Bug#76362: marked as done (switch does not work and other problems)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Nov 2000 09:27:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 06 03:27:46 2000 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tph17.tuwien.ac.at [:::128.130.48.137] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 13siZ7-0004xn-00; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 03:27:46 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tph.tuwien.ac.at) by tph17.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13siZ5-00032I-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:27:43 +0100 Sender: rebhana Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 10:27:43 +0100 From: Anton Rebhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: TU Vienna X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: switch does not work and other problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xmbase-grok Version: 1.4.3-4 The switch statement, when used according to the Manual, leads to a grok session, in which only the summary is shown and no cards can be accessed. Moreover, it is not possible to keep the current form by switch(,...). By the way, the on-line help does not know about switch, but describes instead an equivalent search, which is not recognized by the parser, however. In Print fields I get empty displays when using avg(_somefield) or qavg(_somefield), but curiously the latter version starts to work after issuing a few queries. I also tried to form expressions using foreach, but this command does not seem to be recognized by the parser. Finally, in exporting the built-in templates do not work, e.g. the example given in the Manual: grok -x phone html phone.html grok phone: failed to create HTML file It does work, however, by duplicating the built-in html into ~.grok/phone.tm/ I suspect that some of these problems might have to do with the lesstif1 implementation. Installed packages that grok depends on: ii lesstif1 0.89.4-3 OSF/Motif implementation released under LGPL ii libc6 2.1.3-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii xlib6g 3.3.6-10 shared libraries required by X clients I'm running Debian 2.2 under kernel 2.2.17 --- Received: (at 76362-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:06 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ax-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A447526BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A68923D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#61018: marked as done (xmbase-grok aborts if File/Export is chosen with no database open)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2000 19:25:39 + Received: (qmail 10446 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2000 19:25:39 - Received: from enterprise.mathematik.uni-essen.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 23 Mar 2000 19:25:39 - Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by enterprise.mathematik.uni-essen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA21131 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:25:36 +0100 From: Sebastian Leske [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmbase-grok aborts if File/Export is chosen with no database open Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2000 20:20:35 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Package: xmbase-grok Version: 1.4.3 If you start xmbase-grok and select File / Export... from the menu without first opening a database, the program terminates immediately without an error message. Instead of this rather confusing behaviour, it should pop up an error dialog. This happens with the version linked against Lesstif and with the version statically linked against Motif. Greetings, Sebastian Leske --- Received: (at 61018-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:08 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:07 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ax-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A447526BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A68923D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#28384: marked as done (grok window is too large)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 1998 11:19:03 + Received: (qmail 32296 invoked from network); 22 Oct 1998 11:19:03 - Received: from inf.enst.fr (HELO ulysse.enst.fr) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 1998 11:19:03 - Received: from zaphod.enst.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [137.194.160.95]) by ulysse.enst.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA24102; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 13:18:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by zaphod.enst.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) id QAA04221; Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:54:22 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 16:54:22 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: grok window is too large To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7 Package: xmbase-grok Version: 1.4.1-1 (probably to be forwarded to the authors) Open a grok window, select the TODO database. The grok window won't fit on the screen anymore, in a 1024x768 setup. -- System Information Debian Release: slink Kernel Version: Linux zaphod 2.1.124 #3 Mon Oct 5 10:02:08 CEST 1998 i586 unknown Versions of the packages xmbase-grok depends on: ii lesstifg0.86.5-2 OSF/Motif implementation released under LGPL ii libc6 2.0.7u-3 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files) ii xlib6g 3.3.2.3a-1 shared libraries required by X clients --- Received: (at 28384-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:08 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ax-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A447526BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A68923D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#176782: marked as done (rrlogind: superfluous - RoadRunner no longer uses logins)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:27 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2003 05:32:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 14 23:32:10 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dhcp065-025-118-254.neo.rr.com (deckard.local.funknet.net) [65.25.118.254] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Yg9p-0002Ut-00; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:32:10 -0600 Received: from marvin.local.funknet.net ([192.168.1.12] ident=mail) by deckard.local.funknet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Yg9j-0002dW-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:32:03 -0500 Received: from rfunk by marvin.local.funknet.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Yg9o-0003I4-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:32:08 -0500 From: Rob Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: rrlogind: superfluous - RoadRunner no longer uses logins To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 00:32:08 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: rrlogind Version: N/A Severity: normal rrlogind should be removed from the archive. The description for rrlogind says it is needed for authentication to Road Runner, including in two areas of Ohio. Having lived in both those areas, I can say that RR discontinued the login requirement in those areas sometime before 2000. I also know a former Road Runner network engineer, who recently explained the purposes behind the login system, and said that RR doesn't use the login system *anywhere* anymore. Having the program in the archive could confuse RR users in the area mentioned in its description, making them think they need it when it won't even work for them anymore. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux marvin 2.4.20-ac2 #1 Mon Dec 23 16:57:02 EST 2002 i586 unknown --- Received: (at 176782-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:05 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005av-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 84BF226B2C; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9DA3323D4A; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:28 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:27 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#137805: marked as done (jikespg's manpage is symlinked to undocumented(7), but no bug is filed)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:22 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2002 08:27:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 11 02:27:41 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 12-238-101-237.client.attbi.com (yakko.doogie.org) [12.238.101.237] (uucp) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16kL9h-0005ns-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:27:41 -0600 Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] (uucp) by yakko.doogie.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 1 (Debian)) id 16kL7h-0005ZW-00; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:25:37 -0600 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:25:37 -0600 (CST) From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jikespg's manpage is symlinked to undocumented(7), but no bug is filed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: jikespg Version: 1.2-2 Severity: wishlist Policy-Section: 13.1 Policy section 13.1 says you may only link a manpage to undocumented(7) if a bug has been filed saying a program does not have a manpage. Since this package has a symlink to the above manpage, but has no bug filed yet, this bug is serving that purpose. --- Received: (at 137805-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NK-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id AB17726BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FB6D23D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:22 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:22 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#181973: marked as done (psplpr: useless argument parsing (-x))
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2003 21:57:13 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 21 15:57:12 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dinadan.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.74.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mLAO-Q5-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:57:12 -0600
Received: from giersch by dinadan.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 18mLAN-000328-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:57:11 +0100
To: Debian BTS maintonly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: psplpr: useless argument parsing (-x)
From: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: ICPS
X-Face: yL?ZRfSIk3zaRm*dlb3R4f.8RM~b/h|\wI]pL)}]l$H.Q3Qd3[h!`K6mI=+cWpg-El
B(FEm\EEdLdS{2l7,8\!RQ5aL0ZXlzzPKLxV/OQfrg/t!FGi.K[5isyT2oBNdnvk`~y}vwPYL;R
y)NYo]T8NlX{nmIUEi\a$hozWm#0GCT'e'[EMAIL
PROTECTED][g|I8{By=R8RbDeW7)S0-8:b;ZKo~9K?'
wq!G,MQ\eSt8g`)jeITEuig89NGmN^%1j!*F8~kW(yfF7W[:blRT[`w3x-C
Date: 21 Feb 2003 22:57:11 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 36
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NOSPAM_INC,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: psptools
Version: 1.2.2-7
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi,
If I understand the code correctly, the -x argument is parsed as a
synonym for --warn, which is useless: -x is already used to change
opt-prefix at the beginning of argument processing.
--- psplpr.pl.in~ Fri Feb 21 22:36:55 2003
+++ psplpr.pl.inFri Feb 21 22:37:32 2003
@@ -834,8 +834,7 @@
} elsif ($args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}silent) {
$opt_verbose = 0;
close(STDERR);
-} elsif ($args[0] eq -${opt_prefix}x
- || $args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}warn) {
+} elsif ($args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}warn) {
$opt_warn = 1;
} elsif ($args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}nodsc) {
$opt_nodsc = 1 unless $opt_nodsc;
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dinadan 2.4.19-686 #1 Tue Nov 19 00:52:59 EST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages psptools depends on:
ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
--
Arnaud
---
Received: (at 181973-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:26 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:24 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoGi-0005OL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:24 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 0C5D626BC7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3A7C223D49; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html
for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#160172: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of linuxconf on i386)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2002 03:39:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 08 22:39:43 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17oFOn-00083k-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 22:39:42 -0500 Received: from atoron (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id MAA28845 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:39:10 +0900 X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be atoron Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 12:39:16 +0900 From: Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: submit bug tracking system [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of linuxconf on i386 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: Netfort project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 linuxconf fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build. I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your package from source. It is a serious problem that your source does not build from source using the information provided in your control files, and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution. This build was done using pbuilder package. This package build-deps on libgd-dev, which depends on libpng3-dev. This package build-deps on libpng2-dev, which is not parallel-installable. Please switch over to png3. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer --- Received: (at 160172-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:36 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#161867: marked as done (linuxconf: 2 violations of Debian PAM mini-policy)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2002 06:24:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 22 01:24:09 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from agrenoble-102-1-2-41.abo.wanadoo.fr (jophur.dyndns.org) [80.13.2.41] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17t0A5-0005XU-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 01:24:09 -0500 Received: from laurent by jophur.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17t0A1-0001om-00; Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:24:06 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf: 2 violations of Debian PAM mini-policy X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.60 Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 08:24:05 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 Severity: normal Hi, according to /usr/share/doc/libpam0g/Debian-PAM-MiniPolicy.gz /etc/pam.d/linuxconf-pair is wrong in 2 respects: 1. it uses a full path to the PAM module (/lib/security/pam_pwdb.so instead of pam_pwdb.so): The file should _not_ reference the full path of the modules. It only needs to reference the basename (eg. pam_unix.so). This will ensure that the program continues to work even if the module location changes, since libpam itself will resolve the location. 2. it uses pam_pwdb.so instead of pam_unix.so: Under no circumstances should any program in Debian use the pam_pwdb.so module by default. Instead the pam_unix.so module should be used. Most programs with RedHat support/default files will reference pam_pwdb.so in their example files. Do not use this. There are several problems with regard to pam_pwdb.so: ... -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux jophur 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc62.2.5-14.3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-17Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgd1 1.8.4-20GD Graphics Library ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 0.72-35 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng2 1.0.12-6PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-11 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-2 GNOME XML library ii logrotate3.6.5-1 Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.07Basic TCP/IP networking system ii python2.12.1.3-10An interactive object-oriented scr ii sysvinit 2.84-3 System-V like init. ii xlibs4.2.1-0pre1v1 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 161867-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:35 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
Bug#152843: marked as done (dired fail in emacs20-dl with Japanese locale)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:13 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2002 13:59:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 13 08:59:11 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ylug.mozilla.gr.jp (maison.kyo-ko.org) [203.141.142.92] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17TNQV-0004tA-00; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:59:11 -0500
Received: from triton2 (61-27-130-106.home.ne.jp [61.27.130.106])
by maison.kyo-ko.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACAC24E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:59:02 +0900 (JST)
Received: by triton2 (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A3146117759; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:59:01 +0900 (JST)
X-Mailer: cmail 2.61.1+20011011 on GNU Emacs 20.7.2 / Mule 4.1
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?KBskQjAqGyhCKQ==?=
From: Hiroshi Miura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dired fail in emacs20-dl with Japanese locale
X-Face: 7/]{D;9O-#dR'kB\tvpz_:#o|*UdC.KK/_IN*i5VTUEBhS6w68xQDPh]i4N%1byZ~v~X
k$vdp([EMAIL
PROTECTED]|7x7Ht)^ih5\%\l'hcl$`sqp;%`boxPHDJB~Sr8(e:zPKmeZ)ZPml[0v\|[V00Jm
G,%5V5X9Mw7j}(8+!owmQ]Xh=j
User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNW0lTkMrGyhC?=) FLIM/1.14.3
(=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQCZLNThmTk1BMBsoQg==?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7
(i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCMCobKEI=?=)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - =?ISO-2022-JP?B?IhskQjVtGyhC?=
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU5DKxsoQiI=?=)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:59:01 +0900 (JST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: emacs20-dl
Version: 20.7-14.3
I use dired-mode on japanese environment.
From some time, a ls output format of japanese locale is changed on sid,
then dired-mode fails.
ls format (LANG=ja_JP.eucJP)
before:
mm月dd or mm月dd HH:MM
now:
-mm-dd or mm-dd HH:MM
emacs20 package may also have same bug.
so we should change dired.el. patch is follows:
--- dired.el.orig Tue Nov 30 00:04:12 1999
+++ dired.elSat Jul 13 22:44:59 2002
@@ -1363,7 +1363,7 @@
(month (concat l l +[.]?,? *))
;; Recognize any non-ASCII character.
;; The purpose is to match a Kanji character.
-(k [^\0-\177])
+;; (k [^\0-\177])
;; (k [^\x00-\x7f\x80-\xff])
(s )
( [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@
;; weiand: changed: year potentially unaligned
;;olds \\( HH:MM \\| s \\| s \\)))
s \\( HH:MM \\| s ? \\| s \\)))
-(japanese (concat mm k s dd k s \\( s HH:MM \\| k \\
+(japanese (concat \\( - mm - dd \\| mm - dd s HH:MM
\\
;; The [0-9] below requires the previous column to end in a digit.
;; This avoids recognizing `1 may 1997' as a date in the line:
;; -r--r--r-- 1 may 19971168 Oct 19 16:49 README
Hiroshi Miura --- http://www.da-cha.org/
NTTDATA Corp. Marketing Business Strategy Planning Dept. --- [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 9117 9407 5684 FBF1 4063 15B4 401D D077 04AB 8617
-- My hacking life is happy as the day is long
---
Received: (at 152843-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:23 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoGg-0005NI-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 7EB6A26B2C; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 41E2423D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:13 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:13 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package
Bug#112769: marked as done (linuxconf: complains when lilo is removed)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2001 12:24:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 19 07:24:14 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bacchus.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.21] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15jgOk-0007Pl-00; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:24:14 -0500 Received: from irancy.lis.inpg.fr ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [195.220.21.167]) by bacchus.lis.inpg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/cf de Bacchus - 25/05/2000) with ESMTP id OAA09412; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:24:12 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by irancy.lis.inpg.fr with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15jgOi-0005Au-00; Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:24:12 +0200 From: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf: complains when lilo is removed X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:24:12 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: laurent bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r1-1 Severity: normal Hi, I have removed the lilo package from this system (I'm using grub), but it still had the config file /etc/lilo.conf. In this situation, linuxconf complains that /sbin/lilo is missing. linuxconf could either: - probe the state (installed/removed/purged) of the Debian package - not complain when the /sbin/lilo binary is missing -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.9-686 #1 Sun Aug 19 10:46:52 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-11 Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgd1 1.8.4-7 GD Graphics Library ii libncurses55.2.20010318-3Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 0.72-31 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng21.0.12-2 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010902 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml11:1.8.16-1GNOME XML library ii logrotate 3.5.9-1 Log rotation utility ii netbase4.06 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii sysvinit 2.82-1System-V like init. ii xlibs 4.1.0-6 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-16compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 112769-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:49 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#158637: marked as done ([dendler@idefense.com: iDEFENSE Security Advisory: Linuxconf locally exploitable buffer overflow])
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2002 16:31:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 28 11:31:26 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17k5j4-Sr-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:31:26 -0500 Received: from 209-6-103-23.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.103.23] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #6) id 17k5j4-0001si-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:31:26 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17k5j6-0001Qz-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:31:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:31:28 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: iDEFENSE Security Advisory: Linuxconf locally exploitable buffer overflow] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Severity: grave Tags: security - Forwarded message from David Endler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:58:53 -0400 From: David Endler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: iDEFENSE Security Advisory: Linuxconf locally exploitable buffer overflow iDEFENSE Security Advisory 08.28.2002 Linuxconf locally exploitable buffer overflow vulnerability DESCRIPTION A vulnerability exists in linuxconf which if the LINUXCONF_LANG environment variable processes at least 964 bytes of data, a buffer overflow occurs, thereby allowing an attacker to modify the return address of the function and execute arbitrary code with root permissions. iDEFENSE has an exploit that allows a local user to launch a root shell on Red Hat Linux 7.3 by targeting the latest version of linuxconf 1.28r3. ANALYSIS According to the author of Linuxconf, Jacques Gelinas [EMAIL PROTECTED], linuxconf picks the variable and uses it to format a path using snprintf. This works fine. In fact, the receiving buffer is PATH_MAX large so even a 1000 characters variable won't overflow it and even if this was the case, snprintf would do its work. Once the path is formatted, the corresponding file is opened. If the file do not exist, an error message is formatted in a string. This was the problem and sprintf was used instead of snprintf there. There are two fixes. One is to use snprintf to format error message at this place and the other is to look for appropriate length for this variable (max 5 characters) immediately when it is found. DETECTION This vulnerability affects any version of linuxconf (essentially 6 years worth of distributions) that is installed setuid root. Generally, the four ways in which this utility can be installed setuid are: 1.) Shipped by vendor (Red Hat does not ship linuxconf setuid, but Mandrake does as do other linux vendors) 2.) Installed by RPM from the main site (http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/) for each particular linux OS (installs setuid root by default) 3.) Installed by source code also from main site (http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/) but prompts for whether to install setuid root 4.) Installed in ways 1, 2, or 3 and manually set to setuid root by the user for added functionality. WORKAROUND Remove the setuid bit from the linuxconf binary: $ chmod u-s /bin/linuxconf VENDOR RESPONSE iDEFENSE immediately contacted Jacques Gelinas and he provided a source code patch. iDEFENSE verified that the vulnerability is mitigated in the newer distribution (1.28r4) of linuxconf. An updated version (1.28r4) of linuxconf which addresses this vulnerability will be available on August 28, 2002 at http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ . Affected Linux vendors will make updates available August 28th, 2002. DISCLOSURE TIMELINE August 9, 2002 - Exclusively disclosed to iDEFENSE August 19, 2002 - Disclosed to Vendor August 19, 2002 - Disclosed to iDEFENSE clients August 21, 2002 - Announcement to [EMAIL PROTECTED] August 28, 2002 - Coordinated public disclosure by Linux vendors, Linuxconf
Bug#101160: marked as done (emacs20-dl: copypaste problem)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:13 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2001 01:01:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 16 20:01:36 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from surfchem0.riken.go.jp [:::134.160.25.161] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15BQwa-0004Sl-00; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 20:01:36 -0500 Received: from surfchem0.riken.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by surfchem0.riken.go.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009D51C112 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:06:56 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:06:51 +0900 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: emacs20-dl: copypaste problem Mail-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.1 (Purple Rain) EMY/1.13.8 (Tastes differ) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.1 (AOI) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] package: emacs20-dl version: 20.7-7 Please inform this report to the upstream. A bug report for GNU Emacs with X selection (i.e., copypaste). My Environment - Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable, developing version) i386. - GNU libc 2.2.3 - XFree86 4.0.3 - GNU Emacs 20.7.2 What I do? 1. Invoked Emacs without -nw. 2. Type C-h H to display many languages on Emacs. 3. By drugging mouse with pushing left button, Choose three Japanese characters (Ni-Hon-Go) which mean Japanese language. 4. Go to Rxvt (compiled with multibyte language support) and push middle button of mouse, to paste the characters. 5. I found (BF|K\8lB is inserted instead of correct Japanese three characters. This is the bug. 6. Reproductivity: paste into Xedit (distributed with XFree86) results in beep and ILLEGAL SELECTION in Xedit window. Not only Japanese words but also Chinese (traditional and simplified), Korean, Russian, and Greek also fails. Analysis I inserted a hook code into XChangeProperty() of libX11 to report the content of data parameter. When I selected the three Japanese characters of Ni-Hon-Go and pasted it into Rxvt, the hook code reported (in hexadigimal) data=1b 24 28 42 46 7c 4b 5c 38 6c 1b 28 42 Since Rxvt requires selection in COMPOUND_TEXT format, this is a COMPOUND_TEXT byte sequence which Emacs generated. The first four bytes means designate JIS X 0208 into G0. Following six bytes are JIS X 0208 expression of Japanese three characters. The last three bytes means designate US ASCII into G0. Paste into Xedit, not Rxvt, made the same byte sequence. Rxvt receives the byte sequence using XmbTextPropertyToTextList() function. I checked the return value of the function and found it returns three. This means that XmbTextPropertyToTextList() failed to process the last three bytes. Then Rxvt thinks the selection byte sequence is illegal and falls into pasting the raw byte sequence. This is the cause of the bug behavior. I tested with many selections from Emacs and found that all non-ASCII and non-ISO-8859-1 selections have a final escape to designate ASCII in G0 and ISO-8859-1 in G1. Here, to fix this bug behavior, we can consider three ways. 1. Modify Emacs not to generate the final escape sequence. 2. Modify X11 library (XmbTextPropertyToTextList()) to ignore the final escape sequence. 3. Modify X clients (many!) to ignore positive return value of XmbTextPropertyToTextList(). I think 3 is bad beacuse positive return value may be caused by really illegal sequence. Then, which of 1 or 2? COMPOUND_TEXT is described in xc/doc/specs/CTEXT/CTEXT.txt in XFree86 (or X.org) distribution. Though it mentions the *initial* state, it doesn't mention about the final state. Thus, Emacs doesn't need to set the final state into ASCII + ISO8859-1. In conclusion, I think Emacs should be modified to fix this bug. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/ Introduction to I18N http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/ --- Received: (at 101160-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:57 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:56 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NI-00;
Bug#110796: marked as done (linuxconf and samba in inetd mode)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2001 11:50:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 31 06:50:53 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr [193.55.51.34] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 15cmp2-0003AL-00; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:50:52 -0500 Received: from pc-dg-116-1.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr ([193.55.51.153] ident=mail) by meije.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15cmoW-0008Nm-00; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:50:20 +0200 Received: from bonnaud by pc-dg-116-1.iut2.upmf-grenoble.fr with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15cmoW-00081h-00; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:50:20 +0200 From: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf and samba in inetd mode X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:50:20 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Laurent Bonnaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26-1 Severity: normal Hi, when I installed Samba on this machine, I had the choice between 2 modes: - daemon mode where Samba process is always running - inetd mode where Samba in started on demand and I chose the inetd mode. When I run linuxconf and exit, it always displays this message : Service samba is not running Executing: /etc/rc2.d/S20samba start And thank you for this new linuxconf version ! -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pc-dg-116-1 2.4.9-686 #1 Sun Aug 19 10:46:52 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc6 2.2.4-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb2 2:2.7.7.0-1 The Berkeley database routines (ru ii libgd1 1.8.4-7 GD Graphics Library ii libncurses55.2.20010318-3Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 0.72-30 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng21.0.12-2 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.010827 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml11:1.8.15-1GNOME XML library ii logrotate 3.5.7-3 Log rotation utility ii netbase4.06 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii sysvinit 2.82-1System-V like init. ii xlibs 4.1.0-3 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.3-16compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 110796-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:58 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL
Bug#58084: marked as done (linuxconf: Wrong permissons on /etc/linuxconf/archive/* ?)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Feb 2000 15:04:09 + Received: (qmail 2481 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2000 15:04:07 - Received: from main.tenet.pl (HELO tenet.pl) (195.205.44.70) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Feb 2000 15:04:07 - Received: (qmail 14123 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Feb 2000 15:02:45 - Date: 14 Feb 2000 15:02:44 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf: Wrong permissons on /etc/linuxconf/archive/* ? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.9 Package: linuxconf Version: 1.17r1-1 Severity: grave Linuxconf seems to create archive of shadow file with permissions a+r. Althought /etc/linuxconf/archive directory has permissions go-rwx, this may be dengerous if an administrator change permisson to the 'archive' direcory. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux main 2.2.13 #2 SMP Sun Jan 30 12:26:02 CET 2000 i586 unknown Versions of the packages linuxconf depends on: ii freetype2 1.3.1-1The FREE TrueType Font Engine, shared librar ii libc6 2.1.3-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libgd1g1.7.3-0.1 GD Graphics Library ii libncurses44.2-8 Shared libraries for terminal handling ii libpng21.0.5-0.1 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-5 The GNU stdc++ library ii logrotate 3.2-11 Log rotation utility ii netbase3.16-10Basic TCP/IP networking binaries ii sysvinit 2.78-1 System-V like init. ii zlib1g 1.1.3-5compression library - runtime ^^^ (Provides virtual package libz1) --- Received: (at 58084-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:23 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#85055: marked as done (xmbase-grok: can't load font...)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2001 10:16:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 06 04:16:06 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de [:::132.195.64.1] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14Q5AL-0003zm-00; Tue, 06 Feb 2001 04:16:05 -0600 Received: from wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de [132.195.20.7]) by mail.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA278763718; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:15:55 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by wrpc3.urz.uni-wuppertal.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id LAA01695; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:15:54 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 11:15:54 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Hubert Palme [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xmbase-grok: can't load font... To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xmbase-grok Version: 1.4.3-4 Severity: important The program crashes with th message grok: can't load font -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1,-adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1=BOLD,-adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1=ITALIC But the fonts are definitely available: wrpc3 [10:16] ~xlsfonts -fn '-adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1' -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 wrpc3 [10:16] ~xlsfonts -fn '-adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1' -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-bold-r-normal--12-120-75-75-p-70-iso8859-1 wrpc3 [10:16] ~xlsfonts -fn '-adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1' -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 -adobe-helvetica-medium-o-normal--12-120-75-75-p-67-iso8859-1 wrpc3 [10:17] ~ -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux wrpc3 2.2.17 #1 Fri Oct 27 12:35:32 CEST 2000 i686 unknown Versions of the packages xmbase-grok depends on: ii lesstif1 0.89.4-3 OSF/Motif implementation released under LGPL ii libc6 2.1.3-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii xlib6g 3.3.6-11potato shared libraries required by X clients --- Received: (at 85055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:05 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ax-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id A447526BB4; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A68923D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:47 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#152831: marked as done (conf.modules depreciated but still created by linuxconf)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2002 09:14:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 13 04:14:00 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tail.sads.com (sadsho.sads.com) [213.210.36.107] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17TIyW-0008EF-00; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 04:14:00 -0500 Received: by sadsho.sads.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id 3Z75RZKD; Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:09:56 +0100 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jon Rowlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: conf.modules depreciated but still created by linuxconf Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 10:09:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: Linuxconf version : 1.17r5-2 Whilst trying to use a number of different rtl8139 ethernet cards, I have modified the contents in /etc/modutils/aliases to correctly include the modules to load at boot time. In addition, I have tried to use linuxconf to configure other settings. linuxconf creates a file called conf.modules in /etc whereas what appears to be required by modprobe is modules.conf Once this file has been created by linuxconf, modprobe complains that the use of conf.modules has been depreciated. I presume that it means that this functionality has been replaced in recent revisions and that the filename has been changed around. removing this file and manually updating the details in /etc/network/interfaces the network card is now working properly and can connect to the LAN. (also applies to linuxconf-x with the same version number) jON Jon Rowlan Consultant Director, SADS Ltd phone +44 (0) 1622 600 007 fax +44 (0) 1622 761 046 --- Received: (at 152831-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:38 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#123785: marked as done (Linuxconf segfaults when dumping configs)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Dec 2001 06:18:45 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 13 00:18:45 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16EPCf-0008Gr-00; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:18:45 -0600
Received: from attbi.com ([12.228.152.165]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP
id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:18:14 +
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 22:18:14 -0800
From: Frank P. Miles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linuxconf segfaults when dumping configs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package:linuxconf
Version:1.26r4-1
When using linuxconf to dump a set of configuration files
('Control Panel' - 'Archive configurations'), after the
first dozen files processed it dumps for good:
Archiving Office
Archiving /etc/ssh/sshd_config, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/X11/XF86Config, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/sysconfig/mouse, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/sysctl.conf, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/apt/vendors.list, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/apt/sources.list, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/hostname, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/default/rcS, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/syslog.conf, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/gated.conf, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/networks, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/quota.conf, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/X11/XMetroconfig, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/Xaccel.ini, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/X11/XF86Config, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/XF86Config, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/shells, version Home-Office
Archiving /usr/share/locale/locale.alias, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/conf.linuxconf-base, version Home-Office
Archiving /etc/conf.linuxconf-bind, version Home-Office
Archiving , version Home-Office
Segmentation fault
Thanks for all your work on Debian!
-frank
---
Received: (at 123785-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:39 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html
for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170483: marked as done (linuxconf_1.26r4-2.1(m68k/unstable/zeus): fails to build from source)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2002 02:03:54 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 23 20:03:54 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail305.mail.bellsouth.net (imf05bis.bellsouth.net) [205.152.58.165] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Fm7l-0006XB-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:54 -0600 Received: from loki ([216.78.168.67]) by imf05bis.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:05:11 -0500 Received: from marenks by loki with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Fm7F-Wq-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:21 -0600 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:21 -0600 From: Stephen R Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf_1.26r4-2.1(m68k/unstable/zeus): fails to build from source Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: Stephen R. Marenka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build on release candidate arch. Tags: sid linuxconf fails to build from source. Here are selected excerpts from the buildd log. | Automatic build of linuxconf_1.26r4-2.1 on zeus by sbuild/m68k 1.170 | Build started at 20021123-0044 | ** [...] | ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: | Build-Depends: debhelper (= 3.0.40), libncurses5-dev, libpng3-dev, libgd-dev (= 1.8.3), libdb3-dev, libpam0g-dev, libxml-dev, python-dev (= 2.1) [...] | dh_undocumented -a | dh_installchangelogs -plinuxconf | dh_strip -a | strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN! | strip: Warning: Output file cannot represent architecture UNKNOWN! | dh_compress -a | dh_fixperms -a | dh_installdeb -a | dh_makeshlibs -a | dh_shlibdeps -a | dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: could not find path for liblinuxconf.so.1 | dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/linuxconf/usr/lib/linuxconf/lib/XFmousereset' gave error exit status 1 | dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 256 | make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 | ** | Build finished at 20021123-0735 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] | -- A full buildd log is available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=linuxconfver=1.26r4-2.1arch=m68k Other buildd logs may be available at http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=linuxconf -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 170483-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:34 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#26831: marked as done (Various problems with psplpr)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 1998 16:25:34 +
Received: (qmail 29625 invoked from network); 18 Sep 1998 16:25:29 -
Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it (HELO fly.cnuce.cnr.it) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 18 Sep 1998 16:25:29 -
Received: by fly.cnuce.cnr.it
id m0zK3LV-0008QiC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2); Fri, 18 Sep 1998 18:25:21
+0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 18:25:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Francesco Potorti` [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Linux bug list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Various problems with psplpr
Organization: CNUCE-CNR, Via S.Maria 36, Pisa - Italy +39-50-593211
Package: psptools
Version: 1.2.2-2
Severity: normal
Many problems.
1) A small one I corrected is that no newline is emitted when the --ppdpath
option is used. Here is a fix, but I am not a perl programmer:
--- /usr/bin/psplpr Mon Sep 16 09:37:24 1996
+++ /usr/local/bin/psplpr Fri Sep 18 17:16:47 1998
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@
exit(0);
} elsif ($args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}ppdpath) {
- print ppd::ppdpath();
+ print ppd::ppdpath() . \n;
exit(0);
} elsif ($args[0] eq --${lopt_prefix}help) {
usage(0);
2) Another problem is that psplpr wants a printcap entry to be made like
this:
LWPT|lwpt|Stampante centralino\
:ty=LW8500:\
:bk:lp=:\
:rm=prtsrv0:\
:rp=lw8500pt:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/remote:\
:af=/var/log/lpremote/acct:\
:lf=/var/log/lpremote/log:\
:mx#0:\
:sh:
while I use to write them like this, which is legal by lpr standards:
LWPT
|lwpt
|Stampante centralino
:ty=LW8500
:bk:lp=
:rm=prtsrv0
:rp=lw8500pt
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/remote
:af=/var/log/lpremote/acct
:lf=/var/log/lpremote/log
:mx#0
:sh:
Notice that the names of the printer are on ddifferent lines, that entries
do not necessarily end with a colon, and that newlines are not escaped.
3) If no PRINTER env var is defined (nor any of the other names known by
psptools), it uses lp as the printer. It would be wise to use the
first printer in printcap, or else the default_printer entry, just like
lpr does..
4) PPD files must end with .ppd. This is a useless requirement, in my
opinion.
5) The most important of all: Apple laserwriter ppd files for LW640 and
lw8500 are not parsed at all: a --show all outputs nothing. I append
the former.
*PPD-Adobe: 4.3
*% Adobe Systems PostScript(R) Printer Description File
*% Copyright 1987-1996 Adobe Systems Incorporated and
*% Apple Computer Incorporated.
*% All Rights Reserved.
*% Permission is granted for redistribution of this file as
*% long as this copyright notice is intact and the contents
*% of the file is not altered in any way from its original form.
*% End of Copyright statement
*FormatVersion: 4.3
*FileVersion: 1.1
*LanguageEncoding: ISOLatin1
*LanguageVersion: English
*PCFileName: APLWMGS1.PPD
*Manufacturer: Apple
*Product: (LaserWriter 12/640 PS)
*PSVersion: (2015.105) 1
*ModelName: LaserWriter 12/640 PS
*ShortNickName: Apple LaserWriter 12/640 PS
*NickName: Apple LaserWriter 12/640 PS v2015.105
*% === Options and Constraints =
*OpenGroup: InstallableOptions/Options Installed
*OpenUI *InstalledMemory/Memory Configuration: PickOne
*DefaultInstalledMemory: 4Meg
*InstalledMemory 4Meg/Standard 4 Mb:
*InstalledMemory 8Meg/Upgrade to 8 Mb:
*InstalledMemory 12Meg/Upgrade to 12Mb:
*InstalledMemory 16Meg/Upgrade to 16Mb:
*InstalledMemory 20Meg/Upgrade to 20Mb:
*InstalledMemory 24Meg/Upgrade to 24Mb:
*InstalledMemory 32Meg/Upgrade to 32Mb:
*InstalledMemory 36Meg/Upgrade to 36Mb:
*InstalledMemory 40Meg/Upgrade to 40Mb:
*InstalledMemory 48Meg/Upgrade to 48Mb:
*InstalledMemory 64Meg/Upgrade to 64Mb:
*?InstalledMemory:
save
currentsystemparams /RamSize get
1048576 div cvi 6 string cvs dup length dup 3 add string dup 0 4 index
putinterval dup 2 index (Meg) putinterval exch pop exch pop = flush
restore
*End
*CloseUI: *InstalledMemory
*OpenUI *OptionalCassette1/Cassette (Optional): PickOne
*DefaultOptionalCassette1: False
*OptionalCassette1 True/Installed:
*OptionalCassette1 False/Not Installed:
Bug#142566: marked as done (linuxconf can't find fetchmail help files)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2002 17:57:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 12 12:57:06 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from yktgi01e0-s3.watson.ibm.com (wyvern.diz.watson.ibm.com) [198.81.209.17] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16w5II-0005wv-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:57:06 -0500 Received: from jlquinn by wyvern.diz.watson.ibm.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16w5Hn-0007fi-00; Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:56:35 -0400 From: Jerry Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf can't find fetchmail help files X-Mailer: reportbug 1.49 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:56:35 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Jerry Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2 Severity: normal In linuxconf, I go to config-networking-remote mail servers(fetchmail). Here, I select the Help button. I receive the following error message: Help file help.eng/fetchmailconf/fetchmailconf not yet written The appropriate help files seem to be in the directory /usr/lib/linuxconf/help.eng/fetchmailconf/ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux wyvern 2.4.18-686 #2 Wed Mar 20 20:21:31 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc62.2.5-4 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb3 3.2.9-15Berkeley v3 Database Libraries [ru ii libgd1 1.8.4-15GD Graphics Library ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-5 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libpam0g 0.72-35 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libpng2 1.0.12-3PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-5 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml1 1:1.8.17-2 GNOME XML library ii logrotate3.5.9-7 Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.07Basic TCP/IP networking system ii python2.12.1.2-3 An interactive object-oriented scr ii sysvinit 2.84-2 System-V like init. ii xlibs4.1.0-14X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-1 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 142566-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:39 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#170001: marked as done (youbin: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2002 07:23:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 21 01:22:55 2002 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net (albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net) [207.217.120.120] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18Elfq-0003XD-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:22:54 -0600 Received: from user-vcaunmd.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.94.205] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18Elfq-0006CB-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:54 -0800 Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Elfq-00032u-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:54 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: youbin: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:54 -0800 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: youbin Severity: normal This source package Build-Depends on libxaw-dev, which is wrong because it's a pure virtual package. You need to specify a specific version of libxaw-dev to be used (either libxaw6-dev or, preferably, libxaw7-dev). (This is an automatically generated bug report based on an initial template and on the contents of the Sources file for the main section.) --- Received: (at 170001-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:14 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ay-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id B4A0126BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97AA723D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#181971: marked as done (psptools: psplpr loops with --dontincfeatures option)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Feb 2003 21:55:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 21 15:55:49 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dinadan.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.74.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18mL91-LK-00; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:55:47 -0600
Received: from giersch by dinadan.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 18mL90-0002zv-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:55:46 +0100
To: Debian BTS submit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: psptools: psplpr loops with --dontincfeatures option
From: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Feb 2003 22:55:41 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lines: 57
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Arnaud Giersch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: psptools
Version: 1.2.2-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Using option --dontincfeatures makes psplpr looping:
$ psplpr --dontincfeatures -o - foo.ps
%!PS-Adobe-2.0
[...]
%%BeginSetup
%%Feature: *Resolution 600dpi
%%Feature: *Resolution 600dpi
%%Feature: *Resolution 600dpi
[... line repeated infinitely ...]
foo.ps is a simple file generated with latex+dvips (which I can
provide if needed).
I tried to trace the problem and found that the following patch solves
the problem. But as I don't speak Perl natively and I have no idea
what psplpr is supposed to do here, I don't know if it is correct.
--- psplpr.pl.in~ Fri Feb 21 14:22:52 2003
+++ psplpr.pl.inFri Feb 21 21:32:13 2003
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@
$_ = readpsline($conformant);
};
-while ($_) {
+for ( ; $_ ; $_ = readpsline($conformant)) {
if (!$code) {
last if (!/^%%/);
}
@@ -476,7 +476,6 @@
}
}
- $_ = readpsline($conformant);
}
return ($_, $ps);
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dinadan 2.4.19-686 #1 Tue Nov 19 00:52:59 EST 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Versions of packages psptools depends on:
ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
--
Arnaud
---
Received: (at 181971-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:26 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19EoGi-0005OL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:24 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 0C5D626BC7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3A7C223D49; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:16 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been
orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html
for more information.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#18518: marked as done (xcoral: too little documentation)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Feb 1998 12:01:52 + Received: (qmail 19777 invoked from network); 23 Feb 1998 12:01:51 - Received: from mail1.rrz.uni-koeln.de (134.95.80.223) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 1998 12:01:51 - Received: from axp1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [134.95.100.216]) by mail1.rrz.uni-koeln.de (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id NAA11092 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 13:01:45 +0100 (MET) From: Kerstin Hoef-Emden [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost by axp1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (5.65v4.0/1.1.8.2/23Apr94-0300PM) id AA29700; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 13:01:42 +0100 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 13:01:42 +0100 (MET) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bugreport? Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII package: xcoral_3.1_2.deb Hi there! I just want to add a comment on the above mentioned package, which I got from ftp.de.debian.org (out of hamm/hamm) belonging to the future-to-be Debian 2-release. This looks like a nice text editor to me, but unfortunately I am missing some help how to set up this thing. When installing the package with dpkg, no man-pages were included. The example-file is not commented, just a line-up of things and the help included in xcoral itself is not much of a help when it comes to setting up this soft. I would really like to use it under x but I am no programmer or informatics student, so I am really dependend on some kind of additional information. Best wishes, Kerstin -- ## ## # Kerstin Hoef-Emden Universitaet zu Koeln# # Botanisches Institut # # Lehrstuhl I # ## # [EMAIL PROTECTED]Gyrhofstr. 15# # Tel.: +49-221-470-4504 D-50931 Koeln# # Fax.: +49-221-470-5181 (Germany)# ## ## --- Received: (at 18518-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:31 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005aw-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9465926BAF; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D51323D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#188936: marked as done (linuxconf: v1.26r4-2.1 gives error message from 'remadmin')
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2003 03:04:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 13 22:04:04 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx04.gis.net [208.218.130.12] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 194uGK-0004eK-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 22:04:04 -0500 Received: from arf ([67.30.188.253]) by mx04.gis.net; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:04:01 -0400 Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 194uJD-Lm-00; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:07:03 -0400 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: linuxconf: v1.26r4-2.1 gives error message from 'remadmin' To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: nunya biznis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:07:03 -0400 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.44 X-Spam-Level: * Package: linuxconf Version: 1.26r4-2.1 Severity: important 'linuxconf' used to work for me, but running it now shows: #linuxconf Module pythonmod does not exist Error message from remadmin :/bin/remadmin: 36: Syntax error: Bad fd number Then nothing, it doesn't close. I have to do Ctrl-C to get the command prompt back. Looking at the code of '/bin/remadmin', (a shell script), line 36 is: echo No suitable linuxconf front-end installed. Hope this helps... -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux Arf 2.4.20-1-k6 #1 Sat Mar 22 14:38:19 EST 2003 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages linuxconf depends on: ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libgd1-xpm 1.8.4-32 GD Graphics Library ii libncurses55.3.20021109-2 Shared libraries for terminal handling ii libpam0g 0.76-9 Pluggable Authentication Modules library ii libpng12-0 1.2.5-11 PNG library - runtime ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-17 The GNU stdc++ library ii libxml11.8.17-2 GNOME XML library ii logrotate 3.6.5-2Log rotation utility ii netbase4.09 Basic TCP/IP networking system ii sysvinit 2.84-3 System-V like init. ii zlib1g 1.1.4-11 compression library - runtime rc libgd1-noxpm 1.8.4-32 GD Graphics Library (without XPM support) --- Ignoring conffile /etc/conf.linuxconf (not world readable) --- Received: (at 188936-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:41:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:41:33 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoGg-0005NL-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:41:23 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id C121326BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E523D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:43 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it
Bug#4159: marked as done (xcoral dies)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 1996 20:54:15 + Received: (qmail-queue invoked from smtpd); 14 Aug 1996 20:36:15 - Received: from unknown (HELO tad.micro.umn.edu) (192.77.155.13) by master.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 1996 20:36:15 - Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 1000); 14 Aug 1996 20:32:25 - Date: 14 Aug 1996 20:32:25 - Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xcoral dies Package: xcoral Version: 2.5-1 Today, I decided to try xcoral. The first operation I tried, upon starting it, was New. This was sufficient to kill the program, with the error message: X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 12 (X_ConfigureWindow) Value in failed request: 0x0 Serial number of failed request: 924 Current serial number in output stream: 930 It may be relevant that I'm using 9wm. -- Raul --- Received: (at 4159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:05 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005aw-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9465926BAF; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D51323D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#22499: marked as done (xcoral: toolbar buttons and mouse block selection bug)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 1998 21:12:05 + Received: (qmail 16607 invoked from network); 15 May 1998 21:12:05 - Received: from smtp3.erols.com (207.172.3.236) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 15 May 1998 21:12:05 - Received: from erols.com (207-172-74-144.s144.tnt2.man.erols.com [207.172.74.144]) by smtp3.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14137 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 May 1998 17:12:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 17:10:11 -0700 From: Bob Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win16; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xcoral Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: xcoral Version: 3.14-2 Maintainer: Christophe Le Bars [EMAIL PROTECTED] Depends: libc6, xlib6g (= 3.3-5) Architecture: i386 Filename: dists/frozen/main/binary-i386/editors/xcoral_3.14-2.deb MD5sum: 5afd45f9ff6255efc1a3a0553f243556 Description: Extensible mouse-based text editor for X. This is a multiwindow mouse-based text editor for the X Window System. If there is a toolbar button for cut, there should have been one for copy first. The bar is not crowded, but at least there should be a key-button(cut) combination to copy. Block selection by mouse shares the primeval one-off bug of dosedit, which was fixed in Windows eons ago. --Bob Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 22499-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:30 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005aw-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9465926BAF; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D51323D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:37 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#93704: marked as done (no manpage for sendto yet)
Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2001 05:55:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 00:55:12 2001 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.ajato.com.br [200.212.26.130] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14na4V-0005Yf-00; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 00:55:12 -0500 Received: from carlos (200.255.115.58) by mail.ajato.com.br (5.1.061) id 3AD2D8C26946; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:54:37 -0300 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (added by [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: no manpage for sendto yet X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15 X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:54:35 -0300 Bcc: Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: youbin Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-12 Severity: normal youbin lacks a manpage for the simple program sendto. Perhaps someone can write one, but I think it's pretty much useless. Besides, I bet one would need japanese skills. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux carlos 2.4.3 #2 Thu Apr 5 23:04:18 UTC 2001 i586 --- Received: (at 93704-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2003 10:42:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 05:42:05 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19EoHN-0005ay-00; Sun, 11 May 2003 05:42:05 -0500 Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id B4A0126BB7; Sun, 11 May 2003 12:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97AA723D48; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:41:57 +1000 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Removed Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#101160: marked as done (emacs20-dl: copypaste problem)
On Sun, May 11, 2003 at 05:48:13AM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Your message dated Sun, 11 May 2003 20:40:13 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. [...] package: emacs20-dl version: 20.7-7 Please inform this report to the upstream. A bug report for GNU Emacs with X selection (i.e., copypaste). [...] This package has been removed from Debian unstable because it has been orphaned for a very long time and nobody adopted it. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200304/msg5.html for more information. Have you verified that current versions of Emacs don't suffer from this bug or #152843? (Well, actually, according to the log of #152843 bugs have been reported against other Emacs versions; but even there I'd have been inclined to reassign and merge rather than closing so that the submitter gets proper notification when the bug is really fixed.) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libparagui1.0 override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): libparagui1.0_1.0.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libs. libparagui1.0-dev_1.0.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says libdevel. paragui-themes_1.0.2-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel, override says misc. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Bug#192980: elm-me+: recompile against libssl0.9.7
Package: elm-me+ Version: 2.4pl25ME+100-2 Severity: wishlist Please, consider recompiling Elm against newer libssl so we can purge libssl0.9.6 from our systems. Thanks, - Peter.
