Re: PGP-Schluessel auf keys.openpgp.org?
Hi, sorry for this german mail which i sent to debian-user by mistake. (I was asked by the xorriso maintainer of another distro to upload my public PGP key to the keyserver which the distro uses. Hopefully i was able to fulfill that wish and did not publish any secrets of mine.) Have a nice day :) Thomas
Re: PGP-Schluessel auf keys.openpgp.org?
Hi, > siehst Du eine Möglichkeit Deinen PGP-Schlüssel auf keys.openpgp.org zu > verwalten und die E-Mail-Adresse freizugeben? Ich habe die Ausgabe von gpg --export scdbac...@gmx.net hochgeladen. (Ich haette ja gerne inspiziert, was in dem Ausgabefile steht, aber soweit bringt mich "man gpg" nicht.) Nach Aufforderung per Mail habe ich eine Verifications-URL angesteuert. Diese URL fuehrt dann zu einer Seite mit dem Text keys.openpgp.org Your key 44BC9FD0D688EB007C4DD029E9CBDFC0ABC0A854 is now published for the identity scdbac...@gmx.net. Eine Suche mit meiner Mail Adresse auf keys.openpgp.org bringt: We found an entry for scdbac...@gmx.net. Schau mal, ob das jetzt so ist, wie der RPM-Paketbau es braucht. Have a nice day :) Thomas
Re: PGP: difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, both from KDE
Marco Möller wrote: > So, unfortunately I am still in need to find more information about the > two different (or in the end not different?) GUI tools concerning their > PGP functionality. > Focus on kgpg for now and start with PGP and OpenGPG (gnupg) https://www.openpgp.org/ There are also many other sites that explain use of PGP. Kleopatra can be seen as KDE specific tool for managing certificates and keys (GPGsM) but in different context. My advise: Forget it for now! > Many thanks for all the other explanations which you also gave in your > answer, they have been helpful! > Marco. welcome
Re: PGP: difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, both from KDE
On 31.05.21 22:57, deloptes wrote: apt-cache show kleopatra apt-cache show kgpg I think the above parts of the package description explains quite well the use cases. With kleopatra you manage certificates in KDE (such like SSL) With Kgpg you manage GPG keys and you can encrypt/decrypt GUI style text Well, these descriptions partly cause my question. Following the package descriptions, Kgpg appears as the GUI frontend to GnuPG and in addition having a feature to input text into a field and to encrypt it right there instead of having to receive the input from a file, while Kleopatra appears to be kind of a GUI database manager for managing PGP keys and also X.509 certificates. But installing them both and comparing there PGP related offers without understanding too much about the topic, Kleopatra seems, like Kgpg, the same being a GUI frontend to GnuPG, also including the feature for generating key pairs, and like Kgpg also having in addition a feature to input text into a field and to encrypt it right there instead of having to receive the input from a file. To this extend it could simply be, that Kleopatra includes all Kgpg functionality and then as an extra adds management of also X.509 functionality to it. But if I compare the PGP settings which are offered in the GUI for creating a PGP key, then in detail this looks different in Kgpg and Kleopatra. Kleopatra seems to offer more options and is using more technical names for them, while Kgpg seems to offer a smaller amount of options and describes them more verbosely instead of using so much technical abbreviations. As a beginner it is very difficult to foresee if they are finally the same, with Kleopatra simply enhancing the amount of offered features in comparison to smaller Kgpg, Kgpg being kind of the tool for beginners and Kleopatra being the tool for experts, or if Kgpg is actually targeting work cases by its options in its GUI which are not addressed by Kleopatra like this. It could even be that under the hood one is known to work more reliable or working closer to the openPGP standard or being more compatible to interface with other PGP tools or Apps wanting to use PGP. I am here specially watching out for the PGP functionality and not considering that Kleopatra as an extra also offers X.509 functionality. So, unfortunately I am still in need to find more information about the two different (or in the end not different?) GUI tools concerning their PGP functionality. Many thanks for all the other explanations which you also gave in your answer, they have been helpful! Marco.
Re: PGP: difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, both from KDE
On Lu, 31 mai 21, 22:57:26, deloptes wrote: > > gnupg is the mother of all open source pgp stuff. In fact you must know that > PGP is the commercial implementation of a standard for symetric encryption > (I hope I am not wrong in my wording while citing from memory) PGP supports asymmetric encryption as well (also known as public-key cryptography), otherwise it wouldn't be very usable for e-mail ;) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography > Gnupg is the opensource equivalent of PGP and it is great :) command line > utility and set of libraries that makes it possible to use encryption on > numerous of devices. The application is called gpg. > Kgpg is a front end to gnupg. Go to the home page of gpg and read, get > familiar to it. It definitely needs understanding before using. I'll have to disagree with the "great" here. In my (not so humble) opinion GnuPG's (the software) difficulty to use is one the reasons we still don't have encrypted, or at least signed email for everybody[1]. Getting public-key cryptography right is already difficult enough[2], it would be great if the tools wouldn't add another layer of difficulty on top. [1] signing all email by default could potentially make spam and phishing mostly go away [2] https://wiki.debian.org/GnuPG/AirgappedMasterKey Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP: difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, both from KDE
Marco Möller wrote: > Could someone explain for a raw beginner concerning the usage of PGP the > difference between Kleopatra and Kgpg, what the typical work case is for > the one and the other, what important feature the one and the other is > missing? > apt-cache show kleopatra Description-en: Certificate Manager and Unified Crypto GUI Kleopatra is a certificate manager and a universal crypto GUI. It supports managing X.509 and OpenPGP certificates in the GpgSM keybox and retrieving certificates from LDAP servers. Description-md5: e5d6fc989907b80b691c99f2d8834cf5 Homepage: https://www.kde.org/applications/utilities/kleopatra/ apt-cache show kgpg Description-en: graphical front end for GNU Privacy Guard Kgpg manages cryptographic keys for the GNU Privacy Guard, and can encrypt, decrypt, sign, and verify files. It features a simple editor for applying cryptography to short pieces of text, and can also quickly apply cryptography to the contents of the clipboard. . This package is part of the KDE Utilities module. Description-md5: c2c30394bb363998b52a8fcc2caeb33c Homepage: http://www.kde.org/ > > Sorry for the related but low specific questions in the following. Being > a raw beginner in the topic of PGP signing of email messages, it is > difficult to even know what exactly to ask for. My internet search > engine of choice and the KDE web sites both unfortunately did not guide > me to a nice reading about the differences of Kleopatra and Kgpg, and > adding Thunderbird to this does not make the topic easier to grasp. > Therefore please allow me to add the following complex of questions: > The background to my questions is, that I am aiming to soon use PGP > signatures when working with Thunderbird, but I would not know if > Kleopatra or if Kpgp would be better suited to support this. Besides, as > a raw beginner in the topic of PGP, I am not even sure right now if I > might find good usage of PGP for whatever else in the future (maybe > authentication for a ssh access?), and if for this I should right away > start to get comfortable with the one or the other tool, Kleopatra or > Kpgp, or if anyway both will be needed because they target different > work cases or complement each other? I think the above parts of the package description explains quite well the use cases. With kleopatra you manage certificates in KDE (such like SSL) With Kgpg you manage GPG keys and you can encrypt/decrypt GUI style text > At the moment my impression is that Thunderbird even comes with its own > PGP implementation and is not using any other PGP parts of the rest of > my Debian? Will Kleopatra or Kpgp then be of any help for me at all > right now? Don't know thunderbird or it's ability to use GPG, but it makes sense that it uses it's own implementation. The answer here is probably no. However you could use Kgpg to create and manage your keys and keyring (I would recommend it) > I find package "gnupg" (maybe for the package manager apt to work > fine?), but no package which in its package name would explicitly > contain the word openpgp. Is there a special openpgp package which I > should install in order to get well prepared for a typical PGP future? gnupg is the mother of all open source pgp stuff. In fact you must know that PGP is the commercial implementation of a standard for symetric encryption (I hope I am not wrong in my wording while citing from memory) Gnupg is the opensource equivalent of PGP and it is great :) command line utility and set of libraries that makes it possible to use encryption on numerous of devices. The application is called gpg. Kgpg is a front end to gnupg. Go to the home page of gpg and read, get familiar to it. It definitely needs understanding before using.
Re: PGP Email Client
On 2018-07-08 18:18, HP Garcia wrote: Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently using Claws-Mail 3.14.1 Thanks in advance roundcube with enigma plugin dunno if it is working mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31 0x4BFEBB31.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PGP Email Client
On 18-07-08 14:42:54, Jude DaShiell wrote: If you can live with the configuration mutt or neomutt can fill the bill. I can never truly recommend mutt to people who aren't used to terminal apps. That said, it's a great piece of software and the PGP handling in particular is really nice with a little config. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Email Client
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, HP Garcia wrote: > Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 13:18:25 > From: HP Garcia > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: PGP Email Client > Resent-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 17:18:45 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently > using Claws-Mail 3.14.1 > > Thanks in advance > If you can live with the configuration mutt or neomutt can fill the bill. > --
Re: PGP Email Client
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700, HP Garcia wrote: >Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently >using Claws-Mail 3.14.1 > Why not Claws-Mail? With the correct plugins (claws-mail-pgpinline or claws-mail-pgpmime) that should be packaged in Debian it handles pgp just fine. -- Andreas Rönnquist mailingli...@gusnan.se andr...@ronnquist.net pgpuTTeXWuCA8.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur
Re: PGP Email Client
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:18:25 -0700 HP Garcia wrote: Hello HP, >Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently >using Claws-Mail 3.14.1 CM; Install the relevant plugin(s) and you're ready. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" If we're working class, why ain't we got jobs? Insane Society - Menace pgp_CZDb6YBM0.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PGP Email Client
On 7/8/2018 7:18 PM, HP Garcia wrote: Can anyone recommend an email client that can handle PGP? I'm currently using Claws-Mail 3.14.1 https://www.claws-mail.org/plugin.php?plugin=gpg Thunderbird with enigmail. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/digitally-signing-and-encrypting-messages -- John Doe
Re: PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Mahyuddin Susanto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sip sudah berhasil saya verivikasi oey! Eh memang bagaimana cara memverifikasi-nya, Din? memang sekarang menggunakan apa om? kalo saya menggunakan icedove+enigmail Saya pakai Firefox+FireGPG. - -- Zaki Akhmad -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkOhTgACgkQT4k8JfIMt5faCACfUy2mkWyJb7Tdy4k9DY6uQ3FA OZkAn3HZJ31PZH4iYp2Z7Fg+P65n1Hx6 =xEV9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s. keeling writes: Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the manpage among others. Have you read the _GNU Privacy Handbook_ that is included in the gnupg-doc package? It appears I'll have to wait a bit. grave bugs of gnupg-doc (- 2003.04.06-5) done #425351 - Uninstallable: Can't read doc-base file `gnu-privacy-handbook' (Fixed: gnupg-doc/2003.04.06-6) Summary: gnupg-doc(1 bug) Are you sure you want to install/upgrade the above packages? [Y/n/?/...] Selecting previously deselected package gnupg-doc. (Reading database ... 72694 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking gnupg-doc (from .../gnupg-doc_2003.04.06-5_all.deb) ... Setting up gnupg-doc (2003.04.06-5) ... warning: file `/usr/share/doc/gnupg-doc/GNU_Privacy_Handbook/html/book1.html' does not exist at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 718, gnu-privacy-handbook line 12. ... Thanks. If it didn't work, I'll go find it elsewhere. You probably don't want to delete the old spots uid but adding a new one is easy. That's the precious nugget I've been searching for. I knew it had to be simple, but I'm new to this bit. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
s. keeling writes: grave bugs of gnupg-doc... http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
On 07/06/2008 08:36:13 AM, John W Foster wrote: I have over the years established several PGP public keys that are no longer valid due to expired e-mail addresses. I did not think at the time they were created that I needed an expiration date in thm. FWIW, IIRC accepted best practice is to generate a revocation when you generate the initial key pair. Then (so long as you keep backups) you'll always be able to revoke the key even if you forget the password, or whatever. Karl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software: You don't pay back, you pay forward. -- Robert A. Heinlein -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 07/06/2008 08:36:13 AM, John W Foster wrote: I have over the years established several PGP public keys that are no longer valid due to expired e-mail addresses. I did not think at the time they were created that I needed an expiration date in thm. FWIW, IIRC accepted best practice is to generate a revocation when you generate the initial key pair. Then (so long as you keep backups) you'll always be able to revoke the key even if you forget the password, or whatever. Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? Hints are welcome. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
s. keeling writes: Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? What do you mean by tied? You can edit the key and add, delete or revoke uids. man gpg -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s. keeling writes: Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? What do you mean by tied? You can edit the key and add, delete or revoke uids. man gpg Frankly, I don't know what's the right thing to do. This is esoteric stuff for me. gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the manpage among others. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:21:09AM +0200, s. keeling wrote: John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: s. keeling writes: Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? What do you mean by tied? You can edit the key and add, delete or revoke uids. man gpg Frankly, I don't know what's the right thing to do. This is esoteric stuff for me. gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the manpage among others. You can assign multiple UIDs to a key, just add your new emails and remove the old email and resend it up to the keyservers -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- It's hard to believe that something which is neither seen nor felt can do so much harm. That's true. But an idea can't be seen or felt. And that's what kept the Troglytes in the mines all these centuries. A mistaken idea. -- Vanna and Kirk, The Cloud Minders, stardate 5819.0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: PGP Keys Expiration
s. keeling writes: Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the manpage among others. Have you read the _GNU Privacy Handbook_ that is included in the gnupg-doc package? You probably don't want to delete the old spots uid but adding a new one is easy. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: God doesn't like Kiwis? Which god? But seriously, have you tried the verbose option? Yes. P.S. Also happens to keys: C02440B8 73CDA455 They all work for me... $ gpg -v --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 73CDA455 gpg: requesting key 73CDA455 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: armor header: Version: SKS 1.0.10 gpg: pub 1024D/1880283C 2002-09-15 Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: using PGP trust model gpg: key 1880283C: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 new signatures gpg: 51 keys cached (13899 signatures) gpg: 1 keys processed (1 validity counts cleared) gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model gpg: NOTE: signature key C5F48D6A expired Tue May 13 17:19:22 2008 CDT gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 0 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u gpg: next trustdb check due at 2011-05-17 gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: new signatures: 8 Alas: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg -v --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 73CDA455 gpg: requesting key 73CDA455 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: armor header: Version: SKS 1.0.10 gpgkeys: key 73CDA455 not found on keyserver gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 5F skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3B skipped gpg: malformed CRC gpg: read_block: read error: invalid keyring gpg: Total number processed: 0 -- Chris. == One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted. -- Thomas B. Reed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200 Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chris, The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 Including me; I imported all three of the keys you mentioned without problems. Sorry, but I don't know enough about GPG the servers to offer any constructive advice. Are you running etch? -- Chris. == One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted. -- Thomas B. Reed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:53:34PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different IP addresses, with preference given to either 213.239.206.174 or 64.71.173.107. Try if you still have this problem when you specify one of these IPs as the keyserver. Ah ha! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg -v --keyserver 213.239.206.174 --recv-keys 73CDA455 gpg: requesting key 73CDA455 from hkp server 213.239.206.174 gpg: armor header: Version: SKS 1.0.10 gpg: pub 1024D/1880283C 2002-09-15 Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: using PGP trust model gpg: key 1880283C: public key Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] imported gpg: subpacket of type 20 has critical bit set gpg: 347 keys cached (53608 signatures) gpg: 1 keys processed (1 validity counts cleared) gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model gpg: NOTE: signature key 8B38A1AF expired Sat 13 Oct 2007 17:51:45 NZDT gpg: NOTE: signature key BED7BF43 expired Sun 25 May 2008 13:32:59 NZST gpg: NOTE: signature key E62FA358 expired Wed 12 Mar 2008 01:43:31 NZDT gpg: NOTE: signature key C3AB3F38 expired Wed 09 Jan 2008 04:28:24 NZDT gpg: subpacket of type 20 has critical bit set gpg: NOTE: signature key B1293F34 expired Sat 02 Feb 2008 23:30:11 NZDT gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 0 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 Oooops: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg -v --keyserver 213.239.206.174 --recv-keys 330C4A75 gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server 213.239.206.174 gpg: armor header: Version: SKS 1.0.10 gpgkeys: key 330C4A75 not found on keyserver gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 5F skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3B skipped gpg: malformed CRC gpg: read_block: read error: invalid keyring gpg: Total number processed: 0 Weird is this one, all subsequent tries exhibit same error as above. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gpg --keyserver 213.239.212.133 --recv-keys 330C4A75 gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server 213.239.212.133 gpgkeys: key 330C4A75 not found on keyserver gpg: signature packet: unhashed data too long gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: read_block: read error: invalid packet gpg: Total number processed: 0 subkeys.pgp.net A 221.133.213.196 subkeys.pgp.net A 64.71.173.107 subkeys.pgp.net A 195.113.19.83 subkeys.pgp.net A 213.239.206.174 subkeys.pgp.net A 213.239.212.133 Any others? So, 330C4A75 is the only one left which is problematic. Even from a new user the problem occurs. -- Chris. == One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted. -- Thomas B. Reed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:18:01 +1200 Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chris, Are you running etch? No, Lenny here. GnuPG reports it's version 1.4.6. -- Regards _ / ) The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent You're a sidewalk cipher speaking prionic jive Give You Nothing - Bad Religion signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:05:14PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:18:01 +1200 Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chris, Are you running etch? No, Lenny here. GnuPG reports it's version 1.4.6. Version: 1.4.6-2 for me on etch. Although, it seems like the problem is not due to gpg itself. -- Chris. == One, with God, is always a majority, but many a martyr has been burned at the stake while the votes were being counted. -- Thomas B. Reed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200 Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 Including me; I imported all three of the keys you mentioned without problems. Sorry, but I don't know enough about GPG the servers to Are you running etch? I'm running etch. Using their IP finds all correctly. Hostname/DNS fails. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/08/08 06:17, Chris Bannister wrote: On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: God doesn't like Kiwis? Which god? FSM, of course! - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFITED0S9HxQb37XmcRAneuAKCDifFpaznnJmXsrc0J24HXeFE31wCglfIK 7/NXEnfSh7ndfY12eeKE6sg= =2IY0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/08 09:17, Chris Bannister wrote: On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200 Jochen Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Jochen, $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949B gpg: requesting key 3710949B from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key 3710949B: Frank McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 Typical; I'd tried for hours, without success. You get it, and *now* I've got it. Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I thought I'd mention a problem I've been having. $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75 gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 330C4A75 not found on keyserver gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 5F skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3B skipped gpg: malformed CRC gpg: read_block: read error: invalid keyring gpg: Total number processed: 0 $ The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 messages seems to indicate something to do with the headers returned from the server. Why should I be the only one to get this. Stock gpg from etch. Any hints. God doesn't like Kiwis? But seriously, have you tried the verbose option? P.S. Also happens to keys: C02440B8 73CDA455 They all work for me... $ gpg -v --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 73CDA455 gpg: requesting key 73CDA455 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: armor header: Version: SKS 1.0.10 gpg: pub 1024D/1880283C 2002-09-15 Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: using PGP trust model gpg: key 1880283C: Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8 new signatures gpg: 51 keys cached (13899 signatures) gpg: 1 keys processed (1 validity counts cleared) gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model gpg: NOTE: signature key C5F48D6A expired Tue May 13 17:19:22 2008 CDT gpg: depth: 0 valid: 1 signed: 0 trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u gpg: next trustdb check due at 2011-05-17 gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: new signatures: 8 - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Kittens give Morbo gas. In lighter news, the city of New New York is doomed. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFISrFCS9HxQb37XmcRAsw+AKDskG8N+I09VHl5RnPZi+iNhvKXEgCg3+Rk YnU9K/U7kavPONNDR7tQd4E= =7ZyH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200 Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Chris, The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 Including me; I imported all three of the keys you mentioned without problems. Sorry, but I don't know enough about GPG the servers to offer any constructive advice. -- Regards _ / ) The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent When I say ugly, I don't mean rough looking, I mean hideous Ugly - The Stranglers signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: [...] Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I thought I'd mention a problem I've been having. $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75 gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 330C4A75 not found on keyserver gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 5F skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3B skipped gpg: malformed CRC gpg: read_block: read error: invalid keyring gpg: Total number processed: 0 $ The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 messages seems to indicate something to do with the headers returned from the server. Why should I be the only one to get this. Stock gpg from etch. Any hints. P.S. Also happens to keys: C02440B8 73CDA455 How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different IP addresses, with preference given to either 213.239.206.174 or 64.71.173.107. Try if you still have this problem when you specify one of these IPs as the keyserver. I am not sure if read_block: read error: invalid keyring indicates a separate problem with your own public keyring, or a consequence of corrupted data sent by the keyserver, or a bug in Etch's version of gpg. You could test if you still get this message when you try to download the key to a newly-created test keyring: gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring ./test.gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75 -- Regards,| http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: [...] Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I thought I'd mention a problem I've been having. $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75 gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 330C4A75 not found on keyserver gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 5F skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2E skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 2D skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3A skipped gpg: invalid radix64 character 3B skipped gpg: malformed CRC gpg: read_block: read error: invalid keyring gpg: Total number processed: 0 $ How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different IP addresses, with preference given to either 213.239.206.174 or 64.71.173.107. Try if you still have this problem when you specify one of these IPs as the keyserver. I was experiencing failures (server timeout) apparently due to this DNS issue (my DNS is my ISP). I installed maradns locally, and the problem disappeared. Thanks for the hint. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)
Florian Kulzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different Follow up to my last fup; no, maradns isn't the solution, sorry. Using the IPs works, DNS times out apparently. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp key servers (was Re: Suspend not working)
Or like yours? [application/pgp-signature (No public key to verify the signature)] Signature made at Sun 06 Apr 2008 04:47:48 PM EDT No public key to verify the signature Key fingerprint: B51408D89FF9A76D Cannot find user ID for this key. I think you are using the wrong fingerprint. Try this: gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 9FF9A76D That was a copy/paste from my mailreader Sylpheed. This whole PGP thing drives me nuts sometimes. Is there ONE server everybody is supposed to use...I thought the servers exchanged keys ?? A third of the signed messages fail the check. Apparently they work in a round robin fashion so they should eventually propagate to each other. --- Frank McCormick Also the sig delimiter is --spacereturn Sylpheed's choice, not mine. But I'll try to change it, then file a bug -- Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Key after new install
On 4/17/07, Michael Pobega [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do I go about retaining my GPG/PGP key after a reinstall of Debian? I used to have it so that my GPG key would automatically ask me to sign when replying to any email, but now I don't have my GPG key anymore. Should I generate a new key, or should I use the old one? How would I go about getting the old one back? If you are using http://www.gnupg.org/ usually you have the folder called .gnupg in your home directory. you need to backup that folder before a re-install and restore it. If you have not done the backup and installed over the same partition after formatting it with a file system then it is lost. maybe you could try using http://www.sleuthkit.org/ to recover the files but I am not sure how far it will be succesful over a formatted partition Kind Regards Siju -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP/MIME [Era: Creación automátic a de archivos de dispositivos]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 07/04/07 18:26, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz escribió: Claro. Pero por 'convencer a mi mutt' me refería a hacer que *él* se acuerde de hacer eso cada que envíe correo a la lista y no cuando envío a otros lados. De otra forma habría que confiar en *mi* memoria. Mala idea, esa. Jejeje... ¿Lo ves? Ya te vuelve a poner como 'attach', la firma... :-P Desde que descubrí el CTRL + P, la cosa nunca me fué problemático. No uso el MUTT, puesto que tengo muchas cuentas de email, y por lo tanto, con él, creo que sería mucho mejor con otro cliente, como el que tengo actualmente(Thunderbird 1.5.0.10). - -- Slds de Santiago José López Borrazás. Admin de hackindex.com/.es Conocimientos avanzados en seguridad informática. Conocimientos avanzados en redes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIVAwUBRhfL6buF9/q6J55WAQpDOw/8CGctAGLJHVlBQWEL8aL3vMONF70P50Ye 1BWGSY6lboVwzPaD9VShOq4nA6IdR9x2QIc1jd0pjYU7JNNDkM9P/EiUnfKR1I0C gvbudeHCMauMKyrI++sOtOykyzE81gXMDjXKwjwPU9a7+du8EUE/HADeVIgoXDvZ 0HaH+LFhLw89vPOnNPs0U3VR9AfeZVt0cx9XzLDBmA4timyiT5LP0qkQywo38yI5 We2NFnSOAQZ3NB+q9UeMnYy2btD7nSNoV/X6Yqc1Sg7fSyO8GFRBYx9K328i6m8T z5UboIOOvd/l+Tfn20jxe3RrzCTvn2r1oZADVK1HfCyYHphXlETF10Otc2/6fBM1 radlEhRNhQJEQFWtD4zFelN9xzT21kULsKI8C3iuXM3ctz+lZiRGhtYOZCAvBWRf EZFjQJ1YKS7URFGhRoxjxQ6wvIXPahfbNKgY1EevM/Vm38pu+bQ6P3fw6IfNzJYp AiN9GhRc5SZASodzc/YMN+t88+ykSBEqh9zRg4dKwTBUgnaJBt1FcMqkcDZkZtty awoflndBciCI9qz2Uh+IarQHJttUPX5jXw+uhAVJUKbp6MYtTDR5nUpumHQlfcPH 9bxBVI7RvM9SZfOJkMlIvT6QoJ30rACCZjXLR8sv+tEk4uiV3BppvCupET6lmEKS 50G6IrAQWf4= =C9S/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 18:03, Paul Johnson wrote: Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [snip] Therein lies the rub of any ISP. ISPs suck at doing anything beyond getting you a connection. This includes, but is not limited to, value added services such as email, newsgroups, DNS, web proxying, or web hosting. You should be prepared to do all those for yourself if you don't want to pay someone to get it done proper. Cox (at least in the New Orleans area) does an excellent job at email, newsgroups DNS. Don't know if they do web proxying, and their web hosting is lame but ok for a little vanity site. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFwJNiS9HxQb37XmcRAp/BAJ0XlkyA2ENhPnTii+9tZAw6q19wIwCdEBFq zBfmZEMYv17YkRHsBCDqyuY= =Sdhr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: Who's your provider? Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com Now subkeys.pgp.net. I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the difference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.net Had the same thing happening (but didn't care much since nobody I know uses encryption). Thanks for the subkeys.pgp.net tip, it's indeed tons faster. - --Dan -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFvwRRGdM4FB223AcRAvjFAJ9XmHZY2qA70j23UVTuFBkrG8agzwCePuEe 29a6WftKgrMBnE7eQJ1DG2k= =bvjk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Your test was possibly not valid. Note the difference in speeds between when I, moments apart, fetched your keys. $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m17.315s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.007s $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m0.374s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.004s Who's your provider? Cox, which is fast enough that on good nights I get 700KBps download speeds from kernel.org. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFv0zIS9HxQb37XmcRApJKAJ9mnA/Bi+mgbTQyEcbk9oOjs9Tq9ACfdElL zDSsuG/Ul06kwuFGXehTjY8= =GGUq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Your test was possibly not valid. Note the difference in speeds between when I, moments apart, fetched your keys. $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m17.315s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.007s $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m0.374s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.004s Who's your provider? Cox, which is fast enough that on good nights I get 700KBps download speeds from kernel.org. I get that every once in a while now. But it is FAR better than I was getting with my other key servers I was using. I was getting - near 2 minute response time or even timeouts. I can deal with a few 10+ second response times. I have Comcastic! Meh... crappy. I only get 1100KB/sec from kernel.org and giganews.com. For all the BAD things about Comcast, I can say that, when it is working well it _DOES_ in fact work quite well. Though, DNS is nearly always SCREWED. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
Greg Folkert wrote: I have Comcastic! Meh... crappy. I only get 1100KB/sec from kernel.org and giganews.com. Is that a typo? 1100KBps = 1.1MBps = 8.8Mbps For 9Mbps I'll put up with almost anything---after all, a T1 is only 1.544 Mbps. On ATT [A]DSL, I generally get 130KBps = 1.04Mbps. Beats dial-up all hollow, and keeps my daughter /much/ happier wrt music. :-) -- Best wishes, Max Hyre [All numbers being downstream only. Hisss, b!] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Your test was possibly not valid. Note the difference in speeds between when I, moments apart, fetched your keys. Of course it was valid. What can you expect from a data set with only one data point in it? :-) If Greg is seeing consistently slow responses over a span of weeks, that's pretty comprehensive, and he should be looking to try something else (glad I could help Greg :-). On the other hand, the net was not designed for consistent, instantaneous response. Eg., some mailservers queue every fifteen minutes, some once an hour. Besides, as little as a cron job (or a spam attack) firing up is more than enough to skew response time. System resources are being used by another process. Have patience. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Your test was possibly not valid. Note the difference in speeds between when I, moments apart, fetched your keys. $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m17.315s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.007s $ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 real0m0.374s user0m0.018s sys 0m0.004s Who's your provider? Cox, which is fast enough that on good nights I get 700KBps download speeds from kernel.org. I get that every once in a while now. But it is FAR better than I was getting with my other key servers I was using. I was getting - near 2 minute response time or even timeouts. I can deal with a few 10+ second response times. I have Comcastic! Meh... crappy. I only get 1100KB/sec from kernel.org and giganews.com. Only? Heh, I get more bandwidth now than I did for free as an @Home employee back in the day on Comcast. I'd have to go FiOS if I wanted to go faster, but who the hell wants to deal with Verizon if they don't have to? I'm lucky if I get a dialtone 80% of the time with those robber barons. They actually make me pine for Ma Bell to crush them. For all the BAD things about Comcast, I can say that, when it is working well it _DOES_ in fact work quite well. Though, DNS is nearly always SCREWED. Therein lies the rub of any ISP. ISPs suck at doing anything beyond getting you a connection. This includes, but is not limited to, value added services such as email, newsgroups, DNS, web proxying, or web hosting. You should be prepared to do all those for yourself if you don't want to pay someone to get it done proper. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 00:37:37 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Who's your provider? Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com Now subkeys.pgp.net. I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the difference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.net AFAIK subkeys.pgp.net is a rotation to different servers, so there's no guarantee you'll continue to get no delays. In fact my attempts to refresh keys almost always time out and I'm using subkeys.pgp.net. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus pgpnuZYrfnQQC.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Who's your provider? -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*)http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling Linux Counter #80292 - -http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.htmlPlease, don't Cc: me. Spammers! http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling/emails.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +, s. keeling wrote: Greg Folkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Nope: (0) heretic /home/keeling_ time gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 gpg: requesting key AC94E4B7 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key AC94E4B7: s. keeling (21Dec2003) [EMAIL PROTECTED] not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys AC94E4B7 0.03s user 0.01s system 5% cpu 0.605 total Who's your provider? Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com Now subkeys.pgp.net. I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the difference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.net Oh, well. Thanks. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: pgp sur demande + mutt
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:16:51AM +0200, mess-mate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 12 lines which said: j'aimerais que pgp soit invoqué quand je le juge nécessaire avec un 'key-bindings'. Debian/Sarge. # Check a signature. Thanks to David Champion [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Rob Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] # By default, do not check: unset pgp_verify_sig macro index \Cv enter-commandset pgp_verify_sig=yesenterdisplay-messageenter-commandset pgp_verify_sig=noenter Verify PGP signature macro pager \Cv ienter-commandset pgp_verify_sig=yesenterdisplay-messageenter-commandset pgp_verify_sig=noenter Verify PGP signature -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Vous pouvez aussi ajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Keys on packages
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:50:49 -0500 Tom Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a little tired of all these messages on PGP keys missing or not missing for packages. How do I get the ones that are missing? or How do I make the messages go away and revert to the pre-secure approach? This is asked a lot. You could check the archives as well :) Quoting a recent message (by Andreas Janssen): You need to import the archive key for 2006 (man apt-key). You can get the key here: http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2006.asc HTH, -ol -- I will live forever, or die trying. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp no Debian
Em 22/11/05, G.Paulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Pessoal:Alguém utiliza o pgp para criptografar arquivos do HD? amigo eu uso satisfatóriamente o pgp, existe um frontend para ele chamado seahorse, vc pde instala-lo com um #aptitude install seahorse na debian zine atual tb tem um artigo muito legal do nosso amigo rlinux, de uma olhada em: http://www.debianbrasil.org/zine/ Eu tenho instalado o gpgp e o tkpgp, que estão na distribuição stable, mas não tenho conseguido criptografar arquivos da forma como fazia no DOS (c:\pgp -e filename etc...).Não sei se há algum pacote na distribuição que faça esse serviço. Se alguém souber, por favor, avise-me.sdsG.Pauloabração -- Guilherme RochaConsultor de Tecnologiahttps://e-gui.homelinux.org/egroupware#Linux Registered User: 391180
Re: pgp, téléchargement clé publique
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:01:02PM +0200, Alexandre Delanoë [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote a message of 51 lines which said: la commande % pgp --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net http://wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E ne répond pas... Euh, c'est normal, les et vont être interprétés par le shell et faire des trucs bizarres. Si, par contre, le http://wwwkeys.pgp.net a été ajouté par le service à blaireaux qui friment qu'est Gmail, alors, la commande, privée de ce rajout débile, devrait marcher, en tout cas avec GnuPG (pas testé avec pgp) : % gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0x517D0F0E gpg: requesting key 517D0F0E from hkp server wwwkeys.pgp.net gpg: found 0 ownertrust records gpg: migrated 0 version 2 ownertrusts gpg: key 517D0F0E: public key Linux Kernel Archives Verification Key [EMAIL PROTECTED] imported gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs From et Reply-To: To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP
Alessandro; * Musashi corta a msg que Alessandro - Via Connect enviou para Still: alguem ja teve algum problema ao enviar uma chave pro servidor de pgp??? http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html#submit usei essa pagina, mas qnd tento enviar, da erro de conexao na pagina... alguem sabe o q pode ser??? Hm... Pq vc naum usa o próprio gnupg para enviar a sua chave pública ? Manda ara o MIT. É o servidor mais rápido que eu conheço. gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --send-key iddasuachave []'s, Still -- Nelson Luiz Campos .''`. | I hear; I forget. Engenheiro Eletricista : :' :| I see; I remember. Linux User #89621 UIN 11464303 `. `'` | I do; I understand. gnupgID: 55577339`- | Chinese Proverb signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: pgp keyserver deb?
Am 10:49 2003-02-18 +0100 hat Michael Ablassmeier geschrieben: hi Uwe, On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: Weis einer von euch da was? bei mir gibt ein `apt-cache search gpg server`: * pks - Public Key Server * pkspxy - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Daemon * pkspxyc - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Client Wie kommst Du auf diese ausgabe ??? - Bei mir kommt nur lbdb - The little brother's database for the mutt mail reader raus und ein 'apt-cache search pgp server' reportbug - Reports bugs in the Debian distribution. lbdb - The little brother's database for the mutt mail reader pkspxy - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Daemon pkspxyc - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Client lg-issue58 - Issue 58 of the Linux Gazette. Also nichts mit gpg sondern NUR pgp. Auch ist der pks Server nicht in stable... Sprich: Es waehre immer nett, wenn Personen, die empfehlungen geben auf die Version hinweisen, da man normalerweise von 'stable' ausgehen kann, was die meisten haben. Nicht jeder hat Lust darauf, sich mit testing oder unstable das System zu zerschiessen. Auch wenns bei einigen hier auf der Liste noch NIE (!!!) passiert ist... Michelle -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: pgp keyserver deb?
hi Uwe, On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: Weis einer von euch da was? bei mir gibt ein `apt-cache search gpg server`: * pks - Public Key Server * pkspxy - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Daemon * pkspxyc - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Client -- regards /*/ michael ablassmeier -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: pgp keyserver deb?
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hallo alle zusammen, moeglich das ich heute einfach etwas blind bin aber es sieht so aus als ob es kein debian packet fuer keyserver wie etwa http://www.mit.edu/people/marc/pks/ gibt. Es gibt nur keinen Paket für stable http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/pks.html http://packages.debian.org/testing/net/pks.html -- Thomas Weinbrenner -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: pgp keyserver deb?
Hallo Michael On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:49:10 +0100 Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Uwe, On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger wrote: Weis einer von euch da was? bei mir gibt ein `apt-cache search gpg server`: * pks - Public Key Server * pkspxy - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Daemon * pkspxyc - PGP Public Key Server Proxy Client Ja, aber `apt-cache policy pks` bringt's ans Licht: Gibt es nur für sarge und sid. Uwe, welche Debian-Version setzt Du ein? Da Dein Mozilla aus Woody stammt, vermute ich, dass Du 'stable' nutzt. Gruß Jörg -- http://www.lug-untermain.de/ - http://mypenguin.bei.t-online.de/ Dipl.-Ing. Jörg Schütter [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg36873/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp keyserver deb?
hi Jörg, On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Jörg Schütter wrote: Ja, aber `apt-cache policy pks` bringt's ans Licht: Gibt es nur für sarge und sid. man vergebe mir meine Unachtsamkeit ;) -- regards /*/ michael ablassmeier -- Haeufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:07:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:21:53PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? For ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, read ~/.gnupg/options. From the gpg manpage: OPTIONS Long options can be put in an options file (default ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf). I had .gnupg/options, but gpg appears to use whichever is there. If they're both there, it opens gpg.conf and ignores options. --Pete -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Signatures
on Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Friends, forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have been made up to me. It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 (I'm at work), that they have no significance. An essay I happen to have handy on the subject... Note that the tone may not be directly relevant to you -- attitudes on PKI-signed mail seem to be improving with time. I've also (temporarially) abandoned signing my mail due to a disturbingly shifting HW situation at my end A (not so) Short Rant / FAQ on the Subject of Signed E-Mail and Public Key Infrastructure By Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] You're probably reading this because you either stumbled across it at my website, or I sent it to you in response to an email you sent me saying you can't read my mail. The reason is that I'm using an open Internet standard, RFC 2015 encoding, to sign, or authenticate, my mail. This standard has existed since 1996, and can be freely implemented by any email software author. It provides means to both authenticate, and encrypt, email. You have a legal right to do this in many parts of the free world. And the standard is written such that any compliant mailer _can still read_ the body of a signed message, though it may not be able to validate it, or understand the signature itself. By sending mail encoded per RFC 2015, I and others are creating compelling content under this standard. At some point it's sufficient that others will want to access it. By doing so, they are also (usually) availing themselves of *practical* crypto, including generating keys, getting these signed, and the other appurtenances of a viable public key infrastructure. Merely having a legal right to encryption doesn't mean you have the technical means. Merely having the technical capability doesn't mean you have (or know how to use) your keys. Merely having a key doesn't mean that it is signed, in use, well known, or part of a web of trust. If you find yourself with a need to produce authenticated or encrypted content, you're going to have to find, install, learn to use, and build the infrastructures necessary, for same. There's a saying among the Boy Scouts here, be prepared. Hence the intentional role I and others play as goads to the online world. As to the immediate problem, the short answer is that: - Your mailer is broken. - This is your problem, not mine. - File a bug report with your vendor. - I'm going to continue signing my mail, and if you don't change your end of things, you're going to continue having problems reading it. In some cases (you're cute, my mom, or you're offering sufficient reasons per hour), I'll make exceptions, but this is on a case-by-case basis, and I'm intentionally leaving it as a PITA manual process so that each of us is reminded it's a bad idea: me, when I do it, you, when I forget and you're stuck with unreadable mail from me. GET A REAL MAILER. - No, this isn't a virus, a bomb, a bug, a worm, or any other executable code. And if it is, that's your problem, not mine. For signed mail, both the content and the signature are simply text with a particular semantic context significat to a validation program. - If your IT or MIS department is brain-dead enough to actually strip off these attachments before you get your mail, I'm going to laugh at you in public. Sorry, this ain't the sympathy department. There's a nice rant below about why this is such a pathetic action, though, you might enjoy reading it. The long answer is the rest of this document. For a well-reasoned essay on why public key infrastructures, including encryption and authentication, are vital to a modern economy, please read: http://gnu-darwin.sourceforge.net/war.html Your Mail is Weird I use a combination of tools in my email to create messages which are cryptographically signed in such a way that it is readily possible for the recipient to gain a good level of assurance that the message: - Originates from me. - Hasn't been modified in any way en route. This is sometimes called a digital signature (a technical term, not to be confused with the recently passed US legislation on electronic
Re: PGP Signatures
Thanks to all for your help. Indeed, options or a conf are both valuable after a test. mess-mate On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:10:24 -0500 Robert L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | Move the file from .gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf, they changed the | location of the file a bit back. | | May want to try different keyservers (comment out the gatech, etc. | | Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | | On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:28:31 -0500 | Robert L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | | | Make one. | | | | Here's mine: | | # So we can work with pgp keys | | force-v3-sigs | | # To deal with mailer and From lines | | escape-from-lines | | # we only need to do this once while the gpg process is using the ring | | lock-once | | # Our options | | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve include-disabled include-revoked |honor-http-proxy | | keyserver x-hkp://pgp.gatech.edu | | keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu | | keyserver x-hkp://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net | Thanks, but when I add this keyservers like above and key-server-options... in | ~/.gnupg/options my system freezes :-( | I'm running woody and toke gnupg there. | mess-mate | | | | | | | | Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | | | | On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 | | Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | | On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 | | | Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | | | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | | | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and |added | | | | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | | | | mess-mate | | | | | | | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | | | | the keyserver for you. | | | | | | | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? | | | | | | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | | | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. | | | | | ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? | | here are the files I have in ~/.gnupg : | | mess.txt options pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ random_seed secring.gpg |trustdb.gpg | | mess-mate | | | | -- | | Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open | | Windows. | | | | | | | | | | :wq! | | --- | | Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 | | | | DISCLAIMER: | | These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. | | FYI: | | perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' | | | | | | | -- | Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open | Windows. | | | | | :wq! | --- | Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 | | DISCLAIMER: | These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. | FYI: | perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' | | -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. msg27503/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote: Friends, forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have been made up to me. It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 (I'm at work), that they have no significance. That last sounds about right. Good mail clients can verify the signatures automatically. It doesn't really matter what OS he's using. GnuPG has a Windows port available, and even Outlook Express has a GnuPG plugin available, if anyone is foolish enough to actually use that email client. Of course, none of this is supported by default in Windows... -- My secret to happiness... is that I have a heart of a 12-year-old boy. It's over here in a jar. Would you like to see it? msg27508/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | mess-mate | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | the keyserver for you. | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. msg27114/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | mess-mate | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | the keyserver for you. | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. -- Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 | Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added | | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | | mess-mate | | | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | | the keyserver for you. | | | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? | | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. | ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? here are the files I have in ~/.gnupg : mess.txt options pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ random_seed secring.gpg trustdb.gpg mess-mate -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. msg27139/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
Make one. Here's mine: # So we can work with pgp keys force-v3-sigs # To deal with mailer and From lines escape-from-lines # we only need to do this once while the gpg process is using the ring lock-once # Our options keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve include-disabled include-revoked honor-http-proxy keyserver x-hkp://pgp.gatech.edu keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu keyserver x-hkp://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 | Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added | | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | | mess-mate | | | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | | the keyserver for you. | | | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? | | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. | ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? here are the files I have in ~/.gnupg : mess.txt options pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ random_seed secring.gpg trustdb.gpg mess-mate -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. :wq! --- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' msg27165/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? Go look at the comments in your .gnupg/options -- .''`. Baloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system msg27169/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:21:53PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? For ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, read ~/.gnupg/options. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Signatures
This one time, at band camp, mess-mate said: On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. | ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? here are the files I have in ~/.gnupg : mess.txt options pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ random_seed secring.gpg trustdb.gpg It goes in options. -- -- | Stephen Gran | Man has never reconciled himself to the | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ten commandments. | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | -- msg27179/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
Move the file from .gnupg/options to .gnupg/gpg.conf, they changed the location of the file a bit back. May want to try different keyservers (comment out the gatech, etc. Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:28:31 -0500 Robert L. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | Make one. | | Here's mine: | # So we can work with pgp keys | force-v3-sigs | # To deal with mailer and From lines | escape-from-lines | # we only need to do this once while the gpg process is using the ring | lock-once | # Our options | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve include-disabled include-revoked honor-http-proxy | keyserver x-hkp://pgp.gatech.edu | keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu | keyserver x-hkp://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net Thanks, but when I add this keyservers like above and key-server-options... in ~/.gnupg/options my system freezes :-( I'm running woody and toke gnupg there. mess-mate | | | | Thus spake mess-mate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): | | On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 07:07:30 -0500 | Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:39:57AM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:26:26 -0800 | | Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | | | | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:50:06PM +0100, mess-mate wrote: | | | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added | | | to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. | | | mess-mate | | | | | | Unless you've set your gnupg to automagically grab public keys from | | | the keyserver for you. | | | | | Uhh, good idea, how can I do that ?? | | | | In ~/.gnupg/gnupg.conf, uncomment or add | | keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve. | | | ?? there is no gnupg.conf !! Did I missing somewhat ? | here are the files I have in ~/.gnupg : | mess.txt options pubring.gpg pubring.gpg~ random_seed secring.gpg trustdb.gpg | mess-mate | | -- | Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open | Windows. | | | | | :wq! | --- | Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 | | DISCLAIMER: | These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. | FYI: | perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' | | -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. :wq! --- Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. FYI: perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' msg27263/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:28:31AM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote: Make one. No, the preferred file this is in is .gnupg/options. Having two different options files *will* be a pain in the ass. -- .''`. Baloo [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system msg27281/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Monday 27 Jan 2003 2:51 pm, debian parisc wrote: It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 (I'm at work), that they have no significance. If you are using pgp you can verify the authenticity of the message - i.e. it comes from who the 'from' line says, rather than someone else. It also verifies that the message hasnt been altered during transmission. (This is a simplistic explanation, see www.gnupg.org for more). Tom msg26591/pgp0.pgp Description: signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote: Friends, forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have been made up to me. It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 (I'm at work), that they have no significance. That last sounds about right. Good mail clients can verify the signatures automatically. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Signatures
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote: forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have been made up to me. It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 (I'm at work), that they have no significance. The signatures are a way of verifying the sender and content of an email. The sender of a message has two keys, a private key, and a public key. The sender signs the message with the private key, and the signature can be verified with the sender's public key. If the contents of the message are changed, the signature does not match the message. -- Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] msg26602/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:06:27 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote: | forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with | PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of | your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have | been made up to me. | | It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 | (I'm at work), that they have no significance. | | The signatures are a way of verifying the sender and content of an | email. The sender of a message has two keys, a private key, and a | public key. The sender signs the message with the private key, and the | signature can be verified with the sender's public key. If the contents | of the message are changed, the signature does not match the message. | | -- | Seneca | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. mess-mate -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. msg26656/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Signatures
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 11:06:27 -0500 Seneca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:51:39PM +, debian parisc wrote: | forgive me for my ignorance, but I see a lot of emails on this list with | PGP signatures. Exactly what purpose does it serve having PGP as part of | your signature? They just look like a string of characters that could have | been made up to me. | | It maybe because I receive most of the emails from this list in windows95 | (I'm at work), that they have no significance. | | The signatures are a way of verifying the sender and content of an | email. The sender of a message has two keys, a private key, and a | public key. The sender signs the message with the private key, and the | signature can be verified with the sender's public key. If the contents | of the message are changed, the signature does not match the message. | | -- | Seneca | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | But the senders public key must be retrieved from a key-server and added to your own key-list before an automated check is possible. mess-mate like this: Signature made lun 27 jan 2003 17:06:27 CET Good signature from Seneca Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Computers are like air conditioners, they are useless when you open Windows. 0001.mimetmp Description: PGP signature msg26658/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: pgp on Woody
[jeremy@MERCURY:pts/4:~]$ apt-cache show gnupg Package: gnupg Priority: standard Section: utils Installed-Size: 2424 Maintainer: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.6-3 Replaces: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref Provides: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.4-4), libgdbmg1, zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4), makedev (= 2.3.1-13) | devfsd Suggests: gnupg-doc Conflicts: gpg-rsa, gpg-rsaref, suidmanager ( 0.50) Filename: pool/main/g/gnupg/gnupg_1.0.6-3_i386.deb Size: 966202 MD5sum: 4834f43bc0b710182b1d98c1423fa389 Description: GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement. GnuPG is GNU's tool for secure communication and data storage. It can be used to encrypt data and to create digital signatures. It includes an advanced key management facility and is compliant with the proposed OpenPGP Internet standard as described in RFC2440. . GnuPG does not use use any patented algorithms so it cannot be compatible with PGP2 because it uses IDEA (which is patented worldwide) and RSA. RSA's patent expired on the 20th September 2000, and it is now included in GnuPG. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gaddis.org -Original Message- From: Mike M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: pgp on Woody I need to install pgp on a Woody system. I went to dselect and did a search on pgp and did not find a package. I assume pgp is not installed because man pgp has no entry, and $ find / -iname *pgp* did not turn up anything interesting. I did find a Debian package description here: http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/pgp.html Thanks -- Mike M. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: pgp on Woody
Mike M wrote: I need to install pgp on a Woody system. I went to dselect and did a search on pgp and did not find a package. I assume pgp is not installed because man pgp has no entry, and $ find / -iname *pgp* did not turn up anything interesting. I did find a Debian package description here: http://packages.debian.org/stable/non-us/pgp.html http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=pgpsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=gpgsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Sonntag 10 November 2002 09:37 schrieb Norbert Preining: On Sam, 09 Nov 2002, Hannes Hromadka wrote: send-hook . 'set pgp_create_traditional=no' Das funktioniert aber nur solange keine Umlaute drin sind oder Ataches dran sind, also nur bei reinen 7Bit Mails ohne Extrawürste Sic, das kann auch nur so funktionieren. Deswegen gibt es pgp/mime!! Nun denn, Grau und einfach ist alle Theorie, düster und kompliziert die Realität 8-( Das inlining hat eben diese limitationen, damit muss man leben oder einen mail client verwenden, der pgp/mime kann. Nur warum könnens denn so wenige. Ähem, welche könnens denn, außer mutt ? a) ich selber unter ein und derselben Adresse mutt, KMail, PMMail/2 und PMMail200 verwende Hmm, keine Ahnung warum man was anderes als mutt verwendet, aber bitte. Weil ich als noch immer nicht ganz ex OS/2ler die WPS gewohnt war und es dort wirklich gute GUI Programme gibt, und die Einstiegsschwelle zu mutt schon sehr hoch liegt. Dennoch strebe ich die Verwendung von mutt unter Linux mittelfristig an. pgp/mime ist der standard, und aus. Wenn einer definitiv Probleme hat, bekommt er eine Ausnahme. Dann wird die Ausnahme zur Regel 8-( aber diese funktioniert nicht, wegen den inline PGP Limits mit Umlauten -( Also suche ich nach einer Lösung die unabhängig vom Emfänger funktioniert und alle/die meisten gängigen pgp fähigen Mailprogramme Unmöglich. Entweder pgp/mime mit beliebigen emails und attachments, Mist, soll daran Signatur für alle scheitern 8-( oder inline pgp dann abe nix attachtment. Den RFC gibt es seit vielen Jahren, wenn ihn die Doddln nicht umsetzten kann man nichts machen. Da gibts noch schlimmeres wenn ich an Ausguck im Büro denke, .. z.B.: Keine Vorschau von signierten Mails z.B. Mit der modernen Art kann außer mutt wohl keines umgehen 8-( Mozilla pgp plugin (enigma oder so heißt das DIng). Und noch ein paar Windows sachen, habe aber keine detailierten Infos, nur einmal eine Liste gesehen. So eine Liste würde mich interessieren, da Mozilla Mail bei mir nicht eingesetzt wird. Muß mal die PMMail Programmierer mit pgp/mime Anforderungen quälen, hoffentlich bauen sie es ein. Ciao, Hannes - -- Johannes Hromadka | Email Office: HromadkaJ at gmx.at | Home : Dyane at surfeu.at Vienna/Austria/Europe | OECC: http://www.oecc.org/ Rust never sleeps (borrowed from Neil YOUNG) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE90pGQ/z2gp/Gb+PcRAsKGAJ4oCCo0k/Xw+zftvxPzxVRToIpY5gCfUEq8 1+sLZw2GO1DdaCPGx9c3aCw= =0PfL -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
On Sam, 09 Nov 2002, Hannes Hromadka wrote: send-hook . 'set pgp_create_traditional=no' Das funktioniert aber nur solange keine Umlaute drin sind oder Ataches dran sind, also nur bei reinen 7Bit Mails ohne Extrawürste Sic, das kann auch nur so funktionieren. Deswegen gibt es pgp/mime!! Das inlining hat eben diese limitationen, damit muss man leben oder einen mail client verwenden, der pgp/mime kann. a) ich selber unter ein und derselben Adresse mutt, KMail, PMMail/2 und PMMail200 verwende Hmm, keine Ahnung warum man was anderes als mutt verwendet, aber bitte. b) Ich bei Mails an Listen ja nicht weiß was die anderen benutzen und sicher nicht alle das gleiche Proggie verwenden. pgp/mime ist der standard, und aus. Wenn einer definitiv Probleme hat, bekommt er eine Ausnahme. Also suche ich nach einer Lösung die unabhängig vom Emfänger funktioniert und alle/die meisten gängigen pgp fähigen Mailprogramme befriedigt. Unmöglich. Entweder pgp/mime mit beliebigen emails und attachments, oder inline pgp dann abe nix attachtment. Den RFC gibt es seit vielen Jahren, wenn ihn die Doddln nicht umsetzten kann man nichts machen. Mit der modernen Art kann außer mutt wohl keines umgehen 8-( Mozilla pgp plugin (enigma oder so heißt das DIng). Und noch ein paar Windows sachen, habe aber keine detailierten Infos, nur einmal eine Liste gesehen. Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Disposition: inline message prüfen ? Nicht trivial. RFC lesen. Herzliche Grüße Norbert --- Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Technische Universität Wien gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- SWANIBOST (adj.) Complete shagged out after a hard day having income tax explained to you. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
On Sam, 09 Nov 2002, Hannes Hromadka wrote: Wie kann ich mutt beibringen, daß es die Signatur so in die Mail einfügt, daß auch andere Mailer (Kmail, PMMail 2000, PMMail/2 und Outlook) diese automatisch erkennen. Altes Problem, immer gleich, blöde Windows Rechner. Ich habe: send-hook . 'set pgp_create_traditional=no' send-hook . 'unset pgp_autoencrypt' send-hook . 'set pgp_outlook_compat=yes' # # Hier die Benutzer die old style pgp bekommen wollen # send-hook user1@ 'set pgp_create_traditional=yes' send-hook user2@ 'set pgp_create_traditional=yes' Das funktioniert bei mir soweit so gut. Herzliche Grüße Norbert --- Norbert Preining preining AT logic DOT at Technische Universität Wien gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 --- LYDIARD TREGOZE (n.) The opposite of a mavis enderby (q.v.) An unrequited early love of your life who still causes terrible pangs though she inexplicably married a telephone engineer. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
Am 09 Nov 2002, schrieb Norbert Preining: On Sam, 09 Nov 2002, Hannes Hromadka wrote: Wie kann ich mutt beibringen, daß es die Signatur so in die Mail einfügt, daß auch andere Mailer (Kmail, PMMail 2000, PMMail/2 und Outlook) diese automatisch erkennen. Altes Problem, immer gleich, blöde Windows Rechner. Da hast du recht :-) Ich habe: send-hook . 'set pgp_create_traditional=no' send-hook . 'unset pgp_autoencrypt' send-hook . 'set pgp_outlook_compat=yes' Du hättest auch schreiben können: send-hook . set pgp_create_traditional=no \ unset pgp_autoencrypt \ set pgp_outlook_compat=yes Sieht schöner übersichtlicher aus. Finde ich. -- Lotharmailto:L.Schweikle;logout.de Du sollst nicht helfen, sondern treten. -- Benjamin Hagemann msg24479/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
* Lothar Schweikle-Droll [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-11-02 18:19]: Sieht schöner übersichtlicher aus. Finde ich. Deine Mails sehen noch schöner aus. :-( | Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 18:19:00 +0100 | From: Lothar Schweikle-Droll [EMAIL PROTECTED], |[EMAIL PROTECTED], |Reply-To:setpgp_create_traditional=nosetsignature=~/.signature@logout.de | Subject: Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] /var/log/exim/paniclog | wc -l 12 Panische Zeiten, liegt es an dir oder an mir? msg24491/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
Am 09 Nov 2002, schrieb Lothar Schweikle-Droll: Du hättest auch schreiben können: send-hook . set pgp_create_traditional=no \ unset pgp_autoencrypt \ set pgp_outlook_compat=yes Sieht schöner übersichtlicher aus. Finde ich. Das kommt davon, wenn man jemand einen Ratschlag geben möchte. Erst einmalan all Danke die mich darauf hingewiesen haben. Ich hoffe der fehler ist korrigiert -- Lotharmailto:L.Schweikle;logout.de Gläubiger haben ein besseres Gedächtnis als Schuldner. msg24495/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt, KMail und andere Mailprogramme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Samstag 09 November 2002 13:22 schrieb Norbert Preining: Hallo Norbert: Wie kann ich mutt beibringen, daß es die Signatur so in die Mail einfügt, daß auch andere Mailer (Kmail, PMMail 2000, PMMail/2 und Outlook) diese automatisch erkennen. Altes Problem, immer gleich, blöde Windows Rechner. Nicht nur, Auch Linux und OS/2 haben das Problem Ich habe: send-hook . 'set pgp_create_traditional=no' Das funktioniert aber nur solange keine Umlaute drin sind oder Ataches dran sind, also nur bei reinen 7Bit Mails ohne Extrawürste # # Hier die Benutzer die old style pgp bekommen wollen # send-hook user1@ 'set pgp_create_traditional=yes' Das funktioniert bei mir soweit so gut. Das ist leider keine Lösung für mich da a) ich selber unter ein und derselben Adresse mutt, KMail, PMMail/2 und PMMail200 verwende b) Ich bei Mails an Listen ja nicht weiß was die anderen benutzen und sicher nicht alle das gleiche Proggie verwenden. Also suche ich nach einer Lösung die unabhängig vom Emfänger funktioniert und alle/die meisten gängigen pgp fähigen Mailprogramme befriedigt. Mit der modernen Art kann außer mutt wohl keines umgehen 8-( Und weils mich technisch interessiert: Wie kann ich zu fuß eine Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Disposition: inline message prüfen ? Ciao, Hannes - -- Johannes Hromadka | Email Office: HromadkaJ at gmx.at | Home : Dyane at surfeu.at Vienna/Austria/Europe | OECC: http://www.oecc.org/ Rust never sleeps (borrowed from Neil YOUNG) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9zWZE/z2gp/Gb+PcRArhfAJ9cqWChsfazhUZPikKWM1PYP+ZVFwCfd/RZ R0zJvoKSgcHpZL4YJNx9omA= =/HFM -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: pgp not verifying sigs
on Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:29:47PM +0300, Aigars Mahinovs insinuated: Hello, On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:43:57 -0400, Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry, i meant to say that i've also signed my key. i also noted that i'm getting this problem from people whose keys i've signed. any further ideas? IIRC maximum trust level changed recently from fully trusted to ultimately trusted, check that by doing gpg --edit-key [EMAIL PROTECTED] and using the trust comand (enter help there for some help) awesome, that did it. thanks! /nori -- .~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu /V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/ // \\ @ maenad.net /( )\ www.maenad.net ^`~'^ msg09494/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp not verifying sigs
On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:02:38AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Oct 25 16:27:47 2002) --] gpg: Signature made Fri Oct 25 16:26:47 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 11E030F1 gpg: Good signature from Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 970E E5C6 C0FB 0974 E79D 2B62 4C3A 5981 11E0 30F1 [-- End of PGP output --] i haven't changed anything, and apt-get upgrade didn't tell me it was changing anything ... anyone else run into this, or have suggestions? It's verifying sigs just fine. Sign your key! -- Baloo msg09199/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp not verifying sigs
on Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:07:43AM -0700, Paul Johnson insinuated: On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 02:02:38AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Oct 25 16:27:47 2002) --] gpg: Signature made Fri Oct 25 16:26:47 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 11E030F1 gpg: Good signature from Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: aka Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 970E E5C6 C0FB 0974 E79D 2B62 4C3A 5981 11E0 30F1 [-- End of PGP output --] i haven't changed anything, and apt-get upgrade didn't tell me it was changing anything ... anyone else run into this, or have suggestions? It's verifying sigs just fine. Sign your key! sorry, i meant to say that i've also signed my key. i also noted that i'm getting this problem from people whose keys i've signed. any further ideas? thanks, /nori -- .~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu /V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/ // \\ @ maenad.net /( )\ www.maenad.net ^`~'^ msg09240/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp not verifying sigs
Hello, On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:43:57 -0400, Nori Heikkinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry, i meant to say that i've also signed my key. i also noted that i'm getting this problem from people whose keys i've signed. any further ideas? IIRC maximum trust level changed recently from fully trusted to ultimately trusted, check that by doing gpg --edit-key [EMAIL PROTECTED] and using the trust comand (enter help there for some help) -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovsmailto:aigarius;debian.org #--# | .''`.| |: :' : Debian GNU/Linux | |`. `' http://www.debian.org | | `- | #--# msg09287/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP key signing parties
also sprach Leconte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002.09.21.1742 +0200]: *are these parties as formal as they're supposed to be (for instance, are the two forms of picture IDs essential, or is there some leeway ?) they are not that formal, in fact usually pretty personal and lax. i always require and official picture ID issued by the government if i know that government and its IDs. if i don't, then i might ask for another or even a third. * what are the topics of conversation (I suppose cryptograhy and security issues are big, but are there others ?) i find myself often explaining GPG, the web of trust, and public key cryptography as people rarely know the details and they aren't all that complicated. i've gone as far as to explain DSA, ElGamal, RSA and Diffie-Hellman. but usually it's just geek-talk, Debian related in most cases. * what are the requirements for the maintainers ? http://nm.debian.org -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^.*|tr * mailto:; net@madduck lus wallace (pulp fiction) msg02981/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp
* Oi Yan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020426 13:17]: Hi all I installed pgp but don't know how to exchange the public key and use in email I don't think it will be very straightforward using a web-based email client like Yahoo unless the client webapp includes specific support for it. I do recommend, however, that if possible, you do your actual message composition in a Real Editor and then paste it into the web form on the Yahoo compose page. If you use this method, you can easily create old-style inline pgp signatures by piping the message through gpg --clearsign before you paste it in. As for distributing your public key, send it to a keyserver with gpg --send-keys your ID . There was some discussion about which keyserver to use within the last couple of days on this list. If you don't want to go searching, I'm using wwwkeys.us.pgp.net , and it Works For Me. I'm assuming you meant gnupg instead of pgp. If not, go ahead and remove pgp and install gnupg (unless you have a specific need to do otherwise). It's Free. =) good times, Vineet -- Currently seeking opportunities in the SF Bay Area Please see http://www.doorstop.net/resume.shtml pgpkPuP6OYVQa.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: pgp
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 01:48:28PM -0400, Oi Yan wrote: | Hi all | | I installed pgp but don't know how to exchange the | public key and use in email Do you mean gpg (aka 'gnupg')? I just learned how to do this 2 days ago. It really is simple! To publish your key just run gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --send-keys [names] where [names] is the name of your key. If you don't know the name, run gpg --list-keys to list all the keys. I don't know if you can sign messages sent through yahoo's web mail interface. I use mutt and simply adding set pgp_autosign set pgp_verify_sig to my .muttrc and everything was cool. HTH, -D -- The light of the righteous shines brightly, but the lamp of the wicked is snuffed out. Proverbs 13:9 GnuPG key : http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/public_key.gpg pgpxIeiTuu2Ei.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 08:04:09PM -0500, Rohan Deshpande wrote: Hey again, Thanks for the tips so far, but now when I try to use PGP and mutt, it keeps saying (for other peoples messages) that it can't verify PGP because of missing public keys... is there something I haven't configured? Thanks for the help! :). ... Try adding the keyserver line in your .gnupg/options file pointing to a keyserver near you (from the gpg man page: host -l pgp.net | grep wwwkeys). I have: keyserver wwwkeys.us.pgp.net New keys should then be automatically downloaded from the keyservers if people have placed them on them, (keys slowly replicate between the keyservers, so it is only necessary to place them on one keyserver). To place a key on a keyserver use the gpg --send-keys command (look at the gpg man page). donfede -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8oH6Kx+yU3uQx8M4RAuIAAJoDHBHC3VKR/QgVuerVvYLRUOJZOwCeJhL8 3pPDOZkwKpPba1WGKJJILNA= =IjPy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PGP Mutt?
Hey again, Thanks for the tips so far, but now when I try to use PGP and mutt, it keeps saying (for other peoples messages) that it can't verify PGP because of missing public keys... is there something I haven't configured? Thanks for the help! :). -Rohan * Tom Cook ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On 0, Jerome Acks Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:13:12PM -0500, Rohan Deshpande wrote: Hi there, Upon reading a lot of these messages on the debian user list, I get a lot of errors saying mailcap doesn't have an entry for application/pgp-signature, so i finally decided to figure out what this pgp thing is. Anyone know how I can use it with Mutt, and what packages I need? Thanks a lot. -Rohan Look at http://www.gnupg.org/ or http://www.pgp.net/ apt-get install [gnupg pgpgp | pgp | pgp5i }] I recommend gnupg - I installed it the other day; it works beautifully, and mutt was preconfigured to use it. If you like graphical frontend: seahorse, tkpgp, gpa, and others. Probably not necessary if you're using mutt. If you have installed mutt deb, /etc/Muttrc will be preconfigured to use pgp. Yup. Easy as. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide That you're not paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you. - Robert Waldner pgplohDBXlHTm.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt?
On 0, Rohan Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey again, Thanks for the tips so far, but now when I try to use PGP and mutt, it keeps saying (for other peoples messages) that it can't verify PGP because of missing public keys... is there something I haven't configured? Thanks for the help! :). You have imported their public keys, haven't you? Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide That you're not paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you. - Robert Waldner pgpzuRKKRHiVG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt?
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:13:12PM -0500, Rohan Deshpande wrote: Hi there, Upon reading a lot of these messages on the debian user list, I get a lot of errors saying mailcap doesn't have an entry for application/pgp-signature, so i finally decided to figure out what this pgp thing is. Anyone know how I can use it with Mutt, and what packages I need? Thanks a lot. -Rohan Look at http://www.gnupg.org/ or http://www.pgp.net/ apt-get install [gnupg pgpgp | pgp | pgp5i }] If you like graphical frontend: seahorse, tkpgp, gpa, and others. If you have installed mutt deb, /etc/Muttrc will be preconfigured to use pgp. -- Jerome pgphCTjFxYtRN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP Mutt?
On 0, Jerome Acks Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:13:12PM -0500, Rohan Deshpande wrote: Hi there, Upon reading a lot of these messages on the debian user list, I get a lot of errors saying mailcap doesn't have an entry for application/pgp-signature, so i finally decided to figure out what this pgp thing is. Anyone know how I can use it with Mutt, and what packages I need? Thanks a lot. -Rohan Look at http://www.gnupg.org/ or http://www.pgp.net/ apt-get install [gnupg pgpgp | pgp | pgp5i }] I recommend gnupg - I installed it the other day; it works beautifully, and mutt was preconfigured to use it. If you like graphical frontend: seahorse, tkpgp, gpa, and others. Probably not necessary if you're using mutt. If you have installed mutt deb, /etc/Muttrc will be preconfigured to use pgp. Yup. Easy as. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide That you're not paranoid does not mean they're not out to get you. - Robert Waldner pgpA1qxxHU9CR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: PGP no Sylpheed Compilar ou não compilar, eis a questão...
On Sat 19 Jan 2002 12:19, dock master wrote: Vou me meter um pouco no assunto de vocês dois... A questão de compilar ou instalar um binário empacotado, é contraditória... Eu por exemplo, uso Slackware e Debian, sempre preveri pegar o tarball, desempacotar e compilar. Por que? Pelo simples motivo que eu vou saber exatamente o que estou fazendo, e se aparecer algum conflito ou biblioteca não resolvida, sei exatamente onde pro- curar a resposta pro problema. Parece que você ainda não entrou no mundo Debian, pois apt-get install serve para resolver TODOS os problemas de dependência!!! Eu nunca me preocupo com isso! Acho que vc ainda não aprendeu a usar esta ferramente poderosíssima... Senão vejamos. Recentemente estava compilando um programa, que precisava do uma biblioteca em particular, na versão 4.0.01. Como estava usando o Slackware 8.0, o pacote que eu tinha esta biblioteca na versão 4.0.8. Cada vez que eu rodava o ./configure, ele acusava erro, mesmo indicando o pa- rametro --with-tal-lib-de-tal O que eu fiz foi o seguinte: ln -sf /usr/lib/libbibliotecanova.so.4.0.8 /usr/lib/bliliotecavelha.so.4.0.1 Fiz um link pra biblioteca nova, criando a biblioteca velha Isso resolveu meu problema e compilou sem maiores problemas. Outro motivo, é que o tarball se adequa a seu sistema e sua arquitetura. Isso significa que você terá um programa compilado para o seu tipo de Linux e máquina. Já um empacotado, seja ele .rpm ou .deb sempre teremos que lidar com dependecias ás vesez nem sempre resolvidas satisfatóriamente Bem, não sei quanto a você, mas não concordo que a sua solução possa ser considerada satisfatória!!! É uma chuncheira FEIA!!! Veja o seguinte exemplo: $ apt-cache show licq Package: licq Priority: optional Section: net Installed-Size: 984 Maintainer: Zed Pobre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Version: 1.0.3-5 Replaces: licq-data Provides: licq-data Depends: libc6 (= 2.2.4-4), libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 (= 1:2.95.4-0.010810), licq-plugin-qt2 | licq-plugin Recommends: host, sox Conflicts: licq-data, licq-plugin-qt2 ( 0.85) Veja as linhas Depends e Conflicts! Caso vc use o apt-get install licq e não tenha nenhuma daquelas bibliotecas, todas serão instaladas! E se vc tiver o licq-plugin-qt2 numa versão menor que a 0.85, ele será removido! Simples! E sem chuncho (sei lá se é xunxo ou chuncho)... t+ -- Raphael Derosso Pereira - DephiNit *-=-*-=--=-*-=-*-=--=*=-* / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / *-=-*-=--=-*-=-*-=--=*=-* -=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=- | Debian GNU/Linux Addicted User | | Use it, Abuse it. It's Free!!! | -=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=--=*=-
Re: PGP no Sylpheed
Em 13:49 18/01/2002 -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu: On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:12:07 -0200 Marinho Paiva Duarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olá!!! Gostaria de saber como faço para habilitar uso do PGP no sylpheed? Compilei-o na minha máquina (não é uma versão empacotada). Alguém tem alguma ideia? por que não usar a versão empacotada? =P faça: ./configure --enable-gpgme ...mas antes instale o GPGME :) :wq! -- +---+ Fabio Junior Beneditto [KamiKazeNH] - Linux User: 165.457 | _ | Tel: (51)9171-6000 - UIN 62537421 - Novo Hamburgo - RS | °v° | em breve! - http://www.kamikazenh.cjb.net | /(_)\ |WinDoze 98 SE At Work - Conectiva Linux at Home :))) | ^ ^ | Registre-se! É Grátis! - http://counter.li.org +---+ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=[ Uma tagline para animar ]=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Quente que nem frigideira sem cabo _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: PGP no Sylpheed
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:57:30 -0200 Marinho Paiva Duarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Já fiz isso e não funcionou... Por isso mandei a pergunta :-D certamente você não tem a libgpgme-dev continua a pergunta... por que não usa a versão empacotada? []s! -- Gustavo Noronha Silva - kov http://www.metainfo.org/kov *-* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+ | .''`. | Debian GNU/Linux: http://www.debian.org | | : :' : + Debian BR...: http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br+ | `. `'` + Q: Why did the chicken cross the road? + | `-| A: Upstream's decision. -- hmh | *-* -+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+-+
Re: PGP no Sylpheed
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:24:06 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:57:30 -0200 Marinho Paiva Duarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Já fiz isso e não funcionou... Por isso mandei a pergunta :-D certamente você não tem a libgpgme-dev Certo Eu copiei o gpgme em tarball e compilei. Agora funcionou. continua a pergunta... por que não usa a versão empacotada? Sinceramente, não sei. Tem coisas que eu gosto de compilar e tem coisas que eu acho melhor instalar empacotado. Aqui em casa eu uso o Red Hat e não sei se tem rpm para a versão 0.7, por isso eu compilei. No trabalho eu uso o Debian, e lá eu compilei também :-D Vc me sugere a versão empacotada por achar que é melhor ou porque vc é o mantenedor do pacote ;-) ?? Certamente seu tivesse tentado instalar a versão empacotada chegaria à mesmo conclusão: faltava o gpgme. O importante é que agora funciona. Obrigado pela atenção e ajuda. Atenciosamente, --- Marinho Paiva Duarte Usuário Linux #229528 /\ \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: PGP no Sylpheed Compilar ou não compilar, eis a questão...
Vou me meter um pouco no assunto de vocês dois... A questão de compilar ou instalar um binário empacotado, é contraditória... Eu por exemplo, uso Slackware e Debian, sempre preveri pegar o tarball, desempacotar e compilar. Por que? Pelo simples motivo que eu vou saber exatamente o que estou fazendo, e se aparecer algum conflito ou biblioteca não resolvida, sei exatamente onde pro- curar a resposta pro problema. Senão vejamos. Recentemente estava compilando um programa, que precisava do uma biblioteca em particular, na versão 4.0.01. Como estava usando o Slackware 8.0, o pacote que eu tinha esta biblioteca na versão 4.0.8. Cada vez que eu rodava o ./configure, ele acusava erro, mesmo indicando o pa- rametro --with-tal-lib-de-tal O que eu fiz foi o seguinte: ln -sf /usr/lib/libbibliotecanova.so.4.0.8 /usr/lib/bliliotecavelha.so.4.0.1 Fiz um link pra biblioteca nova, criando a biblioteca velha Isso resolveu meu problema e compilou sem maiores problemas. Outro motivo, é que o tarball se adequa a seu sistema e sua arquitetura. Isso significa que você terá um programa compilado para o seu tipo de Linux e máquina. Já um empacotado, seja ele .rpm ou .deb sempre teremos que lidar com dependecias ás vesez nem sempre resolvidas satisfatóriamente = Gilberto Nunes Ferreira Linux User nº 159670 Coordenador Linux-SC célula de Itajaí-SC ICQ #136176504 Celular: (0xx47)9991-7677 ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tenha seu lugar na Web. Construa hoje mesmo sua home page no Yahoo! GeoCities. É fácil e grátis! http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/
