proposal: announce 2.3.4 as GA
Hi there, is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in the maven repos. Regards Kai
Re: proposal: announce 2.3.4 as GA
The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong? B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in the maven repos. Regards Kai
Re: proposal: announce 2.3.4 as GA
Also, here is our policy: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process Did we vote on 3.4? If not, we should probably do that so that we can consider it GA. B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong? B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi there, is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in the maven repos. Regards Kai
Re: proposal: announce 2.3.4 as GA
2.3.4 was a bit of an emergency fix, so the vote was indeed deferred for the GA stamp. I think we should proceed exactly as you suggest, vote for GA anytime. Clinton On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Also, here is our policy: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process Did we vote on 3.4? If not, we should probably do that so that we can consider it GA. B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong? B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi there, is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in the maven repos. Regards Kai
Re: proposal: announce 2.3.4 as GA
that was exactly what I wanted to achieve: let some PMC member start a vote about releasing 2.3.4 as GA and updating the downloads page accordingly if the vote is successful. So could some PMC member start a vote? Regards Kai --- Original Nachricht --- Absender: Clinton Begin Datum: 18.09.2008 17:37 2.3.4 was a bit of an emergency fix, so the vote was indeed deferred for the GA stamp. I think we should proceed exactly as you suggest, vote for GA anytime. Clinton On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Also, here is our policy: http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/IBATIS/iBATIS+Release+Process Did we vote on 3.4? If not, we should probably do that so that we can consider it GA. B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Brandon Goodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The way i see it, if we consider something stable we push it out as GA. If for some reason it fails to uphold to the quality standards of GA we can always downgrade it to beta, fix it, and push it out a new release as GA. The whole GA thing has more to do with terminology than anything. So as far as I'm concerned GA is implicit when we release something. Am I wrong? B On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi there, is there anything that speak against promoting 2.3.4 (or possibly at least 2.3.3) as GA? 2.3.4 is already in the maven repos. Regards Kai
[VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
+1 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:28 PM, RInaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Rinaldo Brandon Goodin ha scritto: This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
+1 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Nathan Maves [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: +1 On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:28 PM, RInaldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Rinaldo Brandon Goodin ha scritto: This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
Not sure if my vote counts but... +7 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brandon Goodin wrote: This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
I think only PMC vote count but I vote +1 as well --- Original Nachricht --- Absender: Tom Duffey Datum: 18.09.2008 22:12 Not sure if my vote counts but... +7 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brandon Goodin wrote: This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
Re: [VOTE] Promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability
I like hearing votes from everyone. While they aren't counted officially by Apache, they are certainly counted by me and the other members as votes of confidence in the release. Keep voting. Cheers, Clinton On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Kai Grabfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think only PMC vote count but I vote +1 as well --- Original Nachricht --- Absender: Tom Duffey Datum: 18.09.2008 22:12 Not sure if my vote counts but... +7 On Sep 18, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brandon Goodin wrote: This is a vote to promote iBATIS 2.3.4 to General Availability. Brandon
