RE: [Declude.Virus] Imail Queue Manager/SMTP at 100% after declude f-prot updates

2004-03-19 Thread GlobalWeb.net Webmaster
The server is a Compaq Proliant with Dual Piii 800's, RAID 5 (I know - RAID
1,0 is better - it's on the schedule to be re-config'd), 1GB RAM, defragged
by diskkeeper every nite

We run IMAIL program on C: and spool  mailboxes on D:

I identified the outside hit increase as coming from an outside address
sending mail in; have blocked te address and all is running smooth again 


Sincerely,

Randy Armbrecht
Global Web SolutionsR, Inc.
804-346-5300 ext. 1
877-800-GLOBAL (4562) ext. 1
http://globalweb.net

Richmond's Internet Source since 1996!
WEB HOSTING including EMAIL beginning at $29/month!
Non-Profits - receive a 25% discount!




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Imail Queue Manager/SMTP at 100% after declude
 f-prot updates


We have been running Declude JM Pro and Declude Virus Standard for 
almost 2 years now; it wasn't until shortly afer the updates to both 
Declude and F-Prot yesterday that this occurred...The CPU with all 
services running is sustained normally between the 20%-50% range with 
peaks to 75%

We generally average about:
LocalDeliver29000
RemoteDeliver9500

If you have a single 500MHz CPU, you'll likely see the CPU usage you
describe.  A dual 2GHz CPU server, though, should not.

However, in the daily report we generate overnight that I got this 
a.m., the RemoteDeliver from yesterday was up to 22,000.  I am looking 
into where these extra messages were generated from right now.

[I am still a little concerned as to why the server was pegged at 100% 
for a double increase in usage; it seems to me the server should be 
able to handle much more than that.]

If the server has an older CPU, or if the server is doing other tasks (SQL,
web, etc.), that would explain the problem.

When the server is at 100% CPU, when you use Task Manager, click on the
Processes tab, and then click on the CPU button, what process(es) are
closest to the top (using the most CPU)?  One process at near 100% CPU
usage?  Several processes that together use up close to 100% CPU?

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]


---
[This message was Virus Scanned by GlobalWeb.net]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

How about putting the interim release number on the interim release page?
That is something that we have considered, but we will likely not be doing 
(due to the extra work involved).

Or when you do announce interim releases to the list including the interim
release number.  That way everyone would know it before installing and
running -diag to find out what version they are running.
This we try to do when we first announce a new interim.  However, once we 
come out with the new interim and announce it, we stop referring to the 
specific interim, as new interims may have come out since.  That way, there 
is a record of important changes in interims, while minimizing confusion.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread andyb
Hi,

I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
banned right now).

Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I do
a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
work?

Thanks, andy
thumpernet

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
banned right now).
Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I do
a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
work?
You could disable virus scanning for that one customer (if you are using 
Declude Virus Pro).  But it is not possible to set the banned file 
extensions or vulnerability detect on a per-user or per-domain basis.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread Douglas Cohn
I agree with your customer.  Why do you ban all zip files?  How are they expected to 
conduct business if their business requires transferring files?  My customers required 
that I create a way for them to retrieve the infected files for them.

You could simply do that.  Allow the customer to retrieve the infected files if 
desired by creating a link and script to copy them into the spool dir.

Blocking encrypted zips is one thing but why all zip files?

Doug


-- Original Message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:44:15 -0500

Hi,

I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
banned right now).

Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I do
a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
work?

Thanks, andy
thumpernet

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


 




 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread andyb
Because I am dealing with unsophisticated uses that click on anything
attached.

There was so much confusion on the list at the time that I just banned all
zip files, better safe than sorry.

I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.

I know, I know, go search the archives.. That is exactly why it is the
way it is.  I'm one of those people that believe telling people to go search
the archives is a waste of time.   Everytime I search the archives, I never
find what  I need and I end up asking anywayor I ask Scott off list so I
don't get ridiculed for asking (that's why I pay for a support contract, to
get support).

If things have settled down enough now so that it is OK to allow certain zip
files to go through, I'd be happy to do that if I knew concisely how.

Thanks, andy

- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?


 I agree with your customer.  Why do you ban all zip files?  How are they
expected to conduct business if their business requires transferring files?
My customers required that I create a way for them to retrieve the infected
files for them.

 You could simply do that.  Allow the customer to retrieve the infected
files if desired by creating a link and script to copy them into the spool
dir.

 Blocking encrypted zips is one thing but why all zip files?

 Doug


 -- Original Message --
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:44:15 -0500

 Hi,
 
 I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
 banned right now).
 
 Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I
do
 a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
 work?
 
 Thanks, andy
 thumpernet
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 







 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread andyb
I have the pro version

syntax please

Thanks, andy

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?



 I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
 banned right now).
 
 Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I
do
 a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
 work?

 You could disable virus scanning for that one customer (if you are using
 Declude Virus Pro).  But it is not possible to set the banned file
 extensions or vulnerability detect on a per-user or per-domain basis.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

 You could disable virus scanning for that one customer (if you are using
 Declude Virus Pro).  But it is not possible to set the banned file
 extensions or vulnerability detect on a per-user or per-domain basis.

I have the pro version

syntax please
You can add a line [EMAIL PROTECTED]OFF to the 
\IMail\Declude\virus_users.txt file (if that file doesn't exist, you can 
just create one, with that one line in it -- making sure that the cursor 
can go to the line below it).

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.
FYI, the latest advice is:

[1] Run the latest interim of Declude Virus (1.78i27 or later), and
[2] Block all encrypted .ZIP files by adding a line BANEXT EZIP to the 
\IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file.

That shuold block all known viruses.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread Darin Cox
Try just banning encrypted zips and allowing your virus scanner to handle
issues with non-encrypted zips.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?


Because I am dealing with unsophisticated uses that click on anything
attached.

There was so much confusion on the list at the time that I just banned all
zip files, better safe than sorry.

I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.

I know, I know, go search the archives.. That is exactly why it is the
way it is.  I'm one of those people that believe telling people to go search
the archives is a waste of time.   Everytime I search the archives, I never
find what  I need and I end up asking anywayor I ask Scott off list so I
don't get ridiculed for asking (that's why I pay for a support contract, to
get support).

If things have settled down enough now so that it is OK to allow certain zip
files to go through, I'd be happy to do that if I knew concisely how.

Thanks, andy

- Original Message -
From: Douglas Cohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?


 I agree with your customer.  Why do you ban all zip files?  How are they
expected to conduct business if their business requires transferring files?
My customers required that I create a way for them to retrieve the infected
files for them.

 You could simply do that.  Allow the customer to retrieve the infected
files if desired by creating a link and script to copy them into the spool
dir.

 Blocking encrypted zips is one thing but why all zip files?

 Doug


 -- Original Message --
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date:  Fri, 19 Mar 2004 12:44:15 -0500

 Hi,
 
 I have a customer that is insisting I let .zip files through (I have them
 banned right now).
 
 Is there any way to allow email to a single address to go through?  If I
do
 a whitelist entry for this one email address in the global.cfg, will that
 work?
 
 Thanks, andy
 thumpernet
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 







 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]



_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread andyb
Thanks Scott,

Best money I ever spent - Declude.

Can't say enough how much your efforts are appreciated.

:)  Andy
Thumpernet

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?



 I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
 need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.

 FYI, the latest advice is:

 [1] Run the latest interim of Declude Virus (1.78i27 or later), and
 [2] Block all encrypted .ZIP files by adding a line BANEXT EZIP to the
 \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file.

 That shuold block all known viruses.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread andyb
and

BANEZIPEXTS  ON

is no longer needed, correct?

Thanks, Andy

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?



 I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
 need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.

 FYI, the latest advice is:

 [1] Run the latest interim of Declude Virus (1.78i27 or later), and
 [2] Block all encrypted .ZIP files by adding a line BANEXT EZIP to the
 \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file.

 That shuold block all known viruses.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?

2004-03-19 Thread Wind
Thanks Scott,

Best money I ever spent - Declude.

Can't say enough how much your efforts are appreciated.

:)  Andy
Thumpernet

Same to me !

Thank you a lot, Scott for this great product and the excellent support!

Uwe

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] whitelisting?



 I would now need to go back and try to figure out exactly what settings I
 need to stop the bad stuff and allow the good stuff.

 FYI, the latest advice is:

 [1] Run the latest interim of Declude Virus (1.78i27 or later), and
 [2] Block all encrypted .ZIP files by adding a line BANEXT EZIP to the
 \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file.

 That shuold block all known viruses.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] OBJECT CODE vulnerability - Notifications

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

I was wondering what if any notification are sent out when this is
caught.  Is there anything needed to be changed in the global or virus.cfg
files?  I downloaded and installed the latest interim release.
These are treated exactly the same as all other vulnerabilities.  You do 
not need to make any config files changes; the latest interim release 
handles it automatically.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] How do we block the next Bagle?

2004-03-19 Thread Greg Little
How will we block a virus like Bagle.Q that does not use an auto run 
vulnerability?
There's still no attachment to hand off to the mail server's virus 
scanner(s).
If the body was VERY standard, it could be pattern matched by Declude. 
Add a little random action to the body (and the port used) and here we 
go again.

The latest batch of Bagle's (Q,R,S,T) can be blocked because, while not 
a virus, it breaks the rules.
(Auto run using a hole in MS outlook)

The next version may be the same, except the user has to run it by hand.
Just a 1 K e-mail with a link to a recently compromised PC.
When will it end?? (or at least slow down)

PS Scott,
Thanks for the recently added Vulnerability blocking. (for Q R S  T)
--

	Greg Little

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Findlay Internet]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.Virus] OBJECT CODE vulnerability - Notifications

2004-03-19 Thread Jeff Maze - Hostmaster
Great.. Thanks.. 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] OBJECT CODE vulnerability - Notifications


 I was wondering what if any notification are sent out when 
this is caught.  Is there anything needed to be changed in the global 
or virus.cfg files?  I downloaded and installed the latest interim release.

These are treated exactly the same as all other vulnerabilities.  You do not
need to make any config files changes; the latest interim release handles it
automatically.


-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To unsubscribe, just
send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] How do we block the next Bagle?

2004-03-19 Thread Matt
Heuristics!

This was a novel, but lame attempt at exploiting a download 
vulnerability.  This would have been 1,000 times worse if the virus 
dynamically provided a list of IP's from known infected computers.  This 
can be done, and eventually it will be done.  The kid writing Bagle has 
shown that he has some talent for coming up with new tricks, and so far 
he has come up with the best human engineering attempt, and new exploits 
for password protected files and hiding the payload outside of the 
E-mail.  It's clear to me that a person that knows this stuff has some 
experience with E-mail systems and he almost definitely works for spammers.

If he was to mix some human engineering with remotely hosted code, the 
result could be disastrous.  This attempt was lame because the exploit 
was old, long-past patched, easily detectable, and it relied on hard 
coded IP's.

Pete from Sniffer has been coding up new rules for this stuff (not all 
of his clients use Declude Virus), and if you have JunkMail Pro, it's 
easy to write a filter to block something that is IP linked to port 81.  
In the future, there will likely be little difference between what is 
necessary to block spam and viruses, and I could see when it might make 
sense to merge functionality between Declude Virus and Declude JunkMail 
to achieve a higher level of heuristics.  Full MIME parsing in JunkMail 
may very well give us many useful capabilities.  For now, I don't see 
the need as being urgent, but I've thought that such a thing as you 
described was possible for some time, and I've been wondering why it 
didn't happen.  Maybe the AV scanner companies will come out with 
command line functionality that includes content heuristics some time in 
the future.

FYI, I've found Declude JunkMail on my system tends to catch most all of 
the undetected variants that slip through in normal ZIP files early on.

Matt



Greg Little wrote:

How will we block a virus like Bagle.Q that does not use an auto run 
vulnerability?
There's still no attachment to hand off to the mail server's virus 
scanner(s).
If the body was VERY standard, it could be pattern matched by Declude. 
Add a little random action to the body (and the port used) and here we 
go again.

The latest batch of Bagle's (Q,R,S,T) can be blocked because, while 
not a virus, it breaks the rules.
(Auto run using a hole in MS outlook)

The next version may be the same, except the user has to run it by hand.
Just a 1 K e-mail with a link to a recently compromised PC.
When will it end?? (or at least slow down)

PS Scott,
Thanks for the recently added Vulnerability blocking. (for Q R S  T)
--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] How do we block the next Bagle?

2004-03-19 Thread Matt




I'm a big fan of deeper categorization. I believe these are listed in
the Experimental category presently, but due to some of the patterns in
that rule base, I actually score it lower than the others. This change
in particular though wouldn't likely affect us since Scott has been up
on the issues and working around them as they appear.

Matt



Scott Fisher wrote:

  Perhaps Pete from Sniffer could assign a new Message Sniffer Result Code just for these heuristics.
We could then assign a hold based on this specific result code.

Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

  
  

  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/04 03:42PM 

  

  
  Heuristics!

This was a novel, but lame attempt at exploiting a download 
vulnerability.  This would have been 1,000 times worse if the virus 
dynamically provided a list of IP's from known infected computers.  This 
can be done, and eventually it will be done.  The kid writing Bagle has 
shown that he has some talent for coming up with new tricks, and so far 
he has come up with the best human engineering attempt, and new exploits 
for password protected files and hiding the payload outside of the 
E-mail.  It's clear to me that a person that knows this stuff has some 
experience with E-mail systems and he almost definitely works for spammers.

If he was to mix some human engineering with remotely hosted code, the 
result could be disastrous.  This attempt was lame because the exploit 
was old, long-past patched, easily detectable, and it relied on hard 
coded IP's.

Pete from Sniffer has been coding up new rules for this stuff (not all 
of his clients use Declude Virus), and if you have JunkMail Pro, it's 
easy to write a filter to block something that is IP linked to port 81.  
In the future, there will likely be little difference between what is 
necessary to block spam and viruses, and I could see when it might make 
sense to merge functionality between Declude Virus and Declude JunkMail 
to achieve a higher level of heuristics.  Full MIME parsing in JunkMail 
may very well give us many useful capabilities.  For now, I don't see 
the need as being urgent, but I've thought that such a thing as you 
described was possible for some time, and I've been wondering why it 
didn't happen.  Maybe the AV scanner companies will come out with 
command line functionality that includes content heuristics some time in 
the future.

FYI, I've found Declude JunkMail on my system tends to catch most all of 
the undetected variants that slip through in normal ZIP files early on.

Matt



Greg Little wrote:

  
  
How will we block a virus like Bagle.Q that does not use an "auto run" 
vulnerability?
There's still no attachment to hand off to the mail server's virus 
scanner(s).
If the body was VERY standard, it could be pattern matched by Declude. 
Add a little random action to the body (and the port used) and here we 
go again.

The latest batch of Bagle's (Q,R,S,T) can be blocked because, while 
not a virus, it breaks the rules.
(Auto run using a hole in MS outlook)

The next version may be the same, except the user has to run it by hand.
Just a 1 K e-mail with a link to a recently compromised PC.

When will it end?? (or at least slow down)

PS Scott,
Thanks for the recently added Vulnerability blocking. (for Q R S  T)


  
  
  


-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=




Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?

2004-03-19 Thread IMail Admin
Hi Scott, and thanks for the reply.  This leads to another issue: we haven't
used your interim releases because these are either considered beta or alpha
(according to your interim page).  We normally try to use only the standard
(final) releases on our production software.  Following this newsgroup, it
seems like your current beta/alpha versions have a lot of cool features, but
they're still beta/alpha.  So do we have to use beta/alpha versions to be
current and safe?  With other software, such as MS Windows Server 2003, it's
not critical to use them right away, so we wait a while (until there's a
service pack or two for MS OS software, for example), but with AV
protection, as well as SPAM protection, we need to be really current.  So
how do we reconcile this?

Ben

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?



 Normally, I don't see these because I set my Outlook Express security
 settings to refuse ActiveX objects.  The question is, is this considered
a
 virus?  Should we (with Declude and F-Prot) have caught  blocked it?  If
 not, then why not?  Or did I just miss something in our setup?  What's
your
 opinion of mail like this?

 This is one of these odd ones -- the E-mail doesn't contain a virus, but
 the person receiving the E-mail may receive a virus (which gets downloaded
 from a web site).  The latest interim of Declude Virus at
 http://www.declude.com/interim catches this vulnerability.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?

2004-03-19 Thread Scott Fisher
Like Scott said, you have to weigh the risks.

In my opinion (therefore my company's opinion) the risk of a undetectable virus 
getting through, as in the case of the encrypted zip viruses, far outweighs the risk 
of encountering an undetected Declude glitch in the alpha/betas. If mail flow were to 
stop because of an alpha/beta, I'd then be forced to go back to a previous release.


Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/19/04 04:21PM 
Hi Scott, and thanks for the reply.  This leads to another issue: we haven't
used your interim releases because these are either considered beta or alpha
(according to your interim page).  We normally try to use only the standard
(final) releases on our production software.  Following this newsgroup, it
seems like your current beta/alpha versions have a lot of cool features, but
they're still beta/alpha.  So do we have to use beta/alpha versions to be
current and safe?  With other software, such as MS Windows Server 2003, it's
not critical to use them right away, so we wait a while (until there's a
service pack or two for MS OS software, for example), but with AV
protection, as well as SPAM protection, we need to be really current.  So
how do we reconcile this?

Ben

- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] Are ActiveX controls considered viruses?



 Normally, I don't see these because I set my Outlook Express security
 settings to refuse ActiveX objects.  The question is, is this considered
a
 virus?  Should we (with Declude and F-Prot) have caught  blocked it?  If
 not, then why not?  Or did I just miss something in our setup?  What's
your
 opinion of mail like this?

 This is one of these odd ones -- the E-mail doesn't contain a virus, but
 the person receiving the E-mail may receive a virus (which gets downloaded
 from a web site).  The latest interim of Declude Virus at
 http://www.declude.com/interim catches this vulnerability.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.14e Settings

2004-03-19 Thread Bill Newberg
Scott,

What are the recommended settings for 3.14e?

Should we add /ARCHIVE=5/SERVER/PARANOID? Anything else?

Thanks,

Bill

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.Virus] Suggestion

2004-03-19 Thread Robert Grosshandler
I'm lazy (actually, just small staff, and I want to keep it that way).

I would love to find a way to give Scott  Co. the way to automatically
force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, if important.

I understand that there is a possibility that might backfire, but I think
that's less a troubling issue than letting something nasty through to users.

Of course, the nasties always seem to come out on weekends, or nights, or
when I'm on vacation, when I don't want to have somebody on duty to make the
decision, and then do the upgrade.  I'd rather the decision be Scott's, and
the process be automatic.

It could be as simple as a special mailbox that triggers an action on my
server.  If a specially formated e-mail sent by Scott reaches that mailbox,
the action does the download.  We use that to trigger Sniffer downloads, and
it works flawlessly.

I haven't seen anything like that for Declude, and I scanned the archives,
but I may have missed it.  If so, my apologies.

Rob



www.iGive.com

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] F-Prot 3.14e Settings

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

What are the recommended settings for 3.14e?
We haven't yet changed our recommended settings for F-Prot.  We just don't 
have enough information yet -- we don't know what kind of false positives 
may result from any changes.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] Suggestion

2004-03-19 Thread R. Scott Perry

I would love to find a way to give Scott  Co. the way to automatically
force my installation to upgrade to the next interim release, if important.
That is a good idea.  There is a third party program that can automatically 
upgrade to new betas and released versions, but it doesn't handle interims, 
nor does it have a way that we can trigger it somehow.  We will be looking 
into the possibility of adding an option for pushing updates to customers.

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.Virus.The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.Virus] How do we block the next Bagle?

2004-03-19 Thread Pete McNeil


To clarify, group 62 is experimental.
Malware is in group 55.
_M
At 05:20 PM 3/19/2004, you wrote:
I'm a big fan of deeper
categorization. I believe these are listed in the Experimental
category presently, but due to some of the patterns in that rule base, I
actually score it lower than the others. This change in particular
though wouldn't likely affect us since Scott has been up on the issues
and working around them as they appear.

Matt

Scott Fisher wrote:

Perhaps Pete from Sniffer could assign a new Message Sniffer Result
Code just for these heuristics.
We could then assign a hold based on this specific result code.

Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies



[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/19/04 03:42PM 
 
Heuristics!

This was a novel, but lame attempt at exploiting a download 
vulnerability. This would have been 1,000 times worse if the virus 
dynamically provided a list of IP's from known infected computers. This 
can be done, and eventually it will be done. The kid writing Bagle has 
shown that he has some talent for coming up with new tricks, and so far 
he has come up with the best human engineering attempt, and new exploits 
for password protected files and hiding the payload outside of the 
E-mail. It's clear to me that a person that knows this stuff has some 
experience with E-mail systems and he almost definitely works for spammers.

If he was to mix some human engineering with remotely hosted code, the 
result could be disastrous. This attempt was lame because the exploit 
was old, long-past patched, easily detectable, and it relied on hard 
coded IP's.

Pete from Sniffer has been coding up new rules for this stuff (not all 
of his clients use Declude Virus), and if you have JunkMail Pro, it's 
easy to write a filter to block something that is IP linked to port 81. 
In the future, there will likely be little difference between what is 
necessary to block spam and viruses, and I could see when it might make 
sense to merge functionality between Declude Virus and Declude JunkMail 
to achieve a higher level of heuristics. Full MIME parsing in JunkMail 
may very well give us many useful capabilities. For now, I don't see 
the need as being urgent, but I've thought that such a thing as you 
described was possible for some time, and I've been wondering why it 
didn't happen. Maybe the AV scanner companies will come out with 
command line functionality that includes content heuristics some time in 
the future.

FYI, I've found Declude JunkMail on my system tends to catch most all of 
the undetected variants that slip through in normal ZIP files early on.

Matt



Greg Little wrote:

 
How will we block a virus like Bagle.Q that does not use an auto run 
vulnerability?
There's still no attachment to hand off to the mail server's virus 
scanner(s).
If the body was VERY standard, it could be pattern matched by Declude. 
Add a little random action to the body (and the port used) and here we 
go again.

The latest batch of Bagle's (Q,R,S,T) can be blocked because, while 
not a virus, it breaks the rules.
(Auto run using a hole in MS outlook)

The next version may be the same, except the user has to run it by hand.
Just a 1 K e-mail with a link to a recently compromised PC.

When will it end?? (or at least slow down)

PS Scott,
Thanks for the recently added Vulnerability blocking. (for Q R S  T)

 

 
-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=