Bug#1084101: RFS: golang-golang-x-oauth2/0.23.0-1 [Team] -- Google APIs support for OAuth2
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Matt, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: golang-golang-x-oauth2 source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.6.2 (released 2022-12-17) (current is 4.7.0) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... Not going to beat you up with a 'moreinfo' tag here Matt, but can you update the 'Standards-Version' in 'd/control' prior to upload please. I believe golang-golang-x-oauth2 is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1084022: RFS: buffybox/3.2.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Touch-enabled framebuffer keyboard (not only) for vampire slayers
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Sat, 2024-10-05 at 15:32 +1000, undef wrote: > Hi Phil, Soren > On 10/5/24 15:11, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Package is looking good now. > > Thanks! > > > > > A few 'd/copyright' / license issues remain. > > > > GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/library.json > > GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/LICENCE.txt > > MIT | BSD-3-clause > > lvgl/src/libs/thorvg/rapidjson/msinttypes/inttypes.h > > MIT | BSD-3-clause > > lvgl/src/libs/thorvg/rapidjson/msinttypes/stdint.h > > These and the Expat vs MIT issue Soren explained above should be fixed in the > latest upload to mentors. > > Thanks, > Jarrah. > Jarrah, Great work and very responsive to feedback. Now passes all initial sanity checking tests, so am now marking as "confirmed". Hopefully a DD will be able to look at this package soon for review and possible upload to Debian. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1084022: RFS: buffybox/3.2.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Touch-enabled framebuffer keyboard (not only) for vampire slayers
Control: tasg -1 +moreinfo Hi Jarrah, Package is looking good now. A few 'd/copyright' / license issues remain. GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/library.json GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/LICENCE.txt MIT | BSD-3-clause lvgl/src/libs/thorvg/rapidjson/msinttypes/inttypes.h MIT | BSD-3-clause lvgl/src/libs/thorvg/rapidjson/msinttypes/stdint.h Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#981030: RFS: sctk/2.4.10-20151007-1312Z+dfsg2-4 -- speech recognition scoring toolkit
Hi Giulio, There has been no progress with this RFS since December of 2023. Can you offer more information on the progress of this package update? When answering or if you do a new upload to Debian Mentors, could you remove the 'moreinfo' tag off this RFS please. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1062001: RFS: trader/7.20-3 -- simple game of interstellar trading
Hi John, There has been no progress with this RFS since March of 2024. Can you offer more information on the progress of this package update? When answering or if you do a new upload to Debian Mentors, could you remove the 'moreinfo' tag off this RFS please. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1084044: RFS: elpher/3.6.3-1 [Team] -- friendly gopher and gemini client
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Xiyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Information Running lintian... N: I: elpher source: upstream-metadata-missing-bug-tracking [debian/upstream/metadata] N: N: The DEP 12 metadata file does not specify any upstream bug tracking N: information (ie. the Bug-Database or Bug-Submit fields are missing). N: N: The upstream metadata can be found in the source package in the file N: debian/upstream/metadata. N: N: Please refer to https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep12/ for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/upstream/metadata N: N: I: elpa-elpher: wrong-section-according-to-package-name lisp => editors N: N: This package has a name suggesting that it belongs to a section other than N: the one it is currently categorized in. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/section N: I: Lintian run was successful. 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... Xiyue, the package is in a very good state as always. One thing, could we use https://thelambdalab.xyz/elpher/ for the 'Homepage' in 'debian/control' rather than the gopher link? The linked page has the gopher link on it. I believe elpher is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1084022: RFS: buffybox/3.2.0+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Touch-enabled framebuffer keyboard (not only) for vampire slayers
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Undef, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: 2. Lintian [3]: Issue Running lintian... N: I: buffybox source: no-complete-debconf-translation N: N: Even though this package provides debconf translation support, there are N: no translations or none of the translations are complete. This may mean N: that translators weren't properly warned about new strings. N: N: Translators may be notified of changes using podebconf-report-po, for N: example: N: N:podebconf-report-po --call --withtranslators --deadline="+10 days" \ N:--languageteam N: N: Please refer to Section 6.5.2.2 of the Debian Developer's Reference for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/po-debconf N: N: I: buffybox source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.6.2 (released 2022-12-17) (current is 4.7.0) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: N: I: unl0kr: typo-in-manual-page managable manageable [usr/share/man/man1/unl0kr.1.gz:22] N: N: Lintian found a spelling error in a manual page. Lintian has a list of N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like N: a spelling checker does. N: N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of N: gettext (with the help of po4a, for example) or a similar tool, please fix N: the error in the translations as well as the English text to avoid making N: the translations fuzzy. With gettext, for example, this means you should N: also fix the spelling mistake in the corresponding msgids in the *.po N: files. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: spelling-error-in-manpage N: I: Lintian run was successful. 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, may include false positives. philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/buffybox- 3.2.0+dfsg$ lrc en: Versions: recon 2.0 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading d/copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/buffyboard.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/command_line.c GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/command_line.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/config.c GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/config.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/lv_conf.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/main.c GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/meson.build GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/regenerate-layouts.sh GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/terminal.c GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/terminal.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/uinput_device.c GPL-3+ | GPL-3 buffyboard/uinput_device.h GPL-3+ | GPL-3 find-lvgl-sources.sh GPL-3+ | GPL-3 iskey/iskey.c GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/docs/intro/index.rst MIT | Expat lvgl/env_support/rt- thread/lv_rt_thread_conf.h MIT | Expat lvgl/env_support/rt- thread/lv_rt_thread_port.c MIT | Expat lvgl/env_support/rt- thread/squareline/lv_ui_entry.c MIT | Expat lvgl/env_support/rt- thread/squareline/ui/lvgl/lvgl.h GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/library.json GPL-3+ | Expat lvgl/LICENCE.txt MIT | Expat lvgl/src/draw/nxp/pxp/lv_draw_buf_pxp.c MIT | Expat lvgl/src/draw/nxp/pxp/lv_draw_pxp.c MIT | Expat
Bug#1067448: RFS: gcdemu/3.2.6-1 [ITP] -- GNOME application to control CDEmu daemon
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Matteo, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe gcdemu is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1029781: RFS: bandcamp-dl/0.0.13-1 [ITP] -- script to download bandcamp albums
Control: tags -1 +wontfix Hi, No response since June 2024, so closing this RFS. If you wish to pursue getting this package into Debian in the future, please file a new RFS bug. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1028418: RFS: mongovi/2.0.0-1 ITP -- mongovi - cli for mongodb
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Tim, This package has had no feedback from Debian contributors since your last upload. I will change that now. Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Issue dh_auto_test make -j22 test make[1]: Entering directory '/build/mongovi-2.0.0' cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix- map=/build/mongovi-2.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -std=c17 -Wall -Wextra - pedantic-errors -I/usr/include/libbson-1.0 -I/usr/include/libmongoc-1.0 - DVERSION_MAJOR=2 -DVERSION_MINOR=0 -DVERSION_PATCH=0 -o testshorten test/shorten.c cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix- map=/build/mongovi-2.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -std=c17 -Wall -Wextra - pedantic-errors -I/usr/include/libbson-1.0 -I/usr/include/libmongoc-1.0 - DVERSION_MAJOR=2 -DVERSION_MINOR=0 -DVERSION_PATCH=0 -o testprefixmatch test/prefix_match.c strlcpy.o reallocarray.o cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix- map=/build/mongovi-2.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -std=c17 -Wall -Wextra - pedantic-errors -I/usr/include/libbson-1.0 -I/usr/include/libmongoc-1.0 - DVERSION_MAJOR=2 -DVERSION_MINOR=0 -DVERSION_PATCH=0 -o testparsepath test/parse_path.c cc -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix- map=/build/mongovi-2.0.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -std=c17 -Wall -Wextra - pedantic-errors -I/usr/include/libbson-1.0 -I/usr/include/libmongoc-1.0 - DVERSION_MAJOR=2 -DVERSION_MINOR=0 -DVERSION_PATCH=0 -o testjsonify test/jsonify.c jsmn.o ./testshorten FAIL: 한 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한 3 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한한 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한한 3 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한한 4 = exit: -1, expected: 4 FAIL: 4 = exit: -1, expected: 4 FAIL: 5 = exit: -1, expected: 4 FAIL: 6 = exit: -1, expected: 6 FAIL: 7 = exit: -1, expected: 6 FAIL: 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: £ 2 = exit: -1, expected: 1 FAIL: £한 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: £한 3 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: £한한 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: £한한 3 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: £한한 4 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: £한한 5 = exit: -1, expected: 5 FAIL: 한£ 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한£ 3 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: 한한£ 2 = exit: -1, expected: 2 FAIL: 한한£ 3 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: 한한£ 4 = exit: -1, expected: 3 FAIL: 한한£ 5 = exit: -1, expected: 5 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄ 4 = exit: -1, expected: 4 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄ 5 = exit: -1, expected: 5 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄ 6 = exit: -1, expected: 6 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄ 7 = exit: -1, expected: 7 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄ 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: £ह€한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ ＄ 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: £＄ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: ＄ £ह€한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 8 = exit: -1, expected: 8 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 9 = exit: -1, expected: 9 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 10 = exit: -1, expected: 10 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 11 = exit: -1, expected: 11 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 12 = exit: -1, expected: 12 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 13 = exit: -1, expected: 13 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 14 = exit: -1, expected: 13 FAIL: ＄£ह€ 한𐍈＄£ह€한𐍈＄ 15 = exit: -1, expected: 15 All UTF-8 tests failed, make sure your locale supports UTF-8. Try: LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8; export LC_CTYPE make[1]: *** [Makefile:51: test] Error 39 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/mongovi-2.0.0' dh_auto_test: error: make -j22 test returned exit code 2 make: *** [debian/rules:10: build] Error 255 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build subprocess returned exit status 2 I: copying local configuration E: Failed autobuilding of package I: unmounting dev/ptmx filesystem I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem I: unmounting dev/shm filesystem I: unmounting proc filesystem I: unmounting sys filesystem I: cleaning the build env I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build/35029 and its subdirectories philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring$ * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue Running lintian... N: E: mongovi changes: unreleased-changes N: N: The distribution in the Changes field copied from debian/changelog N: indicates that this package was not intended to be released yet. N: N: Pl
Bug#1061051: RFS: notes-tree/1.2-1 -- a note taking app, which organizes notes in a hierarchical structure
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Dmitry, There has been no progress with this RFS since April. Is there still an appetite for getting this package into Debian? Issue: * 'debian/changelog' is template. * No 'debian/watch' file. * 'debian/control' - 'Standards-Version' out of date. Not exhaustive list. Help: * Developers Corner: https://www.debian.org/devel/ * Manuals: https://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals If you wish to move forward with your package, I would encourage importing it into Debian's Salsa[1] and uploading ready source package to Debian Mentors[2]. [1] https://salsa.debian.org [2] https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers/ Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1071394: RFS: guile-curl/0.9-1 [ITP] -- Guile language bindings for cURL
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Shrirm, Deepest apologies for missing this submission. Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Issue PASS: test/setopt.scm - 'http-version CURL_HTTP_VERSION_1_1 PASS: test/setopt.scm - 'ignore-content-length #t PASS: test/setopt.scm - 'http-content-decoding #t PASS: test/setopt.scm - 'http-transfer-decoding #t make[3]: *** [Makefile:1365: test/setopt.log] Segmentation fault make[3]: *** Deleting file 'test/setopt.log' make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs PASS: test/stress.scm - doesn't crash make[3]: Leaving directory '/build/guile-curl-0.9' make[2]: *** [Makefile:1340: check-TESTS] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/guile-curl-0.9' make[1]: *** [Makefile:1555: check-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/guile-curl-0.9' rm -fr -- /tmp/dh-xdg-rundir-vQgT4JY2 dh_auto_test: error: make -j22 test "TESTSUITEFLAGS=-j22 --verbose" VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 255 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status 2 I: copying local configuration E: Failed autobuilding of package I: unmounting dev/ptmx filesystem I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem I: unmounting dev/shm filesystem I: unmounting proc filesystem I: unmounting sys filesystem I: cleaning the build env I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build/10765 and its subdirectories philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring$ * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Issue - See 1. 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Issue - See 1. 7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additional... A. I would suggest disabling DH_VERBOSE in 'debian/rules' with release builds that would be uploaded into Debian. Summary... I believe guile-curl is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1077618: RFS: libjs-jush/2.0.2+git20210206+1-1 [ITP] -- JavaScript Syntax Highlighter
Alexandre, While we are waiting for a DD to review the package, can we just add something for clarity. Add a file 'README.source' to the 'debian' directory with something like the following text between '// Starts' and '// Ends' in it. // Starts libjs-jush source version for this package is a git tag, version 2.0.2. Link: https://sourceforge.net/p/jush/git/ci/v2.0.2/tree/ // Ends This would help folks, giving the best information possible as we do. :-) Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1061048: RFS: RPGMod/1.3 ITP -- heyo!
Hi, A 'moreinfo' request was made on this package back in January. There has been no response or activity on this RFS since. For this reason I will close this RFS at this time. If you upload a new submission to Debian Mentors in the future, you can re- open this or file a new RFS. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1067426: RFS: qucs-s/24.1.0 [ITP] -- Quite universal circuit simulator with SPICE
Hi Vadim, I am going to close this RFS at this time. ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=714836 ITP is 4110 days old. I have CC'ed in the reporter of ITP and also the owner of the ITP. I think any progress on this needs to be continued in the ITP and maybe as Andreas Tille suggested, try and involve the electronics team - link below. https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/pkg-electronics If the ITP is turned into an RFP, is best discussed in the ITP. I do hope contributors can be found for packaging this application, as I believe it would be a great package to have in Debian. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1073988: RFS: rabbitcommon/2.2.6-1 [ITP] -- Rabbit common library using Qt
Hi, It has been some time since the 'moreinfo' tag was added to this RFS. Is there still an appetite for getting this package into Debian? Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1077044: RFS: vesktop/1.5.3 [ITP] -- Vesktop is a custom Discord App
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Hi, Information was supplied back in July. Is there still an appetite for uploading this package to mentors for review and then possible sponsorship? Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1083069: RFS: with-editor/3.4.2-1 -- call program using Emacs as $EDITOR
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Xiyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Issue dpkg-source -b . dpkg-source: info: using source format '3.0 (quilt)' dpkg-source: info: building with-editor using existing ./with- editor_3.4.2.orig.tar.xz dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: with-editor-3.4.2/docs/with-editor.texi dpkg-source: info: Hint: make sure the version in debian/changelog matches the unpacked source tree dpkg-source: info: you can integrate the local changes with dpkg-source -- commit dpkg-source: error: aborting due to unexpected upstream changes, see /tmp/with-editor_3.4.2-1.diff.Toj0Gj dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b . subprocess returned exit status 2 I: copying local configuration E: Failed autobuilding of package I: unmounting dev/ptmx filesystem I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem I: unmounting dev/shm filesystem I: unmounting proc filesystem I: unmounting sys filesystem I: cleaning the build env I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build/543828 and its subdirectories 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe with-editor is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1072518: RFS: debpic/1.0.0 [ITP] -- build Debian packages in an isolated Docker environment
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Control: tags -1 +confirmed Aidan, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe debpic is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1083010: RFS: waycheck/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Display all Wayland protocols that your compositor supports
Control: tags -1 +confirmed David, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Warnings / Information W: waycheck: no-manual-page [usr/bin/waycheck] N: N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have N: a manual page N: N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its N: own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't N: support this. N: N: If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the N: exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page. N: N: If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package N: depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a N: Lintian override. N: N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: binary-without-manpage I: waycheck: desktop-entry-lacks-keywords-entry [usr/share/applications/dev.serebit.Waycheck.desktop] N: N: This .desktop file is either missing a Keywords entry, or it does not N: contain keywords above and beyond those already present in the Name or N: GenericName entries. N: N: The Keywords field is intended to show keywords relevant for a .desktop N: file. N: N: Desktop files are organized in key-value pairs and are similar to INI N: files. N: N: The desktop-file-validate tool in the desktop-file-utils package may be N: useful when checking the syntax of desktop entries. N: N: Please refer to N: https://specifications.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s06.html , N: Bug#693918, and N: https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/DesktopFileKeywords for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: menu-format 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Godo 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additional... A. For a future release you may wish to verify the upstream archive using the upstream key via 'debian/watch'. Summary... You have put forward a package is a good state, Kudos. I believe waycheck is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Packages "confirmed" and ready for DD review/possible upload - Debian Mentors - 2024-09-29
On Sun, 2024-09-29 at 22:27 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 29, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > Below is the link to the page of currently "confirmed" as being in good > > order > I suggest that you also add the list to these emails. > > > Hi all DDs, It has been suggested that I need to supply a list of the current "confirmed" packages requiring a sponsor that need a DD to review and possibly upload to Debian when ready. Below is that list. #1072910 RFS: lsp-treemacs/0.5-1 -- treemacs integration for Emacs LSP RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1072910 #1077968 RFS: scrcpy/2.6.1-1 -- Display and control your Android device RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077968 #1079474 RFS: openscap/1.4.0+dfsg-1 -- libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards - Documentation RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079474 #1082242 RFS: nvidia-vaapi-driver/0.0.12-1 [ITA] -- VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082242 #1082589 RFS: purple-discord/0.9.2024.09.29.git.32899c2-1 -- Discord messaging service plugin for libpurple RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1082589 #1022747 RFS: prismlauncher/8.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- FOSS Minecraft launcher supporting multiple instances and accounts RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022747 #1037098 RFS: serious-engine/0~git20230724+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- game engine developed for the classic Serious Sam games RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037098 #1061087 RFS: bash-unit/2.3.1-1 [ITP] -- bash_unit - bash unit testing RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061087 #1064485 RFS: samplebrain/0.18.5-1 [ITP] -- Custom sample smashing app designed by Aphex Twin RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064485 #1073153 RFS: emacs-lsp-docker/0.0~git20240507.16a0cfb-1 [ITP] -- LSP Docker integration for lsp-mode RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073153 #1074622 RFS: emacs-dape/0.15.0-1 [ITP] -- Debug Adapter Protocol for Emacs RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074622 #1076146 RFS: feenox/1.0.83-1 [RFP] -- cloud-first free no-X uniX-like finite-element(ish) tool RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076146 #1077618 RFS: libjs-jush/2.0.2+git20210206+1-1 [ITP] -- JavaScript Syntax Highlighter RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077618 #1078341 RFS: gpgmngr/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- GPG assistant for the Linux terminal RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078341 #1079664 RFS: saf/1.013-1 [ITP] -- Minimal abstract interface for simple games RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079664 #1079902 RFS: descent3/1.5.0+ds-1 [ITP] -- port of the 1999 classic game Descent 3 RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079902 #1080305 RFS: apt-mirror2/9-1 [ITP] -- Python/asyncio reimplementation of the apt-mirror RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080305 #1080360 RFS: caio/0.9.17-1 [ITP] -- Asynchronous file IO for Linux MacOS or Windows RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080360 #1081042 RFS: aiolimiter/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- asyncio rate limiter, a leaky bucket implementation RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081042 #1081131 RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081131 #1081455 RFS: keyd/2.5.0-1 [ITP] -- keyboard key remapping daemon RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081455 #1081586 RFS: log2ram/1.7.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Write log files to RAM RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1081586 Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Packages "confirmed" and ready for DD review/possible upload - Debian Mentors - 2024-09-29
Dear all DDs, Below is the link to the page of currently "confirmed" as being in good order packages that are awaiting a DD review and possible upload to Debian. If DDs could spare the time to pick up a package or two and finish off the package mentor process it would be greatly appreciated. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?include=tags%3Aconfirmed;package=sponsorship-requests Please check that another DD is not already involved with the package. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082589: RFS: purple-discord/0.9.2024.09.29.git.32899c2-1 -- Discord messaging service plugin for libpurple
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Patrick, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe purple-discord is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1078983: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-2 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters
Hi, Looking back at the only issue blocking this moving forwrd. philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/popt-1.19+dfsg$ lrc en: Versions: recon 2.0 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading d/copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck expat| public-domain po/eo.po expat| public-domain po/fi.po expat| public-domain po/ga.po expat| public-domain po/id.po expat| public-domain po/it.po expat| public-domain po/ka.po expat| public-domain po/lv.po expat| public-domain po/nl.po expat| public-domain po/popt.pot expat| public-domain po/pt_BR.po expat| public-domain po/ru.po expat| public-domain po/si.po expat| public-domain src/lookup3.c If these can be resolved, we can mark the package as "confirmed" and hopefully then an interested DD will look at it. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1068724: RFS: gensync/2.0.5-1 [ITP] -- a library for efficient synchronization of data over a network.
Hi, This RFS is not moving forward and no upload is present on mentors. I am closing this RFS at this time but leaving the ITP[1] open. Please reopen this RFS or file a new one at a time when the package submission is ready to move forward. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069684 Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1078066: RFS: qatlib/24.02.0-1 ITP -- Intel QuickAssist user space library
Colin, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Fresh review based on new upload. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue W: qatlib-examples: groff-message an.tmac::38: warning: tbl preprocessor failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE macro called with TW register undefined) [usr/share/man/man7/cpa_sample_code.7.gz:1] N: N: A manual page provoked warnings or errors from the man program. Here are N: some common ones: N: N: "cannot adjust" or "can't break" are issues with paragraph filling. They N: are usually related to long lines. Justifying text on the left hand side N: can help with adjustments. Hyphenation can help with breaks. N: N: For more information, please see "Manipulating Filling and Adjusting" and N: "Manipulating Hyphenation" in the Groff manual (see info groff). N: N: "can't find numbered character" usually means that the input was in a N: national legacy encoding. The warning means that some characters were N: dropped. Please use escapes such as \[:a] as described on the groff_char N: manual page. N: N: Other common warnings are formatting typos. String arguments to .IP N: require quotes. Usually, some text is lost or mangled. See the groff_man N: (or groff_mdoc if using mdoc) manual page for details on macros. N: N: The check for manual pages uses the --warnings option to man to catch N: common problems, like a . or a ' at the beginning of a line as literal N: text. They are interpreted as Groff commands. Just reformat the paragraph N: so the characters are not at the beginning of a line. You can also add a N: zero-width space (\&) in front of them. N: N: Aside from overrides, warnings can be disabled with the .warn directive. N: Please see "Debugging" in the Groff manual. N: N: You can see the warnings yourself by running the command used by Lintian: N: N: LC_ALL=C.UTF-8 MANROFFSEQ='' MANWIDTH=80 \ N: man --warnings -E UTF-8 -l -Tutf8 -Z >/dev/null N: N: Please refer to the groff_man(7) manual page and the groff_mdoc(7) manual N: page for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: manpage-has-errors-from-man I: qatlib-service: systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key [usr/lib/systemd/system/qat.service] N: N: The systemd service file does not contain a Documentation key. N: N: Documentation for systemd service files can be automatically viewed using N: systemctl help servicename if this field is present. N: N: Please refer to the systemd.unit(5) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: systemd 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not performed at this time Additional... A. autopkgtest failure autopkgtest --- autopkgtest [15:29:37]: starting date and time: 2024-09-25 15:29:37+0100 autopkgtest [15:29:37]: version 5.39 autopkgtest [15:29:37]: host ks-tarkin; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest /home/philwyett/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/qatlib_24.02.0- 1_amd64.changes -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild autopkgtest [15:29:38]: testbed dpkg architecture: amd64 autopkgtest [15:29:38]: testbed apt version: 2.9.8 autopkgtest [15:29:38]: testbed running kernel: Linux 6.10.9-amd64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.10.9-1 (2024-09-08) autopkgtest [15:29:38]: source /home/philwyett/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/qatlib_24.02.0-1.dsc dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package (/tmp/autopkgtest.bWce0r/qatlib_24.02.0-1.dsc) dpkg-source: info: extracting qatlib in src dpkg-source: info: unpacking qatlib_24.02.0.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: info: unpacking qatlib_24.02.0-1.debian.tar.xz dpkg-source: info: using patch list from debian/patches/series dpkg-source: info: applying 0001-qat_init.sh-hard-code-system-service- path.patch dpkg-source: info: applying cpa_sample_code_manpage.patch dpkg-source: info: applying qat-init-man.patch dpkg-source: info: applying lac_ecsm2-fix-spelling-mistakes.patch dpkg-source: info: applying qat.service.in-fixup-for-renamed-qat_init.patch autopkgtest [15:29:38]: testing package qatlib version 24.02.0-1 autopkgtest [15:29:38]: build not needed autopkgtest [15:29:39]: test libqat-dev: preparing testbed Reading package lists... Buil
Bug#1082711: RFS: company-mode/1.0.2-1 -- Modular in-buffer completion framework for Emacs
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Xiyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/company-mode- 1.0.2$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.19 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GFDL-1.3+ doc/company.texi GPL-3+ | CC-BY-4.0 icons/attribution.md Ypu will need to appropriately document the copyright status of the contents of the 'icons' and its sub directories. 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe company-mode is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1074622: RFS: emacs-dape/0.15.0-1 [ITP] -- Debug Adapter Protocol for Emacs
On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 23:56 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Control: retitle -1 RFS: emacs-dape/0.15.0-1 [ITP] -- Debug Adapter Protocol > for Emacs > > Friendly ping for sponsoring. Also update the package on mentors to the > latest release (0.15.0). Thanks in advance for considering! > Xiyue, I have given this new upload a check through and all is good here. I hope this can have a DD look at it sooner rather than later. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082619: RFS: imsprog/1.4.4-1 -- Linux chip programmer for CH341a devices
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Mikhail, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Tip philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/imsprog-1.4.4$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.19 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Missing Files Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck Add a 'Files: debian/*' for tracking who has made changes within the 'debian'directory. 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe imsprog is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082589: RFS: purple-discord/0.9.2024.08.19.git.ea54c6f-1 -- Discord messaging service plugin for libpurple
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Patrick, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/purple-discord- 0.9.2024.08.19.git.ea54c6f$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.19 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2+purple2compat/http.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+purple2compat/http.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+purple2compat/purple-socket.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+purple2compat/purple-socket.h 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe purplr-discord is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the raised issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082594: RFS: bats-file/0.4.0-1~bpo12+1 -- Helper library providing filesystem-related assertions for Bats
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Hi, This package passes all requirements of a backport. Marking as "confirmed". Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082242: Thanks for your review!
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Fri, 2024-09-20 at 13:34 +0800, EiPiFun wrote: > Hello, Mr Phil Wyett! > > Thanks for your review, and the changelog has been improved! > > Best regards, > EiPi Fun/Dong Xu > Sep 20, 2024 Dong, Superb. I will now mark the package as "confirmed" and ready for a DD to review and hopefully sponsor in the near future. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082156: RFS: shaderc/2024.2-1 -- Library API for accessing glslc functionality - shared libraries
On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 16:51 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > Philippe, > > Preamble... > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution > to the Debian project. > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the > submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the > review. > > Review... > > 1. Build: > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > * sbuild [2]: Good > > 2. Lintian [3]: Issue > > The override rule in 'glslc.lintian-overrides' has invalid data, see data at > link below. > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/shaderc/ > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good > > 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good > > 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good > > 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good > > 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good > > Summary... > > I believe shaderc is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian > Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and > upload if you feel it is ready. > Apologies. Package is in good shape, it is just the lintian issue that needs to be resolved and the summary should have reflected that. > Regards > > Phil > > [1] pbuilder: > > * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc > * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks > > [2] sbuild: > > * Command: sbuild .dsc > * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild > > [3] lintian: > > * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, > *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian > > [4] lrc: > > * Command: lrc > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon > > [5] reprotest > > * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- > build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild > * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method > -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082156: RFS: shaderc/2024.2-1 -- Library API for accessing glslc functionality - shared libraries
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Philippe, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue The override rule in 'glslc.lintian-overrides' has invalid data, see data at link below. https://mentors.debian.net/package/shaderc/ 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe shaderc is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082242: RFS: nvidia-vaapi-driver/0.0.12-1 [ITA] -- VA-API implementation that uses NVDEC as a backend
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Dong, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... Thanks for your continued contributions. The package is in a good state, but could you expand on the second line of the changelog that is vague and needs to specify what changes were were made. I believe nvidia-vaapi-driver is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time
Bug#1082022: RFS: cpp-httplib/0.18.0+ds-1 -- C++ HTTP/HTTPS server and client library
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Tue, 2024-09-17 at 19:50 +0200, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > Hi Phil, > > On Tue Sep 17, 2024 at 7:25 PM CEST, Phil Wyett wrote: > > 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Issue > > > > [--] 2 tests from SocketStream > > [ RUN ] SocketStream.is_writable_UNIX > > [ OK ] SocketStream.is_writable_UNIX (0 ms) > > [ RUN ] SocketStream.is_writable_INET > > ../test/test.cc:189: Failure > > Expected equality of these values: > > 0 > > ::bind(s, reinterpret_cast(&addr), sizeof(addr)) > > Which is: -1 > > > > ../test/test.cc:199: Failure > > Expected equality of these values: > > 0 > > connect(s, reinterpret_cast(&addr), sizeof(addr)) > > Which is: -1 > > > > ../test/test.cc:204: Failure > > Expected: (disconnected_svr_sock) != (-1), actual: -1 vs -1 > > > > [ FAILED ] SocketStream.is_writable_INET (100 ms) > > [--] 2 tests from SocketStream (100 ms total) > > thanks for your tests, as always. I did not encounter this issue though, > maybe this is an issue related to your test environment? > > In any case, cpp-httplib's test suite is known to be flaky, and there's > not much I can do about it. See > <https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib/issues/1199> and > <https://bugs.debian.org/1041249>. > > Flakyness shouldn't block this upload from getting into experimental, in > my opinion. > > Bye! -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1082022: RFS: cpp-httplib/0.18.0+ds-1 -- C++ HTTP/HTTPS server and client library
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Andrea, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: N/A 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Issue [--] 2 tests from SocketStream [ RUN ] SocketStream.is_writable_UNIX [ OK ] SocketStream.is_writable_UNIX (0 ms) [ RUN ] SocketStream.is_writable_INET ../test/test.cc:189: Failure Expected equality of these values: 0 ::bind(s, reinterpret_cast(&addr), sizeof(addr)) Which is: -1 ../test/test.cc:199: Failure Expected equality of these values: 0 connect(s, reinterpret_cast(&addr), sizeof(addr)) Which is: -1 ../test/test.cc:204: Failure Expected: (disconnected_svr_sock) != (-1), actual: -1 vs -1 [ FAILED ] SocketStream.is_writable_INET (100 ms) [--] 2 tests from SocketStream (100 ms total) 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Issue, see 5. 7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not performed at this time Summary... Thanks as always for submitting for review. Just one issue. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: RFS: electrum-nmc/4.0.6-2 [ITP] -- Easy to use Namecoin client
Soren, Done. You will see it appear on the RFS below very soon. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080242 All good, needs package reverting back to '-1', see 'Additional...' section. Regards Phil On Mon, 2024-09-16 at 10:18 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Phil, > > Would you be willing to run your suite of triage tests against the most > recent > upload of electrum-nmc? > > On Thursday, September 12, 2024 3:51:06 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Nicholas, > > > > > On 2024-09-01 04:52, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Issue > > > > > > > > I: electrum-nmc source: uses-deprecated-python-stdlib chunk (deprecated > > > > in > > > > Python 3.11, removed in Python 3.13) > > > > > > In a previous review it was mentioned that the > > > "uses-deprecated-python-stdlib" lintian output was "Information only, > > > future for upstream." To clarify, is this still the case, or has it been > > > long enough for it to become an issue? > > > > It is not a problem for packaging this right now, as Debian currently has > > Python 3.12. But, this lintian tag was added now because a lot of these > > changes require upstream to alter the program, so everyone needs to start > > working on it now. If this isn’t fixed when Python 3.13 because the default > > in Debian, the program will cease to function. > > > > So, you don’t need to worry about it for the sponsorship of this package > now, > > but you do need to start working with upstream to get it fixed soon. > > > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/electrum-nmc- > > > > 4.0.6$ uscan --force-download > > > > Newest version of electrum-nmc on remote site is 4.0.6.4.0.6, local > > > > version > > > > is 4.0.6 > > > > > > > > => Newer package available from: > > > > => > > > > > > > > https://www.namecoin.org/files/electrum-nmc/electrum-nmc-4.0.6/Electrum-NMC > > > > ->>sourceonly-4.0.6.tar.gz gpgv: Signature made Fri Dec 22 05:51:24 2023 > > > > GMT > > > > gpgv:using EDDSA key > > > > A0BE08C865661A9316E0A7FF762ED28DA5C007DA > > > > gpgv: Good signature from "Jeremy Rand (Namecoin Electrum-NMC Binary > > > > Signing > > > > Key) " > > > > Successfully renamed ../Electrum-NMC-sourceonly-4.0.6.tar.gz to > > > > ../electrum- > > > > nmc_4.0.6.4.0.6.orig.tar.gz. > > > > > > > > Would it not be easier to pull from the GitHub tags of the package? > > > > > > Is this uscan confusion (4.0.6.4.0.6) a problem? If so I suppose I could > > > indeed pull from GitHub. > > > > I didn’t take a look at your debian/watch file, but I can do so if you still > > need help. > > > > As mentioned in the comment on Mentors[1], I would recommend you include the > > package under the Debian Cryptocoin Team. If you would like to do so, > please > > let me know what your Salsa name is and I will create a repository and share > > it with you. > > > > I don’t typically like to go any further with sponsorship reviews until they > > have passed all of Phil’s triage tests. I’ll look forward to his review of > > your second upload. > > > > [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/electrum-nmc/ > > -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080242: RFS: electrum-nmc/4.0.6-2 [ITP] -- Easy to use Namecoin client
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Nicholas, An updated review. Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additional... A. Please change version to '-1' as this is a new release/package and must be this before entering Debian. e.g. electrum-nmc (4.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low Summary... I believe electrum-nmc is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080356: RFS: gxkb/0.9.6+ds-1 -- X11 keyboard indicator and switcher
Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/gxkb-0.9.6+ds$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.18 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-2+ | FSFAP doc/INSTALL File has its own license header, so should really be added to 'd/copyright'
Bug#1081810: RFS: linux-firewire-utils/0.5.1-2 [ITP] -- Linux FireWire utilities
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Takashi, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe linux-firewire-utils is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081809: RFS: libhitaki/0.2.1-3 [ITP] -- Library to operate ALSA HwDep device for ALSA firewire stack
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Takashi, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue, none blocking I: libhitaki-dev: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration N: N: The package ships a .html or .pdf file under /usr/share/doc/. Those files N: are usually documentation, but no files are registered in doc-base. N: N: Files in folders named examples are exempt from this tag. N: N: Please refer to Registering Documents using doc-base (Section 9.10) in the N: Debian Policy Manual for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: menus 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Additional... – Package has lintian errors libhitaki source E missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon gir (does not satisfy gobject-introspection:any) [debian/rules] If anyone can offer wisdom here it would be appreciated. Summary... I believe libhitaki is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080372: RFS: libhinoko/1.0.3-1 [ITP] -- I/O library for IEEE 1394 isochronous communication
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Takashi, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue, none blocking I: libhinoko-dev: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration N: N: The package ships a .html or .pdf file under /usr/share/doc/. Those files N: are usually documentation, but no files are registered in doc-base. N: N: Files in folders named examples are exempt from this tag. N: N: Please refer to Registering Documents using doc-base (Section 9.10) in the N: Debian Policy Manual for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: menus Info link: https://wiki.debian.org/doc-base 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Additional... Mentors show: – Package has lintian errors libhinoko source E missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon gir (does not satisfy gobject-introspection:any) [debian/rules] If anyone can offer wisdom here it would be appreciated. Summary... I believe libhinoko is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081019: RFS: ventoy/1.0.99-1 [ITP] -- Create bootable USB drives for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files
Manuel, Updated review. Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, possibility of false positives philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/ventoy-1.0.99$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.18 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/byteorder.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/cluster.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/compiler.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/exfatfs.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/exfat.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/io.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/lookup.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/mount.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/node.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/platform.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/repair.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/time.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/utf.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/libexfat/utils.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/cbm.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/cbm.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/fat.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/fat.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/mkexfat.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/mkexfat.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+ Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/mkexfat_main.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/rootdir.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/rootdir.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/uct.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/uctc.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/uctc.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/uct.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/vbr.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/exfat/src/mkfs/vbr.h GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_access.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_cache.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_filelib.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_format.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_misc.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_string.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_table.c GPL-3+ | GPL-2+Ventoy2Disk/Lib/fat_io_lib/fat_write.c GPL-3+ | Expat Ventoy2Disk/Lib/libhttp/include/civetweb.c GPL-3+ | Expat Ventoy2Disk/Lib/libhttp/include/civetweb.h GPL-3+ | Expat Ventoy2Disk/Lib/libhttp/include/handle_form.inl GPL-3+ | public-domain Ventoy2Disk/Lib/xz- embedded/linux/lib/xz/xz_dec_syms.c GPL-3+ | public-domain Ventoy2Disk/Lib/xz- embedded/linux/lib/xz/xz_dec_test.c Tip: The 'debian' directory section should be that alone, no files or folders from other parts of the package. Just makes this cleaner. 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe ventoy is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document:
Bug#1081570: RFS: luit/2.0.20240910-1 -- locale and ISO 2022 support for Unicode terminals
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Thomas, Many thanks for addressing some of the issues raised. One lintian issue remains. I: luit source: unused-override no-debian-changes [debian/source/lintian- overrides:2] N: N: Your package specifies the named override but there were no tags that N: could have been silenced by it. N: N: Maybe you fixed an underlying condition but forgot to remove the override. N: It is also possible that the Lintian maintainers fixed a false positive. N: N: If the override is now unused, please remove it. N: N: This tag is similar to mismatched-override except there a tag could have N: been silenced if the context had matched. N: N: Sometimes, overrides end up not being used because a tag appears only on N: some architectures. In that case, overrides can be equipped with an N: architecture qualifier. N: N: Please refer to Architecture specific overrides (Section 2.4.3) in the N: Lintian User's Manual for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: 0 hints overridden; 1 unused override You can remove 'd/source/lintian-overrides', it is not required for the current package source tree and will eliminate the only lintian warning. 'd/copyright'. Please add a 'Files: debian/*' section that will inform of changes related to persons who have made contribution to the debian packaging related files and directories. Some Debian Developers (DDs) will be hesitant to sponsor a package without this section being included. For me it is good for completeness and clarity. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081586: RFS: log2ram/1.7.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Write log files to RAM
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Steve, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe log2ram is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081570: RFS: luit/2.0.20240910-1 -- locale and ISO 2022 support for Unicode terminals
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Thomas, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issues W: luit source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package Build-Depends: pkg-config => pkgconf N: N: The package build-depends on a package that has been superseded. If the N: superseded package is part of an ORed group, it should not be the first N: package in the group. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/package-relations N: N: I: luit source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.6.1.0 (released 2022-05-11) (current is 4.7.0) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider updating N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field N: appropriately. N: N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you don't N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version control N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you upload N: the package. N: N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of N: Policy. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version N: N: I: luit source: unused-override no-debian-changes [debian/source/lintian- overrides:2] N: N: Your package specifies the named override but there were no tags that N: could have been silenced by it. N: N: Maybe you fixed an underlying condition but forgot to remove the override. N: It is also possible that the Lintian maintainers fixed a false positive. N: N: If the override is now unused, please remove it. N: N: This tag is similar to mismatched-override except there a tag could have N: been silenced if the context had matched. N: N: Sometimes, overrides end up not being used because a tag appears only on N: some architectures. In that case, overrides can be equipped with an N: architecture qualifier. N: N: Please refer to Architecture specific overrides (Section 2.4.3) in the N: Lintian User's Manual for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: yes N: Check: lintian N: N: 0 hints overridden; 1 unused override 3. Licenses [4]: Issues, with false positives possible philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/luit$ lrc en: Versions: recon 1.18 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Missing Files Paragraph for debian/ Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck X11 | Expat charset.c X11 | Expat charset.h X11 | Expat fontenc.c X11 | Expat iso2022.c X11 | Expat iso2022.h X11 | Expat luit.c X11 | Expat luitconv.c X11 | Expat luitconv.h X11 | Expat luit.h X11 | Expat luit.log.html X11 | Expat luit.man X11 | Expat minstall.sh X11 | Expat other.c X11 | Expat other.h X11 | Expat package/luit.spec X11 | Expat parser.c X11 | Expat parser.h X11 | Expat plink.sh X11 | Expat sys.c X11 | Expat sys.h X11 | Expat trace.c X11 | Expat trace.h 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe luit is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * D
Bug#1081455: RFS: keyd/2.5.0-1 [ITP] -- keyboard key remapping daemon
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Richard, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... Great work and very responsive to review. I believe keyd is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081455: RFS: keyd/2.5.0-1 [ITP] -- keyboard key remapping daemon
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Richard, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Issue piuparts: 0m16.7s DUMP: (Reading database ... 11781 files and directories currently installed.) Purging configuration files for keyd (2.5.0-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/keyd.postrm: 19: groupdel: not found dpkg: error processing package keyd (--purge): installed keyd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 127 dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove keyd-application-mapper which isn't installed dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove keyd-dbgsym which isn't installed Errors were encountered while processing: keyd 0m16.7s ERROR: Command failed (status=1): ['schroot', '--preserve- environment', '--run-session', '--chroot', 'session:unstable-amd64-sbuild- b53d308a-7073-11ef-9013-525400cf9b02-piuparts', '--directory', '/', '-u', 'root', '--', 'dpkg', '--purge', 'keyd', 'keyd-application-mapper', 'keyd- dbgsym'] (Reading database ... 11781 files and directories currently installed.) Purging configuration files for keyd (2.5.0-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/keyd.postrm: 19: groupdel: not found dpkg: error processing package keyd (--purge): installed keyd package post-removal script subprocess returned error exit status 127 dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove keyd-application-mapper which isn't installed dpkg: warning: ignoring request to remove keyd-dbgsym which isn't installed Errors were encountered while processing: keyd 0m16.9s DEBUG: Terminate schroot session '/var/run/schroot/mount/unstable- amd64-sbuild-b53d308a-7073-11ef-9013-525400cf9b02-piuparts' 0m16.9s DEBUG: Starting command: ['schroot', '--end-session', '--chroot', 'session:unstable-amd64-sbuild-b53d308a-7073-11ef-9013-525400cf9b02- piuparts'] 0m17.1s DEBUG: Command ok: ['schroot', '--end-session', '--chroot', 'session:unstable-amd64-sbuild-b53d308a-7073-11ef-9013-525400cf9b02- piuparts'] 0m17.1s ERROR: piuparts run ends. E: Piuparts run failed. 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: keyd-application-mapper: capitalization-error-in-description Gnome GNOME N: N: Lintian found a possible capitalization error in the package description. N: Lintian has a list of common capitalization errors, primarily of upstream N: projects, that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like a spelling N: checker does. N: N: This is a particularly picky check of capitalization in package N: descriptions, since they're very visible to end users, but it will have N: false positives for project names used in a context where they should be N: lowercase, such as package names or executable names. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/description N: N: I: keyd: hardening-no-bindnow [usr/bin/keyd] N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the "bindnow" linker flag. N: N: This is needed (together with "relro") to make the "Global Offset Table" N: (GOT) fully read-only. The bindnow feature trades startup time for N: improved security. Please consider enabling this feature or consider N: overriding the tag (possibly with a comment about why). N: N: If you use dpkg-buildflags, you may have to add hardening=+bindnow or N: hardening=+all to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS. N: N: The relevant compiler flags are set in LDFLAGS. N: N: Please refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/hardening N: N: I: keyd: systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key [usr/lib/systemd/system/keyd.service] N: N: The systemd service file does not contain a Documentation key. N: N: Documentation for systemd service files can be automatically viewed using N: systemctl help servicename if this field is present. N: N: Please refer to the systemd.unit(5) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: systemd 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe keyd is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc *
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Control: tags -1 +confirmed Now that it is commented in 'd/watch' as we discussed, yes, tagging "confirmed". Many thanks for your work and patience with this one. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 03:43 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Phil Wyett writes: > > > On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 08:54 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 00:25 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > > Xiyue Deng writes: > > > > > > > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2024-09-08 at 14:21 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > > > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xiyue, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Preamble... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your > > > > > > > > contribution > > > > > > > > to the Debian project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to > > > > > > > > help package > > > > > > > > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages > > > > > > > > prior to > > > > > > > > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on > > > > > > > > behalf of the > > > > > > > > submitter to make any alterations based upon information > > > > > > > > provided in the > > > > > > > > review. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Review... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Build: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > > > > > > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/emacs-oauth2-0.17$ > > > > > > > > uscan --force-download > > > > > > > > uscan warn: Possible OpenPGP signature found at: > > > > > > > >https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/oauth2-0.17.tar.sig > > > > > > > > * Add opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ or opts=pgpmode=auto to > > > > > > > > debian/watch > > > > > > > > * Add debian/upstream/signing-key.asc. > > > > > > > > See uscan(1) for more details > > > > > > > > uscan: error: tar is not a supported compression > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that on GNU ELPA (GNU Emacs Lisp Package Archive) tar is the > > > > > > > default option used by all packages. I think this can be > > > > > > > considered as > > > > > > > a restriction on uscan which should support tar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, I'm mainly using uscan to check for new > > > > > > > upstream > > > > > > > version. The Salsa repository uses DEP14 recommended layout and > > > > > > > doesn't > > > > > > > use pristine-tar but tags and "git deborig" for generating the > > > > > > > tarball > > > > > > > for Debian archive (which will be in .tar.xz), so this is not an > > > > > > > actual > > > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps clarify the situation :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I feel tar support in uscan is not a discussion for Debian Mentors. > > > > > > An > > > > > > appropriate bug filed elsewhere to start a discussion is a better > > > > > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A bit of a backtrack: I was puzzled when you mentioned that uscan had > > > > > an > > > > &g
Bug#1081256: RFS: ample/0.5.7-14 [QA] [RC] -- simple MP3 server easy to use
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 16:31 +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > Hi, > On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:18 PM Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > Bo, > > > > Preamble... > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution > > to the Debian project. > > > Thanks for reviewing this! > > ... > > I: ample source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/040_add- > > pidfile-option.patch] > > N: > > N: According to the DEP-3 headers, this patch has not been forwarded > > N: upstream. > > N: > > N: Please forward the patch and try to have it included in upstream's > > version > > I have forwarded this to upstream. > > Please let me know if any issues. > > BR, > Bo Hi Bo, Super, tagging as "confirmed". Hopefully a DD will look at this soon for you. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 08:54 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 00:25 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > Xiyue Deng writes: > > > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > > > On Sun, 2024-09-08 at 14:21 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > > > Xiyue, > > > > > > > > > > > > Preamble... > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your > > > > > > contribution > > > > > > to the Debian project. > > > > > > > > > > > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help > > > > > > package > > > > > > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages > > > > > > prior to > > > > > > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf > > > > > > of the > > > > > > submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided > > > > > > in the > > > > > > review. > > > > > > > > > > > > Review... > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Build: > > > > > > > > > > > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > > > > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > > > > > > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/emacs-oauth2-0.17$ > > > > > > uscan --force-download > > > > > > uscan warn: Possible OpenPGP signature found at: > > > > > >https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/oauth2-0.17.tar.sig > > > > > > * Add opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ or opts=pgpmode=auto to > > > > > > debian/watch > > > > > > * Add debian/upstream/signing-key.asc. > > > > > > See uscan(1) for more details > > > > > > uscan: error: tar is not a supported compression > > > > > > > > > > Note that on GNU ELPA (GNU Emacs Lisp Package Archive) tar is the > > > > > default option used by all packages. I think this can be considered > > > > > as > > > > > a restriction on uscan which should support tar. > > > > > > > > > > On the other hand, I'm mainly using uscan to check for new upstream > > > > > version. The Salsa repository uses DEP14 recommended layout and > > > > > doesn't > > > > > use pristine-tar but tags and "git deborig" for generating the tarball > > > > > for Debian archive (which will be in .tar.xz), so this is not an > > > > > actual > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps clarify the situation :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I feel tar support in uscan is not a discussion for Debian Mentors. An > > > > appropriate bug filed elsewhere to start a discussion is a better > > > > course. > > > > > > > > > > A bit of a backtrack: I was puzzled when you mentioned that uscan had an > > > error when running with "--force-download" because it worked for me. > > > Then I realized that I was running Bookworm which has an older version > > > of devscripts and uscan somehow still created the archive after it > > > didn't detect any compression suffix so it kind of worked by > > > unexpectedly. I manually backported devscripts 2.23.7 and can reproduce > > > the issue. I have filed Bug#1081182 for tracking this. > > > > > > > We work with what we have. If a working 'debian/watch' file is not > > > > possible > > > > in the package, it would in my opinion be best to remove it. > > > > > > > > > > In fact, "uscan --report-status" still works and can be used for > > > detecting new versions. I wonder whether UDD or qa.debian.org requires > > > actually downloading the newer archive for det
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
On Tue, 2024-09-10 at 00:25 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Xiyue Deng writes: > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > On Sun, 2024-09-08 at 14:21 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > > > > Phil Wyett writes: > > > > > > > > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > > > > > > > Xiyue, > > > > > > > > > > Preamble... > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your > > > > > contribution > > > > > to the Debian project. > > > > > > > > > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help > > > > > package > > > > > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior > > > > > to > > > > > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of > > > > > the > > > > > submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in > > > > > the > > > > > review. > > > > > > > > > > Review... > > > > > > > > > > 1. Build: > > > > > > > > > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > > > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > > > > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > > > > > > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > > > > > > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > > > > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/emacs-oauth2-0.17$ > > > > > uscan --force-download > > > > > uscan warn: Possible OpenPGP signature found at: > > > > >https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/oauth2-0.17.tar.sig > > > > > * Add opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ or opts=pgpmode=auto to > > > > > debian/watch > > > > > * Add debian/upstream/signing-key.asc. > > > > > See uscan(1) for more details > > > > > uscan: error: tar is not a supported compression > > > > > > > > Note that on GNU ELPA (GNU Emacs Lisp Package Archive) tar is the > > > > default option used by all packages. I think this can be considered as > > > > a restriction on uscan which should support tar. > > > > > > > > On the other hand, I'm mainly using uscan to check for new upstream > > > > version. The Salsa repository uses DEP14 recommended layout and doesn't > > > > use pristine-tar but tags and "git deborig" for generating the tarball > > > > for Debian archive (which will be in .tar.xz), so this is not an actual > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > Hope this helps clarify the situation :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I feel tar support in uscan is not a discussion for Debian Mentors. An > > > appropriate bug filed elsewhere to start a discussion is a better course. > > > > > > > A bit of a backtrack: I was puzzled when you mentioned that uscan had an > > error when running with "--force-download" because it worked for me. > > Then I realized that I was running Bookworm which has an older version > > of devscripts and uscan somehow still created the archive after it > > didn't detect any compression suffix so it kind of worked by > > unexpectedly. I manually backported devscripts 2.23.7 and can reproduce > > the issue. I have filed Bug#1081182 for tracking this. > > > > > We work with what we have. If a working 'debian/watch' file is not > > > possible > > > in the package, it would in my opinion be best to remove it. > > > > > > > In fact, "uscan --report-status" still works and can be used for > > detecting new versions. I wonder whether UDD or qa.debian.org requires > > actually downloading the newer archive for detecting newer versions, and > > if "--report-status" is sufficient, maybe we can keep it as-is as I'm > > not using pristine-tar anyway. Alternatively, I can change it to track > > the git head instead if desired. > > > > When debugging another issue with watch file result (Bug#1081249) I > found that DDPO may be using "uscan --dehs" for detecting newer > versions. The command succeeded and output the following for > emacs-oauth2: > > , > > $ uscan --dehs > > > > emacs-oauth2 > >
Bug#1081256: RFS: ample/0.5.7-14 [QA] [RC] -- simple MP3 server easy to use
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Bo, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issues I: ample source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/040_add- pidfile-option.patch] N: N: According to the DEP-3 headers, this patch has not been forwarded N: upstream. N: N: Please forward the patch and try to have it included in upstream's version N: control system. If the patch is not suitable for that, please mention N: not-needed in the Forwarded field of the patch header. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, Changes to N: the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual, and N: Bug#755153 for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/patches/dep3 N: Renamed from: send-patch 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe ample is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081251: RFS: dh-make-elpa/0.19.5 -- helper for creating Debian packages from ELPA packages
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Xyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe dh-make is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081246: RFS: streamlink/6.10.0-1 -- CLI for extracting video streams from various websites to a video player
Hi, Please close RFS bugs when package has been uploaded. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
On Sun, 2024-09-08 at 14:21 -0700, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Phil Wyett writes: > > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > Xiyue, > > > > Preamble... > > > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution > > to the Debian project. > > > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package > > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to > > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the > > submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the > > review. > > > > Review... > > > > 1. Build: > > > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/emacs-oauth2-0.17$ > > uscan --force-download > > uscan warn: Possible OpenPGP signature found at: > >https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/oauth2-0.17.tar.sig > > * Add opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ or opts=pgpmode=auto to debian/watch > > * Add debian/upstream/signing-key.asc. > > See uscan(1) for more details > > uscan: error: tar is not a supported compression > > Note that on GNU ELPA (GNU Emacs Lisp Package Archive) tar is the > default option used by all packages. I think this can be considered as > a restriction on uscan which should support tar. > > On the other hand, I'm mainly using uscan to check for new upstream > version. The Salsa repository uses DEP14 recommended layout and doesn't > use pristine-tar but tags and "git deborig" for generating the tarball > for Debian archive (which will be in .tar.xz), so this is not an actual > issue. > > Hope this helps clarify the situation :) > > Hi, I feel tar support in uscan is not a discussion for Debian Mentors. An appropriate bug filed elsewhere to start a discussion is a better course. We work with what we have. If a working 'debian/watch' file is not possible in the package, it would in my opinion be best to remove it. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081131: RFS: emacs-oauth2/0.17-1 [ITP] -- OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Xiyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/emacs-oauth2-0.17$ uscan --force-download uscan warn: Possible OpenPGP signature found at: https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/oauth2-0.17.tar.sig * Add opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ or opts=pgpmode=auto to debian/watch * Add debian/upstream/signing-key.asc. See uscan(1) for more details uscan: error: tar is not a supported compression 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe emacs-oauth2 is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081113: RFS: emacs-buttercup/1.36-1 -- behaviour-driven testing for Emacs Lisp packages
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Xiyue, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe emacs-buttercup is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081045: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-3 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Sat, 2024-09-07 at 22:58 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > Patrick, > > Preamble... > > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution > to the Debian project. > > The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package > submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to > possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the > submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the > review. > > Review... > > 1. Build: > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > * sbuild [2]: Good > > 2. Lintian [3]: Good > > 3. Licenses [4]: Good > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good > > 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good > > 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good > > 7. Install [No previous installs]: Issue > > Install this package on a clean system/Virtual Machine (VM) and it installs a > variety of dependencies but not the pidgin GUI. > > 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not performed at this time > > Summary... > > I believe pidgin-skype is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could > the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. > > Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the > 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. > > Regards > > Phil > > [1] pbuilder: > > * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc > * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks > > [2] sbuild: > > * Command: sbuild .dsc > * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild > > [3] lintian: > > * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, > *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian > > [4] lrc: > > * Command: lrc > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon > > [5] reprotest > > * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- > build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild > * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ > * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method > Hi, As discussed. Naming of the package is not a discussion to be had here on mentors. I would encourage a bug be filed to resolve confusing naming of such plugins. I will mark as "confirmed" on this occasion. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081045: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-3 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo On Sat, 2024-09-07 at 18:36 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2024-09-07 at 17:58, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > Review... > > > 7. Install [No previous installs]: Issue > > > > Install this package on a clean system/Virtual Machine (VM) and it > > installs a variety of dependencies but not the pidgin GUI. > > Speaking as someone who once used a similar pidgin-* plugin package: I > don't believe that this is an issue. > > My understanding is that this is a plugin intended to be available to be > used by *any* application which uses the libpurple backend, not > necessarily just pidgin. If that is correct, then it would be erroneous > for this to have a dependency chain which leads any single specific such > application to get installed. > > My experience with such plugins is most prominently with purple-discord, > which likewise identifies itself as a plugin for applications which use > libpurple, and which cites two of them: pidgin and finch. In addition to > naming those in the package description as examples of such > applications, it includes an Enhances: field, and lists the packages in > that field. > > It might make sense for other libpurple plugin packages to similarly > include an Enhances: field for the endpoint applications. Then again, > that would mean either inconsistency between the plugin packages in that > regard, or each one needing to keep up with updating the list whenever > an appropriate change is made to it in another plugin package; that > might not be worth the bother. > > It *is* a bit inconsistent that some of the libpurple plugin packages > seem to use the purple-* prefix and others the pidgin-* prefix. It would > probably be good to get that sorted out, but I don't know if here would > be the place to start doing it. > Hi, Thanks for the information. Not that familiar with chat packages as I would like. I will agree with the last paragraph, having this package with 'pidgin' naming is extremely confusing for the user. True, here is not the place to start fixing this, the Bug Tracking System (BTS) is the place. I will look at the package again later and move forward with the review. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081045: RFS: pidgin-skype/20240122+gitab786a3+dfsg-3 -- Skype plugin for libpurple messengers
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Patrick, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Issue Install this package on a clean system/Virtual Machine (VM) and it installs a variety of dependencies but not the pidgin GUI. 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not performed at this time Summary... I believe pidgin-skype is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080529: RFS: mplayer/2:1.5+svn38638-1 [RC] -- movie player for Unix-like systems
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Sat, 2024-09-07 at 19:33 +0200, Lorenzo wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > Hi Phil, > thanks for your review: > > new version uploaded with a fix in d/copyright, > > package overview: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/mplayer/ > > dsc: > dget > -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mplayer/mplayer_1.5+svn38638-1.dsc > > git: > https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/mplayer/-/tree/next?ref_type=heads > > reply to your review below > > On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:03:21 +0100 > Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > > > 1. Build: > > > > * pbuilder [1]: Good > > * sbuild [2]: Good > > > > 2. Lintian [3]: Issue > > > > I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page > > I'm sorry I'm not committed to fix typos, for this project it takes > a disproportionate amount of time compared to the gain and I have more > urgent bugs to fix right now. Maybe someone who wishes to get into Debian contribution and working with upstream projects may wish to take up this task. A good way to get involved, can you hear me on the mentors list? ;-) > > N: > > N: The debian/copyright file mentions Files-Excluded but the source > > version N: has no repack suffix. > > N: > > we repack to strip ffmpeg when there is a release, however we are now > temporary tracking unreleased svn where there is no ffmpeg. > > Long time since the last official release. I would do as you are now, i.e. +svn'. Never use the release tarballs and then the 'Files-Excluded: ffmpeg/*' can then be dropped from 'debian/copright'. Repacking can then be also looked at. Your choice though. > > 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, possible chance of false positives > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/mplayer- > > 1.5+svn38638$ lrc > > en: Versions: recon 1.17.1 check 3.3.9-1 > > > > Parsing Source Tree > > Reading copyright > > Running licensecheck > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > other-1 | NTP libass/ass_strtod.c > > I think is a false positive (but I'm not expert in license) > compared to the text in > https://opensource.org/license/ntp-license-php > the one in ass_strtod.c is slightly different > - without fee --> with or without fee > - [missing] --> and that the name (TrademarkedName) not be used > in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software > without specific, written prior permission > Hmm... I am unsure too, will ket it go as already in the archive. > > GPL-2+ | LGPL-2.1+libmpdemux/muxer_avi.h > > right, fixed this and another one with the new upload > > > > > > > 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/mplayer- > > 1.5+svn38638$ uscan --force-download > > Can't exec "svn": No such file or directory at > > this is because you don't have subversion package installed in you > system; however svn is not a requirement to build mplayer so I don't > think it would be correct to add it to Build-Depends > > My bad, missed that one. Marking as "confirmed". Any issues can be looked at in the future. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081019: RFS: ventoy/1.0.99-2 [ITP] -- Create bootable USB drives for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Manuel, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Additionl... A. 'debian/changelog' - New packages into Debian need to be '-1'. B. 'debian/rules' - For releases, turn off 'export DH_VERBOSE = 1' C. This package requires super user access, general reasoning? D. Package is a Graphical User Interface (GUI) application with no documentation accessible from within the GUI. This is a very serious issue for me, especially when performing disk changes is a core application function. I would class this as a major barrier to Debian inclusion. Summary... I believe ventoy is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081042: RFS: aiolimiter/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- asyncio rate limiter, a leaky bucket implementation
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Yuri, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe aiolimiter is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081019: RFS: ventoy/1.0.99-1 [ITP] -- Create bootable USB drives for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files
On Sat, 2024-09-07 at 07:56 -0400, Manuel Guerra wrote: > Hi Phil > > Thanks for checking out this package. > > According to the documentation I have available the disclaimer field is > required due to point 6.5 of the copyright file format manuel because this > package goes into the non-free section of Debian > > 6.5. Disclaimer > Formatted text, no synopsis: this field is used for non-free or contrib > packages to state that they are not part of Debian and to explain why (see > Debian Policy section 12.5). > > https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#disclaimer-field > > If it is not added on the first line of the debian/copyright file then > Lintian flags a "missing-explanation-for-contrib-or-non-free-package" tag > > missing-explanation-for-contrib-or-non-free-package > > The specified package is in the contrib or non-free archive area but does not > include a "Comment" (or "Disclaimer") field in its copyright file. > > Please add a brief comment why this package cannot be part of the main Debian > distribution. > El 7/9/24 a las 07:28, Phil Wyett escribió: > > > Is not machine readable. The disclaimer is not needed and blocks scanning. > -- > Manuel Guerra > Hi Manuel, I reformatted to below and no 'lintian' issues. Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ Upstream-Name: ventoy Upstream-Contact: The Ventoy Authors Source: https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy https://www.ventoy.net Disclaimer: THIS PACKAGE IS PLACED IN THE NON-FREE SECTION OF DEBIAN DUE TO THE INCLUSION OF PRECOMPILED BINARY FILES WITHOUT THE CORRESPONDING SOURCE CODE. THESE FILES ARE NECESSARY FOR THE FUNCTIONALITY OF VENTOY, BUT THEY CANNOT BE REBUILT FROM SOURCE. THE UPSTREAM AUTHORS HAVE NOT PROVIDED THE SOURCE OR BUILD PROCESS FOR THESE BINARIES. AS A RESULT, VENTOY CANNOT BE PART OF THE MAIN DEBIAN ARCHIVE. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080529: RFS: mplayer/2:1.5+svn38638-1 [RC] -- movie player for Unix-like systems
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Lorenzo, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/cs/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6551] N: N: This manual page uses the \' groff sequence. Usually, the intent is to N: generate an apostrophe, but that sequence actually renders as an acute N: accent. N: N: For an apostrophe or a single closing quote, use plain '. For single N: opening quote, i.e. a straight downward line ' like the one used in shell N: commands, use '\(aq'. N: N: In case this tag was emitted for the second half of a '\\' sequence, this N: is indeed no acute accent, but still wrong: A literal backslash should be N: written \e in the groff format, i.e. a '\\' sequence needs to be changed N: to '\e' which also won't trigger this tag. N: N: Please refer to Bug#554897, Bug#507673, and Bug#966803 for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: acute-accent-in-manpage N: N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:1885] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:2911] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:510] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5820] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5821] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5823] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5825] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/de/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5857] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:1012] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5875] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5876] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5877] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5879] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/fr/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5909] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:2710] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:499] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5790] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5791] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5793] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5795] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/hu/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5826] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:3029] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6294] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6295] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6296] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6298] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6330] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/it/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6331] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6125] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6126] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6127] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6129] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6161] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/ru/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5535] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/ru/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5536] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/ru/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5537] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/ru/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5539] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/ru/man1/mplayer.1.gz:5572] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/zh_CN/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6154] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/zh_CN/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6155] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr/share/man/zh_CN/man1/mplayer.1.gz:6156] N: I: mplayer: acute-accent-in-manual-page [usr
Bug#1081019: RFS: ventoy/1.0.99-1 [ITP] -- Create bootable USB drives for ISO/WIM/IMG/VHD(x)/EFI files
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Manuel, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue Is not machine readable. The disclaimer is not needed and blocks scanning. 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Not performed at this time 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe ventoy is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080305: RFS: apt-mirror2/8-1 [ITP] -- Python/asyncio reimplementation of the apt-mirror
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Yuri, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe apt-mirror2 is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080360: RFS: caio/0.9.17-1 [ITP] -- Asynchronous file IO for Linux MacOS or Windows
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Yuri, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe caio is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1081029: RFS: ereandel/0.26.1-1 -- Gemini web browser using shell script
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Akash, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe ereandel is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: duck have another separator after URL
On Wed, 2024-09-04 at 16:55 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-09-04 at 16:01 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2024-09-04 at 13:50 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > Package: duck
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Version: not_known_by_submitter
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:51:25PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 21:25 +0100, Peter B wrote:
> > > > > @Phil
> > > > >
> > > > > Another test you could consider adding to your reviews is duck.
> > > > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck
> > > > >
> > > > > Easy to run, just type duck in top of the source tree.
> > > > > Silence indicates success.
> > > > >
> > > > > Its prone to false positives with "parked domains" & email addresses,
> > > > > but works well in finding dead links, 404s,
> > > > > and use of http instead of https
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > > Peter,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for putting this out there.
> > >
> > > And I was blunt enough to make a bugreport about it.
> > >
> > > > An interesting thought, but the output is mangled by the addition of
> > > > ':' to
> > > > the end of links. Makes all links 404 if you attempt to right click on
> > > > them
> > > > in a terminal and open them.
> > > >
> > > > Example...
> > > >
> > > > I: debian/copyright:62: URL:
> > > > http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/: INFORMATION
> > > > (Certainty:possible)
> > > >
> > > > The ':' is part of the link in the terminals I have tried. A solution
> > > > here
> > > > would be to replace ': ' with ' - '.
> > >
> > > I suggest to replace the ': ' with ' : '.
> > >
> > >
> > > > I would consider using the application if some work was to be done on
> > > > it.
> > >
> > > I know. Hence my reason to contribute to free software.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Phil
> > >
> > > Groeten
> > > Geert Stappers
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for turning this into a bug report.
> >
> > I'll use your suggestion " : " for now. Quite a trivial change in git.
> >
> > diff --git a/src/duck b/src/duck
> > index 72ed95b..2183626 100755
> > --- a/src/duck
> > +++ b/src/duck
> > @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ foreach my $entry (@entries) {
> > }
> >
> > if ($opt{n}) {
> > -print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . ": ";
> > +print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . " : ";
> > print STDOUT " DRY RUN\n";
> > next;
> > }
> > @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ sub display_result($;$;$) {
> > }
> >
> > if ($data->{url}) {
> > -$out .= $data->{url} . ": ";
> > +$out .= $data->{url} . " : ";
> > }
> >
> > $res->{retval} = 2 unless $res->{retval} < 2;
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Phil
> >
>
> Ignore, the diff. Not as trivial as I thought.
>
> Regards
>
> Phil
>
OK, new diff. If some can verify and see I have missed something.
diff --git a/src/duck b/src/duck
index 72ed95b..685bc43 100755
--- a/src/duck
+++ b/src/duck
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ foreach my $entry (@entries) {
}
if ($opt{n}) {
-print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . ": ";
+print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . " : ";
print STDOUT " DRY RUN\n";
next;
}
@@ -492,9 +492,9 @@ sub display_result($;$;$) {
$out .= $data->{verbose};
if ($states->{$res->{retval}}) {
-$out .= ': ' . $states->{$res->{retval}};
+$out .= ' : ' . $states->{$res->{retval}};
} else {
-$out .= ': ' . $states->{1};
+$out .= ' : ' . $states->{1};
}
$out .= ' (Certainty:' . $data->{certainty} . ')';
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ sub display_result($;$;$) {
}
if ($data->{url}) {
-$out .= $data->{url} . ": ";
+$out .= $data->{url} . " : ";
}
$res->{retval} = 2 unless $res->{retval} < 2;
Regards
Phil
--
"I play the game for the game’s own sake"
Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans
--
Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas
Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org
Website: https://kathenas.org
Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg
--
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: duck have another separator after URL
On Wed, 2024-09-04 at 13:50 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Package: duck
> Severity: normal
> Version: not_known_by_submitter
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:51:25PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 21:25 +0100, Peter B wrote:
> > > @Phil
> > >
> > > Another test you could consider adding to your reviews is duck.
> > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck
> > >
> > > Easy to run, just type duck in top of the source tree.
> > > Silence indicates success.
> > >
> > > Its prone to false positives with "parked domains" & email addresses,
> > > but works well in finding dead links, 404s,
> > > and use of http instead of https
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Peter
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > Thanks for putting this out there.
>
> And I was blunt enough to make a bugreport about it.
>
> > An interesting thought, but the output is mangled by the addition of ':' to
> > the end of links. Makes all links 404 if you attempt to right click on them
> > in a terminal and open them.
> >
> > Example...
> >
> > I: debian/copyright:62: URL:
> > http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/: INFORMATION
> > (Certainty:possible)
> >
> > The ':' is part of the link in the terminals I have tried. A solution here
> > would be to replace ': ' with ' - '.
>
> I suggest to replace the ': ' with ' : '.
>
>
> > I would consider using the application if some work was to be done on it.
>
> I know. Hence my reason to contribute to free software.
>
>
> > Regards
> > Phil
>
> Groeten
> Geert Stappers
Hi,
Thanks for turning this into a bug report.
I'll use your suggestion " : " for now. Quite a trivial change in git.
diff --git a/src/duck b/src/duck
index 72ed95b..2183626 100755
--- a/src/duck
+++ b/src/duck
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ foreach my $entry (@entries) {
}
if ($opt{n}) {
-print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . ": ";
+print STDOUT $type . ": " . $k . ": " . $url . " : ";
print STDOUT " DRY RUN\n";
next;
}
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ sub display_result($;$;$) {
}
if ($data->{url}) {
-$out .= $data->{url} . ": ";
+$out .= $data->{url} . " : ";
}
$res->{retval} = 2 unless $res->{retval} < 2;
Regards
Phil
--
"I play the game for the game’s own sake"
Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans
--
Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas
Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org
Website: https://kathenas.org
Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg
--
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080299: RFS: dia/0.98+git20240814-1 -- Diagram editor
On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 22:57 +0200, Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote: > Hello, > > Le 03/09/2024 à 08:28, Phil Wyett a écrit : > > > Hey - I'll sponsor this, but i would like to see something more > > > descriptive for the closing of the bug in the changelog: > > > > > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > > > > > dia (0.98+git20240814-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > > > . > > > > * New upstream snapshot > > > > - Closes: #1078335 > > > > * Remove patches applied upstream > > > > * Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures > > > > > > > perhaps something like > > > > > > > * New upstream snapshot > > > > - Fix adding images to diagrams - Closes: #1078335 > > > > * Remove patches applied upstream > > > > * Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures > > Done. > > > > > Could the below files be appropriately handled in 'debian/copyright' > > > > philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/dia- > > 0.98+git20240814$ lrc > > : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 > > > > Parsing Source Tree > > Reading copyright > > Running licensecheck > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > GPL-2 | public-domainplug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.cpp > > GPL-2 | public-domainplug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.h > > Done. > > > GPL-2 | MIT~Xfig plug-ins/xfig/fig-format-3.2 > > This one seems like a false-positive: the copyright of this file is not > clear, but I cannot find any mention about "MIT-Xfig" in this file or > even in the whole project. > File header below. /* * FIG : Facility for Interactive Generation of figures * Copyright (c) 1985 by Supoj Sutanthavibul * Parts Copyright (c) 1989-2002 by Brian V. Smith * Parts Copyright (c) 1991 by Paul King * Parts Copyright (c) 1995 by C. Blanc and C. Schlick * * Any party obtaining a copy of these files is granted, free of charge, a * full and unrestricted irrevocable, world-wide, paid up, royalty-free, * nonexclusive right and license to deal in this software and * documentation files (the "Software"), including without limitation the * rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish and/or distribute copies of * the Software, and to permit persons who receive copies from any such * party to do so, with the only requirement being that this copyright * notice remain intact. */ Reference: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Xfig_Variant > I uploaded to mentors the updated package: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/dia/. > > Thanks for your reviews, > > Philippe. > Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: duck
On Tue, 2024-09-03 at 21:25 +0100, Peter B wrote: > @Phil > > Another test you could consider adding to your reviews is duck. > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/duck > > Easy to run, just type duck in top of the source tree. > Silence indicates success. > > Its prone to false positives with "parked domains" & email addresses, > but works well in finding dead links, 404s, > and use of http instead of https > > > Regards, > Peter Peter, Thanks for putting this out there. An interesting thought, but the output is mangled by the addition of ':' to the end of links. Makes all links 404 if you attempt to right click on them in a terminal and open them. Example... I: debian/copyright:62: URL: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/: INFORMATION (Certainty:possible) The ':' is part of the link in the terminals I have tried. A solution here would be to replace ': ' with ' - '. I would consider using the application if some work was to be done on it. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080383: RFS: vixl/7.0.0-1 -- ARMv8 Runtime Code Generation Library
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Andrea, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe vixl is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080416: RFS: u-config/0.33.1-1 [ITP] -- smaller, simpler, portable pkg-config clone
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Andrea, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe u-config is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#1080299: RFS: dia/0.98+git20240814-1 -- Diagram editor
On Mon, 2024-09-02 at 01:33 +0200, Andreas Ronnquist wrote: > Control: owner -1 gus...@debian.org > > On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 18:29:35 +0200, > Philippe SWARTVAGHER wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dia": > > > > Hey - I'll sponsor this, but i would like to see something more > descriptive for the closing of the bug in the changelog: > > > Changes since the last upload: > > > > dia (0.98+git20240814-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* New upstream snapshot > > - Closes: #1078335 > >* Remove patches applied upstream > >* Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures > > > > perhaps something like > > >* New upstream snapshot > > - Fix adding images to diagrams - Closes: #1078335 > >* Remove patches applied upstream > >* Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures > > > best > -- Andreas Rönnquist > mailingli...@gusnan.se > gus...@debian.org > Hi, As a side note I hope you do not mind. Could the below files be appropriately handled in 'debian/copyright' philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/dia- 0.98+git20240814$ lrc : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-2 | public-domainplug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.cpp GPL-2 | public-domainplug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.h GPL-2 | MIT~Xfig plug-ins/xfig/fig-format-3.2 Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Debian Mentors - Confirmed package of the day - graphite-carbon - Needs love
Hi Debian Developers, Our package marked as "confirmed" that has languished on mentors for quite some time is our package of the day. Please could a DD with a little free time, graciously give it your time and show this package some love? Package: graphite-carbon Links... * Mentors - https://mentors.debian.net/package/graphite-carbon/ * RFS bug - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077619 * Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/debian-graphite-team/graphite-carbon Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1079687: RFS: opencpn/1:5.10.0+dfsg-5~bpo12+1 -- Open Source Chartplotter and Marine GPS Navigation Software
Hi Alec, The new upload 1:5.10.0+dfsg-5~bpo12+1 also meets backport requirements and remains marked as "confirmed" awaiting a DD to look at the package. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080372: RFS: libhinoko/1.0.3-1 [ITP] -- I/O library for IEEE 1394 isochronous communication
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Takashi,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution
to the Debian project.
The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package
submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to
possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the
submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the
review.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
W: libhinoko-dev: gir-package-name-does-not-match gir1.2-hinoko-1.0-dev
[usr/share/gir-1.0/Hinoko-1.0.gir]
N:
N: Development packages that contain public GObject-Introspection XML files
N: (/usr/share/gir-1.0/Foo-23.gir or
N: /usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/gir-1.0/Foo-23.gir) should be named
N: gir1.2-foo-23-dev if the GIR XML is the only content of the package, or
N: should have a versioned Provides for gir1.2-foo-23-dev (=
N: ${binary:Version}) if the package contains other development files.
N:
N: Since gobject-introspection 1.78.1-6 (Debian trixie), the recommended
way
N: to populate the Provides fields is to use debhelper and dh_girepository,
N: via the gir addon or the dh-sequence-gir virtual package, and add
N: Provides: ${gir:Provides} to packages that contain public GIR XML.
N:
N: For example, libgtk-3-dev contains Gtk-3.0.gir, Gdk-3.0.gir and
N: GdkX11-3.0.gir, so it should have Provides: gir1.2-gtk-3.0-dev,
Provides:
N: gir1.2-gdk-3.0-dev and Provides: gir1.2-gdkx11-3.0-dev.
N:
N: Please refer to usr/share/doc/gobject-introspection/policy.txt for
N: details.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: desktop/gnome/gir
W: libhinoko-dev: stray-devhelp-documentation
[usr/share/doc/hinoko/hinoko.devhelp2]
N:
N: The named file is not in the Devhelp search path
(/usr/share/devhelp/books
N: or /usr/share/gtk-doc/html) and also not located in a directory that is
N: accessible via a symbolic link from that search path. Devhelp cannot
find
N: that file.
N:
N: For Devhelp documentation installed outside the search path (such as
N: /usr/share/doc), create a symbolic link in /usr/share/gtk-doc/html that
N: points to the documentation directory.
N:
N: Please refer to https://apps.gnome.org/app/org.gnome.Devhelp/ for
details.
N:
N: Visibility: warning
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: documentation/devhelp
N: Renamed from: package-contains-devhelp-file-without-symlink
N:
N: Screen: examples/ship/devhelp
N: Advocates: "Lintian Maintainers"
N: Reason:
N: Any Devhelp files shipped in the examples are not expected to
be discoverable by
N: the Devhelp browsing tool.
I: libhinoko source: out-of-date-standards-version 4.6.2 (released 2022-12-
17) (current is 4.7.0)
N:
N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version older than the one that
N: was current at the time the package was created (according to the
N: timestamp of the latest debian/changelog entry). Please consider
updating
N: the package to current Policy and setting this control field
N: appropriately.
N:
N: If the package is already compliant with the current standards, you
don't
N: have to re-upload the package just to adjust the Standards-Version
control
N: field. However, please remember to update this field next time you
upload
N: the package.
N:
N: See /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz in the
N: debian-policy package for a summary of changes in newer versions of
N: Policy.
N:
N: Please refer to
N: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.html for
N: details.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: fields/standards-version
I: libhinoko-dev: possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration
N:
N: The package ships a .html or .pdf file under /usr/share/doc/. Those
files
N: are usually documentation, but no files are registered in doc-base.
N:
N: Files in folders named examples are exempt from this tag.
N:
N: Please refer to Registering Documents using doc-base (Section 9.10) in
the
N: Debian Policy Manual for details.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: menus
I: libhinoko1: symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field
libhinoko.so.1 [symbols]
N:
N: The symbols file for this package does not contain a Build-Depends-
Package
N: meta-information field.
N:
N: This field specifies the name of the -dev package associated to the
N: library and is used by dpkg-shlibdeps(1) to make sure that the
dependency
N: generated is at least as strict as the corresponding build dependency.
N:
N: This is useful as allows packages to not hardcode this information
N: multiple times.
N:
N: Note that the format of deb-symbols(5) files requires that the *
N: Build-Depends-Package: line should start in column one of the file and
not
N: be indented t
Bug#1080357: RFS: audacious-plugins/4.4-1 -- Base plugins for audacious
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: audacious-plugins source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/0001-Do-not-hard-code-build-architecture-pkg-config.patch] N: N: According to the DEP-3 headers, this patch has not been forwarded N: upstream. N: N: Please forward the patch and try to have it included in upstream's version N: control system. If the patch is not suitable for that, please mention N: not-needed in the Forwarded field of the patch header. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, Changes to N: the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual, and N: Bug#755153 for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/patches/dep3 N: Renamed from: send-patch I: audacious-plugins: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/audacious/General/song_change.so] N: N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc N: functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called by N: any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated at N: compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian N: compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using dpkg- buildflags N: directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS. N: N: NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions N: (e.g. memcpy). N: N: Please refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and Bug#673112 for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/hardening N: N: I: audacious-plugins: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/audacious/Input/console.so] N: I: audacious-plugins: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/audacious/Output/alsa.so] N: I: audacious-plugins: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/audacious/Output/oss4.so] N: I: audacious-plugins: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/audacious/Output/sndio-ng.so] 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, chance of false positives philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/audacious-plugins- 4.4$ lrc : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck BSD-2-clause| FSFAPINSTALL BSD-2-clause| Expatsrc/aosd/ghosd-license GPL-3 | GPL src/cdaudio/cdaudio-ng.cc BSD-2-clause| LGPL src/console/gme_notes.txt BSD-2-clause| LGPL src/console/gme_readme.txt BSD-2-clause| GPL-2src/psf/peops/License.txt BSD-2-clause| GPL-2src/psf/peops2/License.txt GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/actions-mainwin.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/actions-playlist.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/actions.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/button.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/button.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/dnd.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/eq-graph.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/eq-graph.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/eq-slider.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/eq-slider.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/equalizer.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/equalizer.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/hslider.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/hslider.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/main.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/main.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/menurow.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/menurow.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/monostereo.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/monostereo.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/number.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/number.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/playlist-slider.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/playlist-slider.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/playlist-widget.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/playlist-widget.h GPL-3 | GPL src/skins-qt/playlistwin.cc GPL-3 | GPL src/skins
Bug#1080358: RFS: audacious/4.4-1 -- small and fast audio player which supports lots of formats
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Mateusz,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution
to the Debian project.
The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package
submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to
possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the
submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the
review.
Review...
1. Build:
* pbuilder [1]: Good
* sbuild [2]: Good
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
I: libaudtag3t64: hardening-no-fortify-functions [usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/libaudtag.so.3.0.0]
N:
N: This package provides an ELF binary that lacks the use of fortified libc
N: functions. Either there are no potentially unfortified functions called
by
N: any routines, all unfortified calls have already been fully validated at
N: compile-time, or the package was not built with the default Debian
N: compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags. If built using dpkg-
buildflags
N: directly, be sure to import CPPFLAGS.
N:
N: NB: Due to false-positives, Lintian ignores some unprotected functions
N: (e.g. memcpy).
N:
N: Please refer to https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening and Bug#673112 for
N: details.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: binaries/hardening
I: libaudcore5t64: unused-override package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
libaudcore5 [usr/share/lintian/overrides/libaudcore5t64:1]
N:
N: Your package specifies the named override but there were no tags that
N: could have been silenced by it.
N:
N: Maybe you fixed an underlying condition but forgot to remove the
override.
N: It is also possible that the Lintian maintainers fixed a false positive.
N:
N: If the override is now unused, please remove it.
N:
N: This tag is similar to mismatched-override except there a tag could have
N: been silenced if the context had matched.
N:
N: Sometimes, overrides end up not being used because a tag appears only on
N: some architectures. In that case, overrides can be equipped with an
N: architecture qualifier.
N:
N: Please refer to Architecture specific overrides (Section 2.4.3) in the
N: Lintian User's Manual for details.
N:
N: Visibility: info
N: Show-Always: yes
N: Check: lintian
N:
I: libaudtag3t64: unused-override package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
libaudtag3 [usr/share/lintian/overrides/libaudtag3t64:1]
P: audacious source: trailing-whitespace [debian/changelog:12]
N:
N: This file contains lines with trailing whitespace characters.
N:
N: Whilst often harmless and unsightly, such extra whitespaces can also
cause
N: tools to interpret the whitespace characters literally. The tool diff(1)
N: does not like them, either. They are best avoided.
N:
N: Some of these problems can be hard to track down.
N:
N: Whitespace at the end of lines may be removed with the following:
N:
N:$ sed -i -e 's@[[:space:]]*$@@g' debian/control debian/changelog
N:
N: If you use Emacs, you can also use "M-x wh-cl" (whitespace-cleanup).
N:
N: However, if you wish to only remove trailing spaces and leave trailing
N: tabs (eg. for Makefiles), you can use the following code snippet:
N:
N:$ sed -i -e 's@[ ]*$@@g' debian/rules
N:
N: To remove empty lines from the end of a file, you can use:
N:
N:$ sed -i -e :a -e '/^\n*$/{$d;N;};/\n$/ba' debian/rules
N:
N: Visibility: pedantic
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: debian/trailing-whitespace
N: Renamed from: file-contains-trailing-whitespace
3. Licenses [4]: Issue
philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/audacious-4.4$ lrc
: Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1
Parsing Source Tree
Reading copyright
Running licensecheck
d/copyright | licensecheck
BSD-2-clause| FSFAPINSTALL
4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good
5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good
6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good
7. Install [No previous installs]: Good
8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good
Summary...
I believe audacious is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the
contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your
satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the
Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report.
Regards
Phil
[1] pbuilder:
* Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc
* Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
[2] sbuild:
* Command: sbuild .dsc
* Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
[3] lintian:
* Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc,
*.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough.
* Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian
[4] lrc:
* Command: lrc
* Document: https://wiki.debian.or
Bug#1080356: RFS: gxkb/0.9.6-1 -- X11 keyboard indicator and switcher
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: gxkb source: repackaged-source-not-advertised [debian/copyright] N: N: The debian/copyright file mentions Files-Excluded but the source version N: has no repack suffix. N: N: Repackaged sources are expected to indicate in their version number that N: they are different from the upstream release. It is commonly done by N: adding a repack suffix to the upstream version. N: N: The choice of repack suffix depends on the reason for repackaging. When N: some files were excluded because licensing was a concern, the suffix +dfsg N: may be appropriate. In more generic cases, one could chose +ds. N: N: Upstream sources are sometimes repackaged by accident when using old N: versions of dh_make. It can also happen when a maintainer invokes the N: dh_make option --createorig even though it is not needed. N: N: According to the Debian Developer's Reference 6.7.8.2, the repack suffix N: is not required. N: N: Please include such a suffix in the changelog version number to avoid this N: warning. N: N: Please refer to Bug#471537 and N: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html N: for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/copyright/dep5 Needs to be '+ds' repacked. P: gxkb source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/gxkb.desktop] N: N: The maintainer keeps a desktop entry in ./debian. Please forward the N: desktop entry upstream and ask them to include it in their version control N: system, and in their next release. N: N: If the desktop entry was already forwarded or rejected, or the upstream is N: gone, please override the tag and annotate it with a suitable comment. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, and N: Changes to the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/desktop-entries 3. Licenses [4]: Issue philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/gxkb-0.9.6$ lrc : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-2+ | FSFAPdoc/INSTALL 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe gxkb is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080026: RFS: smplayer/24.5.0+ds-1 -- Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I am sure you will correct this before upload or next upload. I: smplayer source: unused-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright bsd-2-clause [debian/copyright:115] N: N: The license paragraph in the machine-readable copyright file is not N: referenced by any files paragraph. It could be a typo in the license name N: or the license paragraph is simply not needed and can be removed. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for N: details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/copyright/dep5 For upstream... I: smplayer: spelling-error-in-binary "allows to" "allows one to" [usr/bin/smplayer] N: N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like N: a spelling checker does. N: N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mistake N: in the corresponding msgids in the *.po files. N: N: You can often find the word in the source code by running: N: N:grep -rw N: N: This tag may produce false positives for words that contain non-ASCII N: characters due to limitations in strings. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: binaries/spelling N: N: I: smplayer: spelling-error-in-binary Addd Add [usr/bin/smplayer] N: I: smplayer: spelling-error-in-binary abitrate arbitrate [usr/bin/smplayer] 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe smplayer is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080306: RFS: prandom/1.0r1 -- whish list - First package
On Sun, 2024-09-01 at 13:13 -0700, Sylvain wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package “prandom": > > * Package name : prandom > Version : 1.0.0 > Upstream contact : sylv...@sysau.com > * URL : https://github.com/sysaulab/prandom > * License : BSD-2-clause > * Vcs : https://github.com/sysaulab/prandom-debian.git > Section : utils > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > prandom - portable chaotic number generator > > This is the state of my debianization: > https://github.com/sysaulab/prandom-debian/blob/main/prandom_1.0.0.tar.xz > > The .deb package that was created claim to be for all architectures, but > clearly only the aarch64 version has been built. Not sure what to do next… > https://github.com/sysaulab/prandom-debian/blob/main/prandom_1.0.0_all.deb > > > Changes since the last upload: > > First upload. > > Regards, > > Sylvain Saucier, > Proud author of prandom Hi, Your source package files need to be uploaded to Debian Mentors. At that time they will be built and reviewed by someone. For details: https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers/ Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1079664: RFS: saf/1.013-1 [ITP] -- Minimal abstract interface for simple games
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Julio, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Summary... I believe saf is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready and appropriate for the distribution. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080316: RFS: nxt-firmware/1.29.7-1 -- Improved firmware for LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Nicolas, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe nxt-firware is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080242: RFS: electrum-nmc/4.0.6-2 [ITP] -- Easy to use Namecoin client
Control: tags -1 +morinfo Nicholas, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue I: electrum-nmc source: uses-deprecated-python-stdlib chunk (deprecated in Python 3.11, removed in Python 3.13) [electrum_nmc/electrum/blockchain.py:586] N: N: N: In Python $deprecated, $library has been formally marked as deprecated
Bug#1065008: RFS: hexwalk/1.7.1-1 [ITP] -- HexWalk is an Hex analyzer, editor and viewer
Morning Carmine, Many thanks for addressing all the things mentioned. Do not worry that you have made a new upstream release since the original submission. At this time I understand you wish to get the package first into Debian and then go from there. It is not necessary for it to be latest when entering Debian, as we know, the process can take time and releases maybe made during the process. I hope Pierre can look at the package soon. Regards Phil On Sun, 2024-09-01 at 08:43 +0200, carmix wrote: > Hi Phil, > > I just adjusted with your suggestions, > > as for the warning referred to the new upstream version, it is true on > the github repository I just made a new release, > > but I would like it to stay around for a while before uploading it to > debian just to be sure that it is really stable, > > > Regards, > > > Carmine > > > On 31/08/2024 20:00, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Hi Carmine, > > > > The manual page is not an issue for me at this time. > > > > Some issues... > > > > W: hexwalk source: timewarp-standards-version (2024-03-03 < 2024-04-07) > > N: > > N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version that was released > > after > > N: the date of the most recent debian/changelog entry. Perhaps you forgot > > to > > N: update the timestamp in debian/changelog before building the package? > > N: > > N: Visibility: warning > > N: Show-Always: no > > N: Check: fields/standards-version > > > > > > I: hexwalk source: vcs-field-not-canonical Browser > > https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk.git > > https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk > > N: > > N: The VCS-* field contains an uncanonical URI. Please update to use the > > N: current canonical URI instead. This reduces the network bandwidth used > > and > > N: makes debcheckout work independent of the port forwarding and > > redirections > > N: properly working. > > N: > > N: Note that this check is based on a list of known URIs. Lintian did not > > N: send an HTTP request to the URI to test this. > > N: > > N: Visibility: info > > N: Show-Always: no > > N: Check: fields/vcs > > > > The 'Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk.git' line just > > needs th '.git' removing. > > > > > > P: hexwalk: odd-mark-in-description comma not followed by whitespace (line > > 2) > > N: > > N: A punction mark was placed oddly in the description. > > N: > > N: This tag is currently only issued for a comma that is not followed by a > > N: whitespace character or a number (eg. for "300,000"). > > N: > > N: Please refer to Bug#591665 and Bug#591664 for details. > > N: > > N: Visibility: pedantic > > N: Show-Always: no > > N: Check: fields/description > > N: > > P: hexwalk: odd-mark-in-description comma not followed by whitespace (line > > 4) > > > > > > X: hexwalk source: upstream-metadata-file-is-missing > > N: > > N: This source package is not Debian-native but it does not have a > > N: debian/upstream/metadata file. > > N: > > N: The Upstream MEtadata GAthered with YAml (UMEGAYA) project is an effort > > to > > N: collect meta-information about upstream projects from any source > > package. > > N: This file is in YAML format and it is used in to feed the data in the > > N: UltimateDebianDatabase. For example, it can contains the way the > > authors > > N: want their software be cited in publications and some bibliographic > > N: references about the software. > > N: > > N: Please add a debian/upstream/metadata file. > > N: > > N: Please refer to https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep12/ and > > N: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata for details. > > N: > > N: Visibility: pedantic > > N: Show-Always: no > > N: Check: debian/upstream/metadata > > N: This tag is experimental. > > > > The upstream meta data is not mandatory (is experimental), but would be > > nice. > > > > Regards > > > > Phil > > > > > > On Sat, 2024-08-31 at 19:29 +0200, carmix wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > > I have done as you suggested, > > > I added the project on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk > > > I also fixed some minor issues that you pointed out and made a new upload > > > to > > > mentors, > > > I haven't added a man because it is a GUI app and a
Bug#1079664: RFS: saf/1.013-1 [ITP] -- Minimal abstract interface for simple games
Julio, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Isuue bsaf-dev-tools: no-manual-page [usr/bin/convert_image.py] N: N: Each binary in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /bin, /sbin or /usr/games should have N: a manual page N: N: Note that though the man program has the capability to check for several N: program names in the NAMES section, each of these programs should have its N: own manual page (a symbolic link to the appropriate manual page is N: sufficient) because other manual page viewers such as xman or tkman don't N: support this. N: N: If the name of the manual page differs from the binary by case, man may be N: able to find it anyway; however, it is still best practice to match the N: exact capitalization of the executable in the manual page. N: N: If the manual pages are provided by another package on which this package N: depends, Lintian may not be able to determine that manual pages are N: available. In this case, after confirming that all binaries do have manual N: pages after this package and its dependencies are installed, please add a N: Lintian override. N: N: Please refer to Manual pages (Section 12.1) in the Debian Policy Manual N: for details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: documentation/manual N: Renamed from: binary-without-manpage N: N: W: libsaf-dev-tools: script-with-language-extension [usr/bin/convert_image.py] N: N: When scripts are installed into a directory in the system PATH, the script N: name should not include an extension such as .sh or .pl that denotes the N: scripting language currently used to implement it. The implementation N: language may change; if it does, leaving the name the same would be N: confusing and changing it would be disruptive. N: N: Please refer to Scripts (Section 10.4) in the Debian Policy Manual for N: details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: files/scripts This python script is a bit too generic for '/usr/bin/' and primarily useful to your package. I would install it in somewhere like '/use/share/libsaf- dev/tools/' and then there would be no issue with the '.py' file extension. I: libsaf-dev: extra-license-file [usr/share/doc/libsaf-dev/LICENSE.gz] N: N: All license information should be collected in the debian/copyright file. N: This usually makes it unnecessary for the package to install this N: information in other places as well. N: N: Please refer to Copyright information (Section 12.5) in the Debian Policy N: Manual for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: files/licenses This does not need to be packaged. 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: See 2. 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: N/A Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080236: RFS: git-credential-oauth/0.13.2-1~bpo12+1 -- Git credential helper for GitHub and other forges using OAuth
Control: tags -1 +confirmed Hi Mirth, Many thanks for your contributions as always. This backport passed all the basic requirements of a backport and will be marked as "confirmed". I hope a DD can review/sponsor this package in the near future. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1065008: RFS: hexwalk/1.7.1-1 [ITP] -- HexWalk is an Hex analyzer, editor and viewer
Hi Carmine, The manual page is not an issue for me at this time. Some issues... W: hexwalk source: timewarp-standards-version (2024-03-03 < 2024-04-07) N: N: The source package refers to a Standards-Version that was released after N: the date of the most recent debian/changelog entry. Perhaps you forgot to N: update the timestamp in debian/changelog before building the package? N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/standards-version I: hexwalk source: vcs-field-not-canonical Browser https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk.git https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk N: N: The VCS-* field contains an uncanonical URI. Please update to use the N: current canonical URI instead. This reduces the network bandwidth used and N: makes debcheckout work independent of the port forwarding and redirections N: properly working. N: N: Note that this check is based on a list of known URIs. Lintian did not N: send an HTTP request to the URI to test this. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/vcs The 'Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk.git' line just needs th '.git' removing. P: hexwalk: odd-mark-in-description comma not followed by whitespace (line 2) N: N: A punction mark was placed oddly in the description. N: N: This tag is currently only issued for a comma that is not followed by a N: whitespace character or a number (eg. for "300,000"). N: N: Please refer to Bug#591665 and Bug#591664 for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/description N: P: hexwalk: odd-mark-in-description comma not followed by whitespace (line 4) X: hexwalk source: upstream-metadata-file-is-missing N: N: This source package is not Debian-native but it does not have a N: debian/upstream/metadata file. N: N: The Upstream MEtadata GAthered with YAml (UMEGAYA) project is an effort to N: collect meta-information about upstream projects from any source package. N: This file is in YAML format and it is used in to feed the data in the N: UltimateDebianDatabase. For example, it can contains the way the authors N: want their software be cited in publications and some bibliographic N: references about the software. N: N: Please add a debian/upstream/metadata file. N: N: Please refer to https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep12/ and N: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata for details. N: N: Visibility: pedantic N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/upstream/metadata N: This tag is experimental. The upstream meta data is not mandatory (is experimental), but would be nice. Regards Phil On Sat, 2024-08-31 at 19:29 +0200, carmix wrote: > Hi Pierre, > I have done as you suggested, > I added the project on Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/gcarmix/hexwalk > I also fixed some minor issues that you pointed out and made a new upload to > mentors, > I haven't added a man because it is a GUI app and at the moment I don't know > how to write a man for it (anyway on github I have a wiki that should do) > Let me know if it is ok, > > Thank you for your time! > > Carmine > On 07/08/2024 22:59, Carmine wrote: > > > > > Hi Pierre, > > thank you for the reminder, actually I didn't see your previous message, my > > fault. I'll try to address your comments and come back with updates as > > soon as possible, > > > > Cheers, > > > > Carmix > > > > > > Il Mer 7 Ago 2024, 22:37 Pierre Gruet ha scritto: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I hope you are well! > > > > > > This is a reminder as I sent comments > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065008#45 > > > to you some weeks ago; are you able to address them? Do you need some > > > help to to do? If so, please ask :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > -- > > > Pierre > > > > -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Bug#1078983: RFS: popt/1.19+dfsg-2 -- lib for parsing cmdline parameters
On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 11:39 +0100, Peter B wrote: > On 19/08/2024 08:13, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Looks like it wants to flag one by one on different files. Best to have a > > review of all the *.po files and run checking. > > Hi Phil, > > That's the whole point of the --terse option. > > Using the -t option with lrc is a good idea for your reviews, > to give a concise indication of problems. > > However, maintainers fixing a copyright file should run > lrc without it, otherwise issues will be hidden. > > > Maybe be remove the '-t' from your standard appendix [4], > even if you prefer to use it yourself for the reviews? > > > Regards, > Peter > > P.S. > > For full info, run lrc -h > Peter, Yes, got used to '-t' and documented wrongly etc. Amended my appendix accordingly. Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080060: RFS: sosreport/4.8.0-1 -- Set of tools to gather troubleshooting data from a system
Control: tags -1 +confirmed On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 09:31 +0100, Arif Ali wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sosreport": > > * Package name : sosreport > Version : 4.8.0-1 > Upstream contact : Jake Hunsaker > * URL : https://github.com/sosreport/sos > * License : GPL-2 > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/sosreport-team/sosreport > Section : admin > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > sosreport - Set of tools to gather troubleshooting data from a system > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/sosreport/ > > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sosreport/sosreport_4.8.0-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > sosreport (4.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * New Upstream 4.8.0 release. > . > * For more details, full release note is available here: > - https://github.com/sosreport/sos/releases/tag/4.8.0 > . > * d/copyright: > - Remove the only plugins that were GPL-2+ from file, now that the file > has been updated upstream and now GPL-2 > . > * d/control: > - Add branch for Vcs-Git to debian/latest based on DEP-14 > . > * d/tests/simple.sh: > - Replace sosreport with sos report. The old command is now deprecated, > and > should be sos report in all places. > . > * d/p/0004-debian-do-not-install-LICENSE.patch: > - Rename patch to 0002 for future patch additions, as well as README and > AUTHORS being duplicated > - Update patch to not add README and AUTHORS to /usr/share/sos. This was > causing a duplicate of files in /usr/share/sosreport. > . > * Fixed Patches: > - d/p/0003_man-sos-report.patch > - d/p/0005-man-Fix-man-page-lintian-issues.patch > . > * Remaining patches: > - d/p/0001-debian-change-tmp-dir-location.patch > - d/p/0002-debian-do-not-install-LICENSE-README-AUTHORS.patch > > Regards, Arif, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Good 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Summary... I believe sosreport is ready for review/possible sponsorship. Could a Debian Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package and upload if you feel it is ready. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc -t * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080026: RFS: smplayer/24.5.0+ds0-1 -- Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Good 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, verified philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/smplayer- 24.5.0+ds0$ lrc -t : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck BSD-3-clause| GPL-2webserver/mongoose.h 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Good 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good Additional... * Remove debian-orig directory. * '+ds0-1', '0' not needed. Summary... I believe smplayer is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc -t * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080027: RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-8 [RC] -- Multi-panel tabbed file manager
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue E: spacefm source: source-is-missing [data/spacefm-manual-en.html] N: N: The source of the following file is missing. Lintian checked a few N: possible paths to find the source, and did not find it. N: N: Please repack your package to include the source or add it to N: "debian/missing-sources" directory. N: N: Please note, that very-long-line-length-in-source-file tagged files are N: likely tagged source-is-missing. It is a feature not a bug. N: N: Visibility: error N: Show-Always: no N: Check: files/source-missing I: spacefm source: duplicate-long-description spacefm-common spacefm-gtk3 [debian/control] N: N: The listed binary packages all share the same extended description. N: N: Please add some additional, useful information to the extended N: descriptions that explain what is in each package and how it differs from N: the next. N: N: It is not okay to rely only on package naming conventions to indicate what N: is inside. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/description/duplicate 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, verified philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/spacefm-1.0.6$ lrc -t : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1 Parsing Source Tree Reading copyright Running licensecheck d/copyright | licensecheck GPL-2+ | LGPL-3+ src/ptk/ptk-text-renderer.c GPL-3+ | LGPL src/vfs/vfs-file-monitor.c 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Good 5. Build Twice [sudo pbuilder build --twice .dsc]: Good 6. Reproducible builds [5]: Good 7. Install [No previous installs]: Issue Installed on Debian unstable (default desktop) and up to date. philwyett@ks-dooku:~$ spacefm (spacefm:2826): SpaceFM-WARNING **: 22:33:03.185: No root settings found in /etc/spacefm/ Setting a root editor in Preferences should remove this warning on startup. Otherwise commands run as root may present a security risk. Segmentation fault philwyett@ks-dooku:~$ 8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Not tested at this time. Summary... I believe spacefm is not yet ready for sponsorship at this time. Could the contributor rectify one of more of the rasied issues. Once updated to your satisfaction and a new upload done, please remove the 'moreinfo' tag on the Request For Sponsorship (RFS) bug report. Regards Phil [1] pbuilder: * Command: sudo pbuilder build .dsc * Document: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PbuilderHowto. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks [2] sbuild: * Command: sbuild .dsc * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0002 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild [3] lintian: * Command: lintian -v -i -I -E --pedantic --profile debian (*.dsc, *.changes, *.buildinfo). Each can throw up different results, so be thorough. * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian [4] lrc: * Command: lrc -t * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReviewTools#licenserecon [5] reprotest * Command: sudo reprotest --vary=-build_path,domain_host.use_sudo=1 --auto- build .dsc -- schroot unstable-amd64-sbuild * Document: https://wiki.kathenas.org/pmwiki.php/Kathenas/Article0004 * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ * Document: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Matrix: #kathenas:matrix.org Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg -- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#1080026: RFS: smplayer/24.5.0+ds0-1 -- Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 19:59 +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer": > > * Package name : smplayer >Version : 24.5.0+ds0-1 >Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : https://smplayer.sourceforge.net/ > * License : [fill in] > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/smplayer >Section : video > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > smplayer - Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv > smplayer-l10n - Complete front-end for MPlayer and mpv - translation files > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/smplayer/ > > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/smplayer/smplayer_24.5.0+ds0-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > smplayer (24.5.0+ds0-1) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* New upstream release. >* Update standards version to 4.7.0, no changes needed. >* Update debian/copyright. >* Remove Alf Gaida from Uploaders. > > Regards, Hi Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Good 2. Lintian [3]: Issue W: smplayer source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright Continuation line not in paragraph (line 25). Missing a dot on the previous line? [debian/copyright] N: N: The machine-readable copyright file didn't pass Debian control file syntax N: check. N: N: This issue may hide other issues as Lintian skips some checks on the file N: in this case. N: N: Please refer to N: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ for N: details. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/copyright/dep5 I: smplayer source: older-debian-watch-file-standard 3 [debian/watch] N: N: The version= line in the debian/watch file in this package declares an N: older version. Please upgrade when you have a chance. N: N: Please refer to the uscan(1) manual page for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/watch/standard I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/00_drop_docs_dir.patch] N: N: According to the DEP-3 headers, this patch has not been forwarded N: upstream. N: N: Please forward the patch and try to have it included in upstream's version N: control system. If the patch is not suitable for that, please mention N: not-needed in the Forwarded field of the patch header. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, Changes to N: the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual, and N: Bug#755153 for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/patches/dep3 N: Renamed from: send-patch I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/01-update- mime-types.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/04_update_desktop_launcher.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/05-add- debian-hardening-flags.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/07-disable- chromecast.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/08-disable- yt-js.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/09-use- https.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/10_drop_DONATE_REMINDER.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/11-drop- google-dns.patch] N: I: smplayer source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/12-drop- google-dns-from-chromecast.patch] I: smplayer: spelling-error-in-binary "allows to" "allows one to" [usr/bin/smplayer] N: N: Lintian found a spelling error in the given binary. Lintian has a list of N: common misspellings that it looks for. It does not have a dictionary like N: a spelling checker does. N: N: If the string containing the spelling error is translated with the help of N: gettext or a similar tool, please fix the error in the translations as N: well as the English text to avoid making the translations fuzzy. With N: gettext, for example, this means you should also fix the spelling mis
Bug#1080027: RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-8 [RC] -- Multi-panel tabbed file manager
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Thu, 2024-08-29 at 19:59 +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "spacefm": > > * Package name : spacefm >Version : 1.0.6-8 >Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] > * URL : https://ignorantguru.github.io/spacefm/ > * License : GPL-3+, LGPL-3+, GAP~Makefile.in, permissive, Zlib, > GPL-2+ > * Vcs : https://github.com/mati75/spacefm.git >Section : utils > > The source builds the following binary packages: > > spacefm - Multi-panel tabbed file manager > spacefm-common - Multi-panel tabbed file manager - common files > (transitional package) > spacefm-gtk3 - Multi-panel tabbed file manager (transitional package) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/spacefm/ > > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/spacefm/spacefm_1.0.6-8.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > spacefm (1.0.6-8) unstable; urgency=medium > . >* Add patch from Gentoo to fix FTBFS with gcc-14. (Closes: #1075530) >* Bump to Standards-Version to 4.7.0 > > Regards, Mateusz, Preamble... Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution to the Debian project. The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided in the review. Review... 1. Build: * pbuilder [1]: Good * sbuild [2]: Hood 2. Lintian [3]: Issue W: spacefm source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package Build-Depends: pkg- config => pkgconf N: N: The package build-depends on a package that has been superseded. If the N: superseded package is part of an ORed group, it should not be the first N: package in the group. N: N: Visibility: warning N: Show-Always: no N: Check: fields/package-relations I: spacefm source: duplicate-long-description spacefm-common spacefm-gtk3 [debian/control] N: N: The listed binary packages all share the same extended description. N: N: Please add some additional, useful information to the extended N: descriptions that explain what is in each package and how it differs from N: the next. N: N: It is not okay to rely only on package naming conventions to indicate what N: is inside. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/description/duplicate I: spacefm source: installable-field-mirrors-source (in section for spacefm- common) Priority [debian/control:41] N: N: The named field for an installation package in debian/control has the same N: value as the one inherited from the source paragraph. N: N: In the interest of shorter and clearer files, you may wish to take N: advantage of the inheritance rules. This field is redundant. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/control/field/redundant N: Renamed from: binary-control-field-duplicates-source N: N: I: spacefm source: installable-field-mirrors-source (in section for spacefm- gtk3) Priority [debian/control:49] I: spacefm source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/drop-gnome- common-macros.patch] N: N: According to the DEP-3 headers, this patch has not been forwarded N: upstream. N: N: Please forward the patch and try to have it included in upstream's version N: control system. If the patch is not suitable for that, please mention N: not-needed in the Forwarded field of the patch header. N: N: Please refer to social contract item 2, Coordination with upstream N: developers (Section 3.1.4) in the Debian Developer's Reference, Changes to N: the upstream sources (Section 4.3) in the Debian Policy Manual, and N: Bug#755153 for details. N: N: Visibility: info N: Show-Always: no N: Check: debian/patches/dep3 N: Renamed from: send-patch N: N: I: spacefm source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/drop_spacefm- installer.patch] N: I: spacefm source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/fix-gcc10- fno-common.patch] N: I: spacefm source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/fix-spelling- error.patch] N: I: spacefm source: patch-not-forwarded-upstream [debian/patches/update_desktop_files.patch] P: spacefm source: redundant-globbing-patterns (data/*.png data/faenza/*.png) for data/faenza/spacefm-find.png [debian/copyright:10] N: N: Two globbing patterns in the same Files section in debian/copyright match N: the same file. N: N: This situation can occur when a narrow pattern should apply the same N: license as a broader pattern. Pl
