Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Forrest Xia]

I will start Samples 3.0-M1 release soon.

Forrest

On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

>
> On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
>
> > On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> >> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the
> release were
> >>
> >> Rick McGuire
> >> Jarek Gawor
> >> Kevan Woods
> >> Donald Wood
> >> Joe Bohn
> >>
> >> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will
> be promoted and made available for download ASAP.
> >>
> >> Rick
> >
> > Hi, Rick.
> > Couple of comments...
> >
> > There's a problem with the names of the install packages.   Check out the
> link to the tomcat7 image on this page:
> > http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html
> >
> > That link tries to download this file:
> >
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz
> >
> > Actual name is:
> >
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz
>
> Fixed, I think...
>
> --kevan

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Kevan Miller]

On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:

> On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the 
>> release were
>> 
>> Rick McGuire
>> Jarek Gawor
>> Kevan Woods
>> Donald Wood
>> Joe Bohn
>> 
>> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will be 
>> promoted and made available for download ASAP.
>> 
>> Rick
> 
> Hi, Rick.
> Couple of comments...
> 
> There's a problem with the names of the install packages.   Check out the 
> link to the tomcat7 image on this page:
> http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html
> 
> That link tries to download this file:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz
> 
> Actual name is:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz

Fixed, I think...

--kevan

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Delos]

I will start GEP M1 release soon.

2010/6/21 Bill Stoddard 

> On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the
>> release were
>>
>> Rick McGuire
>> Jarek Gawor
>> Kevan Woods
>> Donald Wood
>> Joe Bohn
>>
>> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will
>> be promoted and made available for download ASAP.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>
> Hi, Rick.
> Couple of comments...
>
> There's a problem with the names of the install packages.   Check out the
> link to the tomcat7 image on this page:
> http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html
>
> That link tries to download this file:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz
>
> Actual name is:
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz
>
> Maybe a good idea to work up an announcement letter when GEP and sample
> apps are ready.
>
> Bill
>
>
>> On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
>>> has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have
>>> been included.
>>>
>>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>>
>>> Staged to
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>>
>>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>>> plausible builds from them.
>>>
>>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,

Delos

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Bill Stoddard]

On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for 
the release were


Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Kevan Woods
Donald Wood
Joe Bohn

Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts 
will be promoted and made available for download ASAP.


Rick


Hi, Rick.
Couple of comments...

There's a problem with the names of the install packages.   Check out 
the link to the tomcat7 image on this page:

http://geronimo.apache.org/apache-geronimo-v30-m1-release.html

That link tries to download this file:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0.M1-bin.tar.gz

Actual name is:
http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-tomcat7-javaee6-3.0-M1-bin.tar.gz

Maybe a good idea to work up an announcement letter when GEP and sample 
apps are ready.


Bill


On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE 
problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that 
Jarek noticed have been included.


See the JIRA issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/ 



The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.


The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Rick

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Rick McGuire]

On 6/18/2010 8:24 AM, Donald Woods wrote:

Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-)
   

Yeah...it's been a rough morning!

Rick



-Donald


On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
   

The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the
release were

Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Kevan Woods
Donald Wood
Joe Bohn

Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will
be promoted and made available for download ASAP.

Rick

On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
 

A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
noticed have been included.

See the JIRA issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220


Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz


If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.

The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Rick
   


 
   

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Donald Woods]

Believe you meant Kevan Miller and Donald Woods... :-)


-Donald


On 6/18/10 7:57 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the
> release were
> 
> Rick McGuire
> Jarek Gawor
> Kevan Woods
> Donald Wood
> Joe Bohn
> 
> Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will
> be promoted and made available for download ASAP.
> 
> Rick
> 
> On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
>> problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
>> noticed have been included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
> 
> 

[RESULT][VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Rick McGuire]

The Vote passes with 4.5 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.  Voting for the 
release were


Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Kevan Woods
Donald Wood
Joe Bohn

Thank you for the time spent reviewing this.  The release artifacts will 
be promoted and made available for download ASAP.


Rick

On 6/9/2010 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE 
problem has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek 
noticed have been included.


See the JIRA issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.


The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Rick

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Donald Woods]

On 6/15/10 11:33 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I
> don't think have been pointed out yet:
> 
> Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql
> connector rars in server images as with previous releases.  I guess this
> isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means -
> just a bit annoying.

Yep, I fixed that in trunk.

> 
> I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a
> geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version).  This doesn't actually
> exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either.
> 
> I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat
> assembly.
> 
> Joe
> 
> 
> On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
>> has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed
>> have been included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>>
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>>
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
> 
> 

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Joe Bohn]

Here's my +1 as well ... but I did notice a few strange things that I 
don't think have been pointed out yet:


Perhaps the most annoying thing is that we aren't including the tranql 
connector rars in server images as with previous releases.  I guess this 
isn't a big concern because they should be available via other means - 
just a bit annoying.


I also noticed a dependency management entry in the root pom for a 
geronimo bundle of axiom (at a SNAPSHOT version).  This doesn't actually 
exist but it seems that it isn't causing any build issues either.


I was able to build fine and I ran one of the EBA samples in the tomcat 
assembly.


Joe


On 6/9/10 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed
have been included.

See the JIRA issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220


Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz


If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
plausible builds from them.

The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)

Rick

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Kevan Miller]

Here's my +1. Build, source, signatures, checksums, license/notice files all 
look good.

Some minor issues running the server:

ExceptionInInitializerError during shutdown of Jetty server
warnings during start of Tomcat Java EE server

Here's my +1

--kevan

On Jun 9, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem has 
> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been 
> included.
> 
> See the JIRA issues here:
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>  
> 
> Staged to
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
> 
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>  
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>  
> 
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
> plausible builds from them.
> 
> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
> 
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> 
> Rick

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Vamsavardhana Reddy]

Ah... missed the bootstrap build step :D .  The build seems to run fine now.
Will post again if it fails. Thanks Donald.

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Donald Woods  wrote:

> Those versions on Mac
>
> What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
> mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
> mvn install
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> > Donald,
> >
> > I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
> > with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
> > 1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
> > tag?
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods  > > wrote:
> >
> > +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone
> release.
> >
> > Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
> >
> >
> > -Donald
> >
> >
> > On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> > > +0.5
> > >
> > > M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind
> to
> > > the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you
> won't
> > > be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> > > setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> > > var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing
> the
> > > following in var/config/config.xml:
> > >
> > > tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort
> +
> > > PortOffset}
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> > > PortOffset}
> > >
> > > Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated
> at
> > > server startup by the activemq plugin.
> > >
> > > M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> > > error from time to time.
> > >
> > > Jarek
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire  > > wrote:
> > >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
> > problem has
> > >> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
> > noticed have been
> > >> included.
> > >>
> > >> See the JIRA issues here:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> > <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> >
> > >>
> > >> Staged to
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
> > >>
> > >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
> > >>
> > >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure
> something
> > >> plausible builds from them.
> > >>
> > >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> > >> [  ]  0 no opinion
> > >> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> > >>
> > >> Rick
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Vamsi
>



-- 
Vamsi

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Donald Woods]

Those versions on Mac

What problem did you encounter?  Did you run the bootstrap build first?
mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap
mvn install


-Donald


On 6/11/10 12:33 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
> Donald,
> 
> I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried
> with Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK
> 1.6.0_20.  Which version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the
> tag?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods  > wrote:
> 
> +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
> 
> Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> > +0.5
> >
> > M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> > the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> > be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> > setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> > var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
> > following in var/config/config.xml:
> >
> > tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
> > PortOffset}
> >
> > to
> >
> > tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> > PortOffset}
> >
> > Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
> > server startup by the activemq plugin.
> >
> > M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> > error from time to time.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire  > wrote:
> >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE
> problem has
> >> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek
> noticed have been
> >> included.
> >>
> >> See the JIRA issues here:
> >>
> >>
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> 
> 
> >>
> >> Staged to
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
> >>
> >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> >>
> >>
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
> >>
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
> >>
> >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> >> plausible builds from them.
> >>
> >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> >> [  ]  0 no opinion
> >> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> >>
> >> Rick
> >>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Vamsi

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Vamsavardhana Reddy]

Donald,

I am unable to build the tag starting with an empty maven repo. I tried with
Maven-2.2.1 as well as Maven-3.0-beta1. I am using Sun JDK 1.6.0_20.  Which
version of Sun JDK and Maven have you used to build the tag?


On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Donald Woods  wrote:

> +1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.
>
> Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> > +0.5
> >
> > M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> > the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> > be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> > setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> > var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
> > following in var/config/config.xml:
> >
> > tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
> > PortOffset}
> >
> > to
> >
> > tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> > PortOffset}
> >
> > Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
> > server startup by the activemq plugin.
> >
> > M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> > error from time to time.
> >
> > Jarek
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire  wrote:
> >> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem
> has
> >> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have
> been
> >> included.
> >>
> >> See the JIRA issues here:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
> >>
> >> Staged to
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
> >>
> >> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
> >>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
> >>
> >> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> >> plausible builds from them.
> >>
> >> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> >> [  ]  0 no opinion
> >> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
> >>
> >> Rick
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Vamsi

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Donald Woods]

+1  as I think the below issues are acceptable for a milestone release.

Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat Java EE 6 server.


-Donald


On 6/10/10 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> +0.5
> 
> M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
> following in var/config/config.xml:
> 
> tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}
> 
> to
> 
> tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}
> 
> Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
> server startup by the activemq plugin.
> 
> M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> error from time to time.
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire  wrote:
>> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem has
>> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
>> included.
>>
>> See the JIRA issues here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>>
>> Staged to
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
>> plausible builds from them.
>>
>> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>>
>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Kevan Miller]

On Jun 10, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:

> +0.5
> 
> M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
> the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
> be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
> setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
> var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
> following in var/config/config.xml:
> 
> tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}
> 
> to
> 
> tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
> PortOffset}
> 
> Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
> server startup by the activemq plugin.
> 
> M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
> error from time to time.

Thanks Jarek. I haven't reviewed the release yet (though given past reviews, I 
think I'll be able to support this one). IMO, those issues are acceptable for 
an M1. Hope to get to a full review, but I've got family in town. So, may be a 
little slow...

--kevan

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Jarek Gawor]

+0.5

M1 is affected by GERONIMO-5336. All services will most likely bind to
the local loopback device instead of all network devices so you won't
be able to access the console, etc. remotely. That can be fixed by
setting the ServerHostname property to 0.0.0.0 in
var/config/config-substitutions.properties file and also changing the
following in var/config/config.xml:

tcp://${ServerHostname}:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}

to

tcp://localhost:${ActiveMQPort +
PortOffset}

Otherwise, without the second change an exception will be generated at
server startup by the activemq plugin.

M1 also seems to be affected by GERONIMO-5334. But I only see that
error from time to time.

Jarek

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Rick McGuire  wrote:
> A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem has
> been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed have been
> included.
>
> See the JIRA issues here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220
>
> Staged to
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz
>
> If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something
> plausible builds from them.
>
> The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.
>
> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [  ]  0 no opinion
> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>
> Rick
>

[VOTE] Geronimo 3.0-M1 release - 3rd attempt

[Rick McGuire]

A new 3.0-M1 release candidate is ready for review.  The LICENSE problem 
has been corrected and the missed testsuite updates that Jarek noticed 
have been included.


See the JIRA issues here:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12315090&styleName=Text&projectId=10220 



Staged to

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/

The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.zip 

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-046/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/3.0-M1/geronimo-3.0-M1-source-release.tar.gz 



If you vote you should at least examine these and make sure something 
plausible builds from them.


The voting will be open a minimum of 72 hours.

[  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[  ]  0 no opinion
[  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)

Rick