Re: What are the new features in 4.2?
Mike, I closed it. 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Hi Animesh, Upon seeing your e-mail here, I tried to go in and mark mine as Resolved, but the control for this is disabled. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: You can use this JIRA filter for 4.2 features and improvements https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12323963 Some of the items are in open state which I am following to get them closed. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:30 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: What are the new features in 4.2? Hello guys, I've been trying to find a definitive new features for 4.2, but failed. Can anyone point me to the right URL or make a summary of what's new? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: What are the new features in 4.2?
Thanks! On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, I closed it. 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Hi Animesh, Upon seeing your e-mail here, I tried to go in and mark mine as Resolved, but the control for this is disabled. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: You can use this JIRA filter for 4.2 features and improvements https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12323963 Some of the items are in open state which I am following to get them closed. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:30 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: What are the new features in 4.2? Hello guys, I've been trying to find a definitive new features for 4.2, but failed. Can anyone point me to the right URL or make a summary of what's new? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
RE: IP Address Allocation
Can this be done on system VMs as well? I see that its targeted for the guests, if there is a way to abstract and apply ip address on any component - it would certainly make ACS much more flexible than it is now. -Original Message- From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:29 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation We can define a third type of element for IP Address Allocation, let me look at the code and see is there is standard base class that it can extend or we have to come up with a new base class like we have for NetworkElements. -Soheil From: Chiradeep Vittal [chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alex Huang Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation The way the gurus are consulted for network design and reservation makes it difficult to put this inside a guru. However it does seem odd to put this inside an element. Perhaps we need a 3rd type (IpAddressReserver?) On 8/6/13 10:42 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: The NetworkGuru does a lot more than IP address allocation, e.g. handle the Layer2/3 networking unique to the particular vendor. There are a lot of NetworkElements providing their own NetworkGuru plugins (Nicira, MidoNet, ...) extending the standard CloudStack Gurus. The feature of providing IP Address Allocation, DHCP and DNS is common for all these networks, so rather than provide our own Guru the proposed design would allow the above functions to coexist with existing Gurus. -Soheil From: Murali Reddy [murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation On 06/08/13 8:59 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be updated by the NetworkElement. There is logic in getIp(), the current IP Allocation that handles the case where the Nic Profile already has an IP Address. This needs to be updated to handle this new use case. The current use case assume that the VM had already been prepared once and has an IP Address allocated that could be reused. Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Purpose of Guru (to design the network) and Element (implement the network) are different. Right way would be for your plug-in to implement both network Guru and element and let the guru do the IP address allocation. -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IP Address Allocation I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP Address and you must develop a NetworkGuru to provide this function. There is some customization of the IP Address designed into the Secondary NICs (see allocateGuestIP()). -Soheil
RE: Is the simulator broken?
Eventually got it running.
Still hangs during marvin.setup though.
On 6 Aug 2013 18:55, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Can you try: mvn -P developer,systemvm,simulator -D nonoss,simulator
clean install
-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is the simulator broken?
Yeah complied with:
mvn -P developer,systemvm -D nonoss,simulator clean install
Will retry...
On 6 August 2013 14:43, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
I haven't tried on master but it seems to be broken on 4.2:
I see this in the management server log when starting systemVMs
https://gist.github.com/vogxn/6164508
But that error you showed just means the simulator jar was not found
in the classpath. Did you build with the -Dsimulator switch?
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 12:51:41PM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
Hi,
Is the simulator broken?
Trying to run
nosetests -v --with-marvin --marvin-config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg -w
/tmp
and getting
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /opt/python/bin/nosetests, line 9, in module
load_entry_point('nose==1.3.0', 'console_scripts', 'nosetests')()
File /opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/core.py, line
118, in __init__
**extra_args)
File /opt/python/lib/python2.7/unittest/main.py, line 94, in
__init__
self.parseArgs(argv)
File /opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/core.py, line
135, in parseArgs
self.config.configure(argv, doc=self.usage())
File /opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/config.py, line
344, in configure
self.plugins.configure(options, self)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/plugins/manager.py,
line 284, in configure
cfg(options, config)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/plugins/manager.py,
line 99, in __call__
return self.call(*arg, **kw)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/plugins/manager.py,
line 167, in simple
result = meth(*arg, **kw)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/marvinPlugin.py,
line 68, in configure
deploy.loadCfg() if options.load else deploy.deploy()
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
line 576, in deploy
self.createZones(self.config.zones)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
line 408, in createZones
self.createpods(zone.pods, zoneId)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
line 126, in createpods
vmwareDc=pod.vmwaredc)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/deployDataCenter.py,
line 84, in createClusters
clusterresponse = self.apiClient.addCluster(clustercmd)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackAPI/cloudst
ackAPIClient.py,
line 1378, in addCluster
response = self.connection.marvin_request(command,
response_type=response, method=method)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackConnection.
py,
line 222, in marvin_request
response = jsonHelper.getResultObj(response.json(), response_type)
File
/opt/python/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/jsonHelper.py,
line 148, in getResultObj
raise cloudstackException.cloudstackAPIException(respname,
errMsg)
marvin.cloudstackException.cloudstackAPIException: Execute cmd:
addcluster failed, due to: errorCode: 431, errorText:Could not find
corresponding resource manager for simulator
--
Prasanna.,
Powered by BigRock.com
Documentation Question
Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
RE: IP Address Allocation
Agree that the IP Address allocation is different than the DHCP and DNS service offered by the NetworkElements. The third party NetworkGurus just reference the standard NetworkManager IP Address Allocation routines, either directly (e.g. _networkMgr.assignPublicIpAddress()) or by calling out to the GuestNetworkGuru. I would say in the current design the Network Manager manages the IP Addresses not the Network Gurus. I don't think this is a bad design, in that the NetworkGurus are sharing the same ip address allocation and get new features (e.g. IP reservation or VM migration) without implementing new code to support them. -Soheil From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:27 AM To: Chiradeep Vittal; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation We can either break NetworkManager down further and say NetworkGuru sets the actual parameters of the network and a new IpAddressReserver sets the ip address or we can let NetworkGurus identify the IpAddressReserver to use themselves. I generally think NetworkManager shouldn't care where the ip address came from because it really shouldn't know anything about the actual network we're laying out for the end user. That's always been left to the NetworkGurus. If you think about it from that perspective, then it's natural that ip address is allocated by the NetworkGuru. But I can see different NetworkGurus may want to share the same ip address allocation tables/schemes so an interface for them to share that code does make sense. Note there's a difference between allocating ip address and the act of actually issuing the ip address and associating the ip address to a fqdn. That act is performed by the network elements. Here we're specifically saying who is responsible for figuring out the ip address that can be allocated to a particular vm and works within a network. --Alex -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alex Huang Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation The way the gurus are consulted for network design and reservation makes it difficult to put this inside a guru. However it does seem odd to put this inside an element. Perhaps we need a 3rd type (IpAddressReserver?) On 8/6/13 10:42 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: The NetworkGuru does a lot more than IP address allocation, e.g. handle the Layer2/3 networking unique to the particular vendor. There are a lot of NetworkElements providing their own NetworkGuru plugins (Nicira, MidoNet, ...) extending the standard CloudStack Gurus. The feature of providing IP Address Allocation, DHCP and DNS is common for all these networks, so rather than provide our own Guru the proposed design would allow the above functions to coexist with existing Gurus. -Soheil From: Murali Reddy [murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation On 06/08/13 8:59 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be updated by the NetworkElement. There is logic in getIp(), the current IP Allocation that handles the case where the Nic Profile already has an IP Address. This needs to be updated to handle this new use case. The current use case assume that the VM had already been prepared once and has an IP Address allocated that could be reused. Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Purpose of Guru (to design the network) and Element (implement the network) are different. Right way would be for your plug-in to implement both network Guru and element and let the guru do the IP address allocation. -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IP Address Allocation I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP Address and you must develop a NetworkGuru to provide this function. There is some customization of the IP Address designed into the Secondary NICs (see allocateGuestIP()). -Soheil
Re: What are the new features in 4.2?
Thanks again, Wei. It's silly what happened (just noticed). I thought I was logged in to JIRA, but it was another web system, so not being logged in is why that option was disabled. :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks! On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, I closed it. 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Hi Animesh, Upon seeing your e-mail here, I tried to go in and mark mine as Resolved, but the control for this is disabled. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: You can use this JIRA filter for 4.2 features and improvements https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12323963 Some of the items are in open state which I am following to get them closed. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:30 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: What are the new features in 4.2? Hello guys, I've been trying to find a definitive new features for 4.2, but failed. Can anyone point me to the right URL or make a summary of what's new? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage
On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:17 p.m., edison su wrote: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java, line 77 https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/1/?file=334435#file334435line77 why not just use select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id? Rajesh Battala wrote: if we use the above query then we get list of scope values. mysql select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id; +-+ | scope | +-+ | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | ZONE| +-+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) So I had written the above query like SELECT_POOLSCOPE = SELECT s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id =(select pool_id from volumes where id =?); to fetch the scope of the storage pool where the volume is existing. edison su wrote: If this is the case, you can use select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id and v.id = your-volume-id? edison, the query select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id and v.id = your-volume-id will also get me the scope without any issue. the query you had mentioned is proper one. I will incorporate the change and rebase with 4.2 and submit the patch. - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24653 --- On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:07 a.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 10:07 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: 3781 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == for Volume operations we are finding the hypervisor type. Volume can be in ZONE/Cluster scope storage pool. when volume is in ZONE scope, there is issue with they way we fetch the hypervisor type. It was written to handle Cluster scope only. fixed: == Fixed with sql queries to fetch the Hypervisor type. 1. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from storage pool table if the voluem is in ZONE scope storage pool. 2. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from cluster table if the voluem is in CLUSTER scope storage pool. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDao.java 7b58e7d engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java e6595b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/ Testing --- Setup: KVM and Xenserver with Adv Zone. Added pool Zone scope on KVM and Cluster Scope on Xenserver 1. created instances on KVM and xenserver. 2. Create two volumes attached to instances on KVM and Xenserver. 3. vol1 is in Zone scope and vol2 is in cluster scope. 4. Successfully performed resize opertions on vol1 and vol2. 5. Succssfully attached/detaches volumes Thanks, Rajesh Battala
Re: [DISCUSS] Selectable UI list view rows
It's good to hear there is a demand for this. However, this is something that we could really use in our integrations targeted for 4.3. I have some spare cycles planned for contributing to CloudStack while working on our integrations if you're interested in talking more either online or off about your plans for implementation. I know I'm not as knowledgeable about the UI codebase, but I think I've got an idea about how to put this into listview.js with minimal impact and make it generic/reusable from the start. If I began working on it, I could test it against the list views that we would want to see it on within our plugin and work more closely with you when you have the bandwidth. -Chris On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.commailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com wrote: Hey Chris, I’ve actually created a ticket for this, which I’m planning to implement in a future release (hopefully the next one if I have the bandwidth). See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1579 This will require a good deal of refactoring of existing code to support though, so to start it will probably be implemented on 1-2 sections; most likely instances and events/alerts which is where it is requested the most. -Brian From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.comhttp://netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:57 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Selectable UI list view rows One feature I'd like to look in to is allowing list views to have 'selectable' rows. With this, users could check individual rows of a list view to perform some action on a subset of the list. When one or more row is selected, the list of actions at the top of the list view would be filtered to only those which can be performed on the selected rows. Additionally, there would be a checkbox in the header of the list view which would allow the user to quickly select/unselect all items in the list. Maybe a quick mockup will help make this more clear: Any thoughts, concerns, feedback or existing plans for something like this? Thanks, Chris
Re: What are the new features in 4.2?
:) 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Thanks again, Wei. It's silly what happened (just noticed). I thought I was logged in to JIRA, but it was another web system, so not being logged in is why that option was disabled. :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks! On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, I closed it. 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Hi Animesh, Upon seeing your e-mail here, I tried to go in and mark mine as Resolved, but the control for this is disabled. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: You can use this JIRA filter for 4.2 features and improvements https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12323963 Some of the items are in open state which I am following to get them closed. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:30 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: What are the new features in 4.2? Hello guys, I've been trying to find a definitive new features for 4.2, but failed. Can anyone point me to the right URL or make a summary of what's new? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
RE: IP Address Allocation
It is more a function of the networks that are managed, so any VM including SystemVMs would be managed. It would apply to both Public and Guest Networks. -Soheil From: Musayev, Ilya [imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation Can this be done on system VMs as well? I see that its targeted for the guests, if there is a way to abstract and apply ip address on any component - it would certainly make ACS much more flexible than it is now. -Original Message- From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:29 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation We can define a third type of element for IP Address Allocation, let me look at the code and see is there is standard base class that it can extend or we have to come up with a new base class like we have for NetworkElements. -Soheil From: Chiradeep Vittal [chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alex Huang Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation The way the gurus are consulted for network design and reservation makes it difficult to put this inside a guru. However it does seem odd to put this inside an element. Perhaps we need a 3rd type (IpAddressReserver?) On 8/6/13 10:42 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: The NetworkGuru does a lot more than IP address allocation, e.g. handle the Layer2/3 networking unique to the particular vendor. There are a lot of NetworkElements providing their own NetworkGuru plugins (Nicira, MidoNet, ...) extending the standard CloudStack Gurus. The feature of providing IP Address Allocation, DHCP and DNS is common for all these networks, so rather than provide our own Guru the proposed design would allow the above functions to coexist with existing Gurus. -Soheil From: Murali Reddy [murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:24 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation On 06/08/13 8:59 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be updated by the NetworkElement. There is logic in getIp(), the current IP Allocation that handles the case where the Nic Profile already has an IP Address. This needs to be updated to handle this new use case. The current use case assume that the VM had already been prepared once and has an IP Address allocated that could be reused. Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Purpose of Guru (to design the network) and Element (implement the network) are different. Right way would be for your plug-in to implement both network Guru and element and let the guru do the IP address allocation. -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IP Address Allocation I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP Address and you must develop a NetworkGuru to provide this function. There is some customization of the IP Address designed into the Secondary NICs (see allocateGuestIP()). -Soheil
Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes
+1 On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:43:22PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: Hi dev, I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2 for these changes. I incorporated feedback from the last thread. Per the by-laws, we're using a lazy majority for this vote. Please cast your vote now. I will tally the results in 72 hours. Here's my changelog: * Removed some spurious nbsp; entities * Added A technical decision is any decision that involves changes to the source code that we distribute in our official releases. to § 3.4.1 (Technical Decisions). * Added discussion-lead before consensus gathering in this section. * With the improved definition, I have tightened up the wording so that technical decisions must be made on @dev. * Added § 3.4.2, Non-Technical Decisions. Non-technical decisions are defined as in the inverse of technical decisions. They can be made on whatever list is appropriate. Formal voting will use a lazy 2/3 majority. Votes cannot be vetoed. * Changed § 3.4.3. (Release Plan) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.4. (Product Release) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.5. (Adoption of New Codebase) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.10. (Modifying Bylaws) to limit decisions to @dev. * Added an Oxford comma to the final paras of § 3.4.1. and § 3.4.2. * Section renumbering to accommodate § 3.4.2. And here's the patch: Index: bylaws.mdtext === --- bylaws.mdtext (revision 1510739) +++ bylaws.mdtext (working copy) @@ -198,41 +198,64 @@ 3.4.1. Technical Decisions +A technical decision is any decision that involves changes to the source code +that we distribute in our official releases. + Technical decisions should normally be made by the entire community using -consensusnbsp;gathering, and not through formal voting. +discussion-lead consensus gathering, and not through formal voting. -Technical decisions must be made on a project development mailing list. +Technical decisions must be made on the project development mailing list. During the consensus gathering process, technical decisions may be vetoed by any Committer with a valid reason. If a formal vote is started for a technical decision, the vote will be held as -a lazynbsp;consensusnbsp;of active committers. +a lazy consensus of active committers. -Any user, contributor, committer or PMC member can initiate a technical +Any user, contributor, committer, or PMC member can initiate a technical decision making process. -3.4.2. Release Plan +3.4.2. Non-Technical Decisions +A non-technical decisions is any decision that does not involve changes to the +source code that we distribute in our official releases. + +Non-technical decisions should normally be made by the entire community using +discussion-lead consensus-building, and not through formal voting. + +Non-technical decisions can be made on whichever project mailing list is most +appropriate. + +Non-technical decisions cannot be vetoed, but if there is strong opposition +a formal vote can be used to resolve the dispute. + +If a formal vote is started for a non-technical decision, the vote will be held +as a lazy 2/3 majority of active committers. + +Any user, contributor, committer, or PMC member can initiate a non-technical +decision making process. + +3.4.3. Release Plan + Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also nominates a Release Manager. A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on the project development mailing list. -3.4.3. Product Release +3.4.4. Product Release When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is required to accept the release as an official release of the project. Lazy Majority of active PMC members is required for approval. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on the project development mailing list. -3.4.4. Adoption of New Codebase +3.4.5. Adoption of New Codebase When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to gain approval, the existing code @@ -242,10 +265,10 @@ Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on the project development mailing list. -3.4.5. New Committer +3.4.6. New Committer When a new committer is proposed for the project. @@ -254,7 +277,7 @@ Any active PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on
Re: [DISCUSS] Selectable UI list view rows
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:48:50PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: It's good to hear there is a demand for this. However, this is something that we could really use in our integrations targeted for 4.3. I have some spare cycles planned for contributing to CloudStack while working on our integrations if you're interested in talking more either online or off about your plans for implementation. I know I'm not as knowledgeable about the UI codebase, but I think I've got an idea about how to put this into listview.js with minimal impact and make it generic/reusable from the start. If I began working on it, I could test it against the list views that we would want to see it on within our plugin and work more closely with you when you have the bandwidth. -Chris Awesome Chris, thanks for stepping up and volunteering. Brian, anything you can do to give him a jumpstart would rock. On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Brian Federle brian.fede...@citrix.commailto:brian.fede...@citrix.com wrote: Hey Chris, I’ve actually created a ticket for this, which I’m planning to implement in a future release (hopefully the next one if I have the bandwidth). See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1579 This will require a good deal of refactoring of existing code to support though, so to start it will probably be implemented on 1-2 sections; most likely instances and events/alerts which is where it is requested the most. -Brian From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.comhttp://netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:57 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Selectable UI list view rows One feature I'd like to look in to is allowing list views to have 'selectable' rows. With this, users could check individual rows of a list view to perform some action on a subset of the list. When one or more row is selected, the list of actions at the top of the list view would be filtered to only those which can be performed on the selected rows. Additionally, there would be a checkbox in the header of the list view which would allow the user to quickly select/unselect all items in the list. Maybe a quick mockup will help make this more clear: Any thoughts, concerns, feedback or existing plans for something like this? Thanks, Chris
Re: Is the simulator broken?
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:55:09PM +, Edison Su wrote: Can you try: mvn -P developer,systemvm,simulator -D nonoss,simulator clean install What changed that requires this now?
RE: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes
+1 -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 1:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes +1 On 8/5/13 2:43 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote: Hi dev, I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2 for these changes. I incorporated feedback from the last thread. Per the by-laws, we're using a lazy majority for this vote. Please cast your vote now. I will tally the results in 72 hours. Here's my changelog: * Removed some spurious nbsp; entities * Added A technical decision is any decision that involves changes to the source code that we distribute in our official releases. to § 3.4.1 (Technical Decisions). * Added discussion-lead before consensus gathering in this section. * With the improved definition, I have tightened up the wording so that technical decisions must be made on @dev. * Added § 3.4.2, Non-Technical Decisions. Non-technical decisions are defined as in the inverse of technical decisions. They can be made on whatever list is appropriate. Formal voting will use a lazy 2/3 majority. Votes cannot be vetoed. * Changed § 3.4.3. (Release Plan) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.4. (Product Release) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.5. (Adoption of New Codebase) to limit decisions to @dev. * Changed § 3.4.10. (Modifying Bylaws) to limit decisions to @dev. * Added an Oxford comma to the final paras of § 3.4.1. and § 3.4.2. * Section renumbering to accommodate § 3.4.2. And here's the patch: Index: bylaws.mdtext = == --- bylaws.mdtext (revision 1510739) +++ bylaws.mdtext (working copy) @@ -198,41 +198,64 @@ 3.4.1. Technical Decisions +A technical decision is any decision that involves changes to the +source code +that we distribute in our official releases. + Technical decisions should normally be made by the entire community using -consensusnbsp;gathering, and not through formal voting. +discussion-lead consensus gathering, and not through formal voting. -Technical decisions must be made on a project development mailing list. +Technical decisions must be made on the project development mailing list. During the consensus gathering process, technical decisions may be vetoed by any Committer with a valid reason. If a formal vote is started for a technical decision, the vote will be held as -a lazynbsp;consensusnbsp;of active committers. +a lazy consensus of active committers. -Any user, contributor, committer or PMC member can initiate a technical +Any user, contributor, committer, or PMC member can initiate a +technical decision making process. -3.4.2. Release Plan +3.4.2. Non-Technical Decisions +A non-technical decisions is any decision that does not involve +changes to the +source code that we distribute in our official releases. + +Non-technical decisions should normally be made by the entire +community using +discussion-lead consensus-building, and not through formal voting. + +Non-technical decisions can be made on whichever project mailing list +is most +appropriate. + +Non-technical decisions cannot be vetoed, but if there is strong opposition +a formal vote can be used to resolve the dispute. + +If a formal vote is started for a non-technical decision, the vote +will be held +as a lazy 2/3 majority of active committers. + +Any user, contributor, committer, or PMC member can initiate a non-technical +decision making process. + +3.4.3. Release Plan + Defines the timetable and work items for a release. The plan also nominates a Release Manager. A lazy majority of active committers is required for approval. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must +occur on the project development mailing list. -3.4.3. Product Release +3.4.4. Product Release When a release of one of the project's products is ready, a vote is required to accept the release as an official release of the project. Lazy Majority of active PMC members is required for approval. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must +occur on the project development mailing list. -3.4.4. Adoption of New Codebase +3.4.5. Adoption of New Codebase When the codebase for an existing, released product is to be replaced with an alternative codebase. If such a vote fails to gain approval, the existing code @@ -242,10 +265,10 @@ Lazy 2/3 majority of active PMC members. -Any active committer or PMC member may call a vote. The vote must occur on a +Any active committer or PMC member
RE: Documentation Question
Hi Mike, We use publican for documentation. There is a section on wiki for docs, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Doc+Writers Perhaps it will be helpful. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Documentation Question Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: Documentation Question
Great - thanks for the info! On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: Hi Mike, We use publican for documentation. There is a section on wiki for docs, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Doc+Writers Perhaps it will be helpful. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 2:53 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Documentation Question Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Changes --- Incorporated comments rebased with latest 4.2 and tested the patch. Bugs: 3781 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == for Volume operations we are finding the hypervisor type. Volume can be in ZONE/Cluster scope storage pool. when volume is in ZONE scope, there is issue with they way we fetch the hypervisor type. It was written to handle Cluster scope only. fixed: == Fixed with sql queries to fetch the Hypervisor type. 1. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from storage pool table if the voluem is in ZONE scope storage pool. 2. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from cluster table if the voluem is in CLUSTER scope storage pool. Diffs (updated) - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDao.java 7b58e7d engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java e6595b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/ Testing --- Setup: KVM and Xenserver with Adv Zone. Added pool Zone scope on KVM and Cluster Scope on Xenserver 1. created instances on KVM and xenserver. 2. Create two volumes attached to instances on KVM and Xenserver. 3. vol1 is in Zone scope and vol2 is in cluster scope. 4. Successfully performed resize opertions on vol1 and vol2. 5. Succssfully attached/detaches volumes Thanks, Rajesh Battala
RE: CONSOLE access via API
Antonio, Would you explain what the end goal is? Console access is token based and works directly with your browser and java plugin, I'm not certain what you would achieve by executing console access command in command line. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Antonio Petrocelli [mailto:a.petroce...@netsons.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:32 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CONSOLE access via API Hello, Under CloudStack UI interface, the console link is: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=x I'm trying to use signiture under API, all other commands works, but I'm trying to get VM console, just not work: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=xsignatu re=XX or http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/api?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=X X Could any friend point me correct command for console access through API? Thanks!
Re: [ACS411] 4.1.1 status
This was a mistake in our release process, however instead of re-spinning a 4.1.2 release just for this issue, I've chosen to modify debian/changelog in the source release copy that I built the debs from. They are now correct in cloudstack.apt-get.eu. On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:59:15PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: Wido, Just to confirm, Did you switch to the proper commit or tag? Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS411] 4.1.1 status Hi Chip, On 08/05/2013 08:01 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Hi all, Here's where we are: DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo. The DEBs contain snapshot in their version number. I don't think that is correct, is it? Wido RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed as soon as complete (soon) David is building the docs now. I'll announce once the RPM's and docs are published. -chip
Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24736 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: 3781 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == for Volume operations we are finding the hypervisor type. Volume can be in ZONE/Cluster scope storage pool. when volume is in ZONE scope, there is issue with they way we fetch the hypervisor type. It was written to handle Cluster scope only. fixed: == Fixed with sql queries to fetch the Hypervisor type. 1. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from storage pool table if the voluem is in ZONE scope storage pool. 2. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from cluster table if the voluem is in CLUSTER scope storage pool. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDao.java 7b58e7d engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java e6595b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/ Testing --- Setup: KVM and Xenserver with Adv Zone. Added pool Zone scope on KVM and Cluster Scope on Xenserver 1. created instances on KVM and xenserver. 2. Create two volumes attached to instances on KVM and Xenserver. 3. vol1 is in Zone scope and vol2 is in cluster scope. 4. Successfully performed resize opertions on vol1 and vol2. 5. Succssfully attached/detaches volumes Thanks, Rajesh Battala
RE: api calls in 4.1.1
Daan, The commit CLOUDSTACK-3080 seems like the only change that was made - that would be related. I'm about to try this out and find it - if that's what broke it. Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:26 PM To: dev Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 Ilya, listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next days and report back (wit test case or patch) regards, On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: H, What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else? regards, Daan 4.1.1 status is that we are working on pushing the docs, and then the release will be announced. -chip
RE: IP Address Allocation
I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make some compromises due to time constraints. I always intended to move the ip allocation into NetworkGurus and actually attempted to several times but, at the end for various reasons, we just couldn't complete that task. I generally believe that ip address allocation can actually be done even without CloudStack's database, for example, if it came from a master dhcp server or some IT central database. So an interface like IpAddressReserver to abstract that functionality would be great. I have to say the number of implementations for NetworkGuru grew faster than I expected. In one sense, it's a good sign that everyone was able to use it but then it exposes the work that was incomplete to begin with. IIRC, there's basically two problems I left on NetworkGuru to be better designed. One is this ip address allocation. The other problem is how to identify which set of NetworkGurus should manage the network. I believe that selection process should be much more transparent to the administrator who setup the CS deployment but because at the time only VLAN isolation was supported, I did not put that into CS. As more and more SDN technologies come online, it's best we design that process. I think Hugo made some changes there but I haven't had a chance to study how that all works now in 4.x yet. There are some artifacts in the code to show I was thinking about this. For example, Network and Nic carries the Isolation URI instead of just VLAN tag because it was intended to be cast by the NetworkGuru and then transported to the hypervisor. We expected anyone who plugs into CloudStack have two places to plug into: orchestration and actual provisioning. So the NetworkGuru forms the URI for isolation and then it has code at the hypervisor side to resolve the URI to something that the hypervisor can understand. --Alex -Original Message- From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:54 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation Agree that the IP Address allocation is different than the DHCP and DNS service offered by the NetworkElements. The third party NetworkGurus just reference the standard NetworkManager IP Address Allocation routines, either directly (e.g. _networkMgr.assignPublicIpAddress()) or by calling out to the GuestNetworkGuru. I would say in the current design the Network Manager manages the IP Addresses not the Network Gurus. I don't think this is a bad design, in that the NetworkGurus are sharing the same ip address allocation and get new features (e.g. IP reservation or VM migration) without implementing new code to support them. -Soheil From: Alex Huang [alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:27 AM To: Chiradeep Vittal; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: IP Address Allocation We can either break NetworkManager down further and say NetworkGuru sets the actual parameters of the network and a new IpAddressReserver sets the ip address or we can let NetworkGurus identify the IpAddressReserver to use themselves. I generally think NetworkManager shouldn't care where the ip address came from because it really shouldn't know anything about the actual network we're laying out for the end user. That's always been left to the NetworkGurus. If you think about it from that perspective, then it's natural that ip address is allocated by the NetworkGuru. But I can see different NetworkGurus may want to share the same ip address allocation tables/schemes so an interface for them to share that code does make sense. Note there's a difference between allocating ip address and the act of actually issuing the ip address and associating the ip address to a fqdn. That act is performed by the network elements. Here we're specifically saying who is responsible for figuring out the ip address that can be allocated to a particular vm and works within a network. --Alex -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:14 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alex Huang Subject: Re: IP Address Allocation The way the gurus are consulted for network design and reservation makes it difficult to put this inside a guru. However it does seem odd to put this inside an element. Perhaps we need a 3rd type (IpAddressReserver?) On 8/6/13 10:42 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: The NetworkGuru does a lot more than IP address allocation, e.g. handle the Layer2/3 networking unique to the particular vendor. There are a lot of NetworkElements providing their own NetworkGuru plugins (Nicira, MidoNet, ...) extending the standard CloudStack Gurus. The feature of providing IP Address Allocation, DHCP and DNS is common for all these networks, so rather than provide our
RE: Documentation Question
Mike, Is this what you are looking for? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Doc+Writers Jessica T. From: Mike Tutkowski [mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:52 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Documentation Question Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: Documentation Question
Yeah - thanks! :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote: Mike, Is this what you are looking for? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Doc+Writers Jessica T. From: Mike Tutkowski [mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:52 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Documentation Question Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: Documentation Question
It looks like I'll need to provide an XML file using certain tags and then link to it from another doc. I'm working on the content now. Thanks again On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Yeah - thanks! :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@citrix.com wrote: Mike, Is this what you are looking for? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Doc+Writers Jessica T. From: Mike Tutkowski [mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:52 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Documentation Question Hi, I am working on documenting the SolidFire (storage) plug-in I developed for 4.2. I have plenty of documentation handy, but am not familiar with how I should document this for CloudStack. Would someone be able to point me to a template so I know how mine documentation should look and where it should be placed? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: queryAsyncJobResult ISSUE on 4.1.0
Is it possible that you actually called StartVm ? From: Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.commailto:a.petroce...@netsons.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 6:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: queryAsyncJobResult ISSUE on 4.1.0 It is normal that after a deployVirtualMachine request the queryAsyncJobResult response is: 'cmd' = 'org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd' ? it should be: 'cmd' = 'org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd' Thanks
Re: queryAsyncJobResult ISSUE on 4.1.0
Just tested for deployVm command, DeployVMCmd is returned in the response: queryasyncjobresultresponse cloud-stack-version=4.2.0-SNAPSHOT accountid26ffed14-feb8-11e2-aad9-664f5bd82b4f/accountid userid27002e0a-feb8-11e2-aad9-664f5bd82b4f/userid cmd org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd /cmd jobstatus1/jobstatus From: Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.commailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Alena Prokharchyk alena.prokharc...@citrix.commailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com Subject: Re: queryAsyncJobResult ISSUE on 4.1.0 Is it possible that you actually called StartVm ? From: Antonio Petrocelli a.petroce...@netsons.commailto:a.petroce...@netsons.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 6:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: queryAsyncJobResult ISSUE on 4.1.0 It is normal that after a deployVirtualMachine request the queryAsyncJobResult response is: 'cmd' = 'org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd' ? it should be: 'cmd' = 'org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.DeployVMCmd' Thanks
Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
Why would your primary (local) storage have a different IP than host-corporate-ip? There is also a flag system.vm.use.local.storage which tells CloudStack to use local storage for system vms. From: Sarath Chandra sarath.cloudst...@gmail.commailto:sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup Hi All, I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate any VMs (both system guest vms). I am seeing the following errors: ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[2-1-null-null-null Ntwk[202|Control|3] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (secstorage-1:ctx-3f99cd9c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[84-22-null-10.20.30.11-null Ntwk[200|Public|1] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[3-1-null-null-null Ntwk[201|Management|2] WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at a later place com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to find template routing-3 in VMTemplateStoragePool I suspect my configuration is wrong some where. Can anybody kindly check and confirm if my configuration is right. If its right, then please point me to the likely cause of this issue. I have attached a picture to this mail which shows my lab setup. To give a brief, the following is my setup: Server -- Switch 1 -- Switch 2 KVM Hypervisor The switches allow all Vlan traffic to pass through them (basically trunk all and have added vlans 3100,3200,3300 to both the switches) On my server I have done the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * Started NFS and exported to /mnt/primary (not using this) and /mnt/secondary * Installed the System template by executing the command : cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 -h kvm -o localhost -r root -d * $ mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm * $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb (Deployed the db) * $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run (Started the management server) On my hypervisor I have the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * KVM as hypervisor Server Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it as server-corporate-ip) eth1.3200 : 172.16.10.1 (assigned during CS setup) [eth1.3200 is a subinterface on eth1] Global Settings: system.vm.use.local.storage = true Zone Setup details: DNS 18.8.8.8 DNS 28.8.4.4 Internal DNS 1172.16.10.1 Guest CIDR10.1.1.0/24http://10.1.1.0/24 Local storage enabledYes Pod Setup Netmask255.255.255.0 Start IP172.16.20.10 End IP172.16.20.100 Gateway172.16.20.1 Allocation StateEnabled DedicatedNo Cluster Setup ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 HypervisorKVM Cluster TypeCloudManaged Host Setup Resource stateEnabled StateUp TypeRouting (?? why routing) Host Tags OS PreferenceNone ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 IP Address172.16.10.10 Version4.2.0-SNAPSHOT DedicatedNo Primary Storage (Auto Configured) Name : Hypervisor name Local Storage StateUp PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 TypeFilesystem IP Address172.16.10.10 Path/var/lib/libvirt/images Disk Total221.23 GB Secondary Storage Name : SecondaryStorage-1 URLnfs://server-corporate-ip/mnt/secondary ProviderNFS ScopeZONE ZoneZone-1 Hypervisor Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it ashost-corporate-ip) eth1.3100 : 172.16.10.10 eth1.3200 : assigned to cloudbr0 eth1.3300 : assigned to cloudbr1 I have created the sub-interfaces as per CS hypervisor install guide. agent.properties (has got auto configured) #Storage #Tue Aug 06 15:20:15 IST 2013 guest.network.device=cloudbr0 workers=5 private.network.device= cloudbr0 port=8250 resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource pod=1 zone=1 guid=acc23093-6630-3c1a-aeb0-39367415bf6b cluster=1 public.network.device=cloudbr0 local.storage.uuid=7c7e70ab-7e5d-4766-8d5c-f51935b780c4 domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm host=server-corporate-ip LibvirtComputingResource.id=1 thanks and regards, Sarath
Re: please provide access to cwiki for my account
I don't have the karma to do this, but I do notice there are 2 of you in Confluence. On 8/6/13 3:41 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: After resetting the password also am still facing the issue. Please do the needful. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:14 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: please provide access to cwiki for my account Hi , Am not able to view any page in cwiki after login-in. Am getting permission denied for any page view. Here is my account email rajesh.batt...@citrix.commailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com Please provide access to my a/c. Thanks Rajesh Battala
[DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI
Hey all, As part of the next release, I'm planning on doing a lot of cleanup of our massive heap of CSS code. As part of this, I want to start using SASS/SCSS (http://sass-lang.com/) to improve organization and maintainability. Particularly, this would allow: - Splitting CSS into multiple files (by feature), instead of one large 3000+ line CSS. This is then compiled into one CSS during the build, so the browser doesn't have to make multiple requests. - Hierarchical organization, to reduce redundant selectors - Can easily utilize great helper libraries (i.e., http://bourbon.io,) and a semantic grid system for cleaner + responsive layout (i.e., http://neat.bourbon.io/) Since it supports all standard CSS syntax, our UI code can be gradually converted feature-by-feature, and we can still retain any legacy CSS for certain functionality, if necessary. The only problem I cannot handle is integrating the SASS compiler (which converts .scss-.css) into the UI build phase. I've found a maven plugin at https://github.com/Jasig/sass-maven-plugin, so if anyone wants to tackle that it would be awesome. Any other thoughts? -Brian
Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
Any reason why you aren't using the developer packages? I don't see any info regarding the agent install. Did you also set your KVM traffic labels for the various networks (I'm assuming cloubr0 and cloudbr1 are for management, public, guest bridges, but not sure which is which, management is 3200, maybe?) whats the 3100 addr for? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Why would your primary (local) storage have a different IP than host-corporate-ip? There is also a flag system.vm.use.local.storage which tells CloudStack to use local storage for system vms. From: Sarath Chandra sarath.cloudst...@gmail.commailto:sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup Hi All, I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate any VMs (both system guest vms). I am seeing the following errors: ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[2-1-null-null-null Ntwk[202|Control|3] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (secstorage-1:ctx-3f99cd9c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[84-22-null-10.20.30.11-null Ntwk[200|Public|1] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[3-1-null-null-null Ntwk[201|Management|2] WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at a later place com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to find template routing-3 in VMTemplateStoragePool I suspect my configuration is wrong some where. Can anybody kindly check and confirm if my configuration is right. If its right, then please point me to the likely cause of this issue. I have attached a picture to this mail which shows my lab setup. To give a brief, the following is my setup: Server -- Switch 1 -- Switch 2 KVM Hypervisor The switches allow all Vlan traffic to pass through them (basically trunk all and have added vlans 3100,3200,3300 to both the switches) On my server I have done the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * Started NFS and exported to /mnt/primary (not using this) and /mnt/secondary * Installed the System template by executing the command : cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 -h kvm -o localhost -r root -d * $ mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm * $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb (Deployed the db) * $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run (Started the management server) On my hypervisor I have the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * KVM as hypervisor Server Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it as server-corporate-ip) eth1.3200 : 172.16.10.1 (assigned during CS setup) [eth1.3200 is a subinterface on eth1] Global Settings: system.vm.use.local.storage = true Zone Setup details: DNS 18.8.8.8 DNS 28.8.4.4 Internal DNS 1172.16.10.1 Guest CIDR10.1.1.0/24http://10.1.1.0/24 Local storage enabledYes Pod Setup Netmask255.255.255.0 Start IP172.16.20.10 End IP172.16.20.100 Gateway172.16.20.1 Allocation StateEnabled DedicatedNo Cluster Setup ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 HypervisorKVM Cluster TypeCloudManaged Host Setup Resource stateEnabled StateUp TypeRouting (?? why routing) Host Tags OS PreferenceNone ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 IP Address172.16.10.10 Version4.2.0-SNAPSHOT DedicatedNo Primary Storage (Auto Configured) Name : Hypervisor name Local Storage StateUp PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 TypeFilesystem IP Address172.16.10.10 Path/var/lib/libvirt/images Disk Total221.23 GB Secondary Storage Name : SecondaryStorage-1 URLnfs://server-corporate-ip/mnt/secondary ProviderNFS ScopeZONE ZoneZone-1 Hypervisor Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it ashost-corporate-ip) eth1.3100 : 172.16.10.10 eth1.3200 : assigned to cloudbr0 eth1.3300 : assigned to cloudbr1 I have created the sub-interfaces as per CS hypervisor install guide. agent.properties (has got auto configured) #Storage #Tue Aug 06 15:20:15 IST 2013 guest.network.device=cloudbr0 workers=5
Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
Also, what version are you deploying? 4.1.1? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Any reason why you aren't using the developer packages? I don't see any info regarding the agent install. Did you also set your KVM traffic labels for the various networks (I'm assuming cloubr0 and cloudbr1 are for management, public, guest bridges, but not sure which is which, management is 3200, maybe?) whats the 3100 addr for? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Why would your primary (local) storage have a different IP than host-corporate-ip? There is also a flag system.vm.use.local.storage which tells CloudStack to use local storage for system vms. From: Sarath Chandra sarath.cloudst...@gmail.commailto:sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup Hi All, I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate any VMs (both system guest vms). I am seeing the following errors: ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[2-1-null-null-null Ntwk[202|Control|3] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (secstorage-1:ctx-3f99cd9c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[84-22-null-10.20.30.11-null Ntwk[200|Public|1] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[3-1-null-null-null Ntwk[201|Management|2] WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at a later place com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to find template routing-3 in VMTemplateStoragePool I suspect my configuration is wrong some where. Can anybody kindly check and confirm if my configuration is right. If its right, then please point me to the likely cause of this issue. I have attached a picture to this mail which shows my lab setup. To give a brief, the following is my setup: Server -- Switch 1 -- Switch 2 KVM Hypervisor The switches allow all Vlan traffic to pass through them (basically trunk all and have added vlans 3100,3200,3300 to both the switches) On my server I have done the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * Started NFS and exported to /mnt/primary (not using this) and /mnt/secondary * Installed the System template by executing the command : cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 -h kvm -o localhost -r root -d * $ mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm * $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb (Deployed the db) * $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run (Started the management server) On my hypervisor I have the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * KVM as hypervisor Server Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it as server-corporate-ip) eth1.3200 : 172.16.10.1 (assigned during CS setup) [eth1.3200 is a subinterface on eth1] Global Settings: system.vm.use.local.storage = true Zone Setup details: DNS 18.8.8.8 DNS 28.8.4.4 Internal DNS 1172.16.10.1 Guest CIDR10.1.1.0/24http://10.1.1.0/24 Local storage enabledYes Pod Setup Netmask255.255.255.0 Start IP172.16.20.10 End IP172.16.20.100 Gateway172.16.20.1 Allocation StateEnabled DedicatedNo Cluster Setup ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 HypervisorKVM Cluster TypeCloudManaged Host Setup Resource stateEnabled StateUp TypeRouting (?? why routing) Host Tags OS PreferenceNone ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 IP Address172.16.10.10 Version4.2.0-SNAPSHOT DedicatedNo Primary Storage (Auto Configured) Name : Hypervisor name Local Storage StateUp PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 TypeFilesystem IP Address172.16.10.10 Path/var/lib/libvirt/images Disk Total221.23 GB Secondary Storage Name : SecondaryStorage-1 URLnfs://server-corporate-ip/mnt/secondary ProviderNFS ScopeZONE ZoneZone-1 Hypervisor Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it ashost-corporate-ip) eth1.3100 : 172.16.10.10 eth1.3200 : assigned to cloudbr0 eth1.3300 : assigned to cloudbr1 I have created the sub-interfaces as per CS hypervisor install guide.
RE: What are the new features in 4.2?
-Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 11:55 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: What are the new features in 4.2? Thanks again, Wei. It's silly what happened (just noticed). I thought I was logged in to JIRA, but it was another web system, so not being logged in is why that option was disabled. :) [Animesh] :) On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: Thanks! On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote: Mike, I closed it. 2013/8/6 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com Hi Animesh, Upon seeing your e-mail here, I tried to go in and mark mine as Resolved, but the control for this is disabled. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2778 On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: You can use this JIRA filter for 4.2 features and improvements https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12323963 Some of the items are in open state which I am following to get them closed. Thanks Animesh -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:30 AM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: What are the new features in 4.2? Hello guys, I've been trying to find a definitive new features for 4.2, but failed. Can anyone point me to the right URL or make a summary of what's new? Thanks, Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)* -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *(tm)*
Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup
4.2.0-SNAPSHOT -- this will require a newer system vm than the one you installed. see http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Also, what version are you deploying? 4.1.1? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Any reason why you aren't using the developer packages? I don't see any info regarding the agent install. Did you also set your KVM traffic labels for the various networks (I'm assuming cloubr0 and cloudbr1 are for management, public, guest bridges, but not sure which is which, management is 3200, maybe?) whats the 3100 addr for? On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote: Why would your primary (local) storage have a different IP than host-corporate-ip? There is also a flag system.vm.use.local.storage which tells CloudStack to use local storage for system vms. From: Sarath Chandra sarath.cloudst...@gmail.commailto:sarath.cloudst...@gmail.com Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 4:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup Hi All, I am doing a fresh cloudstack installation and am not able to instantiate any VMs (both system guest vms). I am seeing the following errors: ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[2-1-null-null-null Ntwk[202|Control|3] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (secstorage-1:ctx-3f99cd9c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[84-22-null-10.20.30.11-null Ntwk[200|Public|1] ERROR [network.element.SspElement] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) ReservationContext was null for NicProfile[3-1-null-null-null Ntwk[201|Management|2] WARN [cloud.consoleproxy.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-6d22b00c) Exception while trying to start console proxy com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[ConsoleProxy|v-1-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1 at a later place com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to find template routing-3 in VMTemplateStoragePool I suspect my configuration is wrong some where. Can anybody kindly check and confirm if my configuration is right. If its right, then please point me to the likely cause of this issue. I have attached a picture to this mail which shows my lab setup. To give a brief, the following is my setup: Server -- Switch 1 -- Switch 2 KVM Hypervisor The switches allow all Vlan traffic to pass through them (basically trunk all and have added vlans 3100,3200,3300 to both the switches) On my server I have done the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * Started NFS and exported to /mnt/primary (not using this) and /mnt/secondary * Installed the System template by executing the command : cloud-install-sys-tmplt -m /mnt/secondary -u http://download.cloud.com/templates/acton/acton-systemvm-02062012.qcow2.bz2 -h kvm -o localhost -r root -d * $ mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm * $ mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb (Deployed the db) * $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run (Started the management server) On my hypervisor I have the following: * Ubuntu 13.04 OS * KVM as hypervisor Server Interface configuration: eth0 : Corporate Lab network ip (lets call it as server-corporate-ip) eth1.3200 : 172.16.10.1 (assigned during CS setup) [eth1.3200 is a subinterface on eth1] Global Settings: system.vm.use.local.storage = true Zone Setup details: DNS 18.8.8.8 DNS 28.8.4.4 Internal DNS 1172.16.10.1 Guest CIDR10.1.1.0/24http://10.1.1.0/24 Local storage enabledYes Pod Setup Netmask255.255.255.0 Start IP172.16.20.10 End IP172.16.20.100 Gateway172.16.20.1 Allocation StateEnabled DedicatedNo Cluster Setup ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 HypervisorKVM Cluster TypeCloudManaged Host Setup Resource stateEnabled StateUp TypeRouting (?? why routing) Host Tags OS PreferenceNone ZoneZone-1 PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 IP Address172.16.10.10 Version4.2.0-SNAPSHOT DedicatedNo Primary Storage (Auto Configured) Name : Hypervisor name Local Storage StateUp PodPod-1 ClusterCluster-1 TypeFilesystem IP Address172.16.10.10 Path/var/lib/libvirt/images Disk Total221.23 GB Secondary Storage Name : SecondaryStorage-1 URLnfs://server-corporate-ip/mnt/secondary ProviderNFS ScopeZONE ZoneZone-1 Hypervisor Interface configuration: eth0 :
Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24743
---
plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#comment48851
What is the impact on upgrades? That is, I already have users with salt
length 20. You might have to check with both?
Also, you could make it 'final static int' I guess.
plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#comment48849
convention is to have the } else { on the same line
- Chiradeep Vittal
On Aug. 5, 2013, 7:06 p.m., Amogh Vasekar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
(Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 7:06 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John Burwell.
Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2312 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2314
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
1. Fix timing attack by using a constant-time comparison function
2. Increase salt size
3. Make flow for invalid user go through full normal execution using a fake
password and salt
Diffs
-
plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java
da939273ea10bff3b2687c9684edf8a5d0ab4b2e
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/diff/
Testing
---
Local environment
Thanks,
Amogh Vasekar
Re: please provide access to cwiki for my account
Rajesh: I noticed you weren't listed in the confluence-users group. I have added your account to that group. Let me know if you have any problems. --David On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Hi , Am not able to view any page in cwiki after login-in. Am getting permission denied for any page view. Here is my account email rajesh.batt...@citrix.commailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com Please provide access to my a/c. Thanks Rajesh Battala
Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, Sateesh Chodapuneedi, and William Chan. Changes --- Updating refactored patch that applies on top of latest 4.2 branch. All testing as described previously was redone with the new patch and all cases passed. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3886 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The vminstancename flag has been incorrectly used to simply append the displayname to the internal VM name that shows up on vCenter in vmware deployments. It was intended to show the actual name supplied as hostname, on the hypervisor. This helps admins and deployers to quickly identify VMs and resolve issues related to those VMs. Its usage is very limited as it stands now. This fix corrects it to ensure that the name of the VM on the hypervisor matches the hostname if it is supplied, and if the vm.instancename.flag is set to true. Diffs (updated) - engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudstack/platform/orchestration/CloudOrchestrator.java 96fb1d9 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java 292f7e9 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareManagerImpl.java 8d6bdb8 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java 6b721de plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResource.java d395425 plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/storage/resource/VmwareStorageProcessor.java fe127e3 server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java ad8e3aa server/src/com/cloud/ha/HighAvailabilityManagerImpl.java 25c5a04 server/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/HypervisorGuruBase.java e042eb8 server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java 4a222c4 server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java b33ee49 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql b3206af vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/ClusterMO.java 04ef0f8 vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/CustomFieldConstants.java 11bc157 vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HostMO.java 2735fb0 vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HypervisorHostHelper.java d20eb6f vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/VirtualMachineMO.java cb97b26 vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/VmwareHypervisorHost.java ac14328 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/diff/ Testing --- Post this change, all major VM operations, namely creation/destruction/expunging/start/stop/reboot of the VM have been tested and observed to work correctly. Part of this patch also puts in a fix for VMSync operations where the CS mgmt server doesn't detect that a guest VM is down, if the guest VM has been shut down/powered off in vCenter. Other operations such as VM snapshot, volume snapshots of disks belonging to the VM, volume migration across primaries, volume attach/detach have also been tested and they are working as expected. This is a functional change, and completely transparent to any of cloudstack's existing functionalities and all the test cases that cover the above code paths and APIs - all existing tests should and do pass - no new tests are necessary. UPDATE for 08/05/2013 = 4.2 code has diverged - need to refactor the patch on top of latest 4.2. Will test out refactored patch and resubmit. Thanks, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
Re: api calls in 4.1.1
H Ilya, I am not at the bottom of this yet. It seems the api no longer returns the full list hence a certain key can not be found in the result set. We are looking at it (between other work). If this is the case a test scenario would need a big set of VMs:( regards, On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: Daan, The commit CLOUDSTACK-3080 seems like the only change that was made - that would be related. I'm about to try this out and find it - if that's what broke it. Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:26 PM To: dev Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 Ilya, listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next days and report back (wit test case or patch) regards, On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: H, What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else? regards, Daan 4.1.1 status is that we are working on pushing the docs, and then the release will be announced. -chip
Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:51 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Kinsella. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2312 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2314 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. Fix timing attack by using a constant-time comparison function 2. Increase salt size 3. Make flow for invalid user go through full normal execution using a fake password and salt Diffs - plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java da939273ea10bff3b2687c9684edf8a5d0ab4b2e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/diff/ Testing --- Local environment Thanks, Amogh Vasekar
Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24757
---
Can you add tests to AuthenticatorTest.java
1. authenticate('FooUser', 'FooPassword') takes as long as
authenticate('ValidUser', 'ValidPassword') takes as long as
authenticate('ValidUser', 'FooPassword')
2. authenticate('ValidUserWith20byteSalt', 'ValidPassword') succeeds
- Chiradeep Vittal
On Aug. 6, 2013, 9:59 p.m., Amogh Vasekar wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/
---
(Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and John Kinsella.
Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2312 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2314
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
1. Fix timing attack by using a constant-time comparison function
2. Increase salt size
3. Make flow for invalid user go through full normal execution using a fake
password and salt
Diffs
-
plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java
da939273ea10bff3b2687c9684edf8a5d0ab4b2e
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/diff/
Testing
---
Local environment
Thanks,
Amogh Vasekar
Re: TEST or integration test?
For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are TestNG test cases, requiring DB existence. Thanks -min On 8/6/13 2:59 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage of maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone know why it's set at integration-test? I based this observation on the surefire plugins are set for integration-test phase. Note the following. ./engine/orchestration/pom.xml-phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/integration-test/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/volume/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/swift/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase I think integration test is probably just the smoke test that Prasanna has written. We should enforce that in the maven build. Does that make sense? --Alex
Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24759 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Demetrius Tsitrelis On Aug. 6, 2013, 9:59 p.m., Amogh Vasekar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:59 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Kinsella. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2312 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2314 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- 1. Fix timing attack by using a constant-time comparison function 2. Increase salt size 3. Make flow for invalid user go through full normal execution using a fake password and salt Diffs - plugins/user-authenticators/sha256salted/src/com/cloud/server/auth/SHA256SaltedUserAuthenticator.java da939273ea10bff3b2687c9684edf8a5d0ab4b2e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/diff/ Testing --- Local environment Thanks, Amogh Vasekar
RE: api calls in 4.1.1
Daan, Take this back - the error was on my part it seems (I've used cloudmonkey with api/secret keys for another test user). Once I fixed the secret and api keys to a proper user that had vms, I would see the vms entitled to that user. If you do come around on specifics of this issue, please let me know. Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 5:31 PM To: dev Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 H Ilya, I am not at the bottom of this yet. It seems the api no longer returns the full list hence a certain key can not be found in the result set. We are looking at it (between other work). If this is the case a test scenario would need a big set of VMs:( regards, On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net wrote: Daan, The commit CLOUDSTACK-3080 seems like the only change that was made - that would be related. I'm about to try this out and find it - if that's what broke it. Thanks ilya -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:26 PM To: dev Subject: Re: api calls in 4.1.1 Ilya, listVirtualMachines (as user) for one, but I got a second report that wasn't very precise yet, so I will be working on reproducing next days and report back (wit test case or patch) regards, On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: H, What is the status of 4.1.1 at this moment. I am getting several reports of api calls not working as before. I saw the vote passing by but didn't give them much attention. In jira I don't see much mention of such issues. Is this noticed by anybosy else? regards, Daan 4.1.1 status is that we are working on pushing the docs, and then the release will be announced. -chip
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24756 --- api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment48880 I don't quite understand this part. Why // is missing in this case? Who would require // and who wouldn't? api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment48877 I think by following the previous case, it should be URI(scheme,value.toString()) rather than null, null. It possibly doesn't make difference, but it's better not to use different constructor. The same with several URI constructor above. And I doubt if it's really need to discard this check. At least they would working for other broadcast domain type. api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment48879 No reference of getTypeOf(URI) in the code? api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment48878 Does this function need to be public? I think getSchemeValue() and getTypeOf(String str) should be enough? - Sheng Yang On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24762 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManager.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#comment48882 Seems not neceesary. server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#comment48887 It's better to show the semantic of if this is the last nic in the subnet in code. Say, if (vm.getType() == Type.User it's the last nic) server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#comment48885 Uppercase Subnet. server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#comment48886 Why we still need this if networkid is null then we remove all? removeNic() for each network in network manager is not enough? - Sheng Yang On Aug. 6, 2013, 12:48 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 12:48 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Sheng Yang. Bugs: Cloudstack-4083 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4083 if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed. This occurred because we were not cleaning the alias ips in the event of a failure. As a part of the fix. 1.) moved the function removeDhcpServiceInsubnet and listLastNicsInSubnet to NetworkManager (These were in VirtualMachineManagerImpl earlier.) 2.) add the call to clean ipAlias in the remove nic function of the networkManager. 3.) Modified the removeDhcpServiceInsubnet to take network ad an argument. This will help in removing only the ipAlias which belong to a particular network. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManager.java dab7a13 server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java effee96 server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java b33ee49 server/test/com/cloud/network/MockNetworkManagerImpl.java 7f34e55 server/test/com/cloud/vpc/MockNetworkManagerImpl.java 178ebba Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2. created two guest networks guest1 and guest2. created VMS in both the networks. Added a VM(with no PV drivers) from guest1 to guest2. this failed and on failure ipAlias configured as part of nic creation was removed. Deleting the vm causes all the removal of all ipAliases from all the subnets in which this is the lastvm. Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/#review24763 --- Can you rebase against latest master? How does this apply to Xenserver? - Chiradeep Vittal On July 2, 2013, 7:12 a.m., Pawit Pornkitprasan wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/ --- (Updated July 2, 2013, 7:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- This patch adds PCI Passthrough support to CloudStack on the KVM Hypervisor as previously mentioned on the mailing list PCI Passthrough may be useful for high-performance networking devices or other hardware accelerators. This patch does not care what kind of the device it is or attempt to configure it, leaving it to the guest. Because the devices available at each agent may be different, the available devices for passthrough are configured at the agent configuration file (/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties). Configuration is a comma separated list of available PCI devices and its given name. pci.devices=28:00.1|10GE,28:00.2|10GE,28:00.3|10GE,28:00.4|10GE,28:00.5|10GE,28:00.6|10GE,28:00.7|10GE,28:01.0|10GE At agent startup, the list of PCI devices is parsed and sent together with StartupRoutingCommand (in a new field, not in details). The management server then stores it in a new table “op_host_pci_devices”. If a device is added, removed, or renamed, the table is updated accordingly. The agent also probes libvirt which devices are currently in-use and send it with the command in attempt to synchronize any potential difference between the database and the actual status. The “name” of the PCI device is what is used to assign a device. In a compute offering, the user can specify the name of one or more PCI devices (as a comma-separated list) and CloudStack will find a host with the PCI device of the specified name available and assign it. A new manager, PciDeviceManager, is created to handle the allocation of PCI device. The manager implements StateListener and assigns PCI devices on state change to “starting” and also release the devices VM stop. First fit allocator and first fit planner are also modified to check for PCI device availability accordingly. For migration, intrusive migration is implementated. The PCI device is detached before migration and attached it again at the target host. This will interrupt whatever is using the device on the VM. However, it may be desirable for networking devices where the VM can use a bonding device to channel network traffic through the normal virtualized network device while the PCI Passthrough device is down. Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/PciDeviceTO.java PRE-CREATION api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/VirtualMachineTO.java e6240ff api/src/com/cloud/offering/ServiceOffering.java 45d5f38 api/src/com/cloud/pci/PciDevice.java PRE-CREATION api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/ApiConstants.java 8ac7c3f api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/offering/CreateServiceOfferingCmd.java decac29 api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/ServiceOfferingResponse.java 288f76b client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties ad8d29d client/tomcatconf/applicationContext.xml.in ac1f3e4 core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/AttachPciDevicesCommand.java PRE-CREATION core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/StartupRoutingCommand.java 5961ab0 engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/HostPciDeviceVO.java PRE-CREATION engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/HostVO.java c814b94 engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/dao/HostDaoImpl.java 810b973 engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/dao/HostPciDevicesDao.java PRE-CREATION engine/schema/src/com/cloud/host/dao/HostPciDevicesDaoImpl.java PRE-CREATION engine/schema/src/com/cloud/migration/ServiceOffering21VO.java 7a49e63 engine/schema/src/com/cloud/service/ServiceOfferingVO.java 9a262c5 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java 60cde8c plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtDomainXMLParser.java a283768 plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtVMDef.java 5120870 server/src/com/cloud/agent/manager/allocator/impl/FirstFitAllocator.java b6286aa server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java 9b7cd27 server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java 6f6e277 server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/ServiceOfferingJoinVO.java 05ff5f3 server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManager.java 98eae37
[API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects
How do you go about seeing *all* vms for *all* users in *all* domains and projects? The admin user UI does not do it in 4.1.1 Thanks ilya
RE: [API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects
When I say it does not do it, I don't see all VMs under general instances tab, I have to drill down to specific project to see them. -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 8:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects How do you go about seeing *all* vms for *all* users in *all* domains and projects? The admin user UI does not do it in 4.1.1 Thanks ilya
Re: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI
+1 to that definitely! The only problem I cannot handle is integrating the SASS compiler (which converts .scss-.css) into the UI build phase. I've found a maven plugin at https://github.com/Jasig/sass-maven-plugin, so if anyone wants to tackle that it would be awesome. Below is a meer suggestion, I've only read about it and never done it. I believe you are able to chain grunt into the maven life cycle. This would allow us to do various things with the front end code. This includes but is not limited to: - JSHint - Unit tests via xyz(suggesting QUnit or Jasmine) framework - Static analysis of the javascript with Plato - Compiling SASS + LESS - Uglifying/Minifying - Optimise images(png crush etc.) - Dependency management of 3rd party js libs It would supply us with a bunch nicer build process for the UI elements of Cloudstack. However it would add a dependency of nodejs to the build process.
Question about GUI refresh logic
Hi, I'm curious when I should expect the GUI to refresh and when I should be expected to manually do so. For example, after I destroy a VM, the GUI refreshes to tell me the VM's in the destroyed state. However, to see when the VM is actually expunged, I have to refresh manually by clicking on the Instance tab. Is that expected behavior? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24766 --- Replied to Sheng's comments. api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment4 Sheng, not sure if you caught the conversation around breaking backwards compatibility, but it explains these changes. the reason for using the 4-parameter URI constructor is that it creates scheme://value URIs, which is what this method used to do before it was changed on July 19. There is no 2-parameter URI constructor, so I guess you're proposing the 3-parameter constructor - however that creates a URI without // - see https://gist.github.com/davecahill/6170364 for an example. As for the check, this was also added in the July 19 commit - it causes Exceptions on valid input (colons in the value param are valid), which is why I'm proposing we remove it. Hope that explains it - feel free to grab me on IRC for more details if needed. - Dave Cahill On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: [API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects
Ilya, This has been the status quo since 4.0. It would definitely be nice to be able to list all running VMs, rather than have to drill down to projects. - Si - Original Message - From: Ilya Musayev imusa...@webmd.net To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 7:16:43 PM Subject: RE: [API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects When I say it does not do it, I don't see all VMs under general instances tab, I have to drill down to specific project to see them. -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 8:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [API][4.1.1] ALL VMs for ALL users, domains and projects How do you go about seeing *all* vms for *all* users in *all* domains and projects? The admin user UI does not do it in 4.1.1 Thanks ilya
Comment about Data Disk Offering when creating a VM from an ISO
Hi, I noticed while creating a VM from an ISO today that I am taken to a page in the wizard that talks about a Data Disk Offering. It seems a bit confusing to me because I don't actually get a data disk once the wizard has spun up the VM. This Data Disk Offering page is displayed to collect data regarding the size of the root disk the VM will have. Any thoughts on this? Is this a known issue or should I log a bug? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloudhttp://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play *™*
RE: TEST or integration test?
So is the difference between test and integration-test is that the code access db? I've noticed a great deal of test code that's been disabled by hand as well. A proper test should just mock the db layer. To me it would make sense if we use an in memory db like derby for the unit tests. --Alex -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: TEST or integration test? For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are TestNG test cases, requiring DB existence. Thanks -min On 8/6/13 2:59 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage of maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone know why it's set at integration-test? I based this observation on the surefire plugins are set for integration-test phase. Note the following. ./engine/orchestration/pom.xml-phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/integration-test/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/volume/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/swift/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase I think integration test is probably just the smoke test that Prasanna has written. We should enforce that in the maven build. Does that make sense? --Alex
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
On Aug. 7, 2013, 1:10 a.m., Dave Cahill wrote: api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 135 https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line135 Sheng, not sure if you caught the conversation around breaking backwards compatibility, but it explains these changes. the reason for using the 4-parameter URI constructor is that it creates scheme://value URIs, which is what this method used to do before it was changed on July 19. There is no 2-parameter URI constructor, so I guess you're proposing the 3-parameter constructor - however that creates a URI without // - see https://gist.github.com/davecahill/6170364 for an example. As for the check, this was also added in the July 19 commit - it causes Exceptions on valid input (colons in the value param are valid), which is why I'm proposing we remove it. Hope that explains it - feel free to grab me on IRC for more details if needed. Got it, thanks for explaining! - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24766 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 135 https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line135 I think by following the previous case, it should be URI(scheme,value.toString()) rather than null, null. It possibly doesn't make difference, but it's better not to use different constructor. The same with several URI constructor above. And I doubt if it's really need to discard this check. At least they would working for other broadcast domain type. Dave explained this. Please drop this issue. - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24756 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 135 https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line135 I think by following the previous case, it should be URI(scheme,value.toString()) rather than null, null. It possibly doesn't make difference, but it's better not to use different constructor. The same with several URI constructor above. And I doubt if it's really need to discard this check. At least they would working for other broadcast domain type. Sheng Yang wrote: Dave explained this. Please drop this issue. Thanks for the quick reply Sheng! Actually, I dug deeper and realized that if we use the 4-parameter URI constructor, the value parameter is interpreted as host, and colons wouldn't be allowed! It looks like the only way to preserve the behavior as it was is to stick with the old string concatenation behavior of scheme + :// + value. In fact, this is what Daan and I agreed on in IRC yesterday, but it looks like he went with the 4 param constructor - I'll discuss with him later to see what changed. - Dave --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24756 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 135 https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/5/?file=337785#file337785line135 I think by following the previous case, it should be URI(scheme,value.toString()) rather than null, null. It possibly doesn't make difference, but it's better not to use different constructor. The same with several URI constructor above. And I doubt if it's really need to discard this check. At least they would working for other broadcast domain type. Sheng Yang wrote: Dave explained this. Please drop this issue. Dave Cahill wrote: Thanks for the quick reply Sheng! Actually, I dug deeper and realized that if we use the 4-parameter URI constructor, the value parameter is interpreted as host, and colons wouldn't be allowed! It looks like the only way to preserve the behavior as it was is to stick with the old string concatenation behavior of scheme + :// + value. In fact, this is what Daan and I agreed on in IRC yesterday, but it looks like he went with the 4 param constructor - I'll discuss with him later to see what changed. Thank you Dave! - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24756 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request: Freshness Check for doc xml on section Storage Setup
Appreciate if someone can help to review this doc. Otherwise, it will be deferred to future release. Thanks. On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Jessica Tomechak jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote: Can anyone please review the newly added doc? Otherwise we have to decide whether to revert the commit before 4.2. Do we want to publish a doc section that's almost certainly inaccurate? Here is a link straight to the file that needs a look. https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=docs/en-US/storage-setup.xml;h=dee2f4ccbd721439bf17b4aacbca80d0128b6070;hb=78ffb7ae5ef9c4383f86fa97cd647316dde507be Any help would be much appreciated. Jessica T. On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Gavin Lee gavin@gmail.com wrote: For CLOUDSTACK-1597 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1597 , I made the changes weeks ago. The commit id on master is: 78ffb7ae5ef9c4383f86fa97cd647316dde507be It'll be great if someone can help to review in case some materials missing or out of date since the storage part changed a lot. Thanks. -- Gavin -- Gavin
Re: Review Request 13365: fix local storage volume deployment
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13365/#review24773 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajesh Battala On Aug. 6, 2013, 10:53 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13365/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 10:53 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Rajesh Battala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4121 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- See CLOUDSTACK-4121. This seems to allow the hypervisor type to be queried for local volumes, by using the cluster level storage SQL query. I *think* these three are the only storage-related scope types. You may want to tweak this a bit more to not bother with the sql statement if sql=null, but I think it provides a pretty obvious heads-up as to what's wrong, aside from my little error message. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java 273f7f9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13365/diff/ Testing --- tested in KVM fresh 4.2 zone, VMs now starting rather than throwing SQL errors. Thanks, Marcus Sorensen
Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage
On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:57 p.m., edison su wrote: Ship It! thanks for committing the patch - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24736 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: 3781 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == for Volume operations we are finding the hypervisor type. Volume can be in ZONE/Cluster scope storage pool. when volume is in ZONE scope, there is issue with they way we fetch the hypervisor type. It was written to handle Cluster scope only. fixed: == Fixed with sql queries to fetch the Hypervisor type. 1. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from storage pool table if the voluem is in ZONE scope storage pool. 2. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from cluster table if the voluem is in CLUSTER scope storage pool. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDao.java 7b58e7d engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java e6595b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/ Testing --- Setup: KVM and Xenserver with Adv Zone. Added pool Zone scope on KVM and Cluster Scope on Xenserver 1. created instances on KVM and xenserver. 2. Create two volumes attached to instances on KVM and Xenserver. 3. vol1 is in Zone scope and vol2 is in cluster scope. 4. Successfully performed resize opertions on vol1 and vol2. 5. Succssfully attached/detaches volumes Thanks, Rajesh Battala
Re: Review Request 13320: In case when all the vnets are deleted we are not logging a error message if there are vnets allocated.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13320/#review24775 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:18 a.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13320/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 11:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: Cloudstack-4105 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4105 In case when all the vnets are deleted we are not logging a error message if there are vnets allocated. Also not updating the physicalnetwork table in this case. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DataCenterVnetDao.java de68e1e engine/schema/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DataCenterVnetDaoImpl.java 3ac2729 server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 304cefa Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13320/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2 Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.
On Aug. 7, 2013, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java, line 2433 https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/diff/1/?file=337776#file337776line2433 It's better to show the semantic of if this is the last nic in the subnet in code. Say, if (vm.getType() == Type.User it's the last nic) Hi sheng, removeDhcpServiceInsubnet functon calls the function listLastNicsInSubnet to get the last nics in subnet and then it removes the DhcpService based on the networkId. So I mean we do not know if it is last nic in the subnet until we call the listLastNicsInsubnet so we cannot put this check before hand. On Aug. 7, 2013, 12:03 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java, line 479 https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/diff/1/?file=33#file33line479 Why we still need this if networkid is null then we remove all? removeNic() for each network in network manager is not enough? Hi sheng, In cases when a VM is getting expunged we need to remove the Dhcpservice in all the networks in which this vm has a last nic. so we pass a null as networkId to do this. - bharat --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24762 --- On Aug. 6, 2013, 12:48 p.m., bharat kumar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 12:48 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk and Sheng Yang. Bugs: Cloudstack-4083 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4083 if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed. This occurred because we were not cleaning the alias ips in the event of a failure. As a part of the fix. 1.) moved the function removeDhcpServiceInsubnet and listLastNicsInSubnet to NetworkManager (These were in VirtualMachineManagerImpl earlier.) 2.) add the call to clean ipAlias in the remove nic function of the networkManager. 3.) Modified the removeDhcpServiceInsubnet to take network ad an argument. This will help in removing only the ipAlias which belong to a particular network. Diffs - server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManager.java dab7a13 server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkManagerImpl.java effee96 server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java b33ee49 server/test/com/cloud/network/MockNetworkManagerImpl.java 7f34e55 server/test/com/cloud/vpc/MockNetworkManagerImpl.java 178ebba Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2. created two guest networks guest1 and guest2. created VMS in both the networks. Added a VM(with no PV drivers) from guest1 to guest2. this failed and on failure ipAlias configured as part of nic creation was removed. Deleting the vm causes all the removal of all ipAliases from all the subnets in which this is the lastvm. Thanks, bharat kumar
Re: TEST or integration test?
The integration-test is a lifecycle in maven.[1] Surefire plugin provides a goal to maven where you can hook-in integration tests. The weird thing I find about maven calling it an 'integration test' is that it comes before the install phase. We only put together all our modules and generate the cloudstack war at the end of the install phase. I understand integration-test as anything that runs against a group of environment/systems. Perhaps we're not doing it right as the maven world would have it. [1] http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-lifecycle.html#Lifecycle_Reference On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:15:33AM +, Alex Huang wrote: So is the difference between test and integration-test is that the code access db? I've noticed a great deal of test code that's been disabled by hand as well. A proper test should just mock the db layer. To me it would make sense if we use an in memory db like derby for the unit tests. --Alex -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:58 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: TEST or integration test? For /engine/storage/integration-test, I know that those tests are TestNG test cases, requiring DB existence. Thanks -min On 8/6/13 2:59 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote: I noticed that some of our unit tests are run in integration-test stage of maven. Shouldn't that be in the test phase? Does anyone know why it's set at integration-test? I based this observation on the surefire plugins are set for integration-test phase. Note the following. ./engine/orchestration/pom.xml-phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/integration-test/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./engine/storage/volume/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/image/swift/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/default/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/sample/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase ./plugins/storage/volume/solidfire/pom.xml- phaseintegration-test/phase I think integration test is probably just the smoke test that Prasanna has written. We should enforce that in the maven build. Does that make sense? --Alex -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI
This is definitely a great idea. Will it be feasible to decouple the front-end build from server-side build as mentioned in the following link: http://addyosmani.com/blog/making-maven-grunt/ Regards, Amit Kumar Das *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/ On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 to that definitely! The only problem I cannot handle is integrating the SASS compiler (which converts .scss-.css) into the UI build phase. I've found a maven plugin at https://github.com/Jasig/sass-maven-plugin, so if anyone wants to tackle that it would be awesome. Below is a meer suggestion, I've only read about it and never done it. I believe you are able to chain grunt into the maven life cycle. This would allow us to do various things with the front end code. This includes but is not limited to: - JSHint - Unit tests via xyz(suggesting QUnit or Jasmine) framework - Static analysis of the javascript with Plato - Compiling SASS + LESS - Uglifying/Minifying - Optimise images(png crush etc.) - Dependency management of 3rd party js libs It would supply us with a bunch nicer build process for the UI elements of Cloudstack. However it would add a dependency of nodejs to the build process.
Review Request 13312: Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Diffs - ui/scripts/docs.js 03318b8 ui/scripts/system.js 92fa867 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/diff/ Testing --- Clean compile of 4.2. Logged in as admin. Clicked Infrastrucure. Add Secondary Storage, select S3 as the provider and used the UI while viewing help. Thanks, Thomas O'Dowd
Re: Review Request 13237: Unable to resize disk with Zone wide storage
On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:17 p.m., edison su wrote: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java, line 77 https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/1/?file=334435#file334435line77 why not just use select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id? if we use the above query then we get list of scope values. mysql select s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id = v.pool_id; +-+ | scope | +-+ | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | CLUSTER | | ZONE| +-+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) So I had written the above query like SELECT_POOLSCOPE = SELECT s.scope from storage_pool s, volumes v where s.id =(select pool_id from volumes where id =?); to fetch the scope of the storage pool where the volume is existing. - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/#review24653 --- On Aug. 2, 2013, 10:07 a.m., Rajesh Battala wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/ --- (Updated Aug. 2, 2013, 10:07 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: 3781 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == for Volume operations we are finding the hypervisor type. Volume can be in ZONE/Cluster scope storage pool. when volume is in ZONE scope, there is issue with they way we fetch the hypervisor type. It was written to handle Cluster scope only. fixed: == Fixed with sql queries to fetch the Hypervisor type. 1. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from storage pool table if the voluem is in ZONE scope storage pool. 2. Fetch the hypervisor type for volume from cluster table if the voluem is in CLUSTER scope storage pool. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDao.java 7b58e7d engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java e6595b2 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13237/diff/ Testing --- Setup: KVM and Xenserver with Adv Zone. Added pool Zone scope on KVM and Cluster Scope on Xenserver 1. created instances on KVM and xenserver. 2. Create two volumes attached to instances on KVM and Xenserver. 3. vol1 is in Zone scope and vol2 is in cluster scope. 4. Successfully performed resize opertions on vol1 and vol2. 5. Succssfully attached/detaches volumes Thanks, Rajesh Battala
Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24701 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Jayapal Reddy, and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack
Hi Chiradeep, Exactly Intellicache. As I know, to use this, VDIs on XenServer/XCP must be set two params: + on-boot = persist (or reset). If persist, VM's data (except OS) will be keep when reboot. Otherwise, it will be destroy on local SR when setting to reset. + allow-caching = true. It enables cache mode on local SR. Maybe we'll add a service offering tag so AgentMgr can realize this option. Whatever we change, Xapi must set two above params for VDIs to use this feature. However, Intellicache seemly can't update changes to VMs which were booted before changing of Master image. 2013/8/6 Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com Is this the Intellicache feature? What changes does it require from CloudStack. Would just using service offering tags work? On 8/5/13 12:23 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Is anyone concerned about using XenServer 6.2's clone-on-boot feature on CloudStack? With it, we can quickly deploy a huge of VMs from a single golden template. This is amazing for some scenarios. For example: we can allocate a special/dedicated cluster with only one golden template. And when an update or patch be applied to golden template, changes automatically apply to every VMs. Thought? Thanks, -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: [ACS411] 4.1.1 status
Hi Chip, On 08/05/2013 08:01 PM, Chip Childers wrote: Hi all, Here's where we are: DEBs (oss) are loaded into the cloustack.apt-get.eu repo. The DEBs contain snapshot in their version number. I don't think that is correct, is it? Wido RPMs (nonoss) are being built now and will be pushed as soon as complete (soon) David is building the docs now. I'll announce once the RPM's and docs are published. -chip
Re: Review Request 13312: CLOUDSTACK-3211 - Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 4:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes --- This patch addresses CLOUDSTACK-3211. Added to bugs section and prefixed to summary. Summary (updated) - CLOUDSTACK-3211 - Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3211 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Diffs - ui/scripts/docs.js 03318b8 ui/scripts/system.js 92fa867 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/diff/ Testing --- Clean compile of 4.2. Logged in as admin. Clicked Infrastrucure. Add Secondary Storage, select S3 as the provider and used the UI while viewing help. Thanks, Thomas O'Dowd
CONSOLE access via API
Hello, Under CloudStack UI interface, the console link is: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=x I'm trying to use signiture under API, all other commands works, but I'm trying to get VM console, just not work: http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/console?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX or http://xx.xx.xx.xx:8080/client/api?cmd=accessvm=xsignature=XX Could any friend point me correct command for console access through API? Thanks! smime.p7s Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
Re: unable to view content of cwiki
Rajesh, You must reside behind a proxy or firwall that prohibits you from working. I can access the page you linked us to. regards, Daan On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Am still not able to access any pages. Ex : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewmyprofile.action even a publicly accessable page, when I login am getting error Not Permitted You are not permitted to perform this operation. Please do the needful. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Go Chiba [mailto:go.ch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 7:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to view content of cwiki Yes, I able to access them too. Rajesh, are you still can't access cwiki page? if yes, please share some example link. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote: I've able to access the wiki all day so far. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, Am not able to view any link of cwiki. Am getting permission denied to view any content. Please let me know how to resolve this issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala -- 千葉 豪 Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
Re: Review Request 13312: CLOUDSTACK-3211 - Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/#review24705 --- Commit a764cb91b30cb998aa391a1dc897cbafec26f34a in branch refs/heads/master from Thomas O'Dowd [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a764cb9 ] CLOUDSTACK-3211: Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org (cherry picked from commit 74643c9561b1ea564f180c3780ef762e97e7c10b) - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m., Thomas O'Dowd wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3211 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Diffs - ui/scripts/docs.js 03318b8 ui/scripts/system.js 92fa867 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/diff/ Testing --- Clean compile of 4.2. Logged in as admin. Clicked Infrastrucure. Add Secondary Storage, select S3 as the provider and used the UI while viewing help. Thanks, Thomas O'Dowd
Re: Review Request 13312: CLOUDSTACK-3211 - Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/#review24706 --- Commit 7fd71d708a34556eb9ab168e52f4471a8c2acdc8 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Thomas O'Dowd [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7fd71d7 ] CLOUDSTACK-3211: Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m., Thomas O'Dowd wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3211 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Diffs - ui/scripts/docs.js 03318b8 ui/scripts/system.js 92fa867 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/diff/ Testing --- Clean compile of 4.2. Logged in as admin. Clicked Infrastrucure. Add Secondary Storage, select S3 as the provider and used the UI while viewing help. Thanks, Thomas O'Dowd
Re: Review Request 13312: CLOUDSTACK-3211 - Add help docs for S3 secondary storage configuration.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/#review24707 --- Ship it! Applied on 4.2 and master - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m., Thomas O'Dowd wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 7:10 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3211 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Add help docs to S3 secondary storage configuration. When adding an S3 secondary storage, the administrator will now be shown help for each input field making it friendlier to use. Diffs - ui/scripts/docs.js 03318b8 ui/scripts/system.js 92fa867 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13312/diff/ Testing --- Clean compile of 4.2. Logged in as admin. Clicked Infrastrucure. Add Secondary Storage, select S3 as the provider and used the UI while viewing help. Thanks, Thomas O'Dowd
Re: Breaking docs out
one litle spark here; why does every thing need to go in its own repo. I would rather go for putting it all in one repo. not much of a flame but here you go. Daan On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Make perfect sense. + 1 -Radhika -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 3:13 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Breaking docs out Hi folks: I'd like to propose breaking out a nuymber of our documents into their own repos. My thinking is that specifically; the release notes, midonet, and niciranvp documentation shares very little with the rest of the documentation, and should be broken out akin to how the QIG is currently broken out. The particular problem I am trying to solve is to deal with publishing. For instance, even though the release notes are contained in just a few xml documents, it copies content from every single xml file in thd directory - over 400 - and it also copies those up to the website. Splitting things up also allows us to prioritize l10n. Right now, we just dump 400 xml files worth of content into transifex and people translate away - they can't put a priority on release notes, or de-emphasize more esoteric documentation like Nicira or Midonet. Eventually I'd like to break out each of the individual guides into their own document - separate from the other. Right now they carry a ton of similar content so that isn't very practical; but it's what I am thinking, perhaps for 4.4 or 4.5. In the meantime, I'd like to make this change as soon as we think we have documentation pretty close to done for 4.2 to minimize the disruptive effects. Thoughts, comments, flames? --David
RE: unable to view content of cwiki
Sorry the issue is not with the site. Issue is with my account. Can someone please provide permission to my account to access the content. My email rajesh.batt...@citrix.com Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:21 PM To: dev Subject: Re: unable to view content of cwiki Rajesh, You must reside behind a proxy or firwall that prohibits you from working. I can access the page you linked us to. regards, Daan On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Am still not able to access any pages. Ex : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewmyprofile.action even a publicly accessable page, when I login am getting error Not Permitted You are not permitted to perform this operation. Please do the needful. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Go Chiba [mailto:go.ch...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 7:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: unable to view content of cwiki Yes, I able to access them too. Rajesh, are you still can't access cwiki page? if yes, please share some example link. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote: I've able to access the wiki all day so far. On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: Hi All, Am not able to view any link of cwiki. Am getting permission denied to view any content. Please let me know how to resolve this issue. Thanks Rajesh Battala -- 千葉 豪 Go Chiba E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
Re: upgrade path 4.1.1 - 4.2/master
Thanks Harikrishna, it worked just fine On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: I did a 4.0 - 4.1.1 - master I can/will go back to 4.0 and report my findings tomorrow On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote: Have you taken the DB dump before trying to upgrade. Then you can build CS in 4.1.1 and apply the dump. -Harikrishna On 01-Aug-2013, at 8:42 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: I have allready run master against this dev env, and added the mentioned entry in the upgrade map. Now I cannot access the database using 4.1.1 anymore because of ERROR [agent.manager.AgentManagerImpl] (AgentTaskPool-1:) Monitor StoragePoolMonitor says there is an error in the connect process for 3 due to DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@4171352e: SELECT storage_pool.id, storage_pool.name, storage_pool.uuid, storage_pool.pool_type, storage_pool.created, storage_pool.removed, storage_pool.update_time, storage_pool.data_center_id, storage_pool.pod_id, storage_pool.available_bytes, storage_pool.capacity_bytes, storage_pool.status, storage_pool.scope, storage_pool.storage_provider_id, storage_pool.host_address, storage_pool.path, storage_pool.port, storage_pool.user_info, storage_pool.cluster_id FROM storage_pool WHERE storage_pool.data_center_id = 1 AND ( storage_pool.pod_id IS NULL OR storage_pool.pod_id = 1 ) AND ( storage_pool.cluster_id IS NULL OR storage_pool.cluster_id = 1 ) AND storage_pool.removed IS NULL com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: DB Exception on: com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@4171352e: SELECT storage_pool.id, storage_pool.name, storage_pool.uuid, storage_pool.pool_type, storage_pool.created, storage_pool.removed, storage_pool.update_time, storage_pool.data_center_id, storage_pool.pod_id, storage_pool.available_bytes, storage_pool.capacity_bytes, storage_pool.status, storage_pool.scope, storage_pool.storage_provider_id, storage_pool.host_address, storage_pool.path, storage_pool.port, storage_pool.user_info, storage_pool.cluster_id FROM storage_pool WHERE storage_pool.data_center_id = 1 AND ( storage_pool.pod_id IS NULL OR storage_pool.pod_id = 1 ) AND ( storage_pool.cluster_id IS NULL OR storage_pool.cluster_id = 1 ) AND storage_pool.removed IS NULL at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:415) at com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor$InterceptorDispatcher.intercept(ComponentInstantiationPostProcessor.java:125) at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:350) ... Caused by: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLSyntaxErrorException: Unknown column 'storage_pool.available_bytes' in 'field list' at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) any change I can salvage this installation to run with master? I.E. add the templates outside cloudstack somehow? (and promise I will never do it again) On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote: My comments inline. Thanks Harikrishna On 01-Aug-2013, at 7:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: Harikrishna, I suppose I have to register those templates before upgrading; i.e. in the 4.1.1 version management server. Yes. in 4.1.1 these templates are registered as USER templates. During upgrade to 4.2 these are converted to SYSTEM templates Is this procedure described somewhere? Usually upgrade instructions are given in the release notes. For 4.1 upgrade you can look at Chapter 4 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1 Do I bake the templates myself first or should I use publicly offered templates? No need to prepare templates. I guess there is some discussion happening for place to download system templates. You can download these templates from jenkins URL http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ thanks, Daan On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Harikrishna Patnala harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote: Hi Daan, Before upgrading to 4.2 we need to register the new system templates for each hypervisor with specific names so that during upgrade these new templates are set to the system vms. It is mandatory to upgrade the system vm template if we want upgrade to 4.2. Here seems like you have a Xen cluster. So you need to register xen system template with name systemvm-xenserver-4.2. So for the existing clusters you need to register system vm template per hypervisor. System template names are for each hypervisor are 1) systemvm-xenserver-4.2 2) systemvm-kvm-4.2 3) systemvm-vmware-4.2 4) systemvm-hyperv-4.2 5) systemvm-lxc-4.2 Thank you Harikrishna On 01-Aug-2013, at 5:29 PM, Daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review24709 --- Ship it! Applied on master and 4.2 and some minor changes. Please watch the runs for failures/errors from the next run onwards: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m., Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 4:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Jayapal Reddy, and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone. Diffs - test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py PRE-CREATION Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Ashutosh Kelkar
Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database. Made the correction in the DB entry to point to Debian 7.0 template instead of Debain 6.0. Diffs - setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql f98bb50 setup/db/templates.sql ba13841 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/diff/ Testing --- Verifed the fix locally on cloudstack environment: 1. Created CS environment successfully. 2. SystemVMs are coming up fine. 3. UserVMs are getting deployed successfully. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Review Request 13317: db upgrade 4.1.1 to master
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- not worth much review but have a look if you like Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java eb987ea Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12685: CLOUDSTACK-1532 added utility functions to scan URIs
Hi Daan / Alex, Sorry I missed this change at the time, but it looks problematic to me. The code is trying to check for a scheme part in the incoming value, and doesn't add a scheme if value already has one. Therefore, if the scheme check has a false positive (it thinks the value has a scheme, but it doesn't), we are guaranteed to produce an invalid URI (no scheme part) and an exception. I'm pretty sure the current scheme check is invalid given the URI spec, but definitely shout if I'm off base. Here's the check: if (value.toString().contains(:)) return new URI(value.toString()); else return new URI(scheme, value.toString(), null); value in this case is ssp, the Scheme Specific Part (see signature of the URI constructor we're using [1]). There are basically no restrictions on the scheme specific part of a URI, and certainly no restriction on the presence of colons. In fact, many URIs have an authority part in the SSP (e.g. user:password) which *requires* a colon [2]. http is another example, where a colon is used within the SSP to specify the port. In summary, it's perfectly valid to have a colon in the scheme specific part of a URI, so we shouldn't be creating invalid URIs in that case. What are we trying to protect against in the first place with the check? Should we just remove the check? Thanks, Dave. [1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/URI.html#URI(java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String) [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
Review Request 13318: Update documentation for LDAP authentication
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13318/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Update documentation Diffs - docs/en-US/LDAP-for-user-authentication.xml 61f204c docs/en-US/example-activedirectory-configuration.xml 98ab5da docs/en-US/example-openldap-configuration.xml 2b28032 docs/en-US/images/add-ldap-configuration-ad.png 7d0aa0f44f994fe7a6539527ef42fc68b2d333f6 docs/en-US/images/add-ldap-configuration-openldap.png c801275dbc964f1d0a4637aaf59e9b7e860c6624 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13318/diff/ Testing --- Build with publican. Thanks, Ian Duffy
Re: Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Changes --- Added the mapping in CitrixHelper file to support Debain 7 in older XS versions. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database. Made the correction in the DB entry to point to Debian 7.0 template instead of Debain 6.0. Diffs (updated) - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java 9cdbd84 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql f98bb50 setup/db/templates.sql ba13841 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/diff/ Testing --- Verifed the fix locally on cloudstack environment: 1. Created CS environment successfully. 2. SystemVMs are coming up fine. 3. UserVMs are getting deployed successfully. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Changes --- get Dave involved, because of his mido code Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
Re: Review Request 12685: CLOUDSTACK-1532 added utility functions to scan URIs
Hi, Adding Daan's reply - I sent to the wrong dev@ first time around, so the reply went astray: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote: I'm pretty sure the current scheme check is invalid given the URI spec, but definitely shout if I'm off base. You are not 'way' of but please review https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ If the caller needs BroadcastDomainType the reason why should be known and the value-member can be called taking your foreseen problem into account. The code you are quoting would 'just' be a default behavior. regards, Daan If you're around, maybe discussing on IRC would be faster? I took a read of the code you posted, and the default behavior still causes an exception if colons are present in the value passed to toUri. I might be interpreting wrong, but it sounds like you're saying anyone using BroadcastDomainType should actively work around the new (incorrect) default colon handling by changing what value they're passing. This seems like a strange choice, since the value they're passing may be perfectly correct and other parts of the system may depend on it. Why would we intentionally change the existing behavior to start handling colons incorrectly, and put the burden on the caller? The rest of the code looks fine to me, but the colon part breaks existing callers (the MidoNet plugin for one), is confusing for anyone using BroadcastDomainType in future, and I don't yet see what it gains us. I'll add comments on the review. Thanks for the quick reply; feel free to grab me on IRC, we'll probably figure this out faster than on a mail thread. :) Thanks, Dave. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Dave Cahill dcah...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Daan / Alex, Sorry I missed this change at the time, but it looks problematic to me. The code is trying to check for a scheme part in the incoming value, and doesn't add a scheme if value already has one. Therefore, if the scheme check has a false positive (it thinks the value has a scheme, but it doesn't), we are guaranteed to produce an invalid URI (no scheme part) and an exception. I'm pretty sure the current scheme check is invalid given the URI spec, but definitely shout if I'm off base. Here's the check: if (value.toString().contains(:)) return new URI(value.toString()); else return new URI(scheme, value.toString(), null); value in this case is ssp, the Scheme Specific Part (see signature of the URI constructor we're using [1]). There are basically no restrictions on the scheme specific part of a URI, and certainly no restriction on the presence of colons. In fact, many URIs have an authority part in the SSP (e.g. user:password) which *requires* a colon [2]. http is another example, where a colon is used within the SSP to specify the port. In summary, it's perfectly valid to have a colon in the scheme specific part of a URI, so we shouldn't be creating invalid URIs in that case. What are we trying to protect against in the first place with the check? Should we just remove the check? Thanks, Dave. [1] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/net/URI.html#URI(java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String) [2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
please provide access to cwiki for my account
Hi , Am not able to view any page in cwiki after login-in. Am getting permission denied for any page view. Here is my account email rajesh.batt...@citrix.commailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com Please provide access to my a/c. Thanks Rajesh Battala
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24710 --- api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#comment48820 Commenting as discussed on list - I think we should remove the check for contains(:) at this line. We weren't doing it before July 20, it's invalid as per the URI spec, and it breaks existing callers. - Dave Cahill On Aug. 6, 2013, 9:16 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
RE: [Doc] Adding Multiple IP Ranges is Ready
Thanks for the comments, Bharat. The comments have been incorporated. You can view them in the PDF attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-847 -Radhika From: Bharat Kumar Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:07 AM To: Radhika Puthiyetath Subject: Re: [Doc] Adding Multiple IP Ranges is Ready Hi Radhika, due to recent design changes there is a changes in the behavior. I will describe these below. 1.)Please remove these lines form the doc This operation fails if an IP from the remove range is in use. If the remove range contains the IP address on which the DHCP server is running, CloudStack acquires a new IP from the same subnet. If no IP is available in the subnet, the remove operation fails. 2.) Change the Heading to adding multiple subnets to a shared network. 3.) Mention that this is supported when virtual router is the provider of DNS and DHCP. the user data and ssh-key reset service runs on the primary ip of eth0 interface. The primary ip being the ip allocated to eth0 interface of the virtual router from the first subnet. In case if the virtual router is used for providing the dns, Cloudstack adds the entry eth0Ip data-server in the /etc/hosts of the router vm and users form all the subnets can use this name data-server to access the user-data. On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.commailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote: Hi, Adding Multiple IP Ranges documentation is ready for review. The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-847 Please see 15.13. Adding Multiple IP Ranges (139), and provide your feedback. Regards -Radhika
Re: IP Address Allocation
On 06/08/13 8:59 AM, Soheil Eizadi seiz...@infoblox.com wrote: One way to achieve this behavior is to have a call out in prepareNic() to the NetworkElements before the call to the NetworkGuru allowing the NetworkElement to update the Nic Profile. In this use case the Network Element would suggest an IP Address. In the use case below the IP Address would be updated by the NetworkElement. There is logic in getIp(), the current IP Allocation that handles the case where the Nic Profile already has an IP Address. This needs to be updated to handle this new use case. The current use case assume that the VM had already been prepared once and has an IP Address allocated that could be reused. Does anyone see a problem with this approach? Purpose of Guru (to design the network) and Element (implement the network) are different. Right way would be for your plug-in to implement both network Guru and element and let the guru do the IP address allocation. -Soheil From: Soheil Eizadi [seiz...@infoblox.com] Sent: Monday, August 05, 2013 2:35 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: IP Address Allocation I am trying to figure out what would be the proper way for a Plugin to interact with the CloudStack VM deployment and provide an authoritative IP Address from its database versus the local CloudStack database. It looks like the NetworkElements are not presented an opportunity to provide an IP Address and you must develop a NetworkGuru to provide this function. There is some customization of the IP Address designed into the Secondary NICs (see allocateGuestIP()). -Soheil
Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24711 --- Commit 5cb090ed40816950d0c9dbb62135240a7c8b1e3d in branch refs/heads/master from Wei Zhou [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5cb090e ] CLOUDSTACK-2729: move unlock to finally block to handle failed libvirt operations - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2729 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The storage pool issue (CLOUDSTACK-2729) is because of a bug in libvirt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) We need to prevent deleting a volume when refreshing the pool. This patch use a simple file lock to implement it. PS: I have tested another file lock similar to Read/Write file lock, but it was very unstable. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java b8a9f0f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/diff/ Testing --- Applied on 4.0.2 and 4.0.1 Testing On 4.0.1 From 20,June 3 nodes, create a VM on each node every 15 minutes. Destroy the VMs 5 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Testing On 4.0.2 From 01,July 2 nodes, create two VMs on each node every 5 minutes. Destroy the VMs 4 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Thanks, Wei Zhou
Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24712 --- Commit c229244dabb5c5685fbb1aab84de9afdf199820b in branch refs/heads/4.2 from Wei Zhou [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=c229244 ] CLOUDSTACK-2729: move unlock to finally block to handle failed libvirt operations (cherry picked from commit 5cb090ed40816950d0c9dbb62135240a7c8b1e3d) - ASF Subversion and Git Services On Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/ --- (Updated Aug. 5, 2013, 6:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wido den Hollander. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2729 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- The storage pool issue (CLOUDSTACK-2729) is because of a bug in libvirt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706) We need to prevent deleting a volume when refreshing the pool. This patch use a simple file lock to implement it. PS: I have tested another file lock similar to Read/Write file lock, but it was very unstable. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/LibvirtStorageAdaptor.java b8a9f0f Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/diff/ Testing --- Applied on 4.0.2 and 4.0.1 Testing On 4.0.1 From 20,June 3 nodes, create a VM on each node every 15 minutes. Destroy the VMs 5 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Testing On 4.0.2 From 01,July 2 nodes, create two VMs on each node every 5 minutes. Destroy the VMs 4 minutes later. expunge.inteval = 600 (10 minutes), expunge.worker = 2 Thanks, Wei Zhou
Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 10:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal, Dave Cahill, Koushik Das, and Sheng Yang. Changes --- default behavior as decided after consult with Dave Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Both BroadcastDomainType and IsolationType needed some extra code for backwards compatibility Diffs (updated) - api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java c76c3d4 api/test/com/cloud/network/NetworksTest.java 31114e8 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, daan Hoogland
RE: please provide access to cwiki for my account
After resetting the password also am still facing the issue. Please do the needful. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:14 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: please provide access to cwiki for my account Hi , Am not able to view any page in cwiki after login-in. Am getting permission denied for any page view. Here is my account email rajesh.batt...@citrix.commailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com Please provide access to my a/c. Thanks Rajesh Battala
Re: database upgrade
I did a submission, https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 08:23:48PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
:) meaning now, i suppose.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
H,
What is the policy for adding upgrade paths?
I am working on upgrade from 4.1.1 already.
So when do we add
_upgradeMap.put(4.1.1, new DbUpgrade[] { new
Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() });
to DatabaseUpgradeChecker?
thanks,
Daan
Yup, that should be right.
Yeah, it should be added if it's not yet.
Re: Review Request 13316: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/#review24713 --- Review 13316 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #113 is : http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/113/ - Jenkins Cloudstack.org On Aug. 6, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/ --- (Updated Aug. 6, 2013, 9:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3723 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database. Made the correction in the DB entry to point to Debian 7.0 template instead of Debain 6.0. Diffs - plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xen/resource/CitrixHelper.java 9cdbd84 setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql f98bb50 setup/db/templates.sql ba13841 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13316/diff/ Testing --- Verifed the fix locally on cloudstack environment: 1. Created CS environment successfully. 2. SystemVMs are coming up fine. 3. UserVMs are getting deployed successfully. Thanks, Sanjay Tripathi
Review Request 13320: In case when all the vnets are deleted we are not logging a error message if there are vnets allocated.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13320/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy. Bugs: Cloudstack-4105 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4105 In case when all the vnets are deleted we are not logging a error message if there are vnets allocated. Also not updating the physicalnetwork table in this case. Diffs - engine/schema/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DataCenterVnetDao.java de68e1e engine/schema/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DataCenterVnetDaoImpl.java 3ac2729 server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java 304cefa Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13320/diff/ Testing --- Tested on 4.2 Thanks, bharat kumar
Review Request 13319: [KVM] [PrimaryStorage] deleteStoragePool is not removing the storage pool information from KVM agent/host.
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13319/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh, edison su, and Ram Ganesh. Bugs: 3887 Repository: cloudstack-git Description --- Issue: == [KVM] [PrimaryStorage] deleteStoragePool is not removing the storage pool information from KVM agent/host. root cause: == In the CloudstackPrimaryDatastorelifecycleImpl class, deletedataStore method when storage is getting deleted which is attached to kvm hosts, from the list of hosts only for first host Agentcmd is sent to remove the storage. In case of xenserver this will work as the xapi will take care of removing the storagepool from its slaves. In case of KVM we need to send to all hosts to remove the storage. Fixed: == Fixed by sending the agent command to all the hosts if the storage pool is attached to KVM type hypervisor. Diffs - plugins/storage/volume/default/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/lifecycle/CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycleImpl.java 2c8c871 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13319/diff/ Testing --- 1. Created a zone with two kvm hosts and one xenserver host 2. Created cluster scope primary storage for kvm cluster, storage got mounted on both kvm hosts. 3. Enabled maintenance on storage and removed the storage pool. 4. Storage got successfully umount from both the hosts. virsh-pool is not listing the removed storage pool. 5. Created ZONE scope PS, storage got mounted in both the KVM hosts. 6 Storage got successfully umount from both the hosts. virsh-pool is not listing the removed storage pool. 7. created cluster scope for Xenserver Cluster. 8. Enabled maintenance on storage and removed the storage pool. 9. Storage got successfully umount from both xenserver. Thanks, Rajesh Battala
