Processed: Fixed in NMU of mesa 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 368562 + fixed Bug#368562: mesa: debian/copyright does not contain all licenses There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 369895 + fixed Bug#369895: libgl1-mesa-dri: _tnl_RenderClippedLine spews debug info Tags were: patch Bug#383387: libgl1-mesa-glx: printf() in line rendering loop Tags added: fixed > tag 384057 + fixed Bug#384057: mesa-common-dev: Missing Replaces: xlibosmesa-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > tag 384282 + fixed Bug#384282: libgl1-mesa-glx: Confusing description and provide, libgl1-mesa-dri not pulled in on upgrades. Tags were: patch Bug#366090: xlibmesa-gl: libgl1-mesa-dri not pulled in with xorg7 Tags added: fixed > tag 386185 + fixed Bug#386185: libgl1-mesa-swx11: shlibs file is wrong for libOSmesa6 Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388008: marked as done (fontconfig-config: local modifications are lost across package upgrade)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:32:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#388008: fixed in fontconfig 2.4.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: fontconfig-config Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 I use dpkg-reconfigure to modify the setting of fontconfig after upgrade to version 2.4.0-5. Here are the associated debconf config.dat * My custom setting Name: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Template: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Value: false Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/hinting_type Template: fontconfig/hinting_type Value: Native Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Template: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Value: Never Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen While upgrading to version 2.4.1-1, it seems fontconfig-config automatically restore the setting back to default. I have to use dpkg-reconfigure to set it again. * After upgrade to 2.4.1-1 Name: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Template: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Value: true Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/hinting_type Template: fontconfig/hinting_type Value: Native Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Template: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Value: Automatic Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.13 Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fontconfig-config depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.4 Debian configuration management sy ii ttf-dejavu2.9-1 Vera font family derivate with add ii ucf 2.0015 Update Configuration File: preserv fontconfig-config recommends no packages. -- Best Regards Haifeng Chen --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: fontconfig Source-Version: 2.4.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fontconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: fontconfig-config_2.4.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig-config_2.4.1-2_all.deb fontconfig-udeb_2.4.1-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig-udeb_2.4.1-2_i386.udeb fontconfig_2.4.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.4.1-2.diff.gz fontconfig_2.4.1-2.dsc to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.4.1-2.dsc fontconfig_2.4.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/fontconfig_2.4.1-2_i386.deb libfontconfig1-dbg_2.4.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/libfontconfig1-dbg_2.4.1-2_i386.deb libfontconfig1-dev_2.4.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/libfontconfig1-dev_2.4.1-2_i386.deb libfontconfig1_2.4.1-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/fontconfig/libfontconfig1_2.4.1-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated fontconfig package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:10:18 -0700 Source: fontconfig Binary: libfontconfig1 fontconfig-udeb fontconfig fontconfig-config libfontconfig1-dbg libfontconfig1-dev Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.4.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: fontconfig - generic font configuration library - support binaries fontcon
Bug#388008: fontconfig-config: local modifications are lost across package upgrade
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 10:51 +0800, Haifeng Chen wrote: > While upgrading to version 2.4.1-1, it seems fontconfig-config automatically > restore the setting back to default. I have to use dpkg-reconfigure to set it > again. Oops. Fontconfig wasn't looking for a new-style configuration during upgrade to detect your current settings. I've fixed it to look for either the old-style or new-style conf.d contents, so anyone upgrading from 2.4.0-5 to 2.4.1-2 shouldn't have this problem. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#384282: final NMU diff
Hi Marcelo,
As promised, I will be uploading 6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1 to unstable shortly.
The final diff for this NMU is attached. The only substantive difference to
the previous NMU diff is the addition of debian/control fixes to make the
package binNMU-safe, as documented in the other bug report I've just filed.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/rules
mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/rules
--- mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/rules
+++ mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/rules
@@ -186,7 +186,6 @@
dh_compress -s
dh_fixperms -s
# dh_makeshlibs -s -Nlibglu1-mesa -Nmesag3
- dh_makeshlibs -plibgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg -V 'libgl1-mesa-swx11 | libgl1'
ifneq ($(strip $(shell dh_listpackages -s | grep -w libgl1-mesa-glide3)),)
dh_makeshlibs -plibgl1-mesa-glide3 -V 'libgl1-mesa-glide3'
endif
@@ -197,7 +196,7 @@
dh_makeshlibs -plibosmesa6
endif
ifneq ($(strip $(shell dh_listpackages -s | grep -w libgl1-mesa-swx11)),)
- dh_makeshlibs -plibgl1-mesa-swx11 -V 'libgl1-mesa-swx11 | libgl1'
+ dh_makeshlibs -plibgl1-mesa-swx11
endif
ifneq ($(strip $(shell dh_listpackages -s | grep -w libgl1-mesa-glx)),)
dh_makeshlibs -plibgl1-mesa-glx -V 'libgl1-mesa-glx | libgl1'
@@ -208,7 +207,7 @@
# Make sure nothing has been left behind.
find debian -mindepth 2 -name shlibs | cut -d / -f 2 | sort -u > \
debian/shlibs.actual
- find debian -mindepth 2 -name lib\*.so.\* | cut -d / -f 2 | sort -u > \
+ find debian -mindepth 2 -name lib\*.so.\* | grep -v dbg | cut -d / -f 2
| sort -u > \
debian/shlibs.should
cmp debian/shlibs.actual debian/shlibs.should
rm debian/shlibs.actual debian/shlibs.should
diff -u mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/control
mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/control
--- mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/control
+++ mesa-6.5.0.cvs.20060524/debian/control
@@ -4,12 +4,12 @@
Maintainer: Mesa package maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uploaders: Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
-Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>=
11), libdrm-dev (>> 2) [!hurd-i386], libdirectfb-dev, xutils, libexpat-dev,
libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, pkg-config, x11proto-gl-dev
+Build-Depends: lesstif2-dev, grep-dctrl, debhelper (>> 4), build-essential (>=
11), libdrm-dev (>> 2) [!hurd-i386], libdirectfb-dev, xutils, libexpat-dev,
libxxf86vm-dev, libx11-dev, libxext-dev, pkg-config, x11proto-gl-dev, dpkg-dev
(>= 1.13.19)
Package: libgl1-mesa-swx11
Section: libs
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, libglu1-mesa | libglu1
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Conflicts: mesag3-glide, mesag3-glide2, mesag3+ggi, libgl1, nvidia-glx,
mesag3, libgl1-mesa-swrast
Provides: libgl1, mesag3, libgl1-mesa-swrast
Replaces: libgl1, mesag3, libgl1-mesa-swrast
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
Package: libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev
Section: libdevel
Architecture: any
-Depends: libgl1-mesa-swx11 (= ${Source-Version}), libc6-dev, libx11-dev |
xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), mesa-common-dev (=
${Source-Version}), lesstif2-dev
+Depends: libgl1-mesa-swx11 (= ${binary:Version}), libc6-dev, libx11-dev |
xlibs-dev (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), mesa-common-dev (=
${source:Version}), lesstif2-dev
Provides: libgl-dev, mesag3-widgets, mesag-widgets-dev, libglw-dev, mesag-dev,
libgl1-mesa-swrast-dev
Conflicts: mesa-dev, libgl-dev, mesag3 (<< 3.1-1), nvidia-glx-dev, mesag-dev,
libgl1-mesa-swrast-dev
Replaces: libgl-dev, mesag-dev, libgl1-mesa-swrast-dev
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
Package: libgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg
Section: libs
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, libglu1-mesa | libglu1
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Conflicts: libgl1-mesa-swrast-dbg
Replaces: libgl1-mesa-swrast-dbg
Provides: libgl1-mesa-swrast-dbg
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Conflicts: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
Replaces: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri (<< 6.4.0)
-Provides: libgl1, libgl1-mesa-dri
+Provides: libgl1
Description: A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- GLX runtime
This version of Mesa provides GLX and DRI capabilities: it is capable of
both direct and indirect rendering. For direct rendering, it can use DRI
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Section: libs
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs-Depends}, libgl1-mesa-glx (= ${Source-Version})
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, libgl1-mesa-glx (= ${binary:Version})
Conflicts: xlibmesa-dri (<< 1:7.0.0)
Replaces: xlibmesa-dri (<< 1:7.0.0)
Description: A free implementation of the OpenGL API -- DRI modules
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
Package: libgl1-mesa-dev
Section: libs
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, libc6-dev, mesa-common-dev (= ${Source-Version
Bug#387928: also affects lilypond build
The s390 build of lilypond 2.6.5-1 (but not others) also failed for apparently this reason. See http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=lilypond&ver=2.6.5-1&arch=s390&stamp=1158538806&file=log&as=raw At the end: cd ./out ; fc-cache . /build/buildd/lilypond-2.6.5/mf/out: failed to write cache make[2]: *** [out/fonts.cache-1] Error 1 Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387951: libslp1: postrm fails when the package is purged
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:18:45AM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote: > Something seems to be broken. libslp1 depends on debconf. Why can't it > rely on debconf being installed when the package is purged? Because you can't rely on *any* non-essential packages being installed at purge time. > How were you able to remove debconf in the first place while libslp1 was > still installed? "Remove" != "Purge". Please see policy for details. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388011: xserver-xorg.config needs /var/lib/x11 from x11-common; .config scripts can't count on Pre-Depends
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.0.22 Severity: serious xserver-xorg.config requires /var/lib/x11 from x11-common, in order to create /var/lib/x11/.migrateconfig; however, .config scripts cannot count on Pre-Depends. This breaks upgrades from sarge: xserver-xorg config warning: Migrating xserver-xfree86 debconf values to xserver-xorg. touch: cannot touch `/var/lib/x11/.migrateconfig': No such file or directory xserver-xorg failed to preconfigure, with exit status 1 - Josh Triplett signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#387951: libslp1: postrm fails when the package is purged
Bill Allombert wrote: Package: libslp1 Version: 1.2.1-5 Severity: serious Hello Ganesan, Purging libslp1 fails with: Removing libslp1 ... Purging configuration files for libslp1 ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libslp1.postrm: line 4: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libslp1 (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: libslp1 The postrm cannot rely on debconf being installed when the package is purged. Hi Bill, Something seems to be broken. libslp1 depends on debconf. Why can't it rely on debconf being installed when the package is purged? How were you able to remove debconf in the first place while libslp1 was still installed? Ganesan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: diff.gz for new upstream version
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 386202 patch Bug#386202: gnome-pilot-conduits: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#388008: fontconfig-config: local modifications are lost across package upgrade
Package: fontconfig-config Version: 2.4.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 I use dpkg-reconfigure to modify the setting of fontconfig after upgrade to version 2.4.0-5. Here are the associated debconf config.dat * My custom setting Name: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Template: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Value: false Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/hinting_type Template: fontconfig/hinting_type Value: Native Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Template: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Value: Never Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen While upgrading to version 2.4.1-1, it seems fontconfig-config automatically restore the setting back to default. I have to use dpkg-reconfigure to set it again. * After upgrade to 2.4.1-1 Name: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Template: fontconfig/enable_bitmaps Value: true Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/hinting_type Template: fontconfig/hinting_type Value: Native Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen Name: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Template: fontconfig/subpixel_rendering Value: Automatic Owners: fontconfig-config Flags: seen -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.13 Locale: LANG=zh_CN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=zh_CN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages fontconfig-config depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.4 Debian configuration management sy ii ttf-dejavu2.9-1 Vera font family derivate with add ii ucf 2.0015 Update Configuration File: preserv fontconfig-config recommends no packages. -- Best Regards Haifeng Chen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 386201, tagging 386201
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 386201 patch Bug#386201: gnome-pilot: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0) Tags were: pending Tags added: patch > # I can not do the upload myself so remove the pending tag to make the bug > more visible > tags 386201 - pending Bug#386201: gnome-pilot: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0) Tags were: patch pending Tags removed: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386202: diff.gz for new upstream version
tag 386202 patch thanks Hi, I have prepared a patch for RC bug 386202 with updates the package to the new upstream version 2.0.14. As I am no DD yet I can not do a NMU myself so I would welcome some DD who can upload the new version. I have attached the diff.gz. The complete package is available from my personal repository [1] by doing dget http://moonshine.dnsalias.org/debian/unstable/gnome-pilot-conduits_2.0.14-0.1_i386.changes The changelog is below, Greetings Arjan Oosting gnome-pilot-conduits (2.0.14-0.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * New upstream release - Updated to work with pilot-link 0.12.0 (Closes: 386202) - Several critical bugs fixed. * debian/control: bump build dependency on libgnome-pilot2-dev. gnome-pilot-conduits_2.0.14-0.1.diff.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only
reopen 387848 thanks On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:06:13AM +1000, Alexander Zangerl wrote: > On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:49:39 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: > >Package: tun-source > >Severity: grave > >Justification: renders package unusable > >| The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include support for TUN/TAP > >| devices, and this package provides the same functionality for 2.2.x > >kernels. > >| FreeBSD kernels are also supported. > > > >Etch will ship Linux 2.6 only. > that's not correct, see #354203. etch will *default* to 2.6, ship 2.4 > and some unlucky archs might even still need 2.2. No. Etch will *only* ship 2.6. > furthermore, this is not a bug of the package but should be reported > against ftp.d.o. As noted in the same bug log that you cited, if a package should not be released because it's obsolete, an RC bug should be filed against the package itself to keep it out of testing *as well as* a bug against ftp.debian.org. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 387848 Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386938: xorg-server - FTBFS: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `sti'
José Parrella escribió: > It seems to me that sti doesn't belong here (from the interpretation of > the Principles of Operation [1]) so this might be either a problem in > the configure script (-> autoconf) or an upstream bug in binutils. This > is just my speculation, however. I stand corrected. Gerardo Curiel ([javamaniac], from Debian Venezuela) has suggested that adding libklibc-dev (or any particular kernel headers) to Build-Depends might solve this problem (since include/asm-s390/system.h defines several system support routines, including sti()). Could anyone (with access to raptor or any other S/390 machine) try this? Thank you very much for your time and patience. Jose -- José M. Parrella -> Debian Sid, k2.6.17.13 Escuela de Ingenieria Electrica Universidad Central de Venezuela -> ucvlug.info
Bug#387848: marked as done (tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only)
Your message dated Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:06:13 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387848: tun-source: tun - Obsolete as Etch will be Linux 2.6 only has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: tun-source Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable | The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include support for TUN/TAP | devices, and this package provides the same functionality for 2.2.x kernels. | FreeBSD kernels are also supported. Etch will ship Linux 2.6 only. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:49:39 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff writes: >Package: tun-source >Severity: grave >Justification: renders package unusable > >| The stock 2.4.x Linux kernel series already include support for TUN/TAP >| devices, and this package provides the same functionality for 2.2.x kernels. >| FreeBSD kernels are also supported. > >Etch will ship Linux 2.6 only. that's not correct, see #354203. etch will *default* to 2.6, ship 2.4 and some unlucky archs might even still need 2.2. furthermore, this is not a bug of the package but should be reported against ftp.d.o. regards az -- + Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291) Penguin Trivia #46: Animals who are not penguins can only wish they were. -- Chicago Reader 10/15/82 pgpnmeBc4m6Ku.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message ---
Bug#386938: xorg-server - FTBFS: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `sti'
This package already implements the previous experiences from other Debian maintainers regarding recent gcc and binutils interaction in s390 (that is, usage of -DNO_INLINE and correct --build and --host options for the configure script) It seems to me that sti doesn't belong here (from the interpretation of the Principles of Operation [1]) so this might be either a problem in the configure script (-> autoconf) or an upstream bug in binutils. This is just my speculation, however. Jose [1] http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dz9ar008/CCONTENTS -- José M. Parrella -> Debian Sid, k2.6.17.13 Escuela de Ingenieria Electrica Universidad Central de Venezuela -> ucvlug.info
Processed: ITA: apt-listbugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 374104 O: apt-listbugs -- Lists critical bugs before each apt Bug#374104: ITA: apt-listbugs -- Lists critical bugs before each apt Changed Bug title. > # close server errors that are since recovered. > close 381350 Bug#381350: apt-listbugs: crashes when run from aptitude 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Andreas Pakulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 334697 Bug#334697: apt-listbugs does not show several grave/serious bugs 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 293162 Bug#293162: apt-listbugs: local bug cache not updated? 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Martin Lohmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 341357 Bug#341357: apt-listbugs: bugs severity is still shown as reported even if it was changed 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Rudy Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334697: apt-listbugs needs versioned BTS handling.
reopen 334697 retitle 334697 versioned BTS handling thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 379146
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 379146 pending Bug#379146: headache: `line' setup does not works Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387913: FTBFS on a few arches (source, amd64, hppa, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, sparc)
hi, upstream author has released a new hardinfo (0.4). So FTBS from 0.3 will not be fixed. I was so busy this month, but now I have some time to fix FTBS and related bugs (#385863, #387955) on hardinfo-0.4. I hope to upload a new version supporting all archs without problem soon. This will let hardinfo migrate to testing and solve reported bugs. see ya -- --- Agney Lopes Roth Ferraz [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://agney.linuxhome.com.br GPG fingerprint: 4B6D C72F 824D CF3B 75AE 6479 0FDF 48D6 59B9 57AE -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of headache 1.03-8.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 379146 + fixed Bug#379146: headache: `line' setup does not works Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: apt-listbugs needs versioned BTS handling.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 334697 Bug#334697: apt-listbugs does not show several grave/serious bugs Bug reopened, originator not changed. > retitle 334697 versioned BTS handling Bug#334697: apt-listbugs does not show several grave/serious bugs Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334697: QA packages with really high popcon numbers :-)
Hi, > Indeed. Please see for instance > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=334697 This bugreport sounds like a joke, really. If the goal isn't to 'not release apt-listbugs with etch', this is going to be bad. Note that the load for apt-listbugs is quite huge, and I doubt qa.debian.org, or merkel.debian.org will be able to survive that load. You'll need a new dedicated host for that. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to gnome-pilot libgnome-pilot2 libgnome-pilot2-dev, tagging 115763, tagging 237631 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > package gnome-pilot libgnome-pilot2 libgnome-pilot2-dev Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libgnome-pilot2-dev libgnome-pilot2 gnome-pilot > tags 115763 + pending Bug#115763: Network Sync does not work Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 237631 + pending Bug#237631: gnome-pilot: DND -- Dropping .prc file on gpilot-applet causes busy loop Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 263306 + pending Bug#263306: gnome-pilot: SEGV during Synchronizing ImgFile-Foto with Tungsten E There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 276730 + pending Bug#276730: gnome-pilot: Add Vendor ID for Kyocera 7135 PalmOS Phone - patch attached Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 288820 + pending Bug#288820: gnome-pilot: gpilot-applet trashes network 'cradle' settings Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 296680 + pending Bug#296680: Zire 31/71 connectivity fix for gnome-pilot There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 300164 + pending Bug#300164: gnome-pilot: missing vendor ID for Tungsten T5 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 335224 + pending Bug#335224: /usr/share/gnome-pilot/devices.xml: add IDs for Zire 31 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 386201 + pending Bug#386201: gnome-pilot: FTBFS with libpisock9 (pilot-link 0.12.0) There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#380811: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:05 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380811: fixed in gdeskcal 0.57.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: gdeskcal Version: 0.57.1-1 Severity: important Hi, your package has been detected as generating a (for most of that mass bug fill: private) python module/extension that may need an upgrade to the new Python Policy[1]. A wiki page[2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages to the new Policy. This bug may be a false positive, in that case, please just close the bug. This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be raised to serious when python will default to python2.4 (which should happend on tomorrow - Wed 2nd of July). Please note that this bug (even not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg9.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy especially "Notes for packages with private modules/extensions" Special Notes * embedded interpreters: You don't *need* to do anything for your package, though using XS/XB-Python-Version is much appreciated as it helps tracking your package for binNMUs when python2.4 will become default. * if you need help updating your package, you can either: - mail debian-python@lists.debian.org , - tag your bug + help , - come on #debian-python/OFTC. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gdeskcal Source-Version: 0.57.1-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gdeskcal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gdeskcal/gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.diff.gz gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gdeskcal/gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.dsc gdeskcal_0.57.1-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gdeskcal/gdeskcal_0.57.1-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gdeskcal package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:36:31 +0200 Source: gdeskcal Binary: gdeskcal Architecture: source all Version: 0.57.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gdeskcal - A desktop calendar featuring transparency with smooth alpha-blend Closes: 295644 380811 383732 Changes: gdeskcal (0.57.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated for new python policy (Closes: #380811) * debian/control: - Build-Depends on python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5) - updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2 - use XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version * debian/patches/gdeskcal-0.57.1-deprecations.diff: - applied patch by "Kacper Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the source code, fix warnings about deprecation (Closes: #383732) * debian/patches/gdeskcal-0.57.1-timeparse.diff: - applied patch by "Kacper Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to the source code, fix a time validation bug (Closes: #295644) * debian/rules: - call dh_pycentral Files: d1d83c939ce06e42f05e1307fbb3 648 x11 optional gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.dsc 710d4f323195509dc5764d0b7fa01c2d 11161 x11 optional gdeskcal_0.57.1-2.diff.gz 5b2cf612e7304cbadec0b39f0f7268ed 181232 x11 optional gdeskcal_0.57.1-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDdpWQxo87aLX0pIRApgNAJ9lr3RH9b7ZVAEUNqbPdzt3qxg68ACgk4rP 9J0ThlfprCr3zBDH1k3ccjU= =F8if -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#359855: marked as done (lilypond: FTBFS: gs error in building docs)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#359855: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lilypond
Version: 2.6.3-10
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
Processing `out-www/collated-files.tely:1026 (lily-609190913.ly)'
Parsing...
Renaming input to: `font-family-override.ly'
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Calculating line breaks... [2]
Writing header field `texidoc' to `lily-609190913.texidoc'...
Writing header field `texidoc' to `lily-609190913.texidoc'...
Writing lily-609190913-systems.tex...
Writing lily-609190913-systems.texi...
Layout output to `lily-609190913-1.eps'...
Layout output to `lily-609190913.eps'...
Converting to PNG...Error: /unregistered in --glyphshow--
Operand stack:
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval--
--nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval--
--nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3
%oparray_pop --nostringval-- 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop
.runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2
%stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval--
--nostringval-- --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:1123/1686(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:121/200(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Last OS error: 2
Current file position is 2772390
GPL Ghostscript 8.50: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
We were called in barnumber 3.
GS exited with status: 256lilypond-book.py: warning: `lilypond' failed (status
1) (ignored)
lilypond-book.py: error: Process [snip long line] exited unsuccessfully.
Removing `collated-files.texi'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 1616, in ?
main ()
File "../../scripts/lilypond-book.py", line 1599, in main
ly.exit (1)
File "/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/share/lilypond/2.6.3/python/lilylib.py",
line 139, in exit
raise _ ('Exiting (%d)...') % i
Exiting (1)...
make[4]: *** [out-www/collated-files.texi] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/input/regression'
make[3]: *** [WWW] Error 2
rm out-www/sakura-sakura.ly out-www/typography-demo.ly out-www/puer-fragment.ly
out-www/les-nereides.ly out-www/wilhelmus.ly
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/input'
make[2]: *** [WWW] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3'
make[1]: *** [web] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3'
make: *** [build-doc-stamp] Error 2
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lilypond
Source-Version: 2.6.5-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lilypond, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb
lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb
lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz
lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc
lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb
lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lilypond package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:34:19 -0700
Source: lilypond
Binary: lilypond-data lilypond-doc lilypond
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 2.6.5-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
lilypond - A program for typesetting sheet music
lilypond-data - LilyPond music typesetter (data files)
lilypond-doc - LilyPond Documentation in HTML, PS and DVI formats
Closes: 357057 35
Bug#387644: marked as done (lilypond: FTBFS: include/accidental-interface.hh:24: error: extra qualification 'Accidental_interface::' on member 'accurate_boxes')
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387644: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: lilypond Version: 2.6.3-10 Severity: serious lilypond FTBFS here in a sid pbuilder chroot, with a bug apparently not yet reported. (Note that there's one additional problem in some setups. I get it when logging into pbuilder and building manually: current fontforge won't run when $HOME is set to a non-existent directory, e.g. /home/frank in the chroot. A bug against fontforge has been reported and is pending, the workaround is to simply create the home directory.) Here's the relevant part of the build log: make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/lily' cp -p /tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/config.hh out/config.hh rm -f ./out/accidental-engraver.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/accidental-engraver.dep ./out/accidental-engraver.o" g++ -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude -I./out -I../flower/include -I../flower/./out -I../flow er/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/python2.4 -O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/f reetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/p ython2.4 -O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/ usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-I/usr/include/freetype2 -W -Wall -Wconversion -o out/accidental-engraver.o accidental-en graver.cc rm -f ./out/accidental-placement.dep; DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/accidental-placement.dep ./out/accidental-placement.o" g++ -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude -I./out -I../flower/include -I../flower/./out -I../f lower/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/python2.4 -O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/includ e/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/includ e/python2.4 -O2 -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-I/usr/include/freetype2 -W -Wall -Wconversion -o out/accidental-placement.o accidenta l-placement.cc include/accidental-interface.hh:24: error: extra qualification 'Accidental_interface::' on member 'accurate_boxes' make[2]: *** [out/accidental-placement.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3/lily' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/lilypond-2.6.3' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package The full log is available at http://people.debian.org/~frank/lilypond_2.6.3-10_i386.build Regards, Frank -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (99, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: lilypond Source-Version: 2.6.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lilypond, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lilypond package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: T
Bug#380866: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:13 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380866: fixed in rubrica 1.0.15-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: mboxcheck-applet Version: 0.3-1.1 Severity: important Hi, your package has been detected as generating a (for most of that mass bug fill: private) python module/extension that may need an upgrade to the new Python Policy[1]. A wiki page[2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages to the new Policy. This bug may be a false positive, in that case, please just close the bug. This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be raised to serious when python will default to python2.4 (which should happend on tomorrow - Wed 2nd of July). Please note that this bug (even not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg9.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy especially "Notes for packages with private modules/extensions" Special Notes * embedded interpreters: You don't *need* to do anything for your package, though using XS/XB-Python-Version is much appreciated as it helps tracking your package for binNMUs when python2.4 will become default. * if you need help updating your package, you can either: - mail debian-python@lists.debian.org , - tag your bug + help , - come on #debian-python/OFTC. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: rubrica Source-Version: 1.0.15-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of rubrica, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: rubrica_1.0.15-1.diff.gz to pool/main/r/rubrica/rubrica_1.0.15-1.diff.gz rubrica_1.0.15-1.dsc to pool/main/r/rubrica/rubrica_1.0.15-1.dsc rubrica_1.0.15-1_i386.deb to pool/main/r/rubrica/rubrica_1.0.15-1_i386.deb rubrica_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/r/rubrica/rubrica_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rubrica package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:03:39 +0200 Source: rubrica Binary: rubrica Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0.15-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: rubrica- An addressbook for the GNOME desktop Closes: 380866 Changes: rubrica (1.0.15-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream version * Updated for new python policy (Closes: #380866) * debian/control: - Build-Depends on python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5) - updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2 - use XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version * debian/patches/01_relibtoolise.patch: - updated * debian/rules: - call dh_pycentral Files: 7d9e2eaa3c05a7921b4ff464bf9df45b 701 x11 optional rubrica_1.0.15-1.dsc 6e62785314e6b9be89d0f4e054fa406d 927197 x11 optional rubrica_1.0.15.orig.tar.gz 9800b50a5e518198a644218dd95245b3 109187 x11 optional rubrica_1.0.15-1.diff.gz a421b83479d82d443f7719eb01550a21 408690 x11 optional rubrica_1.0.15-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDdscQxo87aLX0pIRAk0cAJ4kbTtH5ksIAy1+cbeXCfrtG2Zi9QCg0vNN alZIIe5s34XOlftAfGAquso= =nmd1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#308268: marked as done (mboxcheck-applet: Should depend on python-gnome2-extras)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308268: fixed in mboxcheck-applet 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: mboxcheck-applet Version: 0.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$ /usr/lib/gnome-panel/mboxcheck Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/gnome-panel/mboxcheck", line 8, in ? import gnome.applet ImportError: No module named applet -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7a Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages mboxcheck-applet depends on: ii python2.3.5-2An interactive high-level object-o ii python-gnome2 2.6.1-1Python bindings for the GNOME desk -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: mboxcheck-applet Source-Version: 0.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mboxcheck-applet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mboxcheck-applet package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:15:36 +0200 Source: mboxcheck-applet Binary: mboxcheck-applet Architecture: source all Version: 0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: mboxcheck-applet - A GNOME2 applet to check your mboxes Closes: 308268 380866 Changes: mboxcheck-applet (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated for new python policy (Closes: #380866) * Acknowledge NMU (Closes: #308268) * mboxcheck.py: - use "gnomeapplet" instead of "gnome.applet" * debian/control: - Build-Depends on python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5) - changed Standards-Version to 3.7.2 - use XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version * debian/rules: - call dh_pycentral Files: 2b0af834ec4a6c397fa531df579f0706 683 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc c757691e6c4a7e9fd1e569c47b9154f5 2286 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz 776bde97d207715a804f8adbb0ea152b 17196 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDdsGQxo87aLX0pIRAnouAKCRFcR0YMacYcPft/5QuMLbRUtB4gCgyRkv N2FqaAM6CFgjqAFSFKEGsrs= =4fec -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#357057: marked as done (FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:17 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357057: fixed in lilypond 2.6.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: lilypond Version: 2.6.3-10 Severity: important Tags: patch Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious. A patch is below. > Automatic build of lilypond_2.6.3-10 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 ... > rm -f ./out/accidental-placement.dep; > DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT="./out/accidental-placement.dep > ./out/accidental-placement.o" g++ -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG > -DSTRING_UTILS_INLINED -Iinclude -I./out -I../flower/include > -I../flower/./out -I../flower/include -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/python2.3 -O2 > -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 > -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > -I/usr/include/freetype2 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/python2.3 -O2 > -finline-functions -g -pipe -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 > -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > -I/usr/include/freetype2 -W -Wall -Wconversion -o > out/accidental-placement.o accidental-placement.cc > include/accidental-interface.hh:24: error: extra qualification > 'Accidental_interface::' on member 'accurate_boxes' > make[2]: *** [out/accidental-placement.o] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/lilypond-2.6.3/lily' > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 --- ./lily/include/accidental-interface.hh~ 2006-03-15 14:48:11.0 + +++ ./lily/include/accidental-interface.hh 2006-03-15 14:48:17.0 + @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static bool has_interface (Grob *); static String get_fontcharname (String style, int alteration); - static Array Accidental_interface::accurate_boxes (Grob *me, Grob **common); + static Array accurate_boxes (Grob *me, Grob **common); }; #endif --- ./lily/include/stem.hh~ 2006-03-15 14:49:02.0 + +++ ./lily/include/stem.hh 2006-03-15 14:49:09.0 + @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static Direction get_direction (Grob *); static void set_stemend (Grob *, Real); static Direction get_default_dir (Grob *); - static Slice Stem::beam_multiplicity (Grob *); + static Slice beam_multiplicity (Grob *); static Real thickness (Grob *); static int head_count (Grob *); static bool is_invisible (Grob *); --- ./lily/include/slur-scoring.hh~ 2006-03-15 14:59:21.0 + +++ ./lily/include/slur-scoring.hh 2006-03-15 14:59:25.0 + @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ void fill (Grob *); void set_next_direction (); - Array Slur_score_state::generate_avoid_offsets () const; + Array generate_avoid_offsets () const; Drul_array get_bound_info () const; void generate_curves () const; Link_array enumerate_attachments (Drul_array end_ys) const; -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: lilypond Source-Version: 2.6.5-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lilypond, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-data_2.6.5-1_all.deb lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-doc_2.6.5-1_all.deb lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.diff.gz lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1.dsc lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5-1_i386.deb lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.5.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated lilypond package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 22:34:19 -0700 Source: lilypond Binary: lilypond-data lilypond-doc lilypond Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.6.5-1
Bug#380866: marked as done (Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:47:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#380866: fixed in mboxcheck-applet 0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: mboxcheck-applet Version: 0.3-1.1 Severity: important Hi, your package has been detected as generating a (for most of that mass bug fill: private) python module/extension that may need an upgrade to the new Python Policy[1]. A wiki page[2] explains what has to be done to upgrade your packages to the new Policy. This bug may be a false positive, in that case, please just close the bug. This bug is part of a mass bug filling, and its severity will be raised to serious when python will default to python2.4 (which should happend on tomorrow - Wed 2nd of July). Please note that this bug (even not being RC) falls under the 0-day NMU policy. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/06/msg9.html [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy especially "Notes for packages with private modules/extensions" Special Notes * embedded interpreters: You don't *need* to do anything for your package, though using XS/XB-Python-Version is much appreciated as it helps tracking your package for binNMUs when python2.4 will become default. * if you need help updating your package, you can either: - mail debian-python@lists.debian.org , - tag your bug + help , - come on #debian-python/OFTC. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: mboxcheck-applet Source-Version: 0.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of mboxcheck-applet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/m/mboxcheck-applet/mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated mboxcheck-applet package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 01:15:36 +0200 Source: mboxcheck-applet Binary: mboxcheck-applet Architecture: source all Version: 0.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: mboxcheck-applet - A GNOME2 applet to check your mboxes Closes: 308268 380866 Changes: mboxcheck-applet (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Updated for new python policy (Closes: #380866) * Acknowledge NMU (Closes: #308268) * mboxcheck.py: - use "gnomeapplet" instead of "gnome.applet" * debian/control: - Build-Depends on python-all-dev, python-central (>= 0.5) - changed Standards-Version to 3.7.2 - use XS-Python-Version and XB-Python-Version * debian/rules: - call dh_pycentral Files: 2b0af834ec4a6c397fa531df579f0706 683 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.dsc c757691e6c4a7e9fd1e569c47b9154f5 2286 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2.diff.gz 776bde97d207715a804f8adbb0ea152b 17196 gnome optional mboxcheck-applet_0.3-2_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDdsGQxo87aLX0pIRAnouAKCRFcR0YMacYcPft/5QuMLbRUtB4gCgyRkv N2FqaAM6CFgjqAFSFKEGsrs= =4fec -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#386084: [PATCH] Re: blam: Fails to start with an exception
Package: blam
Followup-For: Bug #386084
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
With this patch (basically taken from Ubuntu), blam should
start. There are binary versions at http://www.cmartin.tk/blam/ if
you don't want to compile it yourself and feel you can trust me ;)
This is because the package is orphaned and I don't think I'm
qualified to be a maintainer.
The Ubuntu patch has fixes for some stuff about printing, but I can't
find anywhere were that is actually used, so I've ignored that part.
*** /home/carlos/apps/blam/blam-1.8.2.patched/debian/patches/delete_event.patch
Only in blam-1.8.2.patched: debian
diff -urp blam-1.8.2/src/Application.cs blam-1.8.2.patched/src/Application.cs
- --- blam-1.8.2/src/Application.cs 2005-06-19 13:27:08.0 +0200
+++ blam-1.8.2.patched/src/Application.cs 2006-09-17 23:42:43.0
+0200
@@ -371,6 +371,11 @@ namespace Imendio.Blam {
}
}
+ public void DeleteEventTriggered(object obj, DeleteEventArgs args)
+ {
+ QuitActivated(obj, null);
+ }
+
public void QuitActivated(object obj, EventArgs args)
{
SaveWindowState();
diff -urp blam-1.8.2/src/blam.glade blam-1.8.2.patched/src/blam.glade
- --- blam-1.8.2/src/blam.glade 2004-10-23 15:00:02.0 +0200
+++ blam-1.8.2.patched/src/blam.glade 2006-09-17 23:42:43.0 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
GDK_WINDOW_TYPE_HINT_NORMAL
GDK_GRAVITY_NORTH_WEST
- -
+
diff -urp blam-1.8.2/src/Dialogs.cs blam-1.8.2.patched/src/Dialogs.cs
- --- blam-1.8.2/src/Dialogs.cs 2005-06-19 13:29:31.0 +0200
+++ blam-1.8.2.patched/src/Dialogs.cs 2006-09-17 18:14:40.0 +0200
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ namespace Imendio.Blam {
about.Hide();
}
- - public void OnDelete(object obj, EventArgs args)
+ public void OnDelete(object obj, DeleteEventArgs args)
{
aboutBox = null;
}
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-rc5
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages blam depends on:
ii gconf2 2.14.0-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libatk1.0-01.12.2-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit
ii libbonobo2-0 2.14.0-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library
ii libbonoboui2-0 2.14.0-4 The Bonobo UI library
ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libcairo2 1.2.4-1 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra
ii libfontconfig1 2.4.0-5 generic font configuration library
ii libgcc11:4.1.1-13GCC support library
ii libgconf-cil 1:1.0.10-5CLI binding for GConf
ii libgconf2-42.14.0-4 GNOME configuration database syste
ii libgecko-cil 0.6-4 CLI binding for the GtkMozEmbed li
ii libglade-cil 1:1.0.10-5CLI binding for the Glade librarie
ii libglib-cil1:1.0.10-5CLI binding for the GLib utility l
ii libglib2.0-0 2.12.3-2 The GLib library of C routines
ii libgnome-cil 1:1.0.10-5CLI binding for GNOME
ii libgnome-keyring0 0.4.9-1 GNOME keyring services library
ii libgnome2-02.14.1-3 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file
ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.14.0-2 A powerful object-oriented display
ii libgnomeui-0 2.14.1-2+b1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf
ii libgnomevfs2-0 2.14.2-2+b1 GNOME virtual file-system (runtime
ii libgtk-cil 1:1.0.10-5CLI binding for the Gtk+ toolkit
ii libgtk2.0-02.8.20-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface
ii libice61:1.0.1-2 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libmono-corlib1.0-cil 1.1.17.1-2Mono core library (1.0)
ii libmono-system-web1.0-cil 1.1.17.1-2Mono System.Web library
ii libmono-system1.0-cil 1.1.17.1-2Mono System libraries (1.0)
ii libmono1.0-cil 1.1.17.1-2Mono libraries (1.0)
ii liborbit2 1:2.14.0-2+b1 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB
ii libpango1.0-0 1.12.3-2 Layout and rendering of internatio
ii libpopt0 1.10-3lib for parsing cmdline parameters
ii libsm6 1:1.0.1-2 X11 Session Management library
ii libstdc++6 4.1.1-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-9 X11 client-side library
ii libxcursor11.1.7-4 X cursor management library
ii libxext6 1:1.0.1-2
Bug#387908: ftbfs: 500_ping_icmp fails on VServer
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:35:30PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > On 2006/09/17 23:25, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is a reasonable assumption on any sanely configured Unix > > system. VServer's failure to provide a loopback interface is > > inexcusable design brokenness. > While VServer's design decision is indeed arguable, there might be > other reasons why there is no echo-response from 127.0.0.1, > e.g. firewall rules, rate limits, icmp_echo_ignore_all. True, but there's no reason to consider any of these other causes a bug in the package either, as opposed to a misconfiguration of the build environment. And the only autobuilder in Debian that uses vserver is the amd64 autobuilder, which appears to have been able to build this version of perl without incident; so I'm pretty sure there's no reason here to consider this bug 'serious'. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#386202: Patch for RC bug 386201
Hi, I have prepared a patch to upgrade gnome-pilot to the new upstream version. I will prepare a patch for gnome-pilot-conduits as well. After I have done that I will test them and see which bugs can be closes due to the new upstream version. The new gnome-pilot 2.0.4 already fixes 6 bugs in the BTS as far as I can see. After all this al will send my diff to the BTS. Greetings Arjan Oosting signature.asc Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend
Bug#387996: subversion: [m68k] fix for the failing ruby tests
Package: subversion
Version: 1.4.0
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
I looked at the failing self tests. The first one is a bug in the
created wrapper. The basic problem is that in
svn_delta.c:_wrap_svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper() the value of temp3 is not
modified by svn_txdelta_apply_wrapper(), so the return is basically
random. In this case the stack is clear and svn_md5_digest_to_cstring()
returns a NULL, which rb_str_new2() doesn't like.
The easiest fix is to change the typemap in svn_types.swg so it can deal
with the NULL pointer. (BTW I tried returning Qnil here, but that
doesn't work well output_helper.)
The other two failures are a bug in the test itself, which simply take a
bit too much time on m68k, so I modified the test a little to accept a
small delay.
bye, Roman
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: m68k
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
diff -ur subversion-1.4.0.org/subversion/bindings/swig/include/svn_types.swg subversion-1.4.0/subversion/bindings/swig/include/svn_types.swg
--- subversion-1.4.0.org/subversion/bindings/swig/include/svn_types.swg 2006-04-20 04:47:39.0 +0200
+++ subversion-1.4.0/subversion/bindings/swig/include/svn_types.swg 2006-09-15 02:41:36.0 +0200
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@
%typemap(ruby, argout, fragment="output_helper") unsigned char digest[ANY]
{
char *digest_string = (char *)svn_md5_digest_to_cstring($1, _global_pool);
- $result = output_helper($result, rb_str_new2(digest_string));
+ $result = output_helper($result, rb_str_new2(digest_string ? digest_string : ""));
}
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
%typemap(ruby, argout, fragment="output_helper") unsigned char **digest
{
char *digest_string = (char *)svn_md5_digest_to_cstring(*$1, _global_pool);
- $result = output_helper($result, rb_str_new2(digest_string));
+ $result = output_helper($result, rb_str_new2(digest_string ? digest_string : ""));
}
/* svn_md5_* functions takes const ones as input */
diff -ur subversion-1.4.0.org/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_ra.rb subversion-1.4.0/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_ra.rb
--- subversion-1.4.0.org/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_ra.rb 2006-04-17 16:51:04.0 +0200
+++ subversion-1.4.0/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_ra.rb 2006-09-15 03:06:43.0 +0200
@@ -212,10 +212,10 @@
session = Svn::Ra::Session.open(@repos_uri, config, callbacks)
result = nil
-expect = [1, Time.now.to_s, @author]
+expect = [1, Time.now, @author]
gc_disable do
editor, baton = session.commit_editor(log) do |rev, date, author|
-result = [rev, date.to_s, author]
+result = [rev, date, author]
end
editor.baton = baton
@@ -225,6 +225,7 @@
GC.start
editor.close_edit
end
+ expect[1] = result[1] if result[1] >= expect[1] && result[1] < expect[1] + 10
assert_equal(expect, result)
end
end
@@ -238,10 +239,10 @@
session = Svn::Ra::Session.open(@repos_uri, config, callbacks)
result = nil
-expect = [1, Time.now.to_s, @author]
+expect = [1, Time.now, @author]
gc_disable do
editor = session.commit_editor2(log) do |info|
-result = [info.revision, info.date.to_s, info.author]
+result = [info.revision, info.date, info.author]
end
root = editor.open_root(-1)
@@ -250,6 +251,7 @@
GC.start
editor.close_edit
end
+ expect[1] = result[1] if result[1] >= expect[1] && result[1] < expect[1] + 10
assert_equal(expect, result)
end
end
Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free
Scripsit Steve Langasek > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:47PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > > I have just grepped throught the mesa 6.4.2-1 sources for key phrases > > in the problematic license clauses, without finding any of them. So it > > seems that this bug does not apply to the current mesa packages, at > > least. > Ok, thanks for the confirmation. For the record (since Steve appears to have noticed this already), the last sentence above is false: The SGI Free Software License B still applies to some of the code I grepped through, and does contain the problematic clause. I did not initially notice this because the license text itself is not in the source package; instead file headers just reference an URL. -- Henning Makholm "Jeg mener, at der eksisterer et hemmeligt selskab med forgreninger i hele verden, som arbejder i det skjulte for at udsprede det rygte at der eksisterer en verdensomspændende sammensværgelse."
Bug#386673: patch
Hi,
The attached patch works around the problem. A better fix would be to
use an input constraint or to just use the C doe and have the compiler
generate altivec code. Is there a reason the gcc 2.95 generated altivec
code needs to be used ?
Thanks,
Peter (p2).
--
Goa is a state of mind
--- electricsheep-2.6.8/mpeg2dec/libmpeg2/idct_altivec.c2002-12-12
09:33:31.0 +
+++ electricsheep-2.6.8.new/mpeg2dec/libmpeg2/idct_altivec.c2006-09-17
20:38:29.401074200 +
@@ -58,411 +58,413 @@
void mpeg2_idct_copy_altivec (int16_t * block, uint8_t * dest, int stride)
{
asm (" \n"
- "# stwu%r1, -128(%r1) \n"
- "# mflr%r0 \n"
- "# stw %r0, 132(%r1) \n"
- "# addi%r0, %r1, 128 \n"
+ "# stwu%%r1, -128(%%r1) \n"
+ "# mflr%%r0\n"
+ "# stw %%r0, 132(%%r1)\n"
+ "# addi%%r0, %%r1, 128 \n"
"# bl _savev25\n"
- " addi%r9, %r3, 112 \n"
- " vspltish%v25, 4 \n"
- " vxor%v13, %v13, %v13\n"
- " lis %r10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] \n"
- " lvx %v1, 0,%r9 \n"
- " la %r10, [EMAIL PROTECTED](%r10) \n"
- " lvx %v5, 0,%r3 \n"
- " addi%r9, %r3, 16 \n"
- " lvx %v8, 0,%r10\n"
- " addi%r11, %r10, 32 \n"
- " lvx %v12, 0,%r9 \n"
- " lvx %v6, 0,%r11\n"
- " addi%r8, %r3, 48 \n"
- " vslh%v1, %v1, %v25\n"
- " addi%r9, %r3, 80 \n"
- " lvx %v11, 0,%r8 \n"
- " vslh%v5, %v5, %v25\n"
- " lvx %v0, 0,%r9 \n"
- " addi%r11, %r10, 64 \n"
- " vsplth %v3, %v8, 2 \n"
- " lvx %v7, 0,%r11\n"
- " addi%r9, %r3, 96 \n"
- " vslh%v12, %v12, %v25\n"
- " vmhraddshs %v27, %v1, %v6, %v13 \n"
- " addi%r8, %r3, 32 \n"
- " vsplth %v2, %v8, 5 \n"
- " lvx %v1, 0,%r9 \n"
- " vslh%v11, %v11, %v25\n"
- " addi%r3, %r3, 64 \n"
- " lvx %v9, 0,%r8 \n"
- " addi%r9, %r10, 48 \n"
- " vslh%v0, %v0, %v25\n"
- " lvx %v4, 0,%r9 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v31, %v12, %v6, %v13 \n"
- " addi%r10, %r10, 16 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v30, %v0, %v7, %v13 \n"
- " lvx %v10, 0,%r3 \n"
- " vsplth %v19, %v8, 3 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v15, %v11, %v7, %v13 \n"
- " lvx %v12, 0,%r10\n"
- " vsplth %v6, %v8, 4 \n"
- " vslh%v1, %v1, %v25\n"
- " vsplth %v11, %v8, 1 \n"
- " li %r9, 4 \n"
- " vslh%v9, %v9, %v25\n"
- " vsplth %v7, %v8, 0 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v18, %v1, %v4, %v13 \n"
- " vspltw %v8, %v8, 3 \n"
- " vsubshs %v0, %v13, %v27\n"
- " vmhraddshs %v1, %v9, %v4, %v13 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v17, %v3, %v31, %v0 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v4, %v2, %v15, %v30 \n"
- " vslh%v10, %v10, %v25\n"
- " vmhraddshs %v9, %v5, %v12, %v13 \n"
- " vspltish%v25, 6 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v5, %v10, %v12, %v13 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v28, %v19, %v30, %v15 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v27, %v3, %v27, %v31 \n"
- " vsubshs %v0, %v13, %v18\n"
- " vmhraddshs %v18, %v11, %v18, %v1 \n"
- " vaddshs %v30, %v17, %v4 \n"
- " vmhraddshs %v12, %v11, %v1, %v0 \n"
- " vsubshs %v4, %v17, %v4
Processed: Re: Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 368560 mesa: material under SGI Free Software License B is not > DFSG-free Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free
retitle 368560 mesa: material under SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free thanks On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:55:47PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Steve Langasek > > bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code is under. In the > > sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experimental), I'm unable to > > find any references to the "GLX Public License" at all. Does that > > mean we should consider this particular license issue resolved, or > > do either of you have evidence that the license statements included > > upstream are incorrect? > No, I don't have such evidence. In fact I never knew in detail which > code was covered by that licence - just noticed it in the copyright > file and saw that it looked fishy. That was before the X.org > transition, and it is entirely plausible that the offending files have > been dropped/replaced/relicenced upstream or otherwise disappeared > along the way. > I have just grepped throught the mesa 6.4.2-1 sources for key phrases > in the problematic license clauses, without finding any of them. So it > seems that this bug does not apply to the current mesa packages, at > least. Ok, thanks for the confirmation. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387896: marked as done (libaws-dev depend on libtemplates-parser-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:32:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387896: fixed in libaws 2.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: libaws-dev Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious When I try compile I get: rateme.adb:4:06: file "ai302.ads" not found rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Attachments (spec)" depends on "Ai302 (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Client (spec)" depends on "Aws.Attachments (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Attachments (spec)" depends on "Aws.Headers (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Headers (spec)" depends on "Aws.Containers.Tables (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Containers.Tables (spec)" depends on "Ai302 (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Rateme (body)" depends on "Aws.Client (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Client (spec)" depends on "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)" depends on "Ssl.Thin (spec)" File ai302.ads belong to libtemplates-parser-dev and I have not this package installed yet. IMHO libaws-dev must depend on libtemplates-parser-dev. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libaws-dev depends on: ii gnat-4.14.1.1-10 The GNU Ada compiler ii libaws2.2 2.2-1Ada Web Server shared library ii libgnutls-dev 1.4.3-2 the GNU TLS library - development ii libldap2-dev2.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP development libraries ii libxmlada2-dev 2.2-6XML/Ada, a full XML suite for Ada ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - development Versions of packages libaws-dev recommends: ii libaws-bin2.2-1 Ada Web Server utilities -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libaws Source-Version: 2.2-3 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libaws, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libaws-bin_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-bin_2.2-3_i386.deb libaws-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb libaws-doc_2.2-3_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-doc_2.2-3_all.deb libaws2.2_2.2-3_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws2.2_2.2-3_i386.deb libaws_2.2-3.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws_2.2-3.diff.gz libaws_2.2-3.dsc to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws_2.2-3.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libaws package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 22:30:01 +0200 Source: libaws Binary: libaws-bin libaws-doc libaws2.2 libaws-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libaws-bin - Ada Web Server utilities libaws-dev - Ada Web Server development files libaws-doc - Ada Web Server documentation libaws2.2 - Ada Web Server shared library Closes: 387896 Changes: libaws (2.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/rules, debian/ada2wsdl.gpr, debian/tools.gpr: do not link the libaws.so object files statically into the tools (package libaws-bin); reduces their size significantly. * debian/control (libaws-dev): depend on libtemplates-parser-dev. Closes: #387896. (Olleg, thanks for your patience). Files: dae196490b530c9d467782090143b071 743 - optional libaws_2.2-3.dsc 920f0712eb10786f61c278a0fb3cca2a 14842 - optional libaws_2.2-3.diff.gz 4121c3ad7464c97e03f734412922e05e 850960 doc optional libaws-doc_2.2-3_all.deb a98d95c7dc78d0779fcd072c82ffcc47 4486362 libdevel optional libaws-dev_2.2-3_i386.deb c92f894ddaa2be3cb2d0823cad25f5ec 136174 devel optional libaws-bin_2.2-3_i386.deb 67d9c5f1c1b4
Bug#380852: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Package: lfm Version: 0.91.2-1 Severity: grave Attached is a patch that updates lfm to current python policy. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot
severity 387944 important tags 387944 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 06:06:21PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote: > When I tried to boot up this machine about 1h ago it would not come > up properly - ssh or VLC logins would fail. Upon closer inspection it > hung after the "nmbd" part of the samba initscript output. > It's reproducible, Well, it's not reproducible here, so you will need to provide more information. > Doing /etc/init.d/samba/start from the commandline (in single user) > has the same result, strace attached. Sorry, this strace is not useful, it's an strace only of the /etc/init.d/samba script -- not of the processes it spawns. We will need an strace of the smbd command itself. Please also forward any log entries from /var/log/samba/log.smbd when this happens. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368560: mesa: material under GLX Public License and SGI Free Software License B is not DFSG-free
Scripsit Steve Langasek > bug #368560 concerning what licenses the code is under. In the > sources of mesa 6.5 CVS (the version in experimental), I'm unable to > find any references to the "GLX Public License" at all. Does that > mean we should consider this particular license issue resolved, or > do either of you have evidence that the license statements included > upstream are incorrect? No, I don't have such evidence. In fact I never knew in detail which code was covered by that licence - just noticed it in the copyright file and saw that it looked fishy. That was before the X.org transition, and it is entirely plausible that the offending files have been dropped/replaced/relicenced upstream or otherwise disappeared along the way. I have just grepped throught the mesa 6.4.2-1 sources for key phrases in the problematic license clauses, without finding any of them. So it seems that this bug does not apply to the current mesa packages, at least. -- Henning Makholm"What a hideous colour khaki is." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: xserver-xorg: impossible mouse configuration other than /dev/input/mice
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 385078 +patch Bug#385078: xserver-xorg: impossible mouse configuration other than /dev/input/mice There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 387944 important Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot Severity set to `important' from `critical' > tags 387944 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 387962
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 387962 sid Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14) There were no tags set. Tags added: sid > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385078: xserver-xorg: impossible mouse configuration other than /dev/input/mice
tags 385078 +patch
thank you
Please try this patch. I'm not a bash (nor debconf!) guru but I think
that it address your concerns regarding the non-interactivity for the
mouse device setting. Please let me know if the patch works for you.
Therefore I'm providing:
1) A full, NMU-ready, source package in [1]
2) i386 binary packages in [1], and
3) A diff regarding the config.in, which you'll find attached
Note that this upload does not fix several Lintian warnings that my
build system reports. I will be glad to fix this if the patch works.
Thank you very much for your time and attention to details.
Jose
[1] http://debian.bureado.com.ve/xorg/
--
José M. Parrella -> Debian Sid, k2.6.17.13
Escuela de Ingenieria Electrica
Universidad Central de Venezuela -> ucvlug.info
diff -Nru /tmp/R5Q1ya1nbL/xorg-7.0.23/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in /tmp/poysleOqJV/xorg-7.0.23/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in
--- /tmp/R5Q1ya1nbL/xorg-7.0.23/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in 2006-09-17 17:11:38.0 -0400
+++ /tmp/poysleOqJV/xorg-7.0.23/debian/xserver-xorg.config.in 2006-07-19 01:16:26.0 -0400
@@ -1136,22 +1136,11 @@
MAY_BE_NULL=yes auto_answer validate_string_db_input "$(priority_ceil $PRIORITY)" xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/options "$XKBOPTIONS"
-# Ask the user about their mouse port
-db_input medium xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port
+AUTODETECTED_PORT="/dev/input/mice"
+AUTODETECTED_PROTOCOL="ImPS/2"
-# If the user wasn't asked, see if a previous answer was set
-if [ "$_" = "30" ]
-then
- db_get xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port
- if [ -z $RET ]
- then
-# If a previous answer wasn't set, then we should use our defaults
- AUTODETECTED_PORT="/dev/input/mice"
- AUTODETECTED_PROTOCOL="ImPS/2"
- db_subst xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port choices $AUTODETECTED_PORT
- auto_answer db_input "$(priority_ceil low)" xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port "${AUTODETECTED_PORT}"
- fi
-fi
+db_subst xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port choices $AUTODETECTED_PORT
+auto_answer db_input "$(priority_ceil low)" xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port "${AUTODETECTED_PORT}"
db_get xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/port
case "$RET" in
Bug#387928: fontconfig: Cannot write cache files
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 17:23 +0300, David Baron wrote: > Package: fontconfig > Version: 2.4.1-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Recent Sid versions cannot write font caches. > Will report scanning of # directories, # fonts in log or using -v option, > but will not write caches. This renders X very slow (such a bug reported) > and KDE and such nearly impossible starting and program loading times. This problem stems from user-modified fonts.conf files which renders fontconfig unable to replace it with the new version that includes the necessary elements. I'm not sure how to fix this, aside from forcibley overwritting the file. Please make sure you have allowed fontconfig to replace your fonts.conf file. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: Fixed in NMU of iacd 0.0.26-5.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 386305 + fixed Bug#386305: iacd won't start if the pidfile already exists Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387899: marked as done (As I undestand ssl-thin.ads must be added as "alternative".)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:03:02 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387899: fixed in libaws 2.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: libaws-dev Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious I can't compile aws application. rateme.adb:4:06: file "ssl-thin.ads" not found rateme.adb:4:06: "Rateme (body)" depends on "Aws.Client (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Client (spec)" depends on "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)" rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)" depends on "Ssl.Thin (spec)" But exists files ssl-thin__dummy.ads, ssl-thin__gnutls.ads, ssl-thin__openssl.ads. As I undestand they are alternatives for ssl-thin.ads and must be added debian "alternative" for this. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libaws-dev depends on: ii gnat-4.14.1.1-10 The GNU Ada compiler ii libaws2.2 2.2-1Ada Web Server shared library ii libgnutls-dev 1.4.3-2 the GNU TLS library - development ii libldap2-dev2.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP development libraries ii libxmlada2-dev 2.2-6XML/Ada, a full XML suite for Ada ii zlib1g-dev 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - development Versions of packages libaws-dev recommends: ii libaws-bin2.2-1 Ada Web Server utilities -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: libaws Source-Version: 2.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libaws, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libaws-bin_2.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-bin_2.2-2_i386.deb libaws-dev_2.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-dev_2.2-2_i386.deb libaws-doc_2.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws-doc_2.2-2_all.deb libaws2.2_2.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws2.2_2.2-2_i386.deb libaws_2.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws_2.2-2.diff.gz libaws_2.2-2.dsc to pool/main/liba/libaws/libaws_2.2-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libaws package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:09:41 +0200 Source: libaws Binary: libaws-bin libaws-doc libaws2.2 libaws-dev Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Ludovic Brenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libaws-bin - Ada Web Server utilities libaws-dev - Ada Web Server development files libaws-doc - Ada Web Server documentation libaws2.2 - Ada Web Server shared library Closes: 387899 Changes: libaws (2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low . * aws.gpr: add a package Naming to tell gnatmake which files to use for sgtrong crypto; we use GNU TLS. Closes: #387899. Files: 7a44937e84b6dec5b83c1920a698f444 743 - optional libaws_2.2-2.dsc 71698253d2b64293d5ea6ddcbe790369 14662 - optional libaws_2.2-2.diff.gz 35d72e5f9fcaec13d99bf2835108a25a 850894 doc optional libaws-doc_2.2-2_all.deb 5029759e7cbd57223f7eff97f5a63cb1 4486254 libdevel optional libaws-dev_2.2-2_i386.deb 8c65f20517b296edbfd1197232b5d2ad 1778460 devel optional libaws-bin_2.2-2_i386.deb 5a0b5e5ad138458589f66063195368c2 1515202 libs optional libaws2.2_2.2-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDaiNx9kwJZ3/qtQRAuX0AJ4wWKglmrQcFiTWxNbXQTjCZRJ8lgCgkStI WIbaodAM15kOiKU6RXzHjZA= =QA8b -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#387908: ftbfs: 500_ping_icmp fails on VServer
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 01:48:29PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > Package: perl > Version: 5.8.8-6.1 > Tags: ftbfs > Severity: serious > The Perl test suite fails on the test "lib/Net/Ping/t/500_ping_icmp" > when run on a Linux VServer, because it tries to ping 127.0.0.1 which > is not available on a VServer. Perl should not make assumptions on > the network setup, and should not think that 127.0.0.1 is reachable > via ICMP. This is a reasonable assumption on any sanely configured Unix system. VServer's failure to provide a loopback interface is inexcusable design brokenness. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387908: ftbfs: 500_ping_icmp fails on VServer
On 2006/09/17 23:25, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a reasonable assumption on any sanely configured Unix > system. VServer's failure to provide a loopback interface is > inexcusable design brokenness. While VServer's design decision is indeed arguable, there might be other reasons why there is no echo-response from 127.0.0.1, e.g. firewall rules, rate limits, icmp_echo_ignore_all. Max -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387925: marked as done (gnome-panel-data: postrm fails during purge)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 14:02:51 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#387925: fixed in gnome-panel 2.14.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: gnome-panel-data Version: 2.14.3-1 Severity: serious Hello GNOME, when trying to purge gnome-panel-data, I get Removing gnome-panel-data ... Purging configuration files for gnome-panel-data ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnome-panel-data.postrm: line 7: update-gconf-defaults: command not found dpkg: error processing gnome-panel-data (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: gnome-panel-data I think the issue is that you cannot assume dependencies being satisfied during purge. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: gnome-panel Source-Version: 2.14.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnome-panel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnome-panel-data_2.14.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/gnome-panel-data_2.14.3-2_all.deb gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.diff.gz gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.dsc to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.dsc gnome-panel_2.14.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.14.3-2_i386.deb libpanel-applet2-0_2.14.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/libpanel-applet2-0_2.14.3-2_i386.deb libpanel-applet2-dbg_2.14.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/libpanel-applet2-dbg_2.14.3-2_i386.deb libpanel-applet2-dev_2.14.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/libpanel-applet2-dev_2.14.3-2_i386.deb libpanel-applet2-doc_2.14.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/g/gnome-panel/libpanel-applet2-doc_2.14.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gnome-panel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:11:15 +0200 Source: gnome-panel Binary: gnome-panel-data libpanel-applet2-doc libpanel-applet2-dev gnome-panel libpanel-applet2-dbg libpanel-applet2-0 Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.14.3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Guilherme de S. Pastore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: gnome-panel - launcher and docking facility for GNOME 2 gnome-panel-data - common files for GNOME 2 panel libpanel-applet2-0 - library for GNOME 2 panel applets libpanel-applet2-dbg - library for GNOME 2 panel applets - library with debugging symbol libpanel-applet2-dev - library for GNOME 2 panel applets - development files libpanel-applet2-doc - library for GNOME 2 panel applets - documentation files Closes: 322517 387925 Changes: gnome-panel (2.14.3-2) unstable; urgency=low . [ Josselin Mouette ] * Move menu-xdg to a Depends: instead of a Recommends: (closes: #322517). Rationale: people who don't want the Debian menu can remove "menu" and the "empty menu" bug has been fixed some time ago. . [ Loic Minier ] * Only update-gconf-defaults on removal, not on purge. (Closes: #387925) * Cleanup postinst and postrm. Files: 59c2246aa780d7bf9ddb3702c0b5d4ea 1994 gnome optional gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.dsc 1d7be1d481544e65a13857241d433f54 30433 gnome optional gnome-panel_2.14.3-2.diff.gz d1b881f03d679cd4fcd2470b46f2c407 94438 doc optional libpanel-applet2-doc_2.14.3-2_all.deb d5c695686c9d5c71ee527dca697caa6c 2840478 gnome optional gnome-panel-data_2.14.3-2_all.deb c3e3eb1abb5479cf773679109593e7b5 389420 gnome optional gnome-panel_2.14.3-2_i386.deb 6d9a228e1fed2d4308d0098ca9fba90b 93688 libs optional libpanel-applet2-0_2.14.3-2_i386.deb cb387ada556f958fb31a6898109c7563 155014 libdevel optional libpanel-applet2-dbg_2.14.3-2_i386.deb 118eceb4719e86c951abd59cfc7c08c9 99868 libdevel optional libpanel-applet2-dev_2.14.3-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5
Processed: Fixed in NMU of ffmpeg 0.cvs20060823-3.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 386458 + fixed Bug#386458: libavcodec-dev: Missing dependencies for libraw1394-dev libdc1934-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of linphone 1.3.5-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 382616 + fixed Bug#382616: package is unusable for standalone development: uglib.h has conflicts with glib-2.0 headers Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of gnomeicu 0.99.10-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 379149 + fixed
Bug#379149: Package is not binNMU safe, arch-any gnomeicu depends on arch-all
gnomeicu-common (= ${Source-Version})
Tags were: pending patch
Bug#387738: Uninstallable due to binNMU-safe dependency on gnomeicu-common
Tags added: fixed
> tag 386081 + fixed
Bug#386081: gnomeicu: Links against obsolete libtasn1-2 package
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385800: use %p for printing pointers
This patch uses %p to format pointers, instead of %x with an int cast.
--- assa/Reactor.cpp.orig 2006-08-13 20:56:22.0 +0200
+++ assa/Reactor.cpp2006-09-17 23:27:00.821168000 +0200
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@
}
if (ret == true) {
- DL((REACT,"Found EvtH \"%s\"(0x%X)\n",
- eh_->get_id ().c_str (),int(eh_)));
+ DL((REACT,"Found EvtH \"%s\"(%p)\n",
+ eh_->get_id ().c_str (),eh_));
eh_->handle_close (fd);
}
@@ -327,8 +327,8 @@
}
if (ret == true && ehp != NULL) {
- DL((REACT,"Removed EvtH \"%s\"(0x%X)\n",
- ehp->get_id ().c_str (), int(ehp)));
+ DL((REACT,"Removed EvtH \"%s\"(%p)\n",
+ ehp->get_id ().c_str (), ehp));
ehp->handle_close (fd_);
}
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgtk-java 2.8.5-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 375297 + fixed Bug#375297: libgtk-jni, libgtk-java: Circular depends. There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 375872 + fixed Bug#375872: libgtk-java has circular Depends on libgtk-jni There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 385943 + fixed Bug#385943: libgtk-java: Needs rebuild against libgcj7-0 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387962: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14)
Mirco Bauer wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 19:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Hi >> >> Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (< >> 1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen >> the versioned dependency. > > Sounds like you have mixed testing/unstable. No, just reporting the bug a couple of days after I spotted it... > In testing XSP is 1.1.15-1 which runs with Mono >= 1.1.13 << 1.1.14 > In testing Mono is 1.1.13.8. I run unstable. > So clean testing has not this problem. > Also clean unstable not, since it got XSP 1.1.17 and Mono 1.1.17 Which was not the case a couple of days ago, so indeed the bug has been fixed in the mean time... > The dependency can't be loosed, Mono contains parts that need to match > with the XSP version. Ok, good to know. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: tagging 366620
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 366620 + pending Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works There were no tags set. Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running initramfs init Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387953: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tremulous-data
Heretik wrote: > It's in non-free. Maybe you haven't got non-free in your sources.list ? No, I haven't, though sorry for filing the bug as it's a contrib package which I should have spotted in the first place... Cheers Luk > $ apt-cache policy tremulous-data > tremulous-data: > Installé : 1.1.0-1 > Candidat : 1.1.0-1 > Table de version : > *** 1.1.0-1 0 > 990 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/non-free Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > > Luk Claes a écrit : >> Package: tremulous >> Severity: serious >> Version: 1.1.0-2 >> >> Hi >> >> Your package depends on tremulous-data (>= 1.1.0-1) which is not available in >> unstable. >> >> Cheers >> >> Luk >> > -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: closing 387953
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > close 387953 Bug#387953: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tremulous-data 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: closing 387962
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > close 387962 1.1.17-1 Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14) 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 1.1.17-1, send any further explanations to Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 375035
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 375035 + pending Bug#375035: Kernel 2.6.16 attempts to access root device before running initramfs init Tags were: pending Bug#366620: initramfs-tools: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387983: classpath: missing Replaces in new gtk-peer package
Package: classpath Version: 2:0.92-3 Severity: serious Selecting previously deselected package classpath-gtkpeer. Unpacking classpath-gtkpeer (from .../classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/classpath/libgtkpeer.la', which is also in package classpath dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Preparing to replace classpath 2:0.91-3 (using .../classpath_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement classpath ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/classpath-gtkpeer_2%3a0.92-3_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of classpath: classpath depends on classpath-gtkpeer (= 2:0.92-3); however: Package classpath-gtkpeer is not installed. dpkg: error processing classpath (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (90, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.4-smp-gbbde1285 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages classpath depends on: ii classpath-common 2:0.92-3clean room standard Java libraries pn classpath-gtkpeer (no description available) ii libasound2 1.0.11-7ALSA library ii libc62.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcj-common1:4.1.1-10 Java runtime library (common files ii libjack0.100.0-0 0.101.1-1 JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari ii libmagic14.17-3 File type determination library us classpath recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387962: [Pkg-mono-group] Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14)
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 19:27 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Hi > > Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (< > 1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen > the versioned dependency. Sounds like you have mixed testing/unstable. In testing XSP is 1.1.15-1 which runs with Mono >= 1.1.13 << 1.1.14 In testing Mono is 1.1.13.8. So clean testing has not this problem. Also clean unstable not, since it got XSP 1.1.17 and Mono 1.1.17 The dependency can't be loosed, Mono contains parts that need to match with the XSP version. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? --END GEEK CODE BLOCK-- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#387953: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tremulous-data
It's in non-free. Maybe you haven't got non-free in your sources.list ? $ apt-cache policy tremulous-data tremulous-data: Installé : 1.1.0-1 Candidat : 1.1.0-1 Table de version : *** 1.1.0-1 0 990 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/non-free Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Luk Claes a écrit : > Package: tremulous > Severity: serious > Version: 1.1.0-2 > > Hi > > Your package depends on tremulous-data (>= 1.1.0-1) which is not available in > unstable. > > Cheers > > Luk > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: setting package to gnome-panel gnome-panel-data libpanel-applet2-0 libpanel-applet2-dbg libpanel-applet2-dev libpanel-applet2-doc ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > package gnome-panel gnome-panel-data libpanel-applet2-0 libpanel-applet2-dbg > libpanel-applet2-dev libpanel-applet2-doc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpanel-applet2-dbg libpanel-applet2-0 gnome-panel-data gnome-panel libpanel-applet2-doc libpanel-applet2-dev > tags 322517 + pending Bug#322517: gnome-panel must depend on menu-xdg There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 387925 + pending Bug#387925: gnome-panel-data: postrm fails during purge Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#377299: marked as done (sitebar: CVE-2006-3320: cross-site scripting)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 15:08:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sitebar: CVE-2006-3320: cross-site scripting has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: sitebar Version: 3.3.8-1 3.2.6-7 Severity: serious Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 CVE-2006-3320: "Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in command.php in SiteBar 3.3.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the command parameter." According to the SiteBar svn history page [1], this has not been fixed upstream. The original report [2] contains a simple proof-of-concept. I have not tested it. The CVE indicates that the version in Sarge is also vulnerable. Please mention the CVE in your changelog. Thanks, Alec [1] http://teamforge.net/viewcvs/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/doc/history.txt?view=markup [2] http://www.site.com/sitebar/command.php?command=[CODES] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFErx2dAud/2YgchcQRAhC0AJwP1iEPWCGSnv+4rViEmVMWLJeXIACgl76m hZT2luFqY9Er9egsx7tx6k4= =djii -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package: sitebar Version: 3.3.8-1 3.2.6-7 Severity: serious Fixed thanks to changes made to command.php by Thijs Kinkhorst. Additionally fixed with separate changes to command.php with patch received from upstream. -- Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941 --- End Message ---
Bug#387979: libhtml-mason-perl-examples: purging the package fail without debconf
Package: libhtml-mason-perl-examples Version: 1:1.33-2 Severity: serious Hello Charles, There is an error when attempting to purge the package: Removing libhtml-mason-perl-examples ... Purging configuration files for libhtml-mason-perl-examples ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libhtml-mason-perl-examples.postrm: line 18: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libhtml-mason-perl-examples (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 When purging, the postrm cannot assume debconf to be installed. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387899: As I undestand ssl-thin.ads must be added as "alternative".
Olleg Samoylov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't compile aws application.
>
> rateme.adb:4:06: file "ssl-thin.ads" not found
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Rateme (body)" depends on "Aws.Client (spec)"
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Client (spec)" depends on "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)"
> rateme.adb:4:06: "Aws.Net.Ssl (spec)" depends on "Ssl.Thin (spec)"
>
> But exists files ssl-thin__dummy.ads, ssl-thin__gnutls.ads,
> ssl-thin__openssl.ads. As I undestand they are alternatives for
> ssl-thin.ads and must be added debian "alternative" for this.
No, because this is a compile-time "alternative"; the Debian
alternatives system only deals with run-time "alternatives".
Moreover, you don't really have a choice; due to licensing
requirements, I have linked libaws2.2 against libgnutls13 and so AWS
will always use GNU TLS instead of OpenSSL.
The proper thing to do is to add a package Naming in a project file.
In fact, it should be /usr/share/ada/adainclude/aws.gpr; I'll correct
that problem.
In the mean time, you can try to add this to your project file:
with "aws.gpr";
project Rateme is
[...]
package Naming is
-- Configuration for GNU/Linux using GNU TLS for strong crypto
for Body ("AWS.Net.SSL") use "aws-net-ssl__gnutls.adb";
for Body ("AWS.Net.SSL.Certificate")
use "aws-net-ssl-certificate__gnutls.adb";
for Body ("AWS.Net.Std") use "aws-net-std__gnat.adb";
for Body ("AWS.OS_Lib") use "aws-os_lib__gnat.adb";
for Body ("AWS.Translator.Conversion")
use "aws-translator-conversion__f.adb";
for Spec ("SSL.Thin") use "ssl-thin__gnutls.ads";
for Spec ("Templates_Parser.Configuration")
use "templates_parser-configuration__aws.ads";
end Naming;
...
end Rateme;
This fix will become unnecessary when I upload the patched AWS.
Thanks for pointing the problem to me.
--
Ludovic Brenta.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387980: egroupware-core: purging the package fail
Package: egroupware-core Version: 1.2-104.dfsg-2 Severity: serious Hello Peter, There is an error when attempting to purge the package: Removing egroupware-core ... Purging configuration files for egroupware-core ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/egroupware-core.postrm: line 15: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing egroupware-core (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 When purging the postrm script cannot assume debconf to be installed. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387952: marked as done (FTBFS (sparc): redefinition of serial_struct)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387952: fixed in hwinfo 13.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: hwinfo
Version: 13.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I
/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I
/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include kbd.c
kbd.c:24: error: redefinition of 'struct serial_struct'
make[3]: *** [kbd.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3/src/hd'
make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3/src'
make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3'
make: *** [stampdir/build-arch-stamp] Error 2
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=hwinfo%26ver=13.3-2%26arch=sparc%26stamp=1158502936%26file=log
This is already defined in /usr/include/linux/serial.h .
diff -ruN hwinfo-13.3-old/src/hd/kbd.c hwinfo-13.3/src/hd/kbd.c
--- hwinfo-13.3-old/src/hd/kbd.c2006-09-17 12:21:13.753615000 -0400
+++ hwinfo-13.3/src/hd/kbd.c2006-09-17 12:23:22.222937080 -0400
@@ -21,26 +21,6 @@
#ifdef __sparc__
-struct serial_struct {
- int type;
- int line;
- unsigned long port;
- int irq;
- int flags;
- int xmit_fifo_size;
- int custom_divisor;
- int baud_base;
- unsigned short close_delay;
- chario_type;
- charreserved_char[1];
- int hub6;
- unsigned short closing_wait; /* time to wait before closing */
- unsigned short closing_wait2; /* no longer used... */
- unsigned char *iomem_base;
- unsigned short iomem_reg_shift;
- int reserved[2];
-};
-
#ifdef DIET
typedef unsigned int u_int;
#endif
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: hwinfo
Source-Version: 13.3-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hwinfo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
hwinfo_13.3-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/hwinfo_13.3-3.diff.gz
hwinfo_13.3-3.dsc
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/hwinfo_13.3-3.dsc
hwinfo_13.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/hwinfo_13.3-3_i386.deb
libhd13-dev_13.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/libhd13-dev_13.3-3_i386.deb
libhd13-doc_13.3-3_all.deb
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/libhd13-doc_13.3-3_all.deb
libhd13_13.3-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/hwinfo/libhd13_13.3-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated hwinfo package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:56:18 -0400
Source: hwinfo
Binary: libhd13-dev libhd13-doc libhd13 hwinfo
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 13.3-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
hwinfo - Hardware identification system
libhd13- Hardware identification system library
libhd13-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers
libhd13-doc - Hardware identification system library documentation
Closes: 387952
Changes:
hwinfo (13.3-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add debian/patches/93_serial_struct to fix a FTBFS on sparc. Thanks Clint
Adams. (closes: #387952)
Files:
93e4e0ffe081cfd20e58c0752575f612 687 admin optional hwinfo_13.3-3.dsc
b905b20dd069a3da6d2ab426279db313 7807 admin optional hwinfo_13.3-3.diff.gz
24173af78f95735bbb50f56f824d6289 40604 admin optional hwinfo_13.3-3_i386.deb
fac6c4805e1e813778f4c38a5e837dba 558430 libs optional libhd13_13.3-3_i386.deb
c78d7d3919062d105318c2141c7841fb 644744 libdevel optional
libhd13-dev_13.3-3_i386.deb
92f9081c4f76243523c7e6fd84ed2b5e 1231888 doc optional
libhd13-doc_13.3-3_all.deb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkUNkRkACgkQDb3UpmEybUAV0QCfYxNprgt/xu2xtJgvZyOuLKVh
/YYAn1fwO6p9AMNNFSvKDviPmJXngHDE
=Y040
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
Bug#387967: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgalago2
Il giorno dom, 17/09/2006 alle 19.46 +0200, Luk Claes ha scritto: > Package: libgalago1.0-cil > Severity: serious > Version: 0.5.0-1 > > Hi > > Your package depends on libgalago2 which is not available in unstable (yet?). hello luk, yes, it's sitting in new. ciao, -- Riccardo Setti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387972: tries to stop deinstalled apache
Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20060309-5 Severity: serious When deinstalling dokuwiki, the postrm script tries to stop the apache which has been deinstalled (but not purged) previously. That makes dokuwiki impossible to deinstall. Removing dokuwiki ... /usr/sbin/apachectl is not executable, exiting... failed! invoke-rc.d: initscript apache, action "force-reload" failed. dpkg: error processing dokuwiki (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: dokuwiki E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387974: postinst/postrm delete conffiles
Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20060309-5 Severity: serious dokuwiki's postinst and postrm script delete conffiles in /etc/apache*/conf.d/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385951: marked as done (Fail to scan array in some case when partition is at the end of the disk)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 11:18:52 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385951: fixed in mdadm 2.5.3.git200608202239-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: mdadm Version: 2.5.2-7 Severity: critical Tha actual mdadm in testing makes the whole system to unbootable if on raid slice is on the end of a disk. (In some cases) My config: - ---mdadm.conf--- DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=88cf7fb7:6fab12d7:b713c983:af6eaca5 MAILADDR root - - ---hdc--- Disk /dev/hdc: 60.0 GB, 60060155904 bytes 16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 116374 cylinders Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 * 1 496 249983+ 83 Linux /dev/hdc2 4971488 499968 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hdc31489 11637457902544 fd Linux raid autodetect - - - ---hdd--- Disk /dev/hdd: 320.0 GB, 320072933376 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdd1 1972878140159+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hdd29729 1945678140160 8e Linux LVM /dev/hdd3 31705 3891357906292+ fd Linux raid autodetect - - - ---/proc/mdstat--- Personalities : [raid1] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdd3[0] 57902464 blocks [2/1] [U_] unused devices: - -- Please note that I had to run the raid in degraded mode as /dev/hdc3 cannot be in the array (See below). When I do a "mdadm --assemble --scan --auto=yes" (as done in /etc/init.d/mdadm-raid) then I get the following error: - --- mdadm: no recogniseable superblock on /dev/hda2 mdadm: /dev/hda2 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no recogniseable superblock on /dev/hda1 mdadm: /dev/hda1 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no recogniseable superblock on /dev/hda mdadm: /dev/hda has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdd2 mdadm: /dev/hdd2 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdd1 mdadm: /dev/hdd1 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdd mdadm: /dev/hdd has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdc2 mdadm: /dev/hdc2 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/hdc1 mdadm: /dev/hdc1 has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/vg1/lv_hathi mdadm: /dev/vg1/lv_hathi has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/vg1/lv_misc mdadm: /dev/vg1/lv_misc has wrong uuid. mdadm: no RAID superblock on /dev/vg1/lv_mirror mdadm: /dev/vg1/lv_mirror has wrong uuid. mdadm: WARNING /dev/hdc3 and /dev/hdc appear to have very similar superblocks. If they are really different, please --zero the superblock on one If they are the same, please remove one from the list. - --- Cleaning the superblock of /dev/hdc also clean the one of /dev/hdc3 and so leaving the raid in a degraded state. But at least I can now boot the system after running the md0 by hand. Note that the partition /dev/hdd3 is also at the end of the disk but do not make problemes. This is a very critical bug and should be fixed in etch (I think, this is release critical!!!) - -- Package-specific info: - --- mount output /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,mode=1777) /dev/sysvg/lv_usr on /usr type ext3 (rw,noatime) /dev/sysvg/lv_var on /var type reiserfs (rw) /dev/sysvg/lv_local on /usr/local type ext3 (rw,noatime) /dev/sysvg/lv_home on /home type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/vg1/lv_misc on /misc type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/vg1/lv_mirror on /mirror type reiserfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/vg1/lv_hathi on /hathi type ext2 (ro) capifs on /dev/capi type capifs (rw,mode=0666) /proc/bus/usb on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw) AFS on /afs type afs (rw) localhost:/var/lib/cfs/.cfsfs on /var/cfs type nfs (rw,port=3049,intr,nfsvers=2,addr=127.0.0.1) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw) - --- mdadm.conf DEVICE partitions ARRAY /dev/md0 level=raid1 num-devices=2 UUID=88cf7fb7:6fab12d7:b713c983:af6eaca5 MAILADDR root - --- /proc/mdstat: Personalities : [raid1] read_ahead 1024 sectors md0 : active raid1 hdd3[0] 57902464 blocks [2/1] [U_] unused devices:
Bug#387967: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libgalago2
Package: libgalago1.0-cil Severity: serious Version: 0.5.0-1 Hi Your package depends on libgalago2 which is not available in unstable (yet?). Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#387962: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14)
Package: mono-xsp2-base Severity: serious Version: 1.1.15-1 Hi Your package is not installable due to a dependency on mono-classlib-2.0 (< 1.1.14) which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to loosen the versioned dependency. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processed: Re: severity of 381526 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 381526 serious Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc Severity set to `serious' from `important' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387964: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on python (< 2.4)
Package: xkeysw-config Severity: serious Version: 1.1-1.3 Hi Your package is not installable due to a dependency on python (< 2.4) which is not available in unstable anymore. The package might need an update for the python transition. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#336373: #336373 - subversion: svn MKCOL ssl error - Debian Bug report logs
This bug report is about a client error related to libssl. Ah, right you are. I had read #338006 but managed to miss that detail. Sorry, and thanks. I tried my "svn list -R" with a build of Subversion linked against OS X's native libssl, and all went swimmingly. I'll file a bug with DarwinPorts. Thanks again! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Try harder to reopen bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 387500 Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug still present
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found 387500 0.97-16 Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB Bug marked as found in version 0.97-16. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387952: FTBFS (sparc): redefinition of serial_struct
Package: hwinfo
Version: 13.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
gcc -c -O2 -Wall -Wno-pointer-sign -pipe -g -fPIC -I../../src/hd -I
/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I /usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I
/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include kbd.c
kbd.c:24: error: redefinition of 'struct serial_struct'
make[3]: *** [kbd.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3/src/hd'
make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3/src'
make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/hwinfo-13.3/build-tree/hwinfo-13.3'
make: *** [stampdir/build-arch-stamp] Error 2
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=hwinfo%26ver=13.3-2%26arch=sparc%26stamp=1158502936%26file=log
This is already defined in /usr/include/linux/serial.h .
diff -ruN hwinfo-13.3-old/src/hd/kbd.c hwinfo-13.3/src/hd/kbd.c
--- hwinfo-13.3-old/src/hd/kbd.c2006-09-17 12:21:13.753615000 -0400
+++ hwinfo-13.3/src/hd/kbd.c2006-09-17 12:23:22.222937080 -0400
@@ -21,26 +21,6 @@
#ifdef __sparc__
-struct serial_struct {
- int type;
- int line;
- unsigned long port;
- int irq;
- int flags;
- int xmit_fifo_size;
- int custom_divisor;
- int baud_base;
- unsigned short close_delay;
- chario_type;
- charreserved_char[1];
- int hub6;
- unsigned short closing_wait; /* time to wait before closing */
- unsigned short closing_wait2; /* no longer used... */
- unsigned char *iomem_base;
- unsigned short iomem_reg_shift;
- int reserved[2];
-};
-
#ifdef DIET
typedef unsigned int u_int;
#endif
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387951: libslp1: postrm fails when the package is purged
Package: libslp1 Version: 1.2.1-5 Severity: serious Hello Ganesan, Purging libslp1 fails with: Removing libslp1 ... Purging configuration files for libslp1 ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libslp1.postrm: line 4: /usr/share/debconf/confmodule: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing libslp1 (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: libslp1 The postrm cannot rely on debconf being installed when the package is purged. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 387925
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > tags 387925 + confirmed Bug#387925: gnome-panel-data: postrm fails during purge There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387953: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on tremulous-data
Package: tremulous Severity: serious Version: 1.1.0-2 Hi Your package depends on tremulous-data (>= 1.1.0-1) which is not available in unstable. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#384334: marked as done (loading existing base format breaks tetex or texlive packages)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#384334: fixed in jadetex 3.13-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: jadetex Version: 3.13-6 Severity: wishlist Hi, a new Tex distribution was added to Debian: Tex-Live. It would be great if your package supports it. To do so add an appropriate dependency rule. An alternative of tetex-bin | texlive-base should be enough, but check what your package really need. In case of questions the people on the texlive mailinglist pkg-texlive-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org might help. Thank you. Bye, Jörg. pgphW39QjqcFw.pgp Description: PGP signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: jadetex Source-Version: 3.13-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of jadetex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: jadetex_3.13-7.diff.gz to pool/main/j/jadetex/jadetex_3.13-7.diff.gz jadetex_3.13-7.dsc to pool/main/j/jadetex/jadetex_3.13-7.dsc jadetex_3.13-7_all.deb to pool/main/j/jadetex/jadetex_3.13-7_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated jadetex package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:31:35 +0900 Source: jadetex Binary: jadetex Architecture: source all Version: 3.13-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: OHURA Makoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: jadetex- generator of printable output from SGML or XML using Jade Closes: 335225 343104 352845 375037 384332 384334 Changes: jadetex (3.13-7) unstable; urgency=high . * Set urgency to high. This release fixes RC bugs. And thanks to Norbert Preining. * Switched to dh_installtex (Closes: #352845, #335225, #343104) - Added the respective call to debian/rules - Removed fmt generation code in postinst - Removed prerm file * debian/rules: - Moved the ini files to /usr/share/texmf/tex/jadetex/config * debian/control: - Added alternative build-dependencies on texlive. - Added alternative dependencies on texlive. (Closes: #375037). - Moved debhelper from Build-Depends-Indep to Build-Depends. - Updated Standards-Version. * Changed fmtutil line to not load the latex format, but put the loading of latex.ini into jadetex.ini and the loading of pdflatex.ini into pdfjadetex.ini. (Closes: #384334). * debian/texmf.cnf: - Added latex sub directory in the search path. - Deleted useless pdftex path component (Closes: #384332). * debian/copyright: Extended the copyright notices on the Debian packaging part a bit. Files: 1d1552fd798be1dcc8d894c43df0fa3a 706 tex optional jadetex_3.13-7.dsc 348789f011ba8da06a8012e4dc354823 15548 tex optional jadetex_3.13-7.diff.gz 38b5f3c21da53bb1b6a9711c1a0b1d83 238170 tex optional jadetex_3.13-7_all.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDXIT7qLvonfc4IMRAsukAKCie9CijOMlOxIixrZyp6fvgBHvQgCfYRUv 4HwxmxisAG5YgAlAl/3p2D4= =CCT6 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#384332: marked as done (jadetex: Missing path setting, therefore problems building format when cslatex is installed)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 09:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384332: fixed in jadetex 3.13-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: jadetex
Version: 3.13-6
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
(This bug also exists upstream, at least in texlive. The Debian TeX
maintainer are going to care for this).
Since jadetex is a LaTeX-based format, it should search TEXMF/tex/latex
after TEXMF/tex/jadetex and before other paths. Because the latex path
is missing in TEXINPUTS.jadetex, jadetex will for example find cslatex's
version of fonttext.cfg before LaTeX's.
This problem has not shown up so far because jadetex currently loads a
pre-built latex.fmt. But this must be stopped (see the clone of bug
#375037, don't know the number jet), and therefore jadetex would get
incompatible with cslatex. But the bug would be important anyway.
Furthermore, pdfjadetex should not mention the non-existent pdftex
toplevel directory in its search path. This leads to the following
complete patch:
--- /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf.orig 2006-08-23 17:25:53.0
+0200
+++ /etc/texmf/texmf.d/96JadeTeX.cnf2006-08-23 17:26:10.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-TEXINPUTS.jadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,plain,generic,}//
-TEXINPUTS.pdfjadetex = .;$TEXMF/{pdftex,tex}/{jadetex,plain,generic,}//
+TEXINPUTS.jadetex = .;$TEXMF/tex/{jadetex,latex,plain,generic,}//
+TEXINPUTS.pdfjadetex = .;$TEXMF/{tex}/{jadetex,latex,plain,generic,}//
Note that there's an additional bug in tex-common: It also sets
TEXINPUTS.jadetex and TEXINPUTS.pdfjadetex, so the change in jadetex
won't have any effect until this is removed. No bugnumber yet, I'll
file it at once. And please don't wonder why I file it with severity
important only: That's because the bug exists also in the version in
testing, tex-common is supposed to migrate to testing tonight, and I
don't want to try whether I am able to correctly tell britney that the
bug is in both versions.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages jadetex depends on:
ii debianutils 2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii tetex-bin 3.0-17bpo1 The teTeX binary files
ii tetex-extra 3.0-18bpo1 Additional library files of teTeX
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii tex-common0.24bpo1 Common infrastructure for using an
ii ucf 1.17 Update Configuration File: preserv
Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2 1.4.30.13 Debian configuration management sy
ii debianutils2.8.4 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii dialog 1.0-20050306-1Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii dpkg 1.10.28 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii ed 0.2-20The classic unix line editor
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfontconfig1 2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libgcc11:3.4.3-13GCC support library
ii libice66.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii libkpathsea4 3.0-17bpo1path search library for teTeX (run
ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1PNG library - runtime
ii libpoppler0c2 0.4.5-3bpo1 PDF rendering library
ii libsm6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2X Window System Session Management
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-13The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libt1-55.0.2-3 Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii libx11-6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2X Window System protocol client li
ii libxaw74.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Athena widget set library
ii libxext6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxmu66.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2X Window System miscellaneous util
ii libxpm46.9.0.dfsg.1-5bpo2X pixmap li
Bug#387944: samba hangs during boot
Package: samba Version: 3.0.23c-1 Severity: critical When I tried to boot up this machine about 1h ago it would not come up properly - ssh or VLC logins would fail. Upon closer inspection it hung after the "nmbd" part of the samba initscript output. It's reproducible, not a timeout (I waited at least 10min) and not network related (that comes up fine and pings work). Booting in single user mode bypasses the problem of course but some poeple with headless machines might be in trouble if they're away from them. I run a very current testing an this box, the last reboot (that worked) was about 2 days ago. Doing /etc/init.d/samba/start from the commandline (in single user) has the same result, strace attached. Thanks, C. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_AT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages samba depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.3Debian configuration management sy ii libacl1 2.2.41-1 Access control list shared library ii libattr12.4.32-1 Extended attribute shared library ii libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcomerr2 1.39-1 common error description library ii libcupsys2 1.2.2-2 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libgnutls13 1.4.4-1 the GNU TLS library - runtime libr ii libkrb531.4.4-1 MIT Kerberos runtime libraries ii libldap22.1.30-13+b1 OpenLDAP libraries ii libpam-modules 0.79-3.2 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.79-3.2 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g0.79-3.2 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpopt01.10-2 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii logrotate 3.7.1-3 Log rotation utility ii lsb-base3.1-15 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii netbase 4.25 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii procps 1:3.2.7-2/proc file system utilities ii samba-common3.0.23c-1Samba common files used by both th ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime Versions of packages samba recommends: pn smbldap-tools (no description available) -- debconf information: samba/nmbd_from_inetd: * samba/run_mode: daemons samba/log_files_moved: samba/tdbsam: false * samba/generate_smbpasswd: true samba-hang.strace.gz Description: Binary data
Bug#375035: Bug#366620: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 05:17:40PM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> > The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> > placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd(), but in
> > init/initramfs.c:populate_rootfs() it's wrong, initrd_{start,end}
> > are both 0.
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd() is broken. The
> relevant part of the code is:
Thanks for the patch. I have tentatively added it to trunk (well, once i do a
test build, and thus check it doesn't break), and it should be in tomorrow's
or more probably the day after's snapshot builds. I will probably upload a
package to http://people.debian.org/~luther once the build finishes.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387500: Debian installer fails to install GRUB
found 0.97-16 thanks I just had a look at grub version 0.97-16, and /sbin/grub-install is still missing. This path is used by grub-installer in d-i beta 3, and thus the installation fail. Adding a symlink in /target from /sbin/grub-install to /usr/sbin/grub-install solved the problem. Friendly, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 379743 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21 > severity 379743 important Bug#379743: cynthiune.app: FTBFS (amd64): CynthiuneHeaderCell.m:100: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:3807 Severity set to `important' from `serious' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387937: open-cobol: compilation errors in compiling programs
Package: open-cobol Version: 0.32-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trying to compile the hello world example from the info pages yields this error: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I am a cobol newbie, but even if it's my fault there's either an open-cobol bug, or an open-cobol documentation bug. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages open-cobol depends on: di libc6 2.3.6.ds1-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcob1 0.32-2 COBOL compiler - runtime library ii libcob1-dev 0.32-2 COBOL compiler - development files di libdb4.3 4.3.29-6 Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [ ii libgmp3-dev 2:4.2.1+dfsg-4 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libgmp3c2 2:4.2.1+dfsg-4 Multiprecision arithmetic library ii libltdl3 1.5.22-4 A system independent dlopen wrappe ii libltdl3-dev 1.5.22-4 A system independent dlopen wrappe di libncurses5 5.5-3 Shared libraries for terminal hand open-cobol recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDWzIH98XdLpXjXERAhKQAJ9BgY8VWVDmSIUNEp5Kh8PbuoHL1gCgl6Yj c+kzmmg0seyOK3OBhIuNUeE= =fOFY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366620: 2.6.16-1-powerpc fails to mount rootfs, 2.6.15-1-powerpc works
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Christian Aichinger wrote:
> The kernel somehow loses the information where the initrd image is
> placed in memory. The correct data is there in
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd(), but in
> init/initramfs.c:populate_rootfs() it's wrong, initrd_{start,end}
> are both 0.
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:prom_check_initrd() is broken. The
relevant part of the code is:
,--
| unsigned long val;
| ...
| val = RELOC(prom_initrd_start);
| prom_setprop(_prom->chosen, "/chosen", "linux,initrd-start",
|&val, sizeof(val));
| val = RELOC(prom_initrd_end);
| prom_setprop(_prom->chosen, "/chosen", "linux,initrd-end",
|&val, sizeof(val));
`--
As you can see it tries to store pointers to initrd start/end in the
/chosen node, however in reality it stores the address of val, a
local variable. Since that's long gone invalid when the values are
read out from /chosen again, the result is undefined.
The attached is a patch fixing the problem. It would be nice if the
bug submitters could test it to see if it fixes their problems too.
Cheers,
Christian Aichinger
PS: arch/powerpc/platforms/powermac/bootx_init.c does something
similar, though it looks saner, as it copies *val into it's own
permanent memory block AFAICS.
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c 2006-09-15 18:33:50.0 +0200
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c 2006-09-15 18:33:44.0 +0200
@@ -2141,17 +2141,17 @@
struct prom_t *_prom = &RELOC(prom);
if (r3 && r4 && r4 != 0xdeadbeef) {
- unsigned long val;
+ unsigned long *ptr;
RELOC(prom_initrd_start) = is_kernel_addr(r3) ? __pa(r3) : r3;
RELOC(prom_initrd_end) = RELOC(prom_initrd_start) + r4;
- val = RELOC(prom_initrd_start);
+ ptr = &RELOC(prom_initrd_start);
prom_setprop(_prom->chosen, "/chosen", "linux,initrd-start",
-&val, sizeof(val));
- val = RELOC(prom_initrd_end);
+ptr, sizeof(prom_initrd_start));
+ ptr = &RELOC(prom_initrd_end);
prom_setprop(_prom->chosen, "/chosen", "linux,initrd-end",
-&val, sizeof(val));
+ptr, sizeof(prom_initrd_end));
reserve_mem(RELOC(prom_initrd_start),
RELOC(prom_initrd_end) - RELOC(prom_initrd_start));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#385757: marked as done (octave-gpc: not installable in sid)
Your message dated Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:02:09 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#385757: fixed in octave-gpc 0.1.6-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: octave-gpc Version: 0.1.6-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, here is the problem: # apt-get install octave-gpc Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: octave-gpc: Depends: libgfortran0 (>= 4.0.2) but it is not installable E: Broken packages Could you please recompile octave-gpc with gfortran 4.1 ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (99, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: octave-gpc Source-Version: 0.1.6-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of octave-gpc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.diff.gz to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.diff.gz octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.dsc to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.dsc octave-gpc_0.1.6-4_i386.deb to pool/contrib/o/octave-gpc/octave-gpc_0.1.6-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated octave-gpc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 16:53:03 +0200 Source: octave-gpc Binary: octave-gpc Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.1.6-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: octave-gpc - Octave binding for the General Polygon Clipper Library Closes: 385757 Changes: octave-gpc (0.1.6-4) unstable; urgency=low . * Recompiled to get correct dependency on libgfortran (closes: #385757) Files: d4fcaf1aa8a95f09d31fa4a3306d30dc 693 contrib/math optional octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.dsc 48b0ef840fb20a51c8d33c466ac09423 3669 contrib/math optional octave-gpc_0.1.6-4.diff.gz aaa3e1778c57ca85b82a3b2560f14211 234012 contrib/math optional octave-gpc_0.1.6-4_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFDWIQk3oga0pdcv4RAhOGAJwJ2XB2FkWhhH+R4bEuHBHIHA6JcwCfQhC/ /zvurmniPua0QqWx2uLCs0s= =1FZ/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#387925: gnome-panel-data: postrm fails during purge
Package: gnome-panel-data Version: 2.14.3-1 Severity: serious Hello GNOME, when trying to purge gnome-panel-data, I get Removing gnome-panel-data ... Purging configuration files for gnome-panel-data ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/gnome-panel-data.postrm: line 7: update-gconf-defaults: command not found dpkg: error processing gnome-panel-data (--purge): subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 Errors were encountered while processing: gnome-panel-data I think the issue is that you cannot assume dependencies being satisfied during purge. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#387608: roxen4: has an entire mysql database as conffiles
Quoting "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Package: roxen4 > Version: 4.0.425-2 > Severity: serious > > roxen4 has an entire MySQL database as conffiles: > > fugl:~/nmu/roxen4-4.0.425> cat debian/conffiles > /var/lib/roxen4/my.cfg > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/host.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/db.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/db.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/db.MYD > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/tables_priv.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/host.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/host.MYD > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/user.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/user.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/user.MYD > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/func.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/func.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/func.MYD > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/columns_priv.frm > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/tables_priv.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/tables_priv.MYD > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/columns_priv.MYI > /var/lib/roxen4/mysql/columns_priv.MYD Are you happy with just removing these files as conffiles (i.e., keeping them in the package)? Or do you 'require' them to be removed (and created with a SQL script at (pre)install time)? -- Iran Saddam Hussein spy terrorist attack bomb Peking Ft. Bragg Serbian Qaddafi pits cryptographic Clinton fissionable North Korea [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] [Or http://www.europarl.eu.int/tempcom/echelon/pdf/rapport_echelon_en.pdf] If neither of these works, try http://www.aclu.org and search for echelon. Note. This is a real, not fiction. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/09/06/eu_releases_echelon_spying_report/ http://www.aclu.org/safefree/nsaspying/23989res20060131.html#echelon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
