Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I agree with the respin. Cloudstack is still a young open source project and we don't need any negative press/tweets/blogs/gossip :) On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, +Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, +Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Animesh, Are you aware of any proposed upgrade documentation as of yet? I'd really like to try a couple of upgrades to test the procedure. - Si - Original Message - From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:03:41 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, +Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, +Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
So, I'll be testing KVM which requires the new VR, hence why I want to test the docs. - Original Message - From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:24:39 PM Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 8:05 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) Animesh, Are you aware of any proposed upgrade documentation as of yet? I'd really like to try a couple of upgrades to test the procedure. - Si [Animesh]Here is the upgrade steps from RN for ACS 4.1.0 release. It should be the same for 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1 - Original Message - From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:03:41 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Ok it's on the way VPC upgrade has been tested and working now. Just pulled the commits into 4.2 and building another RC now -Original Message- From: Tracy Phillips [mailto:tracp...@mantoso.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 7:55 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I agree with the respin. Cloudstack is still a young open source project and we don't need any negative press/tweets/blogs/gossip :) On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, +Marcus*, Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, +Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon +Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Simon Weller [mailto:swel...@ena.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 8:05 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) Animesh, Are you aware of any proposed upgrade documentation as of yet? I'd really like to try a couple of upgrades to test the procedure. - Si [Animesh]Here is the upgrade steps from RN for ACS 4.1.0 release. It should be the same for 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1 - Original Message - From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 12:03:41 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, +Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, +Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, +Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I think one of the issues is that practically all the community testing is based on new installs. Since we didn't appear to have a published upgrade procedure available for 4.x to 4.2, it made it very hard to test in a reliable way. I did try a couple of upgrades from 4.02 and 4.1 in my lab, and was unable to bring up the virtual routers (non VPC). But I assumed maybe I missed something in the upgrade procedure, so I didn't consider it valid. We do need to have a think about how we can encourage the community to try upgrades and publish the results. But in order to do so, we need well documented upgrade steps to remove any ambiguity. - Si - Original Message - From: Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:49:26 AM Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, +Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, +Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_p lain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+te st+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, +Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, +Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shor tl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob _p lain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+ te st+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Can we do option (1) please? Many users, including myself, have been waiting for 4.2 to be released for months. On 20 Sep 2013 05:59, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, +Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shor tl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob _p lain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+ te st+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, +Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, +Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shor tl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob _p lain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+ te st+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, +Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, +Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=s hor tl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=b lob _p lain ; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Relea se+ te st+p r ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please
RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
-Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 5:15 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:46 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I prefer a respin, as painful as that seems. VPC is a major feature, do we really want to release something that we know will break anyone who tries to upgrade? I could deal with #1 if we are able to include the hotfix script in the packaging, such that the release notes can provide dead simple instructions for upgrade (no 'go download this script'). I'm just not clear on what we can change and what we can't post-vote. [Animesh] I don't think the release artifacts can be changed so the script will have to be downloaded. David/Chip/Wido any thoughts on that? We can have the script available before the release announcement if we continue with current VOTE. [Animesh] Only Marcus, Indra and Simon have responded I am prepared to respin tomorrow after VPC testing is complete with fixes from Alena. I would like to stick to 72 hour VOTE including weekend since last time most of the VOTEs were received over weekend. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 9:49 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) We do need to ensure that we have the db upgrade fix that was mentioned on the other thread, otherwise people going from 4.1 to 4.2 will have their VPCs break. Looks like we are waiting on a script. It sounds like the plan will be to provide instructions in the release notes. Really wish we would have caught that, its not just that we find bugs at RC, but the severity of ones we miss is astounding sometimes. [Animesh] I am also stumped why this was not caught earlier. Kishan has a fix that is being tested. [Animesh] So while the fix is being tested we have two options 1. Release 4.2, release note this issue, provide a separate script that would have to be run if someone was using VPC in 4.1 and upgraded to 4.2, fix this issue in 4.2.1 2. Since we have not released 4.2 yet, respin another RC and another round of VOTE. That would be a record 6th RC Vote and 2 recalls after successful votes :( Thoughts? On Sep 19, 2013 10:18 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:55 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) On 09/19/2013 01:28 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, +Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, +Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Who is going to build the RPM and Deb packages? I think I should build the .deb packages since I'm the one in debian/changelog who set the version to 4.2 Give me a sign and I'll put the packages online in the DEB repo. Wido [Animesh] Chip/David do we need to wait for the docs to be closed out first? Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a =s hor tl og;h = refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a =b
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1(binding) followed release procedure and tested on devCloud. --Alex -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
[VOTE][RESULTS] Release Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated with a * next to their name: +1 : Alex*, Chip*, Sebastien*, Prasanna*, Hugo*, Marcus*, Wido*, Sebastien, Rajesh Batala, Sheng, Vijay, Abhi, Likitha, Ian, Gavin, Daan, Amogh, Simon Weller, I'm going to proceed with moving the release into the distribution repo now and work on release notes and other documentation tasks. Thanks Animesh On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain; f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+pr ocedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
let me change my vote to +1, we still have some monitor scripts that are based on the xenserver tools, but migrations of system vms works indeed. sorry for kicking trouble on this thread. Daan On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Some people might be expecting that they still have time. On Sep 16, 2013 6:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: 72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or is the community OK to close it out. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Tested using the release procedure. Thanks, Amogh On 9/16/13 5:54 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: 72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or is the community OK to close it out. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs /heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CH ANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced ure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Built nonoss RPMS and deployed fresh installation on RHEL 6.3. Tested CLVM on KVM, adding users, adding projects, adding templates/isos and deploying VMs. I have not tested an upgrade as of yet. - Original Message - From: Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:12:39 PM Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface. Thanks, Likitha -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced ure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) Followed testing procedure. Added Cloudmonkey 5.0.0 basic tests Ran AWSAPI server and started instance with boto -sebastien On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface. Thanks, Likitha -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced ure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) I verified what I could: - Build DEB packages - Installed DEB packages - Tested RBD/Ceph functionality CloudStack is a big project, so I only tested the portion of CloudStack I'm most familiar with and my vote is based on that. Wido On 09/16/2013 10:41 AM, sebgoa wrote: +1 (binding) Followed testing procedure. Added Cloudmonkey 5.0.0 basic tests Ran AWSAPI server and started instance with boto -sebastien On Sep 16, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Likitha Shetty likitha.she...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM life cycle with VMware in advanced zone and AWSAPI EC2 interface. Thanks, Likitha -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip- us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proced ure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match the stock image? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment. I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
This is for xen. the stock image works and it is build in february 2012. We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012. any template newer should not work unless you install xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug 29 says patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb is present in the source tree. This is both a binary and a GPLed software and thus forbidden on two counts. in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e this and another deb file and a kernel module where removed from the cloudstack repo. patches/systemvm/debian/xe-guest-utilities_5.6.0-595_i386.deb contains the service responsible for starting the xe-daemon. also xe-update-guest-attrs contains calls to 'xestore write', write as parameter. On wheezy only xestore-write exists (maybe because of the deb files that where not installed) the same goes for 'xenstore rm'. Strangely it does contain a call to xenstore-read as well. A cp of xenstore-ls to xenstore fixes this as all binaries are copies and is it clever about its name. more is bound to follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match the stock image? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment. I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone else who as been testing Xen comment? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Sorry, july. Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 KVM http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2 VMware (generic) http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-4.2-vh7.ova On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: The stock image is actually from June 2013, I believe. There is a requirement for a new system vm in 4.2 to support some of the newer features. It's absolutely necessary to use this image (or one with the same capabilities) in KVM, maybe less so with Xen. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: This is for xen. the stock image works and it is build in february 2012. We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012. any template newer should not work unless you install xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug 29 says patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb is present in the source tree. This is both a binary and a GPLed software and thus forbidden on two counts. in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e this and another deb file and a kernel module where removed from the cloudstack repo. patches/systemvm/debian/xe-guest-utilities_5.6.0-595_i386.deb contains the service responsible for starting the xe-daemon. also xe-update-guest-attrs contains calls to 'xestore write', write as parameter. On wheezy only xestore-write exists (maybe because of the deb files that where not installed) the same goes for 'xenstore rm'. Strangely it does contain a call to xenstore-read as well. A cp of xenstore-ls to xenstore fixes this as all binaries are copies and is it clever about its name. more is bound to follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match the stock image? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment. I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment. I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Prasanna., Powered by BigRock.com
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our monitoring scripts fail. We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone else who as been testing Xen comment? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
The stock image is actually from June 2013, I believe. There is a requirement for a new system vm in 4.2 to support some of the newer features. It's absolutely necessary to use this image (or one with the same capabilities) in KVM, maybe less so with Xen. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: This is for xen. the stock image works and it is build in february 2012. We did some further investigation. It turns out that due to license issues the xen server tools where removed the 6th of september 2012. any template newer should not work unless you install xe-guest-utilities yourself. bug 29 says patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb is present in the source tree. This is both a binary and a GPLed software and thus forbidden on two counts. in 3db9736a0754388d782b45d31e8e36c9966c508e this and another deb file and a kernel module where removed from the cloudstack repo. patches/systemvm/debian/xe-guest-utilities_5.6.0-595_i386.deb contains the service responsible for starting the xe-daemon. also xe-update-guest-attrs contains calls to 'xestore write', write as parameter. On wheezy only xestore-write exists (maybe because of the deb files that where not installed) the same goes for 'xenstore rm'. Strangely it does contain a call to xenstore-read as well. A cp of xenstore-ls to xenstore fixes this as all binaries are copies and is it clever about its name. more is bound to follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure I understand... my impression from your message is the stock 4.2 image works. This is for Xen, right? Does this mean that there's a step missing in building a custom system vm to make it match the stock image? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: H, The problem is when creating a newer image for the system template as we did on our installations. It will not work with the 4.2 scripts. I am not making hard my thread of this being a blocker but it is a serious impediment for people wanting to harden their cloudstack environment. I am voting a +0 here as I think we are not going to use this distro for this reason. regards, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: At Schuberg Philis, we did some tests and noted that the xe-deamon on router vms is not started and that xenstore no longer exist under that name. The xenstore binary is copied to xenstore-write, --ls etc so this could be solved. I am sure how to formulate this as to convince you all this is a blocker but am inclined to do so. more accurate report will follow, Daan On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote: +1 Ran against simulator. On 16 September 2013 11:25, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote: +1 (binding) The test infra has deployed advanced zone with kvm and xenserver 6.2 since Saturday and I dont see any new failures [1]. So no regressions. Also ran the simulator against 4.2 [2] [1] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-regression-matrix/ [2] http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/simulator/job/run-checkin-tests/ On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:18:48PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Xe-daemon is used to collect cpu/memory usage info inside VM, the VM cannot migrate without installing xe-daemon in XenServer, But CloudStack has a script scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/make_migratable.sh to make VM migratable without xe-daemon, because user might forget to install xe-daemon inside Linux VM. Anthony -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 10:23 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our monitoring scripts fail. We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone else who as been testing Xen comment? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12- master-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
In general we are maintaining tested stock images of system vm templates and they have been now tested by the community for couple of months. The cloudstack migration and HA is not dependant on the xe-daemon running on the VM, that is the reason nobody noticed it. -abhi On 16/09/13 10:53 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our monitoring scripts fail. We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone else who as been testing Xen comment? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-mas ter-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Daan, It will be interesting to know the monitoring use cases, if the community likes these in general we can include these in the maintenance release. The templates can be modified and generated independently as working copies are maintained separately from the artefacts put for vote here. We should start a thread to discuss these as I am also interested in contributing in that area. -abhi On 16/09/13 10:53 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: It does not not work completely. It has no xe-daemon running when instantiated so migration would fail is the theory, also some of our monitoring scripts fail. We failed to see it at first as well as it starts up and networking works On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, so you mean even the stock one does not work for Xen. Can anyone else who as been testing Xen comment? On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Xenserver http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-mas ter-xen.vhd.bz2 I know, it does not have the xenstore binary on board that is called by xe-update-guest-attrs
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or is the community OK to close it out. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Agree to keep the VOTE open. +1 Tested following scenarios on CentOS 6.4 x64: 1 create advanced zone 2 template registration create instance 3 network feature as VPC, LB, static NAT 4 Tried NFS as primary storage on XenServer 6.2 and KVM(CentOS 6.4) On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: 72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or is the community OK to close it out. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) -- Gavin
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
Some people might be expecting that they still have time. On Sep 16, 2013 6:55 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: 72 hours for this VOTE has passed, I had kept this VOTE open until Wednesday because of weekend, but many community members tested this over weekend and we have 12 (+1) Votes and one (+0). Should I keep the VOTE open until Wednesday or is the community OK to close it out. Thanks Animesh From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Tested VM life cycle with Xen in advanced zone. On 16/09/13 7:48 am, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested with simulator. On Sep 14, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=re fs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f= CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+proc edure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) Tested CentOS 6.4 and Ubuntu 12.04.3: create advanced zone create VPC register template create VPC tier create VM on tier w/NFS create VM on tier w/CLM create VM on tier w/Local storage create static NAT to vm, ssh in On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Rajesh Battala rajesh.batt...@citrix.com wrote: +1 Tested VM Life cycle in Xenserver and KVM with Advance Zone configuration. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 4:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1. --Sheng On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote: I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
RE: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
+1 (binding) Tested: Nicira NVP plugin with XenServer Nicira NVP plugin with VMWare VPC with other service providers (NiciraNVP) Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 14 sep. 2013, at 08:17, Vijayendra Bhamidipati vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round) I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.2 Commit: c1e24ff89f6d14d6ae74d12dbca108c35449030f List of changes: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.2 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.2.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Testing instructions are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure Vote will be open for 72 hours (Wednesday 9/18 End of Day PST). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate (binding) with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
