Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a
conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far.

Regards,
Siarhei
On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:


Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Well, I agree that it's basically not a maven specific issue, but the thing
is the build is going completely fine with 2.2.1, but not with 3.0rc3, so
I'm trying to understand where the difference lies.

And for the record, yes, it's a xml parser problem (oracle xmlparserv2 gets
in the way). I just configured exclusions and then it builds fine.

Sure, I could leave this exclusion here and check if it's also ok with mvn2,
but I'm quite reluctant to do that since it might hide a real isolation or
classpath ordering problem imo.

Cheers

2010/10/4 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org

 Hi,
 Not sure it's a maven issue here.
 You can try changing the sax parser

 -Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl

 with a recent xerces version in your classpath (in your pom I mean)

 In the gwt plugin configuration use


 extraJvmArgs...-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl
 .../extraJvmArgs

 HTH,
 --
 Olivier
 http://twitter.com/olamy
 http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy

 2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net:
  Hi,
 
  I just tested maven3 on a project I hadn't tried before and notice a
 build
  failure that doesn't happen with mvn2.2.1.
  It seems to be related to XML parser problemGWTTestCase.
  I suspect it might be related to classpath ordering, though I remember
 this
  order must be guaranteed since 2.0.9.
 
  I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember
 (Arnaud's
  tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable
  yet with maven3 execution? Is it?
 
  What are the possible ways to be able to debug it?
 
  Cheers
  PS :
  The full stacktrace:
  [ERROR] Failure while parsing XML
  org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException:
  http://apache.org/xml/features/nonvalidating/load-external-dtd
  at
 
 oracle.xml.jaxp.JXSAXParserFactory.setFeature(JXSAXParserFactory.java:128)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:320)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.access$100(ReflectiveParser.java:48)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:398)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.nestedLoad(ModuleDefLoader.java:257)
  at
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader$2.load(ModuleDefLoader.java:187)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.doLoadModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:283)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.createSyntheticModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:95)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl2(CompileStrategy.java:169)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl(CompileStrategy.java:116)
  at
 
 com.google.gwt.junit.SimpleCompileStrategy.maybeCompileModule(CompileStrategy.java:330)
  at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1296)
  at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1265)
  at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTest(JUnitShell.java:620)
  at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.runTest(GWTTestCase.java:456)
  at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
  at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
  at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
  at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
  at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
  at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.run(GWTTestCase.java:311)
  at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
  at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
  at
 
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
  at
 
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
  at
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute(JUnitTestSet.java:213)
  at
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
  at
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
  at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:109)
  at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
  at
 
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
  at
 
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
  at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
  at
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:290)
  at
 
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1017)
[ERROR] Unexpected error while processing XML
 
  2010/10/2 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
 
  Robert Scholte wrote:
 
   [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent
  ---
  GPG Passphrase: *
  gpg: can't open

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Baptiste MATHUS
Hi,

I just tested maven3 on a project I hadn't tried before and notice a build
failure that doesn't happen with mvn2.2.1.
It seems to be related to XML parser problemGWTTestCase.
I suspect it might be related to classpath ordering, though I remember this
order must be guaranteed since 2.0.9.

I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember (Arnaud's
tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable
yet with maven3 execution? Is it?

What are the possible ways to be able to debug it?

Cheers
PS :
The full stacktrace:
[ERROR] Failure while parsing XML
org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException:
http://apache.org/xml/features/nonvalidating/load-external-dtd
at
oracle.xml.jaxp.JXSAXParserFactory.setFeature(JXSAXParserFactory.java:128)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:320)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.access$100(ReflectiveParser.java:48)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:398)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.nestedLoad(ModuleDefLoader.java:257)
at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader$2.load(ModuleDefLoader.java:187)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.doLoadModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:283)
at
com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.createSyntheticModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:95)
at
com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl2(CompileStrategy.java:169)
at
com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl(CompileStrategy.java:116)
at
com.google.gwt.junit.SimpleCompileStrategy.maybeCompileModule(CompileStrategy.java:330)
at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1296)
at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1265)
at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTest(JUnitShell.java:620)
at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.runTest(GWTTestCase.java:456)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.run(GWTTestCase.java:311)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute(JUnitTestSet.java:213)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:109)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:290)
at
org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1017)
   [ERROR] Unexpected error while processing XML

2010/10/2 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu

 Robert Scholte wrote:

  [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent
 ---
 GPG Passphrase: *
 gpg: can't open
 `D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No
 such file or directory
 gpg: signing failed: file open error


 This is neither a bug in Maven, the Release Plugin nor the GPG Plugin but
 the Site Plugin:

 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-508


 Benjamin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




-- 
Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
Sauvez un arbre,
Mangez un castor !


Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

Baptiste MATHUS wrote:


I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember (Arnaud's
tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable
yet with maven3 execution? Is it?


Regardless of the Maven version, dependency:list cannot be used to check 
class path ordering because it sorts its output alphabetically.


I suggest you enable debug logging and check the class path printed to 
the console by the plugin in question, i.e. the Surefire Plugin in your 
case.


In general, you should avoid duplicate classes/dependencies on the class 
path and not rely on any order to solve conflicts.



Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Siarhei Dudzin
Just fyi, the change in classpah ordering actually helped me to find a
conflict there. Been testing RC3 since its been out - all is good so far.

Regards,
Siarhei
On Oct 4, 2010 3:01 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
 Baptiste MATHUS wrote:

 I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember
(Arnaud's
 tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable
 yet with maven3 execution? Is it?

 Regardless of the Maven version, dependency:list cannot be used to check
 class path ordering because it sorts its output alphabetically.

 I suggest you enable debug logging and check the class path printed to
 the console by the plugin in question, i.e. the Surefire Plugin in your
 case.

 In general, you should avoid duplicate classes/dependencies on the class
 path and not rely on any order to solve conflicts.


 Benjamin

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi,
Not sure it's a maven issue here.
You can try changing the sax parser
-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl

with a recent xerces version in your classpath (in your pom I mean)

In the gwt plugin configuration use

extraJvmArgs...-Djavax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory=org.apache.xerces.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl
.../extraJvmArgs

HTH,
-- 
Olivier
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy

2010/10/4 Baptiste MATHUS m...@batmat.net:
 Hi,

 I just tested maven3 on a project I hadn't tried before and notice a build
 failure that doesn't happen with mvn2.2.1.
 It seems to be related to XML parser problemGWTTestCase.
 I suspect it might be related to classpath ordering, though I remember this
 order must be guaranteed since 2.0.9.

 I'd like to use dependency:list to check ordering, but I remember (Arnaud's
 tweet, I'd say) reading that the dependency plugin output is not reliable
 yet with maven3 execution? Is it?

 What are the possible ways to be able to debug it?

 Cheers
 PS :
 The full stacktrace:
 [ERROR] Failure while parsing XML
 org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException:
 http://apache.org/xml/features/nonvalidating/load-external-dtd
 at
 oracle.xml.jaxp.JXSAXParserFactory.setFeature(JXSAXParserFactory.java:128)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:320)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser$Impl.access$100(ReflectiveParser.java:48)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.util.xml.ReflectiveParser.parse(ReflectiveParser.java:398)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.nestedLoad(ModuleDefLoader.java:257)
 at com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader$2.load(ModuleDefLoader.java:187)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.doLoadModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:283)
 at
 com.google.gwt.dev.cfg.ModuleDefLoader.createSyntheticModule(ModuleDefLoader.java:95)
 at
 com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl2(CompileStrategy.java:169)
 at
 com.google.gwt.junit.CompileStrategy.maybeCompileModuleImpl(CompileStrategy.java:116)
 at
 com.google.gwt.junit.SimpleCompileStrategy.maybeCompileModule(CompileStrategy.java:330)
 at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1296)
 at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTestImpl(JUnitShell.java:1265)
 at com.google.gwt.junit.JUnitShell.runTest(JUnitShell.java:620)
 at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.runTest(GWTTestCase.java:456)
 at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
 at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
 at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
 at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
 at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
 at com.google.gwt.junit.client.GWTTestCase.run(GWTTestCase.java:311)
 at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:208)
 at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.junit.JUnitTestSet.execute(JUnitTestSet.java:213)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.executeTestSet(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:115)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.suite.AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.execute(AbstractDirectoryTestSuite.java:140)
 at org.apache.maven.surefire.Surefire.run(Surefire.java:109)
 at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at
 sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
 at
 sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
 at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireBooter.java:290)
 at
 org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireBooter.main(SurefireBooter.java:1017)
   [ERROR] Unexpected error while processing XML

 2010/10/2 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu

 Robert Scholte wrote:

      [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent
 ---
     GPG Passphrase: *
 gpg: can't open
 `D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No
 such file or directory
     gpg: signing failed: file open error


 This is neither a bug in Maven, the Release Plugin nor the GPG Plugin but
 the Site Plugin:

 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-508


 Benjamin


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




 --
 Baptiste Batmat MATHUS - http://batmat.net
 Sauvez un arbre,
 Mangez un castor !


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-02 Thread Robert Scholte

Hi Benjamin,

 

I've tried to release the mojo-parent with Maven 3.0-RC3, but it failed:

 

[INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent ---
GPG Passphrase: *
gpg: can't open 
`D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No such 
file or directory
gpg: signing failed: file open error
[INFO] 

[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 


 

According to the Maven 3.x Plugin Compatibility Matrix, this plugin should be 
M3 proof.

Running it with Maven 2.2.1 succeeded without any problem.

This parent contains a m3-profile for site-generation.

Also this project doesn't have a site, that's done in a separate project.

 

- Robert
 
 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:24:30 +0200
 From: benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
 To: dev@maven.apache.org; us...@maven.apache.org
 Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3
 
 Hi,
 
 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is 
 seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody 
 interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive 
 can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-014/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC3/
 
 Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have 
 a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes
 
 If you encounter unexpected build issues, please fill a report in JIRA 
 that provides sufficient information to reproduce and analyze the issue:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
 
 The fixes contained in this release candidate since the 3.0-beta-3 
 release and the previous release candidates can be seen in JIRA:
 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=13142
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 -The Maven team
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
 
  

Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-10-02 Thread Benjamin Bentmann

Robert Scholte wrote:


 [INFO] --- maven-gpg-plugin:1.1:sign (sign-artifacts) @ mojo-parent ---
 GPG Passphrase: *
gpg: can't open 
`D:\java-workspace\helios\mojo-parent\target\mojo-parent-26-site.xml': No such 
file or directory
 gpg: signing failed: file open error


This is neither a bug in Maven, the Release Plugin nor the GPG Plugin 
but the Site Plugin:


http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-508


Benjamin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Ed Staub
Just my 2 cents, but I'd think it would be good to get the release
candidates reviewed publicly.  The main page (http://maven.apache.org) still
is at beta-3.  

-Ed Staub

-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] 
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List; Maven Users List
Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

Hi,

in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is 
seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org



Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Stephen Connolly
Updating the main page would require a formal vote on the dev list...

IANAL but AFAIK these are not formal releases, but weakly release candidates
and are not officially released by the apache foundation (because an
official release would require a vote and only official releases can be
linked from the home page)

Now just because they are not for4mal releases does not mean that they are
not good enough to try out, as the build process only difference is a 72h
voting period with testing by the maven developers, but we've found most
everything we can and we are now looking for wider feedback... when we
exhaust this pool of testers we'll fall back to voted releases I guess ;-)

-Stephen

On 26 September 2010 22:10, Ed Staub esta...@comcast.net wrote:

 Just my 2 cents, but I'd think it would be good to get the release
 candidates reviewed publicly.  The main page (http://maven.apache.org)
 still
 is at beta-3.

 -Ed Staub

 -Original Message-
 From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu]
 Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:25 PM
 To: Maven Developers List; Maven Users List
 Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

 Hi,

 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
 seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x.




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org




RE: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

2010-09-26 Thread Ed Staub
Stephen,

Thanks for the reply.

Maybe vote every N (3?) weeks on posting the latest RC? 
Waiting till you exhaust this pool of testers adds unnecessary schedule
risk, doesn't it?

-Ed


-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 5:34 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

Updating the main page would require a formal vote on the dev list...

IANAL but AFAIK these are not formal releases, but weakly release candidates
and are not officially released by the apache foundation (because an
official release would require a vote and only official releases can be
linked from the home page)

Now just because they are not for4mal releases does not mean that they are
not good enough to try out, as the build process only difference is a 72h
voting period with testing by the maven developers, but we've found most
everything we can and we are now looking for wider feedback... when we
exhaust this pool of testers we'll fall back to voted releases I guess ;-)

-Stephen

On 26 September 2010 22:10, Ed Staub esta...@comcast.net wrote:

 Just my 2 cents, but I'd think it would be good to get the release
 candidates reviewed publicly.  The main page (http://maven.apache.org)
 still
 is at beta-3.

 -Ed Staub

 -Original Message-
 From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu]
 Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:25 PM
 To: Maven Developers List; Maven Users List
 Subject: [PLEASE TEST] Apache Maven 3.0-RC3

 Hi,

 in preparation for the release of Apache Maven 3.0, the Maven team is
 seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x.




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org