Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-16 Thread Martin Marinschek
+1,

best regards,

Martin

On 7/16/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 +1

 2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
 for binary and source packages).

 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
 released,
   and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/7/16 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org

 +1,

 best regards,

 Martin

 On 7/16/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
  +1
 
  Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  +1
 
  2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
  MyFaces core out.
 
  The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
  Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
 
  The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
  for binary and source packages).
 
  The release notes could be found at [4].
 
  Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
  myfaces-api.
 
  Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
  Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
  +1 votes (see [3]).
 
  
  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
and why..
  
 
  Thanks,
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
  [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 


 --

 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-16 Thread Hazem Saleh
+1

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Gerhard Petracek 
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:

 +1

 regards,
 gerhard


 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



 2010/7/16 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org

 +1,

 best regards,

 Martin

 On 7/16/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
  +1
 
  Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  +1
 
  2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
  MyFaces core out.
 
  The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
  Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
 
  The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
 [3]
  for binary and source packages).
 
  The release notes could be found at [4].
 
  Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
  myfaces-api.
 
  Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
  Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
  +1 votes (see [3]).
 
  
  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
and why..
  
 
  Thanks,
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  [1] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
  [3] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 


 --

 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces





-- 
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed

Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets):
http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002M052KY

Web blog: http://hazems.blogetery.com/

[Web 2.0] Mashups Integration with JSF:
http://code.google.com/p/mashups4jsf/


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-16 Thread Jakob Korherr
+1

Regards,
Jakob

2010/7/16 Hazem Saleh haz...@apache.org

 +1


 On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Gerhard Petracek 
 gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:

 +1

 regards,
 gerhard


 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



 2010/7/16 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org

 +1,

 best regards,

 Martin

 On 7/16/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
  +1
 
  Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  +1
 
  2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Hi,
 
  I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
  MyFaces core out.
 
  The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
  Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
 
  The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
 [3]
  for binary and source packages).
 
  The release notes could be found at [4].
 
  Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
  myfaces-api.
 
  Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
  Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
  +1 votes (see [3]).
 
  
  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
and why..
  
 
  Thanks,
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  [1] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
  [3] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 


 --

 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces





 --
 Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed

 Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets):

 http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370
 http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002M052KY

 Web blog: http://hazems.blogetery.com/

 [Web 2.0] Mashups Integration with JSF:
 http://code.google.com/p/mashups4jsf/




-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-16 Thread Michael Concini

+1

On 7/16/2010 9:19 AM, Jakob Korherr wrote:

+1

Regards,
Jakob

2010/7/16 Hazem Saleh haz...@apache.org mailto:haz...@apache.org

+1


On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
wrote:

+1

regards,
gerhard


http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/7/16 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org
mailto:mmarinsc...@apache.org

+1,

best regards,

Martin

On 7/16/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
 +1

 Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 +1

 2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1
release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the
following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group
org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core
v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test
v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache
account ([1] and [3]
 for binary and source packages).

 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary
incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with
a minimum of three
 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits
not to be
 released,
   and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2]
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3]
http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]



http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117



http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces





-- 
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed


Author of (The Definitive Guide to Apache MyFaces and Facelets):
http://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Apache-MyFaces-Facelets/dp/1590597370
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002M052KY

Web blog: http://hazems.blogetery.com/

[Web 2.0] Mashups Integration with JSF:
http://code.google.com/p/mashups4jsf/




--
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at




Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
+1

2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for
 binary and source packages).

 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
  and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-15 Thread Werner Punz

+1

Am 16.07.10 01:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

+1

2010/7/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.

The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
for binary and source packages).

The release notes could be found at [4].

Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
myfaces-api.

Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
  and why..


Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe

[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
[4]

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-07 Thread Martin Koci
Hi,

can you  guys take a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2753 before release
2.0.1? 

Thanks,

Martin Kočí

Werner Punz píše v Út 06. 07. 2010 v 18:07 +0200:
 Jepp there were a handful of showstoppers, most have been fixed (but not 
 all)
 I am glad 2.0.1 did not make it out of the door, this gave us additional 
 time to fix the bugs which have crawled up lately.
 
 
 Werner
 
 
 Am 06.07.10 00:48, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  Hi
 
  Yes, the vote has been stopped. In the last weeks we have found some
  issues, so it is necessary to fix them before propose another release.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/7/5 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org
 
  Hi,
 
  I was out for a bit, and was wondering if this vote has now been
  officially stopped ?
 
  Thanks!
  Matthias
 
  On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
   
That's cool! Thanks!. After release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll
  propose a
release of 2.0.1 again.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo
   
2010/6/16 Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com
  mailto:mconc...@gmail.com
   
Leonardo,
I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far
  as 2754 and
2755 we should be good to go.
   
-Mike
On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
   
Hi Bernd
   
Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps,
  because
there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but
  I'm not have
a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in
  progress,
TOMAHAWK).
   
We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7
  (checkstyle
version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this
  pom and we
don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point
  I have to
release myfaces master pom first.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   
Hi Leonardo,
   
thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.
   
Regards
   
Bernd
   
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe
  lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi Bernd

 I added in api:

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 in impl

 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.

 The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to
  prevent
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello Leonardo,

 looks ok for me.

 Can you also add in api

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 and in impl

 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 an example would be



  
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

 I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
 afternoon.

 Regards

 Bernd

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe
  lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
 
  This product includes software developed by:
  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 
 
 
  
  See the file LICENSE.txt
  See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
  subdirectory.
 
 
  
 
  This software also includes code from Facelets
  (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
  for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0
  support.
 
  This product includes schema files developed for the
 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-06 Thread Werner Punz
Jepp there were a handful of showstoppers, most have been fixed (but not 
all)
I am glad 2.0.1 did not make it out of the door, this gave us additional 
time to fix the bugs which have crawled up lately.



Werner


Am 06.07.10 00:48, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

Hi

Yes, the vote has been stopped. In the last weeks we have found some
issues, so it is necessary to fix them before propose another release.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/7/5 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org mailto:mat...@apache.org

Hi,

I was out for a bit, and was wondering if this vote has now been
officially stopped ?

Thanks!
Matthias

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  That's cool! Thanks!. After release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll
propose a
  release of 2.0.1 again.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo
 
  2010/6/16 Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com
mailto:mconc...@gmail.com
 
  Leonardo,
  I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far
as 2754 and
  2755 we should be good to go.
 
  -Mike
  On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
 
  Hi Bernd
 
  Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps,
because
  there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but
I'm not have
  a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in
progress,
  TOMAHAWK).
 
  We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7
(checkstyle
  version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this
pom and we
  don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point
I have to
  release myfaces master pom first.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 
  Hi Leonardo,
 
  thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
  I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi Bernd
  
   I added in api:
  
   META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
  
   in impl
  
   META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
  
   because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
  
   The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to
prevent
   misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
  
   Hello Leonardo,
  
   looks ok for me.
  
   Can you also add in api
  
   META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
   META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
  
   and in impl
  
   META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
  
   an example would be
  
  
  

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
  
   I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
   afternoon.
  
   Regards
  
   Bernd
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Hi
   
I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
   
This product includes software developed by:
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
   
   
   

See the file LICENSE.txt
See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
subdirectory.
   
   

   
This software also includes code from Facelets
(https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0
support.
   
This product includes schema files developed for the
Glassfish Java
EE
reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this
distribution
under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the
License at:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
The source code is available at:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
   
The following schemas are included:
   

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-06 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi!

1.) My colleague Bütti fixed a bug today (committed it for him) and I'd like to 
see this tested by a few others before we go on with the release.

2.) I also like to add ASL headers to all our poms, so our board is happy ;)
Hope to get this done in the next 2 days.

3.) What about apache-parent-7 and switching over our release process? I 
successfully did this for OWB build-tools and currently running the 
OWB-1.0.0-alpha-1 release, so I can volunteer/guide with the release.


LieGrue,
strub

--- On Tue, 7/6/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2010, 4:07 PM
 Jepp there were a handful of
 showstoppers, most have been fixed (but not 
 all)
 I am glad 2.0.1 did not make it out of the door, this gave
 us additional 
 time to fix the bugs which have crawled up lately.
 
 
 Werner
 
 
 Am 06.07.10 00:48, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  Hi
 
  Yes, the vote has been stopped. In the last weeks we
 have found some
  issues, so it is necessary to fix them before propose
 another release.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/7/5 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
 mailto:mat...@apache.org
 
      Hi,
 
      I was out for a bit, and was
 wondering if this vote has now been
      officially stopped ?
 
      Thanks!
      Matthias
 
      On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00
 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
      mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
        Hi
       
        That's cool! Thanks!. After
 release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll
      propose a
        release of 2.0.1 again.
       
        regards,
       
        Leonardo
       
        2010/6/16 Michael Concini
 mconc...@gmail.com
      mailto:mconc...@gmail.com
       
        Leonardo,
        I just committed the
 proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far
      as 2754 and
        2755 we should be good to
 go.
       
        -Mike
        On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM,
 Leonardo Uribe wrote:
       
        Hi Bernd
       
        Ok, thanks. Unfortunately
 I have to restart all release steps,
      because
        there was changes applied
 on trunk that should be applied, but
      I'm not have
        a separate patch to apply
 it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in
      progress,
        TOMAHAWK).
       
        We still have an
 unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7
      (checkstyle
        version is snapshot).
 Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this
      pom and we
        don't have response from
 Matthias fix this issue, At this point
      I have to
        release myfaces master
 pom first.
       
        regards,
       
        Leonardo Uribe
       
        2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann
 bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
      mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
       
        Hi Leonardo,
       
        thanks a lot. Now it
 is ok for me.
        I added some missing
 licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.
       
        Regards
       
        Bernd
       
       
       
        On Tue, Jun 15, 2010
 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe
      lu4...@gmail.com
 mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
        wrote:
         Hi Bernd
        
         I added in api:
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         in impl
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         because the
 schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
        
         The update to
 NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to
      prevent
        
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
        
         regards,
        
         Leonardo Uribe
        
         2010/6/15 Bernd
 Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
      mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
        
         Hello
 Leonardo,
        
         looks ok for
 me.
        
         Can you also
 add in api
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         and in impl
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         an example
 would be
        
        
        
      
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
        
         I have no
 time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
         afternoon.
        
         Regards
        
         Bernd
        
         On Tue, Jun
 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe
      lu4...@gmail.com
 mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
         wrote:
      Hi
         
      I think
 the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
         
      This
 product includes software developed by:
      The
 Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
 Hi!

 1.) My colleague Bütti fixed a bug today (committed it for him) and I'd like 
 to see this tested by a few others before we go on with the release.

 2.) I also like to add ASL headers to all our poms, so our board is happy ;)
 Hope to get this done in the next 2 days.

 3.) What about apache-parent-7 and switching over our release process? I 
 successfully did this for OWB build-tools and currently running the 
 OWB-1.0.0-alpha-1 release, so I can volunteer/guide with the release.


 LieGrue,
 strub

 --- On Tue, 7/6/10, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2010, 4:07 PM
 Jepp there were a handful of
 showstoppers, most have been fixed (but not
 all)
 I am glad 2.0.1 did not make it out of the door, this gave
 us additional
 time to fix the bugs which have crawled up lately.


 Werner


 Am 06.07.10 00:48, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  Hi
 
  Yes, the vote has been stopped. In the last weeks we
 have found some
  issues, so it is necessary to fix them before propose
 another release.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/7/5 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
 mailto:mat...@apache.org
 
      Hi,
 
      I was out for a bit, and was
 wondering if this vote has now been
      officially stopped ?
 
      Thanks!
      Matthias
 
      On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00
 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
      mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
        Hi
       
        That's cool! Thanks!. After
 release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll
      propose a
        release of 2.0.1 again.
       
        regards,
       
        Leonardo
       
        2010/6/16 Michael Concini
 mconc...@gmail.com
      mailto:mconc...@gmail.com
       
        Leonardo,
        I just committed the
 proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far
      as 2754 and
        2755 we should be good to
 go.
       
        -Mike
        On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM,
 Leonardo Uribe wrote:
       
        Hi Bernd
       
        Ok, thanks. Unfortunately
 I have to restart all release steps,
      because
        there was changes applied
 on trunk that should be applied, but
      I'm not have
        a separate patch to apply
 it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in
      progress,
        TOMAHAWK).
       
        We still have an
 unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7
      (checkstyle
        version is snapshot).
 Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this
      pom and we
        don't have response from
 Matthias fix this issue, At this point
      I have to
        release myfaces master
 pom first.
       
        regards,
       
        Leonardo Uribe
       
        2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann
 bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
      mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
       
        Hi Leonardo,
       
        thanks a lot. Now it
 is ok for me.
        I added some missing
 licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.
       
        Regards
       
        Bernd
       
       
       
        On Tue, Jun 15, 2010
 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe
      lu4...@gmail.com
 mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
        wrote:
         Hi Bernd
        
         I added in api:
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         in impl
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         because the
 schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
        
         The update to
 NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to
      prevent
        
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
        
         regards,
        
         Leonardo Uribe
        
         2010/6/15 Bernd
 Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
      mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
        
         Hello
 Leonardo,
        
         looks ok for
 me.
        
         Can you also
 add in api
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         and in impl
        
        
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
        
         an example
 would be
        
        
        
      
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
        
         I have no
 time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
         afternoon.
        
         Regards
        
         Bernd
        
         On Tue, Jun
 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe
      lu4...@gmail.com
 mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
         wrote:
      Hi
         
      I think
 the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
         
      This
 product includes software developed

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-07-05 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi,

I was out for a bit, and was wondering if this vote has now been
officially stopped ?

Thanks!
Matthias

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 That's cool! Thanks!. After release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll propose a
 release of 2.0.1 again.

 regards,

 Leonardo

 2010/6/16 Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com

 Leonardo,
 I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far as 2754 and
 2755 we should be good to go.

 -Mike
 On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:

 Hi Bernd

 Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps, because
 there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but I'm not have
 a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in progress,
 TOMAHAWK).

 We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 (checkstyle
 version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this pom and we
 don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point I have to
 release myfaces master pom first.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

 Hi Leonardo,

 thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
 I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi Bernd
 
  I added in api:
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
 
  The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent
  misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello Leonardo,
 
  looks ok for me.
 
  Can you also add in api
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  and in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  an example would be
 
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
 
  I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
  afternoon.
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi
  
   I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
  
   This product includes software developed by:
   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
  
  
   
   See the file LICENSE.txt
   See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
   subdirectory.
  
   
  
   This software also includes code from Facelets
   (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
   for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
  
   This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java
   EE
   reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
   Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
   under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
       https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
   The source code is available at:
       https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
  
   The following schemas are included:
  
   ===
     javaee_5.xsd
     javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   ===
  
   If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
   artifacts and
   start vote again.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  
   Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can
   regenerate
   (again) the artifacts.
  
   To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote
   and
   after that wait another 72 hours for release.
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
  
   The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
   And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using
   this vote.
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe
   lu4...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   
2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
   
At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the
voting
thread?
   
By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so
long
as they are appropriately documented.
   
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
   
   
So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure,
right?
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:




 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-16 Thread Michael Concini

Leo,

I've been looking in some test failures that we're seeing with the 2.0.1 
snapshot builds, and I think I've found one that we really need to 
resolve for 2.0.1.  I'm about to open a JIRA issue but wanted to give 
you a heads up on this thread.


With the new javascript, we now wrapper jsf.ajax.request with a function 
call.  So for example this:


h:commandButton id=incrementButton value=Increment
   onclick=jsf.ajax.request(this, event, { 
execute: this.id, render: 'counter' }); return false;

   actionListener=#{counter.increment} /

would be rendered as this:
input id=incrementButton name=incrementButton type=submit 
value=Increment
onclick=var cf = function(){jsf.ajax.request(this, event, { execute: 
this.id, render: 'counter' }); return false;};var oamSF = 
function(){};return (cf()==false)? false : oamSF(); /



The problem is that by doing this we've broken the reference to this.id 
as it is undefined at the function's scope. This works fine in both the 
2.0.0 release as well as Mojarra so it will regress anyone who might be 
using this.


Regards,
Mike

On 6/15/2010 5:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:

Hi Bernd

I added in api:

META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

in impl

META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.

The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent 
misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.


regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com 
mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com


Hello Leonardo,

looks ok for me.

Can you also add in api

META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

and in impl

META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

an example would be


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
afternoon.

Regards

Bernd

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:

 This product includes software developed by:
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).



 See the file LICENSE.txt
 See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
subdirectory.



 This software also includes code from Facelets
 (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
 for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.

 This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish
Java EE
 reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
 Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
 under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
 https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
 The source code is available at:
 https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/

 The following schemas are included:

 ===
   javaee_5.xsd
   javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
 ===

 If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
artifacts and
 start vote again.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

 Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can
regenerate
 (again) the artifacts.

 To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another
vote and
 after that wait another 72 hours for release.

 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
mailto:mkien...@gmail.com

 The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
 And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using
this vote.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
mailto:mkien...@gmail.com
 
  At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the
voting
  thread?
 
  By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec
files, so long
  as they are appropriately documented.
 
  http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
 
 
  So we can close this vote and continue the release
procedure, right?
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-16 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hi Leonardo,

thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.

Regards

Bernd



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Bernd

 I added in api:

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 in impl

 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.

 The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent 
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello Leonardo,

 looks ok for me.

 Can you also add in api

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 and in impl

 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 an example would be

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

 I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.

 Regards

 Bernd

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
 
  This product includes software developed by:
  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 
  
  See the file LICENSE.txt
  See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses subdirectory.
  
 
  This software also includes code from Facelets
  (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
  for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
 
  This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
  reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
  Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
  under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
      https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
  The source code is available at:
      https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
 
  The following schemas are included:
 
  ===
    javaee_5.xsd
    javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
  ===
 
  If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts and
  start vote again.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
  (again) the artifacts.
 
  To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and
  after that wait another 72 hours for release.
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 
  The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
  And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
  
   At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
   thread?
  
   By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
   as they are appropriately documented.
  
   http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
  
  
   So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Hi
   
Those files were copied from tomcat project:
   
   
   
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
   
There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
   
Hello,
   
the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
   
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
   
Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
   
Any suggestions?
   
Regards
   
Bernd
   
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL
 are
 we
 even
 allowed to bundle them?
 Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error
 made
 on
 Bernds side.


 Werner



 Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 Hi Bernd

 All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we
 can
 continue with the vote.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

    Hello,

    here is my

    -1

    I found too many files without or old apache license header.
    j4fry is missing in the notice file.

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-16 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Bernd

Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps, because there
was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but I'm not have a
separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in progress,
TOMAHAWK).

We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 (checkstyle
version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this pom and we
don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point I have to
release myfaces master pom first.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

 Hi Leonardo,

 thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
 I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi Bernd
 
  I added in api:
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
 
  The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello Leonardo,
 
  looks ok for me.
 
  Can you also add in api
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  and in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  an example would be
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
 
  I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Hi
  
   I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
  
   This product includes software developed by:
   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
  
  
 
   See the file LICENSE.txt
   See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
 subdirectory.
  
 
  
   This software also includes code from Facelets
   (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
   for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
  
   This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
   reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
   Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
   under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
   https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
   The source code is available at:
   https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
  
   The following schemas are included:
  
   ===
 javaee_5.xsd
 javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   ===
  
   If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
 artifacts and
   start vote again.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  
   Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
   (again) the artifacts.
  
   To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote
 and
   after that wait another 72 hours for release.
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
  
   The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
   And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this
 vote.
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   wrote:
   
2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
   
At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
thread?
   
By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so
 long
as they are appropriately documented.
   
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
   
   
So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure,
 right?
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe 
 lu4...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:




 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

 There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

 Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

 Any suggestions?

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
 werner.p...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi, sorry 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-16 Thread Michael Concini

Leonardo,
I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far as 2754 
and 2755 we should be good to go.


-Mike
On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:

Hi Bernd

Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps, because 
there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but I'm not 
have a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in 
progress, TOMAHAWK).


We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 
(checkstyle version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on 
this pom and we don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At 
this point I have to release myfaces master pom first.


regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com 
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com


Hi Leonardo,

thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.

Regards

Bernd



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Bernd

 I added in api:

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 in impl

 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.

 The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to
prevent misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello Leonardo,

 looks ok for me.

 Can you also add in api

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 and in impl

 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 an example would be



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

 I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow
afternoon.

 Regards

 Bernd

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
 
  This product includes software developed by:
  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 
 

  See the file LICENSE.txt
  See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
subdirectory.
 

 
  This software also includes code from Facelets
  (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
  for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
 
  This product includes schema files developed for the
Glassfish Java EE
  reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
  Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this
distribution
  under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
  https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
  The source code is available at:
  https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
 
  The following schemas are included:
 
  ===
javaee_5.xsd
javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
  ===
 
  If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
artifacts and
  start vote again.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can
regenerate
  (again) the artifacts.
 
  To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose
another vote and
  after that wait another 72 hours for release.
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
mailto:mkien...@gmail.com
 
  The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
  And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release
using this vote.
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe
lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
mailto:mkien...@gmail.com
  
   At this point, should this discussion be moved out of
the voting
   thread?
  
   By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec
files, so long
   as they are appropriately documented.
  
   http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
  
  
   So we can close this vote and continue 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-16 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi

That's cool! Thanks!. After release myfaces master pom v 8 I'll propose a
release of 2.0.1 again.

regards,

Leonardo

2010/6/16 Michael Concini mconc...@gmail.com

  Leonardo,
 I just committed the proper fix for MYFACES-2754 now so as far as 2754 and
 2755 we should be good to go.

 -Mike

 On 6/16/2010 1:52 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:

 Hi Bernd

 Ok, thanks. Unfortunately I have to restart all release steps, because
 there was changes applied on trunk that should be applied, but I'm not have
 a separate patch to apply it (MYFACES-2755, MYFACES-2754 is in progress,
 TOMAHAWK).

 We still have an unresolved problem with myfaces master pom v7 (checkstyle
 version is snapshot). Since myfaces core 2.0.x depends on this pom and we
 don't have response from Matthias fix this issue, At this point I have to
 release myfaces master pom first.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/16 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

 Hi Leonardo,

 thanks a lot. Now it is ok for me.
 I added some missing licenses on the 2.0.1 branch.

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi Bernd
 
  I added in api:
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.
 
  The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent
 misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello Leonardo,
 
  looks ok for me.
 
  Can you also add in api
 
  META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  and in impl
 
  META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT
 
  an example would be
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/
 
  I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Hi
  
   I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
  
   This product includes software developed by:
   The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
  
  
 
   See the file LICENSE.txt
   See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses
 subdirectory.
  
 
  
   This software also includes code from Facelets
   (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
   for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
  
   This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java
 EE
   reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
   Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
   under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
   https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
   The source code is available at:
   https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
  
   The following schemas are included:
  
   ===
 javaee_5.xsd
 javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   ===
  
   If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all
 artifacts and
   start vote again.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  
   Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
   (again) the artifacts.
  
   To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote
 and
   after that wait another 72 hours for release.
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
  
   The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
   And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this
 vote.
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 
   wrote:
   
2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
   
At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
thread?
   
By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so
 long
as they are appropriately documented.
   
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
   
   
So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure,
 right?
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe 
 lu4...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:




 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

 There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Werner Punz
Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we 
even allowed to bundle them?
Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on 
Bernds side.



Werner



Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

Hi Bernd

All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
continue with the vote.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

Hello,

here is my

-1

I found too many files without or old apache license header.
j4fry is missing in the notice file.

The files
core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd

core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
are cddl and are missing in the notice file

I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
branch.

Regards

Bernd



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
  +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
them from the source distribution.
 
  LieGrue,
  strub
 
 
  --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
  Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
  To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
 
  Hi,
 
  I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
  MyFaces core out.
 
  The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
  Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
 
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]
 
  The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
[3] for binary and source packages).
 
 
  The release notes could be found at [4].
 
  Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
myfaces-api.
 
  Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
  Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
 
  +1 votes (see [3]).
 
  
  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released,
 
   and why..
  
 
  Thanks,
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 
  [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
  [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 
  [4]

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello,

the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

Any suggestions?

Regards

Bernd



On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we even
 allowed to bundle them?
 Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
 Bernds side.


 Werner



 Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 Hi Bernd

 All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
 continue with the vote.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

    Hello,

    here is my

    -1

    I found too many files without or old apache license header.
    j4fry is missing in the notice file.

    The files
    core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd

  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
    are cddl and are missing in the notice file

    I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
    branch.

    Regards

    Bernd



    On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
    mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
      +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
    them from the source distribution.
     
      LieGrue,
      strub
     
     
      --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
    mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
     
      From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
      Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
      To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
    mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
      Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
     
      Hi,
     
      I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
      MyFaces core out.
     
      The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
     
      Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
       1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
     
       2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
       3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]
     
      The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
    [3] for binary and source packages).
     
     
      The release notes could be found at [4].
     
      Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
    myfaces-api.
     
      Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
     
      Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
     
      +1 votes (see [3]).
     
      
      [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
      [ ] +0
      [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
    released,
     
       and why..
      
     
      Thanks,
      Leonardo Uribe
     
      [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
     
      [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
      [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
     
      [4]

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
     
     
     
     
     
     







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi

Those files were copied from tomcat project:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

 Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

 Any suggestions?

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
 even
  allowed to bundle them?
  Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
  Bernds side.
 
 
  Werner
 
 
 
  Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  Hi Bernd
 
  All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
  continue with the vote.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 
 Hello,
 
 here is my
 
 -1
 
 I found too many files without or old apache license header.
 j4fry is missing in the notice file.
 
 The files
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
 
 
  
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
 are cddl and are missing in the notice file
 
 I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
 branch.
 
 Regards
 
 Bernd
 
 
 
 On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
 mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
   +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
 them from the source distribution.
  
   LieGrue,
   strub
  
  
   --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  
   From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
   Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
   To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
 mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
   Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
  
   Hi,
  
   I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
   MyFaces core out.
  
   The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
  
   Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  
2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
  
   The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
 [3] for binary and source packages).
  
  
   The release notes could be found at [4].
  
   Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.
  
   Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
  
   Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
  three
  
   +1 votes (see [3]).
  
   
   [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
   [ ] +0
   [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
 released,
  
and why..
   
  
   Thanks,
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   [1] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  
   [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
   [3] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  
   [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
   
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Kienenberger
At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
as they are appropriately documented.

http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

 There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

 Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

 Any suggestions?

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
  even
  allowed to bundle them?
  Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
  Bernds side.
 
 
  Werner
 
 
 
  Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  Hi Bernd
 
  All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
  continue with the vote.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 
     Hello,
 
     here is my
 
     -1
 
     I found too many files without or old apache license header.
     j4fry is missing in the notice file.
 
     The files
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
 
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
     are cddl and are missing in the notice file
 
     I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
     branch.
 
     Regards
 
     Bernd
 
 
 
     On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
     mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
       +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
     them from the source distribution.
      
       LieGrue,
       strub
      
      
       --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
     mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
      
       From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
       Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
       To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
     mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
       Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
      
       Hi,
      
       I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
       MyFaces core out.
      
       The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
      
       Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
        1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
      
        2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
        3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
  [1]
      
       The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
     [3] for binary and source packages).
      
      
       The release notes could be found at [4].
      
       Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
     myfaces-api.
      
       Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
      
       Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
  three
      
       +1 votes (see [3]).
      
       
       [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
       [ ] +0
       [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
     released,
      
        and why..
       
      
       Thanks,
       Leonardo Uribe
      
       [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
      
       [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
       [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
      
       [4]
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
 
 
 
 




Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

 By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
 as they are appropriately documented.

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  Those files were copied from tomcat project:
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
 
  There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello,
 
  the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
 
  Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
 
  Any suggestions?
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
   even
   allowed to bundle them?
   Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made
 on
   Bernds side.
  
  
   Werner
  
  
  
   Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  
   Hi Bernd
  
   All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
   continue with the vote.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  
  Hello,
  
  here is my
  
  -1
  
  I found too many files without or old apache license header.
  j4fry is missing in the notice file.
  
  The files
  
  
  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
  
  
  
  
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
  are cddl and are missing in the notice file
  
  I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the
 2.0.1
  branch.
  
  Regards
  
  Bernd
  
  
  
  On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg 
 strub...@yahoo.de
  mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
  them from the source distribution.
   
LieGrue,
strub
   
   
--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
   
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:
 lu4...@gmail.com
Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
  mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
   
Hi,
   
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of
 Apache
MyFaces core out.
   
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
   
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
 1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2
  [1]
   
 2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
 3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test
 v1.0.0-beta-4
   [1]
   
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
 and
  [3] for binary and source packages).
   
   
The release notes could be found at [4].
   
Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
  myfaces-api.
   
Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
   
Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
   three
   
+1 votes (see [3]).
   

[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
   
 and why..

   
Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe
   
[1] 
   http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
   
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] 
   http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
   
[4]
  
  
  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
  
  

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
 
 



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com


 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

 By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
 as they are appropriately documented.

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


 So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?



If no objections I'll close this vote and continue the release procedure
tomorrow.



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  Those files were copied from tomcat project:
 
 
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
 
  There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello,
 
  the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
 
  Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
 
  Any suggestions?
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are
 we
   even
   allowed to bundle them?
   Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made
 on
   Bernds side.
  
  
   Werner
  
  
  
   Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  
   Hi Bernd
  
   All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
   continue with the vote.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  
  Hello,
  
  here is my
  
  -1
  
  I found too many files without or old apache license header.
  j4fry is missing in the notice file.
  
  The files
  
  
  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
  
  
  
  
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
  are cddl and are missing in the notice file
  
  I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the
 2.0.1
  branch.
  
  Regards
  
  Bernd
  
  
  
  On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg 
 strub...@yahoo.de
  mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
+0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
  them from the source distribution.
   
LieGrue,
strub
   
   
--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
   
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:
 lu4...@gmail.com
Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
  mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
   
Hi,
   
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of
 Apache
MyFaces core out.
   
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
   
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
 parts:
 1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2
  [1]
   
 2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
 3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test
 v1.0.0-beta-4
   [1]
   
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
 and
  [3] for binary and source packages).
   
   
The release notes could be found at [4].
   
Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities
 with
  myfaces-api.
   
Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
   
Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum
 of
   three
   
+1 votes (see [3]).
   

[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
   
 and why..

   
Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe
   
[1] 
   http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
   
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] 
   http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
  http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
   
[4]
  
  
  
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
  
  

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
  
  
  
  
 
 





Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello Mike,

can you define appropriately documented. Should we add a section to
the notice file?

Regards

Bernd

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
 At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

 By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
 as they are appropriately documented.

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

 There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

 Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

 Any suggestions?

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
  even
  allowed to bundle them?
  Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
  Bernds side.
 
 
  Werner
 
 
 
  Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  Hi Bernd
 
  All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
  continue with the vote.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 
     Hello,
 
     here is my
 
     -1
 
     I found too many files without or old apache license header.
     j4fry is missing in the notice file.
 
     The files
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
 
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
     are cddl and are missing in the notice file
 
     I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
     branch.
 
     Regards
 
     Bernd
 
 
 
     On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
     mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
       +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
     them from the source distribution.
      
       LieGrue,
       strub
      
      
       --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
     mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
      
       From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
       Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
       To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
     mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
       Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
      
       Hi,
      
       I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
       MyFaces core out.
      
       The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
      
       Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
        1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
      
        2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
        3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
  [1]
      
       The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
     [3] for binary and source packages).
      
      
       The release notes could be found at [4].
      
       Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
     myfaces-api.
      
       Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
      
       Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
  three
      
       +1 votes (see [3]).
      
       
       [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
       [ ] +0
       [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
     released,
      
        and why..
       
      
       Thanks,
       Leonardo Uribe
      
       [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
      
       [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
       [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
      
       [4]
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
 
 
 
 





Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Yes, my reading of that page is that they'd have to be documented in
the notices file.

I would copy what you previously found at this URL:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

You might also want to look at one of Geronimo's xsd files and see if
they labeled it in some way as stated by the ASF licensing page.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Bernd Bohmann
bernd.bohm...@atanion.com wrote:
 Hello Mike,

 can you define appropriately documented. Should we add a section to
 the notice file?

 Regards

 Bernd

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
 At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

 By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
 as they are appropriately documented.

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Those files were copied from tomcat project:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/

 There is no mention in NOTICE file there.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello,

 the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:

 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE

 Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.

 Any suggestions?

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are we
  even
  allowed to bundle them?
  Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made on
  Bernds side.
 
 
  Werner
 
 
 
  Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  Hi Bernd
 
  All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
  continue with the vote.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 
     Hello,
 
     here is my
 
     -1
 
     I found too many files without or old apache license header.
     j4fry is missing in the notice file.
 
     The files
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
 
 
   core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
     are cddl and are missing in the notice file
 
     I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
     branch.
 
     Regards
 
     Bernd
 
 
 
     On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
     mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
       +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
     them from the source distribution.
      
       LieGrue,
       strub
      
      
       --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
     mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
      
       From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
       Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
       To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
     mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
       Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
      
       Hi,
      
       I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
       MyFaces core out.
      
       The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
      
       Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
        1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
      
        2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
        3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
  [1]
      
       The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
     [3] for binary and source packages).
      
      
       The release notes could be found at [4].
      
       Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
     myfaces-api.
      
       Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
      
       Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
  three
      
       +1 votes (see [3]).
      
       
       [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
       [ ] +0
       [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
     released,
      
        and why..
       
      
       Thanks,
       Leonardo Uribe
      
       [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
      
       [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
       [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
     http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
      
       [4]
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
      
      
      
      
      
      
 
 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Kienenberger
The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?

 By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
 as they are appropriately documented.

 http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b


 So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?


 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  Those files were copied from tomcat project:
 
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
 
  There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
 
  Hello,
 
  the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
 
  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
 
  Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
 
  Any suggestions?
 
  Regards
 
  Bernd
 
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are
   we
   even
   allowed to bundle them?
   Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error made
   on
   Bernds side.
  
  
   Werner
  
  
  
   Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
  
   Hi Bernd
  
   All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
   continue with the vote.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
  
      Hello,
  
      here is my
  
      -1
  
      I found too many files without or old apache license header.
      j4fry is missing in the notice file.
  
      The files
  
  
    core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
  
  
  
    core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
      are cddl and are missing in the notice file
  
      I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the
   2.0.1
      branch.
  
      Regards
  
      Bernd
  
  
  
      On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
   strub...@yahoo.de
      mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
        +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build
      them from the source distribution.
       
        LieGrue,
        strub
       
       
        --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
      mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
       
        From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
        Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
        To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
      mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
        Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
       
        Hi,
       
        I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of
   Apache
        MyFaces core out.
       
        The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
       
        Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
   parts:
         1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2
    [1]
       
         2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
         3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test
   v1.0.0-beta-4
   [1]
       
        The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
   and
      [3] for binary and source packages).
       
       
        The release notes could be found at [4].
       
        Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities
   with
      myfaces-api.
       
        Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
       
        Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum
   of
   three
       
        +1 votes (see [3]).
       
        
        [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
        [ ] +0
        [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
      released,
       
         and why..
        
       
        Thanks,
        Leonardo Uribe
       
        [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
      http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
       
        [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
        [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
      http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
       
        [4]
  
  
  
    http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
  
  
  
    http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
       
       
       
       
       
       
  
  
  
  
  
 
 




Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate (again)
the artifacts.

To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and after
that wait another 72 hours for release.

2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
 And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 
  At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting thread?
 
  By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
  as they are appropriately documented.
 
  http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
 
 
  So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Hi
  
   Those files were copied from tomcat project:
  
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
  
   There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
  
   Hello,
  
   the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
  
   Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
  
   Any suggestions?
  
   Regards
  
   Bernd
  
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 
   wrote:
Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL are
we
even
allowed to bundle them?
Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error
 made
on
Bernds side.
   
   
Werner
   
   
   
Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
   
Hi Bernd
   
All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can
continue with the vote.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   
   Hello,
   
   here is my
   
   -1
   
   I found too many files without or old apache license header.
   j4fry is missing in the notice file.
   
   The files
   
   
   
  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
   
   
   
   
  
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   are cddl and are missing in the notice file
   
   I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the
2.0.1
   branch.
   
   Regards
   
   Bernd
   
   
   
   On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
   mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
 +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to
 build
   them from the source distribution.

 LieGrue,
 strub


 --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
   mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of
Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2
 [1]

  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1
  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test
v1.0.0-beta-4
[1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1]
and
   [3] for binary and source packages).


 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities
with
   myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum
of
three

 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to
 be
   released,

  and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] 
http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
   http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201

 [2]
 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi

I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:

*This product includes software developed by:
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).


See the file LICENSE.txt
See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses subdirectory.


This software also includes code from Facelets (
https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.

This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
The source code is available at:
https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/

The following schemas are included:

===
  javaee_5.xsd
  javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
===
*
If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts and
start vote again.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com

 Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
 (again) the artifacts.

 To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and
 after that wait another 72 hours for release.


 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
 And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 
  At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
 thread?
 
  By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
  as they are appropriately documented.
 
  http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
 
 
  So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
   Hi
  
   Those files were copied from tomcat project:
  
  
  
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
  
   There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
  
   Hello,
  
   the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
  
   Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
  
   Any suggestions?
  
   Regards
  
   Bernd
  
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz 
 werner.p...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL
 are
we
even
allowed to bundle them?
Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error
 made
on
Bernds side.
   
   
Werner
   
   
   
Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
   
Hi Bernd
   
All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we
 can
continue with the vote.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   
   Hello,
   
   here is my
   
   -1
   
   I found too many files without or old apache license header.
   j4fry is missing in the notice file.
   
   The files
   
   
   
  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
   
   
   
   
  
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   are cddl and are missing in the notice file
   
   I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the
2.0.1
   branch.
   
   Regards
   
   Bernd
   
   
   
   On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
   mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
 +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to
 build
   them from the source distribution.

 LieGrue,
 strub


 --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
   mailto:dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of
Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following
parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2
   

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello Leonardo,

looks ok for me.

Can you also add in api

META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

and in impl

META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

an example would be

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.

Regards

Bernd

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:

 This product includes software developed by:
 The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).

 
 See the file LICENSE.txt
 See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses subdirectory.
 

 This software also includes code from Facelets
 (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
 for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.

 This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
 reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
 Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
 under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
 The source code is available at:
     https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/

 The following schemas are included:

 ===
   javaee_5.xsd
   javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
 ===

 If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts and
 start vote again.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com

 Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
 (again) the artifacts.

 To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and
 after that wait another 72 hours for release.

 2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com

 The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
 And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this vote.

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 
  At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
  thread?
 
  By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
  as they are appropriately documented.
 
  http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
 
 
  So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
 
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
   Hi
  
   Those files were copied from tomcat project:
  
  
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
  
   There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
  
   regards,
  
   Leonardo Uribe
  
   2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
  
   Hello,
  
   the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
  
   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
  
   Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
  
   Any suggestions?
  
   Regards
  
   Bernd
  
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
   werner.p...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL
are
we
even
allowed to bundle them?
Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error
made
on
Bernds side.
   
   
Werner
   
   
   
Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
   
Hi Bernd
   
All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we
can
continue with the vote.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
   
   Hello,
   
   here is my
   
   -1
   
   I found too many files without or old apache license header.
   j4fry is missing in the notice file.
   
   The files
   
   
   
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
   
   
   
   
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
   are cddl and are missing in the notice file
   
   I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in
the
2.0.1
   branch.
   
   Regards
   
   Bernd
   
   
   
   On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
   mailto:strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
     +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to
build
   them from the source distribution.
    
     LieGrue,
     strub
    
    
     --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   mailto:lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
    
     From: 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-15 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Bernd

I added in api:

META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

in impl

META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

because the schemas with CDDL license are on impl jar.

The update to NOTICE.txt message was committed too. Anyway to prevent
misunderstandings, I'll wait your response about it.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com

 Hello Leonardo,

 looks ok for me.

 Can you also add in api

 META-INF/licenses/dojo-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/j4fry-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/glassfish-LICENSE.TXT
 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 and in impl

 META-INF/licenses/facelets-LICENSE.TXT

 an example would be


 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk/trunk/core/src/main/resources/META-INF/licenses/

 I have no time to perform the required changes unit tomorrow afternoon.

 Regards

 Bernd

 On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi
 
  I think the NOTICE.txt file on impl module could be like this:
 
  This product includes software developed by:
  The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
 
  
  See the file LICENSE.txt
  See licenses for accompanying products in the /licenses subdirectory.
  
 
  This software also includes code from Facelets
  (https://facelets.dev.java.net/)
  for the purpose of implementing Facelets PDL for JSF 2.0 support.
 
  This product includes schema files developed for the Glassfish Java EE
  reference implementation (http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/).
  Apache Myfaces elects to include this software in this distribution
  under the CDDL license.  You can obtain a copy of the License at:
  https://glassfish.dev.java.net/public/CDDL+GPL.html
  The source code is available at:
  https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/
 
  The following schemas are included:
 
  ===
javaee_5.xsd
javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
  ===
 
  If no comments, I'll commit this fix tomorrow, regenerate all artifacts
 and
  start vote again.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/15 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 
  Ok, let me know when all fixes has been applied, so I can regenerate
  (again) the artifacts.
 
  To prevent misunderstandings, it is better to propose another vote and
  after that wait another 72 hours for release.
 
  2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
 
  The licensing issue has to be fixed, if there is such an issue.
  And Bernd needs to withdraw his -1 before we can release using this
 vote.
 
  On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  wrote:
  
   2010/6/15 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
  
   At this point, should this discussion be moved out of the voting
   thread?
  
   By the way, MyFaces can include CDDL xsd and dtd spec files, so long
   as they are appropriately documented.
  
   http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
  
  
   So we can close this vote and continue the release procedure, right?
  
  
   On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
   wrote:
Hi
   
Those files were copied from tomcat project:
   
   
   
   
 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk/java/javax/servlet/resources/
   
There is no mention in NOTICE file there.
   
regards,
   
Leonardo Uribe
   
2010/6/15 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@atanion.com
   
Hello,
   
the geronimo project includes these file as well. See:
   
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk/NOTICE
   
Maybe we should follow with the same procedure.
   
Any suggestions?
   
Regards
   
Bernd
   
   
   
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Werner Punz
werner.p...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Hi, sorry to be nitpicking again, but since both files are CDDL
 are
 we
 even
 allowed to bundle them?
 Or are both clear due to reimplementation and this was an error
 made
 on
 Bernds side.


 Werner



 Am 14.06.10 19:57, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 Hi Bernd

 All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we
 can
 continue with the vote.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com
 mailto:bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

Hello,

here is my

-1

I found too many files without or old apache license
 header.
j4fry is missing in the notice file.

The files




  core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd





  
 

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-14 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Bernd

All artifacts has been regenerated, to include your fix, so we can continue
with the vote.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/13 Bernd Bohmann bernd.bohm...@googlemail.com

 Hello,

 here is my

 -1

 I found too many files without or old apache license header.
 j4fry is missing in the notice file.

 The files
 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd

 core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
 are cddl and are missing in the notice file

 I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1
 branch.

 Regards

 Bernd



 On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
  +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build them from
 the source distribution.
 
  LieGrue,
  strub
 
 
  --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
  Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
  To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
  Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM
 
  Hi,
 
  I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
  MyFaces core out.
 
  The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
  Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
 
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]
 
  The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for
 binary and source packages).
 
 
  The release notes could be found at [4].
 
  Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.
 
  Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
  Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
 
  +1 votes (see [3]).
 
  
  [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
  [ ] +0
  [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
 
   and why..
  
 
  Thanks,
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  [1] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 
  [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
  [3] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 
  [4]
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-13 Thread Mark Struberg
Hi Leo!

Just to be sure: There was no change needed for myfaces-shared?

LieGrue,
strub


--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.

The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
 1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]

 2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
 3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for binary 
and source packages).


The release notes could be found at [4].

Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with myfaces-api.

Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three

+1 votes (see [3]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,

 and why..


Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe

[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201

[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc

[4] 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-13 Thread Mark Struberg
+0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build them from the 
source distribution.

LieGrue,
strub


--- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.

The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
 1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]

 2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
 3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for binary 
and source packages).


The release notes could be found at [4].

Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with myfaces-api.

Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three

+1 votes (see [3]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,

 and why..


Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe

[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201

[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc

[4] 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-13 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Mark

2010/6/13 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de

 Hi Leo!

 Just to be sure: There was no change needed for myfaces-shared?


Yes, no change needed on myfaces-shared, just one line on myfaces-api.


 LieGrue,
 strub


 --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]

  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for
 binary and source packages).


 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three

 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,

  and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201

 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc

 [4]
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117








Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-13 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello,

here is my

-1

I found too many files without or old apache license header.
j4fry is missing in the notice file.

The files
core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_5.xsd
core/impl/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/resource/javaee_web_services_client_1_2.xsd
are cddl and are missing in the notice file

I have tried to fix some of the errors in the trunk and in the 2.0.1 branch.

Regards

Bernd



On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
 +0 the artifacts look good so far, but I was not able to build them from the 
 source distribution.

 LieGrue,
 strub


 --- On Fri, 6/11/10, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:

 From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 Subject: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1
 To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
 Date: Friday, June 11, 2010, 7:06 PM

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]

  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for 
 binary and source packages).


 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three

 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,

  and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201

 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc

 [4] 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117








Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-12 Thread Martin Marinschek
+1,

best regards,

Martin

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Just one small note, I regenerate all artifacts to include a small fix in
 MYFACES-2638. It is just move one line of code, so it does not affect
 anything, but I did all tests again, so we can continue the vote as is.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/11 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com

 +1

 Werner


 Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 +1

 2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

    Hi,

    I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
    MyFaces core out.

    The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

    Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
      1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
      2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
      3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

    The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
    for binary and source packages).

    The release notes could be found at [4].

    Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
    myfaces-api.

    Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

    Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
    +1 votes (see [3]).

    
    [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
    [ ] +0
    [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
 released,
      and why..
    

    Thanks,
    Leonardo Uribe

    [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
    [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
    [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
    [4]

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117









-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1

On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martin Marinschek
mmarinsc...@apache.org wrote:
 +1,

 best regards,

 Martin

 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi

 Just one small note, I regenerate all artifacts to include a small fix in
 MYFACES-2638. It is just move one line of code, so it does not affect
 anything, but I did all tests again, so we can continue the vote as is.

 regards,

 Leonardo Uribe

 2010/6/11 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com

 +1

 Werner


 Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 +1

 2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

    Hi,

    I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
    MyFaces core out.

    The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

    Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
      1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
      2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
      3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

    The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
    for binary and source packages).

    The release notes could be found at [4].

    Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
    myfaces-api.

    Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

    Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
    +1 votes (see [3]).

    
    [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
    [ ] +0
    [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
 released,
      and why..
    

    Thanks,
    Leonardo Uribe

    [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
    [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
    [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
    http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
    [4]

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117









 --

 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces




-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/6/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org

 +1

 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martin Marinschek
 mmarinsc...@apache.org wrote:
  +1,
 
  best regards,
 
  Martin
 
  On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  Just one small note, I regenerate all artifacts to include a small fix
 in
  MYFACES-2638. It is just move one line of code, so it does not affect
  anything, but I did all tests again, so we can continue the vote as is.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/11 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 
  +1
 
  Werner
 
 
  Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  +1
 
  2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
 Hi,
 
 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.
 
 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
 
 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
 [3]
 for binary and source packages).
 
 The release notes could be found at [4].
 
 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.
 
 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
 +1 votes (see [3]).
 
 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
   and why..
 
 
 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe
 
 [1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
   
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
 



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-12 Thread Jakob Korherr
+1

Regards,
Jakob

2010/6/12 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

 +1

 regards,
 gerhard


 http://www.irian.at

 Your JSF powerhouse -
 JSF Consulting, Development and
 Courses in English and German

 Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



 2010/6/12 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org

 +1

 On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martin Marinschek
 mmarinsc...@apache.org wrote:
  +1,
 
  best regards,
 
  Martin
 
  On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Hi
 
  Just one small note, I regenerate all artifacts to include a small fix
 in
  MYFACES-2638. It is just move one line of code, so it does not affect
  anything, but I did all tests again, so we can continue the vote as is.
 
  regards,
 
  Leonardo Uribe
 
  2010/6/11 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
 
  +1
 
  Werner
 
 
  Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:
 
  +1
 
  2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.
 
 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
 
 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
   2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
   3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4
 [1]
 
 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
 [3]
 for binary and source packages).
 
 The release notes could be found at [4].
 
 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.
 
 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!
 
 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of
 three
 +1 votes (see [3]).
 
 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
  released,
   and why..
 
 
 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe
 
 [1] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] 
  http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]
 
 
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
   
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  --
 
  http://www.irian.at
 
  Your JSF powerhouse -
  JSF Consulting, Development and
  Courses in English and German
 
  Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
 



 --
 Matthias Wessendorf

 blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
 sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
 twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf





-- 
Jakob Korherr

blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at


Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-11 Thread Leonardo Uribe
+1

2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com

 Hi,

 I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
 MyFaces core out.

 The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

 Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

 The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3] for
 binary and source packages).

 The release notes could be found at [4].

 Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
 myfaces-api.

 Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

 Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
 +1 votes (see [3]).

 
 [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
 [ ] +0
 [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
  and why..
 

 Thanks,
 Leonardo Uribe

 [1] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
 [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
 [3] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
 [4]
 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117



Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-11 Thread Werner Punz

+1

Werner


Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

+1

2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com

Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.

The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
for binary and source packages).

The release notes could be found at [4].

Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
myfaces-api.

Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
  and why..


Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe

[1] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrc
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
[4]

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117







Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces core 2.0.1

2010-06-11 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi

Just one small note, I regenerate all artifacts to include a small fix in
MYFACES-2638. It is just move one line of code, so it does not affect
anything, but I did all tests again, so we can continue the vote as is.

regards,

Leonardo Uribe

2010/6/11 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com

 +1

 Werner


 Am 11.06.10 21:07, schrieb Leonardo Uribe:

 +1

 2010/6/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com mailto:lu4...@gmail.com


Hi,

I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.0.1 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.

The artifacts passed all TCK tests.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
  1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.0.2  [1]
  2. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.core v2.0.1  [1]
  3. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.0-beta-4 [1]

The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [3]
for binary and source packages).

The release notes could be found at [4].

Also the clirr test does not show binary incompatibilities with
myfaces-api.

Please take a look at the 2.0.1 artifacts and vote!

Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see [3]).


[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
  and why..


Thanks,
Leonardo Uribe

[1] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201

[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[3] 
 http://people.apache.org/~lu4242/myfaces201binsrchttp://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc
http://people.apache.org/%7Elu4242/myfaces201binsrc

[4]

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10600styleName=Htmlversion=12315117