Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+1 (binding) -Mark On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J < mark.kessler@usmc.mil> wrote: > +0 > > I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm > good. (or if anyone else wants to update it) > > OS: Win 7 64bit English > > -Successfully built from source (after changing path). > -Successfully installed. > -Successfully downloaded sdk using installer. > > > > > -Mark > >
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+0 I forgot to commit the README update last night . After that happens I'm good. (or if anyone else wants to update it) OS: Win 7 64bit English -Successfully built from source (after changing path). -Successfully installed. -Successfully downloaded sdk using installer. -Mark
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On 6/22/15, 11:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >>> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. >> >> I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! > >In case it helps, this is the log of one of the failed one when cache was >on: https://paste.apache.org/grVW Well, that log and probably Justin’s earlier report was due to a bug in the install script of the nightly build itself. I fixed that and was still getting 3003 reports from you. It could be that you pull from a different flex.a.o mirror in EU and my change hadn’t propagated out there. IMO, this 3003 issue was the last big concern I had, so I will count up votes shortly. -Alex
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Hi, > Also, Justin reported the same issue on Mac If it helps, it was OS X and with no cache, non en_US locale (but located in the US) and with default options in installer. Thanks Justin
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. > > I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! In case it helps, this is the log of one of the failed one when cache was on: https://paste.apache.org/grVW Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100 > >> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. > > I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! > >> Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does >> not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and >> saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try >> to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this >> release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m >> pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. > > Ok, so, we can carry on my +1 binding > > Thanks, > Frédéric THOMAS > > > -------------------- >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:57:15 + >> >> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. >> >> Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does >> not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and >> saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try >> to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this >> release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m >> pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 6/22/15, 7:02 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> >>>I've been trying without cache and it has been working, tried again >>>without cache and been working again. >>>We've been in 2 seeing the error 3003 and me repeatability until I >>>disabled the cache, not sure it is linked though or even it worth >>>investigated more ? >>> >>>For the progress bar, it was almost at each fast steps, I checked in the >>>log for fast steps and seen things like this, not sure it is related. >>> >>>copyfiles: >>> [copy] Copying 0 files to >>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/ant/lib >>>progress 0 0 >>> [copy] Copying 14 files to >>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/bin >>>progress 0 14 >>>progress 1 14 >>>progress 2 14 >>>progress 3 14 >>>progress 4 14 >>>progress 5 14 >>>progress 6 14 >>>progress 7 14 >>>progress 8 14 >>>progress 9 14 >>>progress 10 14 >>>progress 11 14 >>>progress 12 14 >>>progress 13 14 >>>progress 14 14 >>> >>> >>>Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 + >>>> >>>> I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and >>>>it >>>> worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the >>>> verbose log. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>> >>>>>Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- Original message-- >>>>> >>>>>From: Frédéric THOMAS >>>>> >>>>>Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM >>>>> >>>>>To: dev@flex.apache.org; >>>>> >>>>>Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>>>externs. >>>>>> I just got it to
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
>> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. > > I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! Also, Justin reported the same issue on Mac Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 07:34:11 +0100 > >> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. > > I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! > >> Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does >> not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and >> saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try >> to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this >> release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m >> pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. > > Ok, so, we can carry on my +1 binding > > Thanks, > Frédéric THOMAS > > > -------------------- >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:57:15 + >> >> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >> file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. >> >> Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does >> not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and >> saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try >> to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this >> release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m >> pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 6/22/15, 7:02 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> >>>I've been trying without cache and it has been working, tried again >>>without cache and been working again. >>>We've been in 2 seeing the error 3003 and me repeatability until I >>>disabled the cache, not sure it is linked though or even it worth >>>investigated more ? >>> >>>For the progress bar, it was almost at each fast steps, I checked in the >>>log for fast steps and seen things like this, not sure it is related. >>> >>>copyfiles: >>> [copy] Copying 0 files to >>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/ant/lib >>>progress 0 0 >>> [copy] Copying 14 files to >>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/bin >>>progress 0 14 >>>progress 1 14 >>>progress 2 14 >>>progress 3 14 >>>progress 4 14 >>>progress 5 14 >>>progress 6 14 >>>progress 7 14 >>>progress 8 14 >>>progress 9 14 >>>progress 10 14 >>>progress 11 14 >>>progress 12 14 >>>progress 13 14 >>>progress 14 14 >>> >>> >>>Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 + >>>> >>>> I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and >>>>it >>>> worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the >>>> verbose log. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>> >>>>>Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- Original message-- >>>>> >>>>>From: Frédéric THOMAS >>>>> >>>>>Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM >>>>> >>>>>To: dev@flex.apache.org; >>>>> >>>>>Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>>>externs. >>>>>> I just got it to work for me. >>>>> >>>>>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a > file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. I just tried now with cache on and it also worked ! > Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does > not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and > saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try > to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this > release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m > pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. Ok, so, we can carry on my +1 binding Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 04:57:15 + > > Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a > file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. > > Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does > not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and > saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try > to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this > release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m > pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. > > -Alex > > On 6/22/15, 7:02 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > >>I've been trying without cache and it has been working, tried again >>without cache and been working again. >>We've been in 2 seeing the error 3003 and me repeatability until I >>disabled the cache, not sure it is linked though or even it worth >>investigated more ? >> >>For the progress bar, it was almost at each fast steps, I checked in the >>log for fast steps and seen things like this, not sure it is related. >> >>copyfiles: >> [copy] Copying 0 files to >>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/ant/lib >>progress 0 0 >> [copy] Copying 14 files to >>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/bin >>progress 0 14 >>progress 1 14 >>progress 2 14 >>progress 3 14 >>progress 4 14 >>progress 5 14 >>progress 6 14 >>progress 7 14 >>progress 8 14 >>progress 9 14 >>progress 10 14 >>progress 11 14 >>progress 12 14 >>progress 13 14 >>progress 14 14 >> >> >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> >>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 + >>> >>> I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and >>>it >>> worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the >>> verbose log. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>> >>>>Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks >>>> >>>> >>>>Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >>>> >>>> >>>>-- Original message-- >>>> >>>>From: Frédéric THOMAS >>>> >>>>Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM >>>> >>>>To: dev@flex.apache.org; >>>> >>>>Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> >>>> >>>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>>externs. >>>>> I just got it to work for me. >>>> >>>>Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the >>>>js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error >>>>3003, just tried again and had the same issue. >>>>Forgive me if I missed something though. >>>> >>>>Frédéric THOMAS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + >>>>> >>>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>>externs. >>>>> I just got it to work for me. >>>>> >>>>> -Alex >>>>> >>>>> On 6/22/15, 9:
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On 6/22/15, 10:33 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in >>order to cast a binding >> vote. > >As per [1] you need to: >"Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source >code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable >on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets >the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.” > >So yes there is a minimum. > >That being said the script does do most of that and even if you don’t >vote or not 100% sure of the requirements then checking / testing a >release in the time you have is still a good thing to do. IMO, the script asks you about all of the things in the paragraph you quoted, excepting testing the results of the build. The installer build does run an automated test of ant_on_air. But my point about minimum scrutiny was that checking a release can take minutes not hours, because you don’t have to scrutinize every word in the various text files each time, especially for releases without huge changes to the code base. > >The PMC in general, and the PMC chair in particular (as an officer of the >Foundation) is responsible for compliance with requirements. [2] But again, I don’t know of any documentation of the minimum level of effort, time or scrutiny required in order to be considered compliant. We’ve done our best each time, but as you know, we still find mistakes long after we ship something. I’d rather have more folks try to review than not bother because we make it sound too hard. -Alex > >1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Hi, > but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in order to > cast a binding > vote. As per [1] you need to: "Before voting +1 PMC members are required to download the signed source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases.” So yes there is a minimum. That being said the script does do most of that and even if you don’t vote or not 100% sure of the requirements then checking / testing a release in the time you have is still a good thing to do. The PMC in general, and the PMC chair in particular (as an officer of the Foundation) is responsible for compliance with requirements. [2] Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#release_manager
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On 6/22/15, 9:57 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a >file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. Well, it worked for me, with both cache on and cache off. I did both twice. I’m wondering if you are choosing some version of AIR or some CDN is redirecting differently in the US than where you are. So, if you have time, run it again with just verbose logging (no progress logging) and post the results so I can try to see what URL is causing the problem. Thanks, -Alex
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On 6/22/15, 3:04 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: >Ok, yeah, I had read that before. My time is limited and also why I asked, >i don't want to just +1 something and not follow procedure, I will stay >out >of this thread now, sorry. While we don’t want PMC voters to “not follow procedure”, the goal of the approval script is to make following procedure less time consuming. More senior Apache folks will correct me if I’m wrong here, but I don’t think there is a minimum level of scrutiny required in order to cast a binding vote. You don’t have to labor over every word of each text file like README, NOTICE, etc. We certainly don’t want you to close your eyes and just type “yes” at all the questions in the approval script, but I’d rather have more eyes doing at least some checking of the release than discourage folks from participating at all by making the process seem onerous. But no worries if you don’t want to take the time now. I do hope you will take some time (hopefully less than an hour) when we get around to voting on releasing your code. -Alex
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Aha! Your cache is on! I’ll try that shortly. That usually means a file’s URL has characters in it that are not allowed on Windows. Regarding the progress bar, I found some articles that claim that AIR does not always report bytesTotal and bytesLoaded correctly. I ran a log and saw exactly that in the progress on Windows (but not Mac). I’d say we try to fashion a workaround some time in the future. I want to get this release out and find out how this as3httpclient helps (or not). I’m pretty sure there will be an Installer 3.3. -Alex On 6/22/15, 7:02 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >I've been trying without cache and it has been working, tried again >without cache and been working again. >We've been in 2 seeing the error 3003 and me repeatability until I >disabled the cache, not sure it is linked though or even it worth >investigated more ? > >For the progress bar, it was almost at each fast steps, I checked in the >log for fast steps and seen things like this, not sure it is related. > >copyfiles: > [copy] Copying 0 files to >D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/ant/lib >progress 0 0 > [copy] Copying 14 files to >D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/bin >progress 0 14 >progress 1 14 >progress 2 14 >progress 3 14 >progress 4 14 >progress 5 14 >progress 6 14 >progress 7 14 >progress 8 14 >progress 9 14 >progress 10 14 >progress 11 14 >progress 12 14 >progress 13 14 >progress 14 14 > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >------------------------ >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 + >> >> I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and >>it >> worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the >> verbose log. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >> >>>Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks >>> >>> >>>Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >>> >>> >>>-- Original message-- >>> >>>From: Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>>Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM >>> >>>To: dev@flex.apache.org; >>> >>>Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> >>> >>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>externs. >>>> I just got it to work for me. >>> >>>Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the >>>js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error >>>3003, just tried again and had the same issue. >>>Forgive me if I missed something though. >>> >>>Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + >>>> >>>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>>externs. >>>> I just got it to work for me. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>>> +1 Binding >>>>> >>>>>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the >>>>>3003 >>>>> >>>>>Thanks >>>>>Frédéric THOMAS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Binding >>>>>> >>>>>> What a great script ! >>>>>> >>>>>> approve: >>>>>> 牋牋 [echo] >>>>>> 牋牋 [echo] +1 >>>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Package >>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache- >>>>>>fl >>>>>>ex >>>>>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Java 1.7 >>>>>> 牋牋 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >&
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
I've been trying without cache and it has been working, tried again without cache and been working again. We've been in 2 seeing the error 3003 and me repeatability until I disabled the cache, not sure it is linked though or even it worth investigated more ? For the progress bar, it was almost at each fast steps, I checked in the log for fast steps and seen things like this, not sure it is related. copyfiles: [copy] Copying 0 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/ant/lib progress 0 0 [copy] Copying 14 files to D:\SDKs\FlexJS\nightly_PF16.0_AIR16.0_fr_FR/bin progress 0 14 progress 1 14 progress 2 14 progress 3 14 progress 4 14 progress 5 14 progress 6 14 progress 7 14 progress 8 14 progress 9 14 progress 10 14 progress 11 14 progress 12 14 progress 13 14 progress 14 14 Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org; webdoubl...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:15:56 + > > I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and it > worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the > verbose log. > > -Alex > > On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >>Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks >> >> >>Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >> >> >>-- Original message-- >> >>From: Frédéric THOMAS >> >>Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM >> >>To: dev@flex.apache.org; >> >>Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> >> >>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>externs. >>> I just got it to work for me. >> >>Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the >>js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error >>3003, just tried again and had the same issue. >>Forgive me if I missed something though. >> >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> >>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + >>> >>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>>externs. >>> I just got it to work for me. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>>Frédéric THOMAS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>>>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>>> >>>>> What a great script ! >>>>> >>>>> approve: >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] +1 >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Package >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>>ex >>>>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Java 1.7 >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit builds: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] README is ok: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>>>> 牋牋 [echo] >>>>> >>>>> main: >>>>> >>>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Fr閐閞ic THOMAS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Binding >>>>>> >>>>>> Source compiles fine >>>&
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
I got home and tried to install FlexJS on my home Windows computer and it worked fine there as well. So please also provide OS version with the verbose log. -Alex On 6/22/15, 4:03 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks > > >Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > >-- Original message-- > >From: Frédéric THOMAS > >Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM > >To: dev@flex.apache.org; > >Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > > >> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>externs. >> I just got it to work for me. > >Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the >js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error >3003, just tried again and had the same issue. >Forgive me if I missed something though. > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >-------------------- >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + >> >> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the >>externs. >> I just got it to work for me. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> >>>> +1 Binding >>> >>>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >>> >>>Thanks >>>Frédéric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>>> >>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>> What a great script ! >>>> >>>> approve: >>>> 牋牋 [echo] >>>> 牋牋 [echo] +1 >>>> 牋牋 [echo] Package >>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>ex >>>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>>> 牋牋 [echo] Java 1.7 >>>> 牋牋 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit builds: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] README is ok: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>>> 牋牋 [echo] >>>> >>>> main: >>>> >>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Fr閐閞ic THOMAS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>>> >>>>> Source compiles fine >>>>> Signatures match >>>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Om >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>>>does, >>>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>>>convenience >>>>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> EdB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting >>>>>>>send. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> Package >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache- >>>>>>fl >>>>>>ex-s >>>>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>>>>> Java 1.7 >>>>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>>>>> Sou
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Turn on verbose logging and post a log. Thanks Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message-- From: Frédéric THOMAS Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 3:13 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org; Subject:RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me. Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error 3003, just tried again and had the same issue. Forgive me if I missed something though. Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + > > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me. > > -Alex > > On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > >>> +1 Binding >> >>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >> >>Thanks >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >>-------------------- >>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>> >>> +1 Binding >>> >>> What a great script ! >>> >>> approve: >>> [echo] >>> [echo] +1 >>> [echo] Package >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex >>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>> [echo] Java 1.7 >>> [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>> [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>> [echo] Source kit builds: y >>> [echo] README is ok: y >>> [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>> [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>> [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>> [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>> [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>> [echo] >>> >>> main: >>> >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Fr�d�ric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> >>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>> Source compiles fine >>>> Signatures match >>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>>does, >>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>>convenience >>>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting >>>>>>send. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> Package >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>>ex-s >>>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>>>> Java 1.7 >>>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>>>> Source kit signatures match: y >>>>>> Source kit builds: y >>>>>> README is ok: y >>>>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>>> NOTICE is ok: y >>>>>> LICENSE is ok: y >>>>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>>> No unapproved binaries: y >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>>>>released. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> The temp folder was just for testing, he was copying from the unit test > output. I changed it yesterday to out/bin because of git thinking the swc > needed to be committed, out/* is gitignored. Yeah, seen that too :-) nice one ! Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:14:50 -0400 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Frédéric THOMAS > wrote: > >>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. >>> I just got it to work for me. >> >> Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the >> js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error 3003, >> just tried again and had the same issue. >> Forgive me if I missed something though. >> >> > The temp folder was just for testing, he was copying from the unit test > output. I changed it yesterday to out/bin because of git thinking the swc > needed to be committed, out/* is gitignored. > > Mike > > > >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >> ------------ >>> From: aha...@adobe.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + >>> >>> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. >>> I just got it to work for me. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>>Frédéric THOMAS >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>>>> >>>>> +1 Binding >>>>> >>>>> What a great script ! >>>>> >>>>> approve: >>>>> [echo] >>>>> [echo] +1 >>>>> [echo] Package >>>>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex >>>>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>>>> [echo] Java 1.7 >>>>> [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>>>> [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>>>> [echo] Source kit builds: y >>>>> [echo] README is ok: y >>>>> [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>> [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>>>> [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>>>> [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>> [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>>>> [echo] >>>>> >>>>> main: >>>>> >>>>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Fr�d�ric THOMAS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 Binding >>>>>> >>>>>> Source compiles fine >>>>>> Signatures match >>>>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Om >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>>>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>>>>does, >>>>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>>>>convenience >>>>>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> EdB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui >> wrote: >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > > I just got it to work for me. > > Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the > js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error 3003, > just tried again and had the same issue. > Forgive me if I missed something though. > > The temp folder was just for testing, he was copying from the unit test output. I changed it yesterday to out/bin because of git thinking the swc needed to be committed, out/* is gitignored. Mike > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + > > > > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > > I just got it to work for me. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > > > >>> +1 Binding > >> > >>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 > >> > >>Thanks > >>Frédéric THOMAS > >> > >> > >> > >>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 > >>> > >>> +1 Binding > >>> > >>> What a great script ! > >>> > >>> approve: > >>> 牋牋 [echo] > >>> 牋牋 [echo] +1 > >>> 牋牋 [echo] Package > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex > >>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip > >>> 牋牋 [echo] Java 1.7 > >>> 牋牋 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 > >>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit signatures match: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit builds: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] README is ok: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] NOTICE is ok: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] LICENSE is ok: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved binaries: y > >>> 牋牋 [echo] > >>> > >>> main: > >>> > >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Fr閐閞ic THOMAS > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com > >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 > >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> +1 Binding > >>>> > >>>> Source compiles fine > >>>> Signatures match > >>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Om > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it > >>>>>does, > >>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary > >>>>>convenience > >>>>> utility, it gets my vote. > >>>>> > >>>>> EdB > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting > >>>>>>send. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> Package > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl > >>>>>ex-s > >>>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz > >>>>>> Java 1.7 > >>>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 > >>>>>> Source kit signatures match: y > >>>>>> Source kit builds: y > >>>>>> README is ok: y > >>>>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > >>>>>> NOTICE is ok: y > >>>>&g
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me. Yeah, I've seen that (well done btw and i like the externs swc in the js/libs foldre rather than temp) but what's the point with this error 3003, just tried again and had the same issue. Forgive me if I missed something though. Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 21:59:16 + > > OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. > I just got it to work for me. > > -Alex > > On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > >>> +1 Binding >> >>I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 >> >>Thanks >>Frédéric THOMAS >> >> >>---------------- >>> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >>> >>> +1 Binding >>> >>> What a great script ! >>> >>> approve: >>> [echo] >>> [echo] +1 >>> [echo] Package >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex >>>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >>> [echo] Java 1.7 >>> [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >>> [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >>> [echo] Source kit builds: y >>> [echo] README is ok: y >>> [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>> [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >>> [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >>> ���� [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>> [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >>> [echo] >>> >>> main: >>> >>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Fr�d�ric THOMAS >>> >>> >>> >>>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>> >>>> +1 Binding >>>> >>>> Source compiles fine >>>> Signatures match >>>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Om >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>>does, >>>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>>convenience >>>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>>> >>>>> EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting >>>>>>send. >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> Package >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>>ex-s >>>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>>>> Java 1.7 >>>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>>>> Source kit signatures match: y >>>>>> Source kit builds: y >>>>>> README is ok: y >>>>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>>> NOTICE is ok: y >>>>>> LICENSE is ok: y >>>>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>>> No unapproved binaries: y >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>>>>released. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Ok, yeah, I had read that before. My time is limited and also why I asked, i don't want to just +1 something and not follow procedure, I will stay out of this thread now, sorry. Mike On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The approval script is only there to help please read this to understand > what the ASF policy is that PMC members are required to follow. > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > Thanks > Justin > On Jun 22, 2015 3:54 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > wrote: > > > > > Go to the Vote Thread, follow the link to the source kit, download the > > approval script, open a console, type ant -f ApproveInstaller.xml > > -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2, follow and check as requested by the > script, > > once ok, install the installer from the release folder, if you had a > > installer 3.2 installed before, uninstall it first, play with the new > > installer and report. > > > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > > ------------ > > > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400 > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > > Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release > stuff. > > I > > > don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right? > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> Package > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle > > >> x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip > > >> Java 1.7 > > >> OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 > > >> Source kit signatures match: y > > >> Source kit builds: y > > >> README is ok: y > > >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > > >> NOTICE is ok: y > > >> LICENSE is ok: y > > >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y > > >> No unapproved binaries: y > > >> > > >> Adobe Air 18.0 > > >> Apache Flex Nightly > > >> > > >> I was able to install Apache Flex Nightly and FlexJS Nightly using > > >> installer > > >> file built from sources. > > >> > > >> Piotr > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> - > > >> Apache Flex PMC > > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > > >> -- > > >> View this message in context: > > >> > > > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-2-RC2-tp47991p48103.html > > >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > > Nabble.com. > > >> > > >
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Hi, The approval script is only there to help please read this to understand what the ASF policy is that PMC members are required to follow. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html Thanks Justin On Jun 22, 2015 3:54 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > > Go to the Vote Thread, follow the link to the source kit, download the > approval script, open a console, type ant -f ApproveInstaller.xml > -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2, follow and check as requested by the script, > once ok, install the installer from the release folder, if you had a > installer 3.2 installed before, uninstall it first, play with the new > installer and report. > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release stuff. > I > > don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right? > > > > Mike > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz > wrote: > > > >> +1 (binding) > >> Package > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle > >> x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip > >> Java 1.7 > >> OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 > >> Source kit signatures match: y > >> Source kit builds: y > >> README is ok: y > >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > >> NOTICE is ok: y > >> LICENSE is ok: y > >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y > >> No unapproved binaries: y > >> > >> Adobe Air 18.0 > >> Apache Flex Nightly > >> > >> I was able to install Apache Flex Nightly and FlexJS Nightly using > >> installer > >> file built from sources. > >> > >> Piotr > >> > >> > >> > >> - > >> Apache Flex PMC > >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-2-RC2-tp47991p48103.html > >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
OK, the falcon script got busted with all of the changes for the externs. I just got it to work for me. -Alex On 6/22/15, 9:59 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >> +1 Binding > >I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 > >Thanks >Frédéric THOMAS > > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 >> >> +1 Binding >> >> What a great script ! >> >> approve: >> 牋牋 [echo] >> 牋牋 [echo] +1 >> 牋牋 [echo] Package >>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex >>-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >> 牋牋 [echo] Java 1.7 >> 牋牋 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit signatures match: y >> 牋牋 [echo] Source kit builds: y >> 牋牋 [echo] README is ok: y >> 牋牋 [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >> 牋牋 [echo] NOTICE is ok: y >> 牋牋 [echo] LICENSE is ok: y >> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y >> 牋牋 [echo] No unapproved binaries: y >> 牋牋 [echo] >> >> main: >> >> BUILD SUCCESSFUL >> >> Thanks, >> Fr閐閞ic THOMAS >> >> >> >>> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >>> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> >>> +1 Binding >>> >>> Source compiles fine >>> Signatures match >>> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Om >>> >>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it >>>>does, >>>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary >>>>convenience >>>> utility, it gets my vote. >>>> >>>> EdB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>>> >>>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting >>>>>send. >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> Package >>>>> >>>> >>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fl >>>>ex-s >>>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>>> Java 1.7 >>>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>>> Source kit signatures match: y >>>>> Source kit builds: y >>>>> README is ok: y >>>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>>> NOTICE is ok: y >>>>> LICENSE is ok: y >>>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>>> No unapproved binaries: y >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>>>released. >>>>>> >>>>>>The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ >>>>>> >>>>>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective >>>>>>platforms, >>>>>>are available here: >>>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binarie >>>>>>s >>>>>> >>>>>>As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. >>>>>> >>>>>>Before voting please review the sections: >>>>>>What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >>>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >>>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>>>>> >>>>>>For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that >>>>>>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. >>>>>>It will: >>>>>> - download the default source package for your OS (use >>>> -Dpackage.suffix >>>>>>to override) >>>>>> - run md5 and gpg checks (this
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Go to the Vote Thread, follow the link to the source kit, download the approval script, open a console, type ant -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2, follow and check as requested by the script, once ok, install the installer from the release folder, if you had a installer 3.2 installed before, uninstall it first, play with the new installer and report. Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 17:40:30 -0400 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > From: teotigraphix...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release stuff. I > don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right? > > Mike > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> Package >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle >> x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip >> Java 1.7 >> OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 >> Source kit signatures match: y >> Source kit builds: y >> README is ok: y >> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >> NOTICE is ok: y >> LICENSE is ok: y >> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >> No unapproved binaries: y >> >> Adobe Air 18.0 >> Apache Flex Nightly >> >> I was able to install Apache Flex Nightly and FlexJS Nightly using >> installer >> file built from sources. >> >> Piotr >> >> >> >> - >> Apache Flex PMC >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-2-RC2-tp47991p48103.html >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
Hey guys, I am really naive when it comes to this testing release stuff. I don't have a lot of time but what is the exact process to do it right? Mike On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, piotrz wrote: > +1 (binding) > Package > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle > x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip > Java 1.7 > OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 > Source kit signatures match: y > Source kit builds: y > README is ok: y > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > No unapproved binaries: y > > Adobe Air 18.0 > Apache Flex Nightly > > I was able to install Apache Flex Nightly and FlexJS Nightly using > installer > file built from sources. > > Piotr > > > > - > Apache Flex PMC > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-2-RC2-tp47991p48103.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+1 (binding) Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-fle x-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip Java 1.7 OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y Adobe Air 18.0 Apache Flex Nightly I was able to install Apache Flex Nightly and FlexJS Nightly using installer file built from sources. Piotr - Apache Flex PMC piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Flex-SDK-Installer-3-2-RC2-tp47991p48103.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
> +1 Binding I hold on my previous vote until we have more clarification on the 3003 Thanks Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 16:01:55 +0100 > > +1 Binding > > What a great script ! > > approve: > [echo] > [echo] +1 > [echo] Package > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip > [echo] Java 1.7 > [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 > [echo] Source kit signatures match: y > [echo] Source kit builds: y > [echo] README is ok: y > [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > [echo] NOTICE is ok: y > [echo] LICENSE is ok: y > [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y > [echo] No unapproved binaries: y > [echo] > > main: > > BUILD SUCCESSFUL > > Thanks, > Fr�d�ric THOMAS > > > ------------ >> From: bigosma...@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> >> +1 Binding >> >> Source compiles fine >> Signatures match >> Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 >> >> Thanks, >> Om >> >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does, >>> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience >>> utility, it gets my vote. >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>> >>>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. >>>> >>>> +1 >>>> Package >>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s >>>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>>> Java 1.7 >>>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>>> Source kit signatures match: y >>>> Source kit builds: y >>>> README is ok: y >>>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>>> NOTICE is ok: y >>>> LICENSE is ok: y >>>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>>> No unapproved binaries: y >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>>released. >>>>> >>>>>The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ >>>>> >>>>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >>>>>are available here: >>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binaries >>>>> >>>>>As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. >>>>> >>>>>Before voting please review the sections: >>>>>What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >>>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>>>> >>>>>For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that >>>>>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. >>>>>It will: >>>>> - download the default source package for your OS (use >>> -Dpackage.suffix >>>>>to override) >>>>> - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your >>>>>path) >>>>> - uncompress the source package >>>>> - install and run rat >>>>> - display the rat report and ask you to verify >>>>> - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify >>> the >>>>>non-AL files >>>>> - display the README and ask you to verify >>>>> - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify >>>>> - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify >>>>> - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify >>>>> - run the build and any tests run by the build. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it is >>>>>finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote thread. >>>>>You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the >>> packages >>>>>and build results are always encouraged. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as >>>>>simple as: >>>>>- Create an empty folder >>>>>- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveInsta >>>>>l >>>>>ler.xml >>>>> >>>>>- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Vote >>>>>[ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>> >>>>>This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>>>Alex Harui >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>> T. 06-51952295 >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>> >
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+1 Binding What a great script ! approve: [echo] [echo] +1 [echo] Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-sdk-installer-3.2.0-src.zip [echo] Java 1.7 [echo] OS: Windows 7 amd64 6.1 [echo] Source kit signatures match: y [echo] Source kit builds: y [echo] README is ok: y [echo] RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y [echo] NOTICE is ok: y [echo] LICENSE is ok: y [echo] No unapproved licenses or archives: y [echo] No unapproved binaries: y [echo] main: BUILD SUCCESSFUL Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: bigosma...@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:32:36 -0700 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2 > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > +1 Binding > > Source compiles fine > Signatures match > Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 > > Thanks, > Om > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does, >> it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience >> utility, it gets my vote. >> >> EdB >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >> >>> And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. >>> >>> +1 >>> Package >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s >>> dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz >>> Java 1.7 >>> OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 >>> Source kit signatures match: y >>> Source kit builds: y >>> README is ok: y >>> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y >>> NOTICE is ok: y >>> LICENSE is ok: y >>> No unapproved licenses or archives: y >>> No unapproved binaries: y >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >>>>released. >>>> >>>>The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ >>>> >>>>The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >>>>are available here: >>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binaries >>>> >>>>As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. >>>> >>>>Before voting please review the sections: >>>>What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >>>>http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >>>> >>>>For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that >>>>automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. >>>>It will: >>>> - download the default source package for your OS (use >> -Dpackage.suffix >>>>to override) >>>> - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your >>>>path) >>>> - uncompress the source package >>>> - install and run rat >>>> - display the rat report and ask you to verify >>>> - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify >> the >>>>non-AL files >>>> - display the README and ask you to verify >>>> - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify >>>> - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify >>>> - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify >>>> - run the build and any tests run by the build. >>>> >>>> >>>>You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it is >>>>finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote thread. >>>>You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the >> packages >>>>and build results are always encouraged. >>>> >>>> >>>>To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as >>>>simple as: >>>>- Create an empty folder >>>>- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: >>>> >>>> >>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveInsta >>>>l >>>>ler.xml >>>> >>>>- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 >>>> >>>> >>>>Vote >>>>[ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>> >>>>This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Alex Harui >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+1 Binding Source compiles fine Signatures match Minor issue with README, but not worth a -1 Thanks, Om On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > +1 > > Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does, > it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience > utility, it gets my vote. > > EdB > > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. > > > > +1 > > Package > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s > > dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz > > Java 1.7 > > OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 > > Source kit signatures match: y > > Source kit builds: y > > README is ok: y > > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > > NOTICE is ok: y > > LICENSE is ok: y > > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > > No unapproved binaries: y > > > > > > > > On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be > > >released. > > > > > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ > > > > > >The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, > > >are available here: > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binaries > > > > > >As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. > > > > > >Before voting please review the sections: > > >What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at > > >http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at > > >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > > > >For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that > > >automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. > > >It will: > > > - download the default source package for your OS (use > -Dpackage.suffix > > >to override) > > > - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your > > >path) > > > - uncompress the source package > > > - install and run rat > > > - display the rat report and ask you to verify > > > - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify > the > > >non-AL files > > > - display the README and ask you to verify > > > - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify > > > - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify > > > - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify > > > - run the build and any tests run by the build. > > > > > > > > >You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it is > > >finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote thread. > > >You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the > packages > > >and build results are always encouraged. > > > > > > > > >To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as > > >simple as: > > >- Create an empty folder > > >- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveInsta > > >l > > >ler.xml > > > > > >- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 > > > > > > > > >Vote > > >[ ] +1 Approve the release > > >[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > > > > > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > >Thanks, > > >Alex Harui > > > > > > > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
+1 Despite the problems getting the source version to compile, when it does, it works as expected. Since the Installer is mostly a binary convenience utility, it gets my vote. EdB On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. > > +1 > Package > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s > dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz > Java 1.7 > OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 > Source kit signatures match: y > Source kit builds: y > README is ok: y > RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y > NOTICE is ok: y > LICENSE is ok: y > No unapproved licenses or archives: y > No unapproved binaries: y > > > > On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be > >released. > > > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ > > > >The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, > >are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binaries > > > >As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. > > > >Before voting please review the sections: > >What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at > >http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at > >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > > > >For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that > >automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. > >It will: > > - download the default source package for your OS (use -Dpackage.suffix > >to override) > > - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your > >path) > > - uncompress the source package > > - install and run rat > > - display the rat report and ask you to verify > > - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify the > >non-AL files > > - display the README and ask you to verify > > - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify > > - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify > > - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify > > - run the build and any tests run by the build. > > > > > >You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it is > >finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote thread. > >You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages > >and build results are always encouraged. > > > > > >To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as > >simple as: > >- Create an empty folder > >- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveInsta > >l > >ler.xml > > > >- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 > > > > > >Vote > >[ ] +1 Approve the release > >[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > > > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >Thanks, > >Alex Harui > > > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.2 RC2
And this time I made sure I ran the ApprovalScript before hitting send. +1 Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/apache-flex-s dk-installer-3.2.0-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved licenses or archives: y No unapproved binaries: y On 6/18/15, 11:33 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hi, > >Please vote to approve Apache Flex SDK Installer version 3.2 to be >released. > >The source distributions for Windows and Mac are available here: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ > >The binary distributions as a convenience for the respective platforms, >are available here: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/binaries > >As agreed, there are no Linux binaries for this version. > >Before voting please review the sections: >What are the ASF requirements on approving a release? at >http://www.apache.org/dev/ and approving a release at >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > >For your convenience, there is an Ant script in the RC folder that >automates the checks a voter should perform on the RC. >It will: > - download the default source package for your OS (use -Dpackage.suffix >to override) > - run md5 and gpg checks (this assumes you have gpg installed in your >path) > - uncompress the source package > - install and run rat > - display the rat report and ask you to verify > - display the rat report without the AL files and ask you to verify the >non-AL files > - display the README and ask you to verify > - display the RELEASE_NOTES and ask you to verify > - display the NOTICE and ask you to verify > - display the LICENSE and ask you to verify > - run the build and any tests run by the build. > > >You should be able to go away for a while during the build. When it is >finished, it will display information to be copied into the vote thread. >You are not required to use this script, and more testing of the packages >and build results are always encouraged. > > >To use this script (assuming you have Ant installed), it should be as >simple as: >- Create an empty folder >- Download ApproveInstaller.xml into that folder from: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/installer/3.2/rc2/ApproveInsta >l >ler.xml > >- Run: ant -e -f ApproveInstaller.xml -Drelease.version=3.2 -Drc=2 > > >Vote >[ ] +1 Approve the release >[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) > >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >Thanks, >Alex Harui >
