Re: VirtualBox (VB) and Windows on Debian
Le 16/07/2024 à 16:31, jeremy ardley a écrit : VirtualBox is not supported on Debian 12. why ? I use it daily and it works well on my debian 12... There are alternatives that include: - KVM/QEMU - VMWare Workstation Pro (which is now free for private use) cool ! will try it too :) In my experience KVM/QEMU is fairly stable. The VMWare product not so much. Given everything is virtual you can easily try all options in an hour or two. Regards, Jeff
Re: CD/DVD is obsolete or deprecate at 2025?
Hello ^^) Le 18/06/2024 à 03:00, Stefan Monnier a écrit : Is there a chance to change in next versions i.e. Debain 13 or other versions an assembly specifically for a USB flash drive as primary download? Do you think the time has come? When do you think this moment will happen? AFAIK, all the so-called CD/DVD images work just fine when "burned" on a USB flash drive. So I think the question is whether it's time to change the doc to stop suggesting that those images should be burned onto optical media. Just a question : why should we ditch the cd or dvd just because some guys said that's it was obsolete or inferior to the usb keys et al ? Memory keys (and ssd and downlodable audio and ...) all have still a major flaw in regard to hard stuff like CD dvd or real hard disks, and it's their 'volatility'. these memory devices just dies on us with their contents (our valuable or paid for datas, way more often than a hard disk or cd dvd stuff. and I don't think this will change soon, not where we are now in technology. btw, the industry pushes forward a total abandon of hard copy of the stuff we buy with good money, only to ensure that we would buy it again if it was to disapear 'magically' and the buying contract says so in one form or another... Remember the 'robbery' that has occured when buyers of electronic books found a day that some of their bought books had vanished from their readers devices 'cause the reseller contract had been broke by the publisher of the books with some merchants ? That will be impossible with a real book, or cd, dvd, physical bought software. (well if your house doesn't catch a fire at least ;)) industry does not want you to own what you pay for in hard form. as well as banks are pushing to the abandon of physical money (notes or coins) to have even more control of your hard won money and have you dancing in their hands... sorry if it's OT, but just think to all this by yourselves. ^^)
Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC?
Hello :) Le 08/04/2024 à 14:40, Michael Grant a écrit : I have built dcc myself from their most recent source. I guess I could send that to whoever wants it, or the debian dir. cool :) that would be kind and usefull to see :) thanks Michael Grant -- Original Message -- From "Marco Moock" To debian-user@lists.debian.org Date 08/04/2024 13:25:26 Subject Re: Debian 12, Pyzor, Razor, DCC? Am 08.04.2024 um 07:52:34 Uhr schrieb David Mehler: This is to any users running Debian 12 as a mail server. I am wondering if you have some, most, all, or none of these packages installed, Pyzor, Razor, DCC? If so how did you get them going and how did you get them to start? No, I haven't. apt can't find ddc, what is the correct packet name? I only have installed Cyrus, sendmail and opendkim. If you have problems setting up other services, specify which server packages you use and how they should interact. -- kind regards Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 171254mu...@cartoonies.org
Re: Bookworm Fasttrack and Virtualbox
Hello :) Le 15/03/2024 à 00:26, Miguel A. Vallejo a écrit : Hello! This evening I tried to install virtualbox into a fresh Bookworm install. I followed the steps in Virtualbox's Debian Wiki entry. After set up fasttrack repository successfully and issue a apt install virtualbox command I get: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: virtualbox: Depends: python3 (< 3.10) but 3.11.2-1+b1 is to be installed Depends: python3.9 but it is not installable Depends: libgsoap-2.8.104 but it is not installable Depends: libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.1) but it is not installable Depends: libvpx6 (>= 1.6.0) but it is not installable Recommends: virtualbox-qt (= 7.0 .6-dfsg-1~fto11+1) but it is not going to be installed Recommends: libqt5opengl5 (>= 5.0.2) but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I was surprised by the python 3.9 dependency, it leads me to think fasttrack repos are abandoned? What is the right way to install virtualbox in Debian Bookworm? why not just go to virtualbox.org and download the deb install file ? no need for a repo there. Jeff
DoS protection solutions for Debian Servers ?
Hello folks :) Looking for advice for protecting debian servers from DoS attacks as there are more and more of these ones to fight against :/ needless to say that fail2ban isn't enough for this task... scripts for firewall too... and tiring to make as hackers responses are damn' fast to this. what should we use for datacenter grade DoS protections for our servers now ? appart an army of people glued to their terminals to offer realtime answer to treats ;) what solutions (free or not) do you debian servers pros use (for pro or private servers) ? Thanks by advance :) Jeff
RE: N’hésites pas de commencer une conversation avec moi Anaelle
j espere bien que tu ne morts pas tu vois je commence une conversation il y a du progres De : Anaelle Shamsoun Envoyé : mardi 4 juillet 2017 04:16:52 À : debian-user@lists.debian.org Objet : N’hésites pas de commencer une conversation avec moi Anaelle Je ne mords pas tu sais. Bon, sauf si t le demande… http://bitly.com/2sIc8bn
Re: bluetooth speakers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 16/08/2015 18:51, bri...@aracnet.com a écrit : > On Sun, 16 Aug 2015 16:16:44 +0200 François Patte > wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Bonjour, >> >> I try to have speakers connected through bluetooth. Everything >> seems ok: bluetooth connection succeeded, I can see the speakers >> in pavu-control and choose this option as playback but no >> sound from the speakers if I disconnect the wire connection! >> >> What did I miss? >> > > probably you have to tell pulse-audio what the sink is. > > try "pacmd list-sinks", and make sure AFTER you disconnect the wire > the sink is still there. > > you'll still have to tell pulse-audio which sink to use though. > > pacmd --help > > for example if i do pacmd list-sinks > > * index: 2 name: > > > then in my /etc/pulse/default.pa file: > > set-default-sink > alsa_output.usb-Audioengine_Audioengine_2_-00-A2.analog-stereo > > you should be able to do the same thing with pacmd, e.g. > > pacmd set-sink [name of your sink] > > Brian > Thank you for answering. I succeeded to connect to speakers through bluetooth *but* only once! Today connection no more works and I am unable to connect even repeating the same commands as yesterday! Why sound stuff is so difficult under linux? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlXS7QoACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXe6QCfVCRwhPOeU9uh1FbfunGDCTdf o04Ani91Bvmag3S3KVEIGE1lYcg/bjVV =KmsK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
bluetooth speakers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I try to have speakers connected through bluetooth. Everything seems ok: bluetooth connection succeeded, I can see the speakers in pavu-control and choose this option as playback but no sound from the speakers if I disconnect the wire connection! What did I miss? Thank you. debian wheezy. - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlXQm0wACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVKoQCeNEl24aa17DAq5FeCmPOsnkuV 97cAoJTtd9kWyQE7r+prRJ/kK6ugLKmP =xGwR -END PGP SIGNATURE-
wine does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I have a garmin GPS; in order to register the product and update the maps, there is only a windows application GarminExpress. I have no windows install, so I installed wine on my debian sid and tried to run this program: wine GarminExpress.exe But, wine seems to do nothing, says nothing and, after a while gives up without any message... Do I have to install something else? Is there a way to understand why wine gives up? Some logs somewhere? Moreover, I cannot see any wine menu in xfce menus... Is it normal? Thanks for anty help. - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlSZcWsACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUuGACeIPLtPediTxxOkBdhAh27ujmP /DQAnAi+6zD7tD/WfZqBanbu4wQQ1xLD =BLs+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54997171.9040...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
gps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, Are there software available to fully manage a GPS: update maps and all this kind of things which are usualy provided for mac or windows when you buy a GPS. Iam using debian sid Thank you - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlP4nacACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUzXgCfYTE7KfrOiuAnNrneVXMLH0B6 nSUAoKMDGLGu6//LYNZ/84ok3oKm5Wec =NxM9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53f89dae.5070...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
android connection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I don't know anything to android but I have to connect an android device to a computer. Are there tools to easily connect debian to android in order to transfer files from and to android? A graphic interface would be preferred... Thank you. - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlPBsXUACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUKgQCfQbfX8rMpYzmg7O3BC6NUqRHz zXMAoJFTaD6cSroHwJHe02ozhvtP2xDp =1oAO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53c1b17b.4010...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: watching films full screen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 08/07/2014 20:02, Steve B a écrit : > On 07/07/2014 11:08 PM, François Patte wrote: >> >> 1- I would like to configure kaffeine for a "real full screen >> ie. without any visible xfce panels. There are only one option in >> the menu "configuration": choosing the startup mode! > > I had a similar bug with XFCE and VLC causing a "partial" full > screen on Wheezy. If VLC is maximized, i.e. takes the whole screen > except XFCE bars, enabling the full screen mode (by menu item or > shortcut) results in a partial full screen: VLC goes in full screen > mode but XFCE bars remain visible. If VLC is not maximized, i.e. > other windows are visible, enabling the full screen mode results in > a real full screen, i.e. VLC contents takes really the full > screen. > > >> >> 2- How to prevent dpms action when on fullscreen mode? >> > > xset -dpms or xset s off Of course, but I'm wondering why these applications made for watching a moovie do not turn dpms, (or screensavers or power management or...) off as soon as you ask for full screen. It seems that this feature does not exist in kaffeine and, while it exists in vlc, it does not work! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO8/jwACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVqlACeKHZEHPG3qw5MWVUz+oZ7nKZL 4WAAnjW4sHW+wT1rynyiLnUshx1mbba1 =fTd7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bcfe42.1000...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
watching films full screen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I don't know how to configure apps for watching films full screen: 1- I would like to configure kaffeine for a "real full screen ie. without any visible xfce panels. There are only one option in the menu "configuration": choosing the startup mode! 2- How to prevent dpms action when on fullscreen mode? Thank you - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO7DC8ACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXX+wCg0F0IfIhbAC5OUB+s2+i1gM09 uI8Anj2hE6J8H2+XWX4YP30Zwc0rCn7Y =LlnH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53bb0c35.9040...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: ati radeon HD 8790M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 05/07/2014 11:37, François Patte a écrit : > Bonjour, > > I tried to install this video card using dkms and fglrx debian > module... It does not compile... > > I tried the amd proprietary module, it does not compile. > > No clue in log files > > Debian wheezy kernel 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 OK! Compilation succeeded after installing kernel 3.13 and removing dkms... BUT it does not work! fglrx module is there, fglrx module can be installed by the kernel, but X does not start. In Xorg.0.log I can see this line: (EE) fglrx(0): Unspported by intel driver! vendor id 0×8086, device id 0×416 Then a segmentation fault.... Any clue? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO4KlcACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWZeQCgkIHhalDQK6XsnwveCiFlvcg9 Ru4An1mE9v/v7fxz+QwjVidqzhL0mk6o =XLbC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b82a57.5050...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: ati radeon HD 8790M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 05/07/2014 15:32, John Bleichert a écrit : > > > On 07/05/2014 06:48 AM, François Patte wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Le 05/07/2014 12:32, Rob a écrit : >>> Have you installed the linux-headers package that matches your >>> linux-image version? >> >> Of course! >> >> > > > Are you sure? Does aptitude show something similar? > > $ aptitude search linux-headers | grep '^i' i A > linux-headers-3.14-1-amd64 - Header files for Linux > 3.14-1-amd64 i A linux-headers-3.14-1-common - Common header > files for Linux 3.14-1 i linux-headers-amd64 - Header > files for Linux amd64 configuration > $ aptitude search linux-headers | grep '^i' i linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd6 - Header files for Linux 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 i A linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-comm - Common header files for Linux 3.14-0.bpo.1 i A linux-headers-3.2.0-4-amd64 - Header files for Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 i A linux-headers-3.2.0-4-common- Common header files for Linux 3.2.0-4 i A linux-headers-amd64 - Header files for Linux amd64 configuration - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO4FQoACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVfhwCgzb/TmXBhUpKR9do2B/0Feeiy RV4AnArjCofdurbP95sVqeUTHIvVawFZ =AoXP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b8150a.7080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: ati radeon HD 8790M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 05/07/2014 12:32, Rob a écrit : > Have you installed the linux-headers package that matches your > linux-image version? Of course! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO32AsACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUHDQCfSjssZd4XJa5n6aeKtu+eUfBx xngAnAp+l3nS0LcZ0wcH/Fr7kLiyQS97 =IiMN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b7d80c.8070...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
ati radeon HD 8790M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I tried to install this video card using dkms and fglrx debian module... It does not compile... I tried the amd proprietary module, it does not compile. No clue in log files Debian wheezy kernel 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 Does anyone have an idea? Thanks - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO3x2MACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUaRQCdHRSSjEnjBixm3SaTwWV8FrBD ZzYAnA75REkExF2kWJLvosBSV+kQfKeD =YAEy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b7c763.7080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: unable to upgrade kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 04/07/2014 16:12, Lisi Reisz a écrit : > On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote: >> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I >> assume that you are running wheezy. You need to install the >> initramfs-tools package from wheezy-backports too, version >> 0.115~bpo70+1, I think. > > I had no trouble installing the backported kernel, but I > specifically instructed aptitude to use wheezy-backports > repository. <-t wheezy-backports install> OK thank this worked... I thought that adding backports repository to the source.list file was enough! This is quite redondant! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO23jIACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUUkwCgrrIol3el/EVnvDqto37i9wUa HYYAnR8gZbD5o+MaIYsCd9FZatZbDptQ =lWcG -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b6de32.6090...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
unable to upgrade kernel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I don't understand the following: # apt-get install linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 : Breaks: initramfs-tools (< 0.110~) but 0.109.1 is to be installed Breaks: initramfs-tools:i386 (< 0.110~) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. What exactly is the problem about initramfs: # apt-cache show initramfs-tools Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.109.1 - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO2q14ACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWsGgCgj9y2sqCqYXk8mZKe6dLdpbV3 a38AoNIyb/gYRsWmez75TRJNo6I/JkJ5 =2nzs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b6ab5f.6080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: upgrading kernel on wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 03/07/2014 19:33, B a écrit : > On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 19:28:12 +0200 François Patte > wrote: > >> Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an >> entry to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in >> case... > > Doc's on the backport site… Here? http://backports.debian.org/ Nothing special about the kernel... - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO1mKwACgkQdE6C2dhV2JU1MgCgi0LXO33574AIoVtCm02fE9l9 mIoAnRRPsjKyKStZWI+mtknVKrPt9QMG =8Z/T -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b598ac.7030...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
upgrading kernel on wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I'd like to install kernel 3.14 on wheezy from backports. Is the install with apt keeps the previous kernel and add an entry to the grub menu so I could come back to kernel 3.2 in case... Thank you - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlO1kqYACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUDlQCffVCViymkO2EbLvSBFchRSXqb 33IAoMWAux1FpEt2oh7sSJOV3jpW280+ =b91z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53b592ac.9020...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 29/06/2014 12:35, Brian a écrit : > On Sun 29 Jun 2014 at 10:35:50 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> BTW I tried to prevent to install systemd, putting >> >> #Package: systemd #Pin: release * #Pin-Priority: -1 >> >> in /etc/apt/preferences >> >> and tried to install gthumb after that. The answer came >> immediately: impossible because of broken dependencies... >> >> It seems that apt is working differently for different people! > > If that is what you really want to do you are not going about it in > the right way. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2014/05/msg01042.html > > Not sure of what you mean here... If it is that systemd is unavoidable, you are probably right, but I use my computer to work not to waste my time in new configurations; I just wanted to reinstall gthumb (broken I don't know why... probably some missing backward compatibility taken into consideration by developpers) in order to work with and not to use many hours to change the init of the computer... There is a time to install and a time to work... and for me, time to work is more important thant time to install. I am probably old fashionned! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOv7/gACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXXzgCfeHaZLh7M/De690ZtwB9MIzWT YFgAn2RauvpeUc3Yn43wb6s8xxbNwjgw =7AEl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53afeff8.9050...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 29/06/2014 00:15, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > On 2014-06-27 11:38:50 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:07:40PM +0200, François Patte wrote: >>> This what is writen as dependencies in packages... OK but I am >>> wondering why gthumb (and its dependencies) needs to install >>> systemd >> >> That sounds like a challenge :) >> >> gthumb (3:3.3.1-2) depends on: gsettnings-desktop-schemas >> depends on: dconf-gsettings-backend depends on: dconf-service >> depends on: ... No, this doesn't look right libgtk-3.0 (>=3.10.0) >> depends on: ... more libraries... >> >> I don't see anything there that would bring in systemd. > > FYI, on my machine: > > $ apt-get install gthumb systemd- -s [...] The following extra > packages will be installed: gthumb-data The following packages > will be REMOVED: appstream-index brasero colord gconf-editor > gnome-applets gnome-bluetooth gnome-control-center > gnome-settings-daemon gnome-sushi gvfs gvfs-backends gvfs-daemons > hplip libpam-systemd nautilus nautilus-sendto packagekit > packagekit-tools policykit-1 policykit-1-gnome > printer-driver-postscript-hp steadyflow systemd udisks2 The > following packages will be upgraded: gthumb gthumb-data 2 upgraded, > 0 newly installed, 24 to remove and 32 not upgraded. Remv > appstream-index [0.6.2-1] Remv brasero [3.10.0-1] Remv > gnome-control-center [1:3.8.3-7+b2] Remv colord [1.2.1-1] Remv > gconf-editor [3.0.1-2] Remv gnome-applets [3.4.1-4] Remv > gnome-bluetooth [3.8.1-3] Remv gnome-settings-daemon [3.8.5-2+b2] > Remv gnome-sushi [3.10.0-1+b1] Remv nautilus-sendto [3.8.1-1+b1] > Remv nautilus [3.8.2-3] Remv steadyflow [0.2.0-1] Remv > gvfs-backends [1.20.2-1] Remv gvfs [1.20.2-1] Remv gvfs-daemons > [1.20.2-1] Remv printer-driver-postscript-hp [3.14.6-1] Remv hplip > [3.14.6-1] Remv udisks2 [2.1.3-2] Remv packagekit-tools [0.8.17-4] > Remv packagekit [0.8.17-4] Remv policykit-1 [0.105-6] > [policykit-1-gnome:amd64 ] Remv libpam-systemd [204-12] > [policykit-1-gnome:amd64 ] Remv policykit-1-gnome [0.105-2] Remv > systemd [204-12] Inst gthumb [3:3.2.6-1+b1] (3:3.3.1-2 > Debian:testing [amd64]) [] Inst gthumb-data [3:3.2.6-1] (3:3.3.1-2 > Debian:testing [all]) Conf gthumb-data (3:3.3.1-2 Debian:testing > [all]) Conf gthumb (3:3.3.1-2 Debian:testing [amd64]) > > So, no need for systemd. But François should make sure that he > used --no-install-recommends. Looking back to my first mail, I can read: The following extra packages will be installed: ^^^ gcc-4.9-base gcc-4.9-base:i386 geoclue-2.0 gir1.2-pango-1.0 gthumb-data libabw-0.0-0 libaudit-common libaudit1 libboost-date-time1.55.0 libcmis-0.4-4 libe-book-0.0-0 libeot0 libetonyek-0.0-0 libfreehand-0.0-0 libgl1-nvidia-glx libharfbuzz-dev libharfbuzz-gobject0 libharfbuzz-icu0 libharfbuzz0b libharfbuzz0b:i386 libjavascriptcoregtk-3.0-0 libllvm3.4 libmbim-glib0 libmm-glib0 libmwaw-0.2-2 libnvidia-ml1 libpam-systemd libpango-1.0-0 libpango-1.0-0:i386 libpango1.0-0 libpango1.0-dev libpangocairo-1.0-0 libpangocairo-1.0-0:i386 libpangoft2-1.0-0 libpangoft2-1.0-0:i386 libpangoxft-1.0-0 libpangoxft-1.0-0:i386 libqmi-glib0 libreoffice libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer libreoffice-base libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-base-drivers libreoffice-calc libreoffice-common libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gtk libreoffice-impress libreoffice-math libreoffice-style-galaxy libreoffice-style-tango libreoffice-writer libstdc++6 libstdc++6:i386 libsystemd-daemon0 libwebkit2gtk-3.0-25 libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 libwebp5 libxatracker2 libxshmfence1 modemmanager network-manager nvidia-alternative nvidia-driver nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-modprobe nvidia-settings nvidia-vdpau-driver python-uno systemd systemd-sysv sysvinit ^ So they are not in recommended/suggested packages BTW I tried to prevent to install systemd, putting #Package: systemd #Pin: release * #Pin-Priority: -1 in /etc/apt/preferences and tried to install gthumb after that. The answer came immediately: impossible because of broken dependencies... It seems that apt is working differently for different people! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOvz+AACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXBNQCeJStJ04nAnkGxaGjvh+xcdqg4 8PYAnR47rYWRIRVRVAUliGK533lXC9Nl =HvzK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53afcfe6.9050...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2014 14:11, Floris a écrit : > Op Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:06:25 +0200 schreef Floris > : > >> Op Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:51:17 +0200 schreef François Patte >> : >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Le 25/06/2014 11:01, Weaver a écrit : >>>> >>>> On Wed, June 25, 2014 1:57 am, François Patte wrote: >>>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> >>>>> Le 25/06/2014 10:49, Lisi Reisz a écrit : >>>>>> On Wednesday 25 June 2014 09:32:22 François Patte wrote: >>>>>>> I wanted to update my gthumb package (wich became ugly >>>>>>> for an unknown reason). So I asked: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> apt-get install gthumb >>>> >>>> Before installing anything, always update. This is what the >>>> machine is actually trying to do. >>>> >>>> Update, so that everything is current, then install the >>>> required package immediately, and you won't have that >>>> trouble. Cheers! >>> >>> The problem is: why do I have to install, for instance, >>> gcc-4.9-base gcc-4.9-base:i386 (I don't want to compile >>> anything...) >>> >>> why do I have to install these xserver: >>> >>> xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-evdev >>> xserver-xorg-input-mouse xserver-xorg-input-synaptics >>> xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse xserver-xorg-input-wacom >>> xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-ati >>> xserver-xorg-video-cirrus xserver-xorg-video-fbdev >>> xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-mach64 >>> xserver-xorg-video-mga xserver-xorg-video-modesetting >>> xserver-xorg-video-neomagic xserver-xorg-video-nouveau >>> xserver-xorg-video-nvidia xserver-xorg-video-openchrome >>> xserver-xorg-video-r128 xserver-xorg-video-radeon >>> xserver-xorg-video-savage xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion >>> xserver-xorg-video-sisusb xserver-xorg-video-tdfx >>> xserver-xorg-video-trident xserver-xorg-video-vesa >>> xserver-xorg-video-vmware >>> >>> I have an nvidia graphic card, so, if needed "nouveau" but I >>> use the proprietary driver... >>> >>> Why should I install systemd? >>> >>> etc. etc. >>> >>> I just wanted to work with gthumb, but it was broken by a >>> preceeding update >>> >>> I waste more time to recover a system than to work >>> >> >> try: #apt-get install --no-install-recommends gthumb >> >> But I think there is a xserver-xorg-input-all and >> xserver-xorg-video-all dependency somewhere. Installing >> "xserver-xorg-input-evdev" and "xserver-xorg-video-nvidia" should >> be enough to satisfy all packages >> >> See: https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/gthumb for a list of >> dependencies > > for example: > > gthumb needs libc6 needs libgcc1 needs gcc-4.7-base This what is writen as dependencies in packages... OK but I am wondering why gthumb (and its dependencies) needs to install systemd - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOtQmYACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXogACgphpgs3X3yzf1scgQB0yTMG+s M3IAn0tjw9pDO+K0603BVq9tA7guwf4v =ad1w -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53ad426c.9050...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2014 13:25, Chris Bannister a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:32:22AM +0200, François Patte wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Bonjour, >> >> I wanted to update my gthumb package (wich became ugly for an >> unknown reason). So I asked: > > What do yo mean by "...became ugly for an unknown reason...), how > do you know it is the gthumb package causing it? > here is what you can see with older version of gthumb: http://www.mi.parisdescartes.fr/~patte/gthumb-2.png - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOqw78ACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXKGgCgmqFz6ysycT52qnxpzVOJ+z8U F9MAoMKTMtEpg/SDuvgr9Sh86lqpMrtT =8uNB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aac3bf.3000...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2014 13:25, Chris Bannister a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:32:22AM +0200, François Patte wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Bonjour, >> >> I wanted to update my gthumb package (wich became ugly for an >> unknown reason). So I asked: > > What do yo mean by "...became ugly for an unknown reason...), how > do you know it is the gthumb package causing it? Have look here: here is what I can see using gthumb version 3.0.1-2: http://www.mi.parisdescartes.fr/~patte/gthumb.png You can't see all thumbnails thumbnails hide the names The first row is not displayed... I cannot access the commentaries I wrote for many images in a previous version... etc. What else than gthumb could do that? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOqwVcACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVmcwCgkB8VGd/63cbqC9JNNtt65DDZ gyoAn1YKGVzGqqheJfZRbqgFgCM1UZOp =rtG8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aac157.3030...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2014 11:01, Weaver a écrit : > > On Wed, June 25, 2014 1:57 am, François Patte wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Le 25/06/2014 10:49, Lisi Reisz a écrit : >>> On Wednesday 25 June 2014 09:32:22 François Patte wrote: >>>> I wanted to update my gthumb package (wich became ugly for an >>>> unknown reason). So I asked: >>>> >>>> apt-get install gthumb > > Before installing anything, always update. This is what the > machine is actually trying to do. > > Update, so that everything is current, then install the required > package immediately, and you won't have that trouble. Cheers! The problem is: why do I have to install, for instance, gcc-4.9-base gcc-4.9-base:i386 (I don't want to compile anything...) why do I have to install these xserver: xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-evdev xserver-xorg-input-mouse xserver-xorg-input-synaptics xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse xserver-xorg-input-wacom xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-ati xserver-xorg-video-cirrus xserver-xorg-video-fbdev xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-mach64 xserver-xorg-video-mga xserver-xorg-video-modesetting xserver-xorg-video-neomagic xserver-xorg-video-nouveau xserver-xorg-video-nvidia xserver-xorg-video-openchrome xserver-xorg-video-r128 xserver-xorg-video-radeon xserver-xorg-video-savage xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion xserver-xorg-video-sisusb xserver-xorg-video-tdfx xserver-xorg-video-trident xserver-xorg-video-vesa xserver-xorg-video-vmware I have an nvidia graphic card, so, if needed "nouveau" but I use the proprietary driver... Why should I install systemd? etc. etc. I just wanted to work with gthumb, but it was broken by a preceeding update I waste more time to recover a system than to work - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOqm5QACgkQdE6C2dhV2JW1pQCgoRZAASAow4RndSerSE543cZ7 grUAnjZXmupQpr3XEOoLfZA8GetKdFu+ =/GZW -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aa9b95.2070...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: is this sensible?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 25/06/2014 10:49, Lisi Reisz a écrit : > On Wednesday 25 June 2014 09:32:22 François Patte wrote: >> I wanted to update my gthumb package (wich became ugly for an >> unknown reason). So I asked: >> >> apt-get install gthumb > > If you just want to update, why are you installing? man apt-get: install install is followed by one or more packages desired for installation or upgrading. Each package is a package name, not a fully qualified filename (for instance, in a Debian system, apt-utils would be the argument provided, not apt-utils_1.0.3_amd64.deb). All packages required by the package(s) specified for installation will also be retrieved and installed. The /etc/apt/sources.list file is used to locate the desired packages. If a hyphen is appended to the package name (with no intervening space), the identified package will be removed if it is installed. Similarly a plus sign can be used to designate a package to install. These latter features may be used to override decisions made by apt-get's conflict resolution system. > > Lisi > > - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOqjuAACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUgFgCfbJ70KWlYAU0l16/VeQ+FMwk8 RKoAoMrR0N3mLKBF1V+XbtHerkHTLMnn =zGgP -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aa8ee0.8090...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
is this sensible?
office-gtk libreoffice-impress libreoffice-math libreoffice-style-galaxy libreoffice-style-tango libreoffice-writer libstdc++6 libstdc++6:i386 libwebkitgtk-3.0-0 modemmanager network-manager nvidia-alternative nvidia-driver nvidia-kernel-dkms nvidia-settings nvidia-vdpau-driver python-uno sysvinit uno-libs3 ure xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-evdev xserver-xorg-input-mouse xserver-xorg-input-synaptics xserver-xorg-input-vmmouse xserver-xorg-input-wacom xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-ati xserver-xorg-video-cirrus xserver-xorg-video-fbdev xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-video-mach64 xserver-xorg-video-mga xserver-xorg-video-neomagic xserver-xorg-video-nouveau xserver-xorg-video-nvidia xserver-xorg-video-openchrome xserver-xorg-video-r128 xserver-xorg-video-radeon xserver-xorg-video-savage xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion xserver-xorg-video-sisusb xserver-xorg-video-tdfx xserver-xorg-video-trident xserver-xorg-video-vesa xserver-xorg-video-vmware 70 upgraded, 33 newly installed, 14 to remove and 659 not upgraded. Need to get 143 MB of archives. After this operation, 129 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] NO!!!! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOqiRYACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXHpwCeOCbl/257/qyRH57stWCtqzB4 cIMAoLWTE3cYPlZbeUjVujAVknqLGKQl =9eop -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53aa8916.2030...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: raid/mdadm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/06/2014 18:43, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : I suggest: use fdisk to create a partition on your 500Gb disk and save it as fd type (raid autodetect), then dupplicate this partition on your other disks like this: sfdisk -d /dev/sdb | sfdisk /dev/sdc sfdisk -d /dev/sdb | sfdisk /dev/sdd sfdisk -d /dev/sdb | sfdisk /dev/sde Then you create the raid array: /sbin/mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 Then you format the array mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0 Then you finish as I said in my previous mail... - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOpt5MACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXXpwCffUUrNYM8ir0uuvpz2nR0dQgy 0R4AoLh22StxFpAPAK4/4ZZTf8m6D/I9 =luWf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a9b793.4000...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: raid/mdadm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/06/2014 12:12, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:45:06 +0200 François Patte > wrote: > >> How did you create your partitions on these disks? You did not answer this question... >> >> Every partition should have the same size if you want to put them >> in an array. > > ah, I have 3 x 1gig hard drives, and 1 x .5 gig hard drive > - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOpbskACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUjbgCfYoYzuQSlLZUv8thxwGI20Fp2 ydUAniXFfjuDf1ALZEaAVGxIg0fNGAMq =cPlC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a96ec9.5020...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: raid/mdadm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 24/06/2014 03:00, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : > On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:05:08 -0600 Bob Proulx > wrote: > >> Rodney D. Myers wrote: >>> Linux-Fan wrote: >>>> Rodney D. Myers wrote: >>>>> Is there a debian specific mail list or online forum to get >>>>> some help for a newbie setting up a raid storage device? >>>>> >>>>> I can find plenty of tips to get started, but things are >>>>> not doing the exact thing(s) the online guides are showing. >>>>> >> >> It is all about using Debian so this mailing list is good. Lots >> of us are using raid. >> >>>> Also, if you manually want to create a RAID 1 of two >>>> partitions use >>>> >>>> # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 \ >>>> /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 >>> >>> Not attempting to install on a raid, but create a raid for >>> storage >> >> Linux-Fan's suggestion is a good one. If you are not using it >> for the system then it is easier to get experience building raid >> yourself as in the above example. François's suggestions were >> good too. > > okay I have a 4 drive bay, and I did this (similar to the above) > > /sbin/mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0 --level=5 --raid-devices=4 > /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdd1 /dev/sde1 mdadm: layout defaults to > left-symmetric mdadm: layout defaults to left-symmetric mdadm: > chunk size defaults to 512K mdadm: /dev/sdb1 appears to contain an > ext2fs file system size=976760832K mtime=Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 > mdadm: /dev/sdc1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system > size=976762580K mtime=Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 mdadm: /dev/sdc1 > appears to be part of a raid array: level=raid5 devices=3 ctime=Mon > Jun 23 06:55:12 2014 mdadm: /dev/sdd1 appears to contain an ext2fs > file system size=976760832K mtime=Mon Jun 23 16:54:04 2014 mdadm: > /dev/sde1 appears to contain an ext2fs file system size=488385560K > mtime=Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 mdadm: /dev/sde1 appears to be part > of a raid array: level=raid5 devices=3 ctime=Mon Jun 23 06:55:12 > 2014 mdadm: size set to 488254464K mdadm: automatically enabling > write-intent bitmap on large array mdadm: largest drive (/dev/sdc1) > exceeds size (488254464K) by more than 1% Continue creating array? > yes mdadm: Defaulting to version 1.2 metadata mdadm: array /dev/md0 > started. How did you create your partitions on these disks? Every partition should have the same size if you want to put them in an array. - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOpLHwACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXKwwCgre2SJXaTjLXsEkaG4hOjYlmw U+IAn25ajnKJb1g8BSNA1UTItN23gyEf =6c4K -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a92c82.5000...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: raid/mdadm help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 23/06/2014 17:22, Rodney D. Myers a écrit : which should be still similar in Debian 7. If you are new to RAID, So what HTH you says is the good way: create one partitions on each of your storages devices (say sdX1 and sdY1) then use the given command: # mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=1 --raid-devices=2 \ /dev/sdX1 /dev/sdY1 Then format the created raid array # mkfs.ext4 /dev/md0 Create a mount point for your raid: # mkdir /storage-raid Try the result # mount /dev/md0 /storage-raid If everything ok, finish your install 1- # blkid /dev/md0 /dev/md0: UUID="41Js9Q-0WaZ-JGYR-r88a-FiqA-XS5F-0XWNOy" (of course the uuid will be different for you) 2- add this in /etc/fstab: UUID=41Js9Q-0WaZ-JGYR-r88a-FiqA-XS5F-0XWNOy /storage-raid ext4 rw 0 0 3- # mdadm --detail --scan >> /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf reboot and see if everything works fine... - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOoVCoACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXV6gCcC9SEIzSgCqvOwTHJuRr466ty WxIAnjflYxOJDGc9ppw0k70D954QOrEN =duvV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a8542a.9050...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
chkrootkit message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, I get this alert message (concerning lightdm) from chkrootkit ! RUID PID TTYCMD ! root 3153 tty7 /usr/bin/X :0 -seat seat0 -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch What does it mean? - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOn31IACgkQdE6C2dhV2JW7sgCfX4MfZ3opNXqPaqxS0wj2IfcB qfIAoJ1yb8TtJp4NtrE+bPh5ARrW65z8 =mNoE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a7df52.6080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: meaning of an error message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21/06/2014 11:25, Sven Joachim a écrit : > On 2014-06-21 11:02 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> Le 21/06/2014 10:54, Sven Joachim a écrit : >>> On 2014-06-21 10:32 +0200, François Patte wrote: >>> >>>> When I try to user acroread on debian wheezy, I get this >>>> error message: >>>> >>>> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: >>>> relocation error: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: >>>> symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not >>>> defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference >>> >>> This symbol does not exist in wheezy's libc6, FWIW. >>> >>>> What does it mean and how to correct the problem? >>> >>> There might be a version skew between libc.so.6 and >>> ld-linux.so.2 which would be bad. What does >>> >>> readlink -f /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 >> >> readlink -f /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 >> /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc-2.18.so >> >> readlink -f /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so > > That's your problem, you have the dynamic linker from libc6 2.13 > but a library from 2.18. How you got into this situation is hard > to tell, but reinstalling libc6-i686 should fix it. OK! Thanks Fixed! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOlWpwACgkQdE6C2dhV2JW4JgCgqO9tbzkfjjp3FcTP1ckHxyUc Ou8An1BxZ5lT4iyjkJ2EUrKTiNG1fw1V =PDQw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a55a9c.8010...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: meaning of an error message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21/06/2014 10:54, Sven Joachim a écrit : > On 2014-06-21 10:32 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> When I try to user acroread on debian wheezy, I get this error >> message: >> >> /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: relocation >> error: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol >> _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in >> file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference > > This symbol does not exist in wheezy's libc6, FWIW. > >> What does it mean and how to correct the problem? > > There might be a version skew between libc.so.6 and ld-linux.so.2 > which would be bad. What does > > readlink -f /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 readlink -f /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc-2.18.so readlink -f /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ld-2.13.so Thanks for helping - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOlShgACgkQdE6C2dhV2JU6uACgnDp5EQeQBtBvQctcMyBrP1qH ac0AniJ/V/5Riha1lkUkbUC/08Heicor =PUfB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a54a19.9080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
meaning of an error message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, When I try to user acroread on debian wheezy, I get this error message: /opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: relocation error: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference What does it mean and how to correct the problem? Thank you. - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOlQygACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUzbwCdFO6lIqcGPQeAULh2Va4XzgrK wjoAoJiGuPX3kGL1ifMJpgztnQo/eQ3u =P09q -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a5432d.7080...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
audacious wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, Does anyone use audacious with wheezy and have it working? Thanks - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOj9/kACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWufACg1VqDNIWNr6PLJ9aTCYJp/p2k bqMAn1tVqaUbwWRQMuXfqS1cX3EymN39 =EA+p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53a3f7ff.4040...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: unable to mount removable media with xfce4 version 4.10.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 07/06/2014 12:05, David Dušanić a écrit : > > > 06.06.2014, 10:56, "François Patte" > : >> Le 06/06/2014 10:29, David Dušanić a écrit : >>> 05.06.2014, 15:28, "François Patte" >>> : >>>> Bonjour, >>>> >>>> Since last upgrade, I cannot mount (or umount) any removable >>>> media under xfce4: >>>> >>>> I can see the icon on the desktop, mouse over indicates that >>>> the media is not mounted and if I ask (mouse left click) to >>>> mount them the answer is: not authorized operation >>>> >>>> Yes, I have thunar correctly configured >>>> >>>> Strangely, I can mount CD and DVD using xfce mount plugin but >>>> this one does not show usb disks or sticks >>>> >>>> Any clue? (debian sid updated). >>>> >>>> Thanks >>> I could think about a systemd issue. If you use policykit then >>> it needs systemd now in sid. Are you still using sysv? >> >> Yes, I think so because I did not install systemd If you are >> right, what about a backward compatibility of installed systems? >> Developpers do not care? >> >> Problems are more important than I said first: >> >> 1- xfce4 systematically records my sessions when I logout and I >> don't want it does >> >> 2- lightdm no more allows to shutdown the system I have to >> do it as root from console... >> >> PS. These problems are stupid! I just wanted to show to some >> people that linux can now be used by people unable to use >> command line I missed! They will remain with windows... > > You are using sid, so it has nothing to do with the command line > and new users. ;) These kinds of problems also happen with stable version > > You can disable session saving in Xfce from the > xfce4-settings-manager or to be asked if you want to save the > session (session management), three options, quite nice IMO. Nope! this doesn't work (for many times now!) I had to put some command in my .Xresources (rm -fr .cache/sessions) to get rid of old sessions! > > I am not a developer. Yep, some things got screwed because > everybody is pushing systemd but I do not care, I use it already > and everything works. Could be that Xfce still has to prepare for > total systemd compatibility, therefore your problem with lightdm > and shutdown. I sent a message SOLVED, it is a bug in polkit... I don't understand why developping a new init must screw up the old one! So many times developpers do not care about backward compatibility and this is boring The best example is GNOME, that's why I switched to xfce. I can give other examples. I am a TeX user, and TeX has made many changes since its beginning but I have some 15 year old files which I can still use, because people developping TeX take care of final users, I don't think that it is the case for linux distro developpers/packagers - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOS8BYACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUexACgglShvlN3nV2libag/1jSvcIU 5w8AoMs+18L+MjWC/nrjKV7FFV65aIHg =kMix -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5392f01c.5060...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: unable to mount removable media with xfce4 version 4.10.1 [SOLVED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 05/06/2014 15:28, François Patte a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Since last upgrade, I cannot mount (or umount) any removable media > under xfce4: > > I can see the icon on the desktop, mouse over indicates that the > media is not mounted and if I ask (mouse left click) to mount them > the answer is: not authorized operation > > Yes, I have thunar correctly configured > > Strangely, I can mount CD and DVD using xfce mount plugin but this > one does not show usb disks or sticks > > Any clue? (debian sid updated). Culprit are libpolkit-gobject-1-0:amd64 and libpolkit-backend-1-0:amd64 version: 0.105-6 Going back to version 0.105-4 solves the problem. It also solve the lightdm problem of impossible shutdown - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOS1WMACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVVvgCfbWXCIWBV70ry4p0ZD13T62b2 WXAAniFWxmuIdjGjCSvT8Y0PcDrwH7/O =06eS -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5392d56a.9060...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: unable to mount removable media with xfce4 version 4.10.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 06/06/2014 10:29, David Dušanić a écrit : > 05.06.2014, 15:28, "François Patte" > : >> Bonjour, >> >> Since last upgrade, I cannot mount (or umount) any removable >> media under xfce4: >> >> I can see the icon on the desktop, mouse over indicates that the >> media is not mounted and if I ask (mouse left click) to mount >> them the answer is: not authorized operation >> >> Yes, I have thunar correctly configured >> >> Strangely, I can mount CD and DVD using xfce mount plugin but >> this one does not show usb disks or sticks >> >> Any clue? (debian sid updated). >> >> Thanks > > I could think about a systemd issue. If you use policykit then it > needs systemd now in sid. Are you still using sysv? Yes, I think so because I did not install systemd If you are right, what about a backward compatibility of installed systems? Developpers do not care? Problems are more important than I said first: 1- xfce4 systematically records my sessions when I logout and I don't want it does 2- lightdm no more allows to shutdown the system I have to do it as root from console... PS. These problems are stupid! I just wanted to show to some people that linux can now be used by people unable to use command line I missed! They will remain with windows... - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlORgkoACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUE3wCdGkb4fI+WSrfsNp+u8jmGmVVI bLMAoKkT1L/b+jJKFzN0/u94qm0d6OB4 =G9MY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53918252.7070...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
unable to mount removable media with xfce4 version 4.10.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bonjour, Since last upgrade, I cannot mount (or umount) any removable media under xfce4: I can see the icon on the desktop, mouse over indicates that the media is not mounted and if I ask (mouse left click) to mount them the answer is: not authorized operation Yes, I have thunar correctly configured Strangely, I can mount CD and DVD using xfce mount plugin but this one does not show usb disks or sticks Any clue? (debian sid updated). Thanks - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOQcHsACgkQdE6C2dhV2JUi3QCghcrzWGqS5mfa+HuHBH2a2wcl E/0An3wwEzHJZ2dI9SHbgXpVj8hh9+ek =3Lj1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53907082.90...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: cups problem
Le 07/05/2014 16:51, Brian a écrit : > On Wed 07 May 2014 at 16:06:42 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> Le 07/05/2014 14:50, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : >>> >>> If I would experience the same issue as you do, while using sid, I would >>> install stable beside sid to test, how it works for stable. Assumed it >>> should work for stable, but not for sid, I would compare the >>> differences. Fortunately I run a mix of stable, testing and unstable, so >>> if an issue happens, I test different mixtures for the packages that >>> most likely cause the issue ;D. >> >> No! on sid, you have the "legacy" backend ipp14 which is unavailable on >> wheezy. So on wheezy problem is worst: I can't print at all! > > brian@desktop:~$ locate ipp14 > /usr/lib/cups/backend/ipp14 > /usr/lib/cups/backend-available/ipp14 > > Why do you need ipp4 with your printer? Because it is the only protocol which is able to make my printer working. Anyway thanks for this: /usr/lib/cups/backend-available/ipp14 It seems that cups is not able to find this directory: "backend-available" and I had to make a symlink in /usr/lib/cups/backend directory to see ipp14 in cups config page! Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: cups problem
Le 07/05/2014 14:50, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 14:41 +0200, François Patte wrote: >> Bonjour, >> >> >> Since upgrade, cups if awfull! >> >> 1- I can have my printed (badly) working only using ipp14 protocol... >> >> 2- The printing is corrupted: only twice vertical half page! >> >> >> Does someone encounter the same problem and how to correct this? >> >> Thank you. >> >> PS. Debian sid, cups 1.7.1-1 > > If I would experience the same issue as you do, while using sid, I would > install stable beside sid to test, how it works for stable. Assumed it > should work for stable, but not for sid, I would compare the > differences. Fortunately I run a mix of stable, testing and unstable, so > if an issue happens, I test different mixtures for the packages that > most likely cause the issue ;D. No! on sid, you have the "legacy" backend ipp14 which is unavailable on wheezy. So on wheezy problem is worst: I can't print at all! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cups problem
Bonjour, Since upgrade, cups if awfull! 1- I can have my printed (badly) working only using ipp14 protocol... 2- The printing is corrupted: only twice vertical half page! Does someone encounter the same problem and how to correct this? Thank you. PS. Debian sid, cups 1.7.1-1 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
boot in console mode from grub2
Bonjour, I would like to boot in console mode from the grub screen (ie not in graphic mode), but I don't want to be in single user mode, ie.: I want to have a "normal boot" without X. I can't find any tuto for grub2 installed on my system. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: icedove strange language behaviour
Le 03/05/2014 14:58, filip a écrit : > On Sat, 03 May 2014 13:49:27 +0200 > François Patte wrote: > >> Le 03/05/2014 12:52, filip a écrit : >>> On Sat, 03 May 2014 11:29:43 +0200 >>> François Patte wrote: >>> >>> >> >> I went to "Language" in the extension menu and I could see Français >> Language pack is disabled version 3.1.1195 in incompatible with >> icedove 24. >> >> >> icedove-l10n-fr is installed and seems to provide a wrong version of >> the French language pack >> >> or icedove read this language pack from elsewhere (but where?) and >> this override the icedove-l10n-fr >> >> I don't know! How can I find this? >> > > What does 'apt-cache policy icedove-l10n-fr' say ? > The correct version is provided by the security update repository > (1:24.3.0-1~deb7u1) This is OK > > If that is ok, there is probably an old version left over in the user > profile that is masking the system-wide package. > > Try starting with a blank profile: > > quit icedove if it is still running > > $ mv .icedove icedove.saved > $ icedove This was not the problem! In fact icedove read some extension from an old .mozilla/firefox directory which overrided the icedove-l10n-fr But, as all these extensions have quite cryptic names, I had to remove the whole .mozilla directory and reconfigure iceweasel! Why make simple things when you can make them difficult! Thank you for helping -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: icedove strange language behaviour
Le 03/05/2014 12:52, filip a écrit : > On Sat, 03 May 2014 11:29:43 +0200 > François Patte wrote: > > >> Yes! And this problem concerns ice*dove* not ice*weasel* >> >> > > Ok, then the language package is icedove-l10n-fr. > > The settings for icedove are the same as for iceweasel. Instead of > about:config, go to the 'advanced' tab and select 'config editor'. OK! I went there and changed general.useragent.locale to fr_FR or fr-FR but icedove remains in English I went to "Language" in the extension menu and I could see Français Language pack is disabled version 3.1.1195 in incompatible with icedove 24. icedove-l10n-fr is installed and seems to provide a wrong version of the French language pack or icedove read this language pack from elsewhere (but where?) and this override the icedove-l10n-fr I don't know! How can I find this? Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: icedove strange language behaviour
Le 03/05/2014 11:28, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 11:15 +0200, filip wrote: >> The iceweasel language package (iceweasel-l10n-fr for French) needs to >> be installed. > > On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 10:14 +0200, François Patte wrote: >> On every opened window everything is in French (fichier, Edition, >> Affichage... etc.) except for icedove which is in English on only one >> user account (on other accounts, icedove is in French). > > filip, on François' install Icedove is in French for most installs! Just > one install is broken! Yes! And this problem concerns ice*dove* not ice*weasel* -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
icedove strange language behaviour
Bonjour, I have a problem with icedove: the default locale on my machine is fr_FR-utf8. On every opened window everything is in French (fichier, Edition, Affichage... etc.) except for icedove which is in English on only one user account (on other accounts, icedove is in French). Where does icedove reads its language config on a user account? I searched in .icedove directory but did not fing something relevant... On the user account echo $LANG returns fr_FR-utf8 as on every other accounts. Could someone give me a clue? Thanks. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
graphic amd radeon hd 8790m and wheezy
Bonjour, It seems that the "standard" catalyst driver does not support this video card. Am I right? Is there a way to get it supported? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: no eth0 connection
Le 31/03/2014 07:31, Robert Holtzman a écrit : > I seem to remember this happening after an update but I'm not positive. > It did work before. My wireless connection continues to work. > > Looked at the usual suspects, /etc/ network/interfaces, /etc/resolv.conf, > etc but everything looked the same as before as close as I remember. > > Searching on the subject line turns up a lot of hits but nothing I tried > produced a connection. > > Didn't see anything applicable in dmesg but I may have missed it. > > ifup eth0 gives "Ignoring unknown interface eth0=eth0 > > Running Debian 7.4 on a Lenovo t420 w/ 4G RAM and an Intel i3. > > Being pretty ignorant about networking, I'm at a loss as to where to > begin trouble shooting. Any pointers appreciated. What is the result of: # lshw -class network ? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
kernel upgrade
Bonjour, Since I installed debian sid (august 2013), I regularly made upgrade, but the kernel doesn't appear to be upgraded. Why? I am running 3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel. Do I have to upgrade to 3.13-1-amd64? If yes how to proceed? Thanks. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: how to remove ? directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 28/01/2014 14:35, Sven Hartge a écrit : > Jochen Spieker wrote: >> lina: >>> >>> ls: cannot access .gvfs: Permission denied >>> >>> d? ? ?? ?? .gvfs > >> If this is actual ls output then your filesystem is broken and you >> should fsck it, possibly in single-user mode (init 1). > > Please don't spread panic, when there is no need to panic. He doesn't spread any panic here: these happen when a directory/partition has been uncleanly unmounted and use of fsck is a good suggestion... - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire MAP5 --- UMR CNRS 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLoHXkACgkQdE6C2dhV2JVvSACbBganGWpzVIssdG3uOe1gM+Z7 6XAAnRtf2PhVVFZZN25/+f3GFyzu7oaH =TpH+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52e81d79.8010...@mi.parisdescartes.fr
Re: update flash
Le 17/01/2014 18:28, Patrick Bartek a écrit : > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, François Patte wrote: > >> Le 17/01/2014 05:11, Patrick Bartek a écrit : >>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>> >>>> On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote: >>>>> >>>>> [snip] >>> >>> I was unaware of this. I thought it was the plugin. I have since >>> read the the Debian Flash wiki and see my error. Of course, the >>> Debian way of installing/updating Flash is a lot easier than >>> Fedora's which I switched from middle of last year after using Core >>> and Fedora for a number of years: You have to do it 100% manually. >> >> yum install flash-plugin >> >> Is it what you call "100% manually" > > No. When I first started using Fedora at Core 3, and for a number of > years after, this was the only way to install Flash on Fedora: > > 1. Go to Adobe web site > > 2. Find the step-by-step install instructions. Read them. > > 3. Find download page for Flash for Linux. This was not a simple > click away. The Linux page was not easy to find. The Flash > Download page always defaulted to Windows. > > 4. Download the gzip file. No distro-specific repos or install files. > > 5. Uncompress locally in your /home directory, and as root copy the > flashplugin to the correct directory for your distro. It varied. > > 6. Test to see if it worked, and troubleshoot when it didn't. > > > Later as I remember, Adobe, besides the generic gzip file, > started supplying rpm, deb, etc. files for specific distros, so you > could use that distro's package manager to install the file, but you > still had to download it first. And up until I quit Fedora at > version 12 (I used it for a year past its End-of-Life until Wheezy Beta > was released), a simple 'yum install flash-plugin' was not possible > as Flash was not Open Source, and Fedora never, never, never put > proprietary software in their repos. You had to go to third party repos > for that. I don't know if Adobe ever set up its own dedicated Flash > repository for Linux. You are talking of world before WW1... I have just update my laptop running f14 (WW2) and: yum update Modules complémentaires chargés : langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit Adding fr_FR to language list Configuration du processus de mise à jour Résolution des dépendances --> Lancement de la transaction de test ---> Paquet VirtualBox-4.1.i686 0:4.1.30_91550_fedora14-1 marqué pour être mis à jour ---> Paquet flash-plugin.i386 0:11.2.202.335-release marqué pour être mis à jour ---> Paquet gthumb.i686 0:2.12.3-1.fc14 marqué pour être mis à jour --> Résolution des dépendances terminée Dépendances résolues == PaquetArchitectureVersion Dépôt Taille == Mise à jour: VirtualBox-4.1i6864.1.30_91550_fedora14-1 virtualbox 64 M flash-plugin i38611.2.202.335-release adobe-linux-i3866.6 M gthumbi6862.12.3-1.fc14 updates 4.0 M Résumé de la transaction == Upgrade 3 Package(s) Taille totale : 74 M Taille totale des téléchargement : 70 M Est-ce correct [o/N] : o Téléchargement des paquets : Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata Processing delta metadata Package(s) data still to download: 70 M (1/2): VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.30_91550_fedora14-1.i686.rpm | 64 MB 03:05 (2/2): flash-plugin-11.2.202.335-release.i386.rpm | 6.6 MB 00:18 -- Total 351 kB/s | 70 MB 03:24 Lancement de rpm_check_debug Lancement de la transaction de test Transaction de test réussie Lancement de la transaction Mise à jour: flash-plugin-11.2.202.335-release.i386 1/6 Mise à jour: VirtualBox-4.1-4.1.30_91550_fedora14-1.i686 2/6 (Sorry! I didn't switch to LANG=C) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Typing Greek in Emacs
Le 17/01/2014 19:44, Johann Spies a écrit : > Using the Greek-postfix input method I can type accented characters in > emacs using examples from the input method help like this > > o; όy; ύ > > So using the keys (on a US-intl-keyboard) Petro;w when this input > method is active I can type Πέτρος. > > However I cannot figure out how to type something like this: αὐτῷ or > αὐτῷ or ὅ > > Is there a comprehensive document that can explain all the possibilities? Have a look there: http://iris.math.aegean.gr/~atsol/emacs-unicode/ -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Preserving LVM across builds
Le 17/01/2014 19:26, Brad Alexander a écrit : > Hey, > > Have a question that I thought I would post here because I have never > done it before. > > I have a buddy that has a system that is in desperate need of a rebuild. > It is truly a Franken-box, with 4 hard drives (2*80GB, 1*160GB, and > 1*250GB), and has an Ubuntu build on it and a Mint build. He wants to > consolidate it into a single Debian build. > > The 250GB drive is an LVM PV with a single VG and two LVs. > Unfortunately, he doesn't have sufficient drive space to move the data > from the drive. My question is what needs to be done (or if it is > possible) for him to unplug that drive with the LVM, install Debian on > one or more of the remaining drives, then re-incorporate the drive into > the new Debian install? Is it possible? And what is the best approach to > doing so? I suppose that on the 250Gb drive there are only data (/home or something else). You do not need to unplug anything. Just make an "expert mode" install of the OS on one other disk and when asked for partition by the installer, it will recognize the lvm. Just tell the installer to not reformat the 250Gb drive... (but give a mount point!) -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: update flash
Le 17/01/2014 05:11, Patrick Bartek a écrit : > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> On Jo, 16 ian 14, 09:58:43, Patrick Bartek wrote: >>> >>> I am using the flashplugin from Debian's nonfree repo. If there are >>> any security updates for it from Adobe shouldn't those updates >>> ultimately end up in the repo just like all other nonfree stuff? Or >>> would the security updates end up in some backport repo, since it >>> would be coming from a newer, non-Linux version of Flash? >>> >>> As far as I can tell, I have the latest version not only from the >>> repo, but according to Adobe as well: 11.2.202 >> >> You are missing the fact that the flashplugin-nonfree package doesn't >> actually contain the plugin. The "package" is actually only a >> downloading script executed on package install[1]. So the only way to >> trigger an update would be to bump the package version, which has to >> be done by the maintainer. > > I was unaware of this. I thought it was the plugin. I have since read > the the Debian Flash wiki and see my error. Of course, the Debian way > of installing/updating Flash is a lot easier than Fedora's which I > switched from middle of last year after using Core and Fedora for a > number of years: You have to do it 100% manually. yum install flash-plugin Is it what you call "100% manually" -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: since last upgrade unable to upgrade, install whatever...
Le 06/01/2014 12:28, Selim T. Erdogan a écrit : > François Patte, 6.01.2014: >> Le 06/01/2014 11:38, Selim T. Erdogan a écrit : >>> Erwan David, 6.01.2014: >>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:24:44AM CET, François Patte >>>> said: >>>>> Bonjour, >>>>> >>>>> Since the last upgrade, I am unable to run any apt command (install, >>>>> upgrade...) all end like this: >>>>> >>>>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to >>>>> load -- debian_version (LoadError) >>>>> from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 >>>>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' >>>>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 >>>>> E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error >>>>> code (10) >>>>> E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> file debian_version is on my system. >>>>> >>>>> What to do? >>>> >>>> Bug is in ruby-debian which does not provide debian_version.so for ruby 1.8 >>>> >>>> You may comment out everything in /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs until it >>>> is fixed. >>> >>> Another option would be to remove the apt-listbugs package (temporarily)... >> >> and install bugged upgrade without any warning? > > That's what I would do, though you might want to check bug reports for > "critical" packages, to be on the safe side. Hopefully the bug will be > fixed soon and you can reinstall apt-listbugs. > > Actually, after looking at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734256, > what you could do is to remove apt-listbugs, install ruby1.9.1, install ruby1.9 will install 188 new packages on my system... is it sensible? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: since last upgrade unable to upgrade, install whatever...
Le 06/01/2014 12:21, Selim T. Erdogan a écrit : > Erwan David, 6.01.2014: >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:56:35AM CET, François Patte >> said: >>> Le 06/01/2014 11:30, Erwan David a écrit : >>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:24:44AM CET, François Patte >>>> said: >>>>> Bonjour, >>>>> >>>>> Since the last upgrade, I am unable to run any apt command (install, >>>>> upgrade...) all end like this: >>>>> >>>>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to >>>>> load -- debian_version (LoadError) >>>>> from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 >>>>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' >>>>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 >>>>> E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error >>>>> code (10) >>>>> E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> file debian_version is on my system. >>>>> >>>>> What to do? >>>> >>>> Bug is in ruby-debian which does not provide debian_version.so for ruby 1.8 >>>> >>>> You may comment out everything in /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs until it >>>> is fixed. >>> >>> # ls /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbug >>> /bin/ls: cannot access /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbug: No such file or >>> directory >>> >>> # ls /etc/apt.conf.d/ >>> /bin/ls: cannot access /etc/apt.conf.d/: No such file or directory >>> >>> hum! >> >> Maybe it differs for you but that's where my jessie stores the fact >> that apt* should launch apt-listbugs before install >> >> Maybe in apt.conf for you ? > > Mine was in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs > ^ > (note extra "apt/", and final "s") OK thanks, I found it... Any idea how long this bug will last? Or how to have any info when it will be corrected? Thank you -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: since last upgrade unable to upgrade, install whatever...
Le 06/01/2014 11:38, Selim T. Erdogan a écrit : > Erwan David, 6.01.2014: >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:24:44AM CET, François Patte >> said: >>> Bonjour, >>> >>> Since the last upgrade, I am unable to run any apt command (install, >>> upgrade...) all end like this: >>> >>> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to >>> load -- debian_version (LoadError) >>> from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 >>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' >>> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 >>> E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error >>> code (10) >>> E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 >>> >>> >>> file debian_version is on my system. >>> >>> What to do? >> >> Bug is in ruby-debian which does not provide debian_version.so for ruby 1.8 >> >> You may comment out everything in /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs until it is >> fixed. > > Another option would be to remove the apt-listbugs package (temporarily)... and install bugged upgrade without any warning? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: since last upgrade unable to upgrade, install whatever...
Le 06/01/2014 11:30, Erwan David a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:24:44AM CET, François Patte > said: >> Bonjour, >> >> Since the last upgrade, I am unable to run any apt command (install, >> upgrade...) all end like this: >> >> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to >> load -- debian_version (LoadError) >> from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 >> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' >> from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 >> E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error >> code (10) >> E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 >> >> >> file debian_version is on my system. >> >> What to do? > > Bug is in ruby-debian which does not provide debian_version.so for ruby 1.8 > > You may comment out everything in /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbugs until it is > fixed. # ls /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbug /bin/ls: cannot access /etc/apt.conf.d/10apt-listbug: No such file or directory # ls /etc/apt.conf.d/ /bin/ls: cannot access /etc/apt.conf.d/: No such file or directory hum! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
since last upgrade unable to upgrade, install whatever...
Bonjour, Since the last upgrade, I am unable to run any apt command (install, upgrade...) all end like this: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error code (10) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 file debian_version is on my system. What to do? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: unable to install stardict
Le 05/01/2014 18:31, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > On 2014-01-04 15:41:19 -0500, Jeff Bauer wrote: >> On 01/04/2014 01:38 PM, Slavko wrote: >>> Dňa Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:57:42 +0100 François Patte >>> napísal: >>> >>>> I tried to install stardict >>> >>> The StarDict's development seems to be ended. >>> >> >> Five or more years ago when still enamored with Puppy Linux, I discovered >> that Puppy's PBDict was just a gooey GUI wrapper for the application dict. >> Deciding to forego the clumsy GUI and mouse, I started just issuing "dict >> foo" in a terminal. Since then, first with Arch, and Debian, dict is perhaps >> one of my most frequently used apps. >> >> Another thing I did was to install dictionary databases locally, as I was >> virtually crippled when dict.org's servers were offline. > > There aren't French dictionaries for dict, while IIRC there's one > for StarDict. That may be the reason why the OP wants StarDict. I want stardict because goldendict is not nice too much: mant accented characters or characters with diacritical marks are not well displayed and sometimes not displayed at all: I can see a question mark instead... But, I cannot install stardict and I cannot install anything at that time because a bug in ruby returns systematically: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 E: Le sous-processus /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 a renvoyé un code d'erreur (10) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 I cannot even upgrade my system! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
unable to install stardict
Bonjour, I tried to install stardict but for some unknown reason to me, it fails: Here is what apt-get returns: apt-get install stardict Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following extra packages will be installed: espeak-data libespeak1 libsonic0 stardict-common stardict-gnome stardict-plugin stardict-plugin-espeak stardict-plugin-festival Suggested packages: ttf-arphic-uming The following NEW packages will be installed: espeak-data libespeak1 libsonic0 stardict stardict-common stardict-gnome stardict-plugin stardict-plugin-espeak stardict-plugin-festival 0 upgraded, 9 newly installed, 0 to remove and 240 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/3099 kB of archives. After this operation, 6671 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269:in `require' from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:269 E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 returned an error code (10) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || exit 10 If I understand /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb requires the file "debian_version" and tells that this file is not available on my system but it is there in /etc Is that a bug? Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lm_sensors log
Bonjour, After the last upgrade of my debien sid, lm_sensors reports in logwatch (first time I see that! I didn't change anything in my config). Here is the last report: - lm_sensors output Begin acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1:+27.8 C (crit = +106.0 C) temp2:+29.8 C (crit = +106.0 C) coretemp-isa- Adapter: ISA adapter Physical id 0: +37.0 C (high = +85.0 C, crit = +105.0 C) Core 0: +37.0 C (high = +85.0 C, crit = +105.0 C) Core 1: +34.0 C (high = +85.0 C, crit = +105.0 C) Core 2: +32.0 C (high = +85.0 C, crit = +105.0 C) Core 3: +33.0 C (high = +85.0 C, crit = +105.0 C) nct6779-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter in0:+0.94 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) in1:+1.01 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in2:+3.33 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in3:+3.33 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in4:+1.02 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in5:+2.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in6:+2.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in7:+3.38 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in8:+3.30 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in9:+1.07 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in10: +2.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in11: +2.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in12: +0.26 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in13: +0.17 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM in14: +2.04 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) ALARM fan1: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan2: 1166 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan3: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan4: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) fan5: 0 RPM (min =0 RPM) SYSTIN: +30.0 C (high = +0.0 C, hyst = +0.0 C) ALARM sensor = thermistor CPUTIN: +27.0 C (high = +80.0 C, hyst = +75.0 C) sensor = thermistor AUXTIN0:-63.0 Csensor = thermistor AUXTIN1:-63.0 Csensor = thermistor AUXTIN2:-63.0 Csensor = thermistor AUXTIN3:-62.0 Csensor = thermistor PCH_CHIP_CPU_MAX_TEMP: +0.0 C PCH_CHIP_TEMP: +0.0 C PCH_CPU_TEMP:+0.0 C PCH_MCH_TEMP:+0.0 C intrusion0:ALARM intrusion1:ALARM beep_enable: disabled -- lm_sensors output End - What does it mean? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
fail2ban fails to ban apache...
Bonjour, I try to configure fail2ban in order to ban IP which try to connect to directories protected by .htaccess. Here is my [apache] section in jail.conf: enabled = true port = http,https filter = apache-auth logpath = /var/log/apache*/*error.log maxretry = 3 But I tested filling the auth form with erroneous login/password and nothing happens! Nothing appeared in /var/log/fail2ban.log... I tried the same for ssh connections and the IP of the computer from which I tried was banned after the third attempt. What is missing in my config? Here is the ssh section in jail.conf: enabled = true port = ssh filter = sshd logpath = /var/log/auth.log maxretry = 6 Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Goodbye GNOME, Hello XFCE
Le 06/12/2013 10:52, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : > On Fr, 2013-12-06 at 10:35 +0100, François Patte wrote: >> Le 06/12/2013 09:51, Reco a écrit : >>> Hi. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote: >>>> It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the >>>> choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to >>>> launch my stuff, there are a lot of warnings, for instance: >>>> >>>> when I quit evince: >>>> >>>> (evince:30376): Gtk-WARNING **: Calling Inhibit failed: >>>> GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name >>>> org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files >>> >>> Try installing evince-gtk instead of evince. >>> >>>> with acroread (on start): >>>> >>>> (acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in >>>> module_path: "xfce", >>> >>> The acroread needs i386 libraries from gtk2-engines-xfce package. >> >> If I try to install this package (i386), I get: >> >> >> The following packages will be REMOVED: >> browser-plugin-libreoffice docvert-libreoffice gtk2-engines-xfce >> libharfbuzz0a libharfbuzz0a:i386 libreoffice >> libreoffice-base libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-calc >> libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gtk >> libreoffice-help-fr libreoffice-impress libreoffice-math >> libreoffice-pdfimport libreoffice-report-builder-bin >> libreoffice-writer libreoffice-writer2latex python-uno xfce4 >> >> >> So, there is some issues with i386 libraries wich cannot coexist with >> amd64 ones! > > http://www.howtoforge.com/multiarch-how-to-use-32bit-packages-on-a-64bit-system-debian-7-wheezy > > Took less then 5 seconds to search the web. It is too much: 5 seconds to have informations on what is already done? If I had no i386 arch installed, I could not use acroread You answer too quickly Ralph! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Goodbye GNOME, Hello XFCE
Le 06/12/2013 09:51, Reco a écrit : > Hi. > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:39:03AM +0100, François Patte wrote: >> It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the >> choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to >> launch my stuff, there are a lot of warnings, for instance: >> >> when I quit evince: >> >> (evince:30376): Gtk-WARNING **: Calling Inhibit failed: >> GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name >> org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files > > Try installing evince-gtk instead of evince. > >> with acroread (on start): >> >> (acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in >> module_path: "xfce", > > The acroread needs i386 libraries from gtk2-engines-xfce package. If I try to install this package (i386), I get: The following packages will be REMOVED: browser-plugin-libreoffice docvert-libreoffice gtk2-engines-xfce libharfbuzz0a libharfbuzz0a:i386 libreoffice libreoffice-base libreoffice-base-core libreoffice-calc libreoffice-core libreoffice-draw libreoffice-gtk libreoffice-help-fr libreoffice-impress libreoffice-math libreoffice-pdfimport libreoffice-report-builder-bin libreoffice-writer libreoffice-writer2latex python-uno xfce4 So, there is some issues with i386 libraries wich cannot coexist with amd64 ones! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Goodbye GNOME, Hello XFCE
Le 05/12/2013 22:46, Stephen Powell a écrit : > Well, the latest update to Debian jessie did it. GNOME 3 apparently > no longer has a "fallback mode" for X drivers which don't support 3D > acceleration. Mine doesn't. And the native GNOME 3 interface is > apparently unusable with such an X driver. > > Goodbye, GNOME. Hello, XFCE. I hope Debian will make XFCE the > default desktop for the production jessie installer. It could a nice choice, but there are many things to fix! I made the choice of xfce at my wheezy install and as I use terminals and cli to launch my stuff, there are a lot of warnings, for instance: when I quit evince: (evince:30376): Gtk-WARNING **: Calling Inhibit failed: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.SessionManager was not provided by any .service files with acroread (on start): (acroread:30504): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to locate theme engine in module_path: "xfce", etc. I had some similar messages launching emacs and other applications. So I have to launch my applications like this: evince beamer.pdf 2>/dev/null & if I want to get rid of these warnings which can appear if I scroll a document . -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: how to activate php in apache
Le 04/12/2013 02:33, Bob Proulx a écrit : > François Patte wrote: > Think back... How many times have someone asked you for help with > something. And you asked them what did they do? And they said, "I > didn't do anything!" And of those times how often did it turn out > that they had actually done something? I am sure quite often! :-) > I am certain that others reading this will go, yes, many times. > >>>> But php is not working...ie.: >>>> >>>> > And I see that the problem turned out that you were expecting short > tags to work and those have been discouraged for years. Glad to see > that the root cause of the problem is solved. I know you think that > short tags should be on by default but really those are official > "discouraged". > > http://php.net/manual/en/language.basic-syntax.phptags.php > PHP tags > > When PHP parses a file, it looks for opening and closing tags, which > are which tell PHP to start and stop interpreting the > code between them. Parsing in this manner allows PHP to be embedded > in all sorts of different documents, as everything outside of a pair > of opening and closing tags is ignored by the PHP parser. > > PHP also allows for short open tags (which are discouraged > because they are only available if enabled with short_open_tag php.ini > configuration file directive, or if PHP was configured with the > --enable-short-tags option. > > And this is a reasonable discussion of short tags too: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/200640/are-php-short-tags-acceptable-to-use But in php.ini file (from debian), we can read: ; short_open_tag ; Default Value: On<-- ; Development Value: Off ; Production Value: Off I am not making any development, I have no web server in production, I just use the web server on my computer to check some web files before puting them on the university web server... Reading this at the beginning of php;ini file, I thought that short tags were enabled by default... -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: how to activate php in apache[solved]
Le 03/12/2013 14:07, Linux-Fan a écrit : > On 12/03/2013 10:50 AM, François Patte wrote: >> You misunderstood the sentence: the file where the php command is >> written is in /var/www and has 644 permissions... (/var/www has, of >> course, 755 permissions). >> >> Re-reading my first message, I can't see any extra w in /var/www ! > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/12/msg00076.html > > > "[...] does not work in /var/ (with 644 permissions)" As far as I can see in my debian sid install this directory is /var/www not /var/ww! And in /etc/apache2/sites-available/000-default.conf DocumentRoot /var/www Anyway, the pb is solved: in php.ini (from debian) shorthand tags are disabled... while in php.ini (from php site) it is by default enabled.. Packagers change the default configuration files and it is difficult to know why and, up to day, no one on this list seems to be aware of this. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: how to activate php in apache
Le 03/12/2013 00:14, Bob Proulx a écrit : > François Patte wrote: >> I'd like to anable php with apache web server. >> >> apache2 is installed >> php5 is installed. >> apache php module is activated > > The above is just too vague and ambiguous. Do you mean this? Where is the ambiguity? > > apt-get install apache2 libapache2-mod-php5 > > If you meant anything else by "activated" please say exactly what you > mean. Because with the above there is no need for 'a2enmod' or any > other commands. It will be available immediately after the above. What do you suppose: I am a dumb person trying to run php in an apache server without apache and without php? I said that because after running a2enmod php5 I got: Module php5 already enabled > >> But php is not working...ie.: >> >> > phpinfo'); >> ?> > > If that is verbatim then that is the problem. Note the syntax errors > in the above. Try this verbatim instead. > > Yes typo here in the mail. > >> does not work in /var/ (with 644 permissions) > > How did /var/www get 644 permissions? That is also incorrect. You misunderstood the sentence: the file where the php command is written is in /var/www and has 644 permissions... (/var/www has, of course, 755 permissions). Re-reading my first message, I can't see any extra w in /var/www ! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
how to activate php in apache
Bonsoir, I'd like to anable php with apache web server. apache2 is installed php5 is installed. apache php module is activated But php is not working...ie.: does not work in /var/ (with 644 permissions) Where is the magic? Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Share VPN connection
Hi,
I finally got it to work using the same steps as before. I have no idea why it
works now and it did not use too.
Thanks for all you help.
François
On Nov 30, 2013, at 23:51 , Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 12/1/13, Ron Leach wrote:
>> On 30/11/2013 20:22, François Fayard wrote:
>
> Francois, it might be useful if you let us know what software you are
> using to set up the vpn.
>
> To set up NAT ("ICS") I use a little nat-enable shell script:
> ---
> #!/bin/sh
> wan=eth2
> echo "NOTE: external/WAN Internet facing device is set to:"
> echo " $wan"
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $wan -j MASQUERADE
> #iptables -A FORWARD -i $wan -o eth1 -m state \
> # --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
> #iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o $wan -j ACCEPT
> echo "NAT enabled for $wan"
> ---
>
> So after establishing your vpn as ppp0, you would probably need to
> re-run the above script (on the vpn gateway host) with "wan=ppp0" line
> in the above script.
>
> However, we are kind of grasping at straws here, because we don't know
> how you're setting up NAT, or your VPN.
>
>> I think the problem is a routing gateway; and I am suspicious of the
>> '*' entry on the default line. My guess is that the default route
>> should not be *, should not be 192.168.1.anything, but should be
>> something like the ppp0 far end address, which is 173.255.189.129 .
>
> Yes.
>
> But, is ppp0 likely to include the "private" part of VPN?
>
> I would with eg OpenVPN expect tun0, not ppp0.
>
> Which Linux-based VPN software encrypts over ppp0 device?
>
>> Also, be clear what
>> (a) the address is that the other machines use to reach your Debian
>> system (that is the 'gateway' address for them), and
>
>> (b) it should be a different gateway address from the 'gateway
>> address' that your Debian machine uses for its gateway
>
>> (c) and the gateway address that your debian machine uses
>> should be on the default route line in the route table, I believe.
> This sounds ambiguous. Let's say:
> After establishing your VPN on your local-LAN gateway host, it's
> default route should be the address of the far-end of the VPN link;
> and that routing table will still need specific routes (the VPN
> software/config should set this up).
>
>> (d) and your VPN should be on a different IP address subnet from the
>> local LAN subnet
> Definitely.
>
> e) be clear on the difference between PTPP tunnelling link,
> unencrypted, which looks acts and quacks like a VPN-duck to the other
> machines on your local LAN, as compared to a true VPN, which also
> encrypts the tunnel.
>
> f) also, make sure you update your NAT firewall rule after bringing up your
> VPN
>
> Good luck
> Zenaan
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/CAOsGNST71O=zS3=How-ZW1s=0oekk-yw2rtvxlhmnsb6ctd...@mail.gmail.com
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/bedeaa94-1aa5-448c-8a34-4db44c4d0...@gmail.com
Share VPN connection
Hi, I would like to use my computer to share a VPN connection. On Debian 7.2 : - I get my internet connection from eth1 - I am connecting to a VPN (I am using Strong VPN) - I share my internet connection using eth0 Everything has been setup using the graphical user interface of Gnome. If I don't connect to the VPN, everything works well, and the internet is shared through eth0. For information, here is the result of ifconfig : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:e5:49:c5:c3:bd inet addr:10.42.0.1 Bcast:10.42.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::52e5:49ff:fec5:c3bd/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:36068 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39710 errors:0 dropped:46 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4632172 (4.4 MiB) TX bytes:41117421 (39.2 MiB) Interrupt:41 Base address:0xe000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr a0:f3:c1:02:3b:3b inet addr:192.168.1.30 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fe02:3b3b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:85170 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:70772 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:31135 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:91420083 (87.1 MiB) TX bytes:8783953 (8.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 Base address:0xe000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) TX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) Then, when I connect to the VPN, everything works well on my Debian system. But the internet is not shared anymore. For information, here is the result of ifconfig : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:e5:49:c5:c3:bd inet addr:10.42.0.1 Bcast:10.42.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::52e5:49ff:fec5:c3bd/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:35709 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39347 errors:0 dropped:46 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4595967 (4.3 MiB) TX bytes:40967837 (39.0 MiB) Interrupt:41 Base address:0xe000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr a0:f3:c1:02:3b:3b inet addr:192.168.1.30 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fe02:3b3b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:84765 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:70394 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:31067 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:91262087 (87.0 MiB) TX bytes:8742729 (8.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 Base address:0xe000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) TX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol inet addr:173.255.189.182 P-t-P:173.255.189.129 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1400 Metric:1 RX packets:461 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:714 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 RX bytes:242402 (236.7 KiB) TX bytes:89722 (87.6 KiB) What can I do to solve that ? Thanks for your help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ac5bd983-bb93-42f6-9d37-3ecd0ed75...@me.com
Re: Share VPN connection
On Nov 30, 2013, at 20:59 , Ron Leach wrote: > [snipped the ifconfig listing when VPN is up] > > Might the default route need to point to the VPN, instead of the physical > eth0 IP address? I'm not expert on VPNs at all, but I have encountered > routing problems in LANs with multiple uplinks and gateways, which might be > somewhat similar to this situation. > > What does > # route > say when the VPN is up? > > Just a thought; I may be off the track here, but could be worth a check. > > regards, Ron Thanks for your help Ron. Without the VPN, route gives : Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface default livebox.home0.0.0.0 UG0 00 eth1 10.42.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 With the VPN, route gives : Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 00 ppp0 10.42.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0 strong-mf35.rel 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 00 eth1 strong-mf35.rel 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 00 eth1 129.189.255.173 * 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1 Francois -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/6b36-c62d-41e4-8571-22378f879...@gmail.com
Share VPN connection
Hi, I would like to use my computer to share a VPN connection. On Debian 7.2 : - I get my internet connection from eth1 - I am connecting to a VPN (I am using Strong VPN) - I share my internet connection using eth0 Everything has been setup using the graphical user interface of Gnome. If I don't connect to the VPN, everything works well, and the internet is shared through eth0. For information, here is the result of ifconfig : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:e5:49:c5:c3:bd inet addr:10.42.0.1 Bcast:10.42.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::52e5:49ff:fec5:c3bd/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:36068 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39710 errors:0 dropped:46 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4632172 (4.4 MiB) TX bytes:41117421 (39.2 MiB) Interrupt:41 Base address:0xe000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr a0:f3:c1:02:3b:3b inet addr:192.168.1.30 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fe02:3b3b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:85170 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:70772 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:31135 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:91420083 (87.1 MiB) TX bytes:8783953 (8.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 Base address:0xe000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) TX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) Then, when I connect to the VPN, everything works well on my Debian system. But the internet is not shared anymore. For information, here is the result of ifconfig : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 50:e5:49:c5:c3:bd inet addr:10.42.0.1 Bcast:10.42.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::52e5:49ff:fec5:c3bd/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:35709 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:39347 errors:0 dropped:46 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4595967 (4.3 MiB) TX bytes:40967837 (39.0 MiB) Interrupt:41 Base address:0xe000 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr a0:f3:c1:02:3b:3b inet addr:192.168.1.30 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::a2f3:c1ff:fe02:3b3b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:84765 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:70394 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:31067 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:91262087 (87.0 MiB) TX bytes:8742729 (8.3 MiB) Interrupt:19 Base address:0xe000 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:25 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) TX bytes:2176 (2.1 KiB) ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol inet addr:173.255.189.182 P-t-P:173.255.189.129 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1400 Metric:1 RX packets:461 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:714 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:3 RX bytes:242402 (236.7 KiB) TX bytes:89722 (87.6 KiB) What can I do to solve that ? Thanks for your help. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/04b33a9d-1239-4fe3-9d21-9182eafa8...@gmail.com
Re: raid problem
Le 30/11/2013 12:56, Andre Majorel a écrit : > On 2013-11-29 23:43 +0100, François Patte wrote: > >> I have a problem with 2 raid arrays: I have 2 disks (sdc and sdd) in >> raid1 arrays. >> >> One disk (sdc) failed and I replaced it by a new one. Copying the >> partition table from sdd disk using sfdisk: >> >> sfdisk -d /dev/sdd | sfdisk /dev/sdc >> >> then I "added" the 2 partitions (sdc1 and sdc3) to the arrays md0 and md1: >> >> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 >> >> mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdc3 >> >> There were no problem with the md0 array: >> >> >> cat /proc/mdstat gives: >> >> md0 : active raid1 sdc1[1] sdd1[0] >> 1052160 blocks [2/2] [UU] >> >> >> But for the md1 array, I get: >> >> md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2](S) sdd3[0] >> 483138688 blocks [2/1] [U_] >> >> What is the problem? And how can I recover a correct md1 array? > > The root of your problem would be that /dev/sdc3 is considered > spare, not active. Not sure why. Thank you for answering > > Guess #1 : before physically changing the disks, you forgot > mdadm /dev/md1 --fail /dev/sdc3 > mdadm /dev/md1 --remove /dev/sdc3 No, I didn't! > > Guess #2 : maybe there were I/O errors during the add. How far > did the sync go ? Run smartctl -d ata -A /dev/sdc3 and look for > non-zero raw values for Reallocated_Sector_Ct and > Current_Pending_Sector. What does badblocks /dev/sdc3 say ? No non-zero values for these two... no badblocks on sdc3 > > Guess #3 : it's a software hiccup and all /dev/sdc3 needs is to > be removed from /dev/md1 and re-added. I tried without any success... But something is strange: there are some badblocks on sdd3! logwatch returs errors on sdd disk: md/raid1:md1: sdd: unrecoverable I/O read error for block 834749 ...: 3 Time(s) res 41/40:00:6f:56:61/00:00:32:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) ...: 24 Time(s) sd 5:0:0:0: [sdd] Add. Sense: Unrecovered read error - auto reallocat ...: 6 Time(s) sd 5:0:0:0: [sdd] Sense Key : Medium Error [current] [descr ...: 6 Time(s) mdmonitor returns: This is an automatically generated mail message from mdadm running on dipankar A FailSpare event had been detected on md device /dev/md1. It could be related to component device /dev/sdc3. If I summarize the situation: the faulty disk (with badblocks) is sdd3, but it is the only active disk in the md1 array and I can fully access the data of this disk which is normally mounted at boot time, while the disk sdc3 has no badblocks and is declared as faulty by mdadm!! I don't understand something! Anyway. I can delete this array and create a new one from scratch (after replacing the faulty disk). Is it enough to run these commands: mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdc3 mdadm --zero-superblock /dev/sdd3 Or do I have also to modify the /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file? Thank you for your answer. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: raid problem
Le 30/11/2013 06:39, Stan Hoeppner a écrit : > On 11/29/2013 4:43 PM, François Patte wrote: >> Bonsoir, >> >> I have a problem with 2 raid arrays: I have 2 disks (sdc and sdd) in >> raid1 arrays. >> >> One disk (sdc) failed and I replaced it by a new one. Copying the >> partition table from sdd disk using sfdisk: >> >> sfdisk -d /dev/sdd | sfdisk /dev/sdc >> >> then I "added" the 2 partitions (sdc1 and sdc3) to the arrays md0 and md1: >> >> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 >> >> mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdc3 >> >> There were no problem with the md0 array: >> >> >> cat /proc/mdstat gives: >> >> md0 : active raid1 sdc1[1] sdd1[0] >> 1052160 blocks [2/2] [UU] >> >> >> But for the md1 array, I get: >> >> md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2](S) sdd3[0] >> 483138688 blocks [2/1] [U_] >> >> >> And mdadm --detail /dev/md1 returns: >> >> /dev/md1: >> Version : 0.90 >> Creation Time : Sat Mar 7 11:48:30 2009 >> Raid Level : raid1 >> Array Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) >> Used Dev Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) >>Raid Devices : 2 >> Total Devices : 2 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> Persistence : Superblock is persistent >> >> Update Time : Fri Nov 29 21:23:25 2013 >> State : clean, degraded >> Active Devices : 1 >> Working Devices : 2 >> Failed Devices : 0 >> Spare Devices : 1 >> >>UUID : 2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 >> Events : 0.72076 >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >>0 8 510 active sync /dev/sdd3 >>2 002 removed >> >>2 8 35- spare /dev/sdc3 >> >> While mdadm --examine /dev/sdc3 returns: >> >> /dev/sdc3: >> Magic : a92b4efc >> Version : 0.90.00 >>UUID : 2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 >> Creation Time : Sat Mar 7 11:48:30 2009 >> Raid Level : raid1 >> Used Dev Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) >> >> >> Array Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) >>Raid Devices : 2 >> Total Devices : 2 >> Preferred Minor : 1 >> >> Update Time : Fri Nov 29 23:03:41 2013 >> State : clean >> Active Devices : 1 >> Working Devices : 2 >> Failed Devices : 1 >> Spare Devices : 1 >>Checksum : be8bd27f - correct >> Events : 72078 >> >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State >> this 2 8 352 spare /dev/sdc3 >> >>0 0 8 510 active sync /dev/sdd3 >>1 1 001 faulty removed >>2 2 8 352 spare /dev/sdc3 >> >> >> What is the problem? And how can I recover a correct md1 array? > > IIRC Linux md rebuilds multiple degraded arrays sequentially, not in > parallel. This is due to system performance impact and other reasons. > When the rebuild of md0 is finished, the rebuild of md1/sdc3 should > start automatically. If this did not occur please let us know and we'll > go from there. I thought it was clear enough that the result of commands mdadm --details or mdadm --examine were what they return *after* the rebuild of array md1. On reboot, I am warned that md1 is started with one disk out of two and one spare and recovery starts immediately: md1 : active raid1 sdd3[0] sdc3[2] 483138688 blocks [2/1] [U_] [=>...] recovery = 7.5% (36521408/483138688) finish=89.1min speed=83445K/sec After that, the situation is what is quoted in my previous message Regards. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
raid problem
Bonsoir, I have a problem with 2 raid arrays: I have 2 disks (sdc and sdd) in raid1 arrays. One disk (sdc) failed and I replaced it by a new one. Copying the partition table from sdd disk using sfdisk: sfdisk -d /dev/sdd | sfdisk /dev/sdc then I "added" the 2 partitions (sdc1 and sdc3) to the arrays md0 and md1: mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdc1 mdadm --add /dev/md1 /dev/sdc3 There were no problem with the md0 array: cat /proc/mdstat gives: md0 : active raid1 sdc1[1] sdd1[0] 1052160 blocks [2/2] [UU] But for the md1 array, I get: md1 : active raid1 sdc3[2](S) sdd3[0] 483138688 blocks [2/1] [U_] And mdadm --detail /dev/md1 returns: /dev/md1: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Sat Mar 7 11:48:30 2009 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) Used Dev Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 1 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Fri Nov 29 21:23:25 2013 State : clean, degraded Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 UUID : 2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 Events : 0.72076 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 8 510 active sync /dev/sdd3 2 002 removed 2 8 35- spare /dev/sdc3 While mdadm --examine /dev/sdc3 returns: /dev/sdc3: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : 2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 Creation Time : Sat Mar 7 11:48:30 2009 Raid Level : raid1 Used Dev Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) Array Size : 483138688 (460.76 GiB 494.73 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 1 Update Time : Fri Nov 29 23:03:41 2013 State : clean Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 1 Checksum : be8bd27f - correct Events : 72078 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 2 8 352 spare /dev/sdc3 0 0 8 510 active sync /dev/sdd3 1 1 001 faulty removed 2 2 8 352 spare /dev/sdc3 What is the problem? And how can I recover a correct md1 array? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mdadm messages
Le 06/11/2013 22:50, Bob Proulx a écrit : > François Patte wrote: >> I have these messages from mdadm: >> >> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/4: No such file or directory >> /dev/md/4 : >> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/5: No such file or directory >> /dev/md/5 : >> >> Of course I haven't these directories, I have /dev/md[0-5] instead. Why >> does mdadm is searching there directories and how can I get rid of this >> message? > > Hmm... Do you have both of these kernel modules installed? I think > those /dev/md/* symlinks are automatically generated when md_mod is > loaded. Not sure. Easy to look for though. > > $ lsmod | grep -e dm_mod -e md_mod > dm_mod 64008 35 > md_mod 92559 5 raid1 Yes! I get this answer: lsmod | grep -e dm_mod -e md_mod dm_mod 63645 35 md_mod 87742 6 raid1 -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mdadm messages
Le 06/11/2013 21:27, Tom H a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:36 PM, François Patte
> wrote:
>> Le 06/11/2013 15:29, Tom H a écrit :
>
>
>>> lsinitramfs /boot/initrd... | grep ...
>>
>> sbin/mdadm
>> conf/mdadm
>> etc/mdadm
>> etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
>> scripts/local-top/mdadm
>
> I would've grepped for "rules" too since the problem might be that the
> "/dev/md/X" symlinks aren't being created by udev in the initramfs. I
> don't understand how the other symlinks generated by the same udev
> rule are being created if these aren't...
lib/udev/rules.d
lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage-dm.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/56-lvm.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/91-permissions.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/55-dm.rules
lib/udev/rules.d/63-md-raid-arrays.rules
63-md-raid-arrays.rules:
# do not edit this file, it will be overwritten on update
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="md_end"
# handle md arrays
ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="md_end"
KERNEL!="md*", GOTO="md_end"
# partitions have no md/{array_state,metadata_version}, but should not
# for that reason be ignored.
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="partition", GOTO="md_ignore_state"
# container devices have a metadata version of e.g. 'external:ddf' and
# never leave state 'inactive'
ATTR{md/metadata_version}=="external:[A-Za-z]*",
ATTR{md/array_state}=="inactive", GOTO="md_ignore_state"
TEST!="md/array_state", ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0", GOTO="md_end"
ATTR{md/array_state}=="|clear|inactive", ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0",
GOTO="md_end"
LABEL="md_ignore_state"
IMPORT{program}="/sbin/mdadm --detail --export $devnode"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="disk", ENV{MD_NAME}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-name-$env{MD_NAME}",
OPTIONS+="string_escape=replace"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="disk", ENV{MD_UUID}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-uuid-$env{MD_UUID}"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="disk", ENV{MD_DEVNAME}=="?*", SYMLINK+="md/$env{MD_DEVNAME}"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="partition", ENV{MD_NAME}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-name-$env{MD_NAME}-part%n",
OPTIONS+="string_escape=replace"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="partition", ENV{MD_UUID}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/md-uuid-$env{MD_UUID}-part%n"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="partition", ENV{MD_DEVNAME}=="*[^0-9]",
SYMLINK+="md/$env{MD_DEVNAME}%n"
ENV{DEVTYPE}=="partition", ENV{MD_DEVNAME}=="*[0-9]",
SYMLINK+="md/$env{MD_DEVNAME}p%n"
IMPORT{program}="/sbin/blkid -o udev -p -u noraid $tempnode"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other|crypto", ENV{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-uuid/$env{ID_FS_UUID_ENC}"
ENV{ID_FS_USAGE}=="filesystem|other", ENV{ID_FS_LABEL_ENC}=="?*",
SYMLINK+="disk/by-label/$env{ID_FS_LABEL_ENC}"
LABEL="md_end"
Thank you if you can understand what I don't!
Regards
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mdadm messages
Le 06/11/2013 15:29, Tom H a écrit : > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:08 PM, François Patte > wrote: >> Le 04/11/2013 19:01, Tom H a écrit : >>> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:57 AM, François Patte >>> wrote: >>>> Le 04/11/2013 11:28, Holger Stein a écrit : >>>>> Am 04.11.2013 09:28, schrieb François Patte: > > >>>>>> I have these messages from mdadm: >>>>>> >>>>>> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/4: No such file or directory >>>>>> /dev/md/4 : >>>>>> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/5: No such file or directory >>>>>> /dev/md/5 : >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course I haven't these directories, I have /dev/md[0-5] instead. Why >>>>>> does mdadm is searching there directories and how can I get rid of this >>>>>> message? >>>>> >>>>> under /dev/md/* are symlinks to /dev/md*. Do you have a folder /dev/md/? >>>>> What says mdadm --detail --scan & mdadm --examine --scan >>>> /dev/md/ is empty >>>> >>>> mdadm --detail --scan >>>> ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=0.90 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md2 metadata=0.90 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md3 metadata=0.90 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c >>>> ARRAY /dev/md4 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:4 >>>> UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md5 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:5 >>>> UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea >>>> >>>> mdadm --examine --scan >>>> ARRAY /dev/md2 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md3 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c >>>> ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md1 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md/4 metadata=1.2 UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8 >>>> name=dipankar:4 >>>> ARRAY /dev/md/5 metadata=1.2 UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea >>>> name=dipankar:5 >>> >>> So the partitions in the v1.2 arrays refer to "/dev/md/X"... >>> >>> Do you have "/lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid-rules" on your system >> >> No! I have: >> >> /lib/udev/rules.d/63-md-raid-arrays.rules >> >> and >> >> /lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid-assembly.rules > > That's OK. It's "63..." that creates the udev stuff. > > >>> and in >>> your initramfs? >> >> I don't know how to check this. > > lsinitramfs /boot/initrd... | grep ... sbin/mdadm conf/mdadm etc/mdadm etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf scripts/local-top/mdadm but /etc/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-topscripts/local-top/mdadm does not exist There is /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/local-top/mdadm though -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
rkhunter warning meaning
Bonjour, I have some warnings from rkhunter: Warning: The file properties have changed: File: /usr/sbin/rsyslogd Current hash: 99fd3e8be4e7b9f553d52f6837eef50ebcebadc8 Stored hash : 2acece0875f8c6156c1f05df71e8c83c91dea2d0 Current inode: 523303Stored inode: 523309 Current size: 522304Stored size: 522400 Current file modification time: 1378296534 (04-sept.-2013 14:08:54) Stored file modification time : 1374534377 (23-juil.-2013 01:06:17) W What do they mean? Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mdadm messages
Le 04/11/2013 19:01, Tom H a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:57 AM, François Patte
> wrote:
>> Le 04/11/2013 11:28, Holger Stein a écrit :
>>> Am 04.11.2013 09:28, schrieb François Patte:
>>>> I have these messages from mdadm:
>>>>
>>>> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/4: No such file or directory
>>>> /dev/md/4 :
>>>> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/5: No such file or directory
>>>> /dev/md/5 :
>>>>
>>>> Of course I haven't these directories, I have /dev/md[0-5] instead. Why
>>>> does mdadm is searching there directories and how can I get rid of this
>>>> message?
>>> under /dev/md/* are symlinks to /dev/md*. Do you have a folder /dev/md/?
>>> What says mdadm --detail --scan & mdadm --examine --scan
>> /dev/md/ is empty
>>
>> mdadm --detail --scan
>> ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072
>> ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=0.90 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13
>> ARRAY /dev/md2 metadata=0.90 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1
>> ARRAY /dev/md3 metadata=0.90 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c
>> ARRAY /dev/md4 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:4
>> UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8
>> ARRAY /dev/md5 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:5
>> UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea
>>
>> mdadm --examine --scan
>> ARRAY /dev/md2 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1
>> ARRAY /dev/md3 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c
>> ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072
>> ARRAY /dev/md1 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13
>> ARRAY /dev/md/4 metadata=1.2 UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8
>> name=dipankar:4
>> ARRAY /dev/md/5 metadata=1.2 UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea
>> name=dipankar:5
> So the partitions in the v1.2 arrays refer to "/dev/md/X"...
>
> Do you have "/lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid-rules" on your system
No! I have:
/lib/udev/rules.d/63-md-raid-arrays.rules
and
/lib/udev/rules.d/64-md-raid-assembly.rules
> and in
> your initramfs?
I don't know how to check this.
> Do you have any symlinks in "/dev/disk/{by-id,by-uuid}/" to your md devices?
In /dev/disk/by-id:
md-name-dipankar:4 -> ../../md4
md-name-dipankar:5 -> ../../md5
md-uuid-2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 -> ../../md1
md-uuid-4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8 -> ../../md4
md-uuid-5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea -> ../../md5
md-uuid-95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c -> ../../md3
md-uuid-beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072 -> ../../md0
md-uuid-eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1 -> ../../md2
In /dev/disk/by-uuid
17e0b155-4d77-4769-b568-723329c5f656 -> ../../md2
c13cc2f9-0fb7-4d2e-b720-129c62541e81 -> ../../md0
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: mdadm messages
Le 04/11/2013 11:28, Holger Stein a écrit : > Am 04.11.2013 09:28, schrieb François Patte: >> Bonjour, >> >> I have these messages from mdadm: >> >> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/4: No such file or directory >> /dev/md/4 : >> mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/5: No such file or directory >> /dev/md/5 : >> >> Of course I haven't these directories, I have /dev/md[0-5] instead. Why >> does mdadm is searching there directories and how can I get rid of this >> message? > > Hi, > > under /dev/md/* are symlinks to /dev/md*. Do you have a folder /dev/md/? > What says mdadm --detail --scan & mdadm --examine --scan /dev/md/ is empty mdadm --detail --scan ARRAY /dev/md0 metadata=0.90 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072 ARRAY /dev/md1 metadata=0.90 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 ARRAY /dev/md2 metadata=0.90 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1 ARRAY /dev/md3 metadata=0.90 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c ARRAY /dev/md4 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:4 UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8 ARRAY /dev/md5 metadata=1.2 name=dipankar:5 UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea mdadm --examine --scan ARRAY /dev/md2 UUID=eb8b5efe:5a8f9369:e940a0f3:83d63ad1 ARRAY /dev/md3 UUID=95c11201:1509169a:860a8b84:c49f865c ARRAY /dev/md0 UUID=beab96c1:465bb223:6b8acb57:6d51b072 ARRAY /dev/md1 UUID=2e8294de:9b0d8d96:680a5413:2aac5c13 ARRAY /dev/md/4 metadata=1.2 UUID=4a28174a:f38b4938:233f85f7:6ce585a8 name=dipankar:4 ARRAY /dev/md/5 metadata=1.2 UUID=5240f249:7feb6832:6682805f:97c4abea name=dipankar:5 Thanks -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
mdadm messages
Bonjour, I have these messages from mdadm: mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/4: No such file or directory /dev/md/4 : mdadm: cannot open /dev/md/5: No such file or directory /dev/md/5 : Of course I haven't these directories, I have /dev/md[0-5] instead. Why does mdadm is searching there directories and how can I get rid of this message? Thanks. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 23:37, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit : > > > Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit : >> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit : >>> On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte >>> wrote: >>>> Bonjour, >>>> >>>> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package >>>> built for a 32bits platform. >>>> >>>> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be >>>> installed. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> Hi Fraçois, >>> >>> You just want to run alien... Convert a RPM (i386) to a DEB (also >>> i386). Nothing more changes. As you said yourself, your 64b machine >>> can run a 32b software. >> >> And you get this answer: >> >> AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package >> cannot be built on this system > > I just noticed the program's name... why not using > AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386linux_fra.deb, available on the official website? > That would be much simpler? It could be: apt-get install AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386linux_fra Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i386linux_fra -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 23:21, Beco a écrit : > On 30 October 2013 19:10, François Patte > wrote: >> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit : >> >> AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package >> cannot be built on this system >> >> > > Hi François, > > What is the exact command you issued? > > On a first check, I think maybe there is a problem. I see people > working around by first converting the RPM to TAR.CZ with : alien > --to-tgz AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm > > I can check better late in the night when I came back from work. OK! Thanks, that was the good idea! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 23:23, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit : > > > Le 30.10.2013 23:10, François Patte a écrit : >> Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit : >>> On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte >>> wrote: >>>> Bonjour, >>>> >>>> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package >>>> built for a 32bits platform. >>>> >>>> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be >>>> installed. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> Hi Fraçois, >>> >>> You just want to run alien... Convert a RPM (i386) to a DEB (also >>> i386). Nothing more changes. As you said yourself, your 64b machine >>> can run a 32b software. >> >> And you get this answer: >> >> AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package >> cannot be built on this system > > Have you enabled i386 architecture on your system? Yes I have! -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 23:07, Beco a écrit : > On 30 October 2013 15:28, François Patte > wrote: >> Bonjour, >> >> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package >> built for a 32bits platform. >> >> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be >> installed. >> >> Thank you. > > > Hi Fraçois, > > You just want to run alien... Convert a RPM (i386) to a DEB (also > i386). Nothing more changes. As you said yourself, your 64b machine > can run a 32b software. And you get this answer: AdbeRdr9.4.2-1_i486linux_fra.rpm is for architecture i386 ; the package cannot be built on this system -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 20:27, Bob Proulx a écrit : > François Patte wrote: >> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package >> built for a 32bits platform. >> >> I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be >> installed. > > You still haven't answered my question concerning this in the other > thread. What is the original problem you are trying to solve? > I want to build a deb 32bits package from a 32bits package (rpm) on an amd64 system. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: alien 32/64 bits
Le 30/10/2013 22:46, Dmitrii Kashin a écrit : > François Patte writes: > >> Bonjour, >> >> Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package >> built for a 32bits platform. > > There's no way to *build* amd64 package from any another non-source > package. But you could *repack* .rpm package into .deb one using alien. > But if it was not amd64, it would *not* suddenly become amd64. > Did I say something like that? I *said* that I do not want to build an amd64 package because a 32bits package can be installed and work on an amd64 system... I want to build a 32bits package from a 32bits package on an amd64 system. Is that clear enough? -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
alien 32/64 bits
Bonjour, Is there a way to build a debian package on an amd64 from a rpm package built for a 32bits platform. I don't mean that I want an amd64 debian package, as 32bits can be installed. Thank you. -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: out to get out of an apt-get problem...[solved]
Le 24/10/2013 23:42, Scott Ferguson a écrit : > On 25/10/13 04:42, François Patte wrote: >> Bonsoir, >> >> trying to overwrite >> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmjpegutils-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in >> package libmjpegutils-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^^ >> Unpacking liblavjpeg-2.1-0:amd64 (from >> .../liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... >> dpkg: error processing >> /var/cache/apt/archives/liblavjpeg-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb >> (--unpack): >> trying to overwrite >> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblavjpeg-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in >> package liblavjpeg-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 >> Unpacking libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0:amd64 (from >> .../libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb) ... >> dpkg: error processing >> /var/cache/apt/archives/libmpeg2encpp-2.1-0_2%3a2.1.0-dmo2_amd64.deb >> (--unpack): >> trying to overwrite >> '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libmpeg2encpp-2.1.so.0.0.0', which is also in >> package libmpeg2encpp-2.0-0 1:2.1.0+debian-1 ^^ I savagely killed these packages, and everything went fine... I don't know why apt-get is unable to do the job by itself (ie. upgrade a package) though. Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: another dependency question[solved]
Le 26/10/2013 08:02, Chris Bannister a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:56:17PM +0200, François Patte wrote: >> Bonjour, >> >> I needed to install acroread and I did from deb-multimedia repo. No > > We cannot help with problems caused by third party repositories. A > search via google regarding "Debian multimedia problems" should shed > more light on the issue. IOW, deb-multimedia *IS NOT* part of Debian. > Use at *YOUR OWN* risk!! > And here is the solution (for those who could need some pdf features which are not supported by evince, xpdf..., but which can be produced using free soft like TeX): The libGL.so.1 is located in /usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu/ and acroread search libraries in /lib/i386-linux-gnu. So, I put a symlink in /lib/i386-linux-gnu Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: another dependency question
Le 26/10/2013 08:02, Chris Bannister a écrit : > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:56:17PM +0200, François Patte wrote: >> Bonjour, >> >> I needed to install acroread and I did from deb-multimedia repo. No > > We cannot help with problems caused by third party repositories. A > search via google regarding "Debian multimedia problems" should shed > more light on the issue. IOW, deb-multimedia *IS NOT* part of Debian. > Use at *YOUR OWN* risk!! OK. At least some compassionate people who have encountered the same problem here, could have given me some clue. I know that debian is totally free... But there are two kinds of people using free softwares, some are not living on the moon and have to deal with the world as it is and try their best to be as "free" as they can, others seem to belong to the world of ayatollahs Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: another dependency question
Le 25/10/2013 20:06, Brian a écrit : > On Fri 25 Oct 2013 at 19:55:35 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> Le 25/10/2013 19:47, Ralf Mardorf a écrit : >>> Hi François, >>> >>> I use Evince and other Linux PDF readers instead. Adobe is a mafia and >>> they become more worse with every single day. >> >> Yes! I use evince too, BUT evince is not (yet) able to display/use all >> the capabilities of a pdf file, so I need to test some pdf file created >> by TeX/LaTeX > > Which capabilities do you have in mind which evince (or another PDF > reader) is unable to display or use? > > java support, and some others -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: another dependency question
Le 25/10/2013 19:45, Brian a écrit : > On Fri 25 Oct 2013 at 17:56:17 +0200, François Patte wrote: > >> I needed to install acroread and I did from deb-multimedia repo. No >> errors during install everything is fine except: >> >> /usr/lib/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while >> loading shared libraries: libGL.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No >> such file or directory >> >> When I launch acroread... >> >> Where can I find this library? And why apt-get did not solve all >> dependencies before installing acroread? > > Search package directories is at > >http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages Thank you, that was my first idea, but how can I find which package provide this library... Moreover, it seems that acroread is a 32bit soft (and needs 32bits libraries) and my install is amd64. I don't understand how apt-get solves the dependencies: it should install all libraries needed by the soft you install or stop the install is one mandatory dependency is missing. No? Regards -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145 Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 8394 5849 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
