Re: problem z pam/glibc po upgradzie Sarge
W liście z śro, 12-03-2003, godz. 15:53, Daniel Koć pisze: zrobilem dist-upgrade Sarge i przestalo dac sie sprawdzac poczte. =o przebudowalem ze zrodel pam -- nie pomoglo, glibc -- tez nie... ha, ale pomoglo jak zrobilem restart systemu... =} -- czemu nie?
Fw: glibc, libc e locales...
| | | Ola pessoal, | | | | | | Faço parte da lista a pouco tempo e é a primeira vez | | que | | | vou me manifestar. | | | Eu estou com um problema: | | | Eu usava sistemas baseados no RedHat. Mudei | | recentemente | | | para o Debian por questões de ideologia e técnicas | (apesar | | | de já ter usado o Debian nos primordios do linux, versão | | | 1.0). Acontece que estou tendo problemas com as | | bibliotecas | | | C. Eu precisei instalar a libc6 para que um outro | | aplicativo | | | funcionasse, desde então o locales parou de funcionar. | | | Seguinto as dicas da lista tentei reconfigurar e/ou | | | reinstalar o pacote locales, mas ele diz que não | encontra | | o | | | glibc-2.2.5-11.2. Não sei como incluir esta biblioteca | | pois | | | não existe pacote para a mesma. E amis, neste fim de | | semana | | | tentei compilar um programa que baixei em codigo fonte, | e | | ao | | | rodar o ./configure estou recebendo uma mensagem que o | | | compilador não é capas de gerar um executavel. Ou seja, | | devo | | | ter feito alguma besteira, e acho que danifiquei as | | | bibliocas C. No Conectiva/Mandraque/RedHat nunca tive | | | problema parecido, pois tenho a impressão que estes | | sistemas | | | possuem tanto a libc6 como a glib2...(não tenho certeza | | | disto, pois não sei nem se elas são realmente duas | | | bibliotecas distintas...) | | | Se alguem souber como resolver este problema, por | | favor | | | me ajudem | | | Grato, | | | ___ | | | : :linux: | | | : Flavio Henrique Moreira :''': | | | : Analista de Sistemas / Mult-e Informática :* w *: | | | : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : (°7 : | | | : +55 12 3923 5535 : /v) : | | | : I hear, I forget; I see, I remember; :* `~~ *: | | | : I do, I understand. - chinese proverb :...: | | | :___:rules: | | | | | | |
Re: Fw: glibc, libc e locales...
Gostei da assinatura. Eheheheheeheheheeh!!!:) []'s, Still * Dizem que Rubens - Mult-e tentou dizer: | | | Ola pessoal, | | | | | | Faço parte da lista a pouco tempo e é a primeira vez | | que | | | vou me manifestar. | | | Eu estou com um problema: | | | Eu usava sistemas baseados no RedHat. Mudei | | recentemente | | | para o Debian por questões de ideologia e técnicas | (apesar | | | de já ter usado o Debian nos primordios do linux, versão | | | 1.0). Acontece que estou tendo problemas com as | | bibliotecas | | | C. Eu precisei instalar a libc6 para que um outro | | aplicativo | | | funcionasse, desde então o locales parou de funcionar. | | | Seguinto as dicas da lista tentei reconfigurar e/ou | | | reinstalar o pacote locales, mas ele diz que não | encontra | | o | | | glibc-2.2.5-11.2. Não sei como incluir esta biblioteca | | pois | | | não existe pacote para a mesma. E amis, neste fim de | | semana | | | tentei compilar um programa que baixei em codigo fonte, | e | | ao | | | rodar o ./configure estou recebendo uma mensagem que o | | | compilador não é capas de gerar um executavel. Ou seja, | | devo | | | ter feito alguma besteira, e acho que danifiquei as | | | bibliocas C. No Conectiva/Mandraque/RedHat nunca tive | | | problema parecido, pois tenho a impressão que estes | | sistemas | | | possuem tanto a libc6 como a glib2...(não tenho certeza | | | disto, pois não sei nem se elas são realmente duas | | | bibliotecas distintas...) | | | Se alguem souber como resolver este problema, por | | favor | | | me ajudem | | | Grato, | | | ___ | | | : :linux: | | | : Flavio Henrique Moreira :''': | | | : Analista de Sistemas / Mult-e Informática :* w *: | | | : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : (°7 : | | | : +55 12 3923 5535 : /v) : | | | : I hear, I forget; I see, I remember; :* `~~ *: | | | : I do, I understand. - chinese proverb :...: | | | :___:rules: | | | | | | | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Nelson Luiz Campos | I hear; I forget. Electrical Engineer| I see; I remember. Linux User #89621 UIN 11464303 | I do; I understand. gnupgID: 55577339 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Chinese Proverb pgpBbfYznTzqj.pgp Description: PGP signature
[kleptog@svana.org: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?]
- Forwarded message from John H. Robinson, IV - Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:38:25 -0800 From: John H. Robinson, IV Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] remember the time_t thing we were discussing? how dates before the epuch nolonge rwork? well, on another list, this same issue was discussed. here is a message from that thread: - Forwarded message from Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:13:28PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:05:52AM +1100, Brian May wrote: On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:50:42AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: Can anyone provide me with mailing list archive URLs from when this change would have been discussed publically? I assume it was deliberate? Or was it unintentional? I'm assuming it was deliberate also, to address the 2038 bug. I've seen much talk of it back in 2000 in Google, but nothing more recent. It was deliberate. The postgresql guys noticed when some release redhat shipped with these modifications. They tried to convince the glibc guys to revert but they refused. Basically, POSIX doesn't define mktime() before 1970, so glibc doesn't support it. Or so the argument goes. IIRC, postgresql has now copied the mktime code from FreeBSDs libc to deal with the problem. Or maybe they're just thinking about it. Some references: http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2002/debian-glibc-200205/msg00010.html http://maths.newcastle.edu.au/~rking/R/help/03a/0066.html http://archives.postgresql.org/search.php?ps=10q=glibc+mktimeps=10wm=wrdo=0ul=%2Fpgsql-hackers%2Fm=allwf=11cat -- Martijn van Oosterhout [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://svana.org/kleptog/ Support bacteria! They're the only culture some people have. - End forwarded message - -john -- http://www.kernel-panic.org list archives http://www.ultraviolet.org To unsubscribe, send a message to the address shown in the list-unsubscribe header of this message. - End forwarded message - -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architectcell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Multimedia, DB, DNS and Metrics. http://www.galis.org/george -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc
Wenn Du von Knoppix bootest und Deine alte Platte unter /mnt/ eingebunden hast, dann müsstest Du eigentlich mit dem Knoppx-dpkg und der --root-Option auch Pakete installieren können, ohne auf die glibc des alten Systems zurückzugreifen. dpkg --root=/mnt -i *.deb Sebastian -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: glibc
Danke fuer eure Tips, habe leider mein Download Limit fast ueberschritten diesen Monat (Uninetz :-)) und habs deswegen noch nicht probieren koennen. Also blieb mir nix anderes als ne Neuinstallation uebrig (natuerlich nach vorheriger Datensicherung), und jetzt laeufts wieder. Werde mir die CD fuers naechste mal libc6 Kack machen ziehen. Scheint ja gut zu sein. MfG Sven -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: glibc
* Sven Richter schrieb am 29.01.03 um 22:22 Uhr: Hi, Ich hab ganz grossen Mist gemacht. Ich wollte auf ner anderen Partition die ich eingemountet habe ne neue glibc compilieren, als root. In der Konsole habe ich chroot gemacht. Beim rummehren hin und her, habe ich dann irgendwann mal die Konsole verwechselt und dummerweise in der Konsole die glibc3.0 installiert, in der ich nicht chroot gemacht hatte. Jetzt kommts noch dummer. Bei der Installation von glibc3.0 gabs einen Fehler. Jetzt kann ich mich nicht mal mehr auf ner Konsole einloggen. Hatter vorher die glibc-2.2.5 drauf. Die meisten Proggis gehen jetzt nicht mehr, und ich gehe mal davon aus wenn ich neustarte ist eh alles vorbei, da ich mich ja nicht mal mehr als root einloggen kann. Zur Zeit habe ich noch ein paar Konsolen offen und mein Sylpheed, das geht noch. Ist aber auch so ziemlich das einzige. Die alte glibc habe ich schon gezogen, installiert er aber auch nicht mit dpkg, da fehlt ihm die libc.so.6 (fragt mich nicht wann die verloren gegangen ist). apt-get und dselect gehen auch nicht mehr. Die einzige Moeglichkeit die ich noch sehe, ist von einer Rettungscd mich auf meinem System einzuloggen und dann irgendwie die alte glibc drauf zu ziehen. Wie seht ihr das. Bin fuer jeden Vorschlag offen. Irgend ne gut Rettungscd parat? Ich würde vielleicht ein aktuelles Knoppix nehmen, booten, deine root-disk mounten und dann die files, die zu libc6 gehören, wieder an ihren Ort kopieren. Danach solltest du in deinem richtigen System (wenn es geklappt hat) mal das Paket libc6 mit --reinstall nochmal installiren um alles gerade zu ziehen. IMHO wichtige files aus dpkg -L libc6 /. /lib /lib/ld-2.2.5.so /lib/libBrokenLocale-2.2.5.so /lib/libanl-2.2.5.so /lib/libc-2.2.5.so /lib/libcrypt-2.2.5.so /lib/libdl-2.2.5.so /lib/libm-2.2.5.so /lib/libnsl-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_compat-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_dns-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_files-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_hesiod-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_nis-2.2.5.so /lib/libnss_nisplus-2.2.5.so /lib/libresolv-2.2.5.so /lib/librt-2.2.5.so /lib/libutil-2.2.5.so /lib/libSegFault.so /lib/libpthread-0.9.so /lib/libthread_db-1.0.so /usr/bin/tzselect /sbin/ldconfig /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/libc.so.6 /lib/libBrokenLocale.so.1 /lib/libm.so.6 /lib/libdl.so.2 /lib/libcrypt.so.1 /lib/libpthread.so.0 /lib/libresolv.so.2 /lib/libnss_dns.so.2 /lib/libanl.so.1 /lib/libnss_files.so.2 /lib/librt.so.1 /lib/libthread_db.so.1 /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2 /lib/libnsl.so.1 /lib/libnss_nis.so.2 /lib/libnss_nisplus.so.2 /lib/libnss_compat.so.2 /lib/libutil.so.1 hier noch ein ldd dpkg lisa:~# ldd $(which dpkg) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40018000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 = /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) Gruss -Marc -- BUGS My programs never have bugs. They just develop random features. If you discover such a feature and you want it to be removed: please send an email to bug at links2linux.de -- Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten (FAQ): http://www.de.debian.org/debian-user-german-FAQ/ Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: glibc
Am Mit, 2003-01-29 um 22.22 schrieb Sven Richter: Hi, Ich hab ganz grossen Mist gemacht. Schaut so aus :) Als Rettungs-CD kann ich nur Knoppix empfehlen (knopper.net/knoppix). Ist ein Debian mit Hardwareerkennung, X und allem, und startet direkt von CD. Viel Erfolg, leider kann ich mehr nicht dazu beitragen. MfG Sven Richter -- Lukas Kolbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
apt-get requests glibc-2.2.5-x; won't install it
When I try to install locales using apt-get I get: # apt-get install locales Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3 E: Sorry, broken packages ...but if I try to install glibc-2.2.5, I get: # apt-get install glibc-2.2.5 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-6 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-9 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-11.2 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-14.3 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 333 not upgraded. Therefore, apt-get is inconsistent when it comes to using libc6 as a substitute for glibc-2.2.5-x. (I am using the 2.4.18-686 kernel. The distribution is Woody.) How can I get around this? Many thanks! kj PS: Please Cc: me in your reply -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get requests glibc-2.2.5-x; won't install it
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:05:02AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I try to install locales using apt-get I get: # apt-get install locales [snip] Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3 ^--^ E: Sorry, broken packages It looks like you are trying to install the testing version of locales. Since you have a woody installation, check your /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure it includes woody or stable sources, and /etc/apt/preferences to make sure woody is your target release. You could try apt-get -t stable install locales to make sure you are trying to install the woody version. ...but if I try to install glibc-2.2.5, I get: glibc-2.2.5-xxx are virtual packages that install libc6-2.2.5-xxx. # apt-get install glibc-2.2.5 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-6 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-9 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-11.2 Note, selecting libc6 instead of glibc-2.2.5-14.3 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 333 not upgraded. Therefore, apt-get is inconsistent when it comes to using libc6 as a substitute for glibc-2.2.5-x. (I am using the 2.4.18-686 kernel. The distribution is Woody.) How can I get around this? Many thanks! kj PS: Please Cc: me in your reply -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jerome msg24149/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: apt-get requests glibc-2.2.5-x; won't install it
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 20:13:44 -0500 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:05:02AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I try to install locales using apt-get I get: # apt-get install locales [snip] Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3 ^--^ E: Sorry, broken packages It looks like you are trying to install the testing version of locales. Since you have a woody installation, check your /etc/apt/sources.list to make sure it includes woody or stable sources, and /etc/apt/preferences to make sure woody is your target release. You could try apt-get -t stable install locales to make sure you are trying to install the woody version. OK, I tried this suggestion (thanks), except that I don't have an /etc/apt/preferences file at all--I assume that in this case the command-line flag determines the distribution to be installed; I got essentially the same results as before. ...but if I try to install glibc-2.2.5, I get: glibc-2.2.5-xxx are virtual packages that install libc6-2.2.5-xxx. But then why does apt-get say that it is missing, when it knows that libc6-2.2.5 is already installed? It makes no sense. Again, many thanks. KJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Cannot shutdown Tomcat with GLIBC in unstable
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:02:19AM -0800, Charles Baker wrote: I just tried to shutdown Tomcat 4.1.12-2 using Sun JDK 1.3.1_03 on my box running unstable. I got the following undefined symbol message and Tomcat does not shutdown. Does anyone have a suggestion for what I should do other than kill the Tomcat pids? I wonder if I do that will Tomcat be able to restart? usmghdebian:~# /usr/share/tomcat4/bin/shutdown.sh Using CATALINA_BASE: /usr/share/tomcat4 Using CATALINA_HOME: /usr/share/tomcat4 Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /usr/share/tomcat4/temp Using JAVA_HOME: /usr/local/java1.3 Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/stow/jdk1.3.1_03/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference usmghdebian:~# The Sun JDK1.3 is broken in sid now, since Sun used an internal glibc symbol that they shouldn't have. I think someone has told me that blackdown has released a fixed 1.3 release, otherwise you'll have to use the 1.4 and complain to Sun :) -rob msg18334/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Cannot shutdown Tomcat with GLIBC in unstable
I just tried to shutdown Tomcat 4.1.12-2 using Sun JDK 1.3.1_03 on my box running unstable. I got the following undefined symbol message and Tomcat does not shutdown. Does anyone have a suggestion for what I should do other than kill the Tomcat pids? I wonder if I do that will Tomcat be able to restart? usmghdebian:~# /usr/share/tomcat4/bin/shutdown.sh Using CATALINA_BASE: /usr/share/tomcat4 Using CATALINA_HOME: /usr/share/tomcat4 Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /usr/share/tomcat4/temp Using JAVA_HOME: /usr/local/java1.3 Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/stow/jdk1.3.1_03/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference usmghdebian:~# = [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.charleshbaker.com/~chb/ Hacking is a Good Thing! See http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rebuild gcc, glibc for woody
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile glibc should work. gcc is one of the few packages that won't work, it uses a mini-compiler to compile itself and thus ignores any CFLAGS arguments. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rebuild gcc, glibc for woody
Hello list, Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-march=i686 -O3 -pipe is it possible for debian woody to do so to rebuild the gcc and glibc with optimized compilation method? If yes, which is the best recommended way to achieve this? -- Patrick Hsieh[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG Pubilc Key at http://www.ezplay.tv/~pahud/pahudatezplay.pubkey MD5 checksum: b948362c94655b74b33e859d58b8de91 1024D/F3662014 9ADF 6E3F 68DE 8DF8 4A67 0B54 6608 BAA8 F366 2014 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: rebuild gcc, glibc for woody
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote: Hello list, Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-march=i686 -O3 -pipe is it possible for debian woody to do so to rebuild the gcc and glibc with optimized compilation method? If yes, which is the best recommended way to achieve this? Add some deb-src lines to your sources.list, then run export CFLAGS='-march=i686 -O3 -pipe', then apt-get --compile source gcc glibc. Untested, but it should work. :) -rob msg13974/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Nergradera glibc i debian
onsdagen den 30 oktober 2002 13.43 skrev Johan Kristell: Därför undrar jag nu om det finns något sätt att nergradera libc tillbaks till min tidigare version. troligtvis var det väll 2.1 Jag gjorde de precis när libc6 2.3.1 var ny och hade en bugg i sig, fast är numera tillbaka till 2.3.1-3, för det var något program jag ville ha som krävde det. Jag kan inte komma ihåg exakt alla steg jag tog, vad jag gjorde eller ens vad som är absolut nödvändigt, men jag har numera följande i /etc/apt/preferences: Package: * Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 600 Package: * Pin: release a=unstable Pin-Priority: 400 Package: libc6* Pin: release a=testing Pin-Priority: 1005 Detta tillåter att paket nedgraderas för att få libc6 till rätt version. Sedan tror jag att jag gjorde något i stil med apt-get install libc6=2.2.5-14.3 (vilket tydligen är den senaste versionen of libc6 i testing) Det var något problem, med att vissa program togs bort istället för att graderas ned. De får antingen nedgraderas manuellt eller återinstalleras. Men proceduren fungerade och libc6 2.3.1 återkom inte förräns jag bestämde mig för att jag behövde ett program som krävde det. Jag kör fortfarande med default till testing och uppgraderar manuellt paket till unstable nivå när jag finner det berättigat. Detta för att undvika att jag får en senaste nya och buggiga versionen av någonting, som gör mitt system tillfälligt oanvändbart. -- Karolina
Re: Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas comsites em java]
posiciona seu source lista pra stable e reinstala apt-get install pacote --reinstall Adilson Junior ICQ 28528156 Debian GNU/Linux Linux user nº #255660 Machine Number 139383 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br - Original Message - From: Márcio de Araújo Benedito [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Lista Debian debian-user-portuguese@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 5:09 PM Subject: Re: Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas comsites em java] ___ Yahoo! GeoCities Tudo para criar o seu site: ferramentas fáceis de usar, espaço de sobra e acessórios. http://br.geocities.yahoo.com/
Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas com sites em java]
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 às 16:31, Nelson Luiz Campos escreveu: É o que eu tô tentnado fazer. :))) Pessoal; Como consigo retornar a glibc da unstable que esta instalada para a versao stable? Tenho alguns pacotes nao-oficiais, como o X4.2 e kde3, que exigem pacotes da unstable, logo se eu fizer o downgrade completo vou perder estes pacotes. Tem como voltar so a glibc (e as dependencias dela)? []'s -- Marcio de Araujo Benedito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Empresa de Informatica e Informacao do Municipio de Belo Horizonte - Prodabel S/A Desktop rodando Debian GNU/Linux, iPaq rodando Familiar GNU/Linux. Todos funcionais e livres de Windows! Quão maravilhosas as pessoas que não conhecemos bem --Millor Fernandes signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas com sites em java]
Tem kde pra woody deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./ -- Adilson Junior ICQ 28528156 Debian GNU/Linux Linux user n #255660 Machine Number 139383 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br Duvidas sobre o Velox? Visite o Grupo Velox-Rio: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Velox-rio/ Em Qui, 2002-10-31 s 15:31, Mrcio de Arajo Benedito escreveu: Em Qui, 2002-10-31 s 16:31, Nelson Luiz Campos escreveu: o que eu t tentnado fazer. :))) Pessoal; Como consigo retornar a glibc da unstable que esta instalada para a versao stable? Tenho alguns pacotes nao-oficiais, como o X4.2 e kde3, que exigem pacotes da unstable, logo se eu fizer o downgrade completo vou perder estes pacotes. Tem como voltar so a glibc (e as dependencias dela)? []'s -- Marcio de Araujo Benedito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Empresa de Informatica e Informacao do Municipio de Belo Horizonte - Prodabel S/A Desktop rodando Debian GNU/Linux, iPaq rodando Familiar GNU/Linux. Todos funcionais e livres de Windows! Quo maravilhosas as pessoas que no conhecemos bem --Millor Fernandes
Re: Voltar a glibc da unstable para stable [era: Re: problemas com sites em java]
Em Qui, 2002-10-31 às 18:08, Adilson Junior escreveu: Tem kde pra woody deb http://people.debian.org/~schoepf/kde3/woody ./ Isso eu ja sei. Agora eu quero saber e como voltar a glibc do meu sistema de unstable para stable. []'s -- Marcio de Araujo Benedito - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Empresa de Informatica e Informacao do Municipio de Belo Horizonte - Prodabel S/A Desktop rodando Debian GNU/Linux, iPaq rodando Familiar GNU/Linux. Todos funcionais e livres de Windows! Solidao: instante de plenitude! -- Michel de Montaigne signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: java 1.3 and glibc 2.3.1
Richard Gellert Roman wrote: I am not sure, if it's right to post sid-related mails here, sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, this is the right place to post questions about any Debian setup. I recently updated my testing/unstable Debian, and had to recognize, that java 1.3.1 from Sun did not run any more: gellert@ritch:~$ javac Error occurred during initialization of VM Unable to load native library: /usr/local/java/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Woah. Downgrading to older glibc would have been to difficult because of the dependencies, and yes, I do need version 1.3 of Java to use PSE Pro. I had the same problem with jdk 1.4. I find that upgrading to 1.4.1 fixes it. The problem here is that some idiot at Sun put a call to __libc_wait in the JVM. __libc_wait is (was) an internal function of libc 2.2 that should never have been called directly from outside libc, and it no longer exists in libc 2.3. I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't found this to cause any problems. Craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: java 1.3 and glibc 2.3.1
On 0, Gottfried Szing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Craig Dickson wrote: I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't found this to cause any problems. i have the same problem. but not with the pse pro, but with the bea weblogic which runs only with a jdk 1.3.1. ok, a jdk 1.2 is also working, but the performance is very poor. for this reason i cannot run weblogic with debian. is there no real solution for this problem? sth like chroot-ing, adding an additional library? Ermmm... read the rest of the thread. The OP posted a solution. Tom -- Tom Cook Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide If your company is not involved in something called ISO 9000 you probably have no idea what it is. If your company _is_ involved in ISO 9000 then you definitely have no idea what it is. - Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle Get my GPG public key: https://pinky.its.adelaide.edu.au/~tkcook/tom.cook-at-adelaide.edu.au msg09980/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Domkumentacja Apache'a i glibc
Nie wiecie przypadkiem gdzie znajdę polską dokumnętację do Apache'a i glibc. Piotrek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: perror(), die aktuelle glibc und vielleicht nen bug
michael loeffler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [perror() ändert errno] Zum Thema undefinierter zustand von errno, entweder eine funktion ändert nichts an errno und führt auch keine anderen funktionen aus die etwas ändern könnten, oder sie ädert errno bzw. führt weitere funktionen aus welche dies tun. Das ist wohl wahr: Eine Funktion ändert errno - oder auch nicht. Undefiniert ist der Zustand nur solange es in keinem standard oder einer manpage genau beschrieben ist, was es mit errno anstellt. Ein Blick in die Manpage von errno beschreibt genau das: | [man errno:] | Its value is significant only when the call | returned an error (usually -1), and a library function that does succeed is | allowed to change errno. Da steht es explizit, und in einer Manpage, so wie Du forderst: errno ist nicht aussagekräftig, wenn kein Fehler zurückgemeldet wird. Und in der Manpage von perror() stehts nochmal drin: | [man perror:] | Note that | errno is undefined after a successful library call: this call may well change | this variable, even though it succeeds [...] Was veranlasst Dich zur Annahme, ausgerechnet perror() sei eine Ausnahme von einem Verhalten, das in der Manpage von perror() beschrieben ist? Solltest Du annehmen, dass eine Funktion errno zu setzen hat, obwohl sie keinen Fehler zurückmelden kann und obwohl von errno nichts in der Manpage erwähnt wird, wirst Du nicht bloss bei perror() auf die Schnauze fallen, sondern bei den meisten Systemfunktionen, die void zurückliefern. Also lass' gut sein. -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
glibc using the GS segment register
I need a version of glibc that uses the GS segment register to access pthread-local storage*. I've neither been able to find one for debian nor is it obvious to me from looking through the sources how to compile it to use %gs. Any suggestions welcomed. I currently have kernel 2.4.18, libc6 version 2.2.5-14.3 on ia32 (pentium 3). TIA Richard * Why? Because the Jikes RVM requires this (and a 2.4 kernel). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: perror(), die aktuelle glibc und vielleicht nen bug
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:23:02 +0200, michael loeffler wrote: errno = 0; /* errno sollte sowiso auf null stehen, aber das hier um das * nochmal zu betonen */ perror(A); /* das macht nun irgendwas daß nen Illegal Seek verursacht, * was imho nicht sein sollte */ perror(B); /* das zeigt nun den error Illegal Seek an, der vom * perror() davor, verursacht wurde */ Und was den Verdacht, daß es sich um einen Bug handelt, noch verstärkt ist daß es unter SunOS funktioniert wie ich es erwartete. perror() hat dort errno unverändert gelassen. man perror: Note that errno is undefined after a successful library call: this call may well change this variable, even though it succeeds, for example because it internally used some other library function that failed. Thus, if a failing call is not immediately followed by a call to perror, the value of errno should be saved. Der call perror(A) ist erfolgreich und hinterläßt damit einen undefinierten errno. Das folgende perror(B) ist somit sinnfrei. Also errno speichern wie die man-page sagt. Reinhard -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
GLibc 2.2 on Alpha
I think this is a mistake on my side, but here it goes: I have an alpha processor and distribution installed of debian 2.1. Now I need to install pptp-linux, but this requires: libc6(= 2.2.4-4) Now the problem is: Normally when i need to install a package for alpha I just search for the package on: http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages and replace the i386 in the filename with alpha. Only this is the first time there does not exist and alpha version of: http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.2.5-6_i386.deb So now my question is: Does there exist an alpha version of libc 2.2.5 ? Or is there another way, or am I just missing something (Probably the latter! hehe) Thanks in advance, Paul
Re: glibc-2.2.5-11.1
preciso dessa glibc-2.2.5-11.1 to da vez que tento instalar algo ele aparece como dependencia.. mas nao encontrei informações de onde consegui-la e nem como instalar... qualquer dica é bem-vinda. grato! -- Adriano Brand Técnico de automação bancaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] licq 29819060 --- RODANDO GNU/LINUX DEBIAN 3.0 QUASE LEGAL E WIN98SE C/ TELA AZUL,E ERRO FATAL INFORMAÇÃO PARA LISTA DE DISCUSSÃO: AMD ATHLON 1.333GHZ,256MB RAM SENDO 64MB RESERVADOS P/ VIDEO , PCHIPS 810 C/ SOM,VIDEO E REDE ONBOARD,HD MAXTOR 40GB NA IDE 0, GRAV PLEXTOR 24/10/40 NA IDE 2, CDROM 60X MARCA GATO IDE3.
glibc-2.2.5-11.1
preciso dessa glibc-2.2.5-11.1 p/ instalar o licq e o plugin flash, mas nao encontrei informações de onde consegui-la e nem como instalar... qualquer dica é bem-vinda. grato! -- ADRIANO BRAND TÉCNICO DE AUTOMAÇÃO BANCÁRIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] licq 29819060 RODANDO GNU/LINUX DEBIAN 3.0 QUASE LEGAL E WIN98SE C/ TELA AZUL,E ERRO FATAL INFORMAÇÃO PARA LISTA DE DISCUSSÃO: AMD ATHLON 1.333GHZ,256MB RAM SENDO 64MB RESERVADOS P/ VIDEO , PCHIPS 810 C/ SOM,VIDEO E REDE ONBOARD,HD MAXTOR 40GB NA IDE 0, GRAV PLEXTOR 24/10/40 NA IDE 2, CDROM 60X MARCA GATO IDE3.
Re: glibc
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:26:07AM +0200, Marcin Błażejowski wrote: 2. mam pytanie o tego nieszczesnego glibc'a z 13 sierpnia, a dokladnie, czy ktos ostatnio robil update bezpieczenstwa i system mu sie nie zawalil? Mam regularnie uaktualnianego Woody'ego. System działa stabilnie, dpkg i inne się nie wykładają (ale przy 20MB pamięci pracują straasznie wolno ;-) Kernel 2.2.19 z optymalizacją 486. -- Jacek Politowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:26:07AM +0200, Marcin Błażejowski wrote: 2. mam pytanie o tego nieszczesnego glibc'a z 13 sierpnia, a dokladnie, czy ktos ostatnio robil update bezpieczenstwa i system mu sie nie zawalil? U siebie zainstalowałem glibc-a z 'sida' (łącznie z paroma pakietami) system myka jak powinien. -- Marcin 'Szczepan|Hrw' Juszkiewicz mailto: marcinatamigadotpl my Debian packages: deb http://users.stone.pl/szczepan/ apt/
c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
Bonjour, Je suis en woody, plutôt content. Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit que des paquets sont kept back, libc6, libc6-dev et locales. Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable apt-cache show locales ne mentionne pas une telle dépendance. Quelqu'un a une idée de ce qui m'arrive ? mirroir debian corrompu, peut-être ? Alexandre Fayolle -- LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org Narval, the first software agent available as free software (GPL). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:01:35PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: Bonjour, Bonjour, Je suis en woody, plutôt content. Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit que des paquets sont kept back, libc6, libc6-dev et locales. Essaie apt-get dist-upgrade pour voir si ça donne le même résultat. -- Pourquoi ABBREVIATION est-il un si long mot ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:01:35PM +0200, Alexandre wrote: Bonjour, Je suis en woody, plutôt content. Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit que des paquets sont kept back, libc6, libc6-dev et locales. Les paquets notés kept back doivent être installés à la main avec la commande apt-get install nom_du_paquet. -- == | FREDERIC MASSOT | | http://www.juliana-multimedia.com | | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ===Debian=GNU/Linux=== -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:01:35 +0200, Alexandre wrote: Je suis en woody, plutôt content. Moi aussi. Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit que des paquets sont kept back, libc6, libc6-dev et locales. Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable Je viens de faire un apt-get update et apt-get dist-upgrade et je n'ai pas eu ce genre de problème. Peut-être que tu as un package d'installé et qui bloque l'upgrade d'autres packages? Un dpkg --status locales me dit que j'ai la version 2.2.5-6 et qui dépend de glibc-2.2.5-6 (entre autres). Au fait, que signifie cette dépendance? Car il n'y a pas de package dont le nom commence par glibc à part glibc-doc. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:19:29PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Un dpkg --status locales me dit que j'ai la version 2.2.5-6 et qui dépend de glibc-2.2.5-6 (entre autres). Au fait, que signifie cette dépendance? Car il n'y a pas de package dont le nom commence par glibc à part glibc-doc. glibc est un meta-paquet, apt-cache show libc6 : ... Provides: glibc-2.2.5-11 Il ne sert pas à grand chose à part combler les dépendences de certains paquets -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 12:08 Je sais, c'est mal de critiquer l'orthographe, mais par pitié, cessez de massacrer le nom de Linux Torvalds (notez le 'v' et non le 'w' comme écrit dans l'article). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
Bonjour, Je suis en woody, plutôt content. Mais il y a un truc que je ne comprends pas. J'ai fait un apt-get update, suivi d'un apt-get upgrade -su pour voir, ce matin, et il me dit que des paquets sont kept back, libc6, libc6-dev et locales. Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable O le gros vilain !! En fait ton PB c'est que t'as pas les lignes pour le miroir de sécurity. J'ai pas vu l'advisory pour la libc mais le nom du package .woody.X me fait pensé aux nom des paquets qui ont été diffusés lors du pb avec ssh. Je viens de vérifier. Tes paquets sont ici http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/g/glibc/ solution : ajoute la ligne pour les updates de sécurité dans ton source.list. (il y a eut un thread dessus il n'y a pas longtemps, je te laisse chercher) Par contre comme je le disais au début, c'est vraiment pas bien de ne pas l'avoir fait plus tot. T'avais mis à jour ton apache et ton ssh jeff -- Paris jean-francois | CLE PUBLIQUE PGPGPG [EMAIL PROTECTED] | DH/DSS ID: 0xBF4B709E [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://mjediyoda.free.fr/ If you use envelopes, why not use encryption? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
Ainsi parlait Jeffo : O le gros vilain !! En fait ton PB c'est que t'as pas les lignes pour le miroir de sécurity. [pounk]~$ grep sec /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free [pounk]~$ sudo apt-get update Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Packages Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/main Release Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/contrib Packages Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/contrib Release Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/non-free Packages Hit http://security.debian.org woody/updates/non-free Release [...] [pounk]~$ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages have been kept back libc6 libc6-dev locales 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. [pounk]~$ sudo apt-get install libc6 libc6-dev locales [...] Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable E: Sorry, broken packages [pounk]~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: language-env locales The following packages will be upgraded libc6 libc6-dev 2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 5772kB of archives. After unpacking 10.7MB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n locales est maintenant inclus dans la libc ? -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:38:53 +0200, Jeffo wrote: J'ai pas vu l'advisory pour la libc mais le nom du package .woody.X me fait pensé aux nom des paquets qui ont été diffusés lors du pb avec ssh. Je ne pense pas que ce soit les seuls. Il semble que tous les nouveaux paquets pour woody contiennent un woody.X. C'est le cas de groff et de texmacs par exemple, alors que je ne vois pas en quoi ils seraient liés à ssh. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:50:17 +0200, Charles Goyard wrote: [pounk]~$ sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Calculating Upgrade... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: language-env locales The following packages will be upgraded libc6 libc6-dev 2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 5772kB of archives. After unpacking 10.7MB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n locales est maintenant inclus dans la libc ? D'après apt-cache show, non. Mais il s'agit peut-être d'un problème de dépendance, et comme la nouvelle version n'est pas installable (cf l'erreur que tu obtiens), apt-get dist-upgrade veut te l'enlever. Je pense qu'il faut que tu refasses un update (l'index a peut-être été corrompu) ou que tu forces le chargement de la bonne version de locales (ça devrait être la 2.2.5-6). Pour info, voici mon fichier /etc/apt/sources.list: # /etc/apt/sources.list deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US testing/non-US main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ - 100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc. Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:30:09 +0200, Arthur wrote: glibc est un meta-paquet, apt-cache show libc6 : ... Provides: glibc-2.2.5-11 Y a-t-il une commande qui permette de savoir quels paquets réels fournissent tel meta-paquet donné? Je n'ai pas trouvé de commande listant les paquet virtuel (une bonne idée pour apt) mais aptitude le fait et te donne la liste complète des meta-paquet, tu peut voir ce qu'il donne. -- -- C aussi la dernière fois que je parlerais de warez En donnant mes adresses, beaucoup plus de gens iront voir ces sites et donc, le téléchargement deviendra de plus en plus impossible ! -+- Pip99 in GPJ : Le piratage c'est bien, mais que pour moi -+- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bonjour, Salut, Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable http://bugs.debian.org/153424 C'est en cours de résolution. @+ JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian GNU/Linux Developer - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public key available on http://www.jblache.org - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: c'est quoi glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 ?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:36:46PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote: Alexandre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bonjour, Salut, Si je fais apt-get install locales, on me répond que locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-9.woody.4 but it is not installable http://bugs.debian.org/153424 C'est en cours de résolution. Merci beaucoup. Alexandre Fayolle -- LOGILAB, Paris (France). http://www.logilab.com http://www.logilab.fr http://www.logilab.org Narval, the first software agent available as free software (GPL). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actualizar glibc version 2.1.3 a 2.2 o mayor
Tengo debian 2.2 r 6 y necesito instalar firebird que requiere una version 2.2. Donde la consigoi y como la instalo Saludos y gracias Eduardo Beltran -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GLIBC error
hi all, i upgraded to XFree86 4.1 and now when i try to run emacs, vi, etc. i keep getting this error: /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.2' not found required by /user/X11R6/libX11.so.6 did i overwrite a library file or does my C library needs updating? thanx ian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GLIBC error
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:02:02PM -0700, ian wrote: i upgraded to XFree86 4.1 and now when i try to run emacs, vi, etc. i keep getting this error: /lib/libc.so.6: version 'GLIBC_2.2' not found required by /user/X11R6/libX11.so.6 How did you upgrade? It sounds like you've forced dependencies or similar. If you're trying to install XFree86 4.1 on potato, try this: http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/ ... or just upgrade to woody since it's pretty close to stable. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to create a patched glibc?
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:49:05PM +0200, Oliver Kowalke wrote: Hi, as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to patch glibc. Ben provides on its LINUX AIO page patches for glibc-2.2.4. OK - I will try it for glibc-2.2.5-4. My intention is to provide a glibc-2.2.5-4.deb which is configured like the standard glibc-2.2.5-4.deb from woody plus the new linux aio feature (access to libaio). What I need to know is where can I get the source-deb-package which contains the glibc sources and its configuration options (./configure --prefix ...). Oops, this is simple. apt-get source glibc I've no experience creating/changing debs. Hopefully you can help me? with regards, Oliver I think glibc is one of the more complicated and special package as other poster indicated. Other than that, you may want to read Developers documents listed here: http://www.debian.org/doc/ At least Debian New Maintainers' Guide and Developers' Reference. Also, visit http://www.debian.org/devel/ -- ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ + Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA See User's Guide: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/ See Debian reference: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ Debian reference Project at: http://qref.sf.net I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux async io and glibc
Hi, as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to patch glibc. Ben provides on its LINUX AIO page patches for glibc-2.2.4. OK - I will try it for glibc-2.2.5-4. My intention is to provide a glibc-2.2.5-4.deb which is configured like the standard glibc-2.2.5-4.deb from woody plus the new linux aio feature (access to libaio). What I need to know is where can I get the source-deb-package which contains the glibc sources and its configuration options (./configure --prefix ...). I've no experience creating/changing debs. Hopefully you can help me? with regards, Oliver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how to create a patched glibc?
Hi, as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to patch glibc. Ben provides on its LINUX AIO page patches for glibc-2.2.4. OK - I will try it for glibc-2.2.5-4. My intention is to provide a glibc-2.2.5-4.deb which is configured like the standard glibc-2.2.5-4.deb from woody plus the new linux aio feature (access to libaio). What I need to know is where can I get the source-deb-package which contains the glibc sources and its configuration options (./configure --prefix ...). I've no experience creating/changing debs. Hopefully you can help me? with regards, Oliver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: how to create a patched glibc?
On 15-May-2002 Oliver Kowalke wrote: Hi, as I've posted to debian-glibc-list I want to program a little bit with the new async IO implementation from Ben LeHaise. The kernel is patched and libaio (provides the native async io api) is also installed. In order to access linux new feature over a POSIX.4 interface I've to patch glibc. Ben provides on its LINUX AIO page patches for glibc-2.2.4. OK - I will try it for glibc-2.2.5-4. My intention is to provide a glibc-2.2.5-4.deb which is configured like the standard glibc-2.2.5-4.deb from woody plus the new linux aio feature (access to libaio). What I need to know is where can I get the source-deb-package which contains the glibc sources and its configuration options (./configure --prefix ...). I've no experience creating/changing debs. Hopefully you can help me? apt-get source 'package' once you add source lines to your /etc/apt/sources.list and run apt-get update: deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free for unstable as an example. the glibc package is one of the more complex packages we keep. There is a patches directory in the source as I recall so you should just need to add the patch to the dir and then register it with the package's makefiles. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glibc
Hi all, wie kann ich bei meinem Debian SID die Glibc wieder downdaten auf 2.2.5-3 und es auch gleich so einrichten das sie beim nächsten apt-get update apt-get -y upgrade nicht upgedated wird ? Greets und besten dank für jede hilfe Adrian -- Aus einem Geschichtsbuch aus dem Jahre 2010 ueber Microsoft: ..denn sie versuchten Ihre Software als Betriebssystem zu verkaufen! -- (° //\ ICQ : 48407402 V_/_ Registered Linuxuser #255628 (http://counter.li.org) signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: Glibc
* Adrian Neumaier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020328 08:31]: wie kann ich bei meinem Debian SID die Glibc wieder downdaten auf 2.2.5-3 und es auch gleich so einrichten das sie beim nächsten apt-get update apt-get -y upgrade nicht upgedated wird ? Hallo Adrian, schau mal im Listarchive die Mails der letzten 2 Wochen durch. Da war ein Thread zum Downgrade mit apt (von Sid auf Potato). Mit den Informationen solltest Du auch den Downgrade von glibc bewältigen. Zum 2. Teil deiner Frage: die entsprechenden Pakete auf Hold setzen. man dpkg hint: --set-selections Gruß Uli -- 'The box said, 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so i installed Linux - TKK 5 -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Updating glibc 2.1.3-19 to glibc 2.2.5-3 on potato
I am new to debian... I keep having problems whenever I want to install an app on this host because of glibc dependancies...This is an out the box debian potato install and as a result has glibc 2.1.3-19 many of the applications that i want to install require at least glibc 2.2.X. Is there some safe way to to just upgrade glibc? I would prefer to not have to upgrade this machine woody. Are there any alternatives? Any help is much appreciated __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards® http://movies.yahoo.com/
Re: Updating glibc 2.1.3-19 to glibc 2.2.5-3 on potato
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 09:09:03AM -0800, dinni bartholomew wrote: I am new to debian... I keep having problems whenever I want to install an app on this host because of glibc dependancies...This is an out the box debian potato install and as a result has glibc 2.1.3-19 many of the applications that i want to install require at least glibc 2.2.X. Is there some safe way to to just upgrade glibc? I would prefer to not have to upgrade this machine woody. Upgrading to woody *is* the safest way. Attempting to upgrade only the libc6 package will probably destabilize your system. Building glibc from source will almost certainly introduce some very subtle problems unless you're very familiar with what's going on. Are there any alternatives? If you don't want to upgrade to woody, you could build the applications in question from source. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glibc 2.2
Does anyone know where I can get the latest version of glibc (2.2) which apparently is needed for the latest version of XFree86? I downloaded the glibc source but can't get it to compile cleanly. It appears the version of glibc in the stable Debian site is 2.1.13 or there abouts. Thanks! Bruce Bruce W. Bodnyk Staff Engineer, CAE Development FCI Electronics 825 Old Trail Road Etters, PA 17319-9351 Phone: (717) 938-7543 Fax: (717) 938-7224 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Glibc 2.2
You should install this package : libc6 apt-cache show libc6 -- [...] Version: 2.2.5-3 Provides: glibc-2.2.5-3 [...] See you -- R.Pac
Re: Glibc 2.2
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:23:13PM -0500, Bodnyk, Bruce W wrote: Does anyone know where I can get the latest version of glibc (2.2) which apparently is needed for the latest version of XFree86? You should get the version of XFree86 4 which is built for Debian stable instead. You can find it at http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/. Regards, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
potato+glibc-2.2.5
Buenas... Como dice el asunto...mi problema pasa por haber necesitado glibc6-2.2.5 que en debian se llama libc6-2.2.5la cuestión es que yo quería instalar kylix oe y este necesitaba de una libc = a 2.1.3...y por mas que en potato la libc que viene es la 2.1.3...no había forma de que se diera cuenta de eso...bueno resolví instalar con dpkg el paquete de la libc6-2.2.5 y fue sin problemas, lo cual me sorprendió por que pensé que iba a ser mucho mas traumático el temala cuestión es que cuando quise instalar cualquier otro paquete me empezó a salir este mensaje: millennium:/home/barto/temp/paquetes# apt-get install enlightenment Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these: Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.1.3-18) but 2.2.5-3 is to be installed libc6-pic: Depends: libc6 (= 2.1.3-18) but 2.2.5-3 is to be installed libgtk1.2: Depends: gconv-modules locales: Depends: libc6 (= 2.1.3-18) but 2.2.5-3 is to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). Entonces al ver que hay problemas con la libc6-dev se me ocurre bajar la mas nueva la libc6-dev-2.2.5-3 pero no puedo, cuando le doy dpkg -i libc6* me dice: millennium:/home/barto/temp/paquetes# dpkg -i libc6-dev_2.2.5-3_i386.deb dpkg: considering removing libstdc++2.10-dev in favour of libc6-dev ... dpkg: no, cannot remove libstdc++2.10-dev (--auto-deconfigure will help): g++ depends on libstdc++2.10-dev (= 1:2.95.2-10) libstdc++2.10-dev is to be removed. dpkg: regarding libc6-dev_2.2.5-3_i386.deb containing libc6-dev: libc6-dev conflicts with libstdc++2.10-dev ( 1:2.95.2-15) libstdc++2.10-dev (version 1:2.95.2-13) is installed. dpkg: error processing libc6-dev_2.2.5-3_i386.deb (--install): conflicting packages - not installing libc6-dev Errors were encountered while processing: libc6-dev_2.2.5-3_i386.deb Entonces veo que el tema empieza a pasar también por los paquetes libstdc++2.10-dev y g++..pero la cuestión es que no puedo sacar ninguno de los 2 ni g++ ni libstdc++* por cuestiones de dependencias entre ellosentonces que hago? O sea lo mas sano y lo que me han recomendado es que consiga woody y haga la actualización del todopero no tengo los cds...entonces? la única que me queda para poder instalar algún paquete de vuelta es volver a la libc6-2.1.3 de potato?.se que es lo razonable pero sigo buscando alguna opción Bueno...espero haberme explicado un poco por lo menos... Saludos.
Large files XFS glibc-2.1.3
Hi, I open again the problem, which was here discussed. Description of problem: System Debian 2.2, glibc 2.1.3, kernel 2.4.17 patched for XFS (journaling 64bit filesystem from SGI) On XFS I can make large files ( 2GB ), but I have problem with manipulating with these large files. I cannot delete them, nor copy, nor list ... - I receive message Value too large for defined data type. The problem is I thing in glibc-2.1.3, which is distributed with Debian2.2. I recompile the glibc from sources with defined values: _LARGEFILE_SOURCE _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 which is necessary for supporting large files, but after installing this new recompiled glibc I have the same problems, which I reported ... Maybe I make some stupid mistake, but I looked into /usr/include/features.h, and defining _LARGEFILE_SOURCE, and _FILE_OFFSET_BIT=64 and recompiling glibc should be sufficient. Has anybody any idea? Answer please cc to me. Thank you, Petr Linke __ Petr Linke tel.: +420-2-71777231 Novicom s.r.o. FAX.: +420-2-71777233 Konevova 67, Praha 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Large files XFS glibc-2.1.3
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Petr Linke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I open again the problem, which was here discussed. Description of problem: System Debian 2.2, glibc 2.1.3, kernel 2.4.17 patched for XFS (journaling 64bit filesystem from SGI) On XFS I can make large files ( 2GB ) You can do that on ext2 and ext3 as well, with the 2.4 kernels. but I have problem with manipulating with these large files. I cannot delete them, nor copy, nor list ... - I receive message Value too large for defined data type. The problem is I thing in glibc-2.1.3, which is distributed with Debian2.2. I recompile the glibc from sources with defined values: _LARGEFILE_SOURCE _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 which is necessary for supporting large files, but after installing this new recompiled glibc I have the same problems, which I reported ... That is because all the tools have to be recompiled as well. Your best bet is to upgrade to 'woody' (the codename for the next release) which is 2.4 and LFS ready. Has anybody any idea? Answer please cc to me. Can't do that, reading this through a mail2news gateway. Mike. -- Computers are useless, they only give answers. --Pablo Picasso
Openoffice i las malditas glibc 2.2.5
Hola a todos, Se que es un problema comun para las versiones de openoffice, las librerias glibc. Tengo una debian sid funcionando con las glibc2.2.5 i el garrulo de openoffice necessitas las..2.1.x!!! increible pero cierto. Lo de siempre renombrar la libstdc+--libc6.1os funciona? a mi no. intento instalar los binarios i sale glibc 2.2.5 i se larga. si hay alguien por ahi que haga funcionar la version 641C con las libc de sid que me heche un cable ...gràcias salut! -- Pere Castanyer Sarda -[EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Management Technical Engineering Student on UOC - (www.uoc.es) Member of AEIGi - (www.aeigi.org) -- Linux Registered User #232073 Debian GNU Linux User - (www.debian.org) GNUPG public Inf: pub 1024D/F19A252B 919B 48CC 835C B535 EF18 1A26 09F9 D16D F19A 252B --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
glibc-2.2.5
Hallo! Weiß zufällig jemand, wann oder ob die neue glibc-2.2.5 nach Woody wandert? Mich würde auch interessieren, wo man solche Info über evtl. zukünftige Pakete aus erster Hand nachlesen kann. Manche Pakete brauchen ja Ewigkeiten (Mozilla, xcdroast-0.98..), manche nur Tage, wie z.B. der VIM-4.0 Viele Grüße, Stefan -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: glibc-2.2.5
Stefan Volmer wrote: Weiß zufällig jemand, wann oder ob die neue glibc-2.2.5 nach Woody wandert? Mich würde auch interessieren, wo man solche Info über evtl. zukünftige Pakete aus erster Hand nachlesen kann. Manche Pakete brauchen ja Ewigkeiten (Mozilla, xcdroast-0.98..), manche nur Tage, wie z.B. der VIM-4.0 Viele Grüße, Stefan http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html Allgemeines zu testing: http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/ lg Stefan -- Wanna listen to my music? -- http://www.shockfrosted.org -- Zum AUSTRAGEN schicken Sie eine Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] mit dem Subject unsubscribe. Probleme? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] (engl)
Re: Zepsułem glibc?
No właśnie to samo mi się wydawało i dlatego mam zainstalowane. libc6 ... Provides: glibc-2.2.4-6 A locales dalej twierdzą co napisałem wcześiej :-( KJ On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 04:12:29AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:07:50AM +0100, Kamil Jonca wrote: Witam. Ostatnio, przy próbie instalacji locales otrzymałem komunikat, że potrzebny jest glibc2.2. tyle że ani w /base ani w /admin ani w /libs niczego takiego nie ma :-( Gdzie to można znaleźć ? Wskazówka: libc6 == glibc2 Marcin -- Keyboard error press F1 continue
OpenOffice 638 y glibc
Hola a todos, Estaba curioseando la nueva version de openoffice pero no me deja ni arrancar el instalador...Se queda frito cuando detecta la glibc2.2.4 de mi debian sid. Es porque solo requiere glibc2.2.1? no hay alguna manera (simbolic link o similar) para instalarlo? lo habeis probado? -- Pere Castañer Sardà Computer Management Technical Engineering Student on UOC (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya) Girona, Spain ...Moving to Linux is More Evolution Than Revolution...
Atualizacao da glibc
Olah povo! Bom, como ninguém me respondeu ainda, retorno a mesma pergunta: Como faco para atualizar a libc da versão 2.1.3 que vem com o potato para a nova versão da libc ? Onde posso encontrá-la no formato deb ? []'s, -- Nelson Luiz Campos Electrical Engineer Linux User #89621 UIN 11464303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailBR - O e-mail do Brasil -- http://www.mailbr.com.br Faça já o seu. É gratuito!!!
Re: Atualizacao da glibc
Isso pode lhe ajudar: www.debian.org/distrib/packages --- Nelson Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Olah povo! Bom, como ninguém me respondeu ainda, retorno a mesma pergunta: Como faco para atualizar a libc da versão 2.1.3 que vem com o potato para a nova versão da libc ? Onde posso encontrá-la no formato deb ? []'s, -- Nelson Luiz Campos Electrical Engineer Linux User #89621 UIN 11464303 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MailBR - O e-mail do Brasil -- http://www.mailbr.com.br Faça já o seu. É gratuito!!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? NEW from Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1
Re: Patch do loading bug da Glibc
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Hélio Perroni Filho wrote: Há um bug na Glibc, chamado de 'loading bug' na documentação do Kylix, que compromete a compilação de programas gerados por essa ferramenta. Minha versão da Glibc é a 2.1.3, o que segundo o instalador do Kylix não é recente o suficiente para estar livre do bug. Como faço para obter um patch ou uma versão mais nova da biblioteca? Tentei fazer pelo apt-get, mas não consegui. O Unstable e testing têm a 2.2.4... mas upgrade de glibc implica em praticamente trocar de distribuição (stable-testing). PS: Holschuh! Então nos encontramos novamente! :P Heh :) -- One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie. -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
Re: Patch do loading bug da Glibc
O Unstable e testing têm a 2.2.4... mas upgrade de glibc implica em praticamente trocar de distribuição (stable-testing). O que torna bastante apropriada a pergunta por um patch... Mas a propósito, qual o nome do package da Glibc no Debian? Procurando por *glibc* nos CD's do Potato, só achei a documentação e umas bibliotecas de C++. Until we meet again... E | _ ___ \Hélio Perroni Filho t |/ |/ | ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] e|| //() () r ( ) // ||-|| n|| || RPG's de anime. ML de fandom. || a|| || Anel de fandom. CD's de anime. || l ( )|| || || || http://www.geocities.com/phelio || H|| ||-|| o|| () () m|| e|| Se nada for feito, nada irá mudar. (...) O seu mundo... l||Eu não aceito este mundo. A ele, devo dizer... Não. a|| n||-- Zorndyke d'' I t ' s a d r e a m o f t h o s e w h o r e m e m b e r
Re: Patch do loading bug da Glibc
Olah! GLibc eh a GNU Libc. Como ela substitui a libc que era o padrao ateh uns anos atras (a ultima grande distro a trocar foi o slackware, mesmo assim soh na versao 7), o pacote eh chamado de libc. A ultima versao da libc antiga foi a libc5, entaum a glibc eh chamada por muitos de libc6. Esse eh o pacote q vc deve procurar. []s Pablo Em Sex 21 Set 2001 21:13, Hélio Perroni Filho escreveu: | O Unstable e testing têm a 2.2.4... mas upgrade de glibc implica | em praticamente trocar de distribuição (stable-testing). | | O que torna bastante apropriada a pergunta por um patch... Mas a | propósito, qual o nome do package da Glibc no Debian? Procurando | por *glibc* nos CD's do Potato, só achei a documentação e umas | bibliotecas de C++. | | Until we meet again... | | E | _ ___ \Hélio Perroni Filho | t |/ |/ | ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | e|| //() () | r ( ) // ||-|| | n|| || RPG's de anime. ML de fandom. || | a|| || Anel de fandom. CD's de anime. || | l ( )|| || | | || || http://www.geocities.com/phelio || | | H|| ||-|| | o|| () () | m|| | e|| Se nada for feito, nada irá mudar. (...) O seu mundo... | l||Eu não aceito este mundo. A ele, devo dizer... Não. | a|| | n||-- Zorndyke | d'' |I t ' s a d r e a m o f t h o s e w h o r e m e m b | e r -- Pablo Lorenzzoni (Spectra) [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG PubKey at search.keyserver.net (Key ID: 268A084D) Webpage: http://people.debian.org/~spectra/
Patch do loading bug da Glibc
Há um bug na Glibc, chamado de 'loading bug' na documentação do Kylix, que compromete a compilação de programas gerados por essa ferramenta. Minha versão da Glibc é a 2.1.3, o que segundo o instalador do Kylix não é recente o suficiente para estar livre do bug. Como faço para obter um patch ou uma versão mais nova da biblioteca? Tentei fazer pelo apt-get, mas não consegui. PS: Holschuh! Então nos encontramos novamente! :P Until we meet again... E | _ ___ \Hélio Perroni Filho t |/ |/ | ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] e|| //() () r ( ) // ||-|| n|| || RPG's de anime. ML de fandom. || a|| || Anel de fandom. CD's de anime. || l ( )|| || || || http://www.geocities.com/phelio || H|| ||-|| o|| () () m|| e|| Se nada for feito, nada irá mudar. (...) O seu mundo... l||Eu não aceito este mundo. A ele, devo dizer... Não. a|| n||-- Zorndyke d'' I t ' s a d r e a m o f t h o s e w h o r e m e m b e r
Re: glibc version
I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box. The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version. I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found it. The only package that names glibc is libstdc++ What package should I install to satisfy the glibc 2.1.3 requirement? thanks snip libc6 2.1.3 is in Debian Stable. Wouldn't downgrading libc6 to 2.1.3 on a woody/sid box break your system? This happened to me (see my previous thread libc6 downgraded; system won't boot on p. 8 of the August debian-users archive). In that case, someone installed libc6 2.1.3 over libc6 2.2.3, and immediately the system became unusable (everything complained about libc.so.6 not being found), and subsequently could not even boot. Thanks to John Patton for his earlier suggestions to fix that problem, by the way. I ended up completely reinstalling due to a stupid mistake on my part, so never got as far as trying his fix. Bruce
Re: glibc version
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote: but anyway...your answers: glibc == libc6 Woody meets that requirement. You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such. Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using Woody (glibc 2.2), and need support for glibc2.1? I know you can do both libc5 and libc6 (glibc2.x), but can you do different versions of glibc? My understanding is that glibc2.1 and glibc2.2 broke binary compatibility. Looked for it earlier (to unstaill SimCity3000), and couldn't find 2.1 -- John__ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quis custodiet ipsos custodes icq: thales @ 17755648 # I'm subscribed to this list, no need to cc: ##
Re: glibc version
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:01:12PM -0700, John L. Fjellstad wrote: Are there different versions of libc available? What if you are using Woody (glibc 2.2), and need support for glibc2.1? I know you can do both libc5 and libc6 (glibc2.x), but can you do different versions of glibc? My understanding is that glibc2.1 and glibc2.2 broke binary compatibility. You're thinking of glibc2.0 to glibc2.1, and even then it only broke some programs that used undocumented interfaces to the library. glibc2.1 to glibc2.2 is perfectly fine; there are lots of packages in Debian that haven't needed new uploads since glibc2.2 arrived and that still work, and I've just spent the last day and a half testing proprietary code at work that was compiled for glibc2.1 and running on glibc2.2 without any problems. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
glibc version
Hi all. I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box. The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version. I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found it. The only package that names glibc is libstdc++ What package should I install to satisfy the glibc 2.1.3 requirement? thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Re: glibc version
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: | Hi all. | | I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box. | The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version. | I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found | it. | The only package that names glibc is libstdc++ It's called libc6 | What package should I install to satisfy the glibc 2.1.3 | requirement? The libc6 package that is in potato. -D
Re: glibc version
ethics debate RMS would be very disappointed if he knew you wanted to install Oracle... /ethics debate but anyway...your answers: glibc == libc6 Woody meets that requirement. You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such. On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:28:25PM -0700, Eduardo Gargiulo scribbled... Hi all. I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box. The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version. I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found it. The only package that names glibc is libstdc++ What package should I install to satisfy the glibc 2.1.3 requirement? thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: glibc version
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 05:56:58PM -0700, Jason Majors wrote: | You might need libc6-dev too for headers and such. Not likely -- I doubt Oracle gave him the source :-). -D
Re: glibc version
On Tuesday 21 August 2001 04:28 pm, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote: Hi all. I want to install Oracle 8i on my woody box. The Oracle installation requires glibc 2.1.3 version. I was looking for glibc package, but i didn't found it. The only package that names glibc is libstdc++ What package should I install to satisfy the glibc 2.1.3 requirement? thanks snip libc6 2.1.3 is in Debian Stable. Greg Madden
glibc 2.2.3-10 undefined symbol: atexit problem
Hello... I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10 package! When I want to start apache wit php4-support, I become this error-message: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so into server: /usr/lib/libpcre.so.3: undefined symbol: atexit Somebody knows about a new bugfix package? Can you help me? Thanks: Severin Olloz
Re: glibc 2.2.3-10 undefined symbol: atexit problem
#include hallo.h Severin Olloz wrote on Tue Aug 14, 2001 um 12:58:01PM: I have update my debian server and there's a problem with the glibc 2.2.3-10 package! Speak after me: Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable... I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel... Somebody knows about a new bugfix package? http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb or wait for a fixed version (-11). Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- /We are M$ of Borg. We will add your technology to our own crap. / /Your company will be bought. Open Source is futile! /
Re: glibc 2.2.3-10 undefined symbol: atexit problem
On Tuesday 14 August 2001 13:12, Eduard Bloch wrote: Speak after me: Unstable is unstable is unstable is unstable... I know :-) I have to read debian-devel, I have to read debian-devel... OK I will do this! http://auric.debian.org/~bcollins/libc6_2.2.3-10.0.1_i386.deb or wait for a fixed version (-11). Hmmm I have install this package, but with the same apache error. Thank you very much for your help: Severin Olloz
potato and glibc-2.2.3 distrib
I'm trying to setup a machine for development and I just can't get glibc-2.2.3 to build on potato. background In the past I've used debian-unstable for doing development, the trouble is I find that, well, too unstable. I considered using debian-testing but the stuff I'm working on (network implementation layer for GCJ) generally means I have to look at source code anyway so it's easier if I just build from source. Or that's what I thought. background Here's what I've done: - installed a completly fresh potato (development task) - updated autoconf, automake, libtool and binutils to the latest versions (via distrib downloads) - downloaded the glibc-2.2.3 distrib - downloaded the linuxthreads distrib and set it up correctly - downloaded and built the linux kernel 2.2.19 (but not installed) - configured the glibc with: --with-headers=location-of-linux-headers --enable-add-ons - built glibc - run glibc's make check Unfortunately make check fails saying: can't work out user name for id I can fix that by changing the NSS config slightly but that breaks debian and anyway, make check simply fails a bit further on compaining about some posix issue. I presume that I'm missing a library so I added testing (where glibc-2.2.3 is available) to my sources.list and did this: apt-get -s install glibc-2.2.3 This reported no new packages (it did report new packages but I have them all, I presume that there are some versioning issues). Here's a list of some of the relevant installed packages: g++2.95.2-13 gcc2.95.2-13 libc6 2.1.3-18 libc6-dev 2.1.3-18 libdb2 2.4.14-2.7.7.1 libdb2-util2.4.14-2.7.7.1 libgdbmg1 1.7.3-26.2 libident 0.22-2 liblockfile1 1.01 libltdl0 1.3.3-9.1 libltdl0-dev 1.3.3-9.1 libncurses44.2-9 libncurses55.0-6.0potato1 libncurses5-de 5.0-6.0potato1 libnet-telnet- 3.01-2 libstdc++2.10 2.95.2-13 libstdc++2.10- 2.95.2-13 libstdc++2.9-g 2.91.66-4 Please, please, please help. I just don't know what to do next. Nic Ferrier
sid - locales and glibc
Hi list I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important lib, on ehich most c-programs are based. So, what is wrong? Is glibc not needed any more? And if yes, I won't be able to use locales any more, and so apt won't never talk german to me any more :-( ? joerg -- Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you will hear the voice of Satan? That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000.
Re: sid - locales and glibc
Joerg Johannes wrote: I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important lib, on ehich most c-programs are based. So, what is wrong? Is glibc not needed any more? And if yes, I won't be able to use locales any more, and so apt won't never talk german to me any more :-( ? I suggest you place locales and libc6 on hold for a few days. My guess is that they're just out of sync. First locales was updated, but not libc6; now libc6 has been updated, and locales has been updated _again_, so they're still out of sync. With any luck, this will all get straightened out tomorrow... Craig
Re: sid - locales and glibc
Craig Dickson wrote: Joerg Johannes wrote: I just ran apt-get update apt-get upgrade, just to see that locales are going to be removed. Why? because it depends on glibc, and glibc is not available. Hmm, I always thought that glibc is a rather important lib, on ehich most c-programs are based. So, what is wrong? Is glibc not needed any more? And if yes, I won't be able to use locales any more, and so apt won't never talk german to me any more :-( ? I suggest you place locales and libc6 on hold for a few days. My guess is that they're just out of sync. First locales was updated, but not libc6; now libc6 has been updated, and locales has been updated _again_, so they're still out of sync. With any luck, this will all get straightened out tomorrow... Craig OK, I see, so libc6 == glibc ? joerg -- Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you will hear the voice of Satan? That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000.
CUPS is asking for glibc - how do I get it?
I just installed CUPS 1.1.9 on a machine running 2.2r3 (2.2.18pre21 kernel). It is working fine. Next, I installed it (with the 2.4.* deb file from http://www.cups.org) on a machine running 2.2r3 with the 2.4 support packages and with the 2.4 kernel. CUPS installs okay, but when I try to start it I get the message /usr/sbin/cupsd: /lib/libc.so.6:version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /usr/sbin/cupsd) when I look at /lib I find that libc.so.6 - libc-2.1.3.so What do I need to change? Thanks! -- Randy
Re: CUPS is asking for glibc - how do I get it?
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 02:18:14PM -0700, Randolph S. Kahle wrote: I just installed CUPS 1.1.9 on a machine running 2.2r3 (2.2.18pre21 kernel). It is working fine. Next, I installed it (with the 2.4.* deb file from http://www.cups.org) on a machine running 2.2r3 with the 2.4 support packages and with the 2.4 kernel. CUPS installs okay, but when I try to start it I get the message /usr/sbin/cupsd: /lib/libc.so.6:version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /usr/sbin/cupsd) when I look at /lib I find that libc.so.6 - libc-2.1.3.so What do I need to change? Thanks! -- Randy Hi Randy, I've got the same problem when trying to install the 2.4.* deb-file for cups 1.1.9. They've linked the executables against the new version 2.2 of glibc. I like to run a stable system, that's the reason why I still stay with potato. So for me it was no choice to upgrade such a vital library like the glibc to a version from woody or sid. The only way to come around this problem is to get the source tarball from www.cups.org and compile it by yourself. It's as easy as going through the steps tar xvzf cups-1.1.9-1-source.tar.gz; cd cups-1.1.9; ./configure; make; su; make install. But have a look into the INSTALL.txt file in the source directory for additional information. For me it worked without problems. Bye Andreas
Re: Problemas ao atualizar libc6 (GLIBC 2.1 - 2.2)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 12:44:30PM -0300, Edson Yassuo Fugio wrote: Você achou um bug crítico, se ainda não o fez, gaste um tempinho para ajudar a comunidade debian enviando o bug para o Bug Tracking System (BTS). Use o reportbug para enviar este erro. O problema foi o uso de um recurso do cp 4.1 (fileutils), potato tem 4.0, pelo script de instalação desse pacote. -- Edson Fugio Nao tenho como extrair estes prerm e preinst do .deb para tentar conserta-los? Uma vez que os que estao em /var/lib/dpkg/info nao geram problemas creio que os problematicos estao no .deb. -- KrIsSkRoSs kkross at linuxbr.com.br GnuPG ID: F5D5F548 wwwkeys.pgp.net # fortune sh: fortune: command not found
Re: Problemas ao atualizar libc6 (GLIBC 2.1 - 2.2)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 03:03:09PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: Em Sat, 21 Jul 2001 05:32:28 -0300 KrIsSkRoSs [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: Senhores, Na tentativa de atualizar meu sistema da versão 2.2r2 para a unstable encontrei o seguinte problema ao atualizar a libc6. Para essa versão é pra desenvolvedores e testadores... você não deveria usá-la a menos que soubesse o que estava fazendo... ok... pelo jeito você vai ter de editar o preinst na mão para tirar o -L passado pro cp... depois tente novamente... e envie um bug report (apt-get install reportbug ; reportbug fileutils) Ok, eu sempre fiz isto e nunca me deparei com um erro deste tipo, mas vamos la'. Eu extrai os arquivos do package em questao utilizando o dpkg-dev -x ... dpkg-deb -x e editei o arquivo em questao e coloquei em DEBIAN/ assim como os demais arquivos obtidos pelo dpkg-deb -c, porem nao sei onde colocar os usr/ etc/ sbin/ lib/ e outro detalhe, no ato da atualizacao o man-db foi removido para ajudar e nao tenho como instalar o reportbug uma vez que alguns packages foram instalados antes da libc6 e sempre que tento instalar algo ele pede que eu use apt-get -f install que gera o problema em questao. Qualquer ajuda eh bem vinda =) -- KrIsSkRoSs kkross at linuxbr.com.br GnuPG ID: F5D5F548 wwwkeys.pgp.net # fortune sh: fortune: command not found
Re: Problemas ao atualizar libc6 (GLIBC 2.1 - 2.2)
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 05:26:56PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: diretório |- DEBIAN |- usr |- etc |- sbin |- lib daí você faz: dpkg --build diretório pacote_versão-revisão_i386.deb e instala... Ok. Feito. Precisei remover o parametro -L passado ao cp no preinst e comentar tudo referente ao timezone no postinst pois este informava que minha data era invalida (Sat Jul 21 19:54:13 BRT 2001). Instalei a libc e tudo ocorreu normalmente, porem o parametro -L significa -L, --dereferencealways follow symbolic links e como removi o parametro ele nao preservou a libdb3.so, como possuo um debian unstable em outro HD simplesmente copiei pra o diretorio /lib e ao usar o apt-get -f install nao ocorreram novos erros. Resumindo: estou com o unstable rodando redondinho novamente assim como no outro HD. Obrigado a todos que me ajudaram. -- KrIsSkRoSs kkross at linuxbr.com.br GnuPG ID: F5D5F548 wwwkeys.pgp.net # fortune sh: fortune: command not found
Glibc
When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations?
Re: Glibc
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations? glibc = libc6 The easiest way to upgrade to woody is with 'apt-get dist-upgrade'.
Re: Glibc
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations? Do you mean that programs complain about this after you upgraded or while you are upgrading? Cheers, Joost
Re: Glibc
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 09:41:05PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote: The easiest way to upgrade to woody is with 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Also note that the most durable way is to use dselect. Cheers, Joost
Re: Glibc
while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Joost Kooij wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:16 +0200 From: Joost Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Glibc Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:56:04 -0700 Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations? Do you mean that programs complain about this after you upgraded or while you are upgrading? Cheers, Joost
Re: Glibc
Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote on Sun Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:25PM: while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included potato is based on glibc-2.1 -- woody is based on glibc-2.2 So although a libc6 package is installed it may be the case that it is not the one from woody. As already suggested do a dist-upgrade, that's the easiest way to upgrade your glibc-2.1 to glibc-2.2 Matth¡as -- Matthias Richter --+- stud. soz. inf. -+-- http://www.uni-leipzig.de --GPG Public Key: http://www.matthias-richter.de/gpg.ascii-- · Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz: URL:http://wortschatz.uni-leipzig.de pgpSHBthia5E8.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Glibc
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 03:04:25PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: while I'm upgrading, and the libc6 package was already included I just ran update myself. It looks like locales is busted: Depends: glibc_2.2.3-7 Last version had: Depends: glibc2.2 Package libc6 Provides: glibc2.2, so it looks like a minor error by the libc maintainer, and another one to upload it untested to unstable. Just don't try to upgrade your unstable boxes today. Cheers, Joost On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Joost Kooij wrote: Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:55:16 +0200 From: Joost Kooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Glibc Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 14:56:04 -0700 Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 02:31:20PM -0700, Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: When trying to dselect upgrade to woody, I keep running into errors that say that GLIBC_2.2 is required, I tried adding things that say they have glibc, but it doesn't seem to fix it. Any recommendations? Do you mean that programs complain about this after you upgraded or while you are upgrading? Cheers, Joost
Problems with glibc and name service switch in potato?
Hello folks, I am struggling with getting nisplus to work on Debian. I installed the (unofficial) nisplus packages from http://www.realbodo.de/ and set everything up correctly. I've already set up nisplus successfully on RedHat, so at least I know what I'm doing and that I can get it right. Here's the problem though: When I set up /etc/nsswitch.conf as following: passwd: compat group: compat passwd_compat: nisplus group_compat: nisplus programs like login and ssh will segfault. This happens _after_ the login is successful as shown by this output of ssh: ---snip--- 01:19 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # ssh homer [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: Last login: Thu Jun 7 01:15:37 2001 from bart on pts/2 Linux homer 2.2.17 #1 Mon Feb 12 01:28:45 CET 2001 i486 unknown Have a lot of fun. Could not set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s secret key, maybe the keyserver is down? Received disconnect: Command terminated on signal 11. ---snip--- (BTW, the keyserver is not down, dunno what this is all about. It doesn't happen on another machine though, maybe this has something to do this machine acting as a masq router over ISDN. Doesn't have anything to do with the problem at hand, though.) login also segfaults on me. Everything else e.g. the pam module (libpam_unix2.so) is working. This is a up-to-date potato system (well, too actually). Any idea what might be going on? TIA, Viktor -- Viktor Rosenfeld WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
