Bug#594768: Should xconq be removed?

2010-08-30 Thread David Nusinow

On 08/29/2010 05:52 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote:

Package: xconq
Version: 7.4.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid squeeze

xconq seems dead upstream, and requires an obsolete Tcl/Tk version, so it seems
a good candidate for removal.

If you don't think so, please close this bug report, otherwise I'll convert it
into a
removal request in a couple of weeks.
   


Yes, please do convert it into a removal. I'd been hoping to package a 
gtk version that was started, but that's long dead upstream as well. 
It's sad to see such a great old piece of software get removed, but it's 
no longer a fit program for distribution in Debian. Thanks for your work!


 - David




-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
   APT prefers unstable
   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages xconq depends on:
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libx11-6  2:1.3.3-3  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6  2:1.1.2-1  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxmu6   2:1.0.5-1  X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt61:1.0.7-1  X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  tcl8.38.3.5-14   Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii  tk8.3 8.3.5-15   Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 -
ii  xconq-common  7.4.1-4.1  Common files for Xconq

xconq recommends no packages.

xconq suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


   





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#544902: libdrm2 : /dev/dri not created

2009-09-03 Thread David Nusinow

reassign  544902 fglrx-driver
thanks

Matt Olson wrote:

Package:  libdrm2
Version  :  2.4.12-1

O.S.   : Debian Testing
Kernel : 2.6.30-1-amd64

After upgrading libdrm2 from version 2.3.1-2 to version 2.4.12-1, udev 
does not create /dev/dri.


I am using ATI's Catalyst 9.8 driver for linux AMD64  (which gets loaded).

(II) LoadModule: fglrx
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
(II) Module fglrx: vendor=FireGL - ATI Technologies Inc.
compiled for 7.1.0, module version = 8.64.3
Module class: X.Org Video Driver

The dri module also loads :

 Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri.so
(II) Module dri: vendor=X.Org Foundation
compiled for 7.1.0, module version = 1.0.0
ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 0.3
(II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI

Reverting to libdrm2 2.3.1-2 fixes the problem.

Thank you,

  Matt Olson


We can't support closed-source drivers. Reassigning to the right package.

- David Nusinow




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#544969: dh_clean: Manpage clarification

2009-09-03 Thread David Nusinow
Package: debhelper
Version: 7.4.0
Severity: minor

The dh_prep manpage description section doesn't really specify where it
should be used in the rules file. Specifically, it says that acts to
prepare for building a package. This could be interpreted as being prior
to building the software, and thus should be run in the configure target,
or prior to building the deb, in which case it belongs in the install
target. Clarifying this would be helpful.

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages debhelper depends on:
ii  binutils  2.19.51.20090827-1 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii  dpkg-dev  1.15.3.1   Debian package development tools
ii  file  5.03-1 Determines file type using magic
ii  html2text 1.3.2a-14  advanced HTML to text converter
ii  man-db2.5.6-1on-line manual pager
ii  perl  5.10.0-25  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  perl-base 5.10.0-25  minimal Perl system
ii  po-debconf1.0.16 tool for managing templates file t

debhelper recommends no packages.

Versions of packages debhelper suggests:
ii  dh-make   0.48   tool that converts source archives

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#492888: [xserver-xorg-input-kbd] Can confirm this bug

2009-08-19 Thread David Nusinow

severity 492888 important
thanks

Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:

severity 492888 grave
thanks
Package: xserver-xorg-input-kbd
Version: 1:1.3.1-1

I can confirm this bug. It is really a boring bug. dmesg is empty, log also. 
How can I debug this bug ?
  


Are you saying that the /var/log/Xorg.0.log is entirely empty? Or that 
there's nothing interesting? We'd like it if it has any text at all in 
it, as well as an xorg.conf if you have one.


Also what would be helpful is for you to get an X server backtrace if 
you have another machine you can use to ssh in to the crashed one. 
Instructions are here: http://wiki.debian.org/XStrikeForce/XserverDebugging.


Raise importance to grave because it completly render keyboard unusable after 
random time, and destroy completly my X session. Only mouse work, and I need 
to disconnect using mouse.
  


This is not a grave bug. Please don't inflate bug severities.

- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#531295: libx11-6: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture'

2009-08-19 Thread David Nusinow

fixed 531295 2:1.2.2-1
thanks

Kurt Roeckx wrote:

Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.2.1-1

Hi,

I'm seeing this:
Unpacking libx11-6 (from .../libx11-6_2%3a1.2.1-1_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please use 
'--print-architecture' instead.

I'm seeing this in almost every build log, and sbuild is sending
me a separate mail with those warnings.  So I would like it that
that this gets fixed soon.
  


This was fixed with the xsfbs merge in the last upload. Thanks for 
reporting it.


- David Nusinow


Kurt




  





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#527920: please break circular dependency

2009-05-09 Thread David Nusinow

Holger Levsen wrote:
I'd be nice if you'd either given the number or even better, merged yourself. 
But thats bts-usage nitpicking and hardly worth saying :-)


What's worth saying is, that you didnt give a reason for 396613 being marked 
wontfix here and that there is none in 396613. You dont even give a reason 
why there is this circular dependency which causes real problems for existing 
tools.


Can you please explain?!
  


Because these two packages do actually depend on each other to function. 
That's a hard dependency and there's no way around it. Ian Jackson has 
argued strenuously that circular dependencies are not a bad thing, and 
that dpkg handles them fine, and I'm in agreement with him. That said, 
the reason why xserver-xorg was split from xserver-xorg-core was to 
separate the very large and rapidly changing server config scripts from 
the server itself, allowing us to make rapid improvements to them with 
minimal stress to ourselves and our users. Now that those scripts are 
essentially gone, it's time to start thinking earnestly about reuniting 
them as xserver-xorg, and letting -core go away. This is *not* the same 
thing as removing the circular dependency, which is necessary and 
correct so long as these two packages exist despite whatever buggy tools.


- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#524340: Reproducible GUI lockups

2009-04-16 Thread David Nusinow

Hi Ray,

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:

(==) intel(0): Using EXA for acceleration
  
Could you try upgrading to kernel 2.6.29 and seeing if that helps? This 
should enable UXA rather than EXA by default, which has been reported to 
fix issues for some people, particularly with this new version.


- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#524340: Reproducible GUI lockups

2009-04-16 Thread David Nusinow
Sorry, in my last mail I forgot to mention that you have to enable KMS. 
You should be able to do that by adding

i915.modeset=1 on the kernel command line.

- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#524340: Reproducible GUI lockups

2009-04-16 Thread David Nusinow

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:

Hello David,

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:40:14 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
  

J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:


(==) intel(0): Using EXA for acceleration
  
  

Could you try upgrading to kernel 2.6.29 and seeing if that helps?



Actually, this was with 2.6.29.1 already. I'm building from source, with
CONFIG_DRM_I915=m
CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS=y
  


Ok, great!


On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:14:27 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
  
Sorry, in my last mail I forgot to mention that you have to enable KMS.  
You should be able to do that by adding

i915.modeset=1 on the kernel command line.



This doesn't seem to work:
# dmesg | grep 915
	Command line: root=/dev/mapper/Debsys-Root ro i915.modeset=1 
	Kernel command line: root=/dev/mapper/Debsys-Root ro i915.modeset=1 
	Unknown boot option `i915.modeset=1': ignoring

[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 on minor 0

# egrep -i '(uxa|exa)' /var/log/Xorg.log
(==) intel(0): Using EXA for acceleration
(II) intel(0): Using exact sizes for initial modes
(II) Loading sub module exa
(II) LoadModule: exa
(II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libexa.so
(II) Module exa: vendor=X.Org Foundation
(WW) intel(0): DRI2 requires UXA
(II) EXA(0): Offscreen pixmap area of 41287680 bytes
(II) EXA(0): Driver registered support for the following operations:
(II) intel(0): 0x0d8a-0x0fff: exa offscreen (40320 kB)
  
That's a surprise. Could you try forcing UXA by adding 'option 
AccelMethod uxa' to the device section of your xorg.conf?


- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#513545: same problem

2009-04-15 Thread David Nusinow

Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:

Hi,

I just upgraded to the new xserver in unstable and I have the same problem. 
Tapping and scrolling doesn't work.


r...@champaran:~$ dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
ii  xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 1.1.0-1  
Synaptics TouchPad driver for X.Org server



This bug report has 2 workarounds mentioned.

One is about modifying the config file. I think that would not be recommended as 
X is supposed to move to a default config less setup.


How about the 2nd one ? The hal fdi ?
Should that be packaged ?

How will this bug be fixed ?

  
X is only supposed to move to a setup without config by default. If you 
need to customize it, as by enabling tapping, editing xorg.conf is a 
perfectly acceptable way to do it. If there wasn't supposed to be 
support for xorg.conf, we would have ripped out the code to handle it a 
long time ago. There isn't really a bug to be fixed here, just a changed 
default that people will have to configure by one method or another.


- David Nusinow




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#515214: Bug#523960: equivs is surely not the solution to this problem. Recommends: is.

2009-04-15 Thread David Nusinow

Axel Beckert wrote:

I really can't understand how someone can suggest to fake packages
using equivs instead of using the Recommends: header as it's
thought.

The Policy says in 7.2 very clearly in all but unusual
installations, so nobody can't use users who just want it work as
argument. Debian's default is btw. to install recommended packages
anyway. Another reason why users who just want it work are _no_
argument against using Recommends: header.
  
Thank you so much for repeating exactly what other people have said. 
Given that the XSF must be collectively illterate,  we didn't understand 
them the first dozen or so emails stating this, so the above was clearly 
necessary.



X.org not only runs on fat workstations but also on embedded device
where you as less abstraction layers and diskspace used as possible.
Debian always claims to be the _universal_ operating system and it
should also package X.org to be universal. Debian is not (a desktop
focussed) Ubuntu.
  
Note that this is the direction that upstream is heading in. The design 
is conceptually quite simple. The X server asks the system, in this case 
via hal, to enumerate input devices are present and gets them enumerated 
back. It then utilizes that hardware via the kernel rather than driving 
them itself with its own drivers. Note that this system was designed and 
implemented by a Nokia employee for an embedded system. It brings an 
enormous simplification to the overall operating system by putting 
things like keymaps in one place, and only having the kernel driving the 
hardware rather than both the kernel and the X server. It also makes it 
flexible with system changes, allowing hotplugging. Most importantly to 
Debian and the XSF, it means that we don't have to carry around a 
gigantic horrible bunch of shell script just to configure the system. 
All of this is a good thing.


If you object to having the X server depend on external software, you're 
going to have to learn to like it, because the goal has been to decrease 
the amount of OS code that the server needs to duplicate in order to do 
its job. It no longer scans the PCI bus itself, but instead relies on 
libpciaccess to query the OS. It no longer carries its own build system, 
but relies on autotools. All of the video drivers are moving significant 
portions of themselves in to the kernel as well. If you can't deal with 
hal, then you'll have to write a replacement for it that allows the 
server to query the system in a transparent way, and also allows one to 
easily configure device-specific properties. This is something that hal 
currently does very well and the X server can not do otherwise.


All of that said, it's very likely that we will downgrade the depends to 
recommends, just not right now. We have actual important bugs like 
totally broken installs that we want to deal with first.



I herewith vote for demoting hal (#515214) and console-setup (#523960)
to recommends.
  

The BTS is not a voting system.

- David Nusinow



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#497523: NEWS?

2009-04-12 Thread David Nusinow
Brice Goglin wrote:
 David actually wrote a NEWS entry about this yesterday:

 http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics.git;a=commitdiff;h=598ae3fe8592f80e97f58a1c54822754dcd5378e
 
 If anybody knows how to enable tapping at runtime with hal or xinput, we
 can add it as well.

Additionally, if people who actually have and use synaptics could check
the example in that entry and confirm that it works, I'd very much
appreciate it.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#497523: NEWS?

2009-04-12 Thread David Nusinow
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
 Hi!
 
 On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 9:42 AM, David Nusinow dnusi...@debian.org wrote:
 Brice Goglin wrote:
 David actually wrote a NEWS entry about this yesterday:

 http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics.git;a=commitdiff;h=598ae3fe8592f80e97f58a1c54822754dcd5378e

 If anybody knows how to enable tapping at runtime with hal or xinput, we
 can add it as well.
 Additionally, if people who actually have and use synaptics could check
 the example in that entry and confirm that it works, I'd very much
 appreciate it.
 
 Using
 
 Option TouchpadOff 2
 
 didn't work here.
 
 I had to use this however:
 
 Option  TapButton11
 Option  TapButton22
 Option  TapButton33
 
 If there is something that I can do to help (sending logs, etc),
 please, just ask.
 
 Thank you!

This is perfect, I've just updated the NEWS entry accordingly. Thank you!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#523834: RFP: naev -- 2d action/rpg space game

2009-04-12 Thread David Nusinow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: naev
  Version : 0.3.8
  Upstream Author : Numerous. See AUTHORS in their tarball
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/naev/
* License : GPL v3
  Programming Lang: C, Lua
  Description : 2d action/rpg space game

This builds just fine from the packages in unstable, and it appears to be a
solid playable game even at this early version number. The data pack is
published separately on their website, although it all appears to be
available in the upstream git repository located at
http://github.com/bobbens/naev/tree/master so the licensing and whatnot
should be in order.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#515214: [PATCH] hal depends - recommends

2009-04-12 Thread David Nusinow
Here's a slight variant on the patch with much stronger wording in the
NEWS entry, and some more detail in debian/changelog. We want to be very
clear that we want people to use hal. I didn't go so far as to say that
not using hal won't be supported in the future, but I did try to get
across that the user is entirely responsible for their input
configuration if they choose not to use hal.

 - David Nusinow
From 9e594116533cedccf273b216ccdce6585c9696bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Nusinow dnusi...@debian.org
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:31:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Demote hal Depends: to Recommends:.
 For that add a NEWS.Debian entry that people have to be careful on upgrades
 to not lose their input devices (without hal it needs a config option).
 Thanks Joerg Jaspert.

Require that this config option be set when hal is absent during postinst
---
 debian/changelog|6 ++
 debian/control  |3 +--
 debian/xserver-xorg.NEWS|   21 +
 debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in |4 
 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index bc0a3b5..5d4287e 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -4,6 +4,12 @@ xorg (1:7.4+2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 
   * Don't discuss removal of xserver-xorg in its description. 
 It remains tied to -core at this point. (closes: #523630).
+
+  * Demote hal Depends: to Recommends:. For that add a NEWS.Debian entry
+that people have to be careful on upgrades to not lose their input
+devices (without hal it needs a config option). Thanks Joerg Jaspert.
++ Require that this config option be set when hal is absent during
+  postinst
 	
  -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org  Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:12:51 +0100
 
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 350ebb1..cc2b023 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -86,13 +86,12 @@ Depends:
  xserver-xorg-input-evdev [alpha amd64 arm armeb armel hppa i386 ia64 lpia m32r m68k mips mipsel powerpc sparc],
  xserver-xorg-video-all | xserver-xorg-video-5,
  xserver-xorg-input-all | xserver-xorg-input-4,
- hal (= 0.5.12~git20090406),
  console-setup (= 1.29),
  ${shlibs:Depends},
  ${misc:Depends},
  xkb-data (= 1.4),
  x11-xkb-utils
-Recommends: libgl1-mesa-dri, udev
+Recommends: libgl1-mesa-dri, udev, hal (= 0.5.12~git20090406)
 Description: the X.Org X server
  This package depends on the full suite of the server and drivers for the
  X.Org X server, as well as providing a configuration infrastructure to manage
diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg.NEWS b/debian/xserver-xorg.NEWS
index 6987bec..2221c53 100644
--- a/debian/xserver-xorg.NEWS
+++ b/debian/xserver-xorg.NEWS
@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
+xserver-xorg (1:7.4+2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  Starting with this release, hal is a recommended rather than
+  depended-upon package. This is because, although the X server
+  remains capable of configuring input devices without hal, it is
+  strongly recommended that you use this method unless there is a good
+  reason otherwise. Using hal provides the X server with the ability
+  to dynamically and correctly configure input devices while running,
+  and as a result it will be the best supported and most easily
+  maintained method of handling input devices for the forseeable
+  future.
+
+  If you choose to run your system without hal, you will have to take
+  all responsibility for manually configuring your input devices via
+  xorg.conf. To ensure working input devices for your X server when
+  hal is absent, add 'Option AutoAddDevices off' in the
+  ServerLayout section of your /etc/X11/xorg.conf (without the outer
+  '') and configure input devices as you did in the past.
+
+ -- David Nusinow dnusi...@debian.org Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:24:09 -0400
+
 xserver-xorg (1:7.4+1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   Starting from this version, input devices are no longer configured
diff --git a/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in b/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
index 7f75de2..be31457 100644
--- a/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
+++ b/debian/xserver-xorg.postinst.in
@@ -270,6 +270,10 @@ fi
 
 debug_echo Configuring $THIS_PACKAGE.
 
+if ! [ -x /usr/sbin/hald ]   ! grep -q AutoAddDevices ${XORGCONFIG}; then
+bomb Please either install hal or configure your xorg.conf to work without, see NEWS entry for xserver-xorg version 1:7.4+2
+fi
+
 if [ -n $FIRSTINST ] || [ -n $RECONFIGURE ]; then
   # BusID
   PRIORITY=low
-- 
1.6.2.2



Bug#523685: RM: xserver-xorg-video-cyrix -- ROM; abandoned upstream

2009-04-11 Thread David Nusinow
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

   The xserver-xorg-video-cyrix is abandoned upstream and is considered
dead. Please remove it from the archive for the next release. Thank you!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#523683: RM: xserver-xorg-video-imstt -- ROM; abandoned upstream

2009-04-11 Thread David Nusinow
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

   The xserver-xorg-video-imstt driver is abaonded upstream and is
considered dead. Please remove it from the archive for the next release.
Thank you!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#523687: RM: xserver-xorg-video-vga -- ROM; abandoned upstream

2009-04-11 Thread David Nusinow
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

   The xserver-xorg-video-vga driver is abandoned upstream and is
considered supersceded by the -vesa driver. Please remove it from the
archive. Thank you!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#444707: Working with upstream

2009-03-21 Thread David Nusinow
Hello,

   I'm currently working alongside upstream on getting an updated parrot
in to Debian. There's a pkg-parrot project on alioth that's a central
point for this that I've recently been added to. Since Florian seems to
have abandoned this package for some time now I also plan to take up
maintainership of it. Florian, if this isn't Ok, please let me know and
we'll work something out.

   As for the status of the Package, upstream (Allison Randal) has been
hard at work on the packaging for Debian and Ubuntu. Currently there's a
few lintian errors, most notably setting rpath in the binary, that need
to be addressed prior to upload. There's also a number of missing
manpages that need to be written, but those can probably wait until
after the initial upload.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#518295: GL_LINE_LOOP not rendered correctly

2009-03-06 Thread David Nusinow
Brice Goglin wrote:
 reassign 518295 libgl1-mesa-dri 7.0.3-7
 retitle 518295 GL_LINE_LOOP not rendered correctly on Radeon VE 7000 QY
 thank
 
 
 
 
 BALLABIO GERARDO wrote:
 Package: libgl1-mesa-glx
 Version: 7.0.3-7

 After upgrading my home computer to Lenny I am observing a misbehavior of 
 OpenGL programs, namely, whenever they should draw a GL_LINE_LOOP, the first 
 and last segments of the line aren't drawn.

 I'm attaching a simple test program (compile with -lglut). The correct 
 behavior would be to draw two nested white squares on a black background. 
 Instead the outer square (drawn as a GL_LINE_STRIP with the start/end point 
 repeated) is rendered correctly, but of the inner square (drawn as a 
 GL_LINE_LOOP) only two segments are drawn.

 This problem seems to be specific of my hardware configuration, because I 
 tried the same test program on another computer (with a Lenny live cd) and 
 there it worked correctly. It is definitely a regression from Etch where it 
 used to work also on my computer.

 My graphics card is rather old, it is a Radeon 7000. I'm using no 
 proprietary drivers or nonstandard configurations, everything comes from the 
 stock Lenny installation. I'm attaching the /var/log/Xorg.0.log file where I 
 suppose you should find all the needed information. If you need more, please 
 ask.
   
 
 I can't reproduce this with a Radeon X300 (rv370) so this is indeed
 probably a bug in the specific driver for your board (hence reassigning
 to libgl1-mesa-dri). Now it would be nice to try with mesa 7.3
 (currently in experimental).

I tried to reproduce this with a Radeon 9200 either (RV280). I am
running mesa from experimental though, so this may have the necessary
fix if my card is close enough to the 7000.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#515976: xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2009-02-20 Thread David Nusinow
Julien Cristau wrote:
 reopen 515976
 kthxbye
 
 On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 04:09 +, David Nusinow wrote:
 commit b73bd774ce52c946b2ace622d98f3df584258ec9
 Author: David Nusinow dnusi...@debian.org
 Date:   Thu Feb 19 23:06:59 2009 -0500

 Bump x11proto-input-dev build-dep to = 1.5.0 to fix keyboard layout 
 breakage with new libxi built against the same. Closes: #515976
 
 Michel and I think this looks like papering over the real bug, so I'll
 reopen this until we find out what the underlying issue is.
 The version of the protocol headers used to build the server and lib
 shouldn't affect compatibility.

You're right, it looks like I misread one of the commits, although if
the rebuild fixed the problem then a version mismatch of some sort is
probably a cause.

 - David Nusinow




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#515976: [Fwd: Re: Bug#515976: libxi6 causes kdm using the wrong keyboard-layout]

2009-02-19 Thread David Nusinow
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:47:34 -0500
David Nusinow da...@gravitypulls.net wrote:

...

 I think I've figured out this bug. It looks like the new libxi was built
 against the new input protocol headers, while the server was built
 against the old headers. The mismatch in the protocol could very well be
 causing this bug. I've uploaded a simple rebuild of the xserver to
 alioth. Could you add the following to your sources.list and upgrade
 your server to see if that fixes the bug?
 
 deb http://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/libxi-fix ./
 
 If it does, I'll sign the packages and make an upload of this build to
 unstable.

Works for me!

Celejar
--
mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email
ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator

---End Message---


Bug#491629: tk8.5-dev: Package should depend on libxss-dev

2008-07-20 Thread David Nusinow
Package: tk8.5-dev
Version: 8.5.3-2
Severity: normal

Hello,

   While converting one of my packages to tk8.5 and building in a chroot I
got an FTBFS because libXss couldn't be found. This turned out to be
included indirectly via tk8.5-dev's tkConfig.sh script located in
/usr/share/tcltk/tk8.5. This is apparently a new addition with 8.5, because
I can't find this inclusion in previous versions installed here. Could you
please either add libxss-dev to the package's depends or remove the linking
to libXss if it's inappropriate? My own package doesn't use Xss at all, so
I don't know why the script exports this linker flag, and it may be
ultimately useless. Thank you!

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages tk8.5-dev depends on:
ii  libx11-dev2:1.1.4-2  X11 client-side library (developme
ii  tcl8.5-dev8.5.3-2Tcl (the Tool Command Language) v8
ii  tk8.5 8.5.3-2Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.5 -
ii  x11proto-core-dev 7.0.12-1   X11 core wire protocol and auxilia

tk8.5-dev recommends no packages.

Versions of packages tk8.5-dev suggests:
pn  tk8.5-doc none (no description available)

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#476856: gnu-smalltalk-doc: Please include HTML documentation

2008-04-19 Thread David Nusinow
Package: gnu-smalltalk-doc
Version: 3.0.2-4
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

   It would be nice if there were an HTML class reference available for
gst. I personally like to have several tabs open when browsing
documentation, and info makes this more annoying than a web browser. Since
gst-blox isn't at the level of Omnibrowser in squeak, it's also not really
as easy to deal with as a web browser. I don't know if including the html
in this package or a separate one is the way to go, but I'd definitely
appreciate having it available. Thanks for your work on gst!

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages gnu-smalltalk-doc depends on:
ii  info [info-browser]  4.11.dfsg.1-4   Standalone GNU Info documentation 
ii  konqueror [info-brow 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-2+b1 KDE's advanced file manager, web b
ii  pinfo [info-browser] 0.6.9-2 An alternative info-file viewer

gnu-smalltalk-doc recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#468553: setting package to xdm, tagging 468553

2008-03-01 Thread David Nusinow
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#
# xdm (1:1.1.6-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
#  * Add Finnish translation, courtesy of Esko Arajärvi. closes: #468553 

package xdm
tags 468553 + pending




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#468823: ITP: lxsession -- a lightweight X11 session manager

2008-03-01 Thread David Nusinow
Hi,

On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 01:19:50AM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Andrew Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 * Package name: lxsession
   Version : 0.3
   Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee(PCMan) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * URL : http://www.example.org/
 * License : (GPL)
   Programming Lang: (C)
   Description : a lightweight X11 session manager
 
  LXSession is a lightweight X11 session manager with fewer dependencies,
  designed for use with the LXDE(Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment).
  .
  It's desktop-independent and can be used with any window manager.
  .
  As session manager it remembers the applications in use when you
  logout, and restart the applications when you log back in.

What's the difference between this and xsm?

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#468823: ITP: lxsession -- a lightweight X11 session manager

2008-03-01 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 02:10:36AM +0800, Andrew Lee wrote:
 David Nusinow wrote:
  What's the difference between this and xsm?
 
 It well-integrated with LXDE and other modern desktop environments, the
 difference between this and xsm are:
 * Removed the session dialog from xsm.
 * Use better configuration.
 * Provide a nice logout-dialog with the ability to
 shutdown/reboot/suspend/hibernate via HAL or gdm,
 and more
 
 Even though it's based on xsm, but they are quite different. Make a diff
 between xsm and lxsession for detail, if there is any doubt.

Coolness. The HAL stuff in particular sounds really awesome. Would you mind
putting some (or all) of this in the description for the package when you
upload it?

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#375460: Upgrade to linux kernel 2.6.17 makes Xserver crasing on startup

2008-02-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:55:16PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 found 375460 1:1.0.2-8
 retitle 375460 server crash when the device configured as core pointer is a 
 keyboard
 kthxbye
 
 On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 13:34:20 +0200, Marcel Sebek wrote:
 
  On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:44:45PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
   The backtrace looks input related, and indeed, looking at the log file,
   it looks like /dev/input/event1 no longer represents a mouse but a
   keyboard, so the X server ends up running without a core pointer and
   probably chokes on that.
   
  
  Yes, exactly. event1/2 is switched in the new kernel. The same happened
  to me once in the past, but IIRC the xserver printed some reasonable
  warning about missing core pointer, so I found that easily.
  
  I've created a simple udev rule and now have mouse on
  /dev/input/psmouse. I should have done it when I started using evdev
  interface.
 
 Should we consider this a configuration issue?  It looks like
 input-hotplug, or using persistent device names, would prevent this kind
 of problems.

It shouldn't be a configuration issue if it brings down the server. We
should try and revisit this when we move the input-hotplug though, if
that's what'll really fix it.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464734: topshelf: Does Not Start

2008-02-21 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:42:53AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
  Oops, I mean Python 2.5.
 
 Ok, I'll try it at work little later (where topshelf is broken), but
 topshelf works fine on my home system which does not have 2.5 installed.

Sorry it took so long to reply. Yes, I've explicitly tested this with
python 2.5 and it works perfectly.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464734: topshelf: Does Not Start

2008-02-10 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:08:06PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
 I forwarded this upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/topshelf/+bug/190295.
 
 Could you please check if it works with Python 2.4?

As you can see from the version of python that reportbug attached to my bug
report, I was using python 2.4. Interestingly, this program works on one of
my systems but not the other. I don't have any idea why this would be.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464734: topshelf: Does Not Start

2008-02-10 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:15:52PM +0100, Siegfried-Angel wrote:
 Oops, I mean Python 2.5.

Ok, I'll try it at work little later (where topshelf is broken), but
topshelf works fine on my home system which does not have 2.5 installed.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#464734: topshelf: Does Not Start

2008-02-08 Thread David Nusinow
Package: topshelf
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: serious

Adding topshelf to my gnome panel fails to load the app. It pops up an
error dialog box saying The panel encountered a problem while loading
OAFIID:Gnome_Panel_TopShelf. and allows me to delete it from my
configuration. If I don't delete it, I get this message every time I log in
until I do delete the app.

Here's what it prints to ~/.xsession-errors:
** (gnome-panel:4001): WARNING **: panel-applet-frame.c:1278: failed to
load applet OAFIID:Gnome_Panel_TopShelf:
Failed to resolve, or extend
'!prefs_key=/apps/panel/applets/applet_11/prefs;background=none:;orient=up;size=x-small;locked_down=false

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages topshelf depends on:
ii  libgnome2-0   2.20.1.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii  python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-gtk2   2.12.1-1   Python bindings for the GTK+ widge

Versions of packages topshelf recommends:
ii  yelp  2.20.0-1   Help browser for GNOME 2

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400632: x11-common should not ship a SUID root binary

2008-02-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:35PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
 Package: x11-common
 Severity: serious
 tags 400632 -wontfix
 
 Greetings,
 
 The setuid usr/bin/X binary should not be shipped with x11-common
 because it's not *needed* for X11 clients.  That by itself is a good
 enough reason.  Put it in xserver-xorg-core or similar, not in
 x11-common.
 
 Additionally, x11-common gets pulled in on server for things like
 libgd-xpm, which isn't entirely unreasonable if someone wants to
 generate an X pixmap on a server.  One could also have, I dunno,
 *xterm* installed on a server for clients to use without have an X
 server installed on the same server.  Unless xterm *requires*
 usr/bin/X, it shouldn't be installed as part of something xterm
 depends on.

The easy and obvious fix is to just ship this with xserver-xorg instead. To
be honest, I'm not sure why this ended up in x11-common instead of here.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#462761: xorg-server: [INTL:ja] Update po-debconf template translation (ja.po)

2008-01-27 Thread David Nusinow
tag 462761 +pending
thanks

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 08:20:09PM +0900, Hideki Yamane (Debian-JP) wrote:
 Package: xorg-server
 Version: 2:1.4.1~git20080118-1
 Severity: wishlist
 Tags: patch l10n
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Dear xorg-server maintainers,
 
  Here's updated Japanese po-debconf template (ja.po) file.
  Could you apply it, please?

Done. It'll be in the next upload of the xserver. Thank you!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#458916: critical graphical bug during execution of tasksel

2008-01-07 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 04:39:22PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
 unmerge 449055
 clone 449055 -1
 reassign -1 xresprobe
 reassign 458916 xresprobe
 forcemerge 430545 -1 458916
 retitle 449055 cdebconf: display corruption after running xresprobe (during 
 pkgsel)
 block 449055 by 430545
 thanks
 
 On Friday 04 January 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
   This looks like an extremely interesting variation on #449055.
   I'm merging your report with that one.
 
  Err, how so? Surely this is #430545 (xresprobe breaks display at the
  middle of installation).
 
 Additional testing has shown that both bugs are related to #430545, therefore
 reassigning appropriately.
 
 For the X Strike force: two more cases where running xresprobe during
 installation causes display corruption.
 
 Remi: could you provide some details of the system you saw this on?
 The output of 'lspci -nn' would be a good start.

It shouldn't matter actually. We've just cut xresprobe out of the xserver
postinst scripts, so this shouldn't be an issue. If it is an issue, he
should file a bug against his specific driver.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#454304: Transparency

2008-01-06 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:10:23PM +0100, Ties wrote:
 Ties wrote:
 Also, everything that's supposed to be transparent is now opaque.

 I hope I'm not double-posting this, but making sure the extmod module was 
 loaded helped both my issues. For some reason dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg 
 didn't generate a module section.

Yeah, dpkg-reconfigure won't generate that section again for the forseeable
future.

So extmod wasn't loaded for you before? It should be loaded by default
every time. What version of xserver-xorg-core are you running? Can you
attach your /var/log/Xorg.0.log file?

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#411639: x11-common: Variables don't work outside of shells

2008-01-01 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:07:38PM +0100, Andre Colomb wrote:
 Package: x11-common
 Version: 1:7.3+9
 Followup-For: Bug #411639
 
 Hey, this is a very good idea. I've been trying to figure out a clean way
 to do this for quite some time.
 
 However, with the current solution, I'm stuck: I updated the package,
 created my .xsessionrc and put
 export LC_TIME=en_DK
 in there to have ISO 8601-dates everywhere. (German people still haven't
 realized that this is the new standard for over 10 years now, and Ulrich
 Drepper from Redhat apparently doesn't want to change the de_DE locale
 accordingly... whatever!)
 
 Anyway, I checked from inside an xterm shell (bash) if the variable was
 actually set, and there it was. Starting e.g. Icedove from the shell
 gave me the expected date format.
 
 Starting Icedove from the Xfce Panel, however, still has the old date
 format (en_US or C, whatever I set as system default). Is there maybe an
 incompatibility with the xfce4-session script or am I missing something
 else?

Yeah, my guess is that this is some sort of weird xfce issue. Running an
app from a launcher on the gnome panel shows that my test env variable is
present. You may want to ask the xfce folks.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#456955: laptops don't have keypads

2007-12-30 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 04:04:04AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I also note
   Larry likes his laptop in 800x600 mode
 has now become an impossible task in Debian.
 
 And apparently one day when it becomes possible, it will only be via
 tortuous cut and paste of dangerous (to the heath of one's monitor, if
 the numbers get garbled) xrandr output into one's xorg.conf.
 
 Or one could use xrandr in ~/.xsession, adding more wear and tear to
 the monitor.
 
 Also then the user must pick a MHz choice. I picked 75 hoping that it
 won't wear out my monitor or my eyes but I am just guessing.
 
 I recall in the old days one could just dpkg-reconfigure and pick
 one's favorite resolution.

Please stop trolling. We have a bug and we're working on transitioning to a
new model of dealing with things. The work is incomplete, but then again so
is Lenny. We're working on various solutions to make this far better than
the old dpkg-reconfigure scripts, but you'll have to bear with it for a
while. If you can't handle running software in development, please don't
run unstable and save us all the hassle. 

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#456798: gnumeric: Some failures when doing t-tests

2007-12-23 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:12:03AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
 tags 456798 + pending
 thanks
 
 Hi David,
 
 On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 18:49:21 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
 I've attached a patch that fixes this problem for the Observed Mean
  Difference when doing the paired t-test. I basically copied the way that
  the Pearson Correlation calculation was done.
 
 This issue has now been addressed upstream through
 http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnumeric?view=revisionrevision=16244 which
 should make it into the forthcoming 1.8.0 release.
 
 Should you have further concerns or feedback regarding this issue, please
 use
   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504256
 to communicate with upstream directly. As I'm not a statistics expert, I
 have little to add here.

Wonderful, I applied the patch locally and was able to finish my work with
it. Thanks to you and the gnumeric upstream for the quick response!

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#456955: laptops don't have keypads

2007-12-23 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:09:13AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 David, perhaps the difficulty I am having in bug #456955 is related to
 the below. Or maybe I just don't know how to write xorg.conf anymore. Thanks.
 
   [ David Nusinow ]
   * Don't write the default depth to xorg.conf any more.
 The drivers should choose the appropriate depth by default now.
   * Don't bother with resolutions in xorg.conf
 We now rely on the server and drivers to do the right thing.
 

No, I believe these changes should not have an effect given your driver.
Please use the xrandr utility or a suitable frontend to set your mode. In
order to make this permanent, please use the PreferredMode stanza in your
xorg.conf. See the xorg.conf manpage for details.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#456955: laptops don't have keypads

2007-12-23 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 05:03:30AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, the following indeed gets as I see logged e.g.,
 (**) intel(0): Option PreferredMode 800x600
 etc. but still I end up in 1024x768.

Ok, that's broken and should be fixed. I'll try and take a look at it over
the next couple of days...

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#422085: Better terminal emulator patch

2007-12-17 Thread David Nusinow
Hi Bastian,

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
 David Nusinow wrote:
  Hi Bastian,
  
  On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 11:39:03PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
  Hi David,
 
  thanks for your effort and the patches. Personally, I don't like the
  idea of a terminal popping up asking the user questions when a user uses
  a GUI application. 
  
  Because the scripts can be interactive, I see no other way.
  
  Since the output of the bugscripts stuff is AFAIK
  still not mandatory for bugreports, I ask you do not upload this patch
  as NMU.
  
  May I ask why not? This is a really important feature for many developers
  and we'd like to see it in ASAP. 
  
   - David Nusinow
  
 
 Since I received a terrifying amount insults(!) via mail for not
 implementing this feature request after my last blog entry, where I
 asked for help developing rng, I'd like to make my position about this
 issue clear.

 Why was I opposed to implement this.
 
 1. I *personally* hated that some packages sent a *huge* amount of
 unrelated info with every bugreport for this package, even if it's not
 meaningful for this bugreport. I made a quick check against my favorite
 package with a very long output and thought (and still think) that this
 info is not even relevant for the majority of bugreports of this
 package. So I thought it was not too much to ask, to write the reporter
 a friendly mail to post the output of this script, if it's really needed.

It is a great deal to ask when you've got a lot to do. You yourself are
busy with real life, so much so that you're asking for help with rng. Well,
the rest of us are plenty busy too, and these scripts can be a significant
time saver for all of us, both developers and users. Refusing to support
them is simply callous.

Furthermore, your implementation allows the user to trivially delete all
this information in their email client if they're annoyed by it, so this is
a non-issue in rng.

 2. I *personally* was very annoyed by packages with very long presubj
 text, which I doubt anyone reads anyway. Since I don't want rng to be
 annoying to the users, I decided to leave that feature away. An
 implementation of this feature would mean to pop up a window with some
 text the user should read before continuing to report the bug. I don't
 like popups and don't want rng to make use of them.

I haven't implemented presubj text in my patch, so this is a non-issue for
that specifically.

 3. I'm definitely opposed to a feature which will pop up a *terminal*
 where a user has to do something before he can proceed reporting a bug.
 Sorry, but this won't happen in rng. I might consider such a thing if it
 could be scripted to use QT or even GTK but a terminal popping up in a
 GUI application is a no-go for me, sorry.

For any script that is non-interactive the terminal will appear and then
disappear once the script is done running. On my system it's barely
noticeable. One thing that I'd be open to is modifying the standard so that
scripts put something like #BUG_INTERACTIVE in the interactive scripts. We
could trivially grep for this phrase, launch a terminal in this one case,
or just run the script and get the output directly if this comment is
absent. I don't know of any interactive bug scripts that currently exist,
so this should be a fairly simple thing to require if people are willing
(I've CC'ed -devel for opinions on this).

 4. I was *personally* very annoyed by some of the reactions on this
 bugreport. Since we're all volunteers and stuff and this feature is
 maybe a nice-to-have but definitely not a must-have, I decided to put
 this issue very low on my to do list.

 However, I agree that the stuff in /usr/share/bug isn't completely
 useless. The opposite is true, it makes the life of maintainers easier
 and rng should make use of it where possible.
 
 So what can we do now? Maybe we can start all over and discuss this
 issue in a more friendly and constructive way?
 
 Here's my offer: rng will support bugscripts, but it will not feature a
 terminal popping up asking a user questions. I'm developing a GUI
 application and a popping up terminal is not very GUI'ish for me. What
 can we do about this? Is there a way to implement this?

I've offered a partial solution for the terminal above. I think that
neutering the interactive scripts is a horrific idea though. Users who can
report bugs can handle having a terminal ask them a question or two. 

One alternate method is to require interactive scripts to use debconf,
which should be a good middle ground because they've already used it during
the install. We could check what frontend debconf is using, and if it
requires a terminal we pop one up and if not then just let the gtk frontend
do its thing. Again, this would be something other developers would have to
agree to, but I think this is actually a better way to handle these sorts
of scripts now that debconf is our standard for interaction.

 Supporting presubj might

Bug#368560: mesa: material under SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free

2007-12-09 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:30:12PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Is there any progress on this issue ?
 I packaged JOGL for Debian and would like to see it in Debian.
 However, JOGL has the same files as mesa (translated to Java) under the
 same license (SGI free license B).
 Does anyone tried to contact the upstream ?

Basically no, there's no real progrss on the issue. I was speaking with
Brett Smith[0] from the FSF last night about it though, and they are very
interested in seeing the issue resolved. You may want to contact him if
you're really interested in working on it.

 - David Nusinow

[0] [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#422085: Patch

2007-12-08 Thread David Nusinow
tags 422085 + patch
thanks

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.31

Patch attached for this issue. Since reportbug-ng is now being pimped on
planet Ubuntu I'd appreciate a quick upload with this patch before we get
flooded with bugs from novice users.. If not, I'd appreciate a go-ahead to
NMU it myself. Thanks!

 - David Nusinow

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21-1-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableuqm.debian.net 
  500 unstableftp.us.debian.org 
  500 stable  apt.tt-solutions.com 
1 experimentalftp.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.3-3
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


Index: reportbug-ng-0.2007.10.30/src/lib/ReportbugNG.py
===
--- reportbug-ng-0.2007.10.30.orig/src/lib/ReportbugNG.py	2007-12-08 16:30:51.0 -0500
+++ reportbug-ng-0.2007.10.30/src/lib/ReportbugNG.py	2007-12-08 16:30:58.0 -0500
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
 s += getSystemInfo() + \n
 s += getDebianReleaseInfo() + \n
 s += getPackageInfo(package) + \n
+s += getPackageScriptOutput(package) + \n
 
 return s
 
@@ -311,6 +312,17 @@
 
 return debinfo
 
+def getPackageScriptOutput(package):
+Runs the package's script in /usr/share/bug/packagename/script and
+   returns the output.
+output = ''
+path = /usr/share/bug/ + str(package) + /script
+cmd = path +  31
+if os.path.exists(path):
+output += --- Output from package bug script ---\n
+output += commands.getoutput(cmd)
+return output
+
 
 def callBrowser(url):
 Calls an external Browser to upen the URL.
@@ -334,4 +346,4 @@
 status, output = commands.getstatusoutput(command)
 logger.debug(After the  MUA call)
 
-
\ No newline at end of file
+


Bug#452803: please add conflicts to new xorg

2007-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Mon, Dec  3, 2007 at 21:37:07 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
 
  On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
   Hi,
   
   On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve.  IMO
915resolution should just be removed.
   
   right. So it's the other way round: xorg could conflict with it, so that 
   users 
   will notice. And 915resolution can be removed from unstable now. I'll 
   leave 
   it to the mainatiner to file a bug report requesting its removal or 
   retitle 
   and reassign this one.
  
  I've added a conflicts to the intel driver package, so this bug will close
  with the next upload of the driver. Thanks for letting us know.
  
 I'm not sure I get the point of the conflict.  Keeping 915resolution
 installed does no harm, afaik.  Users can notice they have an outdated
 package on upgrade and remove it whenever they want.

Right, that's why I didn't add the conflict way back when, but we've seen
our share of people who still think 915resolution is actually useful even
when they're using -intel. I think a good, hard conflicts will disabuse
them of that notion.

I'm also thinking about adding a NEWS.Debian entry just to make it clear,
and point them to the various online pages (intel's, Brice's blog, etc)
that document how to cope with the change. With all the changes flying
around lately we should probably be more proactive in telling people how to
deal with them, and also helping them get there.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#454263: xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse: vmmouse not used if specified in xorg.conf

2007-12-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:55:48PM +0100, Joerg Platte wrote:
 Am Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2007 schrieb Philipp Kolmann:
 Hi,
 
  I just installed a plain new Debian Sid in a vmware and wanted to change
  the mouse to vmmouse. But since the new X Server is in Sid, it doesn't
  take the vmmouse anymore.
 
  Section InputDevice
  Identifier  Configured Mouse
  Driver  vmmouse
  EndSection
 
 Try to add:
 Option  CorePointer
 
 But then most likely your mouse pointer will not move...

I just hit this bug myself today. I'll try to take a look at it this
weekend.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#452803: please add conflicts to new xorg

2007-12-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
  I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve.  IMO
  915resolution should just be removed.
 
 right. So it's the other way round: xorg could conflict with it, so that 
 users 
 will notice. And 915resolution can be removed from unstable now. I'll leave 
 it to the mainatiner to file a bug report requesting its removal or retitle 
 and reassign this one.

I've added a conflicts to the intel driver package, so this bug will close
with the next upload of the driver. Thanks for letting us know.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#430545: Corrupt display when installing packages

2007-12-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:25:28AM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
 Hi David,
 
 We ran into this bug on Ubuntu (e.g. LP# 127008).  The xprobe.sh script
 fails on Intel laptop hardware during configure when using the -intel
 driver.  This cropped up after -intel driver support was added.  I also
 fixed a number of other issues in xresprobe you might be interested in,
 although I know the goal is to get rid of xresprobe entirely.
 
 The two patches that fixed this for us are:
 
 http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xresprobe/xresprobe_0.4.24ubuntu5.debdiff
 
 http://people.ubuntu.com/~bryce/Testing/xresprobe/xresprobe_0.4.24ubuntu8.debdiff
 
 Basically, we avoid using xprobe.sh for -intel.  doddc probe seems to
 work adequately, and where it doesn't we just let the postinst ask the
 user (this is better than corrupting out the display).

Cool, thanks. This pretty much makes sense, given that with -intel there's
been the move away from asking the BIOS for the modes, which is what
xresprobe seems to do if I'm reading it right.

I'm trying to figure out if we can just dump xresprobe all together at this
point. From my readings of the various bits that manage modesetting (and
there's a lot, so I may well have missed some very important parts) the
drivers will be doing their own ddc probe, which seems to make xresprobe
redundant. I don't fully understand how DDC, VBE, and EDID all interact yet
though, which may be a source of misunderstanding, but I can't see anything
that xresprobe does that the drivers don't do themselves through the
services that the server exposes. Randr1.2 drivers are even better of
couse, especially because we can use the quirks to deal with issues that
xresprobe would have been used for in the past.

If I don't end up ripping out our reliance on xresprobe I'll definitely
grab your fix, but hopefully we can just dump a whole lot of shell script
instead.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#452485: ITA: fetchyahoo

2007-12-02 Thread David Nusinow
retitle 452485 ITA: fetchyahoo -- Retrieve mail from Yahoo!'s webmail service
thanks

Hi,

   I use fetchyahoo daily. I'll adopt it.

  - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#448845: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg fails

2007-11-27 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:14:14AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 09:48:54AM +, Philip Armstrong wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:44:47AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
 Do you still have this problem with latest xserver-xorg? (1:7.3+6 is in
 unstable, 1:7.3+7 just got uploaded there too).

 Problem still exists with 1:7.3+6 :
   dexconf: error: cannot generate configuration file;
   xserver-xorg/config/device/driver not set.  Aborting.  Reconfigure the X 
 server
   with dpkg-reconfigure to correct this problem.

 Also, the dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg process fails to detect my
 monitor (A Samsung Syncmaster 710T). Or at least I presume that it
 fails to do so: after the attempt at autodetection I end up being
 asked to give the full monitor specs regardless. The Xserver detects
 the monitor just fine as far as I can see from the logs. Should I file
 a separate bug?

 Looks like not all of 1:7.3+7 has arrived yet. I'll try it when it
 becomes available.

 OK, just done an update  dragged in 1:7.3+7. Problem still exists.

 Just to test things, I tried removing the debconf config.dat cache
 file, so as to get all the defaults from the new package, but it
 didn't make any difference.

 Oh wait: I've found the problem!

 I didn't have discover installed (it was doing annoying things to my
 machine in the past) and this wasn't being picked up
 anywhere. Installing discover fixes the problem. Looks like the
 configuration needs to be aware of whether discover is installed or
 not, since it's currently a 'recommends' not a 'depends'.

My main goal right now is getting rid of our reliance on discover in the
postinst, so the fix for this bug will be to eventually remove all that
code rather than a tighter dependency on discover.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#453121: grandr: New Upstream Version

2007-11-27 Thread David Nusinow
reassign 453121 gnome-randr-applet
thanks

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:47:00AM +1100, James Healy wrote:
 Package: grandr
 Version: 0.1-2
 Severity: wishlist
 
 
 It looks like there's a new upstream version of this applet (v0.4) @
 http://dekorte.homeip.net/download/grandr-applet/

This is a different program, packaged as gnome-randr-applet. grandr appears
to be dead upstream unfortunately.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#452897: /etc/X11/X points to /bin/true on a clean sid install.

2007-11-26 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:38:33PM +, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+6
 Severity: serious
 
 --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
 
 Installing a base Etch system (just the base, no X or fancy stuff),
 migrating to Sid, and then apt-get installing xorg will install X
 succesfully but will make it useless because of /etc/X11/X pointing
 to /bin/true. GDM will fail showing an empty log. X will exit without
 any output ('true' is not really verbose). xinit and startx will fail
 with misterious errors like server error or connection timed out.
 
 Calling Xorg directly on the console works fine. The problem can be
 fixed by linking /etc/X11/X to /usr/bin/Xorg.

Thanks for catching this, I missed it on my clean install tests. I'll be
pushing a fix shortly, and I should be able to upload it tonight.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#437528: should be able to have an xorg.conf with no ServerLayout, Device, or Screen

2007-11-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 06:42:40PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
  If there is no xorg.conf at all, X automatically deduces default
  settings that work in a lot of cases (including my own).  However,
  if there *is* an xorg.conf, but it does not contain ServerLayout,
  Device, or Screen sections, X refuses to start.
 
  It would be nice if, in this circumstance, the same defaults would
  be used that are currently used if there is no xorg.conf at all.
  Also, if I specify a Device or Screen section with the same name as
  one of the built-in sections that get dumped to Xorg.0.log but
  different contents, that should silently override *just that piece*
  of the built-in defaults.
 
 Hey David,
 
 Is the above possible now that you have merged a lot of stuff in
 the server autodetection code?

Yes, I'd forgotten about this bug. This is fixed with ajax's work in 1.4,
so it can be closed.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#451876: xserver-xorg-core: screen mode selection error

2007-11-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 03:43:05AM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
 ale wrote:
  Package: xserver-xorg-core
  Version: 2:1.4.1~git20071117-1
  Severity: normal
  
  Hello,
  
  I have a custom modeline 1400x1050 in my xorg.conf. However, after the
  last upgrade of xorg, this mode stopped working and even doesn't show up
  in xrandr. It seems the relevant portions of xorg.conf are not even read.
 
 I was just debugging a similar issue on IRC. The problem probably comes
 from:
   (**) |--Screen Default Screen (0)
   (**) |   |--Monitor default monitor
   (==) No device specified for screen Default Screen.
   Using the first device section listed.
   (**) |   |--Device Generic Video Card
   (==) No monitor specified for screen Default Screen.
   Using a default monitor configuration.
 
 This is wrong. There is no reason for these to appear when your config
 contains:
   Section Screen
 Identifier  Default Screen
 Device  Generic Video Card
 Monitor Generic Monitor
 
 You might be able to work around the problem by adding
   Option Monitor-VGA-0 Generic Monitor
 to your Device section (or Monitor-DVI-0 if the monitor is plugged on DVI).
 
 But this only works for RandR 1.2 drivers. I feel like all non-RandR 1.2
 drivers are going to be broken (ignore the monitor section).
 
 
 We need David's input here since he added some patches for
 autoconfiguration. I'd like to push this bug upstream as soon as
 possible, but I'd rather be sure it's not our fault first :)

Yeah, I think I know what the bug is. It's something I fixed upstream but
forgot to bring back to Debian. I'll fix it tomorrow night.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#451537: xserver-xorg: Can no longer scroll up/down with edge of touchpad

2007-11-17 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 06:06:58PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+6
 Severity: important
 
 After upgrading to xserver-xorg 7.3+6 and reconfiguring the package, I
 can no longer use the edge of my touchpad to send mouse wheel scroll
 events.
 
 Also the feel of the mouse acceleration has changed... it feels more
 slippery... but it is hard to quantify. :)

snip

 Section InputDevice
   Identifier  Generic Keyboard
   Driver  kbd
   Option  XkbRules  xorg
   Option  XkbModel  pc105
   Option  XkbLayout gb
 EndSection
 
 Section InputDevice
   Identifier  Configured Mouse
   Driver  mouse
   Option  Emulate3Buttons   true
 EndSection

Ok, this is most likely a result of not writing the synaptics section to
your xorg.conf any more. We need to get input-hotplug working properly to
detect this so it just works for you. I'll try and spend some time on this
over the next week.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#449089: xserver-xorg: Auto detection fails on Thinkpad X31

2007-11-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 07:03:39PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 David Nusinow wrote:
   I've tested the auto detection code David asked for and ran into
   a bug: When I start X.org with the auto-generated config (I use startx,
   since I work on framebuffer console most of the time, on my notebook
   X11 is really just a slim layer beyond MPlayer) the screen remains
   black and the system doesn't take anymore input. (I can't switch
   to tty2 e.g.)
   
   The generated xorg.conf is included by the reportbug script,
   my previous one can be found on http://www.inutil.org/jmm/xorg.conf 
   
   Please let me know if now need further information.
  
  snip
  
   Section Device
 Identifier  ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY
 Driver  ati
 BusID   PCI:1:0:0
 Option  UseFBDev  true
   EndSection
  
  It looks like in this config file you enabled fbdev while in the old one
  you didn't have this option set. Does the autogenerated config work when
  you remove that option or just say no to the question during
  dpkg-reocnfigure?
 
 Indeed, the auto-generated xorg.conf works if UseFBdev is not enabled.
 
 Does this indicate a bug in radeonfb, shall I report it to Linux kernel
 bugzilla?
 
 I don't remember if fbdev mode switches used to work in the past.

Sorry it took me so long to get back to. You a quick glance at the code,
this is most likely an xserver driver problem rather than a kernel problem.
I'll double check to make sure, but I think the bug probably should remain
here for now, possibly being forwarded upstream. Michel probably has a lot
more insight to this bug than anyone else though.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#308073: vim-vimoutliner: Additional Info

2007-11-12 Thread David Nusinow
Package: vim-vimoutliner
Version: 0.3.4-8
Followup-For: Bug #308073

Hi Martin,

   This bug can sort of be closed, as the menu items are in place in gvim.
However, they're not working right now although the fix is simple. In the
ftplugin/vo_base.vim file, it tries to call otl2html.py, although this
script is shipped without the .py suffix. Just edit vo_base.vim to not have
the .py and it works great. With that, this bug should be closed.

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-3-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages vim-vimoutliner depends on:
ii  libpalm-perl 1.3.0-6 Perl 5 modules for manipulating pd
ii  libxml-writer-perl   0.603-1 Perl module for writing XML docume
ii  perl 5.8.8-11.1  Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  python   2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  vim  1:7.1-138+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor
ii  vim-gnome [gvim] 1:7.1-138+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -
ii  vim-gtk [gvim]   1:7.1-138+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor -
ii  vim-python [gvim]1:7.1-138+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor (
ii  vim-ruby [gvim]  1:7.1-138+1 Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor (

vim-vimoutliner recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#450584: xserver-xorg: This package forces all video drivers, pointless on laptops

2007-11-08 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:15:35PM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
 I have a laptop, so I don't want to have every video driver
 on it. The card won't change.
 
 But xserver-xorg depends on xserver-xorg-video-all which
 brings in all drivers. The obvious solution is to
 get rid of xserver-xorg, but this is strongly discouraged
 according to apt-cache show xserver-xorg.

To follow up, the server depends on xserver-xorg-all |
xserver-xorg-video(-2). Any packaged driver from Debian will fulfill the
latter requirement, allowing you to install the server with just a single
driver. The -all package is the default though to ensure that everyone has
the right driver if we can provide it. If you want to work on getting just
the individual driver necessary for the machine installed, it's something
I'm interested in working on, so feel free to help out there if this is
something you want to see happen.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#448944: xserver-xorg: does not generate xorg.conf file suitable for dual head

2007-11-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:44:14PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+3
 Severity: minor
 
 Hi,
 
 the procedure outlined by David in
 http://gravityboy.livejournal.com/38665.html does not result in a
 configuration that is suitable for dual head use: I get both screens
 cloned, and my usual xrandr gymnastics[1] to get them both alongside each
 other does not work.

Yeah, the debconfage never supported creating dual monitors and there's no
plans to make this happen. What will ideally work in the end is to not have
any sort of configuration for this setup in your xorg.conf, and just let
the server detect it and set it up for you. I don't believe the current
code does this though, but I may be able to make it happen in the future.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#449160: Does not support X1300

2007-11-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 10:13:21AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
 Version: 0.0.1+git20071006-1
 Tags: fixed-upstream
 
 In
 
  http://lists.opensuse.org/radeonhd/2007-11/msg00017.html
 
 Benoit Plessis reports that the Debian version of the radeonhd driver
 does not support the X1300, but the latest upstream version does.

I actually tried to build git head on Thursday night or so for this exact
reason, but it ftbfs for some reason that I couldn't really determine at
the time. I'll try again in a few days when I've got some time.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#449089: xserver-xorg: Auto detection fails on Thinkpad X31

2007-11-03 Thread David Nusinow
Hi Moritz,

On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 11:17:32PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+3
 Severity: important
 
 I've tested the auto detection code David asked for and ran into
 a bug: When I start X.org with the auto-generated config (I use startx,
 since I work on framebuffer console most of the time, on my notebook
 X11 is really just a slim layer beyond MPlayer) the screen remains
 black and the system doesn't take anymore input. (I can't switch
 to tty2 e.g.)
 
 The generated xorg.conf is included by the reportbug script,
 my previous one can be found on http://www.inutil.org/jmm/xorg.conf 
 
 Please let me know if now need further information.

snip

 Section Device
   Identifier  ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY
   Driver  ati
   BusID   PCI:1:0:0
   Option  UseFBDev  true
 EndSection

It looks like in this config file you enabled fbdev while in the old one
you didn't have this option set. Does the autogenerated config work when
you remove that option or just say no to the question during
dpkg-reocnfigure?

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442316: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#442316: Xorg hotplugging problems [WAS: Re: Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my keyboard layout]

2007-10-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:08:19AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
 David Nusinow schrieb:
  Ok, I missed that somehow. So it should probably be hal that generates this
  and not the xserver?
 
 The problem with hal generating the fdi file, would be that it could get
 out of sync, whenever you run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg.
 We would also have to duplicate a lot of logic from xserver-xorgs
 postinst in hal. Generating the fdi file from within xserver-xorg seems
 to be more straightforward to me.
 
 If you are going to remove the input device section (generation)
 completely from xserver-xorgs postinst and rely completely on hal for
 that, then I agree hal should be the one and only place where to
 configure the keyboard/input.
 Doing the configuration at two places (xserver-xorg-xorg.conf and hal-
 fdi) will really cause headaches imho.

Yeah, we'll remove it from the xserver postinst. The only thing I want is
to allow the server to respect currently existing xorg.confs. So long as
that happens, it's probably better if hal does create the fdi.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442316: Xorg hotplugging problems [WAS: Re: Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my keyboard layout]

2007-10-24 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:17:10PM -0400, ext David Nusinow wrote:
  On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:02:35PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
   On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
kbd keyboard settings from xorg.conf are ignored and the en_US keyboard
layout is used.
   
   Yes, this should probably be fixed up, I guess.  But the long-term fix
   is to provide an FDI file in /etc that specifies the keyboard layout.
  
  My feeling is the other way around, provided that the X server is the only
  user of this field. People already know how to edit xorg.conf, and they
  expect it. Telling them to edit a relatively obscure file among many other
  fdi's is more painful. There's also userspace tools that exist to help with
  generating a xorg.conf, but nothing friendly to deal with fdi's.
 
 As I've said before, the X server isn't the only user of the field. :)
 Ubuntu were trying to move to cxkb a year or so ago, and the only thing
 that stopped them in the end was how huge the XKB codebase was, which
 I'm fixing (very slowly) upstream.  So yeah, if having this in HAL lets
 us finaly unify console and X keymaps ...

Ok, I missed that somehow. So it should probably be hal that generates this
and not the xserver?

Preferably, the X server should use the keyboard layout specified in
xorg.conf (for the old kbd driver) even when used in xorg hotplugging 
mode.
   
   Yes, probably.
  
  My sense is that if we're going to do this, then there's no need to
  generate the fdi. Just generate the xorg.conf. We can patch the server to
  use libhal_device_set_property_string to dynamically set the keyboard
  layout at runtime in hal's database, and the server can just draw that
  information from xorg.conf initially.
 
 Well, you could even have a postinst that scans xorg.conf and generates
 the FDI, but yes, the X server should be responsible for checking this
 and not breaking existing setups.

Yeah, I'm mainly concerned with not breaking existing setups. I feel like
we've been doing that a lot lately. Luckly, lenny is a ways away so we have
time to break things quite a bit before we get it right.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442316: Xorg hotplugging problems [WAS: Re: Bug#442316: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: evdev from experimental messes up my keyboard layout]

2007-10-23 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:02:35PM +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:02:31PM +0200, ext Michael Biebl wrote:
  Whenever xorg input hotplugging kicks in, the evdev driver is used. The
  kbd keyboard settings from xorg.conf are ignored and the en_US keyboard
  layout is used.
 
 Yes, this should probably be fixed up, I guess.  But the long-term fix
 is to provide an FDI file in /etc that specifies the keyboard layout.

My feeling is the other way around, provided that the X server is the only
user of this field. People already know how to edit xorg.conf, and they
expect it. Telling them to edit a relatively obscure file among many other
fdi's is more painful. There's also userspace tools that exist to help with
generating a xorg.conf, but nothing friendly to deal with fdi's.

  If I understood Daniel correctly, he proposes to set the keyboard layout
  (probably based on the values from xorg.conf) via a generated fdi file.
  I'd like to avoid that, because that would complicate things.
 
 How would it complicate anything?  xorg.conf is a file, so is an FDI.
 We're already using FDIs through HAL, anyway ...

Generating xorg.conf sucks though and we're trying to get away from that as
much as is sensible. Of course, this was the one section I'd planned to
keep generating anyway.

  Preferably, the X server should use the keyboard layout specified in
  xorg.conf (for the old kbd driver) even when used in xorg hotplugging mode.
 
 Yes, probably.

My sense is that if we're going to do this, then there's no need to
generate the fdi. Just generate the xorg.conf. We can patch the server to
use libhal_device_set_property_string to dynamically set the keyboard
layout at runtime in hal's database, and the server can just draw that
information from xorg.conf initially.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446441: xserver-xorg: The problem is in regexp

2007-10-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:44:03AM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+2
 Followup-For: Bug #446441
 
 The fix for this is simple: Just add underscore to grepping for radeon
 in acquiring DRIVER_LIST. So doing s/|radeon|/|radeon_|/ in postints
 fixes this issue.

This part of the debconfage is going away when I get a chance to figure out
what to do about sparc. In the future, you won't even bother to write this
section to your xorg.conf unless you want to override the default, as it'll
just load the right driver by default. The server and drivers in unstable
can already do this. I did add a patch for some pci id's to radeonhd to do
this too, although I don't think it's complete.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446851: xserver-xorg-core: please copy (and improve) x11-input.fdi to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/

2007-10-18 Thread David Nusinow
reassign 446851 hal
retitle 446851 Please package new upstream version which includes x11-input.fdi
thanks

On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:45:11AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
 
 On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:16 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
  On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
   On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg.  x11-input makes sense,
but then again, it's largely a system decision.  OTOH, XKB can be used
in the console, not just in X (hence why it's namespaced input.xkb and
not input.x11.xkb or so), so that's why.
   
   Okay...so it's the domain of xkb? Even in that case, it seems there is
   a more appropriate place for it than hal.
   
Also, as Michel mentions, everything else is already in hal-info, so eh.
The latest release includes it, AIUI.
   
   Well, I really don't care where it comes from, as long as it's included.
  
  I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
  move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
  life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to
  input hotplug is because I've been focused on getting output autodetection
  in better shape.  Once that's done, I'll get to this if no one else beats
  me to it.
 
 I think it would be better to listen to upstream and reassign this to
 hal-info...

Ok, Daniel's message didn't hit my inbox for some reason, so I just saw
the bit about it being in the new hal version. I'm reassigning this to hal
since it looks like all the .fdi files that hal itself ships belong to that
package, and x11-input.fdi is in that category. Sjoerd can reassign it if I
got it wrong.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446441: xserver-xorg: The problem is in regexp

2007-10-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:54:54AM +0900, Michal Čihař wrote:
 Hi
 
 On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:19:02 -0400
 David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  This part of the debconfage is going away when I get a chance to figure out
  what to do about sparc. In the future, you won't even bother to write this
  section to your xorg.conf unless you want to override the default, as it'll
  just load the right driver by default. The server and drivers in unstable
  can already do this. I did add a patch for some pci id's to radeonhd to do
  this too, although I don't think it's complete.
 
 You're right, it seems to work without specifying driver in config (I
 had to rebuild radeonhd from git anyway...). However as long as the
 debconf code is there, it should list all drivers. (I have no idea when
 you except to drop this debconf code, but it is far away, I think it
 should be fixed).

Well, basically I'm telling you that the right fix at this point is to drop
it. Again, sparc is really the only thing holding it back.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446851: xserver-xorg-core: please copy (and improve) x11-input.fdi to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/

2007-10-17 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
 On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg.  x11-input makes sense,
  but then again, it's largely a system decision.  OTOH, XKB can be used
  in the console, not just in X (hence why it's namespaced input.xkb and
  not input.x11.xkb or so), so that's why.
 
 Okay...so it's the domain of xkb? Even in that case, it seems there is
 a more appropriate place for it than hal.
 
  Also, as Michel mentions, everything else is already in hal-info, so eh.
  The latest release includes it, AIUI.
 
 Well, I really don't care where it comes from, as long as it's included.

I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to
input hotplug is because I've been focused on getting output autodetection
in better shape.  Once that's done, I'll get to this if no one else beats
me to it.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#446851: xserver-xorg-core: please copy (and improve) x11-input.fdi to /etc/hal/fdi/policy/

2007-10-17 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:45:20PM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
 On 10/17/07, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
  move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
  life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to
  input hotplug is because I've been focused on getting output autodetection
  in better shape.  Once that's done, I'll get to this if no one else beats
  me to it.
 
 Output hotplug on Intel 915 is pretty terrible right now. It doesn't
 appear to probe the connected monitor for the supported modes.
 However, starting Xorg with the monitor attached works like a charm.

If you could open that as another bug, that'd be much preferrable to
discussing it in this one.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#445331: quodlibet: Broken cover files break the cover scan in album browser

2007-10-04 Thread David Nusinow
Package: quodlibet
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: minor

Hello,

   Using quodlibet with the album view I found that only a fraction of the
album covers would display in the sidebar. The covers had no trouble
displaying in the upper right corner when the song played though. It turned
out that I had some directories where the .folder.jpg file was a broken
symlink to central cover image. The broken symlink caused quodlibet to stop
scanning and loading the cover images. Removing these broken symlinks fixed
the problem. The app should be able to simply skip over these broken cover
images and load the remainder.

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages quodlibet depends on:
ii  exfalso   1.0-1  audio tag editor for GTK+
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-base0.10.14-4  GStreamer plugins from the base 
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-good0.10.6-3   GStreamer plugins from the good 
ii  gstreamer0.10-plugins-ugly0.10.6-2   GStreamer plugins from the ugly 
ii  python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central0.5.15 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-gst0.100.10.8-1   generic media-playing framework (P

Versions of packages quodlibet recommends:
ii  gstreamer0.10-alsa0.10.14-4  GStreamer plugin for ALSA
ii  gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs0.10.14-4  GStreamer plugin for GnomeVFS
pn  python-feedparser none (no description available)
ii  quodlibet-ext 1.0-1  extensions for the Quod Libet audi

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#444788: xserver-xorg-dev: Does not install DESIGN document

2007-09-30 Thread David Nusinow
Package: xserver-xorg-dev
Version: 2:1.4-3
Severity: minor

We should really be installing the DESIGN document in hw/xfree86/doc/sgml,
as well as any other docs in hw/xfree86/doc that aren't being installed.

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-dev depends on:
ii  libpixman-1-dev   0.9.5-2pixel-manipulation library for X a
ii  x11proto-core-dev 7.0.11-1   X11 core wire protocol and auxilia
ii  x11proto-fonts-dev2.0.2-5X11 font extension wire protocol
ii  x11proto-input-dev1.4.2-1X11 Input extension wire protocol
ii  x11proto-randr-dev1.2.1-2X11 RandR extension wire protocol
ii  x11proto-render-dev   2:0.9.3-2  X11 Render extension wire protocol
ii  x11proto-video-dev2.2.2-4X11 Video extension wire protocol
ii  x11proto-xext-dev 7.0.2-5X11 various extension wire protoco

xserver-xorg-dev recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#444203: xserver-xorg-core: EXA greedy mode is broken on 2:1.4-2 is broken

2007-09-27 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:00:37PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
 forwarded 444203 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12520
 thank you
 
 
 
 matthieu castet wrote:
  when using EXA greedy mode, there corruption on mozilla (see attached
  screenshot).

 
 I am wondering: IIRC, greedy isn't the default, what's the point of
 using it instead of the default?
 
  (II) NOUVEAU driver Date:   Thu Sep 20 08:29:43 2007 +1000

 
 So nouveau really works? Great.
 
  (II) Loading sub module dri
  (II) LoadModule: dri
  (II) Reloading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libdri.so
  (II) NOUVEAU(0): Loaded DRI module
  drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
  drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
  drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device or address)
  drmOpenDevice: Open failed
  drmOpenByBusid: Searching for BusID pci::01:00.0
  drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
  drmOpenDevice: open result is 7, (OK)
  drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 7
  drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci::01:00.0
  (II) NOUVEAU(0): [dri] Found DRI library version 1.3.0 and kernel module 
  version 0.0.10

 
 And you really get DRI?
 
 We should really package this driver...

It's almost finished on my machine. Maybe tonight...

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#442892: dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg is useless without discover installed

2007-09-17 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:36:18PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.3+2
 Severity: important
 
 Hi,
 
 I recently upgraded my x.org server in sid, and, after upgrade, the X
 server would not work. But this is another issue I will try to
 understand at another time.
 
 Anyways, the thing is, since my conf was not working, I wanted to try to
 dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg, which I would assume to work, but didn't
 in my case, because discover was not installed.
 
 Here is the message I get after reconfiguring when discover is not
 installed:
 
 xserver-xorg postinst warning: overwriting possibly-customised configuration
file; backup in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.20070917193443
 dexconf: error: cannot generate configuration file; 
 xserver-xorg/config/device/driver not set.  Aborting.  Reconfigure the X 
 server 
 with dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg to correct this problem.
 xserver-xorg postinst warning: error while preparing new Xorg X server
configuration file in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.dpkg-new; not attempting to
update existing configuration
 
 Note that /etc/X11/xorg.conf.dpkg-new doesn't even exist after this, and
 that I never get asked what driver to use.
 
 After installing discover, everything works fine.

Discover is going away from the scripts very soon. The updates from
yesterday are what will finally permit that.

 - David Nusinow



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#438578: xorg-server: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation

2007-08-26 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:42:45AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
 Quoting helix84 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  Package: xorg-server
  Version: 2:3a1.3.0.0.dfsg-12
  Priority: wishlist
  Tags: l10n patch
  
  .po attached
 
 
 I'd be happy to commit this somewhere but I indeed have no idea of
 what branch I should checkout for the xorg-server package.

Right now, debian-experimental would be the right branch. I'm pretty sure
we're done with debian-unstable until after the 7.3 release.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#438578: xorg-server: [INTL:sk] Slovak po-debconf translation

2007-08-26 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 08:19:23PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
.po attached
   
   
   I'd be happy to commit this somewhere but I indeed have no idea of
   what branch I should checkout for the xorg-server package.
  
  Right now, debian-experimental would be the right branch. I'm pretty sure
  we're done with debian-unstable until after the 7.3 release.
 
 
 Ah, well, Julien gave me the opposite advice and I committed to
 debian-unstable, I'm afraid.
 
 Actually, when it comes to debconf l10n, I'd prefer not having to jump
 from one branch to another. If that's needed, it would be preferrable,
 then, that someone else does the commits (Julien can, I just want to
 save as much developer's valuable time as possible by doing all these
 nasty little l10n thingies myself, indeed..:-)..

Ok that's fine. It doesn't really matter, since it's easy to merge things
back.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#436488: xserver-xorg: Addscreen/screeninit failed for driver 0

2007-08-12 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:12:52AM -0500, Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
 On 8/7/07, Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  reassign 436488 xserver-xorg-video-i810
  found 436488 2:1.7.2-4
  severity 436488 normal
  thank you
 
 
 
  Lucas S wrote:
   I have installed the debian etch from a netinstall cd. Stable40r0.
   The gui mode of installation has worked but after selecting to install
   desktop and standard installtion the xserver is not able to start.
  
 
  Your board might not be supported by the i810 driver in Etch. You should
  upgrade to Debian testing (xserver-xorg-core 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-11 and
  xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.1.0-1).
 
 
 Unfortunately this will be a production server in 48h so I am not able
 to use testing.
 
 
   (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory)
   (WW) I810(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is 
   available
  
 
  Either the kernel agpgart and intel_agp modules are not loaded or they
  do not support your board.
 
   (II) I810(0): Initial framebuffer allocation size: 7680 kByte
   (EE) I810(0): Failed to allocate framebuffer. Is your VideoRAM set too 
   low ??
  
 
  This should be fixed in testing.
 
 Are there any plans to include these two version of the program into
 stable anytime soon?

There are plans to release a sort of etch-and-a-half in several months
time. This should include updates for both the kernel and intel driver.
While we're not planning to have DRI working for this scheme, you should be
able to run 2d graphics at a normal speed. In the meanwhile, you'll need to
use the vesa driver though.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#430545: Display goes off at the mid of installation

2007-08-11 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
 As explained by Matthew earlier, this problem is probably caused by
 xresprobe probing available video modes. There is no easy way to fix it
 for now apart from not probing at all but that might generate buggy
 xorg.conf. However, we expect xresprobe to be dropped in the long term
 thanks to the server autoconfiguration features.

I'm not sure that the xserver's autoprobing is going to be a whole lot
better than what xresprobe is doing. We may have to keep in mind what sort
of broken hardware can cause the probe to fail like this and possibly work
around it in the server if it doesn't already.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#383465: Contains obfuscated source code, DFSG violation?

2007-07-16 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
 On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 07:50:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
  
  The nouveau project is deobfuscating the code as they go. Even if their DRI
  work isn't ready for Lenny, we'll definitely be pulling their deobfuscated
  code.
 
 Put aside what we do for Lenny, is there any technical problem in terms of
 user support if we move this driver to non-free and let vesa and/or vga be
 the default for nvidia users?
 
 Given that the driver is 2D-only anyway, I don't see it as a big loss.  With
 the vesa option, at least the non-free bits are moved down to firmware, where
 it's no longer our responsability (read: if the driver is faulty and we can't
 fix it, it would be faulty on all platforms, and I find that highly unlikely
 since the card wouldn't work on pristine win32 either).

The nv driver does provide additional features over the vesa driver, most
notably the recent inclusion of randr 1.2 support. Because of this, I'd
rather not push people even further towards the proprietary driver.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#429941: ITP: grandr -- gtk interface to xrandr

2007-06-21 Thread David Nusinow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Package name: grandr
  Version : 0.1
  Upstream Author : Intel Corporation, hosted at X.org
  URL : http://www.x.org/
  License : MIT/X11
  Programming Lang: C
  Description : gtk interface to xrandr

A simple gtk interface to the X Resize And Roate (XRandR) extension. This
allows you change the resolution and frequency of your monitor dynamically
using a simple interface. For drivers that support it, it can also
configure the relative positioning of multiple monitors.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#429495: Option NoDRI is not used

2007-06-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:58:02PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
 Version: 1:6.6.3-2
 Severity: normal
 
 Hi,
 
 I can not disable DRI. Attached is the xorg config and the log file.
 Also filed here:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207614

In the meantime, you can use 'Disable dri' if you're running unstable, or
if you're running stable comment out the 'Load dri' line in the modules
section of your xorg.conf. hth in the meanwhile.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#427850: ITP: libhpricot-ruby -- A fast, flexible HTML parser for Ruby

2007-06-06 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 06:52:37AM +0900, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
 Package: wnpp
 Severity: wishlist
 Owner: Daigo Moriwaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 * Package name: libhpricot-ruby
   Version : 0.5.140
   Upstream Author : why the lucky stiff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 * URL : http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/hpricot/
 * License : BSD
   Programming Lang: Ruby
   Description : A fast, flexible HTML parser for Ruby
 
  Hpricot is a fast, flexible HTML parser written in Ruby's C extension.
  It is designed to be very accommodating and to have a very helpful
  library.  Also, Hpricot can be handy for reading broken XML files. If a
  quote is missing, Hpricot tries to figure it out.  If tags overlap,
  Hpricot works on sorting them out.

apt-cache show libhpricot-ruby

Package: libhpricot-ruby
Priority: extra
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 40
Maintainer: Ari Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Architecture: all
Version: 0.5-2
Depends: libhpricot-ruby1.8
Filename: pool/main/libh/libhpricot-ruby/libhpricot-ruby_0.5-2_all.deb
Size: 7268
MD5sum: 343eeb5de7305477e56cc0c1dbec0567
SHA1: 5485d4a298ea1fc48bf584b8a12e1bd089a27846
SHA256: 60705d6b64bbd5afecea19e6f61c787673e74592f6b5c34f7b226b2738042f17
Description: A fast, enjoyable HTML parser
 Hpricot is a fast, flexible HTML parser written in C.  It's designed to be
 very accomodating (like Tanaka Akira's HTree) and to have a very helpful
 library (like some JavaScript libs -- JQuery, Prototype -- give you.)
 .
 Also, Hpricot can be handy for reading broken XML files, since many of the
 same principles are used.  If a quote is missing, Hpricot tries to figure it
 out.  If tags overlap, Hpricot works on sorting them out.
 .
 Homepage: http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/hpricot/
 .
 This is a dependency package which depends on Debian's default Ruby version
 (currently 1.8).
Tag: devel::lang:ruby


Maybe I'm missing something?

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#389864: rgb text database replaced by static table

2007-06-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:22:22PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
 Hi Giacomo,
 
 I guess this problem with the RGB database being replaced by a static
 table still occurs wth latest xserver-xorg-core 1.3, right? For the
 record, it looks like we could revert to the old behavior by defining
 USE_RGB_BUILTIN to 0 during the build (see os/oscolor.c). However, I am
 not sure it is worth doing it.

I don't think that's really the method we want. Ideally, the server will
use the built-in table unless we explicitly point it to an external file
using xorg.conf. That way it just works in every situation and no one
loses. I don't really know why you want a custom file in this day and age,
but but I guess there's at least some small call for it.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#402165: [Xcb] Bug#402165: Workarounds for locking assertions in Sun Java 1.5 and 1.6

2007-06-03 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:14:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Sat, Jun  2, 2007 at 11:54:02 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
 
  * Josh Triplett:
  
   Barring that, how about shipping an executable script
   /usr/share/doc/sun-java{5,6}-bin/unbreak-my-java ?
  
  The license does not allow for anything like that, I'm afraid.
  
 We could ship that in libx11-6, then. *shrug*

If you want to do it in the packaging scripts, the problem becomes that
when someone installs java after libx11-6 the scripts won't run to make the
change. The user could re-install the package with dpkg -i, but that'd be
annoying. Maybe we could ship a script to make the change that the postinst
runs, and that the user could run manually if they need to?

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#422948: RM: pwm - dead upstream, hostile upstream

2007-05-08 Thread David Nusinow
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

   Please remove the pwm package from the archive. This window manager is
the predecessor to ion, and is written by the same author. This program is
dead upstream, and while the author has not contacted me, he has been
actively hostile to both the Debian ion maintainer and that of other
distros. I believe that pwm should be removed from Debian as a result.

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#311843: RM: debsig-verify

2007-05-03 Thread David Nusinow
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove debsig-verify from testing until #311843 is resolved. By
default, it will hose the package system. Whether or not it is a bug in
debsig-verify or dpkg doesn't matter, as its installation will seriously
break a system unless it's configured. I also believe that it should be
removed from the stable release as well for the same reason.

 - David Nusinow

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.18-4-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableftp.us.debian.org 
1 experimentalftp.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-===
| 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#414535: Please Set Workaround Environment Variable

2007-04-08 Thread David Nusinow
Package: sun-java6-jre
Version: 6-00-2

Hello,
   The XSF is going to be uploading XCB to unstable soon, and we want to
see this problem at least be manageable. Novell has a patch that we'll be
using[0] that allows XCB to ignore the locking issue if the
LIBXCB_SLOPPY_LOCK environment variable is set. If the variable is not set,
the error in this bug report will still cause problems. We'll be uploading
this patch in the next few days to either experimental or unstable. If you
have any additional questions, please cc debian-x@lists.debian.org so we
can respond.

 - David Nusinow

[0] Actually, we got a version from Ubuntu that's more permissive, but we
want to catch these bugs, so we're shipping the restrictive one from
Novell.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.18-4-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableftp.us.debian.org 
  500 unstabledodji.flucast.org 
1 experimentalftp.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends  (Version) | Installed
==-+-
java-common  (= 0.24) | 0.25
locales| 2.3.6.ds1-13
sun-java6-bin  (= 6-00-2)  | 6-00-2
 OR ia32-sun-java6-bin  (= 6-00-2) | 
debconf  (= 0.5)  | 1.5.13
 OR debconf-2.0| 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#414031: google-earth doesn't work with current version of xserver-xorg-video-i810

2007-03-25 Thread David Nusinow
tags 414031 + fixed-upstream
thanks

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:29:41PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
 On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 15:15 +0100, Hermann Kraus wrote:
  On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 09:39:51 +0100, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  wrote:
  
   We should keep it open for now as it might be a genuine bug in
   xserver-xorg-video-i810. Can you try rebuilding it with the attached
   patch to see if that helps with the new kernel? Please try both versions
   of libgl1-mesa-dri, as I suspect this might fix the old version but
   regress the new one, requiring another fix for the latter.
  
  You are right. This works with the old lib but not with new one. However  
  it depends on the kernel version again:
  
  Kernel 2.6.19:
  -old lib: works
  -new lib: works but prints this error message:
  -
  do_wait: drmWaitVBlank returned -1, IRQs don't seem to be working
  correctly.
  Try running with LIBGL_THROTTLE_REFRESH and LIBL_SYNC_REFRESH unset.
  -
  
  Kernel 2.6.20:
  -old lib: works
  -new lib: fails (error message + unusable slow)
 
 Where's the difference between kernel versions? :)
 
 Anyway, since the current upstream versions don't exhibit this problem
 together and fixing xf86-video-intel for old Mesa would break current
 Mesa, I don't intend to do anything about this upstream.
 
 Also, since no version of Debian ships the problematic combination of
 kernel, xf86-video-intel and Mesa, I'm not sure it's even worth doing
 anything about it in Debian packages. XSF, what do you think?

I agree with you on this one. We'll have to remember to close this bug when
we get the next upstream release in to the archive.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#412069: patch for beryl support

2007-02-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:39:13AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 06:25:51PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
   On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:

I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. 
No
one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such 
a
decision are.

While compiz and beryl may be very sexy, I don't want to break or 
degrade
performance on systems not running them simply for the convenience of 
not
having to modify xorg.conf. It's not out of the question, but I don't 
want
to blindly enable options in our default settings for the bling of it.
   
   Than can we conditionalise it?  We could add a question with priority
   'normal' that most users won't see.  Then in the post-etch era, the Beryl
   community can add a reconfigure xserver-xorg and enable beryl settings
   step in their how-tos.
   
   If we were to do that, I suppose we would prefer to have 
   XAANoOffscreenPixmaps
   and AddARGBGLXVisuals as well.
  
  I'd be fine with that. You'll have to ask the translation team for
  permission on this one though. I've cc'ed Christian in case he's not
  reading this report.
 
 Can I assume that, since you agreed to Composite by default in the other
 sub-thread, we're only discussing XAANoOffscreenPixmaps and AddARGBGLXVisuals
 here ?

Exactly. I don't think composite needs a debconf question.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#402658: That is serious

2007-02-28 Thread David Nusinow
tags 402658 + pending
thanks

On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:08:06PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
 found 402658 2:1.1.1-18
 severity 402658 serious
 thanks
 
 If I'm not mistaken, this should be severity serious, as per policy
 7.5.1. I just got that on a partial upgrade on a etch/sid mixed
 machine.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I've fixed this in git, and I'll
be uploading it shortly.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#412069: patch for beryl support

2007-02-27 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:26:09AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:02:02PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
  
  I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. No
  one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such a
  decision are.
  
  While compiz and beryl may be very sexy, I don't want to break or degrade
  performance on systems not running them simply for the convenience of not
  having to modify xorg.conf. It's not out of the question, but I don't want
  to blindly enable options in our default settings for the bling of it.
 
 Than can we conditionalise it?  We could add a question with priority
 'normal' that most users won't see.  Then in the post-etch era, the Beryl
 community can add a reconfigure xserver-xorg and enable beryl settings
 step in their how-tos.
 
 If we were to do that, I suppose we would prefer to have XAANoOffscreenPixmaps
 and AddARGBGLXVisuals as well.

I'd be fine with that. You'll have to ask the translation team for
permission on this one though. I've cc'ed Christian in case he's not
reading this report.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#412069: patch for beryl support

2007-02-27 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
   My point is that if we don't figure that out satisfactorily in time, we 
   could
   just enable the Composite extension, which sounds fairly safe, and seems 
   to be
   enough for Intel cards.  And Intel happens to be the card brand we have 
   the
   best driver support for (compared to a RE'd driver for ATI and nothing for
   nVidia), so focusing on it makes sense to me.
  
  Yes, that should be mostly safe at this point. The only exception that
  comes to mind offhand is that fglrx disables the DRI when Composite is
  enabled.
 
 If we have to choose between optimizing for free drivers that work sanely
 (either intel or radeon) and non-free drivers that are partly broken, I
 think it's clear what is better.
 
 Ok with enabling Composite by default then?

Yeah, I'm fine with that, although I think the better method is to enable
it directly in the server by default.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#412069: patch for beryl support

2007-02-26 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 12:18:06PM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg
 Severity: wishlist
 Tags: patch
 
 I know it's too late for Beryl to make it into etch, but can we at least ship
 an xorg.conf that is frendly to Beryl ?  With this patch, only installing
 the beryl packages will be enough to get it working with no further setup
 (provided that OpenGL is working fine).
 
 Also note that having these extra lines in your xorg.conf is harmless for
 non-Beryl users (at least it didn't produce any new warnings or errors in
 /var/log/Xorg.log for me), so I propose to add them unconditionaly.
 
 Please, can this make it into etch?  This kind of eye-candy is _awesome_
 to attract new users.
 
 -- 
 Robert Millan
 
 ACK STORM, S.L.  -  http://www.ackstorm.es/

 diff -ur xorg-7.1.0.old/debian/local/dexconf xorg-7.1.0/debian/local/dexconf
 --- xorg-7.1.0.old/debian/local/dexconf   2007-02-13 11:02:09.0 
 +0100
 +++ xorg-7.1.0/debian/local/dexconf   2007-02-23 12:07:45.0 +0100
 @@ -351,6 +351,11 @@
  if [ $DEVICE_USE_FBDEV = true ]; then
printf \tOption\t\t\UseFBDev\\t\t\$DEVICE_USE_FBDEV\\n 4
  fi
 +cat 4 SECTION
 + # needed for beryl
 + Option  XAANoOffscreenPixmaps true
 + Option  AddARGBGLXVisuals On

These aren't generally necessary, and I don't believe it's a good idea to
set them as default when they're not needed. The latter may be harmless,
but I don't know enough about the former, since it only appears to be
useful on some ati hardware. There's a reason why upstream hasn't enabled
it by default in the driver.

 +SECTION
  printf EndSection\n 4
  
  ### MONITOR
 @@ -428,6 +433,15 @@
  EndSection
  SECTION
  
 +### Extensions
 +exec 4$DEXCONFTMPDIR/Extensions
 +cat 4 SECTION
 +Section Extensions
 + # needed for beryl
 + Option  Composite Enable
 +EndSection
 +SECTION

I haven't decided if enabling composite by default is a wise move yet. No
one in Debian has done a real analysis as to what the downsides of such a
decision are.

While compiz and beryl may be very sexy, I don't want to break or degrade
performance on systems not running them simply for the convenience of not
having to modify xorg.conf. It's not out of the question, but I don't want
to blindly enable options in our default settings for the bling of it.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#412275: no display and system freezes after adjusting time with KDE clock on 945GM graphic chip

2007-02-25 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:16:58AM +0100, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
 El domingo, 25 de febrero de 2007, Brice Goglin escribió:
  Ralph Plawetzki wrote:
   When the system freezes, I have to turn off the laptop. When it's
   rebooted, I can reproduce the error by changing the time again.
 
  Just to be sure, can you try changing the time with the 'date' command
  instead of the KDE applet?
 
   Brice, I keep having this problem with ntpdate, for example.  It is not 
 related to KDE, I think.  If I dare to synchronize my local time over NTP and 
 it happens that I am in the future, bang!  The X server crashes inmediately.  
 I think that it was reported repeteadly to upstream, but I did not search for 
 a solution since some weeks ago.

Indeed, this soudns exactly like another bug that was reported at least
once a few months back. I applied a patch that was supposed to help with
the problem, but apparently it wasn't the fix that we'd hoped for. Sorry,
I don't have time to track down the original bug numbers right now, but I
can try and fetch them if people want.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410879: xserver-xorg-core: Dual-screen problem

2007-02-22 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Benjamin Gufler wrote:
 Hi Julien,
 
 On 2007-02-20 07:35, Julien Cristau wrote:
  uh, read the bug, please, this is a regression introduced by the int10
  patch in 2:1.1.1-17, so we might want to fix it.
  
  Benjamin, could you try commenting this line in your xorg.conf:
  Option  UseInt10ModuleTrue
  and tell us whether that fixes it?
 
 thanks for this suggestion. If I remove that line, I'm able to start the
 X server using xserver-xorg-core 2:1.1.1-18, but not with 2:2.1.0-3.
 However, what I get is not one screen next to the other as before, but a
 cloned output (except for the mouse pointer, which is visible only on
 one of the screens).

Can you add the linke 'Load vm86' to your modules section and let us know
if that works?

  - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#411206: git-buildpackage: Please allow use of an external .orig.tar.gz

2007-02-16 Thread David Nusinow
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.2.25
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

   I'd like to make use of pre-existing .orig.tar.gz's. I have a large
of these lying around for more stable parts of xorg, and I'd like to just
have git-buildpackage use them rather than import them in to the
repository. I think this is the last issue that's keeping me from using
git-buildpackage for managing the xorg packages for Debian. Thank you and
keep up the great work!

 - David Nusinow

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages git-buildpackage depends on:
ii  devscripts   2.9.27  Scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  git-core 1:1.4.4.4-1 content addressable filesystem
ii  git-load-dirs1.0.35  Import upstream archives into git
ii  python   2.4.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-support   0.5.6   automated rebuilding support for p

git-buildpackage recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#405714: How would the trivial implementation violate policy?

2007-02-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 08:14:44PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
 Hi David,
 suppose this would be implemented trivially, by identifying a line in 
 xorg.conf where the needed line can be added and adding the needed line 
 there. How would this violate policy?

This is the relevant section:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.4

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#406608: libsm6: ICE socket disappears after a suspend-to-ram, delay when starting session-aware apps

2007-01-15 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:08:45AM +0100, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
 Package: libsm6
 Version: 1:1.0.1-3
 Severity: important
 
 
 Hello, first of all forgive me if libsm6 is not responsible of this bug,
 I had trouble to figure out which is the real buggy package there.
 
 If you want to reassign the bug the a more appropriate package, feel
 free.
 
 I have a Debian etch laptop and use oftenly the suspend-to-ram thing,
 with hibernate (using the sysfs way: echo mem  /sys/power/state).
 
 When I power the laptop back from suspending, the ICE socket is no more:
 
 $ env | grep -i ice
 SESSION_MANAGER=local/heracles:/tmp/.ICE-unix/11483
 $ ls /tmp/.ICE-unix/11483
 ls: /tmp/.ICE-unix/11483: No such file or directory
 
 This makes quite all my apps under X to start with a ~10 seconds-delay.
 
 If I strace xterm for instance, I got the following output:
 
 connect(4, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path=/tmp/.ICE-unix/11483}, 22) = -1
 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
 close(4)= 0
 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [CHLD], [], 8) = 0
 rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, NULL, {SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0
 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
 nanosleep({1, 0}, {1, 0})   = 0
 socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 4
 uname({sys=Linux, node=heracles, ...}) = 0
 
 Any help/hint/advice is welcome, I'm willing to help fixing that bug
 before etch is released (hopefully).
 
 Tell me if I can provide more useful information.

Is every file and directory in your /tmp wiped ont when you suspend and
resume? If so, it really shouldn't be doing that.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323262: reopen 323262, still found in 7.1.0-9

2007-01-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
 found 323262 7.1.0-9
 thanks
 
 Hi,
 
 It appears that bug 323262 is still present in xserver-xorg/7.1.0-9.
 
 Is there a reason not to apply the patch to 7.1 or was this simply an
 oversight?

It's an oversight. I think I missed it in the transition to the 7.x series.
Unfortunately, we're so late in to the release process that I don't think I
can get an acception to this one, or else I'd upload a fix now. I'm sorry.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#406306: Processed: Re: Bug#406306: [INTL:ta] Tamil xserver - xorg templates translation

2007-01-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 07:17:55PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
 Quoting Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
  Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  
   reassign 406306 xserver-xorg
  Bug#406306: [INTL:ta] Tamil xserver - xorg templates translation
 
 
 OK, X folks, where should I commit this? Are SVN commits still OK ?

Yep, they are. We'll announce it, and I'll let you know, when they're not.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#323262: reopen 323262, still found in 7.1.0-9

2007-01-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 12:43:37AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 - -=| David Nusinow, 15.01.2007 00:40 |=-
  On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:15:59AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
  It appears that bug 323262 is still present in xserver-xorg/7.1.0-9.
 
  Is there a reason not to apply the patch to 7.1 or was this simply an
  oversight?
  
  It's an oversight. I think I missed it in the transition to the 7.x series.
  Unfortunately, we're so late in to the release process that I don't think I
  can get an acception to this one, or else I'd upload a fix now. I'm sorry.
 
 No big deal, ltsp packages have a workaround in them, so no high urgency.
 
 Anyway, I hope reopening of this bug will make it harder to miss the
 patch on the next upload :)

Actually, Julien just noticed that the big issue (the new debconf template)
is a hidden one, so we're actually be uploading this fix shortly. Thanks
for noticing the regression.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  1   2   3   4   >