Re: How to change the name of a release when adding data to Apache Project Report Helper
2015-04-06 19:26 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter : > Hello, > > I've received an email from the Apache Reporter Service, asking me to fill > the latest release I've published at > https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?commons > The problem is, that it won't let me change the name of the release. At > commons we have several components we develop and release individually [1]. > So I'd like to be able to change the Project name from "commons" to > "commons-lang". I can do that by modifying the above URL to > https://reporter.apache.org/addrelease.html?commons-lang. Is that the > correct way to do this? > Nobody seems to know... Who can I get in touch with about this? Infra? > > Thanks! > Benedikt > > [1] http://commons.apache.org > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~britter/ > http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ > http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter > http://github.com/britter > -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/britter
Re: projects-new.apache.org
I have found that chrome is not so good at expiring the cache on https pages On 13 April 2015 at 23:59, David Crossley wrote: > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > ok, I added forrest to projects.json and it is now visible in projects > list > > https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html > > Beaut, thanks. > > > notice there may be issues with browser cache: json content doesn't seem > to be > > refreshed when reloading page, I had to directly browse the json file and > > reload it > > in the future, we may eed to do something to improve such refresh for > end- > > users who won't be able to do such tricks > > I reloaded that page just before you sent this message, and it > was okay without such a trick. > > -David > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 08:09:40 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > > great: I generated the json file [1] > > > > > > now you are live! > > > https://projects-new.apache.org/project.html?forrest > > > > > > you still don't appear in the projects list: I need to investigate, > will do > > > tonight (Paris time). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > [1] https://projects-new.apache.org/json/projects/forrest.json >
Re: disabling edit feature in https://projects-new.apache.org/
while working on missing Forrest info, I'm now completely convinced we should not edit json but completely generate them from existing DOAP and project.a.o contents then I'll immediately disable the edit feature: this can easily be reverted later And I'll add a link to existing information on how to add a new TLP Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 18:39:57 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm working on https://projects-new.apache.org/ , trying to figure out the > whole information flow for informations about our projects: I like this new > site, but IMHO we can't switch until we're clear on that. > > > And it seems the edit feature currently cause inconsistencies since it edits > site's svn simplified json content, instead of DOAP which is AFAIK the > current project description standard [1] > > > There are only few projects that used the feature, then it's not too late to > fix the issue before it gets worse and people are lost. > > > IMHO, adding a link to this DOAP page in projects-new's about page would do > the job = explain people how to add their project (perhaps some additionnal > instructions are required, I'm not sure) > > WDYT? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] http://projects.apache.org/doap.html
Re: DOAP format question
ok, it seems I can update the source, then I did it I suppose this will be published in the next site content generation... Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 12 avril 2015 04:41:22 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm working on http://projects-new.apache.org/ , which makes me dig into ASF > DOAP conventions > > And I found something that I think is a bug: on > http://projects.apache.org/docs/pmc.html , half of the page explains about > asfext:PMC in uppercase, while the other half is about asfext:pmc in > lowercase > > AFAIK, everybody is using asfext:pmc, in lowercase > > Can you confirm that it is in lowercase? Then fix the page, that is causing > a little bit of confusion? > > Thanks in advance, > > Hervé
Re: projects-new.apache.org
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > ok, I added forrest to projects.json and it is now visible in projects list > https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html Beaut, thanks. > notice there may be issues with browser cache: json content doesn't seem to > be > refreshed when reloading page, I had to directly browse the json file and > reload it > in the future, we may eed to do something to improve such refresh for end- > users who won't be able to do such tricks I reloaded that page just before you sent this message, and it was okay without such a trick. -David > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 08:09:40 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > great: I generated the json file [1] > > > > now you are live! > > https://projects-new.apache.org/project.html?forrest > > > > you still don't appear in the projects list: I need to investigate, will do > > tonight (Paris time). > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > [1] https://projects-new.apache.org/json/projects/forrest.json
Re: projects-new.apache.org
ok, I added forrest to projects.json and it is now visible in projects list https://projects-new.apache.org/projects.html notice there may be issues with browser cache: json content doesn't seem to be refreshed when reloading page, I had to directly browse the json file and reload it in the future, we may eed to do something to improve such refresh for end- users who won't be able to do such tricks Regards, Hervé Le lundi 13 avril 2015 08:09:40 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > great: I generated the json file [1] > > now you are live! > https://projects-new.apache.org/project.html?forrest > > you still don't appear in the projects list: I need to investigate, will do > tonight (Paris time). > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] https://projects-new.apache.org/json/projects/forrest.json > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 14:41:07 David Crossley a écrit : > > Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > I had a look at Forrest doap file[1]: it's not a doap file, it's a feed > > > containing a doap entry > > > > > > you should IMHO simplify it to match a simple doap file, like [2], for > > > example > > > > Ah, many thanks. I have now published that, and also updated the > > reference in files.xml at the old projects.apache.org > > http://svn.apache.org/r1673100 > > > > -David > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > [1] http://forrest.apache.org/doap.xml > > > > > > [2] > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/trunk/doap_Geronimo.rdf > > > > > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 04:58:05 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > > > if you run parserdf.py, you'll see that forrest is one of the few rdf > > > > that > > > > makes the script choke: > > > > > > > > Error when reading None's doap file > > > > http://forrest.apache.org/doap.xml: > > > > > > > > > > > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > > > File "rdfparse.py", line 59, in > > > > > > > > if pjson['homepage']: > > > > KeyError: 'homepage' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still didn't have time to investigate this one, and report (did it > > > > for > > > > lucy and uima: opened Jira issues on each project) > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > Le lundi 13 avril 2015 12:32:49 David Crossley a écrit : > > > > > Apache Forrest is also missing from projects-new.a.o > > > > > but was one of the early adopters at projects.a.o > > > > > > > > > > I cannot determine why. Would someone else please try. > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:27:18PM +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > > > > > I finally found time to investigate: > > > > > > > > > > > > this is because ofbiz is not in pmcs reference list [1] used by > > > > > > the > > > > > > site > > > > > > to > > > > > > create pmcs.json [2] > > > > > > > > > > > > it seems one step was missed during OFBiz TLP creation [3] > > > > > > > > > > > > As PMC Chair and/or member, you should be able to fix it [4] > > > > > > > > > > > > Once done, just tell and I'll regenerate the pmcs.json file > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/p > > > > > > ro > > > > > > ject > > > > > > s > > > > > > /data_files/ > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://projects-new.apache.org/json/foundation/pmcs.json > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/p > > > > > > ro > > > > > > ject > > > > > > s > > > > > > /data_files/aareadme.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > [4] http://projects.apache.org/create.html#submit > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lundi 30 mars 2015 08:54:46 Pierre Smits a écrit : > > > > > > > Hi. I don't see Apache OFBiz when looking at the 'Projects by > > > > > > > PMC' > > > > > > > overview. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pierre Smits
Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
On 13 April 2015 at 20:42, Roger and Beth Whitcomb < rogerandb...@rbwhitcomb.com> wrote: > Pivot is using Apache Extras basically for "source-code for projects that > can't..." because of licensing issues. So, my feeling is we are different > than AOO. > AOO uses apache-extra, for libraries that we cannot include in our repo due to license restriction. These libraries are solely used by developers who work on the internals of AOO. One developer typically download the libraries once and then check from time to time for updates. The binaries are relative big, but the download numbers really low. These binaries should not be confused with our executables which are big and downloaded frequently, these are stored on sourceForge. rgds jan I. > > ~Roger Whitcomb > Apache Pivot PMC Chair > > > On 4/13/15 6:48 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > >> How much of Apache Extras is "binary dumping ground" (as used by OO >> builds), and how much is just "source-code for projects that >> can't/won't quite fit into ASF" (e.g. for licensing reasons or lack of >> community)? >> >> As long as you have the source code, then you can attach binaries to >> tagged releases in GitHub. >> >> Atlassian's BitBucket likewise provides both source code and binary >> hosting - here binaries are easier to attach independently. >> >> >> As I said, I also found BinTray a great way to do independent >> downloads, with the optional capability of Maven repository with >> mirroring to Central as a nice thing for those still doing >> Java/Groovy/Clojure/Scala etc. >> >> It's still "all eggs in one company's basket" of course.. but then so >> is SourceForge.. and at the moment I would be more worried about >> SourceForge disappearing than GitHub or Atlassian. >> >> On 13 April 2015 at 06:17, Branko Čibej wrote: >> >>> On 19.03.2015 06:22, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> +1 for GitHub - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one or two people and not as clear way in to contribute. GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras organization there should be straight forward. >>> GitHub neither provides nor allows the kind of service that Apache >>> Extras needs. It's pretty much useless as a pure download server, their >>> terms explicitly say they can shut down a project without notice if they >>> don't like its bandwidth characteristics. >>> >>> As for binaries - I found it very useful to use BinTray for Beanshell - as I could do both Maven and regular downloads: >>> Do please consider that all the world cannot use Maven just as all the >>> world is not written in Java. >>> >>> -- Brane >>> >>> >> >> >
Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
Pivot is using Apache Extras basically for "source-code for projects that can't..." because of licensing issues. So, my feeling is we are different than AOO. ~Roger Whitcomb Apache Pivot PMC Chair On 4/13/15 6:48 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: How much of Apache Extras is "binary dumping ground" (as used by OO builds), and how much is just "source-code for projects that can't/won't quite fit into ASF" (e.g. for licensing reasons or lack of community)? As long as you have the source code, then you can attach binaries to tagged releases in GitHub. Atlassian's BitBucket likewise provides both source code and binary hosting - here binaries are easier to attach independently. As I said, I also found BinTray a great way to do independent downloads, with the optional capability of Maven repository with mirroring to Central as a nice thing for those still doing Java/Groovy/Clojure/Scala etc. It's still "all eggs in one company's basket" of course.. but then so is SourceForge.. and at the moment I would be more worried about SourceForge disappearing than GitHub or Atlassian. On 13 April 2015 at 06:17, Branko Čibej wrote: On 19.03.2015 06:22, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: +1 for GitHub - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one or two people and not as clear way in to contribute. GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras organization there should be straight forward. GitHub neither provides nor allows the kind of service that Apache Extras needs. It's pretty much useless as a pure download server, their terms explicitly say they can shut down a project without notice if they don't like its bandwidth characteristics. As for binaries - I found it very useful to use BinTray for Beanshell - as I could do both Maven and regular downloads: Do please consider that all the world cannot use Maven just as all the world is not written in Java. -- Brane
Re: Help! Slide template fixup needed!
Jean-Frederic ran into the same problem as well, and suggested a fix: Simply take each slide, cut the text block of bullets, and then paste back into the slide. Save, and run thru slide show. This worked for me - both for the section break slides as well as the main text slides, this removes the transition and also makes the section breaks appear. Nick's alternate suggestion is to simply export the preso to PDF, and then run through the PDF to do it. Separately, here's hoping that it looks ok on the different projectors - reportedly session rooms default to 4:3 format. - Shane On 4/12/15 3:23 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > So I migrated everything to Nick's pretty Austin template, and didn't > realize all the transitions were in there. Is there any AOO Impress > export out there who's willing to fixup my slides tonight? (I speak > right after lunch tomorrow). > > All I need are simple template/text box fixes for all the normal slides > - most of the deck is just simple bullets with a few obvious section > heading slides in between. > > - Ensure there are *no* transitions on any text slides. When a slide > appears, the text block should appear. > > - Ensure the 2 title slides and each the section heading slides actually > have the text appear in slideshow mode - the slide looks fine except > when I'm presenting, and then the section headers have no text actually > appearing. > > - Leave the two weird slides - with no background - alone. You'll know > then if you look. > > Deck: > > https://people.apache.org/~curcuru/slides/KeepApacheProjectIndependence-SCurcuru-ApacheConAustin-R.odp > > Thanks in advance. Yes, I should learn how to script updating the text > blocks in AOO to fix this myself, but life has been too crazy lately > with some serious extended family health issues. > > - Shane >
Re: Google Code shutting down Jan 2016
How much of Apache Extras is "binary dumping ground" (as used by OO builds), and how much is just "source-code for projects that can't/won't quite fit into ASF" (e.g. for licensing reasons or lack of community)? As long as you have the source code, then you can attach binaries to tagged releases in GitHub. Atlassian's BitBucket likewise provides both source code and binary hosting - here binaries are easier to attach independently. As I said, I also found BinTray a great way to do independent downloads, with the optional capability of Maven repository with mirroring to Central as a nice thing for those still doing Java/Groovy/Clojure/Scala etc. It's still "all eggs in one company's basket" of course.. but then so is SourceForge.. and at the moment I would be more worried about SourceForge disappearing than GitHub or Atlassian. On 13 April 2015 at 06:17, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 19.03.2015 06:22, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >> +1 for GitHub - as Apache Extras are easily mini-communities of one >> or two people and not as clear way in to contribute. >> >> >> GitHub should seriously be considered. Making an apache-extras >> organization there should be straight forward. > > GitHub neither provides nor allows the kind of service that Apache > Extras needs. It's pretty much useless as a pure download server, their > terms explicitly say they can shut down a project without notice if they > don't like its bandwidth characteristics. > >> As for binaries - I found it very useful to use BinTray for Beanshell >> - as I could do both Maven and regular downloads: > > Do please consider that all the world cannot use Maven just as all the > world is not written in Java. > > -- Brane > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) http://orcid.org/-0001-9842-9718