RE: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

2013-03-02 Thread Michael Graveen 
A discussion on the subject that may be of interest in the SmarterMail forum.

http://forums.smartertools.com/showthread.php/38483-jump-in-spam-scores


Mike


Michael Graveen

m...@anim8.net



Return-Path: 

Received: from smtp.declude.com (smtp.declude.com [216.144.195.81]) by 
ns.pixel8.com with SMTP;

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:23:43 -0600

Received: from smail.globalweb.net (smail.globalweb.net [208.74.80.105]) by 
smtp.declude.com with SMTP;

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:22:35 -0500

Received: from HRADT (173-163-199-121-richmond.hfc.comcastbusiness.net 
[173.163.199.121]) by smail.globalweb.net with SMTP;

Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:22:22 -0500

From: "Randy Armbrecht" 

To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

References: 
<1044585735_52516...@declude.com><1056213922_52517...@declude.com><1070057329_52517...@declude.com><1226673407_52521...@declude.com><1245946641_52522...@declude.com>
 <1249494625_52522...@declude.com> <1251923344_52522...@declude.com> 
<-1916622906_42591...@declude.com>

In-Reply-To: <-1916622906_42591...@declude.com>

Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?

Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:22:04 -0500

Message-ID: <-1864395546_42592...@declude.com>

MIME-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

boundary="=_NextPart_000_053A_01CE1738.2B571DA0"

X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0

X-Vipre-Scanned: 0AC03A97003DC80AC03BE4

Thread-Index: 
AQGfnOsLrnxuRjEYIyUIZ/qhpeQALAIkewrQA4Zvh3wCcEpK0AG5X5wcAlfJDG0BMAgZkQGdxfpImHe4hjA=

Content-Language: en-us

X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 208.74.80.105, Ugly c=0 p=0 Source New

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0

X-MessageSniffer-SNF-Group: OK

X-Declude-Sender: ra...@globalweb.us [208.74.80.105]

X-Declude-Spoolname: 42592729.eml

X-Declude-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.51322762.00AC,ss=1,fgs=0

X-DECLUDE: 
--

X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.12.01 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";

X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [-3] at 11:23:01 on 02 Mar 2013 by

X-Declude-Tests: TOKENS [-5], MAILSPIKE-L2 [6], SPFPASS [-1], CT-UNKNOWN [-1], 
FILTER-SUBJECT [2], FILTER-SPAM [5], HAM-INDICATOR [-5], X1234X [0], 
UNSUBSCRIBE [-100], SUBJECT-FWD [-100]

X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination

X-Declude-Code: e

X-Declude-Recipcount: 1

X-Recipients: declude.junkmail@declude.com

X-HELO: smail.globalweb.net

X-Identity: 208.74.80.105 | smail.globalweb.net | globalweb.us

X-DECLUDE: 
--

List-Id: 

X-Mailing-List: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Reply-to: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Precedence: list

Sender: "Randy Armbrecht" 

X-Rcpt-To: 

X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, ISpamAssassin 0 [raw: 0], DK_None, DKIM_None, 
Custom Rules [], URIBL:11

X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: 0 (Trusted Sender)

This doesn't look like Declude is the culprit in your scoring, but rather your 
SmarterMail Spam scoring is the culprit.  Have you changed anything recently in 
the Spam settings of SmarterMail?




Sincerely,

Randy Armbrecht
Global Web Solutions, Inc.
Office: 804.442.5300 x112
Toll Free: 877.800.4562

24 /7 Tech Support!
Your Internet Source.Since 1996!

NEW GlobalSync Remote-BackUp Solutions!

Web Hosting  -  E-Mail  -  Spam/Virus Gateway Services
Hi-Speed DSL, Ethernet and Wireless Internet -  T-1/T-3's
PC Support - Networking - Virus/MalWare Removal

25% discount on most services for Non-Profits!  Call us today!



From: SM Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]

Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:54 PM

To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] why have spam scores jumped?



Hi,



I don't know if anyone is still here but I'd like some insights into some 
strange anti-spam behavior.



We have latest SmarterMail and Declude, as well as Sniffer. Over the last few 
days I noticed a significant drop in email messages.  Upon further 
investigation, I found that messages were being givn much higher spam scores 
than in the past, with the result that they get classified as spam or just 
outright deleted.  Checking the headers, however, I don't see why the scores 
are coming in so high.  Below are a few examples.  Does anyone see why the spam 
scores come out so high?



Thanks,



Ben



***

X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 0

X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 0-0-0-2998-c

X-Declude-Sender: mstad...@ghrlawyers.com [70.89.176.73]

X-Declude-Spoolname: 195938010.eml

X-Declude-RefID:

X-Declude-Note: Scanned by Declude 4.11.00 "http://www.declude.com/x-note.htm";

X-Declude-Scan: Incoming Score [0] at 17:26:20 on 01 Mar 2013

X-Declude-Tests: SPFUNKNOWN [1]

X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination

X-Declude-Code: e

X-HELO: mail.garrettlaw.com

X-Identity: 70.89.176.73 | mail.garrettlaw.com | ghrlawyers

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?

2012-01-26 Thread Michael Graveen 
I would go with 2008 R2 Standard (it's 64bit only).  That way you can go past 
4GB of RAM if you'd like (up to 32GB).  Your server's processor will need to 
support a 64bit OS to use it.  I don't know if there are issues running SM on a 
desktop OS like Win 7 Pro.

Hope this helps.

Mike



Last June I posted a question and got some great replies. Being preoccupied 
with work that actually pays me money, I haven't done anything yet, but the 
time is getting close. My question now is: what OS?

Our old Imail 2006 runs on Win Server 2000. Would SmarterMail run on Win 7 Pro? 
Would it run on a 64-bit version and would there be any point in using the 
64-bit version? I ask because I've actually got a spare system sitting around 
with just that and it has 4 GB of RAM. I'd like to take advantage of all that 
ram.

Thanks in advance,

Ben




From: IMail Admin
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:28 AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?


Thanks, that helped.




From: Todd Richards
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?


Hey Ben -

If you haven't already, you can download a trial of SmarterMail to give you a 
hands on feel for how the interface works, from the system administrator to a 
domain administrator to an end user.  I can't speak to the latest version of 
SmarterMail as we are still running 6.9xx (we have a current subscription but 
never felt the need yet to upgrade - probably will soon), nor can I offer a 
good comparison, since we were still on IMail 8.2x when we made the change.  
There were three main reasons we made the switch:  cost, a much improved web 
interface from our IMail 8.2x version, and the massive number of positive 
recommendations about switching to SM.  Like the others, we have never looked 
back.  We too were on the unlimited version of IMail, but are on a 1000 user 
version of SmarterMail.  That has proved plenty for us at this point.  The nice 
thing is, if we need more then we add them on.

We are heavy users of the Mailing Lists in SmarterMail.  I like the fact that 
we can manage subscribers separate from lists.  Our main domain (the one that I 
am on) currently has almost 70 mailing lists.  It's great that, via the web 
interface, we can add a single subscriber to multiple lists.  We can also go 
into the individual lists and manage subscribers as well.  You can add your own 
custom fields to the subscriber screens if you want to track Name, City, 
Company Name, etc.  It also has the ability to remove a user from the lists if 
they have a certain number of bounces.  While that feature was nice, we 
actually increased it (maybe even turned it off - can't remember for sure 
without going and looking) because it would remove someone and nobody ever knew 
about it.  There were requests about maybe alerting the administrator of such a 
change, or disabling a user versus removing them, etc.  I'm just not sure 
whether that part has been upgraded.  Again, we are on SmarterMail 6.9 but I 
don't think the rest of it has changed that much.

The one thing that I didn't like about the mailing lists is that we had an ASP 
page with all of the options that people could subscribe to.  At the end, when 
they hit submit, it would fire off an email to IMail and subscribe (or 
unsubscribe) them from all of their choices in one swoop.  SmarterMail didn't 
handle things that way, and would simply make the change for the first option 
but ignore the rest of them.  We weren't aware of that at first and had people 
think they were making changes but they really weren't.  SmarterMail does offer 
the ability to tie web pages to the mail server using SOAP, etc.  But I don't 
know it and haven't had the time to make the changeover.

Todd





From: Imail Admin [mailto:imailad...@bcwebhost.net]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 6:12 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?


I guess my three areas on concern would be how IM and SM compare in their web 
mail interface, how they compare in administration, and how they compare in 
list server.  We make pretty modest use of the IM list server (which is pretty 
primitive), but I would hate to give it up altogether.



Thanks for any comments,



Ben

- Original Message -

From: Heimir Eidskrem

To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com

Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 1:41 PM

Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Time to upgrade and to what?


We dumped Imail after being with them since version 4 I think.
Moved to Smartermail and never looked back.

Our customers really like SM and we have nothing but positive feedback.

the transition was easy with the migration tools from SM.

I would do it again with no hesitation.

On 6/1/2011 9:09 PM, Imail Admin wrote:

I've been musing over whether it's time to upgrade or replace my mail system.Â

re: [Declude.JunkMail] Performance issues with SM 8.2 w Declude

2011-09-26 Thread Michael Graveen 
If you are running 32bit Windows definitely take your memory up to 4GB.  If you 
are running 64bit Windows take it higher (until you stop most of your swapping).

Mike

Michael Graveen
m...@anim8.net



I am starting to have some serious performance issues since I upgraded to SM
8.2. Although I can not be for sure that is it due to the upgrade as usage
has also increased with added clients and the start of school. The big
issue is that the web interface becomes unresponsive for up to about 5
minutes. The machine has 2 Gig of RAM, and a swap file of 5.5 Gig. In
Windows task manager I see my peak memory usage is now 10 gig.

Right now I am not sure if the performance issues are being caused by RAM,
too much traffic, Smartermail, or Declude.
_
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this e-mail. Your are asked to notify the sender immediately by e-mail
if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your
system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Prairie
Lakes Area Education Agency. Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency accepts no
liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. -
_
Scott Fosseen - Systems Engineer - Prairie Lakes AEA -
http://www.aea8.k12.ia.us/tech
_
In a study of 200,000 ostriches over a period of 80 years, no one
reported a single case where an ostrich buried its head in the sand
(or attempted to do so - apart from Bones ).
_

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 11

2009-08-11 Thread Michael Graveen 
I went to SmarterMail 4.x a few years ago (from IMail 8.05).  I like the web 
interface.  Is it perfect?  No.  But for the most part the Smarttools folks are 
pretty responsive with bug fixes (especially compared to Ipswitch's past 
performance).  Version 6 has just been released and I will probably upgrade to 
that.  Hope this helps.

Mike



Sorry William I did not catch your sarcasm.  I don't see those problems with 
Imail and we have people with 1000s of messages in their inbox but that is 
version 8.22, I know they had a lot of web mail problems with later versions..  
I think roundcube is better than squirrel mail but I don't know if it will work 
on a windows machine - have never tried to do that. 
  
That being said, I am still looking for recommendations on a Mail 
Serveranyone have thoughts. 
  

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com  



From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of William 
Stillwell
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 10:33 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail 11

You didn't understand my sarcasm did you?
 
I gave up w/Imail on fixing my imail webmail issues, on my servers, if there is 
more than 1000 messages in a mail box, users get "Access Denied" when going to 
different pages in there preview window.
 
If they have less then 500 messages it works fine for them..
 
It's by no means "OWA" . 
 

William Stillwell
 
  
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Michael Graveen 
Hi Brian,
Thanks for the explanation.

Mike



Hi Mike, I can help with this.
 
Greylisting it tremendously effective however it can cause a lot of problems if 
it is not done selectively. We worked closely with Matt Bramble and a few other 
Declude "power users" to develop ways to apply greylisting only when it is most 
likely to be beneficial. Blanket greylisting is dangerous in that not 
everything plays well with greylisting. Also, you'll always have those users 
who are expecting an immediate email from someone, and greylisting is going to 
delay it if they have not successfully passed greylisting before. 
 
Rather than greylisting everyone (which you can do If you want), what we did is 
to allow you to specify a number of criteria that will trigger greylisting. In 
these cases, greylisting is not triggered until something suspicious is 
encountered. Because Interceptor/Alligate is designed from the ground up to 
examine every aspect of the SMTP conversation, there are several points in the 
transaction where greylisting can be invoked. These include the senders 
reputation based on our MXRate rating, the originating country, volume, recent 
history, suspicious HELOs, blacklist hits, and several other items.
 
This provides a much more effective way to employ greylisting without 
inconveniencing most users or senders. In fact, most end users never realize 
greylisting is being used. The idea here is to determine if something is 
probably spam, and if we have reason to believe that it may be, then impose a 
greylist check. You do not have to educate your users this way, and you will 
have far less complaints.
 
Hope this helps.
 
Brian
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael 
Graveen
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 3:57 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
Hi David,
Can you elaborate on why SmarterMail's greylisting is dangerous?  In 
SmarterMail all mail gets greylisted until it "passes".  When it passes 
subsequent email get's whitelisted (for a period of time).  There is a greylist 
exclusion list for mail server that are known not play well.  How does this 
differ from the Alligate/Declude combination?

Thanks,

Mike



Hi Todd,
 
Alligate has way better greylisting capabilities than SmarterMail. SmarterMails 
implementation is somewhat dangerous. You need to be able to accurately qualify 
which messages should be greylisted. Alligate is the only greylisting 
implementation that does this. I don't believe you would have this problem if 
you were running Interceptor or the Alligate/Declude combination, and I am sure 
other Alligate/Declude users would agree with me. 
 
If you are interested, I can work with you to give you an upgrade path to 
Declude Interceptor from your current license.
 
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com
 
 
 
 
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Todd 
Richards
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:11 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
Thanks Craig.  >From all indications our server is tightened down pretty good 
right now.  We moved from Imail to SM at the start of April, and I implemented 
grey listing at the start of May.  So we did have a fair amount of backscatter 
in between until I really understood what greylisting could do. 
 
Unfortunately, I can't talk the bosses into dropping another $800 or so to try 
and fix the problem.  I know others have used ASSP with success, so I might 
look at that.  SmarterMail's greylisting seems to be a lot better than what the 
rules in Declude offer.  
 
I might look at implementing ASSP in front of SM.  I've heard a lot of people 
talk about the advantages of running something in front of your mail server.  
So it might be time.
 
Todd
 
 
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Craig 
Edmonds
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 1:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
Hi Todd,
 
I think grey listing prevents backscatter coming INTO your mail server, it does 
not prevent you getting on blacklists.

If you are on a blacklist then I think you need to figure out how your smtp 
server is configured because it would indicate an issue somewhere. 
Since using Alligate (www.alligate.com) as the first line of defence in front 
of declude, we have had zero black listings and all the backscatter has 
disappeared. The backscatter rules in declude really blow which is why I would 
highly recommend looking at Alligate as your smtp gateway.
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.com
E : cr...@123marbella.com
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-18 Thread Michael Graveen 
Hi David,
Can you elaborate on why SmarterMail's greylisting is dangerous?  In 
SmarterMail all mail gets greylisted until it "passes".  When it passes 
subsequent email get's whitelisted (for a period of time).  There is a greylist 
exclusion list for mail server that are known not play well.  How does this 
differ from the Alligate/Declude combination?

Thanks,

Mike



Hi Todd,
 
Alligate has way better greylisting capabilities than SmarterMail. SmarterMails 
implementation is somewhat dangerous. You need to be able to accurately qualify 
which messages should be greylisted. Alligate is the only greylisting 
implementation that does this. I don't believe you would have this problem if 
you were running Interceptor or the Alligate/Declude combination, and I am sure 
other Alligate/Declude users would agree with me. 
 
If you are interested, I can work with you to give you an upgrade path to 
Declude Interceptor from your current license.
 
David Barker
VP Operations Declude
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933 office
978.988.1311 fax
dbar...@declude.com
 
 
 
 
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Todd 
Richards
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 6:11 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
Thanks Craig.  From all indications our server is tightened down pretty good 
right now.  We moved from Imail to SM at the start of April, and I implemented 
grey listing at the start of May.  So we did have a fair amount of backscatter 
in between until I really understood what greylisting could do. 
 
Unfortunately, I can't talk the bosses into dropping another $800 or so to try 
and fix the problem.  I know others have used ASSP with success, so I might 
look at that.  SmarterMail's greylisting seems to be a lot better than what the 
rules in Declude offer.  
 
I might look at implementing ASSP in front of SM.  I've heard a lot of people 
talk about the advantages of running something in front of your mail server.  
So it might be time.
 
Todd
 
 
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Craig 
Edmonds
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 1:53 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
Hi Todd,
 
I think grey listing prevents backscatter coming INTO your mail server, it does 
not prevent you getting on blacklists.

If you are on a blacklist then I think you need to figure out how your smtp 
server is configured because it would indicate an issue somewhere. 
Since using Alligate (www.alligate.com) as the first line of defence in front 
of declude, we have had zero black listings and all the backscatter has 
disappeared. The backscatter rules in declude really blow which is why I would 
highly recommend looking at Alligate as your smtp gateway.
Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.com
E : cr...@123marbella.com
 

From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Michael 
Graveen
Sent: 16 May 2009 13:54
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter
 
I think Greylisting reduces backscatter.  Greylisting stops the majority of the 
SPAM from ever reaching our mail server, so it never has a chance to get 
bounced back because of a non existent user, etc.

Mike



 
Hi Everyone -
 
We've been having a few issues with mail servers refusing our mail.  Today I 
ran a test on DNSStuff and found that our IP is on BackScatter.org.  They are 
referencing an  event on 4/27, and supposedly we will be removed after 4 weeks 
if they haven't had any other issues.  Of course we can pay to have it removed 
sooner.  I'm not sure if being listed in their DB is the main culprit to the 
server refusals that I've seen?
 
We switched over to SmarterMail in mid-April.  Since 4/27, we have implemented 
grey listing.  
 
Is grey listing a good first line of defense?  Is there anything else I should 
be doing to prevent back scatter? 
 
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
 
Todd

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.

re: [Declude.JunkMail] BackScatter

2009-05-16 Thread Michael Graveen 
I think Greylisting reduces backscatter.  Greylisting stops the majority of the 
SPAM from ever reaching our mail server, so it never has a chance to get 
bounced back because of a non existent user, etc.

Mike



Hi Everyone -
 
We've been having a few issues with mail servers refusing our mail.  Today I 
ran a test on DNSStuff and found that our IP is on BackScatter.org.  They are 
referencing an  event on 4/27, and supposedly we will be removed after 4 weeks 
if they haven't had any other issues.  Of course we can pay to have it removed 
sooner.  I'm not sure if being listed in their DB is the main culprit to the 
server refusals that I've seen?
 
We switched over to SmarterMail in mid-April.  Since 4/27, we have implemented 
grey listing.  
 
Is grey listing a good first line of defense?  Is there anything else I should 
be doing to prevent back scatter? 
 
Thanks for your thoughts on this.
 
Todd
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

re: [Declude.JunkMail] mail server software

2009-02-03 Thread Michael Graveen 
I use SmarterMail (www.smartertools.com) and like it a lot.  SmarterTools has 
conversion tools to help you migrate your IMail domains to SmarterMail.

Hope this helps.

Mike



I am going to move from Imail soon.
Does any one have any recommendations on reasonable Mail Server software.
we need maybe 200 users, and we just pop our mail now.
I have been using Workgroup Share to add calendar sharing etc to our current
config.
Has any one used their Mail Server software and what do you think of it?
and will my junkmail still work with it?

Thanks for any help.

Bruce Loughlin

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew

2008-04-19 Thread Michael Graveen 
>I have not had to reboot my server for over 18 months now. 

What do you do about Windows security patches?

Mike



Hi Michael,

I am sorry to hear you are having a struggle, but I am running mine on HP
servers also and have had no real problems at all in fact I have not had to
reboot my server for over 18 months now. 

Is your server a dedicated mail server or do you run anything else on it?

Kindest Regards
Craig Edmonds
123 Marbella Internet
W: www.123marbella.net 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: 19 April 2008 15:33
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew

Michael,

Judging by that screen cap you are having a rough time to say the least.

I am sure you have exhausted a ton of options, but have you turned off 
DEP for Declude? I have seen repeated crashes like that on a system 
which did not exclude Declude under DEP.

Darrell
--
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, 
Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

Michael Hardrick wrote:
> Greetings All,
> 
> I hate to be a “Naysayer”, but I will not be renewing Declude.
> 
> 
> 
> I don’t usually write negative reviews, but this is an exception.
> 
> I’ve lost several customers due to our inability to get Declude to
function.
> 
> I’ve been using the product since about 2000. The past three
> 
> years have been dismal. Between spools filling up, system crashes,
> 
> CPU loads at 100%, Memory Leaks, Application Errors, Application Hangs,
> 
> GP Faults, etc...
> 
> 
> 
> Declude support was always there… to point the finger back at me
> 
> and the server. Bad DNS servers, Bad Memory, Bad CPUs, or something
> 
> wrong with the version of Windows I was running. I purchased a
> 
> HP Proliant (2CPUs, 6-146GB HDD, 4-GB RAM, Win2k3) and thought
> 
> that would resolve the issues.
> 
> 
> 
> The server I have running must have cron jobs to reboot the server
> 
> every morning at 5AM and restart the declude service every two hours.
> 
> We login into the server daily to clear pop-up errors off the server.
> 
> http://www.tnweb.com/images/declude-error1.png
> 
> 
> 
> This is the only way to keep the server running. I keep a very limited 
> amount
> 
> of traffic on the server. No need to push the envelope.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike Hardrick
> 
> TNWEB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
> *Craig Edmonds
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 03, 2008 3:37 PM
> *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
> 
> 
> 
> I second that.
> 
> I am not trying to brown nose or anything here but without declude we 
> would be completely screwed.
> 
> In 3 years with declude I think I have only had to email them once with 
> a support query and that was answered pretty much within an hour.
> 
> Sure, some spam gets through now and again but there have been times 
> where I have mucked about with the declude config settings and the spam 
> floodgates opened and boy, my clients noticed the difference and were 
> thanking me the next day.
> 
> I have no problem renewing my subscriptions every year.
> 
> 
> 
> Kindest Regards
> Craig Edmonds
> 123 Marbella Internet
> _www.123marbella.net_
> 
> 
> 
> LEGAL DISCLAIMER - This message may contain confidential, proprietary or 
> legally privileged information and is intended only for the use of the 
> addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
> message you are hereby informed that you must not use, disseminate, copy 
> it in any form or take any action in reliance on it. If you have 
> received this message in error please delete it and any copies of it and 
> notify it to the sender.
> 
> 
> 
> AVISO LEGAL - Este mensaje puede contener informacion confidencial, en 
> propiedad o legalmente protegida y esta dirigida unicamente para el uso 
> de la persona destinataria. Si usted no es la persona destinataria de 
> este mensaje, por la presente se le comunica que no debe usar, difundir, 
> copiar de ninguna forma, ni emprender ninguna accion en relacion con ella.
> 
> 
> 
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of 
> *Stephan Chayer
> *Sent:* 03 April 2008 22:21
> *To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reasons to renew
> 
> 
> 
> Dan, Todd,
> 
> 
> 
> I feel a little like you.
> 
> 
> 
> We are using, selling and supporting Declude for the past 4 years. It 
> works great for us. Especially since they brought up version 4 
> including Commtouch and AVG, that was a nice move.
> 
> 
> 
> We went through all the product and pricing changes for the past 
> years. We were surprised when they conbined all the products but they 
> hono

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Migrating from Imail to SmarterMail

2007-03-11 Thread Michael Graveen 
I did the migration from IMail 8.05 to SmarterMail 4 and it was 
pretty painless.  One thing to watch out for is that if you take your 
root accounts over from IMail, change your passwords on those 
accounts right away!  The default root account password is widely 
known and even if you disable the account SmarterMail will still 
accept mail through the system.  I would also add root to the "SMTP 
Blocked Senders" list in the admin console to keep this from happening.


Good luck with your migration,

Mike

At 04:22 PM 3/10/2007, you wrote:
I'm making the jump from Imail to SmarterMail and I'm wondering if 
anyone has any cautions, potential pitfalls or tips before I do 
so.  I'm also curious if my existing Declude Imail Perpetual License 
(that is currently running with Imail) will work with SmarterMail?


Thanks!

Wolf

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.





---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need hep - mail server sending out stock reports email

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Graveen 
SMSS.exe is also a legitimate program in the Windows OS (Session 
Manager Subsystem ).


Mike


At 07:57 PM 2/7/2007, you wrote:
Going aGoogling found that the Intel LANDesk uses a file called 
ssm.exe and there are a couple of programs listed as monitors using 
it, so be careful before just deleting that file.


Exactly where was the file?

Since Howard is running IMail 8.15 this means that his server has 
been compromised ala the SMTP vulnerability that is fixed only in 
8.22 (patched) and 9.1. So, it is not a virus that would be found by 
F-prot or Symantec, but a server hijack or comprise.


John T

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Justin Moose

Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Need hep - mail server sending out 
stock reports email


I called Howard on this, but for everyone else's info, if you are 
seeing this, look for ssm.exe to be a running process.  I found this 
on an Imail server that I administer for another company this 
morning.  The file was showing processing time in the task manager 
and showed up on the Services list at Security Systems Manager, but 
the file had a modified date of 2/5/07 and no updated had been done 
on that server for over a week. Stopping this service stopped the 
junk messages from going out.


Neither F-prot or Symantec showed this file as a virus; however I 
did submit it to Symantec for analysis.



Justin Moose
Information Technology Manager
Sioux Valley Energy
DID: (605) 256-1644
Fax: (605) 256-1690
Toll Free: (800) 234 1960


--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Howard Smith (N.O.R.A.D.)

Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:24 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Need hep - mail server sending out stock 
reports email


Running  imail  8.15,sniffer and declude  - starting  on 2/6/7 my 
mail server start sending out the stock reports email , even when I 
stop the imail smtp process , nothing is in the Imail logs 
indicating problems . I have ran full scans with frprot  and Symantec .


Need help please  , I have already made the spamcop blacklist


Howard Smith
N.O.R.A.D. Inc.
P.O. Box 680116
Miami, Florida 33168
www.norad.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office - (305) NETWORK (638-9675)
Sales - (786) 206-0045
Fax 1 - (305) 359-5144

[]


Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any 
Attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and 
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact  [EMAIL PROTECTED] by email and destroy all copies of the 
original message.




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Experiences

2007-01-29 Thread Michael Graveen 

At 12:50 PM 1/29/2007, you wrote:
Well now that we have moved from IMail 8.15 to 8.22, we are now 
experiencing the problem where Declude needs to be restarted 
regularly to correct an apparent memory leak. I remember following 
threads about this problem and how the upgrade to IMail 2006.1 
generally solved the problem.


Since we are going to have to change to the new IMail platform 
anyway and our support agreement is up for renewal, I have been 
reviewing SmarterMail. The apparent benefits I've seen so far are 
lower cost, lower resource utilization (especially WebMail), and 
support beyond IMail's 8X5 hours.


The only downsides I see so far are user re-education, and that it 
seems to lack SMTP Relay for specified IPs.


So, Would any SmarterMail Admins like to share from actual experience to date?

Bill Green
dfn Systems



Hi Bill,
Can you elaborate on "lack SMTP Relay for specified IPs."?  I thought 
you could whitelist IP addresses in SmarterMail.  Or is this totally different?


Thanks,

Mike




---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

re: [Declude.JunkMail] List up ?

2006-12-14 Thread Michael Graveen 
Sure is quiet.

Mike



From: "IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:49 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] List up ? 

List up ? Nothing in a day or so.. 

  
Karl Drugge 
  
   
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] OT: SmarterMail's website

2006-12-04 Thread Michael Graveen 
Is anyone else having trouble getting to SmarterMail's web site 
(www.smartertools.com)?  I have been unable to access it since Sunday morning.


Mike


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How would you create a filter for this?

2006-04-25 Thread Michael Graveen 

Thanks David, and all who responded.

Mike

At 11:31 AM 4/25/2006, you wrote:

I created a filter you can modify it or add as you need too

David B
www.declude.com

BODYEND NOTCONTAINS MSHTML

BODY1   CONTAINS>a<
BODY1   CONTAINS>b<
BODY1   CONTAINS>c<
BODY1   CONTAINS>d<
BODY1   CONTAINS>e<
BODY1   CONTAINS>f<
BODY1   CONTAINS>g<
BODY1   CONTAINS>h<
BODY1   CONTAINS>i<
BODY1   CONTAINS>j<
BODY1   CONTAINS>k<
BODY1   CONTAINS>l<
BODY1   CONTAINS>m<
BODY1   CONTAINS>n<
BODY1   CONTAINS>o<
BODY1   CONTAINS>p<
BODY1   CONTAINS>q<
BODY1   CONTAINS>r<
BODY1   CONTAINS>s<
BODY1   CONTAINS>t<
BODY1   CONTAINS>u<
BODY1   CONTAINS>v<
BODY1   CONTAINS>w<
BODY1   CONTAINS>x<
BODY1   CONTAINS>y<
BODY1   CONTAINS>z<

BODY1   CONTAINS>1<
BODY1   CONTAINS>2<
BODY1   CONTAINS>3<
BODY1   CONTAINS>4<
BODY1   CONTAINS>5<
BODY1   CONTAINS>6<
BODY1   CONTAINS>7<
BODY1   CONTAINS>8<
BODY1   CONTAINS>9<
BODY1   CONTAINS>0<

BODY1   CONTAINS>$<

BODY1   CONTAINS> a <
BODY1   CONTAINS> b <
BODY1   CONTAINS> c <
BODY1   CONTAINS> d <
BODY1   CONTAINS> e <
BODY1   CONTAINS> f <
BODY1   CONTAINS> g <
BODY1   CONTAINS> h <
BODY1   CONTAINS> i <
BODY1   CONTAINS> j <
BODY1   CONTAINS> k <
BODY1   CONTAINS> l <
BODY1   CONTAINS> m <
BODY1   CONTAINS> n <
BODY1   CONTAINS> o <
BODY1   CONTAINS> p <
BODY1   CONTAINS> q <
BODY1   CONTAINS> r <
BODY1   CONTAINS> s <
BODY1   CONTAINS> t <
BODY1   CONTAINS> u <
BODY1   CONTAINS> v <
BODY1   CONTAINS> w <
BODY1   CONTAINS> x <
BODY1   CONTAINS> y <
BODY1   CONTAINS> z <

BODY1   CONTAINS> 1 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 2 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 3 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 4 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 5 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 6 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 7 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 8 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 9 <
BODY1   CONTAINS> 0 <

BODY1   CONTAINS> $ <

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Olden
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:25 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How would you create a filter for this?

Just today, I added some of the following to my checkraw file in Spamchk.
Just testing since a lot of these seem to have the the lowercase letters
hidden in the HTML version by using white fonts.
/font> I  A  G R 
> Michael Graveen writes:
>> Hello,
>> I have checked through the archives and I have not been able to find
>> anything on creating a filter to block something like V p I t A p G i
>> R h A g ( where every other letter is used to spell a word).  The
>> capital letters stay the same from email to email, but the lower case
>> letters change.  Is there a way to set up a filter line to catch
>> this?  I am using Declude JunkMail Pro 2.0.6.16 Thanks in advance,
>> Mike
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type
> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
> http://www.mail-archive.com.
> [MSGID=D47f301719d24.smd]
>
>
>
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] How would you create a filter for this?

2006-04-25 Thread Michael Graveen 


Hello,
I have checked through the archives and I have not been able to find
anything on creating a filter to block something like
V p
I t
A p
G i
R h
A g ( where
every other letter is used to spell a word).  The capital letters
stay the same from email to email, but the lower case letters
change.  Is there a way to set up a filter line to catch this? 
I am using Declude JunkMail Pro 2.0.6.16
Thanks in advance,
Mike

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Max number of files in directory?

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Graveen 

At 04:14 PM 4/11/2006, you wrote:
Does anyone know of either a hard or practical limit on the number 
of files that a directory may contain under Windows XP?


-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
What file system are you using?  I don't think there is a file limit 
per directory in NTFS like there was under FAT and FAT32.  I had 
originally thought there was a file limit in the root directory in 
NTFS, but I could not find any source stating this.


This article my be helpful:
http://www.windowsitpro.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=27253&DisplayTab=Article

Mike


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0

2005-12-21 Thread Michael Graveen 


I've also posted question to their forum with little or no response (I
didn't think the questions were that obscure). There definitely seems to
be more "experts" in the IMail camp, or at least experts that
are willing to share.
As with new versions of IMail, I'll take the "wait and see
attitude" with Smartermail 3.0
MIchael Graveen
At 03:42 AM 12/21/2005, you wrote:

The “community” support for
SmarterMail is much smaller (or at least quieter).
 
We are running one SM server for a client and I’ve posted several
questions on the SM support forums and have not received any responses at
all.
 
Similar posts to Imail or Declude discussion lists have always resulted
in lots of replies with useful help.
 
Obviously the products are different and the questions are different, but
so far I’m not impressed with the size/responsiveness of the
community.  That’s an important factor we will consider seriously
before migrating any other servers from Imail to SM – saving a few
hundred dollars in license costs is insignificant if we can’t get help
one way or another as quickly.
 
(Needless to say, the SM questions were on issues that SM tech support
provided courteous but not helpful replies when first submitted privately
as an email support case, so I was hoping for help from the
community)
 


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Evans
Martin
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:48 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0
 
It’s such a breath of
fresh air having been in the IMail camp for the last several years. 
LOL!
 
Evans Martin
 
EVANS MARTIN 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOSTING: 
http://www.martek.net
PROGRAMMING: 
http://www.martekware.com
 
iPlus Info Browser – IPB’s IMail Migration Tool, password browser,
reporting suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail administrator
should be without. 

http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96
 
 


From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 6:48 PM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail 3.0
 

The following was posted today on
SmarterTools web forums:



Q:  When will we expect to
see v. 3?


A:  The release date depends
on the results of final QA.  The product is essentially done, just
making sure that all the bugs are out of it.  Since mail servers are
so critical to people's infrastructure, we work extremely hard to make a
stable release with no issues that are going to bite you.  We don't
sacrifice stability for a quick release.


Assuming everything is in good
order (which to this point it appears to be), release will be middle of
January.


You can view the original post
at

http://forums.smartertools.com/forums/2/11125/ShowPost.aspx#11125

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Mail Building up in IMail Spool Directory

2005-12-06 Thread Michael Graveen 
Did you check if Declude may have stopped working (for whatever reason), 
and the mail is just piling up waiting for Declude to process it?  Just 
guessing.


Mike

At 10:13 AM 12/6/2005, you wrote:

Hello, All,
Starting at about 7:51am this morning there's been an inordinate amount of 
e-mail building up in my imail/spool directory.  I've checked the logs and 
it appears that we are accepting all e-mail in to the server but not all 
of it is being sent out.  I haven't been able to 100% confirm it but it 
appears that all of the e-mail which is being held so far is incoming 
e-mail for our Store and Forward spam filtering customers.  The weird 
thing about it is I'm finding lots of e-mail in the spool directory that 
are clearly spam and will probably be identified as spam if it ever 
reached Declude.  It's almost as if the SMTP server hasn't even attempted 
delivering any of this e-mail even once.


Does anyone know what could possibly be going on here?  I'm aware of the 
IMail forum but I thought I'd try here first.


Thanks In Advance,
Dan Geiser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
E-mail scanned for viruses by Nexus (http://www.ntgrp.com/mailscan)

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]




---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] E-mails getting routed to the SPAM email address that shouldn't

2005-09-10 Thread Michael Graveen 
I've just upgraded my Declude Junkmail to version 2.06.16.  I'm running 
into a issue where some emails that DON'T meet the ROUTETO weight are still 
being routed to my SPAM email address.


These are my settings:
WEIGHT10WARN
WEIGHT14SUBJECT **SPAM**
WEIGHT20ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEIGHT25DELETE

Here is the Declude log for the email:
09/10/2005 17:23:54 Q5CF509920108E431 Tests failed [weight=7]: 
CATCHALLMAILS=IGNORE[0] NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE[0] SPAMCOP=WARN[7] 
SPAMHEADERS=WARN[3]

09/10/2005 17:23:54 Q5CF509920108E431 L1 Message OK
09/10/2005 17:23:54 Q5CF509920108E431 Action(s) taken for 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = IGNORE WARN  [LAST ACTION=WARN]
09/10/2005 17:23:54 Q5CF509920108E431 Cumulative action(s) taken on this 
email = IGNORE WARN  [LAST ACTION=WARN]


According to the log, the email should have been delivered, but I found it 
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I'm assuming I should never see an email delivered to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], by Declude, that doesn't have a weight between 20 and 
24.  Is there anything else I should be looking for?


Thanks,

Mike

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Features (or lack thereof?)

2005-05-19 Thread Michael Graveen 
At 01:08 PM 5/19/2005, you wrote:
So, we've been looking quite a bit at SmarterMail for the past few months 
... everyone in here seems to rant and rave about it, wishing they had 
switched sooner. However, when I really dig into it, it seems like it's 
missing a lot of common functionality. Here's a couple examples that I 
confirmed with their tech support:

- There's no way to have an alias launch an EXE (or do anything but go to 
another email address)
- There's no global filters, and no way to create filters automatically 
with web services. Editing the XML directly would require a service 
restart. So it'd need to be entirely manual, or find a way to hook their 
DLLs I guess.
- No way to change the connection banner for IMAP (or smtp or pop3)
- No way to create an address or alias that would allow a user to 
unsubscribe the mailing list by just sending a message there, it *needs* 
to have "unsubscribe" in the subject. I assume this could somehow be 
rigged with some title-rewriting content filter .. ick.

I've seen a few other things that concern me .. some of this stuff is on 
the list, or has been put on the list for the next release, but they're 
shooting for December. So, I guess we should realistically assume 2006.

Any thoughts?
Jonathan
I think SmarterMail has a very nice interface for the end user, but it is 
lacking some features on the admin side.  The vendor does seem to listen to 
feature requests and bug reports.  When I last spoke to the SmaterTool 
folks, they said version 3 of SmarterMail would be released sometime in 
August, 2005.  I hope we don't have to wait until December.

Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail

2005-03-30 Thread Michael Graveen 
At 01:58 PM 3/30/2005, you wrote:
Anybody out there using SmarterMail with multiple IP's (like 50 or more) 
bound to one or more NIC's?

--
Best Regards,
Steve Oren
President
ServerSide, Inc.
317-596-5000 voice
317-596-5010 fax
888-682-2544 toll free
www.serverside.net
---
I use Smartermail with a handful of IPs right now, but plan to scale it up 
to about 40 IPs in the future.  Is there a known issue?

Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Error messages in dec### files

2005-02-02 Thread Michael Graveen 
Thanks.  I've added $default$.junkmail to C:\IMAIL\Declude\
Mike
At 09:00 PM 2/1/2005, you wrote:
Yes, you must have the default files in there proper place.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:51 PM
> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Error messages in dec### files
>
> As I was browsing through my dec### logs I've come across the following
> error messages.
>
> 01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not open
> C:\IMAIL\Declude\$default$.junkmail.  Does it exist?
> 01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not load any config
file
> for @.
>
> I don't have the $default$.junkmail file in the root of the Declude
> directory, but it's in each domain directory below it.  Is this
> correct?  Should I have $default$.junkmail in the root Declude directory?
>
> TIA,
>
> Mike
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] Error messages in dec### files

2005-02-01 Thread Michael Graveen 
As I was browsing through my dec### logs I've come across the following 
error messages.

01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not open 
C:\IMAIL\Declude\$default$.junkmail.  Does it exist?
01/19/2005 00:58:28 Q0500046d00f056d1 ERROR: Could not load any config file 
for @.

I don't have the $default$.junkmail file in the root of the Declude 
directory, but it's in each domain directory below it.  Is this 
correct?  Should I have $default$.junkmail in the root Declude directory?

TIA,
Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Graveen 
Oh, OK.  I didn't understand at first.  Thanks for the clarification.  I 
will install the latest version of Declude.

Thanks,
Mike
At 05:13 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Scott,
> What does the line "Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH"?
> I thought WHITELIST AUTH allowed me to white list my users that
authenticate.
You're correct, that's what it does.  But like Scott said, you have to be
running something newer that version 1.75 in order to use that feature.
Bill
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Graveen 
Scott,
What does the line "Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH"?
I thought WHITELIST AUTH allowed me to white list my users that authenticate.
Thanks,
Mike
At 04:29 PM 11/3/2004, you wrote:
I am running Declude Junkmail  (standard) v1.75.  I keep getting the 
following line in the Declude logs:

Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH
The line WHITELIST AUTH is un-commented in the global.cfg file.  Could 
someone shed some light on what's going on here?  I'm not sure what 
"Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH" means.
That's an option that was added after 1.75 was released.  You can simply 
remove (or comment out) the "WHITELIST AUTH" line from your 
\IMail\Declude\global.cfg file, and the warning will go away.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.


This outgoing message is guaranteed to be authentic by Message Level users.
Guarantee the authenticity of your email @ http://www.messagelevel.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH

2004-11-03 Thread Michael Graveen 
I am running Declude Junkmail  (standard) v1.75.  I keep getting the 
following line in the Declude logs:

Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH
The line WHITELIST AUTH is un-commented in the global.cfg file.  Could 
someone shed some light on what's going on here?  I'm not sure what 
"Invalid WHITELIST type: AUTH" means.

Thanks,
Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen 
I think the question was about zipping graphic files, which as a general 
rule, don't get much smaller after they're zipped (as compared to text 
files, etc.).  I wasn't taking about the compression contained in a 
particular graphic format.  I get about 15%-25% reduction zipping the 
"uncompressed" BMP file vs about 70% from a Word doc (using the stock 
Winzip settings).  I should have been clearer in my first response.

Mike
At 06:43 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Huh?  The logic flaw in trying to zip first, then copy aside (since the file
would have to first be copied into RAM, then zipped, then stored back onto
the USB drive...better just to copy)... uncompressed TIFFs (TIFFs have had
an option for LZW compression since the mid 90s) compress pretty well as
they contain raw raster data, as do BMPs and many other uncompressed
formats.
If you're referring to JPEGs and GIFs, that's because they are already
compressed.  JPEGs have built-in lossy compression, but high quality JPEGs
(low compression) can still see decent compression, and GIFs are already LZW
compressed, which means more LZW compression generally doesn't yield much.
So, it depends on the type of image, but TIFFs are generally uncompressed
these days due to the LZW copyright fiasco, or may have run-length encoding
which still compresses reasonably well with LZW.
Darin.
----- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files
Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.
Mike
At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
>Jeff Pereira wrote:
>>What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
>>there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
>>next folder and see how that works.
>
>I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to
>ZIP them and copy that over.
>
>Jim
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen 
Graphic files as a general rule don't compress well.
Mike
At 03:26 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Jeff Pereira wrote:
What's killing me is not so much the amount of data, but the fact that
there are so many small files.  I'm gonna have to try XCOPY on the
next folder and see how that works.
I can't remember but do TIFF files compress well?  Might be worth it to 
ZIP them and copy that over.

Jim
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT - Copying 200,000 plus files

2004-10-20 Thread Michael Graveen 
Does the computer/server you're connecting your external hard drive to have 
USB 2.0 ports?  I usually get about 650MB/minute with this kind of 
setup.  A 70GB should take about 2 hours.

Mike
At 01:59 PM 10/20/2004, you wrote:
Hi -
Sorry for the OT post, but I am in need of assistance.
I have 200,000 + TIFF (70 GB Worth)images on an external USB 2.0 hard
drive that I need to copy to my local hard drive.  It is taking
forever.
Does anyone know what the fastest way to do this is ?
Drag and Drop ??  Cut and Paste ??
Drop to a command prompt ??  Xcopy ??
Please help.
TIA
jeff
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blacklisted again

2004-09-15 Thread Michael Graveen 


Why can't you make everyone authenticate?
Mike
At 09:15 PM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
I just
got blacklisted again with Spamcop...I have taken out every IP address
from my mail server except for my 1 dial up pool...Everyone else must
authenticateMy server is still at almost 100% most of the time...I am
still sending out spam but how do I tell where it is coming
from...
Richard Farris
Ethixs Online
1.270.247. Office
1.800.548.3877 Tech Support
"Crossroads to a Cleaner Internet"


   

[Declude.JunkMail] Logging order

2004-06-30 Thread Michael Graveen 
I'm Sorry if this is a question that's already been answered (I couldn't 
find anything in the archives).  If an email is tagged as SPAM in Declude 
Junkmail, is it still entered in IMail's log file (log.txt)as being 
received? Does IMail get the email and pass it to Declude, or does Declude 
get it first?

Thanks,
Mike
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-31 Thread Michael Graveen 
We use DirectNic - $15.00 per year/domain.  Easy to administer all you domains.

Mike

At 12:05 AM 1/31/2004 -0600, you wrote:
Anyone using a registrar that they like?  I want to get some of my clients 
accounts off of NetSol.  I have some registered at www.dotearth.com but I 
would like a registrar that I can maintain multiple domains from a central 
interface like at NetSol.

Thanks,

Todd Hunter

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Graveen 
My server runs IMail 8.02 and Declude 1.75.  I use "relay for addresses" 
and I use authentication with Eudora (my email client).

Mike

At 11:15 AM 10/20/2003 +1000, you wrote:
Do you really authenticate with a username and pwd when sending emails ?
 Please check your smtp server settings in your emails program.
Do you use IMail V8.X ?  It works with IMail V8.X and Declude >= V1.75.

(Your email fails the EASYNET-DYNA test because you are on a dialup-line or
Cable/Adsl with a dynamic IP. But with WHITELIST AUTH it should bypass all
tests)
Adrian

-
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?
> I have enabled WHITELIST AUTH and stoped and started the SMTP service, but
> I still can't send mail to internal clients or myself.  I fail the
> following SPAM tests:
> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: EASYNET-DYNA, IPNOTINMX [3]
> I've never had this problem in the past.  I had recently upgraded to
> Declude 1.75.  Any ideas?
>
> Mike
>
>
> At 09:37 PM 10/17/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > > I have Imail8.  What does WHITELIST AUTH do?  I don't se it in the
> >JunkMail
> > > manual.
> >
> >It allows you to automatically whitelist any message that has been sent
by
> >an e-mail client that has authenticated via SMTP Authentication, thereby
> >bypassing all spam tests.
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >---
> >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> >(http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> >---
> >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> >at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?

2003-10-19 Thread Michael Graveen 
I have enabled WHITELIST AUTH and stoped and started the SMTP service, but 
I still can't send mail to internal clients or myself.  I fail the 
following SPAM tests:
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: EASYNET-DYNA, IPNOTINMX [3]
I've never had this problem in the past.  I had recently upgraded to 
Declude 1.75.  Any ideas?

Mike

At 09:37 PM 10/17/2003 -0700, you wrote:
- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have Imail8.  What does WHITELIST AUTH do?  I don't se it in the
JunkMail
> manual.
It allows you to automatically whitelist any message that has been sent by
an e-mail client that has authenticated via SMTP Authentication, thereby
bypassing all spam tests.
Bill

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?

2003-10-17 Thread Michael Graveen 
I have Imail8.  What does WHITELIST AUTH do?  I don't se it in the JunkMail 
manual.

Thanks,

Mike

At 12:50 PM 10/17/2003 +1000, you wrote:
Hi Michael

EASYNET-DYNA is the blacklist of dynablock.easynet.nl see:
http://www.declude.com/Junkmail/support/ip4r.htm .
Use WHITELIST AUTH in your GLOBAL.CFG file if you have Imail V8.X and
declude V1.75 so authenticated users will be whitelisted or do not check
outgoing emails.
Cheers

Adrian

-
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 12:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?
> I have a client that has a domain that we host.  They sent an email
through
> the mail server and it failed the following tests:
>
> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: EASYNET-DYNA, IPNOTINMX [3]
>
> My question is, what is EASYNET-DYNA?  I don't see it in the JunkMail
manual.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] What is this test?

2003-10-16 Thread Michael Graveen 
I have a client that has a domain that we host.  They sent an email through 
the mail server and it failed the following tests:

X-Spam-Tests-Failed: EASYNET-DYNA, IPNOTINMX [3]

My question is, what is EASYNET-DYNA?  I don't see it in the JunkMail manual.

Thanks,

Mike

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] osirusoft

2003-08-28 Thread Michael Graveen 
Is it OK just to comment out the entries for now with a "#"?

Mike

At 11:59 AM 8/28/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> With the news of Osirusoft's troubles, Do I need to disable them in 
Declude?

Absolutely.

>> What are the repercussions of having Osirusoft enabled right now?

Legit E-mail failing their tests and slowdowns in processing E-mail.
The word is that they are blacklisting the world...if you can reach their 
servers.

Matt



Dale McDiarmid wrote:

Hello...

My apologies if this has already been discussed. I'm not normally a 
member here, and the archives seem only to go up thru Aug. 25th.

With the news of Osirusoft's troubles, Do I need to disable them in 
Declude? What are the repercussions of having Osirusoft enabled right now?

Thanks,
D.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAM being sent to personal account after upgrade to Imail 8after upgrade to Imail 8

2003-06-07 Thread Michael Graveen 
Thanks.  I had only disabled DNS Backlist logging at the root.  I forgot to 
go into each domain and disable the antispam features.  I disable these and 
see what happens.

Mike

At 03:27 PM 6/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Before you figure out how things interact I strongly suggest you deactivate
the SPAM filtering in IMail.
First make sure all is as you were before then experiment with the spam
filtering that comes active with the upgrade.
Simply go the Antispam folder, uncheck all the options, specially in the 2nd
and 3rd tab.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Graveen
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAM being sent to personal account after
upgrade to Imail 8
Hello,
I just upgraded to IMail, version 8.  I also run declude junkmail.  Mail
that fails certain SPAM tests I have routed to a SPAM account.  After the
upgrade to IMail 8, SPAM originally destined for other accounts on our
server, that were caught and sent to the SPAM account, are being sent to my
personal account.  They should be getting routed to the SPAM account.  I'm
not sure what's going on because some mail still goes to the SPAM
account.  Has anyone else experienced this?  Any insight on this would be
appreciated.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To unsubscribe,
just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found at
http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAM being sent to personal account after upgrade to Imail 8

2003-06-07 Thread Michael Graveen 
Hello,
I just upgraded to IMail, version 8.  I also run declude junkmail.  Mail 
that fails certain SPAM tests I have routed to a SPAM account.  After the 
upgrade to IMail 8, SPAM originally destined for other accounts on our 
server, that were caught and sent to the SPAM account, are being sent to my 
personal account.  They should be getting routed to the SPAM account.  I'm 
not sure what's going on because some mail still goes to the SPAM 
account.  Has anyone else experienced this?  Any insight on this would be 
appreciated.

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot

2003-02-17 Thread Michael Graveen 

I use F-Prot with Declude and I am very satisfied with it.
Mike
At 11:52 AM 2/17/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Is anyone
using f-prot with Imail and Declude ?? I'm presently using Mcafee net
shield but I am always looking for alternatives ...
 
TIA
Doris