, and speaking English.

--Strengthen federal efforts to provide parental choice
among public schools, including universal--information on
school, student and teacher performance, school safety,
access to technology, and physical conditions; while
encouraging more performance-based "charter" schools.
Consolidate all other K-12 programs into a single fund that
would encourage innovation and --experimentation on a
broad array of educational challenges.

--Introduce a regime of accountability throughout all
federal education programs that would reward success and
punish failure according to simple performance measures.

In effect, Lieberman's bill combines the best ideas for
improving public school performance from every direction.
But it does not endorse the dubious logic of Republican
schemes that demand accountability without standards for
public schools, and no accountability at all for private
schools receiving public funds.

If lawmakers in both parties believe half of what they say
about the critical importance of improved education in an
Information Age global economy, they should get behind
Lieberman's bill as an urgent priority.

***Bad Company in Seattle***

The AFL-CIO recently announced it intends to send 15,000
members to Seattle at the end of November to participate 

Re: [CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: The Software Solution For The

1999-09-22 Thread Bill

 -Caveat Lector-

These people have no idea what "Fair" taxation is
about...they have shown us that already...if they get in
they will never stop...they will be the mob on the
internet...perhaps the lessening of budgets is good...if
every body carried  weaponry there would be a LOT less
crime, and policing wasn't a thing until after the civil war
and the consolidation of power by what was to become the
Federal Reserve...if such a huge percentage of the taxation
today wasn't wasted in pork we could do with about 25% of
what they are taking now and lessen it even further through
efficiency in another decade...the controllers understand
economic strife as whip though, and utilize it to its
fullest through glamour media, copyrighted law,  and
fearb

Alamaine Ratliff wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 --- Forwarded Message Follows ---

 The DLC Update Tuesday, September 21, 1999
 *
 In this Update: * Idea of the Week: The "Software Solution" for the
 Internet Sales Tax * Under the Budgetary Big Top * Gore On Universal
 Health Care

 New Democrat Idea Exchange:
 Discuss the Idea of the Week and see what other New Dems
 are saying at  http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm .
 New comments are posted weekly.
 *
 ***Idea of the Week: The "Software Solution" For The Internet Sales Tax***


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: The Software Solution For The

1999-09-21 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---

The DLC Update Tuesday, September 21, 1999
*
In this Update: * Idea of the Week: The "Software Solution" for the
Internet Sales Tax * Under the Budgetary Big Top * Gore On Universal
Health Care

New Democrat Idea Exchange:
Discuss the Idea of the Week and see what other New Dems
are saying at  http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm .
New comments are posted weekly.
*
***Idea of the Week: The "Software Solution" For The Internet Sales Tax***

The current growth and future explosion of "e-commerce"
(electronic sales of goods and services via
the Internet) is a critical element in the development of
the New Economy.  E-commerce gives consumers
greater choice and more competitive prices. It will help
produce a breakthrough in the number of Americans
who find it useful to go online, and have enormous
implications for the "digitization" of daily life.

But e-commerce is also threatening to reduce state and
local tax revenues, creating a dilemma for
policymakers. On the one hand, state and local
regulation of e-commerce--and even more, regulation of
Internet access--could inhibit the development of the
digital economy.  On the other hand, the migration of
sales from face-to-face transactions to remote media--
including not only e-commerce but telephone and
 mail-order sales--is eroding the revenue base that finances
public schools, policing, infrastructure for economic
development, and other critical services.

Recognizing this problem, Congress last year enacted
the Internet Tax Freedom Act, which imposed a
moratorium on taxation of e-commerce until 2001, and
established a commission to make recommendations on
its future development.  The commission met this past
week in New York and amidst a flurry of activity on
both sides agreed to solicit tax proposals from state tax
officials and other groups.  But the heated deliberations
are in danger of degenerating into a dialogue of the deaf
between those who fear sales taxes will kill e-commerce,
and those who fear e-commerce will kill state and local
governments.

Fortunately, as Rob Atkinson and Randolph Court
explain in the new PPI paper released last week,
"Internet Taxation, A Software Solution," (available at
http://www.dlcppi.org/texts/tech/internettax.htm) there is a "third way"
available: the development and dissemination of computer software that can
make fair taxation of the Internet and other remote sales easy and
efficient.

The software, which should be available for free
downloading by retailers, would immediately identify
tax rates by the address of the buyer, and would
electronically remit sales taxes owed to the proper
jurisdiction, at the click of a mouse.  If publicly
promoted--i.e., by the Federation of Tax Administrators
--this software would become available
almost instantly.  Furthermore, it could be offered to
catalog and phone-sale retailers who are also currently
outside the normal pattern of sales taxation.

This last point reinforces the need for Congressional
action to make taxation of all remote sales fair and
rational.  Under current law, states and localities can tax
mail-order or phone sales only if the seller has retail
outlets within their jurisdiction, on the theory that the
"point of sale" is the seller's location, however remote.
"Virtual sales" on the Internet are making this "point of
sale" doctrine increasingly archaic, and unfair.  It's time
to shift to a system where the "point of sale" is the
buyer's location, not the seller's, no matter how the sale
is conducted, by Internet, phone, mail or in person.  The
"software solution" makes that shift possible.
Some libertarians oppose this approach on grounds that
e-commerce creates a tax-free paradise. They are happy,
not worried, that a shift toward virtual points-of-sale
will make it impossible for states and localities to tax
transactions.  A recent letter from a group of
Congressional Republicans to the commission on
e-commerce taxation  essentially adopts this posture, on
grounds that making it easier to tax electronic sales
represents a "tax increase."

This argument is disingenuous at best. Maintaining the
ability to tax commercial transactions wherever they
occur hardly represents a "tax increase."  And
celebrating the erosion of a major state and local
revenue source only makes sense if you are willing to
identify alternative sources, or specifically recommend
radical spending decreases.  Conservative opponents of
taxing of remote sales are not willing to do either.

Let technology create a level playing field for all sales
and make commerce more convenient and efficient for
sellers and buyers alike.

***Under the Budgetary Big Top***

Under Republican Congressional stewardship, federal
budgeting is beginning to resemble a three-ring circus.

*  In 

Re: [CTRL] The Idea in America

1999-07-17 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

 -Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 07/17/1999 1:59:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Vaszonyi's book, 'America's 30 Years War', is intended to warn citizens of
 this nation about the critical danger he sees to America's continued
 existence as a free society.

 "For the past thirty years," writes Vaszonyi, "all aspects of our lives --
 and all of our institutions -- have been moving in one direction away from
 America's founding principles  And every time we move away from
 America's founding principles, we move in the direction of the sole
 realistic alternative" -- totalitarian socialism, or what Vaszonyi refers to
 as "The Idea." 

I hope Mr. Vaszonyi has information in his book about how we can stop it.  I
think most of us who have any time to think know that America is becoming
what amounts to a tightly controlled feudal society, but no matter what we do
to get back our freedom, Congress is right there to subvert us.  They aren't
alone.  The States' governing bodies are even more efficient than Congress in
these matters.  We all know we're sliding into vicious repression.  Figure
out how to put on the brakes.  Prudy

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] The Idea in America

1999-07-17 Thread Bill

 -Caveat Lector-

the environmental movement are far more effective [at
promoting The Idea]
than any political party

When you consider the trashing of America by elite
industrialists whose "Idea" is to enslave the mass
economically your labeling of environmentalism does not
washfar more insidious are the machinators of a fiat
currency and benefit-based colorable money where PROFIT IS
ALL.  I certainly don't need any outside influences to show
me or coerce me into believing that the elite have defecated
where we eatits in my face man...its all around...I
think you (The Author) are right on with your allusion to
big education though, it is a lesson in ineffectuality,
marketing slickness, and programming.   A clean Earth is
even more profitable than a dirty Earth, but its not as
EASY, and above all the ignorant and greedy sluts who have
run things to date are lazy and only after the easy meat.
The last thing we need, to enforce a clean environment, is
more government...we need a mass awakening.  As a follower
of Non-Semitic Primitive Religious Thought I can honestly
say that the greedy and lazy pigs who run us like a slave
force now CAN'T SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES.
Natural Vision
By Bill Gallagher
6/27/98 0138LThonotosassaFL33592

  The word Canvas is derived from the word cannabis.  Please
allow me to elucidate:
 Canvas,  noun,  F. canevas,  LL canabacius, hempen
cloth,  L cannabis hempa strong cloth made of hemp.
Websters 1902.
 Now think about that for a moment.  Canvas.  That means
rope, bags,  sails,  paper,  shoes,  flags,  tents;  even
the very first blue jeans were canvas for crying out loud!
I'm sure there were plenty of other things too.  I can't
even imagine it, because I was not there, and because this
material has been Outlawed here in America throughout the
whole of my natural born life.
 The forces behind hemps illegality were Wood-Pulp
Paper, and Petroleum Plastics.  Big Paper attacked hemp
throughout the 1920's and 30's because a decorticator (Fibre
Separator) had been developed and patented in 1917 by George
W. Schlicten, and by the 20's it was beginning to make
wood-pulp paper unprofitable.  Petroleum interests colluded
with paper interests because people like Henry Ford and
Edison and Others were inventing ways to make some very good
plastics and even combustible fuels from hemp.
   So in a hush-hush, rush-rush kind of legislation, on
a hot summer night in 1937, hemp was effectively blacklisted
and banned, made illegal.  There was no public outcry over
this because prohibition sentiment ran strong during this
time period, especially concerning alcohol, and this
sentiment had been given a real shot in the arm from a media
financed by Big Paper, and Petroleum interests.  A well
planned and executed disinformation campaign portrayed the
flower of hemp, marijuana, as evil.  The Hearst papers were
singularly guilty as they yellowed the world with stories of
black jazz musicians smoking the evil marijuana, then raping
white women.  They were expert at fanning the fires of
racism, and this is the main reason behind much of the
racial strife in this country, to this day.  Ill founded
notions are the literal foundation of society here, notions
based on malicious lies for the profit of a few elite
industrial operators.  The truth is this:  marijuana, the
flower of mountain grown hemp, is a natural pharmacological
agent, as is aspirin and numerous other curatives, and has
been known among doctors and healers throughout the world
for its psychoactive and medicinal properties for well over
three thousand years.  The smearing of the hemp flower
ensured Big Papers lock on the profitability of its huge
virgin forest holdings in the west, and opened the door for
Petroleum Plastics monopolys.
  Truly the beginning of a New World Order, based not on
hard work, enlightment, and innovation, but, rather, on
special interest manipulations, subterfuge, and outright
lies.
  Since then we have seen gargantuan chunks of
manufacturing become controlled by petroleum plastics, and
Moved OUT of America.  It has made manufacturing quick and
easy and cheap.  And shoddy too.  The death of Americas
awareness concerning the quality and origin of its consumer
goods is inexcusable, because it pertains directly to the
survival of our freedom.  We are less free now than during
any other time in our history, and its not getting any
better.  Our power as a people has been destroyed.
 By disallowing hemp as a resource we have trashed the
environment with petroleum insecticides, shut off all
alternatives to cleaner fuels for our motorized society,
removed a major pain medication from the sick and injured,
thereby actually CREATING pain, and we have all but given
away the primest farmland in America.   But there is hope,
and there are still warriors here, and though the burden is
large, three generations worth at least, the quest for
liberty and fairness has 

[CTRL] The Idea in America

1999-07-16 Thread Bard

 -Caveat Lector-

Source:  The New American, July 19, 1999, page 17


"The Idea" in America

Hungarian expatriate Balint Vaszonyi, a renowned concert pianist and
political philosopher, had first-hand experience of life under totalitarian
socialism of both the Communist and National Socialist varieties.

Much to his dismay, Vaszonyi sees America descending into the same abyss.

Vaszonyi's book, 'America's 30 Years War', is intended to warn citizens of
this nation about the critical danger he sees to America's continued
existence as a free society.

"For the past thirty years," writes Vaszonyi, "all aspects of our lives --
and all of our institutions -- have been moving in one direction away from
America's founding principles  And every time we move away from
America's founding principles, we move in the direction of the sole
realistic alternative" -- totalitarian socialism, or what Vaszonyi refers to
as "The Idea."

"The Idea... has gone through countless transformations and as many
versions," continues Vaszonyi.  "It has been 'Bolshevism' in Russia,
'Fascism' in Italy, 'National Socialism' in Germany, 'Democratic Socialism'
in Sweden, and the 'Long March' and 'Cultural Revolution' in China.

But as The Idea circled the globe, it kept finding America standing in the
way.

America, the impenetrable target, was on the other side."

However, as the century closes, "The Idea has been successfully installed in
America's schools, as well as in most of the information and entertainment
media.

Academia, Hollywood, the news media, the National Education Association, and
the environmental movement are far more effective [at promoting The Idea]
than any political party.

And, as high school textbooks, college courses, television newscasts, or
national newspapers attest, the purpose is the 'transformation' of America"

--- William Norman Grigg


---


The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism.
But, under the name of 'liberalism', they will adopt every
fragment of the socialist program, until one day America
will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.
--- Norman Thomas,
U.S. Socialist Presidential candidate


Bard

Visit me at:
The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government
http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm

Federal Government defined:
a benefit/subsidy protection racket!

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] (Fwd) Idea of the Week: T-Visas

1999-01-17 Thread Alamaine Ratliff

 -Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
Date sent:  Fri, 19 Nov 1999 15:44:59 -0500

The DLC Update Friday, November 19, 1999
*
Discuss the Idea of the Week at the DLC Idea Exchange at
http://www.dlc.org/idea/discussion.htm
*

***Idea of the Week: T-Visas***

There are currently an estimated 346,000 American job
vacancies for computer programmers, systems analysts, and
computer scientists or engineers.  These core information
technology occupations are central to the New Economy, and
to the productivity gains and economic growth it is driving.
Yet every year many thousands of foreign students earn
advanced degrees from U.S. universities in fields related to
these occupations and then go home because their student
visas run out.
 Under current law, the only visa you can get for
skilled work in the United States is the H-1B visa, available
not just to high-tech professionals but to a wide variety of
skilled occupations, including pastry chefs, physical
therapists, and even fashion models.  These visas are capped
at levels well below the demand from U.S. employers.  Last
year, Congress temporarily raised the H-1B cap after urgent
requests from technology companies, and also made a small
down payment on building up the skills of American citizens
by endowing regional skills alliances and other training
efforts.
  Now New Democrat Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and
Sen. Chuck Robb (D-VA) have introduced bills to address the
tech-shortage issue more systematically. Lofgren's BRAIN
Act (HR 2687), and Robb's HITEC Act (S 1645), would
create a "T-Visa"--a new category separate from the models
and the pastry chefs, aimed at temporarily recruiting highly
paid and skilled tech professionals trained at U.S. universities.

 Under both bills, T-Visas would be available only to
graduates in science and engineering programs filling jobs
paying more than $60,000.  Most ingeniously, the bills would
require that employers hiring T-Visa holders pay a fee of
$1,000 per year, with the proceeds used to fund science and
technology training efforts for U.S. citizens from kindergarten
through high school.  Both bills would sunset the T-Visa
system in five years, so that Congress could then determine if
U.S. citizens are able to fill more of the demand for critical
technology skills.
 Robb's bill limits T-Visas to those holding graduate
degrees--where dependence on foreign students is especially
high--and would use the "challenge grant" approach of
regional training alliances (RSAs) to distribute the fees, with
the federal government partnering with industry and
educational institutions in training efforts. (For more on
RSAs, see the Idea of the Week from February 6, 1998, at
http://www.dlcppi.org/fax/1998/980206.htm.)
 The T-Visa is an excellent plan for "lifting the cap" of
immigration restrictions on critical professions, while "filling
the gap" of skilled Americans. Lofgren and Robb's bills
should be high on Congress' agenda next year.

***Deal of the Decade***

Last week, U.S. trade officials announced the culmination of
13 years of negotiations to open China to U.S. goods,
services, and investment.  In a deal to secure U.S. support for
China's accession to the World Trade Organization, China
made a wide variety of concessions on tariffs, non-tariff trade
barriers, distribution rights, foreign investment, financial and
insurance services, and "transparency" and monitoring of its
commercial behavior.  The United States made no
concessions, other than agreeing to continue on a permanent
basis our current policy of offering China Normal Trade
Relations.  It's good news for the businesses, farmers, and
workers who will begin to benefit from new markets almost
immediately, and even better news for those interested in
bringing this emerging superpower into a rules-based system
of trade.
 That is why we are concerned at signs that a variety of
forces on the left and right are indicating they will pressure
Congress to kill the deal of the decade by voting down NTR
next year. Some opponents think the United States should
refuse to do business with China unless it halts its human
rights abuses and essentially changes its political system.
Others want to isolate China as a potential threat to U.S.
security interests in the Pacific.  We are especially
disappointed that the AFL-CIO issued a strident statement
denouncing the deal as an act of submission to China and a
betrayal of the Clinton Administration's policy of making
workers' rights a subject of discussion in the WTO.
 It's pretty hard to see how a deal in which the other
side makes all the concessions represents submission. It's also
hard to identify a better strategy for encouraging civilized
behavior by China than to bring it into the circle of civilized
nations, where