[Generation and log4j]
Hello, FYI : I had a problem to update svn with the core/lib directory that I has to delete... Know it's OK and the problem with the external-links like site:MyLink is solved. (I had message like the following : X [0] error:site:overLibBROKEN: No pipeline matched request: error:site:overLib ) By the way, Log4j needs to be configured : ... cocoon 2.2.0-dev Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ... Lazy mode: true log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. .. -- Regards, Cyriaque,
Re: [Fwd: Re: Apache Lenya User Manual (spanish)]
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 01:26 +0200, Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Sure Mate!, There is some information about how to do it: http://casa.che-che.com/blog/2005/05/10/internalization-a-site-using-forrest-07-dev/ Cheers, dude. I will have a look and give it a go ASAP. Let me now if that works for you guys, or you want me to look about how to implemented with lenya. I will come back to this offer if I am running into problems. Cheers, cheche a ti killo. gracias salu2 Thorsten Scherler wrote: Cheche can you help? ...or better asked how can I help *you* to use full i18n support in lenya? ;-) salu2 Subject: Re: Apache Lenya User Manual (spanish) From: Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:58:02 +0200 To: user@lenya.apache.org To: user@lenya.apache.org X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Delivery-Time: 1116406791 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (minotaur.apache.org [209.237.227.194]) by mailin.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j4I8xnJ2022250 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:59:51 +0200 (MEST) Received: (qmail 55697 invoked by uid 1662); 18 May 2005 08:59:49 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 55639 invoked from network); 18 May 2005 08:59:49 - Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 May 2005 08:59:49 - Received: (qmail 54114 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2005 08:58:33 - Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 54050 invoked by uid 500); 18 May 2005 08:58:31 - Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Post: mailto:user@lenya.apache.org List-Id: user.lenya.apache.org Reply-To: user@lenya.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@lenya.apache.org Received: (qmail 53918 invoked by uid 99); 18 May 2005 08:58:29 - X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from natfrord.rzone.de (HELO natfrord.rzone.de) (81.169.145.161) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 May 2005 01:58:27 -0700 Received: from 172.26.0.5 (242.Red-213-97-135.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.135.242]) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4I8w4nU026174 for user@lenya.apache.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 10:58:05 +0200 (MEST) In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 00:29 -0400, Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: Thorsten Scherler wrote: Yeah, Gregor just started to add more tutorials to our website. This one would be really nice for spanish speaking user/devs. Please let us know whether we can add it to our website. since there is also a german one, i am not sure that we should just add it under howto's. what can the i18n support in forrest do for us, if anything? I have to talk to Cheche about that, he is right now working on full i18n support for forrest. I will report back. salu2 -- thorsten Together we stand, divided we fall! Hey you (Pink Floyd)
Re: [Generation and log4j]
Cyriaque Dupoirieux a écrit : Hello, FYI : I had a problem to update svn with the core/lib directory that I has to delete... had to delete Know it's OK and the problem with the external-links like site:MyLink is solved. Now, it's (I had message like the following : X [0] error:site:overLibBROKEN: No pipeline matched request: error:site:overLib ) By the way, Log4j needs to be configured : ... cocoon 2.2.0-dev Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Apache Software Foundation. All rights reserved. ... Lazy mode: true log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (net.sf.ehcache.CacheManager). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly. .. Sorry I am still sleeping, Cyriaque,
Re: svn commit: r170845 - /forrest/trunk/lib/core/xml-commons-resolver-1.1.license.txt /forrest/trunk/lib/core/xml-commons-resolver-1.2-dev-20050414T0700.jar.license.txt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: crossley Date: Wed May 18 17:31:19 2005 New Revision: 170845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=170845view=rev Log: We recently reverted the new entity resolver, so return to its old license. I think that was my mistake. I only put xml-commons-resolver-1.1.jar because it was like that on cocoon. If you think that we should keep xml-commons-resolver-1.2 then we can move that bak I will put a exclude/ on the build script. WDYT? Cheche
Re: Chaperon jar is required by core (Was: svn commit: r170628)
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: David Crossley wrote: The chaperon jar is required by the core, so i have moved it back. Please, please move one jar and test, next jar, test. Can anyone see why Chaperon is required in the core? Here is output from doing 'forrest run' without Chaperon. Doing 'forrest' is okay no errors. That is because there is a match on sitemap for dynamic creation of gramars: map:match pattern=*.xlex I have a patch, but I am not 100% sure how that will affect input.wiki plugin. WDYT? I think leave Chaperon in the core, record a Jira issue, add your patch and Nicola Ken's notes, and leave it until later. I was just fixing the broken build so that we can get going with other things. One issue that i did wonder about at this stage, is why the error appeared with 'forrest run' but not 'forrest site'. --David
Re: [Generation and log4j]
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: Cyriaque Dupoirieux a ?crit : Hello, FYI : I had a problem to update svn with the core/lib directory that I has to delete... had to delete Know it's OK and the problem with the external-links like site:MyLink is solved. Now, it's (I had message like the following : X [0] error:site:overLibBROKEN: No pipeline matched request: error:site:overLib ) That sounds like you are missing an entry in site.xml --David
Re: svn commit: r170845 - /forrest/trunk/lib/core/xml-commons-resolver-1.1.license.txt /forrest/trunk/lib/core/xml-commons-resolver-1.2-dev-20050414T0700.jar.license.txt
Juan Jose Pablos wrote: Author: crossley Date: Wed May 18 17:31:19 2005 New Revision: 170845 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=170845view=rev Log: We recently reverted the new entity resolver, so return to its old license. I think that was my mistake. I only put xml-commons-resolver-1.1.jar because it was like that on cocoon. If you think that we should keep xml-commons-resolver-1.2 then we can move that bak I will put a exclude/ on the build script. WDYT? I think three No. No, it wasn't you. No, that is not what my commit message says. No, we are not yet using the new entity resolver. You must have missed a big event recently. I tried to use a pre-release of the xml-commons-resolver-1.2 It works on UNIX, but Ross reported huge problems on Windows. I rolled it back but forgot to do the license file too. --David
Re: [Generation and log4j]
David Crossley a écrit : Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote: Cyriaque Dupoirieux a ?crit : Know it's OK and the problem with the external-links like site:MyLink is solved. Now, it's (I had message like the following : X [0] error:site:overLibBROKEN: No pipeline matched request: error:site:overLib ) That sounds like you are missing an entry in site.xml No, I did not change my site.xml, as I said, I had a problem with the code/lib directory with svn -update. So I delete it and re-update svn and now, everything is OK. It seems that I had a conflict with cocoon jars... But for Log4j, I don't know... Cyriaque, --David
Re: BOF for Forrest
Here is the response from the organizers: what is the procedure to apply for a room for additional and BOF meeting at ApacheCon. We'd like to have a BOF on Forrest and possibly one other meeting. We will have a separate call for BOF suggestions closer to the conference itself. Is it possible for non-registrants to participate in these? Well, the BOF sessions are part of the conference and therefore BOF attendees should be registered for the conference. So I guess we'll just have to wait for this to happen and hope that we will get room. But I wouldn't want to rely on this for the Views-Workshop. Also because of the exclusiveness ... Any alternatives? -- Ferdinand Soethe
Re: BOF for Forrest
I have to admit that I am *really* disappointed about the communication of the conference planer and the whole organization of this conference. I personally have send three mails (other threads) before to the conference but still waiting for an answer (and I am not the only one). I reckon this one will not be different. :( I guess that means we should follow the cocoon example and organize something for ourself to meet. BTW if we do so I guess I will not even attend the conference but only meet up with the people of the forrest community. I cannot understand why committers do not get discounts for the conference and having to pay the fee by myself it is just *too* much money. It is a petty but who can spend 800¤ + traveling cost + ... If my understanding is correct the organization of this conference is not directly from the ASF, right? No offense but the organization is to not really helpful in answering questions and helping (unless so many other conferences I attended). salu2 On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:29 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hello everybody, I would like whether we, the forrest community, can apply for a Birds-of-a-Feather session on the ApacheCon EU 05. The question is whether non-registrants are allowed there? Ferdinand suggested the following: As far as I can tell, we could have two separate meet-ups: 1. Workshop Forrest Views with Thorsten explaining the concept and practical details of his Forrest-Views and plenty of opportunity to ask questions. My hope is that I will have a chance to understand Views after that which means that we will address people with a limited understanding of Forrest and Plug-ins. Duration: ~ 2 hrs? Questions: - Thorsten: = are you still willing to do this = is my description of entry requirements correct - All: = can anybody suggest a place that is open for people without conf registration (perhaps even has a beamer?) = What evenings of the conference would you prefer to have this meet-up 2. General Exchange on Forrest an opportunity for Forrest users and developers to meet and have an open exchange about Forrest. If we have enough people committed to participating, we could/should we announce this meeting in our Forrest session for interested people to join us. Questions: = can anybody suggest a place that is open for people without conf registration (perhaps even has a beamer?) = What evenings of the conference would you prefer to have this meet-up Can you please help us with this question to still have time to arrange alternatives? TIA! salu2 email message attachment, Forwarded message - BOF for Forrest On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:29 +0200, Thorsten Scherler wrote: Hi, what is the procedure to apply for a room for additional and BOF meeting at ApacheCon. We'd like to have a BOF on Forrest and possibly one other meeting. Is it possible for non-registrants to participate in these? -- Ferdinand Soethe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- thorsten Together we stand, divided we fall! Hey you (Pink Floyd)
[JIRA] Created: (FOR-501) Chaperon requiere by core
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-501 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key: FOR-501 Summary: Chaperon requiere by core Type: Bug Status: Unassigned Priority: Minor Project: Forrest Components: Core operations Assignee: Reporter: Juan Jose Pablos Created: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:49 AM Updated: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:49 AM Description: Chaperon seems to be requiered by core. If a chapero-*.jar libray is not in place you will get this error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: net/sourceforge/chaperon/process/LexicalProcessor on sitemap.xmap there is this FIXME: !-- FIXME: there is a bug in the Cocoon 2.2 resolving that can make cocoon:/ calls call the base sitemap; remove the following when it's fixed. -- It needs more investigation as it seems to fail only using Command line and not when running as servlet - JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.cocoondev.org//secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[JIRA] Updated: (FOR-501) Chaperon requiere by core
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Juan Jose Pablos (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:51 AM Changes: Fix Version changed to 0.8 - For a full history of the issue, see: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-501?page=history - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-501 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key: FOR-501 Summary: Chaperon requiere by core Type: Bug Status: Unassigned Priority: Minor Project: Forrest Components: Core operations Fix Fors: 0.8 Assignee: Reporter: Juan Jose Pablos Created: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:49 AM Updated: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:51 AM Description: Chaperon seems to be requiered by core. If a chapero-*.jar libray is not in place you will get this error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: net/sourceforge/chaperon/process/LexicalProcessor on sitemap.xmap there is this FIXME: !-- FIXME: there is a bug in the Cocoon 2.2 resolving that can make cocoon:/ calls call the base sitemap; remove the following when it's fixed. -- It needs more investigation as it seems to fail only using Command line and not when running as servlet - JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.cocoondev.org//secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[JIRA] Updated: (FOR-501) Chaperon requiere by core
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Juan Jose Pablos (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:50 AM Comment: This patch resolved the problem as it removes a dinamic generation of gramars.. Changes: Attachment changed to chaperon-dependency-core.diff - For a full history of the issue, see: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-501?page=history - View the issue: http://issues.cocoondev.org//browse/FOR-501 Here is an overview of the issue: - Key: FOR-501 Summary: Chaperon requiere by core Type: Bug Status: Unassigned Priority: Minor Project: Forrest Components: Core operations Fix Fors: 0.8 Assignee: Reporter: Juan Jose Pablos Created: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:49 AM Updated: Thu, 19 May 2005 7:50 AM Description: Chaperon seems to be requiered by core. If a chapero-*.jar libray is not in place you will get this error: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: net/sourceforge/chaperon/process/LexicalProcessor on sitemap.xmap there is this FIXME: !-- FIXME: there is a bug in the Cocoon 2.2 resolving that can make cocoon:/ calls call the base sitemap; remove the following when it's fixed. -- It needs more investigation as it seems to fail only using Command line and not when running as servlet - JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.cocoondev.org//secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: BOF for Forrest
snip Since we cannot get a room at the conference for non-delegates (which again is understandable because they have to be paid for somehow) we need to find an alternative. We could check out if any of the hotels have a room we would be able to use. Once I know where I am staying I can look into that. Does anyone in the area know of any other possabilities? I'm looking into it right now (i.e. sent emails). One option would be to meet at the company I'm working for, but this is rather far from the conference. We might borrow a beamer, so any room would do. There are some academic buildings in the center, I'll try what I can do ... Johannes Ross
Re: BOF for Forrest
According to Thorsten: I have to admit that I am *really* disappointed about the communication of the conference planer and the whole organization of this conference. I personally have send three mails (other threads) before to the conference but still waiting for an answer (and I am not the only one). I reckon this one will not be different. :( Your last email regarding BOFs was submitted by you to the ApacheCon planners 18 May and answered by me today (at 1:30 am). The other two emails you submitted end of March where regarding a session proposal for the conference. It was submitted after our CFP deadline and actually after our final planning meeting. We usually cannot accept proposals received after the deadline as this would be unfair to the other people that submitted proposals. As far as I remember we answered your email and told you that we cannot consider the proposal for ApacheCon Europe. If we really didn't sent this email or if it wasn't received by you, I'm sorry ... we always receive some unsolicited proposals for sessions are the CFP deadline and often we don't have to time to answer these or just fall through the cracks. I guess that means we should follow the cocoon example and organize something for ourself to meet. BTW if we do so I guess I will not even attend the conference but only meet up with the people of the forrest community. I cannot understand why committers do not get discounts for the conference and having to pay the fee by myself it is just *too* much money. It is a petty but who can spend 800¤ + traveling cost + ... Sure, it would be great if we could find a sponsor to give every committer or even every Apache user free admission to the conference, but without such a big sponsor that's not possible. ApacheCon is a commercial tech conference and therefore there is a few for attending the conference ... like with any other tech conference. Do you get in for free at O'Reilly or JavaOne conferences? No, you don't. ApacheCon is not just a social get-to-gether of committers or members, but a conference that provides intense lectures, tutorials, and presentations to Apache users. It's there for people to learn something about Apache and related technologies. Thorsten, as a committer you are probably aware of the ASF hackathon that happens at the beginning of the conference (information about this was provided some time ago). This event is a get-to-gether of developers and open (only) to ASF members and committers. And it's free of charge ... If you do not consider this sufficient, then I'm afraid you may want to consider organizing something yourself. If my understanding is correct the organization of this conference is not directly from the ASF, right? ApacheCon is organized by the ASF in coorporation with a commercial conference producer. My $0.02 ciao... -- Lars Eilebrecht - Imagination is more important [EMAIL PROTECTED]- than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)
NullPointerException building cocoon for forrest
Hi, I need a bit of help building cocoon for forrest. After a succesful build, I am getting this error just for forrest site: Exception in thread main java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.cocoon.Cocoon.initialize(Cocoon.java:177) at org.apache.avalon.framework.container.ContainerUtil.initialize(ContainerUtil.java:283) at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonWrapper.initialize(CocoonWrapper.java:175) at org.apache.cocoon.bean.CocoonBean.initialize(CocoonBean.java:98) at org.apache.cocoon.Main.main(Main.java:320) BUILD FAILED /home/cheche/xml/forrest/trunk/main/targets/site.xml:41: Java returned: 1 I have been digging and it seems relate somehow to this commit: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=164112view=rev Can someone put some light on it? Cheers, cheche
Re: BOF for Forrest
Lars Eilebrecht wrote: According to Thorsten: I have to admit that I am *really* disappointed about the communication of the conference planer and the whole organization of this conference. I personally have send three mails (other threads) before to the conference but still waiting for an answer (and I am not the only one). I reckon this one will not be different. :( Your last email regarding BOFs was submitted by you to the ApacheCon planners 18 May and answered by me today (at 1:30 am). That took nearly 15 hours! You're fired! -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff
Re: BOF for Forrest
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 15:06 +0200, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: According to Thorsten: I have to admit that I am *really* disappointed about the communication of the conference planer and the whole organization of this conference. I personally have send three mails (other threads) before to the conference but still waiting for an answer (and I am not the only one). I reckon this one will not be different. :( Your last email regarding BOFs was submitted by you to the ApacheCon planners 18 May and answered by me today (at 1:30 am). Yeah, I was to fast. Sorry. The other two emails you submitted end of March where regarding a session proposal for the conference. It was submitted after our CFP deadline and actually after our final planning meeting. We usually cannot accept proposals received after the deadline as this would be unfair to the other people that submitted proposals. As far as I remember we answered your email and told you that we cannot consider the proposal for ApacheCon Europe. If we really didn't sent this email or if it wasn't received by you, I'm sorry ... we always receive some unsolicited proposals for sessions are the CFP deadline and often we don't have to time to answer these or just fall through the cracks. Hmm, ok I *never* received anything as answer for the mentioned mails for the proposal. I even wrote Ken Coar directly (that was the third mail) and no answer as well. No problem in not accepting the proposal because like you said it was not in time, but I was waiting for a NO or YES. That is the most basic thing IMO. Ignoring this mails leads to the situation of frustration. Even if you receive a lot of mails, it *should* be possible to copy n' paste something like: sorry your proposal is to late, try next time within the deadline. ...but like I stated in the previous mail I am not the only one waiting for an answer of the conference planer (and the case I have in mind was not like mine). I guess that means we should follow the cocoon example and organize something for ourself to meet. BTW if we do so I guess I will not even attend the conference but only meet up with the people of the forrest community. I cannot understand why committers do not get discounts for the conference and having to pay the fee by myself it is just *too* much money. It is a petty but who can spend 800¤ + traveling cost + ... Sure, it would be great if we could find a sponsor to give every committer or even every Apache user free admission to the conference, but without such a big sponsor that's not possible. I was not talking about free admission but some % off (something like the group discount). It is the work of the committer that creating the basis for this conference (the software and communities). If the committer would not do their work for free the conference would not have anything to talk about. Did you thought about that? ApacheCon is a commercial tech conference and therefore there is a few for attending the conference ... like with any other tech conference. Do you get in for free at O'Reilly or JavaOne conferences? No, you don't. Again I am not talking about free. ...and yes you get % on the above mentioned conference if you are staff of e.g. O'Reilly. Committer are staff of the ASF. ApacheCon is not just a social get-to-gether of committers or members, but a conference that provides intense lectures, tutorials, and presentations to Apache users. It's there for people to learn something about Apache and related technologies. Agree. Thorsten, as a committer you are probably aware of the ASF hackathon that happens at the beginning of the conference (information about this was provided some time ago). This event is a get-to-gether of developers and open (only) to ASF members and committers. And it's free of charge ... Yeah, nice. I guess (hope) we will meet there. ;-) If you do not consider this sufficient, then I'm afraid you may want to consider organizing something yourself. That is not the point. See above. If my understanding is correct the organization of this conference is not directly from the ASF, right? ApacheCon is organized by the ASF in coorporation with a commercial conference producer. Ok. My $0.02 ciao... Thanks for answering. :) ...and sorry if my mail was a wee bit harsh. I guess it was the frustration not getting any answer and having to pay the normal admission. Next time I will submit a proposal in time. ;-) Hope that you guys can arrange a small discount for committers that would be very welcome. ...again I do not expect it to be free. ;-) Then I could come for a day or two. I do not live in Germany anymore so going there will be not very cheap. No hard feelings. salu2 -- thorsten Together we stand, divided we fall! Hey you (Pink Floyd)
