[Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?

2002-06-12 Thread Gufler Markus

Hi,

I'm currently implementing Junkmail. 
My question: Is there a test if the mail is in HTML or in TEXT-Format?

When I check the spam-mails recieved in the past days over 90% of this
mails are HTML-formated. So I think HTML-formated mails should recieve
2-3 points in the weighting system.

Any suggestions, arguments, info's...?

Thanks
Markus

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?

2002-06-12 Thread Mark Smith

Not to mention that all iMail Web mail is HTML. :)

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. 
 Scott Perry
 Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:34 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?
 
 
 
 I'm currently implementing Junkmail.
 My question: Is there a test if the mail is in HTML or in 
 TEXT-Format?
 
 When I check the spam-mails recieved in the past days over 
 90% of this 
 mails are HTML-formated. So I think HTML-formated mails 
 should recieve 
 2-3 points in the weighting system.
 
 Any suggestions, arguments, info's...?
 
 The problem with this is that most personal E-mail is sent in 
 HTML (you can 
 give a BIG thanks to Microsoft for that one).  I believe that 
 the default 
 settings in Outlook will send both text and HTML, even if there is no 
 difference between the text and HTML segments (so even though 
 the E-mail 
 appears to be a plain text E-mail, it has an HTML copy of it).
-Scott
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 
 This E-mail came from the 
 Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just send an 
 E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe 
 Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
 assistance.  You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Actions

2002-06-12 Thread R. Scott Perry


My offical hostname in Imail is mail.mydomain.com so my Declude
configuration is c:\imail\declude\mail.mydomain.com. In that folder are
3 per user configurations user1.junkmail user2.junkmail and
user3.junkmail. If I send an individual message to any of those 3 users
explicitly the rules work great. If I send to the alias that points to
all 3, it does not work. So.I turned on debug mode and sent a test
message. In the debug it said it found the domain name for all 3 users
as mydomain.com and was therefor using the c:\imail\$default$.junkmail
definition.

That sounds like a quirk in the way that IMail processes the aliases.  It 
sounds like it uses the official domain name if E-mail is addressed 
directly to the user (IE [EMAIL PROTECTED] would get changed to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]), but not when aliases are used (so 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would get changed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).

So yes, in this case you would need to keep two copies of the config file(s).
  -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



AW: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?

2002-06-12 Thread Gufler Markus

I'm not sure, but as I know, neither Imail-WebMail-Messages are
HTML-formated nor this messages are scanned by declude. (on the
WebMail-Server side)

Scott:
Yes I know that Outlook has standard-settings to write HTML-Mails. But
on the other side a great part of false-positives on my current settings
are server-generated messages (reports, status-notifications ...) and
100% of this mails are in standard Text-format. So HTML-Mails can
collect some points that allone not trigger any action but helps to
raise the recognition-rate.
But when you say to me, that this don't make any sense I will believe
it.

Markus



 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von Mark Smith
 Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2002 14:39
 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Betreff: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?
 
 
 Not to mention that all iMail Web mail is HTML. :)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. 
  Scott Perry
  Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:34 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HTML-Test?
  
  
  
  I'm currently implementing Junkmail.
  My question: Is there a test if the mail is in HTML or in
  TEXT-Format?
  
  When I check the spam-mails recieved in the past days over
  90% of this
  mails are HTML-formated. So I think HTML-formated mails
  should recieve
  2-3 points in the weighting system.
  
  Any suggestions, arguments, info's...?
  
  The problem with this is that most personal E-mail is sent in
  HTML (you can 
  give a BIG thanks to Microsoft for that one).  I believe that 
  the default 
  settings in Outlook will send both text and HTML, even if 
 there is no 
  difference between the text and HTML segments (so even though 
  the E-mail 
  appears to be a plain text E-mail, it has an HTML copy of it).
 -Scott
  
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
  (http://www.declude.com)]
  
  ---
  
  This E-mail came from the
  Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just send an 
  E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe 
  Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
  assistance.  You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
  
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude JunkMail v1.54 (beta) released

2002-06-12 Thread Jeff Lesperance

Ah, is that the same as when someone sends to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If 
so, meaning that the folder could be POP'ed by checking [EMAIL PROTECTED]?

At 09:58 PM 6/11/2002, you wrote:

does the FOLDER option accept a full drive/directory path, i.e. 
d:\mail\spam or does it only accept a name of a folder, assumed to start 
at a preset dir, i.e. \spool\foldername - or am I entirely off-base?

The folder action stores the E-mail into a *user* folder, not a file 
system directory.  For example, WEIGHT10 FOLDER spam would be the spam 
folder in web messaging.  Kind of like Hotmail's Bulk Mail folder.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

Jeff Lesperance
Matrix Group International, Inc.
1033 N. Fairfax St. 2nd floor
Alexandria, VA 22314
703.838.9777 x3002

*** Custom Web Solution and Web-Based Association Management Software.
Have you been Maxximized? http://www.matrixmaxx.net ***

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I let mails with 'Blank Folding' Vulnerability

2002-06-12 Thread Malcolm Kynoch

Thanks,  I agree we'll take the later tact at first

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How can I let mails with 'Blank Folding'
Vulnerability



Using the pro version of AV how can I allow mail for a certain user 
through even though it has been detected with the Outlook 'Blank 
Folding' Vulnerability.

The mail also contains important attachments for this user.

You can turn off virus scanning for that one user if you want.  There is
no 
way to disable just the vulnerability tests for a specific user.

The only option to make sure that viruses aren't intentionally allowed 
through, however, is to get the person sending the E-mail to fix the 
problem.  With the current situation with spam and viruses, people
sending 
broken mail and mail that could be dangerous are going to have to learn
to 
fix these problems.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
assistance.  You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] W32/Fretham-Fam stopped with Junkmail attachment filtering?

2002-06-12 Thread Todd Holt

Using Junkmail settings, we prohibit attachments with the extensions
.exe,.com,.vbs,.pif,.scr,.bat,.cmd.

Is this virus only spread by the .exe attachment and are we protected with
those settings? (We also scan using f-Prot!)

Todd

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] W32/Fretham-Fam stopped with Junkmailattachment filtering?

2002-06-12 Thread R. Scott Perry


Using Junkmail settings, we prohibit attachments with the extensions
.exe,.com,.vbs,.pif,.scr,.bat,.cmd.

Actually, it's Declude Virus that can block file attachments, not Declude 
JunkMail.

Is this virus only spread by the .exe attachment and are we protected with
those settings? (We also scan using f-Prot!)

As far as we know, all the Fretham variants only use a .exe file.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



[Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet



Howdy to all.

I know this isn't an IMail support list, but 
perhaps someone can shed some light on this situation . . . 

I upgraded from IMail 6.06 to IMail 7.1 HF1 a few 
days ago. Since then, my spool directory has grown by leaps and 
bounds. It normally runs between 300 and 500 files (I think). 
Yesterday evening it was at about 1500.Earlier this afternoon 
itpassed2800. Now it's about 2750. I've moved (a few) 
files older than 3 days out of the queue, it didn't make any difference -- spool 
keeps growing. They look like normalT, D, and Q files dated within 
the last three days, but why are there so many??? I'm not getting any specific complaints about undelivered or missing mail 
from my users.

I am running Declude JunkMail and Virus. 
Perhaps the extra processing is putting too much of a load on the server? 
Per WhatsUp, SMTP and/or HTTP (WebMail) keeps bouncing up and down, but the 
services never actually fail. SMTP and POP3 are a touch sluggish in my OE, 
but they do work. WebMessaginghas also been a touchflaky, and 
there were a few complaints from users yesterday.

Yesterday afternoon I changed my 
default$junkmail$.config to HOLD on WEIGHT30. I do think the spool 
started growing *before* that change, but in case I'm mistaken and it was after, 
would there be any connection??

Thanks!

Glenn Z.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread R. Scott Perry


I upgraded from IMail 6.06 to IMail 7.1 HF1 a few days ago.  Since then, 
my spool directory has grown by leaps and bounds.  It normally runs 
between 300 and 500 files (I think).  Yesterday evening it was at about 
1500.  Earlier this afternoon it passed 2800.  Now it's about 2750.  I've 
moved (a few) files older than 3 days out of the queue, it didn't make any 
difference -- spool keeps growing.  They look like normal T, D, and Q 
files dated within the last three days, but why are there so many???  I'm 
not getting any specific complaints about undelivered or missing mail from 
my users.

I am running Declude JunkMail and Virus.  Perhaps the extra processing is 
putting too much of a load on the server?

That shouldn't be it -- you should see similar loads on 6.06 and 7.1.

Have you checked the spool files to see if there is any pattern to what is 
in there, to make sure the problem isn't a mail loop, for example?

Yesterday afternoon I changed my default $junkmail$.config to HOLD on 
WEIGHT30.  I do think the spool started growing *before* that change, but 
in case I'm mistaken and it was after, would there be any connection??

What was it before?  If it was DELETE before, there would be slightly more 
system load having it at HOLD, but it shouldn't be enough to cause mail 
delivery to slow down.
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet



Before changing WEIGHT30 to HOLD, it was 
WARN.

WEIGHT10, 14, and 20 are still WARN. All 
other tests are LOG.

G.Z.


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  R. Scott 
  Perry 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:10 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE 
  spool folder
  I upgraded from IMail 6.06 to IMail 7.1 HF1 a few days 
  ago. Since then, my spool directory has grown by leaps and 
  bounds. It normally runs between 300 and 500 files (I 
  think). Yesterday evening it was at about 1500. Earlier 
  this afternoon it passed 2800. Now it's about 2750. I've 
  moved (a few) files older than 3 days out of the queue, it didn't make 
  any difference -- spool keeps growing. They look like normal T, 
  D, and Q files dated within the last three days, but why are there so 
  many??? I'm not getting any specific complaints about 
  undelivered or missing mail from my users.I am running 
  Declude JunkMail and Virus. Perhaps the extra processing is 
  putting too much of a load on the server?That shouldn't be it 
  -- you should see similar loads on 6.06 and 7.1.Have you checked the 
  spool files to see if there is any pattern to what is in there, to make 
  sure the problem isn't a mail loop, for example?Yesterday 
  afternoon I changed my default $junkmail$.config to HOLD on 
  WEIGHT30. I do think the spool started growing *before* that 
  change, but in case I'm mistaken and it was after, would there be any 
  connection??What was it before? If it was DELETE before, there 
  would be slightly more system load having it at HOLD, but it shouldn't be 
  enough to cause mail delivery to slow 
  down. 
  -Scott---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]---This 
  E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, 
  just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
  "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail[EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
  assistance. You can visit our website at http://www.declude.com 
.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread Mark Smith
Title: Message



Are 
you sure they're not NDR's from Klez?
I've 
been flooded with them. I had to change my SMTP retry to 6 
hours.

Check 
for that and also use SpamReview to look at the HOLD items.


-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNetSent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:14 
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: 
[Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

  Before changing WEIGHT30 to HOLD, it was 
  WARN.
  
  WEIGHT10, 14, and 20 are still WARN. All 
  other tests are LOG.
  
  G.Z.
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
R. Scott 
Perry 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:10 
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE 
spool folder
I upgraded from IMail 6.06 to IMail 7.1 HF1 a few 
days ago. Since then, my spool directory has grown by leaps 
and bounds. It normally runs between 300 and 500 files (I 
think). Yesterday evening it was at about 1500. Earlier 
this afternoon it passed 2800. Now it's about 2750. I've 
moved (a few) files older than 3 days out of the queue, it didn't 
make any difference -- spool keeps growing. They look like 
normal T, D, and Q files dated within the last three days, but why 
are there so many??? I'm not getting any specific complaints 
about undelivered or missing mail from my users.I am 
running Declude JunkMail and Virus. Perhaps the extra processing is 
putting too much of a load on the server?That shouldn't be 
it -- you should see similar loads on 6.06 and 7.1.Have you checked 
the spool files to see if there is any pattern to what is in there, to 
make sure the problem isn't a mail loop, for example?Yesterday 
afternoon I changed my default $junkmail$.config to HOLD on 
WEIGHT30. I do think the spool started growing *before* that 
change, but in case I'm mistaken and it was after, would there be 
any connection??What was it before? If it was DELETE before, 
there would be slightly more system load having it at HOLD, but it 
shouldn't be enough to cause mail delivery to slow 
down. 
-Scott---[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]---This 
E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. Tounsubscribe, 
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype 
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail[EMAIL PROTECTED] for 
assistance. You can visit our website at http://www.declude.com 
.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread Smart Business Lists

We had a situation twice today where IMAIL just quit delivering
messages.

We sent out a relatively small mailing of 2,000+ messages from another
sever but the bounces came back to our Imail server. Each time the
server received maybe 200 messages at one time. The declude overflow
folder had 100-170 or so and another 30 in the spool.

Declude left a number of .vir directories and in Task manager there
were many (didn't count them) declude.exe tasks accompanied by an equal
number of sniffer.exe tasks.  There was not a corresponding SMTP task
for each one.

Toggling the mail server itself did not help.  The messages would not
send using the console.

Finally I rebooted the server.  As soon as it came up the
overflow directory emptied and most of the queue emptied except for
the 30 or so messages in the queue which were stuck before reboot in
some stage of delivery.  I had to send them one by one from the
console.  They all delivered - just took me a few minutes to send
them.

I think all of them were local deliveries from .  In the
log files I got a few of these errors new to me anyway:

local fail to domain account-main (310)  0

I had to delete the .vir directories.  Some had files in them.

This is the first time we've seen this in similar mailings.

I think it may have something to do with sniffer's interaction with
declude when a bunch of messages are moved to the overflow directory.  Sniffer
is the only significant change we've made in the last few days.

Declude seems to be doing what it is supposed to do but something at
some point simply stops Imail from delivering certain messages in the
spool and then Declude never puts the overflow back until I reboot.

We had a morning mailing and an afternoon mailing and the same thing
happened in each case.


Terry Fritts

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



RE: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread R. Scott Perry


Declude left a number of .vir directories ...

Were there any error messages in the log file?  If Declude Virus can't 
delete the .vir directories, there should be a log file entry with more 
information as to what happened.
 -Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread Smart Business Lists

Forgot to check. Yes - we had these lines coincidental with the
incident: ---

06/12/2002 10:04:46 Q62be1d8101fe3fd0 ERROR: Virus scanner didn't
   finish after 60 seconds; terminating.

Then 39 more virus free lines followed by 10 scanner didn't finish
lines.  Then some more virus free and more didn't finish - until I
rebooted.

Nothing strange in the JunkMail logs in the morning but these were at
the afternoon incident:

06/12/2002 16:57:37  Passing to SMTP1: -v C:\IMail\spool\Qb68b00160216f9ee.SMD
06/12/2002 16:57:41  Passing to SMTP1: -v C:\IMail\spool\Qb68b004c01eaf8a4.SMD



Terry Fritts

Wednesday, June 12, 2002 you wrote:

RSP Were there any error messages in the log file?  If Declude Virus can't 
RSP delete the .vir directories, there should be a log file entry with more 
RSP information as to what happened.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .



Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] HUGE spool folder

2002-06-12 Thread R. Scott Perry


Forgot to check. Yes - we had these lines coincidental with the
incident: ---

06/12/2002 10:04:46 Q62be1d8101fe3fd0 ERROR: Virus scanner didn't
finish after 60 seconds; terminating.

That would explain the leftover .vir directories.

Given the volume you had at the time, it sounds like the CPU was extremely 
busy, and these may have been valid timeouts.

Could those 2,000 E-mails be sent in batches?  IMail's architecture makes 
it handle large volumes of E-mail best when they are batched (whether or 
not Declude is being used).

06/12/2002 16:57:37  Passing to SMTP1: -v C:\IMail\spool\Qb68b00160216f9ee.SMD
06/12/2002 16:57:41  Passing to SMTP1: -v C:\IMail\spool\Qb68b004c01eaf8a4.SMD

Any chance you used the Send One button in IMail Administrator around 
that time?  That message will show up if you have the logging level set to 
MID or higher, and IMail starts Declude with an extra parameter (-v in this 
case, which I believe is used with the Send One, and indicates extra 
logging).
-Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .