Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[Hervé BOUTEMY]

Le mercredi 1 juillet 2015 09:10:42 sebb a écrit :
> On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY  wrote:
> > I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
> > answer.
> > Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
> > doesn't have time.
> > 
> > I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
> > Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
> > unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
> > svn),
> If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
> local changes are reflected in SVN.
dump available in people.apache.org:/home/hboutemy/reporter.apache.org.tgz

> It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.
# m h  dom mon dow   command
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4 
podlings.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4 
parsecommitters.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4 
parsechairs.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4 
countaccounts.py
00 00 * * * cd /var/www/projects.apache.org/scripts/cronjobs && python3.4 
parsereleases.py
00 4,12,20 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/data && python3.4 
parsepmcs.py
00 01 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python mailglomper.py
00 09 * * * cd /var/www/reporter.apache.org/ && python readjira.py
00 12 * * * curl "(removed)" > 
/var/www/reporter.apache.org/data/mailinglists.json



once content is checked against waht is in svn, we could probably copy and run 
pubsubber.py from projects.a.o so svn updates are propagated to the vm

Regards,

Hervé

> 
> > I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
> > 
> > 
> > At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
> > have more time to help on reporter.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Hervé
> > 
> > Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
> >> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
> >> 
> >> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
> >> 
> >> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
> >> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
> >> the faulty data is generated.
> >> 
> >> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
> >> it?

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[sebb]

On 1 July 2015 at 21:59, Rich Bowen  wrote:
>
>
> On 07/01/2015 04:56 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno  wrote:
>>>
>>> My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
>>> state a few things:
>>>
>>> - reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
>>> - Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
>>> - reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
>>> official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
>>> thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev
>>> because
>>> infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If
>>
>>
>> However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
>> IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
>> report.
>
>
>
> Well, yes, but that's always been accompanied by "it's not official, it's
> error-prone, it's only a starting place, blah blah"
>
> Daniel did this on his own time. It is not an infra-supported service. If
> it's useful, great. If it's not, you're welcome to try to fix it.
>
>
>> That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
>> limitations are.
>>
>> At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
>> source for PMC membership or project membership.
>> Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
>> happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.
>
>
> At the risk of sounding like a jerk ...
>
> It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org and
> patches are gleefully welcomed.

I know.

However only part of the code is in SVN at that location, and it has
as yet no documentation apart from a very basic start.

The service also depends on crontabs (I assume; I've not yet
investigated) and httpd.conf (which I have found in SVN) in order to
make sensible patches possible.

And unlike projects-new, someone needs to login to update the code
from SVN when patches are to be applied.

> --Rich
>
>
> --
> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[Rich Bowen]

On 07/01/2015 04:56 PM, sebb wrote:

On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno  wrote:

My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
state a few things:

- reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
- Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
- reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev because
infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If


However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
report.



Well, yes, but that's always been accompanied by "it's not official, 
it's error-prone, it's only a starting place, blah blah"


Daniel did this on his own time. It is not an infra-supported service. 
If it's useful, great. If it's not, you're welcome to try to fix it.




That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
limitations are.

At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
source for PMC membership or project membership.
Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.


At the risk of sounding like a jerk ...

It's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org and 
patches are gleefully welcomed.


--Rich


--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[sebb]

On 1 July 2015 at 11:21, Daniel Gruno  wrote:
> My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will
> state a few things:
>
> - reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
> - Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
> - reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an
> official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal
> thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev because
> infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage it. If

However it has been recommended several times (by some board members,
IIRC) as a way of providing the basic information needed for a board
report.

> anyone is interesting in moving it to a more official (maintainable) state,
> then by all means do so.
> - The service is fully automated, which is one of the reasons it uses
> publicly available information rather than committee information that is not
> publicly available. Using the committee info file would require yet another
> svn role account. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it would require some
> additional work.

That's fair enough, but then the text needs to make clear what the
limitations are.

At present AFAICT it relies on people.a.o, which is not the canonical
source for PMC membership or project membership.
Also if people.a.o fails to run for a day or so (which can and has
happened), the dates of LDAP group changes may be incorrect.

> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
> On 2015-07-01 08:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>>
>> I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
>> answer.
>> Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or
>> doesn't
>> have time.
>>
>> I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
>> Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
>> unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of
>> svn),
>> I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>>
>>
>> At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably
>> have
>> more time to help on reporter.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>>>
>>> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>>
>>> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>>
>>> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>>> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>>> the faulty data is generated.
>>>
>>> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on
>>> it?
>
>

Re: Hosting Searchable Release Specific Documentation

[Niclas Hedhman]

Well, in Apache Zest, we generate versioned documentation with the normal
build process, and that is then committed into the SVN site/content in its
own version-named directory. Documentation that is somewhat independent of
a release, such a "community stuff", are outside this.

Neo4j (not Apache) used a similar process and even generated the docs into
Maven artifacts, along with testsuite results.

Cheers
Niclas

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Suresh Marru  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Can I get some advice on how projects deal with hosting release specific
> documentation? In addition to the CMS and Wiki, I am exploring alternatives
> which have a good search built-in. I preciously came across ASF projects
> hosting documentation on read the docs [1] and floss manuals [2] (sorry I
> could not trace all the links of projects using them, but [3] and [4] are
> examples). I read the thread on github pages [5], but it did not have a
> conclusive end.
>
> I am looking for something immediate, any suggestions please? It will be
> great if there is a precedence so we could just refer or even better
> plagiarize the scripts or approaches.
>
> Thanks,
> Suresh
>
> [1] - https://readthedocs.org/ 
> [2] - http://en.flossmanuals.net/ 
> [3] - https://readthedocs.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/ <
> https://readthedocs.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/>
> [4] - https://readthedocs.org/projects/trafficserver/ <
> https://readthedocs.org/projects/trafficserver/>
> [5] - http://markmail.org/thread/bmbi65q7zdiej6dj <
> http://markmail.org/thread/bmbi65q7zdiej6dj>
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

RE: ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!

[Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)]

Rich can try to take full responsibility, but there was consultation with all 
appropriate places.

Sent from my Windows Phone

From: Rich Bowen
Sent: ‎7/‎1/‎2015 5:48 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!



On 07/01/2015 07:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly
> accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the
> main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?

That would be me, Ross Gardler (President), and Angela Brown, our
conference producer. And as the lead of ApacheCon at the ASF, of course
I take full personal responsibility for this decision. It's the right
decision, and I have the full enthusiastic support of the board of
directors in this decision.

>
> ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
> Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
> promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.
>

I disagree (obviously).


> Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
> the CORE extension?

No. Nothing negative. It's an expansion of the brand.

We have been talking about this for literally 10 years, as we watched
ApacheCon get too large. Or, rather, the topic area get too large, and
ApacheCon suffer as a result. As you have seen in every event that
you've been involved with, we have more *PROJECTS* than conference
slots. So you have to decide which projects to ignore, and which
projects to unfairly overrepresent.

For example, at the last few events, OFBiz has had an entire track, and
other projects have complained bitterly to me, because they had no talks
at all. I took that criticism because it seems obvious to me that
tracks, rather than individual talks, were the only way to actually get
attendees.

TEN years ago, we talked with our conference producer about having
multiple events, including ApacheCon Big Data, ApacheCon Search,
ApacheCon Java, ApacheCon HTTP, and ApacheCon Core for things that were
homeless, including the overarching community and business kinds of
talks. (I believe the conversation was actually in Las Vegas, which
would put it in 2003 or 2004?)

In this way, we dreamed, we could provide a home for all of our
projects, with everyone represented, and still have a community-building
event.

Ironically, at the time, the producer was absolutely thrilled about this
approach, and the peanut gallery killed the concept due to their concern
that it would dilute the branding impact, as you put it.

So, here we are, the most important Open Source entity on the planet, by
any measure you want to choose, and we still have a conference that only
450 people are attending. Why? Because as a manager I'm absolutely going
to send my employee to MesosCon, where they get 2 days of content,
rather than ApacheCon, where they get one or two talks. No question in
my mind.

We firmly believe that the solution is more targeted events. This is the
first of those. But we don't want to lose the main ApacheCon concept.
Thus, two co-located events. We will be doing this again in Vancouver.
And we'll be doing it again in Europe next year. This is the new reality.

If you'd like to be more involved in this process and form the event in
coming years, this is of course the place to have the conversation. But,
given our *LONG* history of mismanaging our producer relationship, the
board has delegated this event to me, and I have contracted with LF to
handle the details because they are *awesome* at building event brands.

One of these days, I need to write a history of ConCom, so that more
people can understand why the board made this decision.

--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!

[Rich Bowen]

On 07/01/2015 07:43 AM, jan i wrote:

On 1 July 2015 at 13:31, Pierre Smits  wrote:




ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.


Actually while we discussed it, one of the ideas was "apacheCON: big data",
but
LF preferred "apache big data" and since it is their event they choose.


Yes, this is the most important point here, which we will continue to 
emphasize. We have licensed our marks to LF to put on an event for us, 
because they are competent professionals and we're not. My job as 
ApacheCon lead is to ensure that we, the ASF community, stay out of 
their way and let them do a great event. We, the ASF community, have a 
long history of tinkering, micromanaging, and generally interfering with 
conference producers. All well intentioned, of course, but it hasn't 
worked. It's time to try something new.



Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
the CORE extension?


No just to avoid some confusion. Think of our homepage, travel assistance,
reports etc, that
is all done combined for the 2 events.

Let me put it like I see it personally, despite contracts, producers etc,
and please bear
in mind, other people have different views.

to me the total "thing" is apacheCON, that consist of 2 unique events (big
data and core).


Yes. For the moment. And the longer-term goal is to build those brands 
further in order that they can fly on their own. See, for example, what 
OReilly has done over the last 15 years while we've been protecting our 
one brand. You can't swing a stick without hitting an OReilly event. And 
they're doing that with content that they don't own. Also note that LF 
had done this successfully for years - see 
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/ for what they have grown the 
venerable "LinuxCon" name into.


No, I absolutely don't believe that we are diluting our brand.


--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!

[Rich Bowen]

On 07/01/2015 07:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:

Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly
accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the
main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?


That would be me, Ross Gardler (President), and Angela Brown, our 
conference producer. And as the lead of ApacheCon at the ASF, of course 
I take full personal responsibility for this decision. It's the right 
decision, and I have the full enthusiastic support of the board of 
directors in this decision.




ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.



I disagree (obviously).



Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
the CORE extension?


No. Nothing negative. It's an expansion of the brand.

We have been talking about this for literally 10 years, as we watched 
ApacheCon get too large. Or, rather, the topic area get too large, and 
ApacheCon suffer as a result. As you have seen in every event that 
you've been involved with, we have more *PROJECTS* than conference 
slots. So you have to decide which projects to ignore, and which 
projects to unfairly overrepresent.


For example, at the last few events, OFBiz has had an entire track, and 
other projects have complained bitterly to me, because they had no talks 
at all. I took that criticism because it seems obvious to me that 
tracks, rather than individual talks, were the only way to actually get 
attendees.


TEN years ago, we talked with our conference producer about having 
multiple events, including ApacheCon Big Data, ApacheCon Search, 
ApacheCon Java, ApacheCon HTTP, and ApacheCon Core for things that were 
homeless, including the overarching community and business kinds of 
talks. (I believe the conversation was actually in Las Vegas, which 
would put it in 2003 or 2004?)


In this way, we dreamed, we could provide a home for all of our 
projects, with everyone represented, and still have a community-building 
event.


Ironically, at the time, the producer was absolutely thrilled about this 
approach, and the peanut gallery killed the concept due to their concern 
that it would dilute the branding impact, as you put it.


So, here we are, the most important Open Source entity on the planet, by 
any measure you want to choose, and we still have a conference that only 
450 people are attending. Why? Because as a manager I'm absolutely going 
to send my employee to MesosCon, where they get 2 days of content, 
rather than ApacheCon, where they get one or two talks. No question in 
my mind.


We firmly believe that the solution is more targeted events. This is the 
first of those. But we don't want to lose the main ApacheCon concept. 
Thus, two co-located events. We will be doing this again in Vancouver. 
And we'll be doing it again in Europe next year. This is the new reality.


If you'd like to be more involved in this process and form the event in 
coming years, this is of course the place to have the conversation. But, 
given our *LONG* history of mismanaging our producer relationship, the 
board has delegated this event to me, and I have contracted with LF to 
handle the details because they are *awesome* at building event brands.


One of these days, I need to write a history of ConCom, so that more 
people can understand why the board made this decision.


--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!

[jan i]

On 1 July 2015 at 13:31, Pierre Smits  wrote:

> Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly
> accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the
> main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?
>

The apacheCON team did that with LF and marketing, and it was actually
discussed quite  while ago.

This is the first time we divide the traditional apacheCON, so the
intention is (and was)
to make a clear statement, this is not the old apacheCON.


>
> ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
> Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
> promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.
>
Actually while we discussed it, one of the ideas was "apacheCON: big data",
but
LF preferred "apache big data" and since it is their event they choose.


>
> Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
> the CORE extension?
>
No just to avoid some confusion. Think of our homepage, travel assistance,
reports etc, that
is all done combined for the 2 events.

Let me put it like I see it personally, despite contracts, producers etc,
and please bear
in mind, other people have different views.

to me the total "thing" is apacheCON, that consist of 2 unique events (big
data and core).

rgds
jan i.


> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *ORRTIZ.COM *
> Services & Solutions for Cloud-
> Based Manufacturing, Professional
> Services and Retail & Trade
> http://www.orrtiz.com
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM, jan i  wrote:
>
> > We have now passed the deadline for submitting talks to ApacheCON CORE in
> > Budapest.
> >
> > We have received 156 submissions, which now will be reviewed. Thanks a
> lot
> > for the
> > big interest.
> >
> > It is already now clear, that some talks have been submitted to both
> > events, and some
> > talks submitted to CORE; really fits better in big data. The ApacheCON
> team
> > will contact
> > the authors shortly, to clarify these cases.
> >
> > Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP. There are a lot of
> open
> > slots here.
> >
> > Please do not hesitate to submit your proposal for Apache Big Data.
> >
> > thanks
> > on behalf of the ApacheCON Team.
> > jan i.
> >
>

Re: ApacheCON CORE and Apache Big Data, Budapest 28 september - 2 October.

[jan i]

Hi

thanks for catching this, I have corrected it.

the CFP deadline for big data is July 10th

rgds
jan i.


On 1 July 2015 at 13:27, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

> jan i wrote:
>
>> Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP.
>>
>
> Then https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage should be corrected. It
> still lists today as deadline for Core (and that's OK) and July 15th as
> deadline for Big Data (and that should be changed if it's July 10th as you
> state above). I don't plan to submit any talks for Big Data, this is just
> for people like me who tend to notice things when it's almost too late...
>
> Regards,
>   Andrea.
>

ApacheCON CORE? ApacheCon!

[Pierre Smits]

Who, in his moment of brightness, dreamed up the notion that a perfectly
accepted household name (and thereby a de facto brand) as ApacheCon for the
main event of the ASF would benefit from adding an extension like CORE?

ApacheCon in itself doesn't eat into the impact of the joint event 'Apache
Big Data', as that name doesn't have Con attached to Apache in all
promotions done up to now... Or dilutes the branding impact of that event.

Is there a negative connotation with the name that it would benefit from
the CORE extension?

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM *
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:20 PM, jan i  wrote:

> We have now passed the deadline for submitting talks to ApacheCON CORE in
> Budapest.
>
> We have received 156 submissions, which now will be reviewed. Thanks a lot
> for the
> big interest.
>
> It is already now clear, that some talks have been submitted to both
> events, and some
> talks submitted to CORE; really fits better in big data. The ApacheCON team
> will contact
> the authors shortly, to clarify these cases.
>
> Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP. There are a lot of open
> slots here.
>
> Please do not hesitate to submit your proposal for Apache Big Data.
>
> thanks
> on behalf of the ApacheCON Team.
> jan i.
>

Re: ApacheCON CORE and Apache Big Data, Budapest 28 september - 2 October.

[Andrea Pescetti]

jan i wrote:

Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP.


Then https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/FrontPage should be corrected. It 
still lists today as deadline for Core (and that's OK) and July 15th as 
deadline for Big Data (and that should be changed if it's July 10th as 
you state above). I don't plan to submit any talks for Big Data, this is 
just for people like me who tend to notice things when it's almost too 
late...


Regards,
  Andrea.

ApacheCON CORE and Apache Big Data, Budapest 28 september - 2 October.

[jan i]

We have now passed the deadline for submitting talks to ApacheCON CORE in
Budapest.

We have received 156 submissions, which now will be reviewed. Thanks a lot
for the
big interest.

It is already now clear, that some talks have been submitted to both
events, and some
talks submitted to CORE; really fits better in big data. The ApacheCON team
will contact
the authors shortly, to clarify these cases.

Apache Big Data has July 10th as deadline for CFP. There are a lot of open
slots here.

Please do not hesitate to submit your proposal for Apache Big Data.

thanks
on behalf of the ApacheCON Team.
jan i.

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[Daniel Gruno]

My time devoted to comdev is unfortunately limited right now, but I will 
state a few things:


- reporter.apache.org runs on the comdev VM (projects-vm).
- Anyone in the comdev project/PMC can access this machine.
- reporter.apache.org is still considered a 'pet project'. It is not an 
official Apache service, it is not maintained by infra, it's a personal 
thing I put together to help out projects. It was donated to comdev 
because infra - while supportive of the project - did not want to manage 
it. If anyone is interesting in moving it to a more official 
(maintainable) state, then by all means do so.
- The service is fully automated, which is one of the reasons it uses 
publicly available information rather than committee information that is 
not publicly available. Using the committee info file would require yet 
another svn role account. I'm not saying it's impossible, but it would 
require some additional work.


With regards,
Daniel.

On 2015-07-01 08:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:

I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
answer.
Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't
have time.

I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of svn),
I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.


At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably have
more time to help on reporter.

Regards,

Hervé

Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :

Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.

As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.

However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
the faulty data is generated.

Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on it?

Re: Reporter.apache.org displaying incorrect data - who is responsible for the host?

[sebb]

On 1 July 2015 at 07:02, Hervé BOUTEMY  wrote:
> I asked about it one week ago (with analysis of the VM state), but got no
> answer.
> Seems the only one to know is Daniel, and he doesn't check this ML or doesn't
> have time.
>
> I have access to the VM: it was given for projects-new.
> Technically, I can change reporter too, but since we're starting from an
> unexpected status (no svn checkout, files on the VM that are not part of svn),

If you can create a copy of the files on the VM I could ensure any
local changes are reflected in SVN.
It would help also to have details of the crontab entries.

> I didn't want to change the VM content without asking before.
>
>
> At the moment, I want to finish projects new switch: then I'll probably have
> more time to help on reporter.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 30 juin 2015 01:20:46 sebb a écrit :
>> Reporter.apache.org is showing misleading PMC membership data.
>>
>> As this is used in board reports, it really ought to be fixed ASAP.
>>
>> However the fixes I made to SVN have not been applied, and there is no
>> documentation I could find on how the host has been set up - nor how
>> the faulty data is generated.
>>
>> Who is responsible for maintaining the host and updating the software on it?
>