Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On 29/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and OpenOffice has always been granted one for years. Before your posting, I've no doubts, that Apache will get a booth at FOSDEM, if they ask for it. Especially, if they say, they will come with Apache OpenOffice. Time passed and it seems today (Friday) is the last day for proposing a stand/booth. As things stand now, with no information at all, probably it would make sense to submit a quick request on behalf of OpenOffice saying that we would accept (and we recommend!) that the request is merged with the Apache one (I mean, the one reportedly sent by Daniel), and that Apache can get adequate table space for the merged booth, on the ground floor. I'm not going to submit it; I'm leaving this to Michael for consideration. Of course, if we already know that Daniel's request will be accepted, there is no reason for submitting this "extra" request. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On 06/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: I'm going to submit a proposal for an ODF Editors devroom too, similar to http://s.apache.org/ved (the one we sent last year). This was sent yesterday. I didn't CC the list since submissions now happen through a web form, but content is not much different from the 2015 submission linked above. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
Roman Shaposhnik wrote: just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for FOSDEM. Good! Not sure how to increase our chances of being accepted, but would love any feedback on that. Both booths/stands and devrooms are accepted (or rejected) directly by the FOSDEM organizers, with (as far as I know) no way to influence the decision. But organizers prefer to see devrooms that focus on one topic rather than one software and that gather similar projects. Acceptance of a stand and/or a devroom for the same project are independent. So a stand for OpenOffice is unrelated to a devroom for ODF Editors. And a stand for Apache is unrelated to a devroom for Big Data projects. And different Apache projects can show up in different devrooms since they apply to different areas. I'm going to submit a proposal for an ODF Editors devroom too, similar to http://s.apache.org/ved (the one we sent last year). Regards, Andrea.
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
Hi! just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for FOSDEM. ASF is the org that can make it a really successfull DEVROOM and last year the feedback was asking for something like this big time. Not sure how to increase our chances of being accepted, but would love any feedback on that. Thanks, Roman. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:59 AM, RA Stehmannwrote: > On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: >>> as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at >>> FOSDEM 2016. >> >> So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We >> don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and >> OpenOffice has always been granted one for years. > > Before your posting, I've no doubts, that Apache will get a booth at > FOSDEM, if they ask for it. Especially, if they say, they will come with > Apache OpenOffice. > > Apache is one of the major (and greatest ;-) ) projects in the Free > Software world. > >> >>> It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins >>> FOSDEM with a booth. >> >> I was assuming/understanding that we would have sent both the OpenOffice >> request (highly likely to be approved; but less important) and the ASF >> request (new, so less likely; but more important). And that, if both >> were approved, we would merge the tables, or if one was approved we >> would share the table. > > We might get a problem, if both booths are granted, but in different > places. It isn't a proper behavior to quit one of the booths in that case. > >> >> So no doubt we would all be together, in any case; I thought we would >> try and maximize the chance of getting a presence. >> >> It appears Daniel has already sent a request on behalf on the ASF >> (deadline is in November) but I haven't seen it at >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 or on the >> lists, so I have no idea about the contents. I just want to be sure that >> the ASF at large, and OpenOffice as part of it, get a presence under >> whatever name; and that we maximize our chances to be at FOSDEM. >> > > Perhaps we should make a conditional request. But the best thing would > be, that Daniel ask the orga sufficiently early before the deadline. > They are all nice human beings. > > Regards > Michael > > >
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: >> as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at >> FOSDEM 2016. > > So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We > don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and > OpenOffice has always been granted one for years. Before your posting, I've no doubts, that Apache will get a booth at FOSDEM, if they ask for it. Especially, if they say, they will come with Apache OpenOffice. Apache is one of the major (and greatest ;-) ) projects in the Free Software world. > >> It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins >> FOSDEM with a booth. > > I was assuming/understanding that we would have sent both the OpenOffice > request (highly likely to be approved; but less important) and the ASF > request (new, so less likely; but more important). And that, if both > were approved, we would merge the tables, or if one was approved we > would share the table. We might get a problem, if both booths are granted, but in different places. It isn't a proper behavior to quit one of the booths in that case. > > So no doubt we would all be together, in any case; I thought we would > try and maximize the chance of getting a presence. > > It appears Daniel has already sent a request on behalf on the ASF > (deadline is in November) but I haven't seen it at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 or on the > lists, so I have no idea about the contents. I just want to be sure that > the ASF at large, and OpenOffice as part of it, get a presence under > whatever name; and that we maximize our chances to be at FOSDEM. > Perhaps we should make a conditional request. But the best thing would be, that Daniel ask the orga sufficiently early before the deadline. They are all nice human beings. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at FOSDEM 2016. So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and OpenOffice has always been granted one for years. It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins FOSDEM with a booth. I was assuming/understanding that we would have sent both the OpenOffice request (highly likely to be approved; but less important) and the ASF request (new, so less likely; but more important). And that, if both were approved, we would merge the tables, or if one was approved we would share the table. So no doubt we would all be together, in any case; I thought we would try and maximize the chance of getting a presence. It appears Daniel has already sent a request on behalf on the ASF (deadline is in November) but I haven't seen it at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2016 or on the lists, so I have no idea about the contents. I just want to be sure that the ASF at large, and OpenOffice as part of it, get a presence under whatever name; and that we maximize our chances to be at FOSDEM. Regards, Andrea.
Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
Hello, as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at FOSDEM 2016. It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins FOSDEM with a booth. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Grunowrote: > On 09/25/2015 09:11 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I've just seen this call for participation at FOSDEM and I know we >> talked about getting more of an Apache presence there. >> >> https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/ > > Indeedy, I was notified by FOSDEM staff about this, and will note that > the ASF has formally requested a stand at FOSDEM 2016. Awesome! Is there any chance to have FOSDEM guys CC comdev to make it easier for everybody to follow. > Time will tell what sort of stand we'll get (how big etc), but we should > plan ahead and _assume_ we'll get two tables (might get one, might get > three, but let's assume two). > > This will require 3-4 volunteers at most times (not to speak of endless > amounts of swag to give away), so I would imagine we'd need at least > double that in available people, so as to do it in shifts. I've volunteered for the booth. And looking at the # of folks who volunteered as well I think we may be covered actually. > Depending on the number of projects that are interested in a presence at > FOSDEM, we'll likely do a rotation, so that each project get N hours of > fame at the stand. FOSDEM has notified us that they are really limited > on space this time around, due to the huge interest in this from FOSS > communities, so if we can help them by rotating a bit, that would work > out for everyone. Having been to previous FOSDEMs, I can also say with > some certainty, that you won't risk getting the "boring time slot", as > the stands are pretty much always crowded. FYI: I will also be trying to organized Bigdata/Data science dev. room. And you all know what projects are the majority in the category ;-) Thanks, Roman.
Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
On 25/09/2015 Daniel Gruno wrote: On 09/25/2015 09:11 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: I've just seen this call for participation at FOSDEM and I know we talked about getting more of an Apache presence there. https://fosdem.org/2016/news/2015-09-24-call-for-participation/ Indeedy, I was notified by FOSDEM staff about this, and will note that the ASF has formally requested a stand at FOSDEM 2016. That was fast! I had committed to inform this list when I would see the calls, but you were faster. Deadline is 13 November but it does not matter if you already applied. Depending on the number of projects that are interested in a presence at FOSDEM, we'll likely do a rotation, so that each project get N hours OpenOffice has traditionally had an own stand/booth at FOSDEM and, as clarified since the beginning of this thread, it may ask for one independently, as it has always done. That said, if both stands are granted we might ask to have them placed next to each other so as to share space more effectively. Regards, Andrea.
RE: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation
Thank you Daniel. -Original Message- From: Daniel Gruno [mailto:humbed...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:43 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation On 09/25/2015 09:11 AM, Sharan Foga wrote: > Hi All > > I've just seen this call for participation at FOSDEM and I know we > talked about getting more of an Apache presence there. > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2ffosde > m.org%2f2016%2fnews%2f2015-09-24-call-for-participation%2f=01%7c0 > 1%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c73e0bcd89e0c4f4cda1808d2c57d051c%7c > 72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=oIJwr0NoDWii2FwjznxG50y4uD% > 2fQpDlqmSrWoCto%2bEQ%3d Indeedy, I was notified by FOSDEM staff about this, and will note that the ASF has formally requested a stand at FOSDEM 2016. Time will tell what sort of stand we'll get (how big etc), but we should plan ahead and _assume_ we'll get two tables (might get one, might get three, but let's assume two). This will require 3-4 volunteers at most times (not to speak of endless amounts of swag to give away), so I would imagine we'd need at least double that in available people, so as to do it in shifts. Depending on the number of projects that are interested in a presence at FOSDEM, we'll likely do a rotation, so that each project get N hours of fame at the stand. FOSDEM has notified us that they are really limited on space this time around, due to the huge interest in this from FOSS communities, so if we can help them by rotating a bit, that would work out for everyone. Having been to previous FOSDEMs, I can also say with some certainty, that you won't risk getting the "boring time slot", as the stands are pretty much always crowded. With regards, Daniel. > > Earlier this year I think Jan setup a wiki page setup about it and > called for volunteers. > > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fcwiki > .apache.org%2fconfluence%2fdisplay%2fCOMDEV%2fFOSDEM%2b2016=01%7c > 01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7c73e0bcd89e0c4f4cda1808d2c57d051c%7 > c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1=JF4cZeIaroWBdZ1ZkIaspbMMK8 > lbLctL6rB9tthZ1Nk%3d > > I'd like to help so please can someone grant me karma to the Comdev > cwiki? (username is sharan) > > Thanks > Sharan >
Re: FOSDEM 2016
On 4 February 2015 at 19:57, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. A huge +1 there. Any opportunity where you get to tap into attention of 5000+ developers is something we can't miss. * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I can volunteer for part time as well. It is very likely that I'd have to split my time between Pivotal booth and ASF's one in 2016. Finally, as FYI: I'm now very actively pursuing having a bigdata/distributed systems dev room at FOSDEM 2016. Given that most of those projects come from ASF, hopefully we'd have ever more ASF hackers at FOSDEM next year. +1 Let me know if I can help. We might also smuggle a presentation in about ASF; about our communities and how we are different from e.g. a place where you just revision your code. rgds jan i. Thanks, Roman.
Re: FOSDEM 2016
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. A huge +1 there. Any opportunity where you get to tap into attention of 5000+ developers is something we can't miss. * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I can volunteer for part time as well. It is very likely that I'd have to split my time between Pivotal booth and ASF's one in 2016. Finally, as FYI: I'm now very actively pursuing having a bigdata/distributed systems dev room at FOSDEM 2016. Given that most of those projects come from ASF, hopefully we'd have ever more ASF hackers at FOSDEM next year. Thanks, Roman.
Re: FOSDEM 2016
Rich Bowen wrote: For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of representing both AOO and the ASF as a whole. Thanks. The feather-decorated Ask me! badges helped a lot to get questions about the ASF. However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. Suggest a main track talk. There are plenty of good Apache stories to tell. I usually have a look at the FOSDEM site in early September for deadlines. I recommend that you do the same. * We would need to either have a separate table from AOO, or double the size of the existing table, so that we don't eclipse their place there. They've put *years* into developing a presence at FOSDEM, and we want to respect that. The OpenOffice table is double (with respect to the one you saw). But our volunteers, due to good relationships with the neighboring Perl table, rearranged them so that instead of 2 OpenOffice + 2 Perl we had 1 OpenOffice (which was enough) + 3 Perl (which was barely enough for the huge amount of stuff they carry, piles of books and even a life-size camel last year). * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I would probably be available for some time, but, like many of the folks that might otherwise be willing to do time, I have work duties as well. I have no work duties at FOSDEM (meaning, I attend it as a pure volunteer) but I have no time either. And I don't know if I will attend next year. * We need printed materials, as well as stickers/pins/whatever. Not sure about this. At FOSDEM most people are content with stickers, pins and talks. We prepared lots of OpenOffice tri-folds for events but not many of them are used at FOSDEM. * A tshirt would be nice Yes! So, if you are interested in being part of this effort, please speak up. I might be at FOSDEM 2016 and/or I might be available to share my knowledge from my experience there. Don't count on me too much for staffing the table though, I'm always very busy at FOSDEM. Regards, Andrea.
Re: FOSDEM 2016
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? same place and time next year. rgds jan i Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com javascript:; wrote: I just came back from FOSDEM. As always, it was a madhouse, but there was some time for sane conversation. For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of representing both AOO and the ASF as a whole. However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. Here are some thoughts from talking with folks (mostly Jan Iversen and Daniel Gruno) at FOSDEM. * We would need to either have a separate table from AOO, or double the size of the existing table, so that we don't eclipse their place there. They've put *years* into developing a presence at FOSDEM, and we want to respect that. * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I would probably be available for some time, but, like many of the folks that might otherwise be willing to do time, I have work duties as well. Two people need to be there at all times, and people should be willing to commit to specific time windows. It would also be cool to have times scheduled for specific projects. Like, say, 11:00 to 12:00 is Cordova Hour, and will have two representatives of the project present to answer questions and give demos. * We need printed materials, as well as stickers/pins/whatever. Printed materials should cover the ASF as a whole, as well as highlighting a variety of projects. Individual projects who wish to be represented should be encouraged to provide materials that we can print, but we don't want to have too many projects with printed materials - that would be overwhelming. We need to provide a template (in AOO, of course) that a project can fill in with their project-specific content to produce a consistent one-page, or tri-fold, or whatever, that could be printed for the event. We don't want twenty different-looking documents. We are trying to present a brand. (Right, Shane?) * A tshirt would be nice - the word-cloud of project names we discussed a year or two ago would be cool. There's several thousand people in attendance, and this is an opportunity to get the Foundation's name in front of a really important, and hugely diverse, audience. So having a cool, eye-catching tshirt is a cheap, easy way to do that. So, if you are interested in being part of this effort, please speak up. This won't happen if I'm in charge of it, but I wanted to throw it out there and see if it catches anyone. I presume that Jan will take the lead on this, but I'm the one that took notes. I'm also aware that we tend to have a lot of passion about this kind of thing for a moment, and then it fades as the event recedes into the past. But something like this takes time, effort, money, and grunt work to make it happen. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com javascript:; - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: FOSDEM 2016
On 02/04/2015 09:49 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? Always first weekend of February, always in Brussels at the ULB (http://www.ulb.ac.be/) It is a two day (Sat, Sun) event, but there are numerous events that orbit it, both before and after, both in Brussels and in surrounding cities, so it is a VERY high-bandwidth time to be in the area. Upwards of 4000 geeks in attendance. Very community focused (as opposed to the corporate focus of may events like OSCON) and one of the oldest free software events in the world - may be the oldest. Event is free. And there are always lots of ASF people in attendance, although not usually wearing their Apache 'hats'. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: FOSDEM 2016
On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 02/04/2015 09:49 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? Always first weekend of February, always in Brussels at the ULB (http://www.ulb.ac.be/) It is a two day (Sat, Sun) event, but there are numerous events that orbit it, both before and after, both in Brussels and in surrounding cities, so it is a VERY high-bandwidth time to be in the area. Upwards of 4000 geeks in attendance. Very community focused (as opposed to the corporate focus of may events like OSCON) and one of the oldest free software events in the world - may be the oldest. Event is free. And there are always lots of ASF people in attendance, although not usually wearing their Apache 'hats'. probably the best open source conference in the world. free, no corporate sponsorship visible. super community focused. All rooms are packed... -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: FOSDEM 2016
Noted! Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:02 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Wednesday, February 4, 2015, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote: Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? same place and time next year. rgds jan i Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com javascript:; wrote: I just came back from FOSDEM. As always, it was a madhouse, but there was some time for sane conversation. For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of representing both AOO and the ASF as a whole. However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. Here are some thoughts from talking with folks (mostly Jan Iversen and Daniel Gruno) at FOSDEM. * We would need to either have a separate table from AOO, or double the size of the existing table, so that we don't eclipse their place there. They've put *years* into developing a presence at FOSDEM, and we want to respect that. * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I would probably be available for some time, but, like many of the folks that might otherwise be willing to do time, I have work duties as well. Two people need to be there at all times, and people should be willing to commit to specific time windows. It would also be cool to have times scheduled for specific projects. Like, say, 11:00 to 12:00 is Cordova Hour, and will have two representatives of the project present to answer questions and give demos. * We need printed materials, as well as stickers/pins/whatever. Printed materials should cover the ASF as a whole, as well as highlighting a variety of projects. Individual projects who wish to be represented should be encouraged to provide materials that we can print, but we don't want to have too many projects with printed materials - that would be overwhelming. We need to provide a template (in AOO, of course) that a project can fill in with their project-specific content to produce a consistent one-page, or tri-fold, or whatever, that could be printed for the event. We don't want twenty different-looking documents. We are trying to present a brand. (Right, Shane?) * A tshirt would be nice - the word-cloud of project names we discussed a year or two ago would be cool. There's several thousand people in attendance, and this is an opportunity to get the Foundation's name in front of a really important, and hugely diverse, audience. So having a cool, eye-catching tshirt is a cheap, easy way to do that. So, if you are interested in being part of this effort, please speak up. This won't happen if I'm in charge of it, but I wanted to throw it out there and see if it catches anyone. I presume that Jan will take the lead on this, but I'm the one that took notes. I'm also aware that we tend to have a lot of passion about this kind of thing for a moment, and then it fades as the event recedes into the past. But something like this takes time, effort, money, and grunt work to make it happen. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com javascript:; - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
Re: FOSDEM 2016
Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: I just came back from FOSDEM. As always, it was a madhouse, but there was some time for sane conversation. For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of representing both AOO and the ASF as a whole. However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. Here are some thoughts from talking with folks (mostly Jan Iversen and Daniel Gruno) at FOSDEM. * We would need to either have a separate table from AOO, or double the size of the existing table, so that we don't eclipse their place there. They've put *years* into developing a presence at FOSDEM, and we want to respect that. * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I would probably be available for some time, but, like many of the folks that might otherwise be willing to do time, I have work duties as well. Two people need to be there at all times, and people should be willing to commit to specific time windows. It would also be cool to have times scheduled for specific projects. Like, say, 11:00 to 12:00 is Cordova Hour, and will have two representatives of the project present to answer questions and give demos. * We need printed materials, as well as stickers/pins/whatever. Printed materials should cover the ASF as a whole, as well as highlighting a variety of projects. Individual projects who wish to be represented should be encouraged to provide materials that we can print, but we don't want to have too many projects with printed materials - that would be overwhelming. We need to provide a template (in AOO, of course) that a project can fill in with their project-specific content to produce a consistent one-page, or tri-fold, or whatever, that could be printed for the event. We don't want twenty different-looking documents. We are trying to present a brand. (Right, Shane?) * A tshirt would be nice - the word-cloud of project names we discussed a year or two ago would be cool. There's several thousand people in attendance, and this is an opportunity to get the Foundation's name in front of a really important, and hugely diverse, audience. So having a cool, eye-catching tshirt is a cheap, easy way to do that. So, if you are interested in being part of this effort, please speak up. This won't happen if I'm in charge of it, but I wanted to throw it out there and see if it catches anyone. I presume that Jan will take the lead on this, but I'm the one that took notes. I'm also aware that we tend to have a lot of passion about this kind of thing for a moment, and then it fades as the event recedes into the past. But something like this takes time, effort, money, and grunt work to make it happen. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: FOSDEM 2016
Free/sponsored always goes a long way (See the list: https://fosdem.org/2015/about/sponsors/), so it leads to value for a lot of groups and individuals. Think recruiters, entrepreneurs, students, independent contractors. But also the sponsors (advertisers as well). Something the ASF could learn from? Share your input at: http://markmail.org/message/rwk6nh2i6lavianm Best regards: Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On 02/04/2015 09:49 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: Had I known upfront it was held in Brussels and the last few days (yes, I had to look it up), I would have popped over as it is only an hour's drive away. Where will the next be held and when? Always first weekend of February, always in Brussels at the ULB ( http://www.ulb.ac.be/) It is a two day (Sat, Sun) event, but there are numerous events that orbit it, both before and after, both in Brussels and in surrounding cities, so it is a VERY high-bandwidth time to be in the area. Upwards of 4000 geeks in attendance. Very community focused (as opposed to the corporate focus of may events like OSCON) and one of the oldest free software events in the world - may be the oldest. Event is free. And there are always lots of ASF people in attendance, although not usually wearing their Apache 'hats'. -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
Re: FOSDEM 2016
I'll plan to attend next year too then. (Camel? Isn't that a trademark infringement? :) ) Hadrian On 02/04/2015 06:27 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rich Bowen wrote: For those that weren't there, you should know that OpenOffice had a presence there (as they always have), staffed by volunteers, with some swag provided by the ASF, and other swag provided by the OpenOffice community, out of their own pockets. They did an *awesome* job of representing both AOO and the ASF as a whole. Thanks. The feather-decorated Ask me! badges helped a lot to get questions about the ASF. However, I think we can do better in 2016. I want to see Apache have a table at FOSDEM 2016, representing more than just one project, with proper respect to the historical position of AOO at the event - ie, not just usurping their place there. Suggest a main track talk. There are plenty of good Apache stories to tell. I usually have a look at the FOSDEM site in early September for deadlines. I recommend that you do the same. * We would need to either have a separate table from AOO, or double the size of the existing table, so that we don't eclipse their place there. They've put *years* into developing a presence at FOSDEM, and we want to respect that. The OpenOffice table is double (with respect to the one you saw). But our volunteers, due to good relationships with the neighboring Perl table, rearranged them so that instead of 2 OpenOffice + 2 Perl we had 1 OpenOffice (which was enough) + 3 Perl (which was barely enough for the huge amount of stuff they carry, piles of books and even a life-size camel last year). * Table Staff: I figure it takes at least 6 people to staff a FOSDEM table if you don't want to go insane. Daniel and Jan have said that they will staff the table. So we're 1/3 of the way there. I would probably be available for some time, but, like many of the folks that might otherwise be willing to do time, I have work duties as well. I have no work duties at FOSDEM (meaning, I attend it as a pure volunteer) but I have no time either. And I don't know if I will attend next year. * We need printed materials, as well as stickers/pins/whatever. Not sure about this. At FOSDEM most people are content with stickers, pins and talks. We prepared lots of OpenOffice tri-folds for events but not many of them are used at FOSDEM. * A tshirt would be nice Yes! So, if you are interested in being part of this effort, please speak up. I might be at FOSDEM 2016 and/or I might be available to share my knowledge from my experience there. Don't count on me too much for staffing the table though, I'm always very busy at FOSDEM. Regards, Andrea.