looking for free software to interactively extract models from images with

2013-03-01 Thread Dan Hitt
Hi All,

I'm looking for a piece of free software that can display images
(such as jpg) and interactively extract data (or form models)
from them.

So this would be something like the measure tool in gimp,
but much more involved: instead of having a single line segment
which you compare with the horizontal (as in the gimp),
you could form and save complexes of points and lines.

Saved along with these complexes would be their
associated lengths and angles, and you could then use them
on other images (such as by identifying
corresponding points on two different photographs).  Perhaps
other options would include some kind of transform, so that
you might select the vertices of a quadrilateral and transform
the images so that your four-sided figure becomes a rectangle.

So i'd be grateful for any suggestions on what piece of free
software comes closest to being able to do this.

Or, if this is the wrong group, please steer me (but i'm
asking here because the people who post here have such
a breadth of knowledge about so many topics).

(I think i'd prefer something compiled over something interpreted,
and probably something written in python over something
written in java, but beggars cannot be choosers, so interested
in any leads whatsoever.)

Thanks in advance!

dan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAOphizJc65=xr_6ro+p3ooa5kx3fk6+fwp7gycou3l4866f...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Chris Bannister
[Sorry, posted previous post too soon! :D]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:23:01PM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >>Fair enough, but... I have to say it
> >>
> >>Back in my day, we not only had to walk to school, uphill, in both
> >>directions, in the snow, but we also had to build our computers by
> >>hand, from TTL logic gates. :-)
> >
> >You had TTL logic gates? Boy, you were lucky! We were given relay

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo

> >switches from cast-off telephone equipment. And we had to buy our
> >own electrodes and lemons to power the machine.
> 
> new/modern/??? <> better ;/!

These days it is !=  :) (I think <> was "not equal to", was it?)

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302063841.GB9278@tal



Re: Install failed - USB flash to USB drive [SOLVED]

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 19:25, Mark Filipak wrote:
> I successfully installed this:
> 
> debian-live-6.0.6-amd64-lxde-desktop.iso
> 
> to a USB flash in Windows with this:
> 
> dd bs=1M if=debian-live-6.0.6-amd64-lxde-desktop.iso od=e:
> 
> (where 'e:' is the USB flash's Windows device letter - note that the
> 'od=' switch is not documented in command-line help.)

I assume od stands for 'output device/drive/disk', and I guess it's a
Windows-specific extension - under Unix/Linux, everything is considered
to be a file, so it's not needed.

> Then I booted from the USB flash and installed Debian + LXDE desktop to
> a USB drive.
> 
> (The GRUB bootloader install failed toward the end of the installation.)
> 
> The problem is in the GUI installer. To do the installation
> successfully, use the text-based installer.

So you've succeeded now? Cool. I don't think I've ever used the
graphical installer myself; mostly it looks like it's just a prettier
version of exactly the same thing, and I'm not too worried about
prettiness :-) Plus it means that a whole bunch of extra hardware (video
card and mouse, anyway) have to be behaving at install time.

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51319dbe.2000...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:34:57AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Fair enough, but... I have to say it
> 
> Back in my day, we not only had to walk to school, uphill, in both
> directions, in the snow, but we also had to build our computers by
> hand, from TTL logic gates. :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe1a1wHxTyo

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302063233.GA9278@tal



Re: [OT] re: trolls and operating systems [was: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.]

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/2 12:57 AM, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written

Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)



Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an
ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish)
enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the
running. :-)

But I think it is not about a "debate on best OS ever". It is about
getting everybody working for him. Everyody must solve his problems to
show that Linux is better than Windows. This is a classic case of
trolling. He used this zombie technique before when he said that Windows
is much easier to install than Linux, and managed to get people
enslaved,
desperate to show that Linux is so superior that even unspeakable
problems
can be solved.


I'm not sure that's it.  I think it's just that we can't let go of a
problem to solve; or this guy is irritating us, or something.  I'm
pretty sure that nobody here really feels we need to prove the
superiority of Linux over Windows.  (Now if we wanted to talk serious
operating systems, then we'd be talking about Tenex, ITS, Plan 9,
Symbolics, Apollo/Domain,  but that a religious argument for another
day :-)


Look, he did it again in the other thread:


Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs).

Ah, yes. Windows had such a switcher addin about 20 years ago.


I don't know if some people in the list fall for the trick, but he is
definitely using it.

He uses other tricks too, like saying that he will accept anyone's
suggestion but from person X. Then everybody starts to work for him,
including person X who has remorses. Here X is for example Lisi, who
solved the problem ages ago (partitioning problem).

João Luis.


It was not a partitioning problem. It is a bug in the GUI installer. The 
text-based installer works and I was successful.

Ciao - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51319c91.4060...@gmail.com



Re: Install failed - USB flash to USB drive [SOLVED]

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

I successfully installed this:

debian-live-6.0.6-amd64-lxde-desktop.iso

to a USB flash in Windows with this:

dd bs=1M if=debian-live-6.0.6-amd64-lxde-desktop.iso od=e:

(where 'e:' is the USB flash's Windows device letter - note that the 'od=' 
switch is not documented in command-line help.)

Then I booted from the USB flash and installed Debian + LXDE desktop to a USB 
drive.

(The GRUB bootloader install failed toward the end of the installation.)

The problem is in the GUI installer. To do the installation successfully, use 
the text-based installer.

Thanks all,
Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51319b67.50...@gmail.com



Re: [OT] re: trolls and operating systems [was: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.]

2013-03-01 Thread Yaro Kasear

On 03/01/2013 11:57 PM, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written

Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)



Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an
ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish)
enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the
running. :-)

But I think it is not about a "debate on best OS ever". It is about
getting everybody working for him. Everyody must solve his problems to
show that Linux is better than Windows. This is a classic case of
trolling. He used this zombie technique before when he said that Windows
is much easier to install than Linux, and managed to get people
enslaved,
desperate to show that Linux is so superior that even unspeakable
problems
can be solved.

I'm not sure that's it.  I think it's just that we can't let go of a
problem to solve; or this guy is irritating us, or something.  I'm
pretty sure that nobody here really feels we need to prove the
superiority of Linux over Windows.  (Now if we wanted to talk serious
operating systems, then we'd be talking about Tenex, ITS, Plan 9,
Symbolics, Apollo/Domain,  but that a religious argument for another
day :-)

Look, he did it again in the other thread:


Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs).

Ah, yes. Windows had such a switcher addin about 20 years ago.

I don't know if some people in the list fall for the trick, but he is
definitely using it.

He uses other tricks too, like saying that he will accept anyone's
suggestion but from person X. Then everybody starts to work for him,
including person X who has remorses. Here X is for example Lisi, who
solved the problem ages ago (partitioning problem).

João Luis.



If he is a troll, then why are we still feeding him?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51319539.3050...@marupa.net



Re: [OT] re: trolls and operating systems [was: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.]

2013-03-01 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>>> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written
 Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)


>>> Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an
>>> ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish)
>>> enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the
>>> running. :-)
>> But I think it is not about a "debate on best OS ever". It is about
>> getting everybody working for him. Everyody must solve his problems to
>> show that Linux is better than Windows. This is a classic case of
>> trolling. He used this zombie technique before when he said that Windows
>> is much easier to install than Linux, and managed to get people
>> enslaved,
>> desperate to show that Linux is so superior that even unspeakable
>> problems
>> can be solved.
>
> I'm not sure that's it.  I think it's just that we can't let go of a
> problem to solve; or this guy is irritating us, or something.  I'm
> pretty sure that nobody here really feels we need to prove the
> superiority of Linux over Windows.  (Now if we wanted to talk serious
> operating systems, then we'd be talking about Tenex, ITS, Plan 9,
> Symbolics, Apollo/Domain,  but that a religious argument for another
> day :-)

Look, he did it again in the other thread:

>> Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs).
> Ah, yes. Windows had such a switcher addin about 20 years ago.

I don't know if some people in the list fall for the trick, but he is
definitely using it.

He uses other tricks too, like saying that he will accept anyone's
suggestion but from person X. Then everybody starts to work for him,
including person X who has remorses. Here X is for example Lisi, who
solved the problem ages ago (partitioning problem).

João Luis.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/9771b29beaa16b2d8cb7f0c6b6e081cb.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 18:08, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 2013/3/1 11:54 PM, Richard Hector wrote:

>> Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs).
> 
> Ah, yes. Windows had such a switcher addin about 20 years ago.

Linux has had them about that long, too :-)

> In the
> case of LWDE, I could see there were multiple windows represented in the
> status bar at the bottom.

I'm not familiar with LWDE (or LXDE, which I've actually heard of), but
the multiple windows/desktops provided by an X desktop are generally
layered on top; they're not the same thing as the kernel-level VTs.

> I tried switching around but the Debian
> Installer had really gone away... never to return.

Ctrl-alt-F1 is the most likely way to get back to it, as described in my
 previous post.

> I tried Alt+F4 because someone suggested that as a way to see the GRUB
> installers error.

Yes. I don't know which VT it will be on, but there's a good chance
it'll be there. It might have scrolled off the top of the screen, of
course - shift-PgUp may be able to scroll up to see it.

> If you have a suggestion, I'll try it.

No others at this stage, unfortunately. I may chip in where I have
something useful to add, but you don't want my help on stuff I don't
understand, right? :-)

> Should I try the Debian Installer again and, when the GRUB installer
> errors out, hit Ctl+Alt+F4?

Try all of them. F2 through F12. The Ctrl key is only needed when X has
control of the VT, but it doesn't seem to cause a problem otherwise.

I don't know what useful info the installer may put on each VT, but
there's a good chance it will give you something.

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513193ab.3090...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: I wish to advocate linux

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Go Linux wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati  wrote:


From: Joao Luis Meloni Assirati 
Subject: Re: I wish to advocate linux
To: "Martin McCormick" 
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 10:01 PM
  This guy managed to get
everybody in
this list working for him, even if he is unable to make a
single
meaningful objective question. Even if he is insulting
individual people,
the community and Debian ("nothing works, why am I not
surprised")! And at
the end all the energy spent with him will be lost. People
will get tired
and he will leave crying that "it is impossible to install
Linux" and
"Linux people are jerks".



After following his soap opera for what seems like an eternity, I can only 
conclude that he suffers from acute if not terminal PEBKAC. Still amusing but 
in the end what a waste of energy.

(I will likely now be added to the 'hit' list.  I also have the honor of the OP in a 
private email telling me he "hopes I get cancer"!.  Yup.  He's a real charmer!!)




I'm assuming this is him: www.linkedin.com/pub/mark-filipak/7/487/955 - 
it explains a lot.


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51318fcf.3070...@meetinghouse.net



[OT] re: trolls and operating systems [was: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.]

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written

Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)



Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an
ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish)
enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the
running. :-)

But I think it is not about a "debate on best OS ever". It is about
getting everybody working for him. Everyody must solve his problems to
show that Linux is better than Windows. This is a classic case of
trolling. He used this zombie technique before when he said that Windows
is much easier to install than Linux, and managed to get people enslaved,
desperate to show that Linux is so superior that even unspeakable problems
can be solved.


I'm not sure that's it.  I think it's just that we can't let go of a 
problem to solve; or this guy is irritating us, or something.  I'm 
pretty sure that nobody here really feels we need to prove the 
superiority of Linux over Windows.  (Now if we wanted to talk serious 
operating systems, then we'd be talking about Tenex, ITS, Plan 9, 
Symbolics, Apollo/Domain,  but that a religious argument for another 
day :-)


Cheers,

Miles

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51318eb5.8050...@meetinghouse.net



Re: I wish to advocate linux

2013-03-01 Thread Go Linux
--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati  wrote:

> From: Joao Luis Meloni Assirati 
> Subject: Re: I wish to advocate linux
> To: "Martin McCormick" 
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 10:01 PM
>  This guy managed to get
> everybody in
> this list working for him, even if he is unable to make a
> single
> meaningful objective question. Even if he is insulting
> individual people,
> the community and Debian ("nothing works, why am I not
> surprised")! And at
> the end all the energy spent with him will be lost. People
> will get tired
> and he will leave crying that "it is impossible to install
> Linux" and
> "Linux people are jerks".
> 
> 

After following his soap opera for what seems like an eternity, I can only 
conclude that he suffers from acute if not terminal PEBKAC. Still amusing but 
in the end what a waste of energy.

(I will likely now be added to the 'hit' list.  I also have the honor of the OP 
in a private email telling me he "hopes I get cancer"!.  Yup.  He's a real 
charmer!!)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362201362.66539.yahoomailclas...@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 11:54 PM, Richard Hector wrote:

On 02/03/13 17:33, Mark Filipak wrote:

I'm back. When the GRUB install failed I pressed Alt+F4. The Debian
Installer disappeared and I was immediately back to the LWDE desktop. I
tried Alt+F4 there and nothing happened.


Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs).


Ah, yes. Windows had such a switcher addin about 20 years ago. In the case of 
LWDE, I could see there were multiple windows represented in the status bar at 
the bottom. I tried switching around but the Debian Installer had really gone 
away... never to return.

I tried Alt+F4 because someone suggested that as a way to see the GRUB 
installers error. If you have a suggestion, I'll try it.

Should I try the Debian Installer again and, when the GRUB installer errors 
out, hit Ctl+Alt+F4?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51318964.9070...@gmail.com



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
> Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>>> Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written
>> Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)
>>
>>
>
> Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an
> ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish)
> enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the
> running. :-)

But I think it is not about a "debate on best OS ever". It is about
getting everybody working for him. Everyody must solve his problems to
show that Linux is better than Windows. This is a classic case of
trolling. He used this zombie technique before when he said that Windows
is much easier to install than Linux, and managed to get people enslaved,
desperate to show that Linux is so superior that even unspeakable problems
can be solved.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/a3d9878fa1eb0df4efb94e437cc5082f.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 17:33, Mark Filipak wrote:
> I'm back. When the GRUB install failed I pressed Alt+F4. The Debian
> Installer disappeared and I was immediately back to the LWDE desktop. I
> tried Alt+F4 there and nothing happened.

Linux has the concept of virtual terminals (VTs). Alt-F switches
between them, as long as they're in text mode (regardless of whether
it's commandline or full-screen). If the X server is running (Gnome,
LXDE, whatever) in the active VT, then you need to add Ctrl- to that, to
stop the X server grabbing the keystrokes.

To summarise:
On a text console, use Alt-F to choose a VT.
In graphical (X) mode, use Ctrl-Alt-F instead.

Note that not all VTs 1-12 will have anything running on them, and we
can't necessarily tell what your system is running on each.

On a normal running system (mine, anyway):
1-6 will have text terminals which you can log into
7 has X

So I can use Ctrl-Alt-F1 to get the first, and Alt-F7 to get back to X.
If I try 8-12, I just get a flashing cursor.

On the install system, the same features are used a bit differently:
* the main installer generally runs in the first terminal.
* often there's a commandline you can start in the second (eg hit alt-f2
and it will say 'Press enter to activate this console' or something -
then you can type exit when you're finished)
* There may be more of those on further terminals; I can't remember.
* Often one terminal will display syslog information.
* Another, I think, displays installer log information.

So you can do quite a bit of debugging if required.

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131860b.4090...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: I wish to advocate linux

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 11:05 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

There was once a fellow on a list I belong to whose postings
were one tale of woe after another which is not that unusual for
those of us who tinker and work in technology. The trouble with
him was that it was all one big conspiracy against him and he
was just going to get out of the hobby of amateur radio all
together as nothing ever worked for him.

He never read about the how and why of things. His idea
of life was you borrow yourself in to the poor house, buy all
this neat stuff, demand accessible manuals, hook it all together
the way you think it goes and then complain when it blows up and
or just doesn't work.

Never once did I hear him ask why an antenna must be
built a certain way or how do the rest of you solve this or that problem.
It was all along the lines of "I spent X Dollars for this or
that and it quit on me in a puff of smoke, bla bla bla.

List members told him about articles he could read,
suggested he contact somebody locally who could help show him
the ropes as to how to do these things right, etc.

Finally, I think everybody just gave up. He left the
list and I have no idea what happened but this present
discussion reminds me much of that very similar discussion. We
were all jerks and just out for ourselves.

In the 35 years I have been involved with modern
computing, my experience has been that if you show you are
making a good effort to help yourself, people will at least
point you at a good reading list and many times, they do a lot
more than the call of duty says they should do.

I think that is exactly the case. This guy managed to get everybody in
this list working for him, even if he is unable to make a single
meaningful objective question. Even if he is insulting individual people,
the community and Debian ("nothing works, why am I not surprised")! And at
the end all the energy spent with him will be lost. People will get tired
and he will leave crying that "it is impossible to install Linux" and
"Linux people are jerks".


Yup.  And it's even obvious what he's doing, but he's too obstinate to listen.

(trying to install onto the same device he's booting from, without paying 
attention to partitioning, telling the installer where to put things, or 
telling grub that it has to worry about two different installs on the same 
device - idiot)


Of course I'm not trying to install to the same device from which I'm booting. 
What's with you, Miles? Why are you making such stupid assumptions and then 
broadcasting them? Have you actually read anything I've written?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51318225.3020...@gmail.com



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Only thing I can think of I think Ubuntu has one but I don't know if it's
actually a installer or just lets your run the Distro live in Windows.

Shane


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

> On 2013/3/1 10:51 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
>
>> On 2013/3/1 10:39 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013/3/1 10:03 PM, green wrote:
>>>
 Shane Johnson wrote at 2013-03-01 20:53 -0600:

> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak <
> markfilipak.li...@gmail.com>**wrote:
>
>> During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
>> when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.
>>
>
> To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you
> are
> getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
> without specifics, we can't assist.
>

 Assuming you are using the standard Debian installer in text mode, you
 may want to check for more details about the failure by pressing
 Alt+F4 (I think it is 4, rather than 2 or 3) immediately after the
 installer gives the error (Alt+F1 returns you to the installer).

>>>
>>> I'm running the Debian installer that's built into a Debian Live ISO
>>> image that's been raw written (dd) to a USB flash drive. Thus, I'm not
>>> running it from a command line. I boot the USB flash drive and click on the
>>> desktop icon identified as the Debian Installer. I do not do any
>>> prepartitioning or preformatting except upon retry after a failure. When I
>>> retry after a failure, the live OS automounts the target's existing
>>> partitions (that had been created during the previous try). I found that
>>> unmounting those existing partitions doesn't work. I have to run the
>>> installer, delete the partitions, then reboot, then rerun the installer.
>>>
>>> I have no idea what problem the GRUB installer encounters. I have no
>>> opportunity to press Alt+F4 as the installer automatically runs full-screen
>>> and I can't get back to the LXDE desktop until I back out of the installer
>>> and quit.
>>>
>>> Hmmm... Perhaps I can press Alt+F4 when the error occurs. I wasn't
>>> instructed to do that, and I don't know what Alt+F4 does since I'm not a
>>> Linux user, but I can try it. I'll quit Windows, reboot to USB, and try
>>> it stay tuned... I'll be right back.
>>>
>>
>> I'm back. Things have changed. When I booted Debian Live, it wouldn't
>> recognize the USB hard drive when I plugged it in. I quit, rebooted
>> Windows, and looked at it with Disk Manager. The USB hard drive is there
>> with all its partitions. I'll boot back to Debian Live and try again, but
>> I'd say that something Debian has broken. We'll see, eh?
>> Stay tuned. I'll be right back.
>>
>
> Shane,
>
> I'm back. When the GRUB install failed I pressed Alt+F4. The Debian
> Installer disappeared and I was immediately back to the LWDE desktop. I
> tried Alt+F4 there and nothing happened.
>
> Is there a Debian installer that runs in Windows?
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
> debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgwith
>  a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/**5131810f.3010...@gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment


Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 10:51 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 10:39 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 10:03 PM, green wrote:

Shane Johnson wrote at 2013-03-01 20:53 -0600:

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.


To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you are
getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
without specifics, we can't assist.


Assuming you are using the standard Debian installer in text mode, you
may want to check for more details about the failure by pressing
Alt+F4 (I think it is 4, rather than 2 or 3) immediately after the
installer gives the error (Alt+F1 returns you to the installer).


I'm running the Debian installer that's built into a Debian Live ISO image 
that's been raw written (dd) to a USB flash drive. Thus, I'm not running it 
from a command line. I boot the USB flash drive and click on the desktop icon 
identified as the Debian Installer. I do not do any prepartitioning or 
preformatting except upon retry after a failure. When I retry after a failure, 
the live OS automounts the target's existing partitions (that had been created 
during the previous try). I found that unmounting those existing partitions 
doesn't work. I have to run the installer, delete the partitions, then reboot, 
then rerun the installer.

I have no idea what problem the GRUB installer encounters. I have no 
opportunity to press Alt+F4 as the installer automatically runs full-screen and 
I can't get back to the LXDE desktop until I back out of the installer and quit.

Hmmm... Perhaps I can press Alt+F4 when the error occurs. I wasn't instructed 
to do that, and I don't know what Alt+F4 does since I'm not a Linux user, but I 
can try it. I'll quit Windows, reboot to USB, and try it stay tuned... I'll 
be right back.


I'm back. Things have changed. When I booted Debian Live, it wouldn't recognize 
the USB hard drive when I plugged it in. I quit, rebooted Windows, and looked 
at it with Disk Manager. The USB hard drive is there with all its partitions. 
I'll boot back to Debian Live and try again, but I'd say that something Debian 
has broken. We'll see, eh?
Stay tuned. I'll be right back.


Shane,

I'm back. When the GRUB install failed I pressed Alt+F4. The Debian Installer 
disappeared and I was immediately back to the LWDE desktop. I tried Alt+F4 
there and nothing happened.

Is there a Debian installer that runs in Windows?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131810f.3010...@gmail.com



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 13:34, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 02/03/13 08:46, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>>> On 03/01/13 11:35, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
 The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline

  > export TERM=ansi80x25
  > printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"

 produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.

 If I put the same in c code, it works

 #include 
 int main() {
 fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
 return 0;
 }

 I get underlined text.

>>> I ran the C example in an xterm on Ubuntu!
>>>
>>> The question remains.
>>>
>>> Why does this produce color rather than underlined text?
>>>
>>> The standard says ESC[32m should produce green text and ESC[4m should
>>> produce underlined text.
>>
>> Are you doing this on a (colour) linux console, rather than an xterm?
>> Apparently it can't do underline, and simulates it with a different
>> colour instead. See 'man console_codes', or here:
>> https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/page/man4/console_codes.4.html
>>
> 
> 404 File not found.


Sorry - fail with copy/paste and attempting to fix annoying line wraps -
which only appear in my mailer.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man4/console_codes.4.html

ie s/page/pages/

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513180ba.4010...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 14:11, Mark Filipak wrote:
> Miles. will you kindly stop responding to me.

Pretty much nobody knows everything.

We have a _community_, each member of which knows some stuff. People can
help by mentioning the bits that they know, and putting it together with
the bits that other people know. When you read the comments, you can
also pick and choose the bits that precisely match your situation, and
infer bits that loosely match.

Someone else may read Miles' comments, and realise how that fits with
your situation, and provide a tip that works. Telling people to stop
contributing has no positive outcome whatsoever.

The whole system works completely differently from proprietary
commercial software. In some ways it may not work as well, in other ways
it clearly (to me, anyway) works better. You have to adapt to get the
best out of it, rather than trying to bully us all into working the way
you're used to.

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51317fdc.5000...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written

Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)




Do you really want to start a "debate" on best OS ever? Talk about an 
ugly religious argument, even if we exclude anyone dumb (or trollish) 
enough to consider any version of Windows anywhere close to in the 
running. :-)


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51317ded.7030...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
> Windows-NT 3.5 was probably the finest OS ever written

Let us see who will be the first to bite the troll :)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/424a8e284c3ec961cdef94c3942f05fa.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: I wish to advocate linux

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

There was once a fellow on a list I belong to whose postings
were one tale of woe after another which is not that unusual for
those of us who tinker and work in technology. The trouble with
him was that it was all one big conspiracy against him and he
was just going to get out of the hobby of amateur radio all
together as nothing ever worked for him.

He never read about the how and why of things. His idea
of life was you borrow yourself in to the poor house, buy all
this neat stuff, demand accessible manuals, hook it all together
the way you think it goes and then complain when it blows up and
or just doesn't work.

Never once did I hear him ask why an antenna must be
built a certain way or how do the rest of you solve this or that problem.
It was all along the lines of "I spent X Dollars for this or
that and it quit on me in a puff of smoke, bla bla bla.

List members told him about articles he could read,
suggested he contact somebody locally who could help show him
the ropes as to how to do these things right, etc.

Finally, I think everybody just gave up. He left the
list and I have no idea what happened but this present
discussion reminds me much of that very similar discussion. We
were all jerks and just out for ourselves.

In the 35 years I have been involved with modern
computing, my experience has been that if you show you are
making a good effort to help yourself, people will at least
point you at a good reading list and many times, they do a lot
more than the call of duty says they should do.

I think that is exactly the case. This guy managed to get everybody in
this list working for him, even if he is unable to make a single
meaningful objective question. Even if he is insulting individual people,
the community and Debian ("nothing works, why am I not surprised")! And at
the end all the energy spent with him will be lost. People will get tired
and he will leave crying that "it is impossible to install Linux" and
"Linux people are jerks".

Yup.  And it's even obvious what he's doing, but he's too obstinate to 
listen.


(trying to install onto the same device he's booting from, without 
paying attention to partitioning, telling the installer where to put 
things, or telling grub that it has to worry about two different 
installs on the same device - idiot)





--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51317a79.3050...@meetinghouse.net



Re: I wish to advocate linux

2013-03-01 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
> There was once a fellow on a list I belong to whose postings
> were one tale of woe after another which is not that unusual for
> those of us who tinker and work in technology. The trouble with
> him was that it was all one big conspiracy against him and he
> was just going to get out of the hobby of amateur radio all
> together as nothing ever worked for him.
>
>   He never read about the how and why of things. His idea
> of life was you borrow yourself in to the poor house, buy all
> this neat stuff, demand accessible manuals, hook it all together
> the way you think it goes and then complain when it blows up and
> or just doesn't work.
>
>   Never once did I hear him ask why an antenna must be
> built a certain way or how do the rest of you solve this or that problem.
> It was all along the lines of "I spent X Dollars for this or
> that and it quit on me in a puff of smoke, bla bla bla.
>
>   List members told him about articles he could read,
> suggested he contact somebody locally who could help show him
> the ropes as to how to do these things right, etc.
>
>   Finally, I think everybody just gave up. He left the
> list and I have no idea what happened but this present
> discussion reminds me much of that very similar discussion. We
> were all jerks and just out for ourselves.
>
>   In the 35 years I have been involved with modern
> computing, my experience has been that if you show you are
> making a good effort to help yourself, people will at least
> point you at a good reading list and many times, they do a lot
> more than the call of duty says they should do.

I think that is exactly the case. This guy managed to get everybody in
this list working for him, even if he is unable to make a single
meaningful objective question. Even if he is insulting individual people,
the community and Debian ("nothing works, why am I not surprised")! And at
the end all the energy spent with him will be lost. People will get tired
and he will leave crying that "it is impossible to install Linux" and
"Linux people are jerks".


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/ad4ba41a2d4d40674dca503b7d2b0633.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Keyboard remapping

2013-03-01 Thread Daniel Dalton
> For instance, in my case, I had written a file
> /etc/udev/keymaps/apple-aluminum containing:
> 
> 0x70035 86  # Left to z: 102nd (providing backslash bar)
> 0x70064 grave   # Left to 1: grave notsign
> 0x70068 insert  # F13
> 
> for the remappings I needed. The first number is the scan code, the
> second word is the key code or some associated symbol corresponding
> to the KEY_* macros from "/usr/include/linux/input.h". Due to a bug
> in the udev keymap utility, I had to use the key code 86 instead of
> the symbol 102nd above (though I've now written a patch, see Debian
> bug 654947).

Thanks. This sounds fairly involved,however, it turns out shift+f10 will
do what I want. 

Dispite it being annoying my keyboard seems to lack this key I think
I'll stick to shift +f10 for now until I get some time to invest a few
hours in doing this. 

Thanks for all your help and such a comprehensive response. 

Best regards, 
Daniel 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302035556.ga5...@gwsc.vic.edu.au



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 10:39 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 10:03 PM, green wrote:

Shane Johnson wrote at 2013-03-01 20:53 -0600:

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.


To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you are
getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
without specifics, we can't assist.


Assuming you are using the standard Debian installer in text mode, you
may want to check for more details about the failure by pressing
Alt+F4 (I think it is 4, rather than 2 or 3) immediately after the
installer gives the error (Alt+F1 returns you to the installer).


I'm running the Debian installer that's built into a Debian Live ISO image 
that's been raw written (dd) to a USB flash drive. Thus, I'm not running it 
from a command line. I boot the USB flash drive and click on the desktop icon 
identified as the Debian Installer. I do not do any prepartitioning or 
preformatting except upon retry after a failure. When I retry after a failure, 
the live OS automounts the target's existing partitions (that had been created 
during the previous try). I found that unmounting those existing partitions 
doesn't work. I have to run the installer, delete the partitions, then reboot, 
then rerun the installer.

I have no idea what problem the GRUB installer encounters. I have no 
opportunity to press Alt+F4 as the installer automatically runs full-screen and 
I can't get back to the LXDE desktop until I back out of the installer and quit.

Hmmm... Perhaps I can press Alt+F4 when the error occurs. I wasn't instructed 
to do that, and I don't know what Alt+F4 does since I'm not a Linux user, but I 
can try it. I'll quit Windows, reboot to USB, and try it stay tuned... I'll 
be right back.


I'm back. Things have changed. When I booted Debian Live, it wouldn't recognize 
the USB hard drive when I plugged it in. I quit, rebooted Windows, and looked 
at it with Disk Manager. The USB hard drive is there with all its partitions. 
I'll boot back to Debian Live and try again, but I'd say that something Debian 
has broken. We'll see, eh?
Stay tuned. I'll be right back.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131772b.1010...@gmail.com



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Yaro Kasear wrote:
I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't 
really have a "hardened profile" or anything like what Gentoo offers. 
(Gentoo isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point 
to the concept of having a "hardened" base available, whihc Debian 
doesn't really offer.) Debian's known for being incredibly STABLE and 
high quality, and embraces FOSS standards pretty well.


But unless Debian is bundling an alternate base system built around 
stuff like Tomoyo, GrSecurity, PaX, or SELinux and starts loading up 
their packages with hardened patchsets I wouldn't boast about it being 
a "security-focused" distro.


The backports are an excellent thing. And the Debian security team 
does an excellent job. Lets just be realistic and a little more honest 
and say Debian is "one of the most secure" but I can't call it "THE 
most secure" unless the system can go hardened readily.




Good point.  And when you start talking security to the point of serious 
testing and configuration control, I believe there are very few 
distributions that are on the DoD approved product list.


On the BSD side, OpenBSD (despite the name), focuses on security, and 
has a pretty good reputation for being pretty secure.


Miles Fidelman


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513175ae.5080...@meetinghouse.net



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Thomas D. Dean

On 03/01/13 16:56, Glenn English wrote:

The linux console is a HDMI display attached to a RaspberryPi.

I changed to ncurses5.  Looks like the display does not support underline.

Thanks,

Tom Dean


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513174f0.6030...@speakeasy.org



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 10:03 PM, green wrote:

Shane Johnson wrote at 2013-03-01 20:53 -0600:

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.


To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you are
getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
without specifics, we can't assist.


Assuming you are using the standard Debian installer in text mode, you
may want to check for more details about the failure by pressing
Alt+F4 (I think it is 4, rather than 2 or 3) immediately after the
installer gives the error (Alt+F1 returns you to the installer).


I'm running the Debian installer that's built into a Debian Live ISO image 
that's been raw written (dd) to a USB flash drive. Thus, I'm not running it 
from a command line. I boot the USB flash drive and click on the desktop icon 
identified as the Debian Installer. I do not do any prepartitioning or 
preformatting except upon retry after a failure. When I retry after a failure, 
the live OS automounts the target's existing partitions (that had been created 
during the previous try). I found that unmounting those existing partitions 
doesn't work. I have to run the installer, delete the partitions, then reboot, 
then rerun the installer.

I have no idea what problem the GRUB installer encounters. I have no 
opportunity to press Alt+F4 as the installer automatically runs full-screen and 
I can't get back to the LXDE desktop until I back out of the installer and quit.

Hmmm... Perhaps I can press Alt+F4 when the error occurs. I wasn't instructed 
to do that, and I don't know what Alt+F4 does since I'm not a Linux user, but I 
can try it. I'll quit Windows, reboot to USB, and try it stay tuned... I'll 
be right back.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131747f.8080...@gmail.com



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Yaro Kasear

On 03/01/2013 05:19 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:

On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:

  Debian is always out of date and even the "stable" is unsecure as
its backported fixes rather than updates

Sorry to answer piecemeal.  Debian stable starts to go out of date as soon as
it is released, or even before, while it was still testing, but in freeze.
It has security updates throughout its life and for the first year of being
Old Stable.  It is very secure.  Nothing, and no distro, is totally secure,
but Debian Stable is as close as you are likely to get.

Many people therefore use Stable only for servers.  Testing is more up to
date, and is as stable as many released versions of other distros.  It does
not, however, get up to date security updates.

Many people in fact run Unstable on their desktops and just upgrade with
caution.  I understand that it does get security upgrades, but although I
have installed it to look at it, I have never had the nerve to install it on
my workhorse machine.

Lisi


I don't know if Debian's the most SECURE distribution. It doesn't really 
have a "hardened profile" or anything like what Gentoo offers. (Gentoo 
isn't a prime example of a secure Linux system, I more point to the 
concept of having a "hardened" base available, whihc Debian doesn't 
really offer.) Debian's known for being incredibly STABLE and high 
quality, and embraces FOSS standards pretty well.


But unless Debian is bundling an alternate base system built around 
stuff like Tomoyo, GrSecurity, PaX, or SELinux and starts loading up 
their packages with hardened patchsets I wouldn't boast about it being a 
"security-focused" distro.


The backports are an excellent thing. And the Debian security team does 
an excellent job. Lets just be realistic and a little more honest and 
say Debian is "one of the most secure" but I can't call it "THE most 
secure" unless the system can go hardened readily.


Cheers.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51317176.1030...@marupa.net



Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread green
Shane Johnson wrote at 2013-03-01 20:53 -0600:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak 
> wrote:
> > During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
> > when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.
> 
> To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you are
> getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
> without specifics, we can't assist.

Assuming you are using the standard Debian installer in text mode, you
may want to check for more details about the failure by pressing
Alt+F4 (I think it is 4, rather than 2 or 3) immediately after the
installer gives the error (Alt+F1 returns you to the installer).


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Ok since we're starting over, some questions.


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

> If anyone is still there, I do want help. I've spent all day at this.
>
> Ground rules:
> 1 - If you can't help, please don't try.

2 - Please don't assume I haven't read how to install Debian. I have. It's
> no big deal.
>

What about other documentation - have you read the information linked
previously on creating a persistent partition?


> 3 - My computer boots from USB - no problem. I'm booting Debian Live from
> USB. So, please don't tell me how hard it is or how the BIOS must support
> it or how I'm too stupid, too lazy, or too arrogant to understand that.
>

What version of Live are you booting to?  (Version # or code name please.)

4 - Please don't assume I'm Windows-lazy or Windows-stupid. Windows-NT 3.5
> was probably the finest OS ever written when David Cutler was done with it.
> Then Bill Gates ruined it by creating Direct-X to improve entertainment
> media performance (thereby bypassing the Intel call-gate mechanism, thereby
> destroying Intel's 4-level protection model). This directly lead to
> rootkits and to my hate of Microsoft. Of course, adding port listeners to
> support RPC-enabled remote desktop utilities (which gave viruses access to
> the rootkits) closed the deal.

5 - Please, if it's been years since you've tried to install to USB, kindly
> refrain from complaining and let other people help me.
> 6 - I have a particular need that will not be met by doing a more standard
> installation, so if you can't help, please don't suggest that I create a
> more standard installation of Debian.
> 7 - My objective is not be become a Linux enthusiast.
> 8 - Please don't suggest that I don't know how to, or that am too lazy to
> use Google to search for answers.
>
> My objective is to create a bootable USB flash drive, or a bootable USB
> hard drive that I can then use to run Iceweasel & Icedove, period. That's
> all I want to do with Linux. Oh, a partition that can be accessed by both
> Linux and Windows is needed for downloads and email profiles. The Windows
> system will not have networking installed.
>

If this is your only requirement, I would recommend Knoppix.  It is an
excellent distribution that can be run from the CD/DVD or loaded to your
USB devices.  I would recommend having a separate partition on whatever
device you install to, or on a thumbdrive if you decide to run from CD/DVD,
for the persistent partition as well.  It can load and access and save
whatever info you need to your NTFS partition or FAT partitions.


> My capabilities:
> Virtual Machines - I've created and used both VirtualBox and VMware Player
> virtual machines. If I could run Firefox & Thunderbird in a WinXP client
> without also having to install networking in the WinXP host, I'd do it in a
> second and wouldn't need Linux.
> Unix - I used Unix. I've installed and used Solaris. I've designed
> Sun-compatible single-board computers.
> Apache - I've installed, configured, and maintained complex,
> multiple-domain Apache servers.
>
> My problem:
> During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive),
> when it goes to install GRUB, it fails.
>

To help further with this, we will need clarification on the error you are
getting from the grub install.  There are many reasons it can fail and
without specifics, we can't assist.


>
> What can you suggest I do? I will try anything.
>
> Thanks - Mark.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
> debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgwith
>  a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/**51316145.70...@gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment


Install failed - let's start again, without bogus assumptions, please.

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

If anyone is still there, I do want help. I've spent all day at this.

Ground rules:
1 - If you can't help, please don't try.
2 - Please don't assume I haven't read how to install Debian. I have. It's no 
big deal.
3 - My computer boots from USB - no problem. I'm booting Debian Live from USB. 
So, please don't tell me how hard it is or how the BIOS must support it or how 
I'm too stupid, too lazy, or too arrogant to understand that.
4 - Please don't assume I'm Windows-lazy or Windows-stupid. Windows-NT 3.5 was 
probably the finest OS ever written when David Cutler was done with it. Then 
Bill Gates ruined it by creating Direct-X to improve entertainment media 
performance (thereby bypassing the Intel call-gate mechanism, thereby 
destroying Intel's 4-level protection model). This directly lead to rootkits 
and to my hate of Microsoft. Of course, adding port listeners to support 
RPC-enabled remote desktop utilities (which gave viruses access to the 
rootkits) closed the deal.
5 - Please, if it's been years since you've tried to install to USB, kindly 
refrain from complaining and let other people help me.
6 - I have a particular need that will not be met by doing a more standard 
installation, so if you can't help, please don't suggest that I create a more 
standard installation of Debian.
7 - My objective is not be become a Linux enthusiast.
8 - Please don't suggest that I don't know how to, or that am too lazy to use 
Google to search for answers.

My objective is to create a bootable USB flash drive, or a bootable USB hard drive 
that I can then use to run Iceweasel & Icedove, period. That's all I want to do 
with Linux. Oh, a partition that can be accessed by both Linux and Windows is 
needed for downloads and email profiles. The Windows system will not have 
networking installed.

My capabilities:
Virtual Machines - I've created and used both VirtualBox and VMware Player virtual 
machines. If I could run Firefox & Thunderbird in a WinXP client without also 
having to install networking in the WinXP host, I'd do it in a second and wouldn't 
need Linux.
Unix - I used Unix. I've installed and used Solaris. I've designed 
Sun-compatible single-board computers.
Apache - I've installed, configured, and maintained complex, multiple-domain 
Apache servers.

My problem:
During the Debian installation (to USB thumb drive or USB hard drive), when it 
goes to install GRUB, it fails.

What can you suggest I do? I will try anything.

Thanks - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51316145.70...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 8:47 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 8:13 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 19:25:30 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:


in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
install GRUB - the installer is either:
a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,

The kernel has no knowledge about a non-existent hard disk so how can
GRUB possibly attempt to install itself there?


good point, but then again, what does grub-install (try to) use as a default if 
a specific device isn't specified?



b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
properly (fail).

The base system has been installed prior to the bootloader stage. The
kernel must have been happy with the existing partitioning.


Maybe yes, maybe no.  In one of his emails, Mark indicated that:

Okay, this is a side trip: Here (to the best of my recollection) is how I'm 
trying to partition:

Pri-0: 243 MB, ext3, LVM, bootable
Pri-1: 28 GB, NTFS, "WindowsTemp"
Ext-0: 333 MB, ext3, /
Ext-1: 3.18 GB, ext3
Ext-2: 1.55 GB, swap
Ext-3: 524 MB, ext3
Ext-4: 277 MB, ext3
Ext-5: 3.24 GB, ext3


Which leads to three immediate questions:
- how and where are these partitions mounted (at the time that grub-install 
runs)?
- how does that jibe with the options specified to grub-install?
- or, if no options are specified, how does that jibe with the defaults that 
grub-install uses?

I'll still bet that the grub-install failure, and subsequent boot failure stems 
from:
- a partitioning error, and/or,
- grub-install installing the boot loader in the wrong place, and/or,
- a messed up grub configuration file.

 From the above partitioning table, I'm going to guess that
1. he's booting and running the live-USB from Pri-0,
2. trying to install to Ext-0,
3. maybe re-installing the MBR on Pri-0,
4. not properly setting up the grub configuration to give a choice of booting 
from either partition


Miles, you are not helping. Kindly stop contributing to this thread.


Mark...
1. go F8&k yourself:
2. I'm trying to help, though why I bother with you I really don't know.
3. One point of support lists is for mutual learning.  The question of how to 
build a bootable memory stick is a persistent one.
4. If you're not interested in my interaction with others on this thread, use 
your delete key.
5. see 1.

Miles Fidelman


Miles, I'm running the Debian installer from a Debian Live USB. I don't try to 
install GRUB. The Debian installer does it. I don't provide command-line 
switches. The Debian installer provides whatever command-line switches it deems 
appropriate in its call. How are the partitions mounted at the time? I'd have 
to ask the person who wrote the installer. I have no way of knowing the answer 
to these questions. The installer takes over the whole screen, so even if I 
knew how to make the queries you suggest, I couldn't do it. You think I'm 
simply being an ass. The problem is, you have not done what I need to do, so 
you can't provide help. So stop trying to provide help and stop blaming me.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51315f6f.90...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 8:13 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 19:25:30 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:


in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
install GRUB - the installer is either:
a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,

The kernel has no knowledge about a non-existent hard disk so how can
GRUB possibly attempt to install itself there?


good point, but then again, what does grub-install (try to) use as a 
default if a specific device isn't specified?



b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
properly (fail).

The base system has been installed prior to the bootloader stage. The
kernel must have been happy with the existing partitioning.


Maybe yes, maybe no.  In one of his emails, Mark indicated that:
Okay, this is a side trip: Here (to the best of my recollection) is 
how I'm trying to partition:


Pri-0: 243 MB, ext3, LVM, bootable
Pri-1: 28 GB, NTFS, "WindowsTemp"
Ext-0: 333 MB, ext3, /
Ext-1: 3.18 GB, ext3
Ext-2: 1.55 GB, swap
Ext-3: 524 MB, ext3
Ext-4: 277 MB, ext3
Ext-5: 3.24 GB, ext3


Which leads to three immediate questions:
- how and where are these partitions mounted (at the time that 
grub-install runs)?

- how does that jibe with the options specified to grub-install?
- or, if no options are specified, how does that jibe with the 
defaults that grub-install uses?


I'll still bet that the grub-install failure, and subsequent boot 
failure stems from:

- a partitioning error, and/or,
- grub-install installing the boot loader in the wrong place, and/or,
- a messed up grub configuration file.

 From the above partitioning table, I'm going to guess that
1. he's booting and running the live-USB from Pri-0,
2. trying to install to Ext-0,
3. maybe re-installing the MBR on Pri-0,
4. not properly setting up the grub configuration to give a choice of 
booting from either partition


Miles, you are not helping. Kindly stop contributing to this thread.


Mark...
1. go F8&k yourself:
2. I'm trying to help, though why I bother with you I really don't know.
3. One point of support lists is for mutual learning.  The question of 
how to build a bootable memory stick is a persistent one.
4. If you're not interested in my interaction with others on this 
thread, use your delete key.

5. see 1.

Miles Fidelman

--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51315a45.7050...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Miles, you are not helping. Kindly stop contributing to this thread.
>
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to 
> debian-user-REQUEST@lists.**debian.orgwith
>  a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/**5131534f.8090...@gmail.com
>
>
Mark,
Miles is trying to help, as we all are.  I don't know what Miles said to
upset you but please remember you are presenting us with a situation and we
in like are responding trying to help you understand your problems so they
can be resolved.  Asking someone that is voluntarily providing assistance
to stop because you don't like how he answered in inappropriate on your
part.

At this point I (and I am sure others on here ) would recommend you do your
research and learn the differences between Windows and Linux and then go
find the documentation you need and follow it.  From my experience, most
issues with Linux can be answered by a Google search of error messages you
are receiving and some time invested in research of the situation.
We would love to help you Mark, but we can't do it for you.  You are going
to have to do your part and invest some time &/ money and then try it
again.  When you run into please feel free to ask questions.  But first and
foremost be nice.

I wish you the best of luck and encourage you to not give up.  I am
confident that once you get it going, and can see the power of Linux, you
will be impressed.  I have been using it for over 6 years now and I am
barely cutting teeth on what it can do.

Sincerely.

-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment


Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 7:47 PM, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:

Do you want to help?
If no, stop reading now (I don't need more heckling).


Do you want help? Then don't write agressive email with sarcastic subject.


What I did:


[...]

What you tried to do requires great Linux skill and knowledge. It is
beyond your possibilities to even understand help on this. Use standard
solutions that work for everybody instead.


Okay, what went wrong:


[...]

If you were able to figure out all by yourself, why ask for help? You
should be able to solve the problem.


Mount error message too cryptic - too generic (does not tell what actually
happened).
GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


There is a tale in my country about an arrogant man that considered absurd
that a pumpkin, being a large fruit, comes from a short plant, and the
blackberry [1] comes from a tall tree although it is a tiny fruit. He kept
thinking like this until he fell asleep under a blackberry tree and was
awaken by a blackberry hitting his nose.

Maybe when you have the required skill and knowledge, which comes from
practice, persistence and good attitude, you will be able to realize that
fundamental and ubiquous utilities like mount, grub and lilo have precise
behaviour and useful error messages.


Any/all help appreciated except from Lisi Reisz.


Don't expect any/all help with this attitude.

OK, I gave my share feeding a troll today.

João Luis.

-

[1] Actually, the tale is about the jabuticaba
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabuticaba but it is generally regarded to be
impossible to explain what a jabuticaba is to a non-Brazilian, so I
adapted Moteiro Lobato's story.


João, kindly stop responding to this thread. I want help, not noise.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513153e0.9030...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 8:13 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 19:25:30 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:


in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
install GRUB - the installer is either:
a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,

The kernel has no knowledge about a non-existent hard disk so how can
GRUB possibly attempt to install itself there?


good point, but then again, what does grub-install (try to) use as a default if 
a specific device isn't specified?



b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
properly (fail).

The base system has been installed prior to the bootloader stage. The
kernel must have been happy with the existing partitioning.


Maybe yes, maybe no.  In one of his emails, Mark indicated that:

Okay, this is a side trip: Here (to the best of my recollection) is how I'm 
trying to partition:

Pri-0: 243 MB, ext3, LVM, bootable
Pri-1: 28 GB, NTFS, "WindowsTemp"
Ext-0: 333 MB, ext3, /
Ext-1: 3.18 GB, ext3
Ext-2: 1.55 GB, swap
Ext-3: 524 MB, ext3
Ext-4: 277 MB, ext3
Ext-5: 3.24 GB, ext3


Which leads to three immediate questions:
- how and where are these partitions mounted (at the time that grub-install 
runs)?
- how does that jibe with the options specified to grub-install?
- or, if no options are specified, how does that jibe with the defaults that 
grub-install uses?

I'll still bet that the grub-install failure, and subsequent boot failure stems 
from:
- a partitioning error, and/or,
- grub-install installing the boot loader in the wrong place, and/or,
- a messed up grub configuration file.

 From the above partitioning table, I'm going to guess that
1. he's booting and running the live-USB from Pri-0,
2. trying to install to Ext-0,
3. maybe re-installing the MBR on Pri-0,
4. not properly setting up the grub configuration to give a choice of booting 
from either partition


Miles, you are not helping. Kindly stop contributing to this thread.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131534f.8090...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 19:25:30 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:


in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
install GRUB - the installer is either:
a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,

The kernel has no knowledge about a non-existent hard disk so how can
GRUB possibly attempt to install itself there?


good point, but then again, what does grub-install (try to) use as a 
default if a specific device isn't specified?



b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
properly (fail).

The base system has been installed prior to the bootloader stage. The
kernel must have been happy with the existing partitioning.


Maybe yes, maybe no.  In one of his emails, Mark indicated that:
Okay, this is a side trip: Here (to the best of my recollection) is 
how I'm trying to partition:


Pri-0: 243 MB, ext3, LVM, bootable
Pri-1: 28 GB, NTFS, "WindowsTemp"
Ext-0: 333 MB, ext3, /
Ext-1: 3.18 GB, ext3
Ext-2: 1.55 GB, swap
Ext-3: 524 MB, ext3
Ext-4: 277 MB, ext3
Ext-5: 3.24 GB, ext3 


Which leads to three immediate questions:
- how and where are these partitions mounted (at the time that 
grub-install runs)?

- how does that jibe with the options specified to grub-install?
- or, if no options are specified, how does that jibe with the defaults 
that grub-install uses?


I'll still bet that the grub-install failure, and subsequent boot 
failure stems from:

- a partitioning error, and/or,
- grub-install installing the boot loader in the wrong place, and/or,
- a messed up grub configuration file.

From the above partitioning table, I'm going to guess that
1. he's booting and running the live-USB from Pri-0,
2. trying to install to Ext-0,
3. maybe re-installing the MBR on Pri-0,
4. not properly setting up the grub configuration to give a choice of 
booting from either partition








--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51315244.9090...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 7:03 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 3:16 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:



GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed to work 
with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a different boot loader on a 
USB stick - and which one is dependent on what your BIOS supports (and, of 
course, you have to set your BIOS appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux as the boot 
loader.

Booting from a USB stick follows yet another process, and which process is 
somewhat dependent on what your BIOS supports.  I'm a little fggy on the 
details (haven't done it it a while), but some BIOSs know how to boot from a 
USB stick, others have a mode called USBHDD, where they treat the USB stick as 
if it's a hard drive - which means you have to play some games in the USB setup 
to make it look like a hard drive, with an MBR and all.  As I recall, syslinux 
is one way to boot from a USB stick.

See http://wiki.debian.org/BootProcess for more details.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en for installing on a 
USB stick
(when in doubt, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS)

Try doing a basic installation from 
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual before you start trying 
more complicated things.


Miles, I'm already booting from USB. I don't need help there. And a basic 
installation per your link is out of the question. I recall something about 
isolinux from a few years ago, but during installation, I'm presented only with 
GRUB (actually, that is automatically tried) or LILO.


First off, I'm going to repeat: STOP SENDING TWO COPIES OF YOUR EMAILS. It's 
simply rude.  Reply to the list or not at all.

Second, obviously you're missing some steps in the installation, and/or making 
some wrong choices.  If you're not going to follow the steps in the 
instructions, don't expect folks to help you clean up things that are a result 
of not configuring something early on. Right off the bat, there's a lot of 
material early on about how to configure various boot media - that catches up 
with you when it becomes time to install a boot loader.

If you're only being presented by the choice of GRUB or LILO, while trying to 
install on a USB stick, then you messed something up early on.  Or more to the 
point, a USB installation is non-standard, it requires special configuration, 
and you're obviously skipping some key step.



Miles. will you kindly stop responding to me.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513151b9.9090...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Joe
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:42:56 -0500
Mark Filipak  wrote:

> On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:
 >
> > Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard drive?
> 
> That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...
> 

And if the computer's hardware can deal with USB hard drives, and
anything recent can, there is no problem. Any OS will treat it like any
other hard drive. Windows will make use of the BIOS, Linux will drive
it directly.

USB *sticks* can have problems. They normally come as a single partition
i.e. with no partition table, and this will freak out anything that
expects one. I have trouble mounting and dismounting *some* USB sticks
on my Sid installation. I've had to reformat a few to make them usable.
I don't think the whole-drive format is as well standardised as the
normal multi-partition arrangement.

It is possible to make a normal partition table, but they don't come
like that. The one I carry around has ext3 and FAT32 partitions, and I
don't really mind that Windows machines can only see the second.

But given the write speed of most flash memory, a USB hard drive will
give much better performance, as well as much more space, and you
don't need to worry about wear optimisation or limiting. I've mentioned
that I have a Sid USB hard drive installation which boots on every
normal PC I've tried it with. Install what you like, configure what you
like, it's just a normal hard drive installation.

You install it as you would any hard drive installation: boot from an
installation ISO medium, normally CD, and tell the installer which drive
you want to use. The usual method with Debian is to use the network
installation ISO, which is very small, and then to add software from
the Net. That way you don't get unnecessary stuff.

If you don't want Stable, then you switch repositories and do a
dist-upgrade of the original Net installation, as there's not much
there to upgrade, and it saves downloading or copying a lot of Stable
and then throwing it away. Installation uses the physical hardware of
the host machine, but not its OS. I installed 32-bit Debian on the drive
while it was attached to my 64-bit workstation. You may want to tidy
up /etc/fstab afterwards, as it will also contain all the host's
partitions.

Unstable can be a bit tricky at times, and needs a lot of updating as
it's a rolling distribution, but I've only needed to reinstall twice in
about eight years of running it. I use an Unstable workstation, so I
pretty well copied it to the USB drive, using dpkg --get-selections.
Using Unison to synchronise data, given that most places I go have a PC
I can borrow, I effectively have a laptop that fits in a small pocket
but uses a big monitor, and has a much faster big brother at home. That
really does look like the sort of thing you want.

And yes, this mucking about with USB sticks and external hard drives is
a bit more complicated than a Windows installation, but then you can't
do this kind of thing with Windows *at* *all*. You can install Windows
to an internal hard drive *from* a USB stick, and some recent server
versions come as ISOs which don't fit on optical media so this is
necessary, but you can't install *to* a removable drive. Windows will
not boot if the hardware around it changes more than slightly, it is
necessary to re-register it with Microsoft, and it's up to Microsoft
whether to permit it.

-- 
Joe


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302011042.6ea51...@jretrading.com



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 6:58 PM, Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 18:44:55 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:


Regarding installing onto the USB hard drive...

I booted from USB thumb drive, then tried to install from that (using
its built-in Debian Installer) onto a USB hard drive. That also
failed, same problem as when I attempted to install to a 2nd USB thumb
drive: GRUB failed (automatically) and then LILO failed (manually
selected). I aborted the installation.

Unfortunately, the experiment failed. As I originally thought, the
problem is not with flash structures, its with USB implementation. Or,
at least, that's how it appears.


Appearences are deceptive. The fundamental cause of the problem and its
solution has nothing to do with USB.

[Snip]


Now I'm going to go back to attempting to install from USB flash stick
to USB hard drive... (stay tuned to this channel).


Any chance of a sight of what syslog reports when GRUB fails to install?


How do I get to the syslog?
If that was important, wouldn't the syslog be displayed automatically?
How am I to know about the syslog?


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131518a.90...@gmail.com



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Glenn English

On Mar 1, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:

> 404 File not found.

Google 'console_codes(4) - Linux manual page'.

-- 
Glenn English





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/7ff07ec2-5efb-434b-bf3e-5f425256c...@slsware.com



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Joao Luis Meloni Assirati
> Do you want to help?
> If no, stop reading now (I don't need more heckling).

Do you want help? Then don't write agressive email with sarcastic subject.

> What I did:

[...]

What you tried to do requires great Linux skill and knowledge. It is
beyond your possibilities to even understand help on this. Use standard
solutions that work for everybody instead.

> Okay, what went wrong:

[...]

If you were able to figure out all by yourself, why ask for help? You
should be able to solve the problem.

> Mount error message too cryptic - too generic (does not tell what actually
> happened).
> GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

There is a tale in my country about an arrogant man that considered absurd
that a pumpkin, being a large fruit, comes from a short plant, and the
blackberry [1] comes from a tall tree although it is a tiny fruit. He kept
thinking like this until he fell asleep under a blackberry tree and was
awaken by a blackberry hitting his nose.

Maybe when you have the required skill and knowledge, which comes from
practice, persistence and good attitude, you will be able to realize that
fundamental and ubiquous utilities like mount, grub and lilo have precise
behaviour and useful error messages.

> Any/all help appreciated except from Lisi Reisz.

Don't expect any/all help with this attitude.

OK, I gave my share feeding a troll today.

João Luis.

-

[1] Actually, the tale is about the jabuticaba
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jabuticaba but it is generally regarded to be
impossible to explain what a jabuticaba is to a non-Brazilian, so I
adapted Moteiro Lobato's story.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/d1b44561c7ee9ee0b6e1548f6e75.squir...@nonada.if.usp.br



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Brian
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 19:25:30 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

> in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
> install GRUB - the installer is either:
> a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,

The kernel has no knowledge about a non-existent hard disk so how can
GRUB possibly attempt to install itself there?

> b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
> properly (fail).

The base system has been installed prior to the bootloader stage. The
kernel must have been happy with the existing partitioning.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302004731.GJ14686@desktop



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:25:30PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
as the boot loader.


GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
right now and it uses GRUB.

Syslinux is another way of doing it, but I don't know enough about it to
comment one way or another.



come to think of it, if one is not REALLY careful, it's pretty easy
to install a boot image on a USB stick, but then install the boot
loader on the attached hard drive -- if you don't partition things
properly, and don't use the right options, grub-install will go
ahead and stick the boot loader on your attached hard disk, rather
than the USB stick; or fail when it tries to access a non-existent
MBR on the USB stick that hasn't been partitioned to have one

in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
install GRUB - the installer is either:
a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,
b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
properly (fail).


I think you're probably right.  When I successfully installed Debian and
GRUB to a USB stick, I manually paritioned the USB stick with the
installer.  I did not partition it beforehand, as I think Mark did.
Maybe the installer's partitioner does some magic that I don't know
about...


Yeah... this is one of those situations where reading the instructions 
VERY carefully, and understanding step by step, what instruction is 
putting what information, where, becomes very important.  Best not to 
try fancy stuff until you're comfortable with a default installation.


How did this start, again?  Something about 'Linux will never be 
successful until as easy to install as Windows;'

- neglecting that fact that most often Windows comes pre-installed; and,
- oh, by the way, I'm trying to install FROM a USB stick; and,
- oh, by the way, I'm also trying to install TO the same USB stick; and,
- I can't be bothered to read the detailed directions - this is what I 
did, it's not working, why?; and,
- I can't use my hard drive, because it's got WinXP on it, and I don't 
have an install disk for it.

Sigh.

Cheers,

Miles




--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51314ae9.4050...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:25:20PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 2013/3/1 3:55 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:39:19PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
> >>13 - Removed hard disk.
> >>14 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
> >>14.1 - Created 2.5-GB /, 0.5-GB swap, and 5.0-GB /windows (FAT-32).
> >>14.2 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB (newly partitioned).
> >>14.3 - Install succeeded!
> >>14.4 - Automatic GRUB install failed!
> >
> >I would try this:
> >
> >Answer "no" to the question about installing GRUB to the MBR.
> 
> I wasn't asked. It did that automatically.
> 
This site has a screenshot near the bottom of the page.  It says
"Install the GRUB boot loader to the master boot record?"

http://www.howtoforge.com/perfect-server-debian-squeeze-debian-6.0-with-bind-dovecot-and-nginx-ispconfig-3-p2

If your installer is not asking you that, I'm not sure why.  Are you
using the graphical installer?  Maybe it asks different questions (which
I would think would be a bug).

> >The next screen should give you some additional options about where to 
> >install GRUB.
> 
> The 'next' screen merely showed the error. I'm not sure, but I think the 
> screen after that (i.e., after I clicked "Continue") was the main menu from 
> which I selected LILO.
> 
> >You want to install it to the 8 GB usb stick, which may be
> >/dev/sdb -- but you should make sure.
> 
> Really? Are you saying that at that point the USB thumb drive has a mount 
> point? I don't think so, but what the hell do I know. Even if it has a mount 
> point, I wouldn't know what to do.
> 
/dev/sdb is not a mount point.  It is just a file representing a device.
In this case, the second hard disc -- which is how Linux sees USB
sticks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302004025.gd...@aurora.owens.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:14:59PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
as the boot loader.


GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
right now and it uses GRUB.

Rob... can you say a bit more about how you partition the USB stick,
how you configure your BIOS, and anything special you do re. the
GRUB install (e.g., re. the fact that USB sticks don't have an MBR).
I know that I've built bootable USB sticks in the past, but can't
remember the details other than that I used the USBHDD boot option
in my BIOS.


I used to use Debian Live, which uses syslinux.  Due to the way Debian
Live is structured, you can't do kernel updates (this may be outdated
information, but it was true at least 2 years ago).

So I decided to switch to straight Debian on a USB stick.  I used a Dell
laptop (can't remember which one) to perform the installation.  I booted
from a netinst i386 CD.  When it came time for partitioning, I treated
the USB stick just like it was a hard drive.  The installer created a
partition table and I created a single large partition for the root
filesystem (formatted to ext4).

The first time I did this, GRUB installed itself to the MBR of the hard
disk.  My USB stick was therefore only bootable on that laptop.  I fixed
that USB stick by installing GRUB (I can't remember the exact commands).

The next time I did this type of installation, I answered "no" to
"install GRUB to the MBR".  The installer then gave me a choice of where
to install GRUB.  I specified /dev/sdb (which was my USB stick).  It
worked.  I did at least one other USB stick installation this way.

All of this was using Squeeze.

I didn't do anything special with the BIOS, other than to configure it
to boot from USB (some BIOS's say USB hard drive, but it still works).
I have booted my Debian USB stick off of several Dell laptops, a Toshiba
laptop, a Dell desktop, and possibly more that I can't remember.  It
seems to work just as well as Debian Live, and there is no special setup
required for things like persistence.

I did this same type of installation on a USB hard drive and the process
was identical as far as I can remember.

All of my USB sticks are Sandisk brand.



Thanks!  I'm going to file this away somewhere, and hope that I can find 
it next time I need to make bootable USB stick.


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513149ad.70...@meetinghouse.net



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom

Richard Hector wrote:

On 02/03/13 08:46, Thomas D. Dean wrote:

On 03/01/13 11:35, Thomas D. Dean wrote:

The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline

 > export TERM=ansi80x25
 > printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"

produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.

If I put the same in c code, it works

#include 
int main() {
fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
return 0;
}

I get underlined text.


I ran the C example in an xterm on Ubuntu!

The question remains.

Why does this produce color rather than underlined text?

The standard says ESC[32m should produce green text and ESC[4m should
produce underlined text.


Are you doing this on a (colour) linux console, rather than an xterm?
Apparently it can't do underline, and simulates it with a different
colour instead. See 'man console_codes', or here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/page/man4/console_codes.4.html


404 File not found.

Hugo



I don't think setting TERM will make any difference; it's your program
that has to interpret that (usually via terminfo and associated
libraries) and send the correct escape sequences - but you're sending
them yourself anyway.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/kgrhfg$ols$1...@ger.gmane.org



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:25:30PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>Mark Filipak wrote:
> >GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.
> >>Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
> >>to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
> >>different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
> >>what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
> >>appropriately).
> >>
> >>Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
> >>as the boot loader.
> >>
> >GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
> >right now and it uses GRUB.
> >
> >Syslinux is another way of doing it, but I don't know enough about it to
> >comment one way or another.
> >
> >
> 
> come to think of it, if one is not REALLY careful, it's pretty easy
> to install a boot image on a USB stick, but then install the boot
> loader on the attached hard drive -- if you don't partition things
> properly, and don't use the right options, grub-install will go
> ahead and stick the boot loader on your attached hard disk, rather
> than the USB stick; or fail when it tries to access a non-existent
> MBR on the USB stick that hasn't been partitioned to have one
> 
> in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to
> install GRUB - the installer is either:
> a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,
> b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned
> properly (fail).
> 
I think you're probably right.  When I successfully installed Debian and
GRUB to a USB stick, I manually paritioned the USB stick with the
installer.  I did not partition it beforehand, as I think Mark did.
Maybe the installer's partitioner does some magic that I don't know
about...

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302003222.gc...@aurora.owens.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:14:59PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Rob Owens wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>Mark Filipak wrote:
> >GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.
> >>Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
> >>to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
> >>different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
> >>what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
> >>appropriately).
> >>
> >>Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
> >>as the boot loader.
> >>
> >GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
> >right now and it uses GRUB.
> 
> Rob... can you say a bit more about how you partition the USB stick,
> how you configure your BIOS, and anything special you do re. the
> GRUB install (e.g., re. the fact that USB sticks don't have an MBR).
> I know that I've built bootable USB sticks in the past, but can't
> remember the details other than that I used the USBHDD boot option
> in my BIOS.
> 
I used to use Debian Live, which uses syslinux.  Due to the way Debian
Live is structured, you can't do kernel updates (this may be outdated
information, but it was true at least 2 years ago).  

So I decided to switch to straight Debian on a USB stick.  I used a Dell
laptop (can't remember which one) to perform the installation.  I booted
from a netinst i386 CD.  When it came time for partitioning, I treated
the USB stick just like it was a hard drive.  The installer created a
partition table and I created a single large partition for the root
filesystem (formatted to ext4).

The first time I did this, GRUB installed itself to the MBR of the hard
disk.  My USB stick was therefore only bootable on that laptop.  I fixed
that USB stick by installing GRUB (I can't remember the exact commands).

The next time I did this type of installation, I answered "no" to
"install GRUB to the MBR".  The installer then gave me a choice of where
to install GRUB.  I specified /dev/sdb (which was my USB stick).  It
worked.  I did at least one other USB stick installation this way.

All of this was using Squeeze.  

I didn't do anything special with the BIOS, other than to configure it
to boot from USB (some BIOS's say USB hard drive, but it still works).  
I have booted my Debian USB stick off of several Dell laptops, a Toshiba 
laptop, a Dell desktop, and possibly more that I can't remember.  It 
seems to work just as well as Debian Live, and there is no special setup 
required for things like persistence.

I did this same type of installation on a USB hard drive and the process
was identical as far as I can remember.

All of my USB sticks are Sandisk brand.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130302003015.gb...@aurora.owens.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
as the boot loader.


GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
right now and it uses GRUB.

Syslinux is another way of doing it, but I don't know enough about it to
comment one way or another.




come to think of it, if one is not REALLY careful, it's pretty easy to 
install a boot image on a USB stick, but then install the boot loader on 
the attached hard drive -- if you don't partition things properly, and 
don't use the right options, grub-install will go ahead and stick the 
boot loader on your attached hard disk, rather than the USB stick; or 
fail when it tries to access a non-existent MBR on the USB stick that 
hasn't been partitioned to have one


in fact, I expect that's what's happening to Mark when he tries to 
install GRUB - the installer is either:

a) trying to install on the hdd, which he's disconnected (fail), or,
b) trying to install to the USB stick, which hasn't been partitioned 
properly (fail).








--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513146fa.3010...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:

GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
as the boot loader.


GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
right now and it uses GRUB.


Rob... can you say a bit more about how you partition the USB stick, how 
you configure your BIOS, and anything special you do re. the GRUB 
install (e.g., re. the fact that USB sticks don't have an MBR).  I know 
that I've built bootable USB sticks in the past, but can't remember the 
details other than that I used the USBHDD boot option in my BIOS.


Miles








--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51314483.5040...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Caldav client on Debian

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mérof 42 wrote:

Hi,

I'm using Owncloud since few month, but with the web interface 
calendar is not really useful

I'm looking for a simple caldav client, but I can't find one.

Do you have any idea which client can I use?

I'm searching a simple client, not like evolution who need a mailbox 
activated.




Maybe Mozilla Sunbird - stand alone calendar, or the associated plug-in 
for Firefox?  (Though, caldav isn't all that useful without a mail 
client - kind a hard to invite people to meetings, or respond to 
invitations.)




--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513143ed.6050...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak  wrote:


From: Mark Filipak 
Subject: Re: Installation failed
To: "Shane Johnson" 
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 2:12 PM

I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or
nothing.


Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard drive?


That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...


Ummm, no.  USB memory stick does not equal USB drive.  For one thing, a 
USB drive (and associated driver) has an MBR, a USB stick does not.



The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can
boot from it. But I can't configure it (different wallpaper,
for example) and I can't install anything (Icedove, for
example). Do you
know of any way to do that?


You can install to USB with 'persistence' - an additional writable 
partition - which will allow some user changes to be retained.


If I could install to USB, I'd do just that. My problem is that I 
can't install to USB.


Again, because you're not following the directions.  It sounds like 
you're making your USB stick into the equivalent of a live CD - which 
creates temporary storage in a ram disk - all of which goes away when 
you power cycle.  There's no persistence.  If you want persistence, then 
you have to do things like create a persistent partition on your USB stick.


How about following people's suggestions, rather than doing things in 
the way you think should work, and then asking people why it isn't 
working. You've got two very specific recommendations on the table:

- download and burn a Knoppix DVD, then use it to install onto a USB stick
- follow, in detail, step-by-step, the Debian install directions

So far, you've done neither, just complained that what you're trying 
isn't working.  If you don't want to take advice, how about not 
pestering us.




--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131430a.5020...@meetinghouse.net



Re: moving /var

2013-03-01 Thread Mr G
Why can't you just

#mount --rebind /var /newvar

B G
On Mar 1, 2013 4:00 PM, "Bob Proulx"  wrote:

> Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> > >> A simple live CD is sufficient:
> > >> Debian netinst minimal CD in rescue mode is sufficient to do so.
> > >> Do not forget to update the /etc/fstab configuration file with respect
> > >> to the change; to clean up the /var (and let an empty one) in the `/'
> > >> (root) partition.
> > >
> > > It is simpler to move the partition in single user mode. Just issue
> the command (as root)
>
> +1 for single user mode.  No need to boot other media.  The system is
> designed to be self-sufficient.
>
> > > # shutdown now
> >
> > Hmm, I have always used the init command to change runlevels. So I would
> have gone for:
> > # init 1
>
> The documented interface is 'telinit' to tell init to change
> runlevels.  But in practice telinit is linked to init.  Therefore it
> works both ways.
>
>   lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jun  7  2012 /sbin/telinit -> init
>
> > And indeed single user lever is the way to go for lots of stuff like
> this.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Bob
>


Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mark Filipak wrote:

On 2013/3/1 3:16 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:



GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed 
to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a 
different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on 
what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS 
appropriately).


Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux as 
the boot loader.


Booting from a USB stick follows yet another process, and which 
process is somewhat dependent on what your BIOS supports.  I'm a 
little fggy on the details (haven't done it it a while), but some 
BIOSs know how to boot from a USB stick, others have a mode called 
USBHDD, where they treat the USB stick as if it's a hard drive - 
which means you have to play some games in the USB setup to make it 
look like a hard drive, with an MBR and all.  As I recall, syslinux 
is one way to boot from a USB stick.


See http://wiki.debian.org/BootProcess for more details.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en for 
installing on a USB stick

(when in doubt, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS)

Try doing a basic installation from 
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual before you start 
trying more complicated things.


Miles, I'm already booting from USB. I don't need help there. And a 
basic installation per your link is out of the question. I recall 
something about isolinux from a few years ago, but during 
installation, I'm presented only with GRUB (actually, that is 
automatically tried) or LILO.


First off, I'm going to repeat: STOP SENDING TWO COPIES OF YOUR EMAILS.  
It's simply rude.  Reply to the list or not at all.


Second, obviously you're missing some steps in the installation, and/or 
making some wrong choices.  If you're not going to follow the steps in 
the instructions, don't expect folks to help you clean up things that 
are a result of not configuring something early on. Right off the bat, 
there's a lot of material early on about how to configure various boot 
media - that catches up with you when it becomes time to install a boot 
loader.


If you're only being presented by the choice of GRUB or LILO, while 
trying to install on a USB stick, then you messed something up early 
on.  Or more to the point, a USB installation is non-standard, it 
requires special configuration, and you're obviously skipping some key step.


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513141c2.9000...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-01 Thread Brian
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 18:44:55 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

> Regarding installing onto the USB hard drive...
> 
> I booted from USB thumb drive, then tried to install from that (using
> its built-in Debian Installer) onto a USB hard drive. That also
> failed, same problem as when I attempted to install to a 2nd USB thumb
> drive: GRUB failed (automatically) and then LILO failed (manually
> selected). I aborted the installation.
> 
> Unfortunately, the experiment failed. As I originally thought, the
> problem is not with flash structures, its with USB implementation. Or,
> at least, that's how it appears.

Appearences are deceptive. The fundamental cause of the problem and its
solution has nothing to do with USB. 

[Snip]

> Now I'm going to go back to attempting to install from USB flash stick
> to USB hard drive... (stay tuned to this channel).

Any chance of a sight of what syslog reports when GRUB fails to install?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301235840.GI14686@desktop



Re: Installation failed - and failed again...

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

Hello All,

By mistake this thread has been going only to Steven Grunza. I'm reposting to 
the whole list for help.

Regarding installing onto the USB hard drive...

I booted from USB thumb drive, then tried to install from that (using its 
built-in Debian Installer) onto a USB hard drive. That also failed, same 
problem as when I attempted to install to a 2nd USB thumb drive: GRUB failed 
(automatically) and then LILO failed (manually selected). I aborted the 
installation.

Unfortunately, the experiment failed. As I originally thought, the problem is 
not with flash structures, its with USB implementation. Or, at least, that's 
how it appears.

= UPDATE =

I'm back early to report my experiences (frustrations) with the Debian 
installer.

First, it goes full screen and doesn't allow a way to close it or to switch 
back to the desktop - basically, it's a one-way street that either succeeds or 
that requires the user to hit the power button.

Second, for the hell of it I tried Alt-Tab (as though Debian was Windows) and - 
surprise! - I could switch between windows (but not go back to the desktop). 
What were those other windows? There were 6 of them! They were all prompts to 
run the file manager on the newly mounted volume! That automounting is really 
getting in the way.

Now I'm going to go back to attempting to install from USB flash stick to USB 
hard drive...

= MORE UPDATE =

I'm back again, but still not done. Sigh! The Debian installer gives you the option 
to save snapshots. I tried to save a snapshot showing how I'm partitioning the USB 
hard drive. The Debian installer said it was saving the snapshots to 
/var/log/<...bla-bla-bla...>.png.

(I would have liked to have been given the option to save them somewhere else, 
such as the partition that I created expressly for Windows, so I could access 
it while running Windows).

Of course, when I got out of the Debian installer, those .png files weren't in 
/var/log! Argh!

Okay, this is a side trip: Here (to the best of my recollection) is how I'm 
trying to partition:

Pri-0: 243 MB, ext3, LVM, bootable
Pri-1: 28 GB, NTFS, "WindowsTemp"
Ext-0: 333 MB, ext3, /
Ext-1: 3.18 GB, ext3
Ext-2: 1.55 GB, swap
Ext-3: 524 MB, ext3
Ext-4: 277 MB, ext3
Ext-5: 3.24 GB, ext3

I can't remember which is for /ver, which is for /usr, etc. Basically, I told it to use 
an LVM, then I created the "WindowsTemp", then I told it to automatically 
partition the remainder.

Now I'm going to go back to attempting to install from USB flash stick to USB 
hard drive... (stay tuned to this channel).

Ciao - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51313d77.1010...@gmail.com



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread John Hasler
Lisi writes:
> I have had a problem with chromium, but that has its own repository.

Filename: pool/main/c/chromium-browser/chromium_25.0.1364.97-1_amd64.deb
-- 
John Hasler


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87a9qmoflv@thumper.dhh.gt.org



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/03/13 08:46, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
> On 03/01/13 11:35, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
>> The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline
>>
>>  > export TERM=ansi80x25
>>  > printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"
>>
>> produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.
>>
>> If I put the same in c code, it works
>>
>> #include 
>> int main() {
>> fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> I get underlined text.
>>
> 
> I ran the C example in an xterm on Ubuntu!
> 
> The question remains.
> 
> Why does this produce color rather than underlined text?
> 
> The standard says ESC[32m should produce green text and ESC[4m should
> produce underlined text.

Are you doing this on a (colour) linux console, rather than an xterm?
Apparently it can't do underline, and simulates it with a different
colour instead. See 'man console_codes', or here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/page/man4/console_codes.4.html

I don't think setting TERM will make any difference; it's your program
that has to interpret that (usually via terminfo and associated
libraries) and send the correct escape sequences - but you're sending
them yourself anyway.

Richard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131398c.9090...@walnut.gen.nz



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
>  Debian is always out of date and even the "stable" is unsecure as
> its backported fixes rather than updates

Sorry to answer piecemeal.  Debian stable starts to go out of date as soon as 
it is released, or even before, while it was still testing, but in freeze.  
It has security updates throughout its life and for the first year of being 
Old Stable.  It is very secure.  Nothing, and no distro, is totally secure, 
but Debian Stable is as close as you are likely to get.

Many people therefore use Stable only for servers.  Testing is more up to 
date, and is as stable as many released versions of other distros.  It does 
not, however, get up to date security updates.  

Many people in fact run Unstable on their desktops and just upgrade with 
caution.  I understand that it does get security upgrades, but although I 
have installed it to look at it, I have never had the nerve to install it on 
my workhorse machine.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303012319.41253.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
> that packages outside of the main Repo aren't tested as well as
> the main so are prone to failure or bugs

The first of these propositions is true, the second false.  Several of the 
repos are very well tested indeed and rock solid (e.g. main and security), 
but there are repos which are tested less:  non-free and contrib for example.  
They are still not "prone to failure or bugs".  The detail depends on the 
version.  In the case of stable, they are still considerably less buggy than 
another well known distro's main repository.  I personally have never had a 
problem arising from a Debian Stable repository, even non-free.  I have had a 
problem with chromium, but that has its own repository.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303012310.07039.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: 10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:33:37 Dick Thomas wrote:
> Me and my lug have a weekly radio show

\o/  Where?

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303012259.13527.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Friday 01 March 2013 22:25:20 Mark Filipak wrote:
> > You want to install it to the 8 GB usb stick, which may be
> > /dev/sdb -- but you should make sure.
>
> Really? Are you saying that at that point the USB thumb drive has a mount
> point? I don't think so, but what the hell do I know. Even if it has a
> mount point, I wouldn't know what to do.

One of those of you to whom he is willing to speak, may want to point out to 
him that /dev/sdb is not a mount point but an identifier.

Lisi


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303012258.04995.lisi.re...@gmail.com



10 top myths of debian

2013-03-01 Thread Dick Thomas
Hello,

Me and my lug have a weekly radio show and I thought I would do a
"debian myths" piece
it only has to be 4 or 5 min long but i'd need 5 or 10 myths abou
debian  *with links to why they are myth*
I'm new to debian but not a new Linux user, so I don't know what is a
myth or not
  things like this have been mentioned before by Ubuntu and Slackware
users and I never know how to answer

*** that packages outside of the main Repo aren't tested as well as
the main so are prone to failure or bugs
*** Debian is hard to install (i know this is a myth, I find Debian
the easiest of the lot)
*** Debian is always out of date and even the "stable" is unsecure as
its backported fixes rather than updates
and any other points you could think of wouldl be awesome

Dick Thomas

About.me http://about.me/dick.thomas
Blog: www.xpd259.co.uk
G+:   www.google.com/profiles/xpd259
gpg key: C791809B


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAGe0=n0con8zukxvsk+8+1cequovg0ahivopfb18jm1v9cw...@mail.gmail.com



Re: An Apology was:Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Richard Owlett

Lisi Reisz wrote:



It has been drawn to my attention off list that I am wrong ...  


NOT TO WORRY

If I took myself too seriously I've siblings {and friends} 
who would resolve issue ;/





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51312c9d.3060...@cloud85.net



Re: upgrade snafu

2013-03-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Frank McCormick wrote:
> localepurge: checking for existence of
> /var/cache/localepurge/localelist... localepurge:
> checking system for new locale ...
> Segmentation fault E: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke
> 'if [ -x /usr/sbin/localepurge ] && [ $(ps w -p $PPID | egrep -c
> '(remove|purge)') != 1 ]; then /usr/sbin/localepurge; else exit 0;
> fi' E: Sub-process returned an error code debian:
> /home/frank#
> Any ideas or should I just wait until it sorts itself out ?

A segmentation fault in a program you are writing is probably a bug in
your program.  A segmentation fault in a program that everyone runs
okay but you is probably not a software bug.  Instead it must be
hardware.

I suspect bad ram or a flakey socket connection.  Bad ram is a likely
suspect but it could be a problem SATA cable or other.  Think hardware
problem.  But probably just a component.  I have had both ram problems
and disk cable problems produce these types of issues.

I would start by checking the disk drive for errors.  Run a SMART
drive selftest.  These exact commands are not important but just to
show you the general idea.

  smartctl -l error /dev/sda
  smartctl -t short /dev/sda &&
sleep 120 &&
  smartctl -l selftest /dev/sda

I would carefully (beware and avoid the ESD zap) unsocket the ram and
resocket it.  I would carefully unplug and reattach every SATA cable.
Hopefully that will sort things out.  If not run memtest.  If no
answer there I would bisect the problem by splitting the ram or
swapping cpus with another.  I usually debug these things by swapping
components until I can isolate the problem to something specific. 

Alternatively it is possible that some attacker is wedging into your
system and the files are compromised.  I doubt that is the problem but
I feel compelled to cover the base by mentioning it.

Good luck!
Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 3:55 PM, Rob Owens wrote:

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:39:19PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

13 - Removed hard disk.
14 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
14.1 - Created 2.5-GB /, 0.5-GB swap, and 5.0-GB /windows (FAT-32).
14.2 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB (newly partitioned).
14.3 - Install succeeded!
14.4 - Automatic GRUB install failed!


I would try this:

Answer "no" to the question about installing GRUB to the MBR.


I wasn't asked. It did that automatically.


The next screen should give you some additional options about where to install 
GRUB.


The 'next' screen merely showed the error. I'm not sure, but I think the screen after 
that (i.e., after I clicked "Continue") was the main menu from which I selected 
LILO.


You want to install it to the 8 GB usb stick, which may be
/dev/sdb -- but you should make sure.


Really? Are you saying that at that point the USB thumb drive has a mount 
point? I don't think so, but what the hell do I know. Even if it has a mount 
point, I wouldn't know what to do.


Think back to the paritioning
menu.  Whatever drive you partitioned, that's the drive you want to
install GRUB to.


Of course... I thought I tried every path, but I'll repeat the experiment and 
get back to you...



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51312ad0.3010...@gmail.com



An Apology was:Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Friday 01 March 2013 08:33:41 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Thirdly, I didn't notice yesterday, but he is not even telling the truth.
>  He cannot both be around 70 (he usually says he is approaching 70) and
> have worked on/with punched cards in 1949.  (Do the arithmetic.)

It has been drawn to my attention off list that I am wrong about this.  And, 
even had it been right, it was pretty catty anyway.  (I haven't yet read the 
list today, but several of you have probably told me so). 

 I have been thinking all day that when I got back to a computer (I have been 
oit all day) I must apologise - before it was drawn to my attention that I 
had got the date wrong.

I shall now read the list.  If 20 of you have written to say how catty I was, 
I acknowledge all 20 here.

Lisi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303012220.55337.lisi.re...@gmail.com



Re: install grub2 to root partition

2013-03-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Skippy VonDrake wrote:
> I have multiple partitions, Ubuntu installed on one and grub2
> installed in the MBR.

The BIOS will only boot one MBR.  Fortunately it can be shared between
Ubuntu and Debian okay.  Since your primary one is Ubuntu I would use
it to boot both.

> When I installed Debian (6.07) on a new partition I wanted to install
> grub for that partition but was unsuccessful.
> Used the "Advanced Install" process and reached the "Grub install"
> options but kept getting a red screen saying it was unsuccessful.

What was the error?  At that point press Alt-F4 and look at the
installer console screen.  Hopefully there will be some clue there as
to the problem.

> During the partition stage I gave Debian 2 partitions ('/' and
> '/home') and made '/' bootable.

The "bootable" flag is legacy and AFAIK no longer used nor relevant.
It was an old MS-DOS thing.

> I know this partition is '/dev/sda6' and gparted verifies this.

You should be able to boot this partition manually by booting grub
from the MBR installed by Ubuntu.  Then stop the countdown and enter
command line mode.

Unfortunately at that point the instructions are completely different
depending upon whether it is grub 1 or grub 2.  So I will just say
that it is possible to enter the commands manually and boot either
system.  There is even TAB completion of the filenames.

Grub 1 is simple.  Just enter the commands.  Simple.  Grub 2 is much
more complicated and really too complicated to enter everything by
hand.  But editing the configuration on the fly is quite reasonable.
Select edit and modify one of the existing entries.  Works well enough.

Having booted the system itself you should be able to run the
grub-install command from the command line and debug it further.

> The reason for wanting grub (or grub2) also installed in the Debian
> partition is because I plan on installing the Xen hypervisor.
> That way when I do "update-grub" from within Debian, it will update
> the "right" config files and give a new menu during the boot process.

Sure.  You will need to debug why the MBR installation failed.

> So my question is: how do I install grub (or grub2) into the root
> partition of Debian to allow chainloading?
> I have no problem re-installing Debian if that is the best choice.

By what you have said so far I don't see any reason for it to not
work.  Hopefully the errors on Alt-F4 or the command line will be
clueful.

The chainloading would be from the first to the second.  The first
loader knows it is chainloading to a second one.  The second one does
not know about this and thinks it is the first one.  You probably know
this but saying it because it wasn't clear by what I read.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 4:41 PM, Go Linux wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak wrote:


I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or
nothing.


Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard

drive?

That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...


The problem is not with USB.  The problem is flash vs hard drive.  AFAIK you 
CAN install grub2 to a hard drive and boot from it.  I've done quite a bit of 
reading but haven't tried it yet because I have no pressing need.


The problem *is* with USB. As I replied in a different branch of this thread, 
attempted installation onto a USB hard disk also failed in exactly the same way.

I'd say, back to square-1, but it looks like square-0 to me.

- Mark.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513128de.6040...@gmail.com



Re: moving /var

2013-03-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> >> A simple live CD is sufficient:
> >> Debian netinst minimal CD in rescue mode is sufficient to do so.
> >> Do not forget to update the /etc/fstab configuration file with respect 
> >> to the change; to clean up the /var (and let an empty one) in the `/'
> >> (root) partition.
> >
> > It is simpler to move the partition in single user mode. Just issue the 
> > command (as root)

+1 for single user mode.  No need to boot other media.  The system is
designed to be self-sufficient.

> > # shutdown now
>
> Hmm, I have always used the init command to change runlevels. So I would have 
> gone for:
> # init 1

The documented interface is 'telinit' to tell init to change
runlevels.  But in practice telinit is linked to init.  Therefore it
works both ways.

  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Jun  7  2012 /sbin/telinit -> init

> And indeed single user lever is the way to go for lots of stuff like this.

Agreed.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Jack Schneider
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:37:32 -0500
Miles Fidelman  wrote:

> Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 08:34:57 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >
> >> Fair enough, but... I have to say it
> >>
> >> Back in my day, we not only had to walk to school, uphill, in both
> >> directions, in the snow, but we also had to build our computers by
> >> hand, from TTL logic gates. :-)
> > You had TTL logic gates? Boy, you were lucky! We were given relay
> > switches from cast-off telephone equipment. And we had to buy our
> > own electrodes and lemons to power the machine.
> >
> >
> Ahh yes, programmable relay logic.  Still around, by the way. :-)
> 
> Ok, anybody here played with really old IBM card sorters - the kind
> that you programmed with patch cords? (Not me, I might add.)
> 
Like an IBM 1400?

'Musing along

Jack


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301154612.7bd1a...@speeduke.wildblue.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Go Linux


--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak  wrote:

> From: Mark Filipak 
> Subject: Re: Installation failed
> To: "Go Linux" 
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 2:42 PM
> On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> > --- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak 
> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive
> or
> >> nothing.
> >
> > Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard
> drive?
> 
> That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...
> 
> 

The problem is not with USB.  The problem is flash vs hard drive.  AFAIK you 
CAN install grub2 to a hard drive and boot from it.  I've done quite a bit of 
reading but haven't tried it yet because I have no pressing need.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362174094.48167.yahoomailclas...@web163404.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: RAID1 all bootable

2013-03-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:20:09PM +0100, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Hi:
> With a raid1 amd64 wheezy, one of the two HDs got broken.
> Unfortunately, I had added grub to sda only, which is just the one
> broken. So that, when it is replaced with a fresh HD, the OS is not
> found. Inverting the SATA cables of course does not help (Operative
> System Not Found). In a previous similar circumstance, I was lucky
> that the broken HD was the one without gru.
> 
> Is any way to recover? perhaps through Knoppix? I know how to look
> into undamaged RAID1 with Knoppix.
> 
> Also, when making a fresh RAID1 from scratch, where to find a Debian
> description  of how to make both sda and sdb bootable? (which should
> be included by default, in my opinion)

You can boot the install disk in rescue mode, select the root partition
to chroot into, then run grub-install from there.

When grub asks where to install, you should configure it for both sda
and sdb.  I think 'dpkg-reconfigure grub-pc' is where that is selected.
Might need it to use -plow to asks all levels of questions.  Not sure.

-- 
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301213542.gd20...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca



Re: /bin/run-init: /sbin/init: No such file or directory.

2013-03-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-03-01 21:22 +0100, Kirk Ismay wrote:

> I have a virtual lenny system (2.6.26-2-amd64) running on VMWare VCenter.
>
> For testing and quality assurance, I am trying to create a clone of
> the machine under VirtualBox running on my development workstation.
>
> I booted from a rescue cd image and created a disk with an identical
> partition layout as the live system, formatted the filesystems and
> then used rsync to copy the filesystem from the live system to the new
> test vm.
>
> I can't boot the test vm without getting this message on boot:
> /bin/run-init: /sbin/init: No such file or directory.
>
> If I set break=bottom at boot, I can mount and view the root
> filesystem.  So /bin/bash and /sbin/init do exist at boot time.
>
> I also can't chroot to the root filesystem from the rescue cd
> environment. Chroot reports:
> chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

This indicates that the ELF interpreter (/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 on
amd64 systems) is missing, you'd get the same error message for every
dynamically linked executable then.  It's a bit confusing, but the
kernel just returns ENOENT, and the userspace programs don't have enough
information to tell you _which_ file is missing.

> /dev & /proc are bind mounted on the root file system when I run
> chroot. I've tried both the chroot on the rescue cd and the root
> filesystem.
>
> I have extracted the coreutils, bash, and sysvinit packages from
> archive.debian.org to the root filesystem and can verify that
> /sbin/init, /bin/bash, and /usr/sbin/chroot do in fact exist. Here are
> the md5sums:
>
> 23f5429412b98a704b888704b7504b7b  /mnt/bin/bash
> 25362d91e139e55a406cfbc2333484d0  /mnt/sbin/init
> 92ce55e8137b60d05788b8c711d4d44d  /mnt/usr/sbin/chroot
>
> The VirtualBox host and rescue cd image are AMD64 linux also.  I also
> tried the lenny64 business card image.
> I have run out of ideas.   Any suggestions would be helpful.

You should have the following files and symlinks (indicated by "->") in
the chroot:

/lib/ld-2.7.so
/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -> ld-2.7.so
/lib64 -> /lib
/lib/libc-2.7.so
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.7.so

I suspect one of these has gone AWOL.

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vc9a24b1@turtle.gmx.de



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:16:12PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Mark Filipak wrote:
> >
> >>>GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.
> 
> Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed
> to work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a
> different boot loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on
> what your BIOS supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS
> appropriately).
> 
> Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux
> as the boot loader.
> 
GRUB will work on a USB stick.  I have Debian installed on a USB stick
right now and it uses GRUB.

Syslinux is another way of doing it, but I don't know enough about it to
comment one way or another.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301210527.ge31...@aurora.owens.net



Caldav client on Debian

2013-03-01 Thread Mérof 42
Hi,

I'm using Owncloud since few month, but with the web interface calendar is
not really useful
I'm looking for a simple caldav client, but I can't find one.

Do you have any idea which client can I use?

I'm searching a simple client, not like evolution who need a mailbox
activated.

Thanks you !


Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
> On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:
> 
> >>The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can
> >>boot from it. But I can't configure it (different wallpaper,
> >>for example) and I can't install anything (Icedove, for
> >>example). Do you
> >>know of any way to do that?
> >
> >You can install to USB with 'persistence' - an additional writable partition 
> >- which will allow some user changes to be retained.
> 
> If I could install to USB, I'd do just that. My problem is that I can't 
> install to USB.
> 
'persistence' is used on the Debian Live USB as a way of saving
settings and /home, etc.  I suspect setting that up is more complicated
than you would like, though.

I recommend Debian to USB (not Debian Live) because it'll give you a
more traditional Debian installation in terms of file layout, etc.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301210251.gd31...@aurora.owens.net



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:39:19PM -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:
> 13 - Removed hard disk.
> 14 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
> 14.1 - Created 2.5-GB /, 0.5-GB swap, and 5.0-GB /windows (FAT-32).
> 14.2 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB (newly partitioned).
> 14.3 - Install succeeded!
> 14.4 - Automatic GRUB install failed!

I would try this:

Answer "no" to the question about installing GRUB to the MBR.  The next
screen should give you some additional options about where to install
GRUB.  You want to install it to the 8 GB usb stick, which may be
/dev/sdb -- but you should make sure.  Think back to the paritioning
menu.  Whatever drive you partitioned, that's the drive you want to
install GRUB to.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301205534.gc31...@aurora.owens.net



Re: I wish to advocate linux --pclos from flash

2013-03-01 Thread Rob Owens
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:13:59PM -0500, Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Doug  wrote:
> > There are instructions for making a boot flash-drive here:
> >
> > http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php/topic,80917.0.html
> 
> Thanks but these instructions are for creating an installation flash
> drive on Linux - and they're well hidden. So it's a fail from the
> perspective of the person criticizing distributions for not providing
> readily-available Windows instructions for creating one.
> 
Last time I used an Ubuntu live cd, there was a big old "install to USB
stick" button either on the desktop or in an easily accessible menu.
It's been a while, but I'm pretty sure I didn't have to look too hard to
find it.  Anybody know for sure if Ubuntu still has that?

So while it's not Debian, it is a very easy way to tesk out a Linux
distribution.

-Rob


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301204527.gb31...@aurora.owens.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 3:29 PM, Go Linux wrote:

--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak  wrote:


From: Mark Filipak 
Subject: Re: Installation failed
To: "Shane Johnson" 
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 2:12 PM

I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or
nothing.


Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard drive?


That would be nice, but that would be on USB also...


The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can
boot from it. But I can't configure it (different wallpaper,
for example) and I can't install anything (Icedove, for
example). Do you
know of any way to do that?


You can install to USB with 'persistence' - an additional writable partition - 
which will allow some user changes to be retained.


If I could install to USB, I'd do just that. My problem is that I can't install 
to USB.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513112d0.5010...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 3:16 PM, Miles Fidelman wrote:

Mark Filipak wrote:



GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed to work 
with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a different boot loader on a 
USB stick - and which one is dependent on what your BIOS supports (and, of 
course, you have to set your BIOS appropriately).

Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux as the boot 
loader.

Booting from a USB stick follows yet another process, and which process is 
somewhat dependent on what your BIOS supports.  I'm a little fggy on the 
details (haven't done it it a while), but some BIOSs know how to boot from a 
USB stick, others have a mode called USBHDD, where they treat the USB stick as 
if it's a hard drive - which means you have to play some games in the USB setup 
to make it look like a hard drive, with an MBR and all.  As I recall, syslinux 
is one way to boot from a USB stick.

See http://wiki.debian.org/BootProcess for more details.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en for installing on a 
USB stick
(when in doubt, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS)

Try doing a basic installation from 
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual before you start trying 
more complicated things.


Miles, I'm already booting from USB. I don't need help there. And a basic 
installation per your link is out of the question. I recall something about 
isolinux from a few years ago, but during installation, I'm presented only with 
GRUB (actually, that is automatically tried) or LILO.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51311230.1060...@gmail.com



/bin/run-init: /sbin/init: No such file or directory.

2013-03-01 Thread Kirk Ismay

I have a virtual lenny system (2.6.26-2-amd64) running on VMWare VCenter.

For testing and quality assurance, I am trying to create a clone of the 
machine under VirtualBox running on my development workstation.


I booted from a rescue cd image and created a disk with an identical 
partition layout as the live system, formatted the filesystems and then 
used rsync to copy the filesystem from the live system to the new test vm.


I can't boot the test vm without getting this message on boot:
/bin/run-init: /sbin/init: No such file or directory.

If I set break=bottom at boot, I can mount and view the root 
filesystem.  So /bin/bash and /sbin/init do exist at boot time.


I also can't chroot to the root filesystem from the rescue cd 
environment. Chroot reports:

chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

/dev & /proc are bind mounted on the root file system when I run chroot. 
I've tried both the chroot on the rescue cd and the root filesystem.


I have extracted the coreutils, bash, and sysvinit packages from 
archive.debian.org to the root filesystem and can verify that 
/sbin/init, /bin/bash, and /usr/sbin/chroot do in fact exist. Here are 
the md5sums:


23f5429412b98a704b888704b7504b7b  /mnt/bin/bash
25362d91e139e55a406cfbc2333484d0  /mnt/sbin/init
92ce55e8137b60d05788b8c711d4d44d  /mnt/usr/sbin/chroot

The VirtualBox host and rescue cd image are AMD64 linux also.  I also 
tried the lenny64 business card image.

I have run out of ideas.   Any suggestions would be helpful.

Thanks,
Kirk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310df1.50...@ismay.ca



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline

2013-03-01 Thread Slavko
Hi,

Dňa 01.03.2013 20:57:47 Sven Joachim  napísal(a):

>>> export TERM=ansi80x25
>>> printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"
>>
>> produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.
> 
> It produces underline text here in an xterm.

On lilyterm (not debian part) too

-- 
Slavko
http://slavino.sk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Go Linux
--- On Fri, 3/1/13, Mark Filipak  wrote:

> From: Mark Filipak 
> Subject: Re: Installation failed
> To: "Shane Johnson" 
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, March 1, 2013, 2:12 PM
> 
> 
> I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or
> nothing.
> 

Duh . . . How about installing on an external hard drive?

>
> The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can
> boot from it. But I can't configure it (different wallpaper,
> for example) and I can't install anything (Icedove, for
> example). Do you
> know of any way to do that?
> 
>

You can install to USB with 'persistence' - an additional writable partition - 
which will allow some user changes to be retained.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1362169742.37125.yahoomailclas...@web163402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Mark,
The easiest way I am aware of (not used) for that is Knoppix to USB.  If I
remember right it comes as a utility on the CDrom.  Also see Miles
comments.

Shane


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Mark Filipak wrote:

> On 2013/3/1 2:25 PM, Shane Johnson wrote:
>
>> ...I had to get a Utility from HP to convert the thumbdrive.
>>
>
> Not needed in this case. The target USB drive did not come with U3. (The
> 1-GB USB drive did come with U3, but I removed that years ago.)
>
>  I would recommend if you want to truly try Debian and play with it
>>
>
> Actually, I want to use Debian (or really, any Linux) for Internetworking
> (browsing and email). Then I can remove networking from Windows - I don't
> trust Windows on the Internet.
>
>  install
>> it to another HD or use the partitioning in the installer to split your
>> existing drive so you can dual boot both Windows and Linux.  I wish you
>> the
>> best of luck.
>>
>
> I don't dare fiddle with my hard disk. It's a Dell laptop that has WinXP
> preinstalled without a maintenance partition and I don't have a backup CD.
> If the current WinXP gets trashed, I'm hosed. I got my current laptop
> (used) when my good-old Toshiba died. In case you're wondering, I do have a
> license, but Dell refuses to honor it or to send a CD, even if I pay them.
> The Dell laptop is top-of-the-line: Precision M90 of about 2008 vintage. Of
> course, I'll never buy a Dell again, not even used.
>
> I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or nothing. There is
> one alternative, but it gets a little complicated...
>
> The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can boot from it.
> But I can't configure it (different wallpaper, for example) and I can't
> install anything (Icedove, for example). Now, if I could install Icedove
> before the USB gets written I could probably establish a roaming identity
> that can actually reside on the Windows hard disk. Do you know of any way
> to do that?
>
> Thanks & Ciao - Mark.
>
>


-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment


Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mark Filipak wrote:



GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


Well that makes perfect sense.  GRUB and LILO boot loaders designed to 
work with a hard drive.  You (probably) need to install a different boot 
loader on a USB stick - and which one is dependent on what your BIOS 
supports (and, of course, you have to set your BIOS appropriately).


Booting from a CD/DVD follows a different process - using isolinux as 
the boot loader.


Booting from a USB stick follows yet another process, and which process 
is somewhat dependent on what your BIOS supports.  I'm a little fggy on 
the details (haven't done it it a while), but some BIOSs know how to 
boot from a USB stick, others have a mode called USBHDD, where they 
treat the USB stick as if it's a hard drive - which means you have to 
play some games in the USB setup to make it look like a hard drive, with 
an MBR and all.  As I recall, syslinux is one way to boot from a USB stick.


See http://wiki.debian.org/BootProcess for more details.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch04s03.html.en for 
installing on a USB stick

(when in doubt, FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS)

Try doing a basic installation from 
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/installmanual before you start 
trying more complicated things.


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310c8c.7030...@meetinghouse.net



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Brian
On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 13:39:19 -0500, Mark Filipak wrote:

> What I did:
> 1 - Booted Windows.
> 1.1 - Copied the Debian-Gnome Live ISO to an 8-GB USB.
> 1.2 - Shut down Windows.
> 2 - Booted Debian-Gnome from 8-GB USB - success!
> 2.1 - Shut down Debian-Gnome.
> 3 - Booted Windows.
> 3.1 - Copied the Debian-LXDE Live ISO to a 1-GB USB.
> 3.2 - Shut down Windows.
> 4 - Booted Debian-LXDE from 1-GB USB - success!

This is good news. You are on your way. For completeness sake would you
please say how you copied the two ISOs to the USB sticks? Not
necessarily a blow-by-blow account but knowing the software used would
useful.
 
> 4.1 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
> - Objective: Install Debian-LXDE to 8-GB USB -

This is doable.

> 5 - Removed hard disk (just to be safe).

And why not?

> 6 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
> 6.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (overwrite Debian-Gnome already on it).
> 6.2 - Install failed!

How far into the install did you get? At what point did it fail? Were
there any messages which came up on the screen?

> 6.3 - My Guess: The 8-GB USB is being automounted.

Very unlikely to be the reason.

> 6.9 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
> 7 - Reinserted hard disk.
> 8 - Booted Windows
> 8.1 - Wiped out existing 8-GB USB partition.
> 8.2 - Shut down Windows.
> 9 - Removed hard disk.
> 10 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
> 10.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (should have no existing partitions).

If what I think is happening is happening a repartition is of no
consequence.

> 10.2 - Install failed!
> 10.3 - Confirmed: Debian-LXDE automounted the existing 8-GB USB - NO 
> PARTITION! WTF!
> 10.4 - Unmounted the 8-GB USB.
> 10.5 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB.
> 10.6 - Install failed!
> 10.7 - Tried to mount 8-GB USB (test).
> 10.8 - "Error mounting: mount: wrongfs type, bad option, bad
> Superblock on /dev/sdb2. Missing codepage or helper program, or other
> error. In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail
> or so." - WTF!i

This has nothing to do with the basic problem. The mount command is not
being used correctly.

> 10.9 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
> 11 - Reinserted my hard disk.
> 12 - Booted Windows
> 12.1 - Created a single, FAT-32 partition on 8-GB USB.
> 12.2 - Shut down Windows.
> 13 - Removed hard disk.
> 14 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
> 14.1 - Created 2.5-GB /, 0.5-GB swap, and 5.0-GB /windows (FAT-32).
> 14.2 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB (newly partitioned).
> 14.3 - Install succeeded!
> 14.4 - Automatic GRUB install failed!

Some work for you. This iGRUB failure should be repeatable. When it
happens switch to console 4 with ALT-F4 and let us know what the last
syslog message is.  It might mention "ISO9660 file system".

> 14.5 - Attempted to install LILO.
> 14.6 - LILO  install failed!

Desperation has set in at this point. :)

> Okay, what went wrong:

You may have hit a particular bug in your install *to a USB target*. It
can be overcome. Changing the install ISO will not help. But, at this
stage, I'm not going to do more guessing. Knowing what syslog says is
essential.

> Automounting got in the way.
> Installer did not unmount the filesystems on the target drive.
> Automounting got fooled by erased partition.
> Mount error message too cryptic - too generic (does not tell what actually 
> happened).
> GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.

ALT-F4. It is in the manual.
 
> Any/all help appreciated except from Lisi Reisz.

Many people, including me, will not like this. I'd suggest you review
what you wrote in the light of the cut and thrust which can sometimes
take place on a mailing list.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130301201342.GH14686@desktop



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Mark Filipak

On 2013/3/1 2:25 PM, Shane Johnson wrote:

...I had to get a Utility from HP to convert the thumbdrive.


Not needed in this case. The target USB drive did not come with U3. (The 1-GB 
USB drive did come with U3, but I removed that years ago.)


I would recommend if you want to truly try Debian and play with it


Actually, I want to use Debian (or really, any Linux) for Internetworking 
(browsing and email). Then I can remove networking from Windows - I don't trust 
Windows on the Internet.


install
it to another HD or use the partitioning in the installer to split your
existing drive so you can dual boot both Windows and Linux.  I wish you the
best of luck.


I don't dare fiddle with my hard disk. It's a Dell laptop that has WinXP 
preinstalled without a maintenance partition and I don't have a backup CD. If 
the current WinXP gets trashed, I'm hosed. I got my current laptop (used) when 
my good-old Toshiba died. In case you're wondering, I do have a license, but 
Dell refuses to honor it or to send a CD, even if I pay them. The Dell laptop 
is top-of-the-line: Precision M90 of about 2008 vintage. Of course, I'll never 
buy a Dell again, not even used.

I'm afraid it's install Linux on a USB thumb drive or nothing. There is one 
alternative, but it gets a little complicated...

The Debian Live USB is acting like a CD. That's fine, I can boot from it. But I 
can't configure it (different wallpaper, for example) and I can't install 
anything (Icedove, for example). Now, if I could install Icedove before the USB 
gets written I could probably establish a roaming identity that can actually 
reside on the Windows hard disk. Do you know of any way to do that?

Thanks & Ciao - Mark.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310bca.5060...@gmail.com



Re: Installation failed - again - why am I not surprised

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Mark Filipak wrote:

Do you want to help?
If no, stop reading now (I don't need more heckling).

What I did:
1 - Booted Windows.
1.1 - Copied the Debian-Gnome Live ISO to an 8-GB USB.
1.2 - Shut down Windows.
2 - Booted Debian-Gnome from 8-GB USB - success!
2.1 - Shut down Debian-Gnome.
3 - Booted Windows.
3.1 - Copied the Debian-LXDE Live ISO to a 1-GB USB.
3.2 - Shut down Windows.
4 - Booted Debian-LXDE from 1-GB USB - success!

4.1 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
- Objective: Install Debian-LXDE to 8-GB USB -
5 - Removed hard disk (just to be safe).
6 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
6.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (overwrite Debian-Gnome already on 
it).

6.2 - Install failed!
6.3 - My Guess: The 8-GB USB is being automounted.
6.9 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
7 - Reinserted hard disk.
8 - Booted Windows
8.1 - Wiped out existing 8-GB USB partition.
8.2 - Shut down Windows.
9 - Removed hard disk.
10 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
10.1 - Attempted install to 8-GB USB (should have no existing 
partitions).

10.2 - Install failed!
10.3 - Confirmed: Debian-LXDE automounted the existing 8-GB USB - NO 
PARTITION! WTF!

10.4 - Unmounted the 8-GB USB.
10.5 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB.
10.6 - Install failed!
10.7 - Tried to mount 8-GB USB (test).
10.8 - "Error mounting: mount: wrongfs type, bad option, bad 
Superblock on /dev/sdb2. Missing codepage or helper program, or other 
error. In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail 
or so." - WTF!

10.9 - Shut down Debian-LXDE.
11 - Reinserted my hard disk.
12 - Booted Windows
12.1 - Created a single, FAT-32 partition on 8-GB USB.
12.2 - Shut down Windows.
13 - Removed hard disk.
14 - Booted Debian-LXDE on 1-GB USB.
14.1 - Created 2.5-GB /, 0.5-GB swap, and 5.0-GB /windows (FAT-32).
14.2 - Attempted install to the 8-GB USB (newly partitioned).
14.3 - Install succeeded!
14.4 - Automatic GRUB install failed!
14.5 - Attempted to install LILO.
14.6 - LILO  install failed!

Okay, what went wrong:
Automounting got in the way.
Installer did not unmount the filesystems on the target drive.
Automounting got fooled by erased partition.
Mount error message too cryptic - too generic (does not tell what 
actually happened).

GRUB & LILO install failures unexplained - no help.


Ok, 2 responses:

1. What instructions were you following?  Or where you making them up as 
you went along?


2. Debian-LDXE (and installation onto a USB) is not a standard 
installation, and probably not the best place to start. If you want to 
experiment, start with a basic install - burn the ISO on a CD or DVD, 
put it in the drive, boot it up, then install to a hard drive. If you 
want to build a bootable USB stick, do that AFTER you have a basic 
install running.


3. If you want a dirt simple, live cd to play with - go to 
http://www.knoppix.org/ (Debian based), download the ISO, burn to 
CD/DVD, stick it in the slot and boot - you should end up with a running 
Debian system plus a bunch of application software  - and I believe it 
includes a utility for burning an image to USB stick










--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310893.1020...@meetinghouse.net



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline

2013-03-01 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2013-03-01 20:35 +0100, Thomas D. Dean wrote:

> The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline
>
>> export TERM=ansi80x25
>> printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"
>
> produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.

It produces underline text here in an xterm.

> If I put the same in c code, it works
>
> #include 
> int main() {
> fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
> return 0;
> }
>
> I get underlined text.

On what terminal emulator, and with what shell?

Cheers,
   Sven


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874ngu3nb8@turtle.gmx.de



upgrade snafu

2013-03-01 Thread Frank McCormick




Did a quick apt-get update this afternoon:
Haven't seem this in a while:

localepurge: checking for existence of 
/var/cache/localepurge/localelist... localepurge:

checking system for new locale ...
Segmentation fault E: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'if [ 
-x /usr/sbin/localepurge ] && [ $(ps w -p $PPID | egrep -c 
'(remove|purge)') != 1 ]; then /usr/sbin/localepurge; else exit 0; fi' 
E: Sub-process returned an error code debian:

/home/frank#


Any ideas or should I just wait until it sorts itself out ?


--
Cheers
Frank


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310833.5010...@videotron.ca



Re: ESC[4m does not produce underline OOPS

2013-03-01 Thread Thomas D. Dean

On 03/01/13 11:35, Thomas D. Dean wrote:

The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline

 > export TERM=ansi80x25
 > printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"

produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.

If I put the same in c code, it works

#include 
int main() {
fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
return 0;
}

I get underlined text.



I ran the C example in an xterm on Ubuntu!

The question remains.

Why does this produce color rather than underlined text?

The standard says ESC[32m should produce green text and ESC[4m should 
produce underlined text.


Tom Dean


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513105a2.8000...@speakeasy.org



Re: Moving from a proprietary OS - unnecessarily inful experience -- was [Re: I wish to advocate linux]

2013-03-01 Thread Miles Fidelman

Brian wrote:

On Fri 01 Mar 2013 at 08:34:57 -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:


Fair enough, but... I have to say it

Back in my day, we not only had to walk to school, uphill, in both
directions, in the snow, but we also had to build our computers by
hand, from TTL logic gates. :-)

You had TTL logic gates? Boy, you were lucky! We were given relay
switches from cast-off telephone equipment. And we had to buy our
own electrodes and lemons to power the machine.



Ahh yes, programmable relay logic.  Still around, by the way. :-)

Ok, anybody here played with really old IBM card sorters - the kind that 
you programmed with patch cords? (Not me, I might add.)


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.    Yogi Berra


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131037c.3090...@meetinghouse.net



ESC[4m does not produce underline

2013-03-01 Thread Thomas D. Dean

The ANSI standard lists ESC[4m as the code to produce an underline

> export TERM=ansi80x25
> printf "\033[4masdfasdfasdf"

produces green text, not underline text as stated in the standard.

If I put the same in c code, it works

#include 
int main() {
fputs("\033[4masdfasdf",stdout);
return 0;
}

I get underlined text.

Why?

Tom Dean


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51310305.1000...@speakeasy.org



Re: RAID1 all bootable

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Francesco,
If your RAID is mdadm based, I would use a live CD and then chroot into
your installed OS. Once in, I would use grub-install /dev/sd? to add the
MBR info to the mirror.  Once you are back up and running  you can use
mdadm to remove the defective disk and if  desired add a new one to the
array.

Shane


On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Francesco Pietra wrote:

> Hi:
> With a raid1 amd64 wheezy, one of the two HDs got broken.
> Unfortunately, I had added grub to sda only, which is just the one
> broken. So that, when it is replaced with a fresh HD, the OS is not
> found. Inverting the SATA cables of course does not help (Operative
> System Not Found). In a previous similar circumstance, I was lucky
> that the broken HD was the one without gru.
>
> Is any way to recover? perhaps through Knoppix? I know how to look
> into undamaged RAID1 with Knoppix.
>
> Also, when making a fresh RAID1 from scratch, where to find a Debian
> description  of how to make both sda and sdb bootable? (which should
> be included by default, in my opinion)
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/caev0nmu_dekcz7fx9fydnpuoaa9j3kkc+7zfkvf-ss7b7p6...@mail.gmail.com
>
>


-- 
Shane D. Johnson
IT Administrator
Rasmussen Equipment


Re: I wish to advocate linux --pclos from flash

2013-03-01 Thread Doug

On 03/01/2013 12:13 PM, Tom H wrote:

/snip/

And there is always PCLinuxOS, which was originally designed expressly to
make
the transition to Linux easy for Windows users.

I wasn't making an exhaustive list of distributions. I just check
three and found their instructions.

I've just checked PCLinuxOS and there aren't any CD/DVD/Stick-creation
instructions:

http://www.pclinuxos.com/?page_id=10

I can only access a cached wiki page at the moment and it only has CD
burning instructions.

There are instructions for making a boot flash-drive here:

http://www.pclinuxos.com/forum/index.php/topic,80917.0.html

Thanks but these instructions are for creating an installation flash
drive on Linux - and they're well hidden. So it's a fail from the
perspective of the person criticizing distributions for not providing
readily-available Windows instructions for creating one.



Just a minute or two with Google found this:

http://voices.yahoo.com/how-bootable-iso-flash-drive-7334710.html

UltraISO is a Windows program to work with iso files.
The program is free for enough of it to make bootable flash drives,
according to the description. I haven't tried it, but you can get the
UltraISO from CNet, so it should be OK.

It sould appear that you could get the program, then get the iso
for PCLOS, and burn the flash drive all from a laptop or notebook
that has no optical drive, and then install pclos from the flash.
I can't think of anything much simpler than that.

--doug



--doug


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5131011c.7000...@optonline.net



Re: Installation failed

2013-03-01 Thread Shane Johnson
Thank you, Shane. I did use 'dd' to write the Debian Live ISOs to USBs and
> that did work (though the documentation for 'dd' was wrong). A gentleman on
> the debian-live list helped me.
>
> What didn't work was this: When I attempted to install from one (booted)
> USB (running Debian-LXDE) to another USB, after much fiddling, I managed to
> get the install to copy over the operating system (took over 1/2 hour), but
> then it failed trying to write GRUB or LILO.
>

Mark,
I don't the particulars of this, but what I do know is that Thumbdrives are
seen different by the MB, BIOS, and thus the OS.  That is why they have the
specific instructions for writing to USB and a basic install won't work and
why Grub/ Lilo have issues writing to the MBR.  I haven't tried installing
to a thumbdrive or USB harddrive with Debian, but the one time I did try
Knoppix I had to get a Utility from HP to convert the thumbdrive.  That was
ages ago as well and any memory I have regarding the reasons why, has been
buried.
I would recommend if you want to truly try Debian and play with it, install
it to another HD or use the partitioning in the installer to split your
existing drive so you can dual boot both Windows and Linux.  I wish you the
best of luck.

Shane


  1   2   >